06-03-08 WSHalcanson CNA Englneera and Lend Surveyors
5501 Thurston Ave., 8"' 101
Anderson AnoIm MN 55303
■ ■ Assoc., I n C. ph: 703427-5580 FW763427.0520
2008 Base Costs and assumptions
Bituminous Mixture
Assumptions:
Overlay thickness:
Unit Cost
Unit weight
Unit rate of overlay =
Pavement
Width
24.00 feet
40.00 feet
23,33 feet
28.33 feet
31.66 feet
41.66 feet
50.66 feet
Surface Preparation
Assumptions:
TackApplicabon Rate:
Unit Cost
Unit rate of Tack =
Pavement
Width
24.00 feet
40.00 feet
23.33 feet
28.33 feet
31.66 feet
41.66 feet
50.66 feet
Edoe Millina
Assumptions:
Milling Width:
Unit Cost
Unit Rate of Milling =
Valve Adivatments
Assumptions:
Adustments
Unit Cost
Unit rate for adjust =
ITEM 2
Sheet of _
By Date
Chkd Date
1.75 Inches (Includes an extra 1/4 inch for Irregularities)
$50.00 per ton
110 Ib1sq yd/inch thichness
$0.53 per square foot
Cost per lin.
Foot
$12.83
$21.39
$12.48
$15.15
$16.93
$22.28
$27.09
0.05 Gal/sq yd
$1.50 Gal
$0.01 per square foot
Cost per Iin.
Foot
$3.20
$5.33
$3.11
$3.78
$4.22
$5.55
$6.75
Edge mill next to exist C&G
3 feet @Ea curb
$1.75 per sq yd
$1.17 per Lin Foot
4 valves per block/8 blocks/mile.
32 per mile
200 Ea.
$1.21 Per Lin Foot
Crack fillingfleveling 30 N sq yd
$75.00 ton
Unit rate of leveling $0.13 per square foot
30' Transition Taper
Area =24X37.5= 100 Sq Yd.
Valve Adiustmen
Assumptions: 10 Manholes /mile
Adjustments 10 per mile
Unit Cost 400 Ea
Unit rate for adjust = $0.76 Per Lin Foot
1111
ngineers and
and
i"'�t�iCr"lt son 3601E ThurstonAvs,`BNIGS10 Surveyors Sheet of
111
Anderson Anoka, MW 55303 BY Date
AssocJnC. Ph: 763-427-5860 Fax: 763-427-0520 Chkd Date
2008 Base Costs, per lineal foot of roadway
Activit
Rural Section
24' Width
Urban Sections
23' Width
STD PL 100 110/112 (Pre 2003)
24' Width 40' width 23' Width 28' Width 32' width 42' Width
51' Width
Bituminous OverlayB'-m$12.83
Preparation3.20
Edge Milling
Aggregate Shoulder
Valve Adjustment
Manhole Adjustment
Striping
SUBTOTAL
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Engineering/Inspect
Indirect Costs"
TOTAL RATE
51' Width
$21.39
$12.48
15.15
$16.93
22.28
27.09Surface
$5.33 $3.11 $3.78 $4.22 $5.55
$6.75
$1.17 $1.17 $1.17, $1.17
$1.17
$0.60 $1.20
75 feet
$1.21 si.2i 1.21 1.21
1.21
$0.76 $0.76 $0.76 $0.76
0.76
0.60 0.20 $0.60
$0.80
$16.63 $28.52 $18.72 $22.06 $24.49 $311.571
37.78
0.83 1.43 0.84 1.22 1.58
1.89
0.831 $1.43 0.94 $1.10 1.22 1:58
1.89
0.83 $1.43 $0.84 $1.10 1.22 $1.58
$1.89
$3,831 $6.56 $4.311 $5.07 $5.63 $7.26
I
.69
- $22.951 $39.36,25.84 30.45 $33.79 43.56
52.1
* Indirect costs include the cost of engineering, legal, fiscal, and administration services provided by the
City staff or other parties. ( Assumed 20% of estimated construction costs)
Assessment Scenarios (On a per Unit basis)
A. City assumes 25% of estimated cost, Benefitted Property assessed 75%
frontage
24' Width
40' width
23' Width
28' Width
32' width
42' Width
51' Width
60 feet
City Cost
72.16
295.21
93.77
228.35
F2 -5-374'-$326.72--F3-9102
.
Prop Cost 516.47 $885.62 581.32 685.04 760.32 1980.17 T,173.07
75 feet
city cosr,5.19
75 feet
$569.01242.22
430.39
285.43
316.80
408.41
8.78
Prop Cost $645.581 1,107.02 726.65 856.30 950.401 1,225.22
1,466.34
175 feet
City Cost
502.12
861.0
565.17 66.01
739.20
952.95
1,140.49
Prop Cast $1,506,361 $2,583.04;1,695.52 $1,998.02 $2,217.601 $2,858.84
$3,421.46
B. City assumes 50% of estimated cost, Benefitted Property assessed 50%
frontage
24' Width 40'
width
23' Width
28' Width
32' width
42' Width
51' Width
60 feet
City Cost
3 3
590.41
387.55
$459.69
506.88
653.45
$782.05
Prop Cost 344.31 590.41 387.55 456.69 506.88 653.45
782.05
75 feet
City Cost
430.39
738.0
-P8-T.-43
70.86
633.60
816.81
877.56
Prop Cost 430.39 738.01 484.43 $570.86 633.60 816.81
977.56
175 feet
City Cost
1,0 .24
1,722.03
30.35
,332.2
1,478.40
,905.89
2,
Pro Cost 1,004.24 1,722.03 1,130.35 1,332.02 1,478.40 1,905.89
2,280.87
B. City assumes 75% of estimated cost, Benefitted Property assessed 25%
frontage
24' Width
40' width
23' Width
28' Width
32' width
42' Width
51' Width
60 feet
City Cost
518.47
885.62
581.32
685.04
760.32
980.17,173.07
Prop Cost 172.16 $295.21 $193.77 228.35 253.44 326.72
391.02
75 feet
City Cost
6 5. 8
1,107.02
726.65
856.30
950.40
,225.22
1, 66.34
Prop Cost $215.191369.01 242.221 $285.431 316.801 408.41
488.78
175 feet
City Cost
$1,506.36
2,583.04
1,695.52
,998.02
2,217.60
2,858.84
3,421. 6
Prop Cost $502.121 $861.011565.17 $666.011 $739,201952.95
$1.140.49
I- akanson IND Engineers and Land Surveyors Sheet Of
Anderson• 3801AndraThVINr 55303
553ve., sAie,°, By Date
,
"M ASSor— i' Ph: 753427SBOO Fax; 783427.0520 MCI Date
General Considerations:
The focus of the assessment policy study pertains to the overlay of residential streets.
The Otsego Engineering Manual identifies 3 typical sections for City residential streets.
A summary of estimated costs for overlaying various sections is presented below. The
residential sections are highlighted.
Rural Section Urban Sections
Rounded Rounded
Activity WValue Average
Estimated Cost:
$/L.in Ft $23.00 $28.00
Estimated Cost:
$/Mlle $121,440 6., $147,84D
Based on a 175' lot width for a Rural Residential section and a 75' lot width for an
urban section, the following table is developed for various funding scenarios
on project costs. Collectors and State-Aid Routes will be paid predominantly by the
City. Residential lots with driveways accessing. Collectors and State Aid routes will be
assessed equal to residents accesssing local streets.
Funding Urban Residential
Peroent8ge Rural Residential Cost Cost
Resident 100% $2,012.60 (lot $1,050.00 7171
city 0%0.00 /mile 0.00 /mile
Resident 75%$1 509.38 /lot $787.50 /lot
city 25% $30.360.00 /mile $36,960. 00 ell
Resident 50°h $1,006.20
lot $525.00 / to
Cl 50% $60,720.00 /mile $73,920.00 /mile
Resident 25% 603.13 /lot 262.50 / to
CI 75% $91.080.00 /mile $1110%880.00 /mile
Resident 0%$0.00 /lot $0:00 /lot
Cl 1.00% $12.1,440.001 mile $147,840.001 mile
Comercial/Industrial streets are to be assessed based on adjusted front footage and
ITEM 3
Memo
To: Otsego City Council
From: Kyle Hartnett
Date: April 28, 2008
Re: Filling City Council Vacancies
This memo is to provide the City Council some background information on replacing a vacancy
on the City Council. Most of the information in this memo was taken from the League of
Minnesota Cities' "Handbook for Minnesota Cities." I have also attached the applicable
Minnesota Statutes to this Memo.
Once a vacancy exists, the Council should pass a resolution declaring a vacancy on the Council.
State law provides that statutory city councils make the appointment to fill a vacancy, except in
the case of a tie vote when the mayor makes the appointment. That means all members of the
council, including the mayor, can vote on the appointment. And as long as at least a quorum of
the council is present, a majority vote of those present is sufficient to make the appointment.
State law does not place any limitation on a mayor's ability to make an appointment in the case
of a tie vote. As a result, the mayor can appoint any qualified person willing to fill the vacancy
even if that person was not the subject of the original appointment vote. If the vacancy is for the
mayor's office and the council casts a tie vote, the acting mayor should make the appointment.
The acting mayor may not, however, appoint himself or herself.
The council may appoint any individual who is eligible for election to that office.
Generally, to be eligible a person must be a U.S. citizen, a resident of the city, and at least
21 years old. The council is not obligated to appoint any candidate previously defeated in
an election for the office.
A retiring council member may not vote on the appointment of the successor to that vacancy. A
council member who is elected mayor, however, may participate in the appointment vote to fill
the vacancy in his or her former council position.
Under certain circumstances, individuals appointed to fill council vacancies serve on a
temporary basis, and the city must hold a special election to elect a permanent replacement to
fill the vacancy. Two factors determine whether an election is required: first, whether filing has
opened for the next regular city election, and second, the length of the unexpired portion of the
term at the time of the vacancy. If the vacancy occurs on or after the first day to file as a
candidate for the next regular city election or if less than two years remain in the unexpired
term, the city does not need to hold a special election, and the appointed person can serve out
the remainder of the unexpired term. In the alternative, if the vacancy occurs before the first day
to file as a candidate for the next regular city election and more than two years remain in the
unexpired term, the city must hold a special election to fill the council vacancy at or before the
next regular city election, and the person elected will serve out the remainder of the unexpired
term. If the council chooses to hold a special election to fill a vacancy at a time other than at the
regular city election, it must first adopt an ordinance specifying the circumstances under which
such an election will be held.
State law generally provides that the terms of elected city officials begin on the first Monday in
January following the election. However, the attorney general has advised that a person elected
to fill a vacancy is eligible to qualify and assume office upon receipt of an election certificate.
0 Page 2
ITEM 4
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RIVERPLACE SECOND ADDITION
REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT REGARDING DEVELOPER
CONSTRUCTION OF CITY TRUNK IMPROVEMENTS
AGREEMENT entered into this day of '2008 by band between
the City of Otsego (CITY), a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of
Minnesota and U.S. Home Corporation (DEVELOPER) a Delaware corporation.
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER installed trunk sanitary sewer, trunk water, and road
improvements benefiting its property as well as property to the East of said
improvements as yet not developed; and
WHEREAS, at the time of construction of these trunk improvements DEVELOPER held
an interest in the property to the East benefited by the Trunk Improvements and entered
into a Developer's Agreement with the CITY which established no reimbursement to
DEVELOPER for said trunk improvements; and
WHEREAS, DEVELOPER no longer holds an interest in the properties to the East
benefiting from the Trunk Improvements now referred to as "The Project".
WHEREAS, CITY has currently no funds available for reimbursement to DEVELOPER
since trunk improvements are paid for by SAC and WAC fees paid at the time of
DEVELOPMENT by benefited property owners; and
WHEREAS, CITY and DEVELOPER both desire to enter into an Agreement to attempt
to reimburse DEVELOPER for trunk costs expended upon development of the benefited
properties.
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
DEVELOPER shall be reimbursed for trunk improvements to the Project over time upon
as other properties benefited by the Project are developed. Reimbursement shall occur as
follows:
A. The CITY has established a Sanitary Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) as per
Ordinance. A portion of this charge (50%) is for trunk facilities. That portion of
each of these charges dedicated to trunk sanitary sewer facilities shall be
reimbursed to DEVELOPER as collected from properties benefited by the Trunk
facilities up to the amounts as set forth in this Agreement. The CITY requires that
50% of applicable SAC charges for each subdivision be paid up front at the time
of Plat approval. Upon receipt of the 50% 0 front payment for SAC charges at
time of Plat approval, CITY shall make payment to DEVELOPER of one half
(50%) of that amount. DEVELOPER shall subsequently be reimbursed at the time
of application for a building permit and payment to the CITY of the other 50% of
the SAC charge by payment to DEVELOPER of one half (50%)of that amount
received. Payments to DEVELOPER of money received for the building permit
portion of the SAC char es subject to reimbursement shall be made quarterly and
at that time CITY shall provide DEVELOPER with an updated accounting of
reimbursement payments made and the reimbursement balance due pursuant to
this Agreement.
B. The City shall establish a per lot or per acre Road Access Fee for properties
benefited by construction of Randolph Avenue. The Road Access Fee shall be
collected from properties benefiting from construction of the same and shall be
reimbursed to DEVELOPER upon collection by the CITY, up to the limits set
forth in this Agreement.
C. The CITY shall have no obligation to reimburse to DEVELOPER SAC and Road
Access Fees from properties which do not benefit from the Project. The area of
benefit for purposes of reimbursement for a portion of the SAC fees is as set forth
in Exhibit A. The area of benefit for purposes reimbursement of Road Access
Fees is set forth in Exhibit B. Reimbursement for SAC fees shall be limited to the
total amount for each designated area as set forth on Exhibit A.
D. Reimbursement from portions of the SAC fees shall be limited to a total of
$530,790.63. Road access fees shall be reimbursed up to $ 77,327.33. The total
CITY obligation for reimbursement shall not exceed $608,117.96.
E. Should DEVELOPER develop any lands within any of the areas benefited by the
Project they shall be credited for any applicable SAC, WAC or Road Access Fees
as per this Agreement and the City's obligation for reimbursement shall be
reduced accordingly.
F. The CITY's obligation to reimburse DEVELOPER pursuant to collections
received from development shall terminate on December 31, 2020. After that date
the CITY will have no further obligations to reimburse DEVELOPER. The CITY
shall provide DEVELOPER payment and accounting of any reimbursement
eligible funds received yearly in December. In the event that DEVELOPER has
not been fully reimbursed pursuant to this Agreement six (6) months prior to
the
termination date, and upon written notification by DEVELOPER, the CITY will
meet with DEVELOPER to discuss possible further extension of the Agreement.
2
G. Developer understands that the reimbursement arrangements set forth in this
Agreement may be subject to judicial review. DEVELOPER agrees that should a
court of competent jurisdiction determine that invalidate this Agreement or any
portion of the reimbursement provisions such that the CITY cannot legally
reimburse DEVELOPER from future fees as set forth in this Agreement the City's
obligation to reimburse shall be null and void.
H. Merger. This Agreement is a full and final recitation of the Agreement between
the Parties and supercedes any previous Agreement either written or oral.
I. Amendment. The terms and conditions of this Agreement may only be amended
by a written Amendment or Addendum approved and executed by both parties.
J. Notices. Required Notice to the DEVELOPER shall be in writing and shall be
either hand delivered to the DEVELOPER, their employees or agents or mailed to
to the DEVELOPER by registered mail at the following address: 935 East
Wayzata Boulevard, Wayzata, MN 55391 attn Carole Toohey. Notice to the CITY
shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Clerk or Deputy
City Clerk at the following address: City of Otsego, City Hall, 8899 Nashua
Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330.
Its:
R3
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Judy Hudson, City Clerk
DEVELOPER
U.S. HOME CORPORATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June, 2008 by
Larry Fournier, Mayor and Judy Hudson, City Clerk, of the City of Otsego, a Minnesota
municipal corporation, on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority of the City
Council.
NOTARY PUBLIC
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of June, 2008 by
the of U.S. Home Corporation a Delaware
corporation, on behalf of the corporation and with authority.
NOTARY PUBLIC
DRAFTED BY:
COURI, MACARTHUR & RUPPE PLLP
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
4