04-20-1995 Board of Review MinutesCITY OF OTSEGO
BOARD OF REVIEW
APRIL 20, 1995
7PM
OTSEGO CITY HALL
Roll Call: Mayor, Norman F. Freske, Council Members: Larry Fournier, Vern Heidner, Suzanne
Ackerman and Ron Black.
City Assessor, Pete Merges, Assistant County Assessor Randy DesMarais.
Staff: Elaine Beatty, Clerk/Zoning Administrator, Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk
Mayor Freske opened the Board of Revenue Meeting at 7 PM.
Mr. DesMarais stated that we are here to talk about the 1995 valuation and classification.
Any decisions and changes made tonight will be done by the City Council.
Pete Merges went over the attached Report, Changes made in 1994.
He stated that residential homes received a 5% increase on their homes and farms received a 10%
increase on their land. This increase was done throughout the county.
1 Richard and MichelleNietfeld,118 500-221205, 8891 Parrish Avenue NE
Mrs. Nietfled said they are being taxed for same improvement two years in a row.
Pete said new construction started in 1993, 50% went on for 1994 and 50% went on for 1995.
Total market value = $126,300.
Walls, light fixtures, fans, need to be installed.
Pete went over what is exactly completed. Per Pete 82% is completed.
Pete added $11,700 last year and added $10,400 this year. The increase this year should have
been $4,800. Completion amounts to $16,571 instead of $20,136.00 as of now.
Pete recommends to decease by $5,600.
CM Black motioned to reduce valuation of Parcel 118-500-221205 by $5,600. Seconded by
CM Fournier. All in favor. Motioned carried. Discussion: Council stated that Pete
Merges should review this.
2. Bill Olson, 118-500-202101, 8789 NashuaAvenue.
Mr. Olson passed out information sheets (attached) showing his taxes increased 134% in two
years and market value increased 155% in two years.
Pete said value is at $59,000 and should be $56,200 a difference of $2,800.00.
Went up 5% before it was reduced.
CM Fournier motioned to reduce value from $59,000 to $56,200 a difference of $2,800. on
Parcel 118-500-202101. Seconded by CM Heidner. All in favor. Motion carried.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 2.
i , • :-I, :-1 1 1 1
Value increased from $110,000 to $130,000 per Pete.
Mr. Bethke said that based upon evaluation by Ce
it is 21,1,4 $130,000 is too high.
Per Pete, square footage is 1,329. Per Mr.
9.
No landscaping has been done.
Pete recommended to lower to $116,900. The $130,000. is incorrect. on Parcel
CM Black approved Pete Merge's recommendation to lower value to $116,900
118-048-002070. Seconded by CM Fournier. All in favor. Motion carried.
��• I • ,•so• :-1 -II $ ' IL •a •I •
Ms. Hoppe said the value went from $72,400 to $74,300. She saidIIhe value of ths is a HUD iHome, she
is
a
first time home owner, home needs more repair than she thought
t
what she thought it was. Pete said he reviewed r Pete MeMerges review 8 and she paid 2this0 parOcel. Seconded
CM Black motioned to have the City Assessor,
b Fournier. All in favor. Motion carried. Discussion: Review date of April 25, 1995, 9:15
Y
AM was set and Michelle Hoppe will be there.
Value went from $102,400. to $130,300. pool house of 20 X 24.
Mr. Cailler said his home is 4 levels, in ground swimming pool,
Pete was there November 15, 1994.
20 X 20 deck = $1,800.00
Central Air = $1,200.00
Basement finish, 600 sq. ft. = $9,456.00t
Per Randy DesMarais there were $16,800.00 worth of increase that o a en't pg area sly assessed.
This was in the review area this year. The Garage was converted
which went on
CM Fournier motioned to have assessors review this parcel.for the first time this year.
Secondedoe ab y CM9 45 M. l ck. Al
in favor. Motion carried. Discussion: Review date of April25,
t. .. e, :-14 -1 I 1 1 l000.
IL. II
Pete was there on November 28, 1994 and lowered value from , e00 o $20,00. This house
needs siding and windows. Pete also mentioned that the lot value wu
CM Fournier motioned to have the assessors do a review
o a a s Kolbparcel.
is sc M Heule fordneseveral
r
seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. Discussion:
medical exams . She will call for appointment.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 3.
• :-1 -I I 111 4 : ► :
1 appraised this property sement, d at $10 in 1990. 0 l88 squalower re City's.
for house and
Mr. Valerius said Mel Beaudry
Pete said this is a double e 1 Land isde on a valued at $20,000 for 1 acre.
880 square feet for garage.
CM Heidner motioned for assessors to review this parcel. Seconded b AM Bas lack.seAll in
Pete was there in 1992.y CM
favor. Motion carried. Discussion: Review of April 25, 19
: U • •. 1 r 1.'
Valuation went from $91,100 to $95,100.
Mrs. Chrisinger said this is a one level rambler with no basement, 1,160 square feet.
Pete had 1,200 square feet.
Pete figures the difference of 40 square feet.
The land is valued at $21,500.
Wood fireplace = $1,200.00
Garage = $8,064.00
House = $51,678.00
TOTAL = $82,442.00
CM Fournier motioned to lower valuation from $95,100
to $82,442.00
82,tion carried.
do Parcele
118-037-001090. Seconded by CM Black. All in
1 11 i _ 1 1 :-
-11 1 1 'is •11•
osto is appealing the property value Value went from $86,000 to $88,300. He hada
Mr. Ag
market value anyalis and top price would be $80,000.
There is a full basement but unfinished, total electric home, basement water control system, clay
soil, very few ramblers in Island Estates,
1 bath, 1 acre.
Per Pete, he has $3,300 worth of
basement
f
sec
n
CM Black motioned to have the assessors review this parcel. CM Ackerman 1995 o d AM I
d. All
April
in ffavor. Motion carried. Discussion. A review date was set for p i
1 ► 11
Value went up from $149,800. to $154,900.
Pete review in 1993.
have been
inc. ries
Kohler said he was down for 2 fireplaces and there is only onee. t There
h Scott had several in
increases in two years, other houses out there haven't gone up t
pictures of different houses throughout the city which he feels are comparable to his but are
valued lower. has been done, no pave roads and no
No basement finish, no deck, yard is in but no landscaping
park in Island View.
Pete explained that he goes by mostly
feet built in 993es in atHe adjustedthebasic quality of the home by
Pete had down for 1,182 square
one-half of a grade.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 4.
Pete lowered the one fireplace by $2,500., and lowered
valuation of $145.700.
CM Fournier motioned to lowervaluation of Parcel
by Black All in favor. Motion ra
rried.
the concrete driveway by $500. for a new
118-121-005100 to $145,700. Seconded
i" : I 1 :-1 '-11 1 1 •.' : II 11"
Mr. Birosh's trailer house burned down in August of 1993
Pete said he
will take off the value of $5,000 for house, $291. for the skirting and the addition of
$1,200.00.
The garage is left, valued at $3,300. and
roii $25,900 to $19,300.s valued at ) Seconded by CM Heidner.
CM Black motioned to lower value
All in favor. Motion carried.
►��•
,• 1 �., :-:11- ' u. ��
Mr. Brown said his valuation went up $5,000.00
Per Pete, the house received a 5% increase for 1995, land stayed the same, 5 acres.
Mr. Brown said he psvalued 0 0. for $97 200 this.
Per Pete this parcel
iNO CHANGE
II 1' ' :' ' '.raised at
Ms. Thell said her valuation has gone up from $81,500 to $90,700. She hadapp
$75,000.
CM25,
Black motioned to have the assessors review this parcel. is ero Seconded
by
y5 at Ackerman.
rman.
All in favor. Motion carried. Discussion. Date of RevsApril
Valuation went up $7,000. up to $167,900.
Per Glen Posusta, there is 1,735 square
fet feet,air
reducingl1/3 of basement is finished.
the square footage and basement finish,
Pete had a difference of 660 square
could reduce value to $160,900.00, a $7,600. difference.
CM Heidner
motioned to lower value of Parcel 118-121-001060 to $116,300.00 Seconded by
CM Black. All in favor. Motion carried.
:.1 -'-II 1 1 '. 1 ► •' •, 1 :
•
' � � •
Value went up to $106,300. started at $100,700. His value was adjusted last year from $111,000.
5
County assessors were out there in June 1993. Pete raised it up tof ,70m,the $13 on thea little bit re than
the 5%. Garage went up to $1,600, all garages went up to $15. sq.
ones. It has now been reduced to $12.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 5.
Square footage of house = 1,072
no basement finish
garage = $11,880.
house = $62,800.
total = $75,600.
land = $30,700.
Total = $106,300.00 Pete recommends no change.
NO CHANGE
:-:II 0'11 1::1► I I
House built in 1994. 6.5 Class rating.
House 30x50 (1,780 sq. ft), = $89,178.00, 1994, 50% complete, 1995 its complete
Garage = $15,120.00
Air = $1,200.
Bath in basement = $1,200.
Deck = $2,250.00
Pole Shed = $8,500. for the 30 X 50 heated part
Pole Shed = $15,450. for the 50 X75 remaining area, 14 ft. sides.
Land, 1 acre for home = $12,000.
Land, 22 acres, Grade B, tillable, green acres = $19,800.
Market value on 22 acres would be $45,760 plus $12,000 for $57,760.00 on the land.
Total $165,600 estimate market value green acres
Roger thinks land should be valued as what the government paid him for the land at $1,05$194,600. TOTAL
. an
acre for the MnRoad Project (70th Street).
Roger's concern was the land value.
NO CHANGE
•I It ., l• -I I -I I I' 1 • 416. ::04
�
Mr. Regnier said his value went up to $132,400 from $127,000. The basement is 75% finished.
He built it for $81,000 in 1992.
Land = $22,000.
Basement finish = $6,532.00
Extra fixtures in basement = $1,200.
Other garage = $11,056.00
Pete figured there has been a total of $19,588 increased of improvement since he built the house.
Appraised at $119,500. in 1994.
CM Fournier motioned to have the assessors review �RReview date set for April 25, 1995 at
s parcel. Seconded by CM
Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. Discussion:
Noon.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 6.
„ 1. I : -I' -II 1 I :III e1 •I : •, •
$78,100. Mr. Chouinard asked about the $41. Solid Waste
Valuation went from $75,700 to g ested that Mr.
Assessment. Mayor Freske explained about theCompost
mpr. LSFacility.
�M B1acel aSc su
increased by the 5%
Chouinard talk to Pat Sawatzke, his County Co
per Pete.
NO CHANGE
Ms. Berg was concerned with property class.
rezoned her property. The Tax rate is the same. County looks at the use and not the
The Count y
zoning.
NO CHANGE
;.1' 1-11 1 1' s 1 h '' ,
Value went up from $114,100. to $133,100.
we didn't have it on as a two story until he visited in October
story.
4 He has missed the
modified two story. This made a $19,
Pete said 600 difference adding on secondry
with roof, 1 fireplace, 1 deck, no air,
No basement finish, 22x22 garage, 8x20 entry way
1792 sq. feet of finish area built in 1991
House = $99,600, garage
NO CHANGE, he just wanted to check out.
I• :-I' -1I 11 :i1 •1 •�
Mr. Archer can't use his basement because of water problems and he wants the valuation lowered.
He lives by Hall's Pond and the house was built in 1981.
Pete said this house is a Grade 6. His land was increased by $5,000 last year. Valuation
increased broom $65,700 to $69,000. by CM Fournier. All in
CM Black motioned to the Assessors reviewd is tenet for May 3 arcel. s, at AM.
favor. Motion carried. Discussion: Review
:-1 -1 1 1 ' $ ' , o : so t.• 6,I� . � • � • _ • purchased Mr. Gloege said he has lived there for 2.5years. He place for $77,600. in 1992.
the
Valuation has gone up from $83,500 to $86,700.
Pete said the increase is due to the 5%. This is graded a 6.5.
NO CHANGE
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 7.
14 . , A . . :-1' -I I 1 1
Mr. Wallace said his valuation has gone up to $96,300,
9, 0, tar drive was omitted in 1992 and went
Per Pete, the land value went up this year by $2,500,
on for 1995 at $500. and the deck is now gone.
Per Mark, the deck went back on, a 14 X 24.
Pete said this would add $1,500.
Addition put on in 1988, 24 X 14 = $14,657.00
Garage = $4,256.00
Basement finish = $1,365 (140 sq. ft.)
12 X 20 Shed = $1,200.00
NO CHANGE
11- x..11 :$ . :• ► :
For the last 3 years, valuation has gone up 24%. From$149,400. and (40 acres 8or more)ost the 0. no new buildi5%ngs.
Pete explained that the State put a 10% increase on fa
depreciation on the house this year.
House, garage and 1 acre = $62,600.
The land last year had $113,600. for market value. New value is $124,960. This year the land is
$126,300.
NO CHANGE
• • . .1 :-1 -11 1 1 I 1 ► 11 ' '"'
She wrote saying she doesn't think her home is worth more than $50,000. It is a double wide.
Pete has a total value of $59.000. to $57 400.
In April of 1994, brought it down from $63,400.
CM Black motioned no change, to leave valuation at $5e�,000a Thwas due to general economic
s property was reviewed
last year and an adjustment was made. This year's increased
impact. Seconded by CM Heidne�� ll in favor. looked at last yyear and adjusotion • tment were made.
to leave at 59,000, this property
Pete looked at this parcel in December 1991, the house was not done. Pete was there again now.
House, 1,3808 square feet = $42.80 sq. ft, Pete has $45.40.
House = $59,064.00
Garage = $9,360.00 6.
there is a gas fireplace and extra bath. Pete dropped grade todown
reead with
the
building
site is $15,000. The 3 acres is $8,475, should drop to $5,400( depreciation economics
because the land is poor). Pete suggested to lower from $97,500 to $83,100.
CM Heidner motioned to accept lowering the valuation from 97,an00 .S tgo $83,100
drop.on
Parcel
118-800-144401 for reasons of the 10% economic depreciation
Seconded by CM Black. All in favor. Motion carried.
Board of Review, April 20, 1995, cont'd. Page 8.
27. Alvin Beaudry,118-500-301100.24Lcres, tillable
Wants this land adjusted according to the SCS Office Maps. There are 6.3 acres that he wants
classified as Waste B Land.
CM Black motioned to have Alvin Beaudry's land adjusted according to the SCS Maps,
from 24 acres to 17.7 acres tillable, a change of 6.3 acres to be classified as Waste B Land,
Seconded by CM Fournier. All in favor. Motion carried.
28. Ken Shierts, 118-010-085050. (not present)
Value is at $101,600.00
Land increased from $18,000 to $21,000.
Basement finish, currently at $8.24 sq. ft, Pete suggested changing to $5. sq. ft.
The house is old, built in 1965. $101,600.00. for
CM Fournier motioned to accept loweringValuation CM Black ssecondedfrom All in favor.
reasons of lower basement valuation and and value.
Motion carried.
29. Todd Huss, 118-049-004080,
Letter written, he says his basement isn't finished. PerPete, 50% finished at
$9.695.00.
CM Fournier motioned to lower value from $135,800 to$126,100.00 onParcel
118-049-004080. Seconded by CM Heidner. All in favor. Motion carried.
CM Fournier motioned to RECESS BOARD OF REVVIE d until May 8,1995, at 6 PM.
Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion,
cry -
Mayor or an F. Freske
Ronald G. Black, Councilmember
Suzanne M. S. Ackerman, Councilmember
Att
Hudson, Deputy Clerk
CITY SEAL
ouncilmember
Vern Heidner, Councilmember
Farms -
Changes made in 1994
The State put a 10% increase on farm
land,this was done pretty much county wide
The increase was put on the market value,
so it will not have a big effect on the tax
dollar The green acre value changed a little
also,
A land went from $1,030060
per acre to $1 $i,,
B land went from $890 per
acre to $ acre to $ 900
600
C land went from $630 per
In the past the farm house and garage weres
given a 15% reduction in value for tax pure
os
The out buildings also got a 15% reduction in
value. Now the house and garage no longer get
the 15% reduction, the out buildings still get
the reduction. This is on farms that have 40
acres or more. As you can see this can make a
big increase in value. There is oam 5%h
increase on the house, this is pretty
county wide.
Sample--- house- $75000
Garage- $5000
Total- $80000
X85%
$68000 value for 1994 assessment
House- $75000
X5% increase for 1995 assessment
$78750
Garage- $5000
Total- $83750 Value for 1995 assessment,tThe is
a $15750 increase over last years
reason this 15% increase was put on all at one
time and not phased in is that it was not
phased in when it was taken off.
By doing this it will get our estimated
market value closer to the selling price, and
hopefully the state will not give us another
increase for some time.
Vassuer 4th -
The lot values went from $20,000 to $21,000
except for a few with water problem, they
were not changed.
Walesh est. Lot values went from $20,000 to $21,500
Halls 2nd-
Lot values went from $20,000 to $22,000
Beaudrys add- Lot values went from $20,000 to $21,500
Miss shores 4th- Lot values went from $20,000 to $22,000
2
Deerfield acres- Lot values went from $20,000 to $22,000
Miss shores 5th- Lot values went from $20,000 to $22,000
The market value went to $15,000 on each
Meyer add- As long lot, they were at $1,400.g as Jerry
keeps farming the lots he will get the green
acre value and only pay taxes on the green acre
value.As the lots are sold they will go on at
the market value.
Billstroms add- The lots on the river are valued at $32,500
for the first 100 feet and $100 per foot after
100 feet.The lots not on the river arevalued
at $20,000. There was one sale this ye
is why there was some changes made. The sale
was for $220,000 and I had it valued at
$137,900, or 63%of what it sold for.We do
not usually like to work with only one sale,
but this sale showed us that something had to
be done. this area will be watched for further
changes
New houses -
Pole sheds -
Other
Schools --
Total --
BUILDING PERMITS
43
6
75
1
125
There were 132 sales in 1994,this includes
bare land sales,improved lot sales,and farm
sales.
This pretty much covers what was done in
199,5. It takes a lot of time to go over the
sales and data that is collected in order to
come up with a fair dollar amount to arrive
at a fair estimated market value. The county
assessors office does a lot of this work for
us, but we do help with and work with them and
try to keep the values fair through out the
county.
I would also like to take this opportunity
to thank the Otsego city council for their
support in the past and now. It makes my job
a lot easier knowing that we can sit down and
talk in order to come up with a solution to a
problem, should one come up.
THANK YOU
Pete Merges
City assessor
SJJV3A Z NI 3SV3210NI %V£I-
•
saxel po°1,
SUV3A Z NI 3SVaIONI °/0g9 I.
•
anigAllIAlls3
0
CD
CD
40
CD
42k
0
0
c")0
0
0
(0
Ul
4tb,
0
0
Irs
11
118-500-202101
OLSON, WILLIAM 0 E VICKI L
8789 NASHUA AV NE
ELK RIVER MN 55330
1ST HALF TAX
PENALTY
TOTAL
H
514.36
F NAME AMR ADDRESS AS SHOWN ARE NOT CORRECT,CHECK
BOX AND MAKE CORRECTION BELOW.
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY.
YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT
THIS STUB MUST ACCOMPANY SECOND HALF PAYMENTND HALF 995
PAY TO WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER ON OR BEFORE 2 PAY STUB
OCTOBER 15, 1995 TO AVOID PENALTY. REAL ESTATE TAXES
PLEASE READ BACK OF FORM FOR PAYMENT PROCEDURE.
118-500-202101
OLSON, WILLIAM 0 E VICKI.L
8789 NASHUA AV NE
ELK RIVER MN 55330
REAL ESTATE TAXES PAYABLE IN 1995 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
OpWNERHA".Ei! Sp NI a �j PROPERTY CLASS*
r:
PROPERTY 1 r gial01 5.59 PEACRES
to
' .CITY OF OTSEGO
SECT -20 TWP-121 RANG -23
(; UNPLATTED LAND
S AT AGL
AT R
TOENOF N1/20F/4
L TLLSNO9NW/T
ASMSD NEW IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL TAX
1,028.72
2ND HALF TAX
514.36
PENALTY
H
TOTAL
F NAME AND/OR ADDRESS AS SHOWN ARE NOT CORRECT, CHECK
BOX AND MAKE CORRECTION BELOW.
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY.
0
TAX.PAYE-?S COPY
r
0
N
3 FORMS 8062-3690
w
i
f
ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE O.
TAXPAYERS 23994 TAXABLE MARKET VALUE ►
OLSON. WILLIAM D E VICKI L
8789 NASHUA AV NE
ELK RIVER MN 55330
44,900
38,900
54:700
44 200
TAX CAPACITY
1. Use this amount on Form M-1 PR to see if you're eligible for a property tax refund. _._-....
File by August 15. If box is checked, you owe delinquent taxes and are not eligible
2. Use this amount for the special property tax refund on schedule 1 on Form M-1PR. _
Your Property Tax And How It Is Reduced By The State
3. Your property tax before reduction by state -paid aids and credits ..._..._............_...........
4. Aid paid by the state of Minnesota to reduce your property tax ......__..._........._._....._ .....__
5. Credits paid by the state of Minnesota to reduce your property tax:
A. Homestead and agricultural credit....._._..............._......__........__.._...._...............____._......._.
B. Other credits
6. Your property tax after reduction by state -paid aids and credits ._.....__.._.._._ ............... _._..___..._......__...
Where Your Property Tax Dollars Go
7. County .._._....................._.__._._.........._.........__.....__................_..__....._........._
6. City or town ......
9. School district _T+ _$ A. Excess levy referenda tax
ax
10. Special taxing district: A. R41513`/9 MI I tL DISTRICT --
B. I STW ICTB.
11. Non -school voter approved referenda levies _....._.._..........
12. Total property tax before special assessments _._.._._......__._.._.._.._.._____.._......._.
13. Sp c' a ssments to th ro t bi I: _..._....._......_.._..._._.....__......
A.3U U WASTE SEf�1��GE HG
B. NE NASHUA AVE
C.OTHER SPECIALS
14. Your total property tax and speclal assessments ... _..._._..._..___
PAY THIS AMOUNT NO LATER THAN MAY 15, 1995
510.50
1,809.20
725.49
573.21
.00
572.04
1677.57
642.98
.00
510.50
124.34
109.58
20.43
245.48
10.67
510.50
375.68
40.00
926.18
572.04
136.20
152.31
22.40
249.71
11.42
572.04
41.00
375.68
40.00
1,028.72
PAY THIS AMOUNT NO LATER THAN OCTOBER 15, 1995
You may be eligible for one or even two refunds to reduce your property tax.
Read the back of this statement to find out how to apply.
ESCROW AGENT NO.
514.36
514.36
JN -r v o,
O
I Z.
t5 m
d O
.7 dy
7856
Bill & Vicki Olson
8789 Nashua Ave. N.E.
Elk River, MN 55330
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
Wright County Assessor
Wright County Government Center
10 N.W. 2nd Street
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1193
Phone: (612) 682-7367 / (612) 682-7368
Metro: (612) 339-6881
FAX: (612) 682-6178
May 11, 1994
Re: PID #118-500-202101
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Olson:
Per the local Board of Review, your 1994 estimated market value was
reduced from $57,800 to $54,700.
Thank you for taking the time to show us your property on Apr i I 28,
1994.
Sincerely,
Ded
Randal L. DesMarais
Assistant Wright County Assessor
cc: Jerome Perrault, Otsego City Clerk
RLD/ga
Wright County Assessors Office
10 2nd St. NW Rm 240
Buffalo, MN 55313-1183
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT YEAR 1995 PAYABLE YEAR 1996
PID 118-500-202101 5.59AC
PROPERTY CLASS
RES/FULL HSTD
PRESORTED FIRST CLASS
U.S. POSTAGE PAID 1 OZ.
BUFFALO, MN 55313
PERMIT NO. 000005
OLSON. WILLIAM
8789 NASHUA AV
ELK RIVER MN
SECT -20 TWP-121 RANG -23
UNPLATTED LAND
S350FT MSD AT R AGL TO S LN,OF E696.03FT
1, ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE
2. UMITED MARKET VALUE
3. VALUE EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS
4. TAXABLE MARKET VALUE S 49. 1 0 0
CITY OR TOWN BOARD OF REVIEW MEETING: APRIL 20TH AT 7:00 P.M.
L
49,100
0 t:. VICKI L
NE
55330
59,000