02-08-99 CCRESOLUTION NO. 99-5
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO CABLE
TELEVISION FRANCHISE BY CABLE TV FUND 14-A, LTD. TO BRESNAN
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LLC AND WAIVING THE RIGHT OF FIRST
REFUSAL TO PURCHASE THE CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego, Minnesota (the "Franchise Authority") granted to
Rite Cable Company of Minnesota, Ltd. a cable television franchise/extension permit to
construct, own operate and maintain a cable television system in the City of Otsego (the
"Franchise"); and -
WHEREAS, by Resolution the Franchise Authority authorized the assignment
and transfer of the Franchise to Jones Intercable, Inc. ("JIC"), and subsequently, amended the
Franchise to include one or more of JIC's controlled affiliates as the "Grantee" under the
Franchise; and
WHEREAS, JIC transferred the Franchise to its affiliate, Cable TV Fund 14-A,
Ltd. (the "Fund"), as the new Grantee; and
WHEREAS, the Fund hasagreed to sell the cable television system serving the
Franchise Authority (the "System"), including the Franchise, to Bresnan Communications
Company Limited Partnership ("Bresnan"), and Bresnan has agreed to purchase the System,
including the Franchise, from the Fund; and
WHEREAS, Bresnan will transfer ownership and control of the System and the
Franchise to Bresnan Telecommunications Company, LLC (`BTCLLC") ("Transferee");
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Franchise Authority hereby consents to the transfer of the Franchise and
the System from the Fund to Bresnan and, subsequently, to Bresnan Telecommunications
Company LLC (the "Transaction").
2. The Franchise Authority acknowledges that its consent to the Transaction shall
be effective upon the closing of the sale of the System by the Fund to Bresnan. Written notice of
the closing date shall be given to the Franchise Authority.
I The Franchise Authority hereby confirms that: (i) the Franchise is currently in
Ml force and effect; (ii) the Fund is in compliance in all material respects with the Franchise;
and (iii) no event has occurred or exists which would permit the Franchise Authority to revoke or
terminate the Franchise.
4. The Franchise Authority hereby waives any right it may have by statute,
franchise or otherwise to purchase the System in respect of the sale of the System referred to
herein.
5. Franchising Authority hereby consents to and approves the assignment,
mortgage, pledge or other encumbrance, if any, of the Franchise, System, or assets relating
thereto, or the interests in the permitted holder thereof, as collateral for a loan.
Adopted by the City of Otsego, Minnesota on February 8
1999.
By:
May Y FOUR=
The undersigned, being the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Clerk of the City of Otsego,
hereby certifies that the foregoing Resolution No. 99-5 is a true, correct, and accurate copy of
Resolution No. 99-5 duly and lawfully passed and adopted by the City of Otsegoon the
8TH day of February '1999. Q n r 19
0462230.01
2.
lerk ELAINE BEAZTY
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
-ivil & Municipal Engineering
and Surveying CITY OF OTSEGO
CITY ENGINEER
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
2/8/99
ITEM 7.1 CONSIDER APPROVAL:
A. Partial Payment #1 — Water Tower COP #98.03
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
We recommend payment to Maguire Iron in the amount of $66,600.
This represents payment for the Design & Shop Drawing (100%) for
the foundation and construction of the foundation (75%). It also
includes some portions of the Change Order #1 (26%).
B. Partial Payment #2 — Well #2 Construction COP #98.01
We recommend payment to Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc. in the amount of
$24,599.06. This amount represents about 93% completion. The
Water Analysis Report and about 50% of the site restoration is
uncompleted to date. The final payment will be withheld until the
restoration is complete this spring. The project will overrun by about
$3,000 due to additional hours of development work required.
ITEM 7.2 DISCUSSION/CONSIDERATION OF TOM KOERWITZ PROPERTY
RECEIVING WATER SERVICE
Find attached a report prepared to address the issue of provided public
water service to the property in the southeast area.
ITEM 7.3 TRUNK SANITARY SEWER AND WATER STUDY
Find attached a report on the feasibility of providing trunk sanitary
sewer and water services to the undeveloped land west of Quaday
Ave., south of 85th Street and north of the Lefebvre Ditch. Several
developers are at different stages of sketch plans for the 7 or 8 forty -
acre parcels in this area. The information in this study is provided to
determine how the area will be served and how much it will cost. Mike
Robertson, Administrator, asked us to prepare this report. We would
recommend a council resolution be approved to initiate the report. It
was done before council approval in order to meet the need of the City
to address issues presented to the City by the developers.
City Engineer Council Agenda Items
Paye 1 of 2
February 3. 1999
C LSharelWPrmirilAOT�EG01901\ot901agend i2-99.doc
ITEM 7.4 CONSIDER ANY ACTION NECESSARY AS A RESULT OF THE
WORKSHOP ON BITUMINOUS STREET OVERLAY STUDY FOR
YEAR 1999-2002.
ITEM 7.5 PUMPHOUSE #1 UPDATE
We are working on the design for the pumphouse and will show the
council some overheads of the preliminary plans. We have positioned the
pumphouse to face the east or bike path.
We are also designing the pumphouse to have capacity for Well #1, Well
#2 and a future well.
The electrical engineers, Kaeding & Associates, are working on the
electrical and SCADA system.
ITEM 7.6 ANY OTHER ENGINEERING BUSINESS
A. Wastewater Treatment Plant
We recommend that some type of communication system be installed
between City Hall and the Wastewater Treatment Plant. According to
the specification, there are no plans for communication systems.
City Engineer Council Agenda Items
kanson
Page 2 of 2 I.:=.%l
-- Anderson
February 3, 1999 Assoc., Inc.
C1SharelWPm!ini�AOTSEGO19011ot90lagenda2-99 doc
in�GUNtE.IRON. IING
1/27/99
Maguire Iron, Inc,
P.O. BOX 1446 • SIOUX FALLS, SD 57101
PHONE (605) 334-9749
AFTER HOURS (605) 334-0029
FAX (605) 334-9752
ITEM 7.1 A
Mr. Lawrence G. Koshak, P.E.
Hakanson Anderson Associates Inc.
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
Re: Ostego, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Koshak:
Enclosed you will find three (3) copies of pay
request No. 1 for the water tower project.
Sincerely yours,
INC.
WATER TOWER SPECIALISTS
ESTABLISHED 1915
NEW AND USED TANKS
Fabricating, Erecting,
Repairing and Painting Water
Tanks and Towers...
PAY ESTIMATE #1
January 25, 1999
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Water Tank & Tower
Contractor: Maguire Iron, Inc.
Contract Amount: $536,245.00
Award Date: September 15, 1998
Completion Date: November 14, 1999
Dear Council Members:
The following work has been completed on the above referenced project:
OWNER
FILE: Share\Excef\lSt. MichaenOT5088T.xis
SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 91 Page 1 1125/99
Percent
Total
Contract
Complete
Complete to
Balance to
to Date
Date
Complete ..........
.
••Item._.:Description.................................................................................Price"
.:..............................................................................................................
1 ::Design Drawing.s
$10,000.00
100
$10,000.00
......._ $0.00:
^ ..... _.. _ _ _ _ _
2 iFoundations
_- . _...... �......__..__..__.....;
$80,000:00:
75
............. _ _...._..
$60,000:00
$20,000 :00
................................................................
3 Delivery of Steel
$239,000.00
0
$0 00 ........
$239,000.00::
.........
.................. .......................,
4 :Field Erection :
$100,000.00:
......... ....,....
0
$0:00 a
$100,000:00;
.............................................................................................................................................. ............................................................
5 Field Painting
$80,000.00
0
$0.00
$80,000.00::
_ ......
���
........ ..... _........ ._ ,
6 :Field Electrical :
................ ...................._
$12,000.00
..............._<............................
0
$0.00
$12,000.00:
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
TOTALS:
$521,000.00
$70,000.00
$451,000.00
"Item Breakdown per Contractor
Change Order No. 1
Item
A :Excavation and grading to develop work platform
$6,550.00
46
$3,035:00:
$3,515.00
B Foundation/Footing Redesign
$965 00
100
$965 00
......... $0.00
.........
Tank & Tower Structural Redesign and Weldin.�
$7,730:00
........ ................
;
$7,730.00.;
.....C.......
TOTALS:
..:............0...........;................$0.00:
$15,245.00
$4,000.00
$11,245.00
Total Contract Price:
$536,245.00
USED TO DATE:
$74,000.00
LESS 10% RETAINAGE:
$7,400.00
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF:
$66,600.00
FILE: Share\Excef\lSt. MichaenOT5088T.xis
SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 91 Page 1 1125/99
APPROVALS:
CONTRACTOR:
Certification by
Signed: . e
Title: ,
ENGINEER: Certification by
HAKANSON A
Signed:
Title:
OWNER:
CITY OF
Signed:
Title:
I certify that all items _ur4mounts are correct for the work completed to date.
fl(A. Date:
7ca Zs
neer: W recommend payment for work and quantities as shown.
ASSOCIATAS, INC.
p
Date:
Date:
FILE: Share\Excel\lSt. Michae110T508BT.xls
SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 01 Page 2 125M
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
it & Municipal Engineering
Ad Surveying
ITEM 7.1 B
January 25, 1999
Mr. David Traut
Mark J. Traut Wells, Inc.
141 - 28th Ave. S.
Waite Park, MN 56387
RE: Partial Payment #2
Municipal Well #2 Construction
COP #98.01
Dear Mr. Traut,
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
Find enclosed three partial payment forms. The payment request will be placed on the
February 8, 1999 Council meeting agenda for payment authorization.
Please sign all three copies and return all copies in the envelope provided to our office
by February 2, 1999. This item needs to be placed in the council agenda packets by
February 3, 1999.
If you have further questions please contact me.
Yours truly,
HAKANSf1�1 ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
ON
Enclosures
/clk
cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\508\OT508mt1.doc
PAY ESTIMATE #2
January 25, 1999
Mark J. Traut Wells
41 - 28th Avenue S.
.Vaite Park, MN 56387
RE: Municipal Well #2 Construction, COP #98.01
Contract Amount: $49,690.00'
Award Date: September 29, 1998
Completion Date: March 1, 1999
Bid Schedule "A" - COMMUNITY P UBLIC WATER SUPPLY FOR THE CITY OF OTSEGO
Estimated Contract
Itcm rlccrrintinn Quantity t]nit Price Price
OWNER
Used to Date Extension
j 1 jMobilization/Demobilization
—i[Drill nominal 24-1/2" Open Hole180
11S
LF
$5,000.00 LS j
$85.00 LF !
$_5,000.00
$15,300.00
1.0 LS_
172 LF
$_5,000.00
C $14,620.00
3!Fill/Bail Open Hole _
4jSet 18" Casing J
_ 8CY
i20! FT
$130.00 CY
$40.00 FT ?
$1,040.00
$4,800.00
8 CY
120 FT
$1,040.00
$4,800.00
I 51 Install Grout
6CY
$325.00 CY i
$1,950.00
10 CY
$3,250.00
_ _
6tBlast
2j LB
$50.00 LB j
$100.00
23 LB
$1,150.00
7iF.I.R. Development Equipment
1 ILS
$4,000.00 LS
$4,000.00
1 LS
_$4,000.00
81 Develop Well/Sandstone Removal
80iHR
$100.00 HR j
$8,000.00
110 HR
$11,000.00
91F.I.R. Test Pump Equipment
1;LS
$2,500.00 LSI
$2,500.00
1 LS
$2,500.00
10Test Pump Well
60 HR
$55.00 HR I
$3,300.00
26 HR
$1,443.75
111 Disinfect Well _
11LS
$150.00 LS
$150.00
1 LS
$150.00
I 12 Gamma Log Well
1 ILS
$800.00 LS I
$800.00
1 LS
$800.00
131Video Record Well
11S
$800.00 LSI
$800.00
2 LS
$1,600.00
_
14 i Water Analysis Report/Permit/Submittals
1 LS
$450.00 LS
$450.00
OILS
( $0.00
15; Site Restoration
1; LS
$1,500.001 LS I
$1,500.00
0.5 LS
$750.00
TOTAL: $49,690.00 $52,103.75
'Contract price per Change Order No. 1
USED TO DATE: $52,103.75
LESS 5% RETAINAGE: $2,605.19
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #1: $24,899.50
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: $24,599.06
APPROVALS:
CONTRACTOR; Certification by Contractor; I certify that all items and amounts shown are correct for the work completed to date.
MARK J. TRAUT WELLS
Signed:
Title: Date: �5
ENGINEER: I recommend payment for items and amount of rk a shown.
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. _
Signed:
Title:
OWNER:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Signed:
Title:
FILE: Share\Exceft\0tsego%ot506bt.xls
SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE #2
Page 1
Date:
Date:
1125/99
A
7 Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
& Municipal Engineering
Land SurMEMO
ITEM 7.2
TO: Mike Robertson, Administrator
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE, City Engineer
John A. Harwood, PE
DATE: January 21, 1999
RE: Koerwitz Property
Water Service
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
As per your direction, we are providing preliminary costs for water service to the
Koerwitz property.
We considered that this property could develop 110 residential lots.
We investigated two scenarios for water service:
➢ Extension of Municipal Service to the property
➢ Development of Independent Water Service for the plat.
In extending water service to this area from the current water tower site, it would be
necessary to extend 16" pipe part of the way. The remaining pipe size could be a 12"
pipe. This size requirement enables the system to provide 1500 gpm fire flow.
Therefore, we assume 2700 LF of 16" pipe and 9700 LF of 12" pipe is needed to reach
the proposed development.
Refer to the hand prepared exhibits attached.
Alternative "A" is a route via TH 101 to CR 36, then east to property. $857,000 total
project cost, of which $661,000 is for basic system size (8" dia.) and $196,000 is for
oversizing for area benefit.
Alternative "B-1" is a route via TH 101 to 65th, then to easement, to the WWTF and to
the development. Total project cost $741,000. A portion of the system size on TH 101
has a trunk oversize cost of $90,000. The remainder of the alternative is not trunk. The
$651,000 would be a development responsibility.
Alternate B-2 assumes construction in conjunction with the sewer force main, which has
a route along 65th. This concurrent construction would minimize restoration cost. This
alternative has a cost of $728,000. The portion along TH 101 has a trunk component of
$90,000. The remainder, $638,000, would be a development cost.
If alternative A is pursued at a cost of $857,000, and if after public hearing lateral costs
were assessed against properties on TH 101 for benefit, then cost to Koerwitz
development could be reduced to $217,000, which is extra pipe along CR 36 for service
only to development.
CAShare\WPmuni\A0TSEG0\901 \0t901 mr&doc
Page 1 of 2
If the City is not able to assess benefit along the route, the extension of water service
will be funded by the development.
Assume that it is uneconomical therefore to extend water service to the site due to cost,
and is not in the best interest of the City at that time.
The developer has the option of providing an independent system, which could
ultimately be purchased by the City for the public utility. The design would require that
municipal well, pumphouse and hydropneumatic tank with chemical addition be
installed. The system would allow for the City to take over the facilities that were
designed by registered engineers and approved by the Dept. of Health (MN DOH) and
the City engineer.
The well would be capable of providing a minimum 500 gpm sand -free potable water
with a minimum of 18 -inch casing, developed in the Ironton -Galesville formation or the
Mount Simon foundation.
The pumphouse should be capable of providing service for the proposed well and one
future well. The chemical treatment will be for chlorine, fluoride and polyphosphates.
The building shall be similar in structure to the other City of Otsego pumphouse — brick
exterior with mansard roof, landscaping and concrete walkway.
The electrical controls shall be compatible with the City of Otsego SCADA system.
The hydropneumatic tank shall be large enough to service the development of 110
houses.
The building must be designed to be able to remove the hydropneumatic tank if
desirable at the time the City water facilities are extended to the area. The tank would
not be a usable facility when the City extends service.
Estimated Costs:
Well Construction
Pump
Pumphouse
Hydropneumatic Tank
Estimated Const. Cost
Ironton -Galesville Mt. Simon
$65,000
$130,000
$25,000
$25,000
$175,000
$175,000
$80,000$80,000
1zkl
Overhead costs such as design fees, legal and financial costs are not included.
The independent system's valve at the time service is extended would need to be
evaluated. The valve could be used to reduce the WAC charges to the homeowners.
The costs provided are preliminary estimates and are provided for the purposes of
determining the magnitude of options only.
C:\Share\WPmun1\A0TSEG0\901 \ot901 mr8.doc
Page 2 of 2
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
i
Z �
41 X02 c /yJ�l
LM62nd
r A 4. y r//
C ST o E
o
L4
wo ,,
o�
4
maim
&�t0
O
2000
8 It
N. 5th STREET
d O T ••
To r n� ,t EN y T f!
!4 ro
00
"IX�
xg
�\
HICHWgy (53
� yFti
5PN ti144,
1
W
L.J
Z
O
Q
w �-
Q
M
M
0.
a
O C
r A 4. y r//
C ST o E
o
L4
wo ,,
o�
4
maim
&�t0
O
2000
8 It
N. 5th STREET
d O T ••
To r n� ,t EN y T f!
!4 ro
00
"IX�
xg
�\
HICHWgy (53
� yFti
5PN ti144,
1
n
PARSON
QUADAY
S ARE ;O �p
n n0 3
QUALEN 3AV a`
ti
�Ql IAMN G
QUAL 0 a
a
� o �
ydMNQ�N • QUEENS AVE. H.E. CO
a -TT
o !► n. J
sow µ v o Z
Z�
z
y m�>
VE.
o z KEFu I
ouuf AVL N.E.
4�1 Z i
t
f
S $ ZLA M
Q
Ln
rhI
n
%.\
�za r
0-0
w -
'I
ti
-� fL ' 8 " fnN/r/� y
62nd
mrtf 10 t
h S
8 h fi1,u/r/�.tY
fvticc� /11/1 � i
W
J
J
W
N
Q
Q Q
O._
a
Q
mrtf 10 t
h S
8 h fi1,u/r/�.tY
fvticc� /11/1 � i
ITEM 7.3
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
TRUNK SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
SECTION 27, CITY OF OTSEGO
78T" STREET, WEST OF QUADAY AVENUE
January 26, 1999
Prepared by:
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
3601 Thurston Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Telephone: 612/427-5860
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under State of
Minnesota Statutes Sections 326.02 to 326.16.
od, PE
G. Kosh-Sk, City Engineer
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc
_ //d y 7
Reg. No.
i/,2�/
Reg. No.
7,1-z,
Dat
�r9
Date '
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
II. DESCRIPTION
III. DESIGN BASIS AND ALTERNATIVE
a) Sewer Size
b) Sewer Location
c) Watermain
IV. ESTIMATED QUANTITIES AND COSTS
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc
INTRODUCTION
The City of Otsego is in the process of constructing municipal sewer and water
facilities. The wastewater treatment facility is scheduled to be on-line in early
summer 2000. The municipal well and water tower are currently under construction.
The pumphouse will be under construction early in 1999. The Phase I trunk water
trunk distribution & sewer collection system is scheduled for May 1999 through
October 1999 construction. During planning for the sanitary sewer collection
system, an approximate 440 acre initial development area was identified located
west of CSAH 42 and south of 85" Street on lands that generally are in the south
half of Section 22 and the north half of Section 27. This initial development area is
shown on an enclosure. The purpose of this study and report is to evaluate
extension of sewer and water westerly from the Phase I system into this initial
development area.
A development moratorium has been in effect during the time the sanitary sewer
and water planning was being reviewed and approved and while the City
comprehensive plans and ordinances were being revised to reflect the impact of
public sewer and water. This moratorium will be lifted by Council when the
ordinances, permits and policies are in place to receive preliminary plats. These
preliminary plats will show the location of the proposed streets and platted lots,
which in turn locate trunk and lateral sewer and water systems. In anticipation of
the moratorium being lifted, and in anticipation of public sewer and water availability,
the City has had initial contact from several property owners and developers
regarding extension of sewer to serve their properties. Those contacts have led to
City authorization of this report and Feasibility Study for public sewer and water
extended westerly from the trunk sewer lift station into the development area.
II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT
Excerpts from the June 1997 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Study are enclosed.
This study evaluated allowable and potential development density within the sewer
study area and identified sewer pipe sizing and elevations to provide service. The
current proposed sewer is one of the major trunk lines from that study, which
extends approximately 4000 ft. westerly from Quaday Ave. This sanitary sewer
provides trunk gravity flow outlet to approximately 400 ± acres of currently vacant
and developable property that is under 6 separate ownerships. This ownership is
shown on an enclosure. This trunk line consists of 900 ft. of sewer in Quaday Ave.
and approximately 4000 LF of sewer westerly from Quaday Ave. While the primary
purpose of this report is for Sanitary Sewer extension, the concurrent extension of
watermain is recommended since both of these utilities are required for the density
of urban service development proposed.
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc 1
III. DESIGN BASIS & ALTERNATIVE
A. SEWER LINE SIZE
The 1997 Sewer Study identified a need for an 18 -inch sewer pipe in Quaday
Ave. to provide service to this development area plus provide service extension
to the south along Quaday Ave. to serve the south TH 101 development areas.
This southerly extension can serve properties to near 65th Street. The sewer
study also showed the westerly line from Quaday Ave. to be an 18 -inch
diameter line immediately adjacent to Quaday decreasing to a 15 -inch line at a
location about 1500 ft. west of Quaday. Since completion of the Sewer Study,
the City has revised its Comprehensive Plan to show an "Urban Service
Reserve" area located generally southwest of the current sewer study area into
Section 28 and southwest towards the Odean Ave. and County Road 37 area.
Long range city planning has projected ultimate sewered development within
this urban service reserve. While the City has not completed a detailed
evaluation of development potential for this urban service reserve, initial review
of topography indicates that some of this area, primarily properties located south
and west of Lefebvre Creek, which are in the south half of Section 27 and the
east half of Section 28, could be served by an extension from the currently
proposed trunk line. In order to maintain future flexibility of service, we
recommend sizing the entire trunk line from Quaday Ave. westerly to a point
4000 ft. west of Quaday as an 18 -inch diameter rather than the 15 -inch size
recommended by the 1997 Sewer Study. The larger pipe size, at 0.15% grade,
increases conveyance capacity enough to serve portions of the urban service
reserve in Section 28, which are up to an additional 1500 to 1800 residential
units.
B. SEWER LINE LOCATION
The ideal location for any sanitary sewer and watermain facilities, regardless of
size or trunk vs. lateral service intent is within the right-of-way for a local street.
This location allows construction of a line that has a dual function for local
service benefit to directly connected residences as well as trunk service. This
dual function results in the cost of basic line construction being a developmental
cost paid by abutting and serviced properties. With the facility in a local street,
only the cost of facility oversizing and extra depth is paid from trunk sources.
For this project we anticipate having knowledge of local street layout, via a
submitted preliminary plat, prior to completing final design. Once that detailed
information is known, the sewer line will be constructed within the right-of-way
for a local street. This location, within a local street, is shown in concept as
Alternative B and is the basis for costing and cost allocation.
Very often, it is not practical or possible to construct trunk sewer lines in local
streets. This is true for the City's Phase 1 Trunk System where construction is
in highway right-of-way. Often, an alternate choice for location of trunk sanitary
sewer and watermain facilities is on or adjacent to existing property ownership
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc 2
IV
boundaries. This option is shown as Alternative A. For the vast majority of
developments, the primary ownership boundary between major original land
ownerships, such as between original farmsteads, will continue to exist during
and after development. Major roads and utilities can most often be routed along
original quarter section lines, with relatively minimal impact on development
planning. The cost and the allocation of costs for this trunk sewer route along
the property line is shown as Alternative A. This alternative can be pursued if
development patterns for the adjacent property are not known at the time facility
construction is required. This alternative will be within or parallel to a proposed
State Aid collector street that has been identified as necessary through the
development area from Quaday Ave. to 85t" Street.
C. CONCURRENT WATERMAIN
Extension of sanitary sewer only, without watermain, could be a problem for
developmental timing if the more westerly development area significantly
precedes the more easterly areas. Concurrently with any moderate level of
development within this 400 ± study area it is necessary to provide watermain
looping both for fire service and consumption. The water system looping is
proposed to be from Quaday Ave. westerly on local streets or the 78' Street
alignment and then through the development area from the 78' St. main to
either the vicinity of Well Number 2 or via routes through development areas to
the 16 -inch main in CSAH 42. The route of the trunk watermain looping can be
along or parallel to a necessary State Aid collector street planned for the area.
Construction of the 4000 LF 78th Street watermain westerly from Quaday Ave.
is recommended to be concurrent with sewer main construction. The looping of
the watermain will be required and provided as new development occurs.
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES AND COSTS
The costs for the proposed facilities are detailed on separate enclosures. The
total estimated project cost, which includes the estimated construction cost plus
30% for contingency and indirect costs, is as follows:
Alternative Route A, parallel to existing property lines, the South line of North X,
Section 27:
Trunk Sanitary System (18" dia.) $517,710
Trunk Water System (12" dia.) $196,500
Restoration, Topsoil & Seed, Agricultural $141,000
Easement & Right -of -Way $32,000
$887,200
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc 3
Alternative Route B, on local streets:
Trunk Sanitary Sewer (18" dia.) $540,000
Trunk Water System $239,000
Restoration $96,000
Easement & Right -of -Way _ 0
$875,000
TRUNK AND LATERAL COSTS
Alternative A is located on a property line and does not directly provide services to
property although there may be potential for some limited direct hookup and benefit,
depending on development patterns. The trunk vs. lateral portions of the cost is as
follows, with the lateral portion based on 8 -inch diameter sewer lines at maximum
12 foot depth:
Based on current information on development patterns, it is likely that the majority
of the cost of Alternative A would be of trunk benefit only, which would require
funding all or most of the $887,200 project costs from individual sewer connection
or sewer availability charges (SAC fees).
Alternative B The utilities are located within a local street, which location assumes
that a preliminary plat is submitted that fixes the location of the street. For this
alternative, the local or lateral costs would be funded by the developer as a direct
benefit to property. Only the trunk oversizing cost, which includes extra depth, would
be a City cost.
Total
Trunk Cost
Lateral Size
Total OversizinA
Sewer Pipe System
$517,700
$205,600
$312,100
Water Pipe System
$196,500
$127,000
$69,500
Restoration
$141,000
$88,400
$52,600
Easement & Right -of -Way
$32,000
$32,000
_ $0_
$887,200
$453,000
$434,200
Based on current information on development patterns, it is likely that the majority
of the cost of Alternative A would be of trunk benefit only, which would require
funding all or most of the $887,200 project costs from individual sewer connection
or sewer availability charges (SAC fees).
Alternative B The utilities are located within a local street, which location assumes
that a preliminary plat is submitted that fixes the location of the street. For this
alternative, the local or lateral costs would be funded by the developer as a direct
benefit to property. Only the trunk oversizing cost, which includes extra depth, would
be a City cost.
This alternative depends on property owner submittal of a development plan and
a commitment via the development agreements for construction of the sewer and
water lines, which would be located to provide both lateral and trunk benefit. The
developer would construct the entire $875,000 project and would be reimbursed
from the City trunk fund, supported by sewer connection charges (SAC fees), for the
$431,000 in trunk costs.
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc 4
Total
Trunk Cost
Lateral Size
Total Oversizing
Sewer Pipe System
$540,000
$224,700
$315,300
Water Pipe System
$239,000
$156,300
$82,700
Restoration
$96,000
$63,000
$33,000
Easement & Right -of -Way
$0
_ $0
_ $0_
$875,000
$444,000
$431,000
This alternative depends on property owner submittal of a development plan and
a commitment via the development agreements for construction of the sewer and
water lines, which would be located to provide both lateral and trunk benefit. The
developer would construct the entire $875,000 project and would be reimbursed
from the City trunk fund, supported by sewer connection charges (SAC fees), for the
$431,000 in trunk costs.
C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\313\ot313FEAS.doc 4
n V �
87
874
861.5
r� �}
874
859
82
�
. .j.
32
872 8
860.4 E
300
874�� 864
856^. El �' -/L� 83
11 -,
ti °.
873.8 1 875.5 I �y� OO ' 86 i
853.2
�00
8801
2 9
880 jj
'A 859.5 1
25 i C5 5
11
0 800 1600
SCALE IN FEET
Ankerson
l„ Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
x67.3
85.7
r
880 g6
R
43
9 2
1 0
880
87s
851h ST
I
m
848.1
1
I�r
I
2
�
z
8 4
I
R
m " Ci
11
0
82.46
I 886.7
i
o
Q
5
l 878
'
/84T.5
Oi00'
858
o
9 i
i
72
8 rd
8j
T. 46
R
876
6 rig
840.7
8 j8
41
20
f'Y
i
300
874�� 864
856^. El �' -/L� 83
11 -,
ti °.
873.8 1 875.5 I �y� OO ' 86 i
853.2
�00
8801
2 9
880 jj
'A 859.5 1
25 i C5 5
11
0 800 1600
SCALE IN FEET
Ankerson
l„ Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
VIJ�J/v�
r
880 g6
852.4 8�
9 2
1 0
880
87s
849.1
848.1
W
8 4
5.7
Q
-,
870
10
Oi00'
858
o
856
859.60
6 rig
41
C
XX DENOTES DESIGN NUMBER
OF
CONNECTIONS
EXCERPT FROM 1997
SANITARY
SEWER STUDY
CITY OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA
FILE: OT313
VIJ�J/v�
1
n"s r'1►
�► vlh�+1�I1M�
NM^ni wMNI►'
� N�1h�IM �MN11
y►���I�MA► ��V
MWNNMr ��
0 600 1200 VCf
'
i
—� SCALE IN FEET ��;✓�/ , ! r�� ± �u
%K,� ' �JAQ A'�EhUE
� •, F� ji /� I. i �
aotL
i f F i j I
% ,��/�
II \ i
°
? ! ?
0
� � •i �'�° � i 1 t �� �J
—1 i i 1• r
e
i
w
LLJ
W
i
j C i I�wLLJ�
Z C'1
Z
Q
N
x •1 i
1 i• _
G N U ! U a!
r• , t it e e ,. i,
i ! t Cy�
01 i Jij t t t` I 1 • fi
on f
,1_�; •• ��� , �; •'
ALTERNATIVE A
CONCEPTUAL SKETCH
Hakonson TRUNK SEWER AND WATER
Anderson ON EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
l
Assoc.,nc.
_�--�-- oc.c CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA
siz rw'.4. M. mow. �r4 )!10
•n-a°a° r•. siz-•n-axo
FILE: OT313
0T313/0T313EBA.DWO
VENUE
EASEMEW
SOUTH LINE OF THE NORfi MEET QUARTER OF SECTION 27 -;s ADAY AVENUE
,r rm awrrr a.a �.
xoo . me qe I
mr a T -P..Pam LM w ,�
.. i l ♦1 '`- .` 'ii'{r.-'t` j til , \ �. iil(L� i i •I•••i l I ,r riiiliil tt 1 tip
I !._: 1
-• -_\, ♦` /l 1 1 `; 11�� \\ 3 - ; 't � �. \t • 11 ' � " r ',�%i%l1 ;1, 1 1 1- .� 1 �♦` I
.- .�` , 1" -`. tt it it l It ��" rail /i '♦\t
♦♦ /� ;'Ilt t't ♦� �,,r ll� It fl ,' r'11 �. 't. 1 �1,llpt 1 `,
7i3'1p0 , 1 ` ` 1 Frir t 1 /2A 100 r `...� ♦ , I I ; t > '__•: li. ;�/xT,ao O1� '1
T" 1„I 1 1 t t t`-_�_ t y i♦ r ! t ` i •- ``ryyl■nOMt�.�:
\ ♦` •_ n `♦ ,, `♦ ````\\ , 1 t `t 1`1t`♦t1 i 't ' 1�1 i I ♦1 , •.' i ... -`- ' ` i i / `♦t; -' ' .♦`,` tt
• 1 � ''- r'. tt, `\ t .� il�ll rl 1 r �� r t - � ``♦t♦ %`
/' t'S'-t�1•:--rte» TI-!WRd ` a:\ � .';.1N �->._'- ' ,a t .1K�” s '. ``.t!'" n s _ . >M t`.''�Plr � :' 117: � a,�_;.>:.»`` fC --.Qi ' .I w1 ' { 1►A. ru" R 1�- - ..t - • _]Cs�
, r `•f• .�`� \ •� `�: .`\ ' r `,' . •� ♦�, i ...r `.`� ♦ - 1 .L tillADAr,AVE ,. 1
.s1e�o lY �•
,: _ �—\ �`�'� _♦... ,� ;. � �`♦�- rM1300 •_ , ._' ___'� ♦', i I - r ♦``i '3N ``i 1 `i I/ .=".r
J.
#21,
•iil% 1� —; 'ii'r _ice- � (/r._\�:- �\%------------
♦ `}�` l .'F?11 I(1� -.`- ,•• /ii ' i/- �_. .; `�-I I 1- 1 rr I� E
N.
♦ r i. - _ t-1 _ t �`� : \`. .3330/
♦� `♦`r ♦ \� , - �♦ ` �♦� �`� { r rel , �`_� I;•'l' - - `. ., i , .
t - .VIul1[ .R wart army
I. w w3q rASD40ff
sass is -
i w
------------------L }
- ,
r -
---
,e-
l.o
DETAIL 1!1 /11
e ro » SEC716N fl -B I wx twt■1 'j •" 'a iallrls.lar"O I I e a m DETAIL. LIT STATION AREA
tuwnl■r arm - m rt:.alnll o► r+lor■tn 1.■ SECTION A -A .. ..;.
w I¢r ■.ip1Ar - f0 R. IIa1M d /ApOtIT UI[0 q A
m R. GO1■ft ou.OAr Mld
0 .t
0 fe q e 20 q ..... ..... .....
r
• w rsr
..... ..... .. ..... ..... ... ..... ..... .....
y, Y
..... .. ............
....... .......
s.
♦ i
-----a-
875. --- -- ..... ..... ................ ..... ...
875
moml
l ♦
86S - 1Y ..... _ -- ---
3.....
- - - -
4 .♦ 865
.. rAm■iAIN......�..
• `' 7 � . ..855..
♦ �i is ri cssleal K
855. ..... .... ..... .. .. .. ..... .. ..... ..... ..
xt
9CrAf-1!' at 0.tS>< 70f11f 1!' at 0.101[ -1C at 0.137[ 000t7�1D' at QtS>< SOOIF-tY 6tD>< SOtXF_tY at 0.1 ... . 7rf0.F-f!' at 0.1ST..... u37c .
w.is wv. re �3ats"1°� .45
.....
$.4g...................................r!a�! wa...:......... wi.........:... M 3.Y... .............. t �
......... i..
ti.'"\3 u wra............ roan ..au �: sisi. w e�`w 3o 9K +ons
1 .. .71
r0 MO.OY .'rw.l2 MUM Mtn n K7.1. wv. .lk -3ett 0.1n
rla.3 PL42
? : 835
Apt..: ..........:........:.........:..................:.........:........:.........:....... � :..
8340
i i 825
:..
Iwu
823 ..:.........:. ..... .....
....
.......:.........:..................:.........:........:.........:..................:.........:..... ....
_ 8 _ S a....< ..................
* > 8 8 8 19 IS 74 12 j0 $ io @ 6 4 2 0-20n13\033130A0.0
N.. ... rB!
:.w...:.+.:. .:. ^.:. .......... ? .............:.......:.............:.... N,.P1,.♦ a anson
atc tllV1S0! 3wt H PROPOSED TRUNK SANRARY M
• --"` I7 Anderson SEWER AND WATERMAIN,
.an �t!!?<11ii.lis�i?9s:::"a.:rl�Ii1RB::R�:::'E:::'t::'�::::'d:��:'tiii,lw.""... `..: �� ■�■ r
I1rA ASsoc.,Inc SECTION 27 1
........:.. :..:....:.........:.........:..... ... .. .. .. .. ase o.. n+""^ .....�.. 1.1t cw a or=. ,..tsar.
50 48 46 44 42 4� 38 36 34 32 30 28 26 24 22 20 wr LGK
,/ie/9! r..t n -.we r» ♦n -m -aa a"f 1/29/99 nc a at313 M's
FEB. 8.1999 11:22AM
70: OTSEGO
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, MN 55303
Phone (812) 427-6860
Fax(812)427-0520
small., haaenoka®eol.com
N0.755 P.1
Hakanson
Anderson
Associates,
Inc.
Toe Mike From$ Larry
Fwa Pages: 19
Phones IDatet February e_ 1 QQQ
Ree Bituminous Overlay Program CCI
❑ Urgent ® For Review ❑ Please Comment O Please Reply 0 Please Recycle
e Commentm
Welcome Back!
At out Feb. V workshop on the above subject the Council requested some changes to the report.
They also want to consider adopting the report and setting the public hearing for 3/11/99.
I'm faxing a Copy to you before the meeting tonight for your review and we will bang copies to the
meeting for the Council.
Call me If you have questions.
Thank youl
FEB. 8.1999 11:23AN
11SHakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
CMI & Municipal Engineering
Lane Surveying
February 8, 1999
Mike Robertson, Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Bituminous Overlay Program
(1999-2000)
Feasibility Report
Dear Mike,
NO. 755 P.2
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
As was requested at the special council workshop on February 3, 1999, we have
updated the bituminous overlay project submitted to the council December 8, 1998.
Changes requested were:
1) Change the overlay program from a 3 year (1999 to 2001) program to a 2
year (1999 and 2000) program.
2) Remove Jaber Ave. N.E. from program. It was overlaid by Monticello
Township.
3) Raise the contingency from 5% to 10%.
Reiterating the program's outline, we have estimated the cost of overlays for all
remaining 2" or less paved streets and/or those pavements where the structure requires
overlays for strength.
Hakanson Anderson Associates; Inc. has divided the proposed overlays into two
groups. The first group is proposed to be constructed during 1999, and the second
group is proposed to be constructed during 2000.
The basis for the groupings Is:
1) Perceived need (ones which are most severely damaged and have more
traffic are proposed to be completed first).
2) Construction costs are closely divided over the two years.
3) Location in conjunction with other streets to be overlaid.
Exhibit A shows the location and the addition of street name. The type of line around
each subdivision or on the street signifies the proposed year the work could be
completed. The legend shows the year and the cost associated with each year.
CAShare\wPmwnMOTSEGO\910\ot910mr5.doc
FEB. 8.1999 11:24AM NO.755 P.3
Mike Robertson
Page 2
February 8, 1999
We estimated the cost of the entire project to be $1,766,376. Exhibit B shows a list of
those streets with projected estimated costs, We have also followed the cost share
approach between landowners and City where landowners pay only for the 2 -inch
overlays and the City pays the rest. This would require an assessment to the properties
benefiting.
The assessment rate shown is based- on the total cost of all of the overlay projects and
distributing the cost equally over all properties receiving benefit. Tables 1 through 12
show the quantities of work and materials, and the cost associated with each
subdivision or portion of street,
The project is technically feasible and will benefit the area served.
If you have any questions or comments, you may contact us at 427-5860.
Yours truly,
HAKANS9.DJiAN
Attachment
/clk
ON ASSOCIATES, INC.
k, P. E.
cc: Elaine Beatty, Clerk
C; \share\WPmun NAOT8EG0\910\ot910mr5.doc
111� 11 1111p; f1r
illHakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
I
GREAT RIVER ACHES —
Vill-
.1J
ter_ �— •�
ul
• ...LAW
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED
ESTIMATED
TOTAL
CITY PORTION
ASSESSED PORTION
---- 1ST YEAR (1999) $777,247
$331,087
$446,160
2ND YEAR (2000) $989,129
$699,437
$289,692
ASSESSED PORTION IS FOR A 2•• OVERLAY AT A MINIMUM OF 24' WIDTH
Anl mn
Mders I n
Assoc., nc.
h•y,J
1 7Z;mw •.oft
(� a��iu saa�s7e )ou
K
0 1000 8000
SCALE IN FEET
PROPOSED 1999-2000
OTSEGO OVERLAY PROGRAM
OUTLINING BENEFMW PROPERTIES
DATE: FEBRUARY 5, 1999 FILE: OT910
0791 CP -D 5\CT9 , 0P,D5. D WG
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF OTSEGO
OVERLAYS (1999-2000)
COMBINING ALL OVERLAY PROJECTS
AVERAGING ASSESSMENTS
Year
Subdivision Name
City's
Cost
# of Benefiting
Units (Residents)
Resident's
Cost
Assessment/per year
Averaging All Subdivisions
1999
Table 1
Hall's 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions
$86,184
83
$127,920
$188.08
1999
Table 2
Deer Feld Acres 8 Hidden Valley
$25,223
36
$37,440
$188.08
1999
Table 3
Walesch Estates 8 Walesch Estates 2nd Addition
$128,492
103
$131,040
$188.08
1999
ITable 4
Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 1st 8 2nd Additions
$52,712
93
$93,600
$188.06
1999
ITable 5
Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 3rd 8 4th Additions
$38,477
69
$56,160
$188.08
SUBTOTAL
$331,087
$446,160
2000
Table 6
Otsego Acres 1st 8 2nd Additions
$34,078
57
$66,300
$188.08
2000
Table 7
Great River Acres 1st Addition
$37,088
49
$70,200
$188.08
2000
Table 8
Mason Ave NE (CSAR 39 to 83rd St NE)
$97,682
35
$63,492
$188.08
2000
Table 9
83rd St NE (Marlowe are NE to Mason Ave NE)
$70,122
4
$12,636
$188.08
2000
Table 10
Marlowe Ave NE (83rd St NE to Both St NE)
$70,083
4
$12,792
$168.08
2000
Table 11
80th St NE (Mac Iver Ave NE to Marlowe Ave NE)
$73,977
6
$13,260
$188.08
2000
Table 12
BM St NE (CSAH 19 to Mac Iver Ave NE)
$316,407
31
$51,012
$188.08
SUBTOTAL
$699,437
1 $289,692
TOTAL 1
$1,030,524
570
1 $735,852
Total of Cost of Projects $1,766,376
Benefiting Units = 570
Cost per Benefiting Unit - $1,290.97
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
7.601. for 10 years: $188.08
SharelexceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.)ds
Sheet AVG. ASSESSMENTS Page 10
Teal F: a CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
HALLS 1ST, 2ND, & 3RD ADDITIONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 1999
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 290,204 SF
Wear Course Mixture =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost: $164,695 $66,295 $98,400
Contingency @ 10% $16,470 $6,630 $9,840
Indirect @ 20%: $32,939 $13,259 $19,680
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 83
SharelexcellotsegolOT910-1999 BUDGET -As
Sheet TABLE 1
$214,104 $86,184
Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
$127,920
$1,541.20
$224.53
Page 11
m
m
W
W
W
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
150
$300
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation
SY
$1.00
32,245
$32,245
4
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
4,100
$98,400
5
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
6
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
675
$10,800
7
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
2
$4,000
8
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
83
$12,450
Construction Cost:
$164,695
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 290,204 SF
Wear Course Mixture =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost: $164,695 $66,295 $98,400
Contingency @ 10% $16,470 $6,630 $9,840
Indirect @ 20%: $32,939 $13,259 $19,680
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 83
SharelexcellotsegolOT910-1999 BUDGET -As
Sheet TABLE 1
$214,104 $86,184
Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
$127,920
$1,541.20
$224.53
Page 11
m
m
W
W
W
TARLE 2 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
DEER FIELD ACRES & HIDDEN VALLEY
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 1999
ITEMS
UNIT
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1.00
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
50.00
$100
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SF
$0.15
2,000.00
$300
4
Aggregate Base Class 5 (6")
T
$7.50
100.00
$750
5
Type 41 Base Course Mixture (7)
T
$34.00
30.00
$1,020
"
6
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal
$1.50
515.00
$773
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
1,200.00
$28,800
8
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1.00
$4,000
9
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
210.00
$3,360
10
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
0.60
$1,200
11
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
36.00
55.400
Construction Cost:
$48,203
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Patching Area as Measured in Field = 2,000 SF
Total Surface Area of RoadwayTmprovement = 84;203F -
"-
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF
Base & Wear Course M'bxtures =146 LBS/CF
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAIJSY
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along
Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost:
$48,203
$19,403
$28,800
Contingency @ 10%
$4,820
$1,940
$2,880
Indirect @ 20%:
$9.641
$3,881
$5.760
Total Project Cost:
$62,663
$25,223
$37,440
Benefiting Units = 36
Cost per Benefiting
Unit:
$1,040
Annual
Cost per Benefiting Unit
Share/exceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As
@7.5%
for 10 years:
$151.51
page 12
Sheet. TABLE 2
TAMI 1='q CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
WALESCH ESTATES AND WALESCH ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 1999
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 299,285 SF
Wear Course Mixture =146 LBS/CF
Top Soil Shouldering = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Seeding =13 FT Width Along edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost: $199,640 $98,840 $100,800
Contingency @ 10% $19,964 $9,884 $10,080
Indirect @ 20%: $39,928 $19.768 $20.160
Total Project Cost: $259,532 $128,492 $131,040
Benefiting Units =103
Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,272.23
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
shaWexcelfotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGEr.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $185.35
Sheet: TABLE 3 Page 13
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
75
$150
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation
SY
$1.00
32,100
$32,100
4
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
4,200
$100,800
5
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
6
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
665
$10,640
7
Common Borrow (shoulder widening)
CY
$5.00
4,000
$20,000
8
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
7
$14,000
9
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
103
$15,450
Construction Cost:
$199,640
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 299,285 SF
Wear Course Mixture =146 LBS/CF
Top Soil Shouldering = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Seeding =13 FT Width Along edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost: $199,640 $98,840 $100,800
Contingency @ 10% $19,964 $9,884 $10,080
Indirect @ 20%: $39,928 $19.768 $20.160
Total Project Cost: $259,532 $128,492 $131,040
Benefiting Units =103
Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,272.23
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
shaWexcelfotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGEr.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $185.35
Sheet: TABLE 3 Page 13
TABLE 4 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE ESTATES IST & 2ND ADDITIONS
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 1999
Share/excellotsegalOT910-1999 BUDGET.As
Sheet TABLE 4
Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit
@ 7.5% for 10 years:
EXTENSION
$2,500
$240
$630
$1,163
$2,040
$1,950
$72,000
$4,000
$3,675
$8,400
$2,000
$112,548
RESIDENT COST
$72,000
$7,200
$14,400
$93,600
$1,006.45
$146.63
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
Page 14
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
120
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SF
$0.15
4,200
4
Aggregate Base Class 5 (6")
T
$7.50
155
5
Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2')
T
$34.00
60
6
Bduminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal
$1.50
1,300
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mature (2')
T
$24.00
3,000
8
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
9
Common Excavation (for base placement)
CY
$3.50
1,050
10
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
525
11
Seedling
Ac
$2,000.00
1
12
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
93.
Construction Cost:
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Patching Area as Measured in Field = 4,200 SF
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 212,680 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GALISY
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width
Along Edge of Roadway
Common Excavation =112 FT Deep x 2 FT Wide Along
Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
Construction Cost:
$112,548
$40,548
Contingency @ 10%
$11,255
$4,055
Indirect @ 20%:
$22,510
HAU
Total Project Cost:
$146,312
$52,712
Benefiting Units = 93
Cost per Benefiting Unit
Share/excellotsegalOT910-1999 BUDGET.As
Sheet TABLE 4
Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit
@ 7.5% for 10 years:
EXTENSION
$2,500
$240
$630
$1,163
$2,040
$1,950
$72,000
$4,000
$3,675
$8,400
$2,000
$112,548
RESIDENT COST
$72,000
$7,200
$14,400
$93,600
$1,006.45
$146.63
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
Page 14
TARLF 5
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE ESTATES 3rd & 4th ADDITIONS
PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 1999
UNrr
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
80
$160
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SF
$0.15
2,100
$315
4
Aggregate Base Class 5 (6")
T
$7.50
80
$600
5
Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2")
T
$34.00
30
$1,020
6
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal
$1.50
785
$1,178
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
1,800
$43,200
8
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
9
Common Excavation (for base placement)
CY
$3.50
650
$2,275
10
Top Sol Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
325
$5,200
11
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
1
$2,000
12
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
69
$10.350
Construction Cost:
$72,798
ASSUMPTIONS:
Estimated Total Patching Area = 2,000 SF
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =128,040 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBSICF
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width
Along
Edge of Roadway
Common Excavation =112 FT Deep x 2 FT Wide Along Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost:
$72,948
$29,598
$43,200
Contingency @ 10%
$7,295
$2,960
$4,320
Indirect @ 20%:
$14,59Q
um
1$,114.4
Total Project Cost: $94,832 $38,477 $56,160
Benefiting Units = 69
Cost per Benefiting Unit: $813.91
Sharelexcellotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per BenefrtingUnit
Sheet TABLE 5 @ 7.5% for 10 years: $118.58
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
t
t
s
Page 15
M
to
m
W
0
3
TARI F 6
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =151,392 SF
-- —
OTSEGO ACRES IST & 2ND ADDITIONS
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
M
P
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY
P
PROJECT COST CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost $77,214
$26,214
ITEMS °D
Contingency @ 10% $3,861
$2,621
$5,100
UNIT
$5,241
$10,200 °
FINANCED kD
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
* N
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
80
$160
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SF
$0.15
1,575
$236
* 3
4
Aggregate Base Class 5 (61
T
$7.50
60
$450
5
Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2')
T
$34.00
25
$850
6
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal
$1.50
925
$1,388
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2')
T
$24.00
2,125
$51,000
8
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
9
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
380
$6,080
10
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
1
$2,000
11
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
57
$8.550
Construction Cost
$77,214
ASSUMPTIONS:
Estimated Total Patching Area =1,500 SF
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =151,392 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBSICF
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost $77,214
$26,214
$31,000
Contingency @ 10% $3,861
$2,621
$5,100
Indirect @ 20%: $15,4443
$5,241
$10,200 °
cr
U
Total Project Cost: $96,517
$34,078
$66,300
Benefiting Units = 57
z
Cost per Benefiting Unit:
$1,163.16
Share/excellotsegolOT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit Page 16
Sheet: TABLE 6 @ 7.5% for 10 years: $169.46
TARLE 7
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
Great River
Acres 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions
c
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
.
ITEMS °D
UNIT
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
'
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
70
$140
* N
3
Remove Bituminous Pavement
SF
$0.15
5,130
$770
3
4
Aggregate Base Class 5 (61
T
$7.50
180
$1,350
5
Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2")
T
$34.00
65
$2,210
6
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
Gal
$1.50
1,100
$1,650
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2')
T
$24.00
2,250
$54,000
8
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
9
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
410
$6,560
10
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
1
$2,000
11
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
49
$7,350
Construction Cost:
$82,530
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Estimated Patching Area = 5130 SF
Total Surface Area for Roadway Improvement =183,838
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST
Construction Cost: $82,530 $28,530 $54,000
Contingency at 10%: $8,253 $2,853 $5,400
z
Indirect @ 20%: $16,506 $5,706 $10,800
Total Project Cost: $107,288 $37,088 $70,200
Benefiting Units = 49 -o
Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,432.65
N
Share/exceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
Sheet TABLE 7 @7.5% for 10 years: $208.72 page 17
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
IAULM-0
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$123,980
$75,140
$48,840
$12,398
MASON AVE NE (CSAH 39 to 83rd St NE)
$4,884
$24,796
$15,028
$9,76S
$161,174
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
$63,492
ITEMS
UNIT
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
45
$90
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation
SY
$1.00
16,110
$16,110
4
Salvaged Pavement Reclamation
SY
$1.00
16,110
$16,110
5
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
2,035
$48,840
6
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1" extra)
T
$24.00
1,020
$24,480
7
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
8
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
300
$4,800
9
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
0.9
$1,800
10
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
35
$5.250
Construction Cost:
$123,980
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =144,980 SF
Wear Course Mixture =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Construction Cost:
Contingency @ 10%:
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 35
Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
SharelExceVOtsego/OT91D-1999 BUDGET.As °@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
Sheet* TABLE 8
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$123,980
$75,140
$48,840
$12,398
$7,514
$4,884
$24,796
$15,028
$9,76S
$161,174
$97,682
$63,492
$1,814.06
$264.28
TARRI F 9 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
83rd St (Mason Ave. NE to Marlowe Ave NE)
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
1
Mobilization
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation (Pickup)
4
2' Deep Subcut
5
Select Backfill
6
6" Aggregate Base Class 5
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
8
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (T)
9
Traffic Control
10
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
11
Seeding
12
Mailbox Relocation
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 28,820 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost
Contingency @ 10%:
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 4
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
PROJECT COST CITY COST
63,660 53,940
6,366 5,394
12.732 10.788
82,758 70,122
3,159
460.22
EXTENSION
.$2,500
$90
$6,730
$14,575
$10,600
$8,325
$9,720
$4,920
$4,000
$1,200
$400
$600
$63,660
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
RESIDENT COST
$9,720
972
7.944
$12,636
Share/exceUotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET -As
Sheet: TABLE 9 "
UNIT
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
LS
$2,500.00
1
LF
$2.00
45
SY
$2.00
3,365
CY
$5.00
2,915
Cy
$5.00
2,120
T
$7.50
1,110
T
$24.00
405
T
$24.00
205
LS
$4,000.00
1
Cy
$16.00
75
Ac
$2,000.00
0.20
EA
$150.00
4
Construction
Cost:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 28,820 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost
Contingency @ 10%:
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 4
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
PROJECT COST CITY COST
63,660 53,940
6,366 5,394
12.732 10.788
82,758 70,122
3,159
460.22
EXTENSION
.$2,500
$90
$6,730
$14,575
$10,600
$8,325
$9,720
$4,920
$4,000
$1,200
$400
$600
$63,660
ITEMS
FINANCED
BY CITY
RESIDENT COST
$9,720
972
7.944
$12,636
Share/exceUotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET -As
Sheet: TABLE 9 "
TARI F In CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
Marlowe Ave NE (83rd St NE to 80th St NE)
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 27,192 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost:
Contingency @ 10%
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 4
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$63,750
$53,910
$9,840
ITEMS
$5,391
$984
$12,750
UNIT
S1,96g
$82,875
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
45
$90
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation (Pickup)
SY
$2.00
3,175
$6,350
4
2' Deep Subcut
CY
$5.00
2,950
$14,750
5
Select Backfill
CY
$5.00
2,140
$10,700
6
6" Aggregate Base Class 5
T
$7.50
1,120
$8,400
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (7)
T
$24.00
410
$9,840
8
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1
T
$24.00
205
$4,920
'
9
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
10
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
75
$1,200
11
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
0.20
$400
12
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
4
X44
Construction Cost:
$63,750
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 27,192 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost:
Contingency @ 10%
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 4
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$63,750
$53,910
$9,840
$6,375.00
$5,391
$984
$12,750
S10,782
S1,96g
$82,875
$70,083
$12,792
$3,198.00
$465.90
SharelexceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.xis
Sheet TABLE 10
N
W
A
3
TAR[ F 11
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
RESIDENT COST
$67,105
- -80th St (Mac lver Ave NE -to Marlowe Ave NE)--
E)-
$10,200
$6,711
$13,421
$5,691
$11.381,
$1,020.00
$2,040.00
$87,237
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
PROPOSED
$13,260
ITEMS
UNIT
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
45
$90
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation (Pickup)
SY
$2.00
3,650
$7,300
4
2' Deep Subcut
CY
$5.00
3,100
$15,500
'
5
Select Backfill
CY
$5.00
2,200
$11,000
6
6" Aggregate Base Class 5
T
$7.50
1,170
$8,775
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2")
T
$24.00
425
$10,200
8
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (T)
T
$24.00
215
$5,160
9
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000-00
1
$4,000
10
Top Soil Shouldering (L1/)
CY
$16.00
80
$1,280
11
Seeding
Ac
$2,000-00
0.20
$400
12
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
6
=0
Construction Cost:
$67,105
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 31,188 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBSICF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost:
Contingency @ 10%
Indirect @ 20% -
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 6
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
SharelexceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As
Sheet: TABLE 11
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$67,105
$56,905
$10,200
$6,711
$13,421
$5,691
$11.381,
$1,020.00
$2,040.00
$87,237
$73,977
$13,260
$2,210.00
$321.97
21
Tent F V)
CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE
RESIDENT COST
$282,630
80th St. (Mac leer Ave NE to CSAR 19)-'
$39,240
$28,263
$24,339
$3,924
156,526
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION YEAR: 2000
$L848
$367,419
$316,407
$51,012
ITEMS
UNIT
FINANCED
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
COST
QUANTITY
EXTENSION
BY CITY
1
Mobilization
LS
$2,500.00
1
$2,500
'
2
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
LF
$2.00
45
$90
3
Full Depth Pavement Reclamation (Pickup)
SY
$2.00
13,500
$27,000
'
4
2' Deep Subcut
CY
.$5.00
11,700
$58,500
'
5
Select Backfill
CY
$5.00
8,500
$42,500
'
6
6" Aggregate Base Class 5
T
$7.50
4,500
$33,750
'
7
Type 41 Wearing Course Mature (7')
T
$24.00
1,635
$39,240
8
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1')
T
$24.00
820
$19,680
9
Bituminous Curb
LF
$0.50
8,000
$4,000
'
10
Traffic Control
LS
$4,000.00
1
$4,000
'
11
Top Soil Shouldering (LV)
CY
$16.00
295
$4,720
`
12
Seeding
Ac
$2,000.00
1
$2,000
`
13
Mailbox Relocation
EA
$150.00
31
$4,650
14
Road Drainage Improvement
LS
$40,000
1
$.40+000
'
Construction Cost:
$282,630
ASSUMPTIONS:
Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =115,500 SF
Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBSICF
Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF
Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway
Construction Cost:
Contingency @ 10%:
Indirect @ 20%:
Total Project Cost:
Benefiting Units = 31
Total Cost per Benefiting Unit:
Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit
@ 7.5 % for 10 years:
SharelexceUotsege/OT910-1999 BUDGErxls
Sheet: TABLE 12
PROJECT COST
CITY COST
RESIDENT COST
$282,630
$243,390
$39,240
$28,263
$24,339
$3,924
156,526
$48,678
$L848
$367,419
$316,407
$51,012
$2,125.50
$309.66
Pe.^a 2'
FEB. 8. 1999 11:37AN NO. 755 P.1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION FOR RECEIVING REPORT AND
CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Otsego City Council adopted February 8,
1999, a report has been prepared by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. with
reference to the improvement of all existing roadways within Hall's 11t, 2nd & 3rd
Additions, Deer Field Acres and Hidden Valley plats, Walesch Estates and Walesch
Estates 2nd Addition, Otsego Acres 1st and 2nd Additions, Great River Acres 1st, 2nd and
3'd Additions, and Mason Ave. (CSAH 39 to 83rd St. NE), 83rd St. N.E. (Marlowe Ave.
NE to Mason Ave. NE), Marlowe Ave. NE (83rd St. NE to 801h St. NE), 80th St. NE
(Marlowe Ave. NE to CSAH 19) of the City of Otsego by construction of bituminous
overlays and other related improvements to such streets and this report was received
by the Council on February 3, 1999.
WHEREAS, the report provides Information regarding whether the proposed project is
necessary, cost effective, and feasible.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance
with the report and the assessment of abutting property for a portion of the
cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statues Chapter 429 at an
estimated total cost of the improvement of $1,766,376.
2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on March
11, 1999 in the Council chambers at city hall at 7:00 pm and the clerk shall
give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as
required by law.
Adopted by the Otsego City Council this 8th day of February, 1999.
Honorable Mayor Lary Fournier
Mike Robertson, Administrator
C:\Share\WPmunMOTSEGO\337\ot337RES2.doc
FEB. 8.1999 11:38AM N0.755 P. 1'j
CITY OF OTSEGO
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve streets within Hall's tat, 2"d & 3rd Additions,
Deer Field Acres and Hidden Valley plats, Walesch Estates and Walesch Estates 2nd
Addition, Otsego Acres Vt and 2nd Additions, Great River Acres IM, 2"d and 3rd
Additions, and Mason Ave. (CSAH 39 to 83`d St. NE), 83`d St. N.E. (Marlowe Ave. NE to
Mason Ave. NE), Marlow Ave. NE (83`d St. NE to 80" St. NE), 80th St. NE (Marlowe
Ave. NE to CSAH 19), and to assess the benefited property for all or a portion of the
cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA;
That the proposed improvement be referred to Hakanson Anderson Associates,
Inc. for study and that they are instructed to report to the council with all convenient
speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed
improvement is feasible and as to whether it should best be made as proposed or in
connection with some other improvement, and the estimated cost of the improvement
as recommended.
Adopted by the council this day of '1999.
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
C:kSharelWPmun(WOTSEGO\337\ot337RESt.doo
02-08-1999 02:42PM FROM
Couri & MacArthur TO 4418823 P.01
C. Cow
Michael l•
COURT & MACAR THUR
Andrew J. MacArthur
at Law
Bag
Marcus Nr mmr
705C4mrl Awnue
Po Bax 369
i
Wrhad, MN 53376-0369
4ALw awwt w
.
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
i
1
I"
Cv
i
f
FAcsimiLE COVER PAGE
i
TO: G l
OF:
FROM:
SUBJECT: '
FAX NUMBER:
DATE: C;L/
TOTAL PAGES (IN(
ADDITIONAL
AMe
UDING COVER SHEET)
IT MAY BE PRI"VII.EGED AND IS
T THE
THIS FACSAv�I.E ��USES OONT� �DRES• SFS ONLY. IF YOU ART
IN'TENDEA FO SvIISSION TO
,ADDRESSEE (OR A P SON RE5POCOS� USE 'I7�IIS TRAa�TSSSION IN ANY WAY,
THE ADDRESSEE) DOI NOT READ, HONE TO ARRANGE FOR THE
BUT PROMP'T'LY ORi IIvAL � TO US.R BY ��
RETURN OF THE
02-08-1999 02:43PM FROM
Couri & MacArthur TO
Michael C. Court-
COURI & MACARTHUR
Andrew J. M"Afthur
Attorneys at Law
Marcus W. Miller
70 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
Si. Michael, MN 55376-0369
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-259.9 (FAX)
cousian&naeanhurapobox. com
4418823 P.02
February 8, 1999
VIA FACSIMILE AND
U.S. MAEL
City Council Member
City. of Otsego
c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue 1NE
Elk Raver, MN 553301
RE: Proposed Resol6tion Approving Transfer Of Cable Television Franchise To
Bresnan Telecommunications and Waiving Right of First Refusal
Dear Council Members:
At the request of the gity, I have reviewed the documents forwarded to the City relative
to the transfer of the c1cisting City cable television franchise from Cable TV Fund 14-A,
Ltd. to Bresnan Telecommunications Company LLC. Federal law requires that certain
disclosures be made b, the buyer, and that the franchising authority approve any transfer
of substantially all of the assets of the current franchise holder prior to the transfer.
The data submitted to;the City by the buyer has been reviewed and, in my opinion, is
satisfactory. This dat> is deemed confidential and should not be released to the public.
The proposed resolution requests that the City consent to the transfer and confirm that the
current franchise hold6r is materially in compliance with the Agreement, that the
Agreement is in force; and effect, and that no present condition exists which would allow
the City to revoke or Terminate the Franchise.
The franchise is in effect at this time. Elaine has utdicated that the City has received the
payments due it under;' the franchise, and that there are no present existing unresolved
complaints regarding the franchise holder's performance at this time. Upon transfer, the
current franchise will iemain in place with the new entity (limited liability company) as
the franchise holder.
02-08-1999 02:43PM FROM Couri & MacArthur TO
Letter to Otsego City i ouncil
February 8; 1999
Page 2
441ee23 P.03
The resolution also states that the City will waive its right of first refusal granted within
the franchise. I am assuming that the City has no interest in acquiring the cable television
assets.
Based upon my revic4v of the documents and the above I would recommend that the City
adopt the proposed re6olution as drafted.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me_
Very urs,
OURI CAR''HYJR
Encl.
pc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator
02-08-1999 02:44PM FROM Couri & MacArthur TO 4418823 P.04
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO CABLE
TELEVISION FRANCHISE BY CABLE TV FUND 14-A, LTD. TO BRESNAN
TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LLC AND WAIVING THE RIGHT OF FIRST
REFUSAL TO PURCHASE THE CABLE TELEVISION SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego, Minnesota (the "Franchise Authority") granted to
Rite Cable Company sof Minnesota, Ltd. a cable television franchise/extension permit to
construct, own operates and maintain a cable television system in the City of Otsego (the
"Franchise"); and
WHEREAS, by Resolution the Franchise Authority authorized the assignment
and transfer of the Franchise to Jones Intercable, Inc. ("JIC"), and subsequently, amended the
Franchise to include ohe or more of JIC's controlled affiliates as the "Grantee" under the
Franchise; and
WHEREAS, JIC transferred the Franchise to its affiliate, Cable TV Fund 14-A,
Ltd. (the "Fund"), as the new Grantee; and
WHERE S, the Fund has agreed to sell the cable television system serving the
Franchise Authoriry (the "System"), including the Franchise, to Bresnan Communications
Company Limited Partnership (`Bresnan"), and Bresnan has agreed to purchase the System,
including the Franchisef from the Fund; and
WHEREAS, Bresnan will transfer ownership and control of the System and the
Franchise to Bresnan Telecommunications Company, LLC ('BTCLLC") ("Transferee';
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Franchise Authority hereby consents to the transfer of the Franchise and
the System from the Fund to Bresnan and, subsequently, to Bresnan Telecommunications
Company LLC (the "Transaction" ).
2. The Franchise Authority acknowledges that its consent to the Transaction shall
be effective upon the closing of the sale of the System by the Fund to Bresnan. Written notice of
the closing date shall b� given to the Franchise Authority.
3. The Franchise Authority hereby confirms that: (i) the Franchise is currently in
full force and effect; (ii) the Fund is in compliance in all material respects with the Franchise;
and (iii) no event has occurred or exists which would permit the Franchise Authority to revoke or
terminate the Franchise.
02-08-1999 02:45PM FROM Couri & MacArthur TO
4418823 P.05
4. The Franchise Authority hereby waives any right it may have by statute,
franchise or otherwise to purchase the System in respect of the sale of the System referred to
herein.
5. Franchising Authority hereby consents to and approves the assignment,
mortgage, pledge or other encumbrance, if any, of the Franchise, System, or assets relating
thereto, or the interests �j the permitted holder thereof, as collateral for a loan.
Adopted by the City of Otsego, Minnesota on
1999.
Mayor
The undersigned, being !the duly appointed, qualified, and acting Clerk of the City of Otsego,
hereby certifies that the aforegoing Resolution No. is a true, correct, and accurate copy of
Resolution No. duly and lawfully passed and adopted by the City of Otsegoon the
day of _, 1999.
0462230.01
l
2.
Clerk
TOTAL P.05
A -
0
Minnesota Department of Health
Central District Office
3400 North First Street, Suite 305
St. Cloud, MN 56303-4000
Telephone: 320/255-4216 Fax: 320/255-4264
January 28, 1999
Honorable Larry Fournier
Mayor, City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Dear Mayor Fournier:
f ..
FEB - i�
Pursuant to Minnesota Rule 4720.5130 Subpart 3, the City of Otsego is required
to prepare and submit to Minnesota Department of Health a wellhead protection
plan for all wells in the public water supply system when you connect another
well to your municipal public water supply. A wellhead protection plan must be
completed and submitted within two years from this date unless your public
water supply system qualifies for additional time as specified in the wellhead
protection rule.
Wellhead protection (WHP) is a program intended to prevent contaminants from
entering wells used by public water supply systems. The emphasis is on
preventing problems before they occur, supporting public health protection, and
the protection of the resources you have invested in your public water supply
system.
As noted above rule provisions do provide for additional time periods to prepare
a WHP Plan. The rule grants additional six-month time periods for each of the
following:
♦ each two existing or new wells up to six,<+.5 >
♦ privately owned systems,
♦ lack of state or local funding,<+.5>
♦ the wellhead protection area is within more than one governmental
jurisdiction, and
♦ the wellhead protection area is influenced by another public water supply well
that is not in the public water system.
The City of Otsego is to complete a WHP plan three years from the date the new
well is connected and online. This determination is based on the first three
criteria listed above. If it is determined during the delineation of the wellhead
protection area, that your wellhead protection area qualifies for the last two
Mayor Larry Fournier/ page 2
criteria listed above you will be automatically granted 6 months for each criteria
you meet
The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is committed to providing you with a
high level of assistance and technical support in this endeavor. I have been
assigned as a primary contact to work with you as you develop your WHP Plan.
I will be contacting you in the near future to discuss requirements and how to get
started. MDH will also sponsor a wellhead protection plan development
workshop that will be targeted for public water suppliers just beginning the
wellhead protection planning effort. Additional workshops will target specific plan
elements including delineation and vulnerability assessments, contaminant
source inventories, and other plan components.
There are several initial steps you must take to ensure development of an
effective WHP Plan. The first step is to identify a Wellhead Protection Plan
Manager. This individual will coordinate plan development and implementation
and serve as the principal contact for MDH. A public water supplier should also
budget for plan development and implementation over the time required to
develop and implement the plan.
Enclosed for your information is a fact sheet entitled "The Ten Most Asked
Questions About Wellhead Protection" which discusses wellhead protection
planning in Minnesota. We look forward to working with you to provide your
customers with a safe and healthy water supply. If you have questions, please
contact me.
Sincerely,
1M4ikeHoVwe, Planner
Source Water Protection Unit
C: Mike Robertson, Administrator; Elaine Beatty, Clerk; Larry Koshak, Engineer
•
MINNESOTA
WELLHEAD
PROTECTION
THE TEN MOST ASKED QUESTIONS
ABOUT WELLHEAD PROTECTION
1. What is wellhead protection all about? Wellhead protection is a method of preventing well con-
tamination by effectively managing potential contaminant sources in the area that contributes water to the
well. This area is known as the wellhead protection area. The Minnesota Groundwater Protection Act
of 1989 grants the commissioner of health authority to develop wellhead protection measures for wells
serving public water supplies. Also, the 1986 Amendments to the federal Safe Drinking Water Act require
states to implement wellhead protection programs for public water supply wells.
2. What is a public water supply well? A public water supply well provides piped drinking water for human
use to 15 or more service connections or to 25 or more persons for at least 60 days a year. A public
water supply well is further defined as either a community or noncommunity water supply well.
A community water supply well serves 15 or more service connections used by year-round residents or
at least 25 year-round residents. Examples include municipalities, subdivisions, and nursing homes.
Noncommunity water supply wells are divided into two groups:
• A nontransient noncommunity supply well serves at least 25 of the same people over six months of the
year. Examples include schools, factories, and hospitals.
• A transient noncommunity supply well serves all other public water systems. Examples include
restaurants, gas stations, and churches.
3. What is in it for me, the public water supplier? The wellhead protection program provides owners of
public water supply wells with another 'tool' that will be used to provide a safe drinking water supply to
their customers. The long-term goals are to 1) reduce the use of costly treatment facilities, 2) avoid drilling
new wells, and 3) avoid cleaning up contaminated groundwater.
4. How does wellhead protection affect the drinking water supply? The purpose of wellhead protection
is to manage potential contamination at its source. This means that the water coming to the well will
continue to be of high quality.
5. What will be required of me, a public water supplier? All public water suppliers are required to:
A. Maintain the isolation distances from potential contamination sources defined in the state Well Code;
B. Monitor noncomplying sources located on their property; and
C. Report to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) other violations to the isolation distance, or ask
a local governmental unit to regulate these sources.
In addition to maintaining the isolation distances, owners of community and nontransient noncommunity
wells must develop a wellhead protection plan which includes:
A. A map of the wellhead protection area,
B. A vulnerability assessment of the well and the wellhead protection area,
C. An inventory of potential sources of contamination within the wellhead protection area,
D. A plan to manage and monitor existing or proposed potential source(s) of contamination, and
E. An emergency response plan.
6. Will all wellhead protection plans look alike? All plans will not look alike because the geologic
setting, the political setting, and the land use within the wellhead protection area are not the same. For
example, the inventory of potential sources of contaminants for a vulnerable well will include all types
of sources. The inventory of a nonvulnerable well will include only those uses which penetrate the
geologic layer that protects the contributing water to the well.
7. How much does it cost, and who will pay to prepare these plans? The cost to prepare a plan will
vary greatly. It is too early to determine cost but will be dependent on the geology of the area. It will be
the responsibility of the public water supplier to pay for this work. However, there appears to be a
number of low-interest loans available as well as support from local, state, and federal planning and
groundwater protection programs. As information is known, it will be shared with the public water
supplier when they are required to prepare a wellhead protection plan.
8. When will I need to start this wellhead protection program? All public water suppliers are required
to oversee the management of the isolation distances and will be phased into the program between
June 1998 and June 2003.
Municipalities are required to prepare a wellhead protection plan when they add a well to their water
supply system.
Also, owners of community wells and nontransient noncommunity wells are required to prepare a
wellhead protection plan when notified by MDH. The phasing is based on well vulnerability, population
served, and availability of resources.
9. How much time do I have to develop a wellhead protection plan? The time allowed to prepare a
plan for all of the wells in a public water supply system will vary from two to five years. It is based on
1) the number of wells in the system, 2) the availability of funding, 3) whether the system is privately
owned, and 4) the number of governmental jurisdictions involved.
10. Once it is completed and approved by MDH, who sees that the plan is implemented? It is up to
the public water supplier to implement the plan on property under their jurisdiction. Areas outside of
their jurisdiction will be addressed through participation by state and local agencies.
Minnesota Department of Health
Source Water Protection Unit
Drinking Water Protection Section
P.O. Box 64975
St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975
IC #141-0170 (6198)
To request this document in another format, call:
Unit Receptionist - (651) 215-0800,
Division TDD - (651) 215-0707, or
Minnesota Relay Service for Greater Minnesota -
1-800-627-3529 (ask for (651 ] 215-0800).
JAN 29 '99 10:37PM LEAGU Nr_ CITIES
P.1
?, /. L
..�..FRIDAYFAx Number 4
A weeldy legislative update from the League of Minnesota Cities January 29, 1999
Governor recommends replacing
HACA, extending levy limits
Gov. Ventura announced his
budget recommendations for the
2000-2001 biennium yesterday.
The centerpieces of his budget are
a billion dollar sales tax rebate and
a permanent income tax cut. But
what will impact city governance
most directly are his proposals to
extend levy limits and to sunset
most major city and county aid
programs including LGA and
HACA.
)v Ventura's budget
„ummary states:
Minnesota's property tax and local
aid system is overly complex and
it makes localities less accountable
for their local revenue raising and
spending decisions. State pay-
ments in local aid help shield
taxpayers from the true cost of
local spending. Too much aid is
distributed without understandable
rationale --without regard to either
a jurisdiction's relative wealth or
need.
The governor recommends estab-
lishing a Tax Reform Study Com-
mission to devise a new intergov-
ernmental finance system that.
Better targets assistance to
individuals who need property
tax relief;
• Reallocates local government
aids so property tax burdens
are more fairly distributed
among different types of
property and regions of the
state; and,
• Better targets aids to local
governments based on pro-
gram needs and local revenue
capacity.
The commission's recommenda-
tions
ecommendstions will be included in the
governor's F.Y. 2002-03 budget.
The governor's budget calls for
the continuation of levy limits until
the new system is in place. The
governor's budget does not in-
clude the repeal of the sales tax
on local government purchases.
The governor's budget also
includes new transit funding. He
recommends $60 million for light
rail and $18.6 million for greater
Minnesota transit and Metro
Mobility operations. The governor
recommends cutting the Motor
Vehicle Registration Fee by nearly
$200 million per year. The gover-
nor recommends covering the
deficit this would cause in the
highway user tax distribution fund
with general fund transfers.
The budget includes $16 million for
the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency for programs to retain
affordable rental housing that
promotes self-sufficiency, and to
develop new affordable housing in
cooperation with private and
nonprofit entities.
Proposed budget cuts include
$22 million for the Dislocated
Worker Fund at the Department of
LGA and
Trade and Economic Development.
The money would be transferred
to the general fund to pay for other
services that benefit dislocated
workers. Funding for the Board
of Government Innovation and
Cooperation would be eliminated.
The bulk of new spending recom-
mended by the governor is in the
areas of K-12 and higher educa-
tion, which would receive $561
million and $248 million respec-
tively. The governor also recom-
mends using $1.3 billion in one-
time tobacco settlement revenues
to establish endowment funds to
improve the health of the citizens
of the state and to conduct medical
research and education.
Sales tax repeal
bill hearing
The House tax committee is
hearing H.F.52, authored by
Rep. Bill Haas (R -Champlin)
that would reinstate the sales
tax exemption for local govern-
ment purchases. No action is
expected to be taken on the
bill today. We will report on the
hearing in next week's Cities
Bulletin.
_._.r.._
,,W Relations teen.
a__..... -,,..#,..i _u month., of the Learus of M
mnesota Cities Intergorernnr
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Transportation Building
395 John Ireland Boulevard
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899
January 26, 1999
76
John Harwood
City of Otsego Engineer
Hakanson Anderson & Associates
3601 Thurston Ave.
Anoka, MN 55303
RE: Notice of Annual Apportionment
Dear Mr. Harwood:
FEB - 1 1999
;t
The following 1999 allotments have been credited to the City of Otsego's state aid accounts in
compliance with the 1999 Commissioner's Order, and will be released in accordance with the
current rules.
General Allotment
Trunk Highway Turnback
Less: General Fund
Advance Repayment
Total
Maintenance Construction
$76,592.00 $229,774.00
0.00
$76,592.00 $229,774.00
If you have any questions, please contact Cindy Degener at (651) 296-7414, or Brad Kennedy
at (651) 297-3740, of the State Aid.Finance Office.
Since y,
EIn klenberg
Commissioner of Trans
',- cc: City Clerk
An equal opportunity employer
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAGE — 1
ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55155'.
' OF OTSEGO, CITY OF
STATUS OF MUNICIPAL STATE AID ACCOUNTS AS OF 98/12/31
MAINTENANCE-;.,.,. CONSTRUCTION
' UNEXPENDED BALANCE
S 0.00 $ 762,910.52
I ALLOTMENT
77, 001.00 ' ` 231, 002.00
TOTAL
77,001.00 993,912.52
)SITS
0.00 .; 0.00
x 1t y s+
)TMENT TRANSFERS
, 0 00 ,, - 0 00
+�
1URSMENTS
./7, 001.00
UNEXPENDED BALANCE
0.00 993,912.52
ENCUMBRANCES
X0100 , ,• 0 00 tom, ,
BALANCE AVAILABLE
�:N>'" { i> '.i0.00� ` i 993,912 52.,J
•' t t aka W d z '.. s
ALLOTMENT
EMCUMBRANCES s :."FtiY.: sr�'.'r' �£ c'i; . ufi .vxrM�.F '. tk , : yes...
'ROJECT NO
AMOUNT
TOTAL
0.00 )1 STs
4i. :r. r y ..t � � Z.s. 3 a x n yrs $,¢�,, � d� � �xt��" �f z � � x •.,u'
s �` Yt au<x'i'.-. b "f''»x r� ��.1, t ,,
r c rx •
$ '�. ' �,�„��.}4�Y,�
��
'a,..
.
(1'Ri. "i i':¢ L Y ,`;. .�.�, v�'1.-.f�P� .'ii�X3E� ;Z�s. •' 1 .sl (.. .�ci ..... ..
d � a�},{� {�. S' M ^� a. 9 `L�g x ��! �.s �x �b �.,� <1Z a f+4t'Y�R` $t �`•, n �� - •�'xk
I +t,v+�! a�+ trb,�'o7 a �?rx r r �y t �+,,,•at (_
Eyre'
° �''i��h•. ' `L►.i��,"�:.'
t .,!�< •�� �; 4, •x, k,�x' :°+„�;a", ,� ppp � ," �•-
'i} ..�y.. , y °.•! :TfY�l*i� g`��» .�.z♦. •:..,..Y. f.�.���: :t L'• ''��r�a4.i.3TL1 ro,:,�..1, �.... (�
r•.�.{ �r�7�l��y�' 1 F N•���' �,b
.
� ..! .y,�i t� .. .. �y Y. l( + 0. �.. �r.�
, f• 7 }.n C F ! n`P"' f f !"s+' tiJ��ip�f; r _ i
Yd
,d{ i,
5ti
4iy <r, �.r 3p�„F�r�'S•€{�pi(�i f x144 x'
1 l ..Y .. ,,.. .'1s •t .'.i r: i�i1:i ..i:'.;`ii�§��1t..' . t. .., ..b'...
CLAIMS LIST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 8, 1999
TO: City Council
Attached is the Claims List for your consideration.
The grand total you are considering is as follows:
Batch 02-04-99 $ 27,239.92
GRAND TOTAL $ 27,239.92
If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me
know.
Judy Hudson
Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
A Feb 19°9 C W 12 Litt Page 1
Thu 5:22 AM CITY OF OTSEGO
Name
Ba' me 020399
4T.
AT&T
AT&T
BANK OF ELK RIVER
BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE
BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
BOY SCOUTS TROOP 190
BOYER TRUCKS
ST OFFICE PRODUCTS
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURT MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
DUERRS WATERCARE SERVICE
DUE""ATERCARE SERVICE
ECI 'SHERS INC
ECM rucLISHERS INC
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
_LK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
LK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO
GIRL SCOUTS TROOP 137
GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
Dept
Description
Culture and Rec (GENERAL)
Administration
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Debt Service (GENERAL)
Recycling
Recycling
Administration
Culture and Rec (GENERAL)
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
Sanitary Sewer Construction
Administration
Legal Services
Legal Services
Sanitary Sewer Construction
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Sanitary Sewer Construction
Administration
Sanitary Sewer Construction
Sanitary Sewer Construction
General Govt Buildings -8899
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
Culture and Rec (GENERAL)
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Street Lighting
Old Town Hall
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Old Town Hall
Administration
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
Culture and Rec (GENERAL)
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Comments
Phone
Phone
Phone
1991 GO IMP Interest
Recycling
Recycling
Supplies
Donation from Park & Rec
Parts for 81 Truck
Supplies
Advert bids sewer plant
Long Haul Trucking
Legal General Services
Litigation
Wastewater Treatment
Odean Avenue
Precision Line
Dayton Sewer Agree
Apex
Water Tower
Elk River Collision
Knutson
LavedUre Site
Salt for City Hall
Supplies for Maint
Legal noticing
Winter Fest Advert
Antelope Park
Country Ridge
96th St
94th & Nashua
42 & Parrish
88th & Parrish
85th & Parrish
101 & 130
39 & Page
CSAH 39
39 & Nashua
Flashers 39
39/ 101 Signal
Shop
Old City Hall
Final Bill Peavey House
Printing Supplies
Appraiser
Short Term Disability
Short Term Disability
Donation from Park & Rec
Parts for 92 Truck
Transaction Batch
Amount Name
5.63 020399
28.70 020399
28.84 020399
3,906.25 020399
101.25 020399
317.50 020399
490.69 020399
50.00 020399
13.81 020399
25.88 020399
205.90 020399
68.00 020399
2,198.00 020399
96.00 020399
2,106.10 020399
109.00 020399
586.50 020399
137.10 020399
68.00 020399
19.20 020399
272.00 020399
127.50 020399
2,078.65 020399
24.30 020399
27.90 020399
106.09 020399
464.63 020399
62.20 020399
46.65 020399
39.41 020399
7.77 020399
33.55 020399
12.78 020399
12.78 020399
16.93 020399
7.99 020399
32.38 020399
12.78 020399
36.68 020399
308.81 020399
64.00 020399
198.79 020399
28.89 020399
239.63 020399
2,127.00 020399
26.69 020399
54.00 020399
50.00 020399
121.11 020399
4 Feb 1999 Clams List Page 2
Thu 5:22 AM CITY OF OTSEGO
Name
5 dame 020399
GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
JERRY OLSON
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST
LONG & SONS
LYLE H NAGELL CO INC.
MAMA
MINNEGASCO
MLNNEGASCO
MN COUNTIES INSURANCE TRUST
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
NORTHERN AIRGAS
PITNEY BOWES
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
P'" EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FO
F EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
PUBLiC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
RANDY'S SANITATION
SOFTRONICS
STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION
TARGET STORES
TARGET STORES
TRAUT WELLS
TRUE VALUE
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY
'BRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
;!RIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
WRICaT-HENNEPIN CO-OP
DEPT
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC
Dept
Description
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Hwys, Streets, 3 Roads
Administration
Administration
Building Inspections
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
General Govt Buildings -8899
Sanitary Sewer Construction
Administration
General Govt Buildings -8899
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Hwys, Streets, b Roads
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Hwys, Streets, b Roads
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Administration
Administration
Hwys, Streets, & Roads
Assessing
Recycling
Administration
Culture and Rec
(GENERAL)
Hwys,
Streets, &
Roads
Water
Utilities
(GENERAL)
Hwys,
Streets, b
Roads
Culture
and Rec
(GENERAL)
Hwys,
Streets, &
Roads
Administration
Administration
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Street
Lighting
Comments
Parts for IH Truck
Parts for 81 Truck
PPE 1-9-99
PPE 1-9-99
PPE 1-23-99
PPE 1-23-99
January Services
Life Ins
Life Ins
Cleaning January
appraisals
Otsego City Adm 99 Dues
City Hall
Old Town Hall
99 Dues Drug b Alcohol
92 Truck parts
IH Truck parts
81 Truck parts
Case Tractor parts
Miscell parts
Oxygen
Postage rental
PPE 1-23-99
PPE 1-23-99
PPE 1-23-99
PPE 1-23-99
January recycling
Labor -fix problem comput
PPE 1-23-99 1141923 Olson
Winter Fest
Miscell for Shop
Repair Well 11
Miscel
Phone service Shed
Phone service Shop
Phone service City Hall
County Maps
Palmgren Ave
Palmgren Ave
Ogren & 71st
71st St
37 & Odean
72nd & Odean
37 S Odean West
Rolling Ridge Creek
Ogren Ave
Ogren Ave
Parell
Parell
Transaction Batch
Amount Name
10.62 020399
372.75 020399
499.31 020399
192.31 020399
422.39 020399
192.31 020399
841.94 020399
29.60 020399
26.85 020399
435.58 020399
400.00 020399
45.00 020399
558.48 020399
464.84 020399
50.00 020399
37.18 020399
7.97 020399
30.28 020399
79.14 020399
337.57 020399
17.52 020399
23.35 020399
251.34 020399
188.23 020399
455.32 020399
56.98 020399
262.50 020399
175.00 020399
50.00 020399
20.50 020399
37.20 020399
1,866.54 020399
41.06 020399
36.13 020399
52.11 020399
345.98 020399
25.76 020399
7.02 020399
7.89 020399
11.76 020399
11.76 020399
7.89 020399
11.76 020399
7.89 020399
11.76 020399
11.76 020399
11.76 020399
7.02 020399
7.02 020399
4 Feb 1999 Cl1lse Lllt Page 3
Thu 5:22 AM CITY OF OTSEGO
Dept Tr#neection Bitch
Napa Description Comments Amount Name
8aC�....ame 020399
4 IGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Parell
7.89
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
72nd Street
11.76
020399
'ARIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
72nd Street
11.76
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Palmgren Ave
7.89
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Rolling Ridge Creek
11.76
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Odell Cir
11.76
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Oday Cir
11.76
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
83rd Cul de Sac
7.02
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
General
Govt Buildings -8899
City Hall
669.38
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
General
Govt Buildings -8899
City Hall
7.02
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Water Utilities (GENERAL)
Otsego Well #1
18.88
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
General
Govt Buildings -8899
Shed
25.42
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Signal Light
169.00
020399
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP
ELECTRIC
Street
Lighting
Ouaday & 42 Siren
8.79
020399
Grand Total
27,239.92