Loading...
Comprehensive Study of the Sanitary Sewer Collection System March 8, 2021OT642 REPORT 3-8-2021 CITY OF OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE STUDY OF THE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signature: Type or Printed Name: Ronald J. Wagner, P.E. Date: March 8, 2021 License No: 26052 OT642 REPORT 3-8-2021 Adopted by: THE CITY OF OTSEGO on March 8, 2021 City Officials Jessica Stockamp, Mayor Tom Darkenwald, Council Member Tina Goede, Council Member Brittany Moores, Council Member Jeff Dahl, Council Member By: Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Engineers Ronald J. Wagner, P.E. Brent Larson, P.E. Graphics Sam Morse Dalton Wagner The Planning Company LLC Planner D. Daniel Licht, AICP TC-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE OF REPORT Page 1 II. SERVICE AREA ANALYSIS Page 3 III. CAPACITY OF EXISTING TRUNK FACILITIES Page 6 IV. FUNDING OF TRUNK SEWER PROJECTS Page 21 V. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS Page 22 VI. RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Page 22 APPENDIX LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit No. 1, Study Area Map Exhibit No. 2, Future Land Use Map Exhibit No. 3, Lift Station Map Exhibit No. 4, Sanitary Sewer Collection System Index Map for 1’=200’ Detailed Maps: 1-3 of 52 Exhibit No. 4, Sanitary Sewer Collection System 1’=200’ Detailed Maps: 4-52 of 52 Exhibit No. 5, Proposed Lift Station Wet Well Geometries Exhibit No. 6, Proposed Pump Selection – Pump Curves LIST OF TABLES Table No. 1, Population Projection (TPC) Table No. 2E, East Lift Station Projected REC Summary Table No. 2W, West Lift Station Projected REC Summary Table No. 3E, East Lift Station Projected Sanitary Sewer and Forcemain Sizing Table No. 3W, West Lift Station Projected Sanitary Sewer and Forcemain Sizing Table No. 4, Existing Lift Station Summary Table No. 5, Proposed Lift Station Summary Table No. 6, Recommended Capital Improvements Program 1 I. PURPOSE OF REPORT A. General Purpose The general purpose of this report is to evaluate the needs of the City of Otsego’s trunk sewer collection system in order to serve the projected growth of the City of Otsego over the next 20 years and beyond. Exhibit No. 1, Study Area Map, shows the entire City of Otsego and the areas anticipated to be ultimately served by municipal sewer. The City of Otsego has recently completed two other related long-term plans for municipal services, a Comprehensive Otsego Drinking Water System Master Plan (January 2020) and Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facilities Master Plan (February 2018). B. Service Areas Description The City of Otsego is topographically divided into two service areas by a general high point that crosses the City in a south to north direction generally west of Nashua Avenue. This separation line designates east from west sewer service areas and was determined by a natural ridge line, along with the desire to allocate as much sewer as technically and economically possible to the East Waste Water Treatment Facility (E-WWTF). The E-WWTF has many items in its favor, including a larger property with easier opportunity for expansion, the Bios Solids treatment necessary to complete the final step of sewer processing without the need to transport over road, and more favorable outfall limits than the West Waste Water Treatment Facility (W-WWTF). This division is functional for development of two separate gravity-based sewer collection systems that serve the City. The E-WWTF has a capacity of 1.0 MGD. At this time, the City has initiated the design of expansion of the W- WWTF to 1.8 million gallons per day (MGD) up from the original capacity of 0.6 MGD. Both east and west systems have their own independent set of sanitary sewer lift stations, force mains and trunk sewer lines. As a City, the trunk costs are combined and an overall Sewer Access Charge (SAC) and Sewer Connection Charge (SCC) are applied to development to fund the City trunk system. In the 20 or so years since City water and sewer utility systems have been in service, there has been a significant amount of residential, industrial, and commercial growth in the City. As a result of this growth, the City commissioned an update of the City’s Comprehensive Plan in 2012, which has most recently been amended in 2018. This plan evaluated the growth patterns and established an orderly growth plan consisting of land use development, transportation improvements, park improvements, as well as designations of where urban development should be encouraged and planned for. The Comprehensive Plan also establishes policies for expansion of utilities for development in specific sections of the City. 2 The purpose of this report is to present the City Council and City staff with an updated evaluation of the additional trunk collection sanitary sewer infrastructure improvements necessary to provide for orderly urban development. This report evaluates approximately 7,137 acres of land that can be served in the next 40 years. This is in addition to the 7,044 acres of land that is or can currently be serviced by the existing lift stations. C. Basic Logic of Study The cost of the trunk sewer main extensions is financed by the developers as they subdivide land within the City. If there are trunk oversizing costs for extension to other properties contiguous to the new development, the City determines and allows partial credit of the SAC fees generated by the development back to the developer for these trunk oversizing costs. Some areas of Otsego have previously been developed into large lots (one acre or more) prior to the City providing municipal water and sewer services. We consider these areas unlikely to redevelop or request municipal water and sewer services within the next 40 years. Other areas considered unlikely to develop with municipal water and sewer services in the next 40 years are: • Areas subject to Wild and Scenic Recreational River Designation in accordance with Minnesota Rules along the Mississippi River; • Areas of the City that due to distance to the treatment facilities and the vast amount of existing developable acreage will remain much as they are today; • Areas in the northwest or western edge of the City where large lot development is guided due to challenges of providing municipal sewer; • DNR owned property, Otsego County Park, and flood way areas of the Mississippi and Crow Rivers. Combined these areas constitute 4,735 acres. It is expected that ultimate development of the City will provide municipal water and sewer services to 75 percent of its 18,916 acres. 3 II. SERVICE AREA ANALYSIS A. Population Projections Population projections for the entire City of Otsego have been updated by the City Planner as of November 2020 for the period from 2020 to 2040. These projections used a 5 and 10 year house hold growth projection rate and the average number of persons per household to arrive at a population number for each time period. These projections are shown in Table No. 1. From past growth rate analysis, the two WWTF service areas are projected to grow at much the same pace. It should be noted that the population projection does not provide information on the projection of industrial, commercial, office, and other non-residential uses. These types of development are very cyclical in nature and very difficult to predict. The sewer usage for these non-residential uses has been estimated at 15 percent of the residential for purposes of this report. B. Residential Equivalent Connection (REC) 1. Sanitary Sewer RECs The estimated sanitary sewer flow projection for each Lift Station as shown on Table No. 2E and 2W has been calculated based on the allocation of specific load factors per acre of area based on designated land use. This unit of load is called a “Residential Equivalent Connection” (REC). In 2004, the City Engineer presented to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) information on the actual wastewater flow rates coming to the WWTFs. This information showed and continues to show, the actual flow rate was only 150 GPD rather than the design rate of 250 GPD per REC used by the MET Council. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) reviewed this flow information and agreed to lower the treatment allocation rate to 175 GPD per REC. Ongoing review of flows received at the WWTFs versus the number of RECs attributed to each WWTF has continued to show 175 GPD per REC is still a valid ratio. Therefore, for purposes of this report, the 175 GPD per REC will be used for design purposes for the gravity collection system, sanitary lift stations force mains and future treatment facility expansions. 4 C. Lift Station Designation The City of Otsego land mass has been divided into lift station service areas so that detailed analysis can more easily be performed as each lift station service area has a viable sewer shed area that affects the extension of sewer service to those areas. The division of the service area according to topographical features such as ridge lines and drainage basins is very critical for sanitary sewer analysis. Of almost equal importance is the breakdown of each lift station area by potential development within each area. The projection of future lift station development has been identified through discussions with property owners and planned development. This is especially important in the timing of the expected development and the expected demand for sewer services based on the separate planned developments. Using the above information, nine proposed lift station areas were identified. These proposed lift stations were evaluated and lettered A-I with the letter indicating staff’s estimation of likely construction order. The actual sequencing of lift station development will be determined at the discretion of the City Council in accordance with the growth management policies established by the Comprehensive Plan. Property owners have no entitlement to development based on the lift station sequencing indicated by this study. An overall view of these Lift Station areas is shown on Exhibit No.3, Lift Station Map. D. 1” = 200’ Detailed Mapping In order to analyze the preliminary engineering details of the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Collection design for the sewer collection facilities, forty-nine 1” = 200’ scale maps numbered 4 of 52 to 52 of 52 were prepared to collectively form Exhibit No.4. Exhibit No. 4 includes index maps showing the summary of the forty-nine 1” = 200’ scale maps for help in locating particular sections of the overall service area. A very extensive part of the design effort was development of trunk sewer line segment locations and profiles for each individual line segment to ensure that each existing property or parcel within the service area could have access to the trunk sewer lines by extension of smaller lateral sewer lines. The details of the line profiles are included on the forty-nine 1” = 200’ maps included in Exhibit No. 4 as described above. The distance between each manhole, ground elevation, invert elevation, pipe size and gradient are drawn on these maps. These maps will be the primary resource for the City when responding to developers’ questions about what do they need to provide to serve others besides themselves. This preliminary design information will assist the City Engineer and developers plan their projects knowing that the upstream and downstream requirements have already been analyzed. 5 E. Land Use Designations The proposed land use that the City has guided in its 2012 Comprehensive Plan for this eastern study area is shown on Exhibit No. 2, Future Land Use Map. The acreage breakdown of the proposed land use of the ultimate service area is shown in the table below. As stated earlier in this report, the redevelopment of existing large lot low density residential areas into smaller lots is quite unlikely. The use of individual septic tanks and private small wells is a perfectly good way to service these subdivisions and municipal services is not projected to occur into these neighborhoods unless required by the MPCA due to environmental concerns or is requested by the neighborhoods themselves. 6 III. CAPACITY OF EXISTING TRUNK FACILITIES A. Land Use Potential Projections The City’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan defines the typical low-density residential development, with public water and sewer available, would have a density of 2.5 single-family units per developable acre. Therefore, all land designated Low Density Residential will be allocated 2.5 RECs per acre. The 2012 Comprehensive Plan also defines Low/ Medium Density Residential land uses as 3 to 6 units per acre and Medium-High Density Residential land uses as land developed with 7 to12 residential units per acre. Therefore, all land designated as Low/ Medium Density Residential will be allocated 5 RECs per acre and Medium-High Density Residential will be allocated 9 RECs per acre. Commercial, Office and Industrial uses, excluding any manufacturing that would have a large water usage and thus generate larger sewer volumes, are expected to generate an average waste water flow of 1,000 GPD per acre of developed land. Therefore, all land designated as Commercial, Office or Industrial will be allocated 6.0 RECs per acre. Institutional areas (parks, schools, city campus, and other government lands) are treated as 2.5 RECs per acre. These areas are generally associated with large tracks of lands with shorter durations of use during non-peak hours for sewage generation. Areas that are not easily served by City sewer services and/or are within the designated Wild and Scenic areas of the Mississippi River will be limited to one unit per two acres for Residential Cluster guided areas or one per 10 acres for other areas and be serviced by well and septic until such time as the municipal service area grows to its boundaries. Due to the fact these areas are either are outside of the 40year projection window of the report, those areas are not included as serviced in the report. B. Trunk Sanitary Sewer Facilities Table No. 2E and Table No. 2W of the report provides data on the projected potential sewer demands for the E-WWTF and W-WWTF to serve the entire 16,068-acre ultimate fully-developed service area using 175 GPD per REC. C. Trunk Gravity Sewers Typically, the most cost-effective sewer collection systems are designed to follow the downhill gradients provided by the natural drainage topography. To make best use of natural gradient, the major trunk sewers should generally follow the defined streams within the natural drainage basin and then branch out into smaller sub-trunk lines to provide service to properties. Therefore, the preliminary location of the proposed trunk facilities in this study will follow the natural drainage channels. The actual location is expected to be modified to suit the developer’s plans while still maintaining the service elevations required for adjacent or upstream properties. 7 EAST WASTE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY COLLECTION SYSTEM EXISTING EAST WASTE WATER SYSTEM 1. East Waste Water Treatment Plant a. Existing Capacity The E-WWTF has a capacity up to 1.0 MGD and is currently treating approximately 0.38 MGD. A minor amount of this flow is from the original village area of neighboring Dayton. b. Capacity Upgrade Schedule The expected wastewater flows to be received by the facility increase to about 1.0 MGD by 2030. It is therefore recommended that the next facility expansion be initiated prior to 2030. This project is included in the Table No. 6, Capital Improvements Program at the end of this report. 2. Lift Station #1 (Quaday Avenue) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #1 is the major lift station in eastern Otsego. This lift station will ultimately service 5,572 acres of the East Sewer District’s 8,952 developable acres or 62%. Wastewater from Lift Station #8, C, D, E, Y and Z will all flow through Lift Station #1. This lift station consists of a 42-foot deep, 12-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 50 HP and one 40 HP submersible pumps operating. These pumps lift sewage through a 12-inch and 16-inch forcemains that are approximately 17,500 feet long and traverses a 98-foot crest on its way to the EWWTF. Currently the City is using only the 12-inch force mail with a maximum capacity of 650 GPM. The lift station is handling around 335,000 GPD or 1,915 RECs or 87.5 percent of the E-WWTF existing flows Since the typical design of lift station pumps are to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this current set up is near capacity. 8 b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to Lift Station #1 are: 2020 335,000 GPD 2030 600,000 GPD 2040 865,000 GPD It is recommended to approach the increasing of flow capacity in a phased plan. c. Phase I When the last 40 HP pump needs replacement, it is to be upgraded to a 50 HP pumps to match the others. Switching to the 16-inch force main from the 12-inch force main will increase capacity approximately 80 percent to around 540,000 GPD, or a total of 3,085 RECs for an additional 1,170 REC allowing between 8 to 12 more years of growth. At some point, the pair of force mains could be used and would allow each 50HP pump to reach about 1,000 GPM, or with both pumps running, 1,200 GPM. The 1,200 GPM peak flow rate equates to an average daily flow of 560,000 GPD or a total of 3,200 RECs for an additional 1,285 RECs allowing between 10 to 12 more years of growth. This would allow for development within the East Sewer District until at least 2030 before additional upgrades would be necessary. An on-site generator must be added to this important lift station at this time, capable of handling all future upgrades. d. Phase II The 12-inch and 16-inch force mains should be able to handle considerable amount of flow before the increased head loss through the system eventually requires placement with a 21-inch force main. Replacement of the 50 HP pumps with larger horsepower pumps will be necessary during Phase II. e. Ultimate Ultimately, Lift Station #1 will need to handle over 2.5 MGPD. This will require a small surface building over the lift station housing three 100 HP suction pumps and the addition of a third 21-inchdiameter force main. The 4,530 GPM peak flow rate equates to an average daily flow of 2,562,000 GPD or approximately 14,640 RECs. This includes the providing sewer service to proposed lift stations B, C, and D, as well as long term service to areas by Lift Stations Y and Z, where on-site septic systems are used. These long-term lift stations are not expected to be constructed within the 40-year report period. 9 3. Lift Station # 2 (Riverpointe) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #2 serves the isolated area of development in the southeastern corner of the City along the Crow River between TH101 and the EWWTF. This lift station consists of a 40-foot deep, 10-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 12 HP submersible pumps operating. Currently there is a pair of 6-inch force mains that run about 2,650 feet long that traverses a 53-foot crest on its way to the E-WWTF. From the pump system curves, each of the two current 12 HP pumps can pump approximately 250 GPM through the two existing 6-inch force main when acting alone or about 340 GPM with both pumps running. Since the typical design for duplex lift stations is for each pump to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 92,400 GPD. b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Lift Station #2 are: 2020 51,210 GPD 2030 68,075 GPD 2040 68,075 GPD Ultimate 122,465 GPD It appears that the current lift station with 12 HP pumps the pair of 6- inch force mains will meet the future demands until the year 2040. The second pump would come on if the flow rate exceeds the capacity of the single pump running. This would occur very rarely. Therefore, the lift station would be considered sufficient. When the flow rates exceed the year 2040 projection, the two 12 HP pumps will need to be replaced. This station was designed and constructed to allow upgrading the pumps to 25 HP in the future as needed. The future 25 HP pumps will be capable of about 450 GPM or the equivalent average daily flow of 180,000 GPD. This exceeds the project ultimate fully developed service area for this lift station. 10 4. Lift Station #5 (Riverplace) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #5 serves the area just east of the Lift Station #2 service area in the far southeastern corner of the City along CSAH 36 and the Crow River but east and north east of the EWWTF. This lift station consists of a 42-foot deep, 10-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are three (3) 25 HP submersible pumps operating. A 6-inch and 10-inch force main each approximately 1,700 feet long traverse a 70-foot crest on its way to tie into the two 6-inch force mains from Lift Station #2. From the pump system curves, each of the three current 25 HP pumps can pump about 350 GPM through the existing 6-inch and 10- inch force main when acting alone or about 440 GPM with two pumps running. Since the typical design for a triplex lift station is for two pumps running together to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 176,000 GPD b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Riverpointe Lift Station are: 2020 232,600 GPD 2030 159,434 GPD 2040 246,991 GPD Ultimate 334,548 GPD It appears that the current lift station with 25 HP pumps and the 6- inch and 10-inch force mains will meet the future demands to near the year 2040. When the flow rates increase beyond the 176,000 GPD flow rate, the three 25 HP pumps will need to be replaced. This station was designed and constructed to allow upgrading the pumps to 40 HP in the future as needed. The 40 HP pumps will be capable of about 1,750 GPM or the equivalent average daily flow of 850,000 GPD. This exceeds the project ultimate fully developed service area for this lift station. At the time of this upgrade, an on-site generator should be assessed. 11 5. Lift Station #8 (Waterfront) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #8 serves the area just east of Trunk Highway 101 south of 90th Street and includes the Mississippi Riverwood Association (a summer seasonal area) along with the area just to the north that is guided for mixed uses consisting of commercial and/or high-density residential land uses. This lift station consists of a 12-foot deep, 4-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two, 3 HP submersible grinder pumps operating. A 3-inch force main approximately 530 feet long traverses a 4-foot crest on its way to tie into a manhole at the edge of Lift Station #1 service area. From the pump system curves, each of the two current 3 HP pumps can pump about 90 GPM through the existing 3-inch force main when acting alone or about 160 GPM with both pumps running. Since the typical design for a duplex lift station is for a single pump to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 32,400 GPD. b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Waterfront Lift Station are expected to be: 2020 27,000 GPD 2030 33,250 GPD 2040 33,250 GPD Ultimate 33,250 GPD It appears that the current lift station with 3 HP pumps and the 3-inch force main will meet the future demands to near the year 2040, . Although some consideration of uprading the lift station to larger pumps and upsizing the short forcemain to 4-inch diameter to accommodate non-grinder pump sewage for less maintenance issues. 12 PROPOSED EAST WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 1. Establish Proposed East Lift Station Districts Using the natural ridgeline basin approach, augmented by the limitations of the grid property system, six additional individual Sewer Lift Station Districts were identified for the foreseeable future. An overall view of these Sewer Lift Station Districts are shown on Exhibit No.3, “Lift Station District Map”. The details of the trunk sewer system, such as pipe length and size, proposed invert elevation, and approximate top of the manhole elevations are shown in Exhibit No.4. Exhibit No. 4 includes an index map showing the overlay of the forty - nine 1” = 200’ scale maps for help in locating particular sections of the sanitary sewer system. As shown on these exhibits, there are six new east lift stations and multiple force mains require to serve the ultimate sewer service area. Three (LS X, Y and Z) of the proposed lift stations are deemed to be long term facilities and are not analyzed beyond the gravity pipe network and potential volume of sanitary sewer they may someday generate. Design of the long-term lift stations and gravity trunk sewer lines are not included in the analysis of this report. A total of four lift stations (existing Lift Station #8) and three proposed Lift Stations (B, C, and D) all discharge into gravity lines that flow into existing Lift Station #1. PROPOSED EAST LIFT STATIONS Lift Station A (Rice Lake) Lift Station A has a service area of nearly 15,00 acres and is bound by TH101 on the east, Oakwood Avenue (CR 137) on the west, 70th Street (CSAH 38) on the north, and St. Michael to the south. This lift station is proposed to be a 37-foot deep, 16-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will eventually need three 50 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through an 8-inch, 12-inch, and a 16-inch force main that are approximately 12,000 feet in length and overcome 89-foot crest on its way to the E-WWTF. The 8-inch force main is existing as it is a remnant of the original force main for Lift Station #1. This 8-inch force main can be used to service the area for the 1st 840 RECs or approximately 10 to 14 years. This would allow the cost of the larger pump upgrades and the additional larger force mains to be added at a later time thus making the initial construction cost of the lift station more manageable. The service area is guided by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan for multiple land use types from industrial along TH101, some medium to high density residential just west of Quaday Avenue, with mostly low density residential throughout the rest. The lift station should be considered for an on-site generator. 13 Lift Station C (Oakwood Avenue) Lift Station C has a service area of a just under 200 acres and is located north of 70th Street (CSAH 38) just east of Oakwood Avenue (CR 137). This lift station will drain into a manhole on the west edge of Lift Station 1. This lift station is proposed to be a 41-foot deep 8-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a bi-plex consisting of two 10 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through 6-inch and 8-inch force mains that are approximately 3,600 feet in length and overcome 38-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the edge of Lift Station A’s service area. The service area of Lift Station C is guided for low density residential land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. Lift Station D (Nashua Central) Lift Station D has a service area of a little over 400 acres and is located north of 70th Street (CSAH 38) just east of the List Station C service area. This lift station will drain into a manhole on the west edge of Lift Station C’s service area. Lift Station D is proposed to be a 30-foot deep, 8-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a du-plex facility consisting of two 7.5 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through a 6-inch and an 8-inch force main that are approximately 1,800 feet in length and overcome 39-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the edge of Lift Station C’s service area. The service area of Lift Station D is guided low density residential land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. Lift Station E (Nashua North) Lift Station E has a service area of a little over 500 acres and is located north of List Station D service area. This lift station will drain into a manhole on the west edge of Lift Station 1. This lift station is proposed to be a 32-foot deep, 8-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a du-plex consisting of two 15 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through an 8-inch force main that is approximately 6,800 feet in length and overcomes a 50-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the west edge of Lift Station #1’s service area. The service area of Lift Station E is guided low density residential and institutional (City Campus and Prairie Park) land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. 14 Lift Station F (River Road) Lift Station F has a service area of a just over 350 acres and is located north of List Station #5 service area and is bound by Queens Avenue to the west, 65th St to the south, and River Road (CSAH 42) to the north. This lift station will drain into a manhole on the northern edge of Lift Station #5. This lift station is proposed to be a 25-foot deep, 8-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a bi-plex consisting of two 20 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through a 6-inch force main that is approximately 1,800 feet in length and overcomes a 43-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the northern edge of Lift Station #5’s service area. The service area of Lift Station F is guided for industrial and low-density residential land uses with a small amount of medium density housing by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. Lift Station G (Nashua South) Lift Station G has a service area of 635 acres and is bound by St. Michael to the south of 60th Street (CR 137), the West Sewer District to the west, 70th Street (CSAH 38) to the north, and Lift Station A service area to the east. This lift station will drain into a manhole on the western edge of Lift Station A. This lift station is proposed to be a 45-foot deep 10-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a du-plex consisting of two 15 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through 6-inch and a 8-inch force mains that each are approximately 2,900 feet in length and overcomes a 29-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the western edge of Lift Station A’s service area. The service area of Lift Station G is guided for industrial land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. WEST WASTE WATER TREATMENT FACILITY COLLECTION SYSTEM EXISTING WEST WASTE WATER FACILITY 1. West Waste Water Treatment Facility a. Existing Capacity W-WWTF has a capacity up to 0.6 MGD. Currently the W-WWTF had flows averaging 0.412 MGD in 2020 or the equivalent of 2,358 RECs. 15 b. Capacity Upgrade Schedule The wastewater flows to be received by the facility are expected to increase to over 0.6 MGD by 2024. Upgrades to the W-WWTF have been initiated to increase the capacity to 1.4 MGD or an additional 4,571 RECs. In order for the City to need another capacity increase prior to the end of this report’s time period, 230 new RECs per year would have to occur within the West Sewer District. 2. Lift Station #3 (W-WWTF) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #3 is the major lift station for most of the current residential development and the next 10 years of residential and industrial development within the West Sewer District. This lift station consists of a 33.5-foot deep, 12-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 50 HP and one 40 HP submersible pumps operating. These pumps lift sewage through a manifold of 8- inch, 10-inch, 12-inch, and 16-inch force mains () that are each approximately 300 feet in length and traverses a 53-foot crest on its way to the W-WWTF. Currently the City is using only the 16-inch force main, which has a maximum capacity of 830 GPM. The lift station is handling around 260,000 GPD or 1,485 RECs currently. The typical design of a triplex lift station is designed for two of the pumps to combine to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day. This lift station has the capacity to handle roughly 415,000 GPD or 885 additional RECs. It is estimated that within nine years or so this lift station will need larger pumps installed. b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the WWWTF Lift Station are: 2020 260,000 GPD 2030 435,000 GPD 2040 610,000 GPD It is recommended to approach the increasing of flow capacity in a phased plan. 16 c. Phase I When the last 40 HP pump needs replacement, it shall be upgraded to a 50 HP pumps to match the others. Switching to the 16-inch FM from the 12-inch force main will increase capacity approximately 80 percent to around 540,000 GPD or 3,085 RECs (an additional 1,170 RECs) allowing between 8 to 12 more years of growth. The pair of force mains would allow each 50HP pump to reach about 1,000 GPM or with both pumps running 1,200 GPM. The 1,200 GPM peak flow rate equates to an average daily flow of 560,000 GPD. This would get the City to near 2030 before additional upgrades would be necessary. d. Phase II The 12-inch and 16-inch force mains should be able to handle considerable amount of flow before the increased head loss through the system eventually requires placement of a 21-inch force main. Replacement of the 50 HP pumps with larger HP pumps will be necessary during Phase II. e. Ultimate Ultimately, the lift station will need to handle nearly 2.6 MGPD. This may require a small surface building over the lift station housing three 100 HP suction pumps. The lift station has an on-site, on-demand generator in case of power outages, which is available from the generator located at the W-WWTF. The nearly 4,600 GPM peak flow rate equates to an average daily flow of 2,573,000 GPD or approximately 14,700 RECs. This includes the providing municipal sewer service to proposed lift stations B, H, and #6, as well as long term currently septic areas of LS W. This need is not expected to be constructed within the 40-year report period. 3. Lift Station #4 (Martin Farms) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #4 (Martin Farms) serves the area bounded by MacIver Avenue to the west, 60th Street (CR 137) to the south, 80th Street to the north, and Nashua Avenue to the east. This lift station consists of a 39-foot deep, 12-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are three 60 HP submersible pumps operating. Currently there are 10-inch and 14-inch force mains that run about 7,100 feet in length that traverses a 58-foot crest on its way to the W- WWTF. 17 Each of the three 60 HP pumps can pump about 760 GPM through the existing 10-inch force main when acting alone or about 840 GPM with two of the pumps running. Since the typical design for a triplex lift station is for two of the pumps to match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 417,000 GPD only using the 10-inch force main. b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Martin Farms lift station: 2020 152,300 GPD 2030 240,000 GPD 2040 327,500 GPD Ultimate 889,350 GPD It appears that the current lift station with three 60 HP pumps and using both the 10-inch and 14-inch diameter force mains will meet the future demands for the ultimate fully developed service area for this lift station. An on-site generator should be assessed as flow continue to increase. 4. Lift Station #6 (Riverwood National- Interim) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #6 currently serves the area of the Riverwood National development along with Lift Station #9’s small area. The Lift Station is along Lift Station District I’s trunk gravity sewer line and has an ultimate drainage area of 600 acres. Lift Station #6’s service area extends from Riverwood National to the west toward the boundary with Monticello Township. The north is bound by 95th Street (CSAH 39), excepting Lift Station #9’s service area, and to the south by 85th Street. This lift station consists of a 29-foot deep, 8-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 15 HP submersible pumps operating. A 6- inch force main approximately 9,700 feet in length traverses a 72-foot crest on its way to tie into a manhole along the trunk gravity sewer line of Lift Station #3. From the pump system curves, each 15 HP pumps can pump about 280 GPM through the existing 6-inch force main. 18 The typical design for a duplex lift station is for one pump flow rate match the peak flow rate GPM expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 105,000 GPD. b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Riverwood National Lift Station are: 2020 21,000 GPD 2030 28,875 GPD 2040 28,875 GPD Ultimate No Ultimate to project as LS is considered Interim It appears that the current lift station with 15 HP pumps and the 6- inch force main will meet the future demands beyond the year 2040. If the flow rates increase beyond the projected year 2040 flow rate, the two 15 HP pumps can accommodate up to an additional 435 RECs. This station was designed and constructed as an interim lift station and is expected to be converted to a trunk sewer line manhole and drain down to Lift Station I. Therefore, no lift station upgrades should ever be warranted. 5. Lift Station #7 (Magnolia Landing) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #7 currently serves the development of Magnolia Landing and a portion of Otsego Preserve. The lift station will also service an area to the east of these developments to MacAllister Avenue. The lift station has an ultimate sewer shed of just under 150 acres. This lift station consists of a 28-foot deep, 8-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 7.2 HP submersible pumps operating. A 6- inch force main approximately 3,350 feet long traverses a 30-foot crest on its way to tie into a manhole at the southern edge of Lift Station #4’s service area. From the pump system curves, each 7.2 HP pumps can pump about 255 GPM through the existing 6-inch force main. The typical design for a duplex lift station is for one to match the peak flow rate expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 105,000 GPD. 19 b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Magnolia Landing Lift Station are: 2020 11,500 GPD 2030 30,000 GPD 2040 100,000 GPD Ultimate 152,600 GPD It appears that the current lift station with 7.2 HP pumps and the 6- inch force main will meet the future demands to near the year 2040. When the flow rates increase beyond the 95,000 GPD the pumps may have to be increased slightly in size. 6. Lift Station No. #9 (Grenins) a. Existing Capacity Lift Station #9 currently serves the development of Grenins 2nd Addition. The lift station was constructed due to poor soils and high- water table not being able to support planned septic systems after development had occurred. The lift station has an ultimate sewer shed of only 13 acres. This lift station consists of a 16-foot deep, 4-foot diameter wet well. Currently there are two 3 HP submersible grinder pumps operating. A 3-inch force main approximately 2,300 feet in length traverses a 23- foot crest on its way to tie into a manhole at the northern edge of Lift Station 6’s service area. From the pump system curves, one 3 HP pump can pump about 70 GPM through the existing 3-inch force main. The typical design for a duplex lift station is to match the peak flow rate expected at the lift station at any hour of the day, this station currently has capacity for an average daily flow of 25,000 GPD b. Projected Flow Rates The projected flow rates to the Lift Station #9are: 2020 1,225 GPD 2030 2,100 GPD 2040 2,100 GPD Ultimate 2,100 GPD It appears that the current lift station with 3 HP pumps and the 3-inch force main will exceed the projected ultimate fully developed service area for this lift station. 20 PROPOSED WEST WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEM 1. Establish Proposed West Lift Station Districts Using the natural ridgeline basin approach, augmented by the limitations of the grid property system, four additional individual sanitary sewer Lift Station Districts were identified for the foreseeable future. An overall view of these LS Districts is shown on Exhibit No.3, “Lift Station District Map”. The details of the trunk sanitary sewer system, such as pipe length and size, proposed invert elevation, and approximate top of the manhole elevations are shown in Exhibit No.4. Exhibit No. 4 includes an index map showing the overlay of the fourty-nine 1” = 200’ scale maps for help in locating particular sections of the sanitary sewer system. Lift Station W is deemed a long-term facility and is not analyzed beyond the gravity pipe network and potential volume of sanitary sewer that may someday be generated. Design of the this lift station and gravity trunk sewer lines were not included in the analysis of this report. A total of five lift stations, consisting of one existing lift station, one interim lift station, two proposed lift stations, and one long term lift station will discharge into trunk gravity sewer lines that flow into existing Lift Station #3 at the W-WWTF. Existing Lift Station #4 and proposed Lift Station B pump directly to the W-WWTF, with existing Lift Station #7 draining into Lift Station #4. PROPOSED WEST LIFT STATIONS Lift Station B (Otsego Creek North) Lift Station B has a service area of a little over 1,000 acres and is bound by Labeaux Avenue (CSAH 19) on the west, Nashua Avenue on the east, 80th Street on the south, and 95th Street (CSAH 39) on the north. This lift station is proposed to be a 44-foot deep, 12-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will eventually need three 40 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through an 8-inch and a 10-inch force main that are to be approximately 10,000 feet in length and overcome 74-foot crest on its way to the W-WWTF. Much of the length of the 8-inch and 10-inch force mains have been constructed during development. Only 2,500 feet of the length remains to be installed. The service area is guided for institutional (Middle and Elementary Schools) and low-density residential land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. This lift station should be assessed for an on-site generator as flow volumes increase. 21 Lift Station H (I-94) Lift Station H is anticipated to be the eighth lift station added to the City system in the future. Lift Station H has a service area of a just under 500 acres and is located south of I-94, west of Kadler Avenue. This lift station will drain into a manhole on the west edge of Lift Station #3’s service area. This lift station is proposed to be a 42-foot deep, 10-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a du-plex consisting of two 10 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through a 6-inch and an 8-inch force main that are approximately 800 feet in length and overcome 14-foot crest on its way to a manhole at the edge of Lift Station #3’s service area. The service area of Lift Station H is guided low density residential and industrial land uses by the 2012 Comprehensive Plan. Lift Station I (CSAH 39) Lift Station I has a service area of nearly 1,300 acres and is located south of 95th Street (CSAH 39) just east Large Court. This lift station will drain into a trunk manhole on the east edge of Labeaux Avenue (CSAH 19) at CROSS STREET and drain into Lift Station #3. This lift station is proposed to be a 31-foot deep, 12-foot diameter wet well. The lift station will be a tri-plex eventually consisting of three 50 HP pumps. These pumps will lift sewage through a 14-inch force main that will be approximately 14,000 feet long and overcome 79-foot crest on its way to a manhole within Lift Station #3’s service area. The service area of Lift Station I is guided for low density residential land uses, with minor areas of commercial, office, and the potential of some institutional land uses. Lift Station 6 (Riverwood National) already exists and will eventually become a manhole and gravity drain to proposed Lift Station I. This lift station should be assessed for an on-site generator as flow volumes increase. IV. FUNDING OF TRUNK SEWER A. Adequacy of SAC fees for Funding Sanitary Sewer Extensions In accordance with the policy statements of the Comprehensive Plan, as new land is developed, the extension of sanitary sewer will be performed and financed by the developers. The developer will be required to install the complete the sewer system to serve their development, as well as make provisions for future connections servicing other adjacent properties. The cost of the additional sewer system provisions that benefit other properties beyond the current development is referred to as trunk oversizing or depth credits, which the City will reimburse back to the developer through the development agreement. 22 Usually, the typical residential development will involve only gravity sewer line extensions. However, some developments may require a new sanitary lift station and force main as well. The trunk oversizing cost that is eligible for reimbursement from the Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund are calculated on Table 5. The City will determine the cost of the lateral sewer facilities that would serve just the development needs and subtract that from the actual cost of construction to determine oversizing or depth costs, otherwise known as trunk costs. 1. General Allocation of Sanitary Access Charge (SAC) and Sewer Connection Charge (SCC) Fee Revenue. Under the current method, the City collects the $2,641 SAC fee for each RECs within a new development. The City later collects a $7,924 SCC fee per REC when the building permit for each lot is obtained. These funds are earmarked to pay for construction of the following: a) Construction of or major upgrading of lift stations. b) Installation of force mains and trunk sanitary sewer lines c) Trunk oversizing or depth credits to developers. d) WWTF expansions or upgrades V. RECOMMENDED PROJECTS For this report, projects that may be constructed during the next 20 years are outlined as shown in Table No. 6, Recommended Capital Improvement Program. These projects along with WWTF expansions and upgrades will need to be evaluated to determine the proper amount of the SAC and SCC fees. Adjustments to that amount can be made annually using the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index to adjust for inflation and changes in materials costs and labor. VI. RECOMMENDED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The total capital outlay for the projects expected to be performed between 2020 and 2040 are summarized in Table No. 6. In addition, the expected revenue from collection of SAC fees is estimated for each time period in the project schedule. The results are that the expected SAC fees are sufficient to cover all of the proposed trunk sewer collection facility improvements through 2040 and still leave an accumulated balance for future trunk sewer collection projects. It should be noted that there are many contingencies that may come up in the next twenty years that may require additional use of these fund balances. It is recommended that the City review the estimated project costs on an annual basis. It is also wise to review the SAC fee structure to maintain a positive fund balance. As with any projection of growth from past history, the City should constantly re-evaluate the actual rate of development occurring in the City and corresponding actual sewer usage rates in GPD. APPENDIX §¨¦9 4 456737 456718 456719 456719 456739 456739 456739 456742 456742 456742 456736 456738 Æ·137 456738 456738 . EXHIBIT 1 0 0.5 10.25 Miles 456738456738 456742 456742 456742 456742 456736 456739 456739456739 456719 456719 §¨¦9 4 456737 456718 EF137 EF137 456738 FUTURE LAND USE00.5 10.25 Miles É LEGEND Planning Districts Rural Rural Residential LD Residential (Large Lot) LD Residential LD/MD Residential MD/HD Residential Mixed Use Commercial Office Industrial Public/Quasi Public K:\cad_eng\PROJECTS\GIS\TPC\Otsego\Comprensive Plan 2012\Future Land Use Map DISCLAIMER:This product is for informational purposes and may not have beenprepared for, or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveyingpurposes. Users of this information should review or consult theprimary data and information sources to ascertain the usabilityof the information. TPC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2012 ADOPTED: 10 December 2012 AMENDMENTS:Resolution 2015-64 adopted 26 October 2015Resolution 2017-20 adopted 13 March 2017Resolution 2018-49 adopted 23 July 2018Resolution 2021-XX adopted XX January 2021 EXHIBIT 2 ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ . EXHIBIT 3 0 0.5 10.25 Miles ^_LIFT STATION WASTE WATER TREAMENT FACILITY EXISTING EXTENT OF SEWER SERVICE DISTRICTSEAST/WEST BOUNDARY LINE LS6 LSI LSB LS3 LSH LSW LS9 LS4 LS7 LSG LSD LSE LSY LSZ LSA LS1 LS8 LSF LS5 LS2 LSX LSC I N D E X M A P S LSW LSH LS6 A L S 3 L S 4 L S B L S 6 L S E L S G L S 7 L S D L S 9 L S C LS4 LSBL S E L S Y L S Z L S 8 L S 1 L S F L S 2 L S 5 L S X L S A L S G LS7 L S D L S C LSI L S Z L S Y E X H B I T 4 D E T A I L E D M A P S LSY LSZ L S Z L S Z L S 1 LS1 LSBLSB L S E L S Y L S Y L S Z LSY L S Z L S 1 L S 1 L S 1 L S 1 L S 8 LSB L S E L S Y L S 1 L S 1 LSC LSY L S 1 L S 1 L S 8 LS4 L S E L S D L S D LSD L S 1 L S 1 LSCLSC L S 1 LS1 LS4LS4 L S D L S G L S G LSGLSG LSD L S 1 L S A L S C L S 1 L S A L S 1 LSA L S F LSF L S 5 LS7LSG LSG L S A L S A LSA L S 1 L S F L S 5 L S 2 L S X LSFL S 5 L S 5 L S 2 LS X L S 5 LS5 L S 6 L S 9 L S 9 L S I LS6 L S I L S B L S I LSILSB L S Y L S I L S 6 L S B L S I LS6 L S 3 L S 3 L S I L S B LSB L S E L S I L S 3 LSI L S 3 L S B LS3 L S 3 L S 4 LSB L S 4 L S E L S 3 L S 3 LSH L S 3 L S 4 L S 4 L S D L S D L S H LSW L S 4 L S 7 L S G L S H L S W LS4 L S 7 L S G 1 EXHIBIT 5 Proposed Lift Station Wet Well Geometry ADF = 784 gpm Pumping Rate = 2276 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 7709 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 16.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 5.5 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 8272 Gallons 0.93198757 5.127841707 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 16.0 Ft Top Elev= 870.50 Gnd Elev= 870.00 SS Invert In= 848.00 Alarm = 845.50 Lag On 2 = 844.50 Lag On = 843.50 Lead On = 842.50 Pumps Off = 837.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 833.00 *As required for complete submergence OK Determine Wet well Diameter NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Lift Station A Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK ADF = 330 gpm Pumping Rate = 1078 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 3435 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 12.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 4.5 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 3807 Gallons 0.902239669 4.061591414 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 12.0 Ft Top Elev= 922.50 Gnd Elev= 922.00 SS Invert In= 892.00 Alarm = 890.00 Lag On 2 = 889.00 Lag On = 888.00 Lead On = 887.00 Pumps Off = 882.50 Bottom Invert Elev* = 878.50 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station B Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 176 gpm Pumping Rate = 616 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 1886 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 8.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 5.0 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 1880 Gallons 1.00307822 5.017259982 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 8.0 Ft Top Elev= 932.50 Gnd Elev= 932.00 SS Invert In= 908.00 Alarm = 906.00 Lag On 2 = 905.00 Lag On = 904.00 Lead On = 903.00 Pumps Off = 898.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 894.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station C Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 126 gpm Pumping Rate = 456 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 1368 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 8.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 4.0 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 1504 Gallons 0.909452087 3.639163902 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 8.0 Ft Top Elev= 940.50 Gnd Elev= 940.00 SS Invert In= 911.00 Alarm = 910.00 Lag On 2 = 909.00 Lag On = 908.00 Lead On = 907.00 Pumps Off = 903.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 899.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station D Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 110 gpm Pumping Rate = 401 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 1197 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 8.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 4.0 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 1504 Gallons 0.796162069 3.18583497 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 8.0 Ft Top Elev= 912.50 Gnd Elev= 912.00 SS Invert In= 892.00 Alarm = 890.00 Lag On = 889.00 Lead On = 888.00 Pumps Off = 884.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 880.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station E Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 122 gpm Pumping Rate = 441 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 1324 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 8.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 4.0 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 1504 Gallons 0.880181235 3.522036869 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 8.0 Ft Top Elev= 862.50 Gnd Elev= 862.00 SS Invert In= 849.00 Alarm = 847.00 Lag On = 846.00 Lead On = 845.00 Pumps Off = 841.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 837.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station F Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 324 gpm Pumping Rate = 1060 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 3374 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 10.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 6.0 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 3525 Gallons 0.957339229 5.746175774 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 10.0 Ft Top Elev= 948.50 Gnd Elev= 948.00 SS Invert In= 917.50 Alarm = 915.00 Lag On = 914.00 Lead On = 913.00 Pumps Off = 907.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 903.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station G Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 347 gpm Pumping Rate = 1126 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 3601 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 10.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 6.5 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 3819 Gallons 0.943007902 6.131835416 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 10.0 Ft Top Elev= 961.50 Gnd Elev= 961.00 SS Invert In= 934.00 Alarm = 931.50 Lag On = 930.50 Lead On = 929.50 Pumps Off = 923.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 919.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station H Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter ADF = 937 gpm Pumping Rate = 1906 gpm Time = 15.0 min. Cycles Per Hour = 4.0 Check Cycles Per Hour: Check Cycles Per Hour: Required Volume = 7145 Gallons Pick Wet Well Diameter = 14.0 Ft Pick Wet Well Cycle = 6.5 Vert. Ft Volume in Cycle = 7484 Gallons 0.954709382 6.207923376 Vertical Datum Used: Wet well Dia. = 14.0 Ft Top Elev= 890.50 Gnd Elev= 890.00 SS Invert In= 877.00 Alarm = 875.50 Lag On 2 = 874.50 Lag On = 873.50 Lead On = 872.50 Pumps Off = 866.00 Bottom Invert Elev* = 862.00 *As required for complete submergence OK NAVD 88 Determine Wet Well Invert & Float Elevations Lift Station I Cycle Time & Wet Well Geometry Target Cycles Per Hour OK OK Determine Wet well Diameter 1 EXHIBIT 6 Proposed Pump Selection Table 1 Population Projection 2012 Otsego Comprehensive Plan Minnesota State Demographer 2000 2010 2020 2030 2019 Households 2,062 4,736 6,800 10,000 6,254 Population 6,389 13,571 19,040 28,000 18,130 Building Permit Data 2010-2020 2010-2019 2015-2019 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 TOTAL Mean/Yr TOTAL Mean/Yr Single family 73 58 140 184 176 181 205 210 274 292 374 1793 179 1162 232 Townhouse 3 6 12 6 14 26 8 8 75 8 54 11 Multiple Family 142 97 170 239 24 239 48 Total 73 58 143 190 188 187 219 352 300 397 552 2107 211 1455 291 Updated Household and Population Forecast 10-Year Growth Rate 2020 2030 2040 Households 6,806 8,913 11,823 Population 19486 25402 33104 5-Year Growth Rate 2020 2030 2040 Households 6,806 9,716 13499 Population 19486 27691 37797 Notes: Building Permit Data used to estimate 2020 population 10-Year growth household projection rate assumed to increase to 263 du./year between 2030-2040 5-year household growth projection rate assumed to increase by +/- 30% between 2030-2040 DATE: 10 Nov 2020 SOURCE: City of Otsego (TPC) Actual Projected Estimates Table 2E East WWTF Lift Station Summary Sanitary Sewer REC's LIFT STATION DISTRICT TOTAL ACRES WETLAND OR UN- DEVELOPABLE AREAS DEVELOPABLE ACRES EXISTING LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (1.0 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE EXISTING LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (1.0 REC'S/AC.) RURAL TRANSITION LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (INITIALLY 1.0 REC / 10 AC., ULTIMATELY 2.5 REC/ AC.) DEVELOPABLE RURAL TRANSITION LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (INITIALLY 1.0 REC / 10 AC., ULTIMATELY 2.5 REC/ AC.) PUBLIC/ QUASI PUBLIC- SCHOOLS, PARKS , CITY SERVICES- 2.5 REC'S PER ACRE DEVELOPABLE PUBLIC/ QUASI PUBLIC- SCHOOLS, PARKS , CITY SERVICES- 2.5 REC'S PER ACRE OFFICE (6 REC'S PER ACRE) DEVELOPABLE OFFICE (6 REC'S PER ACRE) INDUSTRIAL ACRES ( 6 REC'S/ AC.) DEVELOPABLE INDUSTRIAL ACRES ( 6 REC'S/ AC.) COMMERCIAL ACRES (6 REC'S / AC.) DEVELOPABLE COMMERCIAL ACRES (6 REC'S / AC.) HIGH / MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (7-12 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE HIGH / MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (7-12 REC'S/AC.) MEDIUM / LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (3- 6 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE MEDIUM / LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (3-6 REC'S/AC.) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (2.5 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (2.5 REC'S/AC.) TOTAL ACRES SERVED DEVELOPABLE ACRES SERVED TOTAL REC'S SERVED 1,037 499 LS8 56 16.8 39 11 8 1 1 24 17 19 13 1 1 56 39 190 LSF 356 106.8 249 142 99 17 12 197 138 356 249 1,001 LSX 130 39 91 34 24 96 67 130 91 311 LIFT STATION #1 EXISTING QUADAY AVE. LIFT STATION #Y WILSON PERSERVE LIFT STATION #Z MISSISSIPPI SHORES LIFT STATION #8 EXISTING WATERFRONT LIFT STATION #B PRAUGHT LIFT STATION #C NASHUA CENTRAL LIFT STATION #D NASHUA NORTH LIFT STATION #5 EXISTING RIVERPLACE LIFT STATION #F RIVER ROAD LIFT STATION #A DARKENWALD LIFT STATION #G NASHUA SOUTH LIFT STATION #2 EXISTING RIVER POINTE LIFT STATION #X AUTUMN WOODS TOTAL TO EAST WWTP 8952 2685.6 6,266 0 0 63 44 444 164 131 92 1,271 890 461 323 647 453 611 428 5,324 3,727 8,952 6,119 23,876 9,2071,9262,7527551,0782543633084400272389137196921311,926825.62,752LS1 1011448110 18 1,013 753 709 1,031 722 1,804 722 13 177 413LSZ 41590 29 8 6 2 1 539 377 590 413 420135193102146334713557.9193LSC 1,0362874101632331161653468287123410 94537854035350437825162540 LSD LSE 36 91135450533047246354151.5505LS5 1927 3,9229371,547606865141201681852641,547LSA 2091,083 24 2,77646366146334439627 315126181126180112754.3181LS2 LSY 1,031 309.3 198.3661LSG 464.1 East WWTF Lift Station Summary Forcemain Sizing 3/3/2021 LIFT STATION DISTRICT LS8 LSF LSX LIFT STATION #1 LIFT STATION #Y LIFT STATION #Z LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #B LIFT STATION #C LIFT STATION #D LIFT STATION #5 LIFT STATION #F LIFT STATION #A LIFT STATION #G LIFT STATION #2 LIFT STATION #X TOTAL TO EAST WWTP LS1 LSZ LSC LSD LSE LS5 LSA LS2 LSY LSG AVERAGE DAILY FLOW GPD DISCHARGE RECEIVED FROM OTHER LINE SEGMENTS OR PUMP STATIONS TOTAL COMBINED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW RATE POPULATION EQUIVALENT ( 1,000'S) PEAK FACTOR PEAK FLOW RATE GPD Pump Design Avg (gpm) Average Design Flow (cfs) Peak Design Flow (gpm) Peak Design Flow (cfs) FORCE MAIN PIPE DIAMETE R Area (SF) Peak VELOCITY (>2 and <5) Velocity (>1 and <3) 10.75 0.63 16.01352 6.29219 15.17 1.2545 8.041416 3.15971 Both 1.8845 5.35322 2.10344 21 2.4041 4.196286 0.16395 All 4.2886 2.352336 0.9243 8 0.3489 4.79361 1.40023 6 0.1963 8.521974 2.4893 6 0.1963 3.865191 1.03918 4 0.0872 8.696681 2.33816 181,545 181,545 1.82 3.62 656,848 126.07 0.28 456.14 1.02 6 0.1963 5.178549 1.43129 4 0.0872 11.65173 3.2204 87,281 87,281 0.87 3.84 334,926 60.61 0.14 232.59 0.52 4 0.0872 5.941195 1.54827 33,259 33,259 0.33 4.06 134,996 23.10 0.05 93.75 0.21 3 0.0491 4.257207 1.04884 8 0.3489 3.955918 1.12969 6 & 8 0.5451 2.531788 0.723 10 0.5451 2.531788 0.723 8 0.3489 2.908467 0.80374 6 0.1963 5.170608 1.42887 6 & 8 0.5451 1.861419 0.51439 6 0.1963 4.756954 1.30381 4 0.0872 10.70315 2.93356 8 0.3489 2.675787 0.73339 6 & 6 0.3925 2.378477 0.6519 4 & 4 0.1744 5.351573 1.46678 6 0.1963 8.97 2.63755 10 0.5451 3.23 0.94952 Both 0.7414 2.38 0.69818 175,114 175,114 1.75 3.63 635,653 121.61 0.27 441.43 0.98 6 0.1963 5.01 1.38059 12 0.785 6.67 2.31051 16 1.3956 3.75 1.29966 8 0.3489 15.00 5.19865 8 & 12 & 16 2.5294 2.07 0.71706 18 1.7663 2.96 1.02689 8 & 18 2.1151 2.47 0.85751 8 0.3489 7.02 2.15454 8 & 8 0.6978 3.51 1.07727 6 0.1963 3.26 0.86341 4 & 6 0.2835 2.26 0.59774 6 & 6 0.3925 1.63 0.4317 4 0.0872 7.33 1.94267 54,390 54,390 0.54 3.96 215,120 37.77 0.08 149.39 0.33 3 0.0491 6.78 1.71523 4,178,291 - 4.50 - 10.09 4,527.89 3.96 ######6,520,159 2.54 25.62 2,561,965 950,661 1,611,304 1.67 750.65 0.49 219.27 1,080,929 3.42 3.16 0.76 340.46 315,744 315,744 0.20 91.53 490,262 3.72 1.32 131,810 131,810 1.38 619.47 0.39 176.90 892,035 3.50 2.55 254,739 181,239 73,500 1.01 455.45 0.28 125.86 655,841 3.62 1.81 181,239 181,239 0.93 419.01 0.26 114.84 603,373 3.65 1.65 165,375 165,375 1.76 790.31 0.52 232.32 1,138,050 3.40 3.35 334,548 175,114 159,434 5.23 2,349.26 1.81 814.07 3,382,940 2.89 11.72 1,172,264 485,835 686,429 2.45 1,098.71 0.75 337.39 1,582,145 3.26 4.86 485,835 485,835 0.64 287.04 0.17 76.05 413,332 3.77 1.10 109,515 54,390 55,125 S:\Municipal\AOTSEGO\642 MASTER SAN STUDY\Table 2E, 2W, 3E & 3W - SUB-DISTRICT USAGE 2 Table 2W West WWTF Lift Station Summary Sanitary Sewer REC's LIFT STATION DISTRICT TOTAL ACRES WETLAND OR UN- DEVELOPABLE AREAS DEVELOPABLE ACRES EXISTING LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (1.0 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE EXISTING LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (1.0 REC'S/AC.) RURAL TRANSITION LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (INITIALLY 1.0 REC / 10 AC., ULTIMATELY 2.5 REC/ AC.) DEVELOPABLE RURAL TRANSITION LARGE LOT- LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (INITIALLY 1.0 REC / 10 AC., ULTIMATELY 2.5 REC/ AC.) PUBLIC/ QUASI PUBLIC- SCHOOLS, PARKS , CITY SERVICES- 2.5 REC'S PER ACRE DEVELOPABLE PUBLIC/ QUASI PUBLIC- SCHOOLS, PARKS , CITY SERVICES- 2.5 REC'S PER ACRE OFFICE ( 6 REC'S PER ACRE) DEVELOPABLE OFFICE ( 6 REC'S PER ACRE INDUSTRIAL ACRES ( 6 REC'S/ AC.) DEVELOPABLE INDUSTRIAL ACRES ( 6 REC'S/ AC.) COMMERCIAL ACRES (6 REC'S / AC.) DEVELOPABLE COMMERCIAL ACRES (6 REC'S / AC.) HIGH / MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (7-12 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE HIGH / MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (7-12 REC'S/AC.) MEDIUM / LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (3-6 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE MEDIUM / LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (3-6 REC'S/AC.) LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (2.5 REC'S/AC.) DEVELOPABLE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ACRES (2.5 REC'S/AC.) TOTAL ACRES SERVED DEVELOPABLE ACRES SERVED TOTAL REC'S SERVED LS9 13 3.9 9 0 13 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 9 33 LS7 150 45 105 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 48 34 74 52 25 18 150 105 872 LIFT STATION 3 LIFT STATION B LIFT STATION I LIFT STATION 6 RIVERWOOD NATIONAL - INTERIM LIFT STATION 9 LIFT STATION H LIFT STATION W LIFT STATION 4 LIFT STATION 7 MAGNOLIA LANDING TOTAL TO W WWTf 7,116 2134.8 4,981 0 0 2,057 1,440 139 97 463 324 887 621 484 339 327 229 306 214 2,453 1,717 7,116 4,981 23,932 281 1,976 1,383 SW CORNER MARTIN FARMS WWWTF OTSEGO CREEK NORTH C.S.A.H. 39 GRENINS I-94 181 130 91 65 46 402 7,390 928 LS6 629 188.7 440 0 628 440 1,469 440.7 1,028 0 1,326 0 0 258 70 49 77 54 LSI 233 163 826 578020144229 1,077 323.1 754 0 LS3 LSB 1,976 592.8 1,383 0 0 17 12 913 639 1,077 754 2,735 0 19 13 0 124 87 0 0 0 1,469 1,028 4,173 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 629 440 1,573 2,5823494991031470243453752232148211000349149.7499LSH 36695136921320340000009540.8136LSW 4,2108171,16758483410515078111192720290817350.11,167LS4 111600 Table 3E East WWTF Lift Station Summary Sanitary Sewer Flows and Forcemain Sizing LIFT STATION DISTRICT TOTAL REC'S SERVED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW GPD DISCHARGE RECEIVED FROM OTHER LINE SEGMENTS OR PUMP STATIONS TOTAL COMBINED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW RATE POPULATION EQUIVALENT ( 1,000'S) PEAK FACTOR PEAK FLOW RATE (GPD) Pump Design Avg (gpm) Average Design Flow (cfs) Peak Design Flow (gpm) Peak Design Flow (cfs) FORCE MAIN PIPE DIAMETER Area (SF) Peak VELOCITY (>2 and <5) Velocity (>1 and <3) 10.75 0.63 16.0135 6.29219 15.17 1.255 8.04142 3.15971 Both 1.884 5.35322 2.10344 21 2.404 4.19629 0.16395 All 4.289 2.35234 0.9243 8 0.349 4.79361 1.40023 6 0.196 8.52197 2.4893 6 0.196 3.86519 1.03918 4 0.087 8.69668 2.33816 1,037 181,545 181,545 1.82 3.62 656,848 126.07 0.28 456.14 1.02 6 0.196 5.17855 1.43129 4 0.087 11.6517 3.2204 499 87,281 87,281 0.87 3.84 334,926 60.61 0.14 232.59 0.52 4 0.087 5.9412 1.54827 LS8 190 33,259 - 33,259 0.33 4.06 134,996 23.10 0.05 93.75 0.21 3 0.049 4.25721 1.04884 8 0.349 3.95592 1.12969 6 & 8 0.545 2.53179 0.723 10 0.545 2.53179 0.723 8 0.349 2.90847 0.80374 6 0.196 5.17061 1.42887 6 & 8 0.545 1.86142 0.51439 6 0.196 4.75695 1.30381 4 0.087 10.7031 2.93356 8 0.349 2.67579 0.73339 6 & 6 0.393 2.37848 0.6519 4 & 4 0.174 5.35157 1.46678 6 0.196 8.97 2.63755 10 0.545 3.23 0.94952 Both 0.741 2.38 0.69818 LSF 1,001 175,114 - 175,114 1.75 3.63 635,653 121.61 0.27 441.43 0.98 6 0.196 5.01 1.38059 12 0.785 6.67 2.31051 16 1.396 3.75 1.29966 8 0.349 15.00 5.19865 8 & 12 & 16 2.529 2.07 0.71706 18 1.766 2.96 1.02689 8 & 18 2.115 2.47 0.85751 8 0.349 7.02 2.15454 8 & 8 0.698 3.51 1.07727 6 0.196 3.26 0.86341 4 & 6 0.283 2.26 0.59774 6 & 6 0.393 1.63 0.4317 4 0.087 7.33 1.94267 LSX 311 54,390 - 54,390 0.54 3.96 215,120 37.77 0.08 149.39 0.33 3 0.049 6.78 1.71523 LIFT STATION #1 LIFT STATION #Y LIFT STATION #Z LIFT STATION #8 LIFT STATION #B LIFT STATION #C LIFT STATION #D LIFT STATION #5 LIFT STATION #F LIFT STATION #A LIFT STATION #G LIFT STATION #2 LIFT STATION #X TOTAL TO EAST WWTP 23,876 4,178,291 - - - 4.50 - LS1 9,207 1,611,304 950,661 2,561,965 25.62 2.54 6,520,159 1,779.14 3.96 4,527.89 10.09 LSY 1,804 315,744 - 315,744 3.16 753 131,810 131,810 1.32 3.42 1,080,929 219.27 0.49 750.65 1.67 3.72 490,262 91.53 0.20 340.46 0.76 LSZ LSC 420 73,500 181,239 254,739 2.55 3.50 892,035 176.90 0.39 619.47 1.38 LSD 1,036 181,239 - 181,239 1.81 3.62 655,841 125.86 0.28 455.45 1.01 LSE 945 165,375 - 165,375 1.65 3.65 603,373 114.84 0.26 419.01 0.93 LS5 911 159,434 175,114 334,548 3.35 3.40 1,138,050 232.32 0.52 790.31 1.76 LSA 3,922 686,429 485,835 1,172,264 11.72 2.89 3,382,940 814.07 1.81 2,349.26 5.23 LSG 2,776 485,835 - 485,835 4.86 3.26 1,582,145 337.39 0.75 1,098.71 2.45 LS2 315 55,125 54,390 109,515 1.10 3.77 413,332 76.05 0.17 287.04 0.64 Table 3W West WWTF Lift Station Summary Sanitary Sewer Flows and Forcemain Sizing LIFT STATION DISTRICT TOTAL REC'S SERVED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW (GPD) DISCHARGE RECEIVED FROM OTHER LINE SEGMENTS OR PUMP STATIONS TOTAL COMBINED AVERAGE DAILY FLOW RATE POPULATION EQUIVALENT ( 1,000'S) PEAKING FACTOR PEAK FLOW RATE GPD Pump Design Avg (gpm) Avg Design Flow (cfs) Peak Design Flow (gpm) Peak Design Flow (cfs) FORCE MAIN PIPE DIAMETER Area (SF) Peak VELOCITY (>3 and <10) Avg Velocity (>1 and <3) 16 1.396 7.83 3.13 8 0.349 31.31 12.51 10 0.545 20.04 8.00 12 0.785 13.92 5.56 All 3.075 3.55 1.42 12 & 10 1.330 8.21 3.28 12 & 8 1.134 9.63 3.85 12 & 16 2.181 5.01 2.00 10 & 8 0.894 12.22 4.88 10 & 16 1.941 2.85 2.25 12 & 10 & 8 1.679 6.51 2.60 12 & 10 & 16 2.726 4.01 1.60 8 & 16 1.744 6.26 2.50 10 & 8 & 16 2.290 4.77 1.91 8 0.349 6.92 2.12 10 0.545 4.43 1.36 10 & 8 0.894 2.70 0.83 10 & 10 1.090 2.22 0.68 8 0.349 13.23 4.48 10 0.545 8.47 2.87 10 & 8 0.894 5.16 1.75 10 & 10 1.090 4.23 1.43 12 1.788 2.58 0.87 14 2.181 2.12 0.72 8 & 12 2.137 2.16 0.73 10 & 12 2.333 1.98 0.67 8 & 14 2.529 1.82 0.62 4 0.087 17.27 4.98 6 0.196 7.68 2.21 4 & 6 0.283 5.31 1.53 LS9 33 5,688 - 5,688 0.06 4.30 24,474 3.95 0.01 17.00 0.04 3 0.049 0.77 0.18 8 0.349 7.39 2.29 10 0.545 4.73 1.46 10 & 8 0.894 2.89 0.89 6 & 8 1.744 1.48 0.46 3 0.049 7.91 2.02 4 0.087 4.45 1.14 10 0.545 7.59 2.52 14 1.068 3.87 1.29 10 & 14 1.614 2.56 0.85 LS7 872 152,600 - 152,600 1.53 3.67 560,675 105.97 0.24 389.36 0.87 6 0.196 4.42 1.20 West WWTF Total LIFT STATION #3 LIFT STATION #E LIFT STATION #6 LIFT STATION #6A LIFT STATION #9 LIFT STATION #H LIFT STATION #W LIFT STATION #4 LIFT STATION #7 TOTAL TO WEST WWTP 23,932 4,188,170 - 4,188,170 41.88 2.34 9,787,538 LS3 1,958.47 4.36 4,903.36 10.92 LSB 7,390 1,293,233 1,526,963 2,820,195 7,060,83928.20 2.50 2.422,735 478,625 - 478,625 4.79 LS6 3.26 1,561,531 332.38 0.74 1,084.40 702.19 1.56 2,071.38 4.62 LS6A 4,173 730,275 280,875 1,011,150 2,982,79110.11 2.95 1.511,573 275,188 5,688 280,875 2.81 LSH 3.47 973,669 195.05 0.43 676.16 358.20 0.80 1,157.87 2.58 LSW 2,582 451,763 64,050 515,813 1,667,3365.16 3.23 0.3936664,050 - 64,050 0.64 LS4 3.92 250,850 44.48 0.10 174.20 3.01 2,672,585 617.60 1.38 1,855.96 4.144,210 736,750 152,600 889,350 8.89 Table 4 Existing Lift Station Summary Existing Lift Station WWTF Depth (ft) Diameter (ft) Existing Pumps (HP) Existing Peak Flow Rate (GPM) Existing FM in Use (In) Existing LS Capacity (GPD) Existing LS Capacity (REC) Existing LS (GPD) Existing Use (REC) Ultimate Peak Flow Rate (GPM) Ultimate FM (In) Ultimate LS Capacity (GPD) Ultimate LS Capacity (REC) Projected Ultimate Capacity (REC) Projected Year of Ultimate Capacity 1 E 42 12 40,50,50 650 12 335,000 1914 335,000 1914 4525 12,16,21 2,562,000 14,640 14640 2040+ 2 E 40 10 12,12 250 6 92,400 528 51,210 293 450 6,6 180,000 1,029 0 2040+ 3 W 33.5 12 40,40,20 830 16 412,000 2354 412,000 2354 4634 8,10,12,16 2,780,000 15,886 16115 2040+ 4 W 39 12 60,60,60 935 10 479,150 2738 152,300 870 1856 10,14 977,800 5,587 0 2040+ 5 E 42 10 25,25,25 440 6 176,000 1006 32,600 186 1750 6,10 850,000 4,857 0 2040+ 6 W 29 8 15,15 290 6 105,000 600 21,000 120 290 6 105,000 600 see LS I see LS I 7 W 28 8 7,7 255 6 95,000 543 11,500 66 390 6 152,600 872 5082 2040+ 8 E 11.5 4 3,3 90 3 130,000 743 27,000 154 90 3 130,000 743 0 2040+ 9 W 16 4 3,3 70 3 25,000 143 1,225 7 6 3 25,000 143 7 2030 Note:The Lift Stations are color coded to match the Lift Station borders of Exhibit 3 Table 5 Proposed Lift Station Trunk Cost Summary Force Main (DIA)(Length) Lift Station (Depth, DIA) Extra Depth & Trunk Size Sub Totals per Lift $183,500.00 $1,668,578.13 $1,604,520.00 $7,229,852.81 (8")(2600')(37', 16') $3,773,254.69 (12" & 16")(12100')C $1,438,218.75 $1,233,806.25 $1,936,865.00 $4,608,890.00 (8" & 10")(10000')(44', 12') $234,743.75 $769,278.13 $500,600.00 $1,504,621.88 (6" & 8")(1800')(25', 8') $480,646.09 $909,793.75 $484,950.00 $1,875,389.84 (6" & 8")(3550')(41', 8') $517,428.13 $780,850.00 $572,110.00 $1,870,388.13 (8")(6800')(32', 8') $130,596.88 $787,462.50 $223,810.00 $1,141,869.38 (6")(1800')(25', 8') $387,657.81 $1,023,859.38 $612,850.00 $2,024,367.19 (8" & 8")(2850)(45', 10') $611,009.38 $985,837.50 $550,104.00 $2,146,950.88 (6" & 8")(800')C (42', 10') $1,801,906.25 $1,166,028.13 $2,235,392.00 $5,203,326.38 (14")(14000)(31', 12') TOTALS $9,558,961.72 $9,325,493.75 $8,721,201.00 $27,605,656.47 W B Otsego Creek North 3 (40) E A Rice Lake 3 (50) COST (2021) PR O P O S E D L I F T S T A T I O N S WWTF LS ID Name Number of Pumps (HP) E C Oakwood E D E E Nashua North Nashua Central E F River Road E G Nashua South W W H I CSAH 39 I-94 2 (20) 2 (15) 2 (10) 3 (50) 2 (7.5) 2 (10) 2 (15) Table 6 Recommended Capital Improvement Program 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 LS1 9,207 1914 7293 21%70 110 110 110 50 55 55 55 55 55 55 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 3134 34% LS2 315 211 104 67%20 20 20 20 20 311 99% LS3 7,390 2354 5036 32%55 100 100 100 90 90 90 90 65 65 65 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 3624 49% LS4 4,210 870 3340 21%55 75 75 75 85 90 90 90 65 65 65 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 2060 49% LS5 911 186 725 20%35 65 65 65 65 70 70 70 70 70 70 901 99% LS6 135 120 15 89%5 5 130 96% LS7 872 66 806 8%15 20 25 25 25 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 476 55% LS8 190 154 36 81%0 5 5 5 0 169 89% LS9 33 7 26 22%0 5 12 37% E 125 200 200 200 135 125 125 125 125 125 125 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 W 125 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 150 150 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 LSA 3,922 0 3922 0%65 75 75 75 75 75 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 40 930 24% LSB 2,735 0 2735 0%50 50 50 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1050 38% LSC 420 0 420 0%25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 95 920 219% LSD 1,036 0 1036 0%25 25 2% LSE 945 LSF 1,001 LSG 2,776 LSH 2,582 LSI 4,173 E 125 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 W 125 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 Total REC's 250 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 7850 Sewer Fee Generations 10,656.00$ per REC w/ 1.0% inflation 0.01 2,664,000$ 4,305,024$ 4,348,074$ 4,391,555$ 4,435,471$ 4,479,825$ 4,524,623$ 4,569,870$ 4,615,568$ 4,661,724$ 4,708,341$ 4,755,425$ 4,802,979$ 4,851,009$ 4,899,519$ 4,948,514$ 4,997,999$ 5,047,979$ 5,098,459$ 5,149,444$ 92,255,403$ LSA 101,023$ 1,934,087$ 166,967$ 168,637$ 170,323$ 172,026$ 173,747$ 175,484$ 177,239$ 179,011$ 180,801$ 182,609$ 190,549$ 3,658,548$ 7,631,051$ LSB 148,645$ 2,972,895$ 209,735$ 211,832$ 213,950$ 216,090$ 218,251$ 220,433$ 222,638$ 224,864$ 227,113$ 229,384$ 5,315,829$ LSC 61,322$ 1,155,392$ 55,297$ 55,850$ 56,409$ 56,973$ 57,543$ 58,118$ 58,699$ 59,286$ 59,879$ 60,478$ 1,795,247$ LSD 89,949$ 1,632,741$ 58,587$ 1,781,277$ SAC 1,868,192$ 1,875,872$ 1,888,352$ 1,902,576$ 1,538,752$ 1,465,192$ 1,464,883$ Biosolids 377,056$ 1,011,030$ 1,010,603$ 1,011,072$ 1,010,423$ 1,010,671$ 1,010,802$ 1,010,818$ 1,010,717$ 1,010,500$ 1,010,167$ 1,010,718$ 1,010,142$ 1,010,449$ 1,010,628$ 1,010,680$ 1,010,604$ 1,010,400$ 1,011,069$ 1,010,599$ 19,579,148$ WWWTF Exp - Liquids 276,794$ 1,702,813$ 1,705,895$ 1,702,673$ 1,702,825$ 1,701,588$ 1,703,585$ 1,698,159$ 1,700,200$ 1,700,185$ 1,698,375$ 1,694,720$ 1,694,113$ 1,691,791$ 1,693,003$ 1,692,654$ 1,690,710$ 27,450,083$ WWWTF Access 1,200,000$ 1,200,000$ EWWTF Exp - Liquids 452,121$ 2,263,430$ 2,261,109$ 2,262,320$ 2,261,971$ 2,260,028$ 11,760,979$ Cash Balance - 2020 11,769,048$ 12,187,800$ 13,605,922$ 14,954,018$ 13,021,044$ 13,037,560$ 13,166,990$ 13,194,288$ 11,905,594$ 13,364,054$ 13,768,985$ 15,322,514$ 16,916,069$ 18,553,260$ 20,235,429$ 21,697,299$ 21,394,608$ 21,143,291$ 20,656,379$ 15,437,976$ 15,507,017$ Total REC's Available REC's Used REC's Remaining % used Assumed Allocation of REC's