ORD 04-15CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-15
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO CITY CODE TO PROVIDE FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT OF CODE REGULATIONS
The City Council of the City of Otsego ordains as follows:
SECTION 1. The Otsego City Code is hereby amended to add Chapter 2, Section 5,
Administrative Enforcement of Code Regulations which shall read as follows:
2-5-1: Purpose and Intent. The Administrative enforcement procedures
established within this Chapter are intended to provide the City of Otsego with an
informal, cost-effective and more efficient alternative to criminal prosecution or civil
litigation for certain violations of the adopted City Code. The City of Otsego retains
the right, at its sole discretion, to enforce provisions of this Code by bringing criminal
charges or commencing civil litigation in any case where the City determines it is
appropriate or necessary, but finds that an administrative process is beneficial to the
residents of the City and further finds that that such a process is a legitimate and
necessary alternative method of enforcing Code violations.
2-5-2: Definitions.
A. Code Compliance Officer. Is any officer of the Wright County Sheriff's
Department, any employee of the City of Otsego, or any person or company
contracted to provide code enforcement services who has received official
authority by the Otsego City Council to enforce the City Code. There may be
more than one person designated as Code Compliance Officer at any given time.
B. Code Offense. Is a violation of any section, subdivision, paragraph or provision
of the Otsego City Code and is subject to a civil penalty determined according to
a schedule adopted by Resolution of the Otsego City Council from time to time
and payable directly to the City Treasurer. Each day the violation exists
constitutes a separate Code Offense.
C. Owner. Is an individual, association, syndicate, partnership, corporation, limited
liability company, trust or any other legal entity holding an equitable or legal
ownership interest in land, buildings, structures, dwelling unit(s) or other
property.
D. Person. Means a natural person of either sex, a firm, partnership, corporation,
limited liability company, any other association of people, and includes the
manager or agent of that person or organization.
2-5-3: Procedure.
A. Administrative Notice. A Code Compliance Officer may issue, either in person
or by United States first class mail, an Administrative Notice to a person
suspected or known to have committed a Code Offense and/or to be the owner of
property upon which a Code Offense is being committed. The Administrative
Notice shall identify the Code Offense, the location upon which the Code Offense
occurred or is occurring, and the recommended corrective action for the Code
Offense. The Administrative Notice may also state that the alleged violator has, at
the discretion of the Code Compliance Officer, up to fifteen (15) days to correct
or abate the Code Offense. If the alleged violator and/or owner of property upon
which a Code Offense is being committed is unable to correct or abate the Code
Offense within the prescribed time, that person may request in writing an -
extension of no more than 30 additional days from the Code Compliance Officer.
Any extension granted by the Code Compliance Officer shall be in writing and
shall specifically state the date of expiration. If the Code Offense is not corrected
or abated, as outlined in the Administrative Notice, within the prescribed time or
any extension thereto, the Code Compliance Officer may issue a citation, as
provided below.
B. Citation. A Code Compliance Officer is authorized to issue a citation upon the
belief that a Code Offense has occurred, whether or not an Administrative Notice
has first been issued in regard to said Code Offense. The citation shall be given to
the person responsible for the violation and/or to the owner of the property upon
which the violation has occurred, either by personal service or by United States
first class mail. Said citation shall state the nature of the Code Offense, the time
and date said Code Offense occurred, the civil penalty applicable to that Code
Offense as set forth in a schedule of civil penalties which shall be adopted by
Resolution of the City Council from time to time, and the manner for paying the
civil penalty or requesting a hearing before a Hearing Officer to contest the
citation.
C. Responding to a Citation / Payment. Once a citation is issued, the alleged
violator and/or the owner of the property upon which the violation has occurred
shall , within fifteen (15) days of the time of issuance. of the citation, either pay
the civil penalty set forth in the citation or request a hearing in writing according
to the procedure set forth in this Section. The civil penalty may be paid either in
2
person at City Hall, or by United States first class mail, postage prepaid and
postmarked within said prescribed fifteen (15) days. Payment of the civil penalty
shall be deemed to be an admission of the Code Offense.
2-5-4: Appeal to Hearing Officer.
A. Requesting a Hearing. Any person contesting a citation issued pursuant to this
Chapter may, within fifteen (15) days of the time of issuance of the citation,
request a hearing before a Hearing Officer. Any request for a hearing before a
Hearing Officer shall be made in writing on a form provided by the City for such
a request and either delivered personally to the City at City Hall or mailed to the
City by United States first class mail, postage prepaid and postmarked within said
prescribed fifteen (15) days. The hearing shall be held at City Hall within thirty
(30) days of the date the City received a timely written notice that a hearing has
been requested. Failure to attend the hearing constitutes a waiver of the violator's
rights to an administrative hearing and an admission of the violation. A hearing
officer may waive this result upon good cause shown. A determination of good
cause shall be made by the Hearing Officer, but does specifically not include
forgetfulness or intentional delay.
B. Hearing Officer. The City Council shall by Resolution from time to time appoint
a list of persons authorized to act as a Hearing Officer. The Hearing Officer is
authorized to conduct an informal hearing to determine if a Code Offense has
occurred. The Hearing officer may be compensated by the City for such hearings
and related findings. The Hearing Officer shall have the authority to uphold or
dismiss the citation or reduce, stay or waive the civil penalty imposed upon such
terms and conditions as the Hearing Officer shall determine. The Hearing
Officer's decision shall be made in writing on a form provided by the City for
such purpose. A copy of the Hearing Officer's decision shall be served by United
States first class mail upon the person requesting the hearing. The Hearing
Officer's decision is final, except for appeal of the Hearing Officer's decision in
limited cases to the City Council, as set forth below.
C. Conduct of Hearing. At the hearing, the parties will have the opportunity to
present testimony, documents and exhibits and question witnesses. The Hearing
Officer shall tape record the proceedings and receive testimony and exhibits.
Strict rules of evidence will not apply. The Hearing Officer must receive and give
weight to evidence, including hearsay evidence, that possesses probative value
commonly accepted by reasonable and prudent persons in the conduct of their
affairs.
2-5-5: Appeal of Hearing Officer Decision.
A. The Hearing Officer's decision shall be appealable to the City Council only for
the following matters:
3
1. an alleged failure to obtain a required permit, license, or other approval
from the City Council as required by the City Code;
2. an alleged violation of a permit, license, or other approval, or the
conditions attached to the permit, license or approval, that was issued by
the City Council; or
3. an alleged violation of regulations governing a person or entity who has
received a license issued by the City Council.
B. An appeal to the City Council of the Hearing Officer's decision must be made in
writing on a form provided by the city for such an appeal and must be served on
the City Clerk by United States first class mail, postage prepaid, within ten (10)
days after the date of the Hearing Officer's decision.
C. A timely appeal will be heard by the City Council after a notice of hearing is
served by the City upon the appellant in person or by certified mail at lease ten
(10) days in advance of the date of the hearing. The parties to the hearing will
have an opportunity to present oral or written arguments regarding the Hearing
Officer's decision.
D. The City Council shall consider the record, the Hearing Officer's decision, and
any additional arguments before making a determination. The City Council is not
bound by the Hearing Officer's decision, but may adopt all or part of the Hearing
Officer's decision. The City Council's decision may be voted upon and given at
the hearing or may be given in writing within fifteen (15) days of the hearing.
E. The failure of the appellant to appear in front of the City Council or participate in
the appeal constitutes a waiver of the violator's right of appeal and an admission
of the violation. The Council may waive the result upon good cause shown. The
determination of a showing of good cause shown shall be made solely at the
discretion of the City Council but does not include forgetfulness and intentional
delay.
2-5-6: Failure to Pay.
A. In the event a person charged with a Code Offense fails to pay the civil penalty
and correct or abate the Code Offense for which a citation was issued within the
prescribed time, a late charge of fifteen percent (15%) shall be imposed thereon
for each seven (7) days the civil penalty remains unpaid and the Code Offense
remains uncorrected or unabated beyond the due date.
B. An unpaid civil penalty and accrued late charges will constitute a personal
obligation of the person(s)to whom the citation was issued and the City shall have
the right to collect such unpaid civil penalty and accrued late charges, together
4
with the City's costs and reasonable attorney's fees, in criminal or civil
proceedings.
D. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. Chapter 429.101., Minn. Stat. Chapter 514.67 and other
applicable law, a lien in the amount of the civil penalty and any accrued late
charges may be assessed against the property where the Code Offense occurred
and collected in the same manner as taxes. Any such assessment shall not
preclude the City from issuing additional citations for a continuing Code Offense,
nor shall it preclude the City from making additional assessments against the
same property resulting from a continuing or new Code Offense.
E. The City may suspend or revoke a license or permit or other approval associated
with the Code Offense if the civil penalty and accrued late charges are not timely
paid.
2-5-7: Subsequent Violations. If a second citation for a Code Offense is issued
by the City to the alleged violator and/or owner of the property upon which the violation
has occurred within twenty four (24) months of the issuance of a previous citation for the
same Code Offense, the civil penalty shall increase by 25% over the scheduled civil
penalty amount. If a third citation for a Code Offense is issued by the City to the alleged
violator and/or the owner of the property upon which the violation has occurred within
twenty four (24) months of the issuance of a previous citation for the same Code Offense,
the civil penalty shall increase by 50% over the scheduled civil penalty amount. If a
fourth citation for a Code Offense is issued by the City to the alleged violator and/or the
owner of the property upon which the violation has occurred within twenty-four (24)
months of the issuance of a previous citation for the same Code Offense, the civil penalty
shall increase by 100% over the scheduled civil penalty amount.
SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage and publication
according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota this
14 today of June, 2004.
IN FAVOR: Mayor Larry Fournier; CM HEidner, CM Wendel,
CM Struthers and CM Scharber
OPPOSED: NONE
5
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Foumier, Mayor
'�A -
a Af., etvl�
d Hu o City Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE SUMMARY
SUMMARY OF CITY OF OTSEGO ORDINANCE NO. 2004-15 RELATED TO
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT OF CODE REGULATIONS
The following is an approved summary of the above Ordinance No. 2004-15. The Otsego
City Council has determined that the summary accurately summarizes the ordinance and
provides adequate notice to the public of its various terms and conditions.
Ordinance No.2004-15 establishes Chapter 2, Section 5 of the Otsego City Code.
The Ordinance sets forth an alternative method of ordinance enforcement wherein the
City may issue citations with a specified civil penalty amount for violations of specific
sections of the City Code. If payment is not made the civil penalty becomes a personal
obligation of the violator and may create a lien or assessment against property.
The ordinance establishes a right of appeal to an Administrative Hearing Officer,
establishes the position of City Code Compliance Officer and the position of Hearing
Officer and establishes procedures for enforcement and appeals. The ordinance further
allows appeals of certain specific violations to the City Council after Administrative
decision.
The ordinance provides for payment of civil penalties, establishes those civil penalties for
certain offenses and allows for graduated increases in the civil penalty amounts if more
than one same or similar offense occurs within a two year period.
A complete copy of the Ordinance is on file at the Otsego City Hall.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 14th day of June, 2004.
IN FAVOR: Mayor Fournier; CM Heidner, CM WEndel, CM Struthers
and CM Scharber
OPPOSED: NONE
V , - "m 1041%1 -
City Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Foumier, Mayor
Published: Elk River Star News 06-23-04
2