Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
05-29-07
ITEM 5_1 CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 29, 2007 TO: Judy Hudson Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 05 -16 -2007 $ 633,189.00 05 -23 -2007 $ 133,778.64 PAYROLL 05 -23 -2007 $ 39,627.41 GRAND TOTAL $ 806,595.05 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 05/16/07 1:40 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© MAY 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS, INC. $83,924.00 CSAH 37 TURN LANE UnPaid MERLIN BRISBIN $1,500.00 PERM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - W/S UnPaid OTSEGO FESTIVAL INC $4,500.00 07 FALL FESTIVAL UnPaid PITTSBURG TANK & TOWER CO $483,265.00 ELEVATED STRG TANK/TOWER #3 UnPaid WATERFRONT EAST LLC $60,000.00 LEGAL FEES - WILD & SCENIC DESIGNATI Total Checks $633,189.00 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 05/16/07 1:40 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check A Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER _ „,., „., _ ,�•. ,. -,... �, �.- Unpaid _ m IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS, INC E 426 - 43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $80,384.51 FINAL PAY QUADAY AVENUE PROJECT E 426 - 43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $3,539.49 FINAL PAY CSAH 37 TURN LANE Total IMPERIAL DEVELOPERS, INC. $83,924.00 Unpaid BRISBIN E 406 -43100 -500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $1,500.00 PERM DRAINAGE EASEMENT - W/S Total MERLIN BRISBIN $1,500.00 Unpaid OTSEGO FESTIVAL INC E 101 - 41100 -801 CONTINGENCY $4,500.00 07 FALL FESTIVAL Total OTSEGO FESTIVAL INC $4,500.00 Unpad PITTSBURG TANK & TOWER CO E 444 -49400 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $483,265.00 PAY #3 ELEVATED STRG TANK/TOWER #3 Total PITTSBURG TANK & TOWER CO $483,265.00 Unpaid WATERFRONT EAST LLC E 475 -43100 -301 Legal Services $60,000.00 LEGAL FEES - WILD & SCENIC DES Total WATERFRONT EAST LLC $60,000.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $633,189.00 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $4,500.00 406 Lefebvre Watershed $1,500.00 426 Quaday & CSAH 37 $83,924.00 444 SE Utilities Project $483,265.00 475 Waterfront East/Miss. Shores $60,000.00 $633,189.00 CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:07 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© MAY 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $25.51 OXYGEN IND SIZE UnPaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $539.48 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 UnPaid BEAR ALARMS $623.03 EAST WWTF - BLOWER & UV BLDG UnPaid BRADLEY BELAIR $60.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid BRAUN INTERTEC $818.30 65TH ST DUAL FORCEMAIN UnPaid BRENT KOLLES $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid BRIGGS & MORGAN $2,500.00 LEGAL OPINION FOR BONDS UnPaid BROCK WHITE CO LLC $269.85 SINGLE NET WHITE BLANKET UnPaid CITY OF OTSEGO $1,478.77 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF UnPaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFIC $19,507.00 ADMIN ENFORCEMENT UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMEN $557.03 OPERATING SUPPLIES UnPaid DAVID CASTLE $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATIO $911.82 IRR START UP AT PRAIRIE PK UnPaid DMV $8.50 TITLE - 2004 STERLING PLOW TRUCK UnPaid DON MASS $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $547.90 PW - PT SEASONAL EMP AD UnPaid EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES IN $846.09 FIN - JUNE UnPaid FUTURE HOMES, INC. $2,500.00 7553 LARGE - LNDSCP /DRV ESC REFUND UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTE $889.67 UNIFORMS UnPaid GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $504.75 LOCATE TICKETS UnPaid GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVI $235.00 2007 MCMA CONFERENCE - MIKE UnPaid GRAINGER $250.74 TOOLS UnPaid H & L MESABI $3,435.75 GRADER PARTS UnPaid HAROLD LEONARD $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTER $198.00 BARB & MARY - PERMITWORKS /ACCESS C UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.20 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 UnPaid JOE ABRAHAMSON $73.95 MILEAGE - ST. CLOUD BLDG CODE CLASS UnPaid KLEIN BANK $24.00 W/S REFUND - 7329 LAMBERT UnPaid KNUTSON RICK $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRU $1,018.59 CLAIM # 11058314 - LOBECK UnPaid MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRAT $65.00 MAY FEE - FLEX UnPaid MCFOA $140.00 KAREE, JUDY, TAMI MEMBERSHIP FEE UnPaid MENARDS $211.08 CEDAR POST & RAILS - SCHOOL KNOLL UnPaid MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON $244.36 REIMBURSE FOR CRAGUNS UnPaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $831.77 FAX MAINT CONTRACT UnPaid MN POLLUTION CONTROL $350.00 WEST WWTF PERMIT RENEWAL UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $35.00 ANIMAL CONTROL UnPaid NORTHERN LAKES CONSTRUCT $2,140.48 PERMIT OVERPAYMENT UnPaid NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMEN $43.63 TIRE, TUBE AND VALVE UnPaid OFFICEMAX $102.83 "DEPT HEAD" STAMP UnPaid PAT LAUNDERVILLE $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $41,860.13 MONTHLY SERVICE - JUNE UnPaid PREMIER HOME BUILDERS $2,500.00 7421 LARGE - ESC REFUND UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME $4,261.19 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 UnPaid REED BUSINESS INFORMATION $122.65 AD FOR BIDS - GRENIN'S SWR EXT UnPaid REINDERS, INC. $1,437.75 50/50 BLUE/RYE SEED MIX UnPaid SHERWIN - WILLIAMS CO. $61.50 PAINT FOR PARKS UnPaid SOFTRONICS $2,042.66 BATTERIES UnPaid SPRINT $205.98 LAP TOP SERVICE UnPaid SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. $1,388.72 PARKS CONSULTING UnPaid TR COMPUTER SALES LLC $86.25 TRAINING -RANGE TABLE, FEE TYPE & SET UnPaid TRI -STATE PUMP & CONTROL $8,121.97 LS #1 REPAIRS UnPaid TROPHIES PLUS $77.75 NAME PLATE - MARY UnPaid US BANK $23,082.50 GEN'L OBL IMPR BONDS SERIES 2004 UnPaid USA BLUE BOOK $221.97 KEYS FOR PARK IRRIGATIONS UnPaid WHAT WORKS, INC. $1,097.00 JOB COACHING PROJECT /DISC ASSESSM CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:07 AM Page 2 *Check Summary Register© MAY 2007 Na me Check Date Check Amt UnPaid XCEL ENERGY $3,708.13 16935 56TH LS #2 UnPaid ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC $511.41 BROOM REFILL Total Checks $133,778.64 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid , -„„ - �. a _ AIRGAS, INC. w ..... -,T .�. .. -- -_ - -< - E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $25.51 105604628 OXYGEN IND SIZE Total AIRGAS, INC. $25.51 Unpaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP G 101 -21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins $539.48 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 Total ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $539.48 Unpaid � ���_ � BEAR ALARMS E 602 -49450 -402 Repairs/Maint Buildingss $623.03 2474 EAST WWTF - BLOWER & UV BLDG Total BEAR ALARMS $623.03 Unpaid BRADLEY BELAIR ,,.,.,�.�.,� >,�.�,�.�.��., -, E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $60.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total BRADLEY BELAIR $60.00 Unpaid BRAUN INTERTEC E 444 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $127.75 275008 WATER TOWER #3 E 444 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $538.15 275816 65TH ST DUAL FORCEMAIN E 444 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $152.40 277051 65TH ST DUAL FORCEMAIN Total BRAUN INTERTEC $818.30 Un paid . ,,»,.. ,n ,k x, 4 -. D9,7 ,..,., BRENT KOLLES . . .,. , �� .. . E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total BRENT KOLLES $30.00 Unpai a m ,... BRIGGS & MORGAN E 441 -43100 -301 Legal Services $2,500.00 37313.1 LEGAL OPINION FOR BONDS Total BRIGGS & MORGAN $2,500.00 , Unpaid - _ ,:.� .: ,. BROCK WHITE CO LLC Unpaid E 101 -45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $269.85 11633734 -00 SINGLE NET WHITE BLANKET Total BROCK WHITE CO LLC $269.85 .......................... Unpaid CITY OF OTSEGO „��.,,•,���,.���.�..s .0 _ _ _ E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $6.39 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602- 49450 -322 Utilities $6.39 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $53.64 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $80.83 17330 53RD - EAST WWTF E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $365.51 7551 LANCASTER - WEST WWTF E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $742.20 10400 71ST - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $192.50 15501 83RD - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $24.92 6480 MASON - IRR E 101 -45200 -322 Utilities $6.39 11313 74TH - IRR Total CITY OF OTSEGO $1,478.77 Unpaid .�... >m # COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE F - E 414-43100-301 Legal Services $1,515.00 GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS E 406 - 43100 -301 Legal Services $456.00 DRAINAGE PROJ 2003 E 485 -43100 -301 Legal Services $120.00 QUEENS AVENUE E 475 -43100 -301 Legal Services $150.00 MISSISSIPPI SHORES E 444 -49400 -301 Legal Services $120.00 WATER TOWER #3 E 485 -43100 -301 Legal Services $144.00 CSAH 42 E 444 -43100 -301 Legal Services $96.00 FORCEMAIN E 250 - 42410 -311 Ping & Eng. - 101Traffic Study $216.00 HIGHWAY 101 E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $1,248.00 PERSONNEL E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $3,952.00 GENERAL CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 2 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Involve Comment E 426 - 43100 -301 Legal Services $336.00 QUADAY AVENUE E 250 -42410 -301 Legal Services $276.00 ADMIN ENFORCEMENT E 490 -49400 -301 Legal Services $48.00 OTSEGO IND PARK E 490 - 49450 -301 Legal Services $48.00 OTSEGO IND PARK E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $816.00 ZACHMAN G 701 -21861 EAGLE TRUCK INTERIM USE PERM $525.00 POULIOT CUP E 441 -43100 -301 Legal Services $180.00 MAINTENANCE BLDG - PW G 701 -21856 WATERFRONT EAST 3RD $1,590.00 WATERFRONT EAST G 701 -22462 DUKE REALTY $1,260.00 GATEWAY NORTH G 701 -22499 ARROWHEAD SUPPLY $915.00 EDCO G 701 -21855 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION $720.00 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $660.00 DRURY PROPERTY G 701 -21857 VAC OLB RIVERPOINTE 2 $705.00 RIVERPOINTE 2 VAC G 701 -22392 MISSISSIPPI COVE 1 & 2 $450.00 MISSISSIPPI COVE 2 (1) G 701 -22422 ROTTLUND HOMES $75.00 ROTTLUND/WILDFLOWER E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $120.00 CURFEW E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $180.00 RANCH ACRES G 701 -22422 ROTTLUND HOMES $2,130.00 ROTTLUND - WILDFLOWER G 701 -22445 RIVER PLACE II $75.00 RIVERPLACE 2 E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $60.00 SCHABER E 602 -49450 -301 Legal Services $180.00 WWTP CLARIFIER G 701 -22431 PLEASANT CRK 4TH $30.00 PLEASANT CREEK 4 G 701 -22315 RIVERWOOD NATIONAL $30.00 RIVERWOOD NAIL G 701 -21853 T- Mobile antenna CupNariance $36.00 T- MOBILE G 701 -22479 RIVERPLACE 3RD ADDITION $45.00 RIVERPLACE 4 (3) Total COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $19,507.00 Unpaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $324.75 123971 OPERATING SUPPLIES E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $232.28 124034 OPERATING SUPPLIES Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $557.03 "`"��� DAVID CASTLE Unpaid D E 250 - 42410 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total DAVID CASTLE $30.00 Unpaid <,w_....,..,,�...���.. DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATIO - -�~ _.__.__ E 101 -41940 -390 Contracted Services $120.00 799 IRR START UP AT CITY HALL E 101 -45200 -390 Contracted Services $260.00 799 IRR START UP AT PRAIRIE PK E 101 -45200 -390 Contracted Services $208.82 801 IRR REPAIRS AT PRAIRIE PK E 101 -45200 -390 Contracted Services $323.00 808 IRR REPAIRS AT CITY HALL Total DISTINCTIVE DESIGN IRRIGATION $911.82 Unpaid Mu, .w .. _ DMV E 101 -43100 -310 Miscellaneous $8.50 TITLE - 2004 STERLING PLOW TRU Total DMV $8.50 Unpaid �_ DON MASS E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total DON MASS $30.00 p aid .. � eY a p Jm Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC E 101 -43100 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $38.75 241875 PW - PT SEASONAL EMP AD E 101 - 41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $59.40 242412 LEGAL -WEED NOTICE E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $74.25 242413 LEGAL - PUBLIC HEARING E 101 -43620 -390 Contracted Services $263.50 242527 CLEAN UP MONTH AD E 101- 41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $74.25 243107 LEGAL - PUBLIC HEARING E 101- 43100 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $37.75 99779 PW - PT SEASONAL EMP AD CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $547.90 Unpaid . - a A" -- EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES INC - -- - E 101 - 41600 -123 Health $100.98 FIN - JUNE E 101 -41400 -123 Health $354.80 ADMIN - JUNE E 101 -43100 -123 Health $163.22 PW - JUNE E 250 -42410 -123 Health $227.09 BLDG - JUNE Total EMPLOYER PLAN SERVICES INC $846.09 Unpaid FUTURE HOMES, INC. E 702 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $2,500.00 7553 LARGE - LNDSCP /DRV ESC RE Total FUTURE HOMES, INC. $2,500.00 Unpaid , s,. ,. --- G K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM E 101 -43100 -225 Uniforms /Clothing Allowance $115.26 1043438028 UNIFORMS E 101 -41940 -390 Contracted Services $126.48 1043443054 MATS E 101 -43100 -225 Uniforms /Clothing Allowance $169.61 1043443055 UNIFORMS E 101 -43100 -225 Uniforms/Clothing Allowance $115.19 1043448005 UNIFORMS E 101 -41940 -390 Contracted Services $126.48 1043453007 MATS E 101 -43100 -225 Uniforms /Clothing Allowance $139.03 1043453008 UNIFORMS E 101 - 43100 -225 Uniforms /Clothing Allowance $97.62 1043458042 UNIFORMS Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $889.67 Unpaid GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC E 250 -42410 -310 Miscellaneous $504.75 7040695 LOCATE TICKETS Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $504.75 " `" "' " '�"� F K » -- GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE - µ �- - Unpaid E 101 -41400 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $235.00 13057 2007 MCMA CONFERENCE - MIKE Total GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICE $235.00 Unpaid G E 101 -43100 -240 Small Tools $250.74 9366504406 TOOLS Total GRAINGER $250.74 Unpaid H & L MESABI E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $3,435.75 71512 GRADER PARTS Total H & L MESABI $3,435.75 $30.00 npaid ,. .. .a� HAROLD NAR LEOD --- � .- ..,....,.�.� Unpaid E 250 -42410 -320 Telephone MAY CELL PHONE Total HAROLD LEONARD $30.00 Unpaid HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTER E 250 -42410 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $198.00 BARB & MARY - PERMITWORKS /ACCE Total HENNEPIN TECHNICAL CENTER $198.00 Unpa id ,.. � . � ,r'��� ,M. '7 a � ''''M � ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST G 101 -21705 Other Retirement $611.00 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $212.20 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.20 .Unpaid ,.a,w,....,.. - M. JOE ABRAHAMSON E 250-42410-360 Education/Training /Conferences $10.00 INSP MTG LUNCHEON E 250 -42410 -321 Mileage/Travel $33.95 MILEAGE - ST. CLOUD BLDG CODE E 250 -42410 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total JOE ABRAHAMSON $73.95 Unp -� W., ,- - .- . KLEIN BANK. ,- ,- ,., -.-- < .- CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 4 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment R 601 -37150 WATER SALES $24.00 W/S REFUND - 7329 LAMBERT Total KLEIN BANK $24.00 E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total KNUTSON RICK $30.00 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST - E 204 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $1,018.59 CLAIM # 11058314 - LOBECK Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST $1,018.59 Unpaid MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS E 101 -41400 -390 Contracted Services $65.00 14466 MAY FEE - FLEX Total MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS $65.00 Unpaid MCFOA ,,�.,��,,,.�,,,...�., E 101 -41400 -355 Dues & Memberships $105.00 KAREE, JUDY, TAMI MEMBERSHIP F E 101 -41600 -355 Dues & Memberships $35.00 KATHY MEMBERSHIP FEE Total MCFOA $140.00 Unpaid MENARDS E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $183.88 58464 CEDAR POST & RAILS - SCHOOL KN E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $27.20 60432 CEDAR POST & RAILS - SCHOOL KN Total MENARDS $211.08 Unpaid MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON E 101 -41400 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $244.36 REIMBURSE FOR CRAGUNS Total MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON $244.36 Unpaid � - MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEM E 206 -43100 -570 Office Equip and Fumishings $629.42 158115 FAX MACHINE FOR PW BLDG E 101 -43100 -390 Contracted Services $202.35 158116 FAX MAINT CONTRACT Total MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $831.77 Unpaid ���" MN POLLUTION CONTROL E 430 -43256 -310 Miscellaneous $350.00 WEST WWTF PERMIT RENEWAL Total MN POLLUTION CONTROL $350.00 Unpaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL E 101 -42710 -390 Contracted Services $35.00 675 ANIMAL CONTROL Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $35.00 Unpaid - �� NORTHERN LAKES CONSTRUCTION R 250 -32260 BUILDING PERMITS $2,140.48 PERMIT OVERPAYMENT Total NORTHERN LAKES CONSTRUCTION $2,140.48 Unpaid NORTHERN TOOL &EQUIPM CO E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $43.63 191204871 TIRE, TUBE AND VALVE Total NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO $43.63 Unpaid, ,�... m,wz F OFFICEMAX� E 101 -41400 -201 Office Supplies $26.57 562402 "DEPT HEAD" STAMP E 101 -41400 -201 Office Supplies $53.45 917514 OFFICE SUPPLIES E 101 -41600 -201 Office Supplies $22.81 926663 FIN OFFICE SUPPLIES Total OFFICEMAX $102.83 E 101.43100 -320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 5 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total PAT LAUNDERVILLE $30.00 Unpaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. E 602 -49450 -390 Contracted Services $935.13 11872 POLLUTANT SAMPLING E 601 -49400 -390 Contracted Services $12,727.67 11872 MONTHLY SERVICE - JUNE E 602 -49450 -390 Contracted Services $28,197.33 11872 MONTHLY SERVICE - JUNE Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $41,860.13 npaid ,.. .... PREMIER HOME BUILDER'S- ... U E 702 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $2,500.00 7421 LARGE - ESC REFUND Total PREMIER HOME BUILDERS $2,500.00 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 602 -49450 -121 PERA $25.60 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 101 -43100 -121 PERA $712.39 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $400.30 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 101 -41600 -121 PERA $370.70 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 250 -42410 -121 PERA $684.80 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 E 601 -49400 -121 PERA $25.59 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 G 101 -21704 PERA $2,041.81 PPE 5/19/07 CH DTD 5/23/07 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $4,261.19 Unpaid REED BUSINESS INFORMATION E 414 - 43100 -351 Legal Notices Publishing $122.65 3630762 AD FOR BIDS - GRENIN'S SWR EXT Total REED BUSINESS INFORMATION $122.65 Unpaid REINDERS, INC. E 101 -45200 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $639.00 235012 -00 50/50 BLUE /RYE SEED MIX E 441 -43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $798.75 235254 -00 50/50 BLUE /RYE SEED MIX Total REINDERS, INC. $1,437.75 lJnpaid a � ,,,,, � .,, �� . SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. E 101- 45200 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $61.50 6223 -3 PAINT FOR PARKS Total SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. $61.50 Unpaid SOFTRONICS E 601 - 49400 -390 Contracted Services $162.50 2210 W/S - LABOR E 602 - 49450 -390 Contracted Services $162.50 2210 W/S - LABOR E 101 -43100 -390 Contracted Services $650.00 2210 PW - LABOR E 101 -41600 -390 Contracted Services $325.00 2210 FIN - LABOR E 101 -41400 -390 Contracted Services $325.00 2210 ADMIN - LABOR E 101 -43100 -203 Supplies - General $79.88 2210 USB CABLES E 101 - 41400 -201 Office Supplies $12.78 2210 BATTERIES E 250 - 42410 -390 Contracted Services $325.00 2210 BLDG - LABOR Total SOFTRONICS $2,042.66 Unpaid SPRINT E 250 - 42410 -320 Telephone $205.98 LAP TOP SERVICE Total SPRINT $205.98 Unpaid SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. E 203 -45210 -390 Contracted Services $1,388.72 5521 -16 PARKS CONSULTING Total SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. $1,388.72 Unpaid TR COMPUTER SALES LLC E 250 - 42410 -390 Contracted Services $28.75 19348 TRAINING- CHANGING PERMIT STATU E 250 -42410 -390 Contracted Services $57.50 19349 TRAINING -RANGE TABLE, FEE TYPE Total TR COMPUTER SALES LLC $86.25 CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 6 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Unpaid TRI -STATE PUMP & CONTROL E 602 -49450 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $8,121.97 26517 LS #1 REPAIRS Total TRI -STATE PUMP & CONTROL $8,121.97 E 250 -42410 -310 Miscellaneous $77.75 NAME PLATE - MARY Total TROPHIES PLUS $77.75 Unpaid US BANK E 375 - 47000 -602 Bond Interest $23,082.50 GEN'L OBL IMPR BONDS SERIES 20 Total US BANK $23,082.50 Unpaid USA BLUE BOOK E 601 -49400 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $221.97 367075 KEYS FOR PARK IRRIGATIONS Total USA BLUE BOOK $221.97 Unpaid - fr4 WHAT WORKS, INC. E 250 -42410 -390 Contracted Services $1,097.00 OT 07-01 JOB COACHING PROJECT /DISC ASSE Total WHAT WORKS, INC. $1,097.00 Unpaid XCEL ENERGY E 601 -49400 -322 Utilities $182.70 17326 53RD - PH #2 E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $27.78 17388 52ND - LS #5 E 602 - 49450 -322 Utilities $70.97 16935 56TH - LS #2 E 602 -49450 -322 Utilities $3,426.68 17330 53RD - EAST WWTF Total XCEL ENERGY $3,708.13 Unpaid ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $511.41 111752 BROOM REFILL Total ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC $511.41 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $133,778.64 CITY OF OTSEGO 05/23/07 11:08 AM Page 7 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $24,469.48 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT $1,388.72 204 INSURANCE RESERVE $1,018.59 206 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING $629.42 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $6,173.05 375 WATERFRONT EAST & MISS. SHORES $23,082.50 406 Lefebvre Watershed $456.00 414 Revolving Capital Improvements $1,637.65 426 Quaday & CSAH 37 $336.00 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 $350.00 441 Otsego City Campus $3,478.75 444 SE Utilities Project $1,034.30 475 Waterfront East/Miss. Shores $150.00 485 Street Impr. Fund - 2006 $264.00 490 194 Industrial Park - W/S PROJ $96.00 601 WATER FUND $13,344.43 602 SEWER FUND $42,283.75 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND $8,586.00 702 BUILDERS ESCROW FUND $5,000.00 $133,778.64 ITEM 5 -2 Otsego Police Commission Minutes May 8, 2007 Present: Jane Theisen, Sandy Michaelson, Linda Lewis, Denise Andrusko, Jessica Stockamp, Vern Heidner, Joel Torkelson, Sgt. Butch Darsow Absent: Edgar Pearsall, Jeff Stimac Meetings were called to order at 6:40pm. Agenda was approved unanimously Minutes from April were approved unanimously Open Forum ! OCAA (Otsego Citizen Awareness Association) were represented by Jon Gustafson. He was at the meeting to find out what type of planning we were looking for to start National Night Out. He plans to bring the info to his group in May, to find out if they have any interest in heading this up. Sandy Michaelson said she would go and give a brief background about the National Night Out event and the Police Commission. 2. Vern spoke to the group about the meeting that the city had with the fire chief in Elk River, about working on a joint powers agreement to start planning the Otsego substation on the land the city owns on 85 Ave. They expect to be working towards a goal of 2013 to have the site fully operational. New Business 1. McGruff Appearance- Community education is hosting a Safety Camp on June 9 at Otsego Elementary School they would like McGruff to come for a visit. Jessica Volunteered to make the appearance and hand out info pertaining to McGruff from 10:20 -10:50 2. Mail Boxes - The PC received the letter and re- submitted a letter back to the postmaster with all addresses that have mailboxes on the opposite side of the road- awaiting letter to continue process. 3. Restaurant Tents- Joel presented the group with 3 versions of the proposed flyers - the group chose 1 of them and Joel is going to send it to Sandy via e-mail so she can bring to the printer. Group needs to establish a list of where the tents will be distributed in the city. 4. Curfew Results- Butch spoke with Mike Robertson and will be drafting a letter from the county on what they would like as a recommendation. The group looked at what City Planner Dan Licht had drafted and noted they would like to change the ordinance to read 15 and under lOpm all days of the week and ages 16 -17 year olds 12 am on Fridays and Saturdays -the rest of the week is lOpm. Council Reports 1. April 23- Sandy had nothing to report that pertained to Police Commission. Council Meeting Assignments 1. May 14 Joel 2. May 29 Linda 3. June 11 Jane Meeting was adjourned at 7:49 ITEM 5_3 CITY OF OTSEGO PARK & RECREATIONAL COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 9, 2007 7:OOPM Call to order: The meeting was called to order at 7:00 PM. Roll call: Commissioners: Mike Brumm, Aaron Stritesky, Russ Langer, Rose Cassady, Kathy Roberts, Beverly Kumar. Peter Torresani arrived at 7:45 PM. Absent: Rob Miller. Council Members: Jessica Stockamp and Mark Thorsted. Staff: Public Works Director, Brad Belair. 1. Tour of the Public Works Building Commissioners were given a tour of the new Public Works Building by Public Works Director, Brad Belair. Commissioners were impressed with the new building and thanked Belair for the informative tour. 2. Agenda Approval Motion by Commissioner Cassady, seconded by Commissioner Brumm. Motion carried 6-0. 3. Approval of Apri111, 2007 Minutes Motion by Commissioner Brumm, seconded by Commissioner Langer. Motion carried 6-0. 4. Community Education Report Carol McNaughten - Commers from Community Education reviewed the figures from the Recreation program. They added new adult programs, along with a safety summer event for children and "Otsego Friday Knight" event for pre-teens and teenagers. Commissioner Kumar mentioned that Beaudry Meadows Park has two tennis courts that could also be used for tennis lessons. Community Education will have a booth at the Otsego Festival to promote programs. They would be willing to display park maps and Otsego Park and Recreational pictures. They will have a staffed climbing wall and charge $1.00 for the public to climb. Carol mentioned that their online registration, for Otsego, has increased by 60 %. McNaughten - Commers was not fully aware of the details for scheduling the baseball fields. She said that Community Education meets just after the New Year to discuss it. McNaughten- Commers will have Community Education (Pauline) e- mail Belair a current schedule for usage on the fields. Belair stated that this will help him with maintenance of the fields. McNaughten- Commers would said she would like to post information about Community Education programs on the Prairie Park bulletin board. Commissioners welcomed this idea. Commissioners thanked McNaughten - Commers for her information and time. 5. Uses of the Old Skate Park Space Belair suggested Commissioners meet at the old skate park in Prairie Park for their next meeting and bring their suggestions. Commissioners agreed that it would be a good idea. Commissioners will meet at 7:00 PM for the June 13, Park and Recreational Meeting at the old skate park. 6. City Update Council Member Stockamp informed us about issues concerning the scheduling of baseball fields. She said that she spoke to coaches concerning scheduling. She said that there seems to have been a miscommunication about the fields. Stockamp urged Community Education to come to speak with the Park and Recreational Commission. Otsego has 9 -10 teams that play ball on the fields. Commissioners feel that Otsego teams should have priority when scheduling. Commissioner Brumm suggested we have a master log or schedule in place. Commissioner Langer suggested a paper trail for requests and putting the application for use of fields on the city website. Commisioner Torresani suggested that we should be able to look at baseball and softball statistics so the majority occupies the most fields. Commissioners agreed that any group /team that wants to request use of baseball fields needs to meet with the commission. The Park and Recreational Commission will hold a meeting in December for all perspective ball field inquires. In addition, one commissioner will be selected to represent the Park and Recreational Commission at the meeting next year in which Community Education discusses plans for the ball fields. Commissioner Kumar mentioned that there will be an additional ball field at Beaudry Meadows, as stated on the city website. Commissioner Kumar recalled that when McNaughten - Commers visited the commission last November it was discussed that they wouldn't be able to use that field yet as the seeding wasn't done. However, they may be able to use it for t -ball the following year. Belair stated that there would not be a ball field at Beaudry Meadows. Commissioners were under the assumption that there was to be a ball field there. 7. Any Other Business Commissioner Langer asked to table the survey discussion until city administrator, Mike Robertson is present. Commissioner Langer shared his view that the Park and Recreational Commission consider building new parks where there is a higher population of residents. He commented that there was pressure to build Kittredge Park and there are not a lot of people that use that park. Commissioner Roberts also said that she agrees. Council Member Stockamp said that the developer funded Kittredge Park. Council Member Thorsted started that at the time of development, the housing market was good, and a large commercial area was also in the plans across from Kittredge. Commissioner Stritesky commented that we don't know the details and agreement that the development had with the city for that park. Commissioner Cassady said that Prairie Park is not by a lot of houses. Commissioner Langer expressed that he would like to see a certain percentage of residencies before we build new parks as there are Otsego residents that don't have parks near them. Further, if the developers get to say where they want the parks, why are we a park commission? Commissioner Stritesky commented that we are not the Planning Commission. Commissioner Kumar requested that a bulletin board be placed in other Otsego parks, not just Prairie Park, as this would promote programs, city events and community. Belair asked what kind of bulletin boards and Commissioner Kumar indicated something simple where laminated flyers could be displayed. Belair said he would get back to the commission with a price. Commissioner Roberts asked about an update in regard to the flag pole in Praire Park, followed up by an inquiry from Commissioner Cassady. Commissioner Torressani said that he didn't think we voted on the flag pole as a commission. Council Member Stockamp said we discussed it and city administrator Mike Robertson was to give the commission some quotes. Commissioner Roberts asked that the flag pole in Prairie Park be discussed at the next meeting. Adjournment: Commissioner Cassady moved, seconded by Commissioner Roberts, to adjourn at 9:09p.m. Motion carried 7 -0. Minutes by Commissioner Beverly Kumar FINAL PAY ESTIMATE ITEM 5..4- CITY OF OTSEGO Test Well No. 8 Date: May 11, 2007 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Test Well No. 8 Contractor: Mark J Traut Wefts, Inc. Contract Amount: 558,320.00 Award Date: October 27, 2006 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above - referenced project by Mark J Trout Wefts, Inc. Bid Schedule "A" - Test Boring ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION 1 MobSzation & Demobilzaton 1 LS $ 8,915.00 $ 8,915.00 1 $ 8,915.00 2 DO I & Drive 10" Camp 130 LF $ 75.00 $ 9,750.00 118 $ 8,850.00 3 041110" Open Hole 300 LF 5 35.00 5 10.500.00 259 5 9,085.00 4 Furnish & Install 6" Steel Casing 430 LF 5 22.00 $ 9,480.00 375 5 8,250.00 5 DrO 6" Open Hole Thru ML Simon 80 LF $ 25.00 1 2,000.00 65 5 1,825.00 6 Gamma Log and Report 1 LS 5 1.150.00 5 1,150.00 , 1 5 1,150.00 _ 7 Furnish. Install & Remove Test Pump 1 LS $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 1 $ 1,800.00 8 Operate Test Pump 24 HR $ 100.00 5 2,400.00 21 $ 2,100.00 9 Water Test (Bad. M. Radionwaa tides) 1 LS 5 850.00 $ 850.00 1 5 850.00 10 Seal (Grout) Open Annulus 10"X8" 4 CY $ 355.00 5 1,420.00 6.5 $ 2.307.50 11 Abandon 8" Test Well 5 CY 5 355.00 5 1,775.00 $ - Extra Water Sampling (Long Menu) from FIG formation daring the boring to the ML Simon 12 Formation 1 LS $ 1,900.00 $ 1,900.00 _ 1 $ 1,900.00 Total Bid Schedule "A" 5 51.720.00 $ 46.612.50 BM Schedule "B" - FIG Zone Tests ITEM ESTIMATED CONTRACT UNIT USED TO NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE CONTRACT AMOUNT DATE EXTENSION Clem Out Bee Hole Unt8 Clem Enough to 13 Pump 3 HR $ 325.00 5 975.00 3 $ 975.00 Remove Drill Rods to Allow for InsInpatiot of 14 Pump 2,HR 5 325.00 $ 850.00 2 $ 650.00 Furnish, Instal & Remove Test Pump and Set Up 15 Generator 1 LS $ 1,600.00 5 1,800.00 1 $ 1,800.00 16 Operate Test Pwnp 24 , HR _ $ 100.00 _ $ 2,400.00 6.75 5 875.00 17 Install Data Recorders N Wall No. 3 1 EA 5 325.00 5 325.00 1 $ 325.00 Rem Drill Rods to Allow for Continue Down to 18 ML Sinn 2 HR 5 325.00 $ 850.00 2 5 650.00 Total Bid Schedule "B" $ 6.6000.00 $ 4.876.00 Bid Schedule "A` $ 51,720.00 $ 46,612.50 Bid Schedule "B" $ 6,600.00 $ 4,875.00 TOTAL $ 51,487.50 Total Work Completed to Date $ 51,487.80 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1: $ 37.718.75 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2: $ 11,193.38 WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF: $ 2,574.38 ot522twPE PE -1 . FINAL PAY ESTIMATE CONTRACTOR CITY OF OTSEGO Test Well No. 8 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: MARK J TRAUT WELLS, INC. Certification by Contractor. 1 all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Vtiliq AL thG4, - Date 5- 19- 01 ENGINEER: HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Certification .■ . t ineer. W - •. rn end payment for work and quantities as shown. Signed: ./, . 1 .4 ` Title: • _ . F,. Date d /a 3!6 7 OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date ot522twPE PE - 2 ITEM 7_7 MEMO Date: May 24, 2007 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Dust Control We have received two requests for dust control where the City has been asked to pay. Ray Slavic requests dust control on 70 Street due to the truck traffic in and out of Duerr Creek subdivision. Kenny Shierts requested dust control for Nashua Avenue north of County Road 39 to the Mississippi River. Kenny would like the City to pay 50% and he'll pay the other 50 %. He stated he would not ask for dust control if it was just the few homes on the road but there is a lot of traffic going down to the boat landing at the river. ITEM 7_2 CITY OF OTSEGO Memo To: City Council From: Brad Date: 5/24/07 Re: Seasonal summer employees We interviewed for seasonal summer employees and recommend hiring Brad Zahler and Rene Metcalf. They both are very qualified and will be a great addition to the Public Works department. In addition to these new hires, Ryan Donnay will also be returning for summer employment. The starting date will be June 4"'. • Page 1 ITEM 8_1 NAC NORTHWEST ASSOCIATE!) CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231 .2555 Facsimile: 763.231 .2561 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Laurie Shives DATE: 22 May 2007 RE: Otsego — 8652 Nashua Avenue NE; Accessory Building Relocation CUP FILE: 176.02 — 07.11 On May 21, 2007 the Planning Commission held a public hearing for discussion of the proposed conditional use permit to allow the relocation of an existing accessory building. The subject site is located at 8652 Nashua Avenue NE and is owned by Ms. Tricia Knutson. The applicant was present at the public hearing and asked for further explanation of the proposed conditions of approval. There were no other comments from the public. The public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission discussed the degree of compatibility the proposed accessory building would have with the existing buildings on the site, the majority of the commissioners agreeing that the proposed building would not be visible from adjacent properties and the roadway. The Commissioners then voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the application subject to the four conditions as listed in the Planning Report Addendum dated May 17, 2007. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve a CUP for relocation of an existing caboose to 8652 Nashua Avenue NE, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be approved prior to relocation of the existing structure to the subject site. 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within 6 months of the date the building permit is issued. 3. A performance security as determined by City staff shall be provided as specified in Section 20-4 -7 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The subject site shall be inspected by the Code Enforcement Officer and all violations of the City Code related to outdoor storage shall be abated prior to issuance of a building permit. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the proposed use does not conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. C. Motion to table. c. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ron Wagner, City Engineer Tricia Knutson, property owner 2 CITY OF 05 -22 -07 OTSEGO FINDINGS & DECISION CUP APPROVAL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Tricia Knutson. APPLICATION: Request for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow relocation of an existing accessory building to 8652 Nashua Avenue NE. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 29 May 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is PID 118 - 500 - 201301, City of Otsego, County of Wright, State of Minnesota. B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for future Low Density Residential land uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area. C. The subject site is zoned A -1, Agriculture Rural Service District. D. Consideration of the application is to be based upon (but not limited to) the criteria set forth by Section 20 -4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The subject site is guided for low density residential uses by the Comprehensive Plan. A detached accessory structure is a permitted accessory use in the A -1 District and the use is consistent with the guided land use for the area. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The surrounding area is developed with low density and rural density single family residential uses which are planned to continue as discussed in the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The relocated structure shall be required to comply with all applicable performance standards. 4. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The relocated structure will be used for storage of personal property of the property owner and is not anticipated to generate traffic beyond the capabilities of streets serving the subject property. 1 5. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. E. The Planning Report dated 16 May 2007 and Planning Report Addendum dated 17 May 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 21 May 2007 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the application, and other evidence, the public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission recommended by a 5-1 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the findings outlined above. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the application is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit shall be approved prior to relocation of the existing structure to the subject site. 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within 6 months of the date the building permit is issued. 3. A performance security as determined by City staff shall be provided as specified in Section _ 20-4 -7 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The subject site shall be inspected by the Code Enforcement Officer and all violations of the City Code related to outdoor storage shall be abated prior to issuance of a building permit. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: 2 ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 29 day of May, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Foumier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 3 ITEM g_1 RIGHT OF ENTRY, RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AND WAIVER OF TRESPASS Over that property legally described as Lot 2, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS, Wright County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the East 90.00 feet thereof. The undersigned, owners of the above described land situated in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, agree to the partial use of the land for construction of facilities for public improvement purposes as described as follows: For use by the City of Otsego and its contractor as a staging area of construction materials and equipment and to be used for the construction of the sanitary sewer extension as well as the removal of any existing septic system. The City and its contractor shall have the right to leave excess soil material on the site during construction. The undersigned owners hereby consent to the entry by the City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, on the property described for the purposes of construction plus temporary easements for construction purposes. The undersigned does hereby waive all rights to commence an action of trespass against the City of Otsego because of said entry on said property as well as any right to seek monetary compensation for temporary use of the land. The City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, agree that the signing of this Waiver of Trespass shall in no way affect the rights of the undersigned property owners to be reimbursed for any damage to the property described herein, caused by the construction of the sanitary sewer by the City, its agents and assigns. The City further agrees to restore the construction area by July 30, 2007. Dated this 65(P day of f _ , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have set their hands the day and year first above written. Land Owners: _ — ` q ,-) A 1 S:tMunicipaMOTSEGO 33lWAIVEROFTRESPASS (L2B2GRENINS).doc RIGHT OF ENTRY, RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AND WAIVER OF TRESPASS Over that property legally described as Lot 3, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS, Wright County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the East 122.00 feet thereof. The undersigned, owners of the above described land situated in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, agree to the partial use of the land for construction of facilities for public improvement purposes as described as follows: For use by the City of Otsego and its contractor as a staging area of construction materials and equipment and to be used for the construction of the sanitary sewer extension as well as the removal of any existing septic system. The City and its contractor shall have the right to leave excess soil material on the site during construction. The undersigned owners hereby consent to the entry by the City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, on the property described for the purposes of construction plus temporary easements for construction purposes. The undersigned does hereby waive all rights to commence an action of trespass against the City of Otsego because of said entry on said property as well as any right to seek monetary compensation for temporary use of the land. The City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, agree that the signing of this Waiver of Trespass shall in no way affect the rights of the undersigned property owners to be reimbursed for any damage to the property described herein, caused by the construction of the sanitary sewer by the City, its agents and assigns. The City further agrees to restore the construction area by July 30, 2007. Dated this a 1 day of J/ , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have set their hands the day and year first above written. Land Owners: L- teltaq S:\Municipal\AOTSEGO \633 \WAIVEROFTRESPASS (L3B2GRENINS).doc PERMANENT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Bulow Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby convey and warrant to the City of Otsego, Grantee, a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes, together with the unrestricted right to improve, repair and maintain the same, free and clear of all encumbrances, over, under, and across the following described real estate in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A BULOW INC. Dated: ji.-zjo By: Christopher .: ulow, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) s.s. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Subscribed and sworn to before me this ra> day of 2007 by Christopher M. Bulow the President of and with authority on��f Bulow Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor. I _ 1 TAM1 MARIE LOFF Notary ' blic Minnesota 4 My Commission Expires January 31, 2010 0 RIGHT OF ENTRY, RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AND WAIVER OF TRESPASS Over that property legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS, Wright County, Minnesota, EXCEPT the East 117.00 feet thereof. The undersigned, owners of the above described land situated in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, agree to the partial use of the land for construction of facilities for public improvement purposes as described as follows: For use by the City of Otsego and its contractor as a staging area of construction materials and equipment and to be used for the construction of the sanitary sewer extension as well as the removal of any existing septic system. The City and its contractor shall have the right to leave excess soil material on the site during construction. The undersigned owners hereby consent to the entry by the City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, on the property described for the purposes of construction plus temporary easements for construction purposes. The undersigned does hereby waive all rights to commence an action of trespass against the City of Otsego because of said entry on said property as well as any right to seek monetary compensation for temporary use of the land. The City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, agree that the signing of this Waiver of Trespass shall in no way affect the rights of the undersigned property owners to be reimbursed for any damage to the property described herein, caused by the construction of the sanitary sewer by the City, its agents and assigns. The City further agrees to restore the construction area by July 30, 2007. Dated this 2.4 day of iina ,, 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have set their hands the day and year first above written. Land Owners: j 04 IrdPsw S: 1MunicipaMOTSEGO1633 1WAIVEROFIRESPASS (L182GRENIN8).doc EXHIBIT A A permanent 20 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1 ORENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota, lying north of the south 5.00 feet thereof. The centerline of said easement is described as follows. Commencing at the Southwest Comer of Lot 2 said Block 1, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East along the South line of said Lot 2 a distance of 178.44 feet to the point of beginning of said centerline; thence North 05 degrees 11 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 188.49 feet and said centerline there terminating. S:\ Municipal\AOTSEGO16331easements from Andy\Orenins Miss Hills 2nd Lot 1 Block 1 Drainage and Utility Easement Exhibit A.doc • Easement Exhib it • r 1 1 City of Otsego • PROPOSED ORAtl1AQP AND UMY FA111100I.. P 2 A /.a *t 40 Nat atl. a..nd W a0 ""Corer"" M Dart d ld 1. Bled 1 aCae /011=11111 SEGQt+D AOpmri Ml a a III. er OM 0. d IM 0Vane. as 600 d tlw la mnalM d add Gomm 1. amr � pm g Np aa�lq _ 0.. Sealm.t Oamr d tat ! aid 040* 1. URrw m m mw1M O `.. �` la 20 edam a 770.MMt a m 0. * 0*I 0 M &rt 00I* OM Mum ' MO oa *1 alm *. 00 mods Ra .� d 1104* Nat ana ra 0.001.404 ``„ J ;`'� Ma OR 1 a a MM. N.. P�aaa ` LI, Mad %.m.at Ma a0 tram awna0 110 y. R.. 0007 aara :-- - r T -1 '1 + �1. <[ ii `C � J� I °j r� I I l IA . /-,<./ l; 1 / I Lot 2 � . •/ 1 p 1 p 1 .—r � ,. _` 11 G ■ lat Mara Mara c I d 1 i Mk I. ‘ — Iae Md lat P. /a M7 ![REIN 1 ► AI C 1 I II S VI \l_i vll Vv Ivll I rllll. I ni l! •) - Lot. Lil.vvly 1 • • m N OA1E MOON oa* IMO OW _ hi ■ Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS Easement Exhibit 1 01.11 Mame MGM �M 000. 7 Ma, Ma lamb MOS SECOND ADDITION .►sat. .�. ma Ira 703.427-0000 FM 7a7 -u7-M0 City of Otsego 1 .m .l.w.a.,..ia ORS aw...a.a .a..Raaae.-a+.somom 965. I11.414 '411444 .■1 t. ,1 ,.. i .1 „� RIGHT OF ENTRY, RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AND WAIVER OF TRESPASS Over that property legally described as Lot 4, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS, Wright County, Minnesota. The undersigned, owners of the above described land situated in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, agree to the partial use of the land for construction of facilities for public improvement purposes as described as follows: For use by the City of Otsego and its contractor as a staging area of construction materials and equipment and to be used for the construction of the sanitary sewer extension as well as the removal of any existing septic system. The City and its contractor shall have the right to leave excess soil material on the site during construction. The undersigned owners hereby consent to the entry by the City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, on the property described for the purposes of construction plus temporary easements for construction purposes. The undersigned does hereby waive all rights to commence an action of trespass against the City of Otsego because of said entry on said property as well as any right to seek monetary compensation for temporary use of the land. The City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, agree that the signing of this Waiver of Trespass shall in no way affect the rights of the undersigned property owners to be reimbursed for any damage to the property described herein, caused by the construction of the sanitary sewer by the City, its agents and assigns. The City further agrees to restore the construction area by July 30, 2007. vtg Dated this / day of cu , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have set their hands the day and year first above written. Land Owners: ,eY rT.9s -e. !. S:1MunicipaMOTSEGO633 WAIVEROFTRESPASS (L4132GRENINS).doc PERMANENT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Alpine Homes, Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby convey and warrant to the City of Otsego, Grantee, a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes, together with the unrestricted right to improve, repair and maintain the same, free and clear of all encumbrances, over, under, and across the following described real estate in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A ALPINE HOMES INC. • Dated: Ss"— /6 0 rl By: Its: «. �,�-- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) s.s. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) t Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 41 2007 by the l __ of and with authority on behalf of 1pine Hom Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor. 4 1A6e ;P/Atottr CAROL K. KRYSfOSEK NOTARY FOBLIC - MINNESOTA Notary Public : MyCommssionExpiresJan.atAN EXHIBIT A A permanent 20 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 4, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS, Wright County, Minnesota, except those parts of said Lot 4 dedicated as drainage and utility easements on said GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS. The centerline of said easement is described as follows. Commencing at the Southwest Corner of Lot 5, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East along the South line of said Lot 5 a distance of 202.09 feet to the point of beginning of said centerline; thence North 06 degrees 44 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 211.73 feet to the north line of Lot 4, and said centerline there terminating. S:\ Municipal\AOTSEGO \633\easements from Andy\Grenins Miss Hills Lot 4 Block 2 Drainage and Utility Easement Exhibit A.doc Easement Exhibit City of Otsego 1 MIOOW® 20.00 C No mum 6A ow A a.OI101110 20 Nat 44th •_inat 6Y dnlig0� .003.0061 04.100624 dW v '0 — (j I y tl p 0201 � t o ie t W / 1 . . 2. GdM e IO�f!!1 .02 .20 fdlt ; 0.14 .1 — J Lot ( 166d1PM MAL The IAA 4 anb M at ..I0 mamma 12 41v4ad as Mon. odd G6NN5 - L.O. 3 OMewa.y et the $.d..00t Mawr a let 6. 20. 11 el an e nerved bowing et South L I M fat eIM, M WIN W 04 0016 Let 6 a Adanaa 10Pii Mt a IN pill al MOM* N oat 260222144 Orb 0.006 00 Ng*. 44 I .lamb b 21473 Me a 1b and IM et Let 4 a mold Am et Van0rt alit' 20112222412. 001.__6 1720 eq. R ■ 0.001 mew. Go � 1 / — o ° . far.� (.o. 4 G) 1 1 1 < / s./ r 1 0 \T1 . . GO O / ' l 1 LIJ LlJ (Y, / 1 1 1 Lot 5 1 i <( 1 ' 1/ SBY2202097'E L 1 r r _i b C . WdNpt Mar i — 24 S. ` _0. 0 1800.1 2 1 ilk IT A /sr I rsr%1 r L 0 nl I ' 'IC" I V 11 I n \71» I %.7%." L.1 - VVVI\vi I Lot 1 I VV 14. VT n I I 1 1 1 e mar 044* ""'0th °` ° " ° Hakonson Anderson Assoc., Inc. Easement Exhibit see ra w +�_ _ w E 616..1. and Land 000.7.. P.1.0. 118 - 161-00 -2040 for p — ' ,,, 716E -4 A». make. 1-4 MN r �� 7.3-40-5503 PAX City of Otsego 1 7 A:,7 DOS 2211311morel RIGHT OF ENTRY, RIGHT TO CONSTRUCT AND WAIVER OF TRESPASS Over that property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. The undersigned, owners of the above described land situated in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, agree to the partial use of the land for construction of facilities for public improvement purposes as described as follows: For use by the City of Otsego and its contractor as a staging area of construction materials and equipment and to be used for the construction of the sanitary sewer extension as well as the removal of any existing septic system. The City and its contractor shall have the right to leave excess soil material on the site during construction. The undersigned owners hereby consent to the entry by the City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, on the property described for the purposes of construction plus temporary easements for construction purposes. The undersigned does hereby waive all rights to commence an action of trespass against the City of Otsego because of said entry on said property as well as any right to seek monetary compensation for temporary use of the land. The City of Otsego, its agents and assigns, agree that the signing of this Waiver of Trespass shall in no way affect the rights of the undersigned property owners to be reimbursed for any damage to the property described herein, caused by the construction of the sanitary sewer by the City, its agents and assigns. The City further agrees to restore the construction area by July 30, 2007. Dated this /o day of , 2007. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantors have set their hands the day and year first above written. Land Owners: ,i 0, l4- orn.z.v. 0 _a - I .wed ,g /14 � KA yS76SGtr S: 1MunicipaMOTSEG016331WAIVEROFTRESPASS (L2BIGRENINS2nd).doc 1 Y PERMANENT UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT Alpine Homes, Inc., a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor, for and in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby convey and warrant to the City of Otsego, Grantee, a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes, together with the unrestricted right to improve, repair and maintain the same, free and clear of all encumbrances, over, under, and across the following described real estate in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A ALPINE HOMES INC. Dated: /6 -- O 1 9 By: � `- Its: ®lv --AX STATE OF MINNESOTA ) s.s. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) tit Subscribed and sworn to before me s /' day of /2(� 2007 by 9 .4.Z the 11240 -4;QI ,,L� of and with authority on behalf ofNAlpine Home a corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, Grantor. 4 ;; CAROL K. KRYSTOSEK ws NOTARY Fi18UC. MWESOTA N o t a r y Public > ' My Commission Wires Jan.st,zoo8 • EXHIBIT A A permanent 20 foot wide easement for drainage and utility purposes over, under and across that part of Lot 2, Block 1 GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS SECOND ADDITION, Wright County, Minnesota. The centerline of said easement is described as follows. Commencing at the Southwest Comer of said Lot 2, thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 24 minutes 27 seconds East along the South line of said Lot 2 a distance of 178.44 feet to the point of beginning of said centerline; thence North 05 degrees 11 minutes 20 seconds East a distance of 188.49 feet and said centerline there terminating. Except that part of said Lot 2, dedicated as drainage and utility easement on said GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HIILS SECOND ADDITION. S:1 Municipal\AOTSEGO \633\easements from Andy\Grenins Miss Hills 2nd Lot 2 Block 1 Drainage and Utility Easement Exhibit A.doc Easement Exhibit r r 1 • City of Otsego IMPOSED 000/1006 AND 1/1111Y CASCADIT — — — 1 m MA aNa 4•000.00A d r �,y �vpar .�..... R MN pert , Mt:6bn / Y61.9RI IR48 �Olw �OOI7 M Cwn ly, w 1M MIwb 7M oletaW• m N add memo* • NsMd as tataa . m A M S ~op 7 N aW t 01 Maws n a Amami Meow of 6aNb 60 ~op R'7 Cat w�� asp M South M M sail Let 2 . �;; IIo - e»mM R6 aua M l t a aefanoe rwt and 4 aanf a r. C� boot Mywwtt �,�, • • .. _ • • Lot i _ _ boot t a I t % lail J dedleetM as tamp and Wily aowmnt en add finea S ^ IA J errs a b"o"wl NNW N Mims emm.w 24220 q It.. 0.066 awa. V 1' D 1 .(.", • . - - -: W6yfaaaad \ LU VVIL.VI A ` `a J �, _. .. t7 <( < a ..1 01: w t c i . I w I �� -- _ Let 2. Auk 1, t k �tNie1"Art I ,., Ir 1 1-1111.5 I G 6 dI S )') r vh�l v v Ivn.,.:1.,.,:1� 1 1 ni�1 2 Lot 1 I C%L -tJVr� � I I • an 00 M LAW u °•• AAA H mExhibit w 61as.mmwt EC M SECOND ADDITION e MI A m -xa City' of Otsego a � s wee riNa t.ILLil4r • i:lLidual, L1111 ft .4 r 4 . , 1 xt, :aa•! .....r . ITEM 9_2 - Hakanson 30 A nderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 1 1 cicr s i nC Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427 -0520 �- MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego City Council FROM: Mike Foreman, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. DATE: May 23, 2007 RE: Well # 8, Radionuclides/Treatment & Well #3 Unacceptable concentrations of radionuclides have recently been discovered in the Mt. Simon aquifer at Test Well #8 in Otsego. Radionuclides are a group of radioactive elements that may cause cancer in himuins if consumed in high concentrations. As a result, water from proposed Well #8 may not be safe to drink unless treatment is provided to remove these radioactive elements. Treatment for removal of radionuclides can be accomplished in many ways. Processes that have been shown to be effective include, for example: ion exchange, reverse osmosis, chemical addition with filtration, and electrodialysis. The preferred solution for this project is a process using chemical addition with filtration. Adequate space for total water treatment may be available in Pumphouse #2. The installed cost for a system using chemical addition with pressure sand filtration sized for proposed Well #8 is estimated to be approximately $800,000. A water engineering study including a pilot study is needed to establish final design parameters and size equipment. A commitment to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for treatment will be required before Well #8 can be approved for construction. This commitment requires a specific date at which time the city plans to provide treatment for removal and disposal of radionuclides. A copy of the proposed letter is attached. Several issues are discussed below concerning the commitment to construct production Well #8 with treatment for radionuclide removal and residual disposal: 1. Current Planning for Pumphouse #2 and its Wells: Pumphouse #2 is the treatment building for existing Well #3, proposed Well #8 and future Well #9. Treatment currently includes the addition of three chemicals: fluoride to prevent dental carries, polyphosphate to sequester iron and manganese, and chlorine for disinfection. Well #3 has in the past supplied water to Riverpointe through Pumphouse #2, but this well is temporarily out of service. Water is now temporarily supplied to Riverpointe from Wells #1, #2 and #6 until Well #8 and its raw water line are constructed and improvements to Pumphouse #2 are made. The pumps in Wells #1, #2, #3 and #6 do not have adequate head capacity to fill Water Tower #3. The plan has been that new well pumps in proposed Wells #3, #8 and #9 would provide head capacity to fill Water Tower #3. Also Pressure Control Station No. 1 (now in design), located between Pumphouse #1 (lower - pressure zone) and Pumphouse #2 (higher - pressure zone), will allow flow to feed the two pressure zones in either direction with pumps or a pressure reducing valve. Capacity of Well #3 is limited by its pump to only 250 gpm. The original well driller (Traut Wells) expects Well #3 can yield 1,000 gpm with redevelopment of the well and a new pumping system. The plan was to redevelop Well #3 for more capacity, but now there are concerns it too could have unacceptable levels of radionuclides. A test is currently being performed by MDH on the water from Well #3 for radionuclides. The test results should be available by the end of this month. Well #3 currently takes water from the Franconia, Ironton, Galesville (FIG) aquifers and is located adjacent to the East Wastewater Treatment Facility. There are concerns about using the FIG (a relatively shallow aquifer) from a well so close to the East Wastewater Treatment Facility, and even more so if it is redeveloped for more capacity. Redevelopment would require controlled use of explosives in the bottom of the well to open a larger cavity for increased capacity. The well driller assures us this should not create a problem. The water test 6 years ago by Traut Wells included radionuclides, which were within limits although detectable concentrations were found. Well #3 tested for high iron (0.95 mg/L• secondary limit = 0.3 mg/L) and high manganese (0.095 mg/L; secondary limit = 0.05 mg/L) and iron bacteria was detected. However, the water tested reasonably well for total hardness (190 mg/L) good pH (7.8), and no other known unacceptable water quality elements showed up in the test. Another possibility for Well #3 is to drill a test well directly through Well #3 another 100' to 200' into the Mt. Simon aquifer to determine potential water quality and capacity there. Since the Mt. Simon formation is deeper, it thereby offers an aquifer that is better protected from potential pollution from above, and it can provide a relatively good quality and high capacity water source, discounting radionuclides and iron. Well #9 is a planned future well to be located south of Co. Rd 36 near the Crow River; however, the city does not have a deed to the property for this well. The only way to find out if the water at this location has radionuclides and what its yield can be is to drill a test well and test the water quality and the well yield potential in the aquifers there. 2. Recommended Engineering Studies: A water - supply engineering study is needed to determine the needs for water treatment, residual disposal and the quantity of water available for treatment at Pumphouse #2. Knowing the quality and quantity for production well #3, test well #8, eventually test well #9, and finally, pilot treatment studies of these well waters, we will have the information needed to determine design parameters for treatment and residual disposal that will meet the requirements for all three wells connected for treatment at Pumphouse #2. Before long, a similar study will be needed for Pumphouse #1 and then Pumphouse #3. The Comprehensive Plan for Otsego by HAA dated September 2005 discussed several elements of a limited water study, but did not rise to the level of a water- supply engineering study and did not anticipate radionuclides and the treatment needed. Hakanson Ander Assoc.,lnc. 3. Miscellaneous Comments: The good news with radionuclide treatment is that iron and manganese, two troublesome metals, will also be reduced for better quality fmished water. For example, iron at Well #8 in the Mt. Simon is 2.5 times above the recommended secondary limit and would be significantly reduced with the same treatment for radium. With use of radionuclide treatment, it may be possible to eliminate polyphosphate treatment to sequester iron and manganese. In addition, the conditions of the Mt. Simon aquifer at the site for Well #8 are excellent, in that there is plenty of water capacity with low drawdown. The aquifer actually creates an artesian well at this location. If the city wants or needs to use Well #8 before radium treatment is installed, it might do so by alerting its customers to the potential health issues before using it. If customers use and maintain a common ion exchange water softener that is connected to the cold -water side of their drinking water faucets, the water should be safe to drink, since water softeners will remove radionuclides. Bottled drinking water could also be used in the interim. 4. Alternatives for Proceeding with Construction: It appears three alternatives should be considered before proceeding with the current project tentatively awarded to Rice Lake Construction: Alternative 1 — Negotiate a contract change or cancel the construction project with Rice Lake Construction as soon as possible: with redevelopment of Well #3 for more capacity and the installation of a new well pump and a variable speed drive. Also, include a few additional test wells in the area of Pumphouse #2 to determine water quality and supply. It's suggest we first consider another pump test by a well driller to see if conditions for Well #3 have changed over the last 6 years in quantity and quality before deciding whether to redevelop the well and pick a new higher- capacity pump. Modifications for Alternative 1 assuming negotiated changes as described above for Well #3 could be handled by change order; however, these change orders, and required approvals from MDH, could take at least three or four months after a decision to proceed with this alternative is received from the council. Cancellation of the contract with Rice Lake Construction would allow time to hire a well driller to test and redevelop Well #3 as necessary and install a new well pump system to fill Tower #3. A water- supply engineering study for Pumphouse #2 to address water quantity, quality and treatment needs would be undertaken. Hakanson Ander Assocyinc. Alternative 2 - Cancel the construction project with Rice Lake Construction as soon as possible and start a water - supply engineering study for Pumphouse #2 to address water quantity, quality and treatment needs. It may cost $10,000 to $20,000 to back out of the current construction project, but it will allow re- advertising the construction of Well #8 after committing to provide treatment to remove radionuclides and obtaining approval from MDH. An added potential benefit with this alternative is that by directly contracting well construction with a well driller, the city may save $40,000 to $60,000 of overhead and profit otherwise needed by a general contractor. Alternative 3 - If the city wishes to proceed with the current proposed contract with Rice Lake Construction for construction of Well #8, the raw water line and improvements to Pumphouse #2, it will be necessary to modify the Contract Documents significantly, and then get approval from MDH. Modifications to plans and specifications would include: 1.) Increase pump -head capacity for Well #8 to force flow through the new treatment system. This would require a larger motor (extra 20 HP), a bigger pump, and a larger power supply with upsized electrical gear. 2.) Modify piping in Pumphouse #2 to allow a new treatment system to be installed later and after performing a water engineering study. Modifications for Alternative 3 could be handled by change order; however, these change orders, and required approvals from MDH, could take at least two or three months after a decision to proceed with this alternative is received from the council. This alternative is probably not practical, since it could delay the construction project currently scheduled with Rice Lake Construction beyond a reasonable time period for them. The following are our recommendations for the City of Otsego: 1. A commitment letter to MDH to provide radionuclide treatment for Well #8 into the Mt. Simon aquifer is not needed at this time unless the city wants to construct Well #8 now. 2. Direct HAA to negotiate either canceling the project with Rice Lake Construction immediately or having Rice Lake modify Well #3 with a new higher- capacity pump and/or conduct other test wells in the area to determine if other areas have water quality issues as well. 3. If the contract with Rice Lake is cancelled: a. Direct HAA to obtain quotes to test Well #3 for condition, capacity and water quality. b. Once the condition, capacity and water quality are determined and found to be acceptable for Well #3, direct HAA to redevelop the well and provide a new well pump system to fill Tower #3. 4. Once plans and specifications for Pressure Control Station #1 are complete, direct HAA to submit them to MDH for approval and then construction. 5. Direct HAA to prepare an outline of a water- supply engineering study for three wells ( #3, #8 & #9) to be connected for treatment through Pumphouse #2. 6. When necessary, as determined in water supply study, obtain land at the site for Well #9 to allow a test well to be constructed and tested. 7. Later, direct HAA to prepare a second outline of a water engineering study for wells to be connected through Pumphouse #1, which would integrate with the water engineering study for Pumphouse #2 and its wells. Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. 8. Later yet, direct HAA to prepare a third outline of a water engineering study for wells to be connected through Pumphouse #3, which would integrate all water studies for Otsego. Attachment: Water Analyses for Test Well #8. Ha Anderson kanson Assoc.,Inc. Water Sample Analyses for Test Well #8 Otsego, MN Table 1 From Mt. Simon Aquifer Date Collected: 1 -19 -07 Element Tested Activity MCL' Calcium, mg /L 45.8 Iron, mg/L 0.84 0.3 Magnesium, mg/L 13.1 Manganese, mg/L 0.009 0.05' Sodium, mg /L 2.15 Total Dissolved Solids, mg /L 172 500 Chloride, mg/L ND 250 Sulfate, mg /L 3.0 250 Gross Alpha, pCUL 18.6 ± 3.58 15' Radium 226, pCi/L 8.12 ± 1.61 — Radium 228, pCi/L 7.99 ± 0.930 — Radium 226 & 228, pCi/L 16.11 ± 2.54 5' Table 2 From Franconia, Ironton & Galesville (FIG) Aquifers Date Collected: 12 -28 -07 Element Tested Activity MCL' Calcium, mg /L 40.2 Iron, mg/L 1.84 0.3 Magnesium, mg/L 12.0 Manganese, mg/L 0.0234 0.05 Sodium, mg/L 1.82 Total Dissolved Solids, mg /L 160 500 Chloride, mg /L ND 250 Sulfate, mg /L 3.7 250 Gross Alpha, pCi/L 5.41 ± 1.86 15' Radium 226, pCi/L 1.16 ± 0.927 — Radium 228, pCi/L 1.69 ± 0.555 — Radium 226 & 228, pCi/L 2.85 ± 1.482 5 Notes: 1. MCL = Maximum Contaminant Level 2. National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations – non - enforceable 3. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations – enforceable 4. ND = None Detected ot523Test Well Samples.doc MAT 24 - 20071T1111) 10:13 P.001005 ITEM 70_7 • • Lald In landCor 61 Mu "•rl."" COt Inc; Ll and corcomparnes . �.� May 23..2007 . . ' - City 9f Ulsegu • • Mayo% Lacrq Fournier • city Council Members , . • , • ` 8899 Nashua Ave. NE : • • . . Otsego, MN 55330 . - • • RE; 'Waterfront Properly • • • . ' • Thank you for taking,the time to "review the Property tax/special marts on behalf of ' • • . ' our clients for Land Funding L LLC (Waterfiom East) and Mainstreet Otsego, LLC ... : • , • , (Friendship Addition). As we discussed -at your our,meeting last wick, we' are writing to • • • -, nest a !we L._. _-_L Opt On • ._ " , C tfl. I , ,, r _._ '1 - — _ _ ' • . The deferment midi be two years from . . , completion, •and, would be • for the properties ,as detailed on the attachment,: and is . . • • • re4ueeied due to delayed road improvements and road access issues. . .' • • We appreciate. your immediate attention to this matter andrequest that deferment of . assessments be :granted, Os well as any other property tax abatement relief that can•bt • • • • applicd, due to the si turcant delays being.encomnered by MNflOTs delay ofroad . • improvements and road. access issues. tam attichiog the detailed letter that was • • . . • - submitted at t lain 1 meeting for your reference, • . • • . • , SI y _ • • Fiel , E. , • , , • . ' LaudCurCuntpacics . , • , ' • • • 9325 Upland Lane North. Suite 300 • bMaplc'Orovc. 55389 ' ' • . • Phone; 763 - 463-8800 -, Pax 703-403-8801 www.k`u • . -- -- . 61AY 24- 20071111) 10,14 P.003i005 RE: Land Funding 1, LLC and Main Street Otsego Properties — Property Tax and Special Assessment Protest Real Estate Tax Wright County 2007 Special 2006 Special 2007 2006 Assessments, Assessments Property Taxes Proncrty Taxes • 118 -217- 000020, Outlot B - $ 79,068.68 $ 55.50 8 35,04112 5 3,612.50 118 - 217 - 000030, Outlul C - $ 15,1 66.42 $ 5550 S 7,037.58 $ 692.50 118 - 217 - 000040, Outlot D - $ 28,359.74 $ 5550 $ 11,858.26 $ 1,292.50 118 -217- 000050, Outlot E - $ 45,280.89 $ 55.50 8 20,663.11 $ 2,06850 118 -217- 000060, Oullot F - 5 17,558.36 $ 55.50 8 11,143.64 $ 1,026.50 118- 217- 000070, Outlot G - $ 16,184.00 $ 55.50 $ 9,808.00 $ 976.50 11R-21 7-0000en, Outlot 11 $ 17,067.58 t 55.50 $ 9,594.42 $ 778.50 118- 217- 000100, Outlot J - 5 10,273.82 $ 55.50 8 5,752.18 $ 47050 118 - 217 - 000110, Outlot K - $ 19,145.66 $ 55.50 $ 10,724.34 8 870.50 Subtotal Land Funding I, LLC S 248,105.15 $ 555.00 $ 121,622.85 S 11,788.50 118 217 000090, Outlot 1- 5 29,500.02 $ 55.50 $ 6.105.98 $ 634.50 118- 217 - 000120, Outlot L - $ 36.217.56 $ 55.50 $ 21,662.44 5 470.50 Subtotal Main Street Otsego S 65,717.58 8 111.00 S 39,768.43 S 1405.00 Total S 313,822.73 $ 666.00 5 151,391.27 $ 12,893.50 YiEV Laud Funding I, LLC partnership group that owns the above lots in Otsego, is one entity that is impacted by the road access issues. When we purchased the +sbuvn loll from Otsego Dcvclopmcmi Last, LLC on August 15, 2006, the status of the Highway 101 improvements were to start iw May 2006, with a cnrnpletion date of May 2007, These dates were changed without consideration, and the construction is now delayed and is scheduled to be completed by mid to late 2008. As a. result, we are unable to develop lots along the Highway 101 corridor in Otsego, and our sales and leasing opportunities arc severely affeetecl during this cnnstructioa In addition, buildings that already house tenant, (Main Street Otsego) arc being impacted due to the access constraints that are in place and will continue throughout 2007 and much of 2008, New prospective tenant's whn are seeking m sign lasses, are holding back due to these same access issues, or opting for Elk River or Rogers locations. This is a significant loss of revenue for the development. In addition, as we are effectively on hold with this property, we continue to bear additional unplanned ca Tying costs with regards to interest, property taxes, special assessments, insurance, maintenance and marketing. At minimum, we are requesting that the taxes he lowered, but also request that special assessment rata he dofcarod at a minimum to late 2008 to support the valuation of this land in its current condition, Thank ynu fnr addressing our ecmcems. We are extremely exited about this development and the economic opportunities that it will bring to the City of Otsego. Georgeel uinn Sandra Onhcim Senior Property Manager Asset. Manager Main Street Otsego, T.T.0 Land Funding 1, LLC hi--24-2001(T1111) 10:16 P. 004/005 LandCor Capital, LLC 9325 Upland Lane North Suite 325 Maple Grave, MN 55369 [Roe: 783.A83.8988 Fax 76346311991 May 23, 2007 City of Otsego Mayor Larry Fournier City Council Members 8899 Nashua Ave. NE ()ten, MN 55330 RE: Waterfront Property Thank you for taking the lime to review the property tax /special assessments on behalf of our clients for Land Funding 1, LLC (Waled East) and Mainstreet Otsego, LLC (Friendship Addition). As we discussed at your meeting last week. we are writing to raw most s twu your deferment on assessment. an the e'tcnninn of Quantrelle Avenue, including the utility project therein. The determent would be two years from completion., and would be for the properties as dctaikd on the attachment, and is requested due to delayed rural improvements and road access issues. We appreciate your immediate attention to this matter and request that deferment of assessments be gnautrd, as well as any other property tax abatement relief that can he applied, due to the significant delays being encountered by MNDO 's delay of road improvements and road access issues. I am attaching the detailed letter that was submitted at the last City Council =calm fur your reference. Sincerely, Sandra Ophcim, President LandCor Capital, LLC 11 24- 2007(TH11) 10:16 P.005i005 RE: Land Funding T, LT.0 and Main Street Otsego Properties — Property Tax and Special Assessment Protest attalEdwca r1 ht r.mm 2007 Special 2006 Special 2007 2006 Aaseaaments Assessments Property Taxes Proncrty Taxes 118 - 217 - 000020, Outlot B - $ 79.068.68 $ 55.50 $ 35,041.32 $ 3,612:50 118 -217- 000030, Outlot C - $ 15,1 66.42 $ 55.50 $ 7,037.58 $ 692.50 118-217-000040, Outlot 1] - $ 28,359.74 $ 55.50 $ 11,858.26 $ 1.292.50 118 217 000050, Outlot 1; - $ 45,280.89 $ 55.50 $ 20,663.11 $ 2,068.50 118-217-000060, Outlnt F - $ 17,558.36 $ 55.50 $ 11,143.61 $ 1,026.50 118 - 217 - 000070, Uutlot G - S 16,184.00 $ 55.50 $ 9,808.00 $ 976.50 118- 217 - 000080, Outlot 11- $ 17,067.58 S 55.50 $ 9,594.42 $ 778.50 118-217-000100, hurl nt T - $ 10,273.82 S 55.50 $ 5,752.18 $ 470.50 • 118-217-000110, Outlot K - $ 19,145.66 $ 55.50 $ 10,724.34 $ 870.50 Subtotal Laud Funding 1, LLC $ 248,105.15 3 555.00 $ 121,622.85 $ 11,788.50 118- 217 - 000090, Outlot I - 8 29,500.02 $ 55.50 $ 6,105.98 $ 63450 118 - 217 - 000120, Outlot L - $ 36,217.56 $ 55.50 $ 23,662.44 $ 470.50 Subtotal Main street Otsego $ 65,71738 $ 111.0U $ 29,768.42 5 1,105.00 Total $ 313,822.73 $ 666.00 8 151,391.27 S 12,893.50 .,•e�•,� • r- n�4 y � ��.,. •Ndbti i. a "x:S. b"�.�Pyb• lr' M. aR� .,. ete ;� j:4A5,.e1 4. fA 1! 1' SMdMi9 aff s:LR Land Funding I, LLC partnership group that owns the above lots in Otsego, is one entity that is impacted by the road access issues. whoa we purc;ttase l the above lots from Otsego Development East, LLC on August 15. 2006, the status of the Highway 101 improvements were to start in May 2006, with a completion date of May 2007. These dates were changed without cnnciieration, and the construction is now delayed and is scheduled to be completed by mid to late 2008. As a result, we are unable to develop lots along the Highway 101 corridor in Otsego, and our sales and leasing opportunities are severely affected during this construction. In addition, buildings that already house tenants (Main Street Otsego) arc being impacted due to the access constraints that arc in place and will continue throughout 2007 and much of 2008. New prospective tenant's who are seeking to signleases, are holding back due to these same access issues, or opting for Elk River or Rogers locations. This is a significant loss of revenue for the development. In addition, as we are effectively on hold with this property, we continue to bear additional unplanned carrying costs with regards to interest, property taxes, special assessments, insurauue. maintenance and marketing. At minimum, we are requesting that the taxes be lowered, but also request that special assessment rates be deferrers ate minimum to late 2008 to support the valuation of this land in its current condition. Thank you for addressing our concerns_ We are extremely exited about this development and the economic opportunities that it will bring to the City of Otsego. George Quinn Sandra Ovhcim Senior Property Manager Asset Manager Main Street Otsego, LLC Land Funding 1, LLC • COURT, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, P.L.L.P. Michael C. Couri• Attorneys at Law Kristen H. Carr Andrew J. MacArthur 705 Central Avenue East Kyle R. Hartnett Robert T. Ruppe•- PO Box 369 St. Michael. MN 55376 -0369 •.ac■., licensed u, Ill„ (763) 497 -1930 ••.also licensed In ('altorn,a (763) 497 -2599 (FAX) courimacarthur gearthlink. net May 22, 2007 Gerard Zachman 6194 Oakwood Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55370 Allen Zachman 13600 60 Street NE Otsego, MN 55376 RE: 62 " Street Interim Agreement Dear Gerard and Allen: Enclosed, please find a draft agreement regarding 62 Street for your review and comment. The Agreement is set to be placed on the City Council agenda for approval on Tuesday, May 29. The Agreement sets out the basic understanding between the parties. Due to the potential length of use of your property for farming, I have put into the Agreement language allowing the City to release itself from the Agreement in the event that major development occurs within the area which requires access via a full right of way 62 Street or if the City transportation plan requires that 62 Street be developed further for east west access. The Agreement automatically terminates upon any development, change of use or transfer of the property. I have referred to the farm property simply as the Trust Property at this point. The Wright County Property Information system lists the owner of the Trust Property as the Allen Zachman Trust. however the referenced Document No. on the parcel data comes up with a transfer from the Bernadette Zachman Trust dated June 8, 1998 to Wright- Hennepin. The ownership entity needs to be clarified prior to the final signed Agreement. If you have any further information regarding this please let me know. Letter to Zachmans May 22, 2007 Page 2 Please review the proposed Agreement and provide me with any comments prior to the May 29 City Council meeting. Very y you�s, f / /, G A ew J. Ma Arthur OURI, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, PLLP Encl. cc: City of Otsego DRAFT- May 22, 2007 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF OTSEGO AND THE ZACHMAN TRUST RELATIVE TO PROPERTY CONTAINING PORTIONS OF 62 STREET LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF OTSEGO WHEREAS, the City of Otsego (CITY) has a recorded interest in a 161/2 foot strip of property (SUBJECT PROPERTY) lying directly north of the Zachman Trust (TRUST) property (TRUST PROPERTY); and WHEREAS, the TRUST asserts an interest in a portion of that property based upon boundary locations and/or use; and WHEREAS, the SUBJECT PROPERTY is legally described as follows; The South 1 rod of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 33, Township 121, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, portions of the existing traveled roadway designated as 62 " Street are located within the SUBJECT PROPERTY; and WHEREAS, the TRUST asserts that the traveled portion of the roadway has over time migrated into portions of the SUBJECT PROPERTY over which they claim an interest; and WHEREAS, the CITY maintains that it has a valid recorded interest allowing full use of the SUBJECT PROPERTY for road purposes; and 1 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to resolve the current dispute by entering into this temporary agreement regarding the dimensions of the traveled portion of the 62 " Street roadway. NOW THERFORE TT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS FOLLOWS; 1. CITY agrees that the traveled portion of the roadway shall be eighteen and one half (18 %2) feet. The method of marking and designating the eighteen and one half feet shall be agreed to by the parties and shall be accomplished in the most unobtrusive but effective manner so as to provide CITY employees with proper guidance for plowing and maintaining 62 " Street. Upon marking the eighteen and one half feet, all other stakes or markers which would obstruct the roadway or maintenance of the roadway shall be removed. 2. The balance of the SUBJECT PROPERTY not utilized for the actual road surface will be used for snow storage during the winter, and may be used by the TRUST for farming during the rest of the year to the extent of previous use by the TRUST. 3. The TRUST shall use the balance of the subject property in such a way as to facilitate proper drainage for the roadway at all times, and shall construct no additional fences or barriers within the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 4. This Agreement shall be in force and effect for as long as the TRUST uses the TRUST PROPERTY for farming purposes as it is currently utilized. The Agreement shall terminate upon transfer of the TRUST PROPERTY to any individual(s) or entity, upon any development or change of use of the TRUST PROPERTY beyond its current agricultural use. In the event that the City determines at some point that 62" Street needs to be upgraded to a full City street in order to accommodate east west traffic in accordance with the City transportation plan, or as a result of substantial development within the area, the City may terminate this Agreement upon six (6) months written notice. 5. Neither the CITY nor the TRUST waive any claim or right to assert any claim to the SUBJECT PROPERTY or any portion thereof by entering into this Agreement. This Agreement is entered into to avoid litigation regarding claims to the SUBJECT PROPERTY at this time and to maintain the status quo between the parties in writing and allow for the current uses of the SUBJECT PROPERTY. 6. This Agreement contains the full and complete and final understanding between the parties and supersedes any previous Agreement whether written or oral. 2 AGREEMENT entered into this day of May, 2007 between the CITY OF OTSEGO and the ZACHMAN TRUST. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, City Clerk ZACHMAN TRUST By: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Subscribed and sworn before me this _ day of May,2007 By Larry Fournier, Mayor and Judy Hudson, City Clerk with Authority and on behalf of the City of Otsego, a Minnesota municipal corporation. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss 3 • COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Subscribed and sworn before me this _ day of May, 2007 By the of the Zachman Trust with authority and on behalf of the Trust. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: COURI, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, PLLP 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376 763 - 497 -1930 4 ITEM 10_3 COURT, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, P.L.L.P. Michael C. Couri• Attorneys al Law Kristen H. Carr Andrew J. MacArthur 705 Central Avenue East Kyle R. Hartnett Robert T. Ruppe•• PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 `Also hcenv, d in Minims (763) 497 -1930 -*Aka, licensed in Cassia (763) 497 -2599 (FAX) courimacarthur@earthlink.net May 22, 2007 Otsego City Council 8899 Nashua Ave. NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: DONATION OF PROPERTY FROM ALTON DRURY Dear Mayor and Council Members: Enclosed is a copy of a resolution we are requesting to be placed on the City Council's agenda at its May 29 meeting. Mr. Alton Drury has offered to donate certain property to the City in exchange for related tax benefits and transaction costs. The City has had an appraisal done on the property and Mr. Drury accepts the appraised value. The resolution accepts the donation from the Drurys, which is appraised at $30,000. A copy of the relevant portions of the appraisal is attached to the resolution for your review. The City is required, by statute, to pass a resolution approving the donation and the donation's value. Once the resolution is passed, the property will be deeded over to the City. Very Try�lffours, drew �. Ma r C RI, MA ARTHUR, AND RUPPE, PLLP Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson City Administrator E.P. Babcock CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2007-29 RESOLUTION VALUING AND ACCEPTING DONATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY AND EASEMENTS FROM ALTON G AND MARY L DRURY WHEREAS, Alton G. Drury and Mary L. Drury, husband and wife, (the "DRURYS ") own certain property abutting on Parish Avenue Northeast within the City of Otsego ( "CITY ") as set forth on the attached Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the DRURYS wish to donate the property to the City; and WHEREAS, the CITY has agreed to approve the transaction and the appraised value of the contributions for DRURY'S tax purposes and to provide appropriate documentation of the transfer and valuation; and WHEREAS, the property has been transferred from the DRURYS to the CITY; and WHEREAS, an appraised value of the DRURYS property has been determined by the appraiser and is hereby approved by the CITY. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY; 1. Accepts the donation of the property as set forth on Exhibit A for public purposes. 2. The value of the property donated to the City is hereby established at $30,000.00 pursuant to the appraisal set forth on the attached Exhibit B.. ADOPTED this day of May, 2007 by the Otsego City Council. 1 CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A The South one -half of Lots Six (6) and Thirty Eight (38) and the North one -half of Lots Five (5) and Thirty Nine (39), Riverside Park, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the plat and survey thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Wright County, Minnesota. South Half of Lots Seven (7) and Thirty Seven (37) and the North Half of Lots Six (6) and Thirty Eight (38) Riverside Park, according to the plat and survey thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles of said Wright County. SUMMARY APPRAISAL REPORT PROPERTY Vacant Lot/Land XXX Parish Avenue Northeast Otsego, Minnesota 55330 (Owner: Drury) PREPARED FOR Couri, MacArthur & Ruppe Attn: Andrew MacArthur, Attorney 705 Central Avenue East St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 -0369 DATE November 26, 2006 NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING William R. Waytas, Appraiser Nathan P. Hansen, Appraiser 7515 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite #115 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55426 Telephone: (952) 544 -8966 Fax: (952) 544 -8969 File # G0611002 EXHIBIT NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING 7515 Wayzata Blvd. #115 Minneapolis 952- 5448966 Minneapolis, MN 55426 St. Paul 651- 209 -6159 Established in 1968 Central Fax 952- 544 -8969 Couri, MacArthur & Ruppe December 28, 2006 Attn: Andrew MacArthur, Attorney 705 Central Avenue Northeast St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 -0369 Dear Mr. MacArthur: In accordance with your request, an inspection and a Summary Appraisal Report has been made on the following described property: Subject Property: Vacant Lot/Land XXX Parish Avenue Northeast Otsego, Minnesota 55330 It is legally described herein. The appraisal assumes that the property meets all current environmental standards. The appraisal analysis and conclusions are subject to certain limiting conditions and assumptions described herein. As a result of my appraisal and experience, it is my opinion that the current market value of the subject property, "as is" condition, as of November 26, 2006, is: Market Value: $30,000 The accompanying report contains data secured from my personal investigation and from sources considered to be reliable; however, correctness is not guaranteed. To the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements contained in this report are true and correct. Neither my employment to make this appraisal, nor the compensation, is contingent upon the value reported. This report has been prepared in conformity with the code of professional ethics and standards of professional appraisal practice of the Appraisal Institute and appraisal standards set forth by Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Sincerely, William R. Waytas, SRA, CRP Nathan P. Hansen Certified General MN 4000813 Certified General MN 20302514 www.callnagell.com TABLE OF CONTENTS General Informat On Page Summary of Important Facts and Conclusions 1 Introduction, Environmental Issues, Date of the Appraisal 2 Intended Use, Market Value Defined 3 Property Rights Appraised, Personal Property 4 Scope of the Appraisal 5 Identification, Subject Sales & Building History 6 Real Estate Taxes 7 Descriptive Data Regional Data 8 Regional Map 9 City & Neighborhood Description 10 Location Map 11 Site Description 12 Zoning & Flood Map 13 Plat Maps, Aerial Views 15 Subject Photographs 17 Valuation Highest and Best Use 19 Cost Approach 20 Income Approach 20 Sales Comparison Approach 21 Reconciliation 29 Certification 30 Extraordinary Assumptions & Hypothetical Conditions 31 Assumptions and Limiting Conditions 31 Curriculum Vitae 33 Addenda 36 SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS • V � Aerial View of Subject General Description: Vacant Land Appraisal Report: Summary Appraisal Report Current Use: Vacant Land Extraordinary Assumptions & See report for standard assumptions Hypothetical Conditions: Site Size: 33,147 SF (0.76 acres), per Plat Systems Zoning: R -1, Residential -Long Range Urban Service Area Highest and Best Use: Open space, parkland, side yard, etc. Personal Property: No business or personal property included Property Rights Appraised: Fee Simple Cost Approach N/A Income Approach N/A Sales Comparison Approach $30,000 Final Value: $30,000 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting 952- 544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com 1 INTRODUCTION This appraisal report reflects the data found and the conclusions estimated from an appraisal of a vacant land parcel located on Parish Avenue Northeast in the northeast portion of the City of Otsego, Minnesota. The subject is a vacant land parcel with river frontage on the Mississippi River. Per city officials, the subject is located within a flood zone and is encumbered by a large easement (levy maintained and levy access purposes). Per Mike Robertson, City Administrator, based on the subject's location within a flood zone and the encumbering easement(s), the subject is non - buildable; no building improvements are allowed on the subject parcel. Therefore, the highest and best use of the subject is for open space and/or side yard. ENVIRONMENTAL & STRUCTRUAL ISSUES Regarding any adverse environmental and /or improvement structural conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, mold, construction defects or inadequacies, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: None are apparent, however, appraiser is not an expert in this field. Value assumes no hazardous or structural conditions exist. Value assumes any abandoned wells will be properly sealed. If any of these conditions exist the appraised value could differ significantly. DATE OF APPRAISAL The effective dates are: The effective date and inspection date is November 26, 2006. - The date of the report is November 29, 2006 to December 28, 2006. 2 Nagel/ Appraisal & Consulting 952- 544 -6966 1 www.callnagell.com INTENDED USE OF THE APPRAISAL The client intends to use the appraisal for tax donation purposes. Market value will be determined. This appraisal assignment was requested by the named client/owner for its sole use. No party, other than the client, may use or rely upon any part of this report without the prior written authorization of both the named client and the appraiser. This report is not valid unless it contains the original signatures in blue ink. Any unauthorized third party relying upon any portion of this report does so at its own risk. MARKET VALUE DEFINED This report provides an opinion of market value. MARKET VALUE - The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently, knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (A) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (B) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what they consider their own best interest; (C) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (D) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (E) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold, unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale. Source: Dictionary of Real Estate, Fourth Edition, 2002 NagelI Appraisal & Consulting I 952 -544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com 3 SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL REPORT USPAP 2006 defines Scope of Work as: The type and extent of research and analyses in an assignment. For each appraisal, appraisal review and appraisal consulting assignment, an appraiser must: 1) Identify the problem to be solved, 2) Determine and perform the scope of work necessary to develop credible t= _ assignment results; and 3) Disclose the scope of work in the report. The scope of work includes, but is not limited to: 1) the extent to which the property is identified, 2) the extent to which tangible property is inspected, 3) the type and extent of data researched and 4) the type and extent of analyses applied to arrive at opinions or conclusions. Per assignment request, the following degree of research and analysis have been made; see addenda, engagement letter. The scope of this appraisal includes: • 1) Property Identification: Public records, plat maps, zoning maps and aerial photographs /views were used to identify the subject property. • 2) Property Inspection: An inspection of the subject property and neighborhood by the appraiser. Physical factors: Based on property inspection and client and city and county records. Lot size is based on information provided by the county. Economic Factors: Consisted of gathering of information from market experts, city and /or county offices, and internet about the region, community, neighborhood, zoning, utilities, and any pending projects in the area, which might affect the subject property. • 3) Extent of Data Researched: Sales data of competing properties within the subject market area were given primary consideration. The most relevant data is used in this report. Sources include, appraiser data files, Assessor, Plat Systems, MnCar, Internet, Listings, Developers, Agents, MLS, etc. The appraiser has not researched the title or ownership records. • 4) Type and Extent of Analysis Applied at Opinions or Conclusions: The narrative format used is a Summary Report, which is intended to comply with the reporting requirements set forth under Standards Rule 2 -2(b) of USPAP. All three approaches to value will be considered. The most recent, similar and proximate data has been used. The data used will be adjusted on a grid. Adjustments for significant difference will be applied. Explanations of the adjustments are in summary form. Comparable data is verified. Comparables and /or comparables area /neighborhood have been viewed by the appraiser. A final value opinion will be discussed and correlated. The appraiser accepts full professional responsibility for all of the analyses and conclusions contained within this report. The data used was obtained from sources considered credible, yet its accuracy is not guaranteed. Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting 1952-544-8966 1 www.callnagell.com 5 IDENTIFICATION Street Address: X)0( Parish Avenue Northeast Otsego, Minnesota 55330 The County PID # (per County): 118030000060 Legal Description S1 /20F LTS7 &37ALL OF LTS6 &38 &N1 /20F (per County): LTS5 &39 RIVERSIDE PARK The Fee Owner (per County): Alton Drury Census Tract #: 1001 SUBJECT SALES & BUILDING HISTORY Sales History: No known sale or transfer of the subject within the last three years. Building History: The subject is vacant land. The owner reported previous attempt(s) to construct building improvements on the subject were not approved by the city. 6 Nagel! Appraisal & Consulting I 952 -544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com REAL ESTATE TAXES Taxes, per County Records (Payable 2006) Tax $29 Special Assessments /Solid Waste Fee /Other $55 Total Tax & Assessments: $84 COUNTY ASSESSOR'S VALUE Payable 2006 Land $2,000 Building $0 TOTAL $2,000 The 2006 tax rate of 1.45% is typical for the market. The appraised value given in this report reflects any /all special assessments paid in full. Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting I 952 -544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com 7 CITY & NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION Type of Neighborhood: Northwest outer suburban community Percent Built -up: 60% developed (city limits) Stage of Development: Steady Growth Neighborhood Boundaries: City limits Single- family 40 %, Multi- family 5 %, Predominant Type & Conformity: Commercial /Industrial 15 %, Vacant 40 %. Average conformity. Supply & Demand: In balance Reputation of the Area: Average to good Typical Property Age: New to 100+ years; predominantly new to 20 years Residential Lot Sales (buildable): $40,000 to $200,000 per platted lot Non - Buildable /Side yard land area values: $0.50 to $2.00 per SF or about 50% of upland/buildable land values Subject Market: Subject Market: Stable Neighborhood Trend: Stable to gradual increase in value over time Detrimental influences: No major apparent Comments: The subject is located about 45 minutes northwest of Downtown Minneapolis just off 1 -94 near Hwy 101 in Otsego, MN. The subject is in the northeastern portion of the community near Hwy 101, just south of the growing suburban community of Elk River. The city is bordered to the north by the Mississippi River. Otsego has a good reputation as a stable community. Access to most shopping and surrounding communities is via Highway 101 and Interstate 94. Development is moving toward the subject area, which is along the Hwy 101 corridor. Most existing buildings in the area are of average quality, newer buildings tend to be average to good quality. Traffic along Hwy 101 is heavy (about 40,000 per day). NOTE: The subject is a non - buildable site. A typical buyer of a non - buildable site is an adjacent property owner (for side yard or expansion use) or a municipality (for ponding or green space use). 10 Nagel! Appraisal & Consulting 952 -544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com SITE DESCRIPTION Dimensions: See plat 12,000 SF Upland, estimated from plat (36 %) Area: 21.147 SF Encumbered easement area 33,147 SF (0.76 acres), per Plat Systems Topography / Shape: Basically level with elevated levy in the rear / Roughly rectangular Soil conditions / Drainage: Assumed to be stable / Appears adequate Utilities: Electricity /Gas: Yes/Yes Water /Sanitary Sewer: None / None — Public utilities not currently available Off-Site Improvements: Street/Curb- gutter: Asphalt / None Sidewalk: None Street Lights: Standard Alley: None Storm Sewer: Surface Access to site: Parish Avenue Northeast (County Road 42) Frontage: Parish Avenue Northeast (County Road 42) Visibility: Average View: Residential, limited river view Flood hazard zone: Zone AE, Map Panel: 2707470002A - Map Date: 9/30/1992 Apparent Easements: Large levy easement encumbers about 60% of the subject, see comments Encroachments: None apparent Unusual Conditions: Non - buildable site, per city Use: Vacant land Surrounding Uses: North / South Average to fair quality single - family use East / West Vacant - agriculture land / Mississippi River Distance to Major Road: 1.5 miles SE to Hwy 101, 0.5 miles N to Hwy 10 (Elk River) Comments: The subject is a vacant land parcel with river frontage on the Mississippi River. Per city officials, the subject is located within a flood zone and is encumbered by a large easement (levy maintained and levy access purposes). Per Mike Robertson, City Administrator, based on the subject's location within a flood zone and the encumbering easement(s), the subject is non - buildable; no building improvements are allowed on the subject parcel. The existing levy easement, located along the west and southern portions of the subject are used for an existing levy along the Mississippi River. Due to the levy, the subject has a limited view of the Mississippi River. The subject is located within flood zone AE; per city, the subject is located within the 100 year flood area. 12 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting I 952- 544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com ZONING Subject Zoning: R -1, Residential -Long Range Urban Service Area The purpose of the R -1, Residential -Long Range Urban Service District (River Frontage) is to provide suitable areas Primary Uses Allowed: for low density residential uses within selected areas of the Mississippi River Corridor and is intended to implement and govern such areas pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan. Overall Major Minimum Site Size: 2.5 acres Restriction /requirements: The subject size is below the minimum site size for the area. Use Subject is considered a grandfathered use and is a legal site, per city. Appraised value assumes the subject has no transferable building rights. Land Use Plan: Low Density Residential Primary Uses Allowed: Typical single - family development (estimated to be 0-4 units per acre) when utilities are available. According the Otsego Staging Plan, the subject is located in the Long Range Urban Service Area, which is not expected to have access to public utilities in the immediate future. Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting 1952-544-8966 1 www.callnagell.com 13 FLOOD MAP e Prepared for: InterFiood Nagel! Appraisal & Consulting 4 •+•r 18000 PARRISH AVENUE NE www.Mterflood.com • 1- 800 - 252 -6633 Otsego, MN 55330 i ``t1l . )7;.t• 70 " ''.'' x \ — ----- I / Z h ltt ii hZ J is . i� A'I'M • , k . \N A tt ,,, r ,„, „, , \ ' --.,‘, ,,, \ • , ONE / f:I ZONE AE . __ g6'\ i FL00DSCAPE Fbod Hazards Map 0 Hti.p ttttnab.r 2707470002A ONE X I ,j' Effective ante ',;,, September 30,1932 ZONE -,c4 Me ZONE X 4 ZONE X if, r - 11 r `V-... , ' is man Mammon *on , i ft f flood tars and flood ZONE X ' i lit irovar.,o«m: ‘, 1 k i t i 4. il 0 600' 1200' 1800' 24W ZONE X \ $ testa 9ss ssssta ZONE AE, + Powell Floodsoua ...Sy en 77 F1 - � ; ... i ® 1000-2000 soue.Prose a-br Flood Source Companions. PI hafts monied Patents 0,031,320 and 0A79AI5. 131hor patens porafrag. For Info: btoel oodsouw.aom. i 14 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting 952- 544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com PLAT MAP w j 36 s • . _. , ?...,. . 1`,..-A: r T _. 1- 1 • • Vl y 3 / _ _ ____ w. .w w i +w term) i.. -, .7.4z.: ` • - 4.--_,, ' tom �� z 3 3 8 11 6. 1 1 g 1 ' ` • ,, 4 , ` 4, _. - •.Z' . . .�+ ., ` `' � • y 114'1, `. j - i ` ? '. , c .. } s —� . _._ -- ; _ sat" M • . . ... ...... .. - ..•_ •i - er •36 E 1 _?. Z' x' • r' t.s 'ti E .. Reflects Levy Easement Area -- 1 = 1 ' • " ; , • • `b+ .S# • 41 4, • J. › : • . � y . : . . 105 1 N bP71 w 141.04; . :- -"c Z I `• .. vFt " 'at • � h � i` 0 . 42 2 ` I .. 1 ;. V fi.., 4 N'4__y _ • — .�- �_ 11bVbQ mew >K :AO� • o� y.._ y am, it .x: lO2SA7SS. mewl 10. T S21 N, 23 4 3 e 1 >rst+.o2r N a9? STS 0CI 1 g 7.00' • • S 4421`x" E ms� }1;� �'� sK i « �— 4. 1 05 * -...••••• . ;,, `: N 1 0' W 1 5 4'� 6 62 .1 4' • • Al a . . t • • 41F�� . �.' \St E 4000' . ��� .'.�•� ja Q w BMX _ . 5 '1'30" E 1 arr �s NEANCIP •COt '• ��: , .� 23 w• N ••• SS1tOato Bp .1 io _ � , q .• mo V . 711119 1401 rtJNrlr <aN0 ' • 22!) !4' ,� ^ ; ; 8 i we heat a amendIst 3 `. <-:,!"! t „ , • + 1 1 S•1007. t . % DI 0. It 23 W . • v :>• . e 70 1117.M COMM • o' ` N C 1 r u : • 1 .1:2: . • V.i k 1 1 ' i . N er21'3V w 1e0.w y . 22, x w • Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting I 952 - 544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com 15 l AERIAL VIEW -.-- . . ,,, . .. :.....„, ..,.t., , . L,,,,,, ,,4...,,-. . , ., ._.9_ .. - tz . , , .., r ,,,,,,,,-.,:... ., ,... , _ ���rrr j• .• q• 4 k 9 ✓� M ,e;!. rt, f a ...,,...,,,...., r ,, t- t „, r1 1' r r t . ry ,, 8 t d r , �i i z4 e , u s f r tt . Pi ! .4 ... . a . >L 7r. fi ! 4 7 , ; i!~. ra tt , 7t S• `.. • .I r , ",r' r ,s' ' , ?,, r r • ; ° `` r , j1 , t '; Par out fl is a mage.© 200' 97�k rPho: toUS A ,� ,_ : ;+ f! ” * ;:_ y s .'i � � t fi r' 3 .. I 1 , Y t e Ta ` i '� 3 f ' 4C t ■ Y i'y ;, Ji C � - `�� X38. 1 ��] ; * .,k . % 1 t '4fi � M r : ' r � ; *: -: ': :: i ty, k " i ‘ 'y '.�r�'P'E „- � 1!'J: {`.c , 4 • i .£i Hr °A” i' klyr A f f D 3 �. • .,....,.:,.... ,:. ,. . le 4' , t v i ti 1 • fff a Fy 1 }� . . 5- • + t Im " '= "" `Globe 1 t - r .t !� + t 16 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting 1 952- 544 -8966 1 www callnagell com SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS Sr1 , 1 4;i1� f -r' A , ,` 1; 1.'t ∎; — - 1 • Front of Subject E ,er . Rear View of Subject Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting 1952-544-8966 1 www.callnagell.com 17 SUBJECT PHOTOGRAPHS • Street Scene r. a • f IIfiII 1 pl ! Ts • 1 View of Mississippi River from Subject 18 Nagell Appraisal & Consulting I 952- 544 -8966 1 www callnagell.com HIGHEST AND BEST USE Highest and best use as defined in The Appraisal of Real Estate, Twelfth Edition, by the Appraisal Institute, 2001 is: "The reasonably probable and legal use of vacant land or an improved property, that is physically possible, legally permissible, appropriately supported, financially feasible, and that results in the highest value." Highest and best use is analyzed in two ways; site as vacant and site as improved. Since the subject is vacant, only the site as vacant analysis is appropriate. Typically there are four criteria in highest and best use analysis - Legally permissible uses - What uses are allowed by zoning? - Physically possible uses - What uses are physically possible on the site? - Financially feasible use - Which possible and permissible uses will produce a positive return? - Maximally productive use - Of the financially feasible uses, which use produces the highest return warranted by the market (the ideal improvements)? Site as Vacant Legally Permissible Uses: The current zoning allows for a variety of agricultural and rural residential uses. However, when public utilities are available, residential development (2 — 6 units per acres) is allowed. Public utilities are not expected to be available in the immediate future. The minimum lot size is 2.5 acres; however, the subject is a grandfathered use and is a platted residential site, per city. Physically Possible Uses: Per Mike Robertson, City Administrator, based on the subject's location within a flood zone and the encumbering easement(s), the subject is non - buildable; no building improvements are allowed on the subject parcel. Financially Feasible Uses: Surrounding residential uses would indicate a park or greenspace or side yard use for the subject. The market for greenspace within residential areas is in demand throughout the immediate and larger Metro Area market. Maximally Productive Use: Most park or greenspace areas greatly vary in size based on use and surrounding uses. Conclusion Site as Vacant: Based on the above discussion, the highest and best use for the subject site as vacant would be for park land, greenspace or side yard area. NagelI Appraisal & Consulting 952- 544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com 19 COST APPROACH The subject is vacant land, making the Cost Approach not applicable. INCOME APPROACH The Income Approach is not considered appropriate in this situation, as vacant land in the subject market is not typically rented. Very limited rental data renders the Income Approach an unreliable indicator. 20 Nageli Appraisal & Consulting 952 -544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com SALES COMPARISON APPROACH The Sales Comparison Approach to Value is predicated upon sales of properties with similar characteristics as the subject. The primary premise of this approach is that the market value of the subject is directly related to the prices of competing properties after adjustment. Adjustments are made on square foot basis, in an effort to account for significant differences. Supply and Demand: Sales in the market result from negotiations between buyers, sellers and lenders. Buyers reflect market demand and sellers supply. If demand is high, prices tend to increase, if it is low, prices usually decrease. Demand for properties like the subject in recent years has been average. Consequently, prices have been stable. Substitution: The principle of substitution holds that the value of a property tends to be set by the price paid to acquire a substitute property of similar utility and desirability within a reasonable amount of time (The Appraisal of Real Estate, 12th Edition). The sales comparison approach is less reliable if substitute properties are not available in the market. The subject market is generally average, although not as strong as previous, consequently, there are limited sales to apply the sales comparison approach and formulate a reliable indication of market value. Balance: The market tends to force a balance between supply and demand. Balance can change due to shifts in population, variations in purchasing power, consumer tastes and preference, and time. Externalities: When possible, select comparables with similar location, economic conditions and support facilities. The Following Outline Is Used In The Sale Comparison Approach: - A location map of the comparable building sales. - Comparable building sales are listed. - An adjustment grid using the comparable sales. - A discussion of adjustment and conclusion of value. Note: As noted, the subject is a non - buildable site. There are very limited sale transactions of non - buildable areas in the market. Therefore, the most appropriate sales of non - buildable land parcels will be used; land sales from throughout the Metro Area will be considered and utilized. NagelI Appraisal & Consulting I 952 -544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com 21 Sales Comparison Approach -- continued Listed below is the adjustment grid for the comparables listed on the previous pages. Comparable items of significant difference are adjusted for. , ITEM SUBJECT COINARABLE NO .1 COMPARABLE NO.2 COMPARABLE NO.3 COMPARABLE NO.4 XXXX Parsh Ave 23045129th Ave N XXX Beam Avenue XXX sorest Blvd 3185 Oakwooc Ave NE Acdrecs Otsego RoSers , Maoleweod Stacy Otsego Pnximily to Subject 7 miles S 30 miles SE 30 miles NE 2 5 miles SW Sales Price S NIA S 215,000 S 168.000 S 10.000 S 35,000 Pro/ SF S NIA 0 S 0.650 S 1.470 S 1.090 S 0.800 Data Saurco Inspection Plat Sys CREV & buyer CREV & buyer CREV. buyer, city \ILS & Plat systems VALUE ADJUSTMENTS OESCRIPT.ON DESCRIPTION ais DESCRIPTION «.s *mat DESCRIPTION ' $A +gwvr*i DESCRIPTION «i5M rw Sales a finanarg Cash 1 Cash ; Cash :ash Concessions No seller points t No seller points ; No seller points : No seller points Date of Salef me N/A Closed 8/412006 50.01 Closed 5/24/2005 1 50.06 Closed 7/2612005 ' 50.04 C osed 7115/2005 50.03 r Location Average Average Closer -in ( -25 %) 1 -$0.37 Average Average S teIew Residential Residential area Residential area ■ Resicential area , Residential area Lot Size 33,147 SF 421.333 SF ( +20 %) 1 $0.13 114,127 SF 1 9,147 SF ( -11 %; - 50.11 43.560 SF Use Greenspace, berm Wetland Pond, greenspace ; Utiity, greenspa+e 'Residential Upland About 36% About 25% About 50% i 100% ( -5% adj.) , -50.05 100% ( -5% adj.) - 50.04 Net Adj. (total) C t 3- ;5 $0.14 3t 3. is 50.31 Et P. :5 50.12 2 , ©. s $0.o1 Indicated Value Cross: 21.5 Gross: 29.3 Gass: 18.3 Noss: 8.8 of Sutiect Net: 21.5 5 $0.79 Net: -21.1 5 51.16 Net - 11.0 5 S0.97 Vet: -1.3 S 50.79 Discussion of Adjustments Sale or Financing /Concessions: The impact financing may have had on the sale price, favorable interest rate or term. All of the sales were cash or estimated to be near or at market rates. Time of sale All comparables adjusted 3% per year as reflected by the market. Location: The subject and Comparables 1 & 3 are located in similar outer ring suburban communities. Comparable 2 is located closer -in and in a more developed area; rated superior to the subject. SiteNiew: The subject and comparables are located in similar residential areas. Lot size: Adjustments recognize larger parcels of land typically sell for Tess per square foot than smaller sites. Use: The subject and comparables are to be used for similar non - buildable uses. Upland: Properties with a greater percentage of upland area have more appeal in the market. . Nagel! Appraisal & Consulting I 952 -544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com 27 Sale Comparison Approach — continued Conclusion Good comparables that bracket the subject value. The closest and most recent sales have been used. Other sales reviewed were older, further and /or needed more adjustment. The comparables are all located in the marketing area and were selected on the basis of overall similarity. The sales reflect what a potential buyer would be willing to pay on a per square foot basis. The sales have been adjusted for value related differences. The comparables used bracket the subject value. The comparable sales are all considered to be valid indicators of value for the subject on an adjusted basis. The comparables indicate a range from $0.79 to $1.16 per SF, with an average of $0.90 per SF. All comparables given about equal weight. Based upon the information, a value at the mid- range is considered appropriate; $0.90 per SF is concluded. Therefore, the total value for the subject lot is calculated as follows: Site Size: 33,147 SF x $0.90 per SF = $29,832 OPINION OF VALUE - SALES COMPARISON APPROACH: $30,000 28 Nagel! Appraisal & Consulting 952 -544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com RECONCILIATION Indicated Value by Cost Approach N/A Indicated Value by Income Approach N/A Indicated Value by Sales Comparison Approach $30,000 Since the subject is vacant, the Cost Approach is not appropriate. The Income Approach is not considered appropriate in this situation. Very limited rental data renders the Income Approach an unreliable indicator. The Sales Comparison Approach to value analyzed recent sales as compared with the characteristics of the subject property. The comparables reflect what a typical buyer would be willing to pay for the subject property. The comparables used are all competing properties located in the subject market and are considered to provide a reliable estimate of market value. Conclusion: The Sales Comparison Approach is deemed to be the only reliable indicator of value because it represents the actions of buyers and sellers in the area for competing properties. The derived market value for the subject property, November 26, 2006, is: FINAL OPINION OF MARKET VALUE: $30,000 Final value reflects "market exposure" time of under 1 year before the effective date of the appraisal. Changes in the market and /or the subject characteristics subsequent to the effective appraisal date could impact the market value of the property. Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting 952 -544 -8966 1 www.callnagell.com 29 11.'1S/2006 12:1 763- 437 -2599 COUPIP.iACARTHURPUPPE PAGE 02/02 NAGELL APPRAISAL & CONSULTING 7515 Wayzata Blvd. #115 Minneapolis: 952 - 544 -8966 Minneapolis, MN 55426 St. Paul 651- 2094159 Established in 1968 Central Fax 952 - 544 -8969 Couri, MacArthur & Ruppe November 8, 2006 Attn: Andrew MacArthur, Attomey 705 Central Avenue East St. Michael, MN 55376 - 0369 RE: Appraisal of land (Real Estate Only) Parrish Avenue north of 94th Street (118 -030 - 000060) Otsego, MN Dear Mr. MacArthur Thank you for your interest In obtaining appraisal services regarding the property above. Per our conversation, you indicated an appraisal report with the following research and analysis is needed. Report UseNalue Type: The report use is for tax donation purposes. The owner intends to gift land to the city for park use. Current as is market value reflecting highest and best use per Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice. Property Description: A 33,147 SF vacant land parcel per public records. Site is reportedly in a flood plain and is guided for low density residential. Contact for access: Alton Drury at 7 — 127 - /13`1 Scope of Report: (1) An inspection of the property and view the neighborhood. (2) Report the physical and/or economic factors that could affect the property. (3) Complete research and analysis of pertinent market data. Since the subject Is vacant land only the Sales Comparison Approach to value will be applied. (4) Where appropriate, comparables will be confirmed, viewed and be listed on an adjustment grid with explanations. (5) Report findings and conclusions. Report Format: A Summary Report (narrative format) will be used. it has a summary of the data, analysis and conclusions. Appropriate photos, maps and exhibits are Included. Two hard copies of report provided. Fee: The fee i =Client named above is responsible for payment. Due Date: Report can be completed by 11 - 30 - 06 provided signed confirmation is prompt. Information needed by the appraiser at inspection: Any site plans and/or conditions if available. Our company has 10 employees and has been in business since 19138 and has sufficient knowledge. experience, education and resources to competently complete this assignment Neither the employment to make the appraisal, nor the compensation for it, is contingent upon the appraised value of the property. If you agree to the above terms, please sign below and return by fax or mail. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, • Signature / 4 William R. Waytas, SRA, CRP Certified General 4000813, MN Date /v' v • /3 2 0 www.callnagell.com Nagel) Appraisal & Consulting I 952 - 544 -8966 I www.callnagell.com 37