Loading...
RES 92-24RESOLUTION NO. 92 -2 4 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A CODE OF ETHICS AND CONDUCT FOR THE OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Otsego has established a Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, this group is responsible for performing vital functions in the planning and development of the community, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission needs to fully understand its ethical responsibilities, role and function and related conduct expectations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Otsego City Council that the following code of ethics and conduct is established for the Otsego Planning Commission. 1. The primary responsibility of the Planning Commission is to evaluate the impact of planning and development from a long range, community -wide perspective. Specialized interests and, especially self-interest considerations, shall not override a City-wide perspective nor unduly influence recommendations. A concentrated effort shall be made by the Commission to identify and take into account all sides, impacts, and opinions on any application or issue. 2. The Planning Commission is in essence an advisory, study group, serving on behalf of the City Council and it is charged with conducting indepth evaluations of planning and development proposals which come before the City Council for a decision. Completion of this responsibility requires the Commission to maintain an objective perspective and not become involved with a group or interest on any side of an issue. 3. No member of the Planning Commission shall participate in any case in which they have financial or personal interest in the property or action concerned, or will be directly affected by the decision, or have or believe they have any other conflict of interest as defined by applicable law. As soon as any Planning Commission member becomes aware of any potential conflict of interest in any case to come before the Commission, they shall notify the Chair or acting Chair of the particulars. Where the Chair finds that a conflict clearly exists, the Chair shall disqualify the Commission member from discussing and acting on the case and cause the secretary to enter the circumstances in the record and to make arrangements for such alternate services as are required. Where the Chair or acting Chair has reasonable doubt as to whether the facts and applicable law indicate a degree of conflict justifying disqualification or excuse from service, the Chair shall seek advice from the City Attorney. If the City Attorney advises that, under the circumstances reported and applicable law, a conflict appears to exist, the Chair shall proceed to disqualify or excuse as provided above. If the City Attorney advises that there is reasonable doubt, the Chair may (a) disqualify or excuse the person involved, or (b) call for a determination by the Commission at a public meeting. The record on any such determination by the Commission shall be full and complete and shall indicate the reasons supporting the Commission's decision. 4. So as to maintain objectivity, members of the Commission are not to individually meet or converse with an applicant or any other interest involved in a request or issue, in any form other than a public meeting. A member shall disqualify themself from voting whenever any applicant, or their agent, has sought to influence the vote of the member on an application, other than in the public hearing. 5. Failure of a member of the Commission to maintain objectivity, and/or avoid participating in a discussion and recommendation where there is a conflict of interest, shall be grounds for removal by the City Council. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, this 11TH day of K'Ay 1992. CITY OF OTSEGO No F. Freske, Mayor ATTEST: y rvplae Perrault,' City Clerk E