The URL can be used to link to this page

12-02-02 CCITEM 3. 1. CITY OF OTSEGO MINUTES OF DECEMBER 2, 2002 6:30PM 2003 TRUTH -IN -TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING Roll Call : Mayor Larry Fournier, Councilmembers Vern Heidner and Virginia Wendel were present. Absent: Council members Jerry Struthers and Suzanne Ackerman. City Staff: Michael Robertson, City Administrator was present. Mayor Fournier called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. There was no one from the public present to comment on the proposed 2003 tax levy or budget. While waiting to see if any public would attend, Council informally discussed the budget and other policy issues. With no one from the public attending, the Mayor informed all present that there would be another Truth -in -Taxation public hearing at 6:30 p.m., Monday, December 9, 2002 at Otsego City Hall. With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Sincerely, AM i c hk�V ae City Administrator ITEM 3. 2. CITY OF OTSEGO MINUTES OF DECEMBER 9, 2002 6:30PM 2003 TRUTH -IN -TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING Roll Call : Mayor Larry Fournier, Councilmembers Jerry Struthers, Vern Heidner and Virginia Wendel were present. Absent: Councilmember Suzanne Ackerman. City Staff: Michael Robertson, City Administrator; and Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator, were present. Councilmember-elect Dan Scharber was present. Mayor Fournier called the Truth -in -Taxation meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. There was no one from the public present to comment on the proposed 2003 tax levy or budget. Administrator Robertson summarized the proposed 2003 budget and tax levy. Hearing no public comment, Mayor Fournier noted that approval of the proposed 2003 Tax Levy and 2003 Budget was on the agenda for the Council meeting immediately following the Truth -in -Taxation public hearing and adjourned the hearing at 6:33 p.m. Sincerely, Michael Robertson City Administrator CLAIN, IS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 09, 2002 TO: Judy Hudson Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 12-02-2002 $ 32,507.77 12-05-2002 $ 682,810.83 GRAND TOTAL $ 715,318.60 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this fist further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 12/O2jO2 1:42 P0 *Check Summary Reqister@ Page 1 DECEMBER 2002 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER UnPaid BANK OF ELK RIVER -1 $32,507.77 Total Checks $32,507.77 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 12/02JO2 1:43 PM Page 1 *Check Detail Reqister@ DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoicg _ Comment .10100, BANK * OFE ' LK RIVER BANK OF ELK RIVER -1 E 101-41940-410 RentaJs (GENERAL) $32,507.77 EDA PAYMENT BLDGING Total BANK OF ELK RIVER -1 $32,507.77 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER $32,507.77 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 12/05/02 10:22 AM *Check Summary ReqisterC Page 1 DECEMBER 2002 FILTER: None Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER - UnPaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION UnPaid ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO $355.84 UnPaid CARSON CLELLAND & SCHREDER $216,450.56 UnPaid CELLULAR+ $284.38 UnPaid CITY OF MONTICELLO $22�38 UnPaid D&D DISTRIBUTING INC $583.00 UnPaid DAVID CHASE $83.96 UnPaid DESIGN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS $30.00 UnPaid EARL F ANDERSON INC $125,247.43 UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $3,142.68 UnPaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE $128.25 UnPaid FORCE AMERICA $90.00 UnPaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE Co $47.86 UnPaid GRANITE CITY LEASING INC $94.19 UnPaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $34.02 UnPaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $89,479.00 UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $82,418.60 UnPaid KENNEDY& GRAVEN, CHARTERED $422.31 UnPaid KNUTSON RICK $2,554.20 UnPaid LONG & SONS $30.00 UnPaid MAMA $457.79 UnPaid NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO $16.00 ')nPajd NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC $212.99 �Paid OSI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC $104.37 ,.nPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $100.00 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $528.83 UnPaid PURCHASE POWER $1,452.04 UnPaid RANDYS SANITATION $519.00 UnPaid RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT $106.97 UnPaid RUM RIVER CONTRACTING $145.45 UnPaid SANDY LINDENFELSER $26,060.23 UnPaid STS CONSULTANT'S LTD $13.80 UnPaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $3,676.26 UnPaid TROPHIES PLUS $383.40 UnPaid VONCO CORPORATION $38.87 UnPaid W.B. MILLER INC $1,155.00 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $95,660.51 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT $20,318.33 UnPaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $8,386.69 UnPaid XCELENERGY $1,327.00 UnPaid ZIEGLER INC $85-62 $563.02 Total Checks $682,810.83 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 12/05/02 10:23 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Reqister@ DECEMBER 2002 .1.0.1.00 ---- BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION ------------------- E201-45000-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $172.92 211008 NOV UNIT E201-45000-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $182.92 212031 DEC UNIT WINTER CHARGE Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $355.84 npaid ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO ... .............. ................... E 423-43100-530 Improvements Other Than BIdgs $216,450.56 # 3 QUADAY191ST Total ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO $216.450.56 npaid CARSON CLELLAND & SCHREDER E 413-43100-301 Legal Services $284.38 ODEAN AVE - KNOLL PROP Total CARSON CLELLAND & SCHREDER $284.38 - — - — — -- - ------------------------ ........ E101-43100-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $22.38 02-11-104607 PAGER Total CELLULAR+ $22.38 Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO E 213-42200-390 Contracted Services $235.00 7167 4TH QTR FIRE ADDT'L E 101 -42710-390 Contracted Services $348.00 7167 OCT ANIMAL CONTROL Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $583.00 D—I—S"T—RIB—UTIN—G—IN*,—C---,*,---"-,--,,"—,---,—,-----,",*"",,* E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $107.53 221421 PICKUP/PLOW E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) ($71.31) 221422 PICKUP/PLOW E 101 -43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $0.60 221424 PICKUP/PLOW E 101 -43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $47.14 221477 PICKUP/PLOW Total D&D DISTRIBUTING INC $83.96 Unpaid DAVID CHASE E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 DEC CELL PHONE Total DAVID CHASE $30.00 Unpaid DESIGN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS . . .................................. E 423-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs - $125,247.43 - # 2 39/42 TRAFFIC SIGNALS Total DESIGN ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS $125,247.43 Unpaid EARL F ANDERSON INC E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $138.04 45649A PR 4TH E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $201.92 50901 PR 4TH E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $403.77 50902 CP 4TH E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $635.37 51208 OTSEGO FARMS E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $1,366.91 51210 HIDDEN CREEK E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $298.46 51211 THE POINT E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $98.21 51212 GRENINS Total EARL F ANDERSON INC $3.142.68 Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC E101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $19-95 137630 TRUTH IN TAX E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $54.15 137636 ORDINANCE 2002-19 E101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $64.15 137637 SUMMARY PUBL 02-18 Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $128.25 ul—l'........---,—.--,.--,.,.-----'---------.-.-.-.--...—"."...%..—"'- npaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $5.58 13474 95TH ST E 101-41950-310 Miscellaneous $29.82 13620 90TH ST RENTAL HOUSE E101-41940-390 Contracted Services $54.60 CITY HALL CITY OF OTSEGO 12/05/02 10:23 AM *Check Detail Reclister@ Page 2 DECEMBER 2002 Total FINKEN'S WATER CARE rhack-Arnt $90.00 Invni�& f"nt Unpaid FORCE AMERICA ......... E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $47.86 1038890 94 FORD TRK Total FORCE AMERICA $47.86 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO ................................ E101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.19 PW - DEC E101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $54.00 Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94.19 ADMIN - DEC Unpaid GRANITE CITY LEASING INC E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $34.02 — 21 TOSHIBA FAX Total GRANITE CITY LEASING INC $34.02 Unpaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. . ................................ E429-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) - $89,479.00 — 9 WWTF PHASE 2 Total GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $89,479.00 Unpaid HAKANS6N ANDERSON ASSOC INC G 701-21977 Stone Gate 2nd $51.94 6973 STONEGATE2 G 701-21980 Hidden Creek Trail Subd $288.86 6974 HIDDEN CREEK G 701-21940 The "Point 1 & 2" - Big Ed's $334.13 6975 THE POINTE 2 G 701-21993 Otsego Farms $173.40 6976 OTSEGO FARMS G 701-21988 Cummings $280.75 6977 OTSEGO INDUST PARK 5TH G 701-22321 RIVERPOINTE 2ND $6,800.41 6978 RIVERPOINTE 2ND G 701-22313 BLACKWOODs SITE $256.88 6979 BLACKWOODS G 701-22320 RETAIL OFFICE SPACE $179.56 6980 MARKET WEST G 701-22324 RIVERPOINTE 3 $3,153.97 6981 RIVERPOINTE 3 G 701-22331 PHEAST RIDGE 6 $8,871.58 6982 PR 6TH G 701-22332 PHEAST RIDGE 7 $2,018.02 6983 PR 7TH G 701-21927 0. Thompson CUP 99-18 $926.56 6984 RIVERPOINTE I G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00 $37.99 6985 MISS PINES G 701-21940 The "Point 1 & 2" - Big Ed's $259.10 6986 THE POINTE G 701-21941 Pulte Prairie Crk 2nd $221.68 6987 PC 2ND G 701-21938 TMH Development $130.06 6988 TO -DAY G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates $297.38 6989 STONEGATE1 G 701-21914 Grenings - Miss Hills 99-6 $37-99 6990 GRENING MISS HILLS G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge *d & 4th $379.50 6991 PR 4TH G 701-21987 Baurely site Plan Review $171.72 6992 1-94 WEST G 701-21974 Prairie Creek 4th $346.12 6993 PC 4TH E 203-45210-302 Engineering Fees $3,629.67 6994 PRAIRIE PARK E 203-45210-302 Engineering Fees $4,259.42 6995 LILY POND E 430-43100-302 Engineering Fees $115.95 6996 WEST OTSEGO SEWER E 434-43100-302 Engineering Fees $19,196.56 6997 85TH ST EXTENTION E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $350-00 6998 MSAA E 423-43100-302 Engineering Fees $7,080.62 6999 CUADAY/91ST E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $115-50 7000 MINING PERMIT G 701-22337 Quest Development $75-00 7001 G 701-22335 KITTREDGE LNDING $262.50 7001 QUEST G 701-22325 101 MARKET $408.53 7001 KITTRIDGE G 701-22333 MIDWEST LNDSCP $470.69 7001 101 MARKET E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $441-90 7001 MIDWEST E 101-41400-348 Maps STAFF MEETINGS E 423-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,265-00 7002 CITY MAP E 413-43100-302 Engineering Fees $14,315.61 7004 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 42/39 E 42-2-43100-530 Improvements Other Than BIdgs $70-00 $1,161.79 7008 ODEAN AVE E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $3,778.29 7009 7012 88TH ST MISC ENG CITY OF OTSEGO 12!05iO2 10:23 AM Page 3 *Check Detail Reqister@ DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment E101-43100-302 EngineeringFees $183.97 .7013 PUBLIC WORKS Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $82,418.60 Unpaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST E 101-41400-121 PERA $192.31 PPE 11/23 CK DTD 11127 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $230.00 PPE 11/23 CK DTD 11/27 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $422.31 KENNEDY &GRAVEN, CHARTERED . . . ................................ E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $2,554.20 54202 CHARTER RENEWAL Total KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED $2,554.20 Unpaid KNUTSON RICK E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 DEC CELL PHONE Total KNUTSON RICK $30.00 E 101-41940-389 Cleaning Services $427.94 NOV CLEANING E101-41940-203 Supplies -General $29.85 1 CASE T PAPER Total LONG& SONS $457.79 Unpaid MAMA E 101-41400-360 Education/Training/Conferences; $16.00 481 NOVLUNCHEON Total MAMA $16.00 _____"_"N0_RTHE_R_N1' _TO0_L11_&_E_Q_UlPM E—NT—CO-1-1^----------"--.---,— E101-43100-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $212.99 07281414 ENG HOIST Total NORTHERN TOOL& EQUIPMENT CO $212.99 Unpaid NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC E101-43100-393 StreetSigns $104.37 22-6219 STREET SIGNS '�p—a,jd--"*,—",*"—"""---*--,-O—SI Total NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC $104.37 —ENVIRO% E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $100.00 229750 DISPOSAL 2 DRUMS/FILTERS Total OSI ENVIRONMENTAL, INC $100.00 Unpaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP E 101-43100-123 Health $263.46 PW - 12/15 TO 01/14/03 E 101-41400-123 Health $265.37 ADMIN - 12/15 TO 01/14/03 Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $528.83 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 101-41400-121 PERA $303.65 PPE 11/23 CK DTO 11/27 G 101-21704 PERA $696.66 PPE 11/23 CK DTD 11/27 E 101-41550-121 PERA $157.05 PPE 11/23 CK DTD 11/27 E 101-43100-121 PERA $294.68 PPE 11123 CK DTD 11/27 'npaid Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,452.04 E 101-41400-206 Postage $519.00 POSTAGE Total PURCHASE POWER *""--,--,—"","--R,—AN—DY-S--SA—NIT—ATIO—N $519.00 ;,aj, ... . .......................................... E 101-43100-325 Gwbage Service $44.81 13474 95TH ST E 101 -41940-325 Garbage Service $62.16 8899 NASHUA Total RANDY'S SANITATION $106.97 Unpaid RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CITY OF OTSEGO 12_105i02 10:23 AM *Check Detail Reqister@ Page 4 DECEMBER 2002 E 101-431OC-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) rheck Amt $145045 Inuni— C29182 Comment 94 FORD TRK Total RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT $145.45 Unpaid RUM RIVER CONTRACTING R 203-36240 Park Dedication Fees $26,060.23 PAY 1 85TH ST BIKE PATH Total RUM RIVER CONTRACTING $26,060.23 SANDY LINDENFELSER .................................. E 101-41400-321 Mileage/Travel $13.80 MILEAGE 40 MILES TRAINING Total SANDY LINDENFELSER $13.80 Unpaid STS CONSULTANT'S LTD E 423-43100-302 Engineering Fees $3,676.26 237363 QUADAY/91ST ST Total STS CONSULTANT'S LTD $3,676.26 ................................ E101-45200-390 Contracted Services $150-00 245 PRAIRIE PARK E 101 -45200-390 Contracted Services $45-00 245 VOLLEY BALL AREA E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $90-00 245 PUMP HOUSE E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services $98.40 245 CITY HALL FALL CLEAN UP Total SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $383.40 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $38.87 NAME PLATES Total TROPHIES PLUS $38.87 paid VONCO CORPORATION ........................... E 101-43100-394 Rock,etc $1,155.00 — 7294 CRUSHED CONCRETE Total VONCO CORPORATION $1,155.00 Unpaid W.B. MILLER INC E 434-43100-390 Contracted Services $95,660.51 #2 85TH ST EXTENTION Total W.B. MILLER INC $95,660.51 C—OUNTY ITOR-TREASURE ................................. E 101-42100-390 Contracted Services $20,318.33 12 MONTH -DEC Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE — $20,318.33 Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT . ........ ..... E 101-41400-348 Maps $33.95 001088 COUNTYMAPS E101-43100-372 Salt&Sand $8,352.74 3596 134.3 SALT 186.8 SAND/SALT Total WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT $8,386.69 Unpaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $1,327.00 9618 MONTHLY FEE Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $1,327.00 Unpaid XCELENERGY E 101-43160-322 Utilities $41.68 054157132231 56TH ST SEWER E 101-43160-322 Utilities $43.94 061929356031 53RD ST WELL Total XCEL ENERGY $85.62 ........................................... E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $315.35 80115056 88GRADER E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $13.33 80115057 E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $129.67 80115357 88GRADER E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $104067 801153s8 88 GRADER Total ZIEGLER INC $563.02 88 GRADER CITY OF OTSEGO 12,'O5iO2 1023 AM Page 5 *Check Detail Reqister@ DECEMBER 2002 Check Arnt Invoice Comment 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER $682,810.83 FILTER: None 6.4. Applicant LandCor Inc., PUD Development Stage Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, Otsego Waterfront YdAddition to develop a 7,200 square foot Retail Store. 6.5. Darrel Farr Development Corp. Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Plan from Industrial to a Mix of Uses consisting of Industrial, Commercial, and Medium to High Density Residential. 6.6. Other Planning Business 7. Ron Wagner, City Engineer: 7.1. Consider Pay Estimate #1 for Quaday Avenue Storm Sewer Extension. 7.2. Consider Pay Estimate #1 for Jaber Avenue Culvert Replacement. 7.3. Consider any other Engineering Items. 8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney: 9. Council Items: A. East and West Sewer Plant Update. B. Approve 2003 Tax Levy & 2003 Budget C. Set Meeting with Wright County Sheriff D. Consider Establishing a Police Commission 9.1. Mike Robertson, City Administrator: 9.2. Judy Hudson, City Clerk. 10. Adjourn by 10 PM. Open Forum. If you have any questions, comments or information regarding an item not on the agenda, please step forward to be recognized by the Mayor during the "Open Forum" item on the agenda. Please state your name and address for the record. All comments are appreciated. Consent Agenda Items: Are considered to be routine and non -controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember, Staff member, or Citizen so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda. The City Council has been provided background information for agenda items in advance by staff and appointed commissions, committees and boards. Decisions are based on this information, as well as City policy, practices, input from constituents and a Councilmember's personal judgment. The next regular City Council Meeting Is Monday DECEMBER 23, 2002 6:30 PM ITEM 6.1 "alt't"WIST ASSOCIIA--tao t"C' 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 55,5,' St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952-595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO.- Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE.- 19 November 2002 RE: Otsego - Waterfront PUD; 3rd Addition Final Plat NAC FILE: 176.02 - 02.41 BACKGROUND Landcor Construction, Inc. has submitted an application . for final plat approval for Outlots A, B and G of the Waterfront Addition. The final plat also includes a replat of Lot 2, Block 1 of the first addition (bank building) to adjust the lot area. The subject site is guided for commercial development by the Comprehensive Plan. Development of the project is subject to the requirements of a PUD District and development stage plan approved by the City Council on April 8, 2002. Exhibits - A. Site Location B. Preliminary Plat C. Final Plat ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat Consistency. The layout of the final plat, with two buildable lots and seven outlots for future phases, is generally consistent with that of the preliminary plat. The final plat must include documentation of easements allowing cross access and parking between the various lots within the subdivision as approved with the PUD District. The easements are subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and will be recorded with the final plat. The replat of the bank site involves shifting the lot line shared with Outlot G 20 feet to the east in order to reduce the lot by approximately 0.2 acres for financing purposes. Under the PUD District, lots within the project are not subject to a minimum lot area or width requirements. Moreover, the lot line adjustment does not impact setbacks or the way either site functions. As such, we have no issue with the proposed replat. Engineering Review. The City Engineer addressed applicable grading, utility and easement issues as part of the various site plan review memorandums. These comments will be addressed as a condition of final plat approval. Park and Trail Dedication. Park and trail dedication for commercial subdivisions is to be in the form of a cash fee in lieu Of land equal to 10 percent of the pre -development estimated market value of the property. A schedule for the park dedication requirement for each of the lots within the waterfront project has been prepared and will be included in the development contract. These numbers have been adjusted for the replat of the bank site: Lot 1, Block 1 (retail store) = $8,078.00 Lot 2, Block 1 (convenience store) $11,228.00 Lot 1 , Block 2 (restaurant) $ 9,958.00 Lot 2, Block 2 (bank) -$ 858.00 (credit) TOTAL $28,406.00 Development Contract. A development agreement will be required as part of each of the site development stage plans to address issue pertaining to the special assessment of costs related to street and utility improvements, grading and drainage improvements, park dedication, and other fees and securities. The development contract is subject to review and approval by the City Attorney. CONCLUSION The proposed final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. The replat of the bank site will not impact compliance with setbacks or the way each site is to be constructed. As such, we are recommending approval of the final plat subject to the conditions outlined below: The applicant is to provide appropriate documents establishing cross ingress/egress and parking easements over all lots and outlots within the final plat, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 2. All utilities, grading, drainage, and easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 2 3. The developer provide a cash fee in lieu of land in satisfaction of park and trail dedication for each site at the time the development contract is executed. 4. The developer enter into a development contract with the City and pay all applicable fees and securities required by it, subject to review by the City Attorney and approval of the City Council. 5. Comments of other City Staff. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Bob Fields 3 SABO MAP DATA PROViogDay PillHakanson Anderson Assoc.Anc. NOTE: T IS FOR PLA14NING PUR=PONLY AN D SHOULD NOT BE USEQ FOR EXACT MEASUREMENT. 0 T S E G 0 ON THE GRE AT RIVE, R ROAD 07 L 2 --n C�D I I I --------------------------- E80 I T pf i CK 11 In ifu I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ul OUTLOT B 0 F1 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 C=:;= LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT OUTLOT B; NTE= z =r= V. LOT`2/13LOCK1�Vl k DUTLOT OUTL T G .joo; LOT L BLOCK I 1. - -7 A, C."a NO. 30 --j AFii OTSEGOS WATERFRONT JoLn,Oliver & Associates, Inc. 2MIM RV mc 9 OTSEGO. MN E�— CWCKU V. - CONCEPT PLAN EXHIBIT B m x m I., 0 :, -, � 1 s ".. Av en t. e C. S. A. Hn. - ---------------------- I It - — — — — — — - - - - I ---------- �-- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 . — — — — — — — — — — — ha Av ent., e a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - - - - I It ha Av ent., e a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------- - - - - - - - - - - ITEM 6.2 NlQkl'" Wt4l A45SOCIATt4 CONSUkTANT4, 44C, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952-595-9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO- Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM- Daniel Licht DATE- 19 November 2002 RE.- Otsego - Waterfront PUD; Family Restaurant NAC FILE: 176.02 - 02.38 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 18 November 2002 to consider a PUD Development Stage plan for a 4,500 square foot family -style restaurant to be constructed on Outlot G of the Waterfront Addition. The applicant was present to agree with the.comments of City staff. The applicant will also be making revisions to the building elevation to add accent to the east elevation (facing TH 101) improving its appearance. There were no comments from the public and the Planning Commi . ssion had no questions, After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request, subject to the conditions below. The application will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 25 November 2002 at 6-30 PM. A. Motion to approve a PUD development stage plan for Outict G of the Waterfront addition, subject to the following conditions'. Approval is subject to the City Council's review an approval of a final plat for the subject site. 2. The landscape plan is revised to specify plant quantities and locations 3. The freestanding sign is moved to the north and located at the entrance of the site as required by the original development stage plan approval. Plans for the freestanding monument sign are to be submitted and subject to review and approval of City Staff. 4. A lighting plan showing fixture type and location with proposed illumination patterns is submitted, subject to review and approval of City Staff. 5. All grading, drainage, utilities, and easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and pay all required fees or securities required by it, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. B. Motion to deny the request based on a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and PUD District. C. Motion to table the request. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Bob Fields 0 CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 'WTdGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Landcor Construction, Inc. 11-19-02 FINDINGS & DECISION PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION: Request for a PUD Development Plan for a 4,500 square foot restaurant building on Outlot G of the Otsego Waterfront Final Plat. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 25 November 2002 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The legal description of the property is Outlot G of Otsego Waterfront. 2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for commercial land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 3. The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District as approved on April 8, 2002. The PUD District is subject to the uses and performance standards allowed in the B-3 District, except as expressly modified. The PUD District is further subject to the PUD Development Plan and PUD Development Standards incorporated as part of said District. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the PUD District and PUD Development Plan with theirjudgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance. - A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as the City's primary commercial area to be developed with uses that serve local and regional markets. The opportunity for a retail use at this location is consistent with the City's goals for this area of the community and is consistent with the o veral/ project development plan. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding. The subject site is located at the intersection of CSAH42 and 91't Street.andis surrounded by other commercial uses. The site and design provides an appropriate face to 4. ,he City's gateway and is consistent with the character of the overall project. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed use will conform to all applicable development regulations, including those standards or requirements modified or incorporated as part of the PUD District. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Page 1 of Finding:The proposed use will have a positive impact to the community in terms of expanding service opportunities, expanding the City's tax base, contributing positively to the City's identity with a high quality site and building design, and utilization of available municipal utilities. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Traffic generated by the proposed use will be within the capacity of streets serving the area required as part of the overall FUD Development Plan. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. The project will contribute to the City's tax base to support its service capabilities and utilize available infrastructure improvements. 7. The planning report dated 12 November 2002 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. The memorandum dated 14 November 2002 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 18 November 2002 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD Development Plan for a 4,500 square foot restaurant building on Outlot G of Otsego Waterfront is hereby approved based on the most current Plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1 . Approval is subject to the City Council's review an approval of a final plat for the subject site. 2. The landscape plan is revised to specify plant quantities and locations. 3. The freestanding sign is moved to the north and located at the entrance of the site as required by the original development stage plan approval. Plans for the freestanding monument sign are to be submitted and subject to review and approval of City Staff. 4. A lighting plan showing fixture type and location with proposed illumination patterns is submitted, subject to review and approval of City Staff. All grading, drainage, utilities, and easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and pay all required fees or securities required Page 2 of by it, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 25th day of November, 2002. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO By: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk Page 3 of Larry Fournier, Mayor Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. MEMORANDUM ITEMITEM 6.2. 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 5530311 1� It, i! i I Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Bob Fields, LandCor Steve Fischer, LandCor Jeff Shopek, P.E., Loucks Associates From: Ronald J. Wagner, PE Date: November 14, 2002 Re: Otsego Waterfront 3 d Addition Lot 2, Block 2 - Restaurant NOV I We have reviewed the Existing Conditions Plan, Site Plan, Grading Plan and Utility Plan for the above -referenced project and made the following comments: The sidewalk is incorrectly shown as being centered on the property line. The sidewalk shall be moved to the east 2' to depict the correct location. (The overall accuracy of Quaday Avenue NE and 9l't Street NE must be verified as it appears that an old plan is being used) 2. Existing elevations/contours shall be shown on Quaday Ave NE and on adjacent parcels. 3. We have reviewed the parkling lot confliguratiof, and :it appears adequate for a 'WB -40 type semi -trailer combination 4. Plan shall depict the tying in of the proposed contours to the existing contours. 5. Designate tip out curb where applicable. 6. Castings for catch basins located in the curb shall be Neenah R-3067, or equivalent, to match City street standard for uniformity. Castings for catch basins located in the parking areas shall be Neenah R-2503, or equivalent. 7. A 6" gate valve is required for the water service. 8. Storm sewer design computations shall be submitted for review. We recommend approval contingent on the above comments. Civil & Municipal GAMun id pal\AOTSEGO2000\225 5bt22 5 5 hmec.d Engineering OcLandSurveyingfor 2002 ITEM 6.4 III W E31 A S S, Q C PA T 11 D_ C Q 1,J S U k -r A 0 r t"C, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952-595.9636 Facsimile: 952-595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM- Daniel Licht DATE.- 19 November 2002 R E.- Otsego - Waterfront PUD; Retail Store NAC FILE- 176.02 - 02.40 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 18 November 2002 to consider a PUD development stage plan for a 7,200 square foot building on Outlot B of the Waterfront Addition. The applicant was present to clarify that they have not secured a tenant for the building at this time. Under the PUD District, any use allowed in the B-3 District could be a possible use of the proposed building. An off -sale liquor store use would require subsequent application for a business license. Questions from the public were limited to the liquor license issue. The applicant discussed proposed changes to the building exterior that included adding articulation to the facade to match the convenience store to the south and Staff's recommendation for false first story windows across the front facade and portions of the building sides. The Planning Commission asked about turning the building to front Quaday Avenue, but the applicant state that the proposed design provides visibility to CSAH 39 and CSAH 42 and is preferred. After closing the Public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request subject to the conditions outlined below. The City Council will consider the application at their meeting on 25 November 2002 at 6-30 PM. A. Motion to approve a PUD Development Stage Plan for a retail building on Outlot B of the Otsego Waterfront, subject to the following conditions.- A final plat is approved by the City Council for the subject site prior to action on this request. 2. The building facade is revised to provide false windows on either side of the entrance along the at the ground floor of the building. 3. The landscaping is to be revised to specify plant quantities and plant locations, and to planters consistent with the PUD design guidelines at the front of the building. 4. Any freestanding sign that is proposed must be located near the site entrance at Quaday Avenue and be constructed as a monument style sign not exceed 100 square feet, subject to issuance of a sign permit. 5. A cross access/parking agreement is to be provided for Outlots A and B, subject to approval of the City Attorney. 6. A minimum of 33 parking stalls are to be provided on the subject site. 7 Pedestrian connections are made to the sidewalks on Quaday Avenue and CSAH 42 parallel with the front building line. Sidewalks at the perimeter of the building are to be six feet wide if adjacent to parking stalls. 8. A photometric lighting plan showing the location of all light sources and their illumination pattern must be submitted. The use shall comply with the requirements of Section 20-16-10 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding outdoor lighting. 9. The trash area is to be relocated to an area adjacent to the building near one of the two service doors and constructed out of materials consistent with the principal building, 10. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. The applicant must enter into a development contract with the City, adhere to all applicable conditions of approval, and make payment for all fees and securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 12. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the request based on a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and PUD District. 2 C. Motion to table the request. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Bob Fields CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUTNITY, TNH-N-TNESOT�A, APPLICANT: Landcor Construction, Inc. 11-19-02 FINDINGS & DECISION PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION: Request for a PUD Development Plan for a 7,200 square foot retail commercial building on Outlot B of the Otsego Waterfront Final Plat. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 25November2OO2 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The legal description of the property is Outlot B of Otsego Waterfront. 2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for commercial land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. 3. The property is zoned PUD, Planned Unit Development District as approved on April 8, 2002. The PUD District is subject to the uses and performance standards allowed in the B-3 District, except as expressly modified. The PUD District is further subject to the PUD Development Plan and PUD Development Standards incorporated as part of said District. 4. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the PUD District and PUD Development Plan with theirjudgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan describes this area as the City's primary commercial area to be developed with uses that serve local and regional markets. The opportunity for a retail use at this location is consistent with the City's goals for this area of the community and is consistent with the overall project development plan. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area, Finding. The subject site is located at the intersection of CSAH 42 and 91" Street and is surrounded by other commercial uses. The location of the use within the project provides visibility major traffic corridors and is also buffered from existing residential uses to the northwest by the required site design, other uses, and screening, C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding.- The proposed use will conform to all applicable development regulations, including those standards or requirements modified or incorporated as part of the PUD District. Page 1 of D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding:The proposed use will have a positive impact to the community in terms of expanding service opportunities, expanding the City's tax base, contfibuting positively to the City's identity with a high quality site and building design, and utilization of available municipal utilities. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Traffic generated by the proposed use will be within the capacity of streets serving the area required as part of the overall PUD Development Plan. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use isnot anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. The project will contribute to the City's tax base to support its service capabilities and utilize available infrastructure improvements. 7. The planning report dated 12 November 2002 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The memorandum dated 14 November 2002 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9� The Otsego Planning Commission conducted 2 public hearing at their regular meeting on 18 November 2002 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD Development Plan for a 7,200 square foot retail commercial building on Outlot B of Otsego Waterfront is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1 . A final plat is approved by the City Council for the subject site prior to action on this request. 2. The building facade is revised to provide false windows on either side of the entrance along the at the ground floor of the building. 3. The landscaping is to be revised to specify plant quantities and plant locations, and to planters consistent with the PUD design guidelines at the front of the building. 4. Any freestanding sign that is proposed must be located near the site entrance at Quaday Avenue and be constructed as a monument style sign not exceed 100 square feet, subject to issuance of a sign permit. Page 2 of 5. A cross access/parking agreement is to be provided for Outicts A and 8, subject to approval of the City Attorney. 6. A minimum of 33 parking stalls are to be provided on 'the subject, site. 7 Pedestrian connections are made to the sidewalks on Quaday Avenue and CSAH 42 parallel with the front building line. Sidewalks at the perimeter of the building are to be six feet wide if adjacent to parking stalls. I B. A photometric lighting plan showing the location of all light sources and their illumination pattern must be submitted. The use shall comply with the requirements of Section 20-16-10 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding outdoor lighting. 9. The trash area is to be relocated to an area adjacent to the building near one of the two service doors and constructed out of materials consistent with the principal building. 10. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. The applicant must enter into a development contract with the City, adhere to all applicable conditions of approval, and make payment for all fees and securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 25th day of November, 2002. Attes CITY OF OTSEGO M - Judy Hudson, Zoning Ad�mlnistrator/City Clerk Page 3 of Larry Fournier, Mayor Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. MEMORANDUM 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 To: Honorable Mayor and City Council cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Dan Licht, NAC Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Bob Fields, LandCor Steve Fischer, LandCor Jeff Shopek, P.E., Loucks Associates From: Ronald J. Wagner, PE Date: November 14,2002 ITEM 6.4. Nov 19 200Z Re: Lot 1, Block I Otsego Waterfront 3 rd Addition — Liquor Store We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat, Preliminary Grading Plan and Preliminary Utility and Site Plan for the above -referenced project and made the following comments: I . Currently, the grades of the storm sewer inverts do not agree with the invert elevations. 2. The existing Watermain along CSAH 42 and 9l't St labeled '8" PVC' should be revised to read '8" DIP.' Verify that all existing utilities are accurately labeled. 3. The sidewalk is incorrectly shown as being centered on the property line. The sidewalk shall be moved 2' west on the east side of the property, and 2' south on the north side of the property, to depict the correct location. (The overall accuracy of Quaday Avenue NE I _'Stree� NE inust bt�_l verified as it appears that an old plan is being used) and 9Y 4. A 10' drainage and utility easement, centered on the lot line, is required along the south boundary of Lot 1, Block I Otsego Waterfront 3 d Addition. 5. The current configuration of the parking lot does not provide adequate room for a WB -40 type semi -trailer combination due to the island near the southwest corner of the building. 6. The slope from the north and east curb lines to the existing sidewalk shall be 2% minimum, 10% maximum. 7. Castings located in the curb shall be Neenah R-3067, or equivalent, to match City street standard for uniformity. 8. Designate tip out curb where applicable. 9. Storm sewer design computations shall be submitted for review. 10. Plan shall depict the tying in of the proposed contours to the existing contours. 11. The stub that was provided for water service connection shall be utilized. We recommend approval contingent on the above coTQe "t Civil 6 Municipal Engineering 2 95 Page I of I Land Surveyingfor G:\Municipal\AOTSEGO2000\2257bt22571imce.doe ITEM 6.5. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE- 14 November 2002 RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance; Fences NAC FILE: 176.08 City staff met with Allen Kuemper, 8477 Obrian Avenue, at the Staff meeting on 7 November 2002 to discuss the recent amendments to the Zoning Ordinance for fences in side or rear yards adjacent to collector streets. Mr. Kuemper's lot is at the corner of Obrian Avenue and 85"' Street and is one of the cased that led to the recent Ordinance changes. Mr. Kuemper had started to put in a privacy fence along 85hStreet that was in violation of the previous requirements that fences along roadways not exceed 42 inches in height or be a minimum of 75 percent open for visability purposes. The amendments adopted 14 October 2002 would allow for construction of a fence upto six feet tall to be constructed in the side and rear yards of lots abutting collector or arterial streets. In addition to other requirements outlined in Section 20-16-6.J.5.b of the Zoning Ordinance, these fences must be setback 10 feet from the property line and can not extend past the rear line of the principal building,. The intent of the requirement that these be setback 10 feet and that the fences not extend forward of the rear building line of the building was to maintain an open appearance along these roadways and at intersections. Mr. Kuemper wishes to be able to construct the fence to the front line of the principal building such that a vehicle or trailer parked along side the garage is behind the fence and screened from view. Mr. Kuemper's garage also has a service door on the side, of the building that would be behind the fence if it were allowed to be constructed to the front line of the building. Mr. Kuemper does not take issue with the 10 foot setback requirement. The only options to address this situation are for Mr. Kuemper to request a variance or to consider amending the Zoning Ordinance. Under the criteria for variances outlined in Section 20-2-2. B of the Zoning Ordinance a variance would not be justified as there is no unique physical hardship 'involved in complying with the performance standard. As this same issue is applicable to other properties, the City Council may direct the Planning Commission to reconsider the requirement that the fence not extend past the rear building line as a City Initiated effort. Should the City Council decline to have the Planning Commission reconsider, or the Planning Commission recommend no change, Mr. Kuemper may make a private application for amendment of the Zoning Ordinance. City staff is requesting the City Council to take one of the following actions at the City Council meeting on 25 November 2002: Motion to direct the Planning Commission to consider amendment of the fence regulations for privacy fences adjacent to collector or arterial streets to extend to the front building line. 2. Motion not to direct the Planning Commission to consider amendment of the fence regulations for privacy fences adjacent to collector or arterial streets to extend to the front building line. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Allen Kuemper 2 ITEM 6.5. HGtT1AWt%7t A%%QCJA'tt0 k"C, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, IVIN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO- FROM. - RE: DATE. - NAC FILE Otsego Mayor and City Council Daniel Licht Otsego - Farr Development Corp. 3 December 2002 176.02 - 02.35 ACTION DEADLINE CITY FILE: 2002-35 27 January 2003 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 4 November 2002 to consider the request of Farr Development Corporation for a Comprehensive Plan amendment for 320 acres located west of CSAH 19 and north of 1-94. At the public hearing, the applicant was present to discuss the development concept on which the Comprehensive Plan amendment is based. The Planning Commission discussed issues of changing industrial guided land to residential and the design of the development concept. The Planning Commission also took comments from an area resident who lives south of 8 oth Street and is concerned about the loss of rural character in the area. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission table action on the request until their 2 December 2002 meeting to allow additional time to contemplate the proposed amendment. At the 2 December 2002 meeting, the discussion again focused on the changing of industrial guided land and the need to consider changes beyond the boundaries of the subject site. Ultimately, the Planning Commission members said that the proposed amendment would serve to make sanitary sewer service available to areas immediately adjacent to the 1-94 corridor sooner rather than later. The loss of industrial guided land in the area north of I- 94 and west of CSAH 19 can be offset by other suitable industrial locations surrounding the Nashua/Nabor Avenue corriclor. The Planning Commission voted 7 -Oto recommend approval of the request and to direct City Staff to Initiate amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and Sewer and Water Plans in accordance with the staff alternative for lands beyond the subject site. The City Council is to consider the application at their meeting on 9 December 2002 at 6-30 PM. Options for the City Council to consider in acting on the request are outlined below: A. Motion to approve resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan subject to the following conditions: The Comprehensive Plan amendment is to be in the form of Exhibit B of the Planning Report dated 25 November 2002. The City Planner and City Engineer are directed to make appropriate changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Sanitary Sewer and Water facility plans reflecting the amendment and initiate an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan in the form of Exhibit D of the Planning Report dated 25 November 2002, subject to further review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Applications for zoning and subdivision approvals necessary for development of the project are subject to the growth management policies and interim land use provisions outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Specific provisions for staging development of residential elements of the project in relation to commercial or industrial uses are to be incorporated as part of subsequent zoning applications. 3. Development of the project requires applications for, but not limited to, rezoning, site and building plan review, preliminary and final plat, EAW, or other applications required by the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Ordinance. 4 4. Development of the project shall conform to applicable performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The concept plan is to be revised to provide for dedication of park and trail facilities subject to review by the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission and approval of the City Council as part of a preliminary plat application. 6. The concept plan is to be revised to reduce the intensity of the dwelling units along the northern portion of the project by incorporating small lot single family lots ("detached townhomes") in place of attached dwellings. 7. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request based on finding that the application is inconsistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan. - 2 Once established, geographic land use designations and related zoning classifications shall be changed only when it can be demonstrated that such modifications are in the best interest of the community. Such changes shall occur only when they will promote land use compatibility and pre -determined goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (Policy Plan, p. 38) 2� Immediate, short range market potential and demand of activities which are not suggested for a site or area by the Comprehensive Plan or allowed by the Zoning Ordinance shall not be the sole justification for a change in activity. (Policy Plan, p. 38) 3. Industrial (and commercial) development shall be strongly encouraged to create new job opportunities and expand the local tax base to assist in paying for needed service and reduce tax impacts on housing costs. (Policy Plan, p. 49) 4. Industrial development which maximizes the return on City investments in public facilities and service shall be promoted. (Policy Plan, p. 49) C. Motion to table the request. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Lucinda Gardner Mike Gair 3 RESOLUTION NO.: 02 - CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IT PERTAINS PROPERTY OWNED BY DARREL FARR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION CHANGING INDUSTRIAL LAND USE TO A MIX OF RESIDENTIAL) COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES. WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Darrel Farr Development Corporation for approval of an amendment to the Land Use Plan Map changing industrial land use to a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses in the area west of CSAH 19 and north of 1-94; and, WHEREAS, the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment is based on the land uses identified on the development concept entitled Kittredge Crossings submitted with the application, and, WHEREAS, the map changes necessary to accomplish the developer's request are illustrated by Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 4 November 2002, to consider the request, preceded by published and mailed notice; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and tabled the application until their meeting on 2 December 2002 to allow contemplation of the proposed land use plan changes and issues surrounding the request; and, WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission, at their meeting on 2 December 2002 continued discussion of the application and upon review of the application and evidence received voted to recommend by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the requested amendment of the Comprehensive Plan based upon a finding that the amendment is consistent with the following policies: Compatible uses and activities shall be concentrated and clustered into functionally related sub -units of the community. (Page 37) Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative (economic, social, or physical) impact on adjoining developments. (Page 37) Incompatible land uses shall be properly regulated and related so that conflicts are minimized. This shall be achieved through the use of natural and man-made physical barriers (i.e., topography, drainageways, transportation routes, etc.) distances, screens, and/or proper physical orientation fo lots and buildings. (Page 37) Wherever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at center or rear, mid -block points so that similar uses front the same street, or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers. (Page 37) The community shall be planned and developed on a unit (neighborhood) basis as determined by physical barriers and/or homogeneous land use characteristics and urban/rural development area boundaries. (Page 39) Residential neighborhoods shall be protected from penetration by through traffic on local streets. (Page 41) Major streets are to border and not penetrate residential neighborhoods. (Page 41) A high quality "life cycle" residential environment shall be maintained throughout the community which emphasizes physically coordinated neighborhoods which incorporate all types, sizes and styles of dwellings. (Page 41) Residential development shall be promoted proximate to areas targeted for economic development to provide ancillary and market support. (Page 44). NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO THAT; the request to amend the 2001 Comprehensive Plan Update, as illustrated on Exhibit A, is hereby APPROVED, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment is to be in the form of Exhibit B of the Planning Report dated 25 November 2002. The City Planner and City Engineer are directed to make appropriate changes to the Comprehensive Plan and Sanitary Sewer and Water facility plans reflecting the amendment and initiate an amendment of the Comprehensive Plan in the form of Exhibit D of the Planning Report dated 25 November 2002, subject to further review and approval of the Planning Commission and City Council. 2. Applications for zoning and subdivision approvals necessary for development of the project are subject to the growth management policies and interim land use provisions outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Specific provisions for staging development of residential elements of the project in relation to commercial or industrial uses are to be incorporated as part of subsequent zoning applications. 3. Development of the project requires applications for, but not limited to, rezoning, site and building plan review, preliminary and final plat, EAW, or other applications required by the Zoning Ordinance or Subdivision Ordinance. 4. Development of the project shall conform to applicable performance standards of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. 5. The concept plan is to be revised to provide for dedication of park and trail facilities subject to review by the Parks and Recreation Commission and Planning Commission and approval of the City Council as part of a preliminary plat application. 6. The concept plan is to be revised to reduce the intensity of the dwelling units along the northern portion of the project by incorporating small lot single family lots ("detached townhomes") in place of attached dwellings. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 9th day of December 2002. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 3 Halanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 CITY OF OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL CITY ENGINEER'S AGENDA December 9, 2002 Item 7.1 -. Consider Pay Estimate #1 for Quaday Avenue Storm Sewer Extension Item 7.2: Consider Pay Estimate #1 for Jaber Avenue Culvert Replacement Item 7.1 Consider Any Other Engineering Items Civil &Municipal Engineering 25 G:\Municipal\AOTSEGO\Agendas\councilagendhek�o�Urveyl*ligfor December 4, 2002 Honorable Mayor & City Council :ity of Otsego 6899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Quaday Avenue NE Storm Sewer Extension Contractor: Meadowvale Construction Contract Amount: $17,130 Award Date: 10/24/02 Completion Date: 1/1/03 Dear Council Members: Pay Estimate No. 1 City of Otsego Quaday Avenue NE Storm Sewer Extension The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Quote Schedule "A" ITEM 7.1 Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension Used To Date Extension 1 Mobilization 1 LS $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1 $3,000.00 2 Salvage & Reinstall Hydrant Lead / Hydrant 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 3 Minor Ditching 1 LS $1,500.00 $1,500.00 0.75 $1,125.00 4 Remove Bulkhead & Connect to Ex. Storm Sewer 1 EACH $500.00 $500.00 1 $500.00 5 15" HDPE Apron____ 1 EACH $300.00 $300.00 1 $300.00 6 15" RCP CIL 5 24 LF $50.00 $1,200.00 16 $800.00 7 15" HDPE Storm Sewer 100 LF $50.00 $5,000.00 100 $5,000.00 8 48" Diameter Manhole 1 EACH $1,600.00 $1,600.00 1 $1,600.00 9 Bale Check 3 EACH $10.00 $30.00 3 $30.00 10 Restoration 1 LS $2,000.00 $2,000.00 0.75 $1,500.001 Total Bid Schedule "A" Field Modification #1 $15,855.00 Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension Used To Date Extension I Straw Mesh Blanket (Erosion Control) 1120 SY 1 $2.50 $2,800.00 1120 $2,800.001 Total Field Modification #1 $2,800.00 Summary Of Work Completed To Date: WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: $18,655.00 LESS 5% RETAINAGE: $932.75 WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: $17,722.25 FILE: ShareWunicipallaramsey/Quaday Storm Sewer Quote Prop.xis SHEET. PAY ESTIMATE 1 Pay Estimate No. I City of Otsego Quaday Avenue NE Storm Sewer Extension APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: Meadowvale Construction Certification by Contractor: I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: OWNEFCITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: FILE: Share\Municipat/aramsey/Quaday Storm Sewer Quote Prop.xIs SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 1 Date: Date: ITEM 7.1 December 4, 2002 Honorable Mayor & City Council ity of Otsego ,)899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Jaber Avenue Culvert Replacement Contractor.- Meadowvale Construction Contract Amount: $7560.00 Award Date: July 2002 Completion Date: 1/3/02 Dear Council Members Pay Estimate No. 1 City of Otsego Jaber Avenue Culvert Replacement The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Quote Schedule "A" ITEM 7.2 Item Description Contract Quantity Unit Unit Price Extension Used To Date Extension 1 Remove 18" CMP 48 LF $10.00 $480.00 48 $480.00 2 Furnish and Install 24" RCP 48 LF $60.00 $2,880.00 48 $2,880.00 3 Furnish and Install 24" RCP FES 2 EACH $500.00 $1,000.00 2 $1,000.00 4 Furnish and Install Riprap 10 CY $70.00 $700.00 1 10 1 $700.001 1 5 lResotration of Site (seeding) 1 LS $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $0.001 Total Bid Schedule "A" .iORK COMPLETED TO DATE: LESS 5% RETAINAGE: WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: Meadowvale Construction Certification by Contractor: I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: OWNEFGITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Date: Title.- Date: FILE: Share\Municipai/aramsey/ot9lOquote.xls SHEET. PAY ESTIMATE I $5,060.00 $253.00 ITEM 9.iB. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-48 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION SETTING A TAX LEVY OF $1,318,122 FOR 2003 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Otsego City Council is required by State law to establish a final tax levy for 2003 by December 20, 2002. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA 1. That there is hereby approved for proposed expenditure from general taxes the following sums for the purpose indicated. General Government $1,222,172 1999 Overlay Debt Service $ 70,000 Equipment Certificate $ 25,940 Total Tax Levy $1,318,112 Dated this 9th day of December, 2002 ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ITEM 9-B. RESOLUTION NO. 2002-49 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION SETTING A BUDGET OF $1,713,124 FOR 2003 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA 1. That there is hereby approved for proposed expenditure a total budget of $1,713,124.00 for the year 2003. Dated this 9th day of December, 2002 ATTEST: Judy Hudson, City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor -r�(n (-I, io. MEMO Date: December S, 2002 To: mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Police Commission Information I spoke with the City Administrators of Delano and Monticello to find out about their police commissions. DELANO Delano contracts for 12 hours a day of Sheriff's services. Delano established a public safety commission several years ago. The commission consists of 9 members plus a Councilmember and meets quarterly. The local deputy attends every meeting. Usually the Sheriff or a high ranking officer also attends the meeting. In appointing the commissioners, Delano was careful to ensure a balance of opinions regarding the sheriff and police services. Right now the commission is advocating for a trail system in Delano to improve public safety. MONTICELLO Monticello contracts for 32 hours a day of the Sheriff's services. Monticello established a commission 7-10 years ago. There are 5 members plus a Councilmember and it started out meeting quarterly, but in the last year its only met twice because there didn't seem to be any issues. The local deputies plus the Sheriff or a captain attend the meetings. They treat appointments to the commission the same as to any other commission.