Loading...
ITEM 1 Budget Kickoff meetingY OtCITY QF a MINNESOTA TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Adam Flaherty, City Administrator & Finance Director DATE: May 29, 2018 SUBJECT: Budget Kickoff Meeting On Tuesday, Council and staff will begin the 2019 budgeting discussions. This meeting is intended to focus on the big -picture and not specific departmental budget requests. I have developed an outline of discussion topics below, however; the most important aspect of this meeting is to provide the opportunity for the Council to set priorities, set expectations and to provide direction to staff for preparation of the draft budget. Council Roundtable This is an opportunity for the Council to express their current view on City services and programs. This would also be the time for the Council to share any comments they have received from the public regarding City services or programs. Priorities Please use this opportunity to outline your priorities for the 2019 General fund budget. Expectations Please use this opportunity to outline your expectations for the 2019 General fund budget. Assumptions The most significant assumption within the General fund budgeting process is those in relation to personnel. It is important for this assumption to be clearly defined at the beginning of the budgeting process. In past years, assumptions for personnel costs have included a combination of informal salary surveys obtained by City staff, inflation indices, and employment cost indices. To begin the discussion, I have attached two regional indices from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The City's pay plan for full-time employees includes 21 grades, each with 9 steps. The percentage increase for each step within a pay grade is 2.75%. Employees who reach the highest step within their pay grade do not move to the next grade. There are 6 employees at the City who are currently at the top of their respective pay grades, with 8 employees projected at their maximums for 2019. City of Otsego 113400 90"' Street NE, Otsego, N N 553301 Tel. (763) 441-4414 Fax (763) 441-9163 2019 Staffing As mentioned above, personnel costs are the single largest component of the General fund budget as they made up nearly 31% of the 2017 budget. This portion of the meeting will provide the opportunity for City management to review their respective department staffing plans for 2019. It will be important for the City Council to provide direction to staff for preparation of the draft budget. Fund Balance Policy — Calculation of Transfer The City's fund balance policy outlines that the ending fund balance in the General Fund should be 45% of the subsequent years budget. The policy further outlines that any balance more than the defined 45% minimum, can be transferred to a capital reserve fund at the Council's discretion. A calculation is attached with this memorandum for review at this meeting. Calendar Attached with this memorandum is a calendar that outlines the budgeting process as it has been completed during the past two years. This process can be kept the same, expanded upon, or even reduced at the discretion of the Council. Next Meetings June 11 — At this meeting, staff and Council will begin to review the proposed property tax levies and cash flows for the capital project funds. June 25 — At this meeting, staff and Council will begin to review the proposed property tax levies and cash flows for the special revenue and debt service funds. Materials Attached for Discussion 1) Bureau of Labor Statistics Indices a. Consumer Price Index — Midwest Region b. Employment Cost Index — Minneapolis Metropolitan Area 2) Budget Calendar 3) Calculation of Transfer in Accordance With Fund Balance Policy City of Otsego 113400 90"' Street NE, Otsego, N N 553301 Tel. (763) 441-4414 Fax (763) 441-9163 N EWS RELEASE Q�Q�4� SNT oFl��P BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS U. S. D E P A R T M E N T O F L A B O R�� C BLS ��rrATESO�P For Release: Thursday, May 10, 2018 18-784-KAN MOUNTAIN -PLAINS INFORMATION OFFICE: Kansas City, Mo. Technical information: (816) 285-7000 BLSInfoKansasCity@bls.gov www.bls.gov/regions/mountain-plains Media contact: (816) 285-7000 Consumer Price Index, Midwest Region — April 2018 Prices in the Midwest up 0.4 percent in April and 1.8 percent higher over the year The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U) in the Midwest rose 0.4 percent in April, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Higher prices for gasoline (5.4 percent) led the increase. Overall, energy costs were up 2.5 percent and prices for food rose 0.5 percent. The index for all items less food and energy increased 0.2 percent over the month. (Data in this report are not seasonally adjusted. Accordingly, month-to-month changes may reflect the impact of seasonal influences.) Chart 1. Over -the -year percent change in CPI -U, blidwest region, April 2015—April 2018 Percent change 3.0 1 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -20 ..::dl items All items less food and energy Apr Jul Oct Jan .Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr 1 '16 '17 '1-9 Source: U.S. Bureau a f Labnr Statistics. The CPI -U for the Midwest advanced 1.8 percent from April 2017 to April 2018. (See chart 1 and table A.) The energy index, which includes motor fuel and household fuels, rose 5.3 percent and food prices increased 1.3 percent. Excluding food and energy, the CPI -U was up 1.6 percent over the year. (See table 1.) Food Food prices in the Midwest rose 0.5 percent in April after registering little change (-0.1 percent) in March. Costs for food at home were up 0.9 percent over the month following a decrease of 0.4 percent in the prior month. Prices for food away from home changed little (0.1 percent) in April after rising 0.2 percent in March. From April 2017 to April 2018, the index for food was 1.3 percent higher. Prices for food away from home rose 2.1 percent and prices for food at home were up 0.8 percent. Energy The energy index turned up 2.5 percent in April following a decline of 0.6 percent in March. Higher costs for gasoline (5.4 percent) were largely responsible for the increase. Costs for utility (piped) gas service and electricity declined over the month, down 2.0 and 0.3 percent, respectively. Energy costs advanced 5.3 percent from April 2017 to April 2O18 led by a 10.6 -percent increase in gasoline prices. Costs for utility (piped) gas service were 2.0 percent lower over the year and electricity prices declined 0.3 percent. All items less food and energy The index for all items less food and energy for the Midwest was up 0.2 percent in April after rising 0.3 percent in each of the prior two months. Higher costs for shelter (0.3 percent) had the largest upward impact on the index. Prices for other goods and services (1.8 percent) were also among those that contributed to the rise. The index for all items less food and energy was up 1.6 percent from April 2O17 to April 2O18. Higher costs for shelter (3.1 percent) led the over -the -year increase. The Midwest Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U) stood at 233.913 in April 2018. A typical market basket of goods and services that cost $100.00 in the 1982-84 base period cost $233.91 in April 2018. CPI -W In April, the Midwest Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI -W) was 228.153. The CPI -W increased 0.5 percent in April and rose 2.0 percent over the year. Table A. Midwest region CPI-lJ 1 -month and 12 -month percent changes, all items index, not seasonally adjusted Month 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 12- 12- 12- 12- 12- 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month month month month month month January .............................................. 0.5 1.4 -0.6 -0.3 0.3 0.8 0.7 2.2 0.6 1.6 February ............................................ 0.6 0.9 0.3 -0.5 0.0 0.4 0.2 2.4 0.2 1.7 March ................................................ 0.9 1.5 0.6 -0.9 0.6 0.5 0.1 1.9 0.2 1.8 April ................................................... 0.3 1.9 0.1 -1.1 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.8 0.4 1.8 May .................................................... 0.2 1.6 0.4 -0.8 0.4 0.8 0.0 1.4 June ................................................... 0.5 1.7 0.5 -0.7 0.6 0.8 0.0 0.9 July .................................................... -0.3 1.8 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 0.4 0.0 1.3 August ............................................... -0.2 1.6 0.0 -0.3 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.5 September ......................................... 0.1 1.6 -0.3 -0.8 0.2 1.1 0.3 1.5 October .............................................. -0.5 1.6 -0.1 -0.3 -0.1 1.0 -0.2 1.5 November .......................................... -0.6 1.2 -0.5 -0.2 -0.3 1.21 0.2 1.9 Table A. Midwest region CPI -U 1 -month and 12 -month percent changes, all items index, not seasonally adjusted - Continued Month 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 12- 12- 12- 12- 12- 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month 1 -month month month month month month December .......................................... -0.7 0.7 -0.6 0.0 0.1 1.8 -0.2 1.7 The May 2018 Consumer Price Index for the Midwest region is scheduled to be released on Tuesday, June 12, 2018. Technical Note The Consumer Price Index (CPI) is a measure of the average change in prices over time in a fixed market basket of goods and services. The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes CPIs for two population groups: (1) a CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U) which covers approximately 93 percent of the total population and (2) a CPI for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI -W) which covers approximately 29 percent of the total population. The CPI -U includes, in addition to wage earners and clerical workers, groups such as professional, managerial, and technical workers, the self-employed, short-term workers, the unemployed, and retirees and others not in the labor force. The CPI is based on prices of food, clothing, shelter, and fuels, transportation fares, charges for doctors' and dentists' services, drugs, and the other goods and services that people buy for day-to-day living. Each month, prices are collected in 75 urban areas across the country from about 5,000 housing units and approximately 22,000 retail establishments—department stores, supermarkets, hospitals, filling stations, and other types of stores and service establishments. All taxes directly associated with the purchase and use of items are included in the index. The index measures price changes from a designated reference date (1982-84) that equals 100.0. An increase of 16.5 percent, for example, is shown as 116.5. This change can also be expressed in dollars as follows: the price of a base period "market basket" of goods and services in the CPI has risen from $10 in 1982-84 to $11.65. For further details see the CPI home page on the Internet at www.bls.gov/cpi and the BLS Handbook of Methods, Chapter 17, The Consumer Price Index, available on the Internet at www.bls.gov/opub/hom/pdf/homchl7.pdf. In calculating the index, price changes for the various items in each location are averaged together with weights that represent their importance in the spending of the appropriate population group. Local data are then combined to obtain a U.S. city average. Because the sample size of a local area is smaller, the local area index is subject to substantially more sampling and other measurement error than the national index. In addition, local indexes are not adjusted for seasonal influences. As a result, local area indexes show greater volatility than the national index, although their long-term trends are quite similar. NOTE: Area indexes do not measure differences in the level of prices between cities; they only measure the average change in prices for each area since the base period. The Midwest region is comprised of Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339. Table 1. Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U): Indexes and percent changes for selected periods, Midwest Region, (1982-84=100 unless otherwise noted) (not seasonally adjusted) Expenditure category Indexes Percent change from Feb. Mar. Apr. Apr. Feb. Mar. 2018 2018 2018 2017 2018 2018 All items........................................................... 232.512 232.931 233.913 1.8 0.6 0.4 All items (December 1977 = 100) .................... 378.309 378.992 380.589 Food and beverages .................................... 243.603 243.262 244.408 1.4 0.3 0.5 Food ......................................................... 242.865 242.510 243.762 1.3 0.4 0.5 Food at home ....................................... 226.810 225.918 227.910 0.8 0.5 0.9 Cereals and bakery products ............ 258.523 259.331 259.678 0.4 0.1 Meats, poultry, fish, and eggs............ 246.250 246.510 250.928 1.9 1.8 Dairy and related products ................ 197.690 197.449 197.707 0.0 0.1 Fruits and vegetables ........................ 270.372 265.639 268.056 -0.9 0.9 Nonalcoholic beverages and 160.943 160.072 161.413 0.3 0.8 beverage materials ............................ Other food at home ........................... 197.900 197.301 198.865 0.5 0.8 Food away from home .......................... 269.935 270.384 270.538 2.1 0.2 0.1 Alcoholic beverages ................................. 251.636 251.480 251.166 2.1 -0.2 -0.1 Housing........................................................ 224.834 225.275 225.719 2.4 0.4 0.2 Shelter ...................................................... 267.342 268.376 269.145 3.1 0.7 0.3 Rent of primary residence(1)................ 267.484 268.124 268.476 3.1 0.4 0.1 Owners' equivalent rent of residences(1 271.579 272.471 273.041 3.0 0.5 0.2 ) (2) ........................................................ Owners' equivalent rent of primary 271.543 272.425 273.006 3.0 0.5 0.2 residence(1)(2).................................. Fuels and utilities ...................................... 222.393 219.534 218.312 0.3 -1.8 -0.6 Household energy ................................ 181.728 178.513 177.081 -0.4 -2.6 -0.8 Energy services(1) ............................ 188.250 184.940 183.380 -0.8 -2.6 -0.8 Electricity(1)................................... 200.577 199.173 198.609 -0.3 -1.0 -0.3 Utility (piped) gas service(l) .......... 156.381 150.229 147.174 -2.0 -5.9 -2.0 Household furnishings and operations..... 113.552 114.176 114.652 0.2 1.0 0.4 Apparel......................................................... 119.680 120.121 119.830 -1.0 0.1 -0.2 Transportation .............................................. 199.926 201.054 203.479 2.8 1.8 1.2 Private transportation ............................... 194.848 195.963 198.175 3.3 1.7 1.1 New and used motor vehicles(3).......... 96.185 96.982 96.692 -0.7 0.5 -0.3 New vehicles ..................................... 136.898 136.939 137.142 -1.6 0.2 0.1 New cars and trucks(3)(4)............. 96.702 96.718 96.864 -1.6 0.2 0.2 New cars(4)................................... 132.825 132.986 133.314 -2.2 0.4 0.2 Used cars and trucks ......................... 137.587 139.658 138.984 -1.4 1.0 -0.5 Motor fuel ............................................. 226.835 228.003 240.215 10.7 5.9 5.4 Gasoline (all types) ............................ 225.196 226.458 238.799 10.6 6.0 5.4 Gasoline, unleaded regular(4)....... 219.143 220.390 232.741 10.8 6.2 5.6 Gasoline, unleaded midgrade(4) 259.166 260.756 272.681 9.5 5.2 4.6 (5) .................................................. Gasoline, unleaded premium(4).... 248.450 249.876 260.495 9.3 4.8 4.2 Motor vehicle insurance(6)................... 738.214 738.086 733.338 -0.7 -0.6 Medical care ................................................. 481.849 482.275 482.487 0.7 0.1 0.0 Medical care commodities ........................ 390.831 392.852 391.669 0.6 0.2 -0.3 Medical care services ............................... 512.320 512.205 512.890 0.7 0.1 0.1 Professional services ........................... 417.223 417.257 417.494 0.6 0.1 0.1 Recreation(3)................................................ 122.405 122.187 122.365 0.6 0.0 0.1 Education and communication(3)................. 137.778 137.461 137.377 0.4 -0.3 -0.1 Note: See footnotes at end of table. Table 1. Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U): Indexes and percent changes for selected periods, Midwest Region, (1982-84=100 unless otherwise noted) (not seasonally adjusted) - Continued Expenditure category Indexes Percent change from Feb. Mar. Apr. Apr. Feb. Mar. 2018 2018 2018 2017 2018 2018 Tuition, other school fees, and child 1,183.479 1,179.298 1,179.248 -0.4 0.0 care(6)...................................................... Other goods and services ............................ 414.035 418.270 425.978 3.0 2.9 1.8 Commodity and service group Commodities ................................................ 178.223 178.676 179.925 1.1 1.0 0.7 Commodities less food and beverages .... 146.553 147.284 148.520 0.9 1.3 0.8 Nondurables less food and beverages. 194.097 194.970 197.739 2.9 1.9 1.4 Durables ............................................... 101.384 101.954 102.027 -1.7 0.6 0.1 Services........................................................ 288.465 288.847 289.539 2.3 0.4 0.2 Special aggregate indexes All items less shelter ..................................... 222.264 222.475 223.537 1.3 0.6 0.5 All items less medical care ........................... 220.709 221.129 222.147 2.0 0.7 0.5 Commodities less food ................................. 149.821 150.532 151.735 1.0 1.3 0.8 Nondurables ................................................. 218.578 218.889 220.919 2.1 1.1 0.9 Nondurables less food .................................. 197.132 197.946 200.540 2.9 1.7 1.3 Services less rent of shelter(2)..................... 320.163 319.822 320.438 1.5 0.1 0.2 Services less medical care services ............. 271.769 272.188 272.881 2.5 0.4 0.3 Energy.......................................................... 202.097 200.936 205.870 5.3 1.9 2.5 All items less energy .................................... 238.392 238.978 239.569 1.6 0.5 0.2 All items less food and energy ................. 238.302 239.056 239.531 1.6 0.5 0.2 Footnotes (1) This index series was calculated using a Laspeyres estimator. All other item stratum index series were calculated using a geometric means estimator. (2) Indexes on a December 1982=100 base. (3) Indexes on a December 1997=100 base. (4) Special index based on a substantially smaller sample. (5) Indexes on a December 1993=100 base. (6) Indexes on a December 1977=100 base. Note: Index applies to a month as a whole, not to any specific date. N EWS RELEASE Q�Q�4� V, To BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS U. S. D E P A R T M E N T O F L A 6 O R�� BLS ��srATESO�P For Release: Friday, May 11, 2018 18 -536 -CHI MIDWEST INFORMATION OFFICE: Chicago, III. Technical information: (312) 353-1880 BLSInfoChicago@bls.gov www.bis.gov/regions/midwest Media contact: (312) 353-1138 Changing Compensation Costs in the Minneapolis Metropolitan Area — March 2018 Total compensation costs for private industry workers increased 3.5 percent in the Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, Minn.-Wis. metropolitan area for the year ended in March 2018, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported today. Assistant Commissioner for Regional Operations Charlene Peiffer noted that a year earlier, Minneapolis experienced a gain of 2.9 percent in total compensation costs. Locally, wages and salaries, the largest component of total compensation costs, rose 3.9 percent over the 12 -month period ended March 2018. Nationwide, total compensation costs rose 2.8 percent and wages and salaries rose 2.9 percent over the same period. (See chart 1 and table 1.) Chart 1. Twelve-month percent changes in the Employment Cost Index, private industry workers, United States and the Minneapolis area, not seasonally adjusted, blarch 2016—March 2018 Percent change 5.3 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 i United 'States total compensation Minneapolis total compensation -1.0 Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar 1u '17 '18 Scurce: U.S. Bureau ofLaborStatistics. Percent change Z. L. 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Jun Sep Dec riar Jun Sep Dec Mar '17 '13 Minneapolis is 1 of 15 metropolitan areas in the United States, and 1 of 3 areas in the Midwest region of the country, for which locality compensation cost data are now available. Among these 15 largest areas, over - the -year percentage increases in total compensation costs ranged from 7.2 percent in Seattle -Tacoma - Olympia, Wash. to 1.1 percent in Atlanta -Sandy Springs -Gainesville, Ga. -Ala. in March 2018. For wages and salaries, San Jose -San Francisco -Oakland, Calif. registered the largest annual gain (4.9 percent) among the 15 areas, while wages in Atlanta and Boston -Worcester -Manchester, Mass.-N.H. registered the smallest annual gains (1.7 percent each). (See chart 2.) Chart 2. Twelve-month percent change in the Employment Cost Index, private industry workers, United States and localities, not seasonally adjusted, lularch 2018 Percent change 8.0 ■Total compensation 7.5 7-0 ❑4"usages and salaries 65 — 6.0 5.5 4 9 5-0 44 4.5 40 3.9 4 0 3.6 '�� 3.2 3.0 28 2.92 9 2.8 2.8 4 2? 2 8 3.1 2' 2 7 2 5 2.8 25 2q `22-2 213 —E-1 F 2.0 1.5 1 1 1-0 0.5 0-0 i f United Atlanta Boston Chicago Dallas Detroit Houston Las Miami Minne- New Phila- Phoenix San Seattle Wash- States Angeles apolis York delphia Jose ington Source: U.S. Bureau ofLabarStatatics. Minneapolis' annual increase in total compensation costs in March 2018, at 3.5 percent, compared to gains of 2.9 and 2.6 percent, respectively, in Chicago -Naperville -Michigan City, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. and Detroit - Warren -Flint, Mich., the two other metropolitan areas in the Midwest. Minneapolis' 3.9 percent increase in wages and salaries over this 12 -month period compared to advances of 2.9 percent in Chicago and 2.8 percent in Detroit. (See table 2.) Locality compensation costs are part of the national Employment Cost Index (ECI), which measures quarterly changes in compensation costs, which include wages, salaries and employer costs for employee benefits. In addition to the 15 locality estimates provided in this release, ECI data for the nation, 4 geographical regions, and 9 geographical divisions are available. (Geographical definitions for the metropolitan areas mentioned in this release are included in the Technical Note.) In addition to the geographic data, a comprehensive national report is available that provides data by industry, occupational group, and union status, as well as for both private and state and local government employees. The release is available on the Internet at www.bls.gov/ncs/ect/home.htm. Current and historical information from other Bureau programs may be accessed via our regional homepage at www.bls.gov/ regions/midwest. The Employment Cost Index for June 2018 is scheduled to be released on Tuesday, July 31, 2018. Technical Note The Employment Cost Index (ECI) measures the change in the cost of labor, free from the influence of employment shifts among occupations and industries. The compensation series includes changes in wages and salaries and employer costs for employee benefits. Wages and salaries are defined as straight -time average hourly earnings or, for workers not paid on an hourly basis, straight -time earnings divided by the corresponding hours. Straight -time wage and salary rates are total earnings before payroll deductions, excluding premium pay for overtime, work on weekends and 2 holidays, and shift differentials. Production bonuses, incentive earnings, commission payments, and cost -of - living adjustments are included in straight -time earnings, whereas nonproduction bonuses (such as Christmas or year-end bonuses) are excluded. Also excluded are such items as payments -in-kind, free room and board, and tips. Based on available resources and the existing ECI sample, it was determined that estimates would be published for 15 metropolitan areas. Since the ECI sample sizes by area are directly related to area employment, the areas with the largest private industry employment as of the year 2000 were selected. For each of these areas, 12 -month percent changes and associated standard errors were computed for the periods since December 2006. The metropolitan area definitions of the 15 published localities are listed below. • Atlanta -Sandy Springs -Gainesville, Ga. -Ala. Combined Statistical Area (CSA) includes Barrow, Bartow, Butts, Carroll, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, Dawson, DeKalb, Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Hall, Haralson, Heard, Henry, Jasper, Lamar, Meriwether, Newton, Paulding, Pickens, Pike, Polk, Rockdale, Spalding, Troup, Upson, and Walton Counties in Georgia; and Chambers County in Alabama. • Boston -Worcester -Manchester, Mass.-N.H. CSA includes Essex, Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk, and Worcester Counties in Massachusetts; and Belknap, Hillsborough, Merrimack, Rockingham, and Strafford Counties in New Hampshire. • Chicago -Naperville -Michigan City, Ill.-Ind.-Wis. CSA includes Cook, DeKalb, DuPage, Grundy, Kane, Kankakee, Kendall, Lake, McHenry, and Will Counties in Illinois; Jasper, Lake, LaPorte, Newton, and Porter Counties in Indiana; and Kenosha County in Wisconsin. • Dallas -Fort Worth, Texas CSA includes Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Delta, Denton, Ellis, Henderson, Hood, Hunt, Johnson, Kaufman, Palo Pinto, Parker, Rockwall, Somervell, Tarrant, and Wise Counties in Texas. • Detroit -Warren -Flint, Mich. CSA includes Genesee, Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, Oakland, St. Clair, Washtenaw, and Wayne Counties in Michigan. • Houston -Baytown -Huntsville, Texas CSA includes Austin, Brazoria, Chambers, Fort Bend, Galveston, Harris, Liberty, Matagorda, Montgomery, San Jacinto, Walker, and Waller Counties in Texas. • Los Angeles -Long Beach -Riverside, Calif. CSA includes Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura Counties in California. • Miami -Fort Lauderdale -Pompano Beach, Fla. Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) includes Broward, Miami -Dade, and Palm Beach Counties in Florida. • Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud, Minn.-Wis. CSA includes Anoka, Benton, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Goodhue, Hennepin, Isanti, McLeod, Ramsey, Rice, Scott, Sherburne, Stearns, Washington, and Wright Counties in Minnesota; and Pierce and St. Croix Counties in Wisconsin. • New York -Newark -Bridgeport, N.Y.-N.J.-Conn.-Pa. CSA includes Bronx, Dutchess, Kings, Nassau, New York, Orange, Putnam, Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, Ulster, and Westchester Counties in New York; Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex, and Union Counties in New Jersey; Fairfield, Litchfield, and New Haven Counties in Connecticut; and Pike County in Pennsylvania. • Philadelphia -Camden -Vineland, Pa.-N.J.-Del.-Md. CSA includes Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania; Burlington, Camden, Cumberland, Gloucester, and Salem Counties in New Jersey; New Castle County in Delaware; and Cecil County in Maryland. • Phoenix -Mesa -Scottsdale, Ariz. MSA includes Maricopa and Pinal Counties in Arizona. • San Jose -San Francisco -Oakland, Calif. CSA includes Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Benito, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, Sonoma, and Solano Counties in California. • Seattle -Tacoma -Olympia, Wash. CSA includes Island, King, Kitsap, Mason, Pierce, Snohomish, and Thurston Counties in Washington. • Washington -Baltimore -Northern Virginia, D.C.-Md.-Va.-W.Va. CSA includes the District of Columbia; Baltimore City and Anne Arundel, Baltimore; Calvert, Carroll, Charles, Frederick, Harford, Howard, Montgomery, Prince George's, Queen Anne's, and St. Mary's Counties in Maryland; Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Fredericksburg, Manassas, Manassas Park, and Winchester Cities and Arlington, Clarke, Fairfax, Fauquier, Frederick, Loudoun, Prince William, Spotsylvania, Stafford, and Warren Counties in Virginia; and Hampshire and Jefferson Counties in West Virginia. Definitions of the four geographic regions of the country are noted below. • Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont. • South: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. • Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin. • West: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. Information in this release will be made available to sensory impaired individuals upon request. Voice phone: (202) 691-5200; Federal Relay Service: (800) 877-8339. Table 1. Employment Cost Index for total compensation and for wages and salaries, private industry workers, United States, Midwest region, and the Minneapolis area, not seasonally adjusted Total compensation Wages and salaries 12 -month percent changes for period ended- 12 -month percent changes for period ended - Area March June Sep. Dec. March June Sep. Dec. United States 2014 .................................................... 1.7 2.0 2.3 2.3 1.7 1.9 2.3 2.2 2015 .................................................... 2.8 1.9 1.9 1.9 2.8 2.2 2.1 2.1 2016 .................................................... 1.8 2.4 2.3 2.2 2.0 2.6 2.4 2.3 2017 .................................................... 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.6 2.8 2018 .................................................... 2.8 2.9 Midwest 2014 .................................................... 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.7 2015 .................................................... 2.4 1.6 1.7 1.8 2.0 1.9 2.1 2.3 2016 .................................................... 1.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.3 2.7 2.8 2.9 2017 .................................................... 2.8 2.3 2.2 2.2 3.2 2.4 2.2 2.2 2018 .................................................... 2.4 2.4 Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud 2014 .................................................... 1.6 1.8 2.3 2.3 1.4 2.0 2.5 2.6 2015 .................................................... 2.3 2.9 2.4 4.1 2.3 3.2 2.4 4.9 2016 .................................................... 1.9 1.3 2.9 0.7 1.7 1.0 2.8 -0.2 2017 .................................................... 2.9 3.0 1.1 1.4 2.9 3.0 1.0 1.1 2018 .................................................... 3.5 3.9 Table 2. Employment Cost Index for total compensation and for wages and salaries, private industry workers, United States, geographical regions, and localities, not seasonally adjusted Total compensation Wages and salaries 12 -month percent changes for period ended- 12 -month percent changes for period ended - Area Mar. 2017 Dec. 2017 Mar. 2018 Mar. 2017 Dec. 2017 Mar. 2018 United States ................................................... 2.3 2.6 2.8 2.6 2.8 2.9 Northeast...................................................... 2.3 2.6 2.7 2.2 2.7 2.9 Boston -Worcester -Manchester ................. 2.6 2.4 2.0 3.0 2.2 1.7 New York -Newark -Bridgeport ................... 2.9 2.4 2.8 3.2 2.4 3.1 Philadelphia -Camden -Vineland ................ 3.0 2.7 2.7 3.0 2.4 2.7 South............................................................ 1.6 2.4 2.6 1.8 2.7 2.8 Atlanta -Sandy Springs -Gainesville........... 2.8 1.4 1.1 3.0 1.5 1.7 Dallas -Fort Worth ..................................... 2.2 2.4 2.2 2.8 3.2 2.2 Houston -Baytown -Huntsville .................... 1.6 1.7 2.1 2.2 2.0 2.3 Miami -Fort Lauderdale -Pompano Beach . 3.2 2.2 2.4 3.1 2.3 2.7 Washington -Baltimore -Northern Virginia.. 2.3 2.2 2.5 2.8 3.0 2.8 Midwest........................................................ 2.8 2.2 2.4 3.2 2.2 2.4 Chicago -Naperville -Michigan City ............ 2.5 2.4 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.9 Detroit -Warren -Flint .................................. 2.9 2.8 2.6 3.5 3.2 2.8 Minneapolis -St. Paul -St. Cloud ................ 2.9 1.4 3.5 2.9 1.1 3.9 West............................................................. 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.2 3.3 3.7 Los Angeles -Long Beach -Riverside ......... 2.5 3.7 3.2 2.7 3.3 3.1 Phoenix -Mesa -Scottsdale ........................ 2.8 2.7 3.6 3.1 3.1 4.0 San Jose -San Francisco -Oakland............ 3.0 3.4 4.4 3.3 3.6 4.9 Seattle -Tacoma -Olympia .......................... 1 2.4 6.91 7.21 3.6 3.41 3.6 City of Otsego Fund Balance Policy General Fund Transfer 2018 1^ 2018 General Fund Budget Minimum Fund Balance 2017 Ending Fund Balance Excess Calculation 5,378,034 Resolution 2017-100 Comments 2,420,115 The City's Fund Balance states that the minimum General Fund Balance should be 45% of the subsequent year budget. 3,890,645 Per Audited Financial Statements (185,066) Less: Fund Balance from Insurance Reserve Fund (#204) - Grouped with General for Financial Reporting (20,191) Less: Fund Balance from Educational Programming Fund (#215) - Grouped with General for Financial Reporting (114,997) Less: Nonspendable Fund Balance - Financial Reporting Requirement - Funds actually have alredy been expended. (202,200) Less: Nonspendable Fund Balance - Financial Reporting Requirement - Future funds from land for resale proceeds. 3,368,191 Fund Balance Available (Unassigned) 948,076 DRAFT - PRESENTED TO COUNCIL ON 5-29-2018 X:\Budget\2019\Calculation of Fund Balance Policy Transfers 2018 City of Otsego 2019 Budget Process Proposed Meeting Schedule t October -November TBD TBD Public Utility Operating Budgets Direction to Staff October -November TBD TBD Capital Improvement Plan Direction to Staff Adopt Final Property Tax Levy Adopt Final Budgets December 10 Regular Agenda During Regular Meeting Truth -In -Taxation Presenation & Public Input Process Adopte Capital Improvement Plan Meeting Meeting Meeting Actions Date Type Time Objectives Needed April 23 Regular Agenda During Regular Meeting Distribute Proposed Budget Calendar None May 29 Special After Regular Meeting Budget Kickoff (Process / Goals / Objectives / Issues) Direction to Staff June 11 Special After Regular Meeting Capital Improvement Fund Tax Levies Direction to Staff June 25 Special After Regular Meeting Debt Service & Tax Abatement Fund Tax Levies Direction to Staff July 23 Regular Agenda During Regular Meeting Distribute Draft General Fund Budget None July 30 Special 6PM General Fund Revenue & Department Expense Review Direction to Staff August 13 Special After Regular Meeting General Fund Department Expense Review Direction to Staff August 27 Special After Regular Meeting General Fund Department Expense Review Direction to Staff September 10 Special After Regular Meeting Follow Up & General Fund Summary Review Direction to Staff September 24 Regular Agenda During Regular Meeting Action Items Only Adopt Preliminary Tax Levy October -November TBD TBD Public Utility Operating Budgets Direction to Staff October -November TBD TBD Capital Improvement Plan Direction to Staff Adopt Final Property Tax Levy Adopt Final Budgets December 10 Regular Agenda During Regular Meeting Truth -In -Taxation Presenation & Public Input Process Adopte Capital Improvement Plan