11-22-1993 Special Meeting MinutesSTATE OF MINNESOTA The City Council of the City of
COUNTY OF WRIGHT Otsego, called a Special Council
CITY OF OTSEGO Meeting this 22ND day of November
1993 by Norman F Freske, Mayor.
This meeting was a Special Informational Meeting on the
LeFebvre's Watershed at 6:30PM. Also present were Doug
Lindenfelser, Floyd Roden, Larry Fournier and Ron Black,
Council Members. Andy MacArthur, City Attorney, Larry
Koshak, City Engineer, Elaine Beatty, DeputyClerk/Zoning
Administrator and Judy Hudson, Secretary. Mayor Freske
turned the meeting over to Engineer, Larry Koshak.'
Mr Kosh'ak explained that this meeting is being held to
bring people and land owners in this particular area up-to-
date. We are proposing the LeFebvre's Watershed District in
the County Rd #42 and State Hwy #101 area and the watershed
is bound by Page Avenue and Sadowski's farm. It goes to John
LeFebvres property N to #39 and #101. He had exhibits and
talked about them.
The last meeting was last January. We are planning for
future storm water drainage. Last meeting we talked about
different options we could do in the future time frame and we
talked about putting pipes across the Kolles farm and the
options there. At this time it would break up the farming in
the area and they are quite expensive. We also looked at the
proposed future MSA street that would traverse the property
of #42 and #101. It is on our map for sometime in the
future. At that time we could look at storm water drainage.
Those two items are talking about the future. We are talking
about the ditch on Co Rd #42 and 85TH to #42. The proposed
overland waterway for the drainage is in the watershed area
circled in yellow on the map. We are talking about future
and the existing conditions in that area. Light blue on the
map is the elevations below 860 which is the 100 year flood
in that area. To fill that area the owner would be required
to get a permit from the Corps of Engrs and go thru the city
and abide by their Ordinance.. There is a large area in
there that is below the 860. The Corps of Engrs generally
allows excavation, but not filling without special
conditions. We are talking about the main drainage in the
blue area which is already flood plain.
The second exhibit shows what we are looking for
ultimately in drainage easements in yellow. In green is the
proposed channel area. Heavy green is the existing channel.
The pipe from #101, to Sebecks is where there is a defined
channel. The rest of the area doesn't have a defined
channel. We took elevations and topos in the area to define
where the lowest area is where the water can be channeled
thru. Koshak felt that this easement area is the ultimate
area to channel water. The orange lines are property owners.
We are talking about future and how we can manage street
water run off in this area.
Mr Koshak talked about the drainage and pipes and what
the different areas had for CFS. He said that we are talking
about future situations and that we would need to channel the
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON LEFESVRES WATERSHED
INFORMATIONAL MEETING OF 11/22/93 AT 6:30PM. - PAGE 2 -
ditch.
Mr Koshak talked about ultimate ditch channels. Typical
sections are trees and vegetation on the Wild and Scenic side
of the creek. We propose to leave that as is and widen the
other side that doesn't have much vegetation in the bottom 4
to 6 feet wide and improve the flow in the creek. Most of
the channel depth would be increased only slightly. The
upper section between Sebeck and 85TH ST, we would construct
a wide swale so it could be farmed (5 to 1). In doing so, we
would provide an efficient waterway and we feel the area
would be enhanced. There would be larger ponds to support
wildlife habitat and wetland environment. We have been
working with Mn/DOT on pipe size under the highway. In the
junction N of #42 and #101 there are pipes under the road.
They are proposing to install additional pipes under that
road. They will be removing the existing pipe and replacing
it by Benesh property. They will push another pipe under
#101 which would increase it to 340 CFS capacity which is
twice what is now needed. Based on The current zoning the
amount would be 165 CFS. Additional pipes will be put in,
two new 42" at Mississippi Riverwood Campgrounds and add
extended 24" pipe at 500' N of Miss. Riverwood Campgrounds,
to bring it up. There are three points of crossing that the
capacity will be added to; 39 and 101 there will be 24' high
8' wide box culvert with capacity of 240 CFS. It would drain
the pond in the corner with an outlet to the river. The box
culvert will go across 39. Mn/DOT is providing the high
volume outlets to the river so there should be adequate
capacity to the river. Upstream, the SE corner W of Quaday
there is 1200 acres that Jim LeFebvre's and Darkenwald will
be limited to the capacity of the culvert under 42. If that
is developed it would need to limit by ponding to 50CFS with
that capacity under 101 and ponding we should be able to
address the future storm drainage. We are looking to address
the need to acquire easements over this area we are talking
about. They are significant in the near future for the
present Zoning situation for the city. There is a need to
preserve that land, an easement is best described as giving
up a partial right on a land. The City rights are limited to
entering the property and construction or maintenance of a
drainage facility. The property owner can not close a ditch
or impair the drainage. The vegetative cutting is not a
function of the drainage easement.
We are interested in acquiring these easements to
preserve that land for the future under a drainage easement.
There is no immediate time frame for a construction project.
There would need to be a petition from owners or a health
threat to get this drainage ditch project started. The DNR
has designated this as a waterway. The only body that can
work in the creek is the City of Otsego. Without an
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON LEFEBVRES WATERSHED
INFORMATIONAL MEETING MINUTES OF 11/22/93 — PAGE 3 —
easement, we can't perform the maintenance tasks. This is
just an informational meeting.
At this point the meeting was turned back to the Mayor
by Mr Koshak.
Andy MacArthur, City Attorney had no comments when
asked, he said he may have some as questions are asked.
Doug Lindenfelser, Council Member asked what is the
width of the easement?
Mr Koshak said it varies and we are willing to
negotiate with the owners. We need an area to operate and
get in to construct where there are existing ponds, we would
include those in the drainage easement.
Larry Fournier, Council Member asked why don't we
increase the capacity under Co Rd #42?
Mr Koshak said that is an option for the City. We would
have to put another pipe in there.
George Sebeck, a resident of the drainage area said that
this year the pipe under #42 went to full capacity and we had
two to two and one-half feet of water in our front yard. Who
will bear the construction cost of the ditch? He asked how
they will get into the property to the ditch?
Mr Koshak said we are not talking about a project now.
There are different ways to fund a project.
1. City general fund, 2. Contribution as someone
develops, 3. assess property owners
Most of this land is flood plain and the question of
development is another issue. Some of the right of way can
be acquired under MSA because we would have easements of
water off of 85TH St. As far as access to the ditch, as each
construction project is done we will acquire access by some
means. The only reason they would come back, is to maintain
the ditch after it is done.
George Sebeck - If you are widening the ditch, and stay
away from the vegetation, you would be coming towards my
house.
Mr Koshak said we are willing to discuss that with the
property owners.
Mr Sebeck, does the City have to prove that you are
improving the property?
Mr MacArthur answered that the market value would have
to be proved and he explained how it works and an appraiser
would have to do that.
Jim LeFebvre asked what direction would the water from
John LeFebvre's farm run?
Mr Koshak said that there is a swale N of the farm that
comes out to the overflow that way. The farm land has
depressions that hold the water. There are ponds in Country
Ridge and when we had that large rain it did overflow.
Diane Sebeck - You express to us that this is wetland
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON LEFEBVRES WATERSHED
INFORMATIONAL MEETING ON 11/22/93 - PAGE 4 -
and you are taking land. There is a public frontage road
going thru this. You are taking valuable land from us that
we may be able to develop after we fill.
Mr Koshak - There is a permit process that the City
would have to go thru.
Diane Sebeck - said her concern is with the wild life.
You are running oil and salt into it. I think you are
insulting us by saying you are increasing wildlifehabitat.
Mr Koshak explained sediment and how it works. Ron
Black, Council Member Said let's assume for discussion
that the entire parcel was owned by one party or a
combination of parties that wanted to develop the property
and can't the City vacate easements if they wished to?
Mr Koshak said that there would have to be significant
ponding if this developed. We don't want to impact the area
any more then it is today. He explained the whole process
more and what they are trying to do. We are talking about
preserving the environment as much as possible and live with
that plan.
George Benesh - A resident of the area said land North
of 101 is in flood plain, but not flooded since 1961. What
will happen with the water running in that creek? Will that
flood into that land?
Mr Koshak - said that floodplain numbers come from FEMA
and they determine, based on the Corps of Engineers the 100
year profile. FEMA says this is flood fringe area. The
floodway is the channel of the river. If you haven't seen it
back up, it might be true, but the Federal Government
established that area. He talked about the pipes being
increased twice in capacity.
Mr Benesh asked what happens if this is drained down and
it sprays up on that land? Only in 1965 was that land under
any water.
Mr Koshak said that the FEMA information is what we deal
with. We are trying to improve the chance that your land
won't flood.
Ron Pouliot - Did you want to do this to this creek so
it stays as it is?
Mr Koshak - We want to maintain the environment. The
land can always be sold.
Mr Pouliot said a 100' easement puts you in the back
door of his house. You would have to take every tree out of
it. If this water is coming from a housing development why
don't they pay.
Mr Koshak said they already have.
Mr Sebeck said he doesn't want to be assessed for the
ditch.
Mr Pouliot - You mean that the DNR would allow you to
put in a ditch.
Mr Koshak said the DNR and the City would work together.
Mr Pouliot - Why not put in pipe?
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON LEFEBVRES WATERSHED
INFORMATIONAL MEETING OF 11/22/93 — PAGE 5 —
Mr Koshak said in Otsego development is the only kind of
thing that would produce funds for drainage.
Mr Pouliot said if you have an improvement, they can put
in pipe at that time.
George Yankoupe - From Darkenwalds, asked if you
anticipate any opposition from the DNR with the ducks and
fish living in the creek?
Mr Koshak said the DNR would come out and look at it,
and they may set some different criteria. They will respect
the ability for the City to look for solutions for their
storm water drainage. We keep DNR appraised.
John Darkenwald - What portion of the watershed is this
portion in?
Mr Koshak - It is the 400 or 500 acre map and SW 1200
acres.
Mr Darkenwald - In the future, how do you protect and
make sure that all the assessments are relatively fair? Is
that a problem?
Mr Koshak - It will have to be developed as a storm
water policy for the City. We are doing initial planning to
have something to go by for future development. There has to
be a policy on how to assess property.
Mr Darkenwald - Said you are only dealing with 1/3 of
the watershed. You talk about 160CFS. Capacity is
50CFS or 1/3.
George Yankoupe - If the system works as it is now, you
are going to require other land owners to put ponds in? Why
do we have to dig the ditch larger?
Mr Koshak - said the City is looking for the ability to
maintain the creek. Someone has to have the ability to
repair and maintain the creek. If we rely on each land owner
along there, it normally wouldn't work.
Darlene Cota - I have excess water that I never had
before. There is starting to be a problem already.
Mr Koshak - This year is one of the wettest years on
record and the water table is quite high. This area has
impervious materials.
Ms Cota - There is an existing problem caused by the
developer and the road.
Mr Koshak - That is very possible.
Mr Sebeck - If this ditch goes thru, it will be
splitting our property. Do they put in a culvert, or what?
Mr Koshak - We have to provide access to the other side
if we split your property.
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING ON LEFEBVRES WATERSHED
INFORMATIONAL MEETING OF 11/22/93 - PAGE 6
Floyd Roden motioned to close the Lefebvre Watershed
Informational Meeting. Ron Black seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously. Meeting closed at 7:35PM.
CITY OF OTSEGO:
ak-12--41-
MAY, R ORMAN F FRESKE D U$ND NFELS , COUNCIL
F OYD
UNCIL LARR
RO' BLACK, C NCfL
ATTEST:
E rRE BEATTY,
DEPUTY CLERK/ZONING ADM.
EB
oPa-144-W
OURNIER, COUNCIL