The URL can be used to link to this page

04-26-04 CCCLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 26, 2004 TO: Judy Hudson ITEM g--1 Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register APPROVED PAYMENTS PAYROLL 4/14 GRAND TOTAL 03-25-2004 $ 515,402.07 04-14-2004 $ 9,600.50 04-21-2004 $ 101,193.11 $ 23,097.14 S 649,292.82 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 03/25/04 10:55 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© MARCH 2004 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE UnPaid LTD COMMODITIES LLC UnPaid MEDICA UnPaid RICE LAKE CONSTR GROUP UnPaid RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GR FILTER: None $121.50 ADMIN -APRIL $38.17 FLAG BANNERS FOR ELECTION $6,976.70 ADMIN -APRIL $25,413.00 ESCROW TO BANK $482,852.70 WEST WWTF Total Checks $515,402.07 CITY OF OTSEGO 03/25/04 10:56 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© MARCH 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO E 250-42410-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $27.00 BLDG - APRIL E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.50 PW - APRIL E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.50 ADMIN - APRIL E 101-41600-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $13.50 FINANCE - APRIL Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $121.50 Unpaid LTD COMMODITIES LLC E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies $38.17 FLAG BANNERS FOR ELECTION Total LTD COMMODITIES LLC $38.17 Unpaid MEDICA E 250-42410-123 Health $1,793.50 B1,DG -APRIL E 101-43100-123 Health $2,390.47 PW - APRIL E101-41400-123 Health $2,177.82 ADMIN - APRIL E101-41600-123 Health $614.91 FINANCE - APRIL Total MEDICA $6,976.70 Unpaid RICE LAKE CONSTR GROUP E 430-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $25,413.00 PAY 4 ESCROW TO BANK Total RICE LAKE CONSTR GROUP $25,413.00 � Inpaid RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP E 430-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $482,852.70 PAY 4 WEST WWTF Total RICE LAKE CONSTRUCTION GROUP $482,852.70 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $515,402.07 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $5,315.87 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES $1,820.50 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 $508,265.70 $515,402.07 CITY OF OTSEGO 04/14/04 2:41 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© APRIL 2004 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid TRAUT WELLS $8,759.00 WELLS 4 & 5 WEST UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TRE $841.50 FULL AMT 118010078010 Total Checks $9,600.50 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/14/04 2:41 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid TRAUT WELLS E 428-49400-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $8,759.00 PAY 7 WELLS 4 & 5 WEST Total TRAUT WELLS $8,759.00 Unpaid ,.eW __.. WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $722.00 FULL AMT 118010078010 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $87.50 FULL AMT 118010077100 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $32.00 118500202102 Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $841.50 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $9,600.50 Fund Summary 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER 101 GENERAL FUND $841.50 428 WEST WATER PROJ $8,759.00 $9,600.50 CITY OF OTSEGO 04/21/04 2:58 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© APRIL 2004 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION $326.50 HC UNIT UnPaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PROD $223.16 BANK STAMPS UnPaid BRAUN INTERTEC $2,032.75 WEST WWTP UnPaid CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. C $535.73 TRACTOR UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMEN $672.99 MISC SUPPLIES UnPaid DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES $4,804.92 LILYPOND PARK REBID UnPaid DAVID CHASE $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE UnPaid DENNIS FEHN GRAVEL & EXCAV $2,245.19 CRUSHED ROCK UnPaid EARL F ANDERSON INC $2,942.69 PHEASANT RDG 8 UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $524.21 INSERTS Unpaid ELLISON EQUIPMENT CO. $3,953.81 RECYCLE BINS UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTE $510.40 UNIFORMS UnPaid GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $224.40 BILLABLE TICKETS UnPaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $34,361.00 EAST WWTF 2 UnPaid GROEN GARY CPA $1,850.00 MARCH 15 TO APRIL 12 UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $422.31 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 UnPaid INDEPENDENT TESTING TECH 1 $24.00 85TH ST/PAGE PROJECT UnPaid JESSICA STOCKAMP $51.36 EASTER EGG HUNT SUPPLIES UnPaid KENNETH NATHE $4,779.16 101 MARKET UnPaid KNUTSON RICK $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE UnPaid LANDCOR INC $3,410.96 ESCROW ACCTS Paid LARRY FOURNIER $150.00 BLACKWOOD ROOM RENT MAYOR ASSOC iPaid LITTLE FALLS MACHINE $1,822.18 2000 IH TRK UnPaid MAMA $18.00 MIKE - APRIL 15 UnPaid MEDICA $8,129.66 ADMIN - MAY UnPaid MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON $186.27 CAMERA BATTERIES UnPaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $64.52 STAPLES FOR COPIER UnPaid MINNESOTA LIFE $112.70 ADMIN - MAY UnPaid MN STATE TREASURER $35.00 HAROLD - MAY 26 CLASS UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $33.00 MARCH DOG PICK UP UnPaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $21,004.00 MONTHLY SERVICE UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME $1,934.19 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 UnPaid RANDY'S SANITATION $105.81 8899 NASHUA AVE UnPaid UNLIMITED ELECTRIC INC $1,928.49 GARAGE REPAIR (INSURANCE) UnPaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELE $1,713.75 MONTHLY FEE Total Checks $101,193.11 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 04/21/042:58 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION E 101-45250-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $326.50 202 HC UNIT Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $326.50 Unpaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $82.96 215728 BANK STAMPS E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $140.20 491346 SUPPLIES Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $223.16 Unpaid BRAUN INTERTEC E 430-43256-302 Engineering Fees $2,032.75 412310 WEST WWTP Total BRAUN INTERTEC $2,032.75 Unpaid CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO. E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $290.15 1340 TRACTOR E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $91.89 1388 TRACTOR E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $9.22 1420 91 DISK MOWER E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $144.47 1441 91 DISK MOWER Total CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO. $535.73 Unpaid m_..,..__._._ _, .__-. .�_._M ._U_1..._,_. CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT __-_ w __._.tl.__.____.._._._:_._.__.___".__._._ - __ E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $237.96 103352 MISC SUPPLIES E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $39.30 103656 PARKS SUPPLIES E 101-43100-203 Supplies -General $128.58 103656 MISC SUPPLIES E 101-45200-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $258.01 103928 PARKS SUPPLIES E 101-43100-203 Supplies -General $9.14 103928 MISC SUPPLIES Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $672.99 Unpaid DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES E 203-45210-390 Contracted Services $4,804.92 16062 LILYPOND PARK REBID Total DAMON FARBER ASSOCIATES $4,804.92 Unpaid �� -�� DAVID CHASE E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total DAVID CHASE $30.00 Unpaid DENNIS FEHN GRAVEL &EXCAVAT E 430-43255-310 Miscellaneous $1,122.59 12714 CRUSHED ROCK E 428-49400-310 Miscellaneous $1,122.60 12714 CRUSHED ROCK Total DENNIS FEHN GRAVEL & EXCAVAT $2,245.19 Unpaid EARL F ANDERSON INC E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $58.43 58967 STREET SIGNS R 101-34301 Street, Sidewalk and Curb Fees $1,878.65 59004 PHEASANT RDG 8 R 101-34301 Street, Sidewalk and Curb Fees $959.54 59026 RIVERPOINT 3RD E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $46.07 59041 STREET SIGNS Total EARL F ANDERSON INC $2,942.69 E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $270.00 164871 CLEAN UP MONTH AD E 426-43100-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $135.41 165174 QUADAY PROJ HEARING E 101-41400-347 Newsletter $118.80 165369 INSERTS Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC _ $524.21 Unpaid ELLISON EQUIPMENT CO. E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $3,953.81 040604-02 RECYCLE BINS Total ELLISON EQUIPMENT CO. $3,953.81 CITY OF OTSEGO 04/21/04 2:58 PM Page 2 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2004 Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $224.40 Unpaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. E 429-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $34,361.00 PAY 17 REV EAST WWTF 2 Total GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $34,361.00 ---,--G— R' O__ENG__A'_R'_Y CPA '_ ~______.,_...._.. E 101-41600-390 Contracted Services $1,850.00 Total GROEN GARY CPA $1,850.00 paid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST E 101-41400-121 PERA $192.31 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $230.00 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $422.31 MARCH 15 TO APRIL 12 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 Unpaid INDEPENDENT TESTING TECH INC Check Amt Invoice Comment Unpaid - � -G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Total INDEPENDENT TESTING TECH INC E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $71.83 43444125 MATS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $54.55 43444126 UNIFORMS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $50.21 43449051 UNIFORMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $71.83 43453989 MATS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $79.05 43453990 UNIFORMS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $56.55 43458866 UNIFORMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $71.83 43463795 MATS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $54.55 43463796 UNIFORMS Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $510.40 G 701-22341 WATERFRONT FAM REST Unpaid GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC G 701-22318 RIVERVIEW BANK E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $224.40 4030641 BILLABLE TICKETS Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $224.40 Unpaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. E 429-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $34,361.00 PAY 17 REV EAST WWTF 2 Total GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $34,361.00 ---,--G— R' O__ENG__A'_R'_Y CPA '_ ~______.,_...._.. E 101-41600-390 Contracted Services $1,850.00 Total GROEN GARY CPA $1,850.00 paid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST E 101-41400-121 PERA $192.31 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $230.00 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $422.31 MARCH 15 TO APRIL 12 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 Unpaid INDEPENDENT TESTING TECH INC E 435-43100-302 Engineering Fees $24.00 15469 85TH ST/PAGE PROJECT Total INDEPENDENT TESTING TECH INC $24.00 Unpaid JESSICA STOCKAMP E 101-45250-203 Supplies - General $51.36 EASTER EGG HUNT SUPPLIES Total JESSICA STOCKAMP $51.36 Unpaid KENNETH NATHE G 701-22325 101 MARKET $4,779.16 101 MARKET Total KENNETH NATHE $4,779.16 Unpaid KNUTSON RICK E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 APRIL CELL PHONE Total KNUTSON RICK $30.00 .,Unpaid '"_.._.�,....e....a.._....,y.._....�,_._.,_.,.LANDCOR INC. ....._._.,_._M_.._......._.,.....____._._..�._._.�...,.._,._.._._�...,._r_._.._.._.._..__.____..__ G 701-22341 WATERFRONT FAM REST $1,540.71 ESCROW ACCTS G 701-22318 RIVERVIEW BANK $852.16 ESCROW ACCTS G 701-22342 WATERFRON CONV STORE $4,010.31 ESCROW ACCTS G 701-22340 WATERFRONT LIQUOR STORE ($2,520.35) ESCROW ACCTS G701-22343 WF3RD ADD FINPLAT ($471.87) ESCROW ACCTS Total LANDCOR INC $3,410.96 unpaid LARRY FOURNIER E 101-41100-360 Education/Training/Conferences $150.00 BLACKWOOD ROOM RENT MAYOR ASSO Total LARRY FOURNIER $150.00 Unpaid LITTLE FALLS MACHINE E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $58.54 31872 2000 IH TRK E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $1,763.64 31881 92 FORD TRK CITY OF OTSEGO 04/21/04 2:58 PM Page 3 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2004 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total LITTLE FALLS MACHINE $1,822.18 Unpaid E 101-41400-360 Education/Training/Conferences $18.00_949 MIKE -APRIL 15 Total MAMA $18.00 Unpaid MEDICA E 101-43100-123 Health $2,390.47 PW - MAY E 101-41400-123 Health $2,177.82 ADMIN - MAY E 250-42410-123 Health $2,946.46 BLDG - MAY E 101-41600-123 Health $614.91 FINANCE - MAY Total MEDICA $8,129.66 Unpaid MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON E 101-45300-310 Miscellaneous $11.27 CAMERA BATTERIES E 101-41400-360 Education/Training/Conferences $175.00 MID WINTER SEMINAR Total MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON $186.27 Unpaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $32.26 126088 STAPLES FOR COPIER E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $32.26 126098 STAPLES 700 Total MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $64.52 paid MINNESOTA LIFE E 101-41600-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $4.10 FINANCE - MAY E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $17.60 ADMIN - MAY E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $74.60 PW - MAY E 25042410-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $16.40 BLDG - MAY Total MINNESOTA LIFE $112.70 Unpaid MN STATE TREASURER E 250-42410-360 Education/Training/Conferences $35.00 HAROLD - MAY 26 CLASS Total MN STATE TREASURER $35.00 Unpaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $33.00 446 MARCH DOG PICK UP Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $33.00 PEOPLE SERVICE E 602-49450-390 Contracted Services $225.00 7923 LABOR E 602-49450-390 Contracted Services $15,187.64 7923 MONTHLY SERVICE E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $5,411.36 7923 MONTHLY SERVICE E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $180.00 7923 LABOR Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $21,004.00 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 250-42410-121 PERA $404.26 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 E 101-41400-121 PERA $196.64 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 G 101-21704 PERA $927.97 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 E 101-41600-121 PERA $71.66 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 E 101-43100-121 PERA $333.66 PPE 4/10 CK DTD 4/14 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,934.19 Unpaid RANDY'S SANITATION E 101-43100-325 Garbage Service $40.54 13474 95TH ST E 101-41940-325 Garbage Service $65.27 8899 NASHUA AVE Total RANDY'S, SANITATION $105.81 Unpaid UNLIMITED ELECTRIC INC CITY OF OTS E G O 04/21/04 2:58 PM Page 4 *Check Detail Register© APRIL 2004 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 426 Quaday & 78th PROJECT 428 WEST WATER PROJ 429 WWTP-East Phase 2 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 435 85th Street Project - East 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND -11 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $23,279.85 $4,804.92 $3,402.12 $135.41 $1,122.60 $34,361.00 $3,155.34 $24.00 $6,448.24 $16,269.51 $8,190.12 $101,193.11 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $1,928.49 6230 GARAGE REPAIR (INSURANCE) Total UNLIMITED ELECTRIC INC $1,928.49 Unpaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $856.88 12612 MONTHLY FEE E 602-49450-390 Contracted Services $856.87 12612 MONTHLY FEE Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $1,713.75 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $101,193.11 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 250 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 426 Quaday & 78th PROJECT 428 WEST WATER PROJ 429 WWTP-East Phase 2 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 435 85th Street Project - East 601 WATER FUND 602 SEWER FUND -11 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $23,279.85 $4,804.92 $3,402.12 $135.41 $1,122.60 $34,361.00 $3,155.34 $24.00 $6,448.24 $16,269.51 $8,190.12 $101,193.11 ITEM 5.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -XX CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING PEOPLE SERVICE, INC. AS THE CITY OF OTSEGO'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATOR WHEREAS, as part of the City of Otsego's wastewater treatment permit, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has asked for a resolution stating who our wastewater treatment plant operator is. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA THAT PEOPLE SERVICE, INC. IS THE CITY OF OTSEGO'S WASTEWATER TREATMENT OPERATOR Dated this 26th day of April, 2004 ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. 1886 BERKSHIRE LANE PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Owner CITY OF OTSEGO For Period 6/30/03 TO 1/8/04 Engineer BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. ITEM Date Request No. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY SUMMARY.• 1 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 2 CHANGE ORDER - ADDITION $ 34,361 3 CHANGE ORDER - DEDUCTION $ 4 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT 5 VALUE COMPLETED TO DATE 6 MATERIAL STORED 7 AMOUNT EARNED THIS PERIOD 8 LESS RETAINAGE - 5% 9 SUB -TOTAL 10 LESS AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY PAID 11 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST Recommended f Approval by: EnW*neerUt.(Pr Approved by Contractor: GRIDOR CON&N& Robert Meyer 1/8/2004 Specified Contract Completion Date: Approved by Owner: CITY OF... Date O:\BOB\Otsego 2001\Pay Estimate\PAY.XLS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 5-3 763-559-3734 1/8/2004 17 REVISED $ 2,217,700 $ 2,252,061 $ 22240,261 $ 0 $ 2,240,261 $ 0 $ 2,240,261 $ 2,205,900 $ 34,361 PAY ITEMS 4/13/2004 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY PAY ESTIMATE NO. 17 REVISED OTSEGO, MN 6/30/03 TO 10/30/03 ITEM NO DESCRIPTION CONTRACT AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY AMOUNT COMPLETED TOTAL COMPELTED 1 BOND & MBILIZATION AMOUNT APPROVED THIS PERIOD TO DATE 2 EXCAVATION & BACKFILL60,000 60,000 60,000 3 FINE GRADE SITE 70,000 70,000 70,000 4 FENCE 7,000 7,000 7,000 5 ROADS & WALKS 18,000 18,000 18,000 6 TREES & SHRUBS 9,000 9,000 9,000 7 CONCRETE 1300 CY @ $340.00 6,000 442,000 6,000 442,000 6,000 8 REINF. STEEL 130 TON @ $1,200.00 156,000 156,000 442,000 9 PRECAST CONCRETE 22,000 22,000 156,000 10 MASONRY 46,000 46,000 22,000 11 MISC. METALS - FRP - HATCHES46,000 70,000 12 CARPENTRY 70,000 70,000 13 WOOD TRUSSES 22,000 22,000 22,000 14 FRP DOME 9,000 9,000 9,000 15 INSULATION & SHINGLES 41,000 41,000 41,000 16 METAL SIDING & TRIM 000 28,000 28,000 17 CAULKING 44, 44,000 44,000 44,000 18 DOORS & WINDOWS 5,000 5,000 5,000 19 FLOOR TREATMENT 2 22,000000 22,000 20 PAINTING 6,000 044,000 21 SPECIALTIES 455,,000 44,000 22 VORTEX GRIT PUMP 3,700 3,700 3,700 23 POLYMER FEED EQUIPMENT 13,000 13,000 13,000 24 UV DISINFECTION 10,000 10,000 10,000 25 FINAL CLARIFIER 20,000 20,000 20,000 26 CENTRIF. NON -CLOG PUMPS 58,000 58,000 58,000 27 PROGRESSING CAVITY PUMPS 21,000 21,000 21,000 28 GRIT CYCLONE & CLASSIFIER 25,000 25,000 25,000 29 FORCED VORTEX GRIT CHAMBER 20,000 20,000 20,000 30 CYLINDRICAL FINE SCREEN 28,000 28,000 28,000 31 GRAVITY BELT THICKENER 82,000 82,000 82,000 32 CARROUSEL MECHANICAL AERATOR 112,000 112,000 112,000 33 ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM 55,000 55,000 55,000 34 PROCESS PIPE, VALVES, METER - MATERIAL 1,000 110,000 1,000 110,000 61,000 35 PIPE & EQUIPMENT LABOR EXTERIOR 56 116,000 36 PIPE & SLEEVE LABOR INTERIOR ,000 15,000 56,000 56,000 37 PLUMBING 15,000 15,000 38 VENTILATION 31,000 31,000 31,000 39 ELECTRICAL 77,000 76,000 76,000 40 SCADA SYSTEM 264,000 263,000 264,000 28,000 25,200 25,200 SUBTOTAL 2,217,700 2,205,900 0 2,205,900 MATERIAL STORED (CHANGE ORDERS) 34,361 34,361 0 34,361 TOTAL 2,252,061 2,205,900 34,361 2,240,260 4/13/2004 ITEM 5-4 TNI KIDS DK Ir\h- Dedicated to Children s Health, Safety & Environmental Awareness Dear Mayor Fournier and the Otsego Council, I look forward to my role as the official Chiropractic office representing the second annual "Kids Day America/IntemationalTM" event in Otsego on Saturday, May 15, 2003. "Kids Day America/InternationalTM" is a special day set aside to address health, safety and environmental issues that affect us as individuals and as a community. It was founded for the purpose of educating families and communities about these important social concerns. To date, more than 1,400 communities have participated in this event and almost 2,000,000 children and their families have enjoyed this day throughout the world. With the help and support of thousands of local police departments, county sheriff offices, dentists, and photographers who volunteer their time, all of these children completed their own Child Safety ID cards. Mayors, Governors, and Senators across the nation have signed the official "Kids Day Amedca/IntemationalTM" proclamation. I am asking the Town Council to support this community event by signing the proclamation for Otsego. Included are several previously signed proclamations for your reference. There is currently enough support from Mayors and Governors across North America to bring this program to the White House, creating a national day that recognizes the enormous contribution Chiropractors have made in helping the children of their communities. This year, our event will benefit D.A.R.E. The Wright County Sheriff Department will be present to fingerprint ID children for the ID cards. I would love to have you and any council member that is able to attend, join us for the festivities. Please join me in supporting this momentous international event! Thank you for your dedication to the children. Yours in support of the children, r Dr. Jen Esselman Event Coordinator, "Kids Day Amedca/InternationalTM" Healing Hands Family Chiropractic, Inc. 763-274-0373 "Kids Day America/International" Troclamation Way 15, 2004 TfE12EAS, the Yfealth andwell-being of children is our responsibility; and, TWE12EAS, the Safety of our children is a sign cant concern for parents, community leaders and healthcare givers; and, Zl�'XE1RMS, Environmental welfare is of universal concern and deserves the utmost attention; and, ` ME12EAS, if started in childhood, proper Yfealth, Safety and Environmental habits can 6e maintainedfor a lifetime, producing a valued member of society, and enhancing our community; Now, Therefore, I, Larry FournierWayor, do hereby proclaim the 15th of Way, 2004 as "Kids 1nayAmerica/International" in Otsego and urge that this day 6e dedicated to the efforts of (Doctors of Chiropractic in helping educate all citizens on the importance of Yfealth, Safety and Environmental issues affecting our community. Mayor ATS7 City CferllZoningAdministrator r r April 26, 2004 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Watertower #2 Pay Estimate No. 6 Contractor: CB & I Contract Amount: 1,162,600.00 Award Date: May 20, 2003 Completion Date: August 2, 2004 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: City of Otsego Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #2 The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Bid Schedule "A" - 1.000.000 Gallon Water Storane Tang and Tower 1 1 CJYI: r . ITEM 5-5 Item No. Descri tion Qty Unit Unit Cost Contract Amount Used To -Date Extension Provide foundation design prepared by Professional Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota, based 1 on loadinq data in Division 13. 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 Provide steel tank & tower design, including anchorage prepared by Professional Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota based on the 2 21ans ands ecificaitons. 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 Construct tank & tower foundation including excavation, concrete, backfill, and anchorage per 3 approved desi n. Furnish and install piping, including watermain, riser & 1 LS $84,500.00 $84,500.00 1 $84,500.00 overflow, valves, fittings, hydrant, and insulation per 4 plans andspecifications. 1 LS $14,300.00 $14,300.00 0.1 $1,430.00 Furnish and erect the 1,000,000 gallon fluted pillar elevated water tower and tank including all appurtenances as provided on plans and 5 specifications. Furnish and apply coatings on the steel surfaces of 1 LS $803,500.00 $803,500.00 1 $803,500.00 the fluted pillar elevated water tower tank as 6 specified. Furnish and install electrical and control devices as 1 LS $170,000.00 $170,000.00 7 Drovidedfor in the plans andspecifications 1 LS $26,000.00 $26,000.00 8 Mobilization and Demobilization. 1 LS $10,000.00 $10,000.00 0.5 $5,000.00 Furnish and apply coatings for logo on the water tank 9 as shown on the plans ass ecified. 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 Total - Bid Schedule "A' _ 1 000,000 Gallon Water_Storage.Tank and $914;430:00 0t514pe#2 PE - 1 Pay Estimate 96 4/19/04 Bid Schedule "B" • Site Work Y'. City of Otsego Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #2 Total - Bid Schedule "B" - Site Work SUMMARY OF BIDDING Bid Schedule "A" - 1,000,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank and Tower Bid Schedule "B" - Site Work TOTAL Total Work Completed To -Date Less 5% Retainage Less Pay Estimate No. 1 Less Pay Estimate No. 2' Less Pay Estimate No. 3 Less Pay Estimate No. 4 Less Pay Estimate No. 5 We Recommend Partial Payment of: $31,300.00 $7,200.00 $1,131,300.00 $914,430.00 stimat $7,200.00 $1,162,600.00 $921,630.00 $102,723.50 Check # 38923 $102,723.50 $398,145.00 ed $295,421.50 $554,952.00 Check # 39424 $156,807.00 $692,350.50 Check # 39501 $137,398.50 Numbe Check # 39538 $145,031.75 $38,166.25 Item r of Contract Used No. Description Units Unit Unit Cost Amount To -Date Extension All site work including topsoil salvage and replacement, excavation, import and compacting of borrow material and aggregate base, placement of bituminous wear and course filter material and construction of concrete splash pad, apron and 10 sidewalk. 1 LS $24,000.00 $24,000.00 0.1 S2,400.00 Erosion Control items such as bale check, silt fence 11 and rock construction entrance. 1 LS $4,800.00 $4,800.00 1 $4,800.00 12 All restoration including seeding, fertilizing and mulch 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Total - Bid Schedule "B" - Site Work SUMMARY OF BIDDING Bid Schedule "A" - 1,000,000 Gallon Water Storage Tank and Tower Bid Schedule "B" - Site Work TOTAL Total Work Completed To -Date Less 5% Retainage Less Pay Estimate No. 1 Less Pay Estimate No. 2' Less Pay Estimate No. 3 Less Pay Estimate No. 4 Less Pay Estimate No. 5 We Recommend Partial Payment of: $31,300.00 $7,200.00 $1,131,300.00 $914,430.00 $31,300.00 $7,200.00 $1,162,600.00 $921,630.00 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: CB&I Certification by Contractor: I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: Date: OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: ot514pe#2 Pay Estimate #6 Date: PE -2 4119/04 $921,630.00 sum of checks $46,081.50 $102,723.50 Check # 38923 $102,723.50 $398,145.00 Check # 39283 $295,421.50 $554,952.00 Check # 39424 $156,807.00 $692,350.50 Check # 39501 $137,398.50 $837,382.25 Check # 39538 $145,031.75 $38,166.25 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: CB&I Certification by Contractor: I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: Date: OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: ot514pe#2 Pay Estimate #6 Date: PE -2 4119/04 26 -Apr -04 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: WATER TREATMENT PLANT / PUMP HOUSE #3, WELL PUMPS #4 & #5 AND SCADA SYSTEM, COP 03-04 Pay Estimate No. 8 Contractor: EnComm Midwest, Inc. Original Contract Amount: $ 802,707.00 Contract Amount After Change Orders: $ 867,247.00 Award Date: June 12, 2003 Completion Date: April 30, 2004 L.17 1 1IYIM I C 114V. O City of Otsego Improvement Project 03-04 Pumphouse #3 Dear Honorable Mayor and Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project PART Bid Schedule "A" - Site W. i, ITEM 5_6 Bid Rrherinle "R" V-4 0;.. _._. _. "'11010.uu $24,255.00 Estimated r-ncomm rmawest Item No. Estimated Used To - Item Description 4" Drain Pipe Sch 40 PVC Number of Unit Unit Price Extension Used To - Extension No. Descri tion Units Unit Unit Price Contract Price Date Extension 1 Gradinq and Excavation 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 90% $2,250.00 2 Structural Backfill LV 400 CY $13.50 $5,400.00 510 $6,885.00 3 Class V Gravel LV 160 TON $16.00 $2,560.00 186 83 $14,322.00 4 Bituminous Wear Course Type LV2 70 TON $83.00 $5,810.00 $9,545.00 5 6" Concrete Walk - Well Head Pad 47 SY $38.00 $1,786.00 1 $4,150.00 6 Silt Fence 300 LF $2.00 $600.00 150 $300.00 7 Seedin includes seed 0.2 AC$3,200.00 $5,250.00 $640.00 1 $5,250.00 8 Mulchingincludes disk anchorin 0.4 TON $1,000.00 $400.00 50% $125.00 9 Fertilizer 100 B LB $1.00 0.00 $10100.00 $2,S 890 $2,670.00 9A Geo rid HDPE Structural Soils Material- C.O.#1 890 $3.00 Crushed Concrete & Asphalt Recycle 1-1/2" to 3" 98 Material- C.O.#1 405 TONS $30.00 $12,150.00 405 $12,150.00 Bid Rrherinle "R" V-4 0;.. _._. _. "'11010.uu $24,255.00 I Uldi - olu acneuwe -_tj - $42,675.00 $46,077.00 01516pe-1 1 Pay Estimate No. 8 4/22/04 Estimated Item No. Number of Used To - 10 Description 4" Drain Pipe Sch 40 PVC Units Unit Unit Price Extension Date Extension 11 3" DIP Class 52 Mechanical Joints 60 70 LF $26.50 $1,590.00 65 $1,722.50 12 6" DIP Class 52 Mechanical Joints 30 LF LF $48.00 $3,360.00 77 $3,696.00 13 12" DIP Class 52 Mechanical Joints 180LF $50.50 $77.00 $1,515.00 $13,860.00 33 $1,666.50 14 16" DIP Class 52 Mecanical Joints 80 LF $115.00 $9,200.00 186 83 $14,322.00 48" Sanitary Manhole/Include Backwash Air Break $9,545.00 15 16 Piping and 6" PVC SDR35 Stub Out 1 EACH $4,150.00 $4,150.00 1 $4,150.00 16A Fittings I Floor Drain Line and See a e Manhole- C.O.#2 1000 LBS $3.50 $3,500.00 1600 $5,600.00 Remove & Reinstalling Fire Hydrant in Temporary 1 LS $5,250.00 $5,250.00 1 $5,250.00 16B Access Road- (C.O.#2 1 LS $250.00 $250.00 50% $125.00 I Uldi - olu acneuwe -_tj - $42,675.00 $46,077.00 01516pe-1 1 Pay Estimate No. 8 4/22/04 Bid Schedule "C" -Well Pumn and Ann—fannn City of Otsego Improvement Project 03-04 Pumohouse #3 Item No. 17 23 Descri tion Submersible Well Pum & Motor Electric Cable Submersible Pum to Well Head 6" Dro Pi e Pitless Ada ter Unit Excavation & Backfill for Pitless Adapter Unit21 includin cuttin 18" Well Casin Electrical Control Panel & Wirin for Well Pum #4 Electrical Control Panel & Wirin for Well Pum #5 Estimated Number of Units 2 400 400 2 2 1 1 Unit EACH LF LF EACH EACH EACH LS Unit Price $14,750.00 $6.50 $17.25 $20,250.00 $1,250.00 $46,355.00 $64,175.00 00 0019 0020 00 Etj_Date 00 0 0 Used To - 0.9 1.3 122 37% 24% Extension $13,275.0018 $26,325.00 $1,250.00 $17,151.35 $15,402.00 23A Revise Control Panel for Revised Operation of Lift Station- C.O.#3 1 LS $20,470.00 $20,470.00 23B Provide Concrete Pad for Control Panel- C.O.#3 1 LS $800.00 $800.00 1 $800.00 Provide Concrete Pad, Primary & Secondary Conduits, Ground Grid for Interim Electrical Service 23C Transformer- C.O.#3 1 LS $6,030.00 $6,030.00 1 $6,030.00 Provide Temporary Control Panel for Lift Station #3 23D until Permanent Control Panel is Installed 1 LS $3,277.00 $3,277.00 100% $3,277.00 23E Upgrade Service From 200 amp to 400 amp for Pum house #3- C.O.#3 1 LS $7,043.00 $7,043.00 1 $7,043.00 23F Well Pump and Control Panel Rental 3 —,MONTH $2,200.00 $6,600.00 Total - Bid Schedule "C" TOTAL PART I o1516pe-1 Pay Estimate No. 6 $236,750.00 $314,041.00 $90,553.35 $160,885.35 4/22/04 r/ir caijrviHIc NV. o City of Otsego Improvement Project 03-04 Pumphouse #3 PART 2 Rini Total - Bid Schedule "A" $324,609.00 $304,496.18 Bid Schedule "R" - Watar Tranfmant P—iliii— 12,125.00 Estimated $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 Item Item Number of Number of Total Estimated Used To - Total Estimated Used To. Description No. Description Units Unit Unit Cost Cost Date Extension 24 Pumphouse Building 1 LS $184,465.00 $184,465.00 98.00% $180,775.70 25 Building Mechanical 1 LS $31,080.00 $31,080.00 93% $28,904.40 26 IPaintinq and Protective Coating 1 LS $18,564.00 $18,564.00 72% $13,366.08 27 Buildin Electrical 8 System Control 1 LS 1 $90,500.00 1 $90,500.00 90% $81,450.00 Total - Bid Schedule "A" $324,609.00 $304,496.18 Bid Schedule "R" - Watar Tranfmant P—iliii— Total - Bid Schedule "B" $147,600.00 $93,183.00 Bid Schedule "C" - rhamiral Trantmant 12,125.00 Estimated $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 Item Item Number of Number of Total Estimated Used To - Total Estimated Used To - Description No. Description Units Unit Unit Cost Cost Date Extension 28 7000 Gallon H dro neumatic Tank 1 LS $25,440.00 $25,440.00 1 $25,44030- 29 Air Compressor 1 LS $6,780.00 $6,780.00 85% $5,763.00 35 Water Treatment and Distribution Piping and 1 LS $3,240.00 $3,240.00 95% $3,078.00 30 Aopurtenances 1 LS I $61,980.00 1 $61,980.00 100% $61,980.00 31 Control Panel H dro neumatic Tank 1 LS $52,500.00 $52,500.00 37 Startup, Operation and Maintenance Manual and 1 LS 1 $41,500.00 1 $41,500.00 1 10%1 $4,150.00 32 Post Startup Operation Assistance 1 LS $900.00 $900.00 Total - Bid Schedule "B" $147,600.00 $93,183.00 Bid Schedule "C" - rhamiral Trantmant Total - Bid Schedule "C" $27,372.00 $26,003.40 Bid Srhadnla "n" - CrAnA c..�te... 12,125.00 Estimated $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 Item Item Number of Number of Total Estimated Used To - Total Estimated Used To - Description No. Description Units Unit Unit Cost Cost Date Extension 33 Chlorine Gas Treatment 1 LS $20,040.00 $20,040.00 95% $19,038.00 34 Poly Phosphate Treatment 1 LS $2,520.00 $2,520.00 95% $2,394.00 35 Fluoridation Treatment —ump 1 LS $3,240.00 $3,240.00 95% $3,078.00 36 Booster and Vaccum Injection 1 LS 1 $1,572.00 $1,572.00 1 95%1 $1,493.40 Total - Bid Schedule "C" $27,372.00 $26,003.40 Bid Srhadnla "n" - CrAnA c..�te... Total - Bid Schedule "D" $41,500.00 $4,150.00 Bid Sr-hpdnla "F" - Mnhilleac^n 12,125.00 Estimated $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 Item Item Number of Number of Total Estimated Used To - Total Estimated Used To - Description No. Descri tion Units Unit Unit Cost Cost Date Extension ----312;125.OU System or on ro Monitoring o --100% _— --$ Pumphouse (including Hydropneumatic Tank with Well #4, Well #5, 1.0 MG Water Tower #2, Sanitary Lift Station #3 with Main Control Connection to WWTP #2, including additional 37 hardware and software with startup 1 LS 1 $41,500.00 1 $41,500.00 1 10%1 $4,150.00 Total - Bid Schedule "D" $41,500.00 $4,150.00 Bid Sr-hpdnla "F" - Mnhilleac^n Total - Bid Schedule "E" TOTAL PART II 0 12,125.00 Estimated $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 Item Number of Total Estimated Used To - No. Description Units Unit Unit Cost Cost Date Extension - 38 - Mobilization and Demobilization- - ---- -- — -- - 1 — --tS— ----312;125.OU $12125 OQ --100% _— --$ Total - Bid Schedule "E" TOTAL PART II 0 12,125.00 $12,125.00 $12,125.00 $553,206.00 $439,957.58 o1516pe-1 3 Pay Estimate No. 8 4/22/04 rN T Ca 111VIH I C NV. 8 City of Otsego Improvement Project 03-04 Pumphouse #3 SUMMARY OF BIDDING PART Bid Schedule "A" - Site Work $34,616.00 $24,255.00 Bid Schedule "B" Yard Piping $42,675.00 $46,077.00 Bid Schedule "C" - Well Pump and Appurtenances $236,750.00 $90,553.35 TOTAL PARTI $314,041.00 $160,885.35 PART II Bid Schedule "A" - Pumphouse $324,609.00 $304,496.18 Bid Schedule "B" - Water Treatment Facilities $147,600.00 $93,183.00 Bid Schedule "C" - Chemical Treatment $27,372.00 $26,003.40 Bid Schedule "D" - SCADA System $41,500.00 $4,150.00 Bid Schedule "E" - Mobilization $12,125.00 $12,125.00 TOTAL PART II $553,206.00 $439,957.58 TOTAL PART I AND II $867,247.00 $600,842.93 TOTAL USED TO -DATE LESS 5% RETAINAGE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: Certification by Contractor: I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: Date: OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date: $600,842.93 $30,042.15 $514,038.50 $56,762.28 0516pe•1 4 Pay Estimate No. 8 4/22/04 Final, Pay Estimate No. 6 I T E M 5-7 City of Otsego Improvement Project 02-04 CSAH 39 and CSAH 42 Traffic Signals larch 22, 2003 Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Improvement Project No. 02-04, CSAH 39 and CSAH 42 Traffic Signals Contractctor: Design Electrical Contractors Contract Amount: $520,656.80 Award Date: July 22, 2002 Completion Date: January 1, 2003 Dear Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Bid Schedule "A" - Streets Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Used To Date Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS $10,000.00 1 $10,000.00 2 Remove 3" Concrete Median 465 SY $7.14 346.44 $2,473.58 3 Remove 6" Concrete Median 20 SY $39.74 0 $0.00 4 Remove Curb and Gutter 1,550 LF $3.62 2354.2 $8,522.20 5 Remove Bituminous Pavement 1,370 SY $2.05 2188.08 $4,485.56 6 Sawing Bit Pavement Full Depth) 3,800 LF $2.36 5550 $13,098.00 7 Sawing Concrete Curb and Gutter and SW 50 LF $21.00 20 $420.00 8 Common Excavation E 620 CY $9.08 620 $5,629.60 9 Granular Borrow LV 700 CY $11.03 700 $7,721.00 10 Topsoil Stripping E 820 CY $9.98 820 $8,183.60 11 Class 5 Aggregate Base 7" 2,250 TON 1$8.66 2678.96 $23,199.79 12 Mill Bituminous Surface 425 SY $5.88 349.17 $2,053.12 13 Type LV 4 Wearing Course Mixture (CJ 660 TON $39.43 628.34 $24,775.45 14 Type LV 3 Non -Wearing Course Mixture B 1,150 TON $35.54 1356.32 $48,203.61 15 Bituminous Material For Tack Coat 600 GAL $1.05 575 $603.75 16 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting 1 EACH $183.75 1 $183.75 17 48" Diameter Storm MH/CB 1 EACH $1,837.50 1 $1,837.50 18 Connect to Existing Storm 1 EACH $2,257.50 1 $2,257.50 19 Concrete Median 3" 860 SY $21.74 977.35 $21,247.59 20 IConcrete Curb & Gutter Design B618 500 LF $9.08 $0.00 21 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B624 2,050 LF $9.77 2478.95 $24,219.34 22 Traffic Control 1 LS $6,825.00 1 $6,825.00 23 Sign Panels, Type C 205 SF $21.53 186.5 $4,015.35 24 Pavement Message (Right Arrow - Epoxy 8 EACH $78.75 20 $1,575.00 25 Pavement Message Left Arrow - Epoxy 14 EACH $78.75 13.5 $1,063.13 26 Pavement Message "ONLY" - Epoxy 19 EACH $89.25 17 $1,517.25 27 4" Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy 1,650 LF $0.19 8693 $1,651.67 28 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy 8,500 LF $0.18 11846 $2,132.28 29 8" Solid Line White - Epoxy 60 LF $0.36 0 $0.00 FILE: Share\Municipal/aotsegolot349pe.xls SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 6 Bid Schedule "A" - Streets (Continued) Final, Pay Estimate No. 6 City of Otsego Improvement Project 02-04 CSAH 39 and CSAH 42 Traffic Signals Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Used To Date Extension 30 24" Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy (Hatching) 300 LF $4.18 441 $1,843.38 31 24" Stop Line White - Epoxy 360 LF $4.10 290 $1,189.00 32 3'x 10' Pedestrian Cross Walk 2,500 SF $2.05 0 $0.00 33 Bale Check 10 EACH $6.83 8 $54.64 34 Silt Fence, Type Machine Sliced 100 LF $3.68 0 $0.00 35 Seeding - T e Lawn Restoration 0.5 ACRE $1,050.00 0.5 $525.00 36 Seeding Mixture - 60B 75 LBS $3.15 90 $283.50 37 Commercial Fertilizer, 10-10-10 250 LBS $0.42 250 $105.00 38 Hydraulic Soil Stabilizer Type 5 0.65 TON $3,360.00 0.75 $2,520.00 39 Full T Act T Control Signal System 1 SIGS $150,341.00 1 $150,341.00 40 2" Non -Metallic Conduit 2,650 LF $2.79 2842.2 $7,929.74 41 3" Non -Metallic Conduit 70 LF $5.27 219.8 $1,158.35 42 2" Rigid Steel Conduit 230 LF $8.20 231 $1,894.20 43 Underground Wire 1 Cond. No. 2 750 LF $0.87 978 $850.86 44 Under round Wire 1 Cond. No. 4 7,920 LF $0.62 17424 $10,802.88 45 Under round Wire 1 Cond. No. 8 10,560 LF $0.47 2084.4 $979.67 46 Service Cabinet - Lighting/Outlets 1 EACH $3,990.00 1 $3,990.00 47 Service Cabinet Foundation 1 EACH $790.00 1 $790.00 48 Lighting Unit Type II 12 EACH $397.00 12 $4,764.00 49 Lighting Unit Type I Foundation 29 EACH $377.00 29 $10,933.00 50 Lighting Unit Type ll 12 EACH $1,607.00 11 $17,677.00 51 Lighting Unit Type 1 29 EACH $3,079.00 28 $86,212.00 52 Pull Box Design M Is 2 EACH $527.00 0 1 $0.00 53 Benches 4 EACH $183.75 6 $1,102.50 54 Trash Rece tacles 2 EACH $143.85 2 $287.70 Total Bid Schedule "A" Change Order #1 $534,128.03 Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Used To Date Extension 1 Removal and Layout 1 LS $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 2 4" Solid White Paint 5,000 LF $0.14 4934.2 $690.79 3 4" Solid Yellow Paint 1,650 LF $0.15 1686.1 $252.92 4 8" Solid White Paint 300 LF $0.30 300.1 $90.03 5 24" Solid White Stop Bar Paint 360 LF $2.75 229.6 $631.40 6 12" Solid Yellow Xhatch Paint 150 LF $1.50 87 $130.50 7 12" Solid White Xhatch Paint 100 LF $1.50 54.3 $81.45 8 Turn Arrows White Paint 22 EA $43.50 29 $1,261.50 Subtotal $4,638.58 Prime Contractor 10% Markup$463.86 Change Order #1 FILE: ShareVdunicipaVaolsego/ot349pe.xls SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 6 $5,102.44 ication #1 Final, Pay Estimate No. 6 City of Otsego Improvement Project 02-04 CSAH 39 and CSAH 42 Traffic Signals em Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Used To Date Extension 1 Changes to Left Turn Lane from Double Left and 1 LS $960.00 1 $960.00 2 Remobilization for Placement of Shorter Davit 1 LS $150.00 1 $150.00 3 Erosion Control Blanket 800 SY $3.00 800 $2,400.00 4 Sodding at Bank of Elk River 807 SY $3.00 807 $2,421.00 5 R & R Apron & Install 8 ft of 31" x 51" RCPA 1 1 LS 1$2,800.46 1 $2,800.46 6 Install 18' of 18" CMP w118" Elbow @ 91st Street 1 LS $740.00 1 $740.00 Subtotal $9,471.46 10% Prime $947.15 Field Modification #1 $10,418.61 Field Modification #2 Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Used To Date Extension 1 Tvpe MV 4 Wearing Course Mix {CJ Difference 660 TON $8.24 628.34 $5,177.52 2 Type MV 3 Non -Wearing Course Mix B Differend 1,150 TON $7.72 1356.32 $10,470.79 Field Modification #1 $15,648.31 SUMMARY Bid Schedule "A" $534,128.03 Change Order #1 $5,102.44 Field Modification #1 $10,418.61 Field Modification #2 $15,648.31 'ARK COMPLETED TO DATE: $565,297.39 .SS LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED $1,500.00 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 $53,634.47 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 $125,247.43 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 $143,369.36 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 4 $137,737.90 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 5 $38,329.45 WE RECOMMEND FINAL PAYMENT OF: $65,478.78 Please verify the amount of previous payments, if any, and the receipt of the following items prior to making payment. 1. Certificate of claims payment (lien waiver), 2. Affidavit of payment of States taxes (MN State TAX Form 134), 3. Letter of consen sure firm. APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: sign lect i al ors Certificatio by C ntr t rJ that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: V Title: LOU i e . Date: —0 e ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANCLERSONI TES, INC. Signe ��"- &I � A Title: i Date: D VNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date: FILE: SharelMunicipaUaolsego/ot349pe.xls SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 6 3 ITEM 6-1 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 20 April 2004 RE: Otsego — Angel Acres NAC FILE: 176.02 — 04.09 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 19 April 2004 to consider the applications for variance, rezoning and preliminary plat for a three -lot subdivision located along 62nd Lane. The applicant, Ms. Cheri Kuhn was present. The Planning Commission discussion focused on the need for variance from the minimum 30 foot bluff line setback. There was testimony during the public hearing from adjacent property owners stating that this site has already experienced significant erosion. Likewise, the Planning Commission was concerned that allowing additional encroachment towards the bluff, which rises 30 to 40 feet above the Mississippi at this location would threaten any proposed dwellings. Based on the finding that the requested variance lacked hardship and was not consistent with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that it be denied. Subsequently, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend denial of the Zoning Map amendment and preliminary plat. The applications are to be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 26 April 2004 at 6:30 PM. DECISION 1 —Variance A. Motion to approve a variance from the bluff setback requirement based on a finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and criteria of the Zoning Ordinance: B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or criteria of the Zoning Ordinance for approval of a variance. C. Motion to table. DECISION 2 — Zoning Map Amendment A. Motion to approve a Zoning Map amendment rezoning the subject site from A-1 District to R-4 District based on a finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. DECISION 3 — Preliminary Plat A. Motion to approve a preliminary plat for Angel Acres, subject to the following conditions: The preliminary plat is revised to provide potential building sites compliant with all applicable setback requirements. 2. The applicant submit a grading plan illustrating proposed house pad elevations and proposed site alterations, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Connection to sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the City of Dayton. 4. Water service is subject to approval of the City Engineer. 5. All easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The applicant shall satisfy park and trail dedication requirements as a cash fee in lieu of land at the time of final plat approval. 7. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. INI Pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Patty Fowler Cheri Kuhn CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MEN-NESOTA APPLICANT: Cheri Kuhn 04-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION VARIANCE APPLICATION: Request for a variance from the front yard setback and bluff setback requirements of the Zoning Ordinance as part of the proposed Angel Acres preliminary plat. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve and is guided for agriculture land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture, Rural Service District Area and is within the Shoreland Overlay District of the Crow River. D. The applicant submitted a preliminary for subdivision of three lots from 1.6 acres of land with one existing single family home. E. The proposed preliminary plat is to be developed under the requirements of the R-4, Residential, Urban Single Family District. F. The preliminary plat illustrates that the proposed principal buildings encroach within required setbacks of 62nd Lane and the bluff line of the Crow River. The applicant is requesting variance to allow for this encroachment. G. Consideration of the application by the Planning Commission and City Council is to be based upon, but not limited to, the criteria outlined in Section 20-6-2.13 of the Zoning Ordinance: In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standard which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of [Section 20-5-2.8.2]. (see below) 2. A variance from the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district or area. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. (2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance]. (3) Special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship shall not be a result of lot or building size, or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of [the Zoning Ordinance] would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] or put the property in question to any reasonable use. H. The subject site is developed with an existing single family dwelling and therefore has a reasonable use. The proposed encroachment into the required setback from the bluff line creates a potential hazard due to severe erosion resulting from grading, loss of vegetation and the weight of the proposed structures. The planning report dated 13 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. K. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is incorporated herein. L. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council deny the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for variance related to the Angel Acres preliminary plat is hereby denied. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 3 CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Cheri Kuhn 04-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION: Request for a Zoning Map amendment rezoning 1.6 acres of the proposed Angel Acres preliminary plat from A-1 District to R-4 District. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve and is guided for agriculture land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture, Rural Service District Area and is within the Shoreland Overlay District of the Crow River. The applicant is requesting a Zoning Map amendment to include the subject site within the R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District for the purpose of subdividing three lots. D. Consideration of the application by the Planning Commission and City Council is to be based upon, but not limited to, the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The subject site is currently outside of the sanitary sewer service district. However, the proposal to rezone the subject site to allow for development with urban services is consistent with the criteria for expansion of sanitary sewer service outlined by the Comprehensive Plan. Furthermore, the intensity of the use is appropriate given surrounding land uses already served by sanitary sewer service. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. The subject site is surrounded by existing single family uses on lots at least one acre in size. Although less than one acre in size, the proposed use is consistent with the character of the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The proposed use does not conform with applicable performance standards as the proposed preliminary plat illustrates encroachment into a required setback from the shoreline bluff of the Crow River and from a public right-of-way. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The proposed rezoning and subdivision of the subject site is not anticipated to impact the area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to generate traffic beyond the capacity of 62"d Lane, which is an improved local street. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City s service capacity. E. The planning report dated 13 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is incorporated herein. G. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council deny the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a Zoning Map amendment related to the Angel Acres preliminary plat is hereby denied. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Cheri Kuhn 04-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION: Request for approval of a preliminary plat entitled "Angel Acres" consisting of three single family lots. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve and is guided for agriculture land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture, Rural Service District Area and is within the Shoreland Overlay District of the Crow River. D. The applicant requested a Zoning Map amendment to include the subject site within the R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District for the purpose of subdividing three lots. This application was denied by the City Council on 26 April 2004 based on a finding that the proposed use did not conform to the applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. E. Lots established after 14 October 2002 within the A-1 District are subject to requirements for a minimum area of 20 acres and minimum width of 450 feet. The three lots illustrated on the proposed preliminary plat do not conform to the minimum lot requirements of the A-1 District. F. The planning report dated 13 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is incorporated herein. H. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council deny the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for approval of the Angel Acres preliminary plat is hereby denied. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk N0.744 P.12/14 Hakanson 1 Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Assoc., Inc, Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Ron Wagner, PE cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Date: April 7, 2004 Re: Angel Acres a. Rezoning, b. Variance, c. Preliminary Plat We have reviewed the application and had the following comments; 1. Water and sewer connections for the two new proposed houses would require removal and replacement of sections of 62 Id Lane NE. 2. The garage floors of the west house would need to be at 885 or higher requiring fill near the bluff line. 3. The garage floor of the east house would need to be at 886.5 or higher requiring fill near the bluff line. 4. Variance required on bluff setback to proposed houses causes concerns on erosion issues and on general house weight causing slope failures. 5. The Crow River is a Nin/DNR protected waterway and the DNR must review the proposed plat for conformance to their standards, Our recommendation wou be to deny approval of the setback for bluff line setback. Civil t+Munic pal Engineering Isrnd Surveying for 25 F= ...,._ 1 \\HaOI\Shared Doca\KtlnieipalWo[sego2xxx\2500\2004\ot2500angelnares.doa ITEM 6.2 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. .5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 20 April 2004 RE: Otsego — Mississippi Cove NAC FILE: 176.02 - 04.08 The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting on 19 April 2004 to consider the above referenced request. Mr. Scott Dahlke spoke on behalf of the developer for the project. The public hearing was well attended by area residents, most from the south side of CSAH 39 along Mason Avenue. Those that spoke were concerned about the proposed transfer of development rights as creating too intensive a project or creating opportunities not available to all parcels subject to rural development restrictions. The Planning Commission was concerned with these issues too. Specific to this application, the Planning Commission was concerned that transfer of development rights from an already developed subdivision was not appropriate. The Planning Commission also believed that the appropriate forum for considering an issue such as transfer of development rights was during the Comprehensive Plan and not in review of a specific development request. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend the City Council deny the proposed Zoning Ordinance text amendment establishing transfer of development rights. The Planning Commission subsequently voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Zoning Map amendment and preliminary plat subject to the conditions outlined by City Staff and conformance with the 12 units per 40 density limits of the R -C District. These applications will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 26 April 2004. Decision 1 — Zoning Text Amendment A. Motion to approve an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance establishing transfer of development rights within the R -C District by conditional use permit. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Motion to table. Decision 2 — Zoning Map Amendment A. Motion to approve a Zoning Map amendment rezoning the subject site from A-1 District to R -C District based on a finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Decision 3 — Preliminary Plat A. Motion to approve a preliminary plat for Mississippi Cove, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall provide for acquisition of necessary right-of-way and construction of Mason Avenue at their expense. 2. The applicant shall provide for a second public access to the proposed subdivision, subject to approval by the City Engineer and Wright County. 3. The applicant is to provide a landscape plan for the Mason Avenue median and Outlot A, which is to include seedling clusters for future buffering along CSAH 39. 4. All street, grading, easements and utilities are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The applicant shall dedicate 18.48 acres in satisfaction of park and trail dedication requirements at the time of final plat approval. 6. The density of the preliminary plat shall not exceed 12 dwelling units per 40 acres consistent with the requirements of the R -C District. PJ B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Decision 4 — Town Plat Vacation A. Motion to approve vacation of the original town plat underlying the subject site based on a finding that the request necessary to allow for development consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Patty Fowler Mike Leuer Scott Dahlke CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 NN -FIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Mississippi 39, LLC 04-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICATION: Request for an amendment to the Otsego Zoning Ordinance to establish transfer of development rights within the R -C, Residential Rural Open Space Cluster District as a conditional use. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of ,fact: A. The requested text amendment is made in conjunction with the proposed Mississippi Cove preliminary plat to allow transfer of three development rights from other properties within the City of Otsego. B. Consideration of the application by the Planning Commission and City Council is to be based upon, but not limited to, the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed transfer of development rights from property not abutting and not under the same ownership raises policy issues related to equal opportunity, development intensity and development character not anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. These questions cannot be adequately evaluated within the context of the current application. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The proposed allowance of transfer of development rights may present compatibility issues for development of the receiving parcel effecting compatibility with surrounding land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: Not Applicable. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: While the overall density of the transferring and receiving parcels would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the concentration of dwellings on the receiving parcel may create developments not in keeping with the intended rural character of the City's unsewered areas. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: No study has been completed to evaluate the effect of density transfer to property values, although no negative impact would be expected. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The potential to transfer development rights has potential to impact streets serving the property, which is an issue to be considered as part of a broader policy discussion. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The effect of transfer of development rights to the City's service capacity has not been adequately explored as part of a comprehensive planning process. C. The planning report dated 19 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. D. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council deny the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a Zoning Ordinance text amendment is hereby denied. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Mississippi 39, LLC 4-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION: Request for a Zoning Map amendment rezoning property to be developed as part of the Mississippi Cove preliminary plat from A-1 District to R -C District. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Rural Residential Preserve and is guided for rural residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture Rural Service District; The applicant has requested rezoning to R -C, Residential Rural Open Space Cluster to allow for development of single family lots within a rural cluster subdivision to be known as "Mississippi Cove". D. Consideration of the application by the Planning Commission and City Council is to be based upon, but not limited to, the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-25 of the Zoning Ordinance: The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The Comprehensive Plan establishes the rural residential preserve for this area of the City to encourage development of unique single family neighborhoods that incorporate natural or rural character elements. This type of development is especially appropriate for areas included in the Mississippi River Wild, Scenic and Recreational River District in terms of density and opportunities for access to the Mississippi River. The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. The table below summarizes surrounding land uses. The proposed development will be compatible with existing or planned land uses in the area. Direction Land Use Plan Zoning Map Existing Use North NA NA Mississippi River East Rural Residential A-1 District Single Family A riculture South Agriculture A-1 District Agriculture Single Family West Rural Residential I A-1 District Agriculture 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment. The proposed use will be required to conform to the open space, neighborhood and general development standards of the R -C District. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The proposed development continues implementation of the R -C District with another unique neighborhood in the rural residential preserve area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The subject site is accessed via CSAH 39, which is a minor arterial roadway. CSAH 39 has adequate capacity to accommodate traffic generated by the proposed dwelling units. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. E. The planning report dated 13 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a Zoning Map amendment is hereby approved. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR LAND TO BE DEVELOPED AS PART OF THE MISSISSIPPI COVE PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property legally described by Exhibit A (the "property"). Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from an A-1, Agriculture Rural Service District designation to a R -C, Residential Rural Open Space Cluster District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication and the filling of a final plat. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Mississippi 39, LLC 4-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION: Request for approval of a preliminary plat to be known as Mississippi Cove consisting of single family lots in a rural open space cluster subdivision. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Rural Residential Preserve and is guided for rural residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned R -C, Residential Rural Open Space District. The R -C District allows for single family dwellings as a permitted use subject to specific design and performance standards outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. D. The preliminary plat consists of 20 proposed single family lots, 14.74 acres of private common openspace, 18.48 acres of public park and public right-of-way. E. The planning report dated 13 April 2004 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Mississippi Cove preliminary plat is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions.- The onditions: The applicant shall provide for acquisition of necessary right-of-way and construction of Mason Avenue at their expense. 2. The applicant shall provide for a second public access to the proposed subdivision, subject to approval by the City Engineer and Wright County. 3. The applicant is to provide a landscape plan for the Mason Avenue median and Outlot A, which is to include seedling clusters for future buffering along CSAH 39. 4. All street, grading, easements and utilities are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The applicant shall dedicate 18.48 acres in satisfaction of park and trail dedication requirements at the time of final plat approval. 6. The density of the preliminary plat shall not exceed 12 dwelling units per 40 acres consistent with the requirements of the R -C District. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO la Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 RESOLUTION NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF THE ORIGINAL OTSEGO TOWN PLAT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL OF MISSISSIPPI COVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY RESOLVE: WHEREAS, the area including portions of the Original Otsego Town Plat is legally described by Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the Original Otsego Town Plat includes lots, blocks and public rights- of-way that do not comply with the standards established by the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, Mississippi 39, LLC has requested approval of a preliminary plat entitled Mississippi Cove; and, WHEREAS, the requested preliminary plat conforms to the requirements of the R -C, Residential Rural Cluster Open Space District; and, WHEREAS, approval of they Mississippi Cove preliminary plat requires vacation of the underlying Original Otsego Town Plat; and, WHEREAS, Mississippi 39, LLC has requested vacation of the underlying Original Otsego Town Plat. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Otsego that the portion of the Original Otsego Town Plat within the boundaries of the subject site is hereby vacated based on a finding that this action will allow for development consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance and that continuation of the Original Otsego Town Plat serves no public purpose. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk N0.744 P-11/14 Hakanson loll Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Sulte 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Assoc., �nc. Phone: 763/427-5860 far: 763/427-0520 �I I ► = ►11 1►� To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Ron Wagner, PE cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Scott Dahlke, Quality Site Design Mike Leuer, Mississippi 39, LLC Date: April 14, 2004 Re: Mississippi Coves — Preliminary Plat We have reviewed the application and had the following comments: 1. The radius of the horizontal curves for streets meets the City Standard. 2. The entrance from CSAR 39 appears adequate with sufficient ability for the neighboring west property to access. A county access permit will be required. 3. We have not received storm water calculations at this time, but the storm sewer layout and pond sizes causes no concerns. The developer will be required to drop the storm sewer within piping and manholes down to ordinary high water of the Mississippi. Also, adequate erosion control at this outlet will be required. This will help prevent erosion from the bluff down to river's edge from happening, 4. A 2nd access is required for s The along County Highways at spacing of %4 mile. A temporary access (can be rural section gravel) or a permanent local street access located across from Naber Avenue is required. Our recommendatioin would be to approve the preliminary plat with the above conditions. Civil cfMunicipal .6ngineering� 5 t28ise Li DocP\gMieipAl�Ao[sego2XXX\2285\o25Msopf, ITEM 6 -3 - NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. '.'--;:: F 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP DATE: 20 April 2004 RE: Otsego — The Village NAC FILE: 176.02 — 04.10 The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting on 19 April 2004 to consider the concept plan submitted by Solid Ground Development, Inc. for development of 40 acres located south of future 70th Street and '/4 mile east of MacIver Avenue, owned by Mr. John Kolles. Mr. Rick Harrison was present to represent the project and gave a presentation regarding the coving principles upon which the site design is based and architecture of the proposed dwellings. The Planning Commission was generally very favorable to the concept plan, although they had some concerns that mirrored those of City Staff. Specific issues to be resolved between the concept plan and a preliminary plat application include minimization of angled side lot lines, design sections for the proposed traffic circle and cul-de-sacs and separation of the proposed bayhomes in consideration of proposed architecture. Another significant issue to be resolved is the City's requirement that all public streets provide a minimum horizontal 250 foot radius to ensure a 30 mile per hour design speed. There were no comments from the public. The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and voted to recommend approval of the concept plan subject to the conditions outlined below. This application is to be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 26 April 2004 at 6:30 PM. A. Motion to approve a PUD Concept Plan for The Villages, subject to the following conditions: 1. Single family lots shall have a minimum area of 9,000 square feet and minimum width of 60 feet measured at the front and rear building lines. 2. There shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet of lot area per bayhome dwelling. 3. The concept plan is revised to substitute bayhome dwellings for the single family lots of Block 6. 4. The traffic square shall be designated for one-way traffic in a counterclockwise pattern with no direct lot access to a one-way street section. 5. Cul-de-sacs with two-way traffic shall provide a minimum street section width of 28 feet. 6. Public sidewalks not within public right-of-way shall be located within an easement and are not to extend more than 20 feet beyond the right-of-way and that the sidewalk not be closer to a dwelling unit than to the public street. 7. The concept plan is revised to minimize all angled side lot lines. Allowance of flag lots is subject to review for sufficient width at the right-of- way line for driveway access, snow storage and on -street parking. 8. The following setbacks shall be applied to the subject site, subject to approval of a PUD -CUP. Additional flexibility to reduce the separation between the bayhome units may be considered subject to review of proposed architectural designs. Front Side Rear Between Bayhome Bayhome To Pvt. Dr. Wetland 70 St. Local Street 65ft. Livin Gara a 1Oft. 20ft. 20ft. 25ft. 40 ft. 1 25ft. 30ft. 9. Park and trail dedication requirements shall be satisfied as a cash fee in lieu of land in effect at the time of final plat approval. 10. Trail corridors extended between public streets shall be platted within minimum 30 foot wide outlots and dedicated to the City in addition to park and trail dedication requirements. 11. The comments of the City Engineer in their memorandum of 14 April 2004 are incorporated herein. 2 B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. C. Motion to table. pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Jeffery Bock Rick Harrison John Kolles CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MENNESOTA APPLICANT: Solid Ground Development, Inc. 04-20-04 FINDINGS & DECISION PUD -CUP CONCEPT PLAN APPLICATION: Request for concept plan approval of a 114 dwelling subdivision entitled The Village designed based upon coving principles. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 26 April 2004 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the West Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for low density residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1 Agriculture Rural Service Area District. The concept plan would require a Zoning Map amendment to R-6, Residential Townhouse, Quadraminium, and Low Density Multiple Family District and PUD -CUP. D. The applicant has requested concept plan approval as provided for by Section 20-36-4.0 of the Zoning Ordinance. E. The planning report dated 2 October 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The engineering review dated 14 April 2004 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. G. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting 19 April 2004 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a PUD - CUP concept plan for The Village is hereby approved, subject to the following conditions: Single family lots shall have a minimum area of 9,000 square feet and minimum width of 60 feet measured at the front and rear building lines. 2. There shall be a minimum of 9,000 square feet of lot area per bayhome dwelling. 3. The concept plan is revised to substitute bayhome dwellings for the single family lots of Block 6. 4. The traffic square shall be designated for one-way traffic in a counterclockwise pattern with no direct lot access to a one-way street section. 5. Cul-de-sacs with two-way traffic shall provide a minimum street section width of 28 feet. 6. Public sidewalks not within public right-of-way shall be located within an easement and are not to extend more than 20 feet beyond the right-of-way and that the sidewalk not be closer to a dwelling unit than to the public street. 7. The concept plan is revised to minimize all angled side lot lines. Allowance of flag lots is subject to review for sufficient width at the right-of-way line for driveway access, snow storage and on -street parking. 8. The following setbacks shall be applied to the subject site, subject to approval of a PUD - CUP. Additional flexibility to reduce the separation between the bayhome units may be considered subject to review of proposed architectural designs. Front Side Rear Between Bayhome Bayhome To Pvt. Dr. Wetland 70 St. Local Street 65ft. Living Gara e 1 Oft. 20ft. 20ft. 25ft. 40 ft. 25ft. 30ft. 9. Park and trail dedication requirements shall be satisfied as a cash fee in lieu of land in effect at the time of final plat approval. 10. Trail corridors extended between public streets shall be platted within minimum 30 foot wide outlots and dedicated to the City in addition to park and trail dedication requirements. 11. The comments of the City Engineer in their memorandum of 14 April 2004 are incorporated herein. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of April, 2004. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk nr rt . GG . GrJ VJ4 1 G � � rrr� N0.744 P.13i14 Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Assoc., Inc. Phone:763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Ron Wagner, PE cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Rick Harrison, Rick Harrison Site Design Studio Jeff Bock; Solid Ground Development John Kolles Date: April 14, 2004 Re: The Village — Concept Plan We have reviewed the Concept Plan and had the following comments: 1. Many of the horizontal curves within the plat do not meet the minimum radius of 250'. 2. Are the cul-de-sacs one-way cul-de-sacs? If not, the width of street does not meet 28' minimum. 3. Cul-de-sacs are shown with center median, Planning Commission and Council should review how these areas are maintained. 4, Several flag lots are within the plat and are below the standard street frontage required. more than four homes are located on driveways or private streets. City Standard has been all driveways or private streets must have 28 foot wide roadway if 4 or more homes are served by the road, 6. Sidewalks and paths meander through right-of-way which isn't an issue, but generally the sidewalks and paths should be closer to the road/curb than to homes. The large expanses of right-of-way create concerns over: a. Who maintains — homeowners, association or City. Civil 6Municipal �� ,Engineering LandSurvryingfar �;nMIK L,�-� \\HaOAShup✓4 Doce\MunicipollAouego2xxx\2277\ot2277hmccmamo.doc Mr - M. GG. GUVJ4 lcerrM , NO. 744 P. 14/14 b. Homeowners will likely end up treating the large expanses of right-of-way as front yards an install items which are generally not allowed in right-of-way (i.e. trees, gazebos, swings, gardens, etc). c. With sidewalks very close to homes some homeowners become very waryof strangers. Some paths are within 10' of the front door while 45' from curb. 7. The square round -a -bout has traffic calming qualities, but raises question for traffic related issues. Is it one way? How will it be signed? What are the speed limits (10 mph, maybe 5 mph)? 8. A temporary connection (call be rural and gravel) needs to be maintained to 67th Street. This must be on the Developers property. This will require Lot 11 Block 4 to wait until property to east develops before it is buildable. 9. The western 500' of 67th Street is planned to be upgraded to urban residential street standards. This concept shows 4 lots requiring sewer and water from 67ts' Street. The Developer of this plat will be required to pay % of the cost for the street and utility upgrade at time of final plat and must send infon-nation regarding the locations of the sewer and water stubs required, The City will reimburse the Developer of Otsego Preserve. Our recommendation would be to deny approval of the Concept Plan. Hakanson Anderson Assoc , Inc. 1\1ia01VShared Does\Munioipol\Aotsego2xxx\2277\ot2277hmeememo.doe NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. PF 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP APPLICATION: Otsego - Arbor Place, Final Plat REPORT DATE: 20 April 2003 NAC FILE: 176.02 - 04.14 BACKGROUND Emmerich Development Corporation has a final plat for Arbor Place following approval of an 11 lot preliminary plat on 23 February 2004. The subject site guided by the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential use and is zoned R-6, Residential Townhouse, Quadraminium and Low Density Multiple Family District. Exhibits: A. Site Location B. Preliminary Plat C. Final Plat ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat Consistency. The proposed final plat is the same number of lots and same design as the preliminary plat. The submitted final plat illustrates existing improvements on the existing property. Preliminary plat approval was conditioned upon removal of all detached accessory buildings. Lots 2-5 are required to access 79th Lane and a landscape plan for the rear yards of these lots abutting 80th Street has been submitted. Lot 1, Block 1 is the location of the existing dwelling and the construction plans indicate two possible driveways one to 80th Street (existing) and one to 79th Lane. Only one driveway is allowed. It would be preferred if the existing driveway to 80th Street could be closed, but the orientation of the garage makes this problematic. Sidewalks. The construction plans illustrate sidewalks on the south side of 79th Street and east side of Large Avenue. The sidewalk on 79th Street should likely be shifted to the north side of the street to provide a longer continuous path when the street is extended to the east. Construction Plans. The applicant has submitted construction plans for the proposed area of the final plat. These plans address grading, street and utility construction and other site improvements. The construction plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Park and Trail Dedication. There is no land being dedicated for park and trail purposes from the area of the final plat. As such, the applicant must pay a cash fee in lieu of land to satisfy park and trail dedication as per Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The current cash fee in lieu of land is $2,820.00 per dwelling or $31,020 for this final plat. Development Contract. The applicant is required to enter into a development agreement with the City and pay all applicable fees and securities upon approval of a final plat. The development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Arbor Place Final Plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat as well as the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Our office recommends approval of the requested final plat, subject to the conditions below. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve the Arbor Place Final Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. Lot 1, Block 1 shall be allowed only one driveway access and all existing detached accessory buildings are to be removed. 2. The sidewalk shall be located on the north side of 79th Street, subject to approval by the City Engineer. 3. All construction plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant shall pay a cash fee of $$31,020 in lieu of land to satisfy park and trail dedication requirements. 2 5. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and pay all fees and securities required by it, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 6. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. C. Motion to table. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Tim Rochel Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner John Jackels Dave Nash 1 0 SCALE IN MILES NOTE' 11" MAP IS FDA PLANWIG PURPOSES ONLY 411J 51f0lXD N01 DE USED WHEN PRECISE MEASINiCKNIS Flit RtQUinfo WISE WIF SCARCE Wnkilil CU NITY Stfid YDRS (filU , 7-26.89 m 4{ � I � a ou3a ss°3= i o c Flu I ie — 7i N�1j� LQ 5 CL —� F 2 C =Eve _Lol s i _ r O <' a Q n y d I 9 co 8 a @3 @a - Iu � 99qq .YP y 4{ � I � a ou3a i o c Flu I ie — 7i N�1j� LQ 4{ � I � a 7A M�°4 M I ie — L N�1j� LQ d iv -1I I/V-*q V &JUN V" / W7,-,. Z a T— S I I HIBIT B m y �'-�umap s xLlnaM Iwai mwn IAIt) 1 1 I `.j I it f— . traerr Aa P A4p O@ 1- � t , ARBOR -,LACE •••• -m uss MTw War lrcx�Rtal. ••. •• 80TH STREET N.E. ,"x�,ajtR N, Ir4vlr murnaW-�. N WOM • Kcal lR aM EAAND Ra•rrcw)-�� tt '_ $ 79TH � T •:• �.• 1 1 1 1 I Ar1nrt ss� 0 �1po KlAtIEtaM 129.57-75.00 r`w __ ....- B; WAINAQ i R 8 DWI7 EASDEN7 j L—_ -- r-- -7 r-----, � r— r--------- I I II Ik I I II II II II I �I II I J L ----J73.1111 ----J --- — \�-------- - 1 ,cm 74.9.3 - GRAPHIC SCALE 40 20 •0 w ( 1N FEET ) a�-L.47.12 '_ $ 79TH 1 LAME N. E. $ •:• �.• I; - - L.47.12 ' i R.3000 2 I yBOTO'00� X1.26 , 308.•1 `4 ._.• n/ ; 1 _----135.09----11 155.32 I rt------------ H Or RECOBZIWO Or MS PLAT. i Y� z r r I W Z. bfYN NN 1/4 OF SECTION 25, 1. M. R 24 PAS AN ASSWED BEARMO OF MBD'30'5ei. Z 4�eer: I. '9ATI ••• Z •� --� 1 NM9'46'3YE J ---------- -----1B3os-----ql r r �: — -- 1 4. 84.45 -----� •�•: - N,N •, � I lu 41 �I 5 SI i 2 I IW I I I I ;33 b� J I------se9b—'zsv-----.�----"e9vssztJ L — — bIN7 ,X ---- 18109 r sl I gl 3 I I -----JT ; 182.56 -----.J L------- 1 3p'68'w 425.67 .. .. . _ . . 1 5 -4IAEa rrasnuwArs WaN •frM NE M14T•.s Pealp>ulAt Atar GRAPHIC SCALE 40 20 •0 w ( 1N FEET ) McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. LrW ENGINEERS AND DSURVEYORS SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEET' • O[Nons 1/2 MOI 8, 14 MCH NNM PPE NONMWI TOM) O DENOTES 1/2 DIOL BY 14 MCN MOI PIPE HO WENT TO BE SET MID MAIMED BY LICENSE NO. 172M N11f1 CE YEAR O,, H Or RECOBZIWO Or MS PLAT. r FOB THE PLI POKS Or MIS SIMNEY AIC NOAH LME 01 AE W Z. bfYN NN 1/4 OF SECTION 25, 1. M. R 24 PAS AN ASSWED BEARMO OF MBD'30'5ei. Z 4�eer: p I h=jie j - �R¢S DRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: TO w r Q5 -10 5 10 _L___J L___J_ ui ♦r� �vv Ni I BOND S R[1 M NOM MESS DMNYK NPCATiD, ATO AD.ONNO LOT UES. AND 10 FEET M WON, MESS OINOINLSE &PIC.ARD. AAD AWWW R T -OF NAY MS. AS SNOW ON NE qAl. B8 � raD1 I McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES. INC. LrW ENGINEERS AND DSURVEYORS SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEET' r-irr[ . cc . GYJrJ4 1G � �JbF-'I"I ENGINEERING REVIEW Hakanson Residential Subdivision Anderson for the City of Otsego Assoc., Inc. By N0.744 P.7i14 Item Review No. 3 Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. MENNOWNEMEMEMMEMN Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Eric Seashore, PE, McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. John Jackels, OhW. LLC Reviewed by: Ronald J. Wagner, P.E. Shane M. Nelson, E.I,T. Date: April 22, 2004 Proposed Development: Arbor Place Street Location Of Property: The northeast corner of the northwest 1/4 of Section 25, T121 N, R24W, 5.0 acres, south of 80th Street NE, north of 79th Street NE, and east of Lander Avenue NE, Applicant: John Jackels OhW. LLC 1875 Station Parkway NE, Bldg, 1 Andover, Minnesota 55304 (763) 755-6554 Developer: Owners of Record: OhW. LLC Burns and Debbi Doran Purpose: Arbor Place is a proposed 11 lot residential development on 5.0 acres in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota. The proposed development will be served with municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and public streets typical of an urban setting. Jurisdictional Agencies; City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota Department of (But not limited to) Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Wright Soil and Water Conservation District. Permits Required (But not limited to): NPDES MHaOUShared Docs\MunlclpaWtsego2xxx\22791ot2279RVW3.doc APR.22.2004 12:06PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE FINAL PLAT GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT TITLE SHEET SITE PLAN STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN DETAILS SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION MaMShared OocslMunlclpaMotsego2xxx122791ot2279RVW3.doc N0.744 P.8i14 APR.22.2004 12:06PM INFORMATION AVAILABLE N0.744 P.9/14 Preliminary Plat, 2/11/04 revision, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, 2/11/04 revision, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Preliminary Utility Plan, 2/11/04 revision, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Storm Sewer Calculations, 2/27/04 Revision, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Drainage Areas and Runoff Calculations, 3/24/04, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. Final Plat, 4/14/04, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc. General Plan of Development, 4/14/04, by McCombs Frank Roos Associates, Inc, City of Otsego Engineering Manual, 2003 Update City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, 10/14/02 FINAL PLAT 1. No comments. GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT TITLE SHEET 1. No comments. SITE PLAN 1. No comments. STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN 1. Our inspection records indicate that approximately 40LF of 15" RCP (Inv.= 946.37) was stubbed to the north out of the existing storm manhole (CBMH27) on Large Avenue NE. Please adjust plans accordingly. SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN PLAN 1. The sanitary sewer stub to the east from sanitary MH 1 shall be SDR 26. 2. The note to "Lower water services to maintain 18" clearance from storm sewer" should apply to all three services on Large Avenue NE. 11Ma01\Shered Docs\Munlcipal\Aotsego2xxx\2279\ot2279RVW3.doc APR.22.2004 12:07PM N0.744 P.10i14 3. Our inspection records indicate that approximately 184' of 8" sanitary sewer pipe (Inv.= 940.48) was stubbed to the north out of the sanitary manhole at the intersection of 79th Street NE and Large Avenue NE, The manhole was set 0,20' low, FINAL GRADING PLAN 1. Revise plan to depict earth berms (4' high min.) in bufferyard area abutting 80th Street NE in Block 1. (21-16-7.D.3.b) The earth berms may be broken at the lot lines to allow for positive drainage (I have attached an example). 2. Please depict the rock entrances on the plan, 3. A minimum slope of 2% must be provided for Block 1, Lots 3 and 4. There is no ditch system for 80m Street NE at this location (it is an urban section with bituminous curb). Please revise the grading to provide a minimum slope of 2% to the 80th Street curb. 4. The proposed spot elevation for Block 2, Lot 2 shall be revised to provide a minimum slope of 2%. 5. Erosion control measures shall be specifically called out for the 3:1 slope on the east side of Large Avenue NE. (I.e. wood fiber blanket) 6. The existing electrical box in Block 1, Lot 2 must be relocated. Please add a note. 7. The existing septic system in Block 1, Lot 2 must be removed in accordance with state standards. DETAILS 1. No comments STORM SEWER DESIGN 1, The addition of the runoff from Arbor Place has increased the flow through the downstream storm sewer (in Arbor Creek) to slightly greater than the capacity. Considering that the downstream storm sewer has already been constructed and the proposed flow rates are not significantly greater than the capacity, we will allow the connection for this case. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS 1. No comments. SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION We recommend approval contingent on the above comments. \\Ha01\shared Docs\MUNclpal\Aotse902rooc\2279\ot2279RVW3.doc ITF_M 6 -5 - NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP APPLICATION: Otsego - Arbor Creek; 2nd Addition Final Plat REPORT DATE: 19 April 2003 NAC FILE: 176.02 - 04.13 BACKGROUND Emmerich Development Corporation has submitted plans for the final plat of Arbor Creek 2nd Addition. The proposed final plat consists of 172 single family lots. The subject site is currently platted as Outlots B and C of the Arbor Creek final plat. The subject site guided by the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential use and is zoned R-6, Residential Townhouse, Quadraminium and Low Density Multiple Family District. The Arbor Creek preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on 10 March 2003. Exhibits: A. Site Location B. Preliminary Plat C. Final Plat ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat Consistency. The proposed final plat includes the same number of lots over the same area of the subject site, except that there is one less lot in Block 10 and one additional lot in Block 8. All of the proposed lots conform to the requirements of the R-6 District and Shoreland Overlay District. One change from the preliminary plat is the extension of 76th Street to the east plat line. The preliminary plat identified a street connection to the east in the area of Lots 4 and 5 of Block 7. The applicant has cooperated with City Staff to relocate the street connection to provide better access and circulation between the subject site, Martin Farms and future subdivision of the Dale Beaudry property. Feedlot Setback. Section 20-27-9 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a 1,000 foot setback for any new dwelling from a registered feedlot. The 1,000 foot boundary from the Berning feedlot on the north side of 80th Street crosses through Lots 9 and 10, Block 2 and Lots 1-4, Block 3 according to the preliminary plat. The applicant must provide house plans for these lots illustrating compliance with the setback requirement or the lots must be platted as outlots. Construction Plans. The applicant has submitted construction plans for the proposed area of the final plat. These plans address grading, street and utility construction and other site improvements. The construction plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Park and Trail Dedication. The applicant dedicated land adjacent to the west treatment with the first final plat of Arbor Creek. This land only partially satisfied the applicant's park and trail dedication requirements outlined by Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The balance of the required park and trail dedication is to be in the form of a cash fee in lieu of land as shown in the following calculations: Cash Fee x Remaining Dedication = Required Fee/Lot x # of Lots = Payment $2,820.00/dwelling x 69.9% = $1971.18/dwelling x 172 lots = $339,042.96 The park parcel is identified as Outlot B on the final plat. This parcel was dedicated to the City with the first addition final plat. As such, the area of the park should be removed from this final plat drawing. Development Contract. Section 9 of the Subdivision Ordinance establishes guarantees provisions for proposed improvements. The applicant is required to enter into a development agreement with the City and pay all applicable fees and securities. The development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Arbor Creek 2nd Addition Final Plat is consistent with the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and the approved preliminary plat. As such, our office recommends approval of the requested final plat, subject to the conditions below. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve the Arbor Creek 2nd Addition Final Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. House plans are submitted for Lots 9 and 10, Block 2 and Lots 1-4, Block 3 illustrating compliance with the feedlot setback required by Section 20- 27-9 of the Zoning Ordinance or the lots are to be platted as outlots, subject to City Staff approval. 2. The final plat is revised to eliminate Outlot B, which was dedicated to the City with the first final plat of Arbor Creek. 3. All construction plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. The applicant shall pay a cash fee of $339,042.96 in lieu of land to satisfy park and trail dedication requirements. 5. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and pay all fees and securities required by it, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. C. Motion to table. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Tim Rochel Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner John Jackels Dave Nash 3 0 T S E G 0 ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD j BABE MAP DATA PROVIIBD BY ==Nac �of son 'InAnderson Assoc.,Inc. PREPARED OCTOBER 2001 NOTE: THIS MAP IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD 'NOT BE USED FOR EXACT MEASUREMENT. • ycu cm PROPERTY DESCRIPTION zz DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY w yi oac SIDEWALK DEV OPM NT NOT s GRAPHIC SCALE w JT1 60 170 • mewl �R ry R u ra no• ,R Yp1MlIT IpOO O mewl TR Ia R �. rd Iie, ,.( MPIYMT A - 1R i •fie® R UmDL 11a. 11100 eM 01! wN P TIIIIOK P M Iu,. TOI M ,1IM'N. P M -ew1 M tl-ULP MMI INPRC141 i. . n. •. i+ we �+ YI�YO IUi v rrar�rr. D"W4E rwsmmM u[ SHD r TM (r0T ro XNt) - 11 , ,� � NO M4.e X01116 /e q . —1 is -P YY IKlY �- ARBOR CREEK 2ND ADDITION C-4 ARBOR Wot m. mnenl.yu.�ne.exwe•��+Lnp+uu �n..ce�.�r�ol w�'�gni�e�n. el r.m..e...ma �10 5TI REEK. ,cc..a nv o In• r.core.. a In.r.el. .19nl CeunlY.Nm �•el,t .•y.e .ne rlul•e. •R BOP GREE. rNO ,OOIIION ,ne eo•. .•...nl.. ..•..• p e•. .'y'.. ce,.. 4,n^p lr. 'n. I�n•p; n� Ion •n oun.<c,u• •lao __ iN rOFN NE•OTA o rn. eu•un•.nnwm.m .nnnl.e ee.�... m. ... e•r° ,n w uc IEmm.r.cn .. CnI.I4,n.p.ro n ,, umn••eu unneelueluirran o. yr on e.n.na m•<.mwny y .m m...r.n E.: ,. .n•e�n•..nnalnY n..... n e • m � � .�a• . win . ii, m.. <� sr<np: soi ox �s�•e l <<rvxel�<I rl9n••rY• l0 0• e.•19n•1.1 011.., ln,n .• n..n. ty OF u.nn. 1, Er.•n• ass �OVN 11 OP'.. O Ir�ss r• E s.r <io _ r n. r xa,en �.n, s.r .ro Nln�� I. u.•n.. xn r emm�•.�e�c.sn.. i,�rr:. rnsi �ioua •R BOR CPEE[}xD .o O.TlOxn Yx.•ry..�n•C.m.l..len .. roe _ •.v. Orn n.,ol. .. s • •. m..onp n..e In _ __••/ --___ loUPeoR cRE E. zxD AO D1,lON 11 .rr..... ... .curl...n <em pn•n<. •un oe.9 •a. •Y O. CIb Nunce el •]001j p1 u.y o, Nlnn.aou. .l• pu ..mo p •le .n ___d.,el__._ N•ru in•rl•e.••............•rrw.n ul•_..ya—..- _ ° __ Nr r.pn. Counly NI•n..y En9.n..r srue es.• r•u•Ul.•49n pu-__-. .n•u•nuu .n....e. -_ e.. el iioo — I n•r.nr ...Illy 1P,1 I.... r•lo•l. in ln. y.•r 1—. ncr.1. e.,<n•.e ,.. p• a In., e.r .l r1......... II.•..... n. r.er c.•. r •..nl, ,n•vu..n.n•• AMI M 1•• e1T1.. •11n. Ceuntr R.c e.9.r l.r r.co.e on c••nlr p.ce.e•1-__— _ _— wrMn. CREEK 2ND ADDITION .' - PRAM'S DI 1 5 1, APR 14 2004 lanraZ ♦ ,.�.,�, Frank DETAII. oat Rc()s Aswc., Inc NOT TO sc•, .. m _ Y\� esri �, , \.,\ i•I.`s<wiw - a.a .Ili , .• \ 1 \ , y 1 1 It • i \ \ ` \ �' I I r SEE I _L— a�a DETAIL — — — — — — — — L;'t r• _ ar I I -J EXHIBIT C•1 i 77I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1'I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I—..—•IEaL• .'�=.. r-�-i MCCOMHS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS `ew.er�l y._K4•I•R a.l.•}• --.. r _.�fy. .ate..—•. �. _ lr�T'R hxT' •a� I GRAMC Sat I t o r o I I 19•nM � �-- I I I I (MFla,> • m•In I/r •10l M 1, rlol a411R 1p•rYT 10..a o mon lA •lol •+ a •d •.> we enp 411•®9Y t�7ri 9Y7f -�� 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 // I I I I 1 I I 1 1 / �Sr� 1• __ "" ; 'r ; .. .Y ■ L f a! 4d1•p1AcaT umra b Urns am aE to or – _L_L_L_L_LJ-J—LCL`/; / �`^�?.��\ KI ._. � ( 1 1 1 1�5 '/�-� \ ii r0• K 111c096 O M •aar K 4u•1 ua a M w Ve a atlas a T. Ift,eY9•xar•/al.m■rear I I I , T` f i I I I 1 1 I I �I -lrl��1-�-Ast' m _ Y\� esri �, , \.,\ i•I.`s<wiw - a.a .Ili , .• \ 1 \ , y 1 1 It • i \ \ ` \ �' I I r SEE I _L— a�a DETAIL — — — — — — — — L;'t r• _ ar I I -J EXHIBIT C•1 i 77I I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1'I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I—..—•IEaL• .'�=.. r-�-i MCCOMHS FRANK ROOS ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ARBOR CREEK 2ND ADDITION i—1r---7Ir a - 12 lis '!ILJ L J L '�\ � 3 W'A"•' \ \\ s..••oY� �_� see•n'm•E +Yae t�j� b�"°r Ll7ie'e // / / s'�"se...e e-it•se' _' i e%° �. i v°e.o��ti• /// \ Ty \ ✓°y�•,yy`TyS�T e' 77TH: STREET N.E. • t y e-zr 4, r/ ,�-°b��P°• • to vye s �o.p: l C`e`i ;*-1 z+er —1 -ugr ,.C�.r —"i\ \ 4 X00, """ a ys' 70�Tt �0 e•.e •s \ 1 ;Eg \ 1 \ \ \ \ : \ \ Z °O �'°\+e. r 1 1 li 2 N 3 pk 4 A 5 6 7 I. 16 9 10 . Q I I / • d xl�W I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I mM / % WE� p Ln�JL_n�JL��JL�t-JLssLJLJL�aJ••`-�L�,uJ�,..,• ° / �\ \ ' rte`8 Wo t 797H STREET N.E. r-so{'�=• / ! � 1 !1 � �/`� - `-"- _ ,�{• sae•xnti so es qaT s .,,`00 •Je'll•M ' ..,��eer,rrer,r,�er��r—�T,�Tt• °w ss0 i.i.oye e.•>o.00 a e ^' / ! !`� /�' �� WET LAND r I ..-'� -� � J f- I I I I I I �WP�; I I � b l _�•�_°_D"•� a/ \ !! // ---- ��''' p1YYG[ AMO VRJIY U9EIEN,S YE SW- TIMI (MOf TO SOAR) a baa d2 i7 �i 3 P � p 7 I L r , . • seOt , etbOTY ..::,i ;�=^ I ! ( / �e Ire= nx _ YLn�°'�__' 11 2 'sca=Y�:��,f 4�f 1r— yr 12 lis '!ILJ L J L '�\ � 3 W'A"•' \ \\ s..••oY� �_� see•n'm•E +Yae t�j� b�"°r Ll7ie'e // / / s'�"se...e e-it•se' _' i e%° �. i v°e.o��ti• /// \ Ty \ ✓°y�•,yy`TyS�T e' 77TH: STREET N.E. • t y e-zr 4, r/ ,�-°b��P°• • to vye s �o.p: l C`e`i ;*-1 z+er —1 -ugr ,.C�.r —"i\ \ 4 X00, """ a ys' 70�Tt �0 e•.e •s \ 1 ;Eg \ 1 \ \ \ \ : \ \ Z °O �'°\+e. DITCH y GRAPHIC SCALE �.-p�; __� ' • poYm ,R nol M YOM YOM wt Morton nAr --Flo — —e _ [o p0 4 so w +30 i o e M +/I Yp R Y rw YYr AR Morton M ee �- 1[T YO A K nmr b. +1100 YII� Ui ,[M (M IFFY ) Y 11[CYYi d IIO •,AT. pY 1 RT Y YIK YYLY OMwt i - MWYY r Y.AM 101 ,16 YY r �- IA M Yt.OaT v M VrT M MOYY ,MOM Ton r ort wd Yv tY. ns MM,/t OI rL101 74 1,111, lM MA{ M t011m 11Y Yam"X11.0 ot.1 U4 Y YMrI KArC O / ■7Yee' L W M MI. McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASnOCI TES, INC. 6 7 $ 9 10 -EXHIBIT CY2 d $ \ \\ 2 Al rh e, \ // _•wO �_! p1YYG[ AMO VRJIY U9EIEN,S YE SW- TIMI (MOf TO SOAR) DITCH y GRAPHIC SCALE �.-p�; __� ' • poYm ,R nol M YOM YOM wt Morton nAr --Flo — —e _ [o p0 4 so w +30 i o e M +/I Yp R Y rw YYr AR Morton M ee �- 1[T YO A K nmr b. +1100 YII� Ui ,[M (M IFFY ) Y 11[CYYi d IIO •,AT. pY 1 RT Y YIK YYLY OMwt i - MWYY r Y.AM 101 ,16 YY r �- IA M Yt.OaT v M VrT M MOYY ,MOM Ton r ort wd Yv tY. ns MM,/t OI rL101 74 1,111, lM MA{ M t011m 11Y Yam"X11.0 ot.1 U4 Y YMrI KArC O / ■7Yee' L W M MI. McCOMBS FRANK ROOS ASnOCI TES, INC. ARBOR CREEK 2ND ADDITION .r,e1r'-, • 1 - '.�' _� _ �` r �"- � r -aae- � r -]sem, r �xr 1 r mgr; r �a"'l r ��, r � 1 r -nom 1 r '1 Ir 611 J gC� '� �' t ea ('� I i II 117 II II II II 11 II II I 3 I I (J I r - - F - - -I. ,r I I �I :elkI k �I k �I 6 t 1I 6 12 'I 13 14 'I 15 1 2 3 I• A I 1\� 2 3 14 Og'g 5 1-I 6 7 $ a� g 10 �F p �F° I y.•. • II I I I I I I I ISI I I II,,,,,. I I I I I I I I I I ` t n� I I I I I i J L nm -1 L J L_- J L �nl L y9L J L �s9� J L �aL J J 6: = w•, ids J L — ` =-r„ I I �nnr rr�u-w r+n' I i L 1,� J" "L sov rm zw.7s a o es, •v'se t� a 4�p; J L _gym J L — — J" "C �t'-i J woxeo Re9ps.xe w, rs9 1 I"� '501 a STREET 8 N.E. �+ a -vacs .n.o.0; . •oo'se' i sot�eti ]m,0a t e t I S00'IJxei t `S f ]0-66 1TH poo eaa•,J•.J• 4a? ; , t �LANNON AVENUE N.E. '9aJas.xs �„rs.• I ,ao.n �,� ¢I�8• tnw s�yedt` , •a, — — r 6'r X48 I yule oJ.x ^`s el r gs I,oe yes` — ---r'��d .-n0.eo a-1 eoo.xe eaoros' r•= „�.y,r rm.•i` f- R,ar n - s 1 r_y� Eml r T`°e I r „m 1 (�11 I �"'a I..I rl 1 I I I I • 18 1 ;1, \ w{l f_ "• Irarasr, rrrn e, I I „ I I I ell �I b I 74 8 I g 1p 11 12 p 1 \a• \ .,;,,� - i- 1 �b 2 �k 3��71, L —L -au -J L-ba-sJ L---'orc J L y, J L -?U- " „— 1 ac =1 - �. iT rea�°rs 1 ra 1 r - �°° L _ svraa \ \ 12 ou �.� �r -1 f *s -1 r �+,. I I I I 1 1 *r" -- %I r -1 I I I' r - - \ r 11 I I 11 12 ;l k 17 9 6 16 � b 15 � 1 a � 13 1 1 I I e. 18 1 „mss+ \ 11 r 1s 51k la ka` g� � �I 1 \ \ j 23 kj 22 � 21 k 2O �a � � � I � tj I I i 1 1 � � L _ -Xgvw \ `• \ 13 �'�\ w�I 1 II ,,�g:11 '!;t— -j a'J�;yaJL.am-_JL��JL� 8 ,sari I1, ryva• aru_rJ�`s L= 'ry r-- 15 �1--"'d l"] J L= .s .x .-,5,9.], Doss xnoo t sVy -0a. Jsi�'3 w01 l•lae.i♦ e-1110.11 W'e�09 a-0roe 19 --- LANGLEY AVENUE N.E. t *h J ,\ ♦ bye ,,; J �e ,!•1 M1'S] f] ,00ze la^} II 1 Sm]7051 as.ao �. :C 1 14 `a. tv,se 9] R -I o9J,�4 1 ---- I ..; 9r9r-34—*�� r meter r �r r •\ p \ •,pau, v,.as aozn9 .rytR -'1 r ` yr N L-xw.ox e-tnR.], e�r'I "' IE 14 R, 1 \\ 15 E IM3yyi11 I I II ,1tw 7 9 8 9 10 11 r GRAPHIC SCALE'1 \\ 1 • \ I `I § q 1 3 1 1 4 5' �1 6 I I ( 4 1 I 6 i 3 I I "j-= 91 I I I I I I I I I I I I F h F ,..... LKS � L Jvoi- J L _n -m_ J L J}xo_ J L .ate J L — — —: y p I J L s— i , , r �� r �� r �s� r— nzo—' t ._,• r-- ,ar \ 3 ,1 16 �� J L - _ n C ear 1 ha r , son a t xeaw ,n 6 01==.r • "" 11 1 1 I I 11 I I I I I n F t 2 8\ mo]u In a,>, er ,. ro, a.. '\ ` L ' ' 1 N� 5 `5>,a "" n* : "_ _ , , ti 1 ► 14 �d1 1 e dI dl 01 Iy 16 14 13 I 12 17 \5 17 18 ij5 19 I 1 1 1 I I I I f F 1 1 ree M na•aao V M arner M \ pg' v1, \� �\=p9t 20 11 1\ r,en� L J �y' .�.5� J L 1a� J L •ate. J L �t� y �� 9 L— .eYriTPi — J ..., tn0 s M w I/. v 9[ctn, fe. ••\ j ! �19ca t., f C 9 \ L ym.. J. ,iirt •ae w Wuo arc v ` i \ \ r� •- I r \ \ 1 an-� u .1v�]zelis•' ar 6 »I '\ \ , ' 18 . i LANDAU AVENUE N.E. i f 10 De„R9ao[ 9aD Vte1lY fAq]g9,S1 aa2 vlo•. 111t1l: ,\ �.�\ \� 96" �' /\ ~ y �,�. i `•Opp a 11 �yp[L• — e-•�::.i I so tl ` I • 1 19 14- o I •\ p8 \ \ �yy � � t` � h s �sv9 , EXHIBIT C-3 McCOM PRANK RODS ASSOCIATES, INC. ENNE ENGIERS ANO LWD9URVEY00.5 ITEM F -6 - NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. P V 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP APPLICATION: Otsego — Sunray Farms; 2nd Addition Final Plat REPORT DATE: 20 April 2004 NAC FILE: 176.02 — 04.07 BACKGROUND Tollefson Development, Inc. has submitted plans for the second and final phase of the Sunray Farms development. The proposed final plat, located east of CSAH 19 and one-quarter mile north of 701h Street, consists of 71 single lots family lots. The subject site is within the west sanitary sewer district and guided by the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential land use. The subject site is zoned R-6, Residential Townhouse, Quadraminium, and Low Density Multiple Family District. The preliminary plat of Sunray Farms was approved by the City Council on 28 July 2003. Exhibits: A. Site Location B. Preliminary Plat C. Final Plat ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat Consistency. The design and number of lots identified on the final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. All of the lots meet or exceed the R-6 District minimum lot area and lot width requirements of 9,000 square feet and 60 feet, respectively. Construction Plans. The applicant has submitted construction plans for the proposed final plat including grading, streets and utilities. The utilities within this addition include extension of trunk water main that will provide service to the Martin Farms, Zimmer Farms and Otsego Preserve developments. The construction plans and the final plat are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Park and Trail Dedication. A small area of land was provided with the first addition final plat to provide access from 75th Street to the future neighborhood park located east of the City's waste treatment plant site. This land dedication was 5.6 percent of the total land requirement. As such, a cash fee in lieu of land equal to 94.4 percent of the current cash fee per dwelling in lieu of land is required. The current cash fee in lieu of land is $2,820.00 per dwelling. The required cash fee in lieu of land for the proposed final plat is $189,007.68 to be paid with the development contract fees and securities. Development Contract. The applicant is required by the Subdivision Ordinance to enter a development contract with the City upon approval of a final plat. The development contract, which specifies terms of approval, required securities and all applicable fees, is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. RECOMMENDATION The proposed Sunray Farms 2nd Addition Final Plat is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and terms of preliminary plat approval. Our office recommends approval of the application as outlined below. POSSIBLE ACTIONS A. Motion to approve the Sunray Farms 2nd Addition Final Plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. All construction plans and the final plat are subject to approval of the City Engineer. 2. The applicant shall pay a cash fee of $189,007.68 in satisfaction of park and trail dedication requirements. 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and pay all fees and securities required by it, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 4. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request is inconsistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. C. Motion to table. 2 PC. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Tim Rochel, City Building Official Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ron Wagner, City Engineer Casey Wollschlager, Tollefson Development, Inc. John Desens, John Oliver and Associates, Inc. 3 m z yr •wr. Ift.r ..rr *&W 14"01 %*A r rrwr Nor ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD - mavwl nu °Mn ft' .....rl .r.rrrl s.ur-.rrrrsu �B �3M�3M� Y ,1 1.19 N '�II .v Aa rawva° 1�+�°Is rll to s.a aor ,n*r i...r, w -.•u. +e a°Is1° WISo°°o�o•rwr� ! N111-13n3O NOSAI-101 yOe m m _ was war war ❑OadW9874 nva ?a c°in�s aiw " '�"„i0Y1'�.I„° °a '” •pU/ '88j B�DOSSy g JGA!jo UyO/• NVI NC 1 00`✓ WbHslo Y�JN(15 W �c2It!2If °@W iso 11 A I I I 1 C14 �10 Kms' Ir- co �r-1( {� .b��kV�k�4Nk ;1fv 0 r SF_3 SE•R• S' •s -_s ^2 we^1t t Y $ I It 11 ry�Eoi �c2It!2If 11 11 X94/� _hll sy 3 wi lr-1(—!(-11 LU LAJ ao�t^ EwJku,Ae atia5�s��.Xd SWC s..� 4H N � Sieh` O ° y e I C14 �10 Kms' Ir- co �r-1( {� .b��kV�k�4Nk ;1fv 0 r SF_3 SE•R• S' •s -_s ^2 we^1t t Y $ I It 11 ry�Eoi �c2It!2If 11 11 X94/� _hll sy 3 wi lr-1(—!(-11 LU LAJ ao�t^ EwJku,Ae 4H N f if if 1 If T f .r 1 f tf lf� l J 1 I- 1r lr ircocruel - , I as C14 �10 Kms' Ir- co �r-1( {� .b��kV�k�4Nk ;1fv 0 r f•.-1r ^2 we^1t t IITr -I I It 11 iIC)11 �c2It!2If 11 11 X94/� _hll wi lr-1(—!(-11 ao�t^ EwJku,Ae _�---------�,----- —I—�_ /r Ali I ,�.. •� 34^i9 �9 9OiG `� I !{^_ II •W, `•�,,I,I I ._br. tet. I r N 1 / °^ m 1: I !!11 I %! � 7 •r=g 1I I` n71 r — g11 1 4 cm 1 ..-` N , / .� In �,,,t/:'��I 97- Y/• v / `' C; 11r::_gqlr::sl l 1C l� c°/'r/��,N- . \ so (/ cliIn cr a. F ' 1 9 I i I , a I c I h I'YQ 8 N 1 ^2 we^1t t wi Ali I ,�.. •� 34^i9 �9 9OiG `� I !{^_ II •W, `•�,,I,I I ._br. tet. I r N 1 / °^ m 1: I !!11 I %! � 7 •r=g 1I I` n71 r — g11 1 4 cm 1 ..-` N , / .� In �,,,t/:'��I 97- Y/• v / `' C; 11r::_gqlr::sl l 1C l� c°/'r/��,N- . \ so (/ cliIn cr a. F ' 1 9 I i I , a I c I h I'YQ 8 N 1 Z O 0 0 J cc �j g goo 6f �� • 3 a — Him aA p 9-91 49 • o ` Iosno-v.m.er�tav -yo z --------- ell- sr ll sr cs rst zmre- - H1tL � 1 1332lLS re Tu I .�� °` I °` I ;gam, •„� DSPr v L— — — — —j - — — — -J EXHIBIT C-1 I I$ I �artzzvrsas i; ZcaTiraZ].WS I — aeartzzo.zrsr- 8 I I N h iMmar] IQ I — 66'drt'LT0.7r�'r°7- � °e tKl�rb.rr.e6 I — OOaCt7;re.li'.a6f -' ' —rLM `— -- --I `------� a I x7afrav-, — -• -- — — —I R - I $6ni2o.iis°r I I — d®ar,ZtaT:.esr- � Q - I — i9'6c,Tto.Z .r°f � h `O 81 I. I Ia Lo, " � ' L— I 3 � I .�' � —I I — G0'Jn 3.M.t<,r°T- -' I — 6eactzrb.zravf � — IA'dc•IZ2aZca°S- � I °' I^ I Ig 'n IR II I N la W-----I-----I I L I —.zzt ]Czarr sofa- 1 I � I — cvartZz6.rravi- � I — aaacl3zo.Zr.evs- -I --- —I I— �•act�m.Z]-•bvs- -� —t — C sysrt Io�xt L£fB.6BS - LZTot b — — I'rrr .ISL;IY.NM b —.zrrtacnzr,aar I R 1-7-7ws H1SL R R, W b I 1606 60Os °0 °L L5.19°68S - L -----f b I •• � Jw oz r riLZ'Llatzo.z�en7- , _$ � M f N R I I� ^ Yt I. 6 Zo'fZY 7.[£!4°68$ — — — — — — — r— — — — — — — — — — -- — EXHIBIT C-1 -- J F! it L J I — lonL o00 I R I f(fri — st I_. 1 rj'Ct1 aClb.r :3vA- 1 11 m r of a l� aay�W m FBI d (p soul p la I W zzf[rx mn,seA —J I I'd Iz ® • o r Lsn nl,za.z..MVH = 1 — E'CI'I�;tR,7�etP� (p Ofl 3Lo.trerBf - I I^ t I L -----I RI I —A [ iil AZati'fvA— -1 I' ` Ig I WLR 1 wtr,ZM.i�,eos= = �aclZxa�,ar I I -.Ifr1 N.70.Li�avA- -1 I I^ I - cfforlT,zo.zf,sar � I I baa l I - r7}gl ATatT.'6v�- 1 I N Ig I I� 81 18 I la � sz'ftrx razf.sarr -I I I� I — ce'Ot1iT4�10f '� I ��pl I Z�or>-Z.wS' tr ar �I rn Is I ou I� —' RTQr13TR�f0T— •� %1 Mf la A W7 t �I N i8 I >z s - - LLJ - av �o x�1 I >°I �w ww ntnare lw� •-•,I sl I ,1,60,p (> � N $ I aRaL °� L9'lC9 M,LO,PSo9BN • �I a l_ s ( aL oo ( a W,`4( �I . L0. 1_1BftYYf I �-� , � rl71 � -, I I 37Zo� \ WaM I ^ al I i of x r I L--- OO OL Oo'oL Rpp � •sof oCG 000 00- — a ��••1' `i _ oI lf9 M,Lo.YC.ppN _ R 3 133N GWZ � s1S o d, I or ve so 1 1 IN soul p la I W zzf[rx mn,seA —J I I'd Iz r Lsn nl,za.z..MVH = 1 — E'CI'I�;tR,7�etP� (p Ofl 3Lo.trerBf - I I^ t I L -----I RI I —A [ iil AZati'fvA— -1 I' ` Ig I �• I I^ wtr,ZM.i�,eos= = �aclZxa�,ar I I -.Ifr1 N.70.Li�avA- -1 I I^ I - cfforlT,zo.zf,sar � I I h i IR I - r7}gl ATatT.'6v�- 1 I N Ig I I� 81 18 I la � sz'ftrx razf.sarr -I I I� I — ce'Ot1iT4�10f '� I ��pl I Z�or>-Z.wS' tr ar rz1 soul p la bsb� r'- o -o arZtTr..wf — E'CI'I�;tR,7�etP� (p Ofl 3Lo.trerBf - dl 1= I N la i _I I - 9'Crl�'tp.TresS-' -, I - ce3rlZ2o.Zrev3^ -� 81 R I � = i I I8 wtr,ZM.i�,eos= = �aclZxa�,ar al It I I -' ceulZra�w�- � I - cfforlT,zo.zf,sar � I I h i IR I — �R'IZ2o.T�aCYr• � I—'(,�CIZi0.�6/.�. � 81 18 I la - I — OTdr1�2o,ZiisS— � I — ce'Ot1iT4�10f '� Z�or>-Z.wS' 3SoCi �L(d.Zi.:if �I rn Is I ou I� —' RTQr13TR�f0T— •� , �I N i8 I >z s - - LLJ - av �o x�1 f I I I r'- o -o arZtTr..wf I - I i _I - I - �r,ZxRif.evs - h �I I8 � Z ° o i yf I — L%4fliiRl e6pl - � Q k I la - I - zaarlZzarf:fs3- --, CI —' RTQr13TR�f0T— •� I �I N i8 I >z I >°I _ � Ic e,l sl I ,1,60,p (> coc nv oz�u rli I Sj oovoav oo.saL-o sc cst o.°s r.o Was. - -------------------------- EXHIBIT C-2 r. , - Item Review No. 1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Hakanson Residential Subdivision Anderson for the City of Otsego Assoc., Inc. by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc, Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk, Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Casey Wollschlager, Tollefson Development, Inc. John W. Desens, PE, John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Reviewed by: Jeff Elliott, PE Date: April 19, 2004 Proposed Development: Sunray Farm 2"d Addition Street Location of Property: A portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 25, T121 N, R24W, North of 700' Street NE, east of LeBeaux Avenue NE, and west of MacIver Avenue NE. Applicant: Casey Wollschlager Tollefson Development, Inc. 17271 Kenyon Avenue Suite 103 Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 (952) 435-1010 Developer: Tollefson Development, Inc. Purpose: Sunray Farm 2^d Addition is a proposed 8 block residential development on about 22 acres in the City of Otsego, Wright -County, mneso a— The propose"id velopment wfli fbe--------- --- serviced with municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and public streets typical of an urban setting, This project is the second and final phase of the Sunray Farm development started in 2003. Jurisdictional Agencies: (But not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Wright Soil and Water Conservation District, Permits Required (But not limited to): NPDES TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE FINAL PLAT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TITLE SHEET OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE DETAILS STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OTHER CONSIDERATIONS SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION \1Ha01\Shared Docs\MuNapal\Aotsepo2xxx\2284\ot2284REV1.doc INFORMATION AVAILABLE Boundary and Topographic Survey, 05/9/03, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Final Plat, 03/25/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, 02/06/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Construction Plans, 03/25/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc, Development Plan, 01/28/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. City of Otsego Engineering Manual, 2003 Update City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, 10/14/02 National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991 Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for Portions of the Otsego Creek Watershed, February 2003. Wetland Delineation Report, 06/9/03, by Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc. Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review, 06/14/03, by American Engineering and Testing, Inc. CONSTRUCTION PLANS TITLE SHEET I. No comments. OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN (SHEET 2) 1. All sanitary sewer services shall be 4" PVC SDR 26. Revise the Sanitary Sewer Notes. 2. Revise watermain construction note "Any valves over 7.0' from top nut to surface shall have valve nut extensions installed," to "... over 7.5' from top nut,,." — ---3. Include -in -Sanitary -Sewer -Notes: "Chimney-seals-areTequired-foT-al I s-anit-aryma ho e1 s and shall be installed after final casting adjustments are made. Show Standard Plate No. 308 in the details. 4. To provide dual paths of water supply and also to improve the water quality and fire flow capability of the overall water distribution system for the property to the south of Sunray Farm 2" Addition, an 8" watermain line shall be added to the south plat line of Sunray Farm 2"d Addition along the property line between Block 8, Lots 8 and 9. Revise the utility easements between these properties to allow for the installation of the watermain. (See Sheet 5) MaMShared DocsWunlclpalWotsego2xxA22641ot2284REV 1,doc SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN (SHEETS 3 TO 7) 1, Call out the type of each watermain valve on utility sheets, Valves 12" or greater shall be butterfly valves. 2. Sheet 4, the sanitary sewer manhole, MH 43, shall be replaced with a plug and stub for a future connection, 3. Sheet 5, relocate hydrant'S' from the southwest corner of Lot 8 to the northwest corner of Lot 8 for fire protection coverage. 4. Sheet 5, at the east plat line of Sunray Farm 2nd Additon, the 16" trunk watermain turns north and follows the east plat line to the half section line of the SE quarter section of Section 25. Hydrant "AA" is located along this path. It appears that this is just a temporary hydrant. Replace the 16" x 6" tee and 16 " plug with two 16"-45 degree bends and reducers to the temporary hydrant. 5. Sheet 5, a 16" x 8" tee with an 8" gate valve shall be added at approximate station 180+07 at 73rd Street NE, In addition, add an 8" diameter watermain line extending to the south plat line between Block 8, Lots 8 and 9. Show this in the profile also. 6. Sheet 5, curb stop covers are required for all water services located within bituminous areas. The water service to Block 8, Lot 9 is located in the temporary cul-de-sac and requires a curb stop cover and shall be identified in the plans. (Standard plate No. 207) 7. Sheet 6, water services to Block 2, Lots 5 & 6 and Block 5, Lot 8 need to be lowered below the storm sewer to maintain 2 feet of separation or 12 inches of separation with insulation. 8. Sheet 6, move the 8" gate valve at the intersection of Lander Avenue NE and 74th Street NE south about 25 feet to the south side of the intersection. 9. Sheet 7, the 8" gate valve located at approximate station 11 +45 should be moved north along Large Avenue NE to avoid the storm sewer crossing at that location. 10, Sheet 7, lower the water service to Block 7, Lot 6 under the storm sewer and maintain 2 feet of separation or 12 inches of separation with insulation. STREET AM �STORM_SEWf_R_(SHEETS_a_TO 'l2�_ 1. Two (2) Type III Barricades are required where a barricade is shown on the plans. 2. The street grades shown on the utility plans do not match the street grades shown on the grading plans. Revise as necessary. 3. Sheet 8, CBMH 108 shall be a 48" diameter manhole, 4. Sheet 8, the slope across the valley gutter on the north side of the intersection of 75th Street NE and Lander Avenue NE has a grade of 0.46%, this is less than the minimum grade of 0.60% allowed. Revise as necessary, MaMshared Docs\Munfclpal\Aotsego2road2284\ot2284REV1.doc 5. Sheet 9, the percent grade is needed in the profile to the west of the PVI at station 103+20. 6. Sheet 10, the percent grade is needed in the profile to the west of the PVI at station 175+50. 7. Sheet 10 and 12, the temporary cul-de-sacs shall have a 4" bituminous curb. 8. Sheet 10, at catch basin CB 161 B the rim elevation should be 950.29. Verify. 9. Sheet 12, catch basin manhole CBMH 107B shall be a 48" diameter manhole. 10. Sheet 12, the castings at catch basins CBMH 107A. CBMH 1078, and CB 175A shall be R-3067 (DR/DL). Verify. DETAILS (SHEETS 13 TO 16) 1. Standard Plate No. 303 is an old detail. Revise the detail so that all sanitary services shall be 4" PVC SQR 26. The updated standard plate for sanitary sewer services has been emailed to the developer's engineer. 2. The street section detail should note that geotextile fabric is required where the 12" of Class 3 or 4 sand base is to be used. 3. Include Standard Plates No. 308 for Sanitary Manhole Chimney Seal. STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS 1. Submit for review. . GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN The grading plans have street grades shown that do not match those on the utility construction plans. Revise as necessary, 2. The easements between Block 8, Lots 7 and 8 and Lots 8 and 9, shall be adjusted to account for the utilities running alone those property lines. 3. The proposed bale checks in Sunray Farm 2nd Addition should be shown darker than the existing bale checks. Revise. 4. The street section detail should note that geotextile fabric is required where the 12" of Class 3 or 4 sand base is to be used. SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION We recommend approval contingent on the above comments. \\Hao1\Shared Docs\Munlclpai Aotsego2p.X\2294\o=84REV1.doc RPR.22.2004 12:05PM ENGINEERING REVIEW Hakanson Residential Subdivision Anderson for the City of Otsego Assoc., Inc. by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Submitted to: Honorable Mayor and City Council N0.744 P.2i14 Item Review No. 1 cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk, Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Casey Wollschlager, Tollefson Development, Inc, John W. Desens, PE, John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Reviewed by: Jeff Elliott, PE Date: April 19, 2004 Proposed Development: Sunray Farm 2"d Addition Street Location of Property: A portion of the southwest 1/4 of Section 25, T121 N, R24W, North of 70t' Street NE, east of LeBeaux Avenue NE, and west of MacIver Avenue NE. Applicant: Casey Wollschlager Tollefson Development, Inc. 17271 Kenyon Avenue Suite 103 Lakeville, Minnesota 55044 (952) 435-1010 Developer: Tollefson Development, Inc. Purpose: Jurisdictional Agencies: (But not limited to): Permits Required (But not limited to): Sunray Farm 2"d Addition is a proposed 8 block residential development on about 22 acres in the City of Otsego, Wright county, minnesom I ne proposea aeveiopment wm us serviced with municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and public streets typical of an urban setting. This project is the second and final phase of the Sunray Farm development started in 2003. City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Wright Soil and Water Conservation District. NPDES APR.22.2004 12:05PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE FINAL PLAT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TITLE SHEET OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN STREET AND STORM SEWER PLAN AND PROFILE DETAILS STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OTHER CONSIDERATIONS SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION Ma01lShared Docs\Municipal\Aotsepo2m\2284\ot2284REV1.doc N0.744 P.3i14 HrK.6:f.G004 12:05PM N0.744 P.4i14 INFORMATION AVAILABLE Boundary and Topographic Survey, 05/9/03, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Final Plat, 03/25/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan, 02/06/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Construction Plans, 03/25/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc, Development Plan, 01/28/04, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc, City of Otsego Engineering Manual, 2003 Update City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, 10/14/02 National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991 Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for Portions of the Otsego Creek Watershed, February 2003. Wetland Delineation Report, 06/9/03, by Acorn Environmental Consultants, Inc, Report of Geotechnical Exploration and Review, 06/14/03, by American Engineering and Testing, Inc. CONSTRUCTION PLANS TITLE SHEET No comments. OVERALL CONSTRUCTION PLAN (SHEET 21 1. All sanitary sewer services shall be 4" PVC SDR 26. Revise the Sanitary Sewer Notes. 2. Revise watermain construction note "Any valves over 7.0' from top nut to surface shall have valve nut extensions installed," to "... over 7.5' from top nut—" tnctudL-in-Sanitary-SeweT-Notes. "ChiTney-seats are require or all sanitary manholes and shall be installed after final casting adjustments are made. Show Standard Plate No. 308 in the details. 4. To provide dual paths of water supply and also to improve the water quality and fire flow capability of the overall water distribution system for the property to the south of Sunray Farm 2" Addition, an 8" watermain line shall be added to the south plat line of Sunray Farm 2nd Addition along the property line between Block 8, Lots 8 and 9. Revise the utility easements between these properties to allow for the installation of the watermain. (See Sheet 5) VHaNNShared DocslMunlclpalVlotsego2xoc\2264\ot2284REV1,doc HHK.22.2004 12:05PM N0.744 P.5i14 SANITARY SEWER AND WATERMAIN (SHEETS 3 TO 7) 1. Call out the type of each watermain valve on utility sheets. Valves 12" or greater shall be butterfly valves. 2. Sheet 4, the sanitary sewer manhole, MH 43, shall be replaced with a plug and stub for a future connection. 3. Sheet 5, relocate hydrant 'S' from the southwest corner of Lot 8 to the northwest corner of Lot 8 for fire protection coverage. 4. Sheet 5, at the east plat line of Sunray Farm 2nd Additon, the 16" trunk watermain turns north and follows the east plat line to the half section line of the SE quarter section of Section 25. Hydrant "AA" is located along this path. It appears that this is just a temporary hydrant. Replace the 16" x 6" tee and 16 " plug with two 16"-45 degree bends and reducers to the temporary hydrant. 5. Sheet 5, a 16" x 8" tee with an 8" gate valve shall be added at approximate station 180+07 at 73rd Street NE. In addition, add an 8" diameter watermain line extending to the south plat line between Block 8, Lots 8 and 9. Show this in the profile also. 6. Sheet 5, curb stop covers are required for all water services located within bituminous areas. The water service to Block 8, Lot 9 is located in the temporary cul-de-sac and requires a curb stop cover and shall be identified in the plans. (Standard plate No. 207) 7. Sheet 6, water services to Block 2, Lots 5 & 6 and Block 5, Lot 8 need to be lowered below the storm sewer to maintain 2 feet of separation or 12 inches of separation with insulation. 8. Sheet 6, move the 8" gate valve at the intersection of Lander Avenue NE and 74th Street NE south about 25 feet to the south side of the intersection. 9. Sheet 7, the 8" gate valve located at approximate station 11+45 should be moved north along Large Avenue NE to avoid the storm sewer crossing at that location. 10. Sheet 7, lower the water service to Block 7, Lot 6 under the storm sewer and maintain 2 feet of separation or 12 inches of separation with insulation. —STREET -AN D--S-M RM--EWER---(SHEETS-& T0-12)- 1. Two (2) Type III Barricades are required where a barricade is shown on the plans. 2. The street grades shown on the utility plans do not match the street grades shown on the grading plans. Revise as necessary. 3. Sheet 8, CBMH 108 shall be a 48" diameter manhole. 4. Sheet 8, the slope across the valley gutter on the north side of the intersection of 75th Street NE and Lander Avenue NE has a grade of 0.46%, this is less than the minimum grade of 0.60% allowed. Revise as necessary. MaMShared DocslMunfclpaMotsego2wA2294\ot2284REV1.doc APR.22.2004 12:06PM N0.744 P.6/14 5. Sheet 9, the percent grade is needed in the profile to the west of the PVI at station 103+20, 6. Sheet 10, the percent grade is needed in the profile to the west of the PVI at station 175+50. 7. Sheet 10 and 12, the temporary cul-de-sacs shall have a 4" bituminous curb. 8. Sheet 10, at catch basin CB 161 B the rim elevation should be 950.29. Verify. 9, Sheet 12, catch basin manhole CBMH 1078 shall be a 48" diameter manhole. 10. Sheet 12, the castings at catch basins CBMH 107A. CBMH 1078, and CB 175A shall be R-3067 (DR/DL). Verify. DETAILS (SHEETS 13 TO 161 1. Standard Plate No. 303 is an old detail. Revise the detail so that all sanitary services shall be 4" PVC SDR 26. The updated standard plate for sanitary sewer services has tpeen emailed to the developer's engineer. 2. The street section detail should note that geotextile fabric is required where the 12" of Class 3 or 4 sand base is to be used. 3. Include Standard Plates No. 308 for Sanitary Manhole Chimney Seal. STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS 1. Submit for review. , GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 1. The grading plans have street grades shown that do not match those on the utility construction plans. Revise as necessary. 2. The easements between Block 8, Lots 7 and 8 and Lots 8 and 9, shall be adjusted to account for the utilities running alone those property lines. 3. The proposed bale checks in Sunray Farm 2nd Addition should be shown darker than the existing bale checks. Revise. 4. The street section detail should note that geotextile fabric is required where the 12" of Class 3 or 4 sand base is to be used. SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION We recommend approval contingent on the above comments. \\HBWShared Docs\Munlclpal\Aotsepo2xKx\2284\ot2284REV7.doc NO. 2004 - RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Otsego is planning on implementing a Federal Aid Street Project in 2004, which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, said City is prepared to proceed with the construction of said project through the use of advance encumbrances from the general State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subdivision 6 and Minnesota rules Chapter 8820. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the city of Otsego in an amount up to 5 times the previous year's construction allotment ($1,433,405) in accordance with Minnesota rules 9920.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following year's accruals to the construction Account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said City. HEREBY CERTIFY, that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Otsego, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting thereof held in the City of Otsego, Minnesota on the 26th day of April 2004, as disclosed by the records of said City on file and of record in the office. Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, City Clerk G:\,M u n is ipaMOTS EGO\315\2004\ot315 RES4. doc A -TEM 6 -7 - MEMO Date: April 22, 2004 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Proposed Concept Plan Approval MnDOT's Highway 101 Plans As part of the proposed Highway 101 approval I have enclosed several items. A cover letter from MnDOT requesting Concept plan approval. A resolution of approval provided by staff. A resolution of disapproval provided by staff. Two letters from area businesses about the proposed plans. OXNESCTq District 3 o ti Minnesota Department of Transportation n 3725 -12th Street North Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303 S Telephone: 1-800-657-3961/320-2554181 OF Tfko Fax: 320-255-3257 April 7, 2004 320-654-5539 Mayor and Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330-7314 Re: SP 8608-21(TH 101) Junction of TH 101 at CSAH 36, CSAH 37, CSAH 42 and CSAH 39 Concept Layout #1 for Approval Dear Mr. Mayor and Council: Transmitted herewith for your concurrence are four (4) Concept Layouts, all labeled #1, covering four locations on TH 101 in Wright County. The proposals are as follows: 1) at CSAH 36 — a diamond type interchange will replace the existing signalized intersection. CSAH 36 will go over TH 101, and 3 businesses and one home will be acquired to accommodate the new facility. The estimated construction cost of this interchange is $8 million; 2) at CSAH 37 — a diamond type interchange will replace the existing unsignalized intersection, with CSAH 37 going over TH 101. The estimated construction cost at this location is $8 million; 3) at CSAH 42 — a simple grade separation will be constructed to replace the existing signalized intersection. In this case, TH 101 will go over CSAH 42 with an estimated construction cost of $3.5 million; 4) at CSAH 39 — a single point diamond interchange will replace the existing signalized intersection. TH 101 will go over CSAH 39 with an estimated construction cost of $13 million. These projects, being treated as one project, are part of the Governor's Bonding Package and are scheduled for an April 1, 2006 contract letting. Construction will be complete by Fall, 2007. Construction funding will generally be 85% Mn/DOT and 15% local contribution. The right-of-way acquisition needed for construction will be funded by Mn/DOT, although any necessary right-of-way provided by the County or City can be used to offset the required 15% local share of construction cost. Upon receiving concept approval, MN/DOT will commence preparation of an Environmental Assessment and acquisition of property. Granting concept approval at this time will not commit the City or County to funding the proposal. This fall, upon completion of the Environmental Assessment, Mn/DOT will formally submit a final layout for formal approval. At that time, more detailed design details and cost figures will be available. If you have any questions, please call me at 320-654-5539. _- Sinc rely,- -- . i Craig Rdbin' on, PE Preliminary Design Engineer CR:cas c: Tony Hughes Jody Martinson Jim Povich File An Equal Opportunity Employer RESOLUTION NO. 2004 - CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING MNDOT CONCEPT LAYOUT NUMBER ONE FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS TO TRUNK HIGHWAY 101 WHEREAS, the City of Otsego has reviewed a proposed MNDOT Concept Layout Number One transmitted to the City by correspondence dated April 7, 2004 in which MNDOT seeks City concurrence with Concept Layout No. 1; and WHEREAS, said concurrence in principle with Concept Layout No. 1 is not a step in an established statutory procedure and in no way binds the City; and WHEREAS, MNDOT must provide the City with further documents and layouts and follow the established statutory procedure under Minn. Stat. 161_ related to "Official Municipal Consent"; and WHEREAS, the information provided at this point consists of said Concept Layout No. 1 and the very preliminary costs estimates contained in correspondence from MNDOT; and WHEREAS, the City has been provided information regarding projected traffic flows, and is aware of current development as well as substantial proposed future development along the corridor, and has observed the present congestion at times along Trunk Highway 101; and WHEREAS, the City of Otsego agrees with the general concept that State Highway 101 should be upgraded from an expressway to a freeway; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that said upgrade would be in the long term best interests of the City and its residents and would promote safety and increase convenient ccess-to-and-from the-Cityaf Otseg . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA THAT THE COUNCIL GENERALLY CONCURS WITH MNDOT CONCEPT LAYOUT #1, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. The conditional concurrence herein does not constitute "Official Municipal Consent" as set forth in Minn. Stat. 161_, nor does it in any way imply that said "Official Municipal Consent" will be granted by the City after evaluation of final proposals. A decision on whether or not to grant "Official Municipal Consent" will only be made after the City has reviewed an official preliminary design plan, final cost estimates and can properly evaluate the State's financial expectations for City contribution to the project. 2. The City Council believes that MNDOT should continue to pursue the feasibility of access to State Highway 101 at the CSAH 42 intersection. The City requested and MNDOT provided, upon that request, a design alternative for this intersection which was rejected by the affected landowners. The City continues to support any reasonable plan for an interchange at the intersection, subject to safety and financial concerns. The City of Otsego encourages MNDOT to continue discussions with the landowners at the CSAH 42 intersection in hopes that an agreement can be reached that is satisfactory to all parties. The City of Otsego encourages booth MNDOT and the landowners to think "outside of the box" in considering alternative designs for access at this intersection, and to consider the consequences if they cannot reach a compromise. The City of Otsego objects to any attempt to close Quaday Avenue at CSAH 39 as part of this improvement. City officials have been told by representatives of MNDOT that Wright County wants it closed and have been told by County officials that MNDOT wants it closed. The City objects to each party's attempt to blamed the proposed closing on the other, and requests direct and truthful communication take place between both parties and the City of Otsego on this issue. 4. The City of Otsego requests that the proposed interchange at CSAH 36 and Highway 101, and particularly the frontage road on the northeast corner of that intersection, be moved as far to the west as possible consistent with good design. 5. The City of Otsego requests that MNDOT make every effort to develop an interchange at CSAH 37 and Highway 101 in which the Quaker Avenue intersection with CSAH 37 remains a full access intersection with CSAH 37 remains a full access intersection and is not converted into a right in/ right out. 6. The City objects to the proposed cost sharing policy requiring local funding of a portion of a State project. The City Council has not yet received final estimates or an I depth explanation of this policy, so they are presently in no position to evaluate -the proposed -City share of the project. Accordingly, -the City reserves- all rights to withhold "Municipal Consent" to the project if they determine that the City is unable, for whatever reason, to comply with any local share required. ADOPTED this 26`x' day of April, 2004. 2 D ItVAOTO,J Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -XX CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION DISAPPROVING THE PROPOSED MNDOT HIGHWAY 101 RECONSTRUCTION CONCEPT PLAN WHEREAS, the Cities of Otsego and St. Michael, and Wright County, have reviewed the proposed MNDOT plan for the reconstruction and Improvement of State Highway 101; and, WHEREAS, the City of Otsego is in agreement with the concept of upgrading State Highway 101 from an expressway to a freeway; and, WHEREAS, the City of Otsego disagrees with the proposed Highway 101 Reconstruction Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA THAT THE CONCEPT PLAN FOR THE UPGRADE OF STATE HIGHWAY 101 FROM AN EXPRESSWAY TO A FREEWAY IS HEREBY REJECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS. 1. This proposed plan is not consistent with the Otsego Comprehensive Plan because it does not maintain access to State Highway 101 at its intersection with County Road 42 which is regarded as an vital commercial intersection by the City. Dated this 26th day of April, 2004 ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier,.Mayor RTB Spirits, LLC: PO Box 332 11555 205"' Avenue Northwest Elk River, M.innesoo 55330 April 22, 2004 Mr. Michael Robertson City Administrator City of Otsego 8899 N.E. Nashua Avenue Otsego, MN 55330 RE: MnDOT proposed bridge -intersection at Hwy 101 & Co. Rd. 39 Dear Mike, As you know RTB Spirits has secured a commercial lot in Otsego Waterfront East that is to be developed on the east side of Hwy 101 and Co. Rd. 39. RTB Spirits LLC supports the City of Otsego and MaDOT for the construction of a new bridge -intersection at the proposed location. The development plan presented to the city for Waterfront East includes this new intersection. We have reviewed MnDOT's proposed plan for the new bridge -intersection and have two concerns. 1.) A significant portion of the holding pond is located on land that is designated as the commercial lot secured by RTB Spirits in the plans submitted to the City of Otsego. We propose that the City and MnDOT consider moving this holding pond to an area within the 300 ft set back area as designated by Minnesota DNR. 2.) The new portion of Co. Rd. 39 that extends east into the new development does not follow the existing road. The road as proposed will cut through the commercial lot secured by RTB Spirits. We request the road be located back to its existing location and as shown in the plans submitted to the City of Otsego. We ask that you consider these concerns and incorporate these changes as part of the final plan. — Sincerely Rick Schroeder Partner OTSEGO LAND COMPANY EAST, LLC 14285 James Road North Rogers, Minnesota 55374 April 22, 2004 Mr. Michael Robertson City Administrator City of Otsego 8899 N.E. Nashua Avenue Otsego, MN 55330 RE: MnDOT proposed bridge -intersection at Hwy 101 & Co. Rd. 39 Dear Mike, As you know Otsego Land Co. East (OLCE) has an interest in the property on the east side of Hwy 101 and Co. Rd. 39 that is to be developed as Otsego Waterfront East. MnDOT will use a portion of this land for the construction of the proposed bridge - intersection. We support the City of Otsego and MnDOT for the construction of a new bridge - intersection at the proposed location. The development plan presented to the city for Waterfront East includes this new intersection. We have reviewed MnDOT's proposed plan for the new bridge -intersection and have two concerns. 1.) A significant portion of the holding pond is located on land that is designated as commercial lots in the plans submitted to the City of Otsego. We propose that the city and MnDOT consider moving this holding pond to an area within the designated 300 ft set back from the Mississippi river. 2.) The new portion of Co. Rd. 39 that extends east into the new development does not follow the existing road. The road as proposed does not comply with the development plan for this property and should be moved back to the location of the existing road. ---- Weask-that you-consider-thesa-concerns-and-incorporate these_changesas-part_of the__ fmal plan. Sincerely .� William I Christian Chief Manager Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary Gateway- Noun- 1: an opening for a gate 2: Gate 4a Gate- Noun- 1: an opening in a wall or fence 4a: a means of entrance or exit Excerpts from Current Comprehensive Guide Plan Policy Plan p.23 Introduction "...It is emphasized that these goals and policies are the basic and fundamental plan for the development of Otsego. In this regard, their purpose is to provide a decision making framework to guide all public and private actions and development within the City." p.55 Transportation # 20 "The existing primary access points ( CSAH 39, 42, 37, & 36 ) to Highway 101 are viewed as vital to the community and are to be maintained in the future." Proposed change in NAC 27 page memo of 28/01/04 Policies( 1age 15 ) 4. Existing gateways to the City from Trunk Highway 101 are viewed as vital to the community and the City shall work cooperatively with MNDot and Wright County to maintain and improve them to the extent possible in recognition of traffic levels of service, available funding, and local land use and transportation goals. Metropolitan Council Development Framework Early this year the Metropolitan Council adopted its 2003 Regional Development Framework as the unifying theme of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide. While Wright County is not a Metropolitan County, the Northeast corner of the county - which includes Otsego- has most of the attributes of the Metropolitan Counties. In analyzing the new Development Framework, the principal planner for RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. noted that it " seems to focus on several themes". Of particular relevance to our situation in Otsego were several of the themes, they were described by the planner as follows: 1. Paying attention to land use patterns rather than the amount of land developed. The focus now appears to be on how development occurs, such as the mix of land uses, the number of housing units per acre and its relationship to transportation services. 2. Recognizing that transportation and land use are related. The Metropolitan Council will emphasize the need for intensified development in areas with convenient access to transportation corridors and in rural areas that want to grow and that lie along major highways. 3. Encouraging increased market-based housing that reflects shifting demographics, employment locations and differing income levels. It is expected that, with the aging of the baby boomers, the demand for housing will continue and will require a more diverse housing project when compared to traditional single-family housing development. Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary Gateway- Noun- 1: an opening for a gate 2: Gate 4a Gate- Noun- 1: an opening in a wall or fence 4a: a means of entrance or exit Excerpts from Current Comprehensive Guide Plan Policy Plan p.23 Introduction "...It is emphasized that these goals and policies are the basic and fundamental plan for the development of Otsego. In this regard, their purpose is to provide a decision making framework to guide all public and private actions and development within the City." p.55 Transportation # 20 "The existing primary access points ( CSAH 39, 42, 37, & 36 ) to Highway 101 are viewed as vital to the community and are to be maintained in the future." Proposed change in NAC 27 page memo of 28/01/04 Policies ( page 15 ) 4. Existing gateways to the City from Trunk Highway 101 are viewed as vital to the community and the City shall work cooperatively with MNDot and Wright County to maintain and improve them to the extent possible in recognition of traffic levels of service, available funding, and local land use and transportation goals. Metropolitan Council Development Framework Early this year the Metropolitan Council adopted its 2003 Regional Development Framework as the unifying theme of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide. While Wright County is not a Metropolitan County, the Northeast corner of the county - which includes Otsego- has most of the attributes of the Metropolitan Counties. In analyzing the new Development Framework, the principal planner for RLK- Kuusisto, Ltd. noted that it " seems to focus on several themes". Of particular relevance to our situation in Otsego were several of the themes, they were described by the planner as follows: 1. Paying attention to land use patterns rather than the amount of land developed. The focus now appears to be on how development occurs, such as the mix of land uses, the number of housing units per acre and its relationship to transportation services. 2. Recognizing that transportation and land use are related. The Metropolitan Council will emphasize the need for intensified development in areas with convenient access to transportation corridors and in rural areas that want to grow and that lie along major highways. 3. Encouraging increased market-based housing that reflects shifting demographics, employment locations and differing income levels. It is expected that, with the aging of the baby boomers, the demand for housing will continue and will require a more diverse housing project when compared to traditional single-family housing development. Michael C. Couri- Andrew J MacArthur Robert T. Ruppe- David R. Wendorf *Also licensed in Jllinois —Also licensed in California April 22, 2004 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Judy Hudson, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 COURT, MACAR THUR & RUPPE, P.L.L.P. Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-2599 (FAA) cou?iandmacarthur@pobox.com RE: Resolution of Concurrence with Concept Layout No. 1 Dear Council Members: A resolution has been drafted for your consideration at the Monday evening City Council meeting. The draft resolution is in response to correspondence from MNDOT dated April 72 2004 requesting City concurrence with Concept Layout No. 1 for improvements to Highway 101. As clarification for the Council, the requested concurrence is not part of the statutory procedure for Municipal Consent. Thus, while the resolution is informative and responsive to MNDOT regarding the City's general concurrence with the concept of converting Highway 101 from an expressway to a freeway, it does not trigger any legal consequences and is not an official decision or municipal consent to the project. The resolution -drafted indicates -generaLacceptance-of-the-concept,-butincludes-variou — conditions which the City is concerned with, including the eventual status of the Highway 101 CSAH 42 intersection. Under previous statutes there was a statutorily required initial concept approval step in the process. That portion of the process was repealed in 2001. Attached to this letter for your information are copies of the current relevant statutes related to "Official Municipal Consent". Letter to Otsego City Council April 22, 2004 Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this matter at the time that the resolution is under consideration I will be available to answer them. Very t'w 11 J. Ma rth r CARTHUR & RUPPE Encls. cc: Ron Wagner, City Engineer Dan Licht, City Planner Page 2 of 3 MN ST § 161.164 Page 1 M.S.A. § 161.164 C Minnesota Statutes Annotated Currentness Transportation Rw Chapter 161. Trunk Highway System 1W Trunk Highways -*161.164. Final layout approval process Subdivision 1. Submission of final layout. Before proceeding with the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of any route on the trunk highway system lying within any municipality, the commissioner shall submit to its governing body a final layout and project report covering the purpose, route location, and proposed design of the highway. The final layout must be submitted as part of a report containing any supporting data that the commissioner deems helpful to the governing body in reviewing the final layout submitted. The supporting data must include a good faith cost estimate of all the costs in which the governing body is expected to participate. The final layout must be submitted before final decisions are reached so that meaningful early input can be obtained from the municipality. Subd. 2. Governing body action. (a) Within 15 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, the governing body shall schedule a public hearing on the final layout. The governing body shall, within 60 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, conduct a public hearing at which the department of transportation shall present the final layout for the project. The governing body shall give at least 30 days' notice of the public hearing. (b) Within 90 days from the date of the public hearing, the governing body shall approve or disapprove the final layout in writing, as follows: (1) If the governing body approves the final layout or does not disapprove the final layout in writing within 90 days, in which case the final layout is deemed to be approved, the commissioner may continue the project development. (2) If the final construction plans contain changes in access, traffic capacity, or acquisition of permanent right-of-way from the final layout approved by the governing body, the commissioner shall resubmit the portion of the final construction plans where changes were made to the governing body. The governing body must approve or disapprove the changes, in writing, within 60 days from the date the commissioner submits them. (3) If the governing body disapproves the final layout, the commissioner may make modifications requested by the municipality, decide not to proceed with the project, or refer the final layout to an appeal board. The appeal board shall consist of one member appointed by the commissioner, one member appointed by the governing body, and a third member agreed upon by both the commissioner and the governing body. If the commissioner and the governing body cannot agree upon the third member, the chief justice of the supreme court shall appoint a third member within 14 days of the request of the commissioner to appoint the third member. Copr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works http://print.westlaw.com/delivery.html?dest=atp&dataid=A0055800000012890003178427B... 3/9/2004 MN ST § 161.164 M.S.A. § 161.164 Page 3 of 3 Page 2 Subd. 3. Appeal board. Within 30 days after referral of the final layout, the appeal board shall hold a hearing at which the commissioner and the governing body may present the case for or against approval of the final layout referred. Not later than 60 days after the hearing, the appeal board shall recommend approval, recommend approval with modifications, or recommend disapproval of the final layout, making additional recommendations consistent with state and federal requirements as it deems appropriate. It shall submit a written report containing its findings and recommendations to the commissioner and the governing body. CREDITS) Laws 2001, c. 191, § 5. HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES 2004 Electronic Update 2001 Legislation Laws 2001, c. 191, § 10, provides in part that this act (enacting § 161.164) is effective May 25, 2001, and applies to highway construction projects for which municipal approval is sought first after that date. M. S. A. § 161.164, MN ST § 161.164 Current with 2004 Regular Session laws through Chapter 134 END OF DOCUMENT Copr. © 2003 West, a Thomson business Copr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works http://print.westlaw.com/delivery.html?dest=atp&dataid=AO05 5 800000012890003178427B... 3/9/2004 Page 2 of 3 MN ST § 161.3412 Page 1 M.S.A. § 161.3412 Minnesota Statutes Annotated Currentness Transportation 'a Chapter 161. Trunk Highway System "A Construction Contracts -+161.3412. Design -build authority Subdivision 1. Best value selection. Notwithstanding sections 16C.25, 161.32, and 161.321, or any other law to the contrary, the commissioner may solicit and award a design -build contract for a project on the basis of a best value selection process. Section 16C.08 does not apply to design -build contracts to which the commissioner is a party. Subd. 2. Competitive, open process. Sections 161.3410 to 161.3428 apply only to transportation projects using the two-step competitive process utilizing public solicitation for design -build services. Subd. 3. Restriction; reports. (a) The number of design -build contracts awarded by the commissioner in any fiscal year may not exceed ten percent of the total number of transportation construction contracts awarded by the commissioner in the previous fiscal year. (b) The commissioner shall notify the chairs of the senate and house of representatives committees with jurisdiction over transportation policy and transportation finance each time the commissioner decides to use the design- build method of procurement and explain why that method was chosen. Subd. 4. Municipal consent. Use of the design -build method of state transportation project delivery is subject to state law concerning municipal consent to highways in municipalities. CREDIT(S) ----Laws 3p_, -c-$ art 3, §2reff Iilly1, 2001. M. S. A. § 161.3412, MN ST § 161.3412 Current with 2004 Regular Session laws through Chapter 135 Copr. © West 2004 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works http://print.westlaw.comldelivery.html?dest=atp&dataid=BO055800000019330003178427... 4/20/2004 ni 1" . ce . eUK-Jti "J. 411-'1'1 N0.757 P.2/9 IT1=M 7_1 Hakanson 1 Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 ASSOC., Inc. Phcne:763/427.5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 April 22, 2004 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 Re: Negotiated Electrical Bid Items Improvement Project No. 04-07, Municipal Well # 6 Dear Mayor and City Council: As directed by City Council, we have met with the electrical contractor, HyMark Electric, Inc. and the system integrator, Automatic Systems Inc. to negotiate a resolution to the perceived high cost of the electrical items in this project. As you were advised in our letter last week, Stuart Stephens's detailed estimate of the two electrical items came to a total of $ 47,237 as compared to the original bid price of $ 80,300. During our discussion with Automatic Systems on the project and the scope of wort:, it became evident that the expedition of this project to be completed in 60 days was resulting in substantial risk premiums being added to the quotes from Automatic Systems. In addition, the equipment manufacturer, Allen Bradley, of the VFD and most of the electrical equipment to be installed had quoted prices that were approximately $ 7,000 higher than normal for the extremely short delivery time, We advised Automatic Systems that we could extend the substantial completion date to July 1'�. This would mean that the electrical drive and switches would have to be completed and the pump motor fully operational prior to July I". Our discussion also uncovered a significant duplication of effort factor in the SCADA bid item. Automatic Systems had taken the specifications to mean that he would have to prepare separate wiring diagrams, shop drawings and separate program logic for just Well #6, in addition to the SCADA modifications they are already under contract to perform under Pumphouse 43. We arrived at a solution to the duplicated effort by allowing the completion of the SCADA modification work for Well # 6 to coincide with the completion of the overall SCADA system The third element of cost reduction that we discussed was the inherent factor of cost escalation as the vender's price goes through the electrical subcontractor and then continues to the prime contractor. This typically results in a 15% overhead figure being added by the electrical sub- contractor, Then the prime contractor adds his 15% overhead figure to the sub -contractors quote, The end result is a final price that is over 32% higher than the original venders cost, Civil 6 -Municipal �� GAM4nidpa1\A0TSSG0\519\ot519 Award Eleerric�ocEngineering Land Surveying for N0.757 P.3/9 To reduce this project management inflation, Automatic Systems will be the prime contractor and HyMark Electric will be a sub -contractor to them. We had already significantly reduced this inflation by eliminating the electrical work from Traut Wells contract. Therefore, the resolution that we propose for City Council's acceptance consist of the following contract item: 1. Enter into a separate contract, per the attached proposal, at the negotiated price of $ 54,098.00 with Automatic Systems Inc. for combined scope of work identified in Bid Item No. 30 and Bid Item No. 38. The end result is a net project cost decrease of $ 26,202.00. If these actions are approved by City Council, we will prepare the Contracts for execution. Sincerely, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc, William L. Morris, Jr., P.E. ' WLM:dlc Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk Ron Wagner, City Engineer Dave Traut, Traut Wells Kurt Paddock, HyMark Electric Lane Stewart, Automatic Systems Stuart Stephens, Kaeding & Associates Hakanson G:\Mt nioipglk?•0TSRG01519\ot519 Award Elaaric.doc Anderson ■■ Assoc., Inc. r„1�.LL.LCJYJ'i J•4cr"I'I ,FROM Hn� a rHUL, MN PHONE NO. 6515310027 N0.757 P. 4/9 Apr. ?-i 2M4 25; 34PM P2 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS TO: City of Otsego QUOTATION/ C/O Mr. Bill. Morris PROPOSAL N0: ASC04042ILS DATE: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT: Well #f:6 F.o.B.; Factory Frt. allowed to jobsite- Improvement Project 04-07 City of Otsego BID DATE: NA APPROVAL DRAWINGS: 1 Week from receipt of an acceptable order. SHIPMENT: 5-7 Weeks from receipt of sdUOTATION approval. EXPIRES: 45 Days PAGE: 1 .-_--_----------------------------------- ------ --- QUOTATION PROPOSAL This Quotation congtituterms - mid an otfor to fur"i4h e:u itaMa listad aubjecA tot termid conditions ataCed hereon • rcceiye of your puret>,zac order by Automatic syatOU Ce,; Arlt, Iowa; and written acceptance of your order by AutcmQtic 6yacrtsni CO. and/os she hmaufacrarertel involved ro lolloHoa M ARE PLEASED TO OFFER THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE TO THB BELOW REFERENCED SPECIFICATION SECTIONS - 13300 — WATER METER 16900 — STARTER AND MOTOR CONTROL 16950 — INSTRUbO NTATION AND CONTROL Notes; l.) We will provide a Supply and Performance Band for the following equipment and services at an additional cost of approximately $10.00/thousand. An insura=ce certificate will be provided upon . request. 2.) All proposed control panels/MCCs will be factory fabricated, Painted, assembled, wired, tested and ready for installation and connection to power and separate mounted control and MANUFACTURERS WSPRES514TATIVES 9 CONTROLS MECHANICAL 5QU1PMENT 1a MAIN OFFICE: P.O. BOX 120359 ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112 PHONE 651-631.8005 (FAX) 651-631.0027 O BRANCH OFFICE: P.O. BOX 787 AM15S, IOWA 50010 PHONE 616-232'-4710 (FAX) 515,2324705 J YLI-II NO. 757 P.5/9 -FROM (�L 51 f'FaliL, MN PHONE NO. : 6516310027 Apr. 21 2004 05:35PM P3 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. A N U P A C T V R Z R S A U V R Z 3 Z W T A T 2 V 3 QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASCO30421LS Rev. A DATE: April 21, 2004 PAGE: 2 ----------------------------------------------------- I -------------------- QUOTATION PROPOSAL ---------------------------------------- - ------- -------------------------- inatrtmerxtaticn devices. devices. All panels/MCCe will be supplied with U.L. 509 Labeling and Nameplates as required. A One (1) Variable Frequency Drive (VF;D) for well No- 6, 75 HP, 480 Vac, 3-phase in a free standing NEMA. 1 enclosure for installation where shown on plan page E3. Proposed VFD includes surge protection, arrestors, surge cap, auxiliary contacts, analog inputs/outputs and will be oversized to accommodate the additional amp draw of a submersible motor in accordance with specification section 16900. One (1) VIM output Filter, 480 vac for installation per numbered note 1 on plan page M, as shown on plan page E4 and as detailed in specification section 16900 page S. C One (1) 150 Asp Feeder Breaker, 480 Vac, 3 --pole, 42KAIC for installation in the existing motor control, center per numbered note 5 on plan page E3 and as shown on plan page E4, Proposed feeder breaXer will be provided complete including stab -in bucket assembly, operating handle, door and nameplate. D one (1.) Well #6 Drawdown, Level Transmitter as shown on plan pages E2, ES and as detailed in specification section 16650 pages 7 & 8. _E One _(1-Y_--Chemical-Room-7riit--Heater -Thermostat With remote sensing bulb per numbered note 9 on plan page E3. F One (1) Lot of Modifications to the existing Supervisory C04trol Panel as shown on plan pages E3, E4, E5 and as detailed in specification section 16950. Proposed panel modifications shall be complete with required Programmable Logic controller (PLC) input/outputs, relays, selector switches, fuses and customer terminal blocks. G One (1) Lot of System Software Modifications to integrate the new well 46 into the existing SCADA system including Programmable FROM h�t`a i "rHL1I , 'i•N`j r� NO. 757 P. 6/9 PHONE NO. ; 6516310027 Apr. 21 2004 05;3SFM P4 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. X A N b P A C T U R B R 3 R R p R E$ E N T A r Y v S QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASCO3042ILS Rev. A DATE: April 31, 2004 PAGE: 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTATION PROPOSAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ ---------------------------------------- Logic--------------------------------------- Logic "Controller programming, Operator Interface Terminal programming, Graphic User Interface programming, report system programming and alarm notification system programming as outlined in specification section 16950. The new well status, alarming and control will also be added to the existing SCADA master and be re -transmitter through the tank repeater to the new West WWTP currently being constructed. H One (1). Lot supplies, startup and calibration. Note: We take exception to the acceptance testing, training and call-back services as specified on spec page 16950-8, 16950-9 and 1.6 9 5 0 -10 . Training and call back hours will be provided as part of the Pumphouse project. Additional hours are not included in this proposal. I Seven (7) Sets of Approval Drawings/Data fully coordinated with primary elements, motor control equipment and autosensory equipment. J Four (4) Copies of Complete Installation, Operation, Maintenance Maauala. . Note: Separate manuals will not be provided. O & M information will be incorporated into P=rphouse project. K One (1.) Lot of Electrical Installation by a licensed electrical contractor including all conduit, wire, labor, taxes, permits and inspections. -------- ------------------- - ------ ----- --You=- net --price for Items A through K, FOB factory with freight allowed to jobsite including one (1) year warranty from date of startup (riot to exceed 18 months from date of shipment).............................$54,098.00 The above price for Items A through K does not include any; • Bond costs. • Chemical feed equipment. • Pumps or motors of any kiz.d. • Liquidated damages or penalties of any kind. -FRCM r,rnoC Q 1 r-rtL, di'nidrr1 PHQNE NO. : 6516310027 Apr N� 15,7204 fnPz; 7nQ1M P5 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. v A X U F A C T V R 2 R 8 R E P R 3 3 Z 0 T A T I V E QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASCO30421LS Rev. A DATE: April 21, 2CC4 PAGE; 4 QUOTATION PROPOSAL WE WISH TO POINT OUT: OUR %--RMS OF PAYMENT ARE NET 30 DAYS FROM DATE 07 INVOICE 02 DATE OF SHIPMENT, WHICH EVER COMES FIRST UNLESS STARTUP SERVICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO TIM EXPIP-hTION OF TRE 30 DAYS, IN WHICH CASE PAYMENT IS DUE IN FULL PRIOR TO STARTUP, WITH NO RETAINAGE ALLOW=! ANY BALANCE REMAINING DUE 31 DAYS BEYOND THE INVOICE DATE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A 1.5 p$R YZNT MONTHLY SERVICE FEE UNTIL PAID. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. SHALL NOT EN HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR SHALL ACCEPT ANY BA CCKARGES FOR LIRUIDATEP DAMAGES RESULTING FROM FAILURE OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TEE PROJECT CONTRACT ON TIME, OR ANY EXTRA MINEERING COSTS NECESSITATED EY THE CONTINUANCE OF WORK BRYMM THr SPECISI= COMI?LETION DATE, ADTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. ANTICIPATES DELIVERY OF A8PR1J`VAIL DRAWINGS AND MATERZAL/EQUIPMENT IN ACCOIU=CE WITH THI� PERIODS STATED ON PAGE I OF THIS PROPOSAL. MATERIAL SUPPLIERS/M"17PACTURERS axvz ?%'= EX7MMING DELIVERY SCBEDULES WITHOUT PRIOR NOTICE, AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. CANNOT ;UM A,NY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DELAYS DUE TO Zir& UNAVAZLA,BTLITY OF MATERIAL OR aUIPMENT WHICH IS BEYOND OUR CONTROL. t2ZLESS STATED OTHERWISE, THE WARRA W PERIOD FOR MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL E42IPMENT COVERED BY TMIS QUOTATION SPALL BE 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF STARTUP, NOT TO EXCEED 7.B MONTHS PROM DATE OF SHIPMENT. EXTENDED WARRANTIES ARE AVAILABLE AND WILL SE QUOTED ON REQUEST, TSE WARRAATTY PERIOD INCLUDED IN TRE A80VE SELL PRICES FOR MECHANICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT EXPARSSLY EXCLUDES THOSE ITEMS NORMALLY CONSUMED IN SERVICE. EXAMPLES: SEALS, PACKING, OIL, GREASE, LIGHT BULBS, FUSES, ETC. Respectfully submitted, AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS By Lane Stewart ---To- expedite-handling--nd-r_onf rmatiCn,-yotr-may-ssSri--below-and- forward. -as -your------ - --- - order for the equipment quoted above. Items Ordered. Total Net Price Customer Fixm Name Authorized By Purchase Order No. Hrrc. cc. cee4 .d:4.d'M NO. 757 P. 9/9 FROM . REic ST PAUL, MN PHONE N0. : 65].6310027 Apr, 21 2204 05:36PM PS TERMS AND CONDIT►ONS Page 5 Of_52 We request that aur company's quoiagon be aruecubd *you. However, yourpurdtwe: order referencing our quotation by number and date will be suf6cientso long asi, does not create an unfair advw We to either purohaser (somedmms n:ferred to as Wyeryou) orAutomadc SysWM Company (sometimes referred tow our =,panywe, our, us). The order WIN be s<ibject to Nrirten acceptance by our Company's Contracts Ofr= at Ames, Iowa. 2, Prtces are used on dlr4x:t factory snip rb, or as noted. 3. If quanlftlea vary from those indicated we reserve the right to revise our pticaa. 4. Cuoted shipping detect, unless otherwise stated, ere from the daus of reoelpt at the office of the Principal, of required oemplete technical data end/or approved drawings. Any changes requested by U Purchaser wlfl be made only at the purchasers axpanse. S. Where a gUAdly of material Is quoted according to ourfakeoA, such quantity is believed to be accurate but cannot be guarameed. S. If an Item quoted Is not approved by the Consulting Englnserwe assume no respondbifky to furnish the Rem rnanufatdured by others. 7. All orders are subjeiltn approval of the•purchasers;reQ try the Principals Involved, e, our Wartanly on equipment and material mverad hatch Is irrnited to that which Is svianded by the Manufacturer involved. We shall not be responsible for any damwe arising directly or (1101115* from installation or use of fhts equlpmenL Unless elated otherwtta M manufarxurer warrants for a period of ane (1) year from the dais of srdrWP not aro rimed is mo, from data of shlpment, that the egg*enl L4W ("eluding espendnle components such as funs grease of orwater seals, packing. light Nibs, ere.) will be fro• from We= in material and woriartanahip. The Manufacturers We o0figatien in the event of breach of such warranty than are thrt repair a replaoe:rnerd of the defec5ve item at no charge m Purt hasar, oxceptforlanar wars for repair or rtsmoval of the deterhve Adm and 03taliation of any raplacerw t Item and Pansporom dwRes for delivery of the replacement hand relum of the dgfwjve item. The Manufacturer shall have no obligation to porde mai %ur= or make repairs or fepWoernents through normal wear and tear or necmatlated In whole or In pan by catastrophe, fault or negllgenw of the ucw, improper or unauthorized use of the equipment by the user, or by causal oxlemdl to the equipment, Wt as, but not tirmted to, power Wm or ak Conditioning bdure. Replaced parts shall beconn the propeMi of the manufacturer, DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY AND UMITATION OF REMEpIES: Purchaser understands and agrees as foVows: (a) The atprass warranties set forth In file agreement are In Tisa of all other "Nn&m express or implied. Including without Ilmitation, any warranties of merchimmbft or ntnesa for a particular purpose, end an such othar warmnties aro haroby disclaimed and exduded by Aulanrark Systems Co. (b) Autonnadc Systems Cdf. shaN not be Tiable for any loss at damage caused by delay In furnishing equipment products, s er/rms or any other performance under or pwrsuent Io fhb samement (c) The sole and evdtrsiva nsmedlos for breach of any and all warranqu for AuWmaile System Compapl/s IIaDlliCy of any kind (including liatIllty for negl4ance) with raped to the equipment, products and services Covered bytNs aDreament and all other performance by Automak Systems Co. underor pursuantto this agreement shall be 1(mlhad W the remedy provided above. (d) In no awnt shaA Automatic Systems company's Ifaptttry of any ylnd Incluce any sperlal, incidental or consequential damages, even 9 Aulomadc Symm Company shall have been advised of to possibiNtyolsuch Dolantial logs ordemaAe, s. Any ptailronery drawings ane Auslratdve materials herewith shofar germral arrangement end aporWmate dimensions only. Cer6fhed drawingswln be submitted after reoalpt of aider if required. 10. No returns for credit will be allowed wmZhoutspec7c peenissfon by the PrIndpal Involved before such return shipment is made. if. Any materiel and/or equipment held st the Purchasers request from the data of dhe Involca will be stored at the Purchasers expense unlese otherwiso egrwd upon, Invoice will be rendered, as of the date equipment h ready forshfPmtent 12. Unrass 3pCdfiCal1rY stated heroin, an material and/or equipment ahal be Installed and placod In service by and at the expense and under the exclusive responsibility of the Purchaser_ 13. Purchaser ahail be responsble for care, rnalnWnance and protection of materiel and/or equipment after delvery, Purchaser agrees to provide and maIrmfn adequate Insurance for equipment and/or materials covered herein against Ions or damage by Are, explosion or other msec during the Arne between shipdnent and final payment In an amount fully pretedn¢ vendor. 14, AA egreamenb are apntingent upon abtkes, accidents or *or causes beyond our con%. -please nota that our proposal dose not Include any sales or other requited truces or permim. The appllcable tax vA be charged to you- attha time of Involcing.- B ycu fare - - -- - - - eFampt on this; job, you will need is provide us with your exemption cerifiate. You egret to relmburse our company for any taxes we must pay on your behalf. You are nuprn>21 l fey abUning Parmltg in connoteion with the sale or Installation of our equipment, is, Our proposal inclUdw the equipment we offer to furnish you at the prices stated and'Ihese prices will remain Arm when you ekaaula our proposal (or send us your PWohasc order T -hi ting our proposal) vgthlr 30 days from the date or our prmpocai and w2 receive dhe final approved drawings within 30 days atb:rwe nii the shop drawing bcolclatr. The pdne could change If you should require a change in the design of the product or require changes in the cumponens we have quotid. We win issue the W56sary charge orders to either docrnase or inulase the price and said change ordars Will be doomed accepted and assented to you if within a reasonable lithe the term q► Me change order have not been obleded to In wridng by you to us. it bong agreed upon #tat a reasonable time for objection is 20 days from the dale thereof. We of course want to reserve the right to correct typing and clerical errors In our price or proposal. LInl4w we agree ottwrwtse this transactlon will be handiad on a aedft basis and is for business or mrnmerdal purpowd. On this basis there must be agrEemenis on certain terms and conditions so there wlp W no misunderstandin9 at a later data. therefore you and our company agree to the following such Teams and Condh4ons: FROM " ASC ST PAUL, MIN Zr1 I PHONE NO, : 651631d027 Rpr.N 21 2004 05:937pM P7 ' TERMS ANO CONDITIONS - Conlinutd Page � of i0 (e) We will rgta(n title to and a secured kftem it in the agtapmeni described In the proposal until we ata paid In full. You and our company agree and it is our mutual i ntentlon that the equipment proposed and described in our qualm is now and ahal retaln petsooal property and shall not become ■ fixture or part of a Unum until we have been gold in fug. In ofroct you and our company, ars agreeing to waive any other possible defmftian of the equipment ao proposed and descried for the purpose of this artaTansac ion that would Invalldste your and our stated intention, and sono unfair advantage will be gained by any tnlrtd person or ar,tity should our mmpany riot be paid for any reason, (b) Payment subject to continuing approval of credit. Is due in Nil and payable 30 days from the data of invoice or date of ShIpment, which ever tames first unless startup service Is mqulred Par to the ezp1mdan of the 30 days in w" csa payment Is due In fug prlorto smdup, wifit no refalnege allawedl Our company will Invoice you, as the egvdpmaM you wkmd is ready to be shlppad. which may be *Min tine estimated shipment period quoted to you or after sunt period You agree 1: pay in Nil all Invaim within the time spedfiad above in Nis subparagraph. Your payment to us wlli not * dependent or wntingent upon mcaipt of payment by You from any ottar party Any balance ramalri ft due 31 days beyond the invokes date will be subjed it a 15 perrrnl monthly seMce fee unto paid. Should we have to engage an aftrney to coiled the balance due tis, dud" the service fee, you agree le rarriN se us for an collection cme inducing reasonable attorney" fees. (c) Once manufacture of the equilomem has begun. you will be nodded of the tenladve shipment date. tan® the equipment is ready to be shipped, we or the manufacturer may, at our option. agram io amore the equipment should you not be ready for dollvaq. twtb* wg) not postpone your duty to pay the ocica(s) as they become due savrdlttg to the tetras of Ibis contract Shmid our company rind k necessary to store such equipment Por said reason you hereby agree m pay a stome fee at the rate of 15% of the Contract price per month In addition to your duty to pay hwt: c (s). Please note that your mtum of the final approved drawings will oondluts your notice to us to proceed with tine manufacturing of the equ(pment (d) Our company will oat be liabis far arty damages sustained by you resuldrg from aur company s aranysupp" failure tp perform or daisy In perfornting any obligadon, If aitch Nlure(s) at dday(s) elan raersed directly or indhvW by dreumstances or events beyond our control. Some eit3mple3 Include invasion, Insu rriMlon, not Tire, flooding, ie*%, abc, A morn common emirrple of such dreumsbnws of events would be the failure of a MXX or supplier to meet delivery schedules. You agree to waive arty right m Incidental or=nsequomfal damages as stated In our company's wrranty, and as further agmed herein. Yov further agree that our ca Tinny VA not be reeaponslbfe for any 'baekcharges' or =M5 unless and unfd you brat obtain our company" written aopmval Were you mat* such tackehargas' or mats, (a) You agree that K aur equipment Is inslaled or re a(rod by olhem you will nat seek to hold us responsible for any damage and in)uy, which may result from such in3mil;z ion or repair, directly or indirectly. In addl5on, our campany WM not ee mesponslhia for damage to your property or any other property, real or permnal, caused by rralfun*n of our equipment whether or not 9 is Installed by Others or by our company. l0 In nrdar for our company to insure derRM, a is agreed by yoq and by our company that you provide us wart an a— feed to and barn ire job site, which mad Is capable of supporting 7mcde loaded to 75,000 pounds And wRh a 14 foot height clearanoa, Should the fob sfm orau:r tile=d not be suitable for sudi use and our pub, you brat relrrrburse us for any delays at the hourly labor rate and demurrage raja current al. that lime. You will ago be responsibl9 for unioading the equipment unless we are respenslbie for the erection of he equipment (9) The responaibdhy fvr prowcrion of the wplpmentwM be yours after it Is delivered to the Job site. Damage to the equlpmant after delivery, which Is caused try vandalism, the elements or ogterwtae will be your rmpansmlbi rCtq and not that of our company. (h) Far your added protection, we are providing you with a warranty on our squipm in which Is made part of our proposal, and Whitt Is made a part of this agreement by refamrim (I) Except as Otherwise contained In the Quotation, This Contract afterac eptance by you ig not =)=o cancellation by Buyer except prior to shoment and then only by the payment to urs an amount egtral b the cost of labor and materials used plus 10% of quoted sales price as pggidatfng damages, which the Buyer hereby. agreesto pay, Ordera for c istom equipment (non-apndard at non�toolmd equipment), or designed equipment are not cancelable by you, (11 We both agree that this contort mritalns the complete and offal agreement between ua and may not be MOdalad, suppiememed, explained, or waived by parole evidence, your purrhoae wrlar, course of deaiing, or any natter way, except whore made in w0V and signed by you and our companys out &w officer. . 18. Sines we w81 ciao this agreement upon acceptance of it by our Contract's officer in Ames, Iowa, it Is understood by you and OUT compar y that the laws of the State of terra cam govern the ContracL Default and our ramadw.s thereafter are deMad and outlined below. You shall be in default under the contract upon the happening of any one or nar>a of pre following: (a) Defsult in the paytitent of performance of any oblbaDon you hove urmderthis tofhtm4 or (b)Any xWemont of material fact, rt(ade ib writing b�You wriur oorrtpatty, v 1cft proves to be of n(or _- -- - -. - - - - - CF- - Arty omssion.irom any statement made in writing by 1rou bour rsnmpSnY, of any material tact 00 is nta>3saary in creat to make such sraterner>B not misleading or (d) Any event, or change armndlon, which Impalrs yaurahility to pay ar perform your obi(gatbo under this writ= or (a) Any went or condition which reasonably justifies our company in deeming Malf inseaire, Upon defauttby you, and starrytime thereafter, ourcampany shall haw, at Its opilon, the rightta exercise any one or more of tate fonowlrrg remedies (a) Priorto dal wy of the equipment described In this Contract lo refuse to deriver9uch equipment to you or youragent: or (b) i uierdse any romody available to our company undertfte Unftorm Commercial Code or undar any other laws of the jurisdirdlon where such ronteey is sough to be exercised; or (c) gnwr the real 0=12 upon which such equipment Is stored or Installed and rake passegion of such equipment and remove tbt sante, without demand and other legal process; or (d) Demand that you shall assemble such equipment and mage it available to our company at a Dlace reasonable mnvepterit W you and our company and Nrewon you shall cvmpiv with such demand at your expense; to (e) Reteln all Bums rec.lwd by our company as payment tram you made prior to any repossession relened to in subpardgrapth (c) atwve: or (4 Vold all warrantles and refuse service and slap-up; or (9) Salt such equipment st public or prtuate sale, with our without nodes, at a fair price, HrK.cc.cee4 41PM N0.757 P.2/9 ITEM 7-1 i�11Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 ASSOC., Inc. Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax., 763/427-0520 April 22, 2004 Honorable Mayor and City Co=cil City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 Re: Negotiated Electrical Bid Items Improvement Project No. 04-07, Municipal Well # 6 Dear Mayor and City Council: As directed by City Council, we have met with the electrical contractor, HyMark Electric, Inc. and the system integrator, Automatic Systems Inc. to negotiate a resolution to the perceived high cost of the electrical items in this project. As you were advised in our letter last week, Stuart Stephens's detailed estimate of the two electrical items came to a total of $ 47,237 as compared to the original bid price of $ 80,300. During our discussion with Automatic Systems on the project and the scope of worn., it became evident that the expedition of this project to be completed in 60 days was resulting in substantial risk premiums being added to the quotes from Automatic Systems. In addition, the equipment manufacturer, Allen Bradley, of the VFD and most of the electrical equipment to be installed had quoted prices that were approximately $ 7,000 higher than normal for the extremely short delivery time, We advised Automatic Systems that we could extend the substantial completion date to July 1"'. This would mean that the electrical drive and switches would have to be completed and the pump motor fully operational prior to July 1St. Our discussion also uncovered a significant duplication of effort factor in the SCADA bid item. Automatic Systems had taken the specifications to mean that he would have to prepare separate wiring diagrams, shop drawings and separate program logic for just Well #6, in addition to the SCADA modifications they are already tuider contract to perform tinder Purriphouse 03. We arrived at a solution to the duplicated effort by allowing the completion of the SCADA modification work for Well # 6 to coincide with the completion of the overall SCADA system already in progress with Automatic Systems. The third element of cost reduction that we discussed was the inherent factor of cost escalation as the vender's price goes through the electrical subcontractor and then continues to the prime contractor. This typically results in a 15% overhead figure being added by the electrical sub- contractor. Then the prime contractor adds his 15% overhead figure to the sub -contractors quote, The end result is a final price that is over 32% higher than the original venders cost, Civil 6- Municipal �� G:\Municipal\AOTSLG0\519\ot519 Award Electric.�oc'Enonerring and Survrying fnr APR.22.2004 3:42PM NO.757 P.3i9 To reduce this project management inflation, Automatic Systems will be the prime contractor and HyMark Electric will be a sub -contractor to them. We had already significantly reduced this inflation by eliminating the electrical work from Traut Wells contract. Therefore, the resolution that we propose for City Council's acceptance consist of the following contract item: 1. Enter into a separate contract, per the attached proposal, at the negotiated price of $ 54,098.00 with Automatic Systems Inc. for combined scope of work identified in Bid Item No, 30 and Bid Item No. 38. The end result is a net project cost decrease of $ 26,202.00. If these actions are approved by City Council, we will prepare the Contracts for execution. Sincerely, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc, William L. Morris, Jr., P.E. WLM: dlc Enclosure cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk Ron Wagner, City Engineer Dave Traut, Traut Wells Kurt Paddock, HyMark Electric Lane Stewart:, Automatic Systems Stuart Stephens, Kaeding & Associates G:\Municipgl\AOTSEGO\Sl9\ot519 Award 8locuic.doc Hakanson Anderson ■■ Assoc:, Inc. APR. 22.2004 3:42PM ,FROM . H=I- =1 rHUL, FIN PHONE NO. : 6515310027 Apr N ;1 5 004 05 34PM P2 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS TO: City of Otsego QUOTATION/ C/O Mr. Bill Morris PROPOSAL NO: ASCO4042ILS DATE: April 21, 2004 SUBJECT: Well #6 F.o.B.: Factory Frt. allowed to jobsite- Improvement Project 04-07 City of Otsego 8ID DATE: NA APPROVAL DRAWINGS: 1 Week from receipt of an acceptable order. SHIPMENT: 5-7 Weeks f rom receipt of approval. CUOTATTON EXPIRES: 45 Days PAGE: 1 --------------- — . — — — — — — - - - - — - — — — — — .. — ,. - - - - - - - - — — — — - - - r - - - — — — — � — - — - - - - - — — - — - QUOTATION PROPOSAL ---------------------------------------------------- This quotacion conocitntes an o$far to �mrni,sb eh6 itiMa 1,aca4 subject for Cezma and conditions etaCed hereon: roeei9e of your pUxchaae order by Automatic Systomr, co,,, Amor, Iowa; and vr4,Cte-n acceptance of yoµr order by Automat;c $yag9mo Co. uld/or Che nwr+ufaeeure"ie1 involved Av folloWs: WE ARE PLEASED TO OFFER THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE TO THE BELOW REFERENCED SPECIFICATION SECTIONS: 13300 - WATER METER 16900 - STARTER AND MOTOR CONTROL 16950 - INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL Notes: 1.) We will provide a Supply and Performance Bona for the following equipment and services at an additional cost of approximately $10,00/thousand. Ari insurance cerzificata will be provided upon request. 2.) All proposed control, panels/MCCs will be factory fabricated, painted, assembled, wined, tested and ready for installation and connection to power and separate mounted control and MANUFACTURERS REPRFSENTATIVES 9 CONTROLS 0 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAIN OFFICE: P.O. BOX 120359 ST, PAUL, MINNESOTA 55112 PHONE 651-631.19005 (FAX) 651-6310027 D BRANCH OFFICE: P.O. SOX 797 AMOS, IOWA 50010 PHONE 515-232-4770 (FAX) 515.232.0705 APR.22.2004 3:42PM NO.757 P.5i9 'FROM : R�5L 5'I h'RLlL, MN PHONE NO. : 6516310027 Apr. 21 2004 05:35PM P3 AZJTOX;LTI C SYSTEMS CO. D7 L7FAcTVR$R S REYR2SZVTAT Z VP QT JOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASCO3042ILS Rev. A DATE: April 21, 2004 PAGE: 2 ------------------------------------ ---------------------------------- 1 - --------------- -------------- I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - QUOTATION PROPOSAL --------------------------------- ------ ------------------------- instruti6rnLation devices. All pastels1mcCs will be supplied with U.L. 508 Labeling and Nameplates as required. A One (1) variable Frequency Drive ('VPD) for well No. 6, 75 HP, 460 Vac, 3-phase in a free standing NEMA 1 enclosure for installation where shown on plan page E3. Proposed VFD includes surge protection, arrestors, surge cap, auxiliary contacts, analog inputs/outputs and will be oversized to accommodate the additional amp draw of a submersible motor in accordance with specification Section 16900. One (1) VFD output Filter, 480 vac for installation per numbered note 1 on plan page 23, as shown on plan page E4 and as detailed in specification section 16900 page 5. C One (1) 150 Amp Feeder Breaker, 480 Vac, 3 -pole, 42KAZC for installation in the existing motor control. center per numbered note 5 on plan page E3 and as shown on plan page E4, Proposed feeder breaXer will be provided complete including stab -in bucket assembly, operating handle, door and nameplate. D One (1) Well #6 Drawdown Level Transmitter as shown on plan pages E2, ES and as detailed in specification section 16650 pages 7 6. E One (1) Chemical Room Unit Heater Thermostat with remote sensing bulb per numbered note 9 on plan page E3. F one (1) Lot of Modifications to the existing Supervisory Coatxol Pane, as shown on plan pages E3, E4, ES and as detailed in specification section 16950. Proposed panel modifications shall be complete with required Programmable Logic Controller ()?LC) input/outputs, relays, selector switches, fuses and custAmer terminal blocks. G One (1) Lot of System Software Modifications to integrate the new well 46 into the existing SCADA system including Programmable FROM APR�22�200HLILI 14N2PM PHONE N0, : 6516310027 . 21 2 P.:35 Rpr. 21 2x04 05:35PM P4 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. ' DT ti F A C T V R E R S R 8 P R E 5 E N T 4 T 7 V S QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO.: ASC03042ILS Reis. A DATE: April 21, 2004 PAGE o 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- QUOTATION PROPOSAL ---------------------------------'----------------------------------------- Logic—Controller programming, Operator Interface Terminal programming, Graphic User Interface programming, report system programming and alarm notification system programming as outlined in specification section 16950. The new well status, alarming and control will also be added to the existing SCADA master and be re -transmitter through the tank repeater to the new West WWTP currently being constructed. F one (1), Lot supplies, startup and calibration. Note: We take exception to the acceptance testing, training and call-back services as specified on spec page 16950-8, 16950-9 and 16950-10. Training and call back hours will be provided as part of the Pumphouse project. Additional hours are not included in this proposal. I Seven (7) Sets of Approval Drawings/Data fully coordinated with primary elements, motor control equipment and autosensory equipment. J Four (4) Copses of Complete installation, operation, Maintenance Manuals. Note: Separates manuals will not be provided. 0 & M information will be incorporated into Pumphouse project. K One (1) Lot of Electrical installation by a licensed electrical contractor iZicluding all conduit, ware, Labor, taxes, permits and inspections. Your net price for Items A through K, FOB factory with freight allowed to jobsite including cna (1) year warranty from date of startup (not to exceed 3.8 months from date of shipment).............................$54,09$.00 The above price for Items A through K does not include any; Bond costs. • Chemical feed equipment. • Pumps or motors of any kizid . • Liqu�dated damages or pexialties of any kind. -FROM APR 22. 200,4LJL. �:043PM PHONE N0. 6516310927 Apr N .75e7=204 fnpz; 7n'�e9r'M P5 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. N U F a C T V R 2 R 3 g I V R S S B 07 X T I V E QUOTATION/ PROPOSAL NO,: ASCO30421LS Rev. A DATF,: April, 21, 2004 PAGE; 4 ------------------------------------------------------- -- ----- QUOTATION PROPOSAL -------------------- -----_----------------------------------- WE WISH TO POINT O= OUR TERMS OF PAYMENT ARE NET 30 DAYS FROM DATE Or INVOICE OR DATE OF SHIPMENT, WRICB EVER COMES FIRST UNLESS STARTUP SERVICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF TTm 30 DAYS, IN' WHICH CASE PAYMENT IS DUE IN FULL PRIOR TO STARTUP, WITH NO RETAZNAGE ALLOWED! ANY BALANCE{ REMIXING DUE 31 DAYS BEYOND THE INVOICE DATE WILL BE SUBJECT TO A 1.5 PERCENT MONTHLY SERVICE FEE UNTIL PAID. AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR SHALL ACCEPT ANY RACKCHARGES FOR LIQUUIDATEP DAMAGES RESULTING PROM FAILMM OF THE CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT CONTRACT ON TIME, OR ANY EXTRA ENGINEERING COSTS NECESSITATED BY THE CONTINUANCE OF WORK BEYOND THE SPECIFIED COMPLETION DATE. A=CMATIC SYSTEMS CO. ANT2CIPATBS DF LTVERY OF A88RDVAL DRAWINGS AND MATERIAL/EQUIPMENT IN ACCOPIWCE WITH TIF4 PERIODS STATED ON PAGE 1 OF THIS PROPOSAL. MATERIAL SUPPLIERS/D8LV7FACTURERS HAVE BFEN EXTENDING DELIVERY SCHEDULES WITHOUT PRIOR XO!fICE, AUTOMATIC SYS7W4S CO. CANNOT :JME PINY RESPONSIBILITY FOR DELAYS DUE TO TNR UNAVAILABILITY OF MATERIAL OR TIPMENT WHICH IS BEYOND OUR CONTROL. UNLESS STATED OTHERWISE, THE WARRANTY PERIOD FOR MECHWICAL AND/OR ELECTRICAL EQIIIPMSNT COVERED BY THIS QUOTATION SHALL BE 1 YEAR FROM DATE OF STARTUP, NOT TO EXCEED tis MONTHS FROM DATE of SHIPMrWT. EXTENDED WARRANTIES ARE AVAILABLE AND WILL EE QUOTED ON REQUEST, TM WARRANTY PERIOD INCLUDED IN THE ABOVE SELL PRICES FOR MECHANICAL A=/OR ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SXPPMSSLY EXCL=ZS THOSE ITEMS NORMALLY CONSUMED IN SERVICE. £7CAMPLES: SEALS, PACKING, OIL, GREASE, DIGHT BULBS, FUSES, 4TC. Respectfully oubmitted, AIDTOMATIC SYSTEMS C: By Lane Stewart To expedite handling and confirmation, you may sign below =d forward as your order for the equipment quoted above, Items Ordered. Total Net Prioe customer Firm Name Authorized By Purchase Order No. APR.22.2004 3:43PM NO.757 P.8i9 FROM : iPSC ST PAUL, MN PHONE NO. : 65/6310027 Fpr. 21 2004 05:36PM P6 TERMS AND CONDITIONS Page 5 v 6 We request tial our company's quotslon be executN by you. Nawever, your purchase order referencing our quotation by number and date will he sufficient so long as ft does not create an unfair advantage to either purcltaaer (someJrnas retorted to as puyer you) er Auuamadc Systems Company (sometimes referred to as our mmpanywe, our, us). The order will be subject to written acceptance by our mmpany's Contracts Officer at Ames, Iowa. 21 Prtces are based on direct factory Shipments, or as noted. 3. If quantitles vary inert those indicated we reserve t)te rig ht to revise our prices. d. Ouotod shiprAg dates, untass otherwise stated, ere from the date of remot at the attire of the principal, of required complete technical data anular approved drawings. Any Manges requested by the purchaser will be made only tit the purchasers expanse. S. Where a qu-in* of material is quoted according to ourtekeolf, such quantity is believed to be accurate but cannot be guaraniNd. 5, If an Item quatrad Is not approved by the Consulting pnglneer we assume no responsibility to furnish the Item manufactured by others. 7. All orders are subject to approval of the,purchasers credit by u,,e Pdriclpa►s Involved, 6. Our Warranty on equipment and material covered �hareln Is limited to that which Is sxWnded W the Manufacturer inw&Gd. We shall not tie rosponsltle for any damage arising directly or Indlrscdy from instaPation or use of this equipment Unless stated otherwl o oto manufacturer warrants far a period of one (1) year from the date of startup not to exceed 18 tiro, from data of shipment, that the equipment Itsted (excluding expendsale components audt as {uses grease oil orwater seals, packing. fight bglbs, bar-) vt41Y be frog from defects in mateijal and workmanship, The Manufacturers safe oCfigatien in the event of breach of such warranty shall tie the repair or replacement of the defective item at no charge to Puithasar, exceptfarlabor roosts for repair or removal of the detective Han and installation of any mplacemerit Item and 7ansporraIIon dunes for delivery ofihe replacement and return of the dGfechve item. repairs or replacements through nornml wear and tear or necessitated In whole or in pan by cotasbaphe, fault or negligence of the uaar, improper or unauthori2sd use of the equipment by the user, or try causes external to the equipment, such ea, but not limited to, power failure or air conditioning failure. Replaced parts shall bewrne the property of fie ►nanutecturvr. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY AND LIMITATION OF REMEDIES: Purchaser undemiande and agrees as follows: (a) The express warranties set fPrh In this agreement are in lieu of all other warianties, express or implied, Including wlMout Ilmitatlott, any warcanli s of merchantability or fitness fora padwlar purpose, and all such othor warrapUes are haroby disclaimed and excluded by Auwrnadc Systems Co, (b) Automatic Systema Cxu shall not be liable forany loss at damage caused by delay in fumishing equipment products, seNces or any other performance under or pursuant io this a®reement (c) The sole and esdusiwe ramhadios for preach of any and all warranlles far Automatic systems company's Ilablltry of any kind (including IiatIllty for neglNance) wkh Ympod to the equipmefrt, products and services covered bythis agreement and all other perform9nm by Autom]tic Systems Co_ underor pursuantto thb agreement shall be Ilmltod to tits remedy provided above. (d) In no event shalt Automatic Systems Company's riapiliry of any kind Inquoe any sp clal, Incidental or consequential damages, even if Automatic Sysurm Company shall have been advised of Vie possibility of such potential lass or damage. S. Any pre8minary drawinga and Illustrative materials herewith show genal arrangement and apDmIrriate dimensions only. Cetried drawingswlll M submitted after moot of order if required. 10. No returns for credit will be allowed wittroulspecific peenisslon by the principal Involvad before such return shipment is made. 11. Any rnaterW apd/or equipment hold at tho purchasers request from tho date of the Involve will be stored at the Purchasers expense unless ot'torwiso agreed upon. Invoice will be rendered, as of ttte date equlpment Is ready forshipment. 12, Unless specifically stated herein, all malarial and/or equipment shall be installed and placed In service by and at the expense and under the exclusive responsibility of the Purchaser - 13, Purchaser ahttll be responsible for care, maintenance and protection of materfel and/or equipment atter delivery, Purchaser agrees to provide and ntalntaln adequate Insurance for equipment and/or materials covered herein against Ions or damage by Are, explosion or other causes during the time betwean shipment and final payment In an amount" protmVp vendor. 14, All egreaments are contingent upon abikm. accidents or other causes beyond our control. 1s. Please nate that our proposal does not Include any sales or other required aures or permdie. The appllable tax will be ctlergad to you a the Gme of Involcing. It you are esampt on Il is job, you will need to provide we with your exemption ceraficam. You agree to telmt:urse our company for any taxes we muni pay on your behalf. You err: msponslble for obtaining parmib in connection with the sale or installation o° our equipment Is. Our proposal includou the equipment we offer to furnish you at the prices stait<d Ind, Ihsse prig will remain 11rm when you sxaairu our proposal (er send ua your purchaac order refamcing our proposal) within 30 days from the date of our propor4l and We resolve the final approved drawings within 30 days afterwe nZil the shop drawing booklets. The prim could change if you should requlm a change in the design of rho product or require changes in the components twre have qua*. We will Issue the naez, wry change orders to eflher daerease or increeaa the price and said change orders VAH be doomed gmepted and assented to you If within a rmsonable Erne the terms of the change ober have not boon objected to in writing by you to us. it being agreed upon that a reasonable dme for objection is 20 days from the dale - thereof. We of course want to reserve the right to mroct typing and derlml errors In our price or proposal. Unless we agree ot; rwise this transaction will be htndiad on a credit basis and it for business or commard&I putpos . On this W5;Ls the, must be agrwnants on cartaln terms and condlgens so there *111 W no misunderstanding at a later data. Ihamfote you and our company agree to the following such Tents and Cendibons: APR.22.2004 3:43PM -FROM ; ASC ST PALL, MN NO. 757 P.9/9 PHONE NO. : 6516310027 Rpr. 21 2004 25:37PM P7 TERMS AND CONDITIONS —Continued Page 6 of 6 (e) We 01 nara(n ft to and a secured interest in the equipment described in the proposal until we aro paid In full. You and our company agree and It Is our mutual indention thstthe equipment proposed and deaoribed In our quote is now and ahan retaln personal property and shall not become a fixture or pan of a flxture until we have been paid 1nfug, In effoct you and our company are agreeing to waive any other passible definition of the aqulpmerrt iso proposed and dew+hed forte purpose of this credttfansacdon that would Invalidate your and our stated Intention, and so lhat no unfair advantage will be gamed by any third person or entity should our mmpany not be paid for any reason. (b) Payment. subject to continuing approval of cedit Is due in full and payable 30 days from the date of invoice or date of shipment which ever comas first unless startup setvlce Is required prior to the expiration of the 30 days in which case payment ci due In full prior to startup, with no retainage allowed) Our company win Invoke you, as the equipment you ordemd Is ready to be shipped. which may he within the estimated 0orriellt period quoted to you or after such period. You 29ree to pay in full all Innes within the time specified stove In this sub -paragraph, `four payment to uswill not be dependent or contingent upon rvcaipr of payment by you from any outer party. Any balance mmalning due 31 days beyond the Invoice date 9611 be subject to a 1.5 percent monthly servlm fee until paid. Should we have to engage an attcmey to colea the balance due us, including the service fee, you agree to reimburse us for an collection onsis indu66ng reasonable attomey" fees. (c) Once manufacture of the equipmsm has begun, you will be notified of the tentadve shipment date, Once the equipment is ready to be shipped, we or the manufacturer may, at our option, agras to store the equipment should you not be ready for denvery. butttlisurT not postpone your duty to pay the involeajs) as They become due according to the telcos of this contract Should our company rind It necessary to stare such equipment for said reason you hereby agree to pay a strime fee at the to of 15% of the contract price per month In addition to your duty to pay Invoim(s), Please note that your return of the fir+al approved drawings will cwratituts your nada to us to proteeQ With the manufacturing of the equipment, (d) our mrnpany win not be liable for any damages sustained by you rnuld" from our company's orany suppllers failure to perform or delay In performing any ooligadon, If eudh fallure(s) at delay(s) elate routed directly or indirectly by circumstances or events t,ayond our control. Some eiempies include lmrasicn, Insurr4on, tint fire, flooding, bWkec, abr. A more common example of such ciruumstanms of events would be the Nitura of a truck or supplier to meet delivery agnedules. You agree to walve any r�ht to Incidental cr ennsequcntial damages as stated In our company's warranty, and as further agmed herein. Yov further agree that our company will not be maponslbfe for any `backchatges' or m91:5 unless and unttl you first obtain our company" written aDproval before you susttfn such'bacirzharges, or met i, (e) You agree that K aur ecplpment Is Insiatied or repalrea by others, you win not seek to hold us responatble for any damage and injuy, which may resull from such iristatiatfon or repair, dlmcify or indirmt. In addition, aur carrhpany wlb not ee resoonslble for damage to your property or any other property, real or peramtel, caused by malftmction of our equipment whether or not It is InstaW by others or by our mmpany. (I) in order for our company to insure delivery, It is agreed by you and by our company thin you provide us wilt) an aces toad to and from file job site, which road is capable of supporting trud6 loaded to 75,000 pounds and wt a 14 foot height ctearanm, Should the job site or such road not W sultabie for such use and aur purposes, you Will reimburse us for any delays at the hourly labor rate and demwrege rate current at that time. You will also be responsible for unloadlrig fie equipment, unless we arra responstblefor the erection of Ins equipment, (g) The reeponslaility for protection 0 to equipment will be yours akar it Is delivered to The job sire. Damage in die equipment after delivery, wilicn Is caused by %andeltsm, the elements or oylarwlte will he your resportsibffity and not that of our company. (h) For your added protecton, we are providing you with a warranty on our equipment which Is made pan of our proposal, and whim is made a part of this agreement by rafsrence. p) Except as otherwise =ntalned In the Quotation, this Contract after=prance by you is notsuajeet to cancellation by Buyer except pdorto shipment and then only by the payment to us an amount equal to the cast of tabor and materials used plus 10% of quoted sales prim as liquidating damages, which the Buyer hereby, agrees to pay, Orders forcustom equipment (non-standard or poq-clocked rtquipment), or deslgnad equipment are not pric&ble by you, Vl We both agree that this contract eentalns the complete and anal -agreement between us and may not be modified, supplemented, explained, or waived by parole evidence, your purrhaue order, course of deallne. or any other way, except whore made in writing and signed by you and our company's sulhoriaed offitaQr_ 1a. Since we will close this agreement upon acceptance of k by our Contract's Officer in Ames, Iowa, It Is understaed by you and our company that the laws of the State at Iowa will govern the Contract Default and our ramsdies thereafter are dented and oudlned below. You shall be In default under the contract upon the happening of any one or moat of the following; (a) pefault in the paYf1tent or performance of any obItation you have underihis contract; or (b) Any statement of a matwial fact made in writing by you to our company, whirl proves to be untrue; or (c) Any omission, from any statement made in writing by you to our company, of any material fact which Is necessary in order to make such statements not misleading; or (d) Any event or change of condition, which Impairs your ability % pay or perform your obtfgatlon under this rorttr= or (a) Any event or condition which reasonablyjustifies our companY to deeming 11saff hsecure, Upon default by you, and at arty time thereafter, our company shall have. at Its ophlon, the rightto eaerciss any one or more of Cho following remedies (a) Priorio daivery of the equipment desalbad In this Conbr-A la refuse to deliver such equipment to you or your agent; or (b) Ryarcise any remedy available to our company mderthe uniform Commercial Cod@ or under any other laws of the jurisdtceon where such remedy U scuumm be exermised; or (c) Enter the real osGra uoon which such equipment Is stared or Installed and talcs possession of such equipment and tamoye the lama, without demand and other legal prootass; or (d) Demand that you shall assemble such equipment and make it available to our company at a place rMsonable mnveniemt to you and our company and thereubon you shall comply witll such demand at your expense; or (e) Retain all auras received by our company as payment from you made prior to any repotuesslon retired to it subparagraph (c) above; or (� Void all warranties and refuse service and start-up; or (q) Sall such equipment atpublic ar p6+ata sale, with aur wtihout No U, st a fair price, Hakanson 1 Anderson Assoc., Inc. April 27, 2004 Kelvin Howieson Assistant District Engineer Mn/DOT District 3 1991 Industrial Park Road S. Baxter, MN 56401 Re: Advancement in State Aid Dear Kelvin: ITEM 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone:763/427-5860 Fax:763/427-0520 7-2 Enclosed is a Resolution by the City of Otsego requesting advance encumbrances in State Aid Construction Account. The City is approximately $463,000 advanced in their State Aid Construction Account. With the $1,463,319 of advanced encumbrances, the total State Aid available for construction would be approximately $970,000. Otsego has a Federal Aid project planned for the summer of 2004. The Otsego project and construction cost estimates are as follows: State Project # Description Estimated Cost 217-107-04 Quaday Avenue Construction $358,000 217-107-04 Quaday Avenue Easements $258,000 Total Estimated Cost $616,000 If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at 763-427-5860. Sincerely, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Ronald J gner, RJW:dlc cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Civil 6 -Municipal �� Engineering G:\Municipal\AOTSEGO\315\2004\ot315khl.doc Land Surveyingfor NO. 2004 - RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City of Otsego is planning on implementing a Federal Aid Street Project in 2004, which will require State Aid funds in excess of those available in its State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, said City is prepared to proceed with the construction of said project through the use of advance encumbrances from the general State Aid Construction Account, and WHEREAS, repayment of the funds so advanced will be made in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 162.14, Subdivision 6 and Minnesota rules Chapter 8820. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED: That the Commissioner of Transportation be and is hereby requested to approve this advance for financing approved Municipal State Aid Street Projects of the city of Otsego in an amount up to 5 times the previous year's construction allotment ($1,433,405) in accordance with Minnesota rules 9920.1500, Subparagraph 9, and to authorize repayments from the following year's accruals to the construction Account of the Municipal State Aid Street fund for said City. HEREBY CERTIFY, that the above is a true and correct copy of a Resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Otsego, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, at a duly authorized meeting thereof held in the City of Otsego, Minnesota on the 26th day of April 2004, as disclosed by the records of said City on file and of record in the office. Larry Fournier, Mayor _Judy Hudson, City Clerk GAM ITEM 7_3 Order No. 1 A Hakanson Anderson Date: April 26, 2004 _111Assoc.,lnc. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Project: City of Otsego Project 03-02, Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #2 Owner: City of Otsego To: CBI, Inc. (Contractor) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes INCREASE DECREASE In Contract Price in Contract Price 1. Add Line Item # 9A, Provide third logo and provide clear coat on all three logo's, Lump Sum @ $ 12,547.00 / LS $ 12,547.00 Totals $ 12,547.00 Net Change in Contract $ 12,547.00 Original Contract Amount $1,162,600.00 Previous contract changes, Change Order # to # 0 Prior approved contract amount $1,162,600.00 Total contract including this and previous change orders $1,175,147.00 G:XMunicipaNAOTSEG01514\CONSTRUCTION\OT514C01 A.doc .istification: Addition of third log facing the northeast will be visible to persons on C.S.A.H 19 . The clear coat will minimize the fading of the blue pigments in the logo. Due to the change order, the contract period will be: nine(9) days Original contract period: Substantial completion by August 2 2004. Change contract period from previous Change Order N/A Contract period including this and all previous change orders Substantial Completion by August 11 2004. This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Recommended: Accepted: )proved by: (Owner's Arch itect/Engineer) (Contractor) Date Date For the Owner (Name and Title) Date This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. G'.\MunicipaNAOTSEGO\514\CONSTRUCTION\OT514CO1 A. doc Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Order No. 1 B Date: April 26, 2004 Project: City of Otsego Project 03-02, Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #2 Owner: City of Otsego To: CBI, Inc. (Contractor) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes INCREASE DECREASE In Contract Price in Contract Price 1. Add Line Item # 9A, Provide third logo, Lump Sum @ $7,035/1-S $ 7,035.00 Totals $ 7,035.00 Net Change in Contract $ 7,035.00 Original Contract Amount $1,162,600.00 Previous contract changes, Change Order # to # 0 Prior approved contract amount $1,162,600.00 Total contract including this and previous change orders $1,169,635.00 G:V,Aunicipa11A0TSEG01514\CONSTRU CTIO MOT514C01 B. doc istification: Addition of third log facing the northeast will be visible to persons on C.S.A.H 19 . The clear coat will minimize the fading of the blue pigments in the logo. Due to the change order, the contract period will be: four (4) days Original contract period: Substantial completion by August 2, 2004. Change contract period from previous Change Order N/A Contract period including this and all previous change orders Substantial Completion by August 6 This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Recommended: Accepted: )proved by: (Owner's Architect/Engineer) (Contractor) Date Date For the Owner (Name and Title) Date This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. G:\Municipal\AOTSEGO\514\CONSTRUCTION\0T514CO1 BADC Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,lnc. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Order No. 1 C Date: April 26, 2004 Project: City of Otsego Project 03-02, Elevated Water Storage Tank and Tower #2 Owner: City of Otsego To: CBI, Inc. (Contractor) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes INCREASE DECREASE In Contract Price in Contract Price 1. Add Line Item # 9A, clear coat on logo's, Lump Sum @ $3,675 / LS $ 3,675.00 Totals Net Change in Contract $ 3,675.00 Original Contract Amount $1,162,600.00 Previous contract changes, Change Order # to Prior approved contract amount-$TT62,600.00 Total contract including this and previous change$1,166,275.00 orders G:WunicipaRAOTSEG01514%CONSTRUCTION\0T514CO1 CA= Iustification: The clear coat will minimize the fading of the blue pigments in the logo. Due to the change order, the contract period will be: four (4) days Original contract period: Substantial completion by August 2, 2004. Change contract period from previous Change Order N/A Contract period including this and all previous change orders Substantial Completion by August 6, 2004. This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Recommended: Accepted: Approved by: (Owner's Architect/Engineer) (Contractor) For the Owner (Name and Title) Date Date Date This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. G:1Municipat AOTSEGO\5141CONSTRUCTION\OT514C01 C.doc ITEM 8-2 Michael C. Couri- Andrew J. MacArthur Robert T. Ruppe— David R. Wendorf 'Also licensed in Illinois "'Also licensed in California April 22, 2004 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Judy Hudson, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 COURT, MACARTHUR & RUPPE, AL.L.A Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-1599 (FAQ couriandmacarthur@pobox.com RE: Proposed Wright County Meth Ordinance Dear Council Members: At the direction of the Council, I sent a letter to Wright County along with a copy of the Minnetonka ordinance. The letter indicated that Otsego was considering adoption of a similar ordinance and inquiring as to whether the County has a similar ordinance under consideration. I had a discussion with chief Civil Attorney Brian Asleson and he indicated that the County is very interested in putting such an ordinance in affect County wide by this Fall. They are awaiting the results of some relevant legislation regarding Meth labs currently being heard at the State capitol. The County ordinance would be effective County wide including within any City which has not established its own public health authority. The County has considerably more existing resources to deal with this matter and Brian --indicated that there --is a -strong -desire -to -adopt- something -from-the-Count} -staf€ lever--- - -- - -- - - I have attached the proposed Wright County ordinance along with an e-mail I received from Brian. I would also note that there is considerable discussion on the City Attorney internet resource regarding the issue of recording of related notices etc. against meth lab property. I will be available to answer any questions you might have regarding this matter at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting on Monday evening. Letter to Otsego City Council April 22, 2004 Page 2 Very try. urs, A ew J. cArth COURI, MACARTHUR & RUPPE Encl. Andrew MacArthur From: "Brian Asleson" <Brian.Asleson@co.wright.mn.us> To: <amacarthur@earthlink.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 4:02 PM Attach: meth lab ordinance.doc Subject: Meth Lab Ordinance Enclosed is a copy of the draft ordinance that staff here at the county has been looking at. The authority for us to adopt such an ordinance with county -wide effect comes from Chapter 145A - the Local Public Health Act. As I understand it, the County has the power to adopt and enforce regulations county -wide unless a city has established its own public health authority. As I indicated, I've suggested to the workgroup that we wait until the Legislature has adjourned. I'm hoping that we can have an Ordinance in place by the fall. PS- You may want take a look at SF 1863, Article 4, as it deals with a number of issues arising from these sites. HF 3090 also contains a provision for a meth lab cleanup revolving fund. Let me know if I can be of further assistance to you Page 1 of 1 4/14/2004 WRIGHT COUNTY CLEANUP OF CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB SITES ORDINANCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1.10 TITLE AND STATUTORY AUTHORITY SECTION 1.20 PURPOSE SECTION 1.30 JURISDICTION SECTION 1.40 INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION SECTION 1.50 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY SECTION 1.60 FEES SECTION 1.70 DEFINITIONS, RULES, AND WORD USAGE ARTICLE Ii. ADMINISTRATION SECTION 2.00 DECLARATION OF SITE AS A CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION SITE PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE SECTION 2.10 MEDICAL GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSING HEALTH STATUS OF EXPOSED PERSONS SECTION 2.20 LAW ENFORCEMENT NOTICE TO AFFECTED PUBLIC, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND CHILD PROTECTION AUTHORITIES SECTION 2.30 NOTICE OF CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION SITE PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE TO OWNER AND OCCUPANT SECTION 2.40 NOTICE FILED WITH PROPERTY RECORD AND/OR MOTOR VEHICLE RECORD SECTION 2.50 PROPERTY OWNER'S AND OCCUPANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ACT SECTION 2.60 PROPERTY OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS AND OPPORTUNITY FOR RECOVERY SECTION 2.70 SPECIAL ASSESSMENT TO RECOVER PUBLIC COSTS SECTION 2.80 AUTHORITY TO MODIFY OR REMOVE DECLARATION OF CHEMICAL INVESTIGATION SITE PUBLIC HEALTH NUISANCE SECTION 2.90 WASTE GENERATED FROM CLEANING UP A CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB ARTICLE III. EXCEPTIONS AND APPEALS SECTION 3.10 EXCEPTLOXS-AP-P-EALS,_ANIZP_ENALTIES_ SECTION 3.20 SEVERABILITY AND SAVINGS CLAUSE ARTICLE IV. EFFECTIVE DATE cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary intemet $les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc WRIGHT COUNTY CLEANUP OF CLANDESTINE DRUG LAB SITES ORDINANCE ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 1.10 Title and Statutory Authority 1.11 This ordinance shall be known and referenced as the "Cleanup of Clandestine Drug Lab Sites Ordinance." 1.12 This ordinance is enacted pursuant to the powers specified in Minn. Stat. § 145A.05. SECTION 1.20 Purpose 1.21 Professional reports, based on assessments, testing, and investigations, show that chemicals used in the production of illicit drugs can condense, penetrate, and contaminate on the land, surfaces, furnishings, and equipment in or near structures where Clandestine drug labs are located. 1.22 These conditions present health and safety risks to occupants and visitors of such structures and land through fire, explosion, and skin and respiratory exposure to chemicals. 1.23 This ordinance establishes responsibilities and guidelines for involved parties to assure that: a) people are not unnecessarily exposed to the dangers of these contaminated structures or land; and b) proper steps are taken to remove contaminants and assure appropriate tests are completed to verify that affected structures and land are sufficiently cleaned for human contact. 1.24 This ordinance assists and guides appropriate public authorities, property owners, and occupants to prevent injury and illness to members of the public, particularly children. 1.25 This ordinance is intended to reduce exposure to chemicals used at clandestine drug lab operations in structures including dwellings, buildings, motor vehicles, trailers, appliances or the land where they are located. 1.26 This ordinance is intended to minimize the cost to Wright County for clean up of Clandestine drug lab sites. -SECTION-1.30-_-Jurisdiction________ --- ----- - ------ ------ 1.31 This ordinance shall apply to all incorporated and unincorporated municipalities and land (city or township) within the boundaries of Wright County. 1.32 Where a municipality has lawfully passed an ordinance to regulate and enforce the cleanup of Clandestine drug labs that is more restrictive, the County shall coordinate regulation and enforcement with that municipality. SECTION 1.40 Interpretation and Application 1.41 The provisions of this ordinance shall be interpreted and applied as the minimum requirements necessary to protect public health, safety, and welfare. c:\documents and settings\andy\local settings\temporary intemet Qles\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc 1.42 Where the conditions imposed by any provision of this ordinance are either more restrictive or less restrictive than comparable provisions imposed by any other law, ordinance, statute, resolution, or regulation of any kind, the regulations which are more restrictive or which impose higher standards or requirements shall apply. SECTION 1.50 Disclaimer Of Liability Liability on the part of, or a cause of action against, Wright County or any employee or agent thereof for any damages that may result from reliance on this ordinance shall be eliminated or limited as provided by Minn. Stat. §466.02. SECTION 1.60 Fees Fees for the administration of this ordinance may be established and amended periodically by resolution of the Wright County Board of Commissioners. SECTION 1.70 Definitions. Rules, and Word Usage For the purpose of this ordinance, the following terms or words shall be interpreted as follows: 1.71 Child means any person less than 18 years of age. 1.72 Chemical investigation site means a clandestine drug lab site that is under notice and order for cleanup and/or remediation as a public health nuisance, as authorized by Minnesota Statute Chapter 145A, and this ordinance. 1.73 Clandestine drug lab operation means the unlawful manufacture or attempt to manufacture a controlled substance within any area of a structure such as a dwelling, building, motor vehicle, trailer, boat, or other structure or appliance. 1.74 Clandestine drug lab site means any parts of a structure such as a dwelling, building, motor vehicle, trailer, or appliance occupied or affected by conditions and/or chemicals, typically associated with a clandestine drug lab operation. 1.75 Cleanup means proper removal and/or containment of substances hazardous to humans and/or the environment at a chemical investigation site. Cleanup is a part of remediation. 1.76 Controlled substance means a drug, substance or immediate precursor in Schedules I through V of Minnesota Statute § 152.02, as amended in the future. The term shall not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, intoxicating liquors, or tobacco. 1.77 Owner means any person, firm, or corporation who owns, in whole or in part, the land and/or structures such as buildings, motor vehicle, trailer, boat or other appliance at a clandestine drug lab site. 1.78 Public Health Nuisance shall have the meaning attributed to it in Minnesota Statutes § 145A.02, Subd. 17. 1.79 Public Health Authority means the Public Health Director and the Deputy Public Health Director, who are authorized to act as agents of the Wright County Board of Commissioners, in their role as the Community Health Board, pursuant to the Local Public Health Act, Minnesota Statutes § 145A.09 to 145A.13. 1.80 Remediation means methods such as assessment, evaluation, testing, venting, detergent scrubbing, enclosure, encapsulation, demolition, and/or removal of contaminated materials from a chemical investigation site. cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary internet 13les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc 1.81 Structure means a dwelling, building, motor vehicle, trailer, boat, appliance or any other area or location, either fixed or temporary. ARTICLE II. ADMINISTRATION SECTION 2.00 Declaration of Site as a Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance Clandestine drug lab sites, as defined herein, are declared by this ordinance to be "chemical investigation site public health nuisances". SECTION 2.10 Medical guidelines for assessing health status of exposed persons Medical guidelines for assessing the health status and determining medical care needs of persons — particularly children — that are found or known to be occupants or frequent visitors at a clandestine drug lab site, may be established and updated as necessary by the "Medical Consultant" who provides consultation services under contract to the Wright County Public Health Department. SECTION 2.20 Law Enforcement notice to affected public public health and child protection authorities 2.21 Law enforcement authorities who identify a clandestine drug lab site, or clandestine drug lab operation shall notify the Wright County departments responsible for public health and child protection within one working day of identifying the lab site. The obligation to promptly notify may be delayed to accomplish appropriate law enforcement objectives, but only to the extent that public health and child protection responsibilities are not unnecessarily compromised. The notice shall include sufficient information to inform the recipients of the following: a) property location by street address and other identifiable location; b) property owner's and occupant's identities — especially the identities of any children and women of child-bearing age found or known to be associated with the site; C) chemicals found and indications of chemical residues; d) presumed duration of the lab; e) equipment in a dwelling or structure that is typically associated with the manufacture of a controlled substance; and f) conditions typically associated with a clandestine drug lab site or operation including weapons, illicit drugs, filth, fire, or electrical shock and other harmful conditions as determined by Minnesota law. 2.22 Upon identification of the clandestine drug lab site or operation, law enforcement agencies may treat, store, transport or dispose of all hazardous waste found at the site in a manner consistent with Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control, and any local rules and regulations. ----- 2.23 When a law enforcement agency completes its work under 2.22 and is prepared to leave such sites, the agency shall affix a warning sign to the entrance of the affected part of the structure. The warning sign shall be those that have been prepared in advance for such situations through the collaboration of County Law Enforcement, Public Health Authority, and city officials if applicable. The warning sign shall be of a size and contain information sufficient to alert visitors or returning occupants that the site is a chemical investigation site public health nuisance, may be dangerous to enter, and must not be entered except by authorization of the Public Health Authority and/or Law Enforcement agency identified on the sign. cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary intemet 4les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc SECTION 2.30 Notice of Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance to Owner and Occupant 2.31 After the Public Health Authority receives notice from a law enforcement agency that they've identified a clandestine drug lab site and posted the appropriate Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance warning sign, the Public Health Authority shall serve the known lawful occupants and owners of the site pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 145A.04, Subd. 8(b) with notice of their responsibilities relative to the chemical investigation site public health nuisance. 2.32 The Public Health Authority shall notify and order the property owner of record and known occupant or agent to have the public health nuisance removed or abated within 10 days as provided in Minnesota Statute § 145A.04 and this ordinance. The Public Health Authority notice and order shall include the following: a) A replica of the Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance declaration that is posted at the site's entrance(s). b) Information about the potentially hazardous condition of the chemical investigation site. C) A summary of the property owner's and occupant's responsibilities under this ordinance. d) Information on locating professional services necessary to remove and abate the chemical investigation site public health nuisance status as provided in this Ordinance and Minnesota Statute § 145A.04. 2.33 The Public Health Authority shall endeavor to provide information in writing about the Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance declaration and potential hazard(s) to the following additional concerned parties: a) Neighbors within close proximity that can be reasonably affected by the conditions found; b) The local municipal clerk; C) Local law enforcement; d) Other state and local authorities, such as the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and Minnesota Department of Health, that may have public and environmental protection responsibilities at the site. SECTION 2.40 Notice Filed with Property Record and/or Motor Vehicle Record 2.41 If after 10 days notice and order, Public Health Authority is unable to obtain any reasonable assurance or plan from the property owner or occupant that the structure is being properly vacated, cleaned, remediated, and tested, Public Health may provide a copy of the Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance notice and order to the County Recorder and to the lien and mortgage holders of the affected structure and/or properties-.—The--County-Record er-is authorized -to -file -that-information-with-the -property - record, to notify other persons with interest in the property about the property's chemical investigation site public health nuisance status. 2.42 When the affected property is a motor vehicle, boat, or trailer, Public Health shall notify the appropriate State and local agency that maintains motor vehicle, boat, or trailer records, and the holders of liens or security interests against the vehicle or trailer. SECTION 2.50 Property Owner's and Occupant's Responsibility to Act 2.51 Property owner(s) and occupant(s) provided with a notice, which also includes the posted warning sign informing them about the chemical investigation site public health nuisance, shall promptly act to vacate occupants from those parts of a structure that are a chemical cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary internet $les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc investigation site public health nuisance. This includes dwellings, buildings, motor vehicles, trailers, boat, appliances or any other affected area or location. 2.52 Within ten business days of receiving the Public Health notice and order to cleanup the Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance, the property owner(s) and/or occupant(s) shall take the following actions: a) Notify Wright County Public Health Authority that the affected parts of the dwellings, buildings, and/or motor vehicles have been and will remain vacated and secured until the Public Health Authority provides notice that the public health nuisance no longer exists. b) Contract with one or more acceptable environmental hazard testing and cleaning firms (acceptable firms are those that have provided assurance of appropriate equipment, procedures, and personnel, as determined by the Minnesota and/or Wright County Departments of Health) to accomplish the following: 1) A detailed on-site assessment of the extent of contamination at the site and the contamination of the personal property therein; 2) Soil testing of the site and testing of all property and soil in proximity to the site that the environmental hazard testing and cleaning firm determines may have been affected by the conditions found at the site; 3) A complete clean-up of the site (including but not limited to the clean-up or removal of contaminated plumbing, ventilation systems, fixtures and contaminated soil) or a demolition of the site and a complete clean-up of the demolished site; 4) A complete clean-up, or disposal at an approved dumpsite, of all personal property in the site; 5) A complete clean-up of all property and soil in proximity to the site that is found to have been affected by the conditions found at the site, and 6) Remediation testing and follow-up testing to determine that all health risks are sufficiently reduced, according to Minnesota Department of Health guidelines, to allow safe human occupancy and use of the site and use of the personal property therein. C) Provide Wright County Public Health Authority with the identity of the testing and cleaning firm the owner or occupant has contracted with for remediation of the structure(s) as described above. d) Provide Wright County Public Health Authority with the contractor's plan and schedule for remediation that will abate the chemical investigation site public health nuisance declaration. e) The property owner or occupant may request an extension of time to consider options for arranging cleanup or removal of the affected parts of the structure. The owner or occupant must show good cause for any such extension. Any such extension shall be dependant on the owner's assurance that the affected parts of the structure will not be occupied pending appropriate cleanup or demolition.______ SECTION 2.60 Property Owner's Responsibility for Costs and Opportunity for Recovery 2.61 Consistent with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 145A, the property owner shall be responsible for a) private contractor's fees, cleanup, remediation, and testing of chemical investigation site public health nuisance conditions; and b) Wright County's fees and costs of administering notices and enforcing, vacating, cleanup, remediation, and testing of affected parts of the property. 2.62 Nothing in this ordinance is intended to limit the property owners, agents, occupants, or the County's right to recover costs or damages, from persons contributing to the public health nuisance, such as the operators of the clandestine drug lab and/or other lawful sources. cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary internet $les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc 2.63 The County's administrative and enforcement services, referenced in subsection 2.61, include but are not limited to, the following: a) Posting warning notices or signs at the site, b) Notification of affected parties, C) Securing the site, providing limited access to the site, and prosecution of unauthorized persons found at the site; d) Expenses related to the recovery of costs, including the assessment process; e) Laboratory fees; f) Clean-up services; g) Administrative fees; and h) Other associated costs. SECTION 2.70 Special Assessment to Recover Public Costs 2.71 The County is authorized under Minnesota Statute § 145A.04, Subd. 8(c) to proceed within ten business days of service of a notice for abatement or removal of the Public Health Nuisance to initiate the assessment and cleanup when a) the property owner is not located, or b) the Public Health Authority determines that the owner refuses to, or cannot pay the costs, or arrange timely assessment and cleanup that is acceptable to the designated Public Health Authority. 2.72 The County Administrator (or the Administrator's formally identified designee) shall be fully authorized to act, consistent with Minnesota Law, on behalf of the County to direct funds to assure prompt remediation of chemical investigation sites. 2.73 When the estimated cost of testing, cleanup, and remediation exceeds seventy-five percent of the County Assessor's market value of the structure and land, the County Administrator (or the Administrator's formally identified designee) is authorized to notify the property owner of the county's intent to remove and dispose of the affected real property instead of proceeding with cleaning and remediation. 2.74 The property owner shall be responsible for all costs, including those of the County, incurred to abate the public health nuisance, including contractor's fees and public costs for services that were performed in association with a clandestine drug lab site or chemical dump site clean-up. The County's costs may also include, but shall not be limited to those set forth in Section 2.63. Fees and costs specified above that are not paid for in any other way may be collected through a special assessment on the property as allowed by Minnesota Statute § 145A.08, or by any other applicable Federal, State, and County Laws, Ordinances, and/or applicable County Board Resolution. 2.75 Payment on the special assessment, shall be at the annual rate of at least One Thousand Dollars $1000) or more as needed to assure full payment to the Cou_nty.within tenJ1.0)______ years. This amount shall be collected at the time real estate taxes are due. The amount due and/or payment rate may be adjusted by action of the Wright County Board of Commissioners. 2.76 The County may also seek recovery of costs through other methods allowed by Federal or State law. SECTION 2.80 Authority to Modify or Remove Declaration of Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance 2.81 The designated Public Health Authority may modify conditions of the declaration and order removal of the declaration of Chemical Investigation Site Public Health Nuisance. cAdocuments and settings\andy\local settings\temporary internet 0es\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc 2.82 Such modification or removal shall occur only after the Public Health Authority has determined that levels of contamination are sufficiently reduced through remediation to warrant modification or removal of the declaration. The Public Health Authority may rely on information from competent sources, including those supplied by the property owner and/or others such as state and local health, safety, law enforcement and pollution control authorities to reach such decisions. 2.83 When the declaration is modified or removed the Public Health Authority shall forward that information to the County Recorder for addition to the property record if notice of the nuisance declaration was previously filed with the Recorder as described above. Similarly, notice shall be provided to the motor vehicle or other license records agencies and lien holders if a notice had previously been provided to them. SECTION 2.90 Waste Generated From Cleaning Up A Clandestine Drug Lab. Waste generated from chemical investigation site public health nuisances shall be treated, stored, transported, and disposed in accordance with applicable Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and Wright County rules and regulations for solid waste, and for hazardous household and other hazardous wastes. ARTICLE III. EXCEPTIONS, APPEALS, AND PENALTIES SECTION 3.10 Exceptions, Appeals, and Penalties Administration of this ordinance, including guidance for, challenges to, and penalties shall be according to the authorities provided in Minnesota Statute Chapter 145A, other applicable Minnesota law, and the Wright County Solid Waste Management Ordinance. SECTION 3.20 Severability And Savings Clause If any section or portion of this ordinance shall be found unconstitutional or otherwise invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, that finding shall not serve as an invalidation of, or affect the validity or enforceability of any other section or provision of this ordinance. ARTICLE IV. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption pursuant to Minnesota law. Dated this day of , 2004. WRIGHT COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: c:\documents and settings\andy\local settings\temporary internet $les\content.ie5\dshprhdv\meth lab ordinance.doc ITEM 9-2 RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -XX CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR WRIGHT COUNTY CITIES POLICY STATEMENTS WHEREAS, it is important for all governmental entities in Wright County to collaborate and work together to provide effective and efficient services and leadership; and, WHEREAS, the Cities of Wright County have collectively prepared policy statements that address transportation, annexation, land use planning, economic development, and general services; and, WHEREAS, the City of Otsego fully supports the policies prepared by the Cities of Wright County; and, WHEREAS, the City of Otsego requests that the Wright County Commissioners use the policy statements presented as a general statement of Otsego's position on County issues and discussions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA HEREBY APPROVES THE POLICY STATEMENTS AS ATTACHED Dated this 26th day of April, 2004 ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ITEM 9.3 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION April 22, 2004 ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: 9.3. Request for Streetlight City Administrator 9.3. Request for Streetlight at County Road 37 and 67`h Circle. I have not received replies to my phone calls from the applicant nor from Wright -Hennepin Electric so I do not have any price or motivation information STAFF RECOMMENDATION Table request until information is received. ITEM 10_1 MEMO Date: April 20, 2004 To: City Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Park Board Update The Park & Recreation Commission discussed the concerns about park construction and made the following recommendations. Horseshoe Pits - Order a wood back stop to contain errant horseshoes. Volleyball Courts - Remove the wood boundary and replace with fiber. Move the trees further away. Sliding Hill - Move the sliding hill closer to the parking lot. Low Spot - Add dirt to build up the low spot to prevent the path from flooding. Ball Fields - Put up a fence on the short ball field. Put snow fence around the new fields this year to keep people off the new grass. Allow people to use the old fields for practice once the snow fence is up protecting the new fields. Have the City Engineer survey the drainage around the ball fields to see if the drainage ditches could be moved or filled to create more useable land. Loose Footing - Has been fixed by contractor. Drinking Fountain - will be fixed by contractor. Park Shelter - Commissioners asked that the picnic tables be cleaned and that cost estimates be obtained on adding a false roof or netting (to keep birds out), painting the metal, and adding grills, a kitchen, and bathrooms. Commissioners also discussed whether a reservation system should be set up for use of the park shelter and whether the reservations should be done by the Park Commission. 2 ITEM 10.2 MEMO Date: April 20, 2004 To: City Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Damon Farber Bill - Construction Administration I have enclosed Damon Farber's bill for construction administration. The Council decided not to pay this bill in December, 2003 pending resolution of those problems identified with the parks construction project of 2003. Given that those problems have been addressed by Damon Farber and you have a proposed recommendation from the Parks & Recreation Commission, I have placed the bill on the Council agenda for payment. Damon Farber Associates 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Invoice submitted to: OTSEGO 03-139 Mike Robertson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 April 16, 2004 In Reference To: Otsego Parks - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Invoice # 16061 Professional Services 07 Construction Obs. For professional services rendered Previous balance Balance due q PR l 0 J��4 Hours Amount 13.00 975.00 13.00 $975.00 $1,313.85 $2,288.85 COPIED TO CITY ADM. 'BAR r . 2004 Damon Farber Associates 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Invoice submitted to: OTSEGO 03-139 Mike Robertson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 March 02, 2004 In Reference To: Otsego Parks - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Invoice # 15982 Professional Services Hours Amount 07 Construction Obs. 2.00 150.00 For professional services rendered 2.00 $150.00 Previous balance $1,163.85 Balance due $1,313.85 _z 4 =VL4 Damon Farber Associates 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Invoice submitted to: OTSEGO 03-139 Mike Robertson City of Otsego u899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 January 26, 2004 In Reference To: Otsego Parks - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Invoice # 15914 Professional Services Hours Amount 07 Construction Obs. 5.00 375.00 For professional services rendered 5.00 $375.00 Previous balance $788.85 Balance due $1,163.85 ')amon Farber Associates Z 200'{ 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Invoice submitted to: OTSEGO 03-139 Mike Robertson City of Otsego 899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 December 23, 2003 In Reference To: Otsego Parks - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Invoice # 15844 Professional Services Hours Amount 1.00 75.00 07 Construction Obs. For professional services rendered 1.00 $75.00 $713.85 Previous balance $788.85 Balance due Damon Farber Associates OE1- 923 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 Invoice submitted to: OTSEGO 03-139 Mike Robertson City of Otsego 899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 December 05, 2003 In Reference To: Otsego Parks - CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION Invoice # 15780 Professional Services Hours Amount 07 Construction Obs. 8.75 656.25 For professional services rendered 8.75 $656.25 Additional Charges $Mileage 57.60 Total costs $57.60 Total amount of this bill $713.85 Previous balance $2,362.71 12/1/2003 Payment - Thank you - 39188 ($2,362.71) Total payments and adjustments ($2,362.71) Balance due $713.85