Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
07-26-99 CC
L2 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 4A. Special Presentations Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator July 26, 1999 - 6:30 PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 4.A.1. Jeff Bartheld, Chair of Otsego Parks and Recreation Commission - Discussion and review of proposed Prairie Park Shelter. 4.A.2. Discussion of proposed Park Projects. BACKGROUND: 4.A.1. Attached is a sketch plan of a 30'x 60' picnic shelter drawn by Tom Baillargeon. Jeff Bartheld, Chair of P & R will be present to explain their proposed shelter and plans to the Council and be available for questions. 4.A.2. Attached is a memo from Mike Robertson regarding the proposed Park Projects dated July 22, 1999. Jeff Bartheld will also be available to discuss this item with the Council. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council information and discussion. Thanks, Elaine PICNIC SHELTER 30'X 60' 8' ASPHALT WALK AROUND DRAWN r THOMAS BAILLARGEON NOT TO X I - 4 _,P-- !yr fl mli Date: July 22, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Park Board Project Requests Last Wednesday I met with the Park & Recreation Board to discuss their request for an engineer to attend their meetings. The Board noted that they are amateurs and they often feel a need for professional advice. The Board listed the following projects in which they felt they were in need of engineering advice. 1) Design of a Park Shelter for Prairie Park. 2) Finishing the City Trail Plan. 3) Developing a Park Concept Plan for the west area of Otsego in advance of development. 4) Developing a Park Concept Plan for the southeast area of Otsego in advance of development. 5) Obtaining grants for park or trail development. Chair Jeff Bartheld will attend the Council meeting to discuss these projects along with the Park Shelter plans. cc: City Staff 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 5. CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ July 26, 1999 (Non -Controversial Items) 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 5.1. Approve Resolution Congratulating Charlie Rodby. BACKGROUND: 5.1. Attached is Resolution No. 99-33 prepared by Mike Robertson. A Resolution Congratulating Charlie Rodby On Achieving the Rank of Eagle Scout and Thanking Him for His Contributions to the City of Otsego. RECOMiMENDATION: This is for Council consideration and approval. If Council has any questions or need to discuss further, the item should be removed to another section of the Agenda. Thanks, Elaine RESOLUTION NO. 99-33 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING CHARLIE RODBY ON ACHIEVING THE RANK OF EAGLE SCOUT AND THANKING HIM FOR HIS CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CITY OF OTSEGO WHEREAS, Charlie Rodby is a resident of Otsego and a member of Boy Scout Troop 90; and WHEREAS, Charlie Rodby, as part of his efforts to show that he was worthy of the rank of Eagle Scout, did raise funds, obtain materials, solicit labor, and obtain approval to construct bluebird houses in Otsego Prairie Park; and, WHEREAS, said bluebird houses will contribute to the beauty of Otsego Prairie Park into the distant future; and WHEREAS, Charlie Rodby has demonstrated that the negative image of teenagers occasionally portrayed in the media is not the whole truth, and that there are many teenagers like Charlie who do positive things for their community and who deserve recognition for that. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: 1. That Charlie Rodby is hereby thanked for his contributions to the City of Otsego, and congratulated for obtaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Dated this 26th day of July, 1999. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 12 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPART -HENT: PREPARED BY: 6. Dan Licht, Assistant City Planner: Elaine Beatty-, Citv Clerk," July- 26, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6.2. Consider applicant Rick Packer Arcon Development, Inc. 7625 Metro Blvd. #350, Edina, 114N. 5543.9_ The property owners are PID #118-500-272100. Sec. 27, Twp. 121, R23 Russel V. and Sharon F. Martie, 2998 - 150th St. NW, Monticello, M.N. 55362, PID # 118-500-233400 and 222400 in Sec. 22, Twp. 121, R23, Lawrence R. Vorderbruggen, 521 7th ST, Elk River, MN. 55330, Legal descriptions are on file at City Hall for this property located at the proposed 78TH ST NE and Page Ave. NE. Property abutting the Otsego School to the West and South. Request is as follows: A. Rezone from A-1, General Agricultural Rural Service District to R -d, Residential Urban Single Family District and R-6, Residential -Townhouse, Quadraminimum and Low Density . Multiple Family District. B. A PUD -CUP to allow flexibility from the front setback standards to establish varied setback versus the standard 35 ft. setback from the right-of-way. C. Preliminary Plat of "Pheasant Ridge." 6.3. Consider applicant Gilberto Valdez, 6839 Northeast River Road, Elk River, MN. 55330. Owner of record is David Boggs, Midwest Station II, P.O. Box 10, Rogers, Vin. 55374. PID 4118-500-362200 in Sec. 36, Twp. 121, R23, Legal description is Gov. Lot 2, EX 3-1/2 Acres to Bouley, Ex. Part; To10031A, DES in Book 215-308 Edi TR this is on River Road (County Road #42) East of State Hwy. Ir -r'101. This property is zoned A-1, General Ag. Request is as follows: A. Conditional Use Permit Amendment to allow a mobile home/farm use to be upgraded and continued. 6.4. Consider applicant James R. LeFebvre and owner Rita B. LeFebvre, 15234 70TH ST NE (Co. Rd. #37), Elk River (Otsego) Mn. 55330. PID # 118-500-273404. Legal description is Sec. 27, Twp. 121, R. 23, unplatted land the E 26 &2/3 Acres of the S 2/3 of the W 3/4 of the SW except TR DES in BK 187-282 Exc. Tr. Des in BK. 72570541 Exc. Tr. Des in Bk. 257-43, CO of Wright, State of Mn. Property is zoned A-1, General Agricultural and located NE of Packard Avenue and 70TH ST NE (Co. Rd. #37). Request is as follows: A. Two (2) Variances from Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances for less than minimum lot width in the A-1 (General Agricultural District). B. A CUP to allow access not directly to a public street. 6.5. Any other Planning Business BACKGROUND: 6.2. Came before the P.C. on July 19, 1999 for Hearing. No one spoke in opposition of this request. after questions and discussion by the P.C. the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve A. B. and C. above for Pheasant Ridge development. 6_3. Came before the P.C. on July 19, 1999. The applicant had no issues. No one else from the public spoke. The P.C. voted unanimously to approve the CUP request. 6.4. Came before the P.C. on July 19, 1999. The applicants James and Rita LeFebvre both spoke. No one else spoke from the public. After much P.C. discussion and a 5 minute break the P.C. voted unanimously to approve this request A. and B. for CUP. Commissioner Burce Rask had left the meeting. Page Z - 6. Dan Licht's Planning Items (cont.) 6_5. This item is for any additional Planning Business that should arise. in Find attached findings of fact and planning report for all three items above. I will try to get the minutes of the P.C. to you by Monday. RECONaIENDATION: This is for Council Consideration. The Planning Commissions recommendation was unanimous to approve 6.2, 6.3, and 6.4 was 4 to 0 vote to approve the applications above. Thanks, Laine kirA CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: TXfEETI. G DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 6. Dan Licht, Assistant City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ July 26, 1999 6:30Pv1 ITEM NTAT IBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6.1. (Cont. from 7/12/99 Agenda) Consider Applicant Jeff Ophoven, JKO Holdings, LLC, 19315 County Road #30, Corcoran, 'Minnesota 55340. Owner is Shirley A Peterson (Jim Peterson, Jr. 486 Upland Avenue NW, Elk River, NIN 55330. PID #118-155-001010 and #118-155-001020 in Section 2, Township 120, Range 23. Lots I and Lot 2, Block 1, Autumn Woods Commercial. This is on Queens Avenue N -E, Just East of State Hwy. #101, North of County Road #36 and South of MacAlpine Well Co. These two lots are currently Zoned B-3, General Business District. Request is as follows: A. Rezone Property from B-3, General Business District to I-3, Industrial District. B. Variance to allow a holding tank Septic System C. Site and Building Plan Review BACKGROUND: Jeff Ophoven, JKO LLC and Greg Ebert, Builder appeared before the P.C. for the above noted requests. As you know, we did have some concerned residents who did not want to see approval of this application. They also had concerns with the stormwater drainage, holding tank septic system, Queens Avenue traffic, and screening from the residential lots. (You previously received Dan Licht's summary, planning report from NAC and Findings of Fact, I have recopied that information for you.) Dan Licht will be here to present and answer any questions. At the Hearing the residents requested more information on ponding and drainage, screening, etc. At the Council Meeting of July 12, 1999 this item was tabled for the Council, City Engineer and City Planner to be able to hold a site inspection of the applicants site and surrounding area. The residents were allowed to speak at the Council Meeting as was the applicant. This item now comes back for Council decision. I also copied the hydrologic study fro Autumn Woods that Mr. Jim Peterson, Jr. brought in for your information. RECOiNtM- ENDATION: This is for Council consideration and decision. The P.C. has recommended approval of all of the above unanimously with the conditions as written by NAC. Thanks, Elaine A JUL-0?-1999 09:3& NAC 612 595 9837 P.02/12 INC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESION - MARKET RESEARCH 6,/ Otsego Mayor and City Council Daniel Licht 7 July 1999 Otsego - JKO Holding; Planning Commission Recommendations 176.02 - 99.09 The Otsego Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting on July 6, 1999 regarding the applications of JKO Holding, Inc. for a rezoning, Septic Ordinance Variance, preliminaryfnal plat and site building plan review. At the meeting, several residents of the adjacent Autumn Woods single family subdivision spoke in opposition to the applications. The concerns voiced by those who spoke included the following: • Changes in existing levels of storm water runoff from the site and impact to existing ponds and wetlands in the area. • Use of septic holding tanks and potential for overflow and contamination. • Need for additional visual screening of the residential areas. Noise and traffic impacts from potential tractor -trailer traffic. In response to these concerns, the applicant stated that the proposed use involves 15 to 25 employees. The business, which is relocating from Plymouth, currently works one 6 AM to 4 PM shift. A second shift and occasional weekend shifts are a future possibility. Deliveries will be limited to UPS twice daily and tractor -trailer deliveries once per month. The additional loading facilities included as part of the building are in anticipation of re -use should the proposed tenant sell or vacate the building. The issues regarding drainage and design of the holding tank system must be addressed as part of the City Engineer's detailed review of the site and building plans. The Planning Commission did recommend, however, that the on-site ponding be designed to control an extra 25 percent capacity in order to address existing drainage issues in the area. The Planning Commission also recommended that the location of the proposed holding tanks be away from existing wetlands or drainageways on the property to the extent possible. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9637 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM JU--07-1999 09:37 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03/12 A final recommendation of the Planning Commission is that the proposed Landscape Plan is supplemented to provide additional plantings on the east and south property lines. The additional plantings are intended to provide a more complete screen of the proposed building from the residential areas. The Planning Commission, following the discussion, voted 4-0 in three separate motions to recommend approval of the Zoning Ordinance amendment, Septic Ordinance Variance and preliminarynal plat and site plan applications. This recommendation was made subject to the conditions listed under Option A below. A. Approval (Each action should be made as a separate motion): Motion to approve a Zoning Ordinance amendment to rezone the subject site from B-3 District to 1-3 District. 2. Motion to approve a variance from the Septic Ordinance based upon a finding that there are special circumstances associated with the subject property warranting use of holding tanks. 3. Motion to approve a preliminary/final plat of Autumn Woods 2nd Addition and site plan for development of an industrial manufacturingiWarehouse use subject to the following conditions: a. The subject site is developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the City of Otsego, except as modified herein: Site Plan dated 15 June 1999 Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated 15 June 1999 Landscape Plan dated 15 June 1999 b. The landscape plan is revised to: Specify the size of all proposed plantings, subject to review and approval of City Staff. Specify the size, type and location of any plantings proposed adjacent to the front building facade, subject to review and approval of City Staff. iii. Provide additional plantings on the east and south side of the property to provide a complete screen of the use from the adjacent residential use subject to review and approval of City Staff. JUL-07-1999 09 37 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04i12 C. The applicant submit detailed utility system plans for the septic holding tanks and water well location, subject to City Engineer review and approval. The septic holding tanks shall be located away from existing wetlands and drainage ways to the extent possible. d. The City Engineer review and approve of the proposed 36 foot access to Quast Avenue. e. The City Engineer review and approve circulation to and from the loading facilities. The site plan and building elevations be revised to indicate the location and type of all exterior site lighting, subject to review and approval of City Staff. g All exterior signage shall conform to the provisions of Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance. All grading, drainage and erosion plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. On-site ponding areas and drainage control measures shall be designed to provide one hundred twenty five (125) percent of the required storm water storage. The applicant enter into a development contract and post appropriate escrows for the on-going maintenance of the septic holding tank system, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. k. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Ordinance Amendment based upon a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. C. Motion to table the applications (Specific direction should be provided to the applicant on additional information necessary to consider the applications). pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andrew MacArthur Larry Koshak Jeff Ophoven Greg Ebert JUL-07-1999 09:38, NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKO Holding Incorporated 612 595 9837 P-05/12 Zoning Amendment Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment (map) to rezone the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property") from B-3, General Business District to 1-3, Special Industrial District. City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. 5. The property is zoned B-3, General Commercial District. 8. Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The subject parcel is guided for industrial development by the 9998 Comprehensive Plan Update. This industrial area was specifically identified as an opportunity to encourage a lower capital industrial area for small businesses due to the character of the existing uses in the area. Following this directive, the Zoning Ordinance was amended to establish the 1-3, Special Industrial District to accommodate development of vacant parcels in this area. As such, the requested rezoning is consistent with and encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan. JUL-07-1999 09:38 NAC 612.595 9837 P. 06./12 B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding. The subject parcel is surrounded by existing and/or planned industrial uses to the north, west and south. There are existing single family residential uses to the east of the subject site. The site plan for the property includes intensive landscaping on the east property line to mitigate any potential visual or noise impacts from the proposed use. Adddfonally, the proposed building is setback 100 feet from the east property line. The adjacent houses to the east are setback 160 feet from this property line, creating a significant separation between the uses. As such, the proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed use complies with all applicable performance standards.. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed site design includes elements such as building orientation and landscaping that serves to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent residential uses. Therefore, the use will not have a negative impact to the area in which it is proposed. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The subject property is served by Quast/Queens Avenue. This street is designated as a collector street by the Comprehensive Plan and will have sufficient capacity to serve the subject property. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding. The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's overall service capacity. 7. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 2 JUL-07-1999 09:39 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07/12 8. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Foumier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk JUL-07-1999 09:40 NAC 612 595 9837 P.08/12 ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF AUTUMN WOODS COMMERCIAL 2ND ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition (the °property). Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from a B-3, General Business District designation to an 1-3, Special Industrial District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of ,July 1999. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk .TUI_ -07-1999 09:40 NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKO Holding Incorpora-ted 612,595 9937 P.09i12 Septic Ordinance Variance Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a variance from the Otsego Septic Ordinance to allow temporary use of holding tanks as a sewage disposal system for an industrial warehouse office use. City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. 5. The City Council approved an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance on July 12, 1999 to designate the property 1-3, Special Industrial District. 6, Section 3 of the City Septic Ordinance prohibits the use of holding tanks for sanitary systems unless a temporary variance is approved by the City Council. in considering the variance, the following factors from Section 16.4.2 of the Septic Ordinance must be satisfied: A. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that strict application of the provisions of [the Septic] Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the applicant's land; and Finding: The subject parcel is impacted by topography and soil conditions that limit the building area and potential locations for a standard septic system or mound system. The subject site is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District, although no timetable for the availability for serving this area has been established. These conditions are considered special circumstances that warrant variance for temporary holding tanks until sanitary sewer service may be available. 1- JUL-07-1999 09:4i NAC 612 595 9837 P. 10.,-12 B. Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and "Ifare or injurious to other property. Finding: The proposed use is a low generator of sanitary waste, limited to employee bathrooms, water fountains, etc. As such, the use of holding tanks will be adequate until sanitary sewer service maybe made available to the subject site. The City will require an escrow and documentation that the holding tanks are pumped and maintained regularly through a development contract. 7. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested variance is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 JUL-07-1999 09'-41 NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKO Holding Incorporated 612'595 9037 P.11/12 Preliminary/Final Plat Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a preliminarynal plat entitled "Autumn Woods Commercial Second Addition' and site and building plan review for development of a industrial manufacturing/warehouse/office use. City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition_ The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. The City Council approved an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance on July 12, 1999 to designate the property 1-3, Special Industrial District_ The proposed structure has floor area of 25,000 square feet. The proposed lot and use conforms to all performance standards of the 1-3 District, as illustrated by the following table. . Lot Area 1.080. Lot WK" 150 ft Setbacks Impervious Surface Bldg. Height 35 M Front 65 ft Side 10 ft Rear 20 ft Parking Bldg. 50.0% Site 85.0% Front 15 ft Side/ Rear 5 ft. Required Proposed 3.2 ac. 450 ft 85 ft. 10 ft/ 190 tt 100 tt 15 R 1011 14.4% 36.7°� 24. ft. JUL-07-1999 09:42 NAC 612'595 983? P.12i12 8. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is Incorporated herein. 9. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 10. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed preliminary/final plat and site and building plans, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the application based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the Preliminary/Final Plat for Autumn Woods Commercial 2nd Addition and site plan is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 TOTAL P.12 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 28 June 1999 RE: Otsego - JKO Holding; RezoninglSeptic Variance FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.09 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Mr. Jeff Ophoven, owner of JKO Holding, is proposing to construct a 25,000 square foot industrial manufacturing/warehouse building on Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of the Autumn Woods Commercial Addition. The 3.18 acre parcel is located within the industrial area originally platted under Frankfort Township jurisdiction east of T. H. 101 and north of CSAH 36. As part of the development of the building, the applicant is proposing to combine the two separate parcels, as well as utilize holding tanks for collection of septic waste. The subject site is presently zoned, B-3, General Commercial District. Development of the building requires consideration of a Zoning Ordinance amendment to 1-3, Special Industrial District to accommodate the proposed use, as well as building materials. The proposed septic holding tanks requires consideration of a variance from the provisions of the City's Septic Ordinance. The combination of the existing parcels is being considered as a concurrent preliminary/final plat. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Building Plans Exhibit C: Final Plat Exhibit D: Site Plan Exhibit F: Landscape Plan Exhibit F: Grading Plan 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Recommendation. Decisions regarding Zoning Ordinance amendments are policy decisions that must be made by City Officials. The requested rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Update's discussion that the area should be developed as a lower capital industrial park based upon existing uses and character. If the Planning Commission and City Council make a similar finding, the requested rezoning is appropriate and may be approved. City Officials must also make a determination on a variance from the Septic Ordinance to allow holding tanks in place of a septic or mound type system. This is also a policy matter that must be decided by City Officials. Topography and soils limitations of the property may be a justified hardship. If City Officials make such a finding, the variance from the Septic Ordinance may be approved. If requested rezoning and variance applications are determined to be appropriate, the Planning Commission and City Council may then act on the specific site plan design. The subject site and proposed use are generally consistent with all applicable performance standards outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. Based upon the consistency with adopted plans, policies and ordinances, our office would recommend approval of the submitted site plans as outlined under Option A. A. Approval (Each action should be made as a separate motion): 1. Motion to approve a Zoning Ordinance amendment to rezone the subject site from B-3 District to 1-3 District. 2. Motion to approve a variance from the Septic Ordinance based upon a finding that there are special circumstances associated with the subject property warranting use of holding tanks. 3. Motion to approve a preliminarynal plat of Autum Woods 2nd Addition and site plan for development of an industrial manufacturing/warehouse use subject to the following conditions: a. The subject site is developed in substantial conformance with the following plans on file with the City of Otsego, except as modified herein: Site Plan dated 15 June 1999 Grading and Erosion Control Plan dated 15 June 1999 Landscape Plan dated 15 June 1999 Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 2 b. The landscape plan is revised to: Specifiy the size of all proposed plantings, subject to review and approval of City Staff. ii. Specifiy the size, type and location of any plantings proposed adjacent to the front building facade, subject to review and approval of City Staff. iii. Provide additional spruce trees in a staggered pattern on the east side of the property, adjacent to the driveway, subject to review and approval of City Staff. C. The applicant submitt detailed utility system plans for the septic holding tanks and water well location, subject to City Engineer review and approval. d. The City Engineer review and approve of the proposed 36 foot access to Quast Avenue. -e. The City Engineer review and approve circulation to and from the loading facilities. f. The site plan and building elevations be revised to indicate the location and type of all exterior site lighting, subject to review and approval of City Staff. g All exterior signage shall conform to the provisions of Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance. All grading, drainage and erosion plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. j. The applicant enter into a development contract and post appropriate escrows for the on-going maintenance of the septic holding tank system, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. k. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Ordinance Amendment based upon a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 3 .r. C. Motion to table the applications (Specific direction should be provided to the applicant on additional information necessary to consider the applications). ISSUES ANALYSIS Zoning. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to 1-3, Special Industrial District to accommodate a light clothing manufacturing use, as well as proposed building materials. Section 20-3-2.f of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse impacts of the proposed amendment, with judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The subject parcel is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. This industrial area was specifically identified as an opportunity to encourage a lower capital industrial area for small businesses due to the character of the existing uses in the area. Following this directive, the Zoning Ordinance was amended to establish the 1-3, Special Industrial District to accommodate development of vacant parcels in this area. As such, the requested rezoning is consistent with and encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. The subject parcel is surrounded by existing and/or planned industrial uses to the north, west and south. There are existing single family residential uses to the east of the subject site. The site plan for the property includes intensive landscaping on the east property line to mitigate any potential visual or noise impacts from the proposed use. Additionally, the proposed building is setback 100 feet from the east property line. The adjacent houses to the east are setback 160 feet from this property line, creating a significant separation between the uses. As such, the proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: This issue will be discussed in subsequent paragraphs. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The proposed site design includes elements such as building orientation and landscaping that serves to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 4 residential uses. Therefore, the use will not have a negative impact to the area in which it is proposed. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment. Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The subject property is served by Quast/Queens Avenue. This street is designated as a collector street by the Comprehensive Plan and will have sufficient capacity to serve the subject property. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's overall service capacity. Lot Standards. The following table illustrates the required performance standards for lots and uses within the 1-3 District. The proposed site and site design meets or exceeds all of the applicable performance standards for lots and uses in the 1-3 District. Building Construction. The proposed 25,000 square foot building consists of one floor and a small mezzanine level. The building will be constructed with a continous foundation. Metal siding, which is allowed only in the 1-3 District, will be used for the exterior finish. A four foot tall brick accent has been added along the front and portions of the side facades. The color of the building had not been determined as of the date of this report. Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 5 Setbacks Impervious Lot Lot Surface IHeight Bldg. Area Width Front Side Rear Parking Bldg. Site Front Side/ Rear Required 1.0 ac. 150 ft 65 ft 10 ft 20 ft 15 ft 5 ft. 50.0% 85.0% 35 ft Proposed 3.2 ac. 450 ft 85 ft 10 ft/ 100 ft 15 ft 10 ft 14.4% 36.7% 24. ft. 190 ft Building Construction. The proposed 25,000 square foot building consists of one floor and a small mezzanine level. The building will be constructed with a continous foundation. Metal siding, which is allowed only in the 1-3 District, will be used for the exterior finish. A four foot tall brick accent has been added along the front and portions of the side facades. The color of the building had not been determined as of the date of this report. Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 5 Landscaping. A plan illustrating the location, type and quantities of proposed landscaping has been submitted. The landscape plan also generally illustrates existing vegetation. The size of proposed plantings is not included on the plan and must be specified. In review of the landscape plan, our office has the following comments: • The landscape plan provides for a mix of birch and maple trees on the boulevard adjacent to Quast Avenue. The proposed Amur Maple trees are an exotic species from Asia, which produce a large number of seeds if not pruned. Without pruning, the seeds can spread and the species become invasive. Additionally, these trees only grow to 15 to 18 feet tall. If the intent is to provide shade trees, substituting a species more similar to the River Birch, which grow to 40-70 feet tall, may be more appropriate. • The building elevations illustrate vegetation along the front facade of the building, however, no such plantings are indicated on the landscape plan. The proposed plantings for this area should be specified. • The landscaping on the east property line include sumac plants on the slopes with Colorado Green spruce trees and crab trees at the edge of the driveway/loading areas. At full growth, the spruce trees will provide adequate screening of the loading areas from the adjacent residential uses. However, it can take up to 30 years for these trees to reach their full growth. The spruce trees should be planted in a staggered line along the east driveway to "fill in the gaps" and provide a more complete screen at the time of construction. Utilities. No specific utility plan has been received. The site plan includes a location for two 2,000 gallon holding tanks for sanitary waste. There are no well locations indicated on the submitted plans. More detailed plans for the proposed utilities will be required and are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Section 3 of the City Septic Ordinance prohibits the use of holding tanks for sanitary systems unless a temporary variance is approved by the City Council. In considering the variance, the following factors from Section 16.4.2 of the Septic Ordinance must be satisfied: 1. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that strict application of the provisions of [the Septic] Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the applicant's land; and Comment: The subject parcel is impacted by topography and soil conditions that limit the building area and potential locations for a standard septic system or mound system. The subject site is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District, although no timetable for the availability for serving this area has been established. These conditions may be considered special circumstances that warrant variance for temporary holding tanks until sanitary sewer service may be available. Planning Report - JKO Hong Page 6 2. Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or injurious to other property. Comment. The proposed use is a low generator of sanitary waste, limited to employee bathrooms, water fountains, etc. As such, the use of holding tanks should be adequate until sanitary sewer service may be made available to the subject site. The City will need to require an escrow and documentation that the holding tanks are pumped and maintained regularly through a development contract. The ultimate design of the septic holding tanks must be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Access. The subject site is proposed to have two curb cuts to Quast Avenue. Properties are allowed one curb cut plus and additional curb cut for each 125 feet of street frontage. Based upon 450 feet of street frontage, the two curb cuts may be allowed. The two proposed curb cuts are approximately 175 feet apart and not closer than 10 feet to a side lot line, which is consistent with the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 20-22- 4.H.7 limits the width of the curb cuts to 24 feet, unless approved by the City Engineer. The north curb cut is proposed to be 36 feet across. This width may be necessary to accommodate tractor trailer access, subject to further comment and approval of the City Engineer. The south curb cut is 24 feet wide as allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. Parking.- Section 20-22-9.Y of the Zoning Ordinance requires one off-street parking stall for each one and one-half employee on the maximum shift, plus one space for each 7,500 square feet of floor area. The specific calculation is shown below. (35 employees / 1.5) + (25,000 sq. ft. / 7,500 sq. ft.) = 28 stalls The site plan incorrectly indicates 23 three stalls, likely due to the mezzanine level not being included and rounding errors. Regardless, there a 40 off-street parking stalls provided, including two disability van accessible spaces. All of the parking stalls are 18 feet by nine feet and served by a full 24 foot wide driveway as required by Section 20-22- 4.H of the Zoning Ordinance. Loading. The building includes docking bays for four tractor -trailers, as well as two drive- in overhead doors on the east side of the building. With regard to the four docking bays, the driveway area may not be large enough to circulate a tractor -trailer if other tractor - trailers are parked at the loading spaces. The City Engineer should review and comment on this issue further. The need for additional landscaping to screen these loading facilities has been noted in previous paragraphs. Lighting. No exterior lighting is indicated on the site plan or building elevations. The plans will need to be revised to indicate the location and type of any and all site lighting. The location of site lighting should be subject to staff review and approval to ensure no negative impact to adjacent residential properties and/or the public right-of-way. Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 7 A - Trash. An exterior trash enclosure has been located at the southeast comer of the building. The enclosure is to be constructed of a wood fence. Plans for the enclosure are subject to review and approval of the Building Official at the time of building permit review. Signage. No plans for any exterior signage have been provided. All exterior signage must conform to the provisions of Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance. A sign permit is required to be approved for any exterior signage, subject to review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Grading and Drainage. A grading and erosion control plan has been submitted for review. Said plan is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Subdivision. The subject site currently exists as two separate lots. A preliminary/final plat combining the two lot as Lot 1, Block 1 Autumn Woods Commercial 2nd Addition has been submitted. As noted above, the combined parcel meets all the performance standards for lots in the 1-3 District. Development Contract. If the applications are approved, a development contact will be required primarily to establish parameters for the monitoring and maintenance of the proposed septic holding tanks. An escrow for these purposes should also be required as part of the development contract. CONCLUSION Decisions regarding Zoning Ordinance amendments are a policy decision that must be determined by City Officials in consideration of adopted plans and policies. In this regard, the requested rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Update's discussion that the area in which the subject property is located should be established as a lower capital industrial park. The Planning Commission and City Council must also make a determination on a variance from the Septic Ordinance to allow holding tanks in place of a septic or mound type system. This is also a policy matter that must be decided by City Officials, topography and soils limitations of the property may be a justified hardship. The low waste generated by the proposed use also alleviates concerns associated with use of holding tanks. The proposed site desing and proposed use are generally consistent with all applicable performance standards outlined by the Zoning Ordinance. Beyond the basic performance standards, the site plan provides attention for mitigating any potential impact of the proposed use through landscaping and building location/orientation. The only issue with the site plan concems insufficient circulation area to/from the loading docks and minor landscaping matters. Our office's specific recommendation is outlined in the executive summary of this report. Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 8 pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Jeff Ophoven Greg Ebert Stephen Johnson Planning Report - JKO Holding Page 9 JUL-07-1999 09:44 NAC 612 595 9837 P,02/06 U Z EXHIBIT A-1 JLL-07-1999 09:45 NAC 612`595 9637 F.03/06 lZO-NEIGHHORING PROPERTY OWNERS tz awKM .IRO 0 ka mo ue PO j. 10-002-027W4 t� _ 1 ownEQ: art n O, i OW", Abe.t C. i antor E rrAian. jr.• Petr P. at salveroce L Pnfw e«+ Po /: IE••[N-003070 PC r 1I0^04-003030 PC � ac IRlIPP-134-003010010 olo [r1 t� C tom] 0 100 200 SCALE IN FEET . Q oWrE1i rYAt�e entre Pr vw ow P1O >R I10—So 02000 Owr*R: SFr1er A. Peterwn Po p 118—Y55-001010 SUBJECT SITE &O&Z Snriay A. Pete— PD !1: 118-65-001070 OWNM, Shrlet A. Peta`fen PD �; lo-w—Oo10,w 3 ovm m- yw.w G. & L.do [ Po /: M-04-001060 u o•D4JEft: aAfv"—t sawD j: O PICf-LM-OOIOA r Al 0 k2 chwo. P .% rely A. rwQfr o. PV �: IIB-13S•-0OIO40 y Car B. rrMNM PV 18-nS v 4 OWNAR: fwaM T. k Snot C_ Pio t. Ile-n�-oo�o�o s <� OWrCYt Alen O. & tt..tyw n. Pett PO j: 118-05-001070 EXHIBIT A-2 0 JU--07-1999 09:4b NAC r 612 595 9837 P.04i06 I e93l � I EXHIBIT B-1 JUL-07-1999 09:50 NAC s T 612-595 9637 P.05/06 ;EXHIBIT B-2 JUL-07-1999` 09:56 1-1 s j ui q }.'.. "��i fir. • ---_ -- •r r w r r r ; ! r r _ i - ho i ,moi r 3 r R r � ,i 612 595 9837 f w, '1� d -i-�i7� s t< 18 9 }.'.. "��i fir. • ---_ -- •r r w r r r ; ! r r _ i - ho i ,moi r 3 r R r � ,i 612 595 9837 --------------1 11 EXHIBIT C TOTAL P.06 f w, --------------1 11 EXHIBIT C TOTAL P.06 L ® NOTES _ ..�,�.r.:, = w'»--• HOLDING IW MM IK M•. •..� r•y. w Y.Y. iii wa�n�.p»��y. •)�� YY��l1� �V� K�. \[ �.N apt• MY. �. M_�PY`�Mw� O �I t�a•Y••N � aw. `wc� w w•• rtw��r•� ..� ERE a 4- - — — — — MPARXING SUMMARY � .won•... �. ii .41�aie . i IWAREA SUMMARY PROJECT JKO HOLDING OTSEGO. MINNESOTA 1 - 1 0�;° 00 a E n nor EXHIBIT 0 SCALY IN )MLT 1 ------------- ku � i+i •;� �� = n I ly t m O Z l' ;il Iti 0 t � Z : ,� �IW.. �', 1 i i�tiii 'j i � • !lii iil:is� i i � �31:� i --- ----------- �-------- -- ° - --------------- 41 i' fT �fO �L►�0.M __ C®GR.\DIFG/EROSION CONTROL NOTES la• nx• W 4 ,tYrY•. �w.n.A4 • YOi •a M nW N M YP•4 r.nr. �+. w w--.— .. -.- M YJwD N1N11 O,I..yIHn. O W f (� J -M- W .tlN M rY Mw W. (w�� O M YON. w•O'.1+.0 ./ CO.KnY .. M w M �• M i.. /.OW M iY/. M <�ILCM WA W rOT P..M CPI�i.Y .LM.f �CY.f Ryu•f+. Y w. M �Yci�a an,�aw a. •Yc1 w i w- wMo.� .`r uoN ,Yo..r a... fo.an .Y w..N•c •...... ..uY•s.N..:f �.:WYvy ON NOTES a CnuNn u fvy:f Y• 1 of .e. ,mY /� .vw•. -ILT FENCE DETAIL a r 0n n30 so Yr Y� SCAIE Iv FELT JKO � HOLDING •/of YUEW AY/ IlL Y w �TA WM IEBE=1 1117111 .t l — r i PROJECT JKO HOLDING OTSEGO. MINNESOTA 331nvr-�rs,.s •.. ws �OrpN GONfPOI R EXHIBIT F i��V'C -)jr (U p e. f--(I\t\rf-\ -wlOcsr1 p\v-e-n� bun — m n SS Wn- vs dY1v�\c��� b1a CN- Ox Sln CA- - F 1", m , McCom M KA Knutson Associates, Inc. HYDROLOGIC STUDY FOR AUTUMN WOODS JULY, 1987 12800 Industrial Park Eivd., Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800-328-8322 Ext. 784 Engineers Planners Surveyors u► -, McCombs -Knutson Associates, Inc. 12800 Industrial Park Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 612/559-3700 1-800-328-8322 Ext 784 July 14, 1987 Mr. George Nelson, Sr. George Nelson Associates 1660 South Highway 100, Suite 428 Minneapolis, MN 55416 SUBJECT: Hydrologic Study for Autumn Woods MKA File #8375 Dear Mr. Nelson: Attached is the report on the hydrologic study for the Autumn Woods Development. The study was conducted with the aid of John Oliver and Associates, Inc. and for the most part was based on their existing elevation maps and their proposed grading and site development plans. If you have any questions and need additional information, please contact US. Sincerely, McCCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, Inc. f»'a X;:�;' ;9"Z' Thomas K. Noyes TKN:cah Engineers Planners Surveyors Z- �\ J C 928 1'; �r,� '.- 9 � 1 88 • ;{ / r- A ED NDAR 9S� 6. � /'�^ ,," ;i _`� /) �,�•`' __I� jam.` ` � QQ/ _. r ✓ 11 ( J� / \ ) !`^� % \� / • + \x`11 1 - l �--.�„ _ \ Lj `\887 � ''rte !• � � -� -�• ,` , �% II -'� Ir.-�� / � SCALE AUTUMN WOODS McCOMBS-KNUTSON ASSOCIATES, INC. COOM&r IG ENG■E£RS 6 LA/O SUMEXM ■ SrM PIAI■ ft PLYMOUTH, MQMIESOTA WATERSHED AND SITE BOUNDARIES iltE NO. HYDROLOGIC STUDY FOR AUTUMN WOODS OBJECTIVE AND SITE LOCATION I The objective of this study was to determine how the Autumn Woods Development would effect the surface water runoff in the area. As shown on Maps 1 and 2, the development site is located just north of the Crow River and County Highway 36, and just east of State Highway 101. EXISTING CONDITIONS The site encompasses approximately 60 acres of agricultural fields, grasslands and woods. A ditch/swale enters the northwest corner of the site and runs past two centrally located ponding areas. A third pond is located in the east central part of the site. Water generally flows to the southern part of the site and then along the Highway 36 ditch to one of three culverts which takes it under the highway to the Crow River. On July 7, 1987 there was no water flowing in the ditch/swale at its entrance to the site, nor was there any water running along the Highway 36 ditch to Culvert #Is 2 or 3. There was a trickle of water at Culvert 461, reportedly from a nearby artesian. The site was visited again on July 13, 1987, and the same conditions were observed. The only water flow was a trickle going through Culvert 461. During this visit, the ditch/swale was followed downstream from the northwest to Pond 462 to see what occurred to the water flow at this point. Just west of Pond 462, the swale enters a large, thickly grassed meadow. From here, depending upon the existing water levels and flow volumes, the water could possible go in three directions - to the Pond 462, to the drainage for Culvert Vs 2 and 3, and/or to the drainage for Culvert 461. However, neighbors report that water generally flows to the Culvert Vs 2 and 3 drainage. -1- IPROPOSED CONDITIONS iThe site is to be developed into 32 residential lots and 7 business lots located along Highway 101. The ditch/swale running through the property will be directed to Pond #2 by diking the side slopes where necessary. The area around Pond #2 will be graded to contain water so that it will serve as a storm water storage area to slow down the rate of water runoff. The rate of water release from Pond #2 toward Culvert Vs 2 and 3 will be regulated by an outlet culvert as shown on Map 2. EXISTING FLOWS The first step of the hydrologic analysis was to consider the existing flows through the site. Since Pond #2 is to be used for storage, the contributing watershed above the pond was delineated - as shown on Map 1. This 162 acre watershed is composed of a residential development immediately north of the Autumn Woods site, along with some agricultural fields, grasslands and small woodlots further to the north and east. The section of the watershed located west of Highway 101 is primarily covered by agricultural fields and grasslands. Approximately 45 acres of the proposed site are in the watershed, and it also has a ground cover of agricultural fields, grasslands and woods. To estimate the flow, a computer program similar to the Soil Conservation Service's (SCS) TR -20 was used. The program requires an estimate of the time of concentration (Tc) for the watershed, which was determined from U.S. Geological Survey Maps. It also requires is a curve number (CN), which relates soil and ground cover to runoff. The estimate of the CN was based on SCS's Soil Survey for Wright County, the Hydrologic Guide for Minnesota, and site visits. Two storms were run with this program to get an idea of the existing flows. Using a 10 year, 24 hour storm with 4.1 inches of rain, the peak watershed discharge was 56 cubic feet per second (cfs). The 100 year, 24 hour storm of 5.85 inches of rain produced a peak flow of 107 cfs. Both peaks were sharp, so the large amount of runoff was of short duration. -2- Upon reviewing these results, and considering the undefined, overgrown nature of the ditch/swale as it runs through the site, it was felt that these flows may be somewhat high. After rechecking the accuracy of the input data, the culverts immediately upstream were considered. The first culvert at the northwest corner of the property has a 24" diameter. It is in extremely poor condition, being broken and partially silted in, and thus may reduce the rate of water flow entering the site. The next culvert upstream, a 30" pipe, brings flow under Highway 101 from the western section of the watershed. Our conclusion from this information was that the discharge results were probably accurate, but that the poor condition of the culvert immediately upstream may be retarding flow. If it is repaired in the future, we would expect a flow similar to what the model predicted. FUTURE FLOWS The next step was to modify the input data to reflect the effect of the development on the flows. This resulted in a 10 year peak discharge of 61 cfs, and a 100 year of 114 cfs. Finally, using the computer program, this flow was routed through Pond #2 with its post -development increase in storage. Using a 36" culvert outletting toward Culvert #Is 2 and 3, and a maximum pond elevation of 885.6, the pond peak discharges for the 2 storms were determined. The 10 year storm produced a maximum discharge of 25 cfs with a maximum pond elevation of 884.0. The 100 year storm produced a peak discharge of 49 cfs and a maximum pond elevation of 885.6. It is anticipated that these figures may be high since the storage potential for Pond Vs 1 and 3 was not considered. Note, however, that the pond and outlet culvert were designed so that the peak discharge from the 100 year (49 cfs) storm would be less than that for the existing 10 year storm (56 cfs). CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS The results of this hydrologic study of the proposed Autumn Woods site indicate that the development will not increase surface water runoff in most instances. In fact, the development of a larger ponding area in Pond #2 will actually reduce the rate of runoff by providing additional storage area. With this in mind, there are three topics to be specifically addressed. They are as follows: -3- 1. Runoff to Culvert 461. 2. Runoff to Culvert # I s 2 and 3 via Pond 462. 3. Runoff to Culvert 463. 1. The drainage area served by Culvert 461 is estimated at only 9 acres in size. Of this, only 4 acres will be incorporated in the development so only a slight increase in runoff would be anticipated. However, during large storms some water from the ditch/swale may now runoff toward Culvert 441. The proposed grading of the site would eliminate the possibility of this flow, thus maintaining the small drainage area. 2. The development of Pond 462 for storage will decrease the existing runoff to Culvert #Is 2 and 3. Using a 36" pond outlet pipe, the 10 year storm discharge is reduced from 56 to 25 cfs and the 100 year from 107 to 49 cfs. We do recommend that an overflow section be developed above the pipe, so that if a storm larger than the 100 year occurs, the pond will not back-up above the desired level. The lowest elevation of the overflow should be set at 885.6 to pass storms larger than the 100 year, or at the highest desired pond level. We recommend a similar approach to any culverts placed in the ditch/swale upstream from Pond 462. In particular, an overflow section should be designed for the road running through the middle of the project. 3. The development will not significantly increase runoff toward Culvert 463 from the steep ridge running north -south along the eastern section of the site. Residential development will take place on top of the ridge and much of the runoff will be directed to Pond 463. In general, the development site makes up only 25-30% of the existing watershed. Also, the proposed lots are large, so runoff from the development area should not increase too much above existing runoff. Finally, the additional storage area proposed for Pond 462 should actually reduce the rate of runoff from the watershed. -4- I MEMO Date: July 22, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Proposed Industrial Development JKO Holdings (Jeff Ophoven) My recommendation is approval of the proposed industrial development for the following reasons. 1) It fits in with the City's Comprehensive Plan, which encourages industrial development in that area along the Highway 101 frontage road. 2) It fits in with one of the City's top goals, which is to diversify and increase its tax base by commercial and industrial growth. 3) Mr. Ophoven is exactly the kind of business owner any community would want. It is well known that the easiest commercial growth for a community to obtain comes from existing business owners. Mr. Ophoven is clearly the type of business entrepreneur who has a track record for creating growth. He already owns three companies. His existing business in Otsego, Precision Line, has already expanded once. The building he is proposing to move his other business into is larger than he currently needs, which shows that he is intent on creating additional growth. All of these actions will add to the City's tax base and employment base today, and show good promise to continue to do so into the future. JJL-21-1999 11:2.9 N MI 61 612 595 9837 P . 0"I CON SULTAN'rS MEMORANDUM - via fax transmission TO: Greg Ebert (498-9951) Stephen Johnson (252-9077) FROM* Daniel Licht DATE: 13 July 1999 RE: Otsego - JKO Holding; Site Plan Revision FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.09 Following the site meeting yesterday, it is our understanding that Jeff Ophoven was going to contact you regarding redesigning the building such that the loading dock facilities were facing west. The Otsego Zoning Ordinance does include several parameters for loading facilities that are located on the front facade of a building. This information is provided for your reference below. Please • The loading berth, including the area occupied by the tractor trailer, must be setback at least 65 feet from the right-of-way. What was discussed with Mr. Ophoven was that the loading berths should be stepped back from the front line of the building, with the delivery trucks parallel to the side wall. • All circulation for the loading berth must be provided on site. Drive aisles associated with the off-street parking may be used for this purpose. • Some deciduous plantings should be provided at the west end of the loading berths to provide some screening when viewed from the right-of-way. A fence adjacent to the loading berth may also be provided for this purpose. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Also, please advise in advance of the July 26, 1999 City Council meeting as soon as possible as to your intentions regarding the revising the site plan or proceeding with the current plan. pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE(F.C%6pag�VT. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL, NAC 9 WINTERNET.COM TOTAL P.01 JUL-26-99 MON 02:14 PM STAR EXHIBITS INC FAX NO. 6125614688 - Fax Cover Sheet - Date: 7/26/99 Pages: 2 (including cover sheet) To: Lary Fournier Mayor Fax Phone: 612-441-8823 Phone: 612-441-4414 Sherri Anderson, Cell: 327-1041 Froth: 569-9002 Worts 428-7587 Flome Subject Autumn Wood Commercial 1,arry, attached is a plan recommendation which we feel would resolve the co of not cutting trees, leaving the existing water c cement as is, and taking away the 12' high retainingttachca l tan 1n this plan in our ncighborhood would bless theP he still calx have all 4loading docks, in addition to the drive thru, but they are on the north side 0111y. 'Phis should be i-nceting his needs since he only has 1 trick a week or 1 truck a month. }11 regrards the new plan that,jcff Ophoven has submittcd, we do not see the rsidnce m, i.c. cutting trees sit, -silicatit resolution to ins 1cent,�nccdockssbeing completely,blocked retaining wall, rerouting dra ge e sem per •rc>1jing ordinance, ctc. - the issues are below: 1. Where: is the existing dminagc flow bang rerouted since the Parking lot is on the current drainaln. casement. 2. We did not snlvc the issue of trees being cut - still significant amount of trees being c -11t still in this pl,-m around 70% or more:. 3. A 12' retaining wall still exist on the South end of the loading docks. 4. 1;arricx coverage seems insufficient - I do (m de outt sce �Of, and tiilc he �;hL enclosing: What material would this b P. 01 JUL-26-99 MON 02:15 PM STAR EXHIBITS INC coy"n mp-n C�c�� 1 btil FAX NO. 6125614688 P. 02 ,ac o�� V i� � .� C>!c v «� .v C)n QW011, n@ aYA \�;r,plem JUL-26-1999 13:46 NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKQ Holding Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a Zoning Ordinance property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property") from B-3 Special Industrial District. 612 595 9837 P.02i09 Zoning Amendment Findings of Fact & Decision amendment (map) to rezone the , General Business District to 1-3, City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999; continued to 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. 5. The property is zoned B-3, General Commercial District. 6. Section 20-3-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the speck policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The subject parcel is guided for industrial development by the 9998 Comprehensive Plan Update. This industrial area was specifically identified as an opportunity to encourage a lower capital industrial area for small businesses due to the character of the existing uses in the area. Following this directive, the Zoning Ordinance was amended to establish the 1-3, Special Industrial District to accommodate development of vacant parcels in this area. As such, the requested rezoning is consistent with and encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan. JUL-26-1999 13:47 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03i09 B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding. The subject parcel is surrounded by existing andlor planned industrial uses to the north, west and south. There are existing single family residential uses to the east of the subject site. The site plan for the property includes intensive landscaping on the east property line to mitigate any potential visual or noise impacts from the proposed use. Additionally, the proposed building is setback 900 feet from the east property line. The adjacent houses to the east are setback 160 feet from this property line, creating a significant separation between the uses. As such, the proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed use complies with all applicable performance standards.. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed site design includes elements such as building orientation and landscaping that serves to mitigate potential impacts to adjacent residential uses. Therefore, the use will not have a negative impact to the area in which it is proposed. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The subject property is served by Quast/Queens Avenue. This street is designated as a collector street by the Comprehensive Plan and will have sufficient capacity to serve the subject property. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's overall service capacity. 7. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. JUS -26-1999 13:47 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04/09 S. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Karry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk JUL-26-1999 13:48 NAC ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA 612 595 9837 P.05i09 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT OF AUTUMN WOODS COMMERCIAL 2ND ADDITION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block I of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition (the "property"). Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from a B-3, General Business District designation to an 1-3, Special Industrial District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of July 1999. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk JUL-26-1999 13:48 NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKO Holding Incorporated 612 595 9837 P.06i09 Septic Ordinance Variance Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a variance from the Otsego Septic Ordinance to allow temporary use of holding tanks as a sewage disposal system for an industrial warehouse office use. City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999; Continued to 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition, 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. 5. The City Council approved an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance on July 12, 1999 to designate the property 1-3, Special Industrial District. 6. Section 3 of the City Septic Ordinance prohibits the use of holding tanks for sanitary systems unless a temporary variance is approved by the City Council. In considering the variance, the following factors from Section 16.4.2 of the Septic Ordinance must be satisfied: A. There are special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that strict application of the provisions of [the Septic] Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the applicant's land; and Finding: The subject parcel is impacted by topography and soil conditions that limit the building area and potential locations for a standard septic system or mound system. The subject site is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District, although no timetable for the availability for serving this area has been established. These conditions are considered special circumstances that warrant variance for temporary holding tanks until sanitary sewer service may be available. JUL-26-1999 13:49 NAC 612 595 9637 P.07i09 B. Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or Injurious to other property. Finding: The proposed use is a low generator of sanitary waste, limited to employee bathrooms, water fountains, etc. As such, the use of holding tanks will be adequate until sanitary sewer service may be made available to the subject site. The City will require an escrow and documentation that the holding tanks are pumped and maintained regularly through a development contract. 7. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., Is incorporated herein. 8. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed variance, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the variance based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested variance is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 JUL-26-1999 13:50 NAC CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: JKO Holding Incorporated 612 595 9837 P.08i09 Preliminary/Final Plat Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a preliminarytfinal plat entitled "Autumn Woods Commercial Second Addition" and site and building plan review for development of a industrial manufacturing/warehouse/office use. City Council Meeting Date: 12 July 1999; continued to 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is Lots 1 and 2, Block 1 of Autumn Woods Commercial Addition. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for industrial development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan. 5. The City Council approved an ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance on July 26, 1999 to designate the property 1-3, Special Industrial District. 6. The planning report dated 28 June 1999, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 7. The report dated 24 June 1999, prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 6 July 1999, to consider the proposed preliminary/final plat and site and building plans, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the application based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the Preliminary/Final Plat for Autumn Woods Commercial 2nd Addition and site plan is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: JUL-26-1999 13:50 NAC 612 595 9837 P.09i09 1. The revised site plan is found to conform to the performance standards of the 1-3 District and Zoning Ordinance, subject to approval of City Staff. 2. The landscape plan is revised to reflect the current site plan design and provide adequate screeing of the loading areas, subject to review and approval of City Staff 3. The City Engineer review and approve of the proposed 36 foot accesses to Quast Avenue. 4. A revised lighting plan shall be submitted, subject to review and approval of City Staff. 5 All exterior signage shall conform to the provisions of Section 37 of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. All grading, drainage and erosion plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant enter into a development contract and post appropriate escrows for the on- going maintenance of the septic holding tank system, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 8. Comments of other City Staff. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 TOTAL P.09 N INC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH Otsego Mayor and City Council Daniel Licht 20 July 1999 Otsego - Pheasant Ridge Preliminary Plat; Rezoning/PUD-CUP 176.02 - 99.07 Please be advised that the Planning Commission considered the above referenced application as part of a public hearing on July 19, 1999. No comments were received from the public at that meeting. In reviewing the preliminary plat and PUD -CUP, the Planning Commission recommended additional flexibility from the R-4 District provisions in order to maintain the present layout of the subdivision. Specifically, the Planning Commission is recommending that in addition to the varied front setback of 30-70 feet, flexibility is allowed to establish a minimum lot size of 11,000 square feet, side yard setbacks are established as 10 feet for the principal dwelling and five feet for accessory structures (including attached garages), and that the length of the 81st Court cul-de-sac may exceed 500 feet. Additionally, the Planning Commission recommended that the applicant revise the plat to "minimize" the proposed radial lots, as opposed to "eliminatingn them. The Planning Commission believed that this flexibility added to the overall quality of the project and was consistent with the policies and purpose statements cited in the original planning report for granting the PUD -CUP. The City Council has the following options to consider regarding the applications. Findings of Fact reflecting the recommendation of the Planning Commission have been attached. A. Approval (each action should be made as a separate motion): Motion to approve an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to designate the subject property from A-1 District to R-4 District. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC @ WINTERNET.COM 2. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP and Pheasant Ridge Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of the preliminary plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only guarantee such service to approved final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development. b. 82nd Street is aligned with the centerline of 82nd as platted within the Crimson Ponds Preliminary Plat. C. The preliminary plat is revised to minimize all radial lots. d. All lots shall have a minimum 11,000 square foot area. e. Lots 34-35, Block 3 and Lots 1-2, Block 6 are revised, as necessary, to provide adequate snow storage capacity at the right-of-way. f. The depth of Lots 5-8, Block 6, Lots 45-46, Block 6 and Lots 3-4, Block 4 are increased. g. The preliminary plat is revised to illustrate the coved front yard setback and the correct rear yard setbacks of the R-4 District. h. All easements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Appropriate planting materials are provided for ponding areas subject to intermittent flooding as part of an erosion control plan. j. The submitted EAW is subject to the provisions of Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval by the City Engineer. k. Outlot A and B shall be dedicated as trail corridors as part of required park dedication. Additional dedication shall be required at the time of final plat approval. I. The preliminary plat is revised to include the +/-40 acre parcel to the southwest as an outlot. M. All grading, stormwater drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 2 n. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and post all required securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. o. Side yard setbacks shall be 10 feet for the principal structure and five feet for accessory structures (including attached garages). B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment based upon a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the applicant regarding necessary revisions and/or action). pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Rick Packer 3 A CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Zoning Amendment Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Arcon Development Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment (map) to rezone the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property") from A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service Area to R-4, Residential - Urban Single Family District. City Council Meeting Date: 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service Area. 5. Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update guides the subject parcel for low density residential development (less than 5.0 units per gross acre) with the extension of municipal sanitary sewer and water service. The proposed single family residential subdivisions proposed under the R-4 District standards would have a density of approximately 2.3 dwelling units per acre. As such, the development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The following policies included in the Comprehensive Plan further support the requested rezoning: Except in unique cases, all new residential urban growth shall be confined to the immediate urban service area within the sanitary sewer service district and shall hook up to municipal sanitary sewer and water service. (Policy Plan, pg. 44) A mix of housing types in a manner consistent with the City's land use plan, shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg. 44) A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject parcel is bounded by existing unsewered single family residential uses to the north, Otsego Elementary and the recently approved Prairie Creek sewered residential subdivision to the east, agricultural land which is planned for urban residential development to the south and the recently approved Crimson Ponds subdivision to the west. The proposed rezoning is anticipated to be compatible with these existing and planned uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed subdivision conformances with performance standards established by the proposed by the PUD -CUP and the R-4 District. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed rezoning is anticipated to result in a development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with surrounding land uses and within the City's existing or planned service capacities. As such, no negative effects are expected to be caused by the project. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed rezoning is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The subject parcel will be served primarily by future 78th Street and future Page Avenue. These streets are being designed and constructed to collector street standards to accommodate anticipated traffic from the subject parcel, as well as development of surrounding parcels. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed development is within the levels anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan and will, therefore, be within the City's service capacity to support such development. 6. The planning report dated 14 July 1999 preared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. are incorporated herein. 7. The report dated 13 July 1999 prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. are incorporated herein. 8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 19 July 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 3 ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PHEASANT RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the following described property (the "property"). See attached EXHIBIT A Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from an A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District designation to an R-4, Residential -Urban Single Family District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of July 1999. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk , CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA PUD-CUP/Preliminary Plat Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Arcon Development Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a Planned Unit Development -Conditional Use Permit and preliminary plat entitled "Pheasant Ridge" consisting of 178 single family lots on the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property"). City Council Meeting Date: 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is guided for low density residential development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned R-4, Residential Urban Single Family. 5. The Pheasant Ridge Preliminary Plat consists of 178 single family lots and two outlots. 6. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The requested PUD -CUP is to be utilized to allow for the subdivision design to be based on coving principals resulting in less street frontage (measured at the right-of-way) per lot on average, greater visual open space of the streetscape, while hiding the majority of rear yards. The developer benefits from reduced infrastructure costs and by maintaining the density that could be achieved with a conventional subdivision design, while the City benefits with a unique neighborhood design and reduced maintenance costs. The 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update encourages 'Design and planning innovations in housing units and land development shall be encouraged" (Policy Plan, p. 45). Planned Unit Development has been established within the Zoning Ordinance as means of promoting innovative developments that do not necessarily fit the box of a traditional zoning district. The use of PUD -CUP for this project is appropriate in that the proposed subdivision design is consistent with the following objectives of Section 20-36-1: A. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design and sighting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. F. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan encourages changes in neighborhood character to occur mid -block. The transition between the proposed subdivision to abutting neighborhoods will occur on the east and north property lines. Because the transition occurs along rear lot lines, the independent character of each neighborhood is protected. As such, the PUD -CUP will be compatible with the existing and future surrounding land uses. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The PUD -CUP allows for the front yard setback of the required lots to vary from 30 feet to 70 feet, side yard setbacks of 10 feet for the principal structure and Five feet for accessory structures (including attached garages), a minimum lot size of 11, 000 square feet and a cul-de-sac length exceeding 500 feet. All other performance standards of the R-4 District are satisfied. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed PUD -CUP will result in a development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with surrounding land uses and within the City's existing or planned service capacities. As such, no negative effects will be caused by the project. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed PUD -CUP is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The subject parcel will be served primarily by future 78th Street and future Page Avenue. These streets are being designed and constructed to collector street standards to accommodate anticipated traffic from the subject parcel, as well as development of surrounding parcels. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed development is within the levels anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan and will, therefore, be within the City's service capacity to support such development. 6. The planning report dated 14 July 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. are incorporated herein. 7. The report dated 13 July 1999 prepared by the City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. are incorporated herein. 8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 19 July 1999, to consider the proposed PUD -CUP and preliminary plat, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD - CUP and preliminary plat is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only guarantee such service to approved final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development. 2. 82nd Street is aligned with the centerline of 82nd as platted within the Crimson Ponds Preliminary Plat. 3. The preliminary plat is revised to minimize all radial lots. 4. All lots shall have a minimum 11,000 square foot area. 5. Lots 34-35, Block 3 and Lots 1-2, Block 6 are revised as necessary to have adequate snow storage capacity at the right-of-way. 9 ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit A V NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH Nw%f PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 14 July 1999 RE: Otsego - Pheasant Ridge; Rezoning/PUD-CUP/Preliminary Plat FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.07 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Arcon Development, Inc. has submitted a preliminary plat entitled "Pheasant Ridge" consisting of 178 single family lots. The subject parcel is located west of Otsego Elementary and northeast of the future intersection of Page Avenue and 78th Street. The subdivision design is based upon the concept of "coving" using curvalinear streets with varied front yard setbacks in consideration of the natural elements of the parcel. This design concept is intended to reduce the linear street frontage of a subdivision and provide additional open space, while maintaining density. The proposed subdivision is to be served by public sanitary sewer and water service. The 79.1 acre site is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District established by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan update and is currently zoned A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service District. The preliminary plat application requires consideration of a Zoning Ordinance amendment to designate the property R-4, Residential -Urban Single Family District. Also, consideration of a Planned Unit Development - Conditional Use Permit (PUD -CUP) is required to accommodate a varied front setback of 30 feet to 70 feet. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit 6: Sketch Plan Exhibit C: Preliminary Plat Exhibit D: Preliminary Grading Plan Exhibit E: Preliminary Utility Plan 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Recommendation Decisions regarding the appropriate timing and location of new development that may be allowed through zoning decisions are a policy issue determined at the discretion of the City Council. City Officials must make a finding that the requested Zoning Map amendment designating the property within the R-4 District is generally consistent with the plans and policies of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update, compatible with present and future land uses and within the City's planned service capabilities. If such a finding is made, the approval of the rezoning application would be appropriate. The application for a PUD -CUP to establish a variable front yard setback based upon coving design principals and preliminary plat approval are also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and do not present any general negative impacts. However, the preliminary plat must be revised to conform with performance standards for general lot design, minimum lot area, minimum lot width, and cul-de-sac length. The Planning Commission and/or City Council may consider tabling the applications (option C) to allow the applicant to revise the preliminary plat to address the issues outlined herein. Alternatively, the City Officials may approve the preliminary plat with revisions required prior to a final plat application. Our office would recommend any approval of the applications be subject to the conditions outlined under option A.2 A. Approval (each action should be made as a separate motion): Motion to approve an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to designate the subject property from A-1 District to R-4 District. 2. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP for variable front yard setbacks and Pheasant Ridge Preliminary Plat, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of the preliminary plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only guarantee such service to approved final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development. b. 82nd Street is aligned with the centerline of 82nd as platted within the Crimson Ponds Preliminary Plat. C. The preliminary plat is revised to reduce the length of the 81 st Court cul-de-sac to not more than 500 feet. d. The preliminary plat is revised to eliminate all radial lots. e. All lots shall have a minimum 12,000 square foot area. Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 2 f. Lots 34-35, Block 3 and Lots 1-2, Block 6 are revised to have a minimum width of 94 feet. g. The depth of Lots 5-8, Block 6, Lots 45-46, Block 6 and Lots 3-4, Block 4 are increased. h. The preliminary plat is revised to illustrate the coved front yard setback and the correct rear yard setbacks of the R-4 District. All easements shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. A landscape plan of appropriate low maintenance planting materials is provided for ponding areas subject to intermittent flooding. k. The submitted EAW is subject to the provisions of Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval by the City Engineer. Outlot A and B shall be dedicated as trail corridors as part of required park dedication. Additional dedication shall be required at the time of final plat approval. m. The preliminary plat is revised to include the +/-40 acre parcel to the southwest as an outlot. n. All grading, stormwater drainage and utility plans shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. o. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and post all required securities, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment based upon a finding that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the applicant regarding necessary revisions and/or action). ISSUES ANALYSIS Zoning/PUD-CUP. Requests for Zoning Ordinance amendments and PUD-CUPs are to be evaluated based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Sections 20-3-2.F and 204-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: Planning Repot - Pheasant Ridge Page 3 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update guides the subject parcel for low density residential development (less than 5.0 units per gross acre) with the extension of municipal sanitary sewer and water service. The proposed single family residential subdivisions proposed under the R-4 District standards would have a density of approximately 2.3 dwelling units per acre. As such, the development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The following policies included in the Comprehensive Plan further support the requested rezoning: Except in unique cases, all new residential urban growth shall be confined to the immediate urban service area within the sanitary sewer service district and shall hook up to municipal sanitary sewer and water service. (Policy Plan, pg. 44) A mix of housing types in a manner consistent with the City's land use plan shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg. 44) A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) The requested PUD -CUP is to be utilized to establish a linear front yard setback that does not necessarily parallel the right-of-way. The effect of the coved setback in combination with the method used to define lot width and trapezoid or radial lot shapes results in less street frontage (measured at the right-of-way) per lot on average, greater visual open space of the streetscape, while hiding the majority of rear yards. The developer benefits from reduced infrastructure costs and by maintaining the density that could be achieved with a conventional subdivision design, while the City benefits with a unique neighborhood design and reduced maintenance costs. The 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update encourages Design and planning innovations in housing units and land development shall be encouraged" (Policy Plan, p. 45). Planned Unit Development has been established within the Zoning Ordinance as means of promoting innovative developments that do not necessarily fit the box of a traditional zoning district. PUD is not, however, to be used as a means of circumventing the rigid criteria for varying from the Zoning Ordinance. The opportunity to deviate from the standard provisions of the Zoning Ordinance through PUD must be limited to those projects that satisfy one or more of the criteria outlined in Section 20-36-1. The use of PUD -CUP for this project may be appropriate in that the proposed front yard setbacks are consistent with the following objectives of the referenced section: Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 4 A. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design and sighting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. F. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment: The subject parcel is bounded by existing unsewered single family residential uses to the north, Otsego Elementary and the recently approved Prairie Creek sewered residential subdivision to the east, agricultural land which is planned for urban residential development to the south and the recently approved Crimson Ponds subdivision to the west. The proposed rezoning is anticipated to be compatible with these existing and planned uses. Regarding the PUD -CUP, it is important to consider the transition between neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan encourages changes in neighborhood character to occur mid -block. The transition between the proposed subdivision to abutting neighborhoods will occur on the east and north property lines. Because the transition occurs along rear lot lines, the independent character of each neighborhood is protected, whether it is the transition between the coved subdivision to the more conventional design of Prairie Creek or to the large lots of Country Ridge. As such, the PUD -CUP is also anticipated to be compatible with the existing and future surrounding land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The proposed subdivision's conformance with performance standards of the R-4 District will be evaluated in subsequent paragraphs. The PUD -CUP is being requested to allow the front yard setback of the required lots to vary from 30 feet to 70 feet. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The proposed rezoning and PUD -CUP is anticipated to result in a development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with surrounding land uses and within the City's existing or planned service capacities. As such, no negative effects are expected to be caused by the project. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 5 0 7 Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed rezoning and PUD -CUP is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The subject parcel will be served primarily by future 78th Street and future Page Avenue. These streets are being designed and constructed to collector street standards to accommodate anticipated traffic from the subject parcel, as well as development of surrounding parcels. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed development is within the levels anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan and will, therefore, be within the City's service capacity to support such development. Access. The subdivision will have one intersection with 78th Street (Palmgren Avenue) and two intersections with Page Avenue (81st Street and 82nd Street), which are designated collector streets by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. Section 21-7-7.N of the Subdivision Ordinance requires a minimum 500 feet between intersections on arterial and collector streets. The Palmgren Avenue/78th Street intersection meets the separation requirement from the Page Avenue/78th Street intersection and the western access to the Prairie Creek subdivision. On Page Avenue, the 81 st Street access point is 520 feet from the 80th Street/Page Avenue intersection to Crimson Ponds and 720 feet from the 82nd Street/Page Avenue intersection. 82nd Street serving the subject plat from Page Avenue aligns with 82nd street serving the Crimson Ponds subdivision. The centerlines of these two streets are off -set approximately 20 feet. Section 21-7-7.E of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits street intersection off -sets of less than 200 feet. As such, the north access point must be revised to align with the approved 82nd Avenue intersection into Crimson Ponds. Secondary access into the subdivision is provided via a connection to the Prairie Creek subdivision to the east via 81 st Street. The Country Ridge subdivision to the north was platted with an extension of Palmgren Avenue to the north property line of the subject parcel. The preliminary plat extends Palmgren Avenue from this connection to the southern portion of the plat. The internal streets within the preliminary plat are designed such that these inter -neighborhood connections are not likely to be used by through traffic. Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 6 Blocks. The proposed subdivision includes seven blocks. Section 21-7-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance limits block length to not more that 1,200 feet in order to provide access and circulation throughout neighborhoods. All of the blocks, except Blocks 1, 4 and 5, exceed this requirement by over 200 percent. The length of Block 2 is due to the layout of the Country Ridge subdivision to the north and the school property to the east. The other three blocks all exceed the block length because of the coving design of the subdivision. The curvalinear streets eliminate the need for cul-de-sacs, while providing adequate circulations through the subdivision for auto traffic. Through streets could be provided to bisect the longer blocks, although our office does not believe them to be necessary. Rights -of -Way. All of the local street rights-of-way illustrated for the preliminary plat are 60 feet wide. The preliminary plat also provides for dedication of the east half of the Page Avenue and half and full segments of 78th Street 80 foot rights-of-way. The one cul-de- sac proposed has a radius of 60 feet at the terminus. All of these dimensions are consistent with the Engineering Manual. Streets within the rights -or -way must be constructed to the standards of the design plates in the Engineering Manual. Names for streets within the subdivision have also been proposed. These street names are consistent with the policies outlined in Section 21-7-7.Q of the Subdivision Ordinance. Cul-de-sac. Only one cul-de-sac is provided as part of the preliminary plat design. The cul-de-sac has a length of 680 feet, whereas, Section 21-7-6.A limits the length to 500 feet. There are ponding areas to the north and south of the street at the east end of the street. In that the parcel is nearly 80 acres of raw land, there is no physical justification for exceeding the maximum 500 foot length. The preliminary plat should be revised to reduce the length of the cul-de-sac to 500 feet. Lots. The following paragraphs address compliance with the lot standards of the R-4 District. Generally, most lots are designed to accommodate a building site and provide useable open space. However, the majority of the lots on the inside radius of the curved streets are "pie" shaped. As noted during the sketch plan review, this is problem common to coved subdivision designs that results in the useable space of the rear yard being significantly reduced. The following lots have all been laid out in this design: Lots 8-12, Block 2 Lots 13-18, Block 3 Lots 24-27, Block 3 Lots 27-32, Block 6 Lots 6-11, Block 7 Lots 29-30, Block 7 Lots with a more trapezoid shape would address the issue of a useable rear yard that is associated with the radial lots. The preliminary plat should be revised to eliminate these radial lots. Other comments related to the lot designs are as follows: Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 7 Lot Area. The subject plat includes 178 lots ranging is size from 10,875 square feet to 38,202 square feet with a mean area of approximately 17,900 square feet. R-4 District requires a minimum lot size of 12,000 sure feet. The preliminary plat incorrectly identifies a minimum lot size requirement of 10,000 square feet. The following 16 lots have an area less than 12,000 square feet: Lots 4-6, 20, Block 2 Lots 4, 31-32, Block 3 Lot 4, Block 4 Lots 4, 6-7, 13-15, 39-40, Block 6 The preliminary plat should be revised as necessary such that all lots have at least 12,000 square feet. Deviating from this requirement as part of the PUD -CUP is not necessarily justifiable. The minimum lot size has been established to provide a standard for accommodating contemporary housing designs in combination with on- site recreational space. The value of the coving subdivision design is offered as a means of reducing infrastructure costs and increasing visual open space while maintaining a consistent density. The lots with an area less than the minimum required by the R-4 District are a means of increasing density, which is not necessarily congruent with the objectives of approving PUD flexibility to accommodate the coving design. Lot Width. The Zoning Ordinance defines lot width as the distance between the side lot lines measured at the front setback line. In a standard subdivision, the lot width is measured at the basic R-4 District front setback of 35 feet. However, the applicant is seeking to establish a varied front setback of 30 feet to 70 feet for the proposed lots. The minimum 75 foot lot width required in the R-4 District and 94 foot lot width for lots at the terminus of a cul-de-sac (125% of District minimum per Section 21-7-6.A) are, therefore, measured at this varied front setback. The submitted preliminary plat illustrates the standard 35 foot setback. The varied setback is best illustrated by the building pad location on the preliminary grading plan. The applicant will need to revise the preliminary plat to illustrate the varied setback on the preliminary plat in place of the 35 foot front setback currently shown. All of the proposed lots are at least 75 feet wide when measured at the front of the building pad. Lots 34-35, Block 3 and 1-2, Block 6 are required to have a minimum lot width of 94 feet because they front the radius of a cul-de-sac. None of these lots meet this requirement and will need to be revised to provide that lot width. Lot Depth. The R-4 District requires that all lots have a minimum depth of 100 feet. Further, the double frontage lots that back up to Page Avenue and 78th Street must have an additional 10 feet of depth to provide an additional buffer yard. All of the lots within the preliminary plat conform with these requirements. As noted during the sketch plan review, there is a concern regarding the depth of lots backing up to the existing powerline easement, which bisects the property east to west. Specifically, the building pads of Lots 5-8, Block 6, Lots 45-46, Block 6 and to a Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 8 lesser degree Lots 3-4, Block 4 are sandwiched between the front yard setback and powerline easement. The lack of depth for the building envelope reduces the potential for future expansions and may effect property landscaping and placement of accessory structures (garden sheds/play equipment). As such, the preliminary plat should be revised to increase the depth of these lots. Setbacks. The preliminary plat attempts to identify required setbacks. The issue with the illustrated front setback is discussed above. It must also be noted that the minimum 30 foot front setback is five feet less than the minimum 35 feet required by the R-4 District. The slight reduction to 30 feet may be accommodated within the PUD -CUP as part of the overall coving design. The primary concern with the front setback is visibility for traffic and cars entering the street. Thirty feet is sufficient to provide adequate sight lines at intersections and from driveways. Other setbacks are illustrated as 10 foot side (except corner lots) and 30 foot rear. However, only 20 foot rear yard setbacks are required. As such, the preliminary plat should be revised to illustrate all correct setbacks. Easements. The preliminary plat illustrates 10 foot perimeter easements (5 feet each over side lot lines) as required by Section 21-7-15.A of the Subdivision Ordinance. Easements should also be provided over all stormwater drainage ponding areas and any utilities outside of the right-of-way, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Ponding Areas. The grading plan indicates six stormwater ponding areas within the preliminary plat. A landscape plan should be submitted for planting materials within and adjacent to the ponding areas. The landscape plan should provide low maintenance vegetation in the areas subject to intermittent flooding to ensure that the area does not result in a negative visual impact. EAW. An EAW has been prepared by the applicant. The EAW is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and the provisions of Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance. Park Dedication. No park facilities are planned to be dedicated as part of this subdivision due to proximity to city owned land adjacent to the School property that is planned for a future park. Two trail corridors, illustrated as Outlots A and B on the preliminary plat, are proposed. These trails, with 81st Court ,will connect a future trail along Page Avenue to provide access to the school and future park as part of the City-wide trail system. Additional dedication to the City for park and recreation facilities, above the trail corridors, will be required at the time of final plat approval. Abutting Parcel. The applicant also has control of approximately 40 acres to the south of the subject parcel (Exhibit A). The concept plan previously presented indicates that parcel will likely be proposed for development with twinhomes and townhome structures. The development of that parcel has not been included as part of this application. Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 9 However, a portion of that southern parcel is included within Lots 23 and 24, Block 7 and segments of right-of-way for Page Ave and 78th Street. As such, the preliminary plat should be revised to include this southern parcel as an outlot of the preliminary plat that has been presented. The rezoning and PUD -CUP applications currently being considered would not apply to this recommended outlot. Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans. The applicant has submitted plans for grading, drainage and utilities. These plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Development Contract. If the preliminary plat, and ultimately a final plat application are approved, the applicant will be required to enter into a development contract with the City and post all required securities. As a matter of policy, approval of a preliminary plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service capacity. Sanitary sewer service is guaranteed only to approved final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development. The development contract is to be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION Decisions regarding the timing and location of new development are a policy issue that must be decided by the Planning Commission and City Council. In review of the requested rezoning, the application is generally consistent with the plans and policies of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update, compatible with present and future land uses and within the City's planned service capabilities. If City Officials make a similar finding, the requested Zoning Map amendment designating the property within the R-4 District may be considered appropriate. The application for a PUD -CUP to establish a variable front yard setback based upon coving design principals and preliminary plat approval are also consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and do not present any general negative impacts. However, the preliminary plat must be revised to address several performance standard issues. These issues include general lot design, insufficient lot area, insufficient lot width, and cul-de-sac length greater than allowed. Our office's specific recommendation is outlined in the executive summary of this report. pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Rick Packer Planning Report - Pheasant Ridge Page 10 I=1 N/. C BASE MAP: ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD EXHIBIT A-2 rr\ .. I r,\r.rrr.,rr\rrr,. r.r, r••..... r. rrrrr. \....\rr.,\r,,,.r\\r.r\r\,rr.\1.r•a\.r..\rr\rr..rl,.\\rt \t.rr\ t,lrr,t.r.t•rltrrrrr\ttt t,It\r. tlr 1.1. 7 1•iel rr, isi- {1• zf r .{t .r 1 i • f r {rI (lar S= i11 r r r••1 le' •1 fi r`r` �• i!s'1 1 • • ! i i r•i r ola ill. •1 I .. t i : s Ss , ``ij��. I f• r r. f► . s sss S Sii �(( st ►r S s tlSs�q� !tt :r�, jj'ss3� s s�s'i i tSsl!"i(sr i�)�ii(j�►il;'ih !� 1 01HISPiItill!��,Ifi,-k14r 1414 .i11.1i111ri tii!1![i{�:,i1{SI Slielil. Liz.lii 1�+1_tlti[4.1 iiit.\ttiiie ....:.l.l:1 t a itli_S; b. 6a{i,.RC��i�C:.feli[..1._f r. ar .�.. / + ••asn•.ia t�su :ntsn x:•.. .... .... +tss r.rnr.ssx+:sn atsastss:+saute sa sxxts atasn »xxtnastannn+an+s: uxatar tsars tasass:aaazss:aasaas::=at-.:nast •`i i•. `i2 •.^y... rl?x•Ii!ii:?1!:�•ftlt:tii:r'?iliii!?Ii:i:liSi WP..Tli:1'ti•ii;iliii?Ill!S.'!!Ii Illiii!ifl::ifiliiliiii:!ii511i/11'!:fir!I!:5li!rtiit iii71!ii?iifi!!i.liiil:EiLlLii!liii!1!i't?:iii1?i f :3.•.1, ...! "•iii ..rii.. e..l. rr,. �...f � s: fi {lr;�Ear•iiF .ir .il '?i�ii,I i"fan�}l%� •til..ilil.l!ir...�li ii ?r llal!i,irl. ......4i.�i1..1..rljlF.. ..4...�1.1�1 ji....+ i.r t - .t. •r. •¢ r .r. zwvrn: a,t .r: :rrr:rrr s:rrr r.•rr: r,. i ••.., ...:r :: r:i 1. n.ret. r• r• ti•. r:::...:w:: illlltlt•!!r!N•i\/Y!r+1!il•,!NI!! ' i, urn !•IN o rrr r 'r�' - '1«r• f��:Ulf�lintlydlt�{�1F11r�s!\ ii •w• •.o, . no _ O e e V) 11MINIUMMA r•1• I • 1+•'•••'•r P. Q e jnIN1.N.nNNN,a.\u,l••1„N\ t: R • ^ '° J IIII►IIIWIUIt11t1111r t1NN\rm O unnuWpluugliprp.vun. r H/1111! I/ll 1u11tp! IHlIIIHtllll N Iiili LLJ LLJ i iuumuuupuquutcyunn• � � 8 :. . d?' �:1.(yQrd ” • It�� Z4S ' _ _ _�\ . Fi; j cn '-•.p i''r���.--- m ;p. „�;•'; ��__� � d1' �;'�y ; M N N « e a € H m_ r x i w Irl. oa•_ c t :odl. ► V i. • O i 'S33 i Nrji i M !.. �r�.'i ,�~ ." .f %•v'• � .,.,fi1,t� � W � •ti ( � �' 1 r•'1 (i 1 r S • !: f •�"• . .' ✓Qt'iJt I C J � f . • ? S _ a�{' �ii! '�j F� • 1' � • �•a ii:' {� �..tA„ ..r^+., , t^ �• �r�.F•ti' 00 r ' , i • � : t CJ{ ` •.• � •t _'' tl= t (�j �• t�,i' l,j 'tom, 1 ia: ` adi=.�. �/l�=•����.�.y�•,ly: •=e '��1 r•,.�'!i .✓%r:�� �(r� =.aN�.•a,...+ki'F'�;y,.. l ! a . a i � _ • - �..�'110 71 �. •._f3l t� •�.V L. • 7•v�CrS�+�� 1. f .tJ:.Vi ,t %+' 'r tV is `a , j ��1' • ij� ���i \ -�\ * ~� =s':,•+• 'i�!•�wr�� �,�Ll fi;11t= y. �.r'[�: ,` �;.u;/G�,, t' I �'� ! it :f=f1�(,, �(\5 :, a • r a � �•i•� �� ,�1 �rL �+i1 .,•r I 1 4 •i• ..r�{•��!'i �Y• `-•Vi`.J., l..•M.• � 1TJ i. r r \..Z• `��//•. •w,,��' � ! �r 1''��'�n:.r.r..�`�yi� !i� ,. R�� •Ilea e�1. •�:r - •ta'�!.' •�•,�• ;l t✓t ...a.: •'�� Y Jr�,e� � � �•�;�� '..,« -- l.f•',1"' :�. ii �,f_ n..: /-� �: i�� .`+•a:' 'a . "'�--,�y,� •.L y}s�� `V j?��� � !(�j \, �. r •�. �+.1 (•• rj ;' : a at:L� ` .,� .•�'t t 1• '. — ��V `.w �'� �. SCJ �. rte' �•a \ • TY' ` .� s • �•. ! i %.Z; f r �'• :a` '- ./' � tt,4, i \\ �(,ir 11' Q`i ,,"�:.i' J:.,• ��` •1::r • ,%�'.�!1::�� •.,*..,! •r•'``.� / �(.is rte,. J' ! �� \` titL - 1 �' ij. ra . /'u* � �•� V : ! •v'i^i; • a �i . ' �j �� � � r ♦ a't r r} f 9� < .,,i/�/ (Y�� / r %`• � . }. �� � i. r • � `:''N► . Cw.e •rt = h : tit( :tiA►. 'j� t." � '11. � i P y 7 `+ .�ji': • �•"K� 1''!- �1.' ,.�` �'• ��.,1: is tJL ,.t„ffsr"`•'�%%�' � � . h ,, •%•.' Ar F1 i:' '``i�'•sdxL:rs/f.'y� f�'V� c I fi. N r � N. – r to C� ~• yJohn PHEASANT RIDCE OUver d Assoc/alae, Inc. •.�, v....,-. w ,.,...w.. ... w.o� %� a++�» °�. «! ouc _9LLVYt__ w, rn X OTSEGO. MN se0 •`•""• Y,n-usl. !QJ]tl b. a M Sw,. ,,. M a1eM ec m _ FOR: X IOao. atn.•_,o>< af.n r,-s.es MfCRaO e/. J!!_ .� m ARCON DEVELOPMENT 1!'fl. I I n 1 $igMO' n,.. a/�eioo r,.. ana ru Sy i I 9l�'g a••� p f 4 I ~• yJohn PHEASANT RIDCE OUver d Assoc/alae, Inc. •.�, v....,-. w ,.,...w.. ... w.o� %� a++�» °�. «! ouc _9LLVYt__ w, rn X OTSEGO. MN se0 •`•""• Y,n-usl. !QJ]tl b. a M Sw,. ,,. M a1eM ec m _ FOR: X IOao. atn.•_,o>< af.n r,-s.es MfCRaO e/. J!!_ .� m ARCON DEVELOPMENT 1!'fl. I I tlum.Na., Ylnn.. • leia> u.gona°.f rr.ne..aeu $igMO' n,.. a/�eioo r,.. ana ru KSC WI— ~• yJohn PHEASANT RIDCE OUver d Assoc/alae, Inc. •.�, v....,-. w ,.,...w.. ... w.o� %� a++�» °�. «! ouc _9LLVYt__ w, rn X OTSEGO. MN se0 •`•""• Y,n-usl. !QJ]tl b. a M Sw,. ,,. M a1eM ec m _ FOR: X IOao. atn.•_,o>< af.n r,-s.es MfCRaO e/. J!!_ .� m ARCON DEVELOPMENT 1!'fl. '••I 0 PRELIMINARY PLAT tlum.Na., Ylnn.. • leia> u.gona°.f rr.ne..aeu $igMO' n,.. a/�eioo r,.. ana ru KSC WI— O '/COUNTRY V�� = X PHEASANT RIDGE OTSEGO. MN m FOR: ARCON DEVELOPMENT ` ee1 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN I _ _ i I RIDGE N N I dL.Ire 1— Ii Johrt Oliver d Associates, Inc. �a. . �° ���� °• �:;qee.-]°.e•fr.ipe.-..00 . e/m/an e.o w.:r.rMf rnr " I dL.Ire 1— 9 JLL . 14. 1999 '9 : 55AM N0.810 P.2i8 Review No. 1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Hakanson Residential Subdivision Anderson for the City of Otsego Assoc., Inc. by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Submitted to: Mike Robertson, Administrator cc: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk, Developer: Arcon Development Owners of Record: Russel Martie Lawrence Vorderbruggen 2998 —150th St. N.W. 521 7t" St. Monticello, MN 55362 Elk River, MN 55330 Purpose: Pheasant Ridge is proposed as a PUD with 214 unit single and multi -family residential development on 120 acres in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota. The proposed development will be served with municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and public streets typical of an urban. setting. Jurisdictional Agencies: (but not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County Permits Required (but not limited to):NPDES Considerations: MaMsharod dccsWtun1gpaM0TSF_G0121Sftt2199RVW1.dcc Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Rick Packard, Arcon Development John Oliver & Associates, Inc., Developer's Engineer Reviewed by: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE Ronald J. Wagner, PE Craig J, Jochum, P.E. Date: July 13, 1999 Proposed Development: Pheasant Ridge Street Location of Property: SE % SW % Section 22, T121, R23 and NE % NW Section 27, T121, R23. 79 t Acres, north of proposed 78"' St. & East of Page Ave. Applicant: Arcon Development 7625 Metro Blvd. #350 Edina, MN 55439 Developer: Arcon Development Owners of Record: Russel Martie Lawrence Vorderbruggen 2998 —150th St. N.W. 521 7t" St. Monticello, MN 55362 Elk River, MN 55330 Purpose: Pheasant Ridge is proposed as a PUD with 214 unit single and multi -family residential development on 120 acres in the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota. The proposed development will be served with municipal water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and public streets typical of an urban. setting. Jurisdictional Agencies: (but not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County Permits Required (but not limited to):NPDES Considerations: MaMsharod dccsWtun1gpaM0TSF_G0121Sftt2199RVW1.dcc JL L .14.1999 9:56W TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE GRADING SUBDIVISION CONFIGURATION, LOT SIZE, DENSITY LOT BUILDABILITY STREETS PRELIMINARY PLAT CUL-DE-SACS SOILS & EROSION CONTROL WETLANDSIFLOOD PLAIN SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT TRAFFIC/ACCESS ISSUE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION 11Haol\0x cl do= Wunlc1paMoT96oO\2109\ot2199RWV1.doc NO.810 P.3/8 JU1..14.1999 9:56AM N0.810 P.4/8 Preliminary Plat of Pheasant Ridge, 6/16/99, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc, Preliminary Grading Plan of Pheasant Ridge, 6/16199, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Preliminary Utility Plan of Pheasant Ridge, 6/16/99, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. Stormwater Computations, 6/16/99, by John Oliver & Associates, Inc. City of Otsego Engineering Manual, March 1999 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410 — EAW Requirement Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for Portions of Lefebvre Watershed, March 1999 City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, February 1991 National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991 Geotechnical Exploration of Pheasant Ridge, by American Engineering Testing, Inc., 6/11199 Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) June 22, 1999 Page 1 11Ha01Wared docsWlunicipaRAOTSSGO0 21801ot2199RVW1.doc JU-.14.1999 9:57AM GRADING. NO. 81-0 . P'. 518 1. Grading plan in SE comer of plat needs to match Prairie Creek Plat. Coordination with Prairie Creek is needed. 2. Grading plan needs to be signed by a registered civil engineer. (pg. 6, Section 111,5.9) 3, Grading appears to be acceptable as part of the preliminary plat submittal. SUBDIVISION CONFIGURATION, LOT SIZE, DENSITY 1. Minimum single family loft area is required to be 12,000 sq. ft. Lots not meeting the 12,000 sq, ft. minimum requirement are as follows: Lots 4,5,6 and 20, Block 2 Lots 4,31 & 32, Block 3 Lot 4, Block 4 Lots 4,6,7,13,14,15,39 & 40, Block 6 2, Minimum lot width at the building pad as part of PUD status must be 75'. The Preliminary Plat shows all front setbacks at 30', Some of these should be adjusted to front of building pad. 3. Setback of 65' doesn't apply to lots with back facing a collector street. Revise Lots 16 through 29 of Block 7; Lot 1 of Block 6; Lot 35 of Block 3; Lot 1 through 9 of Block 1 - LOT BUILDABILITY 1. Temporary Piezometers need to be installed to establish existing and anticipated high groundwater elevations, The anticipated high groundwater elevation shall be established by a certified geotechnical engineer, STREETS_ 1, Curb radii need to be labeled and it appears the curb radii from collector to local roadways does not meet 50' minimum (see 21-7-7.0). 2. The minimum roadway centerline curvature shall have a 250' radius. Most curves throughout the preliminary plan do not meet this (see 21-7-7G), 3. Final Plans must include Roadway profiles showing street grades, sanitary storm sewer (size, type, slope and inverts), storm sewer (size, type, slope and inverts), and water (size, type and min. depth). (See page 6, Section 111.5.h of Engineering Manual). 4. Final Plans must include Roadway cross-sections showing right-of-way and easements, Cross culverts, If any, or catch basin leads should be shown to verify minimum cover. (See page 6, Section 111.5.1 of Engineering Manual). Page 2 WJaMahared docs\MunidpaMOTSEGo121991ot2199RVW1,doc '•JUL.14.1999 9 57AM No. 810 P. 6/8 5. Tangents of at least 50' are suggested between curves and at intersections. 6. Cul-de-sacs must be centered on attached street. 81't Court cul -de -sae needs revision to comply. 7. Cul-de-sacs must be 500' or less in length. 81 t Court is over 600 feet. PRELIMINARY PLAT Requires identification of boundary in southwest comer of plat. Plat should include ROW dedication for 78th Street and Page Ave, at the Intersection. It should also include granting an easement for a stormwater drainage basin in the southwest corners of intersection. The preliminary plat must meet the requirement of the ordinances. SOiL AND EROSiON CONTROL 1. Show riprap on the grading plan at outlet pipes, 2, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation plan is required. WETLANDS 1, Site must be reviewed for the existence of any delineated wetlands. Submit for Wetland Conservation Act form, which can be obtained at City Hall. This will certify exemption or compliance or no loss. DRAINAGE COMMENTS 1. Label the 100 -year flood elevation and normal elevation on the grading plan for the backyard ponding area in watershed 7. 2. Runoff from watershed 12 flows to the intersection of Page Avenue and 781, Street. Currently there is a water quality pond proposed just west of the intersection which will be constructed as part of 78th Street construction. A drainage easement will be required for the ponding area. 3. Access needs to be provided to all backyard outlets and ponding areas for maintenance. Access roads should be a minimum of 10 feet wide (20 foot drainage easement) with a maximum grade of 10 percent. Label access points and show proper slope on grading plan. 4. The developer's engineer needs to coordinate two issues with the proposed plat to the east. Currently the proposed plat to the east has a considerable amount of area draining to Pheasant Ridge Pond 5. It appears this area has been considered in the drainage computation, The two plats need to coordinate backyard grading. Page 3 MaWsharod docswlunidpaMOTSEGO12199\ot2t99RVW1.doe JU..14.1999 9:58AM N0.810 P.7/8 .. The Pheasant Ridge plat proposes to drain area 10 to the proposed plat to the east. Currently the grading plan for the plat to the east does not allow this drainage pattem. The two plats need to coordinate the grading In this area, (Refer to Grading Comment #1). 5. As discussed in the drainage calculations report, Area 9 will discharge to the 78th Street storm sewer system without treatment. A catchbasin with a sump manhole should be installed in place of the manhole at station 26+50 to provide for sediment removal. 6. The Pheasant Ridge plat has a considerable amount of area draining to the proposed plat to the west. This drainage issue will need to be coordinated with the final design of Page Avenue and the proposed plat to the west. 7. A NURP pond for off-street and #12 area is needed in the southwest comer of plat. 8. The minimum free board requirements are not met for all proposed low floor elevations (refer to Engineering Manual, Appendix C). Revise elevations to meet freeboard requirements. 9. The final stormwater drainage report shall include all items listed in the engineering manual, Appendix C, Section 7. 10, A regional stormwater model has been prepared for this area. The storage and discharge requirements are presented In `Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for portions of Lefebvre Watershed", March 1999. According to the regional model, the allowable peak discharge rate from the proposed plat is 21 cfs. The current plan proposed to discharge 27 cfs and provide 2.8 acre-feet less storage than planned. The impact of the proposed increased discharge will need to be analyzed with the regional model. TRAFFIVACCESS ISSUE 1. 82nd Street must be moved 15 feet further south to match the location of 82nd Street in Crimson Pond to the west. 2. 80�h Street location meets the separation distance between street access onto Page. SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM_ 1, Location, size, type and grades of sanitary lines must be shown on the preliminary plat (see 21-6-2.C.3 and 21-6-2.C.4). Sanitary manholes must be located in the pavement of the street, but not In predominant wheeltrack locations. No trunk sewer Is required to be placed in this plat, Page 4 NNH4011ahared docsWtunlc1panAOYSEGO\2199Wt2199RVW1.doc JUL.14.1999 9:59AM NO.810 P.8/e WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1. Watermain in any cul-de-sac must be 8" to facilitate proper fire flow capacities. 2. The watermain should be connected to proposed Page Ave. through outlot S for looping purposes. Looping through outlot B would negate the need for 8" in the cul- de-sac, 3. During final design, it may be required to extend the watermain to the northeast comer for future tie to main trunk, ENVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Assessment Worksheet has been completed. It will need council approval and then submittal for publication in the EQB Monitor. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS SIDERATIONS 1. Benchmarks need to be shown on each sheet (see page 7 Section 111.14 of Engineering Manual). SUMMARY ANC]/OR RECOMMENDATION With the PUD, the Developer Is assuming special consideration for smaller horizontal radii than required in the street curves, The traveled lanes are required to have 250' radii. The goal is to have a uniform speed of 25-30 mph speed on all streets in the plat. The only mitigation necessary is to super elevate the curves limiting the super to 3% maximum. Our recommendation is to design for a uniform speed throughout the plat. We also feel that an effort should be made to determine the ultimate use of the 33 foot strip of land between this proposed plat and the school property. This strip will be land locked. With the above issues satisfactorily resolved, we recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary Plat/PUD. Page 5 1Wa011ehanad d=WlunlclpaPAOTSEGO1219ftt2199RVW1.doc INC MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH (,3 Otsego Mayor and City Council Daniel Licht 20 July 1999 Otsego - Midwest Station II; CUP 176.02-99.10 The Planning Commission considered the above referenced application at a public hearing on July 19, 1999. No comments were received from the public. The Planning Commission asked if a permanent foundation was required. A permanent foundation for temporary accessory farm dwelling is not required under Otsego's Zoning Ordinance. The structure must only be secured, subject to review and approval by the Building Official. In that the proposed structure is was not intended as a permanent structure under the original Wright County CUP, requiring a permanent foundation is not necessary as part of this application. The Building Official will verify that the dwelling is adequately secured as part of the building permit process. The Planning Commission voted 5-0 in favor of recommending approval of the CUP. A Findings of Fact reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendation is attached for consideration at the July 26, 1999 City Council meeting. PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Gilberto Valdez David Boggs 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Midwest Station II, Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow a mobile home as a farm accessory use on the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property'). City Council Meeting Date: 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 2. The property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The property is guided for continued agricultural use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District. 4. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The subject site is planned for continued agricultural land use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. The applicant would present that the accessory on-site dwelling is necessary to provide a caretaker for horses kept at the farm. As a necessary accessory use to the principal farm use, the proposed conditional use, as originally allowed under Wright County's jurisdiction, would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject site is located within the Urban Service Area Reserve designated by the Comprehensive Plan. Und/ such time as sanitary sewer and water' service is to be extended, the area is planned to remain rural character. The exisfing . horse farm and related accessory dwelling are will be compatible with the existing and planned rural uses in the area. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). _ Finding: The proposed use will conform will all applicable performance standards. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The replacement of the existing accessory dwelling will not create any negative impacts to the area in which it is proposed. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The proposed use will not generate any additional traffic above that generated by the uses on the subject site currently. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use will not have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. 5. The planning report dated 14 July 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. are incorporated herein. 6. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 19 July 1999, to consider the proposed PUD -CUP and preliminary plat, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the aforementioned findings. 2 Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Conditional Use Permit is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Use of the accessory dwelling shall cease if the principal agricultural use of the property is terminated. 2. The applicant demonstrate that the location of the accessory dwelling conforms to applicable side and rear setback requirements. 3. The height of the accessory dwelling shall not exceed 35 feet. 4. The exterior appearance of the accessory dwelling shall be generally compatible with that of existing structures on the property, subject to review and approval of the City Staff. 5. The removal of the existing dwelling and location of the new dwelling shall require approval of a building permit from the City Building Official. 6. The septic and water systems serving the accessory dwelling shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and/or City Building Official. 7. The applicant post a performance security as determined by the City Building Official for the installation of the new accessory dwelling and removal of the existing unit. 8. Findings of other City staff. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th day of July, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 3 ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit A x NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NPI C COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH i PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 13 July 1999 RE: Otsego - Midwest Station II - CUP Amendment FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Gilbert Valdez, on behalf of Midwest Station II, Inc., is proposing to replace an existing mobile home on the Midwest Station II horse farm with anew unit. The existing accessory dwelling provides an on-site residence for a caretaker for the animals kept at the subject site. The intent of the application is to replace the existing single -wide mobile home with a new double -wide unit. The 37.5 acre subject site, located at 6839 Northwest River Road, is zoned A-1 District and is also within the Wild and Scenic Recreational River District. The existing mobile home was approved as an accessory farm dwelling under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) approved by Wright County in 1985. The Otsego Zoning Ordinance allows mobile homes as an accessory farm dwelling only as a temporary residence for immediate family members. However, Section 20-1-6 of the Zoning Ordinance states that any use that was legally established by a CUP prior to adoption of the Zoning Ordinance is to be considered as having an approved CUP under local regulations. Any change to the use requires consideration of a new conditional use permit according to the provisions of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance. This serves to establish local control and provides an opportunity to establish any parameters for the continuation of the existing use. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Site Plan Information Exhibit C: Wright County CUP 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Recommendation The replacement of the existing mobile home as an accessory farm dwelling is permitted because the use was originally approved as a conditional use under Wright County jurisdiction. The change to the conditional use does require consideration of a CUP to establish a local regulation, as well as evaluate the impact the alteration may have. In this respect, the proposed replacement of the existing accessory dwelling is not anticipated to have any negative impact to the surrounding area and does conform with applicable performance standards. Provided that the principal agricultural use of the subject site continues, the accessory dwelling may be considered appropriate. Our office, therefore, recommends approval of the application as outlined under Option A below. A. Motion to approve a conditional use permit to allow a mobile home as a farm accessory dwelling, subject to the following conditions: 1. Use of the accessory dwelling shall cease if the principal agricultural use of the property is terminated. 2. The applicant demonstrate that the location of the accessory dwelling conforms to applicable side and rear setback requirements. 3. The height of the accessory dwelling shall not exceed 35 feet. 4. The exterior appearance of the accessory dwelling shall be generally compatible with that of existing structures on the property, subject to review and approval of the City Staff. 5. The removal of the existing dwelling and location of the new dwelling shall require approval of a building permit from the City Building Official.. 6. The septic and water systems serving the accessory dwelling shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and/or City Building Official 7. The applicant post a performance security as determined by the City Building Official for the installation of the new accessory dwelling and removal of the existing unit. 8. Comments of other City staff. B. Motion to deny the requested conditional use permit based upon a finding that the use is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Report - Midwest Station 11 CUP Page 2 C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided regarding changes or additional information that must be submitted). ISSUES ANALYSIS CUP Criteria. The Planning Commission and City Council must consider the possible impacts of the proposed conditional use. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance outlines criteria on which the judgement of the Planning Commission and City Council is to be based upon (but not limited to). The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The subject site is planned for continued agricultural land use by the 9998 Comprehensive Plan Update. The applicant would present that the accessory on-site dwelling is necessary to provide a caretaker for horses kept at the farm. As a necessary accessory use to the principal farm use, the proposed conditional use, as originally allowed under Wright County's jurisdiction, would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment: The subject site is located within the Urban Service Area Reserve designated by the Comprehensive Plan. Until such time as sanitary sewer and water service is to be extended, the area is planned to remain rural character. The existing horse farm and related accessory dwelling are anticipated to be compatible with the existing and planned rural uses in the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: These issues will be evaluated in subsequent paragraphs. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The replacement of the existing accessory dwelling is not anticipated to create any negative impacts to the area in which it is proposed. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. Planning Report - Midwest Station I! CUP Page 3 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to generate any additional traffic above that generated by the uses on the subject site currently. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. Performance Standards. The following table illustrates the performance standards of the A-1 Agricultural District, as well as the WS District. The new accessory dwelling is to be located in the same general place as the existing mobile home. As illustrated, the proposed accessory dwelling will likely satisfy all applicable performance standards. The applicant will need to provide additional information to verify compliance with the side and rear yard setback requirements. An impervious surface limit is also imposed as part of the WS District. Although the information provided is not adequate to determine impervious surface, it is not likely to be an issue given the 37.5 acre size of the parcel and agricultural use. Building Exterior. No information has been provided regarding the appearance of the new accessory dwelling. As an accessory use, the appearance should be compatible with other structures on the property. The appearance of the dwelling may be made subject to review and approval of City Staff. Building Permit. The removal of the existing dwelling and location of the new dwelling will require approval of a building permit from the City Building Official. Utilities. The septic and water systems serving the accessory dwelling will be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and/or City Building Official. Planning Report - Midwest Station 11 CUP Page 4 Lot Area Lot Setbacks WS District Setbacks Building Width Height Front Side Rear OHWM Bluff Required 1.0 ac. 150 ft. 130 ft. 30 ft. 50 ft. 100 ft. 30 ft. 35 ft. (centerline) Proposed 37.5 ac. 900 ft. 130 ft. Insufficient +100 ft. +30 ft. est. 12ft. Information Building Exterior. No information has been provided regarding the appearance of the new accessory dwelling. As an accessory use, the appearance should be compatible with other structures on the property. The appearance of the dwelling may be made subject to review and approval of City Staff. Building Permit. The removal of the existing dwelling and location of the new dwelling will require approval of a building permit from the City Building Official. Utilities. The septic and water systems serving the accessory dwelling will be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and/or City Building Official. Planning Report - Midwest Station 11 CUP Page 4 Termination. In that the dwelling is accessory to the agricultural use of the property, any approval of the CUP should include a requirement that the accessory dwelling be removed if the agricultural use is terminated. Performance Security. The Planning Commission and City Council may consider requiring a performance security as a condition of approval. The performance security would be to ensure that the existing mobile home is removed from the property with the installation of the new dwelling. Also, with home relocations, the security would provide for repair of any public facilities damaged during the move. The amount of the performance security may be determined by the City Building Official. CONCLUSION A mobile home as an accessory farm dwelling is only allowed as a temporary residence for immediate family under Otsego's Zoning Ordinance. However, the subject use was originally approved by CUP under the jurisdiction of Wright County. Under these circumstances, the use is permitted to continue and any change may be accommodated by processing a CUP under Otsego's Zoning Ordinance provisions. Under this pretext, the proposed accessory farm dwelling may be considered appropriate. The proposed use is anticipated to be compatible with the principal use, and surrounding properties and will satisfy all applicable performance standards. Our office's recommendation is outlined in the Executive Summary of this report. pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Larry Krampka Gilbert Valdez David Boggs Planning Report - Midwest Station 11 CUP Page 5 M- N/,.� C BASE MAP: 2 00 -� ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD D v xs C�\sl / 1 • EXHIBIT A-2 FROM : CITY OF OTSEGO JUN. Jb. 1y`J`j '�:106H'I r1� PHONE NO. : 612 441 4414 On this page, please provide a sketch of the entire property involved, show newly proposed parcels, roads, buildings, railroads, lakes, swamps, neighboring buildings and other pertinent information. (This sketch is for initial staff review only, please prepare a large diagram -for the public hearing.) Applicant 4VI ID �oG'6 S Note The original Government plat- shore Lot 2 contain; 371.icres ..._ ._ .. EXHIBIT B-1 , 7, EXHIBIT B-2 GHI FAX N0. 6127551117 Jul. 26 1999 03:39PM pi LC . ;LAND--pEVEX;Qp ENT -d ' 10732. isitason BxvCo64 Aipids MN 55304 . ' ...... ... <)frice (612)'767= 965. )F Ax (612) 755-11'17 • .. • •'. ; • .: •,'• • . ,� • + , .. :. • . ,. , .. ' ' , , ; . ., . is ' ��• � •Torsi ;.:., �.•. .... udin g cover • • ,',''• • .�• •• ' Notes,'' � '• :,: •, • � � .� • ' ' � • • ' •'• ': •' • • •'. •., • . w FROM : GBI FAX NO. : 6127551117 Jul. 26 1999 03:39PM P2 o 2 2 ,,l ` ,.r 'I 1 26 25 27,18` o 0 9 1.25 •��� t... '9 -� n h JUL-22-1999 16:20 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01/02 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS ING COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM- via fax transmission TO: Mike Robertson FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 22 July 1999 RE: Otsego - Jim and Rita LeFebvre; Variance Findings FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.11 Our office was directed to conceive alternative findings that the City Council may endorse for approval of the above referenced application. In review of the issues, we would suggest the following be considered by the City Council at their meeting on Monday, July 26, 1999. FINDING: The need for variance is a temporary situation until the surrounding parcels are developed as part of the Urban Service Area Reserve with the extension of municipal utilities and streets that will be available for the subject lot, therefore effectuating the goals and directives of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. The granting of this variance is consistent with the following policies of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update: • Develop and implement a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities (Policy Plan, p. 34). • Land use development shall be planned so as not to isolate or create land -locked parcels (Policy Plan, p. 40). The City Council has the authority to apply conditions to variances applicable to protecting the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of the variance is intended to be a temporary situation that provides an opportunity for efficient development of the area. As such, the City Council may consider the following conditions as part of an approval of the variance: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55415 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM JUL-22-1999 16:20 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02i02 Upon sale of any portion of the existing lot, an easement for Ingress and egress shall be recorded against both properties. Said easement shall specifically state that the easement shall terminate upon development of the property to the east, south and or west or upon construction of reasonable public street access to the parcel. Said easement documents shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 2. A sketch plan shall be prepared and submitted illustrating the logical relationship between the proposed subdivision of a one (1) acre lot and the future subdivision of the remaining 21.9 acre parcel and surrounding area. The sketch plan shall also indicate a logical way in which the proposed one (1) acre lot could be re -subdivided in the future, pursuant to Sections 21-6-2.E.5 and 21-5-2.E.6 of the Subdivision Ordinance. 3. The existing residential dwelling shall be required to connect to municipal sanitary sewer and water services with the extension of such services for development of the remaining 21.9 acres of the original parcel. The existing septic system shall be removed pursuant to Section 10 of the Septic Ordinance and the well system capped subject .to approval of the City Engineer. A deed covenant, approved by the City Attorney, shall be recorded against the title of the proposed one (1) acre lot acknowledging this requirement to potential future owners of said lot. pc. Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak 2 of 2 TOTAL P.02 I- NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS_ INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM / LP TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 20 July 1999 RE: Otsego - Jim and Rita LeFebvre; Variance and CUP FILE NO.: 176.02-99.11 The Planning Commission considered the above referenced applications hearing on July 19, 1999. No comments were received from the ublic ations at a public . present and provided the reasons they are seeking the variance and CUPThe ayplicant was The Planning Commission, after much deliberation, concluded that the r e was warranted because it provided for the preservation of agricultural la dconsistestedent variance the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. stent with There was also discussion regarding the impact of the proposed subdivision for future urban development in the area. The need for a sketch plan illustrating how the proposed parcel could be included in a future subdivision was also discussed. Ultimately, the Planning Commission concluded that the parcel could be Incorporated into a future subdivision, although a revised sketch plan should be provided as required the Subdivision Ordinance. y b The Planning Commission voted 4-0 in favor of recommending approval of the variance and CUP in separate motions. Findings of Fact reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendations are attached for consideration at the July 26, 1999 City Council meetin . The City Attorney has recommended alternative language regarding the access ease g documents, which as been included in the conditions of approval for the CUP a licationn. PP . PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Jim and Rita LeFebvre 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NACQa WINTERNET.COM CITY OF OTSEGO Variance Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: James and Rita LeFebvre Request: Request for approval of a variance to allow subdivision of the property described in Exhibit A ("the property") establishing a lot without minimum lot width frontage to a public street. City Council Meeting Date: 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the subject property is: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A 2. The subject property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The subject property is zoned A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service Area. 4. In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and the City Council shall make a findings of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standard which are lower than those required by State law. d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of [Section 20-5-2.B.2 of the Zoning Ordinance]. (see #5 below) 5. A variance from the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district or area. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. (2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance]. (3) Special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship shall not be a result of lot or building size, or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of [the Zoning Ordinance] would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] or put the property in question to any reasonable use. C. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship are not the result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by [the Zoning Ordinance] to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non -conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f. The request is not a use variance. g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. 6. The planning report dated 16 July 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 2 7. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 19 July 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested variance is hereby approved based on the following finding: FINDING: The requested variance is consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance for the granting of a variance as the action is necessary to preserve agricultural land as directed by the Comprehensive Plan. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE EXHIBIT A CITY OF OTSEGO Conditional Use Permit Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: James and Rita LeFebvre Request: Request for approval of a conditional use permit to access to the property described in Exhibit A ("the property") other than directly from a public street. City Council Meeting Date: 26 July 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the subject property is: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A 2. The subject property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserve as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The subject property is zoned A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service Area. 4. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use The seven effects and findings regarding them are: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed access is consistent with the following policy of the Comprehensive Plan: • Land use development shall be planned so as not to isolate or create land- locked parcels (Policy Plan, p. 40). B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding. The proposed access will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding. The proposed access conforms with all applicable performance standards. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed access will not have a negative impact to the area. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the access will not negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The proposed access will not generate any additional traffic. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use will not have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. 5. The planning report dated 16 July 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 6. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 19 July 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 4-0 vote that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested conditional use permit is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Access to a public street shall be utilized when available. 2. Upon sale of any portion of the existing lot, an easement for ingress and egress shall be recorded against both properties. Said easement shall specifically state that the easement shall terminate upon development of the property to the east, south and or west or upon construction of reasonable public street access to the parcel. Said easement documents shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 3. A revised sketch plan is submitted illustrating the logical future subdivision and extension of streets serving the property. 4. Comments of other City Staff. 2 PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 26th Day of July, 1999 Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk R] ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exhibit A N W16A NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH r 61 PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 16 July 1999 RE: Otsego - Jim and Rita LeFebvre; Variance and CUP FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Jim and Rita LeFebvre are proposing to divide a one acre lot, which would incorporate the existing single family house, near the northeast corner of their existing 22.9 acre parcel. The proposed lot does not have any frontage to a public street and would have access via a 25 foot wide driveway easement. The purpose of the division is to facilitate the sale of the remaining 21.9 acre parcel for potential future urban development and sale of the one acre lot and existing dwelling to a third party for continued use as a single family property. The subject parcel is located northeast of CSAH 37 and Packard Avenue within the Urban Service Area Reserve designated by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service District. The proposed subdivision requires consideration of a variance from the lot width requirements of the A-1 District and a conditional use permit to allow access other than directly from a public street. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Certificate of Survey Exhibit C: Development Concept Plan 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Recommendation Decisions regarding variances are policy issues that must be decided by City Officials based upon the criteria established in the Zoning Ordinance and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. As such, our office makes no specific recommendation regarding the applications. The subdivision for which the variance and CUP are necessary raises several issues regarding compatibility and negative impacts with anticipated future development, which conflict with polices of the Comprehensive Plan. Further, a variance from the lot width/street frontage requirements of the Zoning Ordinance is not justified because the property currently has a reasonable use, the applicant has not demonstrated any physical hardship associated with the land that prevents a reasonable use, the need for variance is due to the location of the existing structures and the purpose of the variance may be considered economic in nature. The Planning Commission and City Council may consider the following actions: A. Approval (each motion should be made as a separate action) 1. Motion to approve a variance to allow subdivision of a lot with less than the required lot width and frontage to a public street. FINDING: A specific undue hardship must be cited as part of a motion approving the variance. 2. Motion to approve a conditional use permit to allow access to a lot not directly from a public street, subject to the following conditions: a. Access to a public street shall be utilized when available. b. The ingress/egress easement documents shall specify that the easement is to be vacated at such time as reasonable access to a public street is available. The easement documents shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. C. A revised sketch plan is submitted illustrating the logical future subdivision and extension of streets serving the property. d. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application for variance based upon the following finding FINDING: The request is inconsistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the applicant has not demonstrated any undue hardship as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. Planning Report - LeFebvre VarianceXUP Page 2 -A. Develop and implement a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities (Policy Plan, p. 34). • Land use development shall be planned so as not to isolate or create land- locked parcels (Policy Plan, p. 40). • All development shall be accessed by public streets (Policy Plan, p.40). • The existing parcel is not denied a reasonable use. • The need for variance is directly related to the location of the existing buildings. • The need for variance is based on economic considerations. C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the applicant regarding modifications or additional information). ISSUES ANALYSIS Subdivision. The existing parcel is within the Urban Service Area Reserve, which defines the areas of the City to which the Sanitary Sewer Service District may be expanded, when the present SSSD nears saturation. The applicant has provided a sketch plan prepared by the developer proposing to purchase the 21.9 acre parcel illustrating the planned subdivision and development of the area, with the general location of the proposed lot is shown on the sketch plan. The sketch plan is based upon coving design principals, featuring urban -sized trapezoid or radial lots fronting curvilinear streets, which would be served by municipal utilities. The size and rigid rectangular shape of the proposed lot is inconsistent with the character of the planned neighborhood. The specific location of the proposed lot may be considered a physical barrier and disruptive to the potential development of the area. It may be suggested that the creation of the land -locked parcel is only a temporary situation until the surrounding properties are developed. However, no timetable has been established for development of the surrounding properties, nor should one necessarily be expected. Further, there is no means of guaranteeing that future owners of the proposed one acre parcel would be cooperative as part of a development process for the surrounding properties, which would include attempting to integrate the proposed lot. This issue is in conflict with goal and policy statements in the Comprehensive Plan that encourage development of "... a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships between activities" (Policy Plan, p. 34). The submitted sketch plan illustrates how the area might be subdivided if the proposed one acre lot is not created. Planning Report- LeFebvre VariancelCUP Page 3 No alternative sketch plan illustrating how the surrounding properties would be subdivided if the proposed lot is established has been submitted. Without a reasonable demonstration as to how the proposed lot would be incorporated into a re -subdivision of the proposed 21.9 acre parcel and adjacent properties, the subdivision may be considered premature, for being inconsistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan as defined by Section 21-4-2.E of the Subdivision Ordinance. Performance Standards. The table below illustrates required performance standards of the A-1 District and the proposed lots conformance with said standards. The lot width dimension for the proposed one acre lot does not conform with the minimum requirement of 150 feet. Section 21-7-4.E of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance definitions of lot width and lot frontage require that the 150 minimum lot width be frontage to a public street. The lack of 150 feet of frontage to a public street, requires consideration of a variance. Because a variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would resolve the conflict with the Subdivision Ordinance, no separate variance application is necessary from that Ordinance. The principal structure also encroaches into the required side yard setback. But, the proposed subdivision does not effect that yard. Zoning Ordinance variances are to be evaluated by the following review criteria outlined in Section 20-5-2.B. These criteria are derived directly from State statue and must be satisfied for the variance to be approved. In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standard which are lower than those required by State law. Planning Report- LeFebvre VariancelCUP Page 4 Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth Setbacks Front Side Rear Accessory Required 1 ac. 150 ft. 150 ft. 35 ft. 30 ft. 50 ft. 10.0 ft. Proposed 1 ac. 135 ft.' 323 ft. 150 ft. 29 ft. 129 ft. 13.7 ft. 21.9 ac 200 ft. 1,700 ft. No structures ' Represents dimension of north and south lot lines only as there is no public street frontage. The lot width dimension for the proposed one acre lot does not conform with the minimum requirement of 150 feet. Section 21-7-4.E of the Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance definitions of lot width and lot frontage require that the 150 minimum lot width be frontage to a public street. The lack of 150 feet of frontage to a public street, requires consideration of a variance. Because a variance from the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would resolve the conflict with the Subdivision Ordinance, no separate variance application is necessary from that Ordinance. The principal structure also encroaches into the required side yard setback. But, the proposed subdivision does not effect that yard. Zoning Ordinance variances are to be evaluated by the following review criteria outlined in Section 20-5-2.B. These criteria are derived directly from State statue and must be satisfied for the variance to be approved. In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the Planning Commission and City Council shall make a finding of fact that the proposed action will not: a. Impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. b. Unreasonably increase congestion in the public street. C. Have the effect of allowing any uses which are prohibited, permit a lesser degree of flood protection than the flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standard which are lower than those required by State law. Planning Report- LeFebvre VariancelCUP Page 4 d. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety. e. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way be contrary to the intent of this chapter. f. Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan. g. Violate any of the terms or conditions of [Section 20-5-2.B.2]. (see below) 2. A variance from the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated that: a. Undue hardship will result if the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district or area. (1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area or shape of the property. (2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be solely economic in nature, if a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance]. (3) Special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship shall not be a result of lot or building size, or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel. b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of [the Zoning Ordinance] would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of [the Zoning Ordinance] or put the property in question to any reasonable use. C. The special conditions and circumstances causing the undue hardship are not the result from the actions of the applicant. d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by [the Zoning Ordinance] to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district under the same conditions. e. The request is not a result of non -conforming lands, structures or buildings in the same district. f. The request is not a use variance. Planning Report- LeFebvre Variance/CUP Page 5 g. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended purpose of the applicant. The requested variance allows the creation of a land -locked parcel without direct access to City streets. This purpose is contradictory to the following goal and policy statements included in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. Based upon these goal and policy statements, the requested variance is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance. • Develop and implement a cohesive land use pattern which ensures compatibility and functional relationships among activities (Policy Plan, p. 34). • Land use development shall be planned so as not to isolate or create land -locked parcels (Policy Plan, p. 40). • All development shall be accessed by public streets (Policy Plan, p.40). Regarding the variance, it is difficult to justify a new subdivision that creates a non- conforming parcel. The applicant has not provided evidence of any undue hardship that satisfies the criteria listed under item 2.a above, as summarized below. • The existing 22.9 acre parcel is allowed a reasonable use under the Zoning Ordinance as a rural single family residential parcel. The applicant also has the option to negotiate the sale of the property to a potential developer for future subdivision. • It may be suggested that the intended purpose of the variance is economic in nature: The applicant intends to maximizing the value of parcel by selling the existing residence for continued use and sell the balance of the property as raw land to a potential developer, as the existing dwelling likely has little value to the potential developer. • The need for a variance is directly related to the location of the existing residential buildings and not to any natural characteristic of the property. • The siting of the existing house and garage, which lacked foresight for potential re- subdivision, was a decision of the original builder. These circumstances are man- made factors not unique to the existing parcel compared with others in the A-1 District. Planning Report - LeFebvre VariancelCUP Page 6 Access. The proposed lot is to be accessed via a 25 foot wide easement that extends north from CSAH 37 by 1,000 feet. Section 20-22-4.H of the Zoning Ordinance requires that all lots have direct access to a public street. If the requested variance were approved, an exceptions to this requirement may be allowed by CUP. The Planning Commission and City Council must evaluate the proposed access based upon the criteria outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance (in addition to other factors): 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan, Comment: The requested CUP is necessary to accommodate the proposed subdivision of the property. The existing 22.9 acre parcel currently exists with direct access to CSAH 37. The provision allowing indirect access has been included within the Zoning Ordinance primarily to accommodate planned unit development situations. In this case the Planning Commission and City Council need to consider the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan cited above. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment: Approval of the CUP allowing the establishment of the land -locked one acre lot would create potential conflicts with the future subdivision of the 29.9 acre parcel and surrounding properties, as described above. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: As discussed above, the CUP is necessitated by the fact that the proposed lot does not conform to the minimum lot width and street frontage requirements. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment. -The proposed use will negatively impact the area, as discussed above. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The proposed use is not anticipated to generate any additional traffic. Planning Report - LeFebvre Variance/CUP Page 7 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity Comment. The proposed CUP, which facilitates creation of a land -locked parcel may interfere with the logical future extension of streets and utilities. CONCLUSION The proposed subdivision of the applicant's existing parcel creating a land -locked parcel is inadvisable in that it may create significant compatibility issues and problems for the future development of the area with urban densities. In that a variance and CUP are required to subdivide what exists as a legal conforming property with a reasonable use should raise additional red -flags. While the variance and CUP may be presented as a temporary need, the City can obtain no assurances that the concerns noted herein will not arise at such time as application is made to develop surrounding properties. Decisions regarding variances are policy issues that must be decided by City Officials based upon the criteria established in the Zoning Ordinance and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan because their decision effects the application of zoning regulations to property. As such, our office makes no specific recommendation regarding the application. In review of the Zoning Ordinance criteria and established policies, it the opinion of our office that a variance is not justified because the property currently has a reasonable use, the applicant has not demonstrated any physical hardship associated with the land that prevents a reasonable use, the need for variance is directly related to the location of the existing structures and the purpose of the variance may be considered economic in nature. Each of these factors contradicts the specific criteria established in Section 20-5-2.13 of the Zoning Ordinance. PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Jim and Rita LeFebvre Dave Lendhart (via fax) Planning Report - LeFebvre Variance/CUP Page 8 NAC ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD EXHIBIT A-2 990• L9'22f N .8f.S0.0 N r -Imo----------------- 1 � 1 3 ' .•• a I.ir R A./1 i Wle b/t MS 7H1 �y�gaoa O✓O C •.�. y L . :i:s:o✓ zy:; ✓a a� a .s W I j c W Q � z � a i LLJ EI� Y 1� 1� I ul -----------------------k'r-----L— I � Q I V I I I I , 1 al �I it :I 990• L9'22f N .8f.S0.0 N r -Imo----------------- 1 � 1 3 ' .•• a I.ir R A./1 i Wle b/t MS 7H1 �y�gaoa O✓O C •.�. y L . :i:s:o✓ zy:; ✓a a� a .s ------------------- S 4 -------------------- -y Mn I m I „o W ti � Q s� ti s EI� Y 1� 1� ------------------- S 4 -------------------- -y Mn I m I „o ti 3 s� s EI� Y 1� 1� -----------------------k'r-----L— 1� G Iv � 9hZ ChC ll O a � w yy33 �e}w} W LL.SS = • 5 Wo '� p 9 a Q ti 3 s� s EI� Y 1� 1� -----------------------k'r-----L— 1� 1'r1111 Iv 1 1 • 1 • L41_____________1 ------------- - MI ------------------------- •' J0 6/ t MS -3141 Jo :FIT 3 ,a 4 �a EXHIBIT B 1- O J W CO) 0 IL O cc CL LL 0 Z 0 Q U 0 �J iQ I� 'W 2 W 0 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk' July 26, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 7.1. Approve awarding the bid for Odean Avenue Project S.P. No. 217-105-02, Minnesota Project STPk8600(124). 7.2. Consider ordering the City Engineer to prepare Plans and Specs. for Bid for the 78TH ST and Page Ave Projects. 7.3. Consider partial Payment #2 for Barbarossa and Sons 7.4. Any Other Engineering Business BACKGROUND: Items 7.1 through 7.4. has information prepared by the City Engineer, Larry Koshak. Attached is the information needed for these items for your review. Mr. Koshak will attend this meeting and be available to answer questions. 7.4. Is for any other Engineering Business that should arise. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council consideration and approval where necessary. T Elaine L%i CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETLN. G DATE: DEPART -N EN'T: PREPARED BY: 8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ July 26, 1999 6:30PM ITE-Xf N -UMBER: ITEIM DESCRIPTION 8.1. Consider Petition for Sewer Connection by Jon Zachman, 8384 Parrish Ave NE. 8.2. Any other Legal Business BACKGROUND: 8.1. Attached is a Petition from John Zachman as noted above. Andy MacArthur will be present to answer questions and give legal advise on same. 8.2. This is for any other legal business that may arise. RECONItNiENDATION: This is for Council consideration and any approval needed. Th , Elaine �� CM V11� -- TSEGO 8899 Nashua Avenue. N E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414 Elk Rlver, MN 553.'30 Fax: (612) 441-8823 PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DATE: — J5 = TO: City Council, Ci of Otsego, Minnesota We, the owners of the following described or identified real property, do hereby petition for the Improvement as described herein with the entire cost of such improvement, including indirect or administrative costs, to be assessed against our property. We hereby agree to pay all costs as may be incurred by the City, and to pay the entire project cost as apportioned by the City to each property. The improvement and assessment shall be as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429. A) Description of the requested Improvement: B) List of Owners and Properties Signature of Owners Property I.D. Property Address 5—o0- Note to Property Owners: If your mailing address is different than the property address, please provide a mailing address on the reverse side of this petition. C) Certification by City Clerk This petition was received on the date identified below. I have reviewed the nature of the requested improvement and find that the signatures and properties Identified above appear to be located such as to benefit from the requested improvement and that the total number of property owners signatures appear to represent approximately % of the probable benefited parcels or approximately % of the probable benefited property frontage. Otsego City Clerk Date: 1999 CAShar9\Mun1ciperA0TSEG0\901101901 PP1.doc A,,. ns. KCA CC.WPS %f krAA CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTIMENT: TMEETI G DATE: DEPARTI-fENT: PREPARED BY: 9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk July 26, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NLTXi MER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 9.1. A. Consider Wright -Hennepin proposal concerning Water Service Billing (Cont. from last agenda) B. Any Other Council Business BACKGROUND: 9.1. A. Mike Robertson will be present to discuss Wright-Hennepin's proposal. See attached copy of letter dated 6/10/99 and proposal from Wright Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association from last agenda packet. B. This is for any other Council Business that may be added. RECOXEME`D TION: This is for Council discussion and any consideration for approval needed. Thanks, �e BOARD DIRECTORS • Alvin E. Heinz, Chairman %yers, (N kris A. Lar.tto, Vice Gmirman nnandaie. X IN Dale F. fans. Secretari-Treasurer • Timothy L. Young,Annandale. MN 6/10/1999 Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association A Touchstone Energy' Partner !� PO Box 330' Rocktoro MN 55373-0330 ,bletrc • (612) 477-3000 Tull Free • 1-800-943-2667 24 -Hour Fax • (612) 477-3054 Mike Robertson Administrator City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, M2N 55330-7314 Subject: Water Reading/Billing Proposal Mike: JUN JutthdenEel� ,r fonticello, .VN • Howard L. Ellis, BWW6, MN v .. umas . Mach, hlapl Grove_'0N __.__„_--�tncrs-bt-�tuiti1Ciip e -Plain. ;ALV • Donald A. Lucas, .Maple Grove. ,VN PRESIDENT 3c CEO • Mark F. Vogt, Annandale, ,ALN Please find attached, Wright-Hennepin's proposal concerning water service billing for the City of Otsego. Our proposal encompasses residential meter reading, customer billing, cash collections, and delinquent account management. In our opinion, these are the prevalent services that would be of benefit to the City. Thanks for reviewing the proposal; we look forward in -tum to having a further discussion with you on this project. Regards, Bob Miller Key Account Representative The poyver of human connections City of Otsego Proposal Background Information Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (WH) is an electric distribution cooperative, formed in 1937. Currently, W -H serves over 26,000 members in the counties of Wright, Hennepin, Stearns, Meeker, Sherburne and Carver counties. The cooperative is consumer owned, and governed by local citizens. Services other than electricity provided by WH include: Home Security, Security Response, Wireless & Land Line Communications, Electric Installation and Contracting, Pager, 24 hour Electric Dispatching, Internet, Appliance Warranty, and Surge Protection. This proposal concerns an additional service, where W -H would provide water reading/billing services to the City of Otsego. W -H's proposal is related to the City's current construction of a new wastewater treatment plant & potable water infrastructure, which will initially serve a 1,000 — 1,400 home development. Otsego City administration projects that the development will be complete in five to ten years, assuming that 150-250 homes are built per year. The wastewater treatment is scheduled to be operational by the fall of 1999, and is sized to add future systems beyond the development at issue. W -H Services Proposed services which Wright -Hennepin would provide to the City for the water/sewer project include the following: • Meter Reading • Billing • Cash Collection • Management of Delinquent Accounts • 24 Hour Dispatching (Optional) Meter Readinq Wright -Hennepin currently has the equipment and software, to accommodate meter reading of the water/sewer project. Wright -Hennepin would be responsible for physically collecting the meter data, provided that the City purchases & installs the Itron remote reading system (ERT) into the city's choice of water meter. Since the new homes will also be W -H customers, WH would also install the ERTs into their electric meters at the time of installation. W -H currently has handheld meter reading devices which have the capability of reading the ERTs by radio frequency, therefore the meter reader does not have to go onto the customer's property. Page 1 W -H's contracted meter reading service, RMR Services, Inc, would read the water meters simultaneously with the electric meters (under WH/RMR's current contract). Not only would this create efficiencies for both entities, it would also eliminate the redundancies created by two meter readers reading the same residence. The City of Otsego area meters are read the second week of the month or around the 10th of the month. RMR currently reads 36,000 of WH meters on a monthly basis. RMR Services would have the ability to install the ERTs into the city's choice of water meter. For further technical information, please contact Brent Anderson at RMR Services, Inc, 1228 South 7th St, Minneapolis, MN 55415. 612-376-7600. Billing W -H would be responsible for calculating the billing based on the meter data collected. WH would print and mail the statements. Proposed pricing includes paper, outer envelope, reply envelope and postage and management of the receivable. The water and sewer billing would be included as a separate line item on the customer's electric statement. WH would set the water and sewer billing up as a separate receivable. The water and sewer billing would be included on WH's statement, but displayed as a separate service. The customer would see the total of their water and sewer service as well as the total to be remitted for all services on the statement. See sample of statement (attached). The City of Otsego is current billed for electric and other services the third week of the month (approximately the 21 of each month). Payment is due the 8th of the following month unless the customer chooses the EZ Pay plan (ACH) which provides the customer with additional payment choices of the 1 sr 81h or the 15th of the following month. Cash Collection W -H would be responsible for collecting and posting all payments, and remitting payment to the city on a monthly or semi-monthly basis. W -H is flexible regarding timing and related arrangements. Delinquent Accounts W -H would be responsible for collection of delinquent accounts, through the City's standard disconnect period. WH's current software system has the capability of putting a reminder on the bill, and sending out disconnect notices etc. for individual services. W -H would send out the disconnect notice, but it would be the City's responsibility to physically disconnect the customer. Pricing includes reminder statement and disconnect notices, as well as coordination with the City for payment arrangements and disconnects. Page 2 24 Hour Dispatching (Optional) W -H provides 24 hour dispatching services. WH could provide the City the following dispatching services: • Around the clock personal response. • Disconnect and reconnect customer call handling. Please note that pricing for the above dispatch services are not included in this proposal, but could be added at the City's request. Proposed Pricing W -H's proposes a monthly package fee for the City, to include the services of meter reading, billing, cash collections, and delinquent account management. Package cost would be per the following: Monthly Base Fee $200 Monthly Customer Fee $1.75 (per account) This proposal is valid for 60 days from date of issuance (6/10/1999). Upon acceptance, length of agreement shall be for a two-year period. Presented b Accepted by Representing: Wright -Hennepin Date 6Z_,72 Page 3 Representing: City of Otsego Date Viriti�-ffons�Pln caoow.lhi ;roan... in Account #: 123456789 CID* 1234341 DOE, JOHN 1234 ANYWHERE ANYTOWN, MN 55333 Due Date: June 30, 1999 Amount Due: $100.00 Wright-Henneppin Statement Date: 05/05/99 Coccerative Electric Association Account #: 123456789 PO BOX 330 Total Amount Due: $100.00 Rockford MN 55373.0332 Billing Summar* Previous Balance: $101.00 ayments Received: 4101.00 Balance Forward: $0.00 Total Electric: $50.00 Total Security: $10.00 Total Water: $40.00 Total Amount Due: $100.00 marketing message Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Asscciation PO BOX 330 Rockford MN 55373-0332 Electric Service 01.13 111 - Osage Period 04-01-99 to -'0641.99- - --Sex Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET Meter a ares. Rd Pm,. Rdr Multiplier Basic Service $ 8.25 12345678 500 0 1 Energy 500 kwh a 0.081 $ 40.50 100 W Light 43 kwh $ 7.30 Power Cost Adj 543 kwh @ (0.0163) $ 8.85 Sales Tax Q 0.065 $ 3.06 Total for Electric S 47.20 Security Service Sry Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET Monitor Charfe f 9.40 Soles Tax Q 0.065 f 0.60 Total for Security Water Service Usage Period 04-01-99 - to 05-01-99 Sry Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET Meter • are+. Rof arer. Rd{ Multiplier Basic Serrlce f 0.00 97654321 10.000 0 1 Water Usaae 10.000 a+1 Q 0.00776 f 77.60 5a1es Tax Q 0.065 f 2.40 Total for Water f x.00 DAVID MINGE 2No DISTRICT, MINNESOTA ISIS LONGWORTH BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202)225-2331 'AIL: WWW.HOUSE.GOV/WRITEREP Virginia R. Wendel 9357 65th St NE Albertville, MN 55301-9713 Dear Virginia: UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 22, 1999 COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE GENERAL FARM COMMODITIES, RESOURCE CONSERVATION, AND CREDIT DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS, OVERSIGHT. Nu rRmON, AND FORESTRY COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE Thank you for contacting me about the city of Otsego's need for a post office. It was good to hear from you. I can definitely understand the need for such facilities with the fast growth rate in that area of the state. In support of your request, I have written a letter to the Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service. A copy of that letter is enclosed for your information. Should you need further assistance from my office, please do not hesitate to contact Randy Maluchnik of my Chaska office. Again, thank you for contacting me. DM:cay Si erely, DAVID MINGE Member of Congress — DISTRICT OFFICES: — (SOUTHTOWN PLAZA) (CITY SQUARE) (COURTHOUSE SQUARE) 542 FIRST STREET SOUTH 205 EAST FOURTH STREET 938 FOURTH AVENUE MONTEVIDco. MN 56265 CHAsRA, MN 55318 P.O. Box 367 (320) 269-9)1 I (61'_) 448-6567 WINDoM, MN 56101 TOLL FREE 14900)-453-9392 ( 507) 331 A 115 DAVID MINGE 2N1) DISTRICT. MINNESOTA 1413 (,ONGWORTH BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20515 (202)225-2331 '.MAIL. WWW.HOUSE.GOWWRrTEREP UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES July 21, 1999 The Honorable William Henderson Postmaster General United States Postal Service 475 L' Enfant Plaza SW Washington, DC 20260 Dear Postmaster General Henderson: COMMI'T'TEE ON AGRICULTURE GENERAL FARM COMMOOMES, RESOURCE CONSERVATION. AND CREDIT DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS. OVERSIGHT, NUTRITION. AND FORESTRY COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET JOINT ECONOMIC COMMITTEE I would like to bring to your attention the enclosed request for establishing a post office in the town of Otsego, MN. The City of Otsego is the second largest community in the most highly populated and fastest growing county of my Congressional District. Otsego's population of 6,000 citizens is increasing rapidly, and the community's identity is restricted by the lack of its own zip code. The city is nestled between two booming metropolitan areas, and uses the zip codes and post offices of four surrounding towns. The Otsego area will experience some of Minnesota's largest growth rates. A new post office, along with acknowledgment of the city on addresses, will strengthen community pride and commerce. Given the area's explosive growth rates, it is likely that such an investment will be needed soon. I urge you to review the enclosed request. Thank you for your consideration. I look forward to your response. DM:cay Enclosure DAVID MINGE Member of Congress - DISTRICT OFFICES: - 0 (SOUTHIOWN PLASA) (CITY SQUARE) 542 FIRST STREET SOUTH 205 EAST FOURTH STREET (COURTHOUSE FOURTH SQUARE) MONTEVIDEO, MN 36265 CHASKA, MN 55318 938 FOURTH 3 AVENUE (320)269-931 1 320)269-9311 (612)448-6567 P.O. , MBox 367 WINDOM, MN 56101 ToLL FREE 1-(800)-453-9392 (507) 831-0115 1:_Hakanson Anderson M11 Assoc., Inc. A & Municipal Engineering .and Surveying CITY OF OTSEGO CITY ENGINEER COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING 7/26199 ITEM 7.1 ODEAN AVENUE PROJECT AWARD 3601 Thurston Avenue Suite 101 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 612/427-0520 Fax Consider our recommendation to authorize the City Administrator to sign the attached Certificate recommending to Mn/DOT to award the Odean Avenue Project to Bauerly Bros. in the amount of $1,608,702.39. The completed form should then be submitted to the District State Aid Engineer. The State Aid office has not furnished us with a tabulation of the Bids, however, we have attached a list of the bidders and their bids. ITEM 7.2 QUADAY AVENUE, 78TH STREET AND PAGE AVENUE PROJECT We have completed the plans for the trunk sanitary sewer, trunk watermain, storm sewer and street construction for a portion of Quaday Avenue (CSAH 42 — 78th Street), 78th Street (Quaday Avenue to Page Avenue) and Page Avenue (78th Street to 80th Street). We have inserted the bid ad in the Construction Bulletin for the dates of 7/21/99, 7/28/99, and 8/6/99, to receive bids on 8/17/99 at 10:00 a.m. at the City Hall. The Council could consider awarding the project at their regular meeting on 8/23/99. Since the City, in the process of condemnation, will be able to occupy the property on 9/3/99. The above timing for bidding will allow the fastest possible time this project can get started. We need your approval of two resolutions in this matter. Mike told us to proceed with the plans. We will need a Resolution authorizing our firm to prepare the plans and specifications. We also need a resolution approving the plans and specifications and setting a bid date. Andy MacArthur is preparing the resolution. A set of plans will be available for review at the City Hall. mit!/ `,,glneer" Council ,agenda /terns Page 1 or 2 Ju/i/ _%1, 1999 _„ ,..0?-: -.'ocs'.+r;;;n.:a�.a1,�lOT.SF_'�CiIQIlo,9!ii<gencf•�i'-25-✓9 c:p;; ITEM 7.3 CONSIDER APPROVING PARTIAL PAYMENT #2 FOR BARBAROSSA & SONS ON THE TRUNK SEWER AND WATER PROJECT, COP #98.04. The amount is $258,399.76 and the partial payment is approximately 20% of the original bid amount. See attached progress report and payment #2 form. ITEM 7.4 ANY OTHER ENGINEERING BUSINESS C -.it Engineer COClncil Agenda Items Mage 2 of 2 Hak,an50n Anderson July 21, 1999 , As oecc. llHaQtisnareddor.tiLltrnicip,.iMOT3EG0190iko19rifagenda7-2G-99doc JUL.27.1999 4:53PM CITY OF OTSEGO RESOLUTION NO. 055 P.2/2 RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT OF BIDS WHEREAS, pursuant to direction of the Council, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., the consultant City engineer has prepared plans and specifications for City Project 99.02, Street and Utility Improvements on Quaday Avenue, 78th Street and Page Avenue, and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published not less than twice, shall specify the work to be done, shall state that bids will be received by the clerk until 11;00 a.m. on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at which time they will be publicly opened at city hall by the city clerk and engineer. Bids shall then be tabulated, and will be considered by the council at the regularly scheduled council meeting of August 23, 1999. No bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the clerk and accompanied by a cash deposit, cashier's check, bid bond or certified check in the amount of 5.0% of such bid. Mayor Clerk \\HA01 \Shared Doos\Municipal\AOTSEC30\613\ot613RES4.doo CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OPF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Otsego previously requested a report regarding the feasibility of certain Street and Utility Improvements to Portions of Quaday Avenue, 781h Street, and Page Avenue (City Project 99.02); and WHEREAS, the consultant City Engineer Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. has prepared such a report and presented it to the Council. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed. 3. Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL this day of July, 1999. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor :,I Elaine Beatty, City Clerk f ADMINISTRATOR'S CERTIFICATE FEDERAL AID PROJECT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) City of Otsego ) I, Mike Robertson the duly appointed, qualified and acting City Administrator of the City of Otsego and State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that a regular scheduled , meeting of the City Council of the City of Otsego held on the 26th day of July , 1999, the following named contractors: Barbarossa & Sons, Inc.: Bauerly Bros., Inc.: Buffalo Bituminous: R.L. Larson Excavating; Dennis Fehn Gravel; Richard Knutson Inc. submitted bids for the furnishing of all labor, tools, materials and equipment necessary for the construction of the work provided for under plans and specifications for that improvement on Odean Avenue ; otherwise known as S.P. No. 217-105-02 , Minnesota Project STPX 8600 (124) located between CSAH 37 and CSAH 39 being approximately 21/4 miles in length. The bid of Bauerlv Bros., Inc. in the amount of $ 1,608,702.39 appeared to be the lowest bid received, subject to final audit, and on motion by Councilperson and seconded by Councilperson it was voted by said City Council to recommend to the Commission of Transportation, as Agent for said City, the: (said contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder) or (that all bids be rejected). said contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder Attest: * * Mike Robertson, Administrator Larry Fournier, Mayor IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal this day of 1999. Mike Robertson, City Administrator Recommendation: Award to the lowest responsible bidder. SEAL \\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\334\ot334FEDAIDCERT.doc District State Aid Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation MbM0 District 3 - State Aid 1991 Industrial Park Road Baxter, MN 56425 0L 1 6 July 14, 1999 Office Tel:(218) 828-2475 Fax: :(218) 828-2210 To: Paul Bergman - M.S. 650 Contract Administration o From: Kelvin Howieson - Baxter District State Aid Engineer Subject: S.P. 217-105-02, Minnesota Project STPX 8600(124) Located From CSAH 39 to CSAH 37 in Otsego in Wright County Grade, aggregate base, bituminous surface, storm sewer, concrete curb & gutter, Length 3.631 Kilometers LETTING: Bids were opened for the above referenced project on Tuesday, July 13, 1999, in the Otsego City Hall, by Mike Robertson, Otsego City Administrator, Ron Wagner, Otsego Project Engineer, Terry Nichols, MnDOT District 3 State Aid, and myself. Bid proposals were received from the following contractors: Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. $1,702,336.90 Bauerly Bros., Inc. $1,608,702.39 Buffalo Bituminous $1,674,000.00 R. L. Larson Execvating $1,617,364.39 Dennis Fehn Gravel $1,653,083.54 Richard Knutson, Inc. $1,991,965.00 Engineer's Estimate $1,804,650.40 The Auditor's Certificate will be sent as soon as the City Council meets on Monday, July 26. The bid proposals are enclosed. cc: Don Raisanen/Jim Povich - Baxter Julie Skallman/Al Lidberg - M.S. 500 FHWA Mike Robertson/Ron Wagner - City of Otsego Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. , & Municipal Engineering Land Surveying July 21, 1999 ITEM #7.3 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Pay Estimate No. 2, City Project 98.04 Trunk Sewer and Water Project Dear Mayor and Council, 3601 Thurston Avenue Suite 101 Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 612/427-0520 Fax Attached is Pay Estimate No. 2 for the referenced project. We recommend payment as shown in the amount of $258,399,76 to Barbarossa & sons, P.O. Box 367, Osseo, Minnesota. The project is going well and is on schedule. The restoration adjacent to 65th Street and TH 101 is starting. Work continues on the watermain adjacent to CR 42. The construction of the gravity sewer north of CR 42 at Quaday is starting. The work on Quaday south of CR 42 has been delayed for a few weeks to allow the gas company more time to coordinate the gas line relocation. The high pressure gas main to serve the city and new developments is being relocated to be adjacent to TH 101 instead of in Quaday Avenue. Sincerely, HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Joj�wfA. Harwood, PE P5 \\Haabshared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\612\ot612cc6.doc PAY ESTIMATE #2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Project City of Otsego Project #98.04 For Work through July 2, 1999 July 20, 1999 Barbarossa & Sons 11000 93rd Avenue North P.O. Box 367 Osseo, MN 55369 RE: Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Trunk Facilities Contractor: Barbarossa & Sons, Inc. Contract Amount: $2,173,560.25 Award Date: May 5, 1999 Completion Date: November 1, 1999 Dear Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project: Bid Schedule "A" - REMOVALS Spec Item Ret. Descri tion Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 1 2021 IMobilization, Maximum 3% 1 LS $55,000.00 LS 0.5 0 0.5 LS $ 27,500.00 2 3 2101 Clear and Grub Sta 36+00 - 94+00 2101 Clear and Grub Sta 7+00 - 35+00 1 LS 1 LS $ 2,500.00 LS $ 4,000.00 LS 1 1 0 0 1 LS 1 LS $ 2,500.00 $ 4,000.00 4 2104 Relocate Bank Sin 1 LS $ 2,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ - 5 2104 Relocate Light Pole 6 EA $ 1,500.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 6 2104 Remove Barbed Wire & Electric Fence 570 LF $ 1.00 LF 01 0 0 LF $ 7 2104 Remove Barbed Wire Fence 1,800 LF $ 1.00 LF 01 0 0 LF $ 8 2104 Remove Bituminous Pavement 2,800 SY $ 1.50 SY 0 0 0 SY $ 9 2104 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter 965 LF $ 1.80 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 10 2104 Remove Concrete Pavement 95 SY $ 4.00 SY 0 0 0 SY $ 11 2104 Remove Pipe Culverts 1,600 LF $ 2.00 LF 80 365 445 LF $ 890.00 12 2104 Salvage and Reinstall Traffic and other Signs 26 EA $ 37.50 EA 0 0 0 EA $ - 13 2104 Salvage Mailbox and Reinstall on new Standard 5 EA $ 105.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 14 2104 Sawcut Bituminous Pavement 835 LF $ 1.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 15 21Sawcut Concrete Pavement 70 LF $ 5.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 16 210404Remove and Salvage Stone Retaining Wall 2 EA $ 500.00 EA 0 2 2 EA $ 1,000.00 17 2104 Remove and Salvage Wood Retaining Wall 2 EA $ 500.00 EA 0 2 2 EA $ 1,000.00 TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A": BID SCHEDULE "B" - RESTORATION 36,890.00 Spec Item Ref. Description Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 18 2105 Topsoil Borrow 2500 CY $ 1.00 CY 0 0 0 CY $ 19 20 2211 Class 5 Aggregate Base 2301 6" Concrete Pavement 12000 TN 95 SY $ 6.50 TN $ 27.00 SY 0 0 1347.5 0 1347.5 TN 0 SY $ 8,758.75 $ 21 2340.Type 31 Bit. Base Course 300 TN $ 44.00 TN 0 0 0 TN $ 22 2340 Type 41 Bit. Wear Course 250 TN $ 45.00 TN 0 0 0 TN $ 23 2357 Bit. Material for Tack Coat 100 GAL $ 1.50 GAL 0 0 0 GAL $ 24 2511 Bituminous Flume 4 EA $ 300.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 25 2531 B612 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $ 8.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 26 2531 8618 Concrete Curb & Gutter 140 LF $ 8.75 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 27 2564 4" Double Yellow Paint 85 LF $ 3.70 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 28 2564 4" Solid White Paint 415 LF $ 1.85 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 29 2564 Pavement Paint - Left Turn Arrow 2 EA $ 90.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 30 2564 Pavement Paint -"Only" 1 EA $ 110.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 31 2564 Pavement Paint -Right Turn Arrow 2 EA $ 90.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 32 2564 Traffic Control 1 LS $ 4,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 33 2573 Temporary Erosion Control 1 LS $ 3,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 34 2575 Agricultural Restoration 25 AC $ 400.00 AC 0 0 0 AC $ 35 2575 Seeding - Type Field Restoration 50 AC $ 520.00 AC 0 0 0 AC $ 36 2575Seedin - Type Lawn Restoration 3 AC $ 580.00 AC 0 0 0 AC $ 37 2575 Wetland Restoration 5 AC $ 1,200.00 AC 0 0 0 AC $ 38 2575 Sod 7000 SY $ 1.90 SY 1 01 01 0 SY I$ TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "B": $8758.75 Share/MLnc:peVOtsegolot612bt.)ds Sheet PAY ESTIMATE n2 Page 1 of 3 7/21/99 PAY ESTIMATE #2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Project City of Otsego Project #98.04 For Work through July 2, 1999 RID SCHEDULE "C" - CULVERTS AND npAINACI.F Spec Item � Ref. IDescription Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 391 250118" CS Pipe Culvert 22 LF $ 15.00 LF 0 20 20 LF $ 300.Y- 401 2501115" CS Pipe Culvert 128 LF $ 18.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 411 2501158 W' Span RC Arch Pipe 32 LF $ 104.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 42 2501158 V�" Span RC Arch Pipe Apron 2 EA $ 850.00 EA 0, 0 0 EA $ - 43 2503112" RCP Design 3006 Cl 5 24 LF $ 22.00 LF 0 48 48 LF $ 1,056.00 44 250311 T' RCP Apron 2 EA $ 300.00 EA 0 4 4 EA $ 1,200.00 45 2503 15" RCP Design 3006 Cl 5 706 LF $ 23.00 LF 0 318 318 LF $ 7,314.00 46 2503 15" RCP Apron 36 EA $ 325.00 EA 0 16 16 EA $ 5,200.00 47 2503 18" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3 102 LF $ 24.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ - 48 2503 18" RCP Apron 4 EA $ 375.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ - 49 2503 24" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3 344 LF $ 28.00 LF 0 72 72 LF $ 2,016.00 50 2503 24" RCP Apron 13 EA $ 400.00 EA 0 4 4 EA $ 1,1500.00 511 2503 1 30" RCP Design 3006 C13 24 LF $ 1$ 36.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 1 521 2503130" RCP Apron 1 EA $ 475.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "C": BID SCHEDULE "D" - WATERMAIN $18686.00 Spec Item Ref. IDescription Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 53 2600124" Steel Pipe Casing -jacking 370 $ 140.00 LF 0 70 70 LF $ 9,800.00 54 2611 lConnect to Existing Watermain 4 EA $ 850.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ - 55 2611 8" CI 52 DIP Watermain 1250 LF $ 18.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 56, 2611116- Cl 52 DIP Watermain 15256 LF $ 32.00 LF 0, 0 0 LF $ 57 2611 DIP Fittings 11500 LB $ 2.00 LB 01 0 0 LB $ 58 2611 8" Gate Valve 1 EA $ 650.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 59 2611 16" Butterfly Gate Valve 23 EA $ 1,350.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 60 2611 4" Watermain Insulation 9 SY $ 15.00 SY 0 0 0, SY $ 61 2611 6" CL 52 DIP Watermain Hydrant Leads 200 LF $ 17.00 LF 0 01 0 LF $ 62 -631-26111Hydrant 2611 6" Gate Valve - Hydrant 11 EA �6� 2 2 EA 0 0 OJEA $ $ 73 ET 5 , $ 1,600.00 . (,�2 I EA 0. 0 0 0 E $ TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "D": RID SCHEDULE "E" - SANITARY SFWFP $9800.00 Item Spec Ref. Description Estimated Quantit lContract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Datel Extension --. .. " - , , . ..... . SiiN .. . ........................ >>s ........ ......... ......... .......... - - .. -X..'.:. ............. ..... 641 2600124" Steel Pipe Casing -jacking 530 $ 160.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 65 2621 8" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (all depths) 30 LF $ 40.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 66 2621 15" SOR 26 PVC Pipe (16'-20) 400 LF $ 44.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 67 2621 15" SDR 26 PVC Pie 20'-24 4500 LF $ 45.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 68 2621 15" SDR 26 PVC Pipe(24'-28) 1335 LF $ 46.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 69 2621 15" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (28'-32) 600 LF $ 47.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 70 2621 8" PVC Pipe Plug 2 EA $ 20.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 71 2621 15" PVC Pipe Plug I EA $ 75.00 EA 01 0 0 EA $ 721 1 Deleted per Addendum No. 1 1 LS 13,000.00 0 0 0 $ 73 2621 16" DIP Sewer loo LF $ 65.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 74 2621 18" RCP Sewer 18 LF $ 55.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 75 2621 ISanitary Sewer MH to 8' Dee 23 EA $ 2,050.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 76 26211 Extra Depth Sanitary MH > 8' 352 VF $ 80.00 VF 0 0 0 VF $ 77 2621 lConstruct Outside Drop 3 EA $ 1,600.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ Item Spec �Ref. IDescription Estimated I Quantity lContract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date� Extension --. .. " - , , . ..... . SiiN .. . ........................ >>s .... ..... ... .......... - - .. -X..'.:. .: ......... . :::::: X., .......... ............ .................................. ........................ ...... - ................. .......................... . .. ........ 78 2600118" Steel Pipe Casi; - g 1 1� 295 LF 125.00 LF 0 310 310 LF 1 $ 38,750.00 79 2621 8" DR18 C900 CL 150 PVC Forcemain 18100 LF 23.00 LF 5300 8200 13500 LF $ 310,500.00 80 2621 DIP Fittings 870 LB 2.00 LB 270 300 570 LS $ 1,140.00 81 2621 Cleanout MH - Forcemain 3 4,075.00 EA 2 1 3 E $ 12.225.00 82 2621 Air Release MH -Forcemain 2 EA 3,100.00 EA 2 0 2 E $ 6,200.00 83 2621 8" Gate Valve - Force Main 7 EA 650.00 EA 6 0 6 E $ 3,900.00 ...... . .. ........ ...... ............................... . .............. % ... ..... . 84 2621 Lift Station Electrical 1 5,200.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 85 2621 Lift Station Mechanical 1 LS 13,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 86 2621 Lift Station Pumps 1 LS 35,300.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 87 2621 Lift Station Structure 1 LS 72,525.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 88 2621 Lin Station Valve MH F-6 1 LS 3,800.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 89 2621 Lift Station Site Grading 1 LS 1,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $. TOTAL BID SCHEDULE El, E2, AND E3: Shere/MurwctpaVOtsegoiot6l2bt.YJs Sheet PAY ESTIMATE N2 Page 2 of 3 $ 372,715.00 7121/99 PAY ESTIMATE t$2 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermain Project City of Otsego Project 998.04 For Work through July 2, 1999 810 SCHEDULE "F" - SPECIAL CROSSING OF CSAH 42 Item Spec Ref. Description Estimated I quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Pert od Total to Date Extension iH0:1J�SE''is <. :4Z��9TR $ 18,686.00 810 SCHEDULE "O' WATERMAIN $ 107 90 Zfi00►16" Steel Pip. Casin Mackin , Sanitary Sewer 120 S 125.00 LF 1 0 0 0 LF I S 91 2621 Construct Outside Dro 1 EA $ 1.300.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 92 2621 8- DIP Sewer 128 LF S 30.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 93 2621 DIP Fittings 45 LB $ 2.00 LB 0 0 0 LB $ 94 2564 Traffic Control, W. of CSAH 42 1 LS $ 500.00 LS 0 0 0 LS S 95 2575 Seedinq 8 Restoration W. of CSAR 42 0.3 AC $ 1,000.00 AC 0 1 0 0 AC S ' t2. 1S :iltviEt't�1:LlSAi:iiZ:3 S'AI`>�T�� tx RN .kyr 'k'ERitiFAt£i N. i�EFi �TA 1 EA S 1,600.00 EA 0 0 96 2600 16" Steel Pipe Casing -Jacking Casing-JackingWatermain 80 LF $ 125.00 LF 1 0 0 0 LF $ 97 2611 DIP Fittings 300 LB $ 2.00 LB 0 0 0 LB $ 98 2611 8" CL 52 DIP Watermain 100 LF $ 18.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 99 2611 6" CL 52 DIP Watermain Hydrant Leads 10 LF S 17.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 100 2611 6" Gate Valve - Hydrant 1 EA S 500.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 101 2611 H drant 1 EA S 1,600.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 102 26CO 16" Steel Pipe Casin , Jackin , Sanita Sewer 1 110 LF $ 125.00 LF 01 0 0 LF S 103 2621 8" SDR 26 PVC Pie(all depths) 128 LF S 30.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 104 2621 8" PVC Pice Plug 1 EA $ 10.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 105 2564 Traffic Control West of CSAH 42 1 LS $ 500.00 LS I 0 0 OILS $ 106 2575 Seeding & Restoration, West of CSAH 42 0.3 AC $ 1,000.00 AC I 0 I 0 AC $ Spec Item Ref. Description Estimated I Quant; Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension E 1 iTA S�VffE� D #Ef1 lhFtt3 FiilN kEN::l tGts3£iC:i3FEE1EI� CS�ii t 42':SiA. _....... $ 18,686.00 810 SCHEDULE "O' WATERMAIN $ 107 2104 Remove Pipe Culverts 62 LF $ 4.00 Lr' 0 0 0 LF $ 108 2600 16" Steel Pipe Casing. Jacking, Watermain 100 LF $ 125.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 109 2611 DIP Fittings 1 300 LB $ 2.00 LB 0 0 0 LB $ 110 2611 8" CL52 DIP Watermain 130 $18.00 LF 01 0 0 LF $ 111 2611 6" CL 52 DIP Watermain Hydrant Leads 10 LF $ 17.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 112 2611 6" Gate Valve - Hydrant 1 EA $ 500.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 113 261111 Hydrant 1 EA S 1,600.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 114 2600 16- Steel Pipe Casing, Jacking, SanitarySewer 130 LF $ 125.00 LF 0 0 OT -LF $ 115 2621 8" SDR 26 PVC Pi (All depths) 158 LF $ 28.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 116 117 118 119 2621 8" PVC Pipe Plug 2503 15" RCP Apron 2503115- RCP Design 3006 CI 5 2564 Traffic Control West of CSAH 42 1 EA 2 EA 50 LF 1 LS $ 10.00 EA $ 325.00 EA $ 23.00 LF $ 500.00 LS 0 0 1 01 0 01 OL 0 0 0 EA 0 EA 0 LF 0 LS $ $ $ $ 120 25751Seedin & Restoration West of CSAH 42 0.3 AC S 1,000.00 AC 01 01 0 LAC I S TOTAL BID SCHEDULE F1, F2 and F3: $0.00 BID SCHEDULE "A" - REMOVALS $ 36,890.00 BID SCHEDULE "B" - RESTORATION $ 8,758.75 BID SCHEDULE "C- - CULVERTS AND DRAINAGE $ 18,686.00 810 SCHEDULE "O' WATERMAIN $ 9,800.00 BID SCHEDULE "E1, E2 S E3' - SANITARY SEWER': $ 372,715.00 BIO SCHEDULE'F1, F2 & F3" - SPECIAL CROSSING: $ TOTAL TO DATE: $ 446,849.75 LESS 5% RETAINAGE: $ 22,342'49 LESS PAY ESTIMATE #1: $ 166,107.50 WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF: $ 258,399.76 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR; Ca by contI oorilfy that all birta andm acunm arta*n are mffQct for }ate -6 cnmplatad to dtrto. BARt3AR A 8. a 8, ras INta slgned: Tlue: �9� ENGINEER: I recommend pttyment for ltarrle and amount atwork as shaven, HAKANsCN ANDERSON SCICIATES,IN . 5►g�ed: Tim fit►a eCI "P. aWNER; C17Y OF CTSEGO 610ned: me: Data: g1,wwMtncOeYCtseg1-t61 �t.;61 -- _ _ 70199 N SON MIME W N WORK IN MUST BE COMPLETED IN 1999 0.5. MILES OF ROAD + REGIONAL POND WORK IN GREEN POSSIBLE COMPLETED IN 1999 WORKING STAGES 0.68 MILES OF ROAD WORK INJNNN�COMPLETED IN 2000 ODEAN AVENUE N.E. a low mm 1.32 MILETCP-ROAD CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 7/26/99 FILE: OT334 85th.dwg ■ II.IIIII■ I� I a' I ■■■ �� � ���� 11111111111111 11111111111111 � ��©®���� ��..�'���• . !� ��, . ■■�� .� � 111111111L � �► ���' __ _ _ N SON MIME W N WORK IN MUST BE COMPLETED IN 1999 0.5. MILES OF ROAD + REGIONAL POND WORK IN GREEN POSSIBLE COMPLETED IN 1999 WORKING STAGES 0.68 MILES OF ROAD WORK INJNNN�COMPLETED IN 2000 ODEAN AVENUE N.E. a low mm 1.32 MILETCP-ROAD CITY OF OTESGO, MINNESOTA DATE: 7/26/99 FILE: OT334 85th.dwg N Request for Change Order GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. P. O. BOX 41246 Request No. j PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Date 21 -Jun -99 (612)559-3734 FAX (612)559-3736 Name of Project WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Location OTSEGO, MN To BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. Address 2335 WEST HIGHWAY 36 Subcontract ST. PAUL, MN 55113 Attention GLENN GUSTAFSON Phone No. 651/ 636-4600 Fax No. 651/ 636-1311 Descriptions of Change METER - CITY OF DAYTON INLET WEIR WORK TO BE DONE BY ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. ( COPY OF QUOTE ATTACHED ) NO PRICE CHANGE ON THE WEIR SIZE Labor $0.00 Material $0.00 Equipment $0.00 Subcontract $6,820.00 SUB -TOTAL COSTS $6,820.00 Markup & Bond $409.00 TOTAL CHANGE ADD $7,229.00 The contract completion date to be increased Price subject to change after 30 days. GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. Ag&e� ROBERT MEYER REQUEST.XLS 6/21/99 4 calendar days. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Industerial KILLMER 5141 Lakeland Avenue North mercial Crystal, Minnesota 55429 %--jerground ELECTRIC � Ing Telephone: (612) 425-2525 Overhead Fax: (612) 424-1258 June 17, 1999 Gridor Construction Inc. 1886 Berkshire Lane P.O. Box 41246 Plymouth, MN 55441 Attn.: Bob Meyer Re: Otsego Waste Water Treatment Facility Subject: Proposed Change Order No. 1 Dear Bob: 43- m 3m The cost to include the electrical revisions listed in the above referenced change proposal, dated March 17, 1999, is: $ 6,820.00 Please incorporate the required 4 days additional time into the control buildings scheduled activities. Attached is a recap breakdown sheet for your reference. If you have any questions please call. Respectfully Submitted, c - Kelly Brosseth Project Manager Killmer Electric Co., Inc. � I f r ti I ' r An Equal Opportunity Employer Industerial�LL�� 5141 Lakeland Avenue North mmercial Crystal, Minnesota 55429 erground ELIC CQ, IM Telephone: (612) 425-2525 overhead Fax: (612) 424-1258 Date: /7 yy Otsego Extra Cost Breakdown Material Tax Labor Subtotal Permit Subtotal 15% Margin Subtotal * Subcontractors * Equipment Rental * 7% Margin-Sub/Equip Subtotal Bond Total Submitted Cost $17s � s °' $ $ /C I $ / / 7 O� $ 63--�.`--' $ � s °' $ $ o $ 63--�.`--' $ o $ 63 ;-r .`- An Equal Opportunity Employer METRO MANUFACTURING Fax:1-651-776-2095 FAX METRO MANUFACTORING, INC. 465 KENNY ROAD ST. PAUL, NI N 55112 Apr 7 '39 1022 P.01/01 PHONE: 651-776-5455 Date: y-- 5 9 FAX_ ..651-776-2095. �--- - , ,- ::•. :., �.. Company: <;',e, DQ,�P_ Attention: 13 e Regarding' O i S 6a, XI�Al Message: Po/Jo tSL�/�i9N6G T CtiG-�� Douglas Olson Request for Change Order GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. P. O. BOX 41246 Request No. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Date (612)559-3734 FAX (612)559-3736 Name of Project WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Location OTSEGO, MN To BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. Address 2335 WEST HIGHWAY 36 Equipment ST. PAUL, MN 55113 Attention GLENN GUSTAFSON Phone No. 651/ 636-4600 Fax No. 651/ 636-1311 Descriptions of Change ELECTRICAL - CONTROL BUILDING WORK TO BE DONE BY ELECTRICAL SUBCONTRACTOR KILLMER ELECTRIC CO., INC. ( COPY OF QUOTE ATTACHED) NO PRICE CHANGE K-001 NORTHWEST WALL K-002 SOUTHWEST WALL Labor $0.00 Material $0.00 Equipment $0.00 Subcontract $0.00 SUB -TOTAL COSTS $0.00 Markup & Bond $0.00 TOTAL CHANGE $0.00 $0.00 2 21 -Jun -99 The contract completion date to be increased calendar days. Price subject to change after 30 days. GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. � &t L4� ROBERT ME R REQUEST.XLS 6/21/99 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Request for Change Order GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. P. O. BOX 41246 Request No. PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Date (612)559-3734 FAX (612)559-3736 Name of Project WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Location OTSEGO, MN To BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. Address 2335 WEST HIGHWAY 36 ST. PAUL, MN 55113 Attention GLENN GUSTAFSON Phone No. 651/ 636-4600 Fax No. 651/ 636-1311 Descriptions of Change WATER SUPPLY CHANGES WORK TO BE DONE BY OUR SUBCONTRACTOR E. H. RENNER & SONS ( COPY OF INFORMATION ATTACHED Labor $0.00 Material $0.00 Equipment $0.00 Subcontract DEDUCT $2,035.00 SUB -TOTAL COSTS $2,035.00 Markup & Bond $0.00 TOTAL CHANGE DEDUCT $2,035.00 The contract completion date to be increased Price subject to change after 30 days. GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. ROBERT MEYER REQUEST.XLS 6/21/99 3 21 -Jun -99 calendar days. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 26, 1999 TO: City Council Attached is the Claims List for your consideration. The first page gives a summary. For more detail, please refer to the attached Check Detail Register GRAND TOTAL $ 107,669.44 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Judy Hudson Deputy Clerk/Treasurer CITY OF OTSEGO Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Page 1 of 1 Check Summary Register Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ABDO ABDO EICK & MEYERS LLP $4,750.00 UnPaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION $114.50 UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $12.25 UnPaid BAUERLY $6,534.00 UnPaid CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $102.35 UnPaid CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $826.50 UnPaid CORROW TRUCKING $64.35 UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $28.05 UnPaid EAST SIDE LEASING CO $237.92 UnPaid EDWIN F. DAUPHINAIS $10,000.00 UnPaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $636.87 UnPaid ENSMINGER AUTOMOTIVE, INC. $334.46 UnPaid EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO $5,042.56 UnPaid FRIEDA LOBECK $202.23 UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $306.21 UnPaid GROEN GARY CPA $990.00 UnPaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $702.90 UnPaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $47,139.67 UnPaid I.S.D. 728 $3,313.68 UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $614.70 UnPaid J-CRAFT INC $4,252.08 UnPaid LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIP $47.82 UnPaid LYLE H NAGELL CO INC. $1,400.00 UnPaid MEDICA $2,240.59 UnPaid MINNESOTA MUTUAL $58.60 UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $90.00 UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $4,347.39 UnPaid NORWEST BANKS $375.00 UnPaid OMANN BROTHERS INC. $47.37 UnPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $226.99 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $653.47 UnPaid SOFTRONICS $3,654.93 UnPaid STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION $50.00 UnPaid SUPERIOR SERVICES $460.00 UnPaid US BANK $7,050.00 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR-TREASURE $12.00 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY MAYORS ASSOC $150.00 UnPaid ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC $600.00 Total Checks $107,669.44 CITY OF OTS E G O Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Check Detail Register Page 1 of 4 Check Amt Invoice Comment •:fiv,M�4:v.}?Ml:.ii.}}l\•',�?.'i:•,.}Y},i'.:::.Y,f..'^.,'}}„}}}:..}}:}}}}yi}}}ii}:i.X4y};n,.:?}}ii}}}i}yy}}„} „41: :}v{n'.:J};v.}:: ,,. U.,}'• A' \,. +\\\'n.'.,:,,},:,}\v,.,\,,.\, \.vn„}„};ry}} \1+ \.�iJ.\\`�J�v��}}rl,,,•nW. �t\ixn::.ti•:::r}:}�\\}}i:i?}}}}}}i}}}i}}}:4}}i}}i}:i:...v... v}'`,-, •�� � aq �n, >�y�\� .. \ <i \C }� v��:n ;(, ......,`.•;.Jh\..,:.�-iii}}}:}}k•:.. \T..\�\ 4v`.FtiMZ��\,.rsSiY:a�"\\\\11��\v.:v.��\�v}i:J.+�ti�(4]Ci.�,��\i1i:Qti; V\��Wr��\41�+� 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid ABDO ABDO EICK & MEYERS LLP E 101-41600-304 Accounting & Auditing $4,500.00 17903 Audit Services for 1998 E 101-41600-304 Accounting & Auditing $250.00 17903 Prepare OSA Report Total ABDO ABDO EICK & MEYERS LLP $4,750.00 Unpaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION E 201-45000-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $114.50 990729 July rental Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $114.50 UnPaid:. :AIRGAS.\INC. E101-43100-220 RepainMaint Supply (GENERAL) $12.25 858607 Oxygen Total AIRGAS, INC. $12.25 UnPaid BAUERLY E 101-43100-370 Sand anclGravel $6,534.00 370-99 Gravel Total BAUERLY $6,534.00 YUnPaid :...........:.CITYtOF MAPLEWOOD,.x.,..,,,»�.,,..,V,,.vr,....,.,.r:x.�,.,:xrr..,�.,,r.,..,..:.rx:.,,�,,,,,,,.,�x:.�„xr,.,wrrw.,,,,.,,.�.,.,..,.,..,,,,,,,�,,,.w.,,,.,�,,,.�,. E 101-41400-360 Education/Training/Conferences $102.35 Hotel for LMC Conference Total CITY OF MAPLEWOOD $102.35 Unpaid CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN E 413-43100-310 Miscellaneous $826.50 Odean Ave Bid Advert Total CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $826.50 :.,,m,,.:x.>k..�.rr<.,n,..v.,,•:::.:.:::.,,:,,.:..-::.,::,..,•:.,:,:....:::::::x.,.:.,•:.,,�:.�::.,:,M-,.,,:�::.,-::::::::.,.:rv<.,,,,.::::.,..,-�,,,,.:.,,,,,,.:,,..,:,x:.,.v.:..,.,,...,.,.,K,,.,,�.,M..,r,.,.,rx..,.r..r,,..,:,w.,...,,,. UnPaid CORROW TRUCKING E 101-41940-325 Garbage Service $64.35 July refuse service Total CORROW TRUCKING $64.35 UnPaid :......................:...........:.,........r.:::CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT,. E101-43100-220 RepaiNMaintSupply (GENERAL) $28.05 ChainAinks Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $28.05 YUnPaid 'EAST SIDE <LEASING <CO E101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $237.92 4964 July Rental of Copier Total EAST SIDE LEASING CO $237.92 Wi?C0.vl.[r,W\'+OOOipY.4:«<N.:vlw::.C.........: nuv........ r.......c......:...a...sr.?erA,,.nrnn.vnvn,:r..vx...x.n.n...:...r...........n...........n.n Unpaid EDWIN F. DAUPHINAIS ..................vvrr:m a�.,... r. re�.v.,. E415-43251-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $10,000.00 Sewer & Water easement Total EDWIN F. DAUPHINAIS $10,000.00 <r..,...�.:..,,,,..xr.:.....,...,,,..,:,r:.....,.... UnPaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU E 101-41400-203 Supplies - General $636.87 8988 Printing supplies Total ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $636.87 vrr:xxx.,µ.,,:xx:x..w:s•,rx:r.-rxr:.,:..,:..xw.•:rrrr.,,:.,•:: M,,,,,:-. ,::.,:-:.r:: rxr:rr:::.:,:..r.,,•rr,.,.xx..:.,,.::.,-.,:,..:,...,xx,r.........N.......,�.,,�,.....x, UnPaid ENSMINGER AUTOMOTIVE, INC. .:.,,,.rx„r:,.,..�:,..xx...•xxx..............................�............,,.,.. E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $334.46 11695 87 Chev Truck repair Total ENSMINGER AUTOMOTIVE, INC. $334.46 ..,�.K,x�.�.,.�x..,,.,...».e.�...��.<.rWr,.�.....,...,.,...M,:r�r.,,,....w...,,...ra. UnPaid EVERGREEN <LAND SERVICES CO E 41343100.390 Contracted Services $5,042.56 8480 Odean Ave Appraisals Total EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO $5,042.56 xxM rxrrx xr x xr x rr. r w •r.. -:: rxxxr .:. : xxx.,v.:.rrrrx, •:xxrxxr xrrxr UnPaid FRIEDA LOBECK rxxx: ...................... ....... E 101-45300-310 Miscellaneous $202.23 Cemetery Bench Total FRIEDA LOBECK .. .... • • • .. • .�. .�.� $202.23 r • •Y! / HRVfn':fl.«b.OPY.Ji N:r�rvnw.K �.wx.lw..w�< r_rntm..i.nw.,•�.:<.a:<..w..v.......x...x.:...+.w.:..:.:.•r:marmv\«..v.•w'm.ml.,vw.rrriw....vr..ir..xwn l! <[:Y<vx.rx<.\v��wlrsl:�/ii:il.ViiYF<u/Xrrr�[Jb:�ll/i:<:�Y.«c:avm'vru UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM .. - E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $152.21 Uniforms E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services $77.00 Supplies E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $77.00 Supplies Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $306.21 UnPaid GROEN GARY CPA ............................... CITY OF OTSEGO Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Check Detail Register Page 2 of 4 Check Amt Invoice Comment u>h. E 101-41600-390 Contracted Services $990.00 June 1999 Services Total GROEN GARY CPA $990.00 UnPaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil $230.62 Diesel Fuel E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil $272.49 Gas E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $199.79 Supplies Total H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $702.90 UnPaid •-FiAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC G 701-21920 JKO Holdings $112.50 306 JKO Holdings E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $35,626.05 316 Trunk SS Extra Ser E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $3,762.23 324 Pumphouse E 413-43100-302 Engineering Fees $2,637.44 320 Odean Extra Sery E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $1,666.50 325 Miscell Eng G701-21915 Crimson ponds/Backes 99-7 $1,302.76 308 Crimson Ponds G 701-21914 Grenings - Miss Hills 99-6 $881.15 319 Grenings Miss Hills E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $470.65 323 78th St TSS & W G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer $181.63 300 Prairie Creek PP E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $70.00 321 Well No Const E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $37.50 291 Mining Permits G 701-21918 Bridgeland/Luconic $37.50 327 LuconicBridgeland E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $35.00 322 78th St/Page Ave G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge $318.76 303 Pheasant Ridge Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC -rr..n..rr:.,.:..<[.:<n<rrattx,•>,<m.<[.:� $47,139.67 _:.n,-n.n.n.,.:::::.,v:n».:. UnPaid I.S.D. 728 mxr.�:rr. a x nrn� E 101-45100-390 Contracted Services $3,313.68 July & August 1999 Total I.S.D. 728 $3,313.68 «;.::.::«::,.�.;:.:,i::,i:,:«:,.>,rii::.::�:;<i.>;:.:<.:i;::::::::n::<.;,•<:n:::::::,,::.,,-:._:n.<.,-.,,-:::^,>»-.,-:<:::n,-::.:»-.,-.:..»,;,a,�,-n,-.,,.�.Y»,-n-..,.,,,»�,-n.,.n-n-.,,»,-:n-::::n,-::n»-n,:n».,-::.,,:n..n,•n,.,.H:n»,:n»»•<n...:.,,-::.»,�xn,-::n„• UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST E 101-41400-121 PERA $192.31 PPE 7-10-99 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $422.39 PPE 7-10-99 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $614.70 xUnPaicf:.....,.....:................:........:::....n,: -INC-, E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $4,252.08 23147 Ford Truck 92 repair Total J -CRAFT INC $4,252.08 :,.:,::<.:<•:tt«:<::.;�.:::::,,:•:�:,.>h<w:,-:�,n,.<r;:.:;:::,U,w,A.,:<.a;..;,�:w>:[<..:<�wr.�,:�,��,o.>rr<�[[[[[.�.a;;:<.:.�:.�[«.««�.[..�<.,.n,.�.ttx<a«.,:<�.,.x.h:�,..»»»»:kr.,x.,-<:,,,:<x,.,,..,.«:<:,,x.., UnPaid LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIP E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $47.82 3773 Supplies Total LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIP $47.82 <�:ro,[n«x:[....�<�.�«x,.«tt.:a..<.�:::..xx,�x.»»,�.�«,•<n<.,,.,,�x«xx«,xx«.�<:.,.x:,.<x.»'<xxxx<.,.,.,�:x..�.<M.,�,,,w::x<.�,,.k: UnPaid LYLE H NAGELL CO INC. n-n,-n.-:x::<::<,«<:.,,:x«<.,,�r:x,<.�x..»,.,..,.«<.,,�.,w«,.,.«,..M,.xx«n.,<x. E 415-43251-390 Contracted Services $600.00 8120 Wastewater appraisals E 415-43251-390 Contracted Services $800.00 8117 Wastewater appraisals Total LYLE H NAGELL CO INC. 'nv r -: r: .,-... $1,400.00 F.«<x::«-v r YC«R[<Jc«uCgvw.u: ...-•. <V%M•: ..V%+.,...<!.!M.ti«,.K r-.tta,.-,a//ri. /.[.[n, ..[po':ctt<M<auuWfflrN.ttv,vvvW:cF UnPaid MEDICA : e «x«.nom+,r<aa[«r<x««x<,+r«c<r.vnYm+:<.r..:«i<xn,..««<.rfrx<x«uxrm..r.<rr«r..,.........ww..+..<r<xrr«n E 101-43100-123 Health $796.37 Premium due 8-1-99 E 101-41400-123 Health $1,643.02 Premium due 8-1-99 E 101-41400-123 Health ($198.80) Premium due 8-1-99 Total MEDICA $2,240.59 FUnPaid MINNESOTA MUTUAL E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $29.60 Premium due 8-1-99 E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $29.00 Premium due 8-1-99 Total MINNESOTA MUTUAL $58.60 xUnPaidYn,wnn,«x«n,,.,,<n.v:r<.n»,..«««<..r,.. MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL_nn.»..».,,.n:«««:<x CITY OF OTSEGO Tuesday, July 13, 1W9 Page 3 of 4 Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment ... ,,,,:;.::,, .:.:::,.�?::,�., . .,..:.,.:.... .... ., .. .......... ::.�\v,•.»,-::;..�...:,'.'��.:`.i��.`�'",3t�.>�,•.t�.,,.�;:::::;>:>;;;.::r.�1",•At,�"P�'��.::..:::;;;rrc.\\\\�v:: w�1`.n•:r��.'�.>�"i:.�`�. »r•»»�s�i}a?a...,:%�' E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $90.00 80 June animal pickup service Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $90.00 •pv>r �.,<«•:r�:T,«,-:::.. v4.4.-.�<:««.N,.�««�a�.,:..,�.. �4,.....».,.»,�......n......,.,..,,.,,».,.,.,,„,,....,.....-„»..»»..o..,.e....�,�,...�»...,,..,,w....�,,............ UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $750.00 8783 Meetings G 701-21915 Crimson ponds/Backer 99-7 $405.41 8781 Crimson Ponds PP E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $763.48 8782 General G 701-21920 JKO Holdings $456.43 8781 JKO Holdings G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer $318.37 8781 Prairie Ck PP G 701-21921 Midwest Station $270.00 8781 Midwest Station G 701-21917 Muller CUP $109.62 8781 Muller Bldg CUP G 701-21914 Grenings - Miss Hills 99-6 $934.08 8781 Grenings Miss Hills G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge $340.00 8781 Pheasant Ridge PP Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $4,347.39 UnPaid NORWEST BANKS E 302-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $375.00 Agent Fee Total NORWEST BANKS $375.00 UnPaid OMANN BROTHERS INC. E 101-43100-433 Crackfilling $47.37 2207 Patching supplies Total OMANN BROTHERS INC. $47.37 «<•J:%-: %1•;T'::%.1•]C%•;:«4%-i::l::T>.•Y:T>1:.\'i:N^W.,,:;,Jq•:,lfOc:,V:e.C:v4N. WwaPIP%OCP�MtV:.,JOJCP3MiM?O>:00'nvnMc:Vi UnPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP »+d... .va�w.nnvv»e,�,ar�..w... ...vr.ay,.,�•�emmm�ww. E 101-43100-123 Health $82.23 Due 7-15-99 E 101-41400-123 Health $144.76 Due 7-15-99 Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $226.99 UnPaidY lx. Yl PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 101-41400-121 PERA $191.49 PPE 7-10-99 G 101-21704 PERA $312.58 PPE 7-10-99 E 101-43100-121 PERA $149.40 PPE 7-10-99 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $653.47 Unpaid SOFTRONICS E206-41400-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $3,654.93 1752 Computer/labor/printer Total SOFTRONICS $3,654.93 Y.Ori:M.«CY.Y.J!C]O:C:<«JAP%h}:•]M«<•:%.%-i0:K4%4»Y!%isoa'.c400w:«<.aw,xcc0oo0oY.ca`a0000xnc000v�:tt�.ud:::»:c«%•ax.<«wxmwao+:oncom UnPaid STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION .,-++nwuw,rc,..:::,.,.o....wr.vm±r::.::uwnnYrr<mnarr„�«aw<+:•�«•-wvv.,vr.w:..:e:r.vm... G 101-21709 Medicare $50.00 PPE 7-10-99 Olson141923 Total STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION $50.00 UnPaid SUPERIOR SERVICES E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $460.00 84741 June recycling Total SUPERIOR SERVICES $460.00 :.,:..,..,.v...,:...---:..,.....................:..:.:.x....:.,:.,»,.:............,..........:.�...:.,....::.......,..,:,:M..:.,,,...,�,,,:.w....:�,.,,.».,».�,,.,...»».: ::�„,•:....,.:,W.M.,.,,...,.,,.........::.:.»,..:::.US• BANK •UnPaid E 315-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $225.00 mn198572 Acceptance Fees E 315-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $225.00 MNL98573 Acceptance Fees E 315-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $2,200.00 MNL98573 Paying Agent E 315-47000-620 Fiscal Agent's Fees $4,400.00 mn198572 Paying Agent Total US BANK $7,050.00 H %M':04'/.fMW.H.h%:fl.M:4:4Yi%rCC:svr%Nl//n[P::!<..wrce:.r.<.m+nri...is:.n..vw.M,v.....-..w:m::r•mvr.•:.....nv.,v.n,.v.w:+..:�- UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE E 101-41400-203 Supplies - General $12.00 99-76 Listing/Rogers Fire Dist Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $12.00 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY MAYORS ASSOC „ E 101-41100-355 Dues & Memberships $150.00 1999 Dues Total COUNTY MAYORS ASSOC $150.00 NWRIGHT M M Unpaid+ ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC CITY OF OTSEGO Tuesday, July 13, 1999 Check Detail Register Page 4 of 4 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $600.00 Escrow Refund 8480 Ochoa Total ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC $600.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $107,669.44