Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
12-14-98 CC
CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 4. Open Forum:(5 Minute Limit) Elaine Beatty Council of: 12/14/98-6:30PM ITEM NUI -SER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: 4.1.SPECIAL PRESENTATION: A. Senator Mark Ourada and Representative Bruce Anderson - Discussion with Mayor and Council of legislative issues. B. Jay Swanson, Resident and Tom Constant, P & R - Discussion of a newly formed Otsego Snowmobile Club. BACKGROUND- A. Senator Ourada and Representative Anderson will be here to give information and answer questions of Mayor & Council. B. Jay Swanson and Tom Constant will give information to the Mayor and Council on the new Otsego Snowmobile Club and be present to answer any questions. RECOW4ENDATION: These items A and B are for council information and questions. Thanks, Elaine ABDO ABDO . EICTK7�& Orlifled Addir : krnuntrurla R' L nc uldmh. —^_41 (dim, 1—in, utile 2191 116111ral.,6. V 1:n Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Otsego Otsego, Minnesota I CL / 'r:.Nr November 17, 1998 copy We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide for the City of Otsego for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000. We will audit the general purpose financial statements of the City of Otsego as of and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000. The objective of our audit is the expression of an opinion as to whether the general purpose financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Our audit will be conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards and the standards for financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, and will include tests of the accounting records of the City of Otsego and other procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express such an opinion. If our opinion on the general purpose financial statements is other than unqualified, we will fully discuss the reasons with you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to express an opinion, we may decline to express an opinion or may not issue a report as a result of this engagement. The management of the City of Otsego is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of the controls. The objectives of internal control are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use of disposition, that transactions are executed in accordance with management's authorizations and recorded properly to permit the preparation of general purpose financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In planning and performing our audits, we will consider the internal control sufficient to plan the audit in order to determine the nature, timing and extent of our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinions on the City of Otsego's general purpose financial statements. We will obtain an understanding of the design of the relevant controls and whether they have been placed in operations, and we will assess control risk. Tests of controls may be performed to test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting errors and fraud that are material to the general purpose financial statements and to preventing and detecting misstatements resulting from illegal acts and other noncompliance matters that have a direct and material effect on the general purpose financial statements. (Tests of controls are required only if control risk is assessed below the maximum level.) Our tests, if performed, will be less in scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on internal control and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed. 0,12.10-1).'90M • Raxn12.83.73,1261 City of Otsego r November 17, 1998 Page Two An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify reportable conditions. However, we will inform the governing body or audit committee of any matters involving internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the design or operation of the internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the entity's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data consistent with the assertions of management in the general purpose financial statements. Identifying and ensuring that the City complies with laws, resolutions, contracts and agreements is the responsibility of management. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, we will perform tests of the City's compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and agreements. However, the objective of our audit will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and we will not express such an opinion. Our procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with selected individuals, creditors and financial institutions. We will request written representations from your attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this inquiry. At the conclusion of our audit, we will also require certain written representations from you about the financial statements and related matters. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. We will plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable rather than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that a material misstatement may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed to detect errors, fraud or other illegal acts that are immaterial to the general purpose financial statements. However, we will inform you of any material errors and any fraud that comes to our attention. We will also inform you of any other illegal acts that come to our attention, unless clearly inconsequential. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our audit and does not extend to matters that might arise during any later periods for which we are not engaged as auditors. An audit of the general purpose financial statements performed in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards is not designed to determine whether the computer systems of the City are Year 2000 compliant, or to provide any assurance on whether the City has addressed all of the affected systems on a timely basis. further, we have no responsibility with regard to the systems of vendors, service providers or any other third parties. These are responsibilities of the City's management. However, we may choose to communicate matters that come to our attention relating to the Year 2000 Issue. City of Otsego November 17, 1998 �c r Page Three A Management is responsible for making all financial records and related information available to us. We understand that you will provide us with such information required for our audit and that you are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of that information. We will advise you about appropriate accounting principles and their application and will assist in the preparation of your financial statements, but the responsibility for the financial statements remains with you. That responsibility includes the establishment and maintenance of adequate records and effective internal control over financial reporting, the selection and application of accounting principles, and the safeguarding of assets. We understand that your employees will prepare all cash or other confirmations we request and will locate any invoices selected by us for testing. The workpapers for this engagement are the property of Abdo, Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP and constitute confidential information. Our fees for these services will be at our standard hourly rates plus out-of-pocket costs (such as report reproduction, typing, postage, travel, copies, telephone, etc.) except that we agree that our gross fee, including expenses, should not exceed $4,500 for each year of the three year period. We may incur additional audit costs relating to the utility expansion currently in progress. This may result in additional fees. We will provide detail on any additional billing relating to the utility expansion. Our standard hourly rates vary according to the degree of responsibility involved and the experience level of the personnel assigned to your audit. Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work progresses and are payable on presentation. The above fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the audit. If significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee estimate before we incur the additional costs. Government Auditing Standards require that we provide you with a copy of our most recent quality control review report. Our 1996 peer review report accompanies this letter. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City and believe this letter accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions, please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter, please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us. Sincerely, ABDO, ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP Certified Public Accountants Steven R. McDonald, CPA RESPONSE: This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the City of Otsego. Signature: Title: Date: City of Otsego November 17, 1998 Page Four CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 11 16. Dan Licht, Assistant City Planner Elaine Beatty, City C-erk Counci- of: 12/14/98-6:302M ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: 6.1. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Amendments directed by Comprehensive Plan (Rural Cluster Development) 6.2. Any other Planning Business BACKGROUND: 6.1. The Planning Commission held the public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance Amendments directed by the comp. plan for the Rural Cluster Development Area and the Mayor and Council were present. Dan Licht will explain the changes to the Council and be present to answer any questions. A copy of the proposed amendment is attached. If the Council approves the Rural Cluster Development Area Zoning Ordinance directed by the Comp. Plan, please also approve the summary of same for publication. 6.2. This item is for any other Planning Business that needs Council's attention. RECOW412HIA21ON • This is for Council consideration for approval Thanks, Elaine DEC -03-1998 09:59 NAC 612 595 9e3? P.02 N MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission Scott Richards 3 December 1998 J LTANTS RESEARCH Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Update: Rural Cluster District Ordinance 176.08 - 98.07 Please find attached a revision to the proposed Ordinance amendment to implement cluster open space development requirements within the Rural Residential Preserve Area. These changes reflect the discussion of the Planning Commission and City Council at the joint meeting of November 30, 1998. The revisions include: Page 5, 20-77-7.A.1. Area Regulations. Language was added to clarify the request by the City Council and Planning Commission members that park land dedication would be taken out of the 50% open space area and not the buildable areas of a residential project. Page 12, Figure 77-D.3. Staff is unclear if any changes to this graphic were recommended. Specific design elements such as boulevards, one-way streets, etc. would be dealt with at the time of development proposal submitted. The graphic is intended only to give an example of a development layout and should likely not be made more specific. Page 14, 20-77-8.E. Building Design. The percentage of garage area facing the front of the lot has been reduced from fifty percent to forty percent. Page 14, 20-77-8.F. Landscaping. Provisions one and two related to vegetation were removed, but three remains as it relates to tree preservation standards. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM DEC -03-1998 09:59 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03 Page 15, 20-77-9. B.2 Storm Water Management. The word "basin" was changed to "basic". Page 1S, 20-77-9.C.4. Property Owners Association. The last sentence was clarified to change the word "ease" to "each" and the word "such" was removed. Page 17, Section 3.8.4. The wording "Except in the case of manufactured homes" was removed. Page 17, Section 3.B.S. The words "principal building were added to clarify that sentence. Page 18, Section 4. The reference to "R -O" was changed to "R -C". These changes will be discussed as part of the joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting/hearing on December 7, 1998. 2 DEC -03-1998 10:00 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #98 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add Section 77 as follows: SECTION 77 R -C, RESIDENTIAL -RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DISTRICT Section 20-77-1: Purpose 20-77-2: Permitted Uses 20-77-3: Interim Uses 20-77-4: Accessory Uses 20-77-5: Conditional. Uses 20-77-6: Density 20-77-7: Open Space Performance Standards 20-77-8: Neighborhood Performance Standards 20-77-9: General Development Standards 20-77-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the R -C District is to implement the goals and policies with regard to the Rural Residential Preserve Axea as defined within the Comprehensive Plan. Residential development within the Rural Residential Preserve is encouraged to be clustered in a pattern which satisfies the following planning objectives: A. Preservation of contiguous common open spaces for scenic enjoyment, recreational use, and rural identity. B. Creation of cohesive neighborhoods in order to establish local identity and community interaction. C. Physical integration of neighborhoods, open spaces, and places of destination in order to establish municipal identity and community interaction. D. The diagrams are provided to demonstrate graphically the purpose of the R -C District, its performance standards and strategies by which the internal development pattern described in this Section may be achieved. E_ Creative application of this section is encouraged while preserving its purpose and intent. DEC -03-1998 10:00 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05 20-77-2: PERMITTED USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted uses in the R -C District: A. Single family detached dwellings. B. Farms, farmsteads, farming and agricultural related buildings and structures subject to Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, but not including animal feedlots or other commercial operations. C. Public parks, playgrounds, recreational uses, wildlife areas and game refuges. D. Forestry, nurseries, greenhouses, and tree farms excluding retail sales. E. Day care facilities, as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter, licensed by the State and serving twelve (12) or fewer persons. F. Residential care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. G. Essential services. H. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-3: INTERIM USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are interim uses in the R -C District and are governed by Section 35 of this Chapter. A. Reserved. 20-77-4: ACCESSORY USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted accessory uses in the R -C District: A. Operation and storage of such vehicles, equipment and machinery which are incidental and customary to permitted or conditional uses allowed in this district. H. Home occupations as regulated by Section 28 of this Chapter. C. Private recreational vehicles and equipment. D. Swimming pool, tennis courts and other recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests. E. Tool houses, sheds and similar buildings for storage of domestic and farm supplies and non-commercial recreational equipment. 2 DEC -03-1998 10:01 NAC 612 595 983? P.06 F. Private garages, parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks. G. Fences. H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs, short -wavy radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-5: CONDITIONAL USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are conditional uses allowed in an R -C District: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter.) A. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the City, provided that: 1. The property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. H. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses and country clubs, swimming pools and similar facilities provided that: 1. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character. 2. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area up to a ma ---mum of four thousand (4,000) square feet of the site shall, be covered by buildings or structures. 3. The use will not negatively impact abutting or neighboring existing or potential residential uses. 4. when abutting a residential use or a residential use distract, the property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 5. The traffic generated by the use can be adequately accommodated (both volume and weight) upon the City streets serving the property upon which the use is located. 6. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 3 DEC -03-1998 10:02 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07 C. Cemeteries, provided that: 1. At minimum, the site accesses on a major collector. 2. The site is landscaped in accordance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 3. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are nsidered and determined to be satisfied. Mini g, sand and gravel extraction, land reclamation and alt ation provided that: 1. The use will be in compliance with the provisions of Sections 24 and 25 of this Chapter and other applicable provisions of the City Code. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. E. Temporary seasonal sales of products produced on site (farms only) as regulated by Section 20-26-8 of this Chapter. F. The keeping of horses and farm animals, not including feedlots, as regulated by Section 20-27-4.B of this Chapter. G. Planned unit development as regulated by Section 36 of this Chapter. H. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-6: DSNSiTY:The maximum permitted density within the R -C District shall be ten (10) units per forty (40) acres, subject to the following: A. All development within the R -C District shall be subject to planning for cluster development as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter and regulated by this section. s. The subdivision is processed according to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 20-77-7: OPEN SPACE PERFORZMXCE STANDARD5: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development must provide common open spaces, in addition to park dedication requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, in a site design appropriate to the location of building lots, consistency with the following provisions, subject to review and approval of the City Council. 4 DEC -03-1998 10:02 NAC A. B. 612 595 9837 F.08 Area Regulations. 1. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the net buildable land subdivided for development shall be dedicated to open space consisting of natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, and/or pedestrian corridor open space (see Figure 77-A). Land to be dedicated to conform with park dedication requirements of Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance may be taken from the fifty (50) percent of net buildable area referenced above. 2. All designated open space shall be platted as outlot parcels held as open space in perpetuity. 3. Each open space outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or pedestrian corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification. FIGURE 77-A Natural habitat, pedestrian corridor and neighborhood recreation open spaces are located on the development site according to the type of use. •4- I�:atural Habitat Neighborhood 'Pedestrian Corridor. Recreation _ r � _. { ? , : � - _ `�` �_•••.-:sem- :r-�� Location Criteria. Open space outlots shall be located on the development site according to the following locational criteria: DEC -03-1998 10:03 NAC 612 595 9837 P.09 1. View Sheds. The open space outlots shall preserve the maximum quantity of view shed open space for the anticipated homesite lots on the development tracts (see Figure 77-B). FIGURE 77-B View sheds are directional vistas from a homesite between tree stands and other neighborhood structures. ..: '`.•tom-.� �..;,�;.•,.. -'.�:: �':_`�-,' �•�='-' � �`.r: 'ter Via• - - �• ' � 'Viewshed 2. Natural Habitat. The development shall preserve the maximum quantity of natural habitat open spaces in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural agricultural habitat open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, pastures, wetlands, elopes, bluffs, dense woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shorelands, and other environmentally sensitive areas or desirable view sheds. 3. Pedestrian Corridors. The development shall locate pedestrian corridor open spaces in strategic places such that larger open space outlots and designated places of destination both on the development tract and adjacent tracts are connected with one another_ Pedestrian corridor open spaces may include, but are not limited to, established regional trails, local pathways, paved walkways, and shorelines. Pedestrian corridor outlots shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. A DEC -03-1998 10:03 NAC 612 595 9837 P.10 4. Neighborhood Recreation. The development shall locate neighborhood recreation open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood of surrounding homesites, at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, defined by coherent boundaries, and accessible to all neighbor:iood residents. Neighborhood recreation open spaces may include, but are not limited to, greens, commons., playgrounds, ballfields, gardens, or other recreational areas. C. Accessibility. Open spaces shall be accessible to pedestrians at not less than one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) foot intervals along public streets. Where necessary, pedestrian access corridor outlots between private lots shall be at least twenty (20) feet in width. D. Deed Restrictions. Deed restrictions shall be recorded upon all open space outlots at the time of subdivision specifying allowed use of the outlot in conformance with its open space classification. .Amendments to the allowed uses of the open space outlots shall be subject to approval of the City Council. 1. Natural habitat open spaces shall be considered conservation easements and are for responsible use and enjoyment as passive open space, pasture or agricultural fields. Construction in these areas shall be limited to trails (paved or unpaved), open air shelters, bridges, benches, bird houses, wood fencing, communal drainfields, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 2. Neighborhood recreation open spaces shall be used for active or passive recreational purposes, including gardening. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved walkways, open air shelters, bird houses, garden storage sheds no larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet, wood fencing, landscaping planting, play equipment, outdoor furniture, facilities for active recreation, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 3. Pedestrian corridor open space shall be used for pedestrian or bicycle travel. Motorized vehicles shall be prohibited. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved pathways, wood fencing, and landscape planting. Other uses or structures may be allowed by City Council approval. 4. Habitable structures shall not be permitted in any open space outlot. 7 DEC -03-1998 10:04 NAC 612 595 9837( P.11 E. Ownership and Management. Each designated open space outlot shall be owned and managed according to one of the following means, subject to City Council approval. 1. Open space may be owned in common by the property owners created through subdivision of the original tract. Management shall be the responsibility of that subdivision's homeowner association. In the case where at least one (1) outlot of open space is held in common ownership, a homeowner association shall be established for that subdivision and membership in the association by all property owners in the subdivision shall be mandatory. 2. Open space may be deeded to an established land trust. Management shall be the responsibility of the land trust. Maintenance may be performed by the neighborhood homeowner association, through written agreement between the association and the land trust. 3. Open space may be deeded to the City of Otsego, subject to acceptance by the City Council. Management shall be the responsibility of the City. 20-77-8: NZIGNBORH00D PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development is intended to promote neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes and configurations. Review and approval of the subdivision by the City Council shall be based upon an evaluation that the proposed development plan provides a cohesive neighborhood(s) in a site design appropriate to the location of common open spaces consistent with the following provisions: A. Neighborhood Configuration. 1. To establish a cohesive neighborhood unit, residential lots shall be located in a neighborhood cluster. A neighborhood cluster shall include a minimum of five (5) lots or twenty-five (25) percent of the allowable number of lots on the parcel to be subdivided, whichever is greater. An efficiency of land utilization and community development should be encouraged by maximizing the number of lots in any one cluster development, while adhering to the underlying density and open space requirements of this Chapter (see Figure 77-C). Development of neighborhood clusters is encouraged in locations which minimize the visual impact of the development on the landscape to the greatest extent reasonably possible. DEC -03-1998 10:05 NAC 612 595 9837 P.12 FIGURE 77-C.1 An example of a neighborhood cluster development pattern encouraged by this section. C+ To _ .Or �• .Y r� FIGURE 77-C.3 Example of a cul-de-sac development pattern that is discouraged by this section. w. fl�:i,�:, • rtf „��,,, �r�y :•• - .y. •r:.'�• l��� M� � �,r�,� ; � f r' L" . '•r -t• ,.+ ;7i �Y` r!�..,#�.°�\.�Vl..r ,"r.7fj Yti� .iia\ __. �.1•� Y � .. •i �f~r � � ..�. _ J __ �•�r :h ,•'L•• �. ,T 2. A neighborhood cluster shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which all residential units share in common (see Figure 77-D). Neighborhood identity may be established by one or more of the following features: 9 DEC -03-1998 10:05 NAC 612 595 9837 P.13 a. View Shed. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will take visual advantage of a field, wetlands, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. Physical Amenity. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will face a green, playground, ballfield, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. C. Streetscape. The lots may be arranged such that the principle structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, boulevards, medians, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. FIGURE 77-D.1 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a view shed or a physical amenity. .,�. •ti i •ter ��'-"'3• 'y Viewshed - 1 �1 tt 10 Physical Am thy - V. DEC -03-1996 10 06 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.14 FIGURE 77-D.2 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a corner nark or green streetscane. FIGURE 77-D.3 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green area at an intersection. 11 DEC -03-1998 10:0? NAC 612 595 9837 P.15 FIGURE 77 -DA An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a -perrh ter green streetscape. J. j• 44%p r 44)W .Y•i,^rel � � �,y'�'�y FIGURE 77-D.5 An example of a neighborhood Cluster oriented toward a streetscape and illustrating subdivision design based on "coving" principals. Park \ I,, - 4W,,- � •Trail +y Boulevard 12 DEC -03-1998 10:10 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01i07 B. Lot Area Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter. 1. Lot Area: Not lees than one (1) acre net buildable area (excluding wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes, etc.) and not greater than two and one-half (2-1/2) acres net buildable area. 2. Lot Width: Not less than one hundred (100) feet. 3. Lot Depth: Not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. C. Building Envelope Regulations. 1. Principal Structure Setbacks. a. Front Yard. Setbacks Setbacks From From Right Cent Orli ne Q -Way _Tines Road Class 130 feet 65 feet Principal/Minor Arterial 130 feet 65 feet Collector Street 65 feet 35 feet Local Street 35 feet 35 feet From Cul -De -Sac Right -of -Way Where a lot is located at the intersection of two (2) or more roads or highways which bound two (2) or more sides of the lot, no building shall project beyond the front yard line of either road. b. Side Yard: Thirty (30) feet. C. Rear Yard: Fifty (50) feet. 2. Accessory structure setbacks as regulated by Section 16 of this Chapter, except as provided for below: a. All detached accessory buildings shall be: (1) Located behind the rear most building line of the principal structure. (2) Structures larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet shall be within the side and rear setbacks required in Section 20-77-8.C.1 above. 13 DEC -03-1998 10:10 NAC 612 595 983? P.02i0? (3) Within an area one hundred fifty (150) feet from the rear most building line of the principal structure. D. Building Height. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter. 1. The maximum height of principal buildings shall not exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or forty-five (45) feet. 2. Accessory structures shall be governed by Section 16-4 of this Chapter. E. Building Design. Attached garages having doors facing the lot front shall not represent more than forty (40) percent of the principal structure facade facing the lot front. F. Landscaping. 1. Homesite lots shall be prepared according to the tree preservation measures described in this Chapter. 20-77-9: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Streets. The design and construction of all streets within the R -C District shall be consistent with the provisions of the City's Subdivision Ordinance with the following additions: 1. Local streets should be so planned as to discourage their use for regional traffic. Streets shall connect with one another or be terminated by other streets. Dead-end streets are prohibited, and cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only where topography or other physical conditions necessitate their use. s. Storm Water Management. Storm water management techniques shall be consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, with the following additions: 1. All retention basins shall resemble natural ponds to the maximum extent possible. 2. asiV landscaping shall include indigenous plants and landscaping materials. C. Property owners Association. The development contract for a project developed under the provisions of the R -C District shall contain provisions to assure the continued maintenance of open space outlote and other commonly owned facilities within the project to a pre -determined reasonable standard, 14 DEC -03-1998 10:11 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03i07 subject to approval of the City Council in conformance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tracts or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent document or document such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 11 and a set of floor plans such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 13 shall be filed with the City, said filing with the City to be made prior to the filings of said declaration or document or floor plans with the recording officers of Wright County, Minnesota. 2. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. 3. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall provide that an owner's association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing private control. 4. The declaration shall additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the City incurs any expenses in enforcing its rules and regulations, which said expenses are not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City shall have the right to assess each property its prorate share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which each assessment is made. 5. Membership must be mandatory for each owner and all successors or assigns. 6. The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period of years. 15 DEC -03-1998 10:12 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04i07', 7. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and the maintenance of the open space facilities to be deeded to it. 8. Property owners must pay a prorate share of the cost of the Association by means of an assessment to be levied by the Association which meets ,the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. 9. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 10. The by-laws and rules of the Association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the final plat. Section 2. Section 20-2-2.0 of the Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to include the following definitions: open Space Cluster Development Related., 1. Building Envelope. The boundaries on a homesite lot within which all construction requiring a building permit may occur. 2. Cluster; Cluster Development; Neighborhood Cluster. A grouping of residential or other structures arranged with the expressed intent of preserving open spaces and natural resources for community use, establishing a sense of community among residents, and reducing the costs and impact of infrastructure development and service delivery. 3. Neighborhood. A district, or area, distinguishable by some identifiable feature or point of reference, in which people live in close proximity to one another. 4. Open Space. Undeveloped land of the subdivided property providing visual expanses and recreational areas clear of obstructions other than natural vegetation, or structures directly related to the use and enjoyment of these spaces. Open spaces may include natural habitats, places for neighborhood recreation, and pedestrian corridors. S. Open Space, Natural Habitat. Contiguous, connected areas preserved or restored in their natural condition where indigenous plants and animals live or fields and pastures associated with agricultural uses. 6. Open Space, Neighborhood Recreation. Specific areas, such as playground pakks, greens, and commons, spatially defined and maintained for human recreational activity. 16 DEC -03-1998 10:12 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05i07 7. Open Space, Pedestrian Corridors. Linear areas for pedestrian travel between open spaces or places of destination, such as walking trails and bicycle paths. 8. Open Space, View Shed. A directional view or vista of an open space from a specified location. Section 3. Section 20-16-4 of the Zoning Ordinance (Accessory Buildings, Uses and Equipment) is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Farm and hobby farm operations are exempt from the requirements of this Subsection and are regulated by Section 26 of this Chapter. H. Detached Single Family and Two Family Uses. 1. No accessory use, building, structure or equipment shall be allowed within a required front yard. With the exception of a garage, no accessory building, structure, use or equipment may be placed within a front yard. 2. No accessory building, structure, and/or detached garage for a single family dwelling shall occupy more than ten (10) percent of the area of the required rear yard in the A-1, A-2, R -C, R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning Districts or not more than twenty- five (25) percent of the area of the required rear yard in the R-4, R-5, R-6, R-7, and R -MB Zoning Districts. 3. No building permit shall be issued for more than one (1) detached private garage or accessory structure for each single family dwelling, except by conditional use permit. 4. No accessory building shall exceed the size of the principal structure except by conditional use permit. 5. Accessory buildings may encroach into the required principal building side and rear yard setbacks within the rear yard of a lot, except, however, that no such encroachment may occur on required easement, or in a required side yard setback abutting a street in the case of a corner lot and that no such encroachment shall be closer than ten (10 ) feet to any lot line, occur upon a required easement, or in a required side yard. 17 DEC -03-1998 10:13 NAC 612 595 9837 P. 06/0?'. 6. Accessory buildings in the A-1, A-2, R -C, R-1, R-2 and R-3 Zoning Districts: a. Detached Accessory Buildings. (1) Detached accessory buildings of one thousand (1,00.0) square feet or less shall be permitted upon compliance with other applicable provisions of this Chapter. (2) Detached accessory buildings larger than one thousand (1,000) square feet which do not exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet may be allowed by an administrative permit as regulated by Section 20-16-4.H of this Chapter. (3) No detached accessory building may exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet except by conditional use permit. b. Attached accessory buildings: (1) An attached accessory garage of one thousand (1,000) square feet or less shall be permitted upon compliance with other applicable provisions of this Chapter. (2) No attached accessory garage shall exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet except by conditional use permit. C. The total floor area of a detached accessory building and any attached garage shall not exceed two thousand (2,000) square feet on a single family lot except by conditional use permit. Section 4. Section 20-27-4 of the Zoning ordinance is hereby amended to make the keeping and maintaining of farm animals a conditional use in the R -C District as follows: B. The keeping and maintaining of farm animals, including livestock and horses, shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the A-2 and R -C Zoning Districtg, provided: 1. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 2. The minimum lot size upon which animals are to be located shall be two and one-half (2 14) acres. 18 DEC -03-1998 10:13 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07i07 Ey 4. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feedlot, or building within two hundred (200) feet of any R- 1 Residential District property line not owned or leased by the operator. The keeping and care of animals is provided as regulated by the City Code. 5. The density per acre of farm animals specifically allowed must not exceed the maximum densities, as specified below, unless permitted by conditional use permit: Animal g a. Cattle, horses mules, donkeys 1 b. Goats, sheep 5 C. Swine 10 d. Turkeys, ducks, geese 25 e. Chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigeons 5o 6. A shelter or stabling facility shall provide a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet per acre of enclosed area per animal, or fractions thereof, as based upon the number of animals per acre listed above (example: 100 square feet divided by five goats/acre = 20 square feet of enclosed area per goat) . section S. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this day of 1998. ATTEST: CITY OF OTSEGO RY- BY; Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 19 Larry Fournier, Mayor TOTAL P-07 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: David Licht DATE: 10 December 1998 RE- Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Revision: Cluster Housing (R -C Zoning District) FILE NO: 176.08 - 98.07 This memorandum forwards a revised Zoning Ordinance amendment dealing with the R -C Zoning District. This latest draft reflects the one change made by the Planning Commission from material previously supplied. The change involves deletion of amendments to the accessory building clause of the ordinance. Upon our recommendation, the Planning Commission agreed that including the accessory building provisions in this amendment would be redundant in that we are amending an amendment and it is anticipated that another amendment will be forthcoming. So as to avoid confusion, we have dropped the changes to the accessory building section in anticipation that the addition of the R -C District will be handled with the pending amendment dealing with the rural service area provisions. The draft also includes all the changes which were a result of the 30 November meeting at which the matter was discussed by both the Commission and the Council. Staff from our office will be present to discuss the amendment should you have questions. PC.. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Jerry Olson 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #98 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add Section 77 as follows: SECTION 77 R -C, RESIDENTIAL -RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DISTRICT Section 20-77-1: Purpose 20-77-2: Permitted Uses 20-77-3: Interim Uses 20-77-4: Accessory Uses 20-77-5: Conditional Uses 20-77-6: Density 20-77-7: Open Space Performance Standards 20-77-8: Neighborhood Performance Standards 20-77-9: General Development Standards 20-77-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the R -C District is to implement the goals and policies with regard to the Rural Residential Preserve Area as defined within the Comprehensive Plan. Residential development within the Rural Residential Preserve is encouraged to be clustered in a pattern which satisfies the following planning objectives: A. Preservation of contiguous common open spaces for scenic enjoyment, recreational use, and rural identity. B. Creation of cohesive neighborhoods in order to establish local identity and community interaction. C. Physical integration of neighborhoods, open spaces, and places of destination in order to establish municipal identity and community interaction. D. The diagrams are provided to demonstrate graphically the purpose of the R -C District, its performance standards and strategies by which the internal development pattern described in this Section may be achieved. E. Creative application of this section is encouraged while preserving its purpose and intent. 20-77-2: PERMITTED USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted uses in the R -C District: A. Single family detached dwellings. B. Farms, farmsteads, farming and agricultural related buildings and structures subject to Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, but not including animal feedlots or other commercial operations. C. Public parks, playgrounds, recreational uses, wildlife areas and game refuges. D. Forestry, nurseries, greenhouses, and tree farms excluding retail sales. E. Day care facilities, as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter, licensed by the State and serving twelve (12) or fewer persons. F. Residential care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. G. Essential services. H. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-3: INTERIM USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are interim uses in the R -C District and are governed by Section 35 of this Chapter. A. Reserved. 20-77-4: ACCESSORY USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted accessory uses in the R -C District: A. Operation and storage of such vehicles, equipment and machinery which are incidental and customary to permitted or conditional uses allowed in this district. B. Home occupations as regulated by Section 28 of this Chapter. C. Private recreational vehicles and equipment. D. Swimming pool, tennis courts and other recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests. E. Tool houses, sheds and similar buildings for storage of domestic and farm supplies and non-commercial recreational equipment. 2 F. Private garages, parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks. G. Fences. H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-5: CONDITIONAL USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are conditional uses allowed in an R -C District: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter.) A. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the City, provided that: 1. The property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. B. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses and country clubs, swimming pools and similar facilities provided that: 1. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character. 2. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area up to a maximum of four thousand (4,000) square feet of the site shall be covered by buildings or structures. 3. The use will not negatively impact abutting or neighboring existing or potential residential uses. 4. When abutting a residential use or a residential use district, the property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 5. The traffic generated by the use can be adequately accommodated (both volume and weight) upon the City streets serving the property upon which the use is located. 6. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. ki C. Cemeteries, provided that: 1. At minimum, the site accesses on a major collector. 2. The site is landscaped in accordance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 3. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. D. Mining, sand and gravel extraction, land reclamation and alteration provided that: 1. The use will be in compliance with the provisions of Sections 24 and 25 of this Chapter and other applicable provisions of the City Code. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. E. Temporary seasonal sales of products produced on site (farms only) as regulated by Section 20-26-8 of this Chapter. F. The keeping of horses and farm animals, not including feedlots, as regulated by Section 20-27-4.B of this Chapter. G. Planned unit development as regulated by Section 36 of this Chapter. H. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-6: DENSITY: The maximum permitted density within the R -C District shall be ten (10) units per forty (40) acres, subject to the following: A. All development within the R -C District shall be subject to planning for cluster development as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter and regulated by this section. B. The subdivision is processed according to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 20-77-7: OPEN SPACE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development must provide common open spaces, in addition to park dedication requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, in a site design appropriate to the location of building lots, consistency with the following provisions, subject to review and approval of the City Council. 2 A. Area Regulations. 1. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the net buildable land subdivided for development shall be dedicated to open space consisting of natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, and/or pedestrian corridor open space (see Figure 77-A). Land to be dedicated to conform with park dedication requirements of Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance may be taken from the fifty (50) percent of net buildable area referenced above. 2. All designated open space shall be platted as outlot parcels held as open space in perpetuity. 3. Each open space outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or pedestrian corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification. FIGURE 77-A Natural habitat, pedestrian corridor and neighborhood recreation open spaces are located on the development site according to the type of use. Natural Habitat Neighborhood Pedestrian Corridor. Recreation 1'. B. Location Criteria. Open space outlots shall be located on the development site according to the following locational criteria: E 1. View Sheds. The open space outlots shall preserve the maximum quantity of view shed open space for the anticipated homesite lots on the development tracts (see Figure 77-3). FIGURE 77-B View sheds are directional vistas from a homesite between tree stands and other neighborhood structures. < / ' Mewshed 1 2. Natural Habitat. The development shall preserve the maximum quantity of natural habitat open spaces in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural agricultural habitat open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, pastures, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, dense woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shorelands, and other environmentally sensitive areas or desirable view sheds. 3. Pedestrian Corridors. The development shall locate pedestrian corridor open spaces in strategic places such that larger open space outlots and designated places of destination both on the development tract and adjacent tracts are connected with one another. Pedestrian corridor open spaces may include, but are not limited to, established regional trails, local pathways, paved walkways, and shorelines. Pedestrian corridor outlots shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. on 4. Neighborhood Recreation. The development shall locate neighborhood recreation open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood of surrounding homesites, at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, defined by coherent boundaries, and accessible to all neighborhood residents. Neighborhood recreation open spaces may include, but are not limited to, greens, commons, playgrounds, ballfields, gardens, or other recreational areas. C. Accessibility. Open spaces shall be accessible to pedestrians at not less than one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) foot intervals along public streets. Where necessary, pedestrian access corridor outlots between private lots shall be at least twenty (20) feet in width. D. Deed Restrictions. Deed restrictions shall be recorded upon all open space outlots at the time of subdivision specifying allowed use of the outlot in conformance with its open space classification. Amendments to the allowed uses of the open space outlots shall be subject to approval of the City Council. 1. Natural habitat open spaces shall be considered conservation easements and are for responsible use and enjoyment as passive open space, pasture or agricultural fields. Construction in these areas shall be limited to trails (paved or unpaved), open air shelters, bridges, benches, bird houses, wood fencing, communal drainfields, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 2. Neighborhood recreation open spaces shall be used for active or passive recreational purposes, including gardening. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved walkways, open air shelters, bird houses, garden storage sheds no larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet, wood fencing, landscaping planting, play equipment, outdoor furniture, facilities for active recreation, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 3. Pedestrian corridor open space shall be used for pedestrian or bicycle travel. Motorized vehicles shall be prohibited. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved pathways, wood fencing, and landscape planting. Other uses or structures may be allowed by City Council approval. 4. Habitable structures shall not be permitted in any open space outlot. 7 E. Ownership and Management. Each designated open space outlot shall be owned and managed according to one of the following means, subject to City Council approval. 1. Open space may be owned in common by the property owners created through subdivision of the original tract. Management shall be the responsibility of that subdivision's homeowner association. In the case where at least one (1) outlot of open space is held in common ownership, a homeowner association shall be established for that subdivision and membership in the association by all property owners in the subdivision shall be mandatory. 2. Open space may be deeded to an established land trust. Management shall be the responsibility of the land trust. Maintenance may be performed by the neighborhood homeowner association, through written agreement between the association and the land trust. 3. Open space may be deeded to the City of Otsego, subject to acceptance by the City Council. Management shall be the responsibility of the City. 20-77-8: NEIGHBORHOOD PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development is intended to promote neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes and configurations. Review and approval of the subdivision by the City Council shall be based upon an evaluation that the proposed development plan provides a cohesive neighborhoods) in a site design appropriate to the location of common open spaces consistent with the following provisions: A. Neighborhood Configuration. 1. To establish a cohesive neighborhood unit, residential lots shall be located in a neighborhood cluster. A neighborhood cluster shall include a minimum of five (5) lots or twenty-five (25) percent of the allowable number of lots on the parcel to be subdivided, whichever is greater. An efficiency of land utilization and community development should be encouraged by maximizing the number of lots in any one cluster development, while adhering to the underlying density and open space requirements of this Chapter (see Figure 77-C). Development of neighborhood clusters is encouraged in locations which minimize the visual impact of the development on the landscape to the greatest extent reasonably possible. FIGURE 77-C.1 An example of a neighborhood cluster development pattern encouraged by this section. .'1. � •� 1 , ' ' � � �� _ i•t �`� ;Yew'• A�_ ,,ice=-; ���r• \\ J/ •.1•"}. -.d ."r.'_�'•Y�.i�_:t'!-• - �f_-;y, '. FIGURE 77-C.3 Example of a cul-de-sac development pattern that is discouraged by this section. t•. .-. i~.� - - .>.� •! • •;fes•\.t A � � --� �0 •�;:'".. .-�' ' v.,� :,_: ''tet ��'j t�: _ �': :-:V .•.1�'�'�r J 2. A neighborhood cluster shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which all residential units share in common (see Figure 77-D). Neighborhood identity may be established by one or more of the following features: 2 a. View Shed. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will take visual advantage of a field, wetlands, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. Physical Amenity. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will face a green, playground, ballfield, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. C. Streetscape. The lots may be arranged such that the principle structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, boulevards, medians, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. FIGURE 77-D.1 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a view shed or a physical amenity. Viewshed { `_ Ot - 1 Physical Amenity IN FIGURE 77-D.2 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a corner park or green streetscape. FIGURE 77-D.3 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green area at an intersection. FIGURE 77-D.4 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green streetscape. ;tL FIGURE 77-D.5 An example of a neighborhood cluster oriented toward a streetscape and illustrating subdivision design based on "coving" principals. R i Park j Trail Boulevard Alt 12 404-� _ .vim• r.. r. • 1 FIGURE 77-D.5 An example of a neighborhood cluster oriented toward a streetscape and illustrating subdivision design based on "coving" principals. R i Park j Trail Boulevard Alt 12 B. Lot Area Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter. 1. Lot Area: Not less than one (1) acre net buildable area (excluding wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes, etc.) and not greater than two and one-half (2-1/2) acres net buildable area. 2. Lot Width: Not less than one hundred (100) feet. 3. Lot Depth: Not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. C. Building Envelope Regulations. 1. Principal Structure Setbacks. a. Front Yard. Setbacks Setbacks From From Right Centerline of -Way Lines Road Class 130 feet 65 feet Principal/Minor Arterial 130 feet 65 feet Collector Street 65 feet 35 feet Local Street 35 feet 35 feet From Cul -De -Sac Right -of -Way Where a lot is located at the intersection of two (2) or more roads or highways which bound two (2) or more sides of the lot, no building shall project beyond the front yard line of either road. b. Side Yard: Thirty (30) feet. C. Rear Yard: Fifty (50) feet. 2. Accessory structure setbacks as regulated by Section 16 of this Chapter, except as provided for below: a. All detached accessory buildings shall be: (1) Located behind the rear most building line of the principal structure. (2) Structures larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet shall be within the side and rear setbacks required in Section 20-77-8.C.1 above. 13 (3) Within an area one hundred fifty (150) feet from the rear most building line of the principal structure. D. Building Height. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter: 1. The maximum height of principal buildings shall not exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or forty-five (45) feet. 2. Accessory structures shall be governed by Section 16-4 of this Chapter. E. Building Design. Attached garages having doors facing the lot front shall not represent more than forty (40) percent of the principal structure facade facing the lot front. F. Landscaping. 1. Homesite lots shall be prepared according to the tree preservation measures described in this Chapter. 20-77-9: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Streets. The design and construction of all streets within the R -C District shall be consistent with the provisions of the City's Subdivision Ordinance with the following additions: 1. Local streets should be so planned as to discourage their use for regional traffic. Streets shall connect with one another or be terminated by other streets. Dead-end streets are prohibited, and cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only where topography or other physical conditions necessitate their use. B. Storm Water Management. Storm water management techniques shall be consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, with the following additions: 1. All retention basins shall resemble natural ponds to the maximum extent possible. 2. Basic landscaping shall include indigenous plants and landscaping materials. C. Property Owners Association. The development contract for a project developed under the provisions of the R -C District shall contain provisions to assure the continued maintenance of open space outlots and other commonly owned facilities within the project to a pre -determined reasonable standard, [CI subject to approval of the City Council in conformance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tracts or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent document or document such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 11 and a set of floor plans such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 13 shall be filed with the City, said filing with the City to be made prior to the filings of said declaration or document or floor plans with the recording officers of Wright County, Minnesota. 2. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. 3. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall provide that an owner's association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing private control. 4. The declaration shall additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the City incurs any expenses in enforcing its rules and regulations, which said expenses are not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City shall have the right to assess each property its prorate share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which each assessment is made. 5. Membership must be mandatory for each owner and all successors or assigns. 6. The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period of years. a 7. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and the maintenance of the open space facilities to be deeded to it. 8. Property owners must pay a prorate share of the cost of the Association by means of an assessment to be levied by the Association which meets the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. 9. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 10. The by-laws and rules of the Association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the final plat. Section 2. Section 20-2-2.0 of the Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to include the following definitions: Open Space Cluster Development Related: 1. Building Envelope. The boundaries on a homesite lot within which all construction requiring a building permit may occur. 2. Cluster; Cluster Development; Neighborhood Cluster. A grouping of residential or other structures arranged with the expressed intent of preserving open spaces and natural resources for community use, establishing a sense of community among residents, and reducing the costs and impact of infrastructure development and service delivery. 3. Neighborhood. A district, or area, distinguishable by some identifiable feature or point of reference, in which people live in close proximity to one another. 4. Open Space. Undeveloped land of the subdivided property providing visual expanses and recreational areas clear of obstructions other than natural vegetation, or structures directly related to the use and enjoyment of these spaces. Open spaces may include natural habitats, places for neighborhood recreation, and pedestrian corridors. 5. Open Space, Natural Habitat. Contiguous, connected areas preserved or restored in their natural condition where indigenous plants and animals live or fields and pastures associated with agricultural uses. 6. Open Space, Neighborhood Recreation. Specific areas, such as playground parks, greens, and commons, spatially defined and maintained for human recreational activity. L" 7. Open Space, Pedestrian Corridors. Linear areas for pedestrian travel between open spaces or places of destination, such as walking trails and bicycle paths. 8. Open Space, View Shed. A directional view or vista of an open space from a specified location. Section 3. Section 20-27-4 of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to make the keeping and maintaining of farm animals a conditional use in the R -C District as follows: B. The keeping and maintaining of farm animals, including livestock and horses, shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the A-2 and R -C Zoning Districts, provided: 1. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 2. The minimum lot size upon which animals are to be located shall be two and one-half (2 !4) acres. 3. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feedlot, or building within two hundred (200) feet of any R- 1 Residential District property line not owned or leased by the operator. 4. The keeping and care of animals is provided as regulated by the City Code. 5. The density per acre of farm animals specifically allowed must not exceed the maximum densities, as specified below, unless permitted by conditional use permit: Animals Nimber/Acre a. Cattle, horses mules, donkeys 1 b. Goats, sheep 5 C. Swine 10 d. Turkeys, ducks, geese 25 e. Chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigeons 50 6. A shelter or stabling facility shall provide a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet per acre of enclosed area per animal, or fractions thereof, as based upon the number of animals per acre listed above (example: 100 square feet divided by five goats/acre = 20 square feet of enclosed area per goat) . 17 Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this day of ATTEST: BY: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 1998. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor NIE.VIORANDI;N TO: Elaine Beatty FROM: David Licht 30 November 1998 DEC,— 2 FA - RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Revision - (612) 595-9636 FILE NO.: 176.08 - 98.07 FAX (612) 595-9837 Per your directive, our office has prepared summary publication ordinances for the Zoning and Subdivision amendments passed by the Council on 23 November. These need to be approved at the next City Council meeting prior to their being placed in the paper. We are also providing a copy to Mr. MacArthur in the event he may have comments on suggested modifications. pc: Andrew MacArthur 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD . SUITE 555 • SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 WHITE - ORIGINAL YELLOW - FILE COPY PINK C FILE CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 98-06 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE (TREE PRESERVATION RELATED) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amendment to Section 21-1-11 (Definition) MMM1. Tree Preservation Related. Section 2. Amendment to Section 21-6.2.E (Plat and Data Requirements - Preliminary Plat proposed design features) 2. A tree Preservation Plan. Section 3. Amendment to Section 21-7 (Subdivision Design Standards) 22. Tree Preservation Plan. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this 23rd day of November 1998. CITY OF OTSEGO M ATTEST: Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, this Ordinance is published in summary fashion. Complete copies of the Subdivision Ordinance amendment are available during business hours at the Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330. CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 98-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Including Section 76, 1-3 special Industrial District. Section 2. Revising the I -L, Limited Industrial District (20-67-1) Section 3. An amendment revising building type and construction (20-17-4.A). Section 4. Revising building type and construction (20-17-4.13). Section 5. Revising off-street parking requirements (20-22-4.H.15). Section 6. Revising A-1 District setbacks (20-51-6.C). Section 7. Revising A-2 District setbacks (20-52-6.C). Section 8. Revising R-1 District setbacks (20-53-6.C). Section 9. Revising R-2 District setbacks (20-54-6.6). Section 10. Revising R-3 District setbacks (20-55-6.13). Section 11. Revising R-4 District setbacks (20-56-6.C). Section 12. Revising R-5 District setbacks (20-57-5.G.3). Section 13. Revising R-5 District setbacks (20-57-6.C). Section 14. Revising R-6 District setbacks (20-58-5.D.3). Section 15. Revising R-6 District setbacks (20-58-6.13). Section 16. Revising R-7 District setbacks (20-59-6.6). Section 17. Revising R -B District setbacks (20-61-6.13). Section 18. Revising B-1 District setbacks (20-62-6.C). Section 19. Revising B-2 District setbacks (20-63-6.C). 7.C.2) Section 20. Revising B-3 District setbacks (20-64-6.C). Section 21. Revising B -W District setbacks (20-65-6.C). Section 22. Revising B -C District setbacks (20-66-6.C). Section 23. Revising 1-1 District setbacks (20-67-6.C). Section 24. Revising 1-2 District setbacks (20-68-7.C). Section 25. Revising INS District setbacks (20-69-6.13). Section 26. Revising Off -Street Parking requirements (20-22-4.1-1). Section 27. Adding Environmental Review (Section 39). Section 28. Revising Accessory Building, Use, and Equipment (20-16-4). Section 29. Revising Fencing, Screening and Landscape Requirements (20-16- Section 30. Revising the R-1 Zoning District Title (Section 53). Section 31. Revising the R-1 District Purpose (20-53-1). Section 32. Revising the R-2 District Title (Section 54). Section 33. Revising the R-2 District Purpose (20-54-1). Section 34. Revising the R-3 District Title (Section 55). Section 35. Revising the R-3 District Purpose (20-55-1) Section 36. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this 23rd day of November 1998. CITY OF OTSEGO M Larry Fournier, Mayor E ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, this Ordinance is published in summary fashion. Complete copies of the Zoning Ordinance amendment are available during business hours at the Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330. 3 AGENDA SECTION: CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 6. Can Licht, Assistant City Planner Elaine Beatty, City Clerk Council of: 12/14/98-6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: 6.1. Consideration of Zoning Ordinance Amendments directed by Comprehensive Plan (Rural Cluster Development) 6.2. Any other Planning Business BACKGROUND: 6.1. The Planning Commission held the public hearing on the Zoning Ordinance Amendments directed by the comp. plan for the Rural Cluster Development Area and the Mayor and Council were present. Dan Licht will explain the changes to the Council and be present to answer any questions. A copy of the proposed amendment is attached. If the Council approves the Rural Cluster Development Area Zoning Ordinance directed by the Comp. Plan, please also approve the summary of same for publication. 6.2. This item is for any other Planning Business that needs Council's atten=ion. RECOIWNDATION : This is for Council consideration for approval Thanks, Elaine -03-1998 09:59 A4FINC iC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: NAC 612 595 9837 P.02 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DES 1 G N - MARKET RESEARCH Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission Scott Richards 3 December 1998 Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Update: Rural Cluster District Ordinance 176.08 - 98.07 Please find attached a revision to the proposed Ordinance amendment to implement cluster open space development requirements within the Rural Residential Preserve Area. These changes reflect the discussion of the Planning Commission and City Council at the joint meeting of November 30, 1998. The revisions include: Page 5, 20-77-7.A.1. Area Regulations- Language was added to clarify the request by the City Council and Planning Commission members that park land dedication would be taken out of the 50% open space area and not the buildable areas of a residential project. Page 12, Figure 77-0.5. Staff is unclear if any changes to this graphic were recommended. Specific design elements such as boulevards, one-way streets, etc. would be dealt with at the time of development proposal submitted. The graphic is intended only to give an example of a development layout and should likely not be made more specific. Page 14, 20-77-8.E. Building Design. The percentage of garage area facing the front of the lot has been reduced from fifty percent to forty percent. Page 14, 20-77-8.F. Landscaping. Provisions one and two related to vegetation were removed, but three remains as it relates to tree preservation standards. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9536 FAX 61 2-595-9637 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM DEC -03-1998 09:59 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03 Page 15, 20-77-9.B.2 Storm Water Management. The word "basin" was changed to "basic". Page 15, 20-77-9.C.4. Property Owners Association. The last sentence was clarified to change the word "ease" to "each" and the word "such" was removed. Page 17, Section 3.13.4. The wording "Except in the case of manufactured homes" was removed. Page 17, Section 3.113.5. The words "principal building were added to clarify that sentence. Page 18, Section 4. The reference to "R -O" was changed to "R -C". These changes will be discussed as part of the joint Planning Commission/City Council meeting/hearing on December 7, 1998. AA DEC -03-1990 10:00 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.04 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #98 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS MR RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add Section 77 as follows: SECTION 77 R -C, RES IDErITIAL-RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DISTRICT Section 20-77-1: Purpose 20-77-2: Permitted Uses 20-77-3: Interim Uses 20-77-4: Accessory Uses 20-77-5: Conditional Uses 20-77-6: Density 20-77-7: Open Space Performance Standards 20-77-8: Neighborhood Performance Standards 20-77-9: General Development Standards 20-77-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the R -C District is to implement the goals and policies with regard to the Rural Residential Preserve Area as defined within the Comprehensive Plan. Residential development within the Rural Residential Preserve is encouraged to be clustered in a pattern which satisfies the following planning objectives: A. Preservation of contiguous common open spaces for scenic enjoyment, recreational use, and rural identity. B. Creation of cohesive neighborhoods in order to establish local identity and community interaction. C. Physical integration of neighborhoods, open spaces, and places of destination in order to establish municipal identity and community interaction. D. The diagrams are provided to demonstrate graphically the purpose of the R -C District, its performance standards and strategies by which the internal development pattern described in this Section may be achieved. E. Creative application of this section is encouraged while preserving its purpose and intent. DEC -03-1998 10:00 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05 '20-77-2: PERNITTED USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted uses in the R -C District: A. Single family detached dwellings. B. Farms, farmsteads, farming and agricultural related buildings and structures subject to Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, but not including animal feedlots or other commercial operations. C. Public parks, playgrounds, recreational uses, wildlife areas and game refuges. D. Forestry, nurseries, greenhouses, and tree farms excluding retail sales. E. Day care facilities, as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter, licensed by the State and serving twelve (12) or fewer persons. F. Residential care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. G. Essential services. H. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-3: INTERIM USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are interim uses in the R -C District and are governed by Section 35 of this Chapter. A. Reserved. 20-77-4: ACCESSORY USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted accessory uses in the R -C District: A. Operation and storage of such vehicles, equipment and machinery which are incidental and customary to permitted or conditional uses allowed in this district. B. Home occupations as regulated by Section 28 of this Chapter. C. Private recreational vehicles and equipment. D. Swimming pool, tennis courts and other recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests. E. Tool houses, sheds and similar buildings for storage of domestic and farm supplies and non-commercial recreational equipment. 2 DEC -03-1998 10:01 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06 F. Private garages, parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks. G. Fences. H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-5: CONDITION.A,T. USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are conditional uses allowed in an R -C District: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter.) A. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the City, provided that: 1. The property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. H. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses and country clubs, swimming pools and similar facilities provided that: 1. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character. 2. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area up to a maximum of four thousand (4,000) square feet of the site shall be covered by buildings or structures. 3. The use will not negatively impact abutting or neighboring existing or potential residential uses. 4, when abutting a residential use or a residential use distract, the property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. S. The traffic generated by the use can be adequately accommodated (both volume and weight) upon the City streets serving the property upon which the use is located. 6. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 3 DEC -03-1998 10:02 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07 C. Cemeteries, provided that: 1. At minimum, the site accesses on a major collector. 2. The site is landscaped in accordance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 3. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. D. Mining, sand and gravel extraction, land reclamation and alteration provided that: 1. The use will be in compliance with the provisions of Sections 24 and 25 of this Chapter and other applicable provisions of the City Code. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. E. Temporary seasonal sales of products produced on site (farms only) as regulated by Section 20-26-8 of this Chapter. F. The keeping of horses and farm animals, not including feedlots, as regulated by Section 20-27-4.B of this Chapter. G. Planned unit development as regulated by Section 36 of this Chapter. H. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-6: DENSITY: The maximum permitted density within the R -C District shall be ten (10) units per forty (40) acres, subject to the following: A. All development within the R -C District shall be subject to planning for cluster development as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter and regulated by this section. B. The subdivision is processed according to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 20-77-7: OPEN SPACE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development must provide common open spaces, in addition to park dedication requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, in a site design appropriate to the location of building lots, consistency with the following provisions, subject to review and approval of the City Council. 0 DEC -03-1998 10:02 NAC A. B. Area Regulations. 612 595 9837 P.08 1. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the net buildable land subdivided for development shall be dedicated to open space consisting of natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, and/or pedestrian corridor open space (see Figure 77-A). Land to be dedicated to conform with park dedication requirements of Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance may be taken from the fifty (50) percent of net buildable area referenced above. 2. All designated open space shall be platted as outlot parcels held as open space in perpetuity. 3. Each open space outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or pedestrian corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification. FIGUM 77-A Natural habitat, pedestrian corridor and neighborhood recreation open spaces are located on the development site according to the type of use. Neighborhood Reaeation -- - Natural Habitat Pedestrian Corridor_ • • .'„ S�� [� ,•-i•{%ice •L '4y:��. .1-. Location Criteria. Open space outlots shall be located on the development site according to the following locational criteria: 5 DEC -03-1998 10:03 NAC 612 595 9837 P.09 1. View Sheds. The open space outlots shall preserve the maximum quantity of view shed open space for the anticipated homesite lots on the development tracts (see Figure 77-B). FIGURE 77-B View sheds are directional vistas from a homesite between tree stands and other neighborhood structures. 'Viewshed h :Xi:.� J ' 2. Natural Habitat. The development shall preserve the maximum quantity of natural habitat open spaces in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural agricultural habitat open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, pastures, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, dense woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shorelands, and other environmentally sensitive areas or desirable view sheds. 3. Pedestrian Corridors. The development shall locate pedestrian corridor open spaces in strategic places such that Larger open space outlots and designated places of destination both on the development tract and adjacent tracts are connected with one another. Pedestrian corridor open spaces may include, but are not limited to, established regional trails, local pathways, paved walkways, and shorelines. Pedestrian corridor outlots shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. 2 DEC -03-199e 10:03 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.10 4. Neighborhood Recreation. The development shall locate neighborhood recreation open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood of surrounding homesites, at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, defined by coherent boundaries, and accessible to all neighbor.lood residents. Neighborhood recreation open spaces may include, but are not limited to, greens, commons., playgrounds, ballfields, gardens, or other recreational areas. C. Accessibility. open spaces shall be accessible to pedestrians at not less than one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) foot intervals along public streets. Where necessary, pedestrian access corridor outlots between private lots shall be at least twenty (20) feet in width. D. Deed Restrictions. Deed restrictions shall be recorded upon all open space outlots at the time of subdivision specifying allowed use of the outlot in conformance with its open space classification. Amendments to the allowed uses of the open space outlots shall be subject to approval of the City Council. 1. Natural habitat open spaces shall be considered conservation easements and are for responsible use and enjoyment as passive open space, pasture or agricultural fields. Construction in these areas shall be limited to trails (paved or unpaved), open air shelters, bridges, benches, bird houses, wood fencing, communal drainf ields, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 2. Neighborhood recreation open spaces shall be used for active or passive recreational purposes, including gardening. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved walkways, open air shelters, bird houses, garden storage sheds no larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet, wood fencing, landscaping planting, play equipment, outdoor furniture, facilities for active recreation, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 3. Pedestrian corridor open space shall be used for pedestrian or bicycle travel. Motorized vehicles shall be prohibited. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved pathways, wood fencing, and landscape planting. Other uses or structures may be allowed by City Council approval. 4. Habitable structures shall not be permitted in any open space outlot. 7 DEC -03-1998 10:04 NAC 612 595 9837 P.11 E. Ownership and Management. Each designated open space outlot shall be owned and managed according to one of the following means, subject to City Council approval. 1. Open space may be owned in common by the property owners created through subdivision of the original tract. Management shall be the responsibility of that subdivision's homeowner association. In the case where at least one (1) outlot of open space is held in common ownership, a homeowner association shall be established for that subdivision and membership in the association by all property owners in the subdivision shall be mandatory. 2. Open space may be deeded to an established land trust. Management shall be the responsibility of the land trust. Maintenance may be performed by the neighborhood homeowner association, through written agreement between the association and the land trust. 3. Open space may be deeded to the City of Otsego, subject to acceptance by the City Council. Management shall be the responsibility of the City. 20-77-8: NEIGHBORHOOD PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development is intended to promote neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes and configurations. Review and approval of the subdivision by the City Council shall be based upon an evaluation that the proposed development plan provides a cohesive neighborhood(s) in a site design appropriate to the location of common open spaces consistent with the following provisions: A. Neighborhood Configuration. 1. To establish a cohesive neighborhood unit, residential lots shall be located in a neighborhood cluster. A neighborhood cluster shall include a minimum of five (5) lots or twenty-five (25) percent of the allowable number of lots on the parcel to be subdivided, whichever is greater. An efficiency of land utilization and community development should be encouraged by max- mizing the number of lots in any one cluster development, while adhering to the underlying density and open space requirements of this Chapter (see Figure 77-C). Development of neighborhood clusters is encouraged in locations which minimize the visual impact of the development on the landscape to the greatest extent reasonably possible. H DEC -03-199e 10:©5 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.12 FIGII&S 77-C.1 An example of a neighborhood cluster development pattern encouraged by this section. '� � ��� - ��k __ . � ' - %'F►!.r iii'.' '; f'��-ate.-,..-' � �- r ..- J =+ l 1. %��- ..�—� �?-•`�,,,�+�� ViA FIGURE 77-C.1 Example of a cul-de-sac development pattern that is discouraged by this section. �'•_1�-..�"4'-.-�c.�r •�'1.j1�'�_'i. ��'w .. __'—ter � .��- � • '. i..'!!� � � '��� it :.�• iis`r .�• '�"�� � � _ _, � rte..••• 2. A neighborhood cluster shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which all residential units share in common (see Figure 77-D). Neighborhood identity may be established by one or more of the following features: G: DEC -03-1998 10:05 NAC 612 595 9837 P-13 a. view Shed. The lots of a neighborhood may be 1 arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will take visual advantage of a field, wetlands, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. Physical Amenity. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will face a green, playground, ballfield, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. C. Streetscape. The lots may be arranged such that the principle structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, boulevards, medians, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. FIGURE 77-13.1 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a view shed or a physical amenity. ••��.�,, '.� day �f-...•,�`• •ti• Viewshed lug Physical Amen+�ity�-�-, DEC -03-1998 10 06 NAC 612 595 9837 P.14 FIGURE 77-D.2 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a corner park or green streetscape. rr~•1i• -)''`• ^r.� •:� � is _.�'.•1 .1 4* ' < FIGURES 77-D.3 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green area at an intersection. 11 DEC -03-1998 10:07 NAC 612 595 9837 P-15 FIGURE 77-D.4 ! An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green streetscape. FIGURE 77-D.5 An example of a neighborhood cluster oriented toward a streetscape and illustrating subdivision design based on "coving" principals. /< �_ tiAL' Park - — ►- ,� ,1 % ,% Trail Ile BOUIM�d • di �; -� �• 12 DEC -03-1998 10:10 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01i07 B. Lot Area Requirements. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter. 1. Lot Area: Not less than one (1) acre net buildable area (excluding wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes, etc.) and not greater than two and one-half (2-1/2) acres net buildable area. 2. Lot Width: Not less than one hundred (100) feet. 3. Lot Depth: Not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. C. Building Envelope Regulations. 1. Principal Structure Setbacks. a. Front Yard. Setbacks Setbacks From C entorli ne From Right of -Way _TJ nes aas 130 feet 65 feet Principal/Minor Arterial 130 feet 65 feet Collector Street 65 feet 35 feet Local Street 35 feet 35 feet From Cul -De -Sac Right -of -Way Where a lot is located at the intersection of two (2) or more roads or highways which bound two (2) or more sides of the lot, no building shall project beyond the front yard line of either road. b. Side Yard: Thirty (30) feet. C. Rear Yard: Fifty (50) feet. 2. Accessory structure setbacks as regulated by Section 16 of this Chapter, except as provided for below: a. All detached accessory buildings shall be: (1) Located behind the rear most building line of the principal structure. (2) Structures larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet shall be within the side and rear setbacks required in Section 20-77-8.C.1 above. 13 DEC -03-199e 10:10 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.02i0? (3) Within an area one hundred fifty (150) feet from the rear most building line of the principal structure. D. Building Height. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter: 1. The maximum height of principal buildings shall not exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or forty-five (45) feet. 2. Accessory structures shall be governed by Section 16-4 of this Chapter. E. Building Design. Attached garages having doors facing the lot front shall not represent more than forty (40) percent of the principal structure facade facing the lot front. F. Landscaping. 1. Homesite lots shall be prepared according to the tree preservation measures described in this Chapter. 20-77-9: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Streets. The design and construction of all streets within the R -C District shall be consistent with the provisions of the City's Subdivision Ordinance with the following additions: 1. Local streets should be so planned as to discourage their use for regional traffic. Streets shall connect with one another or be terminated by other streets_ Dead-end streets are prohibited, and cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only where topography or other physical conditions necessitate their use. s. Storm Water Management. Storm water management techniques shall be consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, with the following additions: 1. All retention basins shall resemble natural ponds to the maximum extent possible. 2. Basic landscaping shall include indigenous plants and landscaping materials. C. Property Owners Association. The development contract for a project developed under the provisions of the R -C District shall contain provisions to assure the continued maintenance of open space outlots and other commonly owned facilities within the project to a pre -determined reasonable standard, 14 DEC -03-1998 10:11 NAC 612 595 9837 F.03i07 subject to approval of the City Council in conformance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tracts or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent document or document such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section it and a set of floor plans such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 13 shall be filed with the City, said filing with the City to be made prior to the filings of said declaration or document or floor plans with the recording officers of Wright County, Minnesota. 2. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. 3. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall provide that an owner's association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing private control. 4. The declaration shall additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the City incurs any expenses in enforcing its rules and regulations, which said expenses are not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City shall have the right to assess each property its prorate share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which each assessment is made. 5. Membership must be mandatory for each owner and all successors or assigns. 6. The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period of years. 15 DEC -03-1998 10:12 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04i07'L 7. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and the maintenance of the open space facilities to be deeded to it. 8. property owners must pay a prorate share of the cost of the Association by means of an assessment to be levied by the Association which meets ,the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. 9. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 10. The by-laws and rules of the Association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the final plat. Section 2. Section 20-2-2.0 of the Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to include the following definitions: open Space Cluster Development Related: 1. Building Envelope. The boundaries on a homesite lot within which all construction requiring a building permit may occur. 2. Cluster; Cluster Development; Neighborhood Cluster. A grouping of residential or other structures arranged with the expressed intent of preserving open spaces and natural resources for comity use, establishing a sense of community among residents, and reducing the costs and impact of infrastructure development and service delivery. 3. Neighborhood. A district, or area, distinguishable by some identifiable feature or point of reference, in which people live in close proximity to one another. 4. Open Space. Undeveloped land of the subdivided property providing visual expanses and recreational areas clear of obstructions other than natural vegetation, or structures directly related to the use and enjoyment of these spaces. Open spaces may include natural habitats, places for neighborhood recreation, and pedestrian corridors. S. Open Space, Natural Habitat. Contiguous, connected areas preserved or restored in their natural condition where indigenous plants and animals live or fields and pastures associated with agricultural uses. 6. Open Space, Neighborhood Recreation. Specific areas, such as playground parks, greens, and commons, spatially defined and maintained for human recreational activity. 16 DEC -03-1998 10:12 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05i07 7. Open Space, Pedestrian Corridors. Linear areas for pedestrian travel between open spaces or places of destination, such as walking trails and bicycle paths. 8. Open Space, View Shed. A directional view or vista of an open space from a specified location. Section 3. Section 20-16-4 of the Zoning Ordinance (Accessory Buildings, Uses and Equipment) is hereby amended to read as follows: A. Farm and hobby farm operations are exempt from the requirements of this Subsection and are regulated by Section 26 of this Chapter. B. Detached Single Family and Two Family Uses. 1. No accessory use, building, structure or equipment shall be allowed within a required front yard. With the exception of a garage, no accessory building, structure, use or equipment may be placed within a front yard. 2. No accessory building, structure, and/or detached garage for a single family dwelling shall occupy more than ten (10) percent of the area of the required rear yard in the A-1, A-2, R -C, R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning Districts or not more than twenty- five (25) percent of the area of the required rear yard in the R-4, R-5, R-6, R-7, and R -MH Zoning Districts. 3. No building permit shall be issued for more than one (1) detached private garage or accessory structure for each single family dwelling, except by conditional use permit. 4. No accessory building shall exceed the size of the principal structure except by conditional use permit. 5. Accessory buildings may encroach into the required principal building aide and rear yard setbacks within the rear yard of a lot, except, however, that no such encroachment may occur on required easement, or in a required side yard setback abutting a street in the case of a Corner lot and that no such encroachment shall be closer than ten (10) feet to any lot line, occur upon a required easement, or in a required side yard. 17 DEC -03-1998 10:13 NAC 612 595 983? P.06i07'- 6. Accessory buildings in the A-1, A-2, R -C, R-1, R-2 and R-3 Zoning Districts: a. Detached Accessory Buildings. (1) Detached accessory buildings of one thousand (1,00.0) square feet or less shall be permitted upon compliance with other applicable provisions of this Chapter. (2) Detached accessory buildings larger than one thousand (1,000) square feet which do not exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet may be allowed by an administrative permit as regulated by Section 20-16-4.H of this Chapter. (3) No detached accessory building may exceed one thousand five hundred (1,500) square feet except by conditional use permit. b. Attached accessory buildings: (1) An attached accessory garage of one thousand (1,000) square feet or less shall be permitted upon compliance with other applicable provisions of this Chapter. (2) No attached accessory garage shall exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet except by conditional use permit. C. The total floor area of a detached accessory building and any attached garage shall not exceed two thousand (2,000) square feet on a single family lot except by conditional use permit. Section 4. Section 20-27-4 of the Zoning ordinance is hereby amended to make the keeping and maintaining of farm animals a conditional use in the R -C District as follows: B. The keeping and maintaining of farm animals, including livestock and horses, shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the A-2 and R -C Zoning Districts., provided: 1. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 2. The minimum lot size upon which animals are to be located shall be two and one-half (2 34) acres. 18 DEC -03-1998 10:13 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07i07 3. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feedlot, or building within two hundred (200) feet of any R- 1 Residential District property line not owned or leased by the operator. 4. The keeping and care of animals is provided as regulated by the City Code. 5. The density per acre of farm animals specifically allowed must not exceed the maximum densities, as specified below, unless permitted by conditional use permit: a. Cattle, horses mules, donkeys 1 b. Goats, sheep 5 C. Swine 10 d. Turkeys, ducks, geese 25 e. Chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigeons 50 6. A shelter or stabling facility shall provide a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet per acre of enclosed area per animal, or fractions thereof, as based upon the number of animals per acre listed above (example: 10o square feet divided by five goats/acre = 20 square feet of enclosed area per goat) . Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this day of ATTEST: CITY OF OTSEGO RV - BY: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 19 Larry Fournier, Mayor TOTAL P.07 INC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: r_ _ NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANT COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - .� MARKEDRES ARCH i �i T . Elaine Beatty Daniel Licht 15 December 1998 Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Update: R -C District 176.08 - 97.07 Enclosed please find a revised copy of Ordinance #98-09, which was approved by the City Council at their meeting on December 14, 1998. The revisions to the Ordinance reflect changes made by the City Council as part of their action approving the amendment. If there are any questions regarding this material, please do not hesitate to call. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #98-09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING PROVISIONS AND REGULATIONS FOR RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE TO ALLOW SUCH DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add Section 77 as follows: SECTION 77 R -C, RESIDENTIAL -RURAL OPEN SPACE CLUSTER DISTRICT Section 20-77-1: Purpose 20-77-2: Permitted Uses 20-77-3: Interim Uses 20-77-4: Accessory Uses 20-77-5: Conditional Uses 20-77-6: Density 20-77-7: Open Space Performance Standards 20-77-8: Neighborhood Performance Standards 20-77-9: General Development Standards 20-77-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of the R -C District is to implement the goals and policies with regard to the Rural Residential Preserve Area as defined within the Comprehensive Plan. Residential development within the Rural Residential Preserve is encouraged to be clustered in a pattern which satisfies the following planning objectives: A. Preservation of contiguous common open spaces for scenic enjoyment, recreational use, and rural identity. B. Creation of cohesive neighborhoods in order to establish local identity and community interaction. C. Physical integration of neighborhoods, open spaces, and places of destination in order to establish municipal identity and community interaction. D. The diagrams are provided to demonstrate graphically the purpose of the R -C District, its performance standards and strategies by which the internal development pattern described in this Section may be achieved. E. Creative application of this section is encouraged while preserving its purpose and intent. 20-77-2: PERMITTED USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted uses in the R -C District: A. Single family detached dwellings. B. Farms, farmsteads, farming and agricultural related buildings and structures subject to Minnesota Pollution Control Standards, but not including animal feedlots or other commercial operations. C. Public parks, playgrounds, recreational uses, wildlife areas and game refuges. D. Forestry, nurseries, greenhouses, and tree farms excluding retail sales. E. Day care facilities, as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter, licensed by the State and serving twelve (12) or fewer persons. F. Residential care facilities serving six (6) or fewer persons. G. Essential services. H. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-3: INTERIM USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are interim uses in the R -C District and are governed by Section 35 of this Chapter. A. Reserved. 20-77-4: ACCESSORY USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are permitted accessory uses in the R -C District: A. Operation and storage of such vehicles, equipment and machinery which are incidental and customary to permitted or conditional uses allowed in this district. B. Home occupations as regulated by Section 28 of this Chapter. C. Private recreational vehicles and equipment. D. Swimming pool, tennis courts and other recreational facilities which are operated for the enjoyment and convenience of the residents of the principal use and their guests. E. Tool houses, sheds and similar buildings for storage of domestic and farm supplies and non-commercial recreational equipment. 2 F. Private garages, parking spaces and car ports for licensed and operable passenger cars and trucks. G. Fences. H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-5: CONDITIONAL USES: Subject to applicable provisions of this Chapter, the following are conditional uses allowed in an R -C District: (Requires a conditional use permit based upon procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter.) A. Governmental and public regulated utility buildings and structures necessary for the health, safety and general welfare of the City, provided that: 1. The property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 2. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. B. Commercial outdoor recreational areas including golf courses and country clubs, swimming pools and similar facilities provided that: 1. The principal use, function or activity is open, outdoor in character. 2. Not more than five (5) percent of the land area up to a maximum of four thousand (4,000) square feet of the site shall be covered by buildings or structures. 3. The use will not negatively impact abutting or neighboring existing or potential residential uses. 4. When abutting a residential use or a residential use district, the property is screened and landscaped in compliance with Section 16 of this Chapter. S. The traffic generated by the use can be adequately accommodated (both volume and weight) upon the City streets serving the property upon which the use is located. 6. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 3 C. Cemeteries, provided that: 1. At minimum, the site accesses on a major collector. 2. The site is landscaped in accordance with Section 16 of this Chapter. 3. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. D. Temporary seasonal sales of products produced on site (farms only) as regulated by -Section 20-26-8 of this Chapter. E. The keeping of horses and farm animals, not including feedlots, as regulated by Section 20-27-4.B of this Chapter. F. Planned unit development as regulated by Section 36 of this Chapter. G. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter. 20-77-6: DENSITY: The maximum permitted density within the R -C District shall be ten (10) units per forty (40) acres, subject to the following: A. All development within the R -C District shall be subject to planning for cluster development as defined in Section 2 of this Chapter and regulated by this section. B. The subdivision is processed according to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 20-77-7: OPEN SPACE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development must provide common open spaces, in addition to park dedication requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance, in a site design appropriate to the location of building lots, consistency with the following provisions, subject to review and approval of the City Council. A. Area Regulations. 1. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of the net buildable land subdivided for development shall be dedicated to open space consisting of natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, and/or pedestrian corridor open space (see Figure 77-A). Land to be dedicated to conform with park dedication requirements of Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance may be taken from the fifty (50) percent of net buildable area referenced above. M 2. All designated open space shall be platted as outlot parcels held as open space in perpetuity. 3. Each open space outlot shall be classified as natural habitat, neighborhood recreation, or pedestrian corridor open space, and shall conform to the type of use, location criteria, and deed restrictions of that classification. FIGURE 77-A Natural habitat, pedestrian corridor and neighborhood recreation open spaces are located on the development site according to the type of use. B. Location Criteria. Open space outlots shall be located on the development site according to the following locational criteria: 1. View Sheds. The open space outlots shall preserve the maximum quantity of view shed open space for the anticipated homesite lots on the development tracts (see Figure 77-B). E FIGURE 77-B View sheds are directional vistas from a homesite between tree stands and other neighborhood structures. ; < ' Mewshed ' R \ 1 Y 2. Natural Habitat. The development shall preserve the maximum quantity of natural habitat open spaces in a contiguous, connected configuration. Natural agricultural habitat open spaces may include, but are not limited to, fields, pastures, wetlands, slopes, bluffs, dense woods, lakes, ponds, streams, shorelands, and other environmentally sensitive areas or desirable view sheds. 3. Pedestrian Corridors. The development shall locate pedestrian corridor open spaces in strategic places such that larger open space outlots and designated places of destination both on the development tract and adjacent tracts are connected with one another. Pedestrian corridor open spaces may include, but are not limited to, established regional trails, local pathways, paved walkways, and shorelines. Pedestrian corridor outlots shall be a minimum of twenty (20) feet in width. 4. Neighborhood Recreation. The development shall locate neighborhood recreation open spaces such that they are an integral part of the neighborhood of surrounding homesites, at an elevation appropriate to their intended recreational use, defined by coherent boundaries, and 0 accessible to all neighborhood residents. Neighborhood recreation open spaces may include, but are not limited to, greens, commons, playgrounds, ballfields, gardens, or other recreational areas. C. Accessibility. Open spaces shall be accessible to pedestrians at not less than one thousand three hundred twenty (1,320) foot intervals along public streets. Where necessary, pedestrian access corridor outlots between private lots shall be at least twenty (20) feet in width. D. Deed Restrictions. Deed restrictions shall be recorded upon all open space outlots'at the time of subdivision specifying allowed use of the outlot in conformance with its open space classification. Amendments to the allowed uses of the open space outlots shall be subject to approval of the City Council. 1. Natural habitat open spaces shall be considered conservation easements and are for responsible use and enjoyment as passive open space, pasture or agricultural fields. Construction in these areas shall be limited to trails (paved or unpaved), open air shelters, bridges, benches, bird houses, wood fencing, communal drainfields, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 2. Neighborhood recreation open spaces shall be used for active or passive recreational purposes, including gardening. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved walkways, open air shelters, bird houses, garden storage sheds no larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet, wood fencing, landscaping planting, play equipment, outdoor furniture, facilities for active recreation, and other uses as approved by the City Council. 3. Pedestrian corridor open space shall be used for pedestrian or bicycle travel. Motorized vehicles shall be prohibited. Construction in these areas shall be limited to gravel or paved pathways, wood fencing, and landscape planting. Other uses or structures may be allowed by City Council approval. 4. Habitable structures shall not be permitted in any open space outlot. E. Ownership and Management. Each designated open space outlot shall be owned and managed according to one of the following means, subject to City Council approval. 1. Open space may be owned in common by the property owners created through subdivision of the original tract. Management shall be the responsibility of that subdivision's homeowner association. In the case where 7 at least one (1) outlot of open space is held in common ownership, a homeowner association shall be established for that subdivision and membership in the association by all property owners in the subdivision shall be mandatory. 2. Open space may be deeded to an established land trust. Management shall be the responsibility of the land trust. Maintenance may be performed by the neighborhood homeowner association, through written agreement between the association and the land trust. 3. Open space may be'deeded to the City of Otsego, subject to acceptance by the City Council. Management shall be the responsibility of the City. 20-77-8: NEIGHBORHOOD PERFORMANCE STANDARDS: The proposed development plan for an open space cluster development is intended to promote neighborhoods that offer a variety of lot sizes and configurations. Review and approval of the subdivision by the City Council shall be based upon an evaluation that the proposed development plan provides a cohesive neighborhood(s) in a site design appropriate to the location of common open spaces consistent with the following provisions: A. Neighborhood Configuration. 1. To establish a cohesive neighborhood unit, residential lots shall be located in a neighborhood cluster. A neighborhood cluster shall include a minimum of five (5) lots or twenty-five (25) percent of the allowable number of lots on the parcel to be subdivided, whichever is greater. An efficiency of land utilization and community development should be encouraged by maximizing the number of lots in any one cluster development, while adhering to the underlying density and open space requirements of this Chapter (see Figure 77-C). Development of neighborhood clusters is encouraged in locations which minimize the visual impact of the development on the landscape to the greatest extent reasonably possible. FIGURE 77-C.1 An example of a neighborhood cluster development pattern encouraged by this section. FIGURE 77-C.2 Example of a cul-de-sac development pattern that is discouraged by this section. �� .:.t:� - �- .- � y=: `••''' - � . ': � -..i �'; .. -:.,fir,.--,�j _' - :::.- �C�,•.... ir- .��,�.� , ,�1 -. .' \• y" f'-`•�" •. ,�:y�-'�-_.l' __.. -'r,•.:.: t'T`'=`ice., 'M,'��J_:... .•!_.:+.�"`. : s .!-''i!-�� Iv �f, sr—��.' yr = "�' ����:•,'•c _'�♦ _`_ . .-_ �;y; :.L. — J =.i �.'�'y t•. .. -•,,.` tom- ;'' C'�y4.��%'ri?�.• „s�..:t� � •'�.•_: <1 ro • l�:.v. .^ , — .,7 I � •. � .l' / -� fir/ �\ ` - �. '— .• J� ?r � •i„/ f.�.r • • tf •.n••�v T 2. A neighborhood cluster shall be oriented toward an identifiable feature which all residential units share in common (see Figure 77-D). Neighborhood identity may be established by one or more of the following features: 9 r� a. View Shed. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will take visual advantage of a field, wetlands, woods, lake, stream, or other open space which could be described as a view shed. b. Physical Amenity. The lots of a neighborhood may be arranged such that a majority of the principle structures will face a green, playground, ballfield, rock outcropping, stand of trees, church, school, or other physical feature unique to that particular neighborhood. C. Streetscape. The lots may be arranged such that the principle structures face a street space enhanced with landscaping, street trees, boulevards, medians, or other landscaping techniques appropriate to the City's street design standards. FIGURE 77-D.1 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a view shed or a physical amenity. Viewshed { �� Physical Amenity - ,M•. 10 FIGURE 77-D.2 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a corner park or green streetscape. Op - •"fin � f"•, ;;i � y FIGURE 77-D.3 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green area at an intersection. FIGURE 77-D.4 An example neighborhood cluster oriented toward a park or green streetscape. FIGURE 77-D.5 An example of a neighborhood cluster oriented toward a streetscape and illustrating subdivision design based on "coving" principals. ,r Trail M',� \�•�, I \ � Boulevard 12 B. Lot Area Requirements. The following minimum requirements ` shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter. 1. Lot Area: Not less than one (1) acre net buildable area (excluding wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes, etc.) and not greater than two and one-half (2-1/2) acres net buildable area. 2. Lot Width: Not less than one hundred (100) feet. 3. Lot Depth: Not less than one hundred fifty (150) feet. C. Building Envelope Regulations. 1. Principal Structure Setbacks. a. Front Yard. Setbacks Setbacks From From Right Centerline of -Way Lines 130 feet 65 feet Principal/Minor Arterial 130 feet 65 feet Collector Street 65 feet 35 feet Local Street 35 feet 35 feet From Cul -De -Sac Right -of -Way Where a lot is located at the intersection of two (2) or more roads or highways which bound two (2) or more sides of the lot, no building shall project beyond the front yard line of either road. b. Side Yard: Thirty (30) feet. C. Rear Yard: Fifty (50) feet. 2. Accessory structure setbacks as regulated by Section 16 of this Chapter, except as provided for below: a. All detached accessory buildings shall be: (1) Located behind the rear most building line of the principal structure. (2) Structures larger than one hundred fifty (150) square feet shall be within the side and rear setbacks required in Section 20-77-8.C.1 above. 13 (3) Within an area one hundred fifty (150) feet from the rear most building line of the principal structure. D. Building Height. The following minimum requirements shall be observed in an R -C District, subject to additional requirements, exceptions and modifications set forth in this Chapter: 1. The maximum height of principal buildings shall not exceed two and one-half (2-1/2) stories or forty-five (45) feet. 2. Accessory structures shall be governed by Section 16-4 of this Chapter. E. Building Design. Attached garages having doors facing the lot front shall not represent more than forty (40) percent of the principal structure facade facing the lot front. F. Landscaping. 1. Homesite lots shall be prepared according to the tree preservation measures described in this Chapter. 20-77-9: GENERAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Streets. The design and construction of all streets within the R -C District shall be consistent with the provisions of the City's Subdivision Ordinance with the following additions: 1. Local streets should be so planned as to discourage their use for regional traffic. Streets shall connect with one another or be terminated by other streets. Dead-end streets are prohibited, and cul-de-sacs shall be permitted only where topography or other physical conditions necessitate their use. B. Storm Water Management. Storm water management techniques shall be consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance, with the following additions: 1. A11 retention basins shall resemble natural ponds to the maximum extent possible. 2. Retention basin landscaping shall include indigenous plants and landscaping materials. C. Property Owners Association. The development contract for a project developed under the provisions of the R -C District shall contain provisions to assure the continued maintenance of open space outlots and other commonly owned facilities within the project to a pre -determined reasonable standard, 14 subject to approval of the City Council in conformance with the following conditions: 1. Prior to the use or occupancy or sale or the execution of contracts for sale of an individual building unit, parcel, tracts or common area, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or an equivalent document or document such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 11 and a set of floor plans such as specified by Laws 1963, Section 457, Section 13 shall be filed with the City, said filing with the City to be made prior to the filings of said declaration or document or floor plans with the recording officers of Wright County, Minnesota. 2. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions or equivalent document shall specify that deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments shall subject said properties to the terms of said declaration. 3. The declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions shall provide that an owner's association or corporation shall be formed and that all owners shall be members of said association or corporation which shall maintain all properties and common areas in good repair and which shall assess individual property owners proportionate shares of joint or common costs. This declaration shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The intent of this requirement is to protect the property values of the individual owner through establishing private control. 4. The declaration shall additionally, amongst other things, provide that in the event the association or corporation fails to maintain properties in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the City or fails to pay taxes or assessments on properties as they become due and in the event the City incurs any expenses in enforcing its rules and regulations, which said expenses are not immediately reimbursed by the association or corporation, then the City shall have the right to assess each property its prorate share of said expenses. Such assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection, shall be a lien on each property against which each assessment is made. 5. Membership must be mandatory for each owner and all successors or assigns. 6. The open space restrictions must be permanent and not for a given period of years. 15 7. The Association must be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes, and the maintenance of the open ' space facilities to be deeded to it. 8. Property owners must pay a prorate share of the cost of the Association by means of an assessment to be levied by the Association which meets the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance with Minnesota Statutes. 9. The Association must be able to adjust the assessment to meet changed needs. 10. The by-laws and rules of the Association and all covenants and restrictions to be recorded must be approved by the City Council prior to the approval of the final plat. Section 2. Section 20-2-2.0 of the Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to include the following definitions: Open Space Cluster Development Related: 1. Building Envelope. The boundaries on a homesite lot within which all construction requiring a building permit may occur. 2. Cluster; Cluster Development; Neighborhood Cluster. A grouping of residential or other structures arranged with the expressed intent of preserving open spaces and natural resources for community use, establishing a sense of community among residents, and reducing the costs and impact of infrastructure development and service delivery. 3. Neighborhood. A district, or area, distinguishable by some identifiable feature or point of reference, in which people live in close proximity to one another. 4. Open Space. Undeveloped land of the subdivided property providing visual expanses and recreational areas clear of obstructions other than natural vegetation, or structures directly related to the use and enjoyment of these spaces. Open spaces may include natural habitats, places for neighborhood recreation, and pedestrian corridors. 5. Open Space, Natural Habitat. Contiguous, connected areas preserved or restored in their natural condition where indigenous plants and animals live or fields and pastures associated with agricultural uses. 6. Open Space, Neighborhood Recreation. Specific areas, such as playground parks, greens, and commons, spatially defined and maintained for human recreational activity. 16 W 7. Open Space, Pedestrian Corridors. Linear areas for pedestrian travel between open spaces or places of destination, such as walking trails and bicycle paths. 8. Open Space, View Shed. A directional view or vista of an open space from a specified location. Section 3. Section 20-27-4 of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to make the keeping and maintaining of farm animals a conditional use in the R -C District as follows: B. The keeping and maintaining of farm animals, including livestock and horses, shall be allowed by conditional use permit in the A-2 and R -C Zoning Districts, provided: 1. The provisions of Section 4.2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 2. The minimum lot size upon which animals are to be located shall be two and one-half (2 j4) acres. 3. Farm animals may not be confined in a pen, feedlot, or building within two hundred (200) feet of any R- 1 Residential District property line not owned or leased by the operator. 4. The keeping and care of animals is provided as regulated by the City Code. 5. The density per acre of farm animals specifically allowed must not exceed the maximum densities, as specified below, unless permitted by conditional use permit: a. Cattle, horses mules, donkeys 1 b. Goats, sheep 5 C. Swine 10 d. Turkeys, ducks, geese 25 e. Chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, pigeons 50 6. A shelter or stabling facility shall provide a minimum of one hundred (100) square feet per acre of enclosed area per animal, or fractions thereof, as based upon the number of animals per acre listed above (example: 100 square feet divided by five goats/acre = 20 square feet of enclosed area per goat) . 17 Section 4. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this day of ATTEST: BY: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 18 e•: CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor • CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 98-09 SUMMRY ORDINANCE N0. 98-9A AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO RESPOND TO DIRECTIVES OUTLINED IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE (CLUSTER HOUSING -'R-C ZONING DISTRICT) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. Amending the ordinance to include the R -C, Residential -Rural Open Space Cluster District (Section 77). Section 2. Amending the ordinance to add definitions related to open space cluster development (Section 20-2-2.0). Section 3. Amending the ordinance by adding the R -C District to provisions addressing farm animals (Section 20-27-4.R). Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. PASSED this 14th day of December 1998. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Chi Larry urnier, Mayor ATTEST: BY: Elaine Beatty, City 60e&rk�/lZo"g Administrator Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, this Ordinance is published in summary fashion. Complete copies of the Zoning Ordinance amendment are available during business hours at the Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330 Publish: Elk River Star NEws: 12/23/98 Posted: 12/15/98 - Both Boards Otsego City HALL # `179 -0 1 -Camp G �- -q'4- CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIO` AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE Andfew MacArthu_, C-ty Attofney: EB Co-snc-- =2/14;93 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 8.1. Hearing for Pattern Station, Inc. dba Riverwood Inn and Conference Center to Consider: A. A Special Sunday On -Sale Liquor License (b Mo.) 8.2. Any other legal business BACKGROUND: The Sunday Liquor Referendum was passed on the November ballot. The Ordinance was finished by the Attorney and approved by the Mayor and Council . Riverwood is now having a Hearing to obtain approval or denial of a Sunday Liquor License for a 6 -month period. (That way it can be renewed with the regular licenses which expire on June 30, 1999 for a full year and be uniform with the other licenses.) Therefore the six month fee is S100.00 or 1/2 of the total fee of 5200.00. Andy_ MacArthur, City Attorney and one or two representatives from Riverwood will be present. RECOMNIENDATION: This is for Council Hearing and consideration of approval or denial. (Riverwood request is for the Sunday Liquor License to start on January 1, 1999 and run for six months. (Plan is - renewed on July 1, 1999 for one year through June 30th, 2000) T ks, Elaine Minnesota Departntcut of Public Safety d ` LIQUOR CONTROL DIVISION v ; 444 Cedar St.- Suite IW l., St. Paul, MN 5510 1-2 156 Fax (612)297-5259''. (612)296-6434 T7Y (6 12)282-0555 APPLICATION FOR COUNTY ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is recen•ed by AIN Liquor Control. Workers Compensation Insitrance CompanyG /'ilG e/ Policy # LICEN SL•F.'S SALES & USE TAX I]) # To , for sales tax number, call 296-6181 or 1-800-657-3777 A licant's name (Business. partnership, corporation) DBA or trade name �t rr �-nn C't+e✓& 7t4�/'t"/L) 1e"o zz: 1, � jVe,4e eob s LCri.7erenee License address Business phone Applicant's home phone /D,7 9 6?-5 6 l � - u �I1- 1,833 Cityounty fyT 0 di ce) l (D WK 1 it f State /99 /v Code 310 7. License period From i -97Z-o (e 3o Gine name, residence, title and alae for all partners, or the officers and directors of a corporation. Also, state the partnership Interest of each partner and for a corporation the percent Qf stock held b�• each officer. Nan be- C410J4 Title D 1% Percent stock or partnership intere-t e�WF) s Address `� c�{ �" tCiin,' f%) f1t.e,F Ct H:A_)Lj 1 S a iue 7 itle DOl3 I Percent stock or partnership interest Address City State Nmue Title DOB Percent stock or partnership uttercu Address Cih• S� ate Date of hicorporatiou ';� Siate,of incorporatiou 1 )VIZ Ccrtific a Nuni �r I Is corporation authorized to do business in Miuncsola? y172 %tS0 T� a � XYes D No P1140-c of corporation if a subsidiary of another corporation. O,c uatnc 1. Desanbc premises to be I'ccnscd (location, facilities). 77— Floor establishment is located on Scatiug capacity Hours food will be av able Number of people restaurant employs MAIN D S�rn - 9m So Number of months per year establishment will be open Name of manager 9 -_ Ede 2. If this restaurant is in corj unction with any other hu.qncss (resort, etc.), describe tic business. 3. Name the nearest municipality in which On Sale Eccuses are iswed. L, j % Q O CG O Has applicant, partners, officers or employocs ever had any Liquor Law violations in Minnesota or clsewhcre, including State Liquor Control Penahics? 11 Yes KNo Ifyes, gh!c date, charges and fatal outcome. 5. Is the applicant or any of the associates in this application a tnertihcr of the County'Board in which the liccnsA: will he isv,ed? U Yes i<No Ifyes, in wbat capacity? (If the applicant for this license or auy of the associates is the spouse of a member of the governing body or %%-here a fanlih' relationship exists, the mcruber sliall not vole on this application.)(PS 90 15-94) Yes XNo 6. I lave the applicant, auy interest. dirccth• or indirectly. in any other liquor e,tabli,fiinent in the county or am city in the county i.,uiug this license? Ify-cs. gh-c the came and address of the euablishntent. Yes )�No 7. During the past license •ear, has a ,untmous hem is awd under the Liquor Civil l.iabdity La%% ([rain Shop) M.S. 340A.902. Ifycs, attach a copy of the sutnroons. / Ye. No S. Will you sen'c liquor oa Sunday? Amount of Stmday License F'ee. Co %�O, 1G`t%. oev G—cC�nS� - I certify that I have read the above questions and that the answers arc true d correct to the best of tin' o%%m knowled NADiti9 h1ja 10711 Name of licant lease rust or type) A licant's si aturc Date The Lic cusec must have oue of the following: Chid cne A. Liquor Liability Insurance (Drain Shop) - S50,000 per person; S 100.000 more than one person; S 10,000 property destruction. 550,000 and S 100,000 for loss of mcaus of support. ATTACH "CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE" TO TIIIS FORM. B. A Surety bond from a surety compam• with minimum coverage as specified above in A. or -C. A certificate from the State Treasltrcr that the licensee has deposited with the State, Tnt,4 Funds having a market value of S 10.000 or S 100.000 in cash or securities. REPORT BY COUNTY ATTORNEY rrtify that to the best of niv knowledge the applicants naucd above are eligible to be licensed. O Yes ❑ No rf no, gate reason. azure REPORT BY SHERIFF Date I certify that to the best of my knowledge. the applicants named above have not been convicted within the last five years for any violation, of state lav or municipal ordinance relating to the sale of liquor, except as follows: Siguawre S1tcrifT 1171A — i q9 9`717 ©n/ S"4 -4 -e- )—, -I C e NSA County IMPORTANT NOTICE Dale ALL RETAIL LIQUOR LICENSEES MUST RAVE A CURRENT FF.DF.RAL SPECIAL OCCUPATIONAL STAMP. THIS STAMP IS ISSTrLD IlY 11fF B(fRfiAU OF AI.COI IOL, TOIIACCOANI) FIREARMS. FOR INFORMATION CALL (612)290-34'X. 12/07/98 .'MON 14:53 F.4.1 805 334 1072 TILE RAYNOTA COMPANIES RIVHRWOOD INN 2002 \ a iAN ..... =L'txs�r '.ya s, �. Y,xe... ;:+., _ .r�,. ::• �� ..mss? .>f.;�t:�3-.•.�'x..;� 5� F �� ..d • �y..�' Y:,.. , �r.•, .. .�.. 12/07/98 14:58 TX/RX NO. 1081 P.002 TFU3 CERTIFICATE IN ISSUED AS A MAI _--MILATION ONLY AND CONFER$ NO RIGHTS UPON TWECOT1FICATE Aon Koap it in i i ty 14OLDOL TK2 CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 1211 SW Fifth Ave., Suite 600 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICES BELOW. Portland OR 97204 COMPANIESA a COVIDUdE COAPAW MS/s J 1 503-224-9700 A Piational Swrwty Corg, IFF) COMPANY Regency Inns Management, Inc. B Commerical Interior Decer.Etal COMPAW 2500 N Louise C Sioux Falls SO 67107 COWANV D THISISTOCERTPY THAT THE P0LICIES0FNNSURANCELISTEDBELOWHAVEBEENIS5UE0TOTI•ETNSURED N/wEDABOVEFORTHEPOLICY PERM INDICATED. NOT WR HST AND04GANYREOUREMENT.TEMAORC ONDITIONOFANYCONTRACTOROTHEROOCL*AENTWITHRESPECTTOWHICHTHIS CER TFICA T E MAYBE ISSUED ORMAY PERT AIV, THE 04SURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLNCES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICES. LIMIT SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAMS. O0 LT* Tr WCW aemikim a /PLIaTIA"amm POI.IOV IPFM IE UKM t4naaw" POL101130"aAT OKM i 'f) Latus SONIMALLwa.TTY OENERAL AOONTEQAIE J QQ PWMUCIS-CAIPICP AW 3 1444404 A X ea1gES+GCAIC%NEiLILIAeLST`r CLAIMS MACE RECUR DX(8ob84874 7!01!96 bt30/99 PERSONA. t ADV KAPY f 1000000 OW013rSaCOUTRACTOR'SPROT 51/PD DED: 5,000 PER EACH OCCURRENCE t 100000 FIRE DAYAM (Any ort firs) f 100000 L i a uo r L i ab : PER LOCATION AGO Wo Exp (Mv w" pwwn) J1000 euTo4raeT�tuaaas ANY AUTO C7JAa3[rED 31►7CLE t11111 � ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AU708 BODCLY 40IRY CPr P --i I HK4ED AUT08 NOW)WNED MHOS 90crLY (AL -RMI CP-600KIVIO f PROPERTY DAMAGE j eANAetU49LRY "0 OILY . EA ACCAMM t AM' AVrO - - OTKM THAI AXO MY: ' EACH ACCIDENT i AODREQ4TE f EX*1=Lnea.TTY EACH OCCLS�RENICE 11 0 0 00 '' t DO A umswLLA FORM XSCO0003231043 10/01/97 10/01/98 _ OIFER /HUT UMBFU_LA FORM PER LOC AGGIfNCL LIQ WOIaID[a 004!@dATTON MO [MPLOYOM'UABLlTT STATUTORY LIMITSf:i:::i: t:•:.. EACH ACCIDENT INE PROPRIETOR/ INCL PARTNERS/EXgCUTNE DISEASE • POLICY LIMIT J EACIAEtPL.0 4eE t OFFIf33tS ARE. EXC L oT>.ar Certificate holder is Additional Insured as respects liquor lic*nso for Pattern Station, Inc. DBA: Riverwood Motto Business Resort, 10990 95th St et NE Mon icello 5536 t. . f Shoes.& AMY or AI[ Asow mmceew POLIOmW at "NSELIM Setae Atli ID"ATTON DAT[ 111271"C. THE ISSURIO 0O4l ANY HULL 040"M TO MAL City o f Otsego 30 PAYS WWrTDI NOTIOR TO THE OMWIOAT[ NOLImI MAA®TO THE U!". 3899 Nashua Avenue NE BUT FALURE TO MAL SUO" NOT Ie[ SMALL IiFOSZ NO OausA•T" OR UAWAY Elk River MN 55330 or ANY KRO wPo" TM[ ooup'AMY• ITS AaeNTS ON Il "&=ffATTVTzS. 404548000 12/07/98 14:58 TX/RX NO. 1081 P.002 PATTERN STATION, INC. DBA RIVERWOOD INN MANAGERS ACCOUNT 10990 - 95TH ST., NE. PH. 612.441-6833 MONTICELLO, MN 55362 PAY TO THE ORDER OF 2167 .. /119 75- � DAT$/ RS Ma—:= 1 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER AGIZ1441. 100 11 4 729 MAIN STRLtT - ELK RIV (,LMN 53330 FOR 000 2 146ol 1409 190 38441: 0-0 3 71,12 1811' �.� Minnesota Department of Public 5atety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar St.. Suite 100L St. Paul. MN 5510t-2156 �'�• 612-296-6430 • TTY 612-282-6555 • FAX 612-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Cud fee i,'Mserved by MN liquor Contiolf 4 Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code ONSLWS City/County where license approved License Period Ending 06 / 30 / 1998 ID # Otsego Licensee Name pattern Station Inc. Trade Name Riverwood Inn & Conference Center Licensed Location address 10990 95th St NE City, State, Zip Code Monticello, MN 55362 Business Phone ( 612) 441-6833 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale 5 269 On Sale $ 4, 000. 00 Sunday $ 150.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following- Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confu-ms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) IVIS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability where license is issued. $000 in liability. / ) / Licensee Signature (Signature certifies that corresponds with the license period in city/county 0, 000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor Date S�G 19'f inf rmation to be correct and license has bee spproved by city/county. Cit Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date 2S (Signature certifies that renewalofa liqu r, wine*or club license h been approve the city/county as stated above. 011 Count Attorne "'2nature \ Date County Board issued lice n ignature certtfies licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff' Si nature Date T (Signature certifies licensee or associates hav,of becel cited during the past rive years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093-96 �tsQu� �C*ja -,I n rim �� n.rn��r-0 rz ,gingo 97f19-Y93RoO boow•tsviA 3&4 fa dine oeeot _Reuort below details of liquor taw violations (civil or gjMjjMWj4batbavetamu f0 las} five vears(Dates. offenses. I •• l o • I • _ t • wowt_1 1. C) U14RITWKII&PNIT_: •L DONALD HOZAPA, WEIGHT CO. SHERIFF City/County Comments: r evor, Minnesota Department of Public Safety ALCOHOL & GANIBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 444 Cedar St., Suite 133, St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 (612)296-6439 TTY(612)282-6555 RENEWAL OF CONSUMPTION & DISPLAY PERS UT Permit Fee $150 (Renewal Date: April 1) MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: ALCOHOL & GAMBLING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION 6133 Pattern Station Inc. Riverwood Conference 10990 95th St NE Otsego (Monticello), Center MN 55362 PUBLIC IF NAME AND ADDRESS;_ _ SHOWN ARE NOT COR 'MARE�(3E.S BII.oWy{ '' Worker's Comp Ins. Co.� l t t+�a h �u ka� Policy No. D W 80-7 1111JANglicy Period 10' 1-1-7 fk% 14-1-11 r%Ia r_JrPermit Name: 1' �I i —Trade Location address: City, State, •Code: �••�' l By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership, corporate off'icers,bylaws, membership, partners, home addresses, or telephone numbers. If changes have occurred during the past 12 months, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following will result in fines. 1. Applicant confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 2. Applicant confirms that for the past five years it has not bad a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Applicant confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Applicant confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. 5. Applicant confirms, no club on -sale intoxicating liquor license is held. 6. Applicant confirms business premises are separate from any other business establishment. (Signature certifies aft eve in \ City Cler ftokznature (Signature certifies that a consumption -le -r �e correct and permit has been approved by city/county. Date display permit has be approved by city/county as stated above). PS09097 (10/97) Amount Received CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 98-8 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL LICENSE FOR THE SALE OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR AND WINE ON SUNDAYS, AND SETTING REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF The Otsego City Council hereby ordains: Section 1. Special Sunday On -Sale License. Special on -sale licenses for the sale of intoxicating liquor and wine on Sundays shall be issued only to bowling centers, hotels, restaurants and clubs, as defined in Minnesota Statutes §340A.101. All special Sunday liquor licenses shall be issued for a period not to exceed one (1) year. All sales at such establishments shall be in accordance with Minnesota Statutes §340A.504, subdivision 3. Section 2. Special License Fee. The fee for a special on -sale Sunday liquor license shall be $200.00. This fee shall be in addition to any fees required for separate on -sale of off -sale liquor licenses. Section 3. Sunday Hours. The sale of on -sale intoxicating liquor on Sundays is allowed between the hours of noon and 1:00 am. on Monday. Establishments serving liquor on Sundays must obtain a special license as provided in Section 1 above. Section 4. Conditions of License and Sale. All special Sunday liquor licenses and Sunday liquor sales shall be subject to the conditions and requirements imposed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 340A and other applicable state law and Otsego ordinance number 93-06 , as the same may from time to time be amended, including, but not limited to, such matters as financial responsibility, insurance requirements, application processes and penalties for violations. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance is effective upon its passage and publication, according to law. Adopted by the Otsego City Council this 23rd day of November. '1998. � V VIAW-w'-nWmal,VA o 004A MM m Elaine Beatty, Cleik Posted: 12/1/98 -0tsego City Hall - Both Boards Published: Elk River Star NEws - 12/9/98 !�� /2-//l y g _ 3: PAI) $ 100.00 Wate of Aftuttim attt, COUNTY OF...... BVI?. QJ1.0................................. MUNICIPALITY OF ....... CITY..QK. I II I;.INt.`..'. 111 11111 011 A I -N MINNI �W IA No. 99-1 oTe I -aft art uor tirragri— "wnr„ SUNDAY LIQUOR PURSUANT TO APPLICATION THEREFOR, payment of a fee of $...1.00•,.00.•....•... VAN and upon investigation and satisfactory evidence of the qualification of the licensee........ herein named to receive the same and that the place of sale hereinafter described is a proper and legal place therefor, LICENSE IS HEREBY GRANTED TO l?ATI2N STATION,...1,`IQ.....id..k3�i7ktWC�QO..ZNN..and..G�(a1�iFERIIVG..�II�1'.F�t............................................................................... ............................... ..... .. N...... for the term of ..... S1X-.MQN.THS ..........................from the ..... IST .......... day of..JANuARy.............................. 19.9.9.., TO SELL INTOXICATING LIQUORS as defined by law AT RETAIL ONLY FOR CONSUMPTION "ON THE PREMISES" described as........................................................................................ ............................................................... 1.0.90...... 9I..ST..NE..L"IOLVTZCE�.LO...(cx>'s o)t�v....5536�.................................................................... I............. IN THE MUNICIPALITY OF ................. CITY...OF...OTSEGO................... in said County and State, at which premises said licensee...... control...... and operate...... a............. ...............................................R1VEf3kyC QD..INCL.AND...CiONE`ERFNC E..(ENTER................................................................................................................ as defined by law; subiect, however, to the laws of the United States, the laws of the State of Minnesota, the regulations and ordinances of said munic- ipality, and the rules and regulations of the LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSIONER, relating to the sale and distribution of intoxicating liquors, hereby made a part hereof, and subject to revocation according to law for violation thereof. This license is non -transferable except by consent of the authority issuing the same. WITNESS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF.........Q174..OF...OT'.SF.M.................and the seal thereof this........ 1.4TH .............. day of........... .......... Q . ... 19..9.8.. AtM:t:...... .. ... ................ .. $ ... CITY ..0 J-tM {.......... ................Clerk. (Seal) The ..................... MAYOR .OF.. Of the......... CITY.................................of............... wsk1QQ .......................... By..................................................................................................................... .............................. ZARRY.. NIERr.. MAYOR ................................................ Michael C. Couri- Andrew J. MacArthur Marcus W. Miller 'AW Goaued in Bbwis December 7, 1998 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, MN 55330 COURI & MACARTHUR Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Bax 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (612) 497-1930 (612) 497-2599 (FAX) couriandmacanhurapobax. com RE: Otsego- Dayton Sewer Agreement Dear Council Members: S, � Please find attached to this correspondence a revised draft of the proposed sewer agreement. This was drafted after a meeting last week between members of the Otsego and Dayton City Councils. At that meeting three main issues were discussed, the language regarding expansion of the plant, language regarding fixed and variable costs, and language relative to the sewer easement within Otsego which Dayton will need in order to bring sewage to and from the plant. These issues were addressed as follows: 1. The language regarding expansion was amended to include a formula for reallocation of costs upon expansion which would require that the total plant costs (initial and expansion) be divided by the number of gallons per day allocation of both parties after expansion, resulting in a per gallon charge for the entire plant. This would result in one party paying the other for a portion of the plant prior to that party using any of the expanded facilities. Attached you will find an example of this formula which we discussed at the Otsego -Dayton meeting last week. 2. In that portion of the agreement regarding fixed and variable costs we have stricken the language which limited those costs to just those listed. The power necessary for aeration and pumping, and which varies by flow has been added as a variable cost. We have also added language which indicates that other costs may be proper operating costs, and that they will be agreed upon between the parties, or may be challenged by Dayton through the arbitration proceedings set out for fee disputes within the Agreement. Letter to Otsego City Council December 7, 1998 Page 2 3. We have added language limiting the easement conveyed to Dayton to only sanitary sewer use. This means that the easement can only be used for that purpose. We have also added language stating that in the event that Dayton terminates the Agreement that sanitary sewer easement cannot be used to connect to any other facility. In recognition of the fact that Otsego may want to use the existing pipe to service areas within the City, the language requires Otsego to pay a depreciated land value for the easement but it may make an additional offer for the pipe. Any offer is subject to Dayton approval, but if the offer is rejected they are left with a useless easement, and liability for the same. There are some other minor changes in language from the November 18 draft, which is probably the last one that the full Council has seen. The draft attached to this letter should contain all of the changes shown as underlined or deleted. Could you please take a look at this draft this evening and let me know whether or not you have any problems with the language tomorrow, if possible. Dayton has a meeting tomorrow and would like to approve the Agreement then, if possible. The MPCA will meet next Tuesday regarding the Otsego EAW. It may be advantageous to have the agreement approved by both parties prior to that meeting. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. Very trul urs, ew J. Arch COURI CARTIIUR Encl. pc: Mike Robertson DEC -07-199E 1505 HOFF, BARRY & KUDERER P. 01 The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed below and no one also. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agerrt responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient, please do not use this transmission in any way, but contact the sender by telephone. TO: Andrew J. MacArthur Company/Fi(m. Couri & MacArthur Telephone Number. No, of Pages following: { ) FAX Number: 497-2599 From: George C. Hoff File No.: 1019-272 If transmission problems occur, or you are not the intended recipient, please call us at (612) 941-9220. Ask For: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Be: Dayton/Otse44 Sewer Agreement Per our discussion of this afternoon please find with this the agreement as amended. Please note the language under paragraph 12 which includes some language on cooperation between the parties in the event of cooperation_ After you have reviewed this please give me a call. cc: Mark Hanson City of Dayton Doug Anderson Anne Z abell ,-NWPDATA)DAYIJNIlAAisA* -7.FX2 PB,tiMSIONAL ASSOCIATION GrnkcF C. Frame, Os course. PAYWICIA E. KUI*Xhig December 7, 1998 THOMAS G. RAR", JR - JcKvra Gxoe Nfa>autuafc PAULA A. CALLIES Tuzpnom (6W 941 -MO STFPHmq A. 6AKFRl 14MQ-4S9-9 KrM1R4I,Y B. KMAR FAX (612) 941-1%9 • wt m unamro .+ �Vtsaarsin FiMA!'a. = Aaso AOMM 11a w PUMA The information contained in this facsimile message is privileged and confidential information intended for the use of the addressee listed below and no one also. If you are not the intended recipient or the employee or agerrt responsible to deliver this message to the intended recipient, please do not use this transmission in any way, but contact the sender by telephone. TO: Andrew J. MacArthur Company/Fi(m. Couri & MacArthur Telephone Number. No, of Pages following: { ) FAX Number: 497-2599 From: George C. Hoff File No.: 1019-272 If transmission problems occur, or you are not the intended recipient, please call us at (612) 941-9220. Ask For: SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: Be: Dayton/Otse44 Sewer Agreement Per our discussion of this afternoon please find with this the agreement as amended. Please note the language under paragraph 12 which includes some language on cooperation between the parties in the event of cooperation_ After you have reviewed this please give me a call. cc: Mark Hanson City of Dayton Doug Anderson Anne Z abell ,-NWPDATA)DAYIJNIlAAisA* -7.FX2 EEC -07-1'39E 16 : 05 DRAFT - DECEMBER 71 1998 SEWER UBE AGRERXE iT CITY OF OTSEGO AND CITY OF DAYTON P. 02 WHEREAS, the City of Otsego (hereinafter "Otsego") is in the process of constructing a wastewater treatment plant (hereinafter the "plant") near its border with the City of Dayton (hereinafter "Dayton"); and WHEREAS, the Plant will be designed to have capacity for the disposal of sewage from portions of Dayton and Otsego, and Otsego wants to allow Dayton to use the plant for the disposal of sewage criginating within portions of Dayton; and WHEREAS, both Dayton and Otsego will assume responsibility for the costs of original construction of the Plant, including land acquisition, engineering, and costs related to reviewing the site and obtaining necessary permits; and WHEREAS, Otsego will own and operate the plant, with Dayton being guaranteed the right to dispose of sewage at the Plant, subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement; and WRHREAS, Otsego and Dayton shall have exclusive ownership and control of all sewer lines lying within their respective jurisdictions, with the exception of that sewer line identified in Exhibit A to this Agreement which is that sewer line located within the City of Otsego which will be the primary line for delivery of sewer service to Dayton (hereinafter referred to as the "Dayton Service Line"), and which shall be under the ownership of Dayton; and WHEREAS, the parties by this agreement intend to establish an equitable means of paying the ongoing costs of operating the plant based upon capacity and usage, with the fee being charged to residents of each community for operation being equal, and including casts for operation and maintenance of the plant. Now, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Construction and Completion. Otsego will construct a Sewage Treatment Plant at the location shown on Exhibit B. Otsego will COnstruct the plant in accordance with the Plans and Specifications by Sonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik dated . Otsego will complete the sewage Treatment Plant no later than June 30, 2000, and have it available for service to the City of Dayton on said date. Otsego's obligation to construct the Plant is contingent upon its obtaining all necessary permits for construction and operation of the Plant. G-.%WPDATA%DAYTON.SF W R8CO7.AL;2 DEC -07-199E 16:06 P.03 Otsego also, has the right to not proceed with construction of the Plant in the event of termination under paragraph ? of this agreement. 2. Use Allowed. For the term of this agreement, and any renewals thereof, Otsego hereby grants to Dayton the non -transferable right and license to dispose of sanitary sewage from within that sanitary sewer service area within the City of Dayton as defined in the June, 1997, Study done by Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates (Figure 1) attached as Exhibit C, and to have said sanitary sewage treated at the otsege Wastewater- Treatment- Plant. Waste treatment done shall be in conformance with all applicable laws and regulations which apply to the Plant and its operation. The initial disposal capacity at the Plant that Dayton will be allowed is 40,000 gallons per day for the first phase of plant operation. The disposal capacity that Dayton may use may be expanded pursuant to paragraph 12. The total amount of said sanitary sewage from Dayton shall not exceed 1.0 million gallons per day, nor shall it at any time exceed 49% of the available plant capacity at any given time, subject to approval by Otsego and further restrictions as contained within this Agreement. If requested by Otsego, Dayton shall adopt an ordinance governing use of sewers; provided any such ordinance shall not be any less restrictive than the sewer use ordinance in effect in Otsego. 3. ownership. Dayton shall own, maintain and repair, at its sole expense, those sewer lines within the borders of the City of Dayton which connect to the Otsego sewer system. Otsego shall own, maintain and repair, at its sole expense, the sewer lines lying withai.n the borders of Otsego, exclusive of the Dayton Service Line. otspgo shall acquire the easement for the DavtOn Service Line no later than June _1. 1999._ All costs and liability associated with the Dayton Service bine, including land acquisition costs, engineering, construction and maintenance shall be paid for solely by the City of Dayton. In the event Otsego acquires more property, or property rights, to the value of the property interest each is retaining. Upon acquisition by Otsego of the easement necessary to construct the Dayton service lines and upon receipt of full payment of all land acgilisition costs related to the Dayton service line by Dayton to Otsego, Otsego agrees to convey by warranty deed an easement fox sanitary sewer serviceuses (with right of reversion in the event that Dayton terminates this Agreement, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D) to Dayton the acquired easement for the Dayton service line_ Necessary maintenance and repair of the Dayton service line shall be paid for solely by the City of Dayton. Otsego hereby grants the City of Dayton a right of entry to repair and maintain the line, or Dayton may request that Otsego repair and maintain the line with all costs for the same being the responsibility of Dayton. K DEC -W-1995 16:06 ME 4. Otsego Property served By Dayton service Line. The areas shown on the attached Exhibit E are Lots which are within the municipal boundaries of the City of Otsego. These lots, however will receive service through connection with the Dayton system of sewer lines. Dayton is obligated to provide service to the lots shown on Exhibit E only in the event that Otsego levies assessments against all said lots in an a-meaounf requested by Dayton and all lots waive in writing app assessment, or no appeal is has been filed from said assessments or any appeal filed has been dismissed.o All for assessments or payments of assessments received by otseg the lots on Exhibit E shall be paid within 30 days to the City of Dayton. Otsego shall pursue all means of collection of delinquent assessments, and shall advise Dayton of all delinquencies and efforts being made to collect delinquent assessments. Otsego shall assess and bill the property owners and pay directly to Dayton any applicable assessment or fee for use of the Dayton service line. The portion of treatment capacity represented by the Otsego residents will be counted as a portion of Otsego's capacity. In the entall fees for service is provided Otsego, Dayton shall bill the Otsego fquarterly basis sewer service for the lots on Exhibit E on a qu Y and Otsego shall pay all amounts billed within 30 days Of billing. Unpaid bills shall carry interest at the rate specified in paragraph 5 of this agreement. In the event of billing other than bills for service on a quarterly is (i.e. payment for repair, meters, etc.) the same shall be sent to Otsego, which shall pay the same within 30 days of billing. All residents receiving service from and through the Dayton service line shall be subject to regulations established by Dayton. 5. Initial Capital Contribution. Dayton shall pay one-fifth (1/5) of the initial construction cost of the plant. The initial Construction cost shall be costs associated with the 7Plns ant which includes all preliminary engineering studies, p specifications, all costs associated with all ircon environmental reVIew land and obtaining a discharge Permit, acquisition for the plant site and discharge facilities to the Crow River, construction inspection costs, and all costs for actual construction of the Plant facilities as set forth. vid the approved plans and specifications as well as any app change orders, which are necessary to allow for the construction and operation of the plant (hereinafter change order) . It, is the intention of the parties that Dayton shall be kept abreast of information on the progress and ton shall Of construction on an ongoing basis. consequently, Dayton be provided with information on the progress ofeconstruction, all proposed change orders when the same are updated on Otsego and other information d change ordehat will r equals or exceeds the project_ If any prop g 5% of Dgiven at least t 14 days noticontribution to the initial ce of thet cost ion shall be Dayton shall qproposed 3 DEC -07-199E 16: 07 am change order and, in its discretion, may terminate its their obligations under this agreement, subject to the retention by Otsego of all funds received to that date by Otsego from Dayton, by providing written notice within 21 days of the ten 9;&all notice provided by Otsego. This Pa,meftt by E3ay etie �t� Otsego shall provide Dayton with an itemized billing of all costs listed above which have already been paid by Otsego to the date of this Agreement_ Dayton shall make payment to Otsego for 20% of those costs previously paid by Otsego on or before (30 days after execution). In the event that payment is not made by that date interest on that amount will accrue at a rate of interest 10% above the rate of any bonds sold by the City of Otsego for financing the project and commencing upon the date of this Agreement. If final payment of this amount is not made on or before ,, (90 days after execution) otsego, at its discretion, maymay terminate this Agreement and neither Dayton nor Otsego shall have any further obligation to the other with respect to the project. Payment �_ .1.1, __rsae-I tv a t location set _forth herein. All other bills received by the City of Otsego for any of the above mentioned costs after shall be immediately copied to Dayton along with a statement indicating the amount of that }gill to be paid by Dayton. Dayton shall within thirty (30) days of receipt of such a statement make payment to Otsego for its portion of the bill submitted- If any such payment is not made within days of receipt of said billing, interest will accrue as set forth above. preliminary Costs. All of those costs a554ciat2d with land acquisition, and construction of the Dayton SeLJice line shall be borne by Dayton. If Otsego is requested to acquire the needed easements for construction of said line, in conjunction with its proceedings for land acquisition, all costs related to acquisition of necessary sanitary sewer easement for the Dayton service line shall be billed to Dayton at the time of expenditure, and Dayton agrees to promptly pay all such billings. The parcels for the Dayton service line shall be separately appraised and any settlement shall be subject to review by Dayton prior to acquisition. 7. Agreement Termination. The parties shall receive an updated estimate of initial construction costs and land acquisition costs (as defined previously in Paragraph 4 of this Agreement) for the facility two weeks prior to advertisement for bids. In the event that the actual construction cost, based upon bids received, and easement costs exceed that estimate by 10% of said estimates, either Otsego or Dayton may terminate this Agreement and all future obligations thereunder. Dayton must exercise it rights of termination within fourteen (14 ) days of the receipt of the actual cost, based on bids received, and negotiated, or adjudicated settlements of easement acquisition DEC -07-1998 16:07 • costs. Otsego shall provide said costs within seven (7) days of its receipt of the same. In the event that Dayton terminates the Agreement, Otsego shall retain all funds received from Dayton prior to the date of termination. 8. Ongoing service. Otsego hereby warrants and covenants that the Plant and necessary lines and appurtenances, shall be available to Dayton for the treatment and disposal of sewage in at least the amount of the capacity granted under this Agreement from time to time and as such capacity may be increased from time to time in conformance with this Agreement and in conformance with all applicable laws and regulations, except for periods of necessary or emergency maintenance, or in the event that the plant is forced out of operation by catastrophic events, including, but not limited to fire, flood, stoma, war, or any other natural or man made catastrophe. The warranty is only to the extent of capacity as defined in this agreement. Otsego further warrants and represents that the Plant will be properly licensed for the disposal of sewage to the limits set forth in this Agreement 9. Fee Formula. Dayton shall pay a fee to Otsego for its share of operating expense of the Plant. it is the intent of this Agreement that the two communities equitably share ongoing costs of wastewater treatment operation and maintenance with fixed operating expenses shared based upon allocated capacity and variable expenses shared based upon flow volume. The fee to be paid by Dayton shall consist of two components; a portion of the fixed operating expense and a portion of the variable operating expense. Fixed Operating Expense shall include, and b limited ';a: (a) Wages, salaries and related expense of all on-site employees while engaged in the operation of the Plant. (b) insurance premiums for property damage to the plant. (c) The cost of heating, air conditioning and lighting necessary for the operation of the Plant. (d) Laboratory and testing expense necessary for the operation of the Plant (e) All regular plant maintenance and repair, including the costs of any contracted or additional costs necessary to affect proper maintenance and repair. Repairs are those actions necessary to maintain the structural integrity of the facility and its various components, including maintenance and repair of access roads and fencing or other means of protecting or screening the facility. Due to the term of this Agreement, and potential extensions of the same, it is understood that proper maintenance and repair of the facility may from time to time include full replacement of certain facility components or structures. It is the intention of this 5 DEC -07-1996 lh : 09 P. 0-11 Agreement that the facility be maintained and repaired so that it is in the same condition as a similar well maintained and repaired facility which has been in use for the same period of time (hereinafter "operating condition"). Otsego shall give at least days notice to Dayton of any proposed repair or replacement which will cost more than If Dayton does not agree to pay its share of said cost, it shall. notify Otsego within days of receipt of the notice. In the event Otsego still wants to proceed with the repair or replacement and to have Dayton share in the cost as provided herein, the same shall be submitted for determination the panel as established in paragraph 10 of this agreement. The panel shall decide if the proposed repair or replacement is necessary to maintain the -lant's "operating condition." Variable Operating Expense shall include a"a be to the following: (a) The cost of materials and chemicals consumed in the treatment and disposal process at the Plant. (b) The cost of sludge hauling and disposal. (c) Other expenses incurred as a direct result of a statutory or State regulatory requirement. (d) The cost of providing_ Power for that machinery and eggipment which may vary based unnn the flow of _sevag 1. Dayton, for its share of the Fixed operating Expense, shall pay: an amount equal to the proportion of the capacity which is available to Dayton. Dayton is currently allocated 1/5 of the capacity of the plant and will thus pay 1/5 of the Fixed Operating Expense for the Plant. In the event Dayton is allocated additional capacity under the terms of this agreement, then its share of operating expenses shall be in the same proportion as the capacity it is allocated_ 2. Dayton for its share of the Variable operating Expense shall pair an anount equal to the proportion of the number of gallons of sewage Dayton places into the Plant in relation to the overall flow to the Plant_ By way example, if the overall flow to the Plant is 200,000 gallons and Dayton contributes 40,000 gallons to the overall flow, it would be responsible for 20% of the Variable operating Expense. The amount of flow to the plant in total, or by either party, shall be determined by the flow meters at locations agreed by the City Engineers. The parties recognize that the varia bl expense can be impacted by the strength of the sewage and DEC -0? -199E 16:09 P. 0E that the assumption for the sharing of variable expense set forth herein is that the strength of the sewage for each party is approximately the same. 3. An operating fund shall be established upon commencement of operation of the wastewater treatment plant and availability of sewer service to Dayton. At that time, and prior to any service delivery, Dayton shall deposit into that fund the estimated cost of one quarter of payment for operation of the facility. Thereafter, payments shall be made by the city of Dayton into the fund on a quarterly basis in an amount estimated by Otsego as the amount to be charged in that next quarter. Each year the fund shall be adjusted by additional charge to Dayton, or refund, based upon actual use. Any interest earned by Otsego on funds paid to it by Dayton under this paragraph, shall be credited to Dayton. 4. if an epera`bieqia-net listed- abeve, it shall be the sale ef the 9tsege. The items listed The parties recognize, however that there may be expenses which neither can anticipate at the time of this agreement The parties therefore agree that if there is an expense necessary for the operation of the Plant that is not listed above it shall be proportionally shared by the part -les as set forth above The parties shall agree as to whether the expense is an operating expense and if so, whether it is a fixed or variable expense. In the event the parties cannot agree on whether it is a necessary o2eratincL expense or whether it Its a fixed or variable expense, the matter shall be submitted to binding arbitration pursuant to paragraph 10 of this agreement. Ia. Right to Review, If either party wishes to challenge any the amount of payment due, it shall be free to do so at its own expense, with the following conditions: Flow determination. Either party may challenge the amount or percentage of flow that goes into the sewer line(s) serving Dayton by arranging for and paying the cost of flow monitoring. The results of said flow monitoring shall be provided to the other party, along with all supporting documentation. The non -challenging party shall have 30 days to accept the results as presented or to undertake, at their expense, their own flow monitoring. If no action is taken by the non -challenging party within that time period, the flow determination as presented shall be deemed binding on both parties. If the non ---challenging party decides to challenge the results, it shall have 45 days *within which to complete the monitoring and present the results. If the second monitoring F'1 DEQ --07-1996 16:09 :r produces a different result, the matter shall be submitted to panel consisting of the city Engineer from Dayton, the City Engineer from Otsego and a third party chosen by the two Engineers. The cost of the third engineer shall be split evenly between the parties. The determination of the panel shall be final as to the amount of flow attributable to Dayton. The panel shall prescribe its own procedure for reaching a decision, provided that each side will be afforded the reasonable opportunity to present evidence and make- inquiry akeinquiry of the opposing party. Fee determination. If Dayton wishes to challenge the fee claimed by Otsego or the calculations associated with it, Otsego will make available to Dayton all the records necessary to complete its review within two weeks of the request_ In the event Dayton and Otsego cannot agree on the fee to be charged to Dayton, the dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration before a panel to be selected by the parties at the time of the dispute. 11. ownership and Maintenance of Lines. Dayton shall pay for, own and maintain all sewer lines constructed within its boundaries, and the Dayton service line. Dayton shall regularly maintain said lines so as to keep them in good operating order. Dayton shall regularly inspect the lines and immediately correct any problem which could adversely affect Otsego's facilities or the Plant or which could result in inaccurate readings of flow through said lines. Otsego shall pay for, own and maintain the sewer lines constructed within its boundaries, with the exception of the Dayton service line. Otsego shall regularly maintain said lines so as to keep them in good operating order. Otsego shall regularly inspect the lines and immediately correct any problem which would adversely affect or interfere with delivery of service to Dayton. All services provided at the Plant by Otsego shall be done in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. 12. $xpansion. it is the intention of the parties to freely allow the expansion of the Plant capacity by Dayton or Otsego for its use, but to limit the use of unused capacity assigned to either party to an agreement between the parties. Dayton may request expansion of the facility to acco=aodate additional sewage disposal needs of Dayton, under the following conditions: (a) Dayton, on behalf of Otsego has Minnesota Pollution control AgencyM� PCA) approval for the proposed expansion of the Plant, if any is required. Otsego shall cooperate with Dayton in obtaining any necessary MPCA approval. (b). Dayton has secured plans for the expansion of the Plant from an engineer/ architect approved by Otsego and properly licensed by the State of Minnesota to design such a facility 8 DEC -07-199E 16: 1-3 P.10 and the plans are approved by Otsego, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. (c)• Dayton has demonstrated that it has the financing to pay For the proposed expansion, cash, or loan. by either an approved bond issue, (d)- The expansion shall Dayton not cause the overall capacity to to exceed 1.o million gallons per day, nor shall it at any time cause Dayton to have more than 491 of the available capacity Of the plant. (e) If the request for expansion is to utilize unused capacity, approval by Otsego. If, at the time of Dayton's request far expansion of capacity, the Plant has unused capacity, the City of iOn Of shall be allowed use of that capacity, provided City Of conditions on al and (e) are met. Dayton shall be allowed the expanded capacity within thirty (390.) days of notice to Otsego, in the event there is unused capacity available. In the event Dayton is requesting plant expansion. O_.t-s-ecxo shall act- evm -,,., ....._-____-- , - - - . ---&' wcLk-on w'T-nln 120 days satisfaction of a of the request, upon ( ) - (dj above. Provided, however, that Dayton shall, if requested by Otsego within 10 days of Otsego getting notice from Dayton of a proposed expansion, meet and confer on the advisability of a plant expansion in a greater amount, to accommodate a use of the additional capacity by Otsego. In the event Otsego determines a need for additional capacity, the cost of any plant expansion shall be borne the parties jointly in proportion to the amount of capacity each is receiving from the expanded plant. For example, if Dayton is receiving an additional 20,00o gallons and Otsego is receiving and additional 10, 000 gallons, Dayton shall bear 2/3 of the expense and Otsego 1/3 of the expansion expense. In the event either party does a plant expansion without the other, that party shall be solely responsible for the cost of the expansion. Otsego shall make a determination as to whether it wants additional capacity no .later than 90 days after receipt of notice of proposed expansion by Dayton. Aeaardless of which ar-t 's an in the Plant the parti.as ree to Coo crate to the --tent.necessary to accomplish the Plant ex ansio authori ed by this Agreement If Dayton has expanded the Plant as provided above and there is unused capacity, Otsego may request utilization of any unused capacity. Authorization to use such unused capacity shall be subject to approval by Dayton. In the event either party uses unused capacity of the other, it shall pay to the other party a portion of the initial V DEC` -07-1996 16: 1 P. 11 construction cost for said capacity in proportion to the capacity used. For example, if Dayton is utilizes another 40,000 gallons of original plant capacity, it shall pay an additional 115 of the initial construction costs. I` Dayton expands and Otsego uses 1/5 of the expanded capacity, otsego shall pay to Dayton 1/5 of Dayton`s cost for the expanded capacity, such amount shall be paid before either party has a right to use the additional capacity. 4-a-alzlonal capacity until the amount owed to the othez party is paid. 13. otsego remedies. In the event Dayton violates a_ny provision of this agreement by non-payment, Otsego shall have the right to bring an action for payment after giving 3o days w-ritten notice of the default.. If Dayton does not fulfill its obligations under this agreement in any other way, Otsego shall give 10 days written notice of the default. Dayton shall have 10 days to cure the default or to set forth a plan for curing the default within a reasonable time, in light of the nature of the default and other relevant circumstances. If Dayton fails to cure the default or put forward a reasonable plan for curing the default, Otsego may seek appropriate injunctive or other appropriate equitable relief. The foregoing is not a limitation on other legal or equitable remedies which Otsego may have available to it. 14« Daeytbn Remedies. In the event Otsego fails to fulfill its obligations, warranties and representations the City of Dayton shall provide 30 days written notice of said failure to Otsego. Otsego shall have 10 days to cure the default or to set forth a plan for curing the default within a reasonable time, in light of the nature of the default and other relevant circumstances. Provided, however, that if a default by Otsego results in sewer service to the City of Dayton below Dayton's allocated capacity under this agreement, otsego must immediately correct the problem upon written Notice by the City of Dayton. If Otsego fails to cure said default, Dayton 10 DEC -Or -199E 16:11 P. 12 may seek appropriate injunctive or ether equitable relief The .foregoing is not a limitation on other legal or equitable remedies which Dayton may have available to it_ 25. Notice and Termination. Dayton shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, but not until initial construction of the plant has been completed and Dayton has paid all of its share of initial construction costs. If a scheduled or requested expansion of the plant has been undertaken, Dayton shall not be able to request termination of this Agreement until after completion of construction of any such expansion and payment of Dayton of all of its share of capitol costs and related expenses incurred due to the plant expansion. The termination shall take effect two (2) years after written notice is given by Dayton of its intention to terminate the Agreement. In the event of termination, all obligations of Dayton to make payment to Otsego, except for funds expended prior to the date of termination shall cease upon the effective date of the termination. In the event that this Agreement is terminated prior to its term, for whatever reason, ownership of the Dayton service line shall iminediately revert to otsego. In the event that the Damien sel_ J& -Shall pay t -f83�the fie#mss i on �-y interest bag sr n8 -price-e€ t#e ea9eme t aed-tAe Best efthe sawer- pipe or -roar-imp c aemento i�-the easement tomes -theme e- 02-9 ems- at-t#e—time of to fta''e�-€�a� E� of t �thit Ag:FeeEaen1d a date seyen,6y--* -- t1l�� vur: ';'4 V �C used nv �aYLon to conVeY sewage to or from any sewage to or from any sewage treatment facility other than the Plant 16. Land Application Of sewage Sludge. In the event that Otsego is not able to find adequate areas outside of both Cities for land application of sewage sludge, by contract or otherwise, and sewage sludge must be applied to lands within its boundaries, Dayton agrees to provide appropriate disposal capacity for application of sludge in proportion to its share of the existing plant capacity at that time. Dayton's responsibility to provide such disposal capacity shall 11 DEC -07-199E 16:12 P. 13 increase or decrease over time in relation to its proportion of existing plant capacity. 27. Te %- This agreement shall be in effect for twenty five (25) years from the date hereof and shall be renewable by Dayton upon the same terms and conditions for two (2) additional twenty five (25) year terms following the initial term. Dayton must give written notice of its intention to renew the agreement at least six (6) months prior to the end of the initial or renewal term. Following the initial three (3) terms set forth above, Otsego agrees to enter good faith negotiations with Dayton concerning extension of this agreement if requested by Dayton. Any such request shall be made at least 1 year prior to termination date of this agreement. 18. IndemnitY. Dayton shall defend and indemnify Otsego for any claims axising from Daytonis operation of sewer lines within the boundaries of Dayton and the Dayton service line. Otsego shall defend and indemnify Dayton for any claims arising from its operation of the plant or boundaries of Otsego, sewer lines located within the Dayton service line. except for claims arising from the 19. Ma$ificatian Of Agreement. This Agreement may be modified only by written agreement of both parties. 20- N-Otice. All notices required by this Agreement shall be in written form and shall be deemed delivered upon its receipt by the city Clerk of either party_ Notice may be Yaade by personal delivery, mail or facsimile. WHEREFORE, the parties have agreed to the foregoing terms_ THE CITY OF oTSEGO By: Dated: Its: Mayor THE CITY OF DAYTON By: Dated: Its: Mayor 12 TOTAL F.13 NCS -2—_-1996 17! L4 Original Plant Cost original Plant Capacity Dayton's Share Dayton's Cost Otsego's Share Otsego's Cost November 23, 1998 $100,000 l0o,000 gal. 20,000 gal. $ 20,000 80,000 $ 80,000 Expansion Plant Cost $ 25,000 Expansion Plant Capacity 50,000 gal. Dayton's Sham of Cost $ 25,000 Dayton's Shara or Capacity 50,000 gal. Total Capacity Total Cast Cost pe- Gallon $150,000 gal. $125,000 $.83 Total owed by Dayton = 70,000 gallons X .83 = $58,100 Total Owed by Otsego = 8(7,000 gallons X .83 = $66.400 P.02 TOTAL P.02 AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer Elaine Beatty Council of: 12/14/98- 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: 7.1. Consider approval and adoption of the Feasibility Report for Odean Avenue (CSAH 37 to 39) Project, COP #98.05. 7.2. Water Tower & Tank COP #98.03 Consider for approval revised Change Order # 1 7.3. Well 92 COP 998.01 Update information on well construction 7.4. Public Works: Data & spreadsheets for your information - No action necessary. a) Revised spreadsheets for 1999 Seal Coating, Gravel, Striping and Crackfilling b) Additional spreadsheets for year 2000 Graveling C) Bituminous Overlay Program (1999 -2001) 7.5. Consider Reimbursement to landowners for unplanted crop lands in 1998 in potential easement areas, due to future sewer and water construction. 7.6. Any other Engineering items BACKGROUND: 7.1.through 7.6. Larry Koshak will be present to explain these items and answer any questions. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council information, update and any decisions. Thanks, Elaine CITY OF OTSEGO CITY ENGINEER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS December 14, 1998 Item 7.1 Consider approval and adoption of the Odean Avenue (CSAH 37 to 39) Project Feasibility Report. COP #98.05 We have presented the Feasibility Report to the Council at the workshop on November 12, 1998. The council will be asked to consider accepting the report with approval of an assessment method. The method of assessment needs discussion. We are proposing the unit and front footage method for those properties that benefit from the improvement. To determine who gets assessed and how much is the issue that hopefully the council can determine. We have determined that there are more assessable units if the new 4 in 40 zoning is used and fewer if we use the old 1 in 40. We used the City's Assessment Ordinance that states, "On MSA streets, the benefited properties will be assessed for an equivalent city street." In our report, we have determined that the equivalent residential street is $20.47/front foot. Item 7.2 Consider for approval revised Change Order No. 1 for the Water Tower and Tank. COP #98.03 We are presenting a revised Change Order No. 1 that will add to the price of the contract by the amount of $15,245. At the previous 11/23/98 council meeting, the same Change Order was passed by the council with no increase to the contract price. At that time, we received indications that the contractor was not asking for an increase. Phone conversations and a meeting at the site with the contractor representative subcontractor, Tank & Tower Foundations, gave all indications that no additional cost was required. However, at the preconstruction meeting on 11/24/98, the contractor was represented by Brad Jones, project manager and brother to the president Gene Jones. A site visit apparently caused Mr. Jones to re -think the cost of constructing the water tower and tank on this site. The original Change Order No. 1 was not returned signed by Maguire Iron. Then on December 1, 1998, we received a fax stating that the "changed conditions" caused the contractor to request additional monies to accommodate the construction on the new site. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\901\ot901 agendal2-98a.doc We support that the "changed conditions" warrant additional costs, primarily because the site is steeper and has more difficult terrain. After a week of negotiation and compromise by letter and phone calls, we were able to recommend to the Mayor and City Administrator that the above amount be considered for approval. Fortunately, the weather and temperature has been with us in this matter. Based on the Mayor's poll of the Council members and his direction, Mike Robertson has written a letter to Maguire Iron relating the consensus of the council and approval of the Mayor to the increase. With the indication of approval the subcontractor, Tank & Tower Foundations, has begun the grading work and excavation for the access road and foundation. The Change Order No. 1, revised, is attached for your information. Original copies will be made available for signatures. The soils report is not included in the Change Order material, however, that document can be made available if requested. Mike has a copy of the soils report in the office. Item 7.3 Update on Construction of Well #2. COP #98.01 The construction of Well #2 began on November 23, 1998. The contractor, Traut Wells, has drilled the well, set the casing and is now developing the well. The contractor hopes to complete the development by December 14th, and then begin the test pumping. The good news is that the formation appears to be firmer than Well #1 formation. After blasting the formations with above 25# of explosive, the retrieval of formation sand is estimated at 125 cubic yards. That means the contractor has been able to create a significant cavity in the formation. At this point we are optimistic about the quality and quantity of the well water. The well should be completed by the end of the year. Our next step will be to begin designing the pumphouse. We anticipate designing the pumphouse to treat and meter water from three wells - #1, #2, and a future Mt. Simon well on the same site. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\901\ot901agendal2-98a.doc AGENDA ITEMS - PAGE 2 of 3 Item 7.4 Public Works A. Spreadsheets We are providing the revised spreadsheets based on the direction received at the Budget Workshop. Please attach these to your Maintenance Manual for further reference. 1. 1999 Seal Coating, Gravel, Striping and Crackfilling Spreadsheets. 2. Year 2000 Gravel Program — This spreadsheet shows with a budget of approximately the same as 1999, the City could catch up on the graveling program as outlined in the Maintenance Manual at the end of year 2000. 3. Albertville share of maintenance on common streets with the City of Otsego for 1999 is estimated at $4,970.50 for seal coating and striping, and $8,139 for gravel in the year 2000. B. Bituminous Overlay Program (1999 — 2001) (see attached letter and exhibits) Item 7.5 Consider reimbursement to landowners for not planting crops on their land. Apparently when meeting with the farmers in the area on whose land the sewer and water facilities would be placed, it was recommended that the farmers not plant crops. At the time, it was thought that the sewer and water project would be constructed in 1998. Obviously the project was delayed. We have no idea how many farmers this affected. However, when we attempted to get permission to discharge the Well #2 water on to Kevin Lefebrve's property, he brought up the subject. Hakanson Anderson Associates wrote a check to Kevin in the amount of $300 for this purpose. Kevin also was agreeable without this issue resolution to allow the City to discharge water on the land. A permission letter was signed by both Kevin and Mike Robertson. It appears appropriate that the City reimburse those farmers for the loss and assign that cost to acquisition of easements. Hakanson Anderson Associates would request reimbursement for the $300 check given to Kevin. Item 7.6 Any other Engineering Items C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO�901\ot9o1agendal2-98a.doc AGENDA ITEMS - PAGE 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM 7.1 FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PROPOSED BITUMINOUS STREET RECONSTRUCTION OF ODEAN AVENUE OTSEGO, MINNESOTA December 1998 Prepared by: HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 Telephone: 612/427-5860 hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under State of Minnesota Statutes Sections 326.02 to 326.16. V\-- .a Lawrence G. Koshak, P.E. eg. No. Ronald J. Wagner, PE Reg. No. Date Date CONTENTS INTRODUCTION II. OBJECTIVE 111. PROJECT LOCATION IV. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. EXISTING CONDITIONS B. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS C. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT D. JUSTIFICATION OF BIKE/PEDESTRIAN PATH E. ESTIMATED COSTS F. ASSESSMENT 1. ASSESSMENT BY FRONT FOOTAGE 2. ASSESSMENT BY LOT UNIT 3. ISTEA GRANT V. PROJECT FUNDING VI. PROJECT SCHEDULE VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ASSESSABLE UNITS (1 PER 40 ACRES BASIS) ASSESSABLE UNITS (4 PER 40 ACRES BASIS) Table 1 — Odean Avenue Improvement Project Cost Estimate Table 2 — Comparison of Cost for Typical Residential Otsego Street to Proposed Odean Avenue (per linear foot) Table 3 — Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments by Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural and 150' max. for Large Undeveloped Lots in Areas Zoned Residential Table 3A- Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments by Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural and Actual Front Footage for All Lots in Areas Zoned Residential Table 4 - Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A Table 4A- Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A Table 5 - Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 Table 5A- Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 ATTACHMENTS APPENDIX A EXHIBIT A PROJECT LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT B TYPICAL SECTION OF ODEAN AVENUE EXHIBIT C 85TH STREET & ODEAN AVENUE INTERSECTION LAYOUT EXHIBIT D EXAMPLE CROSS-SECTION OF ODEAN AVENUE EXHIBIT E EXAMPLE CROSS-SECTION OF ODEAN AVENUE - DITCH SECTION I. INTRODUCTION When Otsego Township became the City of Otsego in late 1989 and was eligible for Municipal State Aid (MSA) funding, Odean Avenue was taken over as a City Street. Wright County Highway Department changed the designation on CR 122 to CSAH 37 from Odean Avenue east through TH 101 to CSAH 42 and upgraded the road. Odean Avenue from CSAH 37 to CSAH 39 was put on the Municipal State Aid road system. The traffic counts on Odean Avenue for 1992 and 1996 show the highest volume of any City street. The condition of Odean Avenue changed rapidly in the last 8 years to a point where it needs a major reconstruction. A maintenance project for crack sealing and pavement patching was done in 1997 as an interim repair. In 1994, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA) was enacted by Congress. The functional classification was upgraded on Odean Avenue from Minor Collector to Major Collector. In doing so, the reconstruction of Odean Avenue was eligible for ISTEA funds. The City applied for funds for every year since then. In 1996 the project first appeared on the list of considered projects for 1999 funding years, but failed to make the final list. In 1997 the project made the final list for the year 2000 program in Mn/DOT District 3. In mid-1997, Mn/DOT indicated that it was projected that the Federal government would be increasing the shares of funds available to Minnesota. The potential of the increase was that projects ready for construction in 1999 could receive early funding. As a practical matter this did not happen for the Odean Avenue Project. Due to the large amount of funds needed ($1.5 million), the district did not receive enough additional for early funding of this project. However, the District engineer has stated that if the project is approved early, the City could use all of the MSA construction funds available and any advance funds allowed by the State Aid. The City however, directed Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. to begin the design phase in preparation for the early construction. The Federal portion of the funding is 80% and the local funding is 20% for construction costs. Since Odean Avenue is an MSA Street, the MSA eligible components of the local 20% can come from the MSA construction fund. Until a final cost is prepared, and the cost participation approved, it will not be known for sure if every cost in the reconstruction will be eligible for funding either Federal or MSA. The City is scheduled to receive a $1.2 million grant for the reconstruction of Odean Avenue from ISTEA funding. The process to finalize funding requires completion of plans and specifications, preparation of a project plan report, hold a public hearing, prepare a design report and acquisition of all necessary easements and right of way, and project authorization by Mn/DOT after which final funding approval is made. The preliminary application that has occurred and the estimated costs used for initial funding application were made based on very preliminary estimates without detail C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 1 of construction. Those details have been refined for this design report. The cost data has been evaluated based on those details. II. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this report is to identify in detail the nature and extent of the improvements and to develop a total cost estimate based on proposed construction. Within this report we have identified permanent and temporary right of way or easements and temporary easement requirements for construction. This report recognizes the City policy for assessing the "equivalent residential street cost" for improvements to major collector streets, and identifies the recommended assessment against abutting and benefited properties. This report is intended to be used as a design outline for plan and specification completion and as input to informational meetings and the necessary public hearings leading to potential assessment of some portion project costs. III. PROJECT LOCATION The project consists of improving Odean Avenue from north of CSAH #37 to CSAH #39. The roadway is located within sections 16, 21, and 28 of Township 121N, Range 23W. The south project terminus is a connection to a previous project, which improved the intersection of CSAH #37 and Odean Avenue. The north terminus is northerly of the intersection with CSAH 39. The project length is about 23 miles. IV. ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A. EXISTING CONDITIONS Odean Avenue is currently a 24 -foot wide paved rural design street with ditch sections and cross culverts to provide drainage. The project is evaluated and reviewed as two segments, separated by 85th Street. The south segment located between CSAH #37 and 85th Street is at a higher elevation and the soils generally tend to be clayey with silts and some sand. The north segment located between 85th Street and CSAH #39 is at a lower elevation. The soils are generally more sandy with silt or clay components. Both segments of roadway have exhibited signs of pavement distress in recent years. In 1997 the most severe cracks were milled out and pavement patch material placed in the areas milled out. Based on the distress that is evident in the pavement, we anticipate the subgrade soils may require special correction for roadway construction. Test borings are being performed to determine the exact subsoil characteristics. The geotechnical report has been ordered and data from that report will be used in final pavement design. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 2 The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps indicate that several of the low areas within or adjacent to the right-of-way are protected under the Wetland Conservation Act of 1991 (WCA) Wetland. These areas will require special attention during the project design phase. The wetland areas must be delineated and work must be performed within the guidelines of the WCA. The existing Right of Way varies but is usually 66 feet to 70 feet in width. At some locations, primarily at either end, there is additional existing ROW. There are no known drainage and utility easements located adjacent to the ROW except in limited locations on newer plats. The current roadway profile has one sharp vertical crest curve. Sight distances appear to be compromised at some of the roadway intersections along the project length due to horizontal obstructions, primarily tree growth. The current average daily traffic along the roadway is about 2500 ADT. This traffic count is expected to increase in the near future due to proposed development work in the area. An executive style golf course is planned for the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 20. Residential lots are being sold in a newly completed development in the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21. Both developments, when completed, and other anticipated growth in Otsego will cause an increase in traffic counts from 85th Avenue on to Odean Avenue. B. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENTS The project involves reconstructing the roadway to Municipal State Aid (MSA) standards within Federal ISTEA guidelines. The design is required to be in metric units. Odean Avenue is proposed to be a 13.2 m (43.3') wide urban design section with concrete curb and gutter. A 3.0 m (10') wide bike path/walkway is proposed for the west side of the roadway. The bike path/walkway is proposed for the west side due to large powerpoles located on the east side. Placing a bike path on the west side of the roadway will move the centerline of the roadway 2.2 m (7.2') to the east of the centerline of the Right of Way. A typical design section will consist of a minimum 90 mm (3-1/2") bituminous surface over a minimum of 150 mm (6") of Class 5 aggregate base course. A 600 mm (24") layer of select granular soils will be placed below the aggregate base to provide structural support where subgrade soils are determined to be marginal for roadway construction. Exhibit B depicts the proposed urban design section with a bikeway/walkway. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 3 Right of Way acquisition will be necessary to expand the ROW 80 feet. At the intersection of 85th Street, 100' of ROW will be required to allow for turning lanes. A sketch of the proposed intersection is included as Exhibit C. Slope easements and temporary construction easements will be required to allow for roadway construction. The extent of the ROW and easements required will be determined during the preliminary design phase of the project. ROW acquisition will occur after the final design is completed. C. STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT PROJECT The proposed street improvements are in both the Lefebvre and the Hall's Pond Watershed district. The long range watershed improvements must be considered for the design of Odean Avenue's improvements. A sub -regional pond in the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21 has been constructed. Hall's Pond itself is presently at or near full capacity. Options to increase the capacity of Hall's Pond are discussed in length in the Feasibility Report for the Reconstruction of 85th Street, 1997. The report concluded the most cost-effective manner to do this is to create a regional pond just prior to Hall's Pond in the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 21. The construction of Odean will incorporate the piping to accommodate the proposed regional drainage plan presented in the 1997 report. D. JUSTIFICATION OF BIKE/PEDESTRIAN PATH A bike/pedestrian path along Odean Avenue conforms with existing City planning. The current traffic makes it unsafe for pedestrians and bicycles to travel in conjunction with cars on the present 24 foot wide surface with no shoulders. Two approved City bike path plans include a bike/pedestrian trail along Odean Avenue. The City of Otsego's Comprehensive Plan proposes placing a bike path from CSAH #37 to 78th St. along Odean Avenue. The City of Otsego's Parks & Recreation Plan proposes a bike/pedestrian trail along Odean Avenue from CSAH #39 south past CSAH #37 to Odean Avenue Pond south of 70th Avenue. The addition of this trail will connect residential areas to a recreation area and to other bike/pedestrian trails (proposed and existing). E. ESTIMATED COSTS Cost estimates for the proposed improvements were determined by estimating quantities and using prices received in previous bids for projects of a similar nature. The amount of right-of-way and temporary construction easements needed is included and the acquisition costs and research, filing fees, etc. were included. Overhead or indirect costs of 20% do not include easement and R.O.W. costs. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 4 A preliminary total estimated project cost is shown on Table 1. The estimate will be converted to metric units for final plan submittal. F. ASSESSMENT The City of Otsego policy requires every property to pay an equitable share of construction and reconstruction costs for the roadway to which the property has direct access. On roadways with pavement width or structure that exceed the design of a typical residential Otsego street, the property is responsible for the equivalent of the cost to construct a typical street. The cost of a typical residential street per foot is shown in Table 2. Two options are available to the City by which costs can be assessed to those benefited. Benefiting properties are either assessed by front footage or by lot unit. The lot unit option basically averages the benefiting front footage over all benefiting lots. Option 1 (front footage) assesses each residential area front footage by the estimated cost to construct one foot of a typical residential street. Areas zoned Al (Agricultural Land) by policy are assessed at not more than 150 feet per 40 acre lot. Large, undeveloped lots within the areas zoned low density residential can either be based on the actual front footage or at not more than 150 feet. Table 3 — Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments By Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural And 150' max. for Large Undeveloped Lots in Areas Zoned Residential Table 3A- Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments By Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural And Actual Front Footage for All Lots in Areas Zoned Residential Option 2 assesses each lot on a unit basis. Areas zoned Al (Agricultural Land) are assessed at 1 lot unit per 40 acre parcel or at 4 lot units per 40 acre parcel. Areas zoned residential are assessed at 1 lot per unit or the larger undeveloped lots can be handled at 4 lots per 40 acre parcel. Table 4 - Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural And using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A Table 4A-Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural And using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 5 Table 5 - Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural And using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 Table 5A- Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Area Zoned Agricultural And using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 The total assessment costs shown on Tables 3, 4, 4A, 5, and 5A are for a typical residential street. The total assessment amount is less than the project cost. The total of ISTEA grant, local funding through MSA, and property assessments will cover the entire cost of the project. V. PROJECT FUNDING Project funding is 80% Federal grant and 20% local of all eligible construction costs. All indirect non -eligible costs are 100% local funds. Using our latest cost estimate included in Table 1, the following is a funding breakdown: The local share of $732,240.00 can be paid for using State Aid Construction Funds. The City has $993,913.00 as of September 1998 available for construction purposes. Assessments are estimated at either $190,283.80 or $218,982.74. Any costs not eligible for ISTEA & MSA Funds will need to be provided by the City through assessments or general funds. VI. PROJECT SCHEDULING The normal project schedule is based on ISTEA grant money availability in the funding year 2000. Using ISTEA grant allocation for the year 2000, the plans would need to be approved for bidding prior to July 1, 1999. The project could then be bid and construction could start during the fall of 1999 for year 2000 completion. An accelerated schedule proposes that the project could be bid in the spring of 1999 and constructed in the summer of 1999 if the City of Otsego assumed responsibility for temporary funding. The City of Otsego would be reimbursed 80% C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 6 FEDERAL LOCAL TOTAL Estimated Construction Cost $1,287,480 $321,870 $1,609,350 Estimated Indirect Costs for Design Engineering, Attorney $0 $321,870 $321,870 Fees, Testing, Construction Engineering, Etc. ROW & Permanent Easement $0 $88,500 $88,500 Acquisition (Estimated) ESTIMATED TOTALS: $1,287,480 $732,240 1 $2,019,720 The local share of $732,240.00 can be paid for using State Aid Construction Funds. The City has $993,913.00 as of September 1998 available for construction purposes. Assessments are estimated at either $190,283.80 or $218,982.74. Any costs not eligible for ISTEA & MSA Funds will need to be provided by the City through assessments or general funds. VI. PROJECT SCHEDULING The normal project schedule is based on ISTEA grant money availability in the funding year 2000. Using ISTEA grant allocation for the year 2000, the plans would need to be approved for bidding prior to July 1, 1999. The project could then be bid and construction could start during the fall of 1999 for year 2000 completion. An accelerated schedule proposes that the project could be bid in the spring of 1999 and constructed in the summer of 1999 if the City of Otsego assumed responsibility for temporary funding. The City of Otsego would be reimbursed 80% C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 6 of the construction costs when ISTEA funds become available in October 1999. The total funds available for construction projects through MSA after February 1999 is $1,217,623.00 and the City can borrow up to $500,000.00 in advance encumbrances. Utilizing this, a total of $1,717,623.00 could be used toward Odean Avenue. At the projected project cost of $2,019,720.00 this leaves a shortfall of approximately $300,000.00. This portion could be borrowed from the City General Fund or by bank note. The length of time the money should have to be borrowed should be approximately 2 months (September 1999 and October 1999). After October 1999, ISTEA grant money totaling $1.2 million would be available to reimburse the City the $300,000 and other construction funds borrowed from the MSA account. Of the $900,000 remaining, approximately $500,000 will reimburse the advance encumbrance and $400,000 will be in the City unencumbered MSA account. VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Reconstruction of Odean Avenue is necessary due to the structural deterioration of the existing pavement section. Potential development in the area will add traffic, taxing the capacity of the existing roadway, which makes the improvement desirable. The project is technically feasible and appears to be financially possible. C:\Share\WPmuniWOTSEGO\334\OT334FEAS-rev.doc 7 APPENDIX A V) F- Q� Ui w0�a R23W Z z O z �d 6 rd CI 9 rd ST. W QV) 00 r S 9 _ j�d . N. C� G�� e UJ 0 A 2 0� O 2nd S > o { MQ N Q c ` W w co U) Z Q� v N.E. 9 st T. Q �sf 5 > o 0 91st CIR. ' A w Q O W I..L Q N.E. Ot ST.' 16 15 a NE 90th 5T. O Vj I. 12 E. 89t ST. t7 NE 89th ST. i < N 8 th S a0 N.E. 88th w ) < Fi8th O O NE th ST. j N. . 88 h ST 88 h T. 8 h a z z O a 0. N.E. 87th ST I I I I = = '�' 87" a Z V W N N.E. 85th ST. Q Z n85th ST. N 84 �'F a �y0 0 G� l N m N 83rd S . a 8 ^ ST ZhN r N z a Z r2l N i 87 , cV 2 s? 27 NF OO C4 1 a W NE at ST. o _ O U O E. 78t 5 R l L t^ rQi Z n N n M n 0 72nd ST 0 A W 71A ST Z 71st T 282 A. H. N 37 3334 (N. 70th ST.) _l. i r��3 00[ I 11 'HOA A A '' z m m \\JI Oq a m oc A.t. CIR. —m O m z L D '421 m 2 UNITS 2 UNITS 2 UNITS 4 UNITS ODA �1d N 2 UNITS -4 34 33 32 30 °'0 3 = cl .E 20 19 16 8 5 1 40 39 37 36 N.E. 27 23 OD N 17 AVE 11 10 m 7 6 3 2 Z 0 m 26 25 18 OD L 12 ODELL AVE. w N.E. ODEL 31 X13 24 z 2 UNITS 35 ..1 0- • VE 4 UNITS m a z w m m Z NE OGDEN .� J _u AVENUE Z J n m m N N � ,p AV w N E. GRE N N.E ACK AVE. N .E 0 LAN PJ E. CA N _ N HLAN AVE. _ C4 Do CA E PAC RD AVE. 0 d � � n Z Z V1 n �^ n m m n A P P N Z 1 PA Eq zm J fJ ' f 1001 NEGR�VNUI m D 92nd 1lll�]IL J'I ca s rt = ? U1 ti .Nj ,S Ni H V / ASSESSABLE UNITS 4 PER 40 ACRES BASIS HDkanson ODEAN AVENUE N.E. '7 Anderson Assoc.,lnc. O ,ODO 2000 CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA —• scut w FEES DATE: 11/08/98 FILE: OT334 85th.dwg Table 1 City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Cost Estimate October 1998 Mobilization LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Removals LS 1 $67,500.00 $67,500.00 Subgrade Excay. Correction CY 6500 $6.00 $39,000.00 Common Excavation - E.V. CY 40000 $2.25 $90,000.00 Cl. 5 Agg. Base Course TON 21000 $5.90 $123,900.00 Bituminous Pavements TON 13500 $23.00 $310,500.00 Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 25000 $7.25 $181,250.00 Revegetation & Landscaping LS 1 $85,500.00 $85,500.00 & Erosion Control Signs & Markings L. S. 1 $41,700.00 $41,700.00 Storm Sewer & 85th St. Pond L. S. 1 $570,000.00 $570,000.00 Bike Path L. S. 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 Total Est. Construction Cost Overhead @ 20% Subtotal $1,609,350.00 $321,870.00 $1,931,220.00 ROW Acquisition Acre 12.5 $5,000.00 $62,500.00 Drainage or Slope Easement Acre 1 26 $1,000.00 $26,000.00 Total Estimated Project Cost Share/exceUotsego/OT334FEAS-TABLES.xis Sheet: TABLET $2,019,720.00 Printed: 10/21/98 Mobilization Removals Bit. Pavements Class 5 Agg. + Bit. Berm/ C. & G Common Exc. Storm Sewer Revegetation Signs & Markings Bike Path Easement & ROW Table 2 Comparison of Cost for Typical Residential Otsego Street to QUANTITY 1 LS 1 f 0.620 Ton 0.525 Ton 2 f 0.802 CY 1 f 1 f 1 f Proposed Odean Avenue (per Linear Foot) COST/UNIT $5000/LS $2.00/LF $23/Ton $5.90/Ton $.50/ft $2.25/CY $8.00/ft $2.50/ft $1.00/ft COST $0.45 $2.00 $14.26 $3.10 $1.00 $1.81 $8.00 $2.50 $1.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 1 LS 1 f 1.17 Ton 1.83 Ton 2 f 3.5 CY 1 f 1 f 1 f 1 f 98.5 sq ft 47.3 sq ft COST/UNIT $25000/LS $5.90/LF $23/Ton $5.90/Ton $7.25/ft $2.25/CY $49.50/ft $7.43/ft $3.63/ft $6.5/FT $0.029/sq ft $0.144/sq ft Estimated Construction $34.12 Estimated Construction Indirect Costs @ 20% $6.82 Indirect Costs @ 20% Total Project Cost $40.94 Total Project Cost COST $2.17 $5.90 $26.91 $10.78 $14.50 $7.88 $49.50 $7.43 $3.63 $6.50 $2.86 $5.45 $143.51 $28.70 $172.21 Typ. Residential Otsego Street LF $40.94 = 23.77% Proposed Odean Avenue LF $172.21 City policy calls for assessment against properties equal to the cost of a typical residential street. We recommend an assessment of $20.47 per frontage foot. + Past residential street project assessments did not include concrete curb. The streets were either bituminous curb or rural sections. Share/exceVotsego/OT334 FEAS-TAB LES.xls Sheet: TABLE2 Printed: 10/21/98 Table 3 City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments by Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural and 150' max. for Large Undeveloped Lots in Areas Zoned Residential December 1998 1 M.IPar a Flame F Cost rf t Pa,., l ei $784.77 2 164302 ..;.' $20.47 1 Olson Acres Lot 4 257.30 $20.47 $5,266.93 $784.77 2 164302 310.71 $20.47 $6,360.23 $947.67 3 164303 311.11 $20.47 $6,368.42 $948.89 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 5 Otsego Acres 1st Add Block 1 Lot 2 190.00 $20.47 $3,889.30 $579.51 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 182.02 $20.47 $3,725.95 $555.17 9 Otsego Acres 1st Add Block 3 Lot 1 290.40 $20.47 $5,944.49 $885.73 10 211302 328.00 $20.47 $6,714.16 $1,000.41 11 211301 270.56 $20.47 $5,538.36 $825.22 12 211300 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 13 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 218.40 $20.47 $4,470.65 $666.13 14 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 217.00 $20.47 $4,441.99 $661.86 15 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 400.50 $20.47 $8,198.24 $1,221.54 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 400.50 $20.47 $8,198.24 $1,221.54 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add. Block 1 Lot 10 258.52 $20.47 $5,291.90 $788.49 18 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 14 162.00 $20.47 $3,316.14 $494.10 19 213101 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 266.20 $20.47 $5,449.11 $811.92 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 170.00 $20.47 $3,479.90 $518.51 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 282.22 $20.47 $5,777.04 $860.78 24 214300 208.70 $20.47 $4,272.09 $636.54 25 214302 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 26 214303 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 27 281202 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 459.56 $20.47 $9,407.19 $1,401.67 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 297.04 $20.47 $6,080.41 $905.98 30 282101 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 31 281300 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 32 282101-a 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 33 283105 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 34 283400 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 35 284203 172.00 $20.47 $3,520.84 $524.61 36 284200 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 37 284204 295.00 $20.47 $6,038.65 $899.76 38 284201 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 39 284202 330.00 $20.47 $6,755.10 $1,006.51 40 284301 418.00 $20.47 $8,556.46 $1,274.91 9295.74 $190,283.80 Cost per year is based upon equal annual payments for 10 years at an interest rate of 8%. Share/exceUotsego/OT334F EAS -TA BLES.)ds Sheet: TABLE3 Printed: 1219/98 Table 3A City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments by Front Footage w/ 150' max. per 40 acre in Areas Zoned Agricultural and actual Front Footage for All Lots in Areas Zoned Residential December 1998 a:.4:;::€ Cost/ tt. Pam Pei t t .........,.a, ,.,.z,w#,.....,,•.•..,•,.,,. , x «;a;;• t,...,,,,,,;:•<zt«,..:,.t«s.�.«.t�:.;'E°a£zza:t.::<:�.::`� .z••z. <:Z<'zz3;. ,.; v. M. "- D j: .. „ .:.tw.•. :....... ,. tit. :'�`: 1 Olson Acres Lot 4 257.30 $20.47 $5,266.93 $784.77 2 164302 310.71 $20.47 $6,360.23 $947.67 3 164303 311.11 $20.47 $6,368.42 $948.89 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 5 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 2 190.00 $20.47 $3,889.30 $579.51 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 182.02 $20.47 $3,725.95 $555.17 9 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 3 Lot 1 290.40 $20.47 $5,944.49 $885.73 10 211302 328.00 $20.47 $6,714.16 $1,000.41 11 211301 270.56 $20.47 $5,538.36 $825.22 12 211300 712.00 $20.47 $14,574.64 $2,171.62 13 Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 218.40 $20.47 $4,470.65 $666.13 14 Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 217.00 $20.47 $4,441.99 $661.86 15 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 400.50 $20.47 $8,198.24 $1,221.54 Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 400.50 $20.47 $8,198.24 $1,221.54 Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add. Block 1 Lot 10 258.52 $20.47 $5,291.90 $788.49 8 Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add. Block 1 Lot 10 162.00 $20.47 $3,316.14 $494.10 19 213101 990.00 $20.47 $20,265.30 $3,019.53 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 266.20 $20.47 $5,449.11 $811.92 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 170.00 $20.47 $3,479.90 $518.51 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 282.22 $20.47 $5,777.04 $860.78 24 214300 208.70 $20.47 $4,272.09 $636.54 25 214302 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 26 214303 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 27 281202 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 459.56 $20.47 $9,407.19 $1,401.67 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 297.04 $20.47 $6,080.41 $905.98 30 282101 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 31 281300 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 32 282101-a 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 33 283105 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 34 283400 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 35 284203 172.00 $20.47 $3,520.84 $524.61 36 284200 150.00 $20.47 $3,070.50 $457.50 37 284204 295.00 $20.47 $6,038.65 $899.76 38 284201 200.00 $20.47 $4,094.00 $610.01 39 284202 330.00 $20.47 $6,755.10 $1,006.51 40 284301 418.00 $20.47 $8,556.46 $1,274.91 10697.74 $218,982.74 Cost per year is based upon equal annual payments for 10 years at an interest rate of 8%. SharelexceVotsegolOT334F EAS -TA BLES.xis Sheet: TABLEM Printed: 12/9/98 Table 4 City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Areas Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A December 1998 :.:,:..»..:...::.:.,:..:..,..,.: »»..z.., .....::..................::::.:..... atm I:::Name ,...,. ;<>:: Rte:.:..........., .....:....................,., . ......,................ ...:.a...,.::o: t. .:.......... ........................................................... `.: �::........... ... ......... ..... ............... ............ ............. .....:.... .......................... ;. rOp�r�#@S< Olson Acres Lot 4 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 2 164302 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 3 164303 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 5 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 2 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 9 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 3 Lot 1 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 10 211302 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 11 211301 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 12 211300 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 13 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 A t Vasseues Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 17 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 10 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 18 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 14 1 _ $5,474.57 $815.71 19 213101 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 1 _ $5,474.57 $815.71 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 24 214300 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 25 214302 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 26 214303 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 27 281202 1 _ $5,474.57 $815.71 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 30 282101 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 31 281300 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 32 282101-a 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 33 283105 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 34 283400 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 35 284203 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 36 284200 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 37 284204 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 284201 1 $5,474.57 $815.71 284202 1 $5,474.57 _ $815.71 40 284301 1 $5,474.57 _ $815.71 40 $218,982.74 Share/exceVotsego/O T334F EAS -TAB LES. As Sheet: TABLE4 Printed: 12/9/98 Table 4A City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Areas Zoned Agricultural ,and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3A December 1998 1 Olson Acres Lot 4 1 44,Zy�5.iis yo3a.1 1 2 164302 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 3 164303 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 5 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 2 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 9 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 3 Lot 1 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 10 211302 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 11 211301 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 12 211300 2 $8,587.56 $1,279.55 13 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 16 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 17 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 10 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 18 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 14 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 19 213101 2 $8,587.56 $1,279.55 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 24 214300 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 25 214302 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 26 214303 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 27 281202 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 30 282101 4 $17,175.12 $2,559.09 31 281300 4 $17,175.12 $2,559.09 32 282101-a 2 $8,587.56 $1,279.55 33 283105 2 $8,587.56 $1,279.55 34 283400 2 $8,587.56 $1,279.55 35 284203 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 36 284200 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 37 284204 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 284201 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 284202 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 40 284301 1 $4,293.78 $639.77 51 $218,982.74 Share/exceUotsego/OT334F EAS -TAB LE S. xls Printed: 12/9/98 Table 5 City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 1 Lot per 40 Acres in Areas Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 December 1998 2 164302 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 3 164303 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 5 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 2 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 9 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 3 Lot 1 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 10 211302 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 11 211301 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 12 211300 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 13 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 14 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 17 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 10 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 18 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 14 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 19 213101 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 24 214300 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 25 214302 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 26 214303 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 27 281202 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 30 282101 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 31 281300 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 32 282101-a 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 33 283105 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 34 283400 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 35 284203 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 36 284200 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 37 284204 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 38 284201 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 l 284202 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 J 284301 1 $4,757.10 $708.81 40 $190,283.80 S hare/exceUatsego/OT334 F EAS -TA B L E S.xls Printed: 1219198 Sheet: TABLE5 Table 5A City of Otsego Odean Avenue Improvement Project Estimated Roadway Assessments Per Lot Unit using 4 Lot per 40 Acres in Areas Zoned Agricultural and using Front Footage Benefit from Table 3 December 1998 1 ......,.:.. a......:.::.........,,..: :: ' .:.,.. 'W, f a I.Vu pJJJ.JV .........v, .:,.......: v: >;.:n, ,::.,:,.: v, .>. ,.. >,, .:...:v:n.• t:� .:: h ..n.: ,.,c::..,vwv.,v.:ly. '�:\>: $3,731.05 $555.93 3 ,} 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 1 uison Acres LOT 4 1 'W, f a I.Vu pJJJ.JV 2 164302 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 3 164303 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 4 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 1 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 5 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 1 Lot 2 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 6 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 7 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 7 Halls Addition Block 3 Lot 6 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 8 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 2 Lot 2 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 9 Otsego Acres 1 st Add Block 3 Lot 1 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 10 211302 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 11 211301 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 12 211300 2 $7,462.10 $1,111.85 13 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 7 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 14 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 8 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 9 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates Block 1 Lot 10 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 17 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 10 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 18 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 2nd Add.Block 1 Lot 10 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 19 213101 2 $7,462.10 $1,111.85 20 Heritage Hills Block 4 Lot 11 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 21 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 5 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 22 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 6 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 23 Walesch Estates Block 1 Lot 14 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 24 214300 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 25 214302 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 26 214303 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 27 281202 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 28 Deer Field Acres Block 1 Lot 1 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 29 Walesch Estates 2nd Add Block 4 Lot 15 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 30 282101 4 $14,924.20 $2,223.71 31 281300 4 $14,924.20 $2,223.71 32 282101-a 2 $7,462.10 $1,111.85 33 283105 2 $7,462.10 $1,111.85 34 283400 2 $7,462.10 $1,111.85 35 284203 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 36 284200 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 37 284204 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 38 284201 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 284202 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 284301 1 $3,731.05 $555.93 51 $190,283.80 Share/exceUotsego/OT334F EAS-TABLES.xts Pnrrted. 12/9198 Sheet: TABLE5A APPENDIX A S. A. H. I I NU• �7 I (N.� 7th ST-) LIL�l I I I I I �0 1500 3000 sr�g IN FEET erson Andx Anderson Assoc.,Inc. I rti.rr ar..r�. � urrc.�. w.w.ar NE 89th ST. ST. TO c� IJ 2 72nd ST. EXHIBIT A PROJECT LOCATION MAP ODEAN AVENUE N.E. RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA GATE 1/21/98 FILE- Or24 BSTHAW9 AVMOVOH 03SOdOUd —E N_ ~ J r ci E toG m� AVM-J0-1HDW ij 4 g � Z.o N W /f • Y v� a f WZ v T 2 m C N I N� v Nn Moa - - F- 'Ya W =N Z z d : .0 m bt h m U� _ V ovo Pro 3 Z w o � 3 o� m _ Z U) <oo N� z W Z J M < Wyl � 3Ym U � z �o W (n w o _ m J Q LLJ = Q o X C) Q LL- o CI4 LLJ W � n O v a F QWz o < E5 a y/ F- 'Ya W =N Z z d : .0 m bt h m U� _ V ovo Pro 3 nm <�c7S Wa dwEw <oo N� z u < Wyl � 3Ym F- 'Ya W =N Z z d : .0 m bt h m U� _ V ovo Pro 3 Q H M W LL— O O M V) f O+ Z w W 0 3 Z v M/a 113 09 z WZ Z J Wp: :2 [n F- Z W f--0UO�o M/a '� DOL I I m 0— W> Q Z �-- w O(n Qcn'. Uva Ld LLJ = 0 N W � O � �1 � 00 Lj I C5 m z F k Q Z o S o V o n ^ N N n � Q D D D C I I Q D D W } fir, I c W N Ci Q t DD � D HL S a B I '3'N 133aLS 000 „ .L „ 10 QD�£0£ DQDD QO Q DD D x N S_ L TI D 3 I m 8 ^ Ntz 8 ` F n ICy d h 'u VM/a •1! oo L 8 �- N M/a'U u w Z J F,1 24.384 m (80.00 FT.) w Z J 3 I O 2.2 m � VARIES (7.2 FT) TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 0 w 3 N 1 O OQ VARIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT II Lm 00 I PROPOSED GROUND ct ui EXISTING GROUND 288 __ ._._.. _...__ ...__._._.__ ,------...__ ._., _..__. __._._...._.. _..... -- ___..�__ ._.... .. 288 A__.2y......_ — — — — — — 2. 286 --- -- . -- - --- --- -�� • -- -,-- _ _ --- - ' - - -- ---- - .-- = 286 i _. _� -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE W METERS 1 : 200 HORIZ. o s 10 GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS 1 : 100 VERT. Ankerson Anderson Assoc..Inc. ..-...�... � .ter. w Z J 3 I 0 1 ir PROPOSED GROUND 24.384 m (80.00 FT. VARIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 0 Li 0 a- 0 cr 0 EXISTING GROUND 270 _ �_ _..__...__ _ 270 22. I __ ..... 268 20 30 -30 -20 -10 0 10 U 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE IN mETiRS 1 : 200 HORIZ. 0 5 10 GRAPHIC SCAB IN METERS 1 : 100 VERT. Ankerson Anderson Assoc..Inc. EXHIBIT E EXAMPLE CROSS—SECTION— DITCH SECTION ODEAN AVENUE N.E. CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 1/21/98 FILE: OT334 ot334x—s.dwg 3 2m 3m 8 (6.55 FT.) (9.85 F z 0.5m CLEAR ZONE I BIKE P 2m (8.55 FT.) OrON'E 3 0 0 z } a 3 o 0 F5 2.2m CL F (7.2 FT.) c v 24 384. (80.00 FT) -A 13.2m (43.3 FT.) 16M " 3.6m (11.81 FT.) (11.81 F DRIVE LANE DRIVE L s.. S 3.Om (9.85 FT.) CURB AND PARKING LANE 3 0 0 z } a 3 o 0 F5 2.2m CL F (7.2 FT.) c v 24 384. (80.00 FT) -A 13.2m (43.3 FT.) 16M " 3.6m (11.81 FT.) (11.81 F DRIVE LANE DRIVE L 3.Om *ROADWAY SECTION IS DEPENDENT ON GEOTECNICAL REPORT I ■■■ Ankerson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. A:^ �z I: i i `ter se t4.184m 3 ,(13.73 FT)� ACK COAT � 3,ra BASE COURSE TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT `- SUBGRADE pWARATIM I'. EXHIBIT B i TYPICAL SECTION ODEAN AVENUE N.E. CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 1/21/98 FILE: OT334 nt334DT.dwq s.. 8618 CURB AND CUTTER (TYPICAL) m TYPE 41 WEAR COURSE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 40mm TYPE 41 - toomm CLS �• -:�:': v., =� BITUMINOUS PAVE AGGREGATE BASE i SUBGRADE PREPARATION 150mm CL 5 •;- ,I I AGGREGATE F 3.Om *ROADWAY SECTION IS DEPENDENT ON GEOTECNICAL REPORT I ■■■ Ankerson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. A:^ �z I: i i `ter se t4.184m 3 ,(13.73 FT)� ACK COAT � 3,ra BASE COURSE TYPE 31 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT `- SUBGRADE pWARATIM I'. EXHIBIT B i TYPICAL SECTION ODEAN AVENUE N.E. CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 1/21/98 FILE: OT334 nt334DT.dwq 11 L MAI 1" 09 M/a •1-4 oot I I n b Uva � 431 � g 0 I I C,3 o 0 ^E gE n '3' N 1338iS U 000 in x X LLI hz x x x x I -x I x Z x Q 3 I n _I vM/2i •1! 00 M/a •j 09 n Fi o O L � Q H o M U0Zw zwwov ZZ LLJ O���� J� 61- z w o En Ow Qzw LLI Q(1) HE of z F— co O 07 � LL- Wa'F—�J �o� Z o °° U a 0 n Fi W Z J 3 I 0 1 cy VARIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT i S 24.384 m (80.00 FT 2.2 m (7.2 FT) W Z J 3 1 0 I VARIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 3 In 0 0 M 0 PROPOSED m a0-1 288 286 > -- --- } -- --- 4 -�-----•---.. --- -� - --- -- -- - -- --- --- = --- - --- - - l `I : -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 r 0 10 20 GRAPHIC SCAB IN METERS 1 200 HORIZ. 0 S 10 s GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS �. '— Ankerson 1 : 100 VERT. lAnderson .I Aswc.,Inc. )UND STING GROUND 288 - - - 286 M_ 30 EXHIBIT D EXAMPLE CROSS—SECTION ODEAN AVENUE N.E. CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 1/21/98 FILE: OT334 ot334x—s.dwg VARIES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT PROPOSED GROUND i..d 4 24.384 In (80.00 FT) 270 268- _- _ �.--- _---!_- __ -_ _ --- -30 -20 -10 l l M���; Assoc.,lne. 0 10 20 GRAPHIC SCALE IN METERS 1 200 HORIZ. 0 5 10 GRAPHIC SCALE IN IETFRS ` 1 : 100 VERT. W 1 r C "EXISTING 09- UND -----__----.. - --? - 270 r . 268 10 z '; ,. 20 30 SV EXHIBIT E EXAMPLE CROSS -SECTION - DITCH SECTION ODEAN AVENUE N.E. CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 1/21/98 FILE: OT334 ot334x—s.dwg Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. AGENDA ITEM 7.2 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER Order No. 1 REVISED Date: 12/9/98 Page 1 of 2 P1, . :t: Construction of Water Storage Tank & Tower Owner: City of Otsego, 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E., Otsego, MN 55330 To: Maguire Iron, Inc., P.O. Box 1446 Sioux Falls. SD 57101 (Contractor) You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications: Description of Changes INCREASE (Revised Plans Attached) in Contract Price Item 1 – Location of Tower Site – The location of the tower & tank site has been changed to a site located on the south side of CSAH 37 approximately 800 feet west of the intersection of CSAH 37 & TH 101 (approximately across the road from the former site). The location was changed when a willing seller agreed to sell the site to the City The Geotechnical Exploration Report dated 11/30/98 by GME Consultants found the soil bearing capacities at elevation 899.0 feet MSLD to be 4000 P.S.F., equal to the original site bearing capacity but at 0.42 feet lower than the original footing elevation. A soil boring was taken at the site by GME Consultants on 11/17/98. The footing design requires minor modification and wall openings for electrical conduit and water Or— need revised locations due to the change in the site location. .ae to the steepness of the new site and the additional structural soils embankment and the platform gracing, there will be a cost increase although the volume is approximately 2500 cy less than the original site. The erosion and sedimentation control has also increased due to the steepness and rough terrain on the site. The loss of approximately 11,000 sf of work platform area from the old site to the new site causes the contractor's method of assembly and erection of tower and tank steel to change. On the old site, the contractor intends as bid to weld on the ground in the platform area the piece of steel in sections and then lift them in place with a stand-by crane. On the new site it will be necessary to weld the piece above ground and in-place. The crane will be a center pivot -type lifting device. This change in method of assembly and erection is an additional cost. Revised drawings G-1, 5, 6, 9 & 10 are attached, deleting previous drawings of the original site. This item revised Section 01 100, Subsection 3A to the above site location. Drawings 7 and 8 are deleted from the specification and replaced by GME Geotechnical Exploration Report dated 11/30/98 and the Boring logs included in that report. Item 2 – Minnesota Department of Health – Report on Plans dated 9/18/98 – Requirements listed in the report on plans: 1) The overflow pipe shall be screened, terminate between 12 and 24 inches above the ground surface and discharge over a drainage inlet structure or a splash plate. 2) Riser pipes for elevated storage tanks shall have protective bars over the riser opening inside the tank. 3) If coating other than Tnemec brand coatings are used, the ANSI/NSF Standard must be verified. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\508\ot508co1 revised.doc Page 2 of 2 Increase in price due to this contract change order: S;+- Work — excavation and grading to develop work F ►rm and prepare approximately 2350 cy of structural embankment: $6,550 Foundation/Footing — Redesign and construct foundation/footings including 5 cy of additional concrete: $965 Tank & Tower Structural Redesign and additional welding: $7,730 Total Additional Amount of this Change: $15,245 Net Change in Contract Price: $15,245 Justification: Site was changed when a willing seller was found on adjacent land to the original site. Due to the relocation of the site, conditions on the site changed significantly to justify the above additional price. Due to the change order, the contract period will not change. Original contract Amount $ 521,000 Previous contract changes, Change Order # 0 to # 0 $ 0 Prior approved contract amount $ 521,000 Change in contract due to this change order $ 15,245 Total contract including this and previous change orders $ 536,245 Oi .y.nal contract period: Painted and operational by 9/30/99 Changed contract period from previous Change Order -0- Contract period including this and all previous change orders: 9/30/99 This document will become Recommended: Accepted: Approved by: Ha Co �6ment t4 the contract and all provisions will apply hereto. sonLKnderson Associates, Inc. Date Itant City Engineer Maquire Iron, Inc. Gene Jones, President Mike Robertson, City Administrator Date Date This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract. C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\508\ot508co 1 revised. doc LOGO -/ S 90°00' E CITY OF LOGO N 90°00' W ERMCE DOOR 45°00 W 4DIM5194;C1 SECTION A -A NO SCALE /08/98 CHANGE ORDER #1 REVISED G5 of 10 TANK LETTERING DETAIL Ha{kanson ELEVATED STORAGE Anderson OT508 TANK & TOWER l Assoc -lint. �� DATE: JULY 199 -8 --[CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA 7 OgCY7 nwc; W/ (2) 15" RCP'. FFS.,, — — T NSTRUC,T G L" VEWAY Ao PARKIN -G LOT T %TYPICA,L SL7'CTION- / rf REPAIR EROSION AREA RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS PER DIVISION 2, SECTION 02930 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS It SECTION A -A 8' VARIES S' GRAVEL I r+. I 1' AIIN. 6' AGGREGATE CLAS 5 PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION GRAVEL DRVEWAY & PARKING LOT N.T.S. i ,,.,q •.wr ...•. nw DATE Ml" oo.� v¢T ...•w.rw. «...« ........ '� SITE GRADING PIAN �. � -^ • •� ■�-�^ ^^- ... '� S"0"" Anderson ELEVATED STORAGE ASSOC.,IfIC. TANK AND TOWER ,�. ,,, u ..- «• + -• CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA 8 Luc „e «. r...,.�,. a+u >K i in iae lAd. orsoa scm 96. I Via. ' N /— 65'-- - — 910 %��---- 920 Q2.50 F �t \ ----� GRADS MATCH LEGEND — — 908 — EXISTING CONTOUR —908 PROPOSED CONTOUR a, DRAINAGE FLOW I PROPOSED WATER MAIN PROPOSED AGGREGATE DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT — — T NSTRUC,T G L" VEWAY Ao PARKIN -G LOT T %TYPICA,L SL7'CTION- / rf REPAIR EROSION AREA RESTORE ALL DISTURBED AREAS PER DIVISION 2, SECTION 02930 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS It SECTION A -A 8' VARIES S' GRAVEL I r+. I 1' AIIN. 6' AGGREGATE CLAS 5 PLACED ON APPROVED SUBGRADE TYPICAL SECTION GRAVEL DRVEWAY & PARKING LOT N.T.S. i ,,.,q •.wr ...•. nw DATE Ml" oo.� v¢T ...•w.rw. «...« ........ '� SITE GRADING PIAN �. � -^ • •� ■�-�^ ^^- ... '� S"0"" Anderson ELEVATED STORAGE ASSOC.,IfIC. TANK AND TOWER ,�. ,,, u ..- «• + -• CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA 8 Luc „e «. r...,.�,. a+u >K i in iae lAd. orsoa scm CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION POND DURING CONSTRUCTION LEGEND - - EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS (WATER TOWER GRADING) SILT FENCE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY AND PARKING LOT II F SPILLWAY FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION POND D -TE scuE EROSION CONTROL PLANAnderson .wr sHowH'� Ankerson ELEVATED STORAGE G—`- Ls ` A5 oc.,InO. TANK AND TOWER �.o.,...r... ,. CITY OF OTSEGO. MINNESOTA 10 I R Sal �«. OTS LGr .rt�r�nu e.u'��t�.~+�ofto� 'M( 11/01/9B ILLY OAIr rm smm TM .•ra R+m <wa a .a•R'rq q « a.no...•q wn b ca•ra =.00 Ma.a•. o.•a. N •.boar u.a ..« w ..owwr..b a uv wl.a srcncw... uw : appaprob b.dr aw•.. nlrA Ns 3w E.— w .rin.a <va.a .vvu °0"'�� nb ..•.rm .I.I :raw. u oar r» rMw b m. IaA.wnq. m rw., r roar u• a'^rq. « m ,Ps✓'.al „ _ slaPaa a Ioo.•,. A<u.1:.. - Ta. nc•.am. •na .w..q a W .aw. � Yra sws+m r um m..�•I.0 w— +w m.Rlm N.. ,,qa�y ,w,, s..s•s - s•.a:ro „ P.arr �`«r. >,.a• a c«waw m .o.or»n •MI M u•.0 b 0.•^•. Ic^q«M Ma.cLon b W .IL Y ro nm ...c •wI.CNYf ffdOY.In.1 vlr•• 4« a.«.w - oa.:a.. rat a mw b r..n ry II•n..an ra/« b mbct naMr Ira« .a.l «r. fat Vr•wr am d• auaa.+�a.. SILT FENCE DETAIL s.e..r •.d•.ra Imm �•a:W «wa b RI•rrt bbr O�wh a^a P.°V.n'.. a.b. r IIJ.A � tl. mnwuctir Fb. R Irc• - 91 Ircn YW W +..a b b•O ..am.a A«. «..a a a.ae lural. R l�cn •.. r.^�P.'a.Y ma .I.a M .a..o..a am w STAGGERED Rows OFp STRAW MAY BALES r Pia' - QA •. Cl.rerd P...ar HEAVY DUTY-- }I 1M co.•<a<er .non pra.e• rWu. e«.a.. « cenwut • vro (u.+q SRT FENCE SVf - up«swJ me1rW) b cWcl V.b1.a. O.mu<m m a N'-V..�r a Or NTH BALE <r Q FLOW «.ice • •an (r« .q.w. a.�w lue..<a..v « V«rm..w .aa oN«ic BACRWG r.t w pa4bnM aw e.....a.w ria v. «.a sPa•.a a . «c«ar<. wn .mr..aa e<ar ..w•rr...= s«a«y b<rc...Kn m PA baa.. <aa.sa bYl.. « ..Pp< m•b rd w a a<a.a m e.• w w� .ar « w•:�y.. R.a arR s. r� cmr«.:..w. «b rba avaaam w ..aFo.a araow. c•.••r CHANNEL PROTECTION rn.l.f.r mnl M aar...w b. bq M alb.m b y.a. Vr •0 3C.11 brn Wa ® N p�.1< « nae .e•e....a a«:v <•.w•<nm a w w.iwr wa1 w 4�ra r r.agwy b •.PY... a,... n «.a .a....am W aa.waby ma.rarm w • Ancrod �. N W.V««Y Mq m ...w.A }✓+W IM cr.wcrd• awn:... wWcn m P.acK.01. m brim q w Lq�✓. PUlUC Rp.'0 7. a4r«r...r w PaP^.r r« a rant a .<.. r•..Ian. wa< ..:L «rn «. er.eAla.a r n.. Pay..a so• I.�IrA+ ca.ea« «ra ..., a r •.w«.w b R.. r«.a % am.wra a a. q.wma w rb. r« ma a.•. sKA P,n.�.�L r .b.b na w�o....u<.. ro. a w«. •�•rra...a.b..�rr• r�mat� . a.a aA.. arq �rcn.«y as :.<ewbl b w c•.wa:w a /\y 6” ruwur & t..r. a .«. va cw.wcmn Roar Sb41.w a<tm N +adw d <ena.u4r N LLn. C— f yrm sw r.r• P p ro r•dw a .mn w ea• ar« ..m y...dr• o.a:, r.a •Rn N M.ralan.• a cabs m... N la.. ar. 7 p.cm ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE sb<v+. a /at ro SGNL O f..sM ! m4wp/ ma.� cenWtim a Prrm�a-dna aa. 9/13 SPILLWAY FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION POND D -TE scuE EROSION CONTROL PLANAnderson .wr sHowH'� Ankerson ELEVATED STORAGE G—`- Ls ` A5 oc.,InO. TANK AND TOWER �.o.,...r... ,. CITY OF OTSEGO. MINNESOTA 10 I R Sal �«. OTS LGr .rt�r�nu e.u'��t�.~+�ofto� 'M( 11/01/9B ILLY OAIr \w, p — J J H LLJ W CC 'z:5 N U W w J D I O W 0 ?3 �n $ K �U 0 JJF CLQ WN �0� Qw W 04 5 Q X^0w "LLLJJJ N -'co �Q3 �O m� 00 ? Z CL w N ¢ CL a o TWO M<O HQ(D JO Qf �w ¢} � 200 �< Cl JNv=i 3 U iin US CD Y C pp Q i QQN �Z NCL Z_O 0Z QGW i LiJ~ ¢p N Z NwQ H a OOR WQ Z m o :7( LO - F¢ J¢ Z ¢ Z N U z S Z rU- Q � Q _ Omo owz � N wQw o -';<: •: Z ZZW awQ UJB �Q 0L' �W O ��_ as m .. ¢ z Z� Z�� .f -.f D3 D Zc� � LLI Q m 000 NWS WNO Sw w Z imN Uti lL OmQ F F- 3 n n n d S \w, — > W CC J J D I W 0 ?3 �U 0 JJF �La X CO to 'm X^0w "LLLJJJ N -'co NtOv Z CL w N ¢ CL a o i Z Qf �w ¢} � JI U O US CD Y C pp t0 G Go 0Z QGW �4 ; JNOa. 0-j to Z O e F¢ J¢ Z ¢ Z N U z U >0 as AGES,.,A ITEM 7AA-1 1999 CITN OTSEGO /12/98 COST ESTIMATES FOR SEAL COAT ITEM #432 STREET NAME LOCATION LENGTH WIDTH (ft.) (ft.) OTHER TOTAL COST AREA SURFACE BITUMINOUS (so. ft.) AREA (so. ft.) MATERIAL COST TOTAL AGGREGATE COST MATERIAL SEAL COAT 70th St NE 77th St. NE to Kadler Ave NE 5,960 28.4 0 169,264 $2,118 $2,888 $5,005 70th St NE Kadler Ave NE to CSAH 19 5,270 28.0 0 147,560 $1,846 $2,517 $4,363 Packard Ave NE CSAH37 to 60th St NE 5,270 24.1 0 127,007 $3,178 $4,333 $7,511 85th St. NE Nashua East 750 feet 750 40.8 0 30,600 $766 $1,044 $1,810 85th St. NE Page Ave. to CSAH 42 2,640 40.8 0 107,712 $2,695 $3,675 $6,370 TOTAL 19,890 582,143 $10,602 $14,458 $25,060 ASSUMPTIONS: Bituminous material application rate = 0.20 GAUSY Aggregate material application rate = 30 LBS/SY Price of bituminous material = $1.10/GAL Price of aggregate material = $20/TON ENR Construction Price Index Increase (Oct. 1997 to Oct. 1998) = 1.0236 70th St NE (CSAH 19 to Kadler Ave.) 1/2 cost to Albertville Share/exceVolsegolOT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: SEAL COAT COST EST. Page 6 AGEiVurCOST � ITEM 7AA-1 19JTSEGO ""y°° COST ESTIMATES FOR GRAVEL STREET NAME LOCATION LENGTH WIDTH OTHER TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL COST IN (tL) AREA SURFACE GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVELING (sq. ft.) AREA (sq. tL) VOLUME (C.Y.) WEIGHT (TON) (CLASS 5) %,UnLf AL,L VUL IUI n=u Odean Ave NE CSAH 37 to South End 2,940 20.4 0 59,976 407 770 $4,137 60th Sl. NE CSAH 37 to Packard Ave. 5,590 22.4 0 125,216 850 1,607 $8,637 Parson Ave. NE 72nd St. to CSAH 37 1,690 22.4 0 37,856 257 486 $2,611 LaBeaux Ave. 80th St. NE to 75th St. NE 2.580 18.0 0 46.440 1 315 596 $3,203 67th St. NE Mac Iver Ave NE to McAllister Ave NE 4,020 20.6 0 82.812 562 1,063 $5,712 67th Sl. NE McAllister Ave NE to Nadala Ave NE 1,080 20.0 0 21,600 147 277 $1,490 70th St. NE Nadala Ave NE to CSAH 37 5,070 19.0 0 96,330 654 1,236 $6,645 Nadala Ave. NE 70th St NE to 67th St. NE 1 730 19.0 0 32,870 223 422 $2,267 87th St. NE O'Brian Ave NE to Odean Ave NE 2,250 21.0 0 47,250__ 321 606 $3,259 O'Brian Ave NE North plat line to 85th St NE 1,640 19.0 0 31,160 212 400 $2,149 Extra Stock Pile 434 $2276 Subtotal 24,700 581,510 3,949 7,463 $42,388 Stockpiled for CI to do work Item #370 62nd St. NE CSAH 37 to East End 1,190 19.0 0 22.610 154 290 $668 67th Circle NE CSAH 37 to cube -sac 1,010 18.0 0 18.180 123 233 $537 Nashua Ave NE CSAH 39 to North End 874 22.0 0 19,228 131 247 $568 96th St. NE Nashua Ave NE to East End 1,670 18.0 0 30,060 1 204 386 $889 92nd St. NE West End to Kadler Ave NE 1,320 17.0 0 22,440 152 288 $663 CSAH 39 Service Rd Naughlor Sl. NE to Nelmark Ave NE 792 17.4 0 13,781 94 177 $407 CSAH 39 Service Rd Nelmark Ave NE to West Plat line of HP 660 17.0 0 11,220 76 144 $332 CSAH 39 Service Rd Ochoa Ave to East End 1.056 17.0 0 17,952 122 230 $531 89th St. NE Pa a Ave NE to Parell Ave NE 1,100 21.0 0 23,100 157 296 $683 Parell Ave NE CSAH 39 to 89th St NE 470 21.0 0 9.870 67 127 $292 Extra Stock Pile At City Road Department for Repairs 184.245_ 1,251 2,364 $4,716 Subtotal 10,142 372,686 2,531 4,783 $10,286 TOTAL 34,842 954,196 6,479 12,246 $52,674 ASSUMPTIONS: 2" LIFT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE =140 LBS/CF FS =1.1 PRICE = $2.25/TON IN STOCKPILE PRICE - $5.25/TON DELIVERED AND PLACED ENR Construction Price Index Increase (OcL 1997 to Oct 1998) a 1.0236 Share/ex votsego/OT9161999 BUDGET.As Sheet: GRAVEL COST EST. Page 2 AGEIvt>A ITEM 7AA-1 lsss T jTEGO _ J1J12198COSST ESTIMATES FOR REGULAR STRIPING ITEM 433 STREET NAME LOCATION LENGTH NPZ Road Double (ft.) one way Length NPZ Stripe illi nhI Nps off► Dashed Edge Total COST Stripe Stripe Length ESTIMATE rffl tffl (ftl STRIPING 70th St NE CSAH 19 to Kadler Ave. 5,270 0 0 0 1,318 10,540 11,858 $607 ` 70th St NE Kadler Ave. to 77th St. 5,960 0 0 0 1,490 11,920 13,410 $1,373 Packard Ave CSAH 37 to 60th St 5,270 0 5,270 10,540 0 0 10,540 $1,079 85th St NE Nashua Ave to 750 ft East 750 0 750 1,500 0 1,500 3,000 $307 85th St NE Page Ave NE to CSAH 42 2,640 0 2,640 5,280 0 5,280 10,560 $1,081 Total 19,890 4,446 ASSUMPTIONS: Price = $0.10/1-F Per Stripe ENR Construction Price Index Increase (Oct. 1997 to Oct 1998) = 1.0236 70th St. (CSAH19 to Kadler Ave) 1/2 Cost to Albertville Share/exceVotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: STRIPING COST EST. Page 8 AGE. _JA ITEM 7AA-1 1999 CIT, TSEGO ./12/98 COST ESTIMATES FOR CRACK FILLING ITEM #433 LENGTH WIDTH OTHER TOTAL EST. EST. TOTAL STREET NAME LOCATION (ft.) (ft.) AREA SURFACE LINEAR FEET POUNDS COST (so. ft.1 AREA (sn_ ft -1 ()F CRACK* nF AFAI ANT** rRACK I=II 1 IIJr-' Quenroe Ave NE 59th St. NE to 58th St. NE 650 22.8 0 14,820 356 148 $114 58th St. NE Queens Ave NE to Quenroe Ave NE 1,302 22.8 0 29,686 712 297 $228 59th St NE Queens Ave NE to Quenroe Ave NE 1,260 22.8 0 28,728 689 287 $221 Queens Ave. NE CSAH 36 to cul-de-sac 3,466 35.9 6,648 131,077 2,986 1,244 $955 Other Street to be determined $23,483 in the spring TOTAL 6,678 204,311 4,744 1,977 $25,000 ASSUMPTIONS: Bituminous surface crack & joint repair = 2.4LF/LB ENR Construction Price Index Increase (Oct. 1997 to Oct. 1998) = 1.0236 *A transverse crack will occur every 50 ft. across the entire roadway width **1.2 Factor added to acount for cracking which may occur during fall and spring freeze/thaw cycles SharelexceUotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: CRACK FILLING Page 7 AGE.. -,A ITEM 7AA-2 CIT) SEGO COST is rIMATES FOR GRAVEL 2000 LENGTH WIDTH OTHER TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL COST STREET NAME LOCATION (ft) (it) AREA SURFACE GRAVEL GRAVEL GRAVELING (sq. tL) AREA (sq. it) VOLUME (C.Y.) WEIGHT (TON) (CLASS 5) Contract Out for Hauled to Road 11tem #431 62nd St NE City Limits to Mac Iver NE 880 24.6 0 21,648 147 278 $747 70th Sl NE CSAH 19 to Mac Iver Ave NE 5,240 21.0 0 110,040 747 1,412 $3,795 83rd St NE Mason Ave NE to Nashua Ave NE 5,230 22.4 0 117.152 795 1,503 $8,081 Kadler Ave NE 70th St NE to 1-94 1,160 20.0 0 23,200 158 298 $1,600 Kadler Ave NE Both St NE to 70th Sl NE 5.170 22.2 0 114,774 779 1,473 $7,917 Mac Iver Ave NE 67th St NE to South End 2,910 24.6 1 0 71,586 486 919 $2,469 Mac Iver Ave NE 70th St NE to 67th St. NE 1,330 24.6 0 32,718 222 420 $1 ,128 Mac Iver Ave NE 80th St NE to 70th St. NE 5,290 22.0 0 116,380 790 1 1.494 $8,028 Subtotal 27,210 607,498 4,125 7,796 $33,765 Stockpiled for Cl to do work Item #370 87th Sl. NE West End to Mason Ave NE 1,560 16.0 0 24,960 169 320 $369 Kadler Ave NE CSAH 39 to 92nd St NE 2,050 26.0 0 53,300 362 684 1 $1 ,576 Extra Stock Pile At City Road Department for Repits 171,440 1,164 2,200 $4,716 Subtotal 3,610 249,700 1,695 3,204 $10,286 TOTAL 30,820 857,198 5,820 11,001 $44,051 ASSUMPTIONS: 2' LIFT CLASS 5 AGGREGATE =140 LBSICF FS =1.1 PRICE - $2.251TON IN STOCKPILE PRICE - S5.25/TON DELIVERED AND PLACED ENR Construction Price Index Increase (Oct. 1997 to Oct. 1998) =1.0236 112 Cost (Shared with Albertville) Slrarelu¢evolsego/OT910.1999 BUDGET.As Street: GRAVEL COST EST. 2D00 Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. it & Municipal Engineering Land Surveying December 8, 1998 Mike Robertson, Administrator City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Bituminous Overlay Program (1999-2001) Dear Mike, 3601 Thurston Avenue Suite 101 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 612/427-0520 Fax AGENDA ITEM 7.46 As was requested at the Budget meeting on November 12, 1998, we have estimated the cost of overlays for all remaining 2 -inch or less paved streets and/or those pavements where the structure requires overlays for strength. See the attached Exhibit B for a list of those streets with projected estimated costs. We have also followed the cost share approach between landowners and City where landowners pay only for the 2 - inch overlays and the City pays the rest. Several options on assessment could be considered. The difference can be noted on Exhibit B where the assessment rate per year is shown for each project area. How much a large lot must pay vs. the typical 1 acre lot vs. rural lots or agricultural land is a matter of judgement and fairness. Hakanson Anderson has divided all of the proposed overlays into 3 divisions. The basis for the groupings are: 1) Location in conjunction with other streets to be overlaid. 2) Closely average same total cost over each of the 3 years. 3) By perceived need (ones which have more traffic and are most severely damaged are proposed to be completed first.) Exhibit A shows the location and the Addition or Street name. The type of line around each division or on the street signifies the proposed year the work could be completed. The legend shows the year and the cost associated with each year. We are providing this data for discussion purposes only. Should the council wish to provide further direction, we can develop more options or refine the proposed one. Yours truly, HAKANSO NDER N ASSOCIATES, INC. w nce C. Ko_sAak, P.E. /clk Attachment cc: Elaine Beatty, Clerk C:\Share\WPmuni\AOTSEGO\336\ot336mrl.doc HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Ronafd J. W er, P Ankerson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. !_QCCAI 12INIM Ar PP4Z �--VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE I ESTATES 1ST AND 2ND ADDMOIN ;t I 1 HIDDEN VALLEY ACRES [�aiSEGO oN H 0 4000 8000 plim SCALE IN FEET ASSESSED PORTION IS FOR A 2" OVERLAY AT A MINIMUM OF 24' WIDTH EXHIBIT A PROPOSED 1999-2001 OTSEGO OVERLAY PROGRAM DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1998 FILE: OT910 \OT910RD5\0791 ORD5.DWG ESTIMATED ESTIMATED ESTIMATED TOTAL CITY PORTION ASSESSED PORTION ---- 1ST YEAR (1999) $656,356 $281,356 $375,000 --• -- 2ND YEAR (2000) $478,681 $263,680 $215,001 - - 3RD YEAR (2001) $611,200 $474,155 $137,045 �--VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE I ESTATES 1ST AND 2ND ADDMOIN ;t I 1 HIDDEN VALLEY ACRES [�aiSEGO oN H 0 4000 8000 plim SCALE IN FEET ASSESSED PORTION IS FOR A 2" OVERLAY AT A MINIMUM OF 24' WIDTH EXHIBIT A PROPOSED 1999-2001 OTSEGO OVERLAY PROGRAM DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1998 FILE: OT910 \OT910RD5\0791 ORD5.DWG EXHIBIT B CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAYS (1999-2001) COMBINING ALL OVERLAY PROJECTS AVERAGING ASSESSMENTS Total of Cost of Projects . $1,748,237 Benefiting Units = 581 Cost per Benefiting Unit = $1,269.02 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit @ 7.5% for 10 years: $184.88 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.xls Sheen AVG. ASSESSMENTS Page 10 Subdivision Name City's Cost # of Benefiting Units Residents Resident's Cost Assessment/per year Individual Subdivision Assessment1per year Averaging All Subdivisions Table 1 Hall's 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions $82,869 83 $123,000 $215.90 $184.88 Table 2 Deer Field Acres & Hidden Valley $24,253 36 $36,000 $145.69 $184.88 Table 3 Walesch Estates & Walesch Estates 2nd Addition $123,550 103 $126,000 $178.22 $184.88 Table 4 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 1st & 2nd Additions $50,684 93 $90,000 $118.43 $184.88 Table 5 Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 3rd & 4th Additions $37,184 69 $54,000 $106.73 $184.88 Table 6 Otsego Acres 1st & 2nd Additions $32,767 57 $63,750 $162.94 $184.88 Table 7 Great River Acres 1st Addition $69,193 49 $67,101 $199.50 $184.88 Table 8 Mason Ave NE CSAH 39 to 83rd St NE $85,413 35 $61,050 $254.12 $184.88 Table 9 83rd St NE Marlowe are NE to Mason Ave NE $56,606 4 $12,150 $442.52 $184.88 Table 10 Marlowe Ave NE 83rd St NE to 80th St NE $56,731 4 $12,300 $447.98 $184.88 Table 11 80th St NE Mac Iver Ave NE to Marlowe Ave NE $60,444 6 $12,750 $309.58 $184.88 Table 12 80th Sl NE CSAH 19 to Mac Iver Ave NE $206,706 31 $49,050 $297.75 $184.88 Table 13 Jaber Ave NE CSAH 39 to 85th St NE $124,536 11 $30,150 $399.31 $184.88 $1,010,9 3 6 581 $737,301 Total of Cost of Projects . $1,748,237 Benefiting Units = 581 Cost per Benefiting Unit = $1,269.02 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit @ 7.5% for 10 years: $184.88 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.xls Sheen AVG. ASSESSMENTS Page 10 TABLE 1 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE HALLS 1ST, 2ND, & 3RD ADDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 290,204 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Construction Cost: Contingency @ 5%: Indirect @ 20%: Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 83 EXTENSION $2,500 $300 $32,245 $98,400 $4,000 $10,800 $4,000 $12,450 $164,695 PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST UNIT $66,295 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 150 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 32,245 4 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 4,100 5 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 6 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 675 7 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 2 8 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 83 Construction Cost: ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 290,204 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Construction Cost: Contingency @ 5%: Indirect @ 20%: Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 83 EXTENSION $2,500 $300 $32,245 $98,400 $4,000 $10,800 $4,000 $12,450 $164,695 PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST $164,695 $66,295 $98,400 $8,235 $3,315 $4,920 $32,939 $13,259 $19,680 $205,869 $82,869 $123,000 Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,481.93 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $215.90 ITEMS FINANCED BY CITY Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: TABLE 1 Page 11 TABLE 2 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE DEER FIELD ACRES & HIDDEN VALLEY ASSUMPTIONS: Total Patching Area as Measured in Field = 2,000 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 84,203 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $48,203 $19,403 Contingency @ 5%: $2,410 $970 Indirect @ 20%: $9,641 $3,881 Total Project Cost: $60,253 $24,253 Benefiting Units = 36 Cost per Benefiting Unit: ITEMS UNIT EXTENSION ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1.00 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 50.00 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF $0.15 2,000.00 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (6") T $7.50 100.00 5 Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2") T $34.00 30.00 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $1.50 515.00 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 1,200.00 8 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1.00 9 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 210.00 10 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 0.60 11 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 36.00 Construction Cost: ASSUMPTIONS: Total Patching Area as Measured in Field = 2,000 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 84,203 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $48,203 $19,403 Contingency @ 5%: $2,410 $970 Indirect @ 20%: $9,641 $3,881 Total Project Cost: $60,253 $24,253 Benefiting Units = 36 Cost per Benefiting Unit: RESIDENT COST $28,800 $1,440 $5,760 $36,000 $1,000 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Sheet: TABLE 2 @7.5% for 10 years: $145.69 Page 12 ITEMS FINANCED EXTENSION BY CITY $2,500 $100 $300 $750 $1,020 $773 $28,800 $4,000 $3,360 $1,200 $5,400 $48,203 RESIDENT COST $28,800 $1,440 $5,760 $36,000 $1,000 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Sheet: TABLE 2 @7.5% for 10 years: $145.69 Page 12 TABLE 3 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE WALESCH ESTATES AND WALESCH ESTATES 2ND ADDITION ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 299,285 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Seeding = 13 FT Width Along edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $199,640 $98,840 $100,800 Contingency @ 5%: $9,982 $4,942 $5,040 Indirect @ 20%: $39,928 $19,768 $20,160 Total Project Cost: $249,550 $123,550 $126,000 Benefiting Units = 103 Cost per Benefiting Unit : $1,223.30 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Share/exceUotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $178.22 Page 13 Sheet: TABLE 3 9 ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 75 $150 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 32,100 $32,100 4 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 4,200 $100,800 5 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 6 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 665 $10,640 7 Common Borrow (shoulder widening) CY $5.00 4,000 $20,000 8 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 7 $14,000 9 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 103 $15,450 Construction Cost: $199,640 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 299,285 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Seeding = 13 FT Width Along edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $199,640 $98,840 $100,800 Contingency @ 5%: $9,982 $4,942 $5,040 Indirect @ 20%: $39,928 $19,768 $20,160 Total Project Cost: $249,550 $123,550 $126,000 Benefiting Units = 103 Cost per Benefiting Unit : $1,223.30 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Share/exceUotsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $178.22 Page 13 Sheet: TABLE 3 9 TABLE 4 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE ESTATES IST & 2ND ADDITIONS Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 93 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: TABLE 4 $140,684 $50,684 Cost per Benefiting Unit: Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit @ 7.5% for 10 years: EXTENSION $2,500 $240 $630 $1,163 $2,040 $1,950 $72,000 $4,000 $3,675 $8,400 $2,000 $13,950 $112,548 RESIDENT COST $72,000 $3,600 $14,400 $90,000 $967.74 $140.99 ITEMS FINANCED BY CITY Page 14 UNIT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 120 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF $0.15 4,200 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (6") T $7.50 155 5 Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2") T $34.00 60 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $1.50 1,300 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 3,000 8 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 9 Common Excavation (for base placement) CY $3.50 1,050 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 525 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 93 Construction Cost: ASSUMPTIONS: Total Patching Area as Measured in Field = 4,200 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 212,680 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Common Excavation = 1/2 FT Deep x 2 FT Wide Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $112,548 $40,548 Contingency @ 5%: $5,627 $2,027 Indirect @ 20%: $22,510 $8,110 Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 93 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Sheet: TABLE 4 $140,684 $50,684 Cost per Benefiting Unit: Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit @ 7.5% for 10 years: EXTENSION $2,500 $240 $630 $1,163 $2,040 $1,950 $72,000 $4,000 $3,675 $8,400 $2,000 $13,950 $112,548 RESIDENT COST $72,000 $3,600 $14,400 $90,000 $967.74 $140.99 ITEMS FINANCED BY CITY Page 14 TABLE 5 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE VASSEUR'S OAK GROVE ESTATES 3rd & 4th ADDITIONS PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $72,948 $29,748 $43,200 Contingency @ 5%: $3,647 $1,487 $2,160 ITEMS 14,590 $5,950 $8,640 Total Project Cost: UNIT $54,000 Benefiting Units = 69 FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 80 $160 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF $0.15 2,100 $315 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (6") T $7.50 80 $600 " 5 Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2") T $34.00 30 $1,020 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $1.50 785 $1,178 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 1,800 $43,200 8 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 9 Common Excavation (for base placement) CY $3.50 650 $2,275 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 325 $5,200 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 $2,000 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 70 $10,500 Construction Cost: $72,948 ASSUMPTIONS: Estimated Total Patching Area = 2,000 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =128,040 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAUSY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Common Excavation = 112 FT Deep x 2 FT Wide Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $72,948 $29,748 $43,200 Contingency @ 5%: $3,647 $1,487 $2,160 Indirect @ 20%: 14,590 $5,950 $8,640 Total Project Cost: $91,184 $37,184 $54,000 Benefiting Units = 69 Cost per Benefiting Unit: $782.61 Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As @ 7.5% for 10 years: $114.02 Sheet: TABLE 5 Page 15 TABLE 6 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE OTSEGO ACRES 1ST & 2ND ADDITIONS ASSUMPTIONS: Estimated Total Patching Area =1,500 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =151,392 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $77,214 $26,214 UNIT $3,861 ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 80 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF $0.15 1,575 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (6") T $7.50 60 5 Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2") T $34.00 25 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $1.50 925 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 2,125 8 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 9 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 380 10 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 11 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 57 Construction Cost: ASSUMPTIONS: Estimated Total Patching Area =1,500 SF Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement =151,392 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $77,214 $26,214 Contingency @ 5%: $3,861 $1,311 Indirect @ 20%: $15,443 $5,243 Total Project Cost: $96,517 $32,767 Benefiting Units = 57 $850 Cost per Benefiting Unit: RESIDENT COST $51,000 $2,550 $10,200 $63,750 $1,118.42 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit Page 16 Sheet: TABLE 6 c@ 7.5% for 10 years: $162.94 ITEMS FINANCED EXTENSION BY CITY $2,500 $160 $236 $450 $850 $1,388 $51,000 $4,000 $6,080 $2,000 $8,550 $77,214 RESIDENT COST $51,000 $2,550 $10,200 $63,750 $1,118.42 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per BenefitingUnit Page 16 Sheet: TABLE 6 c@ 7.5% for 10 years: $162.94 Table 7 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE Great River Acres 1st, 2nd & 3rd Additions ASSUMPTIONS: Total Estimated Patching Area = 5130 SF Total Surface Area for Roadway Improvement =183,838 Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $109,035 $55,355 $53,681 Contingency @ 5%: $5,452 $2,768 $2,684 Indirect @ 20%: $21,807 $11,071 $10,736 Total Project Cost: $136,294 $69,193 $67,101 Benefiting Units = 49 Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,369.41 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Sheet: Table 7 @7.5% for 10 years: $199.50 Page 17 ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 70 $140 3 Remove Bituminous Pavement SF $0.15 182,375 $27,356 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (6") T $7.50 180 $1,347 5 Type 41 Base Course Mixture (2") T $34.00 62 $2,122 6 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal $1.50 1,013 $1,520 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 2,237 $53,681 8 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 9 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 409 $6,542 10 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 $2,028 11 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 52 $7,800 Construction Cost: $109,035 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Estimated Patching Area = 5130 SF Total Surface Area for Roadway Improvement =183,838 Class 5 Aggregate Base =140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Bituminous Material for Tack Coat = 0.05 GAL/SY Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $109,035 $55,355 $53,681 Contingency @ 5%: $5,452 $2,768 $2,684 Indirect @ 20%: $21,807 $11,071 $10,736 Total Project Cost: $136,294 $69,193 $67,101 Benefiting Units = 49 Cost per Benefiting Unit: $1,369.41 Share/excel/otsego/OT910-1999 BUDGET.As Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit Sheet: Table 7 @7.5% for 10 years: $199.50 Page 17 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE TABLE 8 MASON AVE NE (CSAR 39 to 83rd St NE) ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 144,980 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $117,170 $68,330 Contingency @ 5%: $5,858.50 $3,417 Indirect @ 20%: $23,434 $13,666 Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 35 Cost per Benefiting Unit: Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $146,463 $85,413 $1,744.29 $254.12 RESIDENT COST $48,840 $2,442 $9,768 $61,050 0T336/rnason-csah39to87th.x1s Page M ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 16,110 $16,110 4 Aggregate Base Class 5 (2") T $7.50 1,720 $12,900 5 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 2,035 $48,840 6 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1" extra) T $24.00 1,020 $24,480 7 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 8 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 300 $4,800 9 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 0.9 $1,800 10 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 11 $1,650 Construction Cost: $117,170 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 144,980 SF Wear Course Mixture = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $117,170 $68,330 Contingency @ 5%: $5,858.50 $3,417 Indirect @ 20%: $23,434 $13,666 Total Project Cost: Benefiting Units = 35 Cost per Benefiting Unit: Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $146,463 $85,413 $1,744.29 $254.12 RESIDENT COST $48,840 $2,442 $9,768 $61,050 0T336/rnason-csah39to87th.x1s Page M TABLE 9 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE 83rd St. (Mason Ave. NE to Marlowe Ave NE) ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 28,820 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $55,005 $45,285 Contingency @ 5%: $2,750 $2,264 Indirect @ 20%: $11,001 $9,067 Total Project Cost: $68,756 $56,606 Benefiting Units = 4 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $3,037.50 RESIDENT COST $9,720 $486 1 944 $12,150 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336I80th-St-b.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $442.52 Page 19 ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 3,365 $3,365 4 2' Deep Subcut CY $4.00 2,915 $11,660 " 5 Select Backfill CY $5.00 1,765 $8,825 6 6" Aggregate Base Class 5 T $7.50 1,110 $8,325 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 405 $9,720 8 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1") T $24.00 205 $4,920 9 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 75 $1,200 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 0 $400 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 0 $0 " Construction Cost: $55,005 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 28,820 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $55,005 $45,285 Contingency @ 5%: $2,750 $2,264 Indirect @ 20%: $11,001 $9,067 Total Project Cost: $68,756 $56,606 Benefiting Units = 4 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $3,037.50 RESIDENT COST $9,720 $486 1 944 $12,150 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336I80th-St-b.As @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $442.52 Page 19 TABLE 10 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE Marlowe Ave NE (83rd St NE to 80th St NE) ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 27,192 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $55,225 $45,385 Contingency @ 5%: $2,761 $2,269 Indirect @ 20%: $11,046 $9,077 Total Project Cost: $69,031 $56,731 Benefiting Units = 4 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $3,075.00 RESIDENT COST $9,840 $492 $1,968 $12,300 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336/MarloweAs @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $447.98 Page 20 ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 3,175 $3,175 4 2' Deep Subcut CY $4.00 2,950 $11,800 5 Select Backfill CY $5.00 1,780 $8,900 " 6 6" Aggregate Base Class 5 T $7.50 1,120 $8,400 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 410 $9,840 8 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1") T $24.00 205 $4,920 9 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 " 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 75 $1,200 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 0 $400 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 0 Construction Cost: $55,226 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 27,192 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $55,225 $45,385 Contingency @ 5%: $2,761 $2,269 Indirect @ 20%: $11,046 $9,077 Total Project Cost: $69,031 $56,731 Benefiting Units = 4 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $3,075.00 RESIDENT COST $9,840 $492 $1,968 $12,300 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336/MarloweAs @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $447.98 Page 20 TABLE 11 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE 80th St. (Mac Iver Ave NE to Marlowe Ave NE) ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 31,188 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $58,555 $48,355 Contingency @ 5%: $2,928 $2,417.75 Indirect @ 20%: $11,711 $9,671.00 Total Project Cost: $73,194 $60,444 Benefiting Units = 6 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $2,125.00 RESIDENT COST $10,200 $510.00 $2,040.00 $12,750 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336/80th-St-a.xls @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $309.58 Page 21 ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 3,650 $3,650 4 2' Deep Subcut CY $4.00 3,100 $12,400 5 Select Backfill CY $5.00 1,900 $9,500 6 6" Aggregate Base Class 5 T $7.50 1,170 $8,775 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 425 $10,200 8 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1") T $24.00 215 $5,160 9 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 80 $1,280 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 0 $400 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 4 600 " Construction Cost: $58,555 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 31,188 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $58,555 $48,355 Contingency @ 5%: $2,928 $2,417.75 Indirect @ 20%: $11,711 $9,671.00 Total Project Cost: $73,194 $60,444 Benefiting Units = 6 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $2,125.00 RESIDENT COST $10,200 $510.00 $2,040.00 $12,750 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336/80th-St-a.xls @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $309.58 Page 21 TABLE 12 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE $165,365 80th St. (Mac Iver Ave NE to CSAH 19) $10,230 $8,268.25 $1,962.00 Indirect @ 20%: $40,921 $33,073.00 $7,848.00 Total Project Cost: $255,756 $206,706 $49,050 ITEMS UNIT $2,043.75 FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 13,500 $13,500 4 2' Deep Subcut CY $4.00 11,700 $46,800 5 Select Backfill CY $5.00 7,065 $35,325 6 6" Aggregate Base Class 5 T $7.50 4,500 $33,750 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 1,635 $39,240 8 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1") T $24.00 820 $19,680 9 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 295 $4,720 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 $2,000 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 20 $3,000 Construction Cost: $204,605 ASSUMPTIONS: Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 115,500 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures =146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway PROJECT COST CITY COST RESIDENT COST Construction Cost: $204,605 $165,365 $39,240 Contingency @ 5%: $10,230 $8,268.25 $1,962.00 Indirect @ 20%: $40,921 $33,073.00 $7,848.00 Total Project Cost: $255,756 $206,706 $49,050 Benefiting Units = 31 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $2,043.75 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336180th-St.xls @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $297.75 Page 22 TABLE 13 CITY OF OTSEGO OVERLAY COST ESTIMATE Jaber Ave NE (CSAR 39 to 85th St NE) ITEMS UNIT FINANCED ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT COST QUANTITY EXTENSION BY CITY 1 Mobilization LS $2,500.00 1 $2,500 2 Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth) LF $2.00 45 $90 3 Full Depth Pavement Reclamation SY $1.00 16,735 $16,735 4 2' Deep Subcut CY $4.00 14,490 $57,960 5 Select Backfill CY $5.00 8,775 $43,875 6 6" Aggregate Base Class 5 T $7.50 5,525 $41,438 7 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (2") T $24.00 2,010 $48,240 8 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture (1") T $24.00 1,005 $24,120 9 Traffic Control LS $4,000.00 1 $4,000 10 Top Soil Shouldering (LV) CY $16.00 365 $5,840 11 Seeding Ac $2,000.00 1 $1,800 12 Mailbox Relocation EA $150.00 6 900 Construction Cost: $247,498 ASSUMPTIONS: 1/2 Cost to Otsego: $123,749 Total Surface Area of Roadway Improvement = 28,820 SF Class 5 Aggregate Base = 140 LBS/CF Base & Wear Course Mixtures = 146 LBS/CF Top Soil Shouldering & Seeding = 3 FT Width Along Edge of Roadway 112 Cost to Monticello Township PROJECT COST CITY COST Construction Cost: $123,749 $99,629 Contingency @ 5%: $6,187 $4,981 Indirect @ 20%: $24,760 $19,926 Total Project Cost: $154,686 $124,536 Benefiting Units = 11 Total Cost per Benefiting Unit: $2,740.91 RESIDENT COST $24,120 $1,206 $4,824 $30,150 Annual Cost per Benefiting Unit OT336/Jaber.xls @ 7.5 % for 10 years: $399.31 Page 23 DEC.15.1998 4:14PM NO.912 P.1i1 TO:OTSEGO Hakanson Anderson Assoc., inc. civil & Municipal Engineering ,and Surveying [LLI A JIM i7.1 \ [DIiI, 3601 Thurston Avenue Suite 101 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 612/427-0520 Fax TO: Mike Robertson, Administrator FROM: Lawrence G, Koshak, PE City Engineer DATE: December 15, 1998 RE: Culvert under 85th Avenue between Page Avenue and Ohland Avenue The homeowner in the "Green House" asked if he could remove an end section of the culvert under the street so as to expedite mowing the road slope. As per your direction, I stopped at the location and found that the end piece of pipe on the north end is disconnected from the rest of the pipe and should be removed. The rest of the pipe appears to be pulled apart in places as indicated on the street surface by depressions. The pipe could be a problem soon and should be replaced or repaired. The reconstruction of 85tn Street could be 3 to 5 years away based on the 5 -year program. Perhaps public Works could remove the broken end and patch the holes sufficiently until the condition of the pipe can be reviewed next spring. According to the .lames Addition drainage plan, the culvert (not shown on the plan) should drain to the north. The culvert drains from the south side ditch on -85th Street into the James Addition we assume. When the Sodowski property develops, that property will be forced to drain to the south into the Lefebvre Watershed. The culvert will not be needed. CASh9rMWPmunM0TSEG018101ot910mmdoc CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE 9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty December 14, 1998 - 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC 9.1. A. Set Final Property Tax Levy for 1999 B. Any other Council Business BACKGROUND: A. Attached is Resolution #98-30 City of Otsego, County of Wright A Resolution Setting a Final Tax Levy of $827,613 for 1999 Budget Appropriations. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council information and Approval if agreed. Thanks A Elaine RESOLUTION NO. 98-30 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION SETTING A FINAL TAX LEVY OF $827,613 FOR 1999 BUDGET APPROPRIATIONS WHEREAS, the Otsego City Council is required by State law to establish a final tax levy for 1999 by December 23, 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: 1. That there is hereby approved for proposed expenditures from general taxes the following sums for the purpose indicated. General Government $799,563 Bonded Indebtedness 28,050 Total Tax Levy $827,613 FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT as required by State Law the City Clerk shall certify to the Wright County Auditor a copy of this resolution. Dated this 14th day of December, 1998 CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 4 I.4 OJ Date: December 9, 1998 To: Mayor & Council Historic Preservation Commission From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Update on Peavey House Costs As of this day, for 1998 the total costs for cleaning up the_Peavey House amount to $15,884.16. There will still be a couple hundred dollars more spent for minor repairs to the home that have yet to be made. I have hired Linden Corporation of Elk River to rent the property for us. They will answer the phone calls, show the house, and do the credit checks. The cost to the City for this will be 50% of the first month's rent, plus the cost of the credit checks. Linden Corporation offered the opinion that given the shape of the house that the most we could charge for rent would be somewhere between $450-500 a month. They also suggested that we offer a one year lease rather than a six month lease as a way of attracting a better tenant. I have enclosed a copy of a chart that Deputy Clerk Judy Hudson has prepared of the history of the City's expenses on this property. This chart lists the expenses of the City along with the amount of rent we have received. "Debris building removal" is the cost to haul everything to the dump. "Labor & Machine" is our charges for employee time and machinery use, based on established rates for the Public Works Department. At the end of 1997, the City had earned the equivalent of a little more than a four percent return on its investment in this property. As of the end of 1998 that return has fallen to about two percent. I provide this information so that no one will think that owning this property is worthwhile from a financial investment viewpoint. cc: City Staff City Property - G,., ,-eavey House Old Peavey House 118-oio-moio Expenses Au ust.o7 1990 ;'' 199 ;•.1992 ., <; ,, .,,P.199�..fi`Y .1 moi` `.� 1996,:';x_; ,: `1997 1998 Purchase Price $41,900.00 Paint $366.26 Perc Test $175.00 Plumbing repair $301.00 $189.07 Septic installation $2,400.00 Well repair $110.00 Taxes $990.00 $897.30 $951.96 $1044.16 $1019.20 $1101.26 Carpeting $621.00 Plumbing $68.50 New Well $2,723.20 Water Heater $472.24 Electrical Work $308.94 Roof $1,946.56 Tree repair $399.37 Installuation Window Kits $2.98 Debris building removal $6,931.81 Labor & Machine for removal $7,920.00 Electrical past due payment _ $72.44 Cleaning _ $368.49 TOTAL EXPENSES $a1-9o0.Ob a ., . 0'.00 ° #' f X342 $ $1,619.20'.<; g1 101.26 $15 884.16' Income _ Rent $0.00 $3,300.00 $3,025.00 $4,230.00_ $4,410.00 $4,850.00 $4,890.00_ _$3,990.00_ _$3,380.00_ NET BALANCE $41 900.00 $3,300.00 ($1,317.26) $861.18 $1751;IiAOL $3,805.84 $3,870.80 $29888.74 ($12,504. 6 1998 EMV Land $18,000.00 jBldq $18,100.00 [TOTAL EMV $36100.00 Prepared by J Hudson, Deputy Clerk CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1998 TO: City Council Attached are the Claims Lists for your consideration. The grand total you are considering is as follows: Batch 11-20-98 $ 3,083.75 Batch 12-4-98 $ 2,398.50 Batch 12-14-98 $46,689.81 GRAND TOTAL $ 52,172.06 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Judy Hudson Deputy Clerk/Treasurer I _. 1993 Claims List Pave : Dept Transaction Batch l5 Home Deseriptiou Amount Namea 2tc- Name:2,:498 6 _ s MI I7 B h D PLUMBING & HEATING INC General Govt 8uildings-8899 City Hall repair 87.50 121498 8 3 D PLUMBING & HEATING INC Old Town Hall Peavey hse/new toilet 193.07 121498 9 0 � E SA, 4ERYfeE BF11 I - WOCCLAKE SANITATION SER Rec4 cltiy Recycling Decelubei, Recy,11:11;1.2 Recycling Nove 317.50 2t49e 121498 BOISE C;SCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS Administration Supplias 151.300"214-18 ,2 _ 3 ,a 8REZE INDUSTRIES , Hwys, Struts, b Roads J p1 Flat Washers niscel _ _ 5.53 121498 BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNTING Finance Envelopes for checks 48.36 121498 ,s ,6 P.. MVEL V 1. e V CORROW TRUCKING santtai 1t. V lksl Uc 1,o n Recycling Landin 34 andJ5 R23 Oct recylcing LVL. • iLl 1,406.25 121498 CORROW TRUCKING General Govt Buildings -8899 Nov Service City Hall 58.50 121498 ,6 19 20 COtfRI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE Sanitary Sewer Construction Wastewater. Treatment 349.50 121498 COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE Sanitary Sewer Construction Dayton Sewer Agreement ": 527.00 121498 21 LAW EESewer - 122 23 Yi a . . eA i , CCURI MACM HIJR MAW t I OFFICE ❑ t • kt- Sanitary fewer Construction ' ToNer Dauphinais Condemnation 1' V.VY 0:4.00 !2i499 121498 r r QTut! COURI MACARTH:R LAW circ OF11,,L c- Construction Sanitary Sewer Construction Lavedure Site -- nr S2-.rV10 +� X11498 zs zai s 26 T COURIAACARTHUR LAW OFFICE Administration B Estates Precision�Line 96.0 289,40 iii0e 121498 COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE Legal Services -ads Litigation 220.00 121493 RIYER FARM l': CUB FOODS ELK RIVER I E I flwys,. t et , R, Administration 1 V 1 Supplies .22 81.36 !2!498 121498 J -9 DEHN TREE COMPANY Parks Maintenance Otsego Prairie Park 505.88 '_21498 30 3' 32 DEMARS JOHN Refund from CUP 16.81 121498 DENNIS FEHN GRAVEL b EXCAVAT Sanitary SeWer,ConStruCtiOn Water Tower Site work 475.00 121498 Heritage1 e., 21498 ♦, DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER I Hwys, Streets, & Roads Miscel chains/sharpening 58.55 1 121498 -_ DUERR$ WATERCARE SERVICE Hwys, Streets, & Roads Office Usage supplies 41.85 121498 37 ECMU8LISHERS ING Administration" A Xtal fees Legal PH Zoning Ord��_353b 11, 1 11 3 12144 38 ECM PUBLISHERS INC e, ,`Rdoinistrat on Legal Ehg`in PC"geetings - 23.58 121498 h 5 d 39 .... a� EeM 1nisti ECM PUBLISHERS INC ation'Legal14,198 Administration PH Spec Assessments 198.04 121498 ECM PUBLISHERS INC Administration PH Zoning 56.58 121498 ez . TE 43 ELK RIVER FLORAL CITY COUNCIL Election coding it 3 96 2 funeral arrangements 1,580.98 135.80 t2t498 121498 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL`1}TILITIES Street Lighting Antelope Park St Lights 62.20 121498 5 46 67 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lightlag Co Rd 39/Page St Lights 7.99 121498 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lighting Co ?� '?!Nash St Lights 12.'8 1'1498 48 , co ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lighting 85th/Parrish St Lights 12.78 121498 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Old Town Hall Peavey House 72.44 121498 5, 1,^ _L • HIVER 119 i PAL J H ),!, J:i v l,.,, Rvtds"hoe 9.62 _ ♦L1 " ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Old Town Hall Ole Clty Hail 84.31 12:498 ELK R:VER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lighting '? h 10: Signal Lights 23:.54 121119 C8 55 J 5 12i498 56 57 I fi =r etc li93--Claims fist Wed 1,0:43 PM CITY OF OTSEGO J dRWT,LIVIJ Name Description Comments Amount Name 6 7 6 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lighting 88th/P3rrish St lights 12.78 121498 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Street Lighting 94th/Nashua St Lights 7.17 121498 10 )I TTI E9 -I I , L 1_.i r.l.-JAL ELK RITC VER MUN,::P.AL UTILITIES Street Lighting 101 8 :3: St Lights 16.73 i^7C z EI v R.IIeR MU�'I^, L U'IL'T,E LK 1;L I 1 '. 1'A I III S I 'L lr yl a SL eet Li ghting ^e o .. L arrisll 5L RiVER I � �: ._�= — — G E K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM General Gout Buildings -8899 City Hall supplies 1231.84. 121493 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Hwys, Streets, & Roads Shop supplies 147.'0 121498 17 \ IL. I LL _ J11116 JlJlrl GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC H ,s, Streets, Road's Hwys, Streets, h Roads II11' Locate calls ,..,.IJ 8.Cv" !2!49c! GROEN GARY CPA Finance Oct/Nov Services 1,680.00 121493 ,6 J120 19 WEaEI H 6 WEBER OIL COMPANY ! L Hwys, Streets, I Roads heattag aii Diesel Fuel - 580.92 / . 96 111498 H G WEBER QIL COMPANY Hwys, Streets, & Roads Motor Oil & Grease 274.13 1:1495 2, 122 23 .J.J. :L " w4 ,Lil. RETIREMENT TRUST R ecI. 1o I I joint I V , r sm Administration ectober'5e3.: PPE 11-28-98 :=2.31 12!49e 121498 ,24 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST PPE 11-28-98 49='.51 121498 25 26 LERel_. , LLiER LONG & SONS ..Refund Old Town Hall from eU? Peavey House Cleanup 232 G . .368.49 L 121498 - LONG & SONS SON General Govt Buildings -8899 November Cleaning 370.00 121448 j; r LONG E SONS ftneiaf 6uv'L Buildings V1899 General Govt Buildings -8899 supplieselleaning Community Room c:eaninlg J 97 18.00 12!498 121493 Jo LONG & SONS General Govt Buildings -8899 Tax on cleaning 31.:9 121498 E12 MAe'S WELL & PUMP SERVICE MENARDS Culture and Old Town Hall tI Peavey supplies 50 18.32 1214 70 121498 133 MENARDS Adoinistration Groundbreaking supplies 43.49 121448 34 35 ILLI I MTNNEGASCO , 1 , RvQ Old Town Hall ReilibulSe fol Favel's1 Nov Service 140.56 121498 MINNEGASCO General Gout Buildings -8899 Nov Service 252.30 121,498 36 37 :> "'- t ..a r max MODERMICE ` ` ''. L:W < I y t; 4 i , . lrr•" .*�' :. • . Ad�inistrativrr # baba m z '431 98 .r 121498 MONTIC 0 ANIMAL COMTR�� ' Comtrof Asx•" • Aniial pickup '; - 60.38 04 121448 _ 39 :._ ate' NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, E Roads tk r L 1992 Ford Truck parts V- Cc I�1�? NAPA OF ELK EIDER INC Hwys, St7aer5, S Roads Pickup T, U:' 42 43 144 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Case tractor parts 107.84 121498 `...NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC - - Hwys, Streets, & Roads Pickup parts credit -15.81 12115 4s 46 47 LLK 1VER 1\. 1 NORTHERN j , H tv, H«ys, Streets, & Roads pickupl credit Miscell parts :11.09 12149=' NORTHERN AIRGAS Hwys, Streets, & Roads Rental Safaty Equipment 12.32 121498 46 49 - _ -NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS I L Planner EUP.. Wild � Sc Ord Task Force .. 255.15 L .. J 121498 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Sanitary Sewer Construction Sewer System Plan 20.25 121493 _ JJ e VV J 1 r Did pd ""."v .JV L1 ,. NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Sanitary Sewer Construction Water Tower rezoning 22.25 121498 ' NORTHWEST ASSOC CCNSULTANTS Planner Comp Plan Printing 2,439.44 :2:498 `i2i498 74.90 ss NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Planner General Planning 527.26 121498 J i I JName 5I 11 z 9 10 z! Wed 10 43 PH a. •� NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS PITNEY BOWES PRECISION FRAME & ALIGNMENT RANDY'S SANITATION 4iims ::TY OF 37SEG0 Dep` Description Comments Planner Meetings attended/planner Planner Comp Plan update/balance 'Rentsfee:I Hwys, Streets, & Roads 92 Ford Truck repair tire Recycling Recycling Nov Amount 150.00 500.00 :L iT--.1 55.8^ 251.25 - ,syr -- at r- Name 121496 121498 X1,0^ 1:1496 121498 ^V e ii3.Fi V SOFTRONICS Administration Computer repair 1OO.00 121496 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO Hwys, Streets, & Roads 1992 Ford Truck repair 441.77 121498 Heritage Milege ,6 ,7 JV SWENSON JOY 1 1 Heritage Preservation Comm 11 i rs Reinbursement Hert Day J•L 57.02 :La 121496 SWENSON JOY Heritage Preservation Comm Reinbursement meeting 35.00 121498 ,e 19 20 US WEST COMMUNICATION`S Hwys, Streets, &,Roads " Shop Phone 63.05 121498 US WEST COHMUNICATIQNS�g Administration City Hall Phone 366.70 121498 1211 P Zz 23 USA WASTE i Vit' r VL Ree (GENERAL) Old Town Hal'_ We I V J 11 II Peavey Hse Cleanup VV•ee 5,314.19 iLi, qe 1=1498 WRIGHTr I c W;.OUNT'f AUDITOR -TREASURE 1 Co a. Police-�JntracL.d a Jheri�` Parol CeceFl`+e� 510 6,h5C..� 1,2 Li498 << .i Tn1�T 1 T A 61 T nafiitafy n , • nnnLt •'Y.i H25WRIGHT Ty COUNTY RE£OROER Admni-�ra�iol' �` `� n - Host Alter System 19.50 1214G8 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER �: Administration Oman CUP-,* - 19.50 121496 WRi61 T�GG�UNTIvTnnc Eton, n. ��.:4: 30 WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER Administration Administration Boles CUP Bobendrier easement 11.50 19.50 121498 121498 31 )i32 1 TIGHT r Tr WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CU-OP,ELECTRIC Shed' Other Shed & Other_ Buildings , Shed23.52 ' 121498 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Oday Cir Street Light 11.82 121498 3 34 ��35 -Light! WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC y General Govt Buildings -8899 Repair ey 11 ny City Hall 65.eF 601.95 i2!499 12149e WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Water Utilities (GENERAL) Otsego Well 34.72 121498 5ignal36 , Light i2ili% 37 38 P_ELECTk C ro. Street Lighting x Pals9ren Street,Light 1.99 121498 , ILECFRIC Street'LighUrq .s ::. PalilgiEn Street Light 7.08 121498 39 ..H919EPIN C9 el). RIC t .. Stfe t IL St . Eight a0 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC e Street Lighting VII feet Cty 37 & Odean St Light ., 7.99 i , 121496 J- WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 72nd St NE St Light 11.82 121498 .z 44 " WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO OP',ELECTRIC Street Lighting,-' <, Odell Cir St Light L 11.82 i 121498 H45 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN" ELECTRIC Street Lighting.e ` ti- Parell Av St Light 7.08 121498 t 1, 72 Hvht - a6 T:aLI a� WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Li i Street Lighting I Rolling Ridge St Light ii. L 11.82 L1 /Y 12149E WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Rolling Ridge St Light 11.82 121498 49 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 72st St St Light 11.82 121448 50 WRIGHT-HENNEPIt'CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Ouaday & 42nd Siren 22.63 121498 51 W Street Lighting Ave _ 499 - -- , WP,IGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting .I JL - SIL Parell Av St L ght i V- 7.99 •-a 12 14 98 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 0,r=n/'1st St Light 55 „ r " WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP'ELECTRIC Street Lighting _ ijht 83rd Cul de Sac St Light 7.08 121496 5' W W, .. _ I11. U n;:: al•.I Burrmary Check 4cg1s =: r" Pane L .. _ Q'i CITY OF CTSEW 0 a t _ Van--,1or Amount r ;c o 1 00080 JERRY OLSON T0130_' 00300 MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 7CO00:3 00121 PUBLIC_ EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD T00204 00147 STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION _.015 00301 SUPER AMERICA Grand Total m 4._.0-- 84.72 S50.011) 769.,- J 50.0` 33.99 2398.50 :. Noy; 1)93 Claims list i 5::? ,ar :;7Y 0F r, '7E3? Dept Transaction Batch Name Description Comments Amount Name 3a :ch Naga? 11':9�3 ":VN6 a MUTUALndainistration Life Insurance ' 39.15 11i9=•i `1I_SO'A MUTUAL rlw;s, Streets, Reads Life Insurance 29 .SJ 111=="a -RALP4 G. LAUEOURE Sanitary Sewer Construction Earnast Monay;13nd 33,000.00 111993 'ARIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEP' Sani:ary Sewer Construction Oriveway Permit 'Fee 15.00 111Q0 Grand Total 3,033.15 lu