Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
03-12-07 CC
ITEM 5 -1 CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MARCH 12, 2007 TO: Judy Hudson Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 02 -28 -2007 $ 275,341.96 02 -28 -2007 $ 1,470.00 03 -08 -2007 $ 374,533.81 PAYROLL 02 -28 -2007 $ 37,390.84 GRAND TOTAL S 688,736.61 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 03/08/07 9:07 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© MARCH 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt rAft s". -. 4 . INW- 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $84.14 QUARTERLY SERVICE UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $89.14 SUPPLIES UnPaid ARROW TERMINAL LLC $712.29 MICRO TORCH UnPaid B & D PLUMBING & HEATING IN $705.00 CITY HALL NO HEAT Unpaid BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF $6,505.00 APRIL Unpaid CENTERPOINT ENERGY $3,031.90 13400 90TH ST PW UnPaid CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS $119.06 INTERNET UnPaid CITY OF MONTICELLO $247.08 ANIMAL CONTROL DEC 2006 UnPaid COBORNS INC $146.41 BLDG DEPT DRY CLEANING UnPaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFIC $12,840.00 GENERAL UnPaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $138.84 MEETING SUPPLIES Unpaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $144.14 RIVET TOOUBITS Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $696.80 OTSEGO VIEW UnPaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE $32.12 PW RENTAL UnPaid GRAINGER $314.84 SAFETY EYEWEAR UnPaid H & L MESABI $340.14 PLOW BLADES /NUTS /BOLTS UnPaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC $149,352.76 FIRE STATION SITE UnPaid HEARTLAND TIRE SERVICE INC $1,365.52 2005 CHEVY PU UnPaid KUE CONTRACTORS, INC. $151,712.00 PW BUILDING UnPaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $177.86 2007 DIRECTORIES UnPaid LONG & SONS $865.85 FEB CLEANING UnPaid MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRAT $65.00 MARCH FEE UnPaid MENARDS $256.05 PW BUUIDING UnPaid MERGES ANDREW $5,416.66 FEBRUARY 07 ASSESSING UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $140.00 PICK UP DOGS /CATS UnPaid NORTHLAND SECURITIES $1,250.00 20006 CD REPORT FILING UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULT $13,865.49 MISSISSIPPI COVE UnPaid OFFICEMAX $75.32 OFFICE SUPPLIES UnPaid POMP S TIRE SERVICE INC $49.17 TIRE FOR SWEEPER UnPaid PURCHASE POWER $518.99 POSTAGE UnPaid QUICK FUEL FLEET SERVICES $1,475.44 GAS & OIL UnPaid QWEST $344.14 PW 763 -441 -9163 Unpaid RANDY'S SANITATION $187.12 8899 NASHUA UnPaid S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS $19,641.43 FURNITURE NEW PW BLDG UnPaid SCHARBER & SONS $12.90 CAT BLADE UnPaid TARGET STORES $19.25 ACCT NO 9- 555 - 030 -008 UnPaid TROPHIES PLUS $16.77 POLICE COMM NAME PLATES Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TRE $687.22 TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY IT $375.00 COMPUTER CLASSES UnPaid XEROX CORPORATION $516.97 LEASE PAYMENT Total Checks $374,533.81 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 03108/07 9:09 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Check Amt Invoice C omment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER .0 _..H. Unpaid Yu ., .� .ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC E 101 - 41940 -390 Contracted Services $84.14 308589 QUARTERLY SERVICE Total ADAM'S PEST CONTROL INC $84.14 AIRGAS INE a..�...,..,.. .M.....,,,,�.� „�.. �,..,...�..,. -. E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $89.14 105360948 SUPPLIES Total AIRGAS, INC. $89.14 Unpaid � %� � �� ARROW TERMINAL LLC E 101 -43100 -240 Small Tools $66.86 46121 MICRO TORCH E 101 - 43100 -220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $645.43 46121 NUTS /BOLTS Total ARROW TERMINAL LLC $712.29 Unpaid B & D PLUMBING & HEATING INC E 101 - 41940 -402 Repairs /Maint Buildingss $705.00 23747 CITY HALL NO HEAT Total B & D PLUMBING & HEATING INC $705.00 Unpaid m BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN E 250 - 42410 -123 Health $2,315.00 E 101 -41600 -123 Health $588.00 APRIL E 101 -43100 -123 Health $1,377.00 E 101 -41400 -123 Health $2,225.00 Total BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $6,505.00 Uripaid F ,v .„ � CENTERPOINT ENERGY E 101 -43100 -322 Utilities $3,031.90 6671091 -4 13400 90TH ST PW Total CENTERPOINT ENERGY $3,031.90 Unpaid CHARTERCOMM UNICATIONS E 101 -41400 -390 Contracted Services $119.06 INTERNET Total CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS $119.06 Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO E 101 -42710 -390 Contracted Services $247.08 10366 ANIMAL CONTROL DEC 2006 Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $247.08 Unpaid w ..... .COSORNS INC E 250 -42410 -310 Miscellaneous $146.41 BLDG DEPT DRY CLEANING Total COBORNS INC $146.41 Unpaid ��.,� �� COURT MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE G 701 -22498 OTSEGO FIRE DEPT /K. LEFEBVRE $96.00 FIRE STATION G 701 -22496 FRATTALONE CUP /MINING POULIO $2,145.00 POULIOT G 701 -22422 ROTTLUND HOMES $1,170.00 ROTTLUND E 444 -43100 -301 Legal Services $926.00 FORCEMAIN E 441 -43100 -301 Legal Services $780.00 BONDING G 701 -21851 RIVERPOINTE 4TH $840.00 RIVERPOINTE 4 G 701 -21856 WATERFRONT EAST 3RD $690.00 WATFRONT EAST 3RD G 701 -21855 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION $390.00 FRIENDSHIP G 701 -22499 ARROWHEAD SUPPLY $345.00 EDCO/ARROW SUPPLY G 701 -21850 KENNETH SHIERTS - VACATION $192.00 SHIERTS E 250 -42410 -301 Legal Services $456.00 ADMN ENFORCEMENT E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $552.00 PERSONNEL E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $120.00 TURNQUIST E 490 -49400 -301 Legal Services $192.00 194 INDUST PAK E 490 -49450 -301 Legal Services $192.00 194 INDUST PARK E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $180.00 ZACHMAN CITY OF OTSEGO 03/08/07 9:09 AM Page 2 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 475 -43100 -301 Legal Services $375.00 MISSISSIPPI SHORES E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $204.00 RENTAL ORDINANCE G 701 -22392 MISSISSIPPI COVE 1 & 2 $75.00 MISSISSIPPI COVE E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $480.00 ADULT USE E 101 -41700 -301 Legal Services $2,344.00 GENERAL E 408 -43100 -301 Legal Services $96.00 SLAVIK Total COURT MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $12,840.00 Unpaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER E101-41400-203 Supplies -General $82.96 21407 MEETING SUPPLIES E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $55.88 21407 SUPPLIES PW BLDG Total CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $138.84 TOTAL HOME CENTER E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $89.93 19986 SUPPLIES E 101 -43100 -240 Small Tools $38.31 19998 RIVET TOOUBITS E 206- 43100 -501 Equipment $15.90 20106 HANGER HOSE Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $144.14 Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC E 101 -41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $148.50 236519 T- MOBILE HEARING E 101 - 41400 -350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $133.65 236520 ASSESSMENT HEARING E 101 -41400 -347 Newsletter $414.65 236545 OTSEGO VIEW Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $696.80 FINKEN'S WATER CARE E 101 -41940 -390 Contracted Services $22.00 CITY HALL E 101 -43100 -390 Contracted Services $10.12 PW RENTAL Total FINKEN'S WATER CARE $32.12 Unpaid GRAINGER E 206 -43100 -501 Equipment $314.84 9304099006 SAFETY EYEWEAR Total GRAINGER $314.84 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $340.14 70832 PLOW BLADES /NUTS /BOLTS Total H & L MESABI $340.14 Unpaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC G 701 -22498 OTSEGO FIRE DEPT /K. LEFEBVRE $2,174.81 20375 FIRE STATION SITE G 701 -22451 BOULDER CREEK - EMMERICH EA $1,027.16 20470 BUOLDER CREEK G 701 -22396 ARBOR CREEK 2ND $331.51 20471 ARBOR CRK 2 G 701 -22397 SUNRAY FARMS 2ND $82.50 20472 SUNRAY FARMS 2 G 701 -22406 KITCROSS 5/6 $75.60 20473 KITT 5/6 G 701 -22401 ZIMMERFARMS 3RD $774.25 20474 ZIMMER 3 G 701 -22409 PLEASANT CRK 3RD $76.01 20475 PLEASANT FARM 3 G 701 -22413 OTSEGO PRESERVE II $66.96 20476 OTSEGO PRESERVE 2 G 701 -22419 ZIMMER 4TH $100.44 20477 ZIMMER FARM 4 G 701 -22432 OTSEGO PRESERVE 111 $267.86 20478 OTSEGO PRESERVE 3 G 701 -22422 ROTTLUND HOMES $404.60 20479 ROTTLUND G 701 -22426 FIN PLAT ARBOR CRK 3 $2,782.93 20480 ARBOR CREEK 3 G 701 -22424 HAMLET'S CREEKVIEW $429.00 20481 HAMLET G 701 -22431 PLEASANT CRK 4TH $31.42 20482 PLEASANT CRK 4 G 701 -22429 KITTREDGE CROSS 7 $314.60 20483 KITT 7TH G 701 -22463 ARBOR CREEK 4TH $413.63 20484 ARBOR CRK 4TH G 701 -22433 ZIMMER FARMS 5 1PHASE 4 $1,123.66 20485 ZIMMER 5TH G 701 -22479 RIVERPLACE 3RD ADDITION $219.11 20486 RIVER PLACE 3 G 701 -22467 ZIMMER FARMS 6 $1,603.57 20487 ZIMMER FARMS 6 CITY OF OTSEGO 03108/07 9:09 AM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $418.71 26397 2005 CHEVY PU E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $946.81 26477 2000 IH Check Amt Involce Comment E 101 -41560 -302 Engineering Fees $1,982.62 20488 07 MSAA G 701 -22445 RIVER PLACE II $2,415.88 20489 RIVER PLACE 2 G 701 -22465 GREAT RIVER CTR $1,279.95 20490 GREAT RIVER CENTRE E 42743100 -302 Engineering Fees $1,336.62 20491 MACIVER 80/60 E 250 -42410 -311 Ping & Eng. - 101Traffic Study $337.46 20492 TRUNK HWY 101 E 485 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $4,339.72 20493 QUEENS AVE E 475 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $3,504.41 20494 WATER FRONT EAST UTILITIES E 444 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $2,887.80 20495 WATER TOWER 3 E 499 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $1,556.66 20496 WELL HEAD PROTECTION E 44443100 -302 Engineering Fees $3,409.87 20497 TRNK SEWE/WATERMAIN E 485 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $3,615.32 20499 CSAH 42 39185 E 444- 43100 -302 Engineering Fees $8,749.52 20500 TNK WATERMAIN FORCEMAIN E 601 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $343.23 20501 SCADA G701-22410 RWN SEWER/WATER FEE $3,888.21 20502 KADLER FORCEMAIN E 44443100 -302 Engineering Fees $7,060.02 20503 65TH ST DUAL FORCEMAIN E 414 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $1,873.80 20507 GRENINS CITY SEWER E 602 -49450 -302 Engineering Fees $481.60 20508 06 SEWER LINE CLEANING E 101 -41560 -302 Engineering Fees $1,545.70 20509 STAFF MEETING E 44443100 -302 Engineering Fees $7,204.35 20510 101/37142 SEWER WATER BORING G 701 -22496 FRATTALONE CUP /MINING POULIO $7,962.13 20512 MINING PERMIT E 101 -41560 -302 Engineering Fees $534.13 20513 CITY MAP E 101 -41400 -348 Maps $485.03 20514 GOPHER ONE MAPS E 60249450 -302 Engineering Fees $174.12 20515 WATER/SEWER ISSUES E 101 -41560 -302 Engineering Fees $961.16 20515 MISC E 601 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $174.13 20515 WATER/SEWER ISSUE G 701 -22486 BOB'S PRODUCE $78.66 20516 BOBS ORODUCE E 10141560 -302 Engineering Fees $321.76 20516 MISC G 701 -21855 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION $327.25 20516 FRIENDSHIP G 701 -22499 ARROWHEAD SUPPLY $589.12 20516 EDCO G 701 -21850 KENNETH SHIERTS - VACATION $307.97 20516 SHIERTS G 701 -21973 Pheasant Ridge 5th $107.25 20517 PHEASANT RIDGE 5 G 701 -22434 Crimson Ponds West $2,366.36 20518 CRIMSON PONDS WEST G 701 -22315 RIVERWOOD NATIONAL $1,408.71 20519 RIVERWOOD NATIONAL G 701 -22408 Prairie Creek 6th $434.50 20520 PRAIRIE CRK 6 G 701 -22393 REMINGTON COVES $1,786.89 20521 REMINGTON COVE G 701 -22387 ARBOR PLACE PPREZONE $133.93 20522 ARBOR PLACE G 701 -22394 DUERR PROP $805.16 20523 DUERR CREEK G 701 -22460 FEATHERWIND - FARR $123.38 20524 FEATHERWIND G 701 -22353 PLFRM ORRIN THOMP $31.42 20525 PLEASANT CREEK 2 G 701 -22354 ORRIN THOMO CONCEPT $495.00 20526 RIVER PLACE G 701 -22361 SUN RAY FARMS $165.00 20527 SUNRAY FARMS G 701 -22369 DR H ZIMMER PROP $1,587.79 20528 ZIMMER FARMS E 22249490 -302 Engineering Fees $5,901.78 20529 NPDES PHASE 11 G 701 -22462 DUKE REALTY $290.64 20530 DUKE G 701 -22366 MARTIN FARMS $282.90 20531 MARTIN FARMS G 701 -22377 OTSEGO PRESERVE $133.93 20532 OTSEGO PRESERVE G 701 -22384 FOREST HILLS $157.30 20533 FOREST HILLS G 701 -21851 RIVERPOINTE 4TH $592.32 20534 RIVER POINTE 4 E 490 -49400 -302 Engineering Fees $1,474.32 20535 194 WEST W/S IMPROV E 490 -49450 -302 Engineering Fees $1,474.32 20535 194 WEST W/S IMPROVEMENT E 408 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $26,470.95 20538 OTSEGO CREEK PROJECT E 480 -43100 -302 Engineering Fees $21,101.09 20540 194 1ALBERTVILLE STUDY Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $149,352.76 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $418.71 26397 2005 CHEVY PU E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $946.81 26477 2000 IH CITY OF OTSEGO 03/08/07 9:09 AM Page 4 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Check Amt invoice Comment Total HEARTLAND TIRE SERVICE INC $1,365.52 Unpaid , —" — `� ,—" , "- - - -,- KUE CONTRACTORS, INC. —. . — ."`_,. --- —w_.... r.._,._.._..... _- E 441 -43100 -520 Buildings and Structures $151,712.00 PAY 10 PW BUILDING Total KUE CONTRACTORS, INC. $151,712.00 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E 101 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $177.86 2007 DIRECTORIES Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $177.86 Unpaid�� ����LONG &SONS E 101 -41940 -389 Cleaning Services $745.50 07-60 FEB CLEANING E 101 -41940 -203 Supplies -General $120.35 07 -60 SUPPLIES Total LONG & SONS $865.85 Unpaid MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS E 101 -41400 -390 Contracted Services $65.00 MARCH FEE Total MARTIN BENEFIT ADMINISTRATORS $65.00 Unpaid�.�.1R�o,,.� .,,._ �.,u,��_ MEN -- � _aa o ,.�... E 206 -43100 -501 Equipment $156.56 PW BLUIDING E 206 -43100 -501 Equipment $99.49 PW BLUIDING Total MENARDS $256.05 Unpaid MERGES ANDREW E 101 -41550 -390 Contracted Services $5,416.66 FEBRUARY 07 ASSESSING Total MERGES ANDREW $5,416.66 Unpaid �, �� ,—_ ' "MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL�� E 101 -42710 -390 Contracted Services $140.00 668 PICK UP DOGS /CATS Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $140.00 Unpaid NORTHLAND SECURITIES E 101 -41600 -310 Miscellaneous $1,250.00 1195 20006 CD REPORT FILING Total NORTHLAND SECURITIES $1,250.00 Unpad NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS� E 101 -41570 -303 Planning Fees $1,750.00 G 701 -21855 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION $231.00 G 701 -22496 FRATTALONE CUP /MINING POULIO $4,411.14 G 701 -22499 ARROWHEAD SUPPLY $395.50 G 701 -22458 WFE 5TH ADD - OUTLOT J,BLDG D $42.00 G 701 -21853 T- Mobile antenna Cup/Variance $504.00 G 701 -22422 ROTTLUND HOMES $756.00 G 701 -21856 WATERFRONT EAST 3RD $367.50 G 701 -21851 RIVERPOINTE 4TH $283.50 G 701 -22459 WFE 6TH ADD - OUTLOT K, BLDG C $42.00 G 701 -22392 MISSISSIPPI COVE 1 & 2 $63.00 E 101 -41570 -303 Planning Fees $1,424.50 E 101 -41570 -303 Planning Fees $668.10 E 101 -41570 -303 Planning Fees $1,414.75 E 250 -42410 -303 Planning Fees $1,512.50 Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $13,865.49 Unpaid OFFICEMAX E 101 -43100 -203 Supplies - General $8.14 725623 OFFICE SUPPLIES E 101 - 41400 -201 Office Supplies $67.18 725623 OFFICE SUPPLIES Total OFFICEMAX $75.32 MEETINGS 16314 FRIENDSHIP ADDITION 16314 MINING CUP 16314 EDCO 16314 WFE OUTLOT J 16314 T MOBILE 16314 ROTTLUND HOMES 16314 WATERFRONT EAST 3RD ADD 16314 RIVERPOINTE 4 16314 WFE OUTLOT K 16314 MISSISSIPPI COVE 16315 ADULT USE 16315 RENTAL CODE 16315 GENERAL 16316 GENERAL Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $13,865.49 Unpaid OFFICEMAX E 101 -43100 -203 Supplies - General $8.14 725623 OFFICE SUPPLIES E 101 - 41400 -201 Office Supplies $67.18 725623 OFFICE SUPPLIES Total OFFICEMAX $75.32 CITY OF OTSEGO 03/08/07 9:09 AM Page 5 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 Amt Invoice Comment Unpaid POMP S TIRE SERVICE INC E 101 -43100 -390 Contracted Services $49.17 2462 TIRE FOR SWEEPER Total POMP S TIRE SERVICE INC $49.17 Unpaid PURCHASE POWER E 101 -41400 -206 Postage $518.99 POSTAGE Total PURCHASE POWER $518.99 Unpaid QUICK FUEL FLEET SERVICES E 101 -43100 -202 Gas & Oil $1,475.44 61565 GAS & OIL Total QUICK FUEL FLEET SERVICES $1,475.44 Unpaid QWEST E 101 -43100 -320 Telephone $344.14 PW 763 -441 -9163 Total QWEST $344.14 Unpaid RANDY'S SANITATION °��.,.,�. ».,- ..n.......��,..�..... ....x.,.�..,.,� -�.�.. E 101 -43100 -325 Garbage Service $89.70 PW E 101 -41940 -325 Garbage Service $97.42 8899 NASHUA Total RANDY'S SANITATION $187.12 S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS E 206 -43100 -570 Office Equip and Furnishings $19,641.43 01L00649 FURNITURE NEW PW BLDG Total S &T OFFICE PRODUCTS $19,641.43 -- ,-- SCHARBER & SONS E101-43100-220 Repair /Maint Supply (GENERAL) $6.45 371814 CAT BLADE E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $6.45 371893 PLUGS Total SCHARBER & SONS $12.90 E 101 -43100 -210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $19.25 9555030008 ACCT NO 9- 555 - 030 -008 Total TARGET STORES $19.25 Unpaid TROPHIES PLUS E 101 -42150 -310 Miscellaneous $16.77 POLICE COMM NAME PLATES Total TROPHIES PLUS $16.77 E 101 -41400 -310 Miscellaneous $687.22 2006 -TNT TRUTH IN TAXATION NOTICES Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR TREASURE $687.22 Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY IT E 101 - 41400 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $125.00 07 -016 COMPUTER CLASSES E 101 -41600 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $125.00 07 -016 COMPUTER CLASSES E 250 -42410 -360 Education/Training /Conferences $125.00 07 -016 COMPUTER CLASSES Total WRIGHT COUNTY IT $375.00 Unpaid XEROX CORPORATION E 101 - 41400 -413 Office Equipment Rental $516.97 023412413 LEASE PAYMENT Total XEROX CORPORATION $516.97 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $374,533.81 CITY OF OTSEGO 03108/07 9:09 AM Page 6 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2007 $374,533.81 Check Amt Invoice Comment Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $38,916.68 206 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT REVOLVING $20,228.22 222 Citywide Stormwater(NPDES 11) $5,901.78 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $4,892.37 408 Otsego Creek Watershed $26,566.95 414 Revolving Capital Improvements $1,873.80 427 MACIVER/70TH ST ACCESS $1,336.62 441 Otsego City Campus $152,492.00 444 SE Utilities Project $30,237.56 475 Waterfront East/Miss. Shores $3,879.41 480 194 /CASH 37 Project $21,101.09 485 Street Impr. Fund - 2006 $7,955.04 490194 Industrial Park - W/S PROJ $3,332.64 499 WELLHEAD PROTECTION PROJECT $1,556.66 601 WATER FUND $517.36 602 SEWER FUND $655.72 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND $53,089.9 $374,533.81 CITY OF OTSEGO 02/28/07 3:38 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© FEBRUARY 2007 Total Checks $1,470.00 FILTER: None Name Check Date Check Amt g 1 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AARON STRITESKY $90.00 9 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid ALVIN MC CLURE $20.00 2 2006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid BEVERLY KUMAR $40.00 4 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid BLACK RON $80.00 8 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS UnPaid CASSADY ROSE $80.00 8 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid CHERISSE RUSCHMEIER $10.00 12006 POLICE MEETING UnPaid CHRIS WILSON $80.00 8 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS UnPaid EDGAR PEARSALL $90.00 9 2006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid JANE M THEISEN $100.00 10 2006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid JEFF STIMAC $100.00 10 2006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid JOEL TORKELSON $110.00 112006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid JOHN STANDER $20.00 2 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS UnPaid KATHY ROBERTS $110.00 112006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid LILIA ROUSSELET $20.00 2 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS UnPaid MICHAEL R BRUMM $100.00 10 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid PETER TORRESANI $100.00 10 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid RUSS LANGER $90.00 9 2006 PARK MEETINGS UnPaid SANDRA MICHAELSON $110.00 112006 POLICE MEETINGS UnPaid SHIRLEY ISAACSON $10.00 12006 HERITAGE MEETING UnPaid THOMAS CARTER $110.00 112006 POLICE MEETING Total Checks $1,470.00 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 02/28/07 3:38 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© FEBRUARY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER AARON STRITESKY E 101 - 45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $90.00 9 2006 PARK MEETINGS Total AARON STRITESKY $90.00 Unpaid ALVIN MC CLURE E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $20.00 2 2006 POLICE MEETINGS Total ALVIN MC CLURE $20.00 Unpaid__ BEVERLY KUMAR E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $40.00 4 2006 PARK MEETINGS Total BEVERLY KUMAR $40.00 Unpaid BLACK RON E 101 -45300 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $80.00 8 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS Total BLACK RON $80.00 ., CASSADY ROSE E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $80.00 8 2006 PARK MEETINGS Total CASSADY ROSE $80.00 Unpaid CHERISSE RUSCHMEIER E 101 - 42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $10.00 12006 POLICE MEETING Total CHERISSE RUSCHMEIER $10.00 1, .. q �. –., , ,,� .., ,��.�» .t ,,.�. _ .,,, —,,- -- ,..��,� . �,,,,,,,�,.�.— ..»�.a.,m.. -.�,,. ,-.- ,,,- ,.- ,..�.�,.M,, Unpaid CHRIS WILSON E 101 -45300 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $80.00 8 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS Total CHRIS WILSON $80.00 EDGAR PEARSALL E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $90.00 9 2006 POLICE MEETINGS Total EDGAR PEARSALL $90.00 Unpaid JANE M THEISEN E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $100.00 10 2006 POLICE MEETINGS Total JANE M THEISEN $100.00 Unpaid JEFF STIMAC E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $100.00 10 2006 POLICE MEETINGS Total JEFF STIMAC $100.00 JOEL TORKELSON ..,, E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $110.00 11 2006 POLICE MEETINGS Total JOEL TORKELSON $110.00 Unpaid JOHN STANDER E 101 -45300 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $20.00 2 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS Total JOHN STANDER $20.00 ROBERTS E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $110.00 112006 PARK MEETINGS Total KATHY ROBERTS $110.00 E 101 -45300 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $20.00 2 2006 HERITAGE MEETINGS Total LILIA ROUSSELET $20.00 Unpaid MICHAEL R BRUMM E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $100.00 10 2006 PARK MEETINGS CITY OF OTSEGO 02/28/07 3:38 PM Page 2 *Check Detail Register© FEBRUARY 2007 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $ 1,470.00 $1,470.00 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total MICHAEL R BRUMM $100.00 Unpaid PETER TORRESANI E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $100.00 10 2006 PARK MEETINGS Total PETER TORRESANI $100.00 ' . _..ROSSDANGER . ,.tR..,.,,___ E 101 -45250 -100 Wages and Salaries (GENERAL) $90.00 9 2006 PARK MEETINGS Total RUSS LANGER $90.00 Unpaid SANDRA MICHAELSON E 101 -42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $110.00 112006 POLICE MEETINGS Total SANDRA MICHAELSON $110.00 Unpaid SHIRLEY ISAACSON E 101 -45300 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $10.00 12006 HERITAGE MEETING Total SHIRLEY ISAACSON $10.00 Unpaid THOMAS CARTER E 101 - 42150 -101 Full -Time Employees Regular $110.00 112006 POLICE MEETING Total THOMAS CARTER $110.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $1,470.00 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $ 1,470.00 $1,470.00 CITY OF OTSEGO 02/28/07 9:46 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© FEBRUARY 2007 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $2,785.36 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 UnPaid BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF $7,015.00 MARCH UnPaid DOBOSZENSKI & SONS $258,236.09 OTSEGO CREEK RESTORATION UnPaid DRESEL CONTRACTING INC $2,312.65 CSAH 42 RECONSTRUCTION UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.22 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME $4,169.64 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 Total Checks $275,341.96 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 02/28/07 9:47 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© FEBRUARY 2007 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP E 101 -43100 -123 Health $481.26 HSA PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 G 101 -21706 Hospitalization /Medical Ins $539.48 HSA PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 250 -42410 -123 Health $802.10 HSA PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 101- 41400 -123 Health $641.68 HSA PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 101 -41600 -123 Health $320.84 HSA PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 Total ALLIANCE BENEFIT GROUP $2,785.36 Unpaid BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF E 250 -42410 -123 Health $1,667.00 MARCH E 101 - 41600 -123 Health $972.00 MARCH E 101 -41400 -123 Health $1,415.00 MARCH E 101 - 43100 -123 Health $2,961.00 MARCH Total BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MN $7,015.00 Unpaid DOBOSZENSKI & SONS E 408 -43100 -530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $258,236.09 PAY 1 OTSEGO CREEK RESTORATION Total DOBOSZENSKI & SONS $258,236.09 DRESEL CONTRACTING INC E485-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $2,312.65 PAY #6 CSAH 42 RECONSTRUCTION Total DRESEL CONTRACTING INC $2,312.65 Unpaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST G 101 -21705 Other Retirement $611.00 PPE 2124 CK DTD 2/28 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $212.22 PPE 2124 CK DTD 2/28 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $823.22 Unpaid ,- -,- -d- —* -- "- - PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT E 101 -41600 -121 PERA $370.70 PPE 2124 CK DTD 2/28 E 602 -49450 -121 PERA $18.48 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 101 -43100 -121 PERA $739.08 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 G 101 -21704 PERA $1,997.94 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 250 -42410 -121 PERA $711.04 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 601 -49400 -121 PERA $18.49 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 E 101 -41400 -121 PERA $313.91 PPE 2/24 CK DTD 2/28 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $4,169.64 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $275,341.96 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $11,576.11 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $3,180.14 408 Otsego Creek Watershed $258,236.09 485 Street Impr. Fund - 2006 $2,312.65 601 WATER FUND $18.49 602 SEWER FUND $18.48 $275,341.96 --------------------------- I CUST: City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego HN 55330 FRONN: RUE CONTRACTORS, INC. 130 Central Ave S MATMMS, MN 55389 JOB:Otsego Public Works Facility Northwest Quadrant of 90th St 1 6 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, M 55330 ARCBITECT:Oertel Architects, Ltd. 1795 Saint Clair Avenue ITEM 5 -2 2 APPLICATION NO: 10 PERIOD ENDING : 02/28/07 1 CONTRACT NO: CONTRACT DATE: 03/28/06 JOB DESCRIPTION: Otsego Public Works Facility (Nett Construction) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- - -- -- 1 CHOSE ORDERS 1 1------------------- --- ---- -- ---- ------ -- ---- --- - i I ADDITIONS I DEDUCTIONS 1 i I 1 I i PREVIOUS TOTAL 1 83,969.00 1 '.00 1 1 --------------- ------ ---- --- ----- - - - - -- -- - - - -- 1 ----- cmuU rrt - - --- I I I I-- -- -- --- ----- - --- -- i 1 1 1 Number Date I I 1 I---- --------- -- --- - - - - -1 ! I I 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I I I i I I I I I 1 I --------------------- -- --- -------- ------- -- --- ---- - 1 TOTALS TO DATE 1 83,969.00 1 .00 I I ----------------------- - - -------------- --- --- - - -- - i I Mr AMOUNT 1 83,969.00 1 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAININT In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations and the data comprising this application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, Information and belief the Mork has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Mork is in accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is entitled to payment of the AMOUNT CERTIFIED. AMOUNT CBMIFIRD ..................$ • ✓ / ( Attach explanation if amount certified differs from the amount allied -44m. Initial all 449ures on this on ORIfamL CONTRACT xw oum ............................. $ TOTAL CHANGE ORDER AMOUNT ............................ $ TOTAL CONTRACT INCLUDXM CHANOM ORDERS ............... $ 1 AMOUNT COMMUTED TO DAT E ............................. a R12AXNAM - 5.003 OF MORE C0MPLETED ................ $ 5.008 OF STOGM MATERIAL COMPLETED TO DATE LESS RSTAINA= ..................... $ PREVIOUS AMOUNT BILLID ............................... $ SALESTAX ............. ............................... $ CURRENT ANDUNT DUE .... ............................... $ AMOUNT RBNAZNIN G ...... ............................... $ Page: 1 3,859,668.00 83,969.00 3,943,637.00 3,901,887.00 97,556.00 3,804,331.00 3,652,619.00 .00 151,712.00 139,306.00 The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the but of the Contractor's knowledge, information and belief the Mork covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have bum paid by the Contractor for Mork for which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and that current payment shown herein is now due. CONTRACTOR: RUE CONTRACTORS, INC. By: DATE: 02/28/2001 James State f: ota County of: Stearns Subsar ew6rn to before me this 28th day'of February 2007 & / J..tary Public: 'Phis Car not nego 18. The AMOUNT My Commission expires: January 31, 2010 ClRT payable only to the Contractor named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment Lthout prejudice to any rights of the Owner or EATHER LYNN LANDWEHR Factor ender this Contract. Notary PUb$C Y CWMftdM M JB1K1"31, 2010 Je's IQuiaL. r: 2604 Otsego Public Works Facility Application No.: 10 Period From: 02/01/07 Project # Invoice Number : 845 Thru: 02/28/07 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- ------- -- --- ----- --- - --- ITEM BER Pade Number 2 - -- -WORK COMPLETED - - -- COMPLETED SCHEDULED I PREVIOUS THIS STORED AND STORED BALAN& 17ArRTPTTON OF WORK VALUE APPLICATION PERIOD MATERIALS TO DATE TO FINISH RETAINAGE 01000 General Requirements 115,254.00 112,743.00 02200 Earthwork & Site Clearing 70,600.00 70,600.00 02513 Asphalt Concrete Paving 143,000.00 103,000.00 02514 Site Concrete 27,900.00 27,900.00 02730 Sewage Systems 59,100.00 59,100.00 03310 Concrete 246,900.00 246,900.00 03410 Structural Precast Concre 69,300.00 69,300.00 03450 Tilt -up Precast Wall Pane 338,600.00 338,600.00 04200 Unit Masonry 212,874.00 212,874.00 05120 Structural Steel 264,500.00 264,500.00 05210 Steel Joist w /05120 .00 .00 05300 Steel Decking w /05120 .00 .00 05500 Misc Metals w /05120 .00 .00 06100 Rough Carpentry 8,800.06 8,800.00 06200 Finish Carpentry 20,800.00 20,800.00 06400 Archit Millwork w/06200 .00 .00 07200 Insulation 600.00 600.00 07530 Single Ply Membrane Roofi 153,000.00 153,000.00 07600 Flash /Sheet Metal w/07530 .00 .00 07900 Joint Sealers 11,200.00 11,200.00 08110 Steel Doors & Frames 51,900.00 51,900.00 08210 Wood Doors w 108110 .00 .00 08305 Access Doors 800.00 800.00 08330 Overhead Coiling Shutter 1,200.00 1,200.00 8360 Sectional Overhead Doors 37,200.00 37,200.00 08410 Alum. Entrances & Framing 137,900.00 137,900.00 08710 Finish Hardware w 108110 .00 .00 08800 Glass & Glazing w/08410 .00 .00 08900 Alum Curtainwall & w /8410 .00 .00 08955 Unit Skylights 19,200.00 19,200.00 09250 Gypsum Drywall 52,300.00 52,300.00 09300 Tile 16,400.00 16,400.00 09510 Acoustic Ceilings 11,600.00 11,600.00 09680 Carpeting 6,200.00 .00 09900 Painting 37,500.00 35,750.00 10160 Toilet Partitions 1,100.00 1,100.00 10200 Louvers & Vents 800.00 800.00 10400 Signage 6,100.00 6,100.00 10500 Metal lockers & Accessori 7,100.00 7,100.00 10522 Fire Extinguishers & Acce 400.00 400.00 10800 Toilet Accessories 400.00 400.00 11320 Projection Screen 500.00 500.00 11450 Appliances 1,900.00 1,900.00 11600 Vehicle Fueling System 91,900.00 91,900.00 12500 Window Treatment 2,800.00 2,800.00 14250 Hydraulic Elevator 44,600.00 44,600.00 14450 Truck Lifts 12,400.00 12,400.00 14630 Overhead Crane Systems 31,300.00 31,300.00 15000 Mechanical 1118740.00 1080740.00 6000 Electrical 425,000.00 414,685.00 10100 Change Order #01 45,461.00 45,461.00 20200 Change Order #02 38,508.00 38,508.00 95 1,750.00 3943637.00 3844861.00 --------------------------------------------------------------- 2,511.00 .00 115,254.00 100 .00 2,881.00 .00 .00 70,600.00 100 .00 1,765.00 .00 .00 103,000.00 72 40,000.00 2,575.00 .00 .00 27,900.00 100 .00 698.00 .00 .00 59,100.00 100 .00 1,478.00 .00 .00 246,900.00 100 .00 6,173.00 .00 .00 69,300.00 100 .00 1,733.00 .00 .00 338,600.00 100 .00 8,465.00 .00 .00 212,874.00 100 .00 5,322.00 .00 .00 264,500.00 100 .00 6,613.00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 6,800.00 100 x .00 220.00 .00 .00 20,800.00 100 .00 520.00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 600.00 100 .00 15.00 .00 .00 153,000.00 100 .00 3,825.00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 11,200.00 100 .00 280.00 .00 .00 51,900.00 100 .00 1,298.00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 800.00 100 .00 20.00 .00 .00 1,200.00 100 .00 30.00 .00 .00 37,200.00 100 .00 930.00 .00 .00 137,900.00 100 .00 3,448.00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0 .00 .00 .00 .00 19,200.00 100 .00 480.00 .00 .00 52,300.00 100 .00 1,308.00 .00 .00 16,400.00 100 .00 410.00 .00 .00 11,600.00 100 .00 290.00 6,200.00 .00 6,200.00 100 .00 155.00 .00 .00 35,750.00 95 1,750.00 894.00 .00 .00 1,100.00 100 .00 28.00 .00 .00 800.00 100 .00 20.00 .00 .00 6,100.00 100 .00 153.00 .00 .00 7,100.00 100 .00 176.00 .00 .00 400.00 100 .00 10.00 .00 .00 400.00 100 .00 10.00 .00 .00 500.00 100 .00 13.00 .00 .00 1,900.00 100 .00 48.00 .00 .00 91,900.00 100 .00 2,298.00 .00 .00 2,800.00 100 .00 70.00 .00 .00 44,600.00 100 .00 1,115.00 .00 .00 12,400.00 100 .00 310.00 .00 .00 31,300.00 100 .00 783.00 38,000.00 .00 1118740.00 100 .00 27,969.00 10,315.00 .00 425,000.00 100 .00 10,625.00 .00 .00 45,461.00 100 .00 1,137.00 .00 .00 38,508.00 100 .00 963.00 57,026.00 .00 3901887.00 99 41,750.00 97,556.00 ITEM 8_7 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 4800 Olson Memorial Highway, Suite 202, Golden Valley, MN 55422 Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763. 231.2561 plan nersgnacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 7 March 2007 RE: Otsego — UPA Substation; T- Mobile CUP/Variance NAC FILE: 176.02-07. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the application of T- Mobilee USA for a CUP and variance to allow construction of a 120 foot personal wireless service tower and antenna on the UPA substation property located east of Ohland Avenue along CSAH 39. Mr. Steven Edwards was present on behalf of T Mobile USA. Mr. Edwards said that the proposed antenna would provide adequate coverage at a height of 75 feet if the variance were denied. One of the reasons for the variance was to allow the tower to be high enough for other providers with antennas mounted below T- Mobile's units to also have a potentially larger coverage area. Mr. Edwards indicated that T Mobile had no issues with the recommended conditions of approval set forth by City staff Mr. Dan Limoseth owns the property adjacent to the subject site. Mr. Llnoseth is concerned about the proposed use on the subject site following Elk River Utilities expansion in 2006 and potential future expansions. City staff explained that any use of the property is evaluated and must comply with required setbacks and other regulations. Mr. Limoseth also did not feel the antennas were needed on the site as he is a T Mobile customer and receives service at his house. Mr. Edwards and City staff explained that T- Mobile has submitted an engineering analysis of their coverage areas showing the need for improved coverage. Mr. Limoseth asked about the heafth effects of the proposed antennas and it was explained that those factors would be regulated by the Federal Government and are beyond the City's jurisdiction. Mr. Limoseth was also against approval of the variance to allow the additional height to the tower because of impacts to his property. Two other residents spoke regarding the application. The first acknowledged that the City may have to allow the tower at that location, but was opposed to the height variance. The second resident was opposed to the tower and antennas at this location because of potential health effects and aesthetic impacts. There were no other public comments. The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and discussed the need for the variance. There was discussion as to whether allowing additional height for the proposed tower would minimize the need for more towers in the area. City staff and the applicant explained that tower and antenna locations are unique to each provider, which are changing with technology, and that there is no means for the City to determine an ultimate solution. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend the variance application be denied. In a separate motion, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the CUP with conditions including reducing the height of the tower to 75 feet. The application will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 12 March 2007 at 6:30 PM. Findings of fact consistent with the recommendations of the Planning Commission are attached for consideration. Possible actions that the City Council may take on the applications are outlined below. POSSIBLE ACTIONS Decision 1 —Variance A. Motion to approve a variance allowing construction of a PWS tower to a height of 120 feet based on a finding that the applicant has demonstrated undue hardship caused by compliance with the established 75 foot height restriction imposed by the Zoning Ordinance. B. Motion to deny the variance application based on a finding that: 1. Approval of the variance is inconsistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance to limit the height of PWS towers to avoid potential impacts to adjacent properties. 2. Adequate service coverage can be accomplished with placement of additional PWS antennas indicating that compliance with the Zoning Ordinance does not cause the applicant undue hardship. 3. The basis for the variance request is related to the additional economic costs associated with installation of additional PWS towers and antennas to provide adequate service coverage for the area. C. Motion to table. 2 Decision 2 — Conditional Use Permit A. Motion to approve a conditional use permit for construction of a PWS tower and antenna subject to the following stipulations: 1. The height of the tower shall not exceed 75 feet. 2. The location of the tower shall be revised to comply with the setbacks applicable within the INS District, subject to approval of City staff. CSAH 39 East South West 30ft. 50ft. 1008. 50ft. 3. The tower shall be painted silver or have a galvanized finish. 4. There shall be no overnight parking of PWS provider vehicles on the subject site. 5. A landscape plan providing for installation of tall shrubs along the north side of the fenced tower and accessory equipment area and driveway access shall be provided and is subject to approval of City staff. 6. The comments in the City Engineer's memo dated 20 February 2007 are addressed subject to approval by City staff. C. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ron Wagner, City Engineer Steve Edwards, on behalf of T- Mobile USA 3 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: T- Mobile USA 03 -07 -07 FINDINGS & DECISION VARIANCE DENIAL APPLICATION: Request for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow construction of a PWS tower and antenna not upon an existing public structure. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 March 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for future Low Density Residential and Low Density Residential land uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area. C. The subject site is zoned INS, Institutional District; Construction of PWS antenna and towers not upon an existing public structure are allowed as a conditional use within the INS District subject to the performance standards set forth by Section 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. D. Section 20- 33- 4.B.2.c(1) establishes a maximum height for PWS towers of 75 feet. The proposed tower is 120 feet tall and the applicant has requested a variance to allow the proposed tower height. E. Consideration of the application is to be based upon (but not limited to) the criteria set forth by Section 20 -&2.B of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Chapter. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 2, below. 2. A variance from the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district or area. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. (2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Chapter. (3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot or building size, or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of [the Zoning Ordinance] would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to any reasonable use. C. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship are not the result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by [the Zoning Ordinance] to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district f. The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. F. The Planning Report dated 26 February 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The memorandum dated 20 February 2007 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. H. The Otsego Planning Commission opened a public hearing at their regular meeting on 5 March 2007 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the application, and other evidence, the public hearing was dosed and the Planning Commission recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested application is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings: 1. Approval of the variance is inconsistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance to limit the height of PWS towers to avoid potential impacts to adjacent properties. 2. Adequate service coverage can be accomplished with placement of additional PWS antennas indicating that compliance with the Zoning Ordinance does not cause the applicant undue hardship. 2 3. The basis for the variance request is related to the additional economic costs associated with installation of additional PWS towers and antennas to provide adequate service coverage for the area. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of March, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk Larry Fournier, Mayor 91 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: T- Mobile USA 03 -07 -07 FINDINGS & DECISION CUP APPROVAL APPLICATION: Request for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow construction of a PWS tower and antenna not upon an existing public structure. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 March 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for future Low Density Residential and Low Density Residential land uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area. C. The subject site is zoned INS, Institutional District; Construction of PWS antenna and towers not upon an existing public structure are allowed as a conditional use within the INS District subject to the performance standards set forth by Section 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. D. Consideration of the application is to be based upon (but not limited to) the criteria set forth by Section 20 -4-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to provide for orderly, gradual urbanization of the City with necessary services expanded to support new growth. While this goal primarily addresses City provided services, private utilities such as electricity, gas, telephone etc are also required. The Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 places PWS coverage into the same class of essential services as those listed previously. In order to ensure that PWS and other utilities are provided within the City in a manner compatible with existing and planned land uses, growth staging and other policies, spmft performance standards have been adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan states that `all private utilities shall comply with the applicable provisions of the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan." Alo existing public structure exists upon which a PWS antenna could be mounted within the area currently not adequately served. Development of the proposed tower and antenna as allowed by the Zoning Ordinance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment: Location of the tower and accessory equipment will blend in with the current use of the subject site as an elechw substation. Existing trees along the west property line and one the site generally will screen the lower portion of the tower and ground located equipment. Compliance with the height limitations for PINS towers established by the Zoning Ordinance will balance the need to provide adequate service coverage while minimizing impacts to adjacent properties. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The proposed use will be required to conform to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Location of an antenna upon the subject site is necessary to provide adequate service to areas of the City. From a use standpoint, the proposed tower will have little effect on the area given the current use of the property for an electrical substation. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the party. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to generate any substantial traffic that would effect CSAH 39. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including pants, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City =s service capacity. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to impact to the City's service capacity, but will provide adequate PIS coverage for areas of the City were service coverage by this provider is currently laddng. E. The Planning Report dated 26 February 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The memorandum dated 20 February 2007 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. G. The Otsego Planning Commission opened a public hearing at their regular meeting on 5 March 2007 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the application, and other evidence, the public hearing was dosed and the Planning Commission recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested application is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. The height of the tower shall not exceed 75 feet. 2. The location of the tower shall be revised to comply with the setbacks applicable within the INS District, subject to approval of City staff. CSAH 39 East South West 30ft. 50ft. 100ft. 50ft. 3. The tower shall be painted silver or have a galvanized finish. 4. There shall be no ovemight parking of PWS provider vehicles on the subject site. 2 5. A landscape plan providing for installation of tall shrubs along the north side of the fenced tower and accessory equipment area and driveway access shall be provided and is subject to approval of City staff. 6. The comments in the City Engineer's memo dated 20 February 2007 are addressed subject to approval by City staff. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 121th day of March, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk 3 CITY OF 03 -07 -07 0 T S E G 0 FINDINGS & DECISION CUP APPROVAL WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: T- Mobile USA APPLICATION: Request for approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow construction of a PWS tower and antenna not upon an existing public structure. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 March 2007 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fad: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for future Low Density Residential and Low Density Residential land uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area. C. The subject site is zoned INS, Institutional District; Construction of PWS antenna and towers not upon an existing public structure are allowed as a conditional use within the INS District subject to the performance standards set forth by Section 33 of the Zoning Ordinance. D. Section 20- 33- 4.B.2.c(1) establishes a maximum height for PWS towers of 75 feet. The proposed tower is 120 feet tall and the applicant has requested a variance to allow the proposed tower height. E. Consideration of the application is to be based upon (but not limited to) the criteria set forth by Section 20 -6-23 of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of food protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this Chapter. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of Item 2, below. 2. A variance from the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district or area. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. (2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of this Chapter. (3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result of lot or building size, or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of [the Zoning Ordinance] would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] or deny the applicant the ability to put the property in question to any reasonable use. C. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship are not the result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by [the Zoning Ordinance] to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non - conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. F. The Planning Report dated 26 February 2007 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The memorandum dated 20 February 2007 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. H. The Otsego Planning Commission opened a public hearing at their regular meeting on 5 March 2007 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the application, and other evidence, the public hearing was dosed and the Planning Commission recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested application is hereby DENIED, based on the following findings: 1. Approval of the variance is inconsistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance to limit the height of PWS towers to avoid potential impacts to adjacent properties. 2. Adequate service coverage can be accomplished with placement of additional PWS antennas indicating that compliance with the Zoning Ordinance does not cause the applicant undue hardship. 2 3. The basis for the variance request is related to the additional economic costs associated with installation of additional PWS towers and antennas to provide adequate service coverage for the area. MOTION BY: SECOND BY: ALL IN FAVOR: THOSE OPPOSED: ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of March, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO By: Attest: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator /City Clerk Larry Fournier, Mayor 3 Hakanson I I Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 30 Phone: 763/427 -5860 Fax: 763/427 -0520 ..,.Y. Assoc., Inc. MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ronald Wagner, P.E. City Engineer Steve Edwards, T- Mobile, USA Michael Hachey, P.E. T- Mobile, Minneapolis From: Brent Larson, E.I.T. Date: February 28, 2007 Re: T -Mobile Antenna We have reviewed the Construction Plans, dated 1/11/07, for the above - referenced project and would offer the following comments: 1. Location of boundary lines in relation to a known section, quarter section, or quarter - quarter section lines comprising a legal description of the property. Boundary lines shall include bearings, distances, and any curve data. 2. Please include the names of the contact person(s) for each of the involved parties listed as the Project Team on the cover sheet. 3. Existing zoning classifications for land in and abutting the subdivision. 4. Location, size, and elevations of existing culverts and other underground facilities or utilities within 150' of the projects boundaries. Attached is an exhibit of City of Otsego's Gopher State One map for the surrounding area. 5. Boundary lines of adjoining unsubdivided or subdivided land, identified by name and ownership. 6. It is difficult to read the spot elevations and contour elevations depicted on the 11" x 17" site plan. 7. Label the widths of bituminous streets, driveways, and R.O.W. for adjacent roads. 8. It would be help full to depict the Packard Avenue NE intersection at CSAH 39 to the northeast to aid in relating the location of the site along CSAH 39. S:\ Municipal \Aotsego22xx\2500\2007\ot2500 T- Mobile rvwl.l.doc 7 Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Project: SCADA Radio Replacements Owner: City of Otseg To: Automatic Systems Company You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes (Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) INCREASE I DECREASE in Contract`Price in Contract Price 1. Relocate SCADA master radio to Water Tower No. 1. $18,000.00 Totals:$ 18.000.00 Net Change in Contract Price: 18,000.00 $ 0.00 to the change order, the contract period will be: Unchanged Original contract Amount $ 18,000.00 Previous contract changes $ 6,536.00 Prior approved contract amount $ 24,536.00 Change in contract due to this change order $ 18,000.00 Total contract including this and previous change orders $ 42,536.00 Original contract period: December 14, 2007 Changed contract period from previous Change Order May 1, 2007 Contract period including this and all previous change orders: May 1, 2007 This document will become a supple t to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. AZ 1 7/ -- Recommended: ,, E r) -00R.A0,90MM - J a Accepted: Approved by: (Contractor) ITEM 9_1 Order No. 2 Date: March 8, 2007 Date (Owner) Date This infomnation will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. SAMunicipanAOTSEGM291Change Orderslot629co2.doc o At In EL .� J Z ��� 3 � , s SSW 4�' �� � �� �• � i �� 1 4- O c 3 T r t '4Z�3 3� ' I s3a s3 I { = P ! `^ �z 0 3 J t w A 'i lu I . t 1 i ! 1 � I t a i � 3 �r ► �d�' a b < 3 IAJ N o � P . u 0 S e o � d • m N �•c 3r--- - - -��3 i t ate ).7g i q 41 f � Z Q � 1 c CA- i i i c , 3ZAu z It Brent Larson From: Joe MacPherson Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 8:52 AM To: Brent Larson Subject: FW: Otsego radio change order questions 0 Mail message body Attachment old and new radio information, paths.pdf - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ron Wagner Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 9:47 AM To: Joe MacPherson Subject: FW: Otsego radio change order questions i. >°i:Q- Original Message ----- Plt*6m: stuart @kaeding.com (mailto:stuart @kaeding.com) Ight: Monday, March 05, 2007 1:24 PM tdi- Ron Wagner Subject: Otsego radio change order questions 100V t spoke to Lane Stewart about the questions that were raised regarding l�e proposed changes to the radio system in Otsego. 1._ Possibly relocating the east master radio to the new water tower #3. To be clear, with the proposed changes the master radio on the east side of town (whether it's located at water tower #1 or #3) will actually be a fpub- master' radio. The true master radio will be located at water tower #2 �bm k, V)I-e west side of town. I have enclosed a couple sketches that hopefully *pater illustrate the existing and proposed configurations. c the water tower #3 will be taller than the existing water tower #1, u, it is;_also not very centrally located so it does not appear that its ydd itional he'�ght will provide any real benefit. Also, if it were used as a master i . .`,may require some changes to the radio license, we would have to check into that. Finally, the construction schedule for tower #3 does not fit very Well with the schedule for the radio replacement project. 1 recommendation is to leave the radio configuration as planned, using water tower #1 as shown in the enclosed sketch. There does not appear oe any real benefit in relocating the equipment to water tower #3. • .'Would there be any cost savings by using water tower #3 as the east sub- master radio location, by combining the radio costs with the new SCADA panel that will need to be eventually installed at water tower #3 anyway. As mentioned above, there does not appear to be any real benefit to relocating the sub - master equipment to water tower #3. In addition, -after some review it would probably add cost to the project to do so - two ,radio antennas would have to be installed on top of the new tower, one dimnidirectional to talk to the rest of the east side locations and a directional to talk to water tower #2 on the west side of town. Both antennas would :require antenna cable installed from the radios in the base of the tower up to the top of the tower, which will be expensive both for the materials and for the labor to install them. Qr} other hand, there are two directional antennas and the related :�tenna cables already installed at water tower #1. One of the antennas needs to be replaced with an omnidirectional antenna, but since the � P. tpnna cables are in place it will be a relatively simple and tpe?Cpensive RT9Fqss When water tower #3 is completed, it can be simply added to the SCADA dio network with a directional antenna that is located only 20 feet or g9ilup �#p column, pointed at water tower #1, instead of having to mount the antenna all the way up at the top. Installation costs for this antenna will be fairly minimal; since the antenna will be only a short distance away t om the adio in the SCADA panel, inexpensive antenna cable can be used instead of .the expensive, low loss cable that would be required to reach to the of the tower. Also, since the antenna will be relatively low to the ex ouno, the abort costs to install it will be much less. The end costs will be less ff'water 'surer #1 is left as the sub - master location. there any salvage value for the old radios being removed. �h6ii the radios are removed they will still belong to the city. They re'- till tMctional and are still currently being sold new by MDS, so they are w y-, ip bs:olete. The city can keep them or sell them if desired. Automatic 6ystems will look into what can be done; they may have other customers Who are looking to buy radios, or there may be other options they can Yecommend. This is outside the scope of the project and can be pursued separately. Is there any salvage value for the old PLC that will be removed at e'st water tower #2 and replaced. gain, when it is removed it will still belong to the city. It is still vailable Ri,so it is not obsolete. It could be put on the shelf and kept as a pare, ince the same model PLC is also used in some of the other existing CADA panels in town. It could possibly be re -used for a new SCADA 2 panel but that will potentially bring up warrantee issues ... if the used PLC Was installed in a new SCADA panel and there was a failure of some sort, how is it determined what caused the failure and who is responsible for repair costs. Also, the PLC is not a particularly expensive model so it Wouldn't save that much money if it were re -used in a new panel anyway. I I keeping it as a spare. This is also outside the scope of the project. Stuart Stephens kae' ding and Associates 3OO'France Avenue S. Suite 330 Minneapolis, MN 55435 952)831 -0317 'S tephensc�kaeding.com s L fir... :. 3 Hakanson soc. Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone:763/427 -5860 Fax:763/427 -0520 MEMORANDUM To: Mike Robertson, Administrator From: Ron Wagner, PE, Engineer Date: Warch 6,2007 Re: MSA Account from Inception of ITEM g_2 30 Otsego ownship Incorporates in 1990 and begins receiving State Aid in 1991. 1991 S 344.397 Did not allocate 25% to Maintenance 1992 241,069 1993 S 238,453 1994 $ 219,945 1995 $ 207,013 1996 $ 229,489 1997 $ 221,271 1998 $ 231,002 1999 $ 229,774 2000 $ 261,658 2001 $ 240,415 2002 $ 253,232 2003 $ 251,747 2004 $ 315,860 2005 $ 298,538 2006 $ 342,149 $205,547 Account Balance 2007 $ 350,326 $555,873 Account Balance Total $4,475,338 S:\M unic�pal\AOTSEGO\315\200Tot315mrmemo .doc Pro State Aid Construction Funds were Spent on in O tsego Nashua Avenue (CSAH 39 to 83 Street NE) 85 Street (CSAH 42 to Page Avenue NE) 88 Street (CSAH 42 to East Odean Avenue (South End at CSAH 37) Odean Avenue (CSAH 37 to CSAH 39) 78 Street (Page Ave. NE to Quaday Ave. NE) Page Avenue (78 Street to 79 Street) Quaday Avenue (78 St. to CSAH 42) 85 Street (Page Ave. to Nashua Ave.) Total S: \M un is ipaMOTS EGO\315\2007\ot315mrmemo.doe $ 474,391 Est. $ 295,295 Est. $ 107,005 Est. $ 71,580 Est. $ 776,617 $ 526,210 $ 111,791 $ 134,849 $ 1,421,727 $3,919,465 Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREET PLAN - 2DO7 am MM elllq. .q 10111egt ---------------- 1111,11 till ITEM 9_3 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -17 RESOLUTION ADOPTING ADDITIONAL ASSESSMENT OF $56,910.46 FOR FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PREVIOUSLY NOT ASSESSED, MISSISSIPPI SHORES 6"', 7"' and 8"' ADDITIONS IN THE CITY OF OTSEGO WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Otsego City Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed additional assessment for the improvements on the property known as Mississippi Shores Frontage Road Improvement located in the City of Otsego. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby resolves: 1. Such proposed additional assessment amount of $56,910.46 is broken down by property owner on the attached assessment table, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in an amount greater than the assessment levied against it. 2. Such additional assessment shall be payable in equal installments extending over a period of 20 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2008, and shall bear interest at the rate of 6 percent ( %) per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2007. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The Owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Otsego, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 CN)mments and SetdrgsUudy mal Seftgffemporary Irdemet Files%ContentIE51GNF7MGTLIoMM esadoptassessmmVarf2.doc days from the adoption of this resolution. The property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to the City of Otsego the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The Otsego City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the Wright County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Motion for adoption of the resolution by , Seconded by at the meeting of the Otsego City Council on the 12 day of March 2007. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OSTEGO Lary Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Clerk CADocuments and Settings\Judy\Local Settings \Temporary Internet Files\ Content.) E5\ GNF7MGTL\ ot360resadoptassessmentPart2.doc ITEM 77 -1 A RESOLUTION REQUESTING COMPREHENSIVE ROAD AND TRANSIT FUNDING IN 2007 WHEREAS, all Minnesota communities benefit from a sound, efficient and adequately funded transportation system that offers diverse modes of travel; and WHEREAS, due to budget constraints, cities are increasingly deferring maintenance on the over 39,000 lane miles under municipal jurisdiction of the 277,607 total lane miles in Minnesota; and WHEREAS, local cost participation requirements for trunk highway and county projects are onerous and are contributing to strains on city budgets; and WHEREAS, existing local funding mechanisms, such as Municipal State Aid (MSA), property taxes, special assessments and bonding, have limited applications, leaving cities unable to adequately address growing transportation needs; and WHEREAS, the recently approved constitutional amendment that phases in dedication of 100 percent of the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) for transportation purposes will address only a fraction of the transportation funding needs in Minnesota, and total MUST revenues are not meeting projections; and WHEREAS, transportation analysts in consultation with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) estimate Minnesota will have to invest an additional $1.5 billion per year in transportation infrastructure for the next ten years in order to meet identified needs; and WHEREAS, transportation infrastructure maintenance and improvement costs significantly contribute to rising property taxes; and WHEREAS, lack of state funding has delayed regionally significant road construction and reconstruction projects across Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Minnesota's transportation system is failing to meet the capacity needs necessary to sustain population growth and promote economic development; and WHEREAS, congestion, inefficient transportation systems and lack of transportation choices lead to greater dependence on foreign oil, increased environmental degradation, and economic disadvantages for Minnesota's businesses and residents; and WHEREAS, many rural roads are not built to modern safety standards and are not meeting the needs of industries that depend on the ability to transport heavy loads; and WHEREAS, current funding for roads and transit systems across all government levels in Minnesota is inadequate, and this under - investment hinders Minnesota's progress as a national business, economic and civic leader. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF that this Council requests that in 2007 the Minnesota Legislature pass a comprehensive transportation funding package that permanently increases dedicated funding for transportation; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF that this Council requests that in 2007 Governor Tim Pawlenty allow a comprehensive transportation funding package that permanently increases dedicated funding for transportation that is passed by the Legislature to become law; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF that this Council supports funding options including, but not limited to, the following: • An increase in the gas tax; • Indexing of the gas tax, provided there is a limit on how much the tax can be increased for inflation in a given amount of time; • Increases in vehicle registration taxes (a.k.a. license tab fees); • Trunk highway bonding, provided the Legislature implements reasonable restrictions on the amount of debt service the state will incur and provided the Legislature appropriates funding to assist with local costs related to projects funded with trunk highway bonds; • General obligation bonding for local roads and bridges, particularly for roads of regional significance and to assist with local cost participation requirements pertaining to trunk highway projects; • Sales tax exemptions for state and local transportation construction projects; and • New local funding tools, such as local option sales tax authority, expanded wheelage tax authority and/or street utility authority; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF that this Council defines a comprehensive transportation fimding package as an initiative that permanently increases dedicated funding for state and local road and transit systems in Greater Minnesota and the Metropolitan Area. ADOPTED by the City Council on 2007. ITEM - 17_3 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA 2007 -16 A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING FOR THE CSAH 19 AND CSAH 37 I -94 INTERCHANGE PROJECTS LOCATED IN WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA THE I -94 IMPLEMENTATION TASK FORCE COMPRISED OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, CITY OF OTSEGO, WRIGHT COUNTY, AND THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: WHEREAS, the I -94 Implementation Task Force is a multi - jurisdictional entity whose goal is to work collaboratively to address transportation improvements along I -94 from a corridor perspective; and, WHEREAS, the I -94 Implementation Task Force will work to develop consensus and support for project within each community utilizing a phased approach; and, WHEREAS, the I -94 Implementation Task Force has developed a working list of project priorities including access improvements along I -94 at CSAH 19 /CSAH 37, Naber Avenue and Kadler Avenue, as well as additional capacity along I- 94 in the form of a third lane in each direction; and, WHEREAS, the I -94 Implementation Task Force has identified the I -94 interchange improvements at CSAH 19/37 as high priority; and, WHEREAS, traffic studies indicate improved access to I -94 -_ at CSAH 19/37 is essential to local and regional commuters; and, WHEREAS, the proposed improvements at CSAH19 /37 are consistent with the Northeast Wright County Transportation Plan, and, WHEREAS, the proposed improvement at CSAH 19/37 has received Federal Highway Access Approval, and, WHEREAS, the proposed improvements at CSAH 19/37 are identified in the attached Exhibit 1; and, NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED, the City of Otsego hereby endorses and supports Albertville's request for State and Federal funding for CSAH 19/37 access improvements as identified in Exhibit 1 under the following conditions. 1) The City of Otsego will not contribute any funding for this improvement as they do not see any significant benefit for Otsego residents. 2) Should the proposed design change, the City of Otsego would not endorse any proposal which involves limiting or removing any of the existing four legs of the current intersection of Interstate 94 and CSAH 37. Approved by the Otsego City Council the day of March, 2007. CITY OF OTESGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk ITEM 12_1 MEMO Date: March 7, 2007 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Advertising for Building Department Secretary Lisa Larson has left the City and we have to advertise for a new Building Secretary. Staff recommends that the job be advertised as part -time. I have enclosed a copy of the job description and the advertisement,. We are recommending a hiring range of $11.50 - $12.50 an hour, depending on experience. The previous person started at $11.00 /hour over a year ago. Their salary increased to $11.50 /hour when they went full -time in August, 2006 and then increased to $12.60 as of January, 2007. Part -time Building Department Secretary. The City of Otsego is accepting applications for the position of part -time Building Department Secretary. The position is responsible for processing and issuing building permits and performing a variety of administrative and clerical support tasks. Minimum qualifications include a high school diploma or GED and two years experience working with the public and /or one year experience working in a similar building department. Salary range will be $11.50 - $12.50 per hour, depending on qualifications. Application and position descriptions are available at Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330 or by calling 763/441 -4414. Completed applications must be received by 12:00 noon on Wednesday, April 11, 2007. CITY OF OTSEGO POSITION DESCRIPTION Title: Building Department Secretary Department: Building Reports to: City Clerk FLSA Status: Part Time, Non - Exempt Date: December 2005 Position Summary: The Building Department Secretary employee has the authority to perform a variety of diverse and complex technical, administrative, and clerical support tasks. Responsibilities include, but are not limited to, processing and issuing building permits and researching issues related to permits and code enforcement. Position Duties: I . Provide clerical support services to the Building Department 2. Provide technical information regarding development, zoning, building and related code regulations to the public at the counter or over the telephone 3. Receive plans and other construction documents for review, and ensure that applications arr complete and ready to process 4. Track, monitor, and provide information regarding the status of building permits, plan checks, and related issues to other departments and to the public 5. Calculate fees for the issuance of building, plumbing, and mechanical permits 6. Issue basic building permits under the direction of the Building Official (examples may include, but are not limited to water heater installation, re -roof, minor tenant improvements, minor residential remodels, and other simple building permits 7. Keep records and make reports of permits issued and field and code enforcement inspections conducted 8. Perform related work as assigned. Minimum Requirements: 1. Possession of high school diploma or GED 2. Two (2) years working with public and one (1) year working in building department assisting with the permit application process Desirable Qualifications: 1. Knowledge of basic mathematics, research techniques, and records - keeping and records retention systems 2. Ability to communicate material of a diverse and complex technical nature effectively both orally and in writing 3. Ability to work effectively and maintain a calm demeanor under stressful conditions and with frequent interruptions 4. Knowledge of standard office operating practices and procedures 5. Ability to maintain effective working relationships with other City employees, other agency employees, and members of the public. 6. Work independently exercising good judgment and initiative. Physical Demands: The physical demands described here are representative of those that must be met by an employee to successfully perform the essential functions of this job. While performing the duties of this job, the employee is: 1. Frequently required to sit; use hands to finger, handle, or feel; and talk; or hear. The employee is occasionally required to stand and walk. 2. Occasionally lift and/or move up to 10 pounds. 3. Frequently utilizes distance vision, depth perception and ability to adjust focus. Environmental Conditions: The work environment characteristics described here are representative of those an employee encounters while performing the essential functions of this job. 1. Usually, normal office working conditions. 2. The noise level in the work environment is usually quiet to moderate. Non - Discrimination Policy: The City of Otsego does not discriminate on the basis of political opinions or affiliations, race, color, national origin, religion, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance or disability, in the admission or access to, or treatment, or employment in its programs and activities. Revised.• December 2005 ITEM 12_2 Date: March 8, 2007 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Cell Phone Policy Staff has looked at a variety of plans trying to achieve the Council's intentions of reducing cell phone costs. All of the plans that we have examined that involve switching to another system had problems and would work less efficiently than the current plan. At the Department Head meeting we came up with a recommendation. we recommend that all cell phone users except department heads be reduced to the cheapest plan. This will be a savings of at least $30 a month for each user. This will produce savings similar to those estimated for switching to other systems, while retaining the efficiencies of the current plan. ITEM 12 -3 2007 FIRE PROTECTION AGREEME WITH THE CITY OF OTSEGO 10 Cod This agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Albertville, a municipal corporation of the County .of Wright in the State of Minnesota, and the City of Otsego, in the County of Wright in the State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, Otsego desires the services of the fire department of Albertville in case of fires occurring in Otsego, as well as the emergency medical services of Albertville in case of a medical emergency, and WHEREAS, Albertville maintains a volunteer fire department with emergency medical response capability, which department is available to provide fire protection and emergency medical response services to properties located in Otsego, and THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between said parties as follows: 1. Albertville, through its fire department, shall provide fire protection and emergency medical response services to those properties in Otsego. Such fire protection and emergency medical response services shall be provided from January 1 through December 31, 2007. 2. Otsego shall agree to pay Albertville $56,439.60 in exchange for the provision of fire Protection ,and emergency medical response services as described above. Payment due for the year 2007 shall be made in four installments of $14,109.90 on or before April 1, 2007, $14,109.90 on or before July 1, 2007, $14,109.90 on or before October 1, 2007, and $14,109.90 on or before December 31, 2007. The amount is subject to change based on the Fire District Tax Capacity Values which are not available from Wright County until July of each year. The 2007 contract amount is based on the 2006 Fire District Tax Capacity Values, which is percentage based on the Fire District Tax Capacity, therefore is subject to adjustment in August of 2007 when they are available. 3. Albertville's obligation to provide fire protection service and emergency medical response shall be subject to the following: a. If road and weather conditions at the time of the call are such that the fire/medical run cannot be made with reasonable safety to men and equipment, and the decision of the Fire Chief or his Deputy in charge shall be final in such matter, no obligation arises under this agreement on the part of the City of Albertville to answer such call. b. In the event that a sufficient amount of the fire fighting/medical equipment and the number of volunteer firemen, or both, are committed at the time of the fire call, in sole judgment of the Fire Chief or his Deputy, to fighting pre - existing fires or attending pre- existing medical emergencies, so as to render the available equipment and manpower inadequate to answer a fire or medical call from Otsego, no obligation shall arise under M:\Public DataTire Depart nenAfre conbwM\Fire Service ContractV - Otsego.doc this agreement to answer such call, and no person or party shall have recourse against the City of Albertville for refusal to answer such call. A pre - existing fire /medical emergency to which the fire department of Albertville is called previous to receiving the call from Otsego and which fire is still being fought or medical emergency is still being attended to by the Albertville Fire Department at the time the call from Otsego is received. c. In the event a fire call by Otsego is answered by Albertville, but before the fire in question is extinguished, the fire fighting equipment or volunteer firemen, or both, are needed to fight a fire in Albertville or protect property in Albertville from a fire, the Chief or his Deputy without liability therefore to any person or to Otsego under this agreement, may in their judgement recall the fire equipment and firemen to Albertville for the purpose of fighting the fire in Albertville. The judgement of the Fire Chief or his Deputy shall be final and no person or party shall have recourse against the City of Albertville for any damages or losses resulting from such action or decision. 4. The parties acknowledge the fact that Albertville may enter into similar contracts with other municipalities, and acknowledge that Albertville has entered into mutual aid contracts with other fire departments in other municipalities, and that a fire call under any such contract preceding a call in Otsego could be a valid and reasonable basis for the decision of the Fire Chief or his Deputy in refusing to answer a fire call in Otsego. 5. Because the City of Albertville has heretofore entered into mutual assistance fire fighting agreements with other municipalities possessing fire fighting equipment and firemen, which equipment and firemen could be called by the Chief or his Deputy to a fire in Otsego, the City of Otsego agrees to pay such additional cost as may be incurred thereby if in the sole judgement of the Chief or his Deputy, such additional fire fighting equipment and firemen are needed to fight a fire in Otsego and are in fact called to such fire by the Chief or his Deputy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of , 2007. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE By: Ron Klecker, Mayor ATTEST: Larry Kruse City Administrator CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Michael Robertson City Administrator MAPublic DataTire DepartmentViire contractsTire Service Contract07 - Otsego.doc 2