The URL can be used to link to this page

04-23-07 ITEM 5 - CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 23, 2007 TO: Judy Hudson Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 04 -11 -2007 $ 178,788.62 04 -16 -2007 $ 497.00 04 -18 -2007 $ 115,198.77 PAYROLL 04 -11 -2007 $ 38,030.99 GRAND TOTAL $ 332,515.38 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 04/11/07 10:15 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© APRIL 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt .'k....,n, - %: "> . `V1 h'ikk M..4ali�ri AT _.. '4c . M a >.da..eWS < .. '. .,,, C },. �'.%?;14...4i ,a £kY'' sCM, ` 3 a xs'::tRtM 1. S�t :' , .'ir-�r, . .faS e'r,.,°; 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $489.48 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 UnPaid DOBOSZENSKI & SONS $146,380.79 OTSEGO CREEK RESTORATION UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.22 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 UnPaid KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION $26,987.35 PARKS CONSTRUCTION UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME $4,107.78 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 Total Checks $178,788.62 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/11/07 10:15 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© APRIL 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt a c ' a s ..mo w t ts: 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $489.48 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 UnPaid DOBOSZENSKI & SONS $146,380.79 OTSEGO CREEK RESTORATION UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.22 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 UnPaid KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION $26,987.35 PARKS CONSTRUCTION UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME $4,107.78 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 Total Checks $178,788.62 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/11/07 10:15 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid �, ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP _�- �.� >..,<., �..a.,�,��.�._� . �.. b��..-.,,. �,. ��„--.,... �H�.. �, G 101 -21706 Hospitalization /Medical Ins $489.48 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 Total ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $489.48 Unpaid DOBOSZENSKI & SONS E 408 -43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $146,380.79 PAY 2 OTSEGO CREEK RESTORATION Total DOBOSZENSKI & SONS $146,380.79 Unpaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST G 101 -21705 Other Retirement $611.00 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $212.22 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.22 Unpaid KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION E 203 -45210 -500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $26,987.35 PAY 6 PARKS CONSTRUCTION Total KNIFE RIVER CORPORATION $26,987.35 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 602 -49450 -121 PERA $22.04 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 601 - 49400 -121 PERA $22.04 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 250 -42410 -121 PERA $655.28 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 G 101 -21704 PERA $1,968.30 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 101 -43100 -121 PERA $693.12 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $376.30 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 E 101 -41600 -121 PERA $370.70 PPE 4/7 CH DTD 4/11 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $4,107.78 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $178,788.62 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $4,721.12 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT $26,987.35 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $655.28 408 Otsego Creek Watershed $146,380.79 601 WATER FUND $22.04 602 SEWER FUND $22.04 $178,788.62 CITY OF OTSEGO 04/16/07 1:10 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ APRIL 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid PCHELP, LTD $497.00 VEHICLE MAINT SOFTWARE LICENSE Total Checks $497.00 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/16/07 1:10 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid PCHELP, LTD E 101 -43100 -310 Miscellaneous $497.00 3757 VEHICLE MAINT SOFTWARE LICENSE Total PCHELP, LTD $497.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $497.00 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $497.00 $497.00 CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:02 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© APRIL 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AARON STRITESKY $527.64 EASTER EGG HUNT SUPPLIES UnPaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION $163.40 MARCH PORTA RENTALS UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $25.69 ACETYLENE /HAZMAT /OXYGEN UnPaid BEAR ALARMS $74.55 NEW USER CODES /PEOPLESERVICE UnPaid BENCO EQUIPMENT $4,500.25 SHELVING UnPaid BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF $6,361.00 FIN - MAY UnPaid BRENT KOLLES $90.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY $2,759.07 PUMPHOUSE #3 UnPaid CITY OF OTSEGO $1,289.66 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF UnPaid CP TELECOM $602.41 TELEPHONE UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMEN $168.33 NUTS, BOLTS, SHAFT, BAR UnPaid CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT $246.78 CABLES UnPaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $63.85 SUPPLIES - PW UnPaid DAVID CASTLE $249.12 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid DEHNS 4 SEASONS $21.03 OIL UnPaid DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATIO $2,000.00 PW IRRIGATION - 1ST DRAW UnPaid DISTINCTIVE HOMES $1,000.00 7455 LAMONT - LNDSCP ESC REFUND UnPaid DON MASS $1,590.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $2,884.41 CLEAN UP DAY AD UnPaid EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES IN $846.09 BLDG - MAY UnPaid FORT DEARBORN LIFE $807.29 APR - ADMIN UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTE $761.77 UNIFORMS UnPaid GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $240.85 LOCATE TICKETS UnPaid HAROLD LEONARD $90.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid IIMC $115.00 JUDY HUDSON MEMBERSHIP UnPaid INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCI $1,107.46 INSPECTION MANUALS UnPaid JOE ABRAHAMSON $90.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid JUDY & COLLIN RUCH $280.00 SEPTIC PUMP - BY SCHLUENDER UnPaid KNUTSON RICK $90.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRAT $65.00 APRIL FEE - FLEX UnPaid MENARDS $389.81 SCREWS, BITS UnPaid MN DEPT OF NATL RESOURCES $400.00 APP FEE - OTSEGO CREEK CULVERT REPL UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $70.00 ANIMAL CONTROL UnPaid NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMEN $856.36 3" SEMI TRASH PUMP, TRIMMER RACK, HE UnPaid NOVA COMMUNICATIONS $5,692.10 PW PHONE SYSTEM UnPaid OFFICEMAX $18.64 STAMP UnPaid PAT LAUNDERVILLE $90.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE UnPaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $65,910.00 MONTHLY SERVICE - MAY UnPaid REED BUSINESS INFORMATION $330.04 AD FOR BIDS - WELL #8, PH #2 IMPR UnPaid SCHARBER & SONS $738.57 TRIMMER, BLOWER UnPaid SHERWIN - WILLIAMS CO. $149.39 TENNIS BACKBOARD PAINT UnPaid STERLING CUSTOM HOMES $1,000.00 11337 75TH - LNDSCP ESC REFUND UnPaid TIMBERLANE HOMES INC $1,000.00 11628 77TH ST - LNDSCP ESC UnPaid TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS IN $198.13 TOSHIBA COPIER UnPaid TR COMPUTER SALES LLC $3,717.71 PERMITWORKS BUSINESS LIC SOFTWARE UnPaid TROPHIES PLUS $20.77 BADGES, ENGRAVING - RON, ANDY, LAURI UnPaid UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI $2,000.00 POSTAGE FOR W/S UnPaid WASTE MANAGEMENT $30.39 ROADSIDE TRASH DISPOSAL UnPaid XCEL ENERGY $3,476.21 8899 NASHUA AVE Total Checks $115,198.77 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:03 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid AARON STRITESKY E 101 -45250 -440 Recreation Programming $527.64 EASTER EGG HUNT SUPPLIES Total AARON STRITESKY $527.64 Unpaid - AFFORDABLE SANITATION E 101- 45250 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) $163.40 6646 MARCH PORTA RENTALS Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $163.40 Unpaid AIRGAS, INC. E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $25.69 105479132 ACETYLENE/HAZMAT /OXYGEN Total AIRGAS, INC. $25.69 Unpaid BEAR ALARMS E 602 -49450 -390 Contracted Services $37.27 2450 NEW USER CODES /PEOPLESERVICE E 601 -49400 -390 Contracted Services $37.28 2450 NEW USER CODES /PEOPLESERVICE Total BEAR ALARMS $74.55 Unpaid BENCO EQUIPMENT E 206 -43100 -501 Equipment $4,500.25 5- 000605 SHELVING Total BENCO EQUIPMENT $4,500.25 Unpaid BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN E 250 -42410 -123 Health $2,171.00 BLDG - MAY E 101 -41400 -123 Health $2,225.00 ADMIN - MAY E 101 -41600 -123 Health $588.00 FIN - MAY E 101 -43100 -123 Health $1,377.00 PW - MAY Total BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $6,361.00 Unpaid BRENT KOLLES E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total BRENT KOLLES $90.00 Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 601 -49400 -322 Utilities $152.27 PUMPHOUSE #3 E 601 -49400 -322 Utilities $20.21 PUMPHOUSE #3 E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $1,758.29 WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $709.57 EAST WWTF E 601 -49400 -322 Utilities $118.73 PUMPHOUSE #2 Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $2,759.07 Unpaid CITY OF OTSEGO E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $6.39 10400 71ST ST - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $6.39 15501 83RD ST - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $6.39 6480 MASON AVE - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $6.39 11313 77TH ST - IRR E 602 - 49450 -322 Utilities $6.39 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $6.60 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $969.77 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $192.42 17330 53RD ST - EAST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $88.92 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF Total CITY OF OTSEGO $1,289.66 Unpaid CP TELECOM E 101 -41400 -320 Telephone $150.60 TELEPHONE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $150.60 TELEPHONE E 25042410 -320 Telephone $301.21 TELEPHONE CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:03 PM Page 2 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total CP TELECOM $602.41 Unpaid bs-- —., -- CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $168.33 123444 NUTS, BOLTS, SHAFT, BAR Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $168.33 Unpaid CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT E 101 -43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $246.78 FP124222 CABLES Total CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT $246.78 Un aid P CUB FOODS ELK RIVER E 101 -41400 -203 Supplies - General $56.10 MISC SUPPLIES E 101 -43100 -203 Supplies - General $7.75 SUPPLIES - PW Total CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $63.85 ,Unpaid . ,,'� DAVID CA STLE E 441 -43100 -520 Buildings and Structures $36.00 BALL VALVE IN OIL ROOM - PW BL E 250 -42410 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 250 -42410 -321 Mileage/Travel $62.08 MILEAGE - 3/13 & 3/14 SEMINAR E 250 -42410 -321 Mileage/Travel $31.04 MILEAGE - 4/5 SEMINAR E 250 -42410 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $30.00 FEB, MAR, APR INSP MTG LUNCHEO E 250 -42410 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total . DAVID CASTLE $249.12 »19,5.R.. ,na.,,.xf..� Unpaid DEHNS 4 SEASONS E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $21.03 67219 OIL Total DEHNS 4 SEASONS $21.03 Unpaid DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATION E 441 -43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $2,000.00 740 PW IRRIGATION - 1ST DRAW Total DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATION $2,000.00 Unpaid DISTINCTIVE HOMES E 702 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 7455 LAMONT - LNDSCP ESC REFUN Total DISTINCTIVE HOMES $1,000.00 Und DON MASS - pai E 101- 43100 -410 Rentals (GENERAL) $1,500.00 USE OF TOOLS/TOOL RENTAL E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total DON MASS $1,590.00 Unpaid - ECM PUBLISHERS INC E 101 -43620 -390 Contracted Services $263.50 238781 CLEAN UP DAY AD E 250 - 42410 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $37.00 239133 BLDG SEC HELP WANTED AD E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $118.80 239264 LEGAL - ASSESSMENT NOTICE E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $207.90 239265 LEGAL - ORDINANCE E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $1,121.18 239266 LEGAL - ORDINANCE E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $133.65 239847 LEGAL - PUBLIC HEARING E 601 -49400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $735.08 239848 LEGAL - DRINKING WATER REPORT E 444 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing $267.30 239858 LEGAL - AD FOR BIDS Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $2,884.41 Unpaid EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES INC E 101 -41400 -123 Health $354.80 ADMIN - MAY E 250 -42410 -123 Health $227.09 BLDG - MAY E 101 -43100 -123 Health $163.22 PW - MAY E 101 -41600 -123 Health $100.98 FIN - MAY CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:03 PM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES INC $846.09 Unpaid FORT DEARBORN LIFE E 101 - 43100 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $250.46 APR - PW E 101 -41600 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $148.55 APR - FIN E 250 -42410 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $238.33 APR - BLDG E 10141400 -130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $169.95 APR - ADMIN Total FORT DEARBORN LIFE $807.29 Unpaid - . a ... . P G & K TEXTILE LEASIN SYSTEM E 10143100 -225 Uniforms $97.62 1043418161 UNIFORMS E 10141940 -390 Contracted Services $121.67 1043423148 MATS E 101 -43100 -225 Uniforms $166.59 1043423149 UNIFORMS E 10143100 -225 Uniforms $115.19 1043428053 UNIFORMS E 10141940 -390 Contracted Services $121.67 1043433026 MATS E 10143100 -225 Uniforms $139.03 1043433027 UNIFORMS Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $761.77 Unpaid P GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC ____ E 25042410 -310 Miscellaneous $240.85 7030691 LOCATE TICKETS Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $240.85 Unpaid HAROLD LEONARD E 25042410 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE E 250 -42410 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE Total HAROLD LEONARD $90.00 Unpaid IIMC E 101 - 41400 -355 Dues & Memberships $115.00 JUDY HUDSON MEMBERSHIP Total IIMC $115.00 Unpaid INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC E 250 -42410 -203 Supplies - General $1,107.46 282966 -IN INSPECTION MANUALS Total INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL INC $1,107.46 Unpaid JOE ABRAHAMSON -- E 25042410 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 25042410 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total JOE ABRAHAMSON $90.00 Unpaid JUDY & COLLIN RUCH G 701 -22426 FIN PLAT ARBOR CRK 3 $280.00 SEPTIC PUMP - BY SCHLUENDER Total JUDY & COLLIN RUCH $280.00 �_ . Unpaid KNUTSON RICK -�-� __ ..„, E 10143100 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total KNUTSON RICK $90.00 Unpaid ,„ _�.._.�. P MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS E 10141400 -390 Contracted Services $65.00 APRIL FEE - FLEX Total MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS $65.00 Unpaid MENARDS E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $43.58 46006 SCREWS, BITS E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $21.45 47607 PAINT BRUSHES, DROP CLOTHS E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $59.45 49052 CLEANING SUPPLIES, FOAM BRUSHE E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $20.71 49093 ADHESIVE E 10145200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $2.60 49317 EYE BOLT CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:03 PM Page 4 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment immi E 101 - 43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $ 43.22 49532 FILTER, BA WAS HERS E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $28.64 49535 BOLTS, HEX NUTS, WASHERS E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $23.24 50627 WOOD, PAINT E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $138.45 50627 BATTERIES E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $8.47 51192 BOLTS, TIES, QUICK LINKS Total MENARDS $389.81 Unpaid -- .. � MN DEPT OF NATL RESOURCES E 408 -43100 -310 Miscellaneous $400.00 201554 APP FEE - OTSEGO CREEK CULVERT Total MN DEPT OF NATL RESOURCES $400.00 Unpaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL E 101 -42710 -390 Contracted Services $70.00 ANIMAL CONTROL Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $70.00 Unpaid - - NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO E 101 -43100 -240 Small Tools $856.36 191197681 3" SEMI TRASH PUMP, TRIMMER RA Total NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO $856.36 Unpaid NOVA COMMUNICATIONS .._...�....__ "-'° E 441 -43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $5,692.10 18485 PW PHONE SYSTEM Total NOVA COMMUNICATIONS $5,692.10 irii ,, .., tea» ._ « . < , ...,,....u,.,.- .,.- ,.,.,��„ , ..,� ,�..... .�. Unpaid OFFICEMAX °" . - E 101 -43160 -322 Utilities $18.64 813739 STAMP Total OFFICEMAX $18.64 Un aid P PAT LAUNDERVILLE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $60.00 BALANCE OF FEB /MAR CELL PHONE E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total PAT LAUNDERVILLE $90.00 Unpaid -«.,w PEOPLE SERVICE INC. ------ E 602 -49450 -390 Contracted Services $28,197.33 11756 MONTHLY SERVICE - MAY E 602 -49450 -390 Contracted Services $17,214.67 11756 7/06 - 3/07 TRUE UP E 601 -49400 -390 Contracted Services $12,727.67 11756 MONTHLY SERVICE - MAY E 601 -49400 -390 Contracted Services $7,770.33 11756 7/06 - 3/07 TRUE UP Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $65,910.00 i Un ad P REED BUSINESS INFORMATION E 444 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing $165.02 3599580 AD FOR BIDS - WELL #8, PH #2 I E 444 -49400 -351 Legal Notices Publishing $165.02 3602931 AD FOR BIDS - WELL #8, PH #2 I Total REED BUSINESS INFORMATION $330.04 U aid n P SCHARBER & E 101 -45200 -240 Small Tools $578.21 372919 TRIMMER, BLOWER E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $160.36 373370 MOWER BLADES Total SCHARBER & SONS $738.57 Unpaid SHER W ILLIAMS CO. E 203 -45210 -501 Equipment $51.03 4832 -9 TENNIS BACKBOARD PAIN E 203 - 45210 -501 Equipment $51.04 4832 -9 TENNIS BACKBOARD PAIN E 203 -45210 -501 Equipment $23.66 4904 -6 TENNIS BACKBOARD PAINT E 203 - 45210 -501 Equipment $23.66 4904 -6 TENNIS BACKBOARD PAINT Total SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. $149.39 Unpaid STERLING CUSTOM HOMES '— '-- _ . E 702 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 11337 75TH - LNDSCP ESC REFUND CITY OF OTSEGO 04/18/07 4:03 PM Page 5 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total STERLING CUSTOM HOMES $1,000.00 Vrii3arcr TIMBERLANE HOMES INC_ , E 702 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 11628 77TH ST - LNDSCP ESC Total TIMBERLANE HOMES INC $1,000.00 Unpaid TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS INC .. ° E 101 - 41400 -413 Office Equipment Rental $198.13 46892905 TOSHIBA COPIER Total TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS INC $198.13 Unpaid TR COMPUTER SALES LLC E 250 -42410 -570 Office Equip and Fumishings $3,189.68 19121 PERMITWORKS BUSINESS LIC SOFTW E 25042410 -390 Contracted Services $528.03 19122 PERMITWORKS BUS LIC SUPPORT Total TR COMPUTER SALES LLC $3,717.71 Unpaid TROPHIES PLUS E 10141400 -310 Miscellaneous $20.77 BADGES, ENGRAVING - RON, ANDY, Total TROPHIES PLUS $20.77 Unpaid — "UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE E 601 -49400 -206 Postage $1,000.00 POSTAGE FOR W/S E 602 -49450 -206 Postage $1,000.00 POSTAGE FOR W/S Total UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE $2,000.00 — Unpaid p WASTE MANAGEMENT E 101 - 43100 -325 Garbage Service $30.39 23599 - 1706 -5 ROADSIDE TRASH DISPOSAL Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $30.39 Unpaid XCEL ENERGY E 101 - 43160 -322 Utilities $139.70 8899 NASHUA AVE E 602 - 49450 -322 Utilities $45.42 LIFT STATION #5 E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $3,291.09 EAST WWTF Total XCEL ENERGY $3,476.21 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $115,198.77 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $14,030.61 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT $149.39 206 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING $4,500.25 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $8,433.77 408 Otsego Creek Watershed $400.00 441 Otsego City Campus $7,728.10 444 SE Utilities Project $597.34 601 WATER FUND $22,561.57 602 SEWER FUND $53,517.74 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND $280.00 702 BUILDERS ESCROW FUND $3,000.00 $115,198.77 ITEM 5_2 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered irlto this day of , 2007, by and between the COUNTY OF WRIGHT, hereinafter referred to as "County", the WRIGHT COUNTY SHERIFF, and the CITY OF OTSEGO, hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality is desirous to amend Article 10 of the Contract executed on November 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering such service and protect on the terms and conditions set forth in the Contract; NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that Article 10 shall be amended as follows: 10. The number of hours of service to be provided pursuant to the Contract are as follows: 13,152 hours annually and shall provide 24 -hour call and. general service. The Municipality shall notify the County in writing prior to August 15 regarding any change in the number of hours for the subsequent year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment shall be effective as of July 1, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality, by motion duly adopted by it governing body, caused this Amendment to the Contract to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk; and the County of Wright, by the County Board of Commissioners, has caused this amendment to be signed by the Chairperson, County Coordinator, and Sheriff, effective on the day and year first above written. 1 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2007, by and between the COUNTY OF WRIGHT, hereinafter referred to as "County", the WRIGHT COUNTY SHERIFF, and the CITY OF OTSEGO, hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality "; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Municipality is desirous to amend Article 10 of the Contract executed on November 28, 2005; and WHEREAS, the County is agreeable to rendering such service and protect on the terms and conditions set forth in the Contract NOW THEREFORE, it is agreed that Article 10 shall be amended as follows: 10. The number of hours of service to be provided pursuant to the Contract are as follows: 13152 hours annually and shall provide 24 -hour call and. general service. The Municipality shall notify the County in writing prior to August 15 regarding any change in the number of hours for the subsequent year. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that said amendment shall be effective as of July 1, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipality, by motion duly adopted by it governing body, caused this Amendment to the Contract to be signed by its Mayor and attested by its Clerk; and the County of Wright, by the County Board of Commissioners, has caused this amendment to be signed by the Chairperson, County Coordinator, and Sheriff, effective on the day and year first above written. 1 Dated: Aayor ATTEST: Clerk WRIGHT COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Dated: Chairperson ATTEST: Richard W. Norman, County Coordinator Gary Miller, Sheriff Approved as to form and execution: Dated: Tom Kelly, Wright County Attorney 2 ITEM 5_3 Date: April 19, 2007 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Gary Groen, Finance Director RE: Purchasing Policy Attached is the purchasing policy for the City. I am requesting that this policy be approved by the Council for immediate implementation. The policy establishes the process for the purchase of goods or services by the City. The purpose of this policy is described in Section I. The policy establishes dollar thresholds for the authority and approval process. All purchases included in the annual budget up to $1,000 require only department head approval. Purchases from $1,000 to $4,999 require department head and city administrator approval. Any purchases of $5,000 or more and all items not included in the annual budget require Council approval before the purchasing process may begin. The policy also describes the approval and payment process for invoices received by the City for goods or services. All original copies of quotations and bids received as part of the purchasing process will be filed with the finance department. The policy is a very necessary first step in documenting the purchasing, approval and payment procedures. CITY OF OTSEGO PURCHASING POLICY Section I. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish the procedures for purchases made on behalf of the City of Otsego. This policy applies to employees and commission members only. It does not apply to contracted employees such as engineering, planning or attorneys. This policy has the following objectives: 1. To ensure that purchases comply with all applicable laws; 2. To ensure that taxpayers receive the lowest price and the best value for their tax dollars when the City purchases goods and services; 3. To provide clear and consistent guidelines for authorized City employees /purchasers to follow; 4. To limit the discretion of City officials and thus limit the possibility of fraud or favoritism. Section II. Purchasing Oversight The City Administrator or designee is responsible for the overall purchasing function. Department heads shall be responsible for purchasing items within their respective budgets. All contracts, bonds, and instruments of every kind to which the City is a party shall be signed by the Mayor and/or the City Clerk/Treasurer on behalf of the City and shall be executed in the name of the City. All credit applications must be submitted to and approved by the City Clerk/Treasurer. Section III. Purchasing Levels Department heads shall have the authority to authorize and/or approve purchases up to $1,000 based on appropriations contained in the City's Budget. The City Administrator shall have the authority to authorize and/or approve purchases up to $4,999 based on appropriations contained in the City's Budget. Purchases that are greater than $5,000, or items not appropriated through the annual budget, must be approved by the City Council prior to the commencement of the purchasing process. Section IV. Use of Purchase Orders Purchase orders will be required for all purchases greater than $5,000 and may be issued for lesser amounts if requested by the vendor. Council approval is required for all purchases greater than $5,000 before the purchasing process may begin whether or not the purchase was previously approved as part of the annual budget process. Before presentation of the purchase order to the vendor /contractor, the Department Head, Finance Director, and City Administrator must sign the Purchase Order. The Department Head must specify the source of funding for the purchase and fully complete the Purchase Order; the Finance Director must ensure adequate funding is available from the funding source and the City Administrator must provide assurance that City Council or his/her approval, as applicable, has been obtained for the purchase. These procedures apply to the purchase of supplies, materials, equipment, or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of real or personal property. All purchases City of Otsego Purchasing Policy Page Two must be consistent with the approved annual budget. All telephone or verbal quotes must be followed with written confirmation. Section V. Purchasing Procedures Purchases may be made by the following methods: • Regular purchasing procedures • Price agreements • Emergency purchasing • Cooperative purchasing • Establish use of charge accounts 1. Purchases of less than $ 1,000 The purchase may be made in the open market by an authorized purchaser. The authorized purchaser may be any City employee with the approval of the Departmental Supervisor. Authorized purchasers are strongly encouraged to seek quotations from several vendors if the anticipated cost approaches $1,000. All original invoices, packing slips or other documentation should be forwarded to the finance department to begin the payment approval process as soon as possible. 2. Purchases from $1,000 to S4,999 The purchase should be based on a minimum of two (2) written quotations. Quotations may be obtained by telephone or in written form via facsimile, delivery service, or Internet. Quotations must have a specific date and time period for which they are valid. All quotations should be kept on file for a minimum of one (1) year and include the names of vendors providing the quotations, the amounts of the quotations, and each successful quotation signed and dated. Quotation files will be maintained in the finance department. If no quotations or only one quotation is received, the reason for the deviation from standard policy guidelines should be documented in writing and be attached to the invoice to be paid in the finance department. 3. Purchases from $5,000 to $50,000 The proposed purchase must be presented to Council for approval before the commencement of the purchasing process. The purchase may be made either via sealed bids or by obtaining two (2) or more written quotations, without advertising for bids or otherwise complying with the requirements of competitive bidding laws. Quotations may be obtained by telephone or in written form via facsimile, delivery service, or Internet. Quotations must have a specific date and time period for which they are valid. All quotations should be kept on file for a minimum of one (1) year and include the names of City of Otsego Purchasing Policy Page Three vendors providing the quotations, the amount of the quotations, and each successful quotation signed and dated. If quotations are obtained by phone, they must be followed up with a signed quotation to be considered a valid quotation. The quotations must be forwarded to the City Council for selection and approval. This approval shall be accomplished by an agenda write -up submitted for consideration at a regularly scheduled Council meeting. A Purchase Order must be completed. 4. Purchases exceeding $50,000 The proposed purchase must be presented to Council for approval before the commencement of the purchasing process. Purchases or contracts exceeding $50,000 require formal sealed bids solicited by public notice in accordance with Minnesota Statute 471.345, Subd.3. The purchaser shall prepare or cause to be prepared, the specifications, the advertisement to solicit sealed bids, the opening and tabulation of bids, and any necessary investigation of the bids. The City's designated representative shall recommend to the City Council which bid is the lowest, responsible bid. The City Council shall determine the lowest responsible bidder and shall accept such bid. In all cases, the City Council reserves the right to accept or reject any or all of the bids, and waive informalities therein. The City has reasonable discretion in determining the lowest responsible bidder. Not only must a successful bidder submit the lowest bid price and substantially meet the terms and conditions of the specifications, the low bidder must be considered "responsible" and have the capacity to perform the proposed contract. "Responsibility" includes such considerations as the bidders' financial responsibility, integrity, ability, skill, and likelihood of providing faithful and satisfactory performance. There is more latitude in purchasing items of equipment not capable of exact specifications. In making such a purchase, the City Council may exercise reasonable discretion in determining the lowest responsible bidder. The City Council may consider, in addition to the bid price, the quality, suitability, and adaptability of the article for its intended use. 5. Purchasing through Cooperative purchasing agreements (State Bids) In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 471.35, Subd. 15, a municipality may contract for the purchase of supplies, materials, or equipment without regard to the competitive bidding requirements in the statutes if the purchase is through a national municipal association's purchasing alliance or cooperative created by a joint powers agreement that purchases items from more than one source on the basis of competitive bids or quotations. Under these programs, several governmental units can enter into an agreement to authorize one party to solicit bids and provide for the purchase at the option of each participating governmental unit. Once the governmental units agree on the specifications of the item, one party may advertise for bids on behalf of all the parties that participate in the agreement. Rather than specify a specific number of items, the advertising participant will advertise for a range of quantities estimated for the entire group. Each participating City of Otsego Purchasing Policy Page Four unit can make the final decision on whether to purchase the items from the successful bidder. The City currently participates in the Cooperative Purchasing Venture (CPV) administered by the Minnesota State Board of Administration. 6. Purchase of professional services The purchase of professional services is exempt from the competitive bidding process described in the uniform contracting and bidding statutes. These services and contractual arrangements include engineering, planning, legal and others and will all be approved by the City Council. Travel All expenditures for travel and training need prior approval by the Department Head. The travel request will then be forwarded to the City Administrator for approval. The City has a separate travel reimbursement policy detailing this process. Invoice Approval All invoices received at the City offices, whether by mail, fax or delivery, shall be forwarded to the finance department. Original receipts, quotations, packing slips and other purchase documentation should also be forwarded to the finance department. In the finance department, invoices will be matched with other supporting documentation and invoices will be reviewed to determine the invoices are mathematically correct. The reviewed invoices will be placed in separate folders in the finance department for review and approval by the department head. Department Heads will be notified of any deficiencies in the documentation accumulated. Department heads shall review all invoices for expenditures of their departments and verify the validity of the charges. Department heads shall sign and appropriately code invoices after ascertaining that the goods or services have been delivered to the City in the quantities listed and that the amounts charged are correct. The packing list or other documentation of receipt should be attached to the signed invoice. Certain invoices are excluded from Department Head review and approval. These include monthly invoices which are allocated to departments based on employee costs or other factors, e.g., health insurance, life insurance, dental insurance, retirement funds, utilities, telephone invoices, refuse removal. However, if unusual or non- recurring charges appear on any of these invoices, Department head approval should be obtained prior to processing. Payments will only be made from the original invoice; payments from statements are not allowed. Employee reimbursements must be submitted on the approved form and must be signed by the employee and the Department Head. All non - mileage reimbursements must have the original receipts attached. City of Otsego Purchasing Policy Page Five Invoice Approval - continued All purchases /payments shall be reviewed and ratified by the City Council at their regular meeting before payments are released. In some instances, payroll and benefit related payments may need to be released prior to approval. Price Agreements Price agreements may be used to acquire items the City frequently purchases in small quantities, i.e. gasoline, propane, and heating fuel. A price agreement is a contract between the City and a vendor. Under it, the vendor agrees to supply all of the City's requirements for the specified commodity during the period of agreement. The price may be fixed or variable, such as a fixed discount from market price. Such price agreements expedite delivery, reduce paperwork, and generally result in lower prices. The estimated annual cost of the price agreement shall be considered in determining the appropriate purchasing procedure. Emergency Purchasing When an emergency occurs that may jeopardize public safety or the health and welfare of employees or citizens, department heads may authorize a necessary emergency purchase. Department head emergency purchases and the reason for the purchase shall be reported in writing to the City Administrator within 24 hours. In an emergency situation, the City Council may dispense with the bidding requirements of state contract law. Before deciding if an emergency exists, the City Council shall consult with the city attorney. Disaster Purchasing The Mayor may declare a local disaster or emergency. The declaration shall not be continuing for a period in excess of three (3) days except by, or with the consent of, the City Council. A disaster may result from fire, flood, tornado, blizzard, destructive winds, or other natural causes, or from sabotage, hostile action, or from hazardous material mishaps or catastrophic measures, or emergencies that are technological in nature. During a declared emergency, the City may enter into contracts and incur obligations necessary to combat the disaster by protecting the health and safety of persons and property, and providing assistance to victims of such disasters. The City may exercise such power as deemed necessary without complying with purchasing procedures prescribed by law pertaining to the performance of public work, entering into rental equipment agreements, purchase of supplies and materials, limitations upon tax levies, and the appropriation and expenditures of public funds, including, but not limited to, publication of resolutions, publication of call for bids, provisions of personnel laws and rules, provisions related to low bids, and requirement for budgets. City of Otsego Purchasing Policy Page Six Use of Charge Accounts The City Clerk - Treasurer shall approve the establishment of charge accounts. The Finance Department shall keep a record of all persons authorized to sign on these accounts. Authorized persons will sign an authorized purchaser form and the city will forward this form to the participating establishments. The City will not be responsible for unauthorized purchases. Date This policy becomes effective upon adoption by the City Council. ITEM 5 -4 Otsego Police Commission Minutes March 13, 2007 Present: Sandy Michaelson, Linda Lewis, Joel Torkelson, Jessica Stockamp, Sgt. Darsow, Jane Theisen, Denise Andrusko, Edgar Pearsall, Jeff Stimac Meeting was called to order at 6:40 PM. Agenda was approved unanimously. Minutes for January 9 were approved unanimously. Minutes for February 13 were approved unanimously. Open Forum The sheriff's office served a warrant on a house off of 85 Stolen property and stolen snowmobiles were recovered. A citizen had a complaint about the slow response by the fire department to a call for service. A car was on fire inside a garage. Elk River was the department that responded. Old Business 1. Mailbox issue - Our previous letter was re-sent but there still has not been a response back. Denise will contact the Elk River post office to try and find out what the issue is or if they are against the idea. 2. Restaurant Tents- Joel has been working on it and will report back at our next meeting. 3. MEADA Meeting - There will be a meeting at Rogers High School on March 26 The focus will be on alcohol and marijuana in conjunction with Prom season. 4. National Night Out- Sandy just recently received information and will report back to the group at a future meeting. Voting for positions on the Police Commission went as follows: Chair- Jane Theisen Approved unanimously Vice Chair- Joel Torkelson Approved unanimously Secretary- Jeff Stimac Approved unanimously * If there is ever a need for a Treasurer, Edgar has volunteered his services for that position. New Business March 31 is the Easter event at City Hall. Mc Gruff will be there. Sandy has a volunteer to wear the suit for the event. Mc Gruff House- Mailers will be given to the schools to be sent home with the children. Council Reports February 25 Edgar reported there was nothing of significance pertaining to our commission. March 12 Denise reported there was nothing of significance pertaining to our commission. Council Meeting Assignments March 26 Linda April 9 Edgar Next Police Commission meeting will be April 10 at 6:30 PM. Meeting was unanimously adjourned at 7:45 PM. ITEM 5_5 INVOICE Payor Name Invoice Number 04/03/07 OTSEGO CITY OF I T79 21300038602 Mail to: Customer Number Due Date Amount Due MINN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION 0000042008 -2 I - -- COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 05/03/07 323, 043.90 CASH ACCOUNTING Billing Code Address change? If yes, check box. 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD M.S. 215 ST. PAUL MN 55155 7927 Write correct address on back --to- I Please write amount paid in boxes shown below: Bill to: CITY ADMINISTRATOR OTSEGO CITY OF 8899 NASHUA AVE NE OTSEGO MN 55330 -7314 T79 21300038602 1 000032304390 Please detach the above stub and return with your check or money order payable to: COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION Write Invoice Number on front of check or money order. DO NOT MAIL CASH. INTEREST MAY BE CHARGED ON PAST DUE AMOUNTS "` "� The State of Minnesota /:; s .,r];� ... INVOICE PAGE 1 '4 J.. I c � * Number . 'Billing Code orig env ba#e :raITax ID: 41- 6007162 0000042008 -2 7927 Customer Name Invoice Number Invoice Date Due Date OTSEGO CITY OF T79 21300038602 04/03/07 05/03/07 Ref — - Line DESCRIPTION Date of No. of Unit of Unit Price CHARGES /CREDIT No. Service Units Measure 01 AGREEMENT 89418 CONSTR ADV 04/03/07 AGREEMENT 89418 323,043.90 43.90 COOP. CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT NO. 89418 CITY OF OTSEGO S.P. 8608 -21 (T.H. 101 =187) FED PROJ. STPX 8606 (002) CITY COST GRADING, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, DRAINAGE, CONCRET CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCTION BY THE STATE ON T.H. 101 FOR 147TH AVENUE IN HENNEPIN COUNTY TO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER IN WRIGHT COUNTY. ATTENTION: MICHAEL ROBERTSON, CITY ADMINISTRATOR AMOUNT DUE: 323,043.90 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL: 651 - 366 -4903 CONTACT: CONNIE WILLIAMS G T 2 C ITEM 5_6 CITY OF OTSEGO PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MARCH 14, 2007 7:00 PM Call to Order: The meeting was called to order at 7 :00 PM. Roll Call: Commissioners: Mike Brumm, Kathy Roberts, Russ Langer, Beverly Kumar, and Peter Torresani. Absent: Aaron Stritesky, Rose Cassady and Rob Miller. Councilmembers: Jessica Stockamp and Mark Thorsted. Staff: City Administrator Michael Robertson. 1. Agenda Approval. Commissioner Langer asked to add discussion of a survey. Motion by Commissioner Torresani, seconded by Commissioner Roberts, moved to approve the agenda with the addition of discussion of a recreation survey. Motion carried 5 -0. 2. Approval of February 7, 2007 minutes. Motion by Commissioner Roberts, seconded by Commissioner Langer to approve the February 7, 2007 minutes. Carried 5 -0. 3. City Update Councilmembers Thorsted and Stockamp updated Commissioners on recent City happenings. 4. Review of Easter Egg Event Commissioners reviewed duties for the upcoming Easter Egg Event. 5. New Survey Commissioner Langer asked what Council's reaction was to the Commission's suggestion of a new survey. Councilmembers said there hadn't been any reaction. The Commission reiterated its suggestion that the City consider a new survey as the most recent one was over ten years old. Administrator Robertson said that a survey by the best local firm in the field would be around $8- 10,000. 6. Other Business. Commission suggested that No Dog Poop signs be installed in the new parks. Robertson said they would be installed as part of the remaining work to complete the parks this spring. Adjournment: Commissioner Langer moved, seconded by Commissioner Torresani, to adjourn at 8:02 p.m. Motion carried 7 -0. Michael Robertson City Administrator ITEM 5_7 April 5, 2007 City of Otsego Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 Re: Extension for final plat. A 325 acre portion of the northwest 1 /4 of Section 18, T121N, R23W, and the north % of Section 13, T121N, R24W, north of CSAH 39, and south of the Mississippi River. Dear Ms. Hudson: I would like to request a one year extension to file a final plat to retain the entitlements established by the preliminary plat approval on April 24, 2006 relative to our property. Please advise if you need any additional information. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, 1 James R. Kolles 12302 95 Street N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 763.441.6308 ITEM 5_8 Resolution No. 2007 -26 City of Otsego County of Wright State of Minnesota A Resolution Establishing Depositories for City Funds. WHEREAS, the City of Otsego each year must stipulate official depositories for City Funds. The depositories were approved by Resolution No. 2007 -01, January 8, 2007 Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of Otsego, Minnesota. 1. That the following additional official depository for City Funds be added to those previously approve: Premier Bank, Albertville, MN 2. Collateral is required for funds that are not directly invested in investment securities that are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or other United States Government Agencies. Investments shall be in accordance with investment securities allowable under the State of Minnesota guidelines for municipalities and the City's investment policy. The City Treasurer shall deposit all or any part of the City's funds into the approved depositories and withdraw the same when necessary, or when directed by the City Council. Approved this 23 day of April, 2007 City of Otsego Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, City Clerk City Seal ITEM 5.9 PAY ESTIMATE #4 CONTRACTOR CITY OF OTSEGO Dual Forcemain along N.E. 65th Street, Improvement No. 06 -14 Date: April 17, 2007 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego. MN 55330 RE: Dual Forcemains along N.E. 65th Street, Improvement Project No. 06 -14 Contractor S.R. Weidema, Inc. Contract Amount: 81,156,076.50 Award Date: September 14, 2006 Completion Date: July 1, 2007 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members The following work has been completed on the above - referenced project by S.R. Weidema, Inc. Bid Schedule A" - Street Construction ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION 1 Mobilization 1 LS $5,250.00 $ 5,250.00 0.9 $ 4,725.00 2 Traffic Control 1 LS $3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0.75 $ 2250.00 3 Salvage and Reinstall Sfgn 2 EACH 8200.00 $ 400.00 $ - 4 Salvage and Reinstall Fence 100 LF $30.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - 5 Granular FE 300 TON 811.00 $ 3,300.00 24.05 $ 264.55 6 Clas 5 � gregate Base (T Depth) 590 TON 813.00 $ 7,870.00 467.88 $ 6,082.44 7 Sin Fence, Type Machine Sliced 1,900 LF $2.50 $ 4,750.00 267 $ 667.50 Total Bid Schedule "A" $ 27,370.00 $ 13,989.49 Bid Schedule "B" - Sanitary Sewer Forcemain ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION 12" Plastic Pipe Forcemain Installed by Horizontal 8 Directional DrMMing 8050 LF $47.10 $ 379,155.00 7668 $ 381,162.80 18" Plastic Pipe Forcemain Installed by Horizontal 9 Directional Mang 7725 LF $76.40 $ 590,190.00 7545 $ 576,438.00 10 12" DIP Class 52 Sewer Pipe 110 LF 837.15 $ 4,086.50 60 $ 2,229.00 11 16" DIP Class 52 Sewer Pipe 110 LF 854.00 $ 5,940.00 60 $ 3,240.00 12 8" Gate Valve wNalve Box 4 EA 81,260.00 $ 5,040.00 4 $ 5,040.00 13 12' Gate Valve w/ Valve Box 6 EA 82,100.00 $ 12,600.00 5 $ 10,500.00 14 16" Gate Valve w/ Valle Box 6 EA 85,300.00 $ 31,800.00 5 $ 26,500.00 15 DIP Fittings 2500 I.BS 82.50 $ 8,250.00 3975 $ 9,937.50 12" x 8' Cleanout Assembly - Includes all DIP 16 pipe, fittings and labor (valves paid separately) 2 EA $3,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2 $ 6,000.00 16" x 8" Cleanout Assembly - Includes all DIP 17 pipe, fittings and labor (valves paid separately) 2 EA $3,540.00 $ 7,080.00 2 $ 7,080.00 72" Diameter Air Valve Manhole - Includes Combination Air Valve, Ball Valve and associated 18 fittings and labor 8 EA $9,030.00 $ 72,240.00 8 $ 54,180.00 19 Connect to Fling Forcemain 3 EA 82,775.00 $ 8,325.00 1 $ 2,775.00 Total Bid Schedule "B" $ 1. 128.706.50 $ 1,066.082.30 Bid Schedule "A" $ 27,370.00 $ 13,989.49 Bid Schedule "B" $ 1,128,706.50 $ 1,065,082.30 TOTAL $ 1,079,071.79 Total Work Completed to Date $ 1,079,071.79 LESS 5% RETAINAGE: _ 53,953.59 LESS PREVIOUS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 $ 102,236.87 LESS PREVIOUS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 $ 588,397.70 LESS PREVIOUS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 $ 133,108,80 WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF: $ 201,377,84 ot632pe.hds PE - 1 PAY ESTIMATE #4 CONTRACTOR CITY OF OTSEGO Dual Forcemain along N.E. 65th Street, Improvement No. 06 -14 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: S.R. WEIDEMA, INC. Certification by C ra or: I csk ify that all items a n- amou y - correct for the work completed to date. Signed: / / Title: T Date /// '47—i S—O2 ENGINEER: HAKANSON ANDE ASSOCIATES, INC. Certification b �inneeer: ,� a mmend payment for work and quantities as shown. Sign • A erra. . Title: a ! _ Date D f OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date ot632pe.xls PE - Ili- ITEM 5_10 PAY ESTIMATE #2 Contractor CITY OF OTSEGO ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK AND TOWER #3 Date: April 11, 2007 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #3 Contractor. Pittsburg Tank and Tower Company Contract Amount 62,061,000.00 Award Date: October 25, 2006 Completion Date: December 14, 2007 Dear Honorable Mayor and Councl Members: The following work has been completed on the above - referenced project by Pittsburg Tank and Tower Company. Bid Schedule 'B" -Alternate Bid ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION Provide foundation design prepared by Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Minnesota, based on 1 loading data in Division 13. 1 LS *10.000.00 $ 10,000.00 1 $ 10,000.00 Provide steel tank & tower design, Mcluding anchorage prepared by Professional Engineer Rcensed In the State 01 2 Minnesota based on the plans and spedflcatons. 1 LS *10.000.00 $ 10,000.00 1 $ 10,000.00 Construct tank & tower foundation including excavation, 3 concrete. baddit and anchorage per approved design. 1 LS *290,000.00 $ 290,000.00 1 $ 290,000.00 Furnish and Install piping, including watennain, riser & overflow, valves. tittkng8, hydrant, and insulation per Plana 4 and specifications. 1 LS *25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 1 $ 25,000.00 Furnish and erect the 1,000,000 gallon fluted pillar elevated water tower and tank including an appurtenances 5 as Provided on plans and spedfications. 1 LS *1.243.000.00 $ 1243,000.00 $ . Furnish and apply coatings on the steel surfaces of the 8 fluted pillar elevated water tower and tank as spedlted. 1 LS *250,000.00 $ 250.000.00 Furnish and install electrical and control devices as 7 provided for in the plans and spedfications• 1 LS *30.000.00 $ 30,000.00 . $ - 8 Mobilization and Denxibffization. 1 LS *20.000.00 $ 20,000.00 Furnish and apply coatings for logo on the water tank as - 9 shown on the plans and as spedfied. 1 LS $5.000.00 $ 5.000.00 $ - 10 Exterior Containment System,' 1 LS *100.000.00 $ 100,000.00 1 $ 100,000.00 All site work including, shipping, excavation, import and compacting of borrow materiel, sub -base materiel and aggregate base, placement of biturninous materials, concrete curb and gutter, and conetrudion of concrete 11 splash pad. apron and sidewalk. 1 LS *15.000.00 $ 15,000.00 Erosion Control items such as bale check, silt fence and 12 rock construction entrance. 1 LS *3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 0.5 $ 1,500.00 13 Importing and placng topsoil. 1 LS *8.000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ - 14 Excavation and disposal of all excess soil materials. 2 1 LS *50.000.00 $ 50.000.00 0.9 $ 45.000.00 15 All restoration. lndudkrt sew. fern:dna and mulch. 1 _ LS *2.000.00 $ Z000.00 $ - Item eliminate per Change Order Number 1. See page 2 of Pay Estimate. 2 item reduced by *30,000 per Change Order Number 1. See page 2 of Pay Estimate. S:NAunicipaMAOTSEGO15211Pay Estlmate&ct521PE PE - PAY ESTIMATE #2 Contractor CITY OF OTSEGO ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK AND TOWER #3 Change Order No. 1 ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION Decrease amount of excavation and disposal of excess 1 soil material (Decrease to Bid Schedule "B" - Item No. 14) 1 LS ($30,000.00) $ (30,000.00) 1 $ Delete the Exterior Containment System (Decrease to Bid (30,000.00) 2 Schedule "B" - Item No. 10) 1 LS ($100,000.00) $ (100,000.00) 1 $ Revise type, size and model of spotlights and poles (100,000.00) 3 (Increase to Bid Schedule "B" - Item No. 7) 1 LS $2,800.00 $ 2,800.00 Total Original Bid Schedule "8" $ 2,061,000.00 Change Order No. 1 $ 481,500.00 TOTAL $ (127,200.00) $ (130,000.00) Total Work Completed to Date $ 1,933,800.00 $ 351,500.00 LESS 5% RETAINAGE: $ 351,500.00 LESS PAY ESTIMATE #1 $ 17,575.00 $ 185,725.00 WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF: $ 148,200.00 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: PITTSBURG TANK AND TOWER - Certification by tractor. I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. igned: Title: (C h) Date 1 //11/0 ` /0 7 ENGINEER: HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Certifi.. , on by Engi -er: ' e = • mmend payment for work and quantities as shown. Signed' i . _ / ..' Title: f0 T a f Date ! 12- 61 r OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date S:\MunicipallAOTSEG01521\Pay Estimates\ot521PE PE - 2 ITEM 7_1 Date: April 19, 2007 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Gary Groen, Finance Director RE: Capital Equipment Plan Attached is the Capital Equipment Plan as completed through 2009. The process of capital equipment planning will continue and additional information will be provided in the future. The plan will identifies the sources of financing and the planned equipment replacement schedule. City of Otsego Equipment Revolving Fund - Fund 206 As of April 16, 2007 Actual Actual Projected 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Actual /Projected Fund Balance, January 1 $ 197,525 $ 290,930 $ 351,350 $ 282,231 $ 179,287 $ 93,769 Add: General Fund budget transfer 262,886 169,182 154,000 180,000 190,000 200,000 Sale of Equipment - 1992 Ford LT9000 & 1986 Chev. Pickup 31,211 Water and Sewer Fund contribution for Truck with Hoist - Interest Income projected at 2.5% of beginning of year balance - 45,000 _ _ 2,661 9,485 8,784 7,056 4,482 2,344 Balance and Additions 494,283 469,597 559,134 469,287 373,769 296,113 Less: Public Works Vehicles & Equipment 1994 Ford L8000 W /Plow Equipment 31,782 1995 International S/A DumpTruck W /Plow Equipment 37,649 2006 Pickup F350 W /Dump Body & Plow 36,041 John Deere Skidster & Blade W /Snowplow & Snowblower 38,310 1993 Elgin Pelican Sweeper 31,843 Daimler lease payment budgeted in General Fund in 2006 & 2007 27,728 Tractor /roadside mower /broom 60,810 Roller 13,312 Tractor - JD4720 (replaced two others) 24,955 Landpride mower 11,580 Landpride overseeder 7,590 2007 actual to date Safety equipment & misc. Tools 6,056 Mobile Lifts 15,191 Budgeted but not expended as of this date 31,356 S/A Dump With Plow Truck with Hoist (utilities) Sign shop equipment /software /consulting setup Mower (parks) Dascom projection system Grader Vac Truck 135,000 Back Hoe 90,000 Tandem Dump W /Plow 65,000 S/A Dump W /Plow 150,000 130,000 Total Expenditures 203,353 118,247 276,903 290,000 280,000 Actual /Projected Fund Balance, December 31 $ 290,930 $ 351,350 $ 282,231 $ 179,287 $ 93,769 $ 296,113 C:\Documents and Settings \Gary\My Documents\Budgets\PWEquipment Page 1 ITEM 7_2 CITY OF OTSEGO M emo To: City Council From: Brad Belair Date: 4/18/07 Re: Capital Equipment Plan The remaining items to be considered for purchase in the Equipment CIP for 2007 are: 1. Single axle dump truck w/ plow equipment to replace Unit# 20. Unit #20 is the 1990 Ford L9000 purchased used in 2004. I recommend we develop specifications and solicit bids through the State of Minnesota contract. If I can have a recommendation to City Council by the first meeting in June, we might be able to have a truck delivered by the end of the year depending on the manufacturer. Recommended action: Council approval to develop specifications and obtain bids. 2. Truck w/ dump body, equipment hoist, and snow plow. The original 2007 CIP plan recommended the purchase of an additional truck for Public Works to primarily be used for street sign repair and snow removal. In the discussions with Peoples Service the truck was modified to include an equipment hoist capable of lifting lift station pumps for service. This would save the expense of People Service providing the vehicle. Recommended action: Council approval to work with Kurt to develop specifications to serve the needs of both departments and solicit bids. 3. Sign Shop Equipment, software, and consulting: This item has been budgeted and discussed with the City Council throughout the Public Works building project. will be bringing proposals for your approval to City Council meetings in the near future. The intent is to have the sign shop equipped and operational in June 2007. • Page 1 4. Lawn Mower for Parks: The City Council directed the update of the Equipment Capital Improvement Plan prior to the approval of this purchase. Recommendation: Approval of the purchase of a 1545 John Deere mower per State of Minnesota contract from Scharbers and Sons Inc. If approved, the delivery time is about 30 days. A copy of the quote is attached for you to review. 5. Dascom Projection System: This has been approved by City Council and should be installed this week. • Page 2 03/19/2007 10:35 7634289019 SCHARBER:& SONS PAGE 02/02 Prepared For City of Otsego Prepared By JOHN BRAUNSHAUSEN Equipment Name : John Deere 1545 31HP 4WD DIESEL FM Equipment Quantity: 1 Code Description 0441TC 154 Series II Commercial Front Mower ess Q�lantity Price ($) Mower Deck) 1,689.0 ubtotal ,689.0 1' DISCO NT otal 15, . Equipment Name : John Deere 72" SIDE DISCHARGE MOWER Equipment Quantity: 1 Code Description '341 2 n. -Iron ommerca Si•e'ischarge lower Quantity Price (S) Deck (For 1400/1500 Series II and Non -Series If 6 Front Mowers) Subtotal DISCOUNT 4,100.0 0 Total 1,234.6 2,865.3 , Total - RfuuJ4 ,F -'Tz 7), ;" 1i';1.t4 ir4 18,022. E r e i ,,.. i�`.'?i';l1'4, oi,' 1��I! 18,022. 44 I,_I .�! '�t, +lf� , � i�ii'r 'I " lPS1 � ` I a i �d , l , l f a l! C # ,�<'J , 0.0 * Nt Md )EI4 i 7,50P r „' V 0.0 ua R f ns i11411L1t� #(� I�,� :1Z "Zim'I '' , ,A 'I �,�, . �a,� ��,,=�!�t�,�8,�;,�, �,�:�� 19,194. Salesperson: X Accepted By: X Scharber & Sons, Inc. has been proudly serving John Deere customers for 91 years! Additional Information Quote Expires : Apr 30, 2007 ITEM 7_3 Date: April 19, 2007 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Gary Groen, Finance Director RE: Benefits for Part -time Employees The policy regarding benefits for certain part-time employees is attached for your review and approval. The policy establishes a 24 hour workweek as the criteria for participation in City employee benefits on a pro -rated basis. This is a policy that is consistent with benefits offered in other communities. The City currently has two part-time employees that would be affected by this policy change. CITY OF OTSEGO BENEFITS FOR PART -TIME EMPLOYEES The City finds it necessary and beneficial to offer benefits when hiring part-time employees. PROCESS: The Departmental Supervisor must determine the full -time equivalent (FTE) for the requested part-time position. The recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for their review and approval. The job description shall clearly identify that the position is considered a part-time position with pro -rated benefits. For example, a part-time employee working 28 hours per week is considered a .7FTE. ELIGIBILITY: Part-time employees working less than 24 hours per week shall not be eligible for a pro -rata share of employee benefits. Part-time employees working 24 hours per week or more shall be eligible for a pro -rate share of employee benefits. Seasonal part-time employees will not be eligible. Part-time employees shall be eligible for the FTE percentage of benefits including holiday pay, personal time, vacation benefits, health, dental, life, short-term and long- term disability benefits. Holiday pay shall only apply if the holiday is a regularly scheduled work day for the part-time employee. Benefits will be available as soon as the health, dental and other policies allow. For example, in the case of health insurance, this policy may only be changed at the time of renewal. The FTE status of the part-time positions will be determined at the start of the year or at the time of hiring. The FTE status of any position will be reviewed annually or more frequently as necessary under the circumstances. ITEM 7_4- CITY OF OTSEGO Memo To: City Council From: Brad Belair Date: 4/18/07 Re: Public Works Personnel I recommend the City Council approve Steve Springer be reclassified as a part-time (.85FTE) Public Works Maintenance 1 employee effective April 30, 2007. Steve has worked the last two years as a seasonal and on call employee in public works. He has a great attitude and work ethic and has accepted the duties of the main "meter reader" and also obtained a class B CDL. The benefits for the position would be prorated as proposed in the employee manual and the wage recommended is step1 Maintenance I or $16.83per hour. The position has been budgeted for in the 2007 general fund. • Page 1 ITEM 7 -5 CITY OF OTSEGO M emo To: City Council From: Brad Belair Date: 4/18/07 Re: Summer seasonal employees I have budgeted for three seasonal summer employees in the Public Works department. We will be advertising and interviewing for the positions with the intent to have the positions filled by June 1' I have attached a copy of the job description for you to review. • Page 1 CITY OF OTSEGO POSITION DESCRIPTION Title: Public Works Seasonal/Summer Date: April 2007 Department: Public Works Reports to: Public Works Superintendent FLSA Status: Seasonal, Non- Exempt Position Summary: Under the supervision of the Public Works Supervisor the Public Works Seasonal employee assists in maintaining and developing the public works system in the city. Position Duties: 1. Performs labor - related duties required to maintain streets and right of ways such as blacktop patching, street sign repair, and culvert cleaning and repair. 2. Performs labor - related duties required to maintain city parks and grounds such as collecting trash, weed whipping, ballfield maintenance, and playground maintenance 3. Performs labor- related duties required in the maintenance of city buildings such as painting and general cleaning 4. Performs other labor - related duties as directed by the Public Works Superintendent Minimum Requirements: 1. Must be 18 years of age or more 2. Possess a Class D drivers license 3. Must have knowledge of equipment and procedures used in maintaining parks and streets Desirable Qualifications: 1. Previous experience in the operation and maintenance of tools and equipment used in street and park maintenance 2. Previous experience and training in athletic field maintenance, horticulture, and street maintenance Knowledge, Skills and Abilities: 1. Knowledge of practices, methods, and techniques used in park and street maintenance 2. Ability to perform daily maintenance on equipment used in park and street maintenance 3. Skilled in the safe use and care of tools used in street and park maintenance 4. Ability to work extra of flexible hours as needed to complete assigned jobs Physical Demands: 1. Must be able to lift over 100 pounds occasionally from floor to waist level and waist to shoulder level 2. On a frequent basis must be able to stand and/or walk 3. On a frequent basis must be able to climb in and out of equipment cabs at an estimated height of 33 inches 4. On a continuous basis must be able to site and operate equipment 5. On an occasional basis must be able to bend, twist/rotate 6. Ability to work with arms extended and bent on occasion 7. On an occasional basis must be able to push/pull with arms with force of up to 100 pounds while performing labor work 8. On an occasional basis must be able to use hands and fingers to grasp /manipulate levers and steering wheel in a coordinated manner 9. On a continuous basis must be able to maintain balance while climbing in and out of equipment cab 10. On a continuous basis must be able to coordinate use of hands and eyes in operation of equipment Environmental Conditions: 1. Environmental conditions to include operating equipment under adverse weather conditions; extremes of noise, vibrations. Fumes and dust may be present while performing job responsibilities 2. Hazardous conditions to include moving parts on equipment and machines 3. Hazardous materials to include skin irritants, lung irritants, odors/toxic fumes, chemicals, electrical radiation and hazardous materials Examples of Performance Criteria 1. Demonstrates a working knowledge of methods, tools, and equipment used in public works maintenance activities such as, but not limited to: snow removal street repair and maintenance, boulevard repair and maintenance, storm sewer repair and maintenance, equipment care and maintenance, and tree trimming and removal 2. Demonstrates a positive attitude toward job assignments and tasks to be preformed 3. Is conscientious in the maintenance and operation of equipment 4. Shows initiative in recommending methods to improve safety, efficiency, and quality on the job Non - Discrimination Policy: The City of Otsego does not discriminate on the basis of political opinions or affiliations, race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance or disability, in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its programs and activities. ITEM g_y NAC fltDRit1 A7SOCflATED C '.2 iLT_ S MC, 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 17 April 2007 RE: Otsego — Pouliot/ISD 728 IUP; EAW petition NAC FILE: 176.02 — 07.07 BACKGROUND Eagle Trucking, Inc. and Frattalone Companies have submitted an application for an interim use permit (IUP) to excavate 765,000 cubic yards of material from approximately 38.5 acres of the 100 acre property located northwest of Mason Avenue and 83 Street owned by Randy and Karen Pouliot described as PID118 -500- 193100, 118 - 500 - 192300 and 118- 500 - 192400. This application is substantially the same as a previous application and submitted by the same proposer and withdrawn on 17 February 2007. The one change in the application is that access to the property to be excavated is to be over PID 118-500- 193200 owned by Independent School District 728. The City of Otsego received a petition for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the previous application submitted by the proposer. The petition was received by the City on 29 January 2007 from the Environmental Quality Board after the agency determined that the City was the responsible govemment unit (RGU) for deciding if an EAW was to be prepared. The City Council at their meeting on 12 February 2007 voted 5-0 to take no action regarding the need for an EAW in response to the petition as the application had been withdrawn. The petition for an EAW to be prepared is kept on file with the City Clerk and the petition remains in effect for no more than one year from the date on which it was filed with the EQB as set forth by Minnesota Rules 4410.1100, Subp. 9. While the petition remains in effect, Minnesota Rules 4410.3100, Subp. 1 and 2 prohibits City approval or beginning of any proposed project for which the nature and location is substantially similar to the project identified in the petition until the City Council takes action upon the petition. The City Council has requested that consideration of the petition to prepare an EAW be considered relative to the current application at their meeting on 23 April 2007 at 6:30 PM. Exhibits: A. Site Location (1 Sheet) B. Project summary dated 10 April 2007 (3 sheets) C. Existing Conditions (1 Sheet) D. Site Plan (1 Sheet) E. Proposed Haul Road (1 Sheet) F. Grading Erosion Control Plans (4 Sheets) G. Final Grade / Closure Plan (1 Sheet) H. Cross Sections (2 Sheets) I. Certificate of Survey (1 Sheet) J. School District property concept grading plan (1 Sheet) ANALYSIS Project. The proposer has submitted a narrative dated 10 April 2007 describing the proposed excavation. The summary of the project is 765,000 cubic yards of material to be excavated from approximately 38.5 acres in four phases over three years starting in 2007 and ending in 2009. The proposed phasing plan and project schedule may be affected if an EAW is required to be prepared. The project narrative and submitted plans also describes onsite operations, the grading plan, drainage and erosion control measures, dust control, access, haul routes and trip generation. Included as part of the application is a final grading plan / closure plan showing the site restored to elevations suitable for future low density residential uses guided by the Comprehensive Plan. The elevations for the final grading plan are based on the City's Trunk Sanitary Sewer Collection System Plan. The location and elevation of utilities within the site is dependent upon pattern of adjacent development from which the lines will be extended to serve the subject site and the site plan for a future subdivision. Until the west sanitary sewer service district is expanded to include the subject site, use of the property will continue under A -1 District zoning in accordance with the Interim Land Use Plan established by the Comprehensive Plan. Interim Use Permit. The subject site is zoned A -1, Agricultural Rural Service District. Excavation of more than 50 yards of material for transport off -site is allowed as an interim use in the A -1 District subject to the conditions specified in Section 20- 51 -3.D of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of an interim use permit. The proposer has submitted an application for the necessary interim use permit, but the application was deemed to be incomplete pending submission of additional information. If the City Council determines that preparation of an EAW is to be required for the project, the EAW process must be initiated and processed in accordance with Section 38 of the Zoning Ordinance concurrent with the interim use permit application. Surrounding Land Uses. The area of the subject site is rural in character consisting of farmsteads, rural density single family dwellings (Low Density Residential land uses are defined as by the Comprehensive Plan has having a density of 1.0 du /ac or greater) and agricultural fields. Low density residential neighborhoods within the West Sanitary Sewer Service District are located approximately 1,600 feet to the southwest of the excavation area. More specifically, the subject site is surrounded by the following proposed /existing land uses. Direction Land Use Plan Zoning Map Existing Use North LD Residential A -1 District Agricultural fields Rural Single Family East LD Residential A -1 District Agricultural fields Rural Single Family South LD Residential A -1 District Agriculture fields Farmstead West LD Residential A -1 District Agriculture fields Registered feedlot The Interim Land Use Plan policies of the Comprehensive Plan direct maintenance of the existing rural character of the area under A -1 District zoning until such time as sanitary sewer and water utilities may be extended in the future in accordance with the Urban Service Staging Plan adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The area of the subject site is within Urban Service Expansion Area W2, where City staff estimates sanitary sewer and water utilities may be available within 10 to 15 years. The Elk River School District has purchased the 80 acres immediately west of the subject site and has expressed concern about the compatibility of the proposed grading operation with their planned development the property for an elementary and middle school campus. Development of a school on the adjacent property will require a Zoning Map amendment and other zoning approvals. In meeting with School District officials, City staff has also advised that development of the School District property will likely require preparation of an EAW in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 Subp. 14.B and /or Subp. 36 based on the floor area of the proposed buildings and area converted from agricultural to developed urban uses. No application has been received by the City for a Zoning Map amendment or site plans for development of a school facility on this site. Thus no entitlement exists for a school use on the School District property and the City may only consider the property as guided for future low density residential uses by the adopted Future Land Use Plan. Mandatory EAW. Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 12 requires preparation of an EAW if an excavation is 40 acres or more to a mean depth of 10 feet. The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed excavation of the subject site (including the access road across the School District property) and determined that the grading is over an area of approximately 38.5 acres. The proposed use does not exceed the threshold for mandatory preparation of an EAW under Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 12. 3 Phased or Connected Actions. Minnesota Rules 4410.1000, Subp 4 would require preparation of an EAW for multiple projects or phased projects that when defined to be connected actions exceed the thresholds for mandatory preparation of an EAW set forth by Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 12. Minnesota Rules 4410.0200, Subp. 9b defines projects as connected actions if: A. One project would directly induce the other, B. One project is a prerequisite for the other, C. Neither project is justified by itself. The proposer originally submitted a project on 7 September 2006 that would have excavated more than 40 acres to a mean depth greater than 10 feet as determined by the City Engineer. City staff notified the proposer of the need to prepare a mandatory EAW based on the scope of the proposed project in a letter dated 25 September 2006. Revised plans were submitted to the City Engineer on 6 November 2006 for an excavation of the site that would be less than the thresholds established for mandatory preparation of an EAW. This application was withdrawn by the proposer on 17 February 2007. The current application is substantially the same as the one withdrawn previously except that an overland road across property owned by ISD 728 has been provided to access the project at Maclver Avenue and 80 Street. Although it would be possible to excavate more of the site than identified by the current project, the proposed project does not induce this action, excavation of the site to the extent possible is not a prerequisite for the proposed project and the proposed project can be justified without excavation of the site to the extent possible. The School District has independently prepared a conceptual grading plan for their property for potential development of a future elementary school and middle school campus. This conceptual grading plan illustrates that excavation of the subject site does not induce excavation of the School District property, is not a prerequisite for development of the School District property and that development of the School District property is justified and feasible without the proposed excavation of the subject site. The proposed project therefore does not constitute a phased or connected action. A future proposal to expand the current project to an area or depth that the overall excavation exceeds mandatory EAW thresholds established by Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 12. would require preparation of an EAW (retroactively) at that time. From a policy standpoint, it may be advantageous to anticipate and plan for excavation the subject site to the extent possible in order to fully claim the gravel resource if a project is to occur. Gravel has been identified as a critical resource locally and regionally needed to support planned urban development which should be excavated prior to permanent urban development being established on the subject site. 4 EAW Petition. A citizen's petition has been submitted to the City on 29 January 2007 requesting that an EAW be prepared for a previous excavation project on the subject site. The previous project was withdrawn but the petition remains in effect for any substantially similar project for a period of one year under Minnesota Rules 4410.1100, Subp. 9. The current application has been submitted within one year of the City receiving the petition and it is necessary for the City to consider requiring preparation of an EAW as requested by the petition in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.3100 Subp. 1 prior to granting a permit, approving a project or beginning a project until: A. a petition for an EAW is dismissed. B. a negative declaration on the need for an EIS is issued. C. an EIS is determined adequate; or D. a variance is granted under Minnesota Rules 4410.3100 Subp. 3 to 7. Discretionary EAW. Notwithstanding provisions regarding mandatory EAWs and petitions for EAWs, Minnesota Rules 4410.1000 Subp. 3 allows the City to require preparation of an WAW when it determines that, because of the nature or location of a proposed project, the project may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The City has not in the past required preparation of a discretionary EAW. Criteria. In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1100, Subp. 5, the EQB has determined that the City of Otsego is the RGU for responding to the petition and it is therefore the City Council's decision alone as to whether an EAW is to be required. City staff has reviewed the petition for preparation of an EAW. The information presented raises several potential issues with grading activities generally and/or the specific project. The criteria on whether to require an EAW for the project is set forth by Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, Subp. 7, which is also included as Section 20- 38 -3.D.4 of the Zoning Ordinance: A. type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects; B. cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects; C. the extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority; and D. the extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other available environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, including other EISs. 5 The Zoning Ordinance establishes comprehensive regulations for land excavation in Section 24, which together with regulations on land use within Shoreland Overlay District in Section 92 and general regulations in Section 16 regarding erosion and drainage, noise, dust and particulate matter and odors, will address any potential environmental effects related to the proposed use under criteria "C" above. With respect to criteria "D" above, EAWs were required to be prepared as part of the Arbor Creek, Martin Farms and Zimmer Farms developments within the west sewer district in close proximity to the subject site and AUARs prepared for the Great River Centre (SuperTarget) and Gateway North Industrial Park (Duke Realty, LP) /Queens Avenue project due in part to the amount of material graded on these respective sites for development and address mitigation of potential environmental effects from grading activities. The same mitigation strategies described by the other EAWs and AUARs approved within the City are required by existing City ordinances and would be implemented for the proposed project with or without preparation of an EAW. Controlling the potential for significant environmental effects is based on requiring compliance with established City Codes, Zoning Ordinance and Engineering Manual regulations or implementation of measures common to grading activities, such as application of dust control. There are two potential benefits to requiring preparation of an EAW. Based on the initial application by the proposer, it is known that there is the potential to excavate material from the site beyond that illustrated on the current plans. In terms of fully utilizing available resources, it would be in the City and region's interest to encourage the gravel and sand to be removed from the site to the extent possible prior to future urban development. A second reason for requiring an EAW to be prepared would be to further document compliance with performance standards applicable to the project by State and local regulations. City staffs analysis of the application that was withdrawn on 17 February 2007 was that the use complied with regulations or could be conditioned to comply with regulations established by the Zoning Ordinance and Engineering Manual. The EAW is prepared by the developer, approved by City staff for distribution and subject to review by a number of govemment agencies and jurisdictions with opportunity to comment on potential concerns. Given the City's experience with other environmental reviews for larger grading operations than the proposed project, no significant issues are anticipated but the EAW process would confirm that. RECOMMENDATION The project as proposed does not require mandatory preparation of an EAW in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 12. Furthermore, City staff is of the opinion that preparation of an EAW in response to the petition received by the City would not likely yield additional information effecting the decision of the Planning Commission and City Council on the pending interim use permit application. If the City Council determines that an EAW for the project must be prepared based on the need to document compliance with regulations addressing issues raised in the petition, we recommend that the EAW address excavation of the site to the greatest extent necessary to reclaim all of the gravel and sand material to fully utilize the available resource in support of local and regional urbanization. 6 POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to require that an EAW be prepared to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed use to the extent illustrated generally by the grading plan initially submitted 7 September 2006. B. Motion that preparation of an EAW is not to be required as the potential for environmental effects are adequately mitigated by ongoing City regulatory authority though the Zoning Ordinance. C. Motion to table. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Andy MacArthur, City Attomey Ron Wagner, City Engineer Gregg Downing, EQB John Hubers, Eagle Trucking, Inc. (proposer) Randy and Karen Pouliot, property owners Ben J. Bastyr, Jr., EAW petitioners' representative 7 MINING PERMIT SUMMARY Eagle Trucking Inc. Frattalone Companies November 30, 2006 Revised January 22,2007 Revised April 10,2007 Plans prepared by: Solid Ground Engineering 4756 Banning Avenue, Suite 206 White Bear Lake, MN. 55110 Phone - 651 -407 -6018 Fax - 651 -407 6019 EXHIBIT B Introduction Eagle Trucking, Inc. and Frattalone Companies are requesting a permit to excavate and export material from the Randy and Karen Pouliot farm. The site is located on the NE corner of the intersection of Mason Avenue NE and 83 Street NE. The total area to be excavated is approximately 39 acres with approximately 765,000 cubic yards of material exported. The excavated soils will help provide an economical source of material for future city and private projects. The goal is to have the project completed in 3 years (fall of 2009). When the mining operation is completed, the site will be returned to farmland with option of future development. Plan of Operation The proposed mining operation consists of 4 phases, Phase 1 — 2007, Phase 2 & 3 — 2008 and Phase 4 in 2009.Phaze- 1 has 207,000 cubic yards,phase -2 has 91,000 cubic yards,phase -3 has 183,000 cubic yards and phase -4 has 279,000 cubic yards. The mining project will be in operation April — February from 7:00 am to 5:00 pm Monday thru Friday. Saturdays may be worked with prior permission from the city. Each phase consists of 10 +/- acres. It is proposed that the topsoil will be stripped from the phase area and stockpiled in a future phase. Once topsoil has been stripped, mining and export operations would begin. When the export materials in the phase have been exhausted, the phase will be finish graded, topsoil re- spread and seeded. Erosion control blankets with seed will be placed on steep slopes. Once the phase has been restored, the operation will move to the next phase and the process will begin again. The following table is an estimate of average loads per day/hour: Trucks returning to the pit empty will double the trips per day/hour. Average Loads Trucks per Trucks per Years Weeks Days Total material Day Hour • 765,000 12 3 156 780 980 54 6 Months 10 3 120 600 1275 71 7 Months It is anticipated that there will be crushing operations at the site approximately two weeks per year. It is proposed that the contractor and city have weekly meetings to discuss any issues that may arise. The access for the site will be on 83 Street NE. There will be a parking lot and staging area on the southern side of the site. The site will be gated to prevent unauthorized access. For safety precautions if the proposed school is opened before the completion date of the project, trucks will not haul out of the site during the arrival and departure of students. Haul routes, traffic control and Loads Hauled The travel routes proposed are the following: Leave the site on the west side of the property using the temporary haul road to get to Maciver ave . Travel south on Maciver Ave to county 37 , go east on county 37 to get to Hwy 101. Travel south on Maciver Ave to 70 th street NE, travel west on 70 street to get to county 19. The materials will be hauled off site in belly dump trailers, side dump trailers and tri axle or quad axle dump trucks. The contractor will provide signage along haul routes leaving the site. Erosion control Silt fence will be installed around the site to protect the adjacent properties in areas where runoff could occur. Silt fence will also be placed around the storm water basins to minimize sedimentation. Topsoil stockpiles will be seeded immediately after placement. As stated above, all steep slopes will receive erosion control blankets with seed. A rock construction entrance will be placed on the access road. Ditch checks will be installed in areas of concentrated flows. Dust control and wind erosion control The interior roads will be sprayed with calcium chloride. There will be a water truck on site to control additional dust. The contractor will purchase water from the city for dust control and wind erosion control. Municipal water be purchased from the City of Otsego for use in the water truck. The project will be performed in separate phases. Each phase will be restored before moving to the next phase. Drainage control With the excavating being started from the south going north in phases, the first 2 phases, storm water will be directed to the storm water basin on the south east portion of the property. In the following phases, storm water will directed to the storm water basin on the north east portion of the property. Street sweeping and spill clean up The rock construction entrance will minimize tracking onto the haul roads. However, there are situations, especially after a rain, when the rock entrance is not enough. In these situations, a road sweeper will be available on site to keep the roads clean. If there is a spill on the roadway, the pit personnel will take responsibility for the clean up. Proposed land use After our completion of our excavation, the site will be restored back to farm land. All structures and haul roads will be removed. The type of seed and mulch used on the slopes and field area will be determined later. 3 .1. 1UII4 ,] r. 1 \ I`. I / // I ' . ?� .- \\ /i . \ \\`\ \ t / / \ \ \ / / I \ \� \ 4 : // / 1 1 // 1 i i / .'...'',/ .�P 1 \_$� _/I 1 I l_ / I / 1 \ 1' / , 7/ T 1 • • 1 . .�_i, I . !]�� "y j ` ` . - ^♦ \`�.� /. \ \ ° \ \ \,.. \ \\ , ' .• 1 1 1 \ \ 1,1\ / >3 , 1 1 141 at. , ....•0 �. 1 1 I �O \_ \ ♦�` 1 � • 1 \ \ / i "` `� =� _i + \ r� t t \ i''♦ 1 \/ -\ \ \ `. 1.-,\‘''''...., MY 7 .. ' \ I 1 1 - -. gII \ `\ r \ti • , �c�...K ...> ia.- + ..rYt.rii:.r.y.r•,r \ ( / � , \ . l 1 ' I 1 \ \ 1 � i' r•1 \,4 1;\ a - -. � I III t . ' 1 \ t _ ' 1 \ _ 1 I 1 .�. ` \ I �. 1 l \ .�. /- , _ \ ' \ 1 / t \\ ._ A / / Ir_ \ 1 t \ \ \ \ \ � \1 'ft -_ � \ \ \ � \ ... \ \ \ � 1 ,,.. \ \ ♦ I 1 f 7 i ♦` \ { ^._ -1 / ♦ \` 1 .. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ ,1 1 111 1 1 ,- \ \1 / _ \ ` t - ..` \ \ / • \ . • \ I / 1 I / ' /...-......--- / = • _, I I A i \ \ I I / 1 // \\ ■ 1 ♦ 1 \ \ \1 \ \ \\. 1 1 1 /i_\ .. ? ......,.....\\‘\\\ \ \\ \ .... \ . \ EE \ .-� \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ \\ I / 1 I I 111 \`1.p \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \'`' / 1 f r I \ 1 11 1 t \ . ' 1 .\ 1 1 1 \1\ \ 41 t�.� \ \ \ \; �... ! 1 / II // �. , S - / - 1 1 1 \ \ \ 1 .4 L. 1 \ C y �1� 1�' � L t1 \t1 \ \O, \\ I \\ \I1\ \ 1 1 / 1 /..1 1111 \ \��\\, \ _ / / \ \�\ ` ` , I \ 1 xis. \\\ \ � \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\1 / I / / J .... \` `�\\\��- \\ \\ 11 I 1 / / -\ 1) 1 �\ \ \ I I \\ \ \ \ \ \\ \„� \ \\�`�.\ ,\ \\ , \\ \ \ N \ \ \ \\ I 1 / /aoz 1 •••• `\ \ \ \ \tI11 T 11 I \ \l `'''"?.',1\.., / \ a o i \ \ \ \\\♦.\.\_ I\1 •� \ \ \A1N1 1 \/ / / \ � / i 11 \ 11 \ \ , 1 / /, / 1 /' / . OOZ1 ti \ \\ \ \ \ `\. \ `� \ \ ! I I Iltl \\ 1 1,? / / �. �. � \ \\\ . 1 \\ S • t _// ■ _ . . 1 I \ .\ \\ \ \ \\ \.. \ 11� \ \I ....... • 1 \ / �Z�� = 1 1 1 1 \ \ \ \ � ii. t / / / l -� ` �� 111 /1 1 I l \ \ 1 \ \ ,,,�, \ \ � \ __ _ / , / � 1 11 t1111I r " \ � _ . \:�_'� // / \ 1 i N '/ \ \ \ \_ / / /,' ...41 : I \ \N''''-'..\\\\\ \\ \\\ " / /J// _/ \\ 1 1 / !' � , \\ � �. \...",� _ / , \�+ \ \ \ _ . 1 \ \ \ \ \\ \ , \ r / / \ __ • ' � `= _��..•- • �_ " \ \ / 1 . a / /!. \ \ \ \ 1//.11 ..... , / / .1.. _� r , / 1 1'll � . _ -/ I \ \ \. /// , 1 \\ . " f .' / / I / / // it 1 - +.. o'1 I / - . ._ \ / - 1 1 + p } 1 '' i I ° r . 1 \ I 1 \ I \ \ \ \ \vii' / \ `...-' 1 { / l / / / i '�I E j �: -. ` -.\ I' / ,' ^ _ / r Il t \ / 1 4 , I / I I \ // 1 1 1 \ 11 \ „ i \ 1 1 j +' f / f L / r ' y / -- + / 11 1 . II • 1 , , � ' / / ..i /1 t +• iT•-- \ \ r ; . 11! /i/ J , y_' I / i/ \ 1 / t / / l \ \ • \ \ I AIM \ \ \ � � { \ ' \ \ \ / / / r 1��r f 1 \ - i \ \ I / �` \ \\ III. � / ,..„\\,, \ ` 1 ••••\ / \ / I / I 1 \ I 1 . \ 1 1 1 \ / / ' / / 7 ^ \ \ , \ i' / I / 1 \ I 1 \\ '�. l .•.. I \ \ _ , `.\\ r,,:, \ t. / r I 1 \ _ ` 1 If Il ll \ r I 1 , / // /I -�\ 1 .,,,_, i ♦ ' , I \ � -. r I , / 1 ,'3: • L 1 1 / \� ' \ t ��\ `` [WAN I • . I \\ \\ I 1 1 il ji / / / ii' IIN1 \ \1t1 /n> \ / \ \ \ � \r / ° '._� /r / / l ` ` \ \`-. •\ I 1 I I / 1// // /q '' 100 11 \ / \ \ \ 1 1 _ \ ' ', '' -' . \ \ ' _ 1 _. \ \ 1 r r NI /u \ �t r� 1111 1 / 1 \ \ \_ . \\ \ \\ r / / / '' ,............./ P M , \ _--' , ,p 1 3 " \ 1 \ . 1 1 r I I 1 // \ \ \ \1 \fib\ C �l 1 \ \ y, \ 1 \ I . • / / • i 4 .r i I . \ \ \ \ 0 \ \ 1 1 I I11j1,t111 \, 1 . A \\ � , \1 \ 1 1 .. t � . � \ \ 1 \\ ` ` ■ { �� 1 I t \ \1 1 t/ '' _ � \ -' ,__,•....,..,....,,,,f,........./.., _ �_ , s } )^ , 1 \ \ \ \ 1 1 1 1 ttl \ \ \. : .. \\\ ..... 111 \ 1 \ \ \ �� ' \ \ \ / { •.w�wwwww ... \\ .\ \ \ \ \ I 1 , r `\ \ l \ \, . \ \00_._\ \ \ \ \ \ .�..� � �. °� • s\ \ ` � • \\ \ \ 1 / r -.. \ \ J / / 1 / , .�. \ \\ \ \ ��__` . \ �. \ \,\�\\ WOLh6l/ 1 \ '` 1 \ \ 1 \ ..' .\ •Z . 1 \ . I I \/ I / • J , '''"N‘.\\\".., _ ,, \ \ I � s . \^ 111 I r 1, ': ! 1 \ \ \ \\ ....\__'. �� ` Z%-1'.. " 1 : 4 " .. k a. ,: -�; • 1 , I I 1 -.'• °/ 1 � • _, •••.,,, \ ., \.1 \\ I \~ \ , 1 / t ..;,:•.,// ) / / 'i in 1 t . . -J / i t . i ,_ • / 1 I °' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ r � . � \ \......N*. I // / // StiLZEt �C�. \ ■'• • \\'1 I I 111...f �1 \ I I ., 1 \ \ � ` '� \ 1 \ -\ \ \\ ' ' l ` \ , \ „.'. i J ^ - '�\ \\ \ \ \ \ �._ _ - / e I / \ \ / / ''�$�,I \ \ \\ \\ \ 1 1 I / \ \ \ \. 1 -� /; I \\ \ \ \\ X 11 / \ \ `� o00 �1 �: � � \ � � \\ \\ \ \tlfYLO �� ^\\ \ I 1 1 , ` / r 1 \ l . \ \ ~ \\� / I /. \ of -_ -' J J • ` \ � `\ \ I,. '-- . . � \ - ` _ ∎ Z - - . � ' / s 91Fa�1 --� � hit.'- . ,.'' ' f 1 1 "". - 1" f `' i \ `__=_``.E \ , - J ' �/l/I 1 • i1 1 , . '1 , 7 WO 1_ N 4S I 87th Street NE \ Traller/Office Res troo n Tb 1 PHASE 4 - 9.88 ACRES +1- t . , p. • : her Location H. R. •� z m z 0 CO Q PHASE 3 - 9.36 ACRES +/- '$ • SE2- 9.97 ACRES +/- 2 k lik TD 1D. Interior Haul Roads Temp. Crusher Location ' ExistlugTapogrephy Supplied by Others i c 0 is PHASE 1 - 9.77 ACRES +/- C 1 # • i 'S ri 8 L.; N ae u r. Topsoil Stockpile 83rd Street NE • • o 1 / / \ \ \ � -� / \ �. \ \ \‘‘, ` ,, `ti+ \jam ��`� \� \\ \ \ \ \\ \ . � \-'mi I I I (, ` �\_ \ \ \ \ X "; \),t �� \`, \\� \ \ \1 11\\ \ \ i; `. \ � 1 \ \ \l`` \ \ €1 4U 00 / 1 \ j1 \\\ �,� \ \\\`\ 1 11 I 1 X 1 1 \ A. `` i \. \ 1 Illy\-:. \1 , 9 . \ 1\)1111 I i 1 \ \ E` \ �'\ 1\ \\*\\\ \\\ - • / / / / / /I /I 11 / r , 1 1 a ` 1 1 111 ../ i // / / � \ � \�\ �y ' '�` \ C I _ / ii l 1 l \1 \I\1� , / . � / / /� %% I i l 1, N. \ P V�U� - 1 e • ci ///1 \ \111b\` _ j am / / / // / / I 1 \ \ P4 \ \ / 1 I \\\ 1 \ 1 \ \ � C'� \_''- \ \� -\ - - - - �J J ! / / \ t \\ \, ; 1 . ,.� \ I 1 I / 1 :.. / - / \ I \ \ \ ;; _, --- �.. / // // \) � 111 \ I \ \ \ \ \ I / ` \\ .... /// \ 1 I / 1 ' f/ .- / ) / / ..o,. / / 1 \ / / / /\ 1 1 I / 1 • _IN -� / / / J I / / I \ 1 ) /% % .. \ \ � \ o \ \ \ \ \ % I _- 1 // I / .'- - 1 1 1//1/1 \\ \ \ \ \\ I . / / ..../ % 1 / / 1/ 1 : \ \ \ �\ \ - "/ / 1 1 "'^ \ / � / /_ ∎ . � \ \ \ . `\ \ \ \\ \. \� \ l 1 E \ \ ... N. //// \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / 1 \ I . L.L. / - -- \ Nolo 11 , 1 1 1 / _ �\`� \♦ \' ∎ � :::: �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ N / �` . ... J / ...j 1 \� U 1 1 I 1 / \ \ \\ � \ \\ \ / W / r. 1 \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\ l 4. \ 1 \ \\\ \\. \\\ \ \ \ 41 \ ,., ■ 1 / \ \\\ \\ \\ \\ \ I 1 \\ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ \ 4hi / / ( I \ 1 \ \ \ 1\ \ \ \\ .\ \ ) \ . \ \�� \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ ■ .\ , ,., 1 7 / / 1 / 1 \\ \ \ \\. \ \\ \1 \ \ \ \ \�� \ \� \\ \ \ \ 1 \ 1W � / I l \ \\� \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ • .. 1 \ \ \� \ \ \ \\‘',0\A\ 1 1 11 \ I 1 ) \ \ \ \ \ \. \� 4 l ... \ \ \ i \ 1 1 / . . ../ � 1 \ ,./11)1 1 1\ \ 1 \ I j I l / \ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ , � . 4,,,,k,..0 . ��11\ \ \ -- \� `` \ L. -__� __� �--/ 1\ \ \i .,.. \\ \\ \�� \\�,-��_ - -/ /- 1/ 1 I►i�� • \\ /\ I \ � / � / 1 1 1 \ \ \ J - - \ \ �/ ▪ 1 / ...; , '; =-_-: \11 ; A \ �\ / , • \ \ j \� -_�..� \k , / / III; / - 1 \ \ \ / 0 ✓ / \ I \ �/ /- - \ \ \ . \ / ' r \ \ \ ► �1 / / 1 +•• 111 .\ \ 1 1 \ 1 .. / • `\ \ \ ' \ ',;,:, \ 41).- n' . 1 • ♦ \ - -) 1 \ / � \ 111111.1111.1..1111.11111. man -� • \ ` \ \ j - \ \ 1 i \ - - I l 9 \ ) ) / I f - XV - 1 1 , /// i ce' ; / c /,/ «:./ I ,#� .\ \\ \ � \ \ \\ / 1 1 / / \ \ \\ \\\ \ / \ , ... 1 \ \ \ 1 1 // 1 . ,.. �\ \ \ \.' / / t N _ - -_ % \ \� \ • \ \ . w. \\ '-',../ r •+ mid / J \ 1 '''.....,_,.... il lb' '' .. / // .�\ / i. 1 1 _._•......:.,, i I ti X SIM I ... \ Q .... Alt i 1 / • 1\ t 1 1 A ' \ i x I \ \ \ \n \ ,PH� 1 r >f 0 ! / I i • \\ \ \\ ti r I� / / l II l . , w x I . —\ \\ \ 1 P S E � "'� 9 179 �, 1 \\ \ t i 1 l � �, , t --'-. \ \\ \ k \ \ x 919.1 ;'. \\ , k \ \ \ \ I \ 8457 -3a , II \\ �\ \ \ 1 I t � \ \ 9 '' 1 \ \ , \tit � ` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3 ' i Q \ r` I / B orin g Locations I . " I 11 a re Approximate. �• \ \ \ \ \ \ \ � ( � , V 1 ��— V V ( a� x9196 �� 111 ;::.:, v......... \\\\, \ \ 1 \ t \ � \ ' � STORM WATER BASIN 1 t 1 \ \ 1 ,i, a �a� fi r. e s \ '11111■1■4■411l1111.■MINIT IMMIUMM■11.1.11110011111. MOO{ MI = M. , 11=1,11# \ �� a « � \ \ \ \ �° °� : If x / .��. ..r ` \ \ AREA ss \''' ` N. `� So is uno 1 I ` �` \ \; \ \ \ 1 I x \ � _ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ 1 l 90 r p f ,\ \ \ : , a .. \ \ \ \ \ ` \ \ SO \ \ \.) 9�E6 I \ \ 1: kv.FGe---ce) — - ■\>/i x ) \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ " il 1 � ° r " . � /l /jf�� +� InIik ►III © I ' I ' t — �. , ` \ ' � � / / / / //� / ,,, 1 ► 1 1 1 ► \ \ \ i i i t \ � \ ` \ i f it, r , -� - it' I 1 / / / / X 11\ \\ / / ) / / 1 ` ' \ ► 1 1 I / / // l / ,, 1 / / / 71'' / , - /J ! \ � �.. � � ,r te / / // _/ ( 1 1 i 931 4 / le., / . ,, , \'N', - '7 .,.. -- •' - '' . .....40 ....' I / I f / / /.1 f"' I \\S le i / / /_. \ / i / / / / 1 .. 1 r � / 1 0 / � / / \ / / / / / / /�/ / / L PHASE )) I / / / 1 1 / /,� i i'_ \ / / / / / N I \ , / ; ' ` Boring Locations I 1 \ 1 I S / 7/1: \\ S / �. / / are Approximate. % te, 1 I � s / / id G ou,� 7 i v eioor _m :A\ / .:- i - 4,7 1 4 ,. - . 7 ...-- t` NNL 910.5 / / / APR/1. PR 1 200 10... / / / 1 .. / ' . " 995.8 ;•." ... ,_,... _ . ,,, / � •� V / / , r - i II . 1 t 1. i alliNiiht-Ak dy 4._ . < _ ,,, . :..- , , at e t 41,1 1 , Ian, 1...,.1.,meii,:, - �1nl�! 7\ xa k. a x V i ` `S � ..""rte ...iG_" _ "��i� J< 1 x , III : x / .... `` `..° / / / / ' /- -� ` �.` \ N. — r / i / / r ,/ N. "I / / r x / f � 1 x 4 •� / / B • -- .. ' . /■ , / / , / / --- r ,, .... \ t 1 0 N ''''? I �� 4 ter' — / J _ I )/ / % — _.. i . / / / _ � ... •-•„,, ,,.. 7 .-- . - - - - .� \ c 1 eV .., 4 -, 2 \ t; \ l'-' 1 A I f 0. \ . .‘ \ \ 1 i 1 1/ � � ��vti•,. I 1 1, i / /// l l // � \ � ' 1 \' / // //// 7 / /\ \ 1 \\ 1 1 \ ///// / ///////// / // /. \ I � � f , ; i 4' "*". -- r ,--- 7 - v• - •-.0 -.•--- '1 tempt 1• q, u I!iiilI y / /i ill / i i i / � � � r // \� \4 \ \ C5 ( 1 ,, * x - ...,,,,.r 9 1 I , r \ \ \ \ 41,4; PHASE 4 x + sr,. \ \ , ( r Boring�L,ocations -� A \ \ \ \ +9 9,811 XCRFrS +/- ' a re A roi at ., r \ 1 I I I 1 I V\ \ ‘%,.• Q \ x ,� �', '. \\ I x 1 ` � j �� y� 1 1 \ x \ \\ \ `� �a ` , \� \ \ \ \ �� \ \ \ \\ \ \ � � 918.8 1 i \ \ 1 \ ; � „�" ..,eve .;,,. > „, A \ '', — \ \ � I 1 �,,,, �. � •�-'�+.�`.� � P � � � �� y �. '� � PHASE 2 x I y ?e n , 'r` -rw \ \4 # 1g 1 iI 4 tt'r\I \ NN. N., � �� \ \ , .... \ \ � v. \-. - ..*. .... N , \, 1 Q � _ I II \ \\ \\ \ 1 , I `�` 1. \‘ xi 1 1 . \ . Itt � '-''� 11 11 1 11 1 1c i � )I ) / I iI ) . l I 1 \ \ 1 �. \ \ \�, `1 :/4// \ 1 % 1 1 / 1' 1 , i --...,-... ",...-..,:-- -_ •__ .:>c 4' ... / / i 8.6 � , ,477. / t -.' / � I 1 1 1 , \ 934: b 1 • I, \'' s'''. '-'`' °11%.s. f C. )1 / -A'`41 ) I \ \ \ \ .--- 1„,:,, ; • - ..„... ...........„, r i , ) J.44 _, --- , / i / , I ` N �� 1 1 PHASE 21 I \ / 1 _te 'i — ---,_ - ...... ____, , , ,, , 1,, ,, a f [ , e'''7, 1 litgi ' I CI I W !! • / j .m.„„_ 1 I , 1 87,12 1 14 - - - %// - - �� ' I x ,.., / # \ w \ \ \ \ \ x .., \ \ ` I I � ; / x `,.; /\ \ \ ,- \ \ f 1 W 1 / / .... ..... *•••• 1 ‘ --- --' & .... ( / i; . f *„.. i fr { 11 , ��\ �\ � i ce_ \ - 1 1 I t.. \ V 1 ' s i p �'' \. A A I , �' r/ i' \\ : ■ / i --' 1 ": ;:: \' '' :::: \ \ \ 1\ \ \ \ \ \ \ - 1 I \ \ J / 2/::,,,;.\, •11 . ` ` I i 1 1 1 1 I 1 \) ) m\ \ \ \ _ i ; 1 ' ; 1 _. - � _, x �� - ■ A I I v I v V 1 1 1 � ' r I \ NFU / / i i i / / Mgr 4 4 I ‘ I II ,; \ s, k y� I 1 111 ii' ` 1 �`� , N ` f � 4111 c �` ' / /. \ 1 1 \ I (( a + / I :11 \ \ \` �W 1 1 1 .41 \ 1 I /�� \ \ \ \. ‘..g � \\ I �\ 11 11. / / / I I f fir/i \\\ \\\ \ \ w \ -,, _ii, I / 4 , 4. „-- - • ,-f f ( j i : / � � � � �V�� w V \ V A 1 _ x , \ \ \� � \� V�1 \ \ \ \\ ' \ �. I I ` ' \ y i- \ 1 1 11 1 \11 1 I / \ \\ \ *\1 \ \ ► il 1 1 1 V A V A\ V AI \ V n A l 1 1 � \� \ V A \ „ I s� n� T x61 \ \ \\ \\ \ \ \ .«" \ Il \ it 1 / \ \\ \\\ \ \ \ \ I I1 111 V \ \ \��\ \ \ \ \ \` \\ I I I / ire Approximate. `� / / \ 1 \ \`�\\\\` \\\ \ \� 1��'�� I \ \ 1\ ��Il�lll \ \`` \ \ \ 1 \ \ I r 1. \ 1\ \ \ \. \\ J �� ,. x..,., 1 x \, \ \� % \\` \\ x ; 1 am, �: _ �� \ ' . 1 • \/ x�.. \ \ c\ \ ` : - a'i - " — mag \.. \ \ \ \ \ . ., \ 1 • 1 � ` � : - \ 1 •1 \\ xsm... \ \ \ \ � —J / / ' �` \X ( . N.•• \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ \ \ \\ ' e 1.— 1 I \� �� / / F' \11 /) \ \ \• \ ` \\ \ \ l' \ \ 1 / ( / — �, 7 i ii \ \;,/ I l l \ \ , \ \ I C \ \ ` I i C \\ \\ 1 — x. I / / I x ■ /, II )1 \ \\ i 4 ��1 1 \ \ 1 \.< ,_77 ) )> J 1 1 1 1 ' WeMN lawl Pow 20 OMB 6h 1MM1Qem ow Mira 16 Section D-D Section A -A Prowd GM Section B-B � � • ■ Solid Grow.,.' _ _. Ja . jvyur ul Section C-C • • APR 1 1 2007 Preliminary SectionF -F A\ pp�gY "r :ffEw2!1 NC cc. C $raw 1i OF A 1 O O % ( IP 4 / i O ....... ******4.......**%%. 12 1 1 OOOOO 1111 \ § a A i i \ 1 1 . , 1 -, g - 2 1 . . 1 i 8 a A i 1 b 1 a I i 1 3 . 3 I V. .3 f ■..i La . ,..• k) ../ I 11 1 \ e Ca E a — 0 ,21i ,T L. •=:C Q. • ,i, . , . . PRELIMINARY CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY EAGLE TRUCKING , . BRIMS WAR 1 1 , 1 i affnmAir • . 1 1 .--8777.1 STREET RE _=0 w... i -- 1 ...:. 1 i . . ........... "RP I , • . ,tu. .... 1........." - , Tax , ■:::' . PP, • • ' i SIG 4 . • ...,, ; 1 • 1 t— . " ... lit manrearr ,,--otr.rataum. ankle ... . ". , ,r; . ... I 0 1 iro I • ma 96 I I 4 ... ''..•... . ,:.:., : lb 1 • • 0 A I I 1 j 3 3.• I r. : I 1 1 •;!.--'"- — 1 : ! II i — . 1 , I • •• 3 , • ... 3- 4, .c — — • I ‘3. 1**.Misr .... ...A' - 3 3 1:= •I lRao ,' V .... „,,, Papal. fp - Slk ',II N I 9 M i r.1 = ...se t ,-. rl ia t . ...CF., 1 NOM ... ..... MUSTY 11111P L "00 .01090 Ires bonlyfo/bY by Ea. Rub abal Pena ow on WU/00. . Ea I... — L - ,,„„, PANEL INSCRIPHON WEE loodogs dam on. en bo ...sum* Odom 91 L fO• PP no. P.M. ■Pnauf . Imooll1 of ION not AddIllonol .4 .,:::`. ! i r" , --!..or woonoonla /1711.1i0lb and/Of mayellbearlyes nay ods1 ofhor Moo bon . 1 1 f , 3OPPO nom. Sum, subfool Was., wen feb.110 of o coned VW 7 111 ''''.. ! i 1.e =ZIT Lt 29.00000 °..7".." HZ' 10. :It" '''''' anon** or an efinenvis IlOe .00.0.0. 0 wooer of section 79. how* 121. Roo. 25 NNW County. 0600.044 i .. A I. ; t 9.2 .! , 1 ,,„,.•,....„..„,„..,,,,„„..„.. ....,,„ of S•edlon /A Tomo IX, WIEN . ,:, 1 ,, „„,,.. ik —...—_ ..""PR ' coo • 0010192 PAY MCMINO11 FOL•O 45 4450010 ':.!, •Vis , ' ..... . , I..., I re :kw Sentinr of .x 00.110' 01 lbe Noy.* Cuomo el PM. PP o OM= MN 410VIAIENT SET, 00.0.00 OM 41370 :7:* .• ow/ 3 - 1:,1 .... 41, warn MN COLPITY CAST mot mamma • ,, ,::,..:-. mama • lon— s3. i ..... i o . OnuoTr =I, i re I PM ra/m48 I hereby owlIfy Owl l ., plod l of f wo• prepared 2 or under ,:,..... 1 ,.. rby dine rontnislen Mot 1 ant • ' o duly litodolevd Sumner trodor ir mom •Oo I& 0415 110111r1/01 11 700 Otnro o Of IA o. '.. if" • " Nos'" 7 \.. th. !-- • d ,;* LL INN a SONS, INC. ASONe.C.41> 1 r s—a3Ro snazerne a I GRAPHIC SCALE II r. 111 m Professional Land Surveyors Dol Limo., No. 41579 I NE, Suite 110 Q Uno Lakes, MN 55014 ( 0 MP 1 • 161. (411)3414200 Pax (6SI) 3614701 la . ON n. PLOT 0.470: On 14, 2006 %Von 0000 ru 40.40. (MO) k \ rod \ CAD \ 06p(PA 050.208 \ OOPOOD.34119 EXHIBilf :.1 I y b 9 Li v 0 i 9 k 'O y ° G L i 5 r- / J ,III 1 i F i i X1 1 1.I.. N ' 1 ° g o cba . �y • , elaa eaQai — -7- \ 1 �*4 y- re'-‘,..g.'" --'.� -'. ' 7 lw - } ,, $. , � — 1 > � ;,.. � _ .� � ®t f *Pt '1,0 P '14 . • - ,\ ---•• \- ..e.- `.." .." ": IP --- -; ,,I . , 71 , ;.4 Ar t; 111, / i '. . 1 - c, i ,. 1 . - ._ 1 � v.., - E �1 / • ._ A '� .• a 1 � b1 `r ! a Y \ / / i« AI / A V ��, tr �� \ \ .�.. :+ �.ls x 1 (' . b ,4 to , 1•:1 o ' � o , ` i 1 I « \\ (\ 1 / i t { iil ° , ®� \ ®0 o bo� • r N . . , .: i . "*. / --' tip ,.; :4'%miii.011,.'" 7044' 0 '7'''.. ' ---- I 1 / / 1O `41. , 114 � \ t gww / 1 �A r y s1 I ,1 ' ..... , .. P �� _ 1� 1LJi d 1 1 / t t \ k. o�� tili 1 t 1 \ t;' ; I — \ awl— \ /� ee • ...It., \\ i 1 g t \ \ \ 1 " / / % '' 1.= ei ; \ \ \ \ \ \ �� \ F _ / �;: !fig 11 - � I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ter / / j / i/ / I � : �` \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \. \\ I A1 � 1 1 ( i ll r• -, //� / 1 $ --- 1 - A V A \ a \ / J// 1 . / / s ..- ,1 . \ C : E / gs / � \ fir ' 1' Q >v ® \ ` , / l o { \ f D 1 m 1 I I 1 I _ y r - `' - - .._ J_ P E = 4 �,�". ON THE GREAT FtIt mai 1 R ROAD 1 i � r f Future Land Use : iii ' _ . S �� I I Rural 1 1 I I Rural Residential 11 � ; 1 111 1 — / , SITE LOCATION �I I Riekla�l, LD Residential (Large Lot) 41 AO' 1 , =- 111 a 111 API. r�1S i �� I I LD Residential 11 f I - - ' I LDRviD Residential 7,14.1. } F ._ ` 1 _r` I MDMD Residential a 1 - Commerdal 1111 _ 7 .=impumi nr -alms F ,; 5 -0 11111 Office - r; ' . ,l - I (Industrial , " >'' "'?t,;: ; ; � ; :1 TR,, - � . PubliGQuasi Public � 1 Sr - $ � 1 � � �4 � J i *.` � ,I ;14.: � Y:t , i Sevier 0 istrid 11 a n r .a _ NI I it R .R _ -- -1 � . 1 , - S iP le 11; ri II J JU ® MI 1 j C 1 1 Emil r : • fralpikr u1`i�Bu • t — t .11 iulI N��. X rn - -MME .> \ t _ ' ' " � � 3 111[ _ --- .. � �l i , � 1 • an ` i aka. AfCP OATC ►ROYIfIF f, R4 �:\ 1 1 , I flay .. r.. ' 45' M i , — : - ~ ' �f ■ Note: This map 1s for planning purposes only. ._ ��— c , The Comprehensive Plan must be consulted to `" verify poll eppl fable to specific land use ti designations. Updated: Odober 2006 CITY OF 04 -17 -07 OTSEGO NitAgAgAINABIANANIAIsAid FINDINGS & DECISION WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPROVE Petition for EAW APPLICANT: Ben J. Bastyr, Petitioners Representative APPLICATION: Consideration of a petition for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) related to a proposed gravel /sand excavation within the City of Otsego. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 23 April 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the subject site is PID118- 500 - 193100, 118 - 500 - 192300,118- 500 - 192400 and 118 - 500 - 193200. B. The City has received an application for an interim use permit (IUP) to allow for excavation for transport of more than 50 cubic yards of material from the subject site. C. A petition requesting preparation of an EAW for the proposed CUP has been received by the City on 29 January 2007 and remains in effect for one year from that date. D. In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.0500, the Environmental Quality Board has designated the City as the Responsible Govemment Unit for determining if an EAW is to be prepared. E. Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 and Section 20- 38 -3.D.4 of the Zoning Ordinance require the City Council to consider the need for an EAW on whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects based on (but not limited to) consideration of the following factors: a. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects. b. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. c. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, or of EISs previously prepared on similar projects. F. The Memorandum dated 18 April 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances and criteria, preparation of an EAW IS REQUIRED TO BE PREPARED subject to the following stipulation: 1. The EAW shall evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed use to the extent illustrated generally by the grading plan initially submitted 7 September 2006. 1 MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23rd day of April, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Foumier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 2 CITY OF 04 -17 -07 OTSEGO FINDINGS & DECISION WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA DISMISS Petition for EAW APPLICANT: Ben J. Bastyr, Petitioners Representative APPLICATION: Consideration of a petition for preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) related to a proposed gravel /sand excavation within the City of Otsego. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 23 April 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the subject site is PID118 -500- 193100, 118 - 500 - 192300,118 - 500 - 192400 and 118 - 500 - 193200. B. The City has received an application for an interim use permit (IUP) to allow for excavation for transport of more than 50 cubic yards of material from the subject site. C. A petition requesting preparation of an EAW for the proposed CUP has been received by the City on 29 January 2007 and remains in effect for one year from that date. D. In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.0500, the Environmental Quality Board has designated the City as the Responsible Government Unit for determining if an EAW is to be prepared. E. Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 and Section 20- 38 -3.D.4 of the Zoning Ordinance require the City Council to consider the need for an EAW on whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects based on (but not limited to) consideration of the following factors: a. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects. b. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. c. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, or of EISs previously prepared on similar projects. F. The Memorandum dated 18 April 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances and criteria, preparation of an EAW IS NOT TO BE REQUIRED based on the following findings: 1. The proposed excavation does not exceed thresholds established by Minnesota Rules 4410. 4300, Subp. 12.b for a mandatory EAW 2. Conformance with established performance standards within the Zoning Ordinance and Engineering Manual address any potential environmental effects related to the proposed use 1 3. Previous environmental studies within the City outline extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled. 4. Excavation of the subject site to the elevations shown on the submitted Final Grading / Closure Plan do not cause excavation of adjacent properties resulting in a connected action as per Minnesota Rules 4410.1000, Subp. 4. 5. Minnesota Rules 4410.1400 states that an EAW shall be prepared as early as practicable in the development of the proposed project, whereas the City has received complete plans for the proposed use to evaluate compliance with established performance standards and City policies. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23rd day of April, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 2 Yahoo! Mail - b bastyr@yahoo.com Page 1 of Subject: RE: Otsego Mining Application Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 10:56:36 -0500 Fpm "Gregg Downing" <Gregg.Downing@state.mn.us> Add to Address Book `J Add Mobile Alert To: "Ben Bastyr" <b_bastyr @yahoo.com> CC: "Jon Larsen" <Jon.Larsen @state.mn.us> Mr. Bastyr: In response to your questions: #1. The relevant provision of the rules here is thq definition of "phased action," which reads: "two or more projects by the same proposer that an RGU determines will have environmental effects on the same geographic area and are substantially certain to be undertaken sequentially over a limited period of time? (Mn Rules, part 4410.0200, subpart 60). The issue in this case is whether both actions have the °same proposer? Regarding that question, our guidance, Guide to MN Environmental Review Rules, states that only some of the ownership of both projects needs to be in common, not the whole of the ownership (pg 3). Thus, since the excavating company is a participant common to both, this appears to be a phased action and therefore must be treated as a single project. • #2. We always consider a project to be at least as big as whatever the permits in question would authorize or allow. Since the CUP would cover the 39 acres plus the school land, all of that would be considered vs. the 40 acre threshold. The internal phasing plan is of no consequence to the question of whether the 40 -acre threshold is exceeded. hope this reply answers your questions satisfactorily. If not, or if you have other questions, please contact me again. Gregg Downing 651/201 -2476 From: Ben Bastyr [mailto:b bastyr@yahoo.c m] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2007 1:09 PM To: Gregg.Downing@state.mn.us Subject: Ots!a Mining Application Mr. Downing, I would appreciate some clarification regarding recent changes in the mining application issue. Origionally this was a 39 acre project The Elk River school district may work with the excavating company to remove gravel from school land in exchange for free grading. The two sites are contiguous therefore exceeding the 40 acre threshold for an EAW. My questions are; 1. There are two land owners with one excavating company controlling removal of the gravel. Does this exceed the 40 acre threshold even though there are two land owners? 2. The origional application proposed excavating the 39 acres in four 10 acre phases. As each phase is completed, the area would be restored to prepare for future development. The CUP would be for one 39 acre project plus the school land. Does the 10 acre phasing change the requirements for an EAW if the overall http: //us.f370. mail . yahoo.com /ym/ShowLetter ?MsgId =3427 3789632 5529 1858 3437 0 1370 14608_... 4/5/200' Yahoo! Mail - b bastyr@yahoo.com Page 2 of 2 project exceeds 40 acres on two adjacent properties? The city of Otsego has not yet received a new proposal from the mining company. They are waiting for the school districts decision whether or not to work together on the excavating. Please call if you have any questions: 763 -441 -4068 Thank you! Ben Bastyr 111+,1 Ihaa f27l1 mail vabnn rnmhimighnwLettex7Mscild=3427 3789632 5529 1858 3437 0 1370 14608 ... 415/200' A ITEM 8_2 NAC NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners(u?nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 18 April 2007 RE: Otsego — Ostrom Building Relocation CUP NAC FILE: 176.02 — 07.06 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 16 April 20 to consider the application for a CUP for a detached garage building relocated to 9124 Ohland Avenue. Property owners Rick and Janice Ostrom were present and had no comments. A property owner within the same subdivision as the subject site asked about the compatibility of the existing building's exterior materials with the subdivision covenants. City staff stated that subdivision covenants are a private agreement between property owners, which are not enforced by the City. A question was also asked regarding the extent of exterior changes to the building to make it match the existing principal dwelling. Mr. Ostrom replied that they will paint the existing detached garage to match the house but that no other improvements are planned. The Planning Commission had no comments. The public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend approval of the requested CUP. The City Council will consider the application and the following possible actions at their meeting on 23 April 2007 at 6:30 PM. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve the CUP, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is applied for and approved by the Building Official prior to relocation of the structure. 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six (6) months from the date of location on site, subject to approval of the Building Official. 3. The relocated structure shall be painted to match the existing principal building on the lot within six (6) months from the date a building permit is issued for the building on the site. 4. A permanent occupancy permit for the relocated structure shall not be issued until such time as the property is brought into compliance with all City Code and Zoning Ordinance regulations. 5. The applicant is to submit a detailed site plan or certificate of survey identifying the proposed garage location in relation to the existing septic system and well locations, subject to approval by City staff. 6. A security as required by Section 20 -19-3 of the Zoning Ordinance as determined by City staff is posted. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and /or Zoning Ordinance provisions. C. Motion to table the application. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Tim Roche!, Building Official Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ron Wagner, City Engineer Rick and Janice Ostrom 2 CITY OF 04 -18 -07 OTSEGO FINDINGS & DECISION CUP APPROVAL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Rick and Janice Ostrom. APPLICATION: Request for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow relocation of an existing detached garage to 9124 Ohland Avenue NE. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 23 April 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is Lot 3, Block 8 Antelope Park, City of Otsego, County of Wright, State of Minnesota. B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for future Low Density Residential land uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area. C. The subject site is zoned R -3, Residential Long Range Urban Service District. D. Consideration of the application is to be based upon (but not limited to) the criteria set forth by Section 20 -4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The subject site is guided for low density residential uses by the Comprehensive Plan. A detached garage is a permitted accessory use in the R-3 District and the use is consistent with the guided land use for the area. 2. The proposed uses compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The surrounding area is developed with low density, single family residential uses which are planned to continue as discussed in the Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The relocated structure shall be required to comply with all applicable performance standards. The location of the existing sewage treatment system in relation to the proposed new garage shall be subject to the review and approval of the Building Official. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which ft is proposed. Finding: The relocated garage may be considered an improvement of the property and, as such, it is expected to have a positive effect on the neighborhood provided all performance standards are met. 1 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed garage is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The relocated structure will be used for storage of personal property of the property owner and is not anticipated to generate traffic beyond the capabilities of streets serving the subject property. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities induding parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. E. The Planning Report dated 27 December 2007 and Planning Report addendum dated 1 February 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 16 April 2007 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the application, and other evidence, the public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the findings outlined above. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the application is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is applied for and approved by the Building Official prior to relocation of the structure. 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six (6) months from the date of location on site, subject to approval of the Building Official. 3. The relocated structure shall be painted to match the existing principal building on the lot within six (6) months from the date a building permit is issued for the building on the site. 4. A permanent occupancy permit for the relocated structure shall not be issued until such time as the property is brought into compliance with all City Code and Zoning Ordinance regulations. 5. The applicant is to submit a detailed site plan or certificate of survey identifying the proposed garage location in relation to the existing septic system and well locations, subject to approval by City staff. 2 6. A security as required by Section 20 -19 -3 of the Zoning Ordinance as determined by City staff is posted. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23rd day of April, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Foumier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 3 ITEM 8_3 NAC £, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 17 April 2007 RE: Otsego — LINCO; New Shop Building NAC FILE: 176.02 — 07.08 The Planning Commission considered site and building plans for a new 24,110 shop building for LINCO at their meeting on 16 April 2007. Mr. Brad Praught was present to address questions from the Planning Commission. The one issue addressed by Mr. Praught and discussed by the Planning Commission was the provision of an on -site septic treatment system, toilet facilities and well. Mr. Praught said the business currently operates with portable toilets and bottled water. The proposed building would not include restroom facilities or running water. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the application subject to the conditions outlined below. The site and building plans will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 23 April 2007 at 6:30 PM. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve site and building plans for LINCO subject to the following conditions: 1. The LINCO Addition Final Plat as approved by the City Council on 11 April 2005 shall be recorded with Wright County prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed shop building. 2. The applicant shall submit a drawing showing the exterior appearance of the proposed shop building. 3. The rock face block exterior of the proposed building shall include at least one integral color (other than gray). 4. Access to CSAH 37 shall be subject to Wright County review and approval. 5. All grading plans shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 6. A drainage and utility easement shall be established over all proposed ponding areas, subject to approval by the City Engineer. 7. Provisions for on -site water and sewage treatment shall be identified and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 8. The applicant shall install overstory trees along the 60 Street frontage and east property line from the front lot line to the front line of the proposed building 40 feet on center. The trees to be installed must be 2- 1/2" caliper trees of a type approved by City staff. 9. The comments of the City Engineer's memorandum dated 11 April 2007 are addressed subject to approval of the City Engineer. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Tim Roche!, Building Official Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ron Wagner, City Engineer Brad Praught, applicant 2 CITY OF 04 -17 -07 OTSEGO FINDINGS & DECISION WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA SITE AND BUILDING PLANS APPLICANT: Brad Praught/Linco Fab, Inc. APPLICATION: Request for site and building plan approval to construct a 24,100 square foot shop building. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 23 April 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is Lot 1, Block 1 LINCO ADDITION, City of Otsego, County of Wright, State of Minnesota. B. The property lies within the Urban Service Expansion Area and is guided for industrial uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned 1 -2, General Industrial District which allows for the existing use as a permitted use. D. The planning report dated 12 April 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. E. The memorandum dated 11 April 2007 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. DECISION 1: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested application is hereby approved, based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The LINCO Addition Final Plat as approved by the City Council on 11 April 2005 shall be recorded with Wright County prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the proposed shop building. 2. The applicant shall submit a drawing showing the exterior appearance of the proposed shop building. 3. The rock face block exterior of the proposed building shall include at least one integral color (other than gray). 4. Access to CSAH 37 shall be subject to Wright County review and approval. 5. All grading plans shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer. 6. A drainage and utility easement shall be established over all proposed ponding areas, subject to approval by the City Engineer. 1 7. Provisions for on -site water and sewage treatment shall be identified and are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 8. The applicant shall install overstory trees along the 60 Street frontage and east property line from the front lot line to the front line of the proposed building 40 feet on center. The trees to be installed must be 2 -1/2" caliper trees of a type approved by City staff. 9. The comments of the City Engineer's memorandum dated 11 April 2007 are addressed subject to approval of the City Engineer. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23` day of April, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 2 ::1; 77:-.; akan of i 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 _�� Phone: 763/427 -5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 • MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ronald Wagner, P.E. City Engineer Brad Praught, Linco Far, Inc. Gary D'heilly, P.E., D'Heilly Engineering & Associates, Inc. Taylor Land Surveyors, Inc. From: Brent Larson, E.LT. Date: April 11, 2007 Re: Linco - Preliminary Plat for Site, Grading and Utilities We have reviewed the Preliminary Plans, printed 3/2 for the above - referenced project and would offer the following comments: Title Sheet 1. A revision date is required. 2. The contact name(s) for the Engineer and Surveyors are needed. 3. The Developers Engineer shs,ll sign the cover sheet of the plans. 4. A signature line for Ronald J. Wagner, P.E. City Engineer shall be included on the final plan set. 5. The 11" x 17" plan sets are missing the vicinity and location map. Existing Conditions 1. An existing conditions plan is required. Existing conditions plans require the following information: _1. Existing zoning classifications for land in and abutting the subdivision. ^ 2. Total area of the proposed plat. 3. Show location, names, widths of existing streets, buildings, etc. T 4. Location, size, and elevations of existing sewers, watermain, culverts, and other underground facilities within 150'. 5. Boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided or subdivided land, identified by name and ownership. +.:` ±3 and Se1tin_S lt3s.:31Sr " r: +r r 1 F11:3 t t- 1E5` TBT � i :+ i '+�� ` �'�_.tiiv ..s interne: . _ :,�1 _,:i,t._�_ t'.711� Y I�� i� Jam.. _ ., LE-T. :C. r t; 1. _ o," Site Plan 1. The proposed pond and storm sewer in the northeast comer of the site is depicted extend onto the adjacent property. The drainage and utility easement depicted around the pond and the outlet shall be shown on a final plat. All required easements on adjacent property requires separate documentation. This documentation shall be submitted to the City for review. 2. An ingress/egress easement is required over the shared driveway entrance off of CSAH 37 (60 Street). 3. Label the Right -of -Way width along CSAH 37. The ROW width shall be subject to Wright County approval. 4. If the proposed building is to have facilities requiring water and sewer the location of the proposed well and septic system shall be depicted. 5. Verify the setbacks depicted are in accordance with the proposed zoning requirements. 6. The "3 string electric fence" will need to be relocated. Please depict the fence's new location. 7. Depict the 5' parking setback. 8. It is unclear if the two culverts at the driveway entrance are existing or proposed. Grading Plan 1. A minimum 4:1 slope is required above the NWL of the pond. Please revise the 3:1 slope currently depicted. 2. Please provide additional proposed spot elevations for the driveway and parking areas. The gravel area to the north and west of the proposed building is very flat. We recommend providing a minimum 1% slope over all paved and gravel areas. 3. There is a considerable cross -slope (12 %-17 %) along the gravel driveway along the east side of the proposed building. Please revise. 4. Verify the invert of the outlet pipe from the pond. The current invert is lower than the downstream contours. "Grading to daylight" may be needed. 5. Additional erosion control is required at the edge of the pavement where the storm water runoff leaves the pavement and travels to the CSAH 37 ditch. (i.e., near the southeast and southwest • corners of the proposed building) 6. Rip -rap is required around the flared end section of the pond outlet. SW'A'P Plan '1 �: =�ri -j; r J. 1. See Grading Plan comments 6 & 7. 2. Fiber blanket is required at the inlet and outlet ends of the culverts under the driveway entrance. 3. Depict the location of a rock entrance. Storm Water Drainage Report 1. A drainage area map is required. 2. The listed SCS Runoff Coefficient for the Pre- development Runoff Grass Area does not agree with the Post - development Runoff Grass Area coefficient. Per the City of Otsego Engineering Manual the following curve numbers shall be used for this site. Grass Cover > 75% 61 Grass Cover < 75% 65 Agricultural land 65 Gravel Areas 85 Paved Areas 98 3. In the water quality pond calculations, the formula calculating the S value mislabels the CN. The equation should be S = (1000/89) -10. 4. Per the City of Otsego requirements, the pond shall provide dead storage for a minimum 2.5" 24 -hr Type II storm (approx 12,000 cf). Please provide calculations. 5. It does not appear that enough new impervious area is included in the water quality calculation for the 0.5" runoff calculation. All new gravel area as well as paved and building areas shall be included in the new impervious area for this calculation. 6. The volume provided (8,970 cf) for the BMP calculation does not agree with the volume provide (17,000± cf) in the dead storage calculation. Please provide the areas of the contours and volume calculation below the NWL elevation of 946.0 to verify. Other Considerations 1. A Preliminary/Final Plat is required. 2. A hydrology report is required. All NPDES Permit requirements shall be met as well as verification that the proposed off-site storm water runoff rate does not exceed the existing rate. 3. If a septic system is to be installed soil borings at the proposed location are required. 4. Details for the pond (#404), silt fence ( #501), outlet control structure (#402 & 407), pavement/gravel sections, rock entrance ( #505), and B612 Curb and Gutter (MnDOT #7100G). Otsego Standard Details are attached. I Hakanson Anderson C:\Documents and Settings \Tana o racy Internet Files Settings \Tem p .ontent.IE5 \GOF Assoc., Inc . • i 1 • 1 Q g N FREE BOARD TOP OF 10' Min.. 1' Min. 100 I EVENT PEAK • BERM ELEVATION + &• ..44 10' NORMAL WATER LEVEL 10' o gcY;41i§." STRUCTURE - - -+r ,y,. �"' I fQ t 4' AVG. 10..1 � r 3 1 8 12" MIN. • DEPTH C) -.INN wry. > EXCAVATE TO INVERT SEDIMENT — 1 X z O 8 -H OUTLETS TO DETENTION PONDS MAY BE SUBMERGED BY UP TO h OF THE DIAMETER ( / ) BELOW NWL. HOWEVER. TAILWATER SHALL D Z NOT EXTEND UPSTREAM PAST THE FIRST Z STRUCTURE. 0 z d 1. "0 (1) 1. SL SHALL. BE NO STEEPER THAN THOSE SHOWN. r m Z 2. AN EMERGENCY WRAP OVERFLOW SHALL BE PROVIDED. 2 m 3. 10' WIDE ACCESS ROUTE TO BE PROVIDED TO SKIMMER Z STRUCTURE/RIPIRAP OVERFLOW 4. 0 a 0 G • 48" HAALA 48 -57 GRATE a.- OR EQUIVELANT 4 PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS 11 OVERFLOW ELEVATION SEE NOTE 7 -- RCP OUTLET PIPE FLOW NORMAL WATER ELEVATION _ 2 — _ — — 12" Min.F RCP INLET PIPE NOTE: \--INTEGRAL BASE THE OVERFLOW ELEVATION SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE THE PEAK 2 —YEAR STORM EVENT ELEVATION SKIMMER STRUCTURE NO SCALE 48" HAALA 48 -57 GRATE PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS OR EQUIVELANT 1 OVERFLOW ELEVATION SEE NOTE RCP OUTLET PIPE NORMAL WATER ELEVATION 12" Min. FLOW RCP INLET PIPE INTEGRAL BASE NOTE: THE OVERFLOW ELEVATION SHALL BE AT OR ABOVE THE PEAK 2 —YEAR STORM EVENT ELEVATION SKIMMER 'STRUCTURE NO SCALE APPROVED OF STANDARD PLATE NO. REVISED rZTYSMAR9 402 MARti 2005 ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD DWG NAME S1),5-- 402.DWG i GRATE GALVANIZED `1111iiiiiI . 1 /2" DIAMETER, 6" LONG 8" LONG HINGES �;; ��m � +� THREADED ANCHOR BOLTS MINIMUM 1/2" PIN A/II$IIIII$I` WITH 1 1/4" FLAT WASHER 4IIRIIIIIIIIII► AND NUT IN 4 LOCATIONS (NI iiiiiiiiinininini..1 11111113111111111111111111M1111111 2 urimmutl•uIIui•I 5/8" STEEL ROD I 9IIIM■ / MU � ■ ��G 4" O.C. EACH WAY 1/4" THICK BY 1 1/2" WIDE BY �IM1♦�IIII♦ItLi% WELD AT EACH 56 5/8" LONG S TEEL PLA Immin Im //Imt/ INTERSECTION • '4 STEEL PLATE 1/4" THICK WELDED TO STEEL RODS STEEL BAND 1/4" THICK BY TYPICAL, 4 LOCATIONS 1 1/2" WIDE BY 7' -6 5/8" LONG WRAPPED AROUND AND WELDED TO STEEL RODS I ' 57" TOP VIEW -- 1/4" STEEL BAND / 5/8" 0 RODS 1/ WELD ALL �� HINGED GRATE TYPICAL �°'-•-••-� -w-I 1 /2" TYP. ..i V 9 1/4" STEEL ii • • 58" PLATE - 4 48" ---4 1 1 5 ' 9 ‘/2 1/2" DIAMETER. ANCHOR BOLT. MINIMUM 4 \''.-------- 49 1/ EMBEDMENT 5" 48" Mill SCREEN COVER FOR 48" DIA. OUTLET STRUCTURE NO SCALE APPROVED � STANDARD PLATE NO. REVISED 4 D 7 DECEMBER 2040 ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD DWG NAME STM- 407.OWG MnDOT 2573.503 PREASSEMBLED • MIN. 2 1/2' ABOVE GROUND OPTION AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. • 6X6 EARTH FILL 1 FENCE MATERIAL. 6" APRON 5' POSTS — 8' MAX. ON CENTER MINIMUM 2' PENETRATION REF. MnDOT 3886 SILT FENCE NO SCALE APPROVED OF STANDARD PLATE NO. REVISED t�1'i'SEG�1 501 ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD DWG NAM ERS- 501.OWG • • HARD SURFACE �tllllll • PUBLIC ROAD II"' ,,∎lfllflllll , r 50 MINIMUM , II II I • - • 1 1111111 1111 - • 6 " • MINIMUM 1"-2" WASHED ROCK ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NO SCALE APPROVED -- OF STANDARD PLATE NO. REVISED 505 ON THE GREAT NOR ROAD DWG NAME ERS- 505.DNG • i } 11: , w 3" R. r • • (USE 2-5/8" R. - r FOR 4" QJR8 1 ; ' %. 1 • . = HORIZONTAL LINE E.0 DESIGN 8 • • • • NOTES: ® LGNGI'fuo11A1. JOINT WHEN ADJACENT r0 RICO PAYMENT OR 8ASE. SEE STANDARD PLANS MANUAL roR JOINT INFORMATION. • O SPECIFIED. U DIFFERENT • GUTTER SLOPE IS PERMITTEO THE GUTTER FORM MAY 13E TILTED- • W • 12" 8 a 18" W s 24" 1r s 30" 1< s 36 DESIGN 8 CITE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE • o G S vi v� .: r: e. w L1 . o e %. w ,- Ng Coe w C a. 7a� .«aC yy4 ¢ w t. 0lMENSION5 „ ` a o �i a � et b.' - o.= a• � # ® 0.0421 1E011=1 iI 1 0.4529 18.9 12:ErnIS..11.112611 8430 0.0T42 NUM.I 0.0853 I® 1101121111111111MilliMit 0.0474 LIM 9618 0.0582 ® 04690 8630 0-0722 0A906 11.0 • 0.0529 18.9 8818 0•0631 ®L.0 0.0 42 13.4 8830 • , 0.0- 10.4 i • Inualionawas 00559 IIMINEE011 0.0662 15.0 ElailkucklialltAla 0.0883 1112Eariani 0.0951 I0.1 mama 17 -5/8" 81012 0.0689 17.0 81018 0.0697 14.4 81024 0.0805 12.4 81030 0.0913 11.0 81036 0.1021 IM APPROVED narcd II. 1990 STATE Of MINNESOTA SPECIFICATION STANDARD DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION REFERENCE LATS NCE NO. CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER 2531 710OG gESIGN $ Alm 0$SIGN Y ACTING STATE OESLGN ENGINEER ITEM S_4 NAC ;, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 17 April 2007 RE: Otsego — Wildflower Meadows; Revised townhouse plans NAC FILE: 176.02 — 04.35 The Planning Commission reviewed revised townhouse plans for the Wildflower Meadows preliminary plat. Mr. Shane Chatleain of Rottlund Homes was present to answer questions from the Planning Commission. Prior to the meeting, Rottlund Homes had clarified that the revised building plans would apply to eight of the 16 townhouse buildings approved on the Wildflower Meadow preliminary plat. The revised units include the four lots final platted and four additional lots to be final platted with future phases. The location of all eight of the revised is consistent with the concept of providing an improved transition between the park, single family lots and eight remaining larger scale buildings previous approved as described by City staff in the review memorandum to the Planning Commission. The revised building design decreases the number of townhouses within the Wildflower Meadows development by 32 dwelling units for a total of 138 dwelling units. The Planning Commission was very favorable to the revised townhouse buildings concurring with City staff that the proposed changes will provide an improved transition within the development between land use types, will provide greater variety of dwelling unit types within the development and that the revised design is aesthetically pleasing. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the revised townhouse building for the eight lots presented subject to the conditions outlined below. The City Council will consider the revised building plans at their meeting on 23 April 2007 at 6:30 PM. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve building plans for eight Tots within Wildflower Meadows as shown on the submitted plans, subject to the following conditions: 1. A minimum of two dwelling units within each building, one of which shall be a comer unit or unit fronting a public street, shall be faced with brick. 2. The lap siding used in the building section above the garages for each of the four buildings shall be a unique color. B. Motion to deny the building plans based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and PUD -CUP approvals for Wildflower Meadows. C. Motion to table. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Ron Wagner, City Engineer Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Theresa Greenfield, The Rottlund Company Shane Chatleain, The Rottlund Company 2 ITEM 8 ..5 NAC :. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners @nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 17 April 2007 RE: Otsego — Friendship Addition; Revised building plans NAC FILE: 176.02 — 07.04 The Planning Commission reviewed revised building plans for the retail building and auto repair/tire building to be constructed within the Friendship Addition development at their meeting on 16 April 2007. Mr. Richon Xiong of Landcor, Inc. was present to address questions from the Planning Commission. The changes required of the retail building as part of the PUD Development Stage Plan approval by the City Council were not implemented on the revised plans. The Planning Commission directed that the changes to the facade facing CSAH 42 be shown on revised plans prior to the City Council consideration of the issue. The Planning Commission discussed the changes to the auto repair/tire building more extensively. The Planning Commission was generally positive to the changes which include more use of brick on the most visible portions of the building facing CSAH 42 and use of consistent building materials for the car wash portion of the building. The Planning Commission also directed that the windows on the east facade of the building be revised such that the mullions are centered below the EIFS material on the top half of the building. The City Council will consider the revised building plans at their meeting on 23 April 2007 at 6:30 PM. The Planning Commission recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the revised building plans subject to the following conditions: 1. The building plans for the retail building are revised to: a. Extend the awnings and provide faux windows between the service doors on the east elevation b. Revise the parapet to provide additional detailing. 2. The building plans for the auto repair /tire building are revised to: a. The window mullions on the east facade shall be centered under the EIFS section on the top half of the building, subject to City staff approval. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Ron Wagner, City Engineer Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Bob Fields, Landcor Inc. Richon Xiong, Lancor Inc. 2 ITEM 9 -1 Preliminary Engineer's Estimate City of Otsego Friendship Addition April 19, 2007 Schedule "A" - Streets Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Mobilization LS $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 2 Common Excavation CY $6.00 410 $2,460.00 3 Remove Culvert LF $4.00 120 $480.00 4 Remove Bituminous Pavement SY $3.00 3,300 09,900.00 5 Saw and Remove Curb and Gutter EA $10.00 50 $500.00 6 Adjust Frame and Ring Casting - Sanitary Sewer EA $200.00 6 $1,200.00 7 Adjust Valve Box EA $100.00 12 $1,200.00 8 Salvage Sign EA $25.00 5 $125.00 9 Aggregate Base, Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON $16.00 243 03,888.00 10 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $3.00 2 $6.00 11 Mill Bituminous Surface (2") SY $29.75 2 $59.50 12 Type LV4 Wearing Course Mixture (B) TON $120.00 79 $9,480.00 13 Type LV3 Non Wearing Course Mixture (B) TON $100.00 100 $10;000.00 14 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL $2.85 33 $94.05 15 Concrete Curb and Gutter Design B618 LF $10.00 300 $3,000.00 16 Silt Fence Type Machine Sliced LF $1.50 600 0900.00 17 Inlet Protection EA $370.00 18 $6,660.00 18 Seeding AC $3,000.00 1.5 $4,500.00 19 Type III Barricades EA $240.00 9 $2,160.00 Total Schedule "A ": $61,612.55 Schedule "B" - Sanitary Sewer Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer EA $5,000.00 1 05,000.00 2 8" PVC Pipe Sanitary Sewer SDR 35 (10' -12' Depth) LF $22.00 470 $10,340.00 3 8" PVC Pipe Sanitary Sewer SDR 26 (22' -24' Depth) LF $52.00 290 $15,080.00 4 8x6 PVC Service Wye EA $135.00 4 $540.00 5 6 "PVC Sch 40 Service Pipe LF $12.95 120 $1,554.00 6 Standard 48" Sanitary Sewer MH (0' -8') EA $3,000.00 6 $18,000.00 7 Extra Depth Manhole VF $115.00 60 $6,900.00 8 Drop Connection (0' -2' Depth) EA $116.00 1 $116.00 9 Extra Depth Drop Connection (over 2') VF $175.00 4 $700.00 10 Televise Santary Sewer LF $0.75 760 $570.00 11 Sewer Test LS $500.00 1 $500.00 Total Schedule "B ": $59,300.00 Schedule "C" - Watermain Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Connect to Existing Watermain EA $1,350.00 1 $1,350.00 2 6" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LE $21.00 130 $2,730.00 3 8" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LF $25.00 748 $18,700.00 4 Hydrant EA $2,500.00 3 $7,500.00 5 6" Gate Valve w/Box EA $735.00 3 $2,205.00 6 8" Gate Valve w /Box EA $1,215.00 4 $4,860.00 7 Remove and Reinstall Hydrant and Valve EA $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 8 Watermain Fittings LBS $2.00 792 $1,584.00 Total Schedule "C ": 939,929.00 OT2316ENGEST Preliminary Engineer's Estimate City of Otsego Friendship Addition April 19, 2007 Schedule "D" - Storm Sewer Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 4020 - 54" EA $2,335.00 2 $4,670.00 2 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 4020 - 60" EA $3,200.00 2 $6,400.00 3 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 4020 - 78" EA $4,500.00 1 $4,500.00 4 12" RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006 CL V LF $20.00 20 $400.00 5 15" RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006 CL V LF $26.00 40 $1,040.00 6 30" RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006 CL III LF $51.00 259 $13,209.00 7 42" RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006 CL III LF $87.00 10 $870.00 8 30" Bulk Head EA $250.00 1 $250.00 9 2" Polystyrene Insulation SY $20.00 8 $160.00 Total Schedule "D ": $31,499.00 Total - All Schedules: $192,340.55 SUMMARY: Construction Costs $192,340.55 20% Overhead for Engineering, Legal and Construction Contigencies $38,468.11 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $230,808.66 OT2316ENGEST Preliminary Engineer's Estimate Waterfront East - Extension to Fitness Center City of Otsego April 19, 2007 Schedule "A" - Streets Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Mobilization LS $5,000.00 1 $5,000.00 2 Grading LS $15,000.00 1 $15,000.00 3 ' Adjust Frame and Ring Casting - Sanitary Sewer EA $200.00 6 $1,200.00 4 Adjust Valve Box EA $100.00 8 $800.00 5 Aggregate Base, Class 5 (100% Crushed) TON $14.50 1,600 $23,200.00 6 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $3.00 30 $90.00 7 Mill Bituminous Surface (2 ") SY $29.75 10 $297.50 8 Type LV4 Wearing Course Mixture (B) TON $65.00 410 $26,650.00 9 Type LV3 Non Wearing Course Mixture (B) TON $55.00 520 $28,600.00 10 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL $2.85 130 $370.50 11 Concrete Curb and Gutter Design B618 LF $10.00 1,320 $13,200.00 12 Bituminous Curb LF $4.00 700 $2,800.00 13 Valley Gutter EA $4,000.00 7 $28,000.00 14 Silt Fence Type Machine Sliced LF $1.50 1,000 $1,500.00 15 Inlet Protection EA $370.00 13 $4,810.00 16 Seeding AC $3,000.00 2 $6,000.00 17 Type III Barricades EA $240.00 14 $3,360.00 Total Schedule "A ": $160,878.00 Schedule "B" - Sanitary Sewer Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer EA $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 2 PVC Pipe Sanitary Sewer SDR 35 LF $32.00 750 $24,000.00 3 PVC Service Wye EA $135.00 4 $540.00 4 48 "Diameter Sanitary Sewer Man Hole EA $3,500.00 3 $10,500.00 5 Televise Santary Sewer LF $0.75 750 $562.50 6 Sewer Test LS $500.00 1 $500.00 Total Schedule "B ": $38,102.50 Schedule "C" - Watermain Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Connect to Existing Watermain EA $1,350.00 2 $2,700.00 2 6" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LF $21.00 120 $2,520.00 3 8" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LF $30.00 120 $3,600.00 4 12" Watermain Deuctile Iron CL 52 LF $55.00 1,600 $88,000.00 5 Hydrant EA $2,500.00 8 $20,000.00 6 12" Butterfly Valve w /Box EA $1,600.00 3 $4,800.00 7 8" Gate Valve w /Box EA $1,215.00 6 $7,290.00 8 Salvage Hydrant and Valve EA $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 9 Watermain Fittings LBS $2.00 1,000 $2,000.00 Total Schedule "C ": $132,910.00 S: \Municipal\Aotsego22xx \2500\2007 \OT2500WFE ENGEST Preliminary Engineer's Estimate Waterfront East - Extension to Fitness Center City of Otsego April 19, 2007 Schedule "D" - Storm Sewer Item No. Description Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Estimated Cost 1 Construct Drainage Structure, Design 4020 EA $2,400.00 13 $31,200.00 2 RC Pipe Sewer, Design 3006 CL V LF $40.00 1,200 $48,000.00 3 Flared End Section EA $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00 4 Bulk Head EA $250.00 6 $1,500.00 Total Schedule "D ": $83,700.00 Total - All Schedules: $415,590.50 SUMMARY: Construction Costs $415,590.50 20% Overhead for Engineering, Legal and Construction Contigencies $83,118.10 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $498,708.60 S: \Mun ici pal \Aotsego22>oc\2500 \2007 \OT2500WFE ENGEST ITEM 9_2 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-25 RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the construction of City of Otsego, Improvement Project No. 06 -05, Well No. 8, Raw Water Line and Pumphouse No. 2 Improvements, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the following bids were received complying with the advertisement: Base Bid Rice Lake Construction $799,700.00 Eagle Construction $908,000.00 AND WHEREAS, it appears that Rice Lake Construction of Deerwood, Minnesota is the lowest responsible bidder, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO MINNESOTA: 1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Rice Lake Construction of Deerwood, Minnesota in the name of the City of Otsego for the Improvement Project No. 06-05, Well No. 8, Raw Water Line and Pumphouse No. 2 Improvements, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to retum forthwith to all bidders the bid bond made with their bids, except that the bid bond of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. Adopted by the City Council this 19 day of April, 2007. Motioned By: Seconded By: All in Favor: Those Apposed: Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Clerk ot522ResAcceptBid BID TABULATION CITY OF OTSEGO Improvement Project No. 06 -05, Well No. 8, Raw Water Line and Pumphouse No. 2 Improvements Bids opened 11700 a.m., Wednesday, April 18, 2007. There were 2 bids received, as shown herein. Rice Lake Construction Eagle Construction Bid Schedule "Part I - Well 8 and Meter Vault" ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION Includes constriction of Well 88; furnishing, installation, sitework and testing of well pump and motor, Meter Vault and its components, and 1 buried piping between Well 88 and Meter Vault. 1 LS 8541,000.00 $541,000.00 $612,000.00 8612,000.00 Total Bid Schedule "Part 1" $541,000.00 8612,000.00 Rice Lake Construction Eagle Construction " Breakdown of Part 1- Well 8 and Meter Vault" ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION 1 Blasting 400 LBS 819.00 87000.00 821.00 88,400.00 2 Sandstone Removal and Dial 400 CY $105.00 $42,000.00 8115.00 846,000.00 3 Air Development 100 HR $425.00 842,500.00 $450.00 $45,000.00 4 Test Pumping 80 HR 8192.00 $15,360.00 $210.00 818,800.00 5 Gravel Baddil 12 CY $90.00 81,080.00 8100.00 81,200.00 6 Neat Cement Grout 25 CY 8425.00 810,625.00 8450.00 811,250.00 Total Bid Schedule "Part 1 Breakdown" 8119,165.00 8128,650.00 Rico Lake Construction Eagle Construction B Id Schedule "Part 2 - Raw Watennaln" ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION Includes furnishing, installation, sitework and testing of buried piping, 1 valves and fittings from Meter Vault to Well 83 and Pumphouse #2. 1 LS 878,000.00 $78,000.00 $118,000.00 8118.000.00 Total Bid Schedule "Part 2" 878,000.00 5118,000.00 Rke Lake Construction Eagle Construction B Id Schedule "Part 3 - Pumphouse 82 Improvements" ITEM ESTIMATED NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE EXTENSION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION Includes demolition, and furnishing, installation sltewark and testing of 1 piping, valves. Bttings. meters, and equipment for Pumphouse R. 1 LS 8180,700.00 $180,700.00 8178,000.00 8178,000.00 Total Bid Schedule "Part 3" 8180,700.00 8178,000.00 SUMMARY OF BIDDING: Rice Lake Construction Eagle Construction Total Base Bid Schedule Part 1, 2 and 3 8799.700.00 8908.000.00 ot522bidtabBID TABULATION BT -1 OF 1 Bidders List 7 ii Hakanson Anderson OT522 'HOC " City of Otsego Improvement Project No. 06 -05, Well No. 8, Raw Water Line and Pumphouse No. 2 Improvements April 18, 2007, 10:00 a.m. BID Rec.'v Addendum CONTRACTOR BOND BASE BID Minncomm Utility Construction Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. Rice Lake Construction / / / �/ 79 700 E.H. Renner & Sons Traut Wells Eagle Construction ✓ ✓ "98, 000 EBI Drilling McGraw Hill Construction Automatic Systems Co. EnComm Midwest Ellingson Companies GM Contracting Design Electrical Contractors *-" swp_& ' f . - A c • d and opened by: I 7 ot522bidders list Otsego Engineer's Cost Estimate Summary [OT522, MDF, 3- 18 -07] Estimate Part 1 Well #8 & Meter Vault Well #8 $320,000 Meter Vault - General $40,000 W8 Electical j &op W8 Structural $11,000 W8 Sitework $41,000 Total Part 1 $412,000 Part 2 Raw Watermain Buried Piping $162,000 Total Part 2 $162,000 Part 3 Pumphouse #2 Improvements PH Chemical Feed $50,000 PH Inside Piping $58,000 PH Demolition $26,000 PH Openings $5,000 PH Site Work $21,000 PH Electrical a PH Mechanical .21 ado PH Structural $4,000 Total Part 3 $164.000 Total Project j960" ITEM 10_1 COURT, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, P.L.L.P. Michael C. Couri• Attorneys at Law Kristen H. Carr Andrew J. MacArthur 705 Central Avenue East Kyle R. Hartnett Robert T. Ruppe•• PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376 -0369 'Also licensed in Illinois (763) 497 -1930 "Also licensed in (:atifornia (763) 497 -2599 (FAX) courimacarthur@earthlinknet April 19, 2007 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Judy Hudson, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Proposed Tax Assistance Agreement, City of Otsego and Duke Realty Dear Council Members: Enclosed is a proposed Tax Assistance agreement drafted by Duke's attorneys and modified in accordance with my comments. The Agreement is part of the Master Development Agreement between the City and Duke relevant to the 109 acre Industrial Park. The Agreement is patterned after the City's prior agreement with Apex. The agreement requires the City to rebate 30% of actual taxes paid by Duke up to $380,000.00. The rebate is dependent upon the City actually receiving the tax payment. The Agreement must be approved by both the City Council and the EDA so we have scheduled an EDA meeting at the end of the City Council meeting. My recommendation is that the City Council and EDA both approve the agreement, subject to final review by Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan, the City's bond counsel. I will be available to further discuss this matter at the regular City Council meeting on Monday evening. Ve yours, � — w J. Arthur COURI, A CARTHUR & RUPPE, PLLP Encl. cc: Ann Zaremba, Duke Realty Counsel Ann Dee Colussi, Duke Realty Counsel Mary Ippel, Briggs and Morgan Pat Mascia, Duke Realty