The URL can be used to link to this page

12-23-02 CCCLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCEL MEETING DECEMBER 23,2002 TO: Judy Hudson ITEM 5. Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 12-12-2002 $ 57,314.84 12-18-2002 $ 23,564.71 GRAND TOTAL $ 80,879.55 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO 12112/02 10:47 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ DECEMBER 2002 Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $27.83 UnPaid BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC $234.41 UnPaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $195.07 UnPaid BOYER TRUCKS $180.96 UnPaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $18,250.40 UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $216.41 UnPaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $76.22 UnPaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $107.78 UnPaid DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,000.00 UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $341.55 UnPaid GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC $61.62 UnPaid HYDRANT SPECIALIST INC $79.88 UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $422.31 UnPaid JACK'S SMALL ENGINE INC $59.00 UnPaid MEADOWVALE CONSTRUCTION $24,905.27 UnPaid NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $172.74 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1.095.40 UnPaid RMR SERVICES, INC $8,038.94 UnPaid SHIRWIL TOOL & MFG $40.00 UnPaid SOFTRONICS $473.09 UnPaid ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC $181.17 UnPaid TARGETSTORES $33.99 Oaid TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS INC $211.83 Paid XCELENERGY $44.25 UnPaid ZIEGLER INC $864.72 Total Checks $57,314.84 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 12/12/02 10:48 AM Theck Detail Register@ Page 1 DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANKOFELIKIRIVER Unpai� ' "' -----AIRGAS, IkC.-- E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $8.72 105817943 LEASE MAT 1 YR E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) - $19-11 105828560 HAZMAT/OXYGEN/ACET Total AIRGAS, INC. $27.83 ER I L I -, N TIR I E . CE'NfER, INC-----", E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $234.41 2790008614 CATLOADER Total BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC -$234.41 pat n I FFICE PRODUCTS E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $268-00 517930 OFFICE SUPPLIES E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies ($72,93) 775510 CREDIT Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $195.07 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $0.38 17014R 81 TRK E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $166.65 17708R 92 FORD TRK E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $13.93 17784R 81 TRK Total BOYERTRUCKS _$180.96 COURI'MACA'R'TH'UR LAW'bFFICE E 413-43100-301 Legal Services $2,490.00 ODEAN AVE G 701-21938 TMH Development $462.50 OTSEGO BUS PARK E 101-42420-301 Legal Services $489.40 ABATEMENT E 406-43100-301 Legal Services $537.50 REGIONAL POND G 701-22318 RIVERVIEW BANK $562.50 RIVERVIEW BANK E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $600.00 RELIANT G 701-21990 WH LINK $750.00 WH LINK G 701-22325 101 MARKET $787.50 101 MARKET E 415-43251-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $890.00 WW TREATMENT G 701-22321 RIVERPOINTE 2ND $350.00 RIVERPOINTE 2 G 701-22320 RETAIL OFFICE SPACE $1,387.50 MARKET WEST E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $230.00 DOG ORDINANCE E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $4,971.00 GENERAL G 701-22331 PHEAST RIDGE 6 $1,287.50 PR 6TH G 701-22324 RIVERPOINTE 3 $187.50 RIVERPOINTE 3 E 101-42420-301 Legal Services $50.00 BALAMUT E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $50.00 LIQUOR E 415-43251-301 Legal Services $50.00 WWTP EXPANSION E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $70.00 SLUDGE E 434-43100-301 Legal Services $320.00 85TH STREET E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $187.50 HERITAGE HILLS ISSUES G 701-22313 BLACKWOODS SITE $350.00 BLACKWOODS E 101-42420-301 Legal Services $200.00 BUTLER G 701-22329 QUADAY ADDITION $200.00 DARKENWALD - QUADAY E 430-43100-301 Legal Services $200.00 WEST SEWER PLANT E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $230.00 87TH ST VACATION E 406-43100-301 Legal Services $260.00 DRAINAGE EASEMENT E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $100.00 ASSESSOR CONTRACT Total COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE _$18,2k.46 CROW.-RIVE'R FARIM-EQUIPME - NT E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT npat $216.41 93900 MISC SUPPLIES i216.41 E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies $76.22 SUPPLIES FOR ELECTION CITY OF OTSEGO 12/18/02 3:57 PM Page 1 *Check Summary Register@ DECEMBER 2002 Total Checks $23,564.71 FILTER: None Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER -- UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $90.42 UnPaid AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING $1,754.60 UnPaid DEHMER FIRE PROTECTION $107.75 UnPaid DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,000.00 UnPajd EARL F ANDERSON INC $1,223.70 UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $54.15 UnPaid FAIRVIEW NORTHLAND $184.00 UnPajd G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $486.53 UnPaid GROEN GARY CPA $2,362.00 UnPaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $675.37 UnPaid ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $525.00 UnPaid MEDICA $4,392.05 UnPaid MINNESOTA LIFE $102.00 UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $64.00 UnPaid NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC $70.29 UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $5,415.26 UnPajd PITNEY BOWES $100.02 UnPajd TARGETSTORES $69.36 UnPajd WELSH DEVELOPMENT $800.24 UnPaid XCELENERGY $87.97 UnPaid ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC -.td ()()n r)n Total Checks $23,564.71 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 12/18i02 3:58 PM Page 1 *Check Detail RegisterC DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANKOFELKIRIVER I. . . . . . . . . . . . Unpaid AIRGAS, INC. E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $47.28 105842335 OXYGENNISOR/CUTTING TIP E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $43.14 105845383 AC 4CL ACETYLENE Total AIRGAS, INC. $90.42 Unpaid AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING E 434-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,754.60 20963 85TH ST EXTENSION Total AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING $1,754.60 Unpaid DEHMER FIRE PROTECTION E 101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $107.75 10100 FIRE EXT TESTING/SERVICE Total DEHMER FIRE PROTECTION $107.75 `6- '"a"j"*'d***'*"""""""""�"",-,",*"",-�'""'*'""'""**"""""""*"-"",-""D"�'R"—A,K,*"E�"-C�"�0"'*'N"'*"S"�'T"'R*""'U""C'*""T""I"'O"*"*N",,,-I-N""C"".,",-","-""","—,------,--,*"****""*,-*"***,*-***'-* E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 15107 83RD ST LNDSCP Total DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,000.00 EARL F ANDERSON INC E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $1,223.70 50903 MISS PINES STREET SIGNS Total EARL F ANDERSON INC $1,223.70 ECM PUBLISHERS INC E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $54.15 138334 NOTICE FARR DEV Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $54.15 ,p . aid FAIRVIEW NORTHLAND E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $184.00 2014965 RICK K DRUG TESTING Total FAIRVIEW NORTHILAND $184.00 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM E 101-43100-225 Uniforms E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services E 101-43100-225 Uniforms E 101-43100-2.25 Uniforms E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services E 101-43100-225 Uniforms Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $77.11 104909 UNIFORMS $80.46 109845 MATS $73.58 109846 UNIFORMS $66.90 114807 UNIFORMS $80.46 119787 MATS $108.02 119788 UNIFORMS $486.53 ....... . .............. . .. Unpaid GROEN GARY CPA E 101-41600-390 Contracted Services $2,362.00 OCT/NOV 52.5 HRS Total GROEN GARY CPA $2,362.00 Unpaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil $657.26 45596 DIESEL FUEL E101-43100-202 Gas& Oil $18.11 45642 FUEL FILTER Total H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $675.37 . ... . ..................... .. .......... Unpaid ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL E 101-41400-355 Dues & Memberships $525.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL Total ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $525.00 'Inpaid MEDICA E 101-43100-123 Health $1,803.11 PW - JAN E 101-41400-123 Health $2,588.94 ADMIN - JAN Total MEDICA $4,392.05 Unpaid MINNESOTA LIFE E101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $27.40 ADMIN - JAN CITY OF OTSEGO 12/18/02 158 PM Page 2 *Check Detail Register@ DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $74.60 Pw - JAN Total MINNESOTA LIFE $102.00 E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $64.00 338 2 P/U 10/28 & 11/26 Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $64.00 npaid NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC E 10 1 -43100-393 Street Signs $70.29 22-6376 STREET SIGNS Total NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC $7029 Unpaid NORT WESTAS . SO . C : C ONSULTANITS -- G 701-2-2334 GODFATHER PUD $47.14 12312 G 701-2-2340 WATERFRONT LIQUOR STORE $487.62 12312 G 701-22342 WATERFRON CONV STORE $531.07 12312 G 701-22337 Quest Development $271.36 12312 G 701-22335 KITTREDGE LNDING $271.36 12312 G 701-22343 WF3RD ADD FINPLAT $215.37 12312 G 701-22304 OTSEGO WATERFRONT $91.00 12312 G 701-22341 WATERFRONT FAM REST $667.94 12312 E 203-45210-303 Planning Fees $238.41 12313 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $122.75 12313 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $40825 12313 E 101-45300-390 Contracted Services $56.22 12313 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $28.52 12313 E 429-43256-303 Planning Fees $208.50 12313 E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $169.75 12314 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $1,000.00 12315 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $700.00 12316 Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $5,415.26 PITNEY BOWES GODFATHER RETAILJLIQ STORE CONVSTORE QUEST COMP PLAN FARR-KITTREDGE WATERFRONT 3RD F/PLAT WATERFRONT PUD FAM RESTAURANT PARK PLANNING ZONING MAP UPDATE GENERAL HPC ZONING ORD UPDATE EAST SEWER CODE ENFORCEMENT MEETINGS CITY CODE E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $100.02 POSTAGE METER Total PITNEY BOWES $100.02 npaid TARGETSTORES E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $69.36 1103274670 DAWN/BATTERIES Total TARGET STORES $69.36 .............. . . ....... WELSH DEVELOPMENT G 701-22327 MRD BANK SITE $800.24 DEVELOPMENT REFUND Total WELSH DEVELOPMENT $800.24 XCELENERGY E 101-43160-322 Utilities $41.88 054157032234 56TH CT SERWER E 101-43160-322 Utilities $46-09 061929356034 53RD ST WELL Total XCEL ENERGY $87.97 ............................................. n ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous E702-41400-310 Miscellaneous Total ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC 10100 BANKOFELKRIVER $1,000.00 13875 88TH CRT LNDSCP $1,000.00 13516 89TH ST LNDSCP $1,000.00 13575 89TH ST LNDSCP $1,000.00 13780 89TH CIR LNDSCP $4,000.00 $23,564.71 CITY OF OTSEGO 12/18/02 3:58 PM Page 3 *Check Detail Register@ DECEMBER 2002 Check Amt Invoice Comment FILTER: None ABDO EICK& 4q MMRSLLP Certified Public Accountants & Consultants 7241 Ohms Lane Suite 200 Edina, MN 55439-2150 Mayor and Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue Otsego, Minnesota 55330 Dear Mayor and Council: ITEM 5. 2. NOV 2 5 2002 October 31, 2002 We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide the City of Otsego for the year ended December 31, 2002. We will audit the financial statements of the City as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002. We understand that the financial statements will be presented in accordance with the financial reporting model in effect prior to that described in GASB Statement No. 34. Also, the document we submit to you will include the following additional information that will be subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the financial statements: Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements Audit Objective The objective of our audit is the expression of an opinion as to whether your financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in confon-nity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to report on the fairness of the additional information referred to in the first paragraph when considered in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and will include tests of the accounting records and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express such an opinion. If our opinion on the financial statements is other than unqualified, we will fully discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to form or have not formed an opinion, we may decline to express an opinion or to issue a report as a result of this engagement. Management Responsibilities Management is responsible for making all financial records and related information available to us. We understand that you will provide us with such information required for our audit and that you are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of that information. We will advise you about appropriate accounting principles and their application and will assist in the preparation of your financial statements, but the responsibility for the financial statements remains with you. That responsibility includes the establishment and maintenance of adequate records and effective internal control over financial reporting, the selection and application of accounting principles, and the safeguarding of assets. Management is responsible for adjusting the financial statements to correct material misstatements and for confirm�ing to us in the representation letter that the effects of any uncorrected misstatements aggregated by us during the current engagement and pertaining to the latest period presented are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. 952.835.9090 Fax 952.835.3261 www.aemcpas.com Audit Procedures - General City of Otsego October 31, 2002 Page Two An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. We will plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable rather than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether from errors, fraudulent financial reporting, misappropriation of assets, or violations of laws or governmental regulations that are attributable to the entity or to acts by management or employees acting on behalf of the entity. Because an audit is designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that material misstatements may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect immaterial misstatements, or violations of laws or governmental regulations that do not have a direct and material effect on the financial statements. However, we will inform you of any material errors that come to our attention, and we will inform you of any fraudulent financial reporting or misappropriation of assets that come to our attention. We will also inform you of any violations of laws or governmental regulations that come to our attention, unless clearly inconsequential. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to matters that might arise during any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals, creditors, and financial institutions. We will request written representations from your attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this inquiry. At the conclusion of our audit, we will also require certain written representations from you about the financial statements and related matters. Identifying and ensuring that the City complies with laws, regulations, contracts, and agreements is the responsibility of management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we will perform tests of the City's compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and agreements. However, the objective of our audit will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion. Audit Procedures - Internal Control In planning and performing our audits, we will consider the internal control sufficient to plan the audit in order to determine the nature, tin -Ling, and extent of our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the City's financial statements. An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify reportable conditions. However, we will inform the governing body or audit committee of any matters involving internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the entity's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the financial statements. City of Otsego October 31, 2002 Page Three 1 �4144 Audit Administration, Fees, and Other We understand that your employees will prepare all cash or other confin-nations we request and will locate any invoices selected by us for testing. Our fee for these services will be at our standard hourly rates plus out-of-pocket costs (such as report reproduction, typing, postage, travel, copies, telephone, etc.). We estimate that our gross fee, including expenses will be approximately $8,500. This estimate is based on completion of our year end accounting checklist by City staff. Our standard hourly rates vary according to the degree of responsibility involved and the experience level of the personnel assigned to your audit. Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work progresses and are payable on presentation. In accordance with our firm policies, work may be suspended if your account becomes 90 days or more overdue and may not be resumed until your account is paid in full. If we elect to terminate our services for nonpayment, our engagement will be deemed to have been completed upon written notification of tem-driation, even if we have not completed our report. You will be obligated to compensate us for all time expended and to reimburse us for all out-of-pocket costs through the date of termination. The above fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the audit. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant ternis of our engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us. Sincerely, ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants kteven R. [MflcDio�na'1d'CVPA RESPONSE: This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the City of Otsego. Lo C Date: IEJKILLf�CHILLING LTD. CONSULTANTS AND CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS July 10, 2002 To the Partners Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP Dean R Ager, CPA Thomas L Sykes, CPA Michael S. Altman, CM Williarrij. Grave1le, CPA Deborahj. Medlin, CPA Darla R. Benoi� CPA We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP (the firm) in effect for the year ended May 31, 2002. A system of quality control encompasses the firm's organizational structure and the policies adopted and procedures established to provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards. The elements of quality control are described in the Statements on Quality Control Standards issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The design of the system and compliance with it are the - responsibility of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system, and the firm's compliance with the system based on our review. Our review was conducted in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review Board of the AICPA. In performing our review, we obtained an understanding of the system of quality control for the firm's accounting and auditing- practice. In addition, we tested compliance with th6 firm's quality control policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of the firm's policies and procedures on selected engagements. Because our review was based on selective tests, it would not necessarily disclose all weaknesses in the system of quality control or all instances of lack of compliance with it. Because ' there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control, de . partures from the system may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of a system of quality control to future periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP in effect for the year ended May 31, 2002, has been designed to meet the requirements of the quality control standards for an. accounting and auditing practice established by the AICPA and was complied with during the year then ended toprovide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming with p"rofessional standards. 600 Wells Fargo Center - 230 West Superior Street - Duluth, MN 55802-1953 - Phone 218-722-4705 - Fax 218-722-8589 807 Cloquet Avenue - Cloquet, MN 55720-1677 - Phone 218-879-1503 - Fax 218-879-6240 Suite 228 - 1225 Tower Avenue - Superior, Wl 54880 - Phone 715394-6621 - Fax 715394-5629 wwweikill.com 'T -EM SUMMARY PUBLICATION ORDINANCE No. 2 0 0 2 - 21 As authorized by state law, City of Otsego has approved the publication of an ordinance- the "Charter cable franchise" - in summary form. The full text of the ordinance is posted, and copies are available for inspection, in the office of the City Clerk. The approved summary of the ordinance follows: CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE No. 2 0 0 2 - 21 The Charter cable franchise grants a fifteen (15) year cable television franchise to CC VIII Operating LLC d/b/a Charter Communications. The Charter cable franchise authorizes Charter to use rights-of-way in the City to construct, operate and maintain a system to provide cable services. The Charter cable franchise establishes requirements for operation of the system and delivery of cable services, imposes a franchise fee, and generally sets forth the conditions required for cable franchises under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 238. The ordinance is effective on the date of acceptance by Charter. BY ORDER OF CITY OF OTSEGO By Its ATTEST: By Its Michael C Couri- Andrew J. MacArthur Roben T. Ruppe- David R. Wendorf *Also licensed in Illinois "Also licensed in M�fbrnia December 17, 2002 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Judy Hudson, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, NfN 55330 COURI & MACARTHUR Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-2599 (FAX) couriand7nacarthur@pobox.com RE: Centerpoint Minnegasco- Ordinance Summary for Publication Dear Council Members: Please find enclosed for your consideration a proposed Summary of the recently approved Franchise Ordmiance with Centerpoint Mimegasco for publication purposes. It is my understanding that Centerpoint Minnegasco has already executed the Franchise ordinance and has returned it to the City, I recommend Council approval of the Summary. Very truly yours, ew J. M COURI& CARTHUR Encl. cc: Arnie Hendrickson, Centerpoint Minegasco CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE SUMMARY, OTSEGO ORDINANCE NO. 02-20 OFFICIAL ORDINANCE SUMMARY- ORDINANCE NO. 02-20 GRANTING A NON-EXCLUSIVE GAS ENERGY FRANCHISE TO CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO, A DIVISION OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORPORATION, A DELEWARE CORPORATION. As authorized by State law, including Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, the City of Otsego has approved the publication of the above-described ordinance in summary form. The full text of the ordinance is posted, and copies are available for *inspection at the office of the Otsego City Clerk. The approved summary of the ordinance follows: CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 02-20 The non-exclusive gas energy franchise ordinance grants Centerpoint Energy Minegasco the right to operate gas energy lines and other facilities within the City of Otsego over the term of the franchise, and sets forth the terms and conditions for construction and operation of the same. The Franchise Ordinance incorporates the regulations of the current City right-of-way ordiance. The ordinance shall be effective upon the date of publication of this summary. ADOPTED BY THE OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL this day of December, 2002. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, City Clerk ITEM 5.5. CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2002-22 AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 2001-12 SNOWMOBILES AND OTHER RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: Section 8-1-8:A. of Ordinance No. 2001-12 is hereby amended to read as follows: Recreational motor vehicles may not be operated in designated areas except on private property with owner's written permission between the hours of 8:00 AM and 10:00 PM. ADOPTED this 23 rd day of December 2002 by the Otsego City Council. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Clerk ITEM 6. 1. "alkirowtsir ASSOCIAltub CONSUum"l-s" INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595-9837 planners@nacpianning.com PLANNING REPORT -addendum TO: FROM - RE: REPORT DATE NAC FILE. - BACKGROUND Otsego Mayor and City Council Daniel Licht Otsego - Waterfront PUD; Convenience Gas 17 December 2002 APPLICATION DATE: 30 October 2002 176.02 - 02,39 CITY FILE- 2002- Landcor Construction, Inc. has submitted plans for a 6,900 square foot convenience store with attached car wash and gasoline sales. The subject site is located at the southwest corner of the Otsego Waterfront development (Outlot A) at the corner of CSAH 39 and CSAH 42. The subject site is planned for commercial uses within the east sanitary sewer service district designated by the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council approved a rezoning to PUD District on 8 April 2002 subject to a development stage plan and specific project guidelines. This site is not within the WS Overlay District. The Planning Commission recommended several changes to the site plan, including rotating the orientation of the building and gas islands. The City Council tabled consideration of the application at two meetings in order to allow the applicant to prepare revised plans and submit them for staff review. These plans have been reviewed and our comments follow. Exhibits: A. Site Location D. Building Plans B. Site Plan E. Grading Plan C. Landscape Plan F Utility Plan ANALYSIS PUD Zoning. The subject site is zoned PUD District, which is based on the requirements of the B-3 District. Convenience stores with gasoline sales are allowed as a conditional use within the B-3 District. As such, the use may be allowed in this PUD Development subject to the same conditions and the applicable performance standards unique to the development stage plan. Consideration of the site and building plans for each phase of the Waterfront project is processed as an amendment to the PUD District. The Planning Commission and City Council are to consider the site and building plans based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1 The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). 4� The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. The development stage plan approved for the Waterfront project planned for a convenience gas use at this location. The site plan has been revised such that the building front and pump islands are oriented east as on the original concept plan. Lot Requirements. The development of lots within the PUD District are intended to be subject to the requirements of the B-3 District, outlined below: K Lot Area Lot Width Setbacks Front Side CSAH39 CSAH 42/Quaday Rear North Required 1.0ac. 200ft. 65ft. 65ft./35ft, 20ft. Proposed 1.4ac. 241ft. 100ft. 29ft./l 50ft. 64ft. K As shown above, the proposed site plan meets all of the applicable B-3 District lot requirements except for the setback from CSAH 42, which is 29 feet. The site plan approved with the original development plan with the building oriented to the east would have encroached to within 45 feet of CSAH 42. Section 20-36-2.M of the Zoning Ordinance allows that setbacks at the perimeter of a PUD District may be reduced to 30 feet. Given that this design provides for a more consistent alignment of the buildings along CSAH 39 (bank, family restaurant, and convenience gas) and CSAH 42 (convenience gas, liquor store, and market west) based on changes in right- of-way width along CSAH 42, the setback is appropriate. The site plan will need to be revised such that the building is a full 30 feet from the CSAH 42 right-of-way. Building Design. The proposed building is a 24 foot tall, single story building. Dormers have been used on the north and south facades to create the appearance of a two story building, consistent with the PUD District design guidelines. The majority of the building is faced with brick and there is a narrow band of artificial stucco just below the asphalt shingled roof. Colors for the proposed building should be specified. The building mass has been minimized though the use of large windows on the building front and brick pilasters Sp2ced evenly around the perimeter to add articulation. The rear wall of the car wash features four sets of three windows to avoid a solid wall. Building mechanicals are located at the south of the building and screened behind a cedar fence. Plans have not been submitted for the canopy above the pump islands and must be submitted. The architectural design and color of the canopy should be similar to that of the principal building in an off-white color. The face of the canopy may not be illuminated and should not include extensive color banding that contrasts with the building color. Landscaping. The landscaping plan for the perimeter of the property is generally consistent with the plans approved with the overall project. Additional coniferous tree plantings and shrubs have been provided along CSAH 42 and CSAH 39 to screen the carwash entrance and exit, as well as the stacking lanes. The size of plantings shown on the landscape plan are consistent with the Zoning Ordinance requirements. All of the selected plant materials are appropriate. Signs. The only sign identified on the submitted plans is a wall sign above the building entrance. Plans for any additional signing must be submitted. As a corner lot, signs may be allowed on more than one side of the building, but the total sign area may not exceed 15% of the facade area facing two public streets. Any signs located on the canopy should be limited to maintain an appropriate scale and not exceed 20 percent of the facade area facing a public street. No sign may exceed 100 square feet. One free standing sign is allowed with a maximum height of 20 feet. The PUD District approval a] lowed that this sign may be located near the Quaday Avenue and CSAH 39 intersection for visibility, where it is shown on the site plan. The sign location is setback more than 10 feet from any lot line as required by Section 20-37-2. E. 0 All signs require issuance of a sign permit and these plans are subject to further review and approval of City Staff. Accessory Uses. Under the PUD District and performance standards applicable to convenience gas uses, outdoor sales, storage and display is prohibited. Exceptions to this requirement are limited to 20lbs. propane tank sales provided that they are secured and meet all fire codes. Compressed air and coin operated vacuum are identified on the site plan on the north side of the building. The applicant should provide information on the noise created by the vacuum. Consideration may be given to limiting the use of the vacuum to those hours when the car wash is allowed to operate to minimize noise conflicts. A propane tank is shown along the east property line. Additional shrubs and low-level plantings should be provided around the propane tank to provide screening, subject to applicable fire code requirements. If a public address system is to be used, the system is to be set so as not to be audible at any property line. Playing of music or advertisements over the public address system is to be prohibited. Hours. The hours for convenience gas uses in a B-3 District are limited to 6:00 AM to 12:00 midnight unless extended by the City Council. The applicant applicant is proposing that the gas sales and convenience store be allowed to operate 24 hours. The car wash would operate between 7-00 AM to 10:00 because of staffing needs and expected volume. The Planning Commission believed these hours to be reasonable given the planned site design changes and recommended approval of this specific arrangement. Access. Vehicle access to the subject site is shared with the use to the north via one curb cut to Quaday Avenue, which measures 32 feet wide. Section 20-21-4.H.7 limits curb cut width to 24 feet unless approved by the City Engineer. The width of the curb cut opening matches that of the median within Quaday Avenue and the access on the east side of the roadway. The additional width is necessary to allow fueling trucks and delivery trucks to access the site. The shared access requires cross access and parking agreement for these two lots. A second curb cut is proposed 115 feet to the south of the shared access. Because of the median in Quaday Avenue, this access is right-inlright-out only. This access point is 80 feet from the intersection of Quaday Avenue and CSAH 39. Standard design requirements dictate that access to a local commercial street be setback at least 125 feet from the intersection with a minor arterial street. Furthermore, this access does not appear to be necessary for on-site circulation. Subject to further comment from the City Engineer, we would recommend that this south right-in/right-out access be removed. 51 Pedestrian access to the site is available from sidewalks on the east, south, and west side of the property, The site plan has been revised to provide for pedestrian connections to these sidewalks. Parking/Loading. The table below outlines off-street parking requirements for the proposed use. There are 28 stalls provided on the proposed site plan, which is an oversupply of five stalls. Nine located along the north property line are oversized to accommodate vehicles with trailers or RVs. All other stalls are designed to a 9 foot by 18 foot dimension with at least a two foot overhang. Use Requirement Calculation Required I I I Stalls Motor Fuel 4 stalls + 1 stall/service bay 4 stalls + no service bays 4 Convenience Store 1 stall / 200 square feet 3788.7sf, x 10%/200 17 I TOTAL 21 The fuel tanks are located on the east side of the property. There are two service doors on the north and south sides of the building for product delivery. Circulation is good for access by fuel trucks and other delivery vehicles. Access to the pump islands is also good with room on each side of the island for one vehicle and 24 feet between pumps. Additional space has been provided between the pump islands and the building to avoid conflicts between traffic at the pumps and cars parked adjacent to the building. This space also allows for circulation of oversize vehicles such as RVs or truck and boat trailer combinations. The drive aisle leading to the car wash is segregated from other site traffic and has stacking space for approximately ten cars. Stacking can occur beyond the segregated drive aisle without disrupting site traffic. There is also a bypass lane just before the entrance to the car wash to allow vehicles to go around the building and escape the car wash. Lighting. The site plan does not identify any free standing light locations. Decorative light fixtures consistent with the PUD District design standards are shown on all sides of the principal building. It is also assumed that lighting will be provided under the canopy, but again no plans have been provided. For lighting under the canopy, recessed canister spotlights will be required with no portion of the light source or fixture extending below the bottom face of the canopy. A photometric light plan demonstrating compliance with Section 20-16-10.C.1 (as revised) shall be submitted. Outdoor lighting and any illuminated signs are to be turned off not more than one hour after closing as required by Section 20-16-10. C. 6-1 Trash. A trash room has been provided at the northeast corner of the building with exterior folding door. Adequate access has been provided for garbage trucks. Grading. Plans have been submitted for site grading and drainage and are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Utilities. Plans for sanitary sewer and water connections have been submitted. These plans show that the utility connections are made directly to public facilities within easements or rights-of-way and not shared with the adjacent use to the north. All utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Development Contract. Upon approval of the application, the developer must enter into a development contract with the City. The development contract will include all applicable conditions of approval, fees and securities. The development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION The proposed development plan meets most applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and PUD District. The revised plans address concerns raised by our office and the Planning Commission related to the building orientation and additional details have been resolved. As such, we recommend approval of the PUD Development Stage plan. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 18 November 2002 to consider site and building plans for a convenience gas use proposed for Outlot A of the Waterfront Addition. The Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote to approve the application subject to the conditions outlined below. A. Motion to approve a PUD Development Stage plan for a convenience gas use on Outlot A of the Waterfront addition, subject to the following conditions: The site plans is revised to provide a 30 foot setback from the CSAH 42 right-of-way. 2. Plans for the canopy are submitted demonstrating that the design and color are consistent with that of the principal building, without extensive contrasting color bands and no illuminated fascia. 3. Plans for all signs are to be submitted, subject to review and approval of City Staff. A 4. Outdoor sales, display, or storage shall be prohibited except for 20lbs. propane tanks kept in Conformance with applicable fire codes. The propane tank shall be screened with shrubs and low-level plantings. 5. Sound from a public address system may not be audible at any property line and broadcast of music or advertising shall be prohibited. 6. The gas sales and convenience store are allowed 24 hour operations and the car wash operation shall be limited to 7:00 AM to 10:00. 7. A photometric light plan shall be submitted illustrating all proposed light sources and illumination patterns extending to the property line. All lighting mounted under the canopy is to be recessed canisters with no portion of the light source or fixture extending below the bottom face of the canopy. All lighting is subject to review and approval of City Staff. The use shall comply with the requirements of Section 20-16-10 of the Zoning Ordinance regarding outdoor lighting. 8. All grading and drainage plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. All utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 10. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City, abide by its conditions, and pay all applicable fees and securities, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 11. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the request based on a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, and PUD District. C. Motion to table the request. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Bob Fields 7 I -P RASE MAP DAU PROVIDgony Manson eison Amoc.,lnc. PREPARED OCTOBER 2001 NOTE: THIS MAP 1.5 fOR I'VANNING PURPOSES ONLY AND Si IOULD NOT BE USED FOR EXACT MEASUREMENT 0 T S ON THE GRE AT RIVER ROAD L7 LBJ UTTMTTFO!' CK I I I I u Ounar 8 LOT 4 BLOCK a tit LOT 3 OUM C5 mm% 2 LOT I V BLOCK i gath C.S.1m mm 39 iz----------- ------ H7.0 OTSEGOS WATERFRONT r Associates. Inc. J�h,, 0 OTSEGO. MN 7 __AG_ - ----- 7MA&v.M5L_ EXHIBIT A-2 CONCEPT PLAN .F. - o.&..) x F" 3: 21 T, Lij LL, R, w 2 E. ------ --------- I.j j NE -i)Q th Street (C. S. A H'.",,,, -No.- - _3,9) sou t OTSEGO WATERFRONT NORTH CONVENIENCE STORE o 2o 40 AND CAR WASH %7.� OUTLOT A sclu IN FEET C I T Y 0 F I . Al P � � � � WLandCor , Constfuclion, Inc. MCCOY ARCHITECTS -4 CEDM LAKE P411MUMAY 55- 121- -U&M— SIT SITE PLAN NOTES WA ASSOCIATES VARIES ..0, SEE M. E� VARE SEE 7 T -i iCK)Sf ROOTSOf TO �TWC a DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL "3 0 PERENNIAL PLANTING 0 DICIO—S5— .12POT Tl— —1 To— .low LOOSEN ROOTSOF 4L RIFIR TO C�AMELUET�� SCAROYBOTT(WANDSIDE OF IS I SHRUBS TO BE AAC D SO TMT "'61 _CKIYEDSUs- TOP Of MN—ot . lW11 wicH rxEp Sl SPIC �F� SUSKC. :OGING-f —SEESPEC. m—e- ftrmlo� A-- -11—S—M-POT SEE _LM "2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL a DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL "3 0 .11—S I.A.1 TRUE - I ME. 0 DICIO—S5— .12POT Tl— —1 To— .low (D N1-1 I ITT.,. 1. IS I "'61 _CKIYEDSUs- Al—E C—NT SP -S =UPY SIDUM PLANT PALETTE: MIN isle Ise WIT all Mwj.".M� MMjM NJ ml 1"IME !MEN low 01 M, 11 0 ITT' 20' 40 - M N.E. 90th STREET M'M ill OTSEGO WATERFRONT CONVENIENCE 37GRE AND CAR WASH OUTLOT A C I T Y 0 F M I N N E S 0 T A WLandCor , Construction, Inc. MCCOY ARCHITECTS cf.- 1� —1 5506 SIT: :;Z;— AssOCIATES 0 DICIO—S5— .12POT (D -C-10- 1 1. I—A—C:== "'61 _CKIYEDSUs- Al—E C—NT SP -S =UPY SIDUM I.— A-- -11—S—M-POT 0 ITT' 20' 40 - M N.E. 90th STREET M'M ill OTSEGO WATERFRONT CONVENIENCE 37GRE AND CAR WASH OUTLOT A C I T Y 0 F M I N N E S 0 T A WLandCor , Construction, Inc. MCCOY ARCHITECTS cf.- 1� —1 5506 SIT: :;Z;— AssOCIATES 0 P�j z m .1 4 1 �-, I j�i1poiEUwAw -- - -- 1 6-20r,2 10 _ARCHIQCI� C, t, 2 t= -H V, MINNE U011TV"ELNIENCE LU LL :�dklc . - ;l"'. C'A R' WAr-",) J: '-' Al OLI M14 554. 11 _,;. OTSE ("'1 0, S (D T A U, LA 1�,I.K"-- laf , -, " ` �� 4 U $1 T; g 1-3 P�j z m .1 4 1 �-, I j�i1poiEUwAw -- - -- 1 6-20r,2 10 _ARCHIQCI� C, t, 2 t= -H V, MINNE U011TV"ELNIENCE LU LL :�dklc . - ;l"'. C'A R' WAr-",) J: '-' Al OLI M14 554. 11 _,;. OTSE ("'1 0, S (D T A U, LA 1�,I.K"-- laf , -, " ` �� 4 U $1 T; 1-3 A, iWA P�j z m .1 4 1 �-, I j�i1poiEUwAw -- - -- 1 6-20r,2 10 _ARCHIQCI� C, t, 2 t= -H V, MINNE U011TV"ELNIENCE LU LL :�dklc . - ;l"'. C'A R' WAr-",) J: '-' Al OLI M14 554. 11 _,;. OTSE ("'1 0, S (D T A U, LA 1�,I.K"-- laf , -, " ` �� T; 1-3 P�j z m .1 4 1 �-, I j�i1poiEUwAw -- - -- 1 6-20r,2 10 _ARCHIQCI� C, t, 2 t= -H V, MINNE U011TV"ELNIENCE LU LL :�dklc . - ;l"'. C'A R' WAr-",) J: '-' Al OLI M14 554. 11 _,;. OTSE ("'1 0, S (D T A U, LA 1�,I.K"-- laf , -, " ` �� -Tj — ------- -------------- a7 F- 70 -T) kL F- -IL , I r > 8i I F"nn[-- 0::, : I wt :: L m m m I F1124 IJ L� c 41, tj : I wt :: L m m m I F1124 c 41, 0 133A NJ 31YDS 7o%�% ol oz o N—N `W� 0.3031 - --- - -------- LOWS .b flm� off v 9 D) jee4g L1166 3N I---------- "'M 'AM IV ------- 310"N'm "wLs r ------ --------- — SIX3 01 133NNO3 anis PD 3 W 13INNOD 9 H.1 0 77— MAlm 0 .K & ;k" e., 7 r P LOCATE 5' 8E...o C NEC TO EX PK WATERMAN C-1 IK C5 C C' 1,0 ZIMT.l, 0lVR NIP TUS 5, 1� r 2 *Er IER S.0 - L CONNEcT TO EXIS = FTTIJ .1.10, E AT M, 060.6a - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------ WATERUMN SIM 7 min loin c B 2 c./ 'I To E x 'USBT KR ST 'AT RIM- 54. 0 605 -Lt-- -85879 INV -45P C C' 1,0 ZIMT.l, 0lVR NIP TUS 5, 1� r 2 *Er IER S.0 - L CONNEcT TO EXIS = - - -- - - m__ .1.10, E AT M, 060.6a - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------ min loin min -85879 INV -45P C C' 1,0 ZIMT.l, 0lVR NIP TUS 5, 1� r 2 *Er IER S.0 - L CONNEcT TO EXIS = - - -- - - m__ .1.10, E AT M, 060.6a - - - - - - - - - - - --- ------ NE 90th Street (C. S. A /-['\,-N-o. _3 1 1, " II.,- _txj, South OTSEGO WATERFRONT CONVENIENCE STORE AND CAR WASH OUTLOT A C I TY OF NORTH 0 4o M I N N E S 0 T A SCAIX IN FEET LandCor W, WConstruction. Inc MASTER LEGEND M COY ARCHITECTS 12' C- L.E -1-Al W.—, .1-ES.1A 11- 121-11541 sil t =7_1 Z t-1 r. m Z ==xt =nn- lAs!�oclATESJ 612 595 9e37 p.01/01 ITEM 6. 2. L A330CIATID calm 3 UILTA"Irs" INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952-595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595-9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM - via fax transmission TO- Mike Robertson / Judy Hudson FROM: Daniel Licht DATE- 13 November 2002 RE: Otsego - Waterfront PUD; Civic Monument Sign NAC FILE: 176.02 - 02.04 We have received the letter from Landcor Construction, Inc. dated 8 November 2002 regarding the proposed civic monument/area identification sign to be placed at TH 101 and CSAH 39. We have the following comments: The height of the sign may not exceed 20 feet. Given the sign's location, a lower profile sign may be preferred to the present design so as not to obstruct view of the bank building. 2. The text for'Gity of"and'On the Great River Road" should be a Times New Roman font to match the City's logo. 3. Consideration should be given to placing the logo within an outline of the City to promote the City's identification, instead of overlaying an outline of the State of Minnesota. 4. The letter states that the sign structure will support four signs for use by the interior lots along CSAH 39 and CSAH 42. These signs will not be allowed- Provision was made in the PUD approval for a separate area identification sign along TH 101 that would allow for identification of individual businesses. Identification of the individual business along TH 101 would be allowed only if freestanding signs for each lot were limited to monument signs at the site entrances. Further, it would be improper in our opinion to identify the City along with certain businesses while excluding other businesses within the community outside of this development. PC. Steve Fisher Le I Landor, Inc. Reat Estate Broker, Devetoper, Property Management November 8, 2002 Mike Roberstson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue Otsego, Minnesota 55330 Dan Licht City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue Otsego, Minnesota 55330 Ron Wagner City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue Otsego, Minnesota 55330 Re: Civic MonumentJDevelopment ID Pylon Gentlemen, NOV 12 2002 lIDy- COPied to City Clerk I have received proposals from three different sign companies for the fabrication and installation of a civic monument pylon that would identify the City of Otsego, as well as our development, Otsego Waterfront West. The sign will include, at no additional expense to the City, four signs for use by the four interior lots along County Road 39 and County Road 42. Please review the attached three (3) proposals and process our request for the City to cover fifty percent of the cost of this sign, with the other fifty percent being added to the current special assessments on our development. If you have any questions or should require additional information, please contact me at 763-315-0818. Very truly yours, Steve Fischer Development Agent Js Attachments cc: Bob Fields 9464 Hemlock Lane N., Maple Grove, MN 55369 0 Phone: 763-315-0818 e Fax: 763-315-0817 24" 24- 30* -1 V- "P, 30, MOFILE Steve Fischer Landcor Inc. 9464 Hemlock Lane North Maple Grove MN 55369 Phone: 763-315-0818 KIN A 1 2002 Fax: 763-315-0817 Proposal Date: 10/30/02 Salesperson: Dennis Mellein Job Location: Otsego E -Mail: Signcrafters proposes to furnish all labor and materials as needed to fabricate and install one 2 sided entrance pylon sign. Design as per print. All lcttering and logos will be halo lit with LED lighting. Lettering will be 1/4" aluminum with a polyurethane enamel finish. Support poles will be clad in anodized aluminum panels with a 20 -year no fade paint warranty. Lower portion of column to be clad in brick. All fabrication and installation to be performed by union employees. -4 3 8,000. 00 Projected completion date is after receipt of down payment, signed contract, approved drawings and city approval. I If provisions of above include installation of sign base and/or electrical hookup, sign base is bid "under normal ground conditions only" and electrical hookup is included in bid price with adequate power brought to within six feet (6') of sip(s) area(s) by others. Total bid price: S38,000.00(DZ�s not include charges for sales tax(es), permits, permit staff time fees, and Paymentterms: 50% down payment($ 19,000.00); balance due upon job completion and receipt of invoice. Authorized signature: Dennis Me em Note: This proposal may be withdrawn by Signcrafters, Inc., if not accepted within thirty days. I/We accept the prices, terms, conditions and/or specifications listed here and on reverse page, and hereby authorize You to perform the work as sp-,c,S,--d. Customer signature Date accepted 7775 MAIN STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55432 (763) 571-2995p (763) 571-3588f E -Mail: Signcrafters@SCOUTDOOR.com Me FAX NO. :7635766907 Nov. 04 2002 11:03FM P1 Steve Fischer LandCor, Inc. 9464 Hemlock Lane North Maple Grove, MN 55369 We are pleased to propose the following for the Otsego pylon project. Fabricate two sided pylon with an alum. cap and aluminum letters'�DTSEGO WATER FRONT WES71. (2) 8' x 10' cabinets and 2 shapes of the state of Minnesota fabricated of alum. (2)'Vity of" in neon lettm. (2)'�OTSEGO" in fabricated channel letters with plex face and noon Ulumination. (2) sets of 1/4" aluminum waves stud mounted with 1/2"spacers. (2)'�DN THE GREAT RIVER ROAD" 'A" aluminum lefters stud moLmted with 1/2"spacas. S29,900.00 Aluminum pole covers ptd, one color. S5,800.D0 Installation of bricks on 4 columns, bricks by others. S4,600.00 Excavate and fin-aish cmerete footings and anchor bolts S4,200,00 9C) C) a, q, We would be very pleased to handle this work for you. Sincerely, L ) � K CJ V 041 - Gregory F le;C.kwar 1< PHONE Gal -888-0553 800-699-9568 ,FAX 651-Gaa-2osi - , - 4 1- / VV4 I I . 'T j MIYI P.O. BOX 357 �RONOCO, MN 55960 607-367-2531 FAX 507-387-2633 o�,nmu imAo ojujv� The Sign oF Quality NO. 0 6 16 P. 2 racq--,AL., CIDNTRACT � 1610 E. CLIFF RD. BLDG #5 SURNSVILLF- MN 55337 952-894-2421 FAX 952-894-2748 SUBMITTED TO; Steve FiSbcr PHONE: 763-315-0818 DATE: 10/21/02 COMPANY: LandCor, Inc JOB DESCRIPTION; Pylon Sign ADDRESS: 9464 Hemlock Lane North JOB LOCATION: Otsego Waterfront West CITY, STATE: Maple Grove, NIN. 55369 CITY, STATE: Otsego, MN WE HERESY SUBMIT SPECIFICATIONS AND ESTIMATES FOR: Labor. material and equipment to complete die following: Fabricate and install one 8' by 10' pylon sign 25 feet above gTade, Letters to be flat cut alum and Halo lighted letters with L -E -D's Per drawin.- Cost................................................................................................................................. $39,900.00 Electrical book up by others City Sign permit EXMA 7he power supply to the sign must have a dedicated ground wire with no more than two (2) circuits on a neutral. The sign circuit must allow for the normal operation of the GFCI transformers as noted in the NEC and UL21 61. Any sign service work that resufts from problems caused by the power supply will be billed at our normal service rate. MINNESOTA SALES =IS INCLUDED, SUTDOES NOT INCLUDE MN.LIS15 MOR OUrSTATE W. PRICES DO NOT INCLUDE ;UEL SUPCHARGE, S)GN PERMITS. SECURAL OF PSRMITS, OIR ELECTRICAL. PURCHASER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ADDITIONAL EXPENSE OR OVEPAGE DUE TO UN -FORESEEN OBSTRUCTION SUCH AS EXCESS ROCK TEEL, CEMENT, LMLJ77ES, SPPINKLER SYSTEMS, COMMUNICATION LINES OR 07HER UNFORESEEABLE POUNDA710N OR WALL CONDITIONS. THESE ITEMS MLL BE BILL.ED AS ADDITIONAL 2XPENSES. PAYMENT TO BE MADE AS FOLLOws: Thirty nine tbousand 00/100 DOLLARS ($ 39,900-00 Balance upon completion THIS PROPOM "Y BE WTHDRAM IF NOT ACCEPTEC) WrrHIN 30 DAYS. SALES REPRP-SENTATiVE THIS CONTRACT, WITH ALL CONDITIONS NOTEO, is HEREWTH ACCEMD BY BOTH PAR'n&S. PURCHASER $CHAD TRACY SIGNS, INC. Rick Ballantyne BY TITLE TITLE Sales Representative PERSONALLY GUAAANTIZED CONTRACT DATE Octobur 21, 2002 SUBJECT TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS ON PAGE TWO Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 CITY OF OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL CITY ENGINEER'S AGENDA December 23, 2002 Item 7.1: Consider Ordering Plans and Specifications for: a. Water Tower — 1 M. Gal b. 2 Wells — 500 gpm to 1000 gpm C. Pumphouse d. Lift Station El and Force Main e. Lift Station E3 f. Watermain from Wells to Water Tower Item 7.2-. Consider accepting amended Feasibility Report for 85 1h Street and Page Avenue Item 7.3: Consider Pay Estimate #3 and Change Order #1 for the 85t' Street Extension Project Item 7.4: Consider Any Other Engineering Items Civil &Municipal 9 Engineering, irow5 C:\Documents and Settings\Diane.HAKANSON\Af b�&fkqW�ViGhcilagenda27.doc —1 Hakanson Anderson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone:763/427-5860 Fax:763/427-0520 111 Assoc., Inc. December 19, 2002 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55-330 Re: Otsego West Wastewater Treatment District Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: With the permit for the Otsego West Wastewater Treatment Facility proceeding towards approval, we have compiled a time line and costs for other trunk systems, which will be required to be constructed by the City prior to any urban development. During earlier discussions by City Council and staff there was some talk of having city services (water and sewer) available to developers in the fall of 200"). Although the Wastewater Treatment Facility will not be completed until 2004 (as outlined in Mr. Ted Fields recent letter to council) it is proposed that during the initial low flow period (<I 0,000 gpd), the wastewater would be hauled by trucks from lift station(s) in the west to the existing East Otsego plant for treatment. Initial wastewater flows in late 2003 and early 2004 would most likely be insufficient to operate the facility with any efficiency or within MPCA Standards so trucking of wastewater is required regardless if the west facility is operational or not. The water tower will be the most difficult trunk facility to complete in time to supply city services to developers. I have spoken to contractors who bid water towers in the region and they say a water tower can not realistically be completed by the fall of 2003. A July 2004 completion date is a realistic time line. A recent water tower bid in southern Minnesota had alternate completion dates of either October 15, 2003 or July 1, 2004. The cost difference was $60,000 or a 8.4% surcharge (see bid tabulation attachment). If the City is committed to supplying Developers water by fall of 2003, the options are to either allow Developers to install temporary wells w/individual pneumatic tanks in homes until city water service arrives with the extra costs to be born by the Developer or install a temporary large pneumatic tank on the municipal well in the purnphouse much as River Pointe has. Estimated additional cost is $50,000. All other trunk facilities needed for city services can be completed in a single construction season. A sketch of which trunk facilities required to be installed is attached. Dashed facilities or lines are assumed at this time to be installed by developers as they develop with trunk credits being applied in development agreements. G:\MunicipaMOTSEGO\6-17\ot6l7]inicc.doe Civil 6- Municipal Engineering 25 Land Surveyingfor 0 Preliminary cost estimates for each of the required trunk systems are as follows: E I District Lift Station E3 District Lift Station I Million Gallon Water Tower Trunk Watermain (Pumps to Watertower) 2 Wells and Pumphouse Total Preliminary Project Cost Estimate We estimate the design cost for each of the projects as follows: El District Lift Station E3 District Lift Station I Million Gallon Water Tower Trunk Watermain (Pumps to Watertower) 2 Wells and Pumphouse Estimated Design Cost $ 473,000 $ 390,000 $1,170,000 $ 375,000 $ 650,000 $3,058,000 $ 34,300 $ 29,500 $ 69,030 $ 28,750 $ 49,750 $ 211,330 If the City Council would like to have water and sewer service available to the Developers in Phase I of the Otsego West Study Area, we recommend ordering plans and specifications. The council will need to decide which option they would like to proceed with. Water service by fall of 2003 will require extra costs for temporary pneumatic tank(s). Water service by mid summer of 2004 when the water tower can be completed will not involve extra costs. If you have any questions, please contact me at 763-427-5860. Sincerely, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Ronal 4Ja er,4-P7/'F V RJW:dlc Cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Judy Hudson, City Clerk G:\Municipa]\AOTSEGO\6-17\ot6l7llmcc.doc Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. BID TABULATION 500,000 GALLON ELEVATED WATER STORAGE TANK SE MARSHALL STREETIBLAKE AVENUE CITY PROJECT NO, 0 132 ALBERT LEA, MINNESOTA Bid Date: December 4, 2002 @ 3:00 p.m, ZRT Fl(e K70.7062 Engineer's Estimate TV qq0 $ (1) Base l3id includes project completion dale of October 15, 2003 A"emate No. 1 � Deduct to delete Arches and Words Southern Gate From Logo. Aftemate No. 2 — Deduc;t to change conlPfelion date from October 15, 2003 to juty 1, 2004. T Bid Amount With both Alter Lqtes I & 2 s 75Z000 -- -e— s 719 too T 7 Base Bid AMQRnt I Alternate No. I Alternate No. 2 Bid Amount Bid Arnount qeduct Amount Peduct Am,,nt with with Caldwell Tanks AlternateNo. 2 Louisville, KY s 817 400 0 $ $—.(90- 000 $ dotZ 000 7S7000 CB&I Water $ Clive, ]A 953 -foo $ 500c) $ -<-16 0 $ XY� 7,60 7Z Z-6 0 Maguire iron. Inc. Sioux Falls, SD s 7/ Z- 703 s -300 �';_ goo $ vf-- Engineer's Estimate TV qq0 $ (1) Base l3id includes project completion dale of October 15, 2003 A"emate No. 1 � Deduct to delete Arches and Words Southern Gate From Logo. Aftemate No. 2 — Deduc;t to change conlPfelion date from October 15, 2003 to juty 1, 2004. T Bid Amount With both Alter Lqtes I & 2 s 75Z000 -- -e— s 719 too T 7 CO 9 (D 0 IT f CY) 0 m "I "1 11 0 CO a) 0 Cf) 0 .0 9 0 m m m 9 9 Cu v 'IT 't m E E E m :3 9 0 fu �C 9 :3 C 0 Cu C 0) CL — > .0 Cu (1) CL D (1) 0 0 a) M (U LL 2 m a) CL I < < U) .10 Iz LL 1< n 2 Wells Pumphouse Lift Station Water Tower ot6l7gnatt.xlsChart mber 1, ,ertise and L : Construction and test Fou J -,'','JI --4 ndation Erect Tower n Comple �e tow !erection and site work Pa i n t St r-u-c,t'u' re, �,,.Av d319TIV 6 r, i qA u ck: 0 Q6, ell N6 3*OlWn- 3 rg Ul cn t cn 3 3nN3AV 83t<)VA 'Ilk 141), N., NO -1.0 3 c 0 ta. OZ LM Q0 0 0 1 E, L'i co� CT4 I x C4 Cn C'4 C c I Eal (S 2 Co r -b 0 r"4 44 cn Cf) cn Q) r14 2t r,4 L CIO Co cr lu 3-11LA108-1v Jo kL,o 1; 3111AL83elV JO ).113 r7('.l I.V. 'T cr-) c: C-3 7 ul -V WSW 'TN rrf dIHSNMOi Norl RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECEIVING AMENDED REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the council acceptance of the amended Feasibility Report for 85 �h Street and Page Avenue a report which has been prepared by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. with reference to the improvement of 85 th Street from Page Avenue to Nashua Avenue and was originally presented to the council and was approved on March 12, 2001 -, and has been amended to include Page Avenue from CSAH 39 to 85 th Street and presented to the council for approval December 23, 2002. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF Otsego MINNESOTA: The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized to accept the amended Feasibility Report for 85 th Street and Page Avenue with references to the improvement of 85 th Street from Page Avenue to Nashua Avenue and Page Avenue from CSAH 39 to 85 th Street. Adopted by the council this 23rd day of December, 2002. Clerk G: \M u n icip a MOTS EG0Q45\ot345 RES2, doc Mayor Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. Order No. 1 Date: December 4, 2002 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Project- City of Otsego Project 02-07 Street, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain & Storm Sewer Construction - 85t� Street N.E. ( East of C.S,A.H. No. 42) Owner: City of Otsego To: W. B. Miller, Inc. (Contractor) YOU are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes INCREASE DECREASE In Contract Price in Contract Price 1 Add line item # 55 — 24" RCP FES, 1 EACH @ $ 1,420.00 $ 1,420 EACH 2. Add line item #56 — 8" DIP Sanitary Sewer, 18 LF @ $ 38.00/ LF $ 684.00 3. Add line item #57 Valve Nut Extensions, 13 EACH @ $ 152.00/ EACH $ 1,976.00 4. Add line item #58 — Restocking Cost 30" HDPE, 230 LF @ $ 2.52/ LF $ 579.60 5. Add line item #59 — Granular Borrow, 612 CY @ $ 4.75/ CY $ 2,907.00 6. Decrease line item #27 — 27" HDPE, 230 LF @ $ 24.55/ LF $5,646.50 7. Decrease line item #29 — 4' Dia. Storm Manhole, 2 EACH, @ $1,350.00/ EACH $2,700.00 Totals $ 7,566-60 $ 8346.50 Net Change in Contract $779.90 Justification: Deleted all storm drainage east of Cul-de-sac. Ran short on usable fill material in 0 street. Standard water valves are below water table. AHA01\Shared Docs\Municipai'AOTSEGO\343\changeorderl,doc Due to the change order, the contract period will be: Unchanged Original Contract Amount Previous contract changes, Change Order # to # Prior approved contract amount Change in contract due to this change order Total contract including this and previous change orders S 238,929.58 $ N/A $ 238,929.58 $ -779.90 $ 238,149.68 Original contract period: Nov.15,2002 Change contract period from previous Change Order N/A Contract period including this and all previous change orders: Nov.15,2002 This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. Recommended: Accepted: Approved by: 11 - - I IUI k[NCJ I IU 01 iU I I Llt� I 0-W-6 7 Date - /.;? - / -3 - C).:-,> Date Date This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. k\HA01\Shared Docs�Muniapal�AOTSEGOk343\changeorderl.doc PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3 CITY OF OTSEGO IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 02-07 85TH STREET (EAST OF C.S.A.H. 42) December 2_,), zuu/- Honorable Mayor & City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Improvement Project No. 02-07, 85th Street ( East of C.S.A.H. 42) Contractor: W.B. Miller, Inc. Original Contract Amount: $ 238,929.58 Revised Change Order No. 1 Contract Amount: $ 238,149.68 Award Date: 08/12/02 Completion Date: 11/15/02 Dear Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Schprhilp '*A'* . Rtrppt CONTRACTOR Item No. Description Unit Qty Unit Price Contract Extension Used To- Date Used to -Date Extension 1 Mobilization LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000-00 1 $5,000.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 S8,300.00 $8,300.00 1 $8,300.00 3 Class 5 Aggregate Base TN 2100 $10.00 $21,000.00 1773.69 $17,736.90 4 Type 31 Non -Wearing Course Mixture TN 635 $32.90 $20,891.50 688.94 $22,666.13 5 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture TN 476 $40.25 $19,159.00 30 $316.50 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat GAL 290 $1.30 $377,00 472 $6,041.60 7 Curb and Gutter Design B618 LF 2064 $7.45 $15,376.80 2017 $15,026.65 8 Sign Panels (Type C) SF 36.75 $33.50 S1,231.13 36.75 $1,231.13 9 Pavement Message (Right Arrow) - Epoxy EA 1 $260.00 $260.00 6 $8,340.00 10 4" Double Solid Line Yellow - Epoxy LF 940 $1.15 $1,081.00 21 $2,700.00 11 4" Solid Line White - Epoxy LF 1910 $0.55 $1,050.50 3 $3,405.00 12 24" Stop Bar White - Epoxy LF 35 $12.85 $449.75 2 $1,390.00 13 Adjust frame and Ring Casting EA 4 $255.00 S1,020.00 5 $1,275.00 14 Ad -just Water Valve Box EA 5 $180.00 $900.00 6 $1,080.00 15 Straw Bales EA 60 $10.30 $618.00 12 $123.60 16 Turf Establishment by Seeding AC 2 $825.00 $1,650.00 17 Saw Bituminous Pavement LF 150 $2-60 $390.00 18 lRemove Existing Bituminous Pavement SY 17 1 $7.25 $123.25 .19 1 Mill Bitu .. ino.s Surface SY 17 1 $7.25 $12325 Schedule "A" Totals $99,001.18 $72,439.40 Sr.hprlijlp "R" - Rtnrm Rawar Item No. Description Unit Qty Unit Price Contract Extension Used To- Date Used to -Date Extension - 20 15" RC Pipe Class 5 LF 96 $17.50 S1,680.00 96 $1,680.00 - 21 24" RC Pipe Class 5 LF 223 $31.65 $7,057.95 226 $7,152.90 - 22 15" RC Pipe Class 3 LF 65 $17.50 $1,137.50 65 $1,137.50 - 23 18" RC Pipe Class 3 LF 169 $19.35 $3,270.15 164 $3,173.40 24 15" HOPE Pipe LF 40 $10.55 $422.00 30 $316.50 25 18" HDPE Pipe LF 387 $12.80 $4,953.60 472 $6,041.60 26 21" HDPE Pipe LF 10 $16.35 $163.50 10 $163.50 27 27" HOPE Pipe(Per C.O. #11) LF $24.55 28 4' Dia. Catchbasin/Manhole EA 3 $1,390.00 $4,170.00 6 $8,340.00 29 4' Dia. Storm Manhole( Per C.O. # 1) EA 5 $1,350.00 $6.750.00 21 $2,700.00 - 30 2' x 3' Cat h1basin EA 3 $1,135.00 $3,405.00 3 $3,405.00 31 18" RCP FES EA 2 $695.00 $1,390.00 2 $1,390.00 32 Class 11 Field Stone Rock Rip -Rap CY 4 $105.00 $420.00 8.5 $892.50 Schedule "B" Totals Otsego/343/ot343payestl Pay Est. 3 PE -1 $34,819.70 $36,392.90 0 HAY !=,� I IMA I E NU. :3 CITY OF OTSEGO IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 02-07 85TH STREET ( EAST OF C.S.A.H. 42) -qrhprfiilp 'T" - qnnitary -Rpwpr CONTRACTOR Item No. Description Unit Qty Unit Price Contract Extension Used To- Date Used to -Date Extension 33 8" PVC SOR 26 12 - 14' Deep LF 114 14.7 $1,675.80 225 $3,307,50 34 8" PVC SOR 26 14-16'Deep LF 145 $14.80 $2,146.00 150 $2,220.00 35 8" PVC SDR 26 16-18' Deep LF 370 $15.35 $5,679.50 465 $7,137.75 36 8" PVC SDR 26 18-20' Deep LF 300 $16.15 $4,845.00 130 $2,099.50 37 8" PVC SDR 26 20-22'Deep LF 85 $16.70 $1,419.50 261 $434.20 38 Standard Sanitary Sewer Manhole 0-8' Deep EA 1 3 $1,445.00 $4,335.00 31 $4,335.00 39 Manhole Overdepth VF 1 24 $77.25 $1,854.00 28.23 $2,180.77 40 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer Drop Manhole LS 1 $2,975.00 $2,975.00 1 $2,975.00 41 8"x 6" PVC Wye EA 8 $36.00 $288-00 8 $288.00 42 6" PVC SDR 26 Service Pipe LF 350 $10.60 $3,710.00 392 $4,155.20 4 6" PVC SDR 26 Riser VF 24 $20.50 $492.00 13.5 $276.75 44 8" Plug EA 1 $55.00 1 $55.00 1 11 $55.00, 45 Televise Sanitary Sewer LF 1014 $0.80 1 $811.20 1 1 1 46 Dewatering LF 1014 $15.45 1 $15.666.30 1 10141 $15,666.301 Schedule "C" Totals $45,952.30 $45,130.97 Schedule "D" - Watermain Item No. Description Unit Qty Unit Price Contract Extension Used To- Date Used to -Date Extension 47 6" DIP Watermain Class 52 LF 487 $13.90 S6,769.30 471 $6,546.90 48 12" DIP Watermain Class 52 LF 1020 $22.15 $22,593.00 1022 $22,637.30 49 Insulation SF 96 $3.10 $297.60 192 $595.20 50 Watermain Fittings LBS 3580 $1.50 $5,370.00 1673 $2,509.50 $579.60 onnect to Existing 16" DIP, cut and install 16" x 12" Ti LS 1 $2.575.00 $2,575.00 1 $2,575.00 52 Hydrant w/ Gate Valve EA 4 $2,165.00 S8,660.00 4 $8,660.00 53 12"Butterfly Valve EA 1 $825.00 $825.00 1 $825.00 54 6" Gate Valve EA 8 $465.00 S3,720,00 8 $3,720.00 Schedule "D" Totals $50,809.90 $48,068.90 Chanap Ordpr Nn I Item No. Description Unit Cty Unit Price Contract Extension Used To- Date Used to -Date Extension $72,439.40 55 24" FES EA 1 $1,420.00 $1,420.00 1 $1,420.00 0 56 8" DIP Sanitary Sewer, Class 52 LF 18 1 $38.00 1 $684.00 1 18 $684.00 57 Valve Nut Extensions EA 13 $152.00 $1,976.00 13 $1,976.00 58 Restocking Cost 30" HDPE LF 230 $2-52 $579.60 230 $579.60 59 Granular Borrow CY , 612 $4.75 $2,907.00 612 $2,907.00 Schedule "D" Totals $7,566.60 $7,566.60 BIDDING SUMMARY Total Schedule "A" - Street $99,001.18 $72,439.40 Total Schedule "B" - Storm Sewer $34,819.70 $36,392.90 Total Schedule "C" - Sanitary Sewer $45,952.30 $45,130.97 Total Schedule "D" - Watermain $50,809.90 $48,068.90 Change Order No. 1 $7,566.60 $7,566.60 Total All Schedules $238,149.68 $209,598.77 WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: $209,598.77 LESS 5% RETAINAGE: $10,479.9T LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 $94,577.50 LESS PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 $95,660.51 WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: $3,880.81 otsego/343/ot343payestl Pay Est. 3 PE -2 0 PAY Eb I IMAFE NU. 3 CONTRACTOR CITY OF OTSEGO IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT 02-07 85TH STREET ( EAST OF C.S.A.H. 42) APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: W.B. Miller, Inc. Certification I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date. Signed: '4M Title: Date:) -02, ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer: We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown. HAKANSON AND�RS.0�1 ASSOC�IATEJ, INC. Signed: Title: Date: OWNER CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: otsego/343/ot343payestl Pay Est. 3 Date: PE -3 Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Traffic Engineering Waters Edge Building, 2 nd Floor South 1500 West County Road B-2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113-3105 December 13, 2002 Mr. Ron Wagner City Engineer 8899 Nashua Avenue NE. Otsego, MN 55330-7314 Phone #: (651) 634-2152 Fax #: (651) 634-2085 email: john.bieniek@d FP F=, F---" I P1 ITEM 9.1.11. Ij I Luu� nzs Copied to City Cler� Copied -to City Adrr SUBJECT: Evaluation Results for Potential AWF Device atTH 101 and CR 36 Dear Mr. Wagner: Mn/DOT's Traffic Engineering Section has reviewed the request for installation of an Advance Warning Flasher at the southbound intersection approach of State Trunk Highway 10 1 to Wright County Road 36. The information and July 30, 2002 memo prepared by Hakanson and Associates on behalf of the City of Otsego was also reviewed and considered during the Mn/DOT evaluation. The evaluation includes measurements, observations and data collected by Mn/`DOT personnel, both from computerized records and from the field. The conclusions of the evaluation were arrived at from analvsis of this data by Mn/DOT Signal Design staff and after consultation with Mri/DOT Signal operations and Central Office Traffic staff. The overall goal of the evaluation is to recognize whether or not this location is suitable for the deployment of an AWF. Improper applications and overuse of this device or any other traffic warning devices must be avoided so that the warranted devices remain effective. The warrant guidelines used to determine the justification of an AWF are presented by a Mn/DOT Technical Memo dated 2/11/02. These guidelines were supplied earlier to the City of Otsego and were used by Hakanson and Associates to structure the format of their evaluation. Mn/DOT's evaluation also follows the structure of these guidelines. The measurements, observations and data used, along with the conclusion with regard to each guideline are being provided in this memo, in the order that they appear in the Technical Memo. These conclusions will constitute the remainder of this letter. 1) Category: Isolated or unexpected si=alized intersection - The distance from the last intersection is greater than 10 miles, or at locations where the intersection is unexpected. Evaluation: The distance from the previous intersection (Co Rd 42) is 2.4 miles. The signal does not occur in an unexpected location, and the expectation of signalization on this road corridor is clear to the reasonable driver. 2) Category: Limited sight distance — The distance to the stop bar with two signal heads visible is insufficient. Evaluation: The conservative sight distance calculation that considers the downgrade on the final part of the southbound approach to the intersection and the increased braking distance needed by trucks gives the required sight distance to be 745 feet. Field measurements of the actual sight distance are 1580 feet or more than twice the required sight distance. AWF Device at TH 10 1 and CR 36 Page 2 December 13, 2002 3) Category: Dilemma Zone — The Yellow interval is not loma enough and a "dilemma zone" occurs. Evaluation: The conservative Yellow interval calculation for this intersection gives a minimum interval length of 5.3 seconds. The actual Yellow interval used at this intersection is 6.5 seconds. No dilemma zone exists at this intersection. 4) Category: Accidents — The approach has an accident problem. Evaluation: This category is the most subjective one to evaluate. Crash records were pulled for a three year period. The specific crash rate for this intersection was compared to average crash rates for all intersections of this type (four lane, divided, signalized, rural). Additionally, the individual crashes were analyzed for the contributing factors, time of day, and direction. Overall the intersection has a lower than average crash rate for the three year period ending December 31, 2001 (0.7 crashes per million vehicle miles traveled versus the average of 0.8 crashes pmvmt). The crashes that did occur were primarily rear end type collisions of a property -damage -only nature. Crashes were not concentrated in the morning peak period or any other time period. No day -of -week pattern existed either. Driver inattention is frequently cited as a contributing factor in the crash report. Going by the data, there is no "crash problem" at this intersection that would warrant an AWF. 5) Category: Heavy Truck Volume — The roadway has a P grade of 3% or greater and truck volurn exceeds 15%. Evaluation: Design plans show that the final approach grade at this intersection is 2.9%. Truck volume is substantially lower than 15%. Heavy truck volume is not a warranting parameter for an AWF at this intersection. In summary, in the interest of maintaining effective traffic warning devices, only warranted devices should be deployed. The Mn/DOT evaluation is clear about this location, its geometry and its record of safety. There is not a warranted need for an Advance Warning Flasher device at this intersection approach. Please contact me with any further questions. in rely, Jo4i"ieniek P.E., PTOE Division Traffic Engineer cc: Frank Pafko, Mn/DOT - Metro Division Area A Ramankutty Kannankutty — MnIDOT - Metro Division Area A Amr Jabr — MnIDOT - Metro Division — Traffic