08-09-99 CCk1k
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: TN FETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
4A. Special Presentations Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
August 9, 1999 -
6:30 PTM
ITEM INUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
4.A.1. Tom Constant, Otsego Parks and Recreation Commission - Discussion of Park
Shelter and Proposed Park Projects.
BACKGROUND:
4. A. l . Attached is a sketch plan of a 30'x 60' picnic shelter drawn by Tom B aillargeon.
Tom Constant, from P & R will be present to explain their proposed shelter and plans to
the Council and be available for questions. Also discussion of Proposed Park Projects.
Note: This item was on last Council agenda of.Iuly 26. 1999 and no one from Park
and Recs. was present.
RECOTNMENDATION:
This is for Council information and discussion.
Elaine
PICNIC SHELTER
30'X 60'
-414 -
MEMO
Date: July 22, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Park Board Project Requests
Last Wednesday I met with the Park & Recreation
Board to discuss their request for an engineer to
attend their meetings. The Board noted that they
are amateurs and they often feel a need for
professional advice. The Board listed the
following projects in which they felt they were in
need of engineering advice.
1) Design of a Park Shelter for Prairie Park.
2) Finishing the City Trail Plan.
3) Developing a Park Concept Plan for the west
area of Otsego in advance of development.
4) Developing a Park Concept Plan for the
southeast area of Otsego in advance of development.
5) Obtaining grants for park or trail development.
Chair Jeff Bartheld will attend the Council meeting
to discuss these projects along with the Park
Shelter plans.
cc: City Staff
R
I k
5
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
5. CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ August 9, 1999
(Non -Controversial Items) 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
5.1. Consider Approval of Upgrade of Northern Natural Gas; Town Border Station
Expansion.
5.2. Consider Approval for Awarding Bid for 1999 Bituminous Overlay Improvement
Project.
5.3. Consider Approval of Pay Estimate #2 for Otsego Pumphouse.
BACKGROUND:
5.1. Attached is a Memo from Dan Licht dated July 21, 1999 and a letter from Larry
Koshak no date, regarding the Town Border Station Expansion requested by
Northern Natural Gas.
5.2. and 5.3. Attached is information from Ron Wagner from Hakanson Anderson.
RECOMMENDATION:
This is for Council consideration and approval. If Council has any questions or need to
discuss further, the item should be removed to another section of the Agenda.
Thanks,
Elaine
1%0 ' JUL-21-1999 11 52 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01i01
N
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNINGI - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
5.1
MEMORANDUM - via fax transmission
TO: Mike Robertson
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 21 July 1999
RE: Otsego - Northem Natural Gas; Town Border Station Expansion
FILE NO.: 176.08
The existing Town Border Station is considered an essential service, which is a permitted
use in the A-1 District and is regulated under Section 32 of the Zoning Ordinance. The
subject parcel is a legal non -conforming lot with regard to lot area and width based upon
the site plans attached to the July 16, 1999 correspondence from Enron. As the proposed
expansion reduces the non -conformity, there are no issues.
Under Section 32, the proposed expansion of the facility requires review and
recommendation of the City Engineer. The additional requirements of Section 20-32-4.D
should be addressed as part of the Engineer's review. Approval of the proposed
expansion is made by the City Council.
The proposed expansion should not require any additional input from our office. However,
if you have any questions, please call me.
PC. Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Lary Koshak
(page 7 Of 1)
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NACQWINTERNET.COM
TOTAL P.01
Hakanson
1 Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
ivil & Municipal Engineering
_and Surveying
Memo
TO: Mike Robertson, Adm.
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE Vp_�
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Town Border Station Expansion
SE/4 of Section 36, T12N-RZ3W
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
The request by Northern Natural's contractor Enron for a permit to riprap the west bank
of the Crow River has been reviewed.
The request also includes a site facilities re -construction.
Ordinance 20-24 for land filling applies to this request to rip -rap the west bank. This
matter must be approved & permitted by MN/DNR. We recommend permitting this
operation of placing rip -rap on the bank of the river with MN/DNR issuance of a permit.
The City should receive copies of the final plans and signed permits for this work.
I assume the other work by Enron including the construction of the new building & re -
piping would be a building inspectors matter.
We do need an accurate drawing prepared by a surveyor of the site property & facilities.
The proposed facility changes must be shown in the drawing. Setback distances should
be complied with per the ordinances.
The letter from Brad Brown of Enron states the additional property must be purchased
and a new survey completed. When a resurvey is complete a copy should be
transmitted to the City. Permits should not be issued until the data has been reviewed.
If you have questions please call.
cc: Jerry Olson, Bldg. Insp.
Dan Licht, NAC
\\Ha01 \shared docsWunicipaRAOTSEG0\901 \ot901 mrl 2.doc
Li2
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTLMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTNMENT: PREPARED BY:
6. Dan Licht, Assistant City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ August 9, 1999
6:30PM
ITEM N-L7XIBER: ITE11 DESCRIPTION:
6.1. Consider applicant Bridgeland Development Co., 20141 Icenic Trail,
Lakeville, MIN. 55044 for owner Myrtle C LuConic 8922 NE Nashua Ave,
Otsego; MN. 55330 PID #118-500-201200 (100 -acres). Legal description is
the N1/2 of the NE 1/4: Also the Nl/4 of the Sl/2 of the NE 1/4 all in Sec. 20,
Twp 121, R23 Co. of Wright, State of Mn. Property is Zoned A-1 (General Agricultural).
Request is as follows:
1. PUD (Planned Unit Development) Concept Plan Review of a 50
lot subdivision, with proposed community drainfield area.
6.2. Final Plat Consideration - Applicant Chris Bulow for Grenins
Mississippi Hills PID #118-800-142402.
BACKGROUND:
6.1. Attached is a memo from Dan Licht dated August 3, 1999 Re: Bridgeland (LuConic)
PUD; Concept Plan. The Planning Commission vote on August 2, 1999 P.C. was
Unanimous 7 - 0 to recommend approval of this concept plan to the Council with
conditions as noted in Dan's Memo.
6.2. Attached is a memo from Dan Licht dated August 3, 1999 Re: Grenins Mississippi
Hills; Final Plat. The P. C. voted unanimously to approve 7 - 0 the Final Plat at the P.C.
meeting of August 2, 1999, subject to conditions as noted in Dan's Memo.
RE C ON17NIENDAT ION:
This is for Council consideration and decision. The P.C. has recommended approval of
both of the above applications unanimously with the conditions as written by NAC.
Thanks.
Elaine
14
AUG -03-1999 10'42
NF,Nc
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
-RE:
FILE NO.:
Mao
612 595 9837 P.02/16
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
61/
Otsego Mayor and City Council
Daniel Licht
3 August 1999
Otsego - Bridgeland (LuConic) PUD; Concept Plan
176.02 - 99.12
The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting on August 2, 1999 to
consider the above referenced application. The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to
recommend approval of the application subject to the conditions outlined in the attached
findings of fact. As part of the public hearing, the applicant provided a detailed description
of the proposed communal wetland septic system. The same presentation is expected to be
made at the City Council meeting on August 9, 1999,
The Planning Commission discussion focused on the timing and density of the project in
consideration of potential public benefits. The primary concern is establishing subdivisions
outside of the Sanitary Sewer Service District that compete with new urban
subdivisions potentially jeopardizing the financial planning for the development of municipal
sanitary sewer and water systems. The majority of the Planning Commission believed that
the density of the project as proposed was appropriate given the public benefits. Other
Planning Commissioners were uncomfortable with the density of the project and would prefer
to see the number of lots reduced. The Planning Commission as a whole was supportive,
however, of the use of the communal septic system because of its land use efficiencies and
potential for future connection to municipal sanitary sewer.
Regarding specific issues with the presented PUD concept plan, the Planning Commission
concurred with staff recommendations regarding the alignment and extension of 90th Street,
access to Nashua Avenue, future street connections and the applicant's responsibility for
acquiring easements and constructing the proposed overflow ditch. The applicant indicated
that the staff comments would be incorporated as part of their development stage proposal.
PC. Mike Robertson t Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Neal Krzyzaniak / Peter Knaeble
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5 5 4 1 6
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM
AUG -03-1999 10:42 NAC
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Bfidgeland Development Company
612 595 9837 P.03/16
PUD -CUP Concept Plan
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Request for approval of a Planned Unit Development -Conditional Use Permit
consisting of 50 single family lots served by a communal septic system on the property legally
described by Exhibit A ("the property°).
City Council Meeting Date: 9 August 1999
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is:
See attached EXHIBIT A_
3. The property lies within the Urban Service Area Reserved as identified in the 1998
Comprehensive Plan Update and is guided for continued agricultural use. Development
of the project requires consideration of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to
designate the property within the Long Range Urban Service Area for low density
residential development.
4. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture Rural Service District. Development of the project
will require consideration of an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to designate the
property as being within the R-3, Long Range Urban Service District (General).
5. The PUD Concept Plan consists of 50 single family lots and one outlots.
0. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City
Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed PUD -CUP, with their
judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the speck policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: The Planning Commission and City Council must evaluate if the flexibility
of allowing communal utilities serving one acre lots in this project are an appropriate
trade-off for the proposed public improvements. The use of the communal drainfteld
is certainly positive from the perspective that it eliminates the need for additional lot
area to accommodate primary and secondary septic sites on every lot. This results
AUG -03-1999 10:43 NAC
612 595 9837 P.04/16"
in a more efficient use of the land, which will also likely have less of an
environmental impact than if the project were proposed with 80,000 sq. ft. lots and
standard septic systems. Further, the use of the communal utilities allows for
efficient connection to municipal sanitary sewer, should those services become
available in the area. As such, the proposed flexibility may be considered consistent
with the following purpose statements of PUD:
Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles
of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design and
sighting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land
in such developments_
More convenience in location and design of development and service
facilities.
An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets
thereby lowering development costs and public investments.
B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding: The subject property is surrounded to the east and northeast to by one
acre, non-sewered development, which are in the Long Range Urban Service Area.
Properties to the north and south are designated for continued agricultural/rural land
uses as part of the Urban Service Area reserve. The City Hall is west of the subject
site. The development of one acre lots on the subject site would be compatible with
these existing and planned uses.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e_, parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding: The applicant has indicated that all lots will meet the minimum standards of
the R-3 District, provided the DNR and City agree that the project is considered
"sewered" under the Shoreland District.
Section 21-7-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance limits block length to not more that
1, 200 feet in order to provide access and circulation throughout neighborhoods. The
proposed subdivision includes three blocks, all of which exceed this requirement.
The lengths of the blocks are due to physical barriers created by existing
development and the lake. As such, conformance with this requirements is not
possible. The connection through to the property to the north would, however, break
up the block consisting of lots 1-17.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed -
2
AUG -03-1999 10:44 NAC 612 595 9e37 P.05i16
Finding: The proposed development may be expected to have a positive effect on
the area by correcfing the existing drainage problems, completing the existing street
networks. The project also will provide addition park and trail facilities, subject to
review of the Parks and Recreation Committee and approval of the City Council.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Although no study has been completed, no negative impact to area property
values is anticipated to be caused by the project.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: The concept plan provides for internal public streets connected to Nashua
Avenue and providing future connections to 90th Street and 87th Street. At Nashua
Avenue, the internal street aligns with the north entrance of City Hall. Lots 1, 49 and
50 depend on direct access to Nashua Avenue which is designated as a minor
arterial by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update_ The Comprehensive Plan strongly
discourages direct access to Nashua Avenue because of intersection spacing
requirements and interference with anticipated traffic. As such, the issue of direct
access to Nashua must be revisited.
The proposed connection to 90th Street at the east property line of the subject site
does not align with the existing right-of-way. instead it aligns with the south property
line of Lot 1, Block 5 of Otsego Acres 2nd Addition, which is owned by the City.
Extension of the street along this corridor would create an off set intersection at 90th
Street/O'Brien Avenue. Depending on the purpose and future use of the City
property, it may be possible to extend 90th street to meet at the existing intersection.
Otherwise, the extension of 90th street should be provided to align with the existing
right-of-way at the northeast corner of the subject site.
A cul-de-sac extends south from the proposed 90th Street extension to a terminus
at the south property line. This cul-de-sac exceeds the 500 foot maximum allowed
by the Subdivision Ordinance. However, this cul-de-sac is intended to be temporary
until a connection with 87th Street to the southeast can be established with the future
development of lands to the south of the subject site_
An additional connection from the internal street to the adjacent forty acre parcel to
the north should also be provided. This will allow for the potential development of
the north parcel in a manner other than a loop street, provide intra -neighborhood
connections and potentially reduce access points to Nasuha Avenue.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
AUG -03-1999 10:45 NAC
612 595 9837 P.O?/16
Finding: The proposed development is intended to be served by a private communal
drainfield and water system. No specific utility plans have been provided with the
concept plan, which would be required as part of a subsequent development stage
PUD application. Generally, however, wetland systems such as proposed
conceptually have been used in other communities, most notably Lake Elmo, which
was discussed at the clustering workshop held previously this summer. The only
concern with the proposed communal septic system at this point is the location of the
drainfield. Section 20-71-8.A of the Zoning Ordinance states that sewage treatment
systems must be setback 150 feet from the ordinary high water mark of a waterbody.
The proposed drainfield location is setback only 20 feet from the OHWM of the
subject lake. This location requires further comment of the City Engineer and DNR
Staff.
Again, the applicant is proposing private ownership of the communal septic systems.
The on-going maintenance of the system would be the responsibility of the
homeowners association. In that Otsego has not considered such a treatment
system, City Officials must make a policy decision as to system oversight and
maintenance. One option is private ownership with the alternative being that the
septic system be turned over to the City. The City would likely not assume the water
system in that it would then be required to be constructed to municipal standards,
adding costs.
The deciding factor in this evaluahon must be whether the City has confidence in the
homeowners association's financial and political ability to protect the pubic health
and safety. Given the potential consequences of not being able to fulfill this
responsibility, the City may want to have the system turned over For this reason
our office would recommend such an approach to these systems. Alternatively, the
administration of the system may be a service the City does not want to assume at
this point. If that is the policy direction of the City Council, a developers agreement
would be required between the City and Homeowners Association to provide for the
on-going maintenance of the communal septic system.
7. The planning report dated 27 July 1999 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
8. The report dated 28 July 1999 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
9. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on
2 August 1999, to consider the proposed PUD -CUP Concept Plan, preceded by published
and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the
City Council approve the PUD Concept Plan based on the aforementioned findings.
4
AUG -03-1999 10 46 NAC
612 595 9837 P.08/16
Decision: Based on the foregoing Information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD -
CUP Concept Plan is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received
to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. An application for Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat and
development stage PUD approvals shall be submitted within six (6) months from the
date of concept plan PUD approval.
2. All lots shall conform to the performance standards of the R-3 District, subject to
determination by the DNR that the project may be considered "sewered".
3. The long term ownership and maintenance of the communal septic system shall be
the responsibility of the City of Otsego.
4 A utility plan is submitted for the design of the proposed septic and water systems,
subject to comment by the DNR and approval of the City Engineer.
5. No direct single lot access to Nashua Avenue shall be permitted.
6. The 90th Street Extension shall align with the existing 90th Street right-of-way at the
northeast comer of the subject site.
7. An internal street connection is provided to the abutting parcel to the north_
8. All park dedication shall be subject to review by the Parks and Recreation
Committee and approval of the City Council
9. Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted as part of the development stage
PUD application, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
10. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs for easements and construction of
the proposed overflow ditch.
11. Comments of City Staff.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 9th day of August, 1999
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
F
AUG -03-1999 10:47 NAC 612 595 9837 P.09/16
ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Exhibit A
r
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
IN!%%usle COMM U N ITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING
REPORT `L
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
Otsego Planning Commission
FROM- Daniel Licht
DATE: 28 July 1999
r
J�C�zn?f;,:-
p
RE: Otsego - Bridgeland Development PUD; Concept Plan
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.12
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Bridgeland Development Company has submitted a concept plan for development of 50
single family lots and one outlot on 99 acres located east of Nashua Avenue, directly
across from the City Hall facility. The residential lots are proposed to be served by a
private communal drainfield and well that would be maintained by a homeowners
association. The subject site is within the Urban Service Area reserve designated by the
1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District.
The subject parcel includes a natural environment lake identified by the DNR. As such,
the property is also within the Shoreland Overlay District.
Development of the project would require an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
designating the site part of the Long Range Urban Service Area, a rezoning to R-3,
Residential Long Range Urban Service (General) and approval of a PUD -CUP to
accommodate the proposed communal utilities. The applicant is only requesting concept
plan PUD approval, in advance of a more complete potential future submission.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A:
Subject Site
Exhibit B:
Project Narrative
Exhibit C:
Concept Plan
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM
Recommendation
The ultimate decision as to the appropriateness of the submitted concept plan is a policy
issue that must be decided by City Officials. The proposed concept plan is generally
consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan for further development within the
Long Range Urban Service area of the community, as outlined herein. PUD flexibility on
shoreland lot size requirements may also be appropriate based upon the value of public
improvements and the use of communal utilities, which would provided for efficient land
use and connection to municipal utilities. If the Planning Commission and City Council
make a similar finding, our office would recommend approval of the application as outlined
under Option A below.
A. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP Concept Plan for development of 50 single family
lots with communal septic and water systems, subject to the following conditions:
1. An application for rezoning, preliminary plat and development stage PUD
approvals shall be submitted within six (6) months from the date of concept
plan PUD approval.
2. All lots shall conform to the performance standards of the R-3 District,
subject to determination by the DNR that the project may be considered
"sewered".
3. The long term ownership and maintenance of the communal septic system
shall be the responsibility of the City of Otsego.
4 A utility plan is submitted for the design of the proposed septic and water
systems, subject to comment by the DNR and approval of the City Engineer.
5. No direct single lot access to Nashua Avenue shall be permitted.
6. The 90th Street Extension shall align with the existing 90th Street right-of-
way at the northeast corner of the subject site.
7. An intemal street connection is provided to the abutting parcel to the north.
8. All park dedication shall be subject to review by the Parks and Recreation
Committee and approval of the City Council
9. Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted as part of the development
stage PUD application, subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
10. Comments of Other City Staff.
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 2
B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment based upon a finding
that the application is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the
applicant regarding necessary revisions and/or action).
ISSUES ANALYSIS
PUD Process. The applicant is requesting PUD Concept Plan approval. The Zoning
Ordinance states that the purpose of the PUD Concept Plan review is to provide the
applicant an opportunity to submit a plan illustrating the basic intent of a development
without incurring substantial cost in preparing a full submittal. As opposed to a sketch plan
review, the Planning Commission and City Council take action on the concept plan, either,
approving or denying it. If approved, the applicant must prepare more complete
development stage PUD plans, which are subject to a second review process. Approval
of a concept plan PUD does not predetermine approval of the development stage PUD.
Comprehensive Plan. The subject parcel is currently within the Urban Service Area
Reserve, which allows a maximum density of four units per 40 acres. To allow the
proposed project, an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan is required. Because the
proposed utility system is not municipal sanitary sewer or water, designating the property
as being within the Sanitary Sewer Service District is not appropriate. The other
alternative is to designate the property as Long Range Urban Service Area, which is
designated over existing one acre unsewered developments. Because of the financial
commitments to developing a municipal sanitary sewer system, the 1998 Comprehensive
Plan Update is specific that all new residential development should occur within the
sanitary sewer service district and connect to municipal services. Exceptions to this policy
include further development of the Long Range Urban Service Areas provided at least one
of the following criteria are satisfied:
a. Completion of an unfinished street network.
Comment: The proposed development would allow for the future extension of 90th
Street from O'Brien to Nashua Avenue from Otsego Acres 3rd Addition and the
extension of 87th Street from Vassur's Oak Grove Addition.
b. Such development shall have the result of the correction or improvement of a
demonstrated area drainage problem.
Comment: There is an existing drainage problem during high rainfall seasons where
the lake on the subject property overflows and floods existing residential areas to
the east. As part of this project, the applicant is proposing to correct this issue by
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 3
providing an overflow ditch to the north of the subject property to an existing ditch
on the west side of Nashua Avenue. This will involve improvements across the
subject site, as well as the abutting property to the north.
C. The dedication of lands to a legitimate public purpose (i.e., desired parks, public
facility structures, right-of-way dedication, etc.).
Comment: The project provides for the dedication of public facility structures and
right-of-way for the extension of public streets, and additional park land.
The potential benefits of the project are listed above following each criteria. Planning
Commission and City Council must evaluate the public benefit of the ditch improvements,
right-of-way extension and park and trail dedications in determining if the proposed
development is appropriate in terms of density and project amenities, which are discussed
further below.
Zoning/PUD-CUP. The proposed subdivision would require an amendment to R-3 District.
A PUD -CUP is also required to accommodate the proposed communal septic system and
flexibility on lot size requirements from the Shoreland Overlay District. While the R-3
District minimum lot size is 1 acre, the Shoreland Ordinance allows 80,000 sq. ft. lots for
unsewered development and 40,000 sq. ft.120,000 sq. ft. (riparian/non-riparian) for
sewered development (NOTE: Although none of the lots are riparian, the Shoreland
Ordinance would require that the density of the project be maintained even if the lot sizes
were reduced to 20,000 sq. ft.). DNR staff has indicated that, on a concept basis, they
may consider the subdivision as "sewered" under the Shoreland Ordinance. The DNR
endorsement of smaller lot sizes is dependent upon the design, location and on-going
maintenance provisions of the communal septic system.
The applicant has indicated that all lots would be at least 1 acre in size, although the
concept plan has lot sizes smaller than 1 acre. Sections 20-3-2.17 and 20-4-2.F of the
Zoning Ordinance outline the specific criteria to be considered by the Planning
Commission and City Council relative to the PUD Concept Plan and pending rezoning
application:
1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Comment. If the Planning Commission and City Council make a positive finding that
the project satisfies the criteria for further development of Long Range Urban
Service Areas, the rezoning application would also likely be considered appropriate.
Regarding the PUD -CUP for the communal septic systems, the Planning
Commission and City Council must evaluate if the flexibility of allowing communal
utilities serving one acre lots in this project are an appropriate trade-off for the
Planning Report- Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 4
proposed public improvements. The use of the communal drainfield is certainly
positive from the perspective that it eliminates the need for additional lot area to
accommodate primary and secondary septic sites on every lot. This results in a
more efficient use of the land, which will also likely have less of an environmental
impact than if the project were proposed with 80, 000 sq. ft. lots and standard septic
systems. Further, the use of the communal utilities allows for efficient connection
to municipal sanitary sewer, should those services become available in the area.
As such, the proposed flexibility may be considered consistent with the following
purpose statements of PUD:
A. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all
styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design
and sighting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of
land in such developments.
C. More convenience in location and design of development and service
facilities.
F. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets
thereby lowering development costs and public investments.
2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Comment: The subject property is surrounded to the east and northeast to by one
acre, non-sewered development, which are in the Long Range Urban Service Area.
Properties to the north and south are designated for continued agricultural/rural land
uses as part of the Urban Service Area reserve. The City Hall is west of the subject
site. The development of one acre lots on the subject site would be compatible with
these existing and planned uses.
3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Comment. The applicant has indicated that all lots will meet the minimum standards
of the R-3 District, provided the DNR and City agree that the project is considered
"sewered" under the Shoreland District.
Section 21-7-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance limits block length to not more that
1, 200 feet in order to provide access and circulation throughout neighborhoods. The
proposed subdivision includes three blocks, all of which exceed this requirement.
The lengths of the blocks are due to physical barriers created by existing
development and the lake. As such, conformance with this requirements is not
possible. The connection through to the property to the north would, however,
break up the block consisting of lots 1-17.
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 5
4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Comment: The proposed development may be expected to have a positive effect
on the area by correcting the existing drainage problems, completing the existing
street networks. The project also will provide addition park and trail facilities, subject
to review of the Parks and Recreation Committee and approval of the City Council.
5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Comment: Although no study has been completed, no negative impact to area
property values is anticipated to be caused by the project.
6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Comment: The concept plan provides for internal public streets connected to
Nashua Avenue and providing future connections to 90th Street and 87th Street.
At Nashua Avenue, the internal street aligns with the north entrance of City Hall.
Lots 1, 49 and 50 depend on direct access to Nashua Avenue which is designated
as a minor arterial by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. The Comprehensive
Plan strongly discourages direct access to Nashua Avenue because of intersection
spacing requirements and interference with anticipated traffic. As such, the issue
of direct access to Nashua must be revisited.
The proposed connection to 90th Street at the east property line of the subject site
does not align with the existing right-of-way. Instead it aligns with the south property
line of Lot 1, Block 5 of Otsego Acres 2nd Addition, which is owned by the City.
Extension of the street along this corridor would create an off -set intersection at 90th
Street/O'Brien Avenue. Depending on the purpose and future use of the City
property, it may be possible to extend 90th street to meet at the existing
intersection. Otherwise, the extension of 90th street should be provided to align with
the existing right-of-way at the northeast corner of the subject site.
A cul-de-sac extends south from the proposed 90th Street extension to a terminus
at the south property line. This cul-de-sac exceeds the 500 foot maximum allowed
by the Subdivision Ordinance. However, this cul-de-sac is intended to be temporary
until a connection with 87th Street to the southeast can be established with the
future development of lands to the south of the subject site.
An additional connection from the internal street to the adjacent forty acre parcel to
the north should also be provided. This will allow for the potential development of
the north parcel in a manner other than a loop street, provide intra -neighborhood
connections and potentially reduce access points to Nasuha Avenue.
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 6
7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's
service capacity.
Comment: The proposed development is intended to be served by a private
communal drainfield and water system. No specific utility plans have been provided
with the concept plan, which would be required as part of a subsequent
development stage PUD application. Generally, however, wetland systems such
as proposed conceptually have been used in other communities, most notably Lake
Elmo, which was discussed at the clustering workshop held previously this summer.
The only concern with the proposed communal septic system at this point is the
location of the drainfield. Section 20-71-8.A of the Zoning Ordinance states that
sewage treatment systems must be setback 150 feet from the ordinary high water
mark of a waterbody. The proposed drainfield location is setback only 20 feet from
the OHWM of the subject lake. This location requires further comment of the City
Engineer and DNR Staff.
Again, the applicant is proposing private ownership of the communal septic systems.
The on-going maintenance of the system would be the responsibility of the
homeowners association. In that Otsego has not considered such a treatment
system, City Officials must make a policy decision as to system oversight and
maintenance. One option is private ownership with the alternative being that the
septic system be turned over to the City. The City would likely not assume the
water system in that it would then be required to be constructed to municipal
standards, adding costs.
The deciding factor in this evaluation must be whether the City has confidence in the
homeowners association's financial and political ability to protect the pubic health
and safety. Given the potential consequences of not being able to fulfill this
responsibility, the City may want to have the system turned over. For this reason
our office would recommend such an approach to these systems. Alternatively, the
administration of the system may be a service the City does not want to assume at
this point. If that is the policy direction of the City Council, a developers agreement
would be required between the City and Homeowners Association to provide for the
on-going maintenance of the communal septic system.
Park Dedication. The concept plan identifies the 40.2 acre Outlot A as a park, which
would be dedicated to the City. A trail corridor is also illustrated within the outlot. The
appropriateness of Outlot A for satisfying park dedication requirements needs to be
evaluated by the Parks and Recreation Committee. It should be noted that in terms of
satisfying park dedication requirements, the area absorbed by the lake and ponding areas
are not included in the calculation. A second issue is that the proposed communal
drainfield is within the Outlot. This leaves 16.5 acres of land suitable for dedication.
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 7
Grading and Drainage Plans. No grading and drainage plans have been submitted as
part of the Concept Plan. These plans will be expected as part of a subsequent
development stage application. All grading and drainage issues are subject to review and
approval of the City Engineer.
CONCLUSION
The decisions regarding the necessary Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning
applications will be made at the time of a future development stage PUD. The intent of the
concept plan PUD application is to give the developer input regarding the general nature
of the project. As such, approval of a PUD concept plan should be granted if City Officials
believe that the intended project, including density and uses, are appropriate and
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed project generally satisfies the criteria for development of Long Range
Service Areas in that it corrects an existing drainage problem and completes a street
network and provides additional land for a public purpose. As an incentive for the public
improvements, PUD flexibility allowing communal utilities and one acre lots under the
Shoreland Overlay District would seem to be a reasonable tradeoff. Generally, the
communal utilities proposed for the project are also positive in that they provide for allow
a more efficient use of land and future connection to municipal services. Issues that must
be resolved as part of a development stage application, if the City Council approves the
concept plan, are the design and ownership/maintenance of the communal systems, intra -
neighborhood street alignments and connections, and direct access to Nashua Avenue.
The concept plan review provides City Officials the opportunity to give direction to the
applicant on these matters. Our office's specific recommendations are outlined in the
executive summary of this report.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Neal Krzyzaniak
Peter Knaeble
Planning Report - Bridgeland Development PUD Concept
Page 8
The developer and myself will be attending the Planning Commission meeting to review
the Concept Plan and answer any questions they may have. Representatives of North
American Wetland Engineering will also be attending this meeting to address the
community drainfield design issues. If you have any questions or comments, please call.
Sincerely,
L
,
Pte7
Pr Knaeble
TERRA ENGINEERING, INC.
CC: Neal Krzyzaniak, Bridgeland Development Co. (w/ encl.)
Curtis Sparks, North American Wetland Engineering (w/ encl.)
N►� C
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
TERRA ENGINEERING, INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING • CONSULTING
July 19, 1999
Elaine Beatty
Clerk/Zoning Administrator
8899 Nashua Ave. NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Re: PUD Concept Plan Review
LvConic Site
Otsego, MN
Dear Elaine:
L5 11�!2 L_ U L
JUL 2 0 1999
6001 Glenwood Ave.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
(phone/tax) 593-9325
As we discussed, attached are five copies (full & 11x17) of the Concept Plan for the above
referenced project. We are requesting review of this project at the August 2nd Planning
Commission meeting. The Concept Plan is based on the following-
* 50 single family lots at 1.0 acre minimum lot size.
* 60' road right-of-way, with a temporary cul-de-sac at the south property line for
a future extension, and a future connection to the east to NE O'Brien Ave.
* A community drainfield area to serve the 50 lots, with the assumption that the
drainfield would be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association.
* The project may be designed with a community well to also serve the 50 lots.
* This project would include an overflow storm sewer to the north from the
existing pond area. This stormwater would be directed, via ditches and berms,
to the northwest to alleviate the existing flooding conditions to the northeast.
* The proposed storm sewer pond would treat the on-site stormwater prior to
discharge into the existing pond area.
EXHIBIT B
q�+Uil,
.\
� c o 1 '
P• II o p - •CITY HALL I '
:MASFIV —
i CONCEPT PLAN TERRA ENGINEERING. INC.
F3
gig
i
' : ." llrwapOrtr, laiz2
-� LUC04C PROPERTY mee.rtaes
o ' O�.. OTSEGO, MINNESOTA ".:.'' "'_, _ I a . t«+
°
`
O
N
\,
cn
f Q^G
H=az
mvzm
\ 1
oQ. tna
per. IQ'
0,� p=
1 - +p
X
ca
,co
p �
�i _
N
d
m
��\\\\;\\\,
oma•
o po / u
290' CT )
r
fu r
f
\
„
D ..
I Ac,/(T pJ
-Prop.
floc
Pond Ove
n
C
p /
/
// /
a
/I
o
Z
l;l1lrf r I
O y♦ t 1
\
i
S
1
I t
CA
ra
\
\Ito
1
(I
1 �0
c
\
\ \
1
N
N
N N
tv.IV
o11,
%0
I` z
i
10
o.
�,
I/
m/ A
pl.,„ p
NE O'BRIAN AVE.
i CONCEPT PLAN TERRA ENGINEERING. INC.
F3
gig
i
' : ." llrwapOrtr, laiz2
-� LUC04C PROPERTY mee.rtaes
o ' O�.. OTSEGO, MINNESOTA ".:.'' "'_, _ I a . t«+
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
vil & ,Municipal Engineering
_and Surveying
MEMO
TO: Mike Robertson, Adm.
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE
City Engineer
SUBJECT: Concept Plan for Luconic Property
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
We have reviewed the concept PUD for the above mentioned property. This following
are the concerns and comments.
• Wetland Delineation could inpact the lot total. Lot 19 & 20 may be
considered wetland type soil. Lot 17 may also have significant wetland
soils. The DNR Wetland would be a required delineation.
• Who would own Outlot A?
• The overflow outlet from the DNR pond diverted to Otsego Creek would
be a positive change for the Hall's Watershed District. This change would
help avert the periodic high water conditions in the Hall's Pond Watershed.
The approval for this change would need a permit from the DNR
Hydrologist.
• Easements to construction a positive overflow will be required on the
proposed PUD and offsite.
• Nashua Ave. is proposed on the Wright County long term transportation
plan as a County Road. The City needs to limit the number accesses to
Nashua Ave. to protect the street for future use. It is our recommendation
that no accesses except the streets be allowed onto Nashua Ave. Lots
49, 50 & 1 would not be allowed access.
• The location of proposed 90th Street appears to be acceptable except for
the location on the east side. The street will need to match up with
existing 90th Street. Should this proposal be approved, we would
recommend the Developer continue the street to O'Brien Ave.
• We assume that a plat using a common sewage treatment system would
install sanitary sewer in the streets. That would require concrete curb and
gutter and a urban street section.
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2200\ot2200mr.doc
Page Two
July 28, 1999
The common sewage drainfield location appears in a practical place.
Design data should be made available to demonstrate the area needed for
service is adequate. We need a preliminary design in document form to
be able to review the proposal.
• We assume water service would be by individual wells.
If you have questions on the comments please call.
Yours truly,
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
4ren;�e�GZ"Koshak,
Ik/pm
cc: Terra Engineering, Inc.
Dan Licht, NAC
Neal Krzyzcaniak, Bridgeland Development Co.
\\Ha0l\shared docs\Municipal�AOTSEGO\2200\ot2200mr.doc
PMU
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
AUG-03-1999 10=47 NAC 612 595 91337 P. 10/16
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
fNC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM (4�' 2"
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 3 August 1999
RE: Otsego - Grenins Mississippi Hills; Final Plat
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.13
Please be advised that the Planning Commission considered the above referenced
application at their meeting on August 2, 1999. The Planning Commission discussion
focused on two issues:
First, the Planning Commission believed that the separate outlots for the clubhouse and
bed and breakfast may create future complications with ownership, access and potential
uses. Until there is an approved development stage PUD for the property, the Planning
Commission recommended that the Final Plat include only one outlot for these planned
uses, as originally approved by the preliminary plat.
Second, the Planning Commission recommended two changes to the proposed covenants.
The first change was to establish a homeowners association that would continue to provide
for architectural review and oversight even after the project has been built out. The
second change recommended by the Planning Commission is that the charter membership
privileges to the golf course should run with the ownership of the single family lots and not
just the first owner of such lots. The basis of this recommendation is that the golf course
and privileges are supposed to be amenities of the cluster development, which should not
be lost to the second owner of one of the single family lots.
The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the Grenins Mississippi
Hills Final Plat subject to the conditions as outlined in the attached findings of fact.
PC. Mike Robertson / Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Chris Bulow
5775 WAYZATA SOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NACQWINTERNET.GOM
AUG -03-1999 10:48 NAC
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Bulow Incorporated
612 595 9837 P.11/16
Final Plat
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Request for approval of a final plat application entitled "Grenins Mississippi Hills",
described by Exhibit A ("the property"), consisting of 17 single family lots and three outlots.
City Council Meeting Date: 9 August 1999
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is:
See attached EXHIBIT A-
3.
3. The property lies within the Rural Residential Preserve Area as identified in the 1998
Comprehensive Plan Update.
4. The property is guided for rural residential development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan
Update and is zoned R -C, Residential -Rural Open Space Cluster District.
5. The proposed Grenins Mississippi Hills Final Plat consists of seventeen (17) single family
residential lots and three outlots to be developed as a privately owned golf course
(commercial recreation) use. A fourth outlot is proposed to convey property to an adjacent
lot to rectify an existing property line encroachment.
6. The planning report dated 27 July 1999 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
7. The reports dated 15 July 1999 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
10. The Otsego Planning Commission, at their regular meeting on 2 August 1999, considered
the proposed final plat application. Upon review of the application and evidence received,
the Otsego Planning Commission recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council
approve the final plat applications.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the Final Plat of
Grenins Mississippi Hills is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information
received to date, subject to the following conditions:
AUG -03-1999 10:48 NAC 612 595 9837 P.12i16
A corrected preliminary plat reflecting the approval of the City Council on 23 June 1999 is
submitted.
2. The final plat is revised to illustrate all existing easements and trail easements required as
part of the Preliminary Plat approval.
3. All park dedication requirements are satisfied, subject to review of the Parks and
Recreation Committee and approval of the City Council.
4. Proposed deed covenants shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attomey and
City Council.
5. The applicant enter into a development contract and post all required securities, subject
to review and approval of the City Attorney.
6. The deed covenants are revised to provide for a homeowners association with permanent
architectural review control, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
7. The deed covenants are revised to provided that "charter membership° at the golf course
facility shall nun with the individual lots and be vested with the members of the homeowners
association, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 9th day of August, 1999
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
N
I N C
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - D E S
PLANNING REPORT �' ,-2-
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
Otsego Planning Commission
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 27 July 1999
RE: Otsego - Grenins Mississippi Hills; Final Plat
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
Mr. Chris Bulow, of Bulow Inc., has requested final plat approval of the 82.5 acre Grenins
Mississippi Hills subdivision located northeast of CSAH 39 and Kadler Avenue. The final
plat consists of 17 single family residential lots and three outlots associated with the
planned golf course/bed and breakfast use. A fourth outlot has also been provided in
order to convey a small parcel to an adjacent property. The subject site is zoned R -C,
Residential - Rural Cluster Open Space District.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B - Final Plat
Exhibit C- Property Covenants
Recommendation
Based upon the a review of the application in consideration of the approved preliminary
plat, our office recommends approval of Grenins Mississippi Hills Final Plat, subject to the
following conditions under Option A.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM
H
A. Motion to approve the Final Plat of Grenins Mississippi Hills, subject to the
following conditions:
1. A corrected preliminary plat reflecting the approval of the City Council on 23
June 1999 is submitted.
2. The final plat is revised to illustrate all existing easements and trail
easements required as part of the Preliminary Plat approval.
3. All park dedication requirements are satisfied, subject to review of the Parks
and Recreation Committee and approval of the City Council.
4. Proposed deed covenants shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Attorney and City Council.
5. The applicant enter into a development contract and post all required
securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
6. Comments of other City Staff.
B. Motion to deny the final plat based upon a finding that it is inconsistent with the
approved preliminary plat.
C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided regarding
changes or additional information).
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Preliminary Plat Consistency. The submitted final plat is generally consistent with the
preliminary plat approved with conditions by the City Council on June 23, 1999. No
corrected preliminary plat has yet been submitted, which is required. Other issues
stemming from the approved preliminary plat are as follows:
• Block 2. The City Council approved the preliminary plat with the condition that
three lots be eliminated due to poor soils. The three lots have been eliminated from
the final plat with that area now included as part of Outlot A, but does not expand
the playable area of the golf course. The revision could have also been made by
increasing the area of one or more lots adjacent to Kahler to absorb this
unbuildable area. This would, however, create lots that are out of character with
others in the subdivision and surrounding neighborhoods. As such, the plat
revision as presented is appropriate.
Planning Repos` - Grenins Mississippi Hills Final Plat
Page 2
• Outlots B and C. The preliminary plat included one outlot for future development
of the proposed clubhouse and bed and breakfast inn uses. The final plat provides
a separate outlot for each. This arrangement raises an issue of timing. Outlot C
does not have the minimum frontage required to a public street. The preliminary
plat anticipated that the clubhouse and bed and breakfast would be on one lot. As
such, this issue is a matter of semantics as to whether the approved concept plan
PUD -CUP allows for two principal uses on one lot or two lots, one without minimum
frontage to a pubic street. However, outlot C is proposed for a future use which
requires approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment before it can be developed.
The concern would be that final platting the outlot is premature without considering
the development stage PUD and Zoning Amendment concurrently.
• Outlot D. The final plat includes a fourth outlot, just to the north of Lot 1, Block 1.
The purpose of this outlot is to allow the conveyance of the parcel to the adjacent
property owner. An accessory building on the adjacent property overlays the
common property line encroaching into the applicant's property. As part of the
conveyance, sufficient area should be provided such that the accessory building is
setback 10 feet from the proposed property lines.
• Easements. The proposed final plat does not illustrate the existing ingresslegress
easement extending from 99th Street for the two excepted lots on the north end of
the subject site. Also, the final plat does not illustrate proposed easements for cart
path access to the golf course that were proposed and approved adjacent to the
residential lots. The final plat should be revised to illustrate these easements.
Park Dedication. As a condition of final plat approval, all park dedication requirements
must be provided for as recommended by the Parks and Recreation Committee. The
preliminary plat was approved with the condition that the applicant provide a grade
separated trail adjacent to Kadler Avenue.
Covenants. The applicant has submitted proposed covenants governing the construction
and use of the residential lots. These documents are subject to review by the City Attorney
and approval of the City Council as part of the development contract.
Development Contract. Upon approval of the final plat, the applicant will be required to
enter into a development contract and post all appropriate securities. The development
contract is to be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
CONCLUSION
The proposed final plat for Grenins Mississippi Hills is generally consistent with the
approved preliminary plat for this project. Based upon the preceding review, our office
recommends approval of the final plat subject to the conditions outlined in the executive
summary of this report.
Planning Report - Grenins Mississippi Hills Final Plat
Page 3
pc. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Chris Bulow
Planning Report - Grenins Mississippi Hills Final Plat
Page 4
m
x
co
C
NF2 C
BASE ►IAP.
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
n
h
N
0
N
EXHIBIT
49/04/1996 23:05 6/24412229 EL'LOW ItiC. PAGE 02
07-14-L995 OL:23;M LUNDBERG LAW CFFICE +1 6112 441 1258 P.01
PROTECTIVE COVZN1JNTS FOR GRENINS MISSISSIPPI HILLS
KNGw ALT, 3Y THESE PR SENTS, that Bulow, Inc., a Minnesota
corporation, being the owner of real estate platted as Lots 1
thru 12, Block 1 and Lots 1 thru 5, Block 2, GRENINS MISSISSIPPI
HILLS and located in the City of Otsego, Wright County,
Minnesota, (hereafter referred to as "Subdivision") has declared
and by these presents does declare that the said lots shall be,
subject to the following protective covenants, restrictions and
servitudes, and that every subsequent owner of said lots shall be
bound to said covenants, restrictions and servitudes, and shall
accept title subject thereto.
1. Land Use and Building Type. Each lot shall be used exclusively
for residential purposes. No building shall be erected, altered,
placed or permitted to remain on any lot other than one (1)
detached single family dwelling and attached private garage for not
less than two (2) cars.
2. Architectural Control. No building shall be erected, placed or
altered on any lot until the construction plans and specifications
and the plans showing the location of the structure have been
approved by the Architectural Control Committee as to quality of
workmanship and materials, harmony of external design with existing
structures, external colors, and as to location with respect to
topography and finished grade elevation. No fence or wall shall be
erected, placed or altered on any lot unless approved by this
Committee.
3. Quality and Size. All structures shall be of new construction
and shall comply with all applicable ordinances, statutes, and
regulations. The foundation, and ground floor area of the main floor
of the structure, exclusive of open porches and garages, shall not
be less than set forth in the following schedule:
A. For a single -story building - 1,550 square feet.
B. For a two-story structure --1,350 square feet.
C. For a split level or bi-level type of construction. - 1,600
square feet.
D. For a modified two-story type of construction - 1,400 square
feet.
All structures must have a minimum construction cost of
$250,000.00, including lot and landscaping.
All garages shall have a minimum size of 26 feet wide by 24 feet
deep.
All roofing shall meet or exceed the quality of Timberline
shingling.
EXHIBIT C
0804/1996 23:05 6124412229 BULOW INC. PAGE 0.3
rr-la-lyyy @1:24FM LUND6EFG LAW CFFICc- +1 622 441 1255 P.02
All structures shall have a roof pitch of 6/12 to 12/12.
All mailboxes shall conform to uniform standards to be
established by the Architectural Control Committee.
Any variance from the foregoing requirements must be approved by
the Architectural Control Committee.
E. Yard Specifications.
A. Front Yard. The front yard shall have grass cover not
exceeding three (3) inches in height from roadway to the
structure foundation_. The front yard shall initially be sodded or
professional seeded from street lire to building setback line.
All sod or seed shall be in place before occupancy, provided that
if the structure is completed during winter months, then the
front yard shall be sodded or seeded no later than June 1 of the
following spring.
B. Side and back yards. All side and back yards shall have grass
cover by seeding or sodding, except such parts thereof as shall
be converted to garden or patio space under the approval and
supervision of the Architectural Control Committee.
C. Driveways. All driveways shall be blacktopped or concrete.
S. Antennas
No satellite dishes or antennas shall be erected in any yard or
attached to any structure without the prior approval
Architectural Control Committee.
6. Accessory Buildings. No accessory buildings shall be permitted
on any lot except with the approval of the Architectural control
Committee and the City of Otsego.
7. Lot Improvements. All improvements to any lot in this
subdivision shall require the prior approval of the Architectural
control committee.
B. Lot Area. No lot shall be replotted, rearranged, or re -
subdivided without the consent of the Architectural Control
Committee and approval by City planning and zoning authorities.
Set -back and yard requirements shall be as set forth in the City
Zoning Ordinance.
9. Nuisances. No noxious or offensive trade or activity shall be
carried on upon any lot nor shall anything be done thereon which
may be annoyance to the neighborhood. No accumulation of junk,
garbage, junk cars, or debris may be maintained on any lot. No
trailer house, travel trailer, or bus are to be permitted on
premises unless properly garaged.
No motorized vehicle of any nature which is not in sound and
X8/04/1996 23:05 6/24412229 BLLCW INC. PAGE 04
ee-14-1y99 01:24PPI LUND6ERG LOU CFF(CE +1 612 441 1258 P.03
legal operating condition for use on Minnesota's state highways
shall be stored either permanently or temporarily for any period
of time on any lot. No motorized vehicle exceeding 9,Ooo pounds
cross weight shall be stored either permanently or temporarily
for any period of time on any lot. No motorized vehicle of any
nature shall be stored upon any lot or any public street or right
of way for a period of an excess of eight (6) hours unless it is
stored within the confines of a garage structure approved by the
Architectural Control Committee.
!0. Temporary Structure. No structure of a temporary nature such
as a trailer house, camping truck, basement, tent, shack, garage,
barn, outhouse or other buildings sr.all be used on any lot at any
time as a residence, either temporarily or permar�ently, nor shall
a structure to be used as a residence be moved upon any lot. All
structures shall be completed and finished on the exterior within
nine (9) months after commencement of the excavation or
construction thereof, and before the structure shall be used as a
residence.
11. Architectural Control Committee Membership. The Architectural
Control Committee shall be the Developer, Bulow, Inc. The
Architectural Control Committee may for good cause provide a
variance on an individual basis with regard to any of these
covenants.
12. Procedure of the Committee. The Committee's approval or
disapproval as required in these covenants shall be in writing.
The Committee or its designated representative shall approve or
disapprove all plans within .thirty (30) days of submissio:.. No
construction upon or alteration of any lot shall be permitted
without the written approval of the Committee or its designated
representative.
13. Term. The covenants are to run with the lard and all the
persons claiming under them for a period of twenty (20) years
from the date these covenants are filed or recorded, after which
said covenants shall be automatically extended for an additional
ten (10) years unless an instrum,,nt signed by the majority of the
then owners of the lots has been filed or recorded, agreeing to
change said covenants in whole or in part; Provided that the
Architectural Control Committee shall automatically be disbanded
90 days after the last lot to be built upon shall have received a
occuioancy permit from the City of Otsego.
14. Enforcement. If there be a violation or an attempt to violate
any of these covenants or restrictions, the Architectural Control
Committee or any person owning any real estate in this
subdivision may bring suit in law or equity for damages or
injunctive relief or both.' In addition to damages or injunctive
relief, any person being found to have violated any of these
covenants shall be liable for the attorney fees and other costs
necessarily incurred to obtain damages or injunctive relief.
08/04/1996 23:05 6124412229 BULOW INC. PAGE 05
kfe-14-1999 01:25PM LUNDBERG LAW OFFICE *1 612 441 1258 P.04
15. Severability. If any of these covenants or restrictions are
found by any Court to be invalid, the invalidity of any covenant
or portion thereof shall not effect the validity of the remaining
covenants which shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bulow, Inc. has caused these covenants to be
executed this day of 11999.
Bulow Inc., Developer
By
Christopher P1. Bulow
its President
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
S5.
COUNTY OF Sherburne )
The foregoing instrument has been acknowledged before me
this day of , 1999, by Christopher M. Bulow
as President of Bulow, Inc., a Minnesota corporation.
Notary Public
TOTAL P.04
08/04/1996 23:05 6/24412229 ELLGW INC. PAGE 06
Charter Membership Priviliges
I . Charter members can purchase yearly memberships ar a 10 percent discount.
2. When accompanied by a charter Member their guest may purchase a guest pass ar a 10 percent
Discount.
3. Block 1 Lots 1 - 12 are allowed direct access to hole 7, with a prior reservation. Block 2 lots 1 -
5 are allowed to access the club house directly by way of an easement to the golf course property.
4. Unlimited practice on putting green. 5 percent off any Pro Shop merchandise. Use of Club
house for small gatherings or special occasions, during regular business hours and by appoil-fitment.
5. charter Members will have priority tee times. Charter Members should identify themselves when
calling for the tee time. Restricted only on league and special events.
A Charter Member
Original Home owners of Block 1 Lots 1 - 12 and block 2 Lots 1 -5 of Grenins Mississippi Hills.
M
AUG. 4.1999 2:46PN
l� Hakanson
Anderson
01 Assoc., Inc.
Wil & Municipal Engineering
-and Surveying
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Robertson, Administrator
cc: Elaine Beatty, Clerk
Dan Licht, City Planner
Andy MacArthur, City Attorney
Chris Bulow, Bulow Inc.
John Oliver & Associates, Surveyor & Engineer
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak, P.E,
Craig J. Jochum, PE
DATE: August 4, 1999
RE: Grenin's Mississippi Hills
N0.243 P.2/3
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
The current Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control plan, dated 6/24/99, and the
Drainage Calculations dated June 25, 1999, have been reviewed. The following
engineering issues still need to be addressed:
1. Traffic volumes at the intersection of Kadler Ave. & CSAH 39 will increase and
therefore safety issues are a concern. Site distance at the intersection needs to
be reviewed with cost of the sight improvement allocated to the development.
2. As indicated in Wright County Department of Highways letter dated July 16,
1999, a right turn lane and bypass lane will be required at the access point'to
County Road No. 39. Show the turn lane and bypass lane on the grading plan
and provide construction details for the lanes,
3. The Wetland Determination and Delineation Report identified one wetland in the
NW comer of the site. It is not apparent from the grading plan whether this
wetland will be impacted during the grading operation. The limits of the wetland
should be shown on the grading plan. If the wetland will be impacted , an
Exemption Decision as discussed in the report should be requested for the
project. The wetland needs to be protected with silt fence during the grading
operations.
1\Ha01\sharad docsWlun(clpaNAOTSEG0121971ot2197mr4.doc
PUG. 4.1999 2:44PM N0.242 P.2i2
Mike Robertson
Page 2
August 4, 1999
4. Drainage and utility easements on lots rear, front and those abutting non -platted
parcels must be a minimum of 10' wide. Lots in Block 2 will require additional
drainage easement to the proposed 100 -year flood elevation of 951.55.
Easement is also required around the wetland area for lots in Block 1,
5. The series of ponds which are located within the golf course are proposed to
drain east, and are all interconnected with 12" HDPE pipe. The outlet for the
system consists of a proposed '12" HDPE pipe which is adjacent to the north end
of Lot 1, Block 2. The proposed outlet connects to an existing draintile at the NE
corner of Lot 1, Block 2,
We recommend that the existing 12" draintile not be accepted as the outlet for
the golf course ponds for the following reasons:
• The condition and actual location of the tile is not known east of the plat
boundary. According to the Developer's Engineer, the tile is currently being
located.
• It is not evident from the information we have received if the tile daylights. It is
not known if there is easement for the tile system.
• If the tile fails in the future the city will likely need to correct potential flooding
problems since the tile may be within the street R.O.W.
• According to the drainage calculations, the tile would need a capacity of 4.3
cfs during the 24-hour 100 -year storm event to maintain the peak flood
elevation of 951,55. Computations have not been provided to verify the the
capacity.
If the the failed, the backyards on Block 2 could experience flooding, however,
the septic areas and low floor elevations reported on the grading plan are higher
than the emergency overflow, which is at elevation 955.0.
Connecting the the directly to the surface water system as proposed could
increase the rate of discharge in tile. Downstream effects from this increased
rate should be verified.
\1Nao1\shered docsWiunic1paMOTSEGO\21971ot2l97mr4.doc
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., ! nc.
A
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTILEN T: MEETING DATE:
DEPART'NIENT: PREPARED BY:
9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ August 9,1999
6:30PM
ITEM NC', IBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
9.1. A. Consider Wright -Hennepin proposal concerning Nater Service Billing
(Cont. from July 26, 1999 agenda)
B. Any Other Council Business
BACKGROUJIND:
9.1. A. Mike Robertson will be present to discuss Wright-Hennepin's proposal.
See attached copy of letter dated 6/10/99 and proposal from Wright
Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association from last agenda packet
and has been continued a few tunes.
B. This is for any other Council Business that may be added.
REC0INLNIEIND ATI0N:
This is for Council discussion and any consideration for approval needed.
as,
Elaine
rvrl-DTVMO
Date: August 4, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Wright -Hennepin Billing Proposal
I met with Wright -Hennepin Electric officials to
discuss their water/sewer billing proposal. We
discussed the following issues.
MONTHLY BASE FEE
I discussed with them the City's concern that the
base fee was too high given the small amount of
customers we would be starting out with. They said
that the base fee was a pass through cost from
their software company and that Wright -Hennepin was
not adding any additional costs to it. They said
that Wright-Hennepin's compensation was strictly in
the Monthly Customer Fee. They were not willing to
reduce the Monthly Base Fee even if the City agreed
to an increase in the Monthly Customer Fee.
CREDITING OF PAYMENTS
They said that their intent was to credit
underpayments proportionately between the
customer's electric bill and the City water bill.
They said they would detail this procedure in the
contract that the City and Wright -Hennepin would
sign regarding the billing.
ITRON METER READING SYSTEM
We discussed Council concerns that the City could
be locked into one supplier for meter reading
systems and subject to high costs. They said that
they currently use Itron because they consider it
the industry leader in radio modules for utilities.
They said the Itron radio module can be used with
many different kinds of meters. They also said
that the module and the meter can be placed
anywhere in the home and do not have to be placed
on the outside of the house. They feel that there
is plenty of price competition in this market and
have indicated that they are not worried about
Itron increasing prices unreasonably.
Their meter reading contractor has water meters in
stock in their warehouse. They offered to put the
Itron module into the water meter and ship them to
us as we need them. They have also provided some
technical information sheets on the Itron system
which I will bring to the Council meeting.
CONTRACT ISSUES
Wright -Hennepin would like to sign a two year
contract with Otsego because they are just as
uncertain as we are about how this will work out.
They do see it as a natural complement to their
electric business. I suggested that they start
preparation of a draft contract based on our
discussion and that I would call them after August
9 with the Council's decision.
RECOMMENDATION
Wright -Hennepin is the only viable outside bidder
left. If the Council decides not to contract with
them, I think we immediately have to start lining
up the necessary equipment to do the billing
ourselves. I think doing the billing ourselves
will require additional staff.
Giving the changes in staff the City will face near
the end of 2000, I would like to try working with
Wright -Hennepin for the first two years of our
water system. If it doesn't work out or is costing
the City too much money, I think it would be easier
at that time to seek another vendor or bring the
billing in house.
cc: City Staff
2
BOARD DIRECTORS
r
6/10/1999
]us
Wright -Hennepin
Cooperative Electric Association
A Touchstone Energy' Partner Kt>
PO Bax 330' Rocktora SAN 55373-0330
Metro • (612) 4%7-3000 Toll Free • 1-2100-941-2266;
34 -Hour Fax • (612) 4'-3054
, t
Mike Robertson
Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330-7314
Subject: Water Reading/Billing Proposal
Mike:
I
1
J�!I
t'jut dvnfel.�er.IvIantwello .W,
Howard L. Ellis, Surralo, XIS
- -I 1I nia lach, M1,111i Grcliv.MN
*ar3c^'r tt' Mont, 1T,ie-Plaut. AIN
• Donald A. Lucas, Mavle Gro''e, MN
PRESIDENT do CEO
• Mark F. Vo-, t. Anna?: tale. AIN
Please find attached, Wright-Hennepin's proposal concerning water service billing for the
City of Otsego. Our proposal encompasses residential meter reading, customer billing,
cash collections, and delinquent account management. In our opinion, these are the
prevalent services that would be of benefit to the City.
Thanks for reviewing the proposal; we look forward in -turn to having a further discussion
with you on this project.
Regards,
Bob Miller
Key Account Representative
The power of hurnun connections
City of Otsego Proposal
Background Information
Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Electric Association (WH) is an electric distribution
cooperative, formed in 1937. Currently, W -H serves over 26,000 members in the
counties of Wright, Hennepin, Stearns, Meeker, Sherburne and Carver counties. The
cooperative is consumer owned, and govemed by local citizens.
Services other than electricity provided by WH include: Home Security, Security
Response, Wireless & Land Line Communications, Electric Installation and
Contracting, Pager, 24 hour Electric Dispatching, Internet, Appliance Warranty, and
Surge Protection. This proposal concerns an additional service, where W -H would
provide water reading/billing services to the City of Otsego.
W -H's proposal is related to the City's current construction of a new wastewater
treatment plant & potable water infrastructure, which will initially serve a 1,000 — 1,400
home development. Otsego City administration projects that the development will be
complete in five to ten years, assuming that 150-250 homes are built per year. The
wastewater treatment is scheduled to be operational by the fall of 1999, and is sized to
add future systems beyond the development at issue.
W -H Services
Proposed services which Wright -Hennepin would provide to the City for the water/sewer
project include the following:
• Meter Reading
• Billing
• Cash Collection
• Management of Delinquent Accounts
• 24 Hour Dispatching (Optional)
Meter Readinq
Wright -Hennepin currently has the equipment and software, to accommodate meter
reading of the water/sewer project. Wright -Hennepin would be responsible for
physically collecting the meter data, provided that the City purchases & installs the Itron
remote reading system (ERT) into the city's choice of water meter. Since the new
homes will also be -H customers, WH would also install the ERTs into their electric
meters at the time of installation. W -H currently has handheld meter reading devices
which have the capa ility of reading the ERTs by radio frequency, therefore the meter
reader does not have to go onto the customer's property.
Page t
W -H's contracted eter reading service, RMR Services, Inc, would read the water
meters simultaneo sly with the electric meters (under WH/RMR's current contract). Not
only would this create efficiencies for both entities, it would also eliminate the
redundancies created by two meter readers reading the same residence. The City of
Otsego area meters are read the second week of the month or around the 10th of the
month. RMR currently reads 36,000 of WH meters on a monthly basis.
RMR Services would have the ability to install the ERTs into the city's choice of water
meter. For further technical information, please contact Brent Anderson at RMR
Services, Inc, 1228 South 7th St, Minneapolis, MN 55415. 612-376-7600.
Billie
W -H would be responsible for calculating the billing based on the meter data collected.
WH would print and mail the statements. Proposed pricing includes paper, outer
envelope, reply envelope and postage and management of the receivable.
The water and sewer billing would be included as a separate line item on the customer's
electric statement. WH would set the water and sewer billing up as a separate
receivable. The water and sewer billing would be included on WH's statement, but
displayed as a separate service. The customer would see the total of their water and
sewer service as well as the total to be remitted for all services on the statement. See
sample of statement (attached).
The City of Otsego is currently billed for electric and other services the third week of the
month (approximately the 21St of each month). Payment is due the 8th of the following
month unless the customer chooses the EZ Pay plan (ACH) which provides the
customer with additional payment choices of the 1 St Stn or the 15th of the following
month.
Cash Collection
W -H would be responsible for collecting and posting all payments, and remitting
payment to the city on a monthly or semi-monthly basis. W -H is flexible regarding
timing and related arrangements.
Delinquent Accounts
W -H would be responsible for collection of delinquent accounts, through the City's
standard disconnect period. WH's current software system has the capability of putting
a reminder on the bill, and sending out disconnect notices etc. for individual services.
W -H would send out the disconnect notice, but it would be the City's responsibility to
physically disconnect the customer. Pricing includes reminder statement and
disconnect notices, as well as coordination with the City for payment arrangements and
disconnects.
Page 2
24 Hour Dispatching (Optional)
W -H provides 24 hour dispatching services. WH could provide the City the following
dispatching services.-
Around
ervices:
Around the clock personal response.
Disconnect and reconnect customer call handling.
Please note that pricing for the above dispatch services are not included in this
proposal, but could be added at the City's request.
Proposed Pricinq
W -H's proposes a monthly package fee for the City, to include the services of meter
reading, billing, cash collections, and delinquent account management. Package cost
would be per the following:
Monthly Base Fee $200
Monthly Customer Fee $1.75 (per account)
This proposal is valid for 60 days from date of issuance (6/10/1999). Upon acceptance,
length of agreement shall be for a two-year period.
Presented b -� %�` Accepted by
Representing: Wright -Hennepin
Date , o Z_�if
Page 3
Representing: City of Otsego
Date
Wright -Hennepin
:ooperaNM E4cv�nnepi n
Account #: 123456789
CID#: 1234341
DOE, JOHN
1234 ANYWHERE
ANYTOWN, MN
55333
Due Date: June 30, 1999
Amount Due: $100.00
Wright -Hennepin Statement Date: 05/05/99
Cooperative Electric Association Account #: 123456789
PO BOX 330 Total Amount Due: 5100.00
Rockford MN 55373.0332
j Billing summary
Previous Balance: $101.00
ayments Received: -5101.00
Balance Forward:
$0.00
Total Electric:
$50.00
Total Security:
$10.00
Total Water:
$40.00
Total Amount Due:
$100.00
marketing message
Wright -Hennepin
Cooperative Electric Association
PO BOX 330
Rockford MN 553730332
Electric Service 0113 111
Usage Period
04-01.99 to 05-01.99
Sry Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET
Meter a Pres. Rag Prev. Rog
Multiplier
Basic Service
$ 8.25
12345678 500 0
1
Energy 500 kWh
@ 0.081 $ 40.50
100 W light 43 kwh
$ 7.30
Power Cost Adj 543 kwh
@ (0.0163) $ 8.85
Sales Tax
@ 0.065 $ 3.06
Total for Electric
Security Service Sry Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET
Monitor Charge $ 9.40
Sales Tax a 0.065 $ 0.60
Total for Security
Water Service Usage Period 04-01-99 to 05.01.99 Sry Addr 1234 ANYWHERE STREET
Meter a Pres. Rdg Prev. Rdg Multiplier Basic Service $ 0.00
87654121 10,000 0 1 Water usage 10,000 gal 0 0.00376 $ 37.60
Sales Tax a 0.065 $ 2.40
Total for Water $ 40.00
:% CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTNIENT: NIEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
9 COL'N;CH_ ITEMS: Elaine Beatty. City Clerk, August 9, 1999
6:30PM
ITEM N-L-MBER• ITEM DESCRIPTION:
9.2. )vlike Robertson, City Administrator - Update:
A. Consider a third full-time person for Publics `Yorks
B. Discussion of driveway width issues
C. Discussion of Cost Estimates for Sewer Hookups
D. Consider Payment #3 for Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facility to
Gridor Construction, Inc. for 5220,165.
BACKGROUND:
A. Mike Robertson will be here to explain this and answer questions.
B. See attached memo dated August 3, 1999 from dike Robertson.
C. Mike Robertson will explain this information.
D. Attached is information from Bonestroo and letter dated August 3, 1999 which
has the information needed for this Pay Estimate 93 request.
RECONMENDATION:
This is for Council consideration and any approval needed.
Thaks,
Elaine
q• ,-,) 'A
Date: August 4, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Hiring a third person for the
Public Works Department
During the Budget Workshop the Council directed
staff to put the issue of hiring a third, full-time
person for the Public Works Department on the
Council agenda. The proposed 2000 budget has a
third full-time person budgeted at a salary of
$12.00 an hour. We would probably advertise at a
slightly lower rate, with the thought that after
the person passed their probation they could
receive an increase.
Dave Chase has made increased use of part-time help
since the last person hired full time did not work
out. With the growth in population of the City
Dave feels that a third full time person is needed.
Dave would like the person to start in the Fall so
that they work one winter while on their
probationary period so that everyone can see if
they can handle it.
X
C,�
Date: August 3, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Driveway width
I was informed by Jerry Olson that another
homeowner in Lin -Bar Estates has just had a
driveway installed that is wider than allowed by
City ordinance. This installation apparently
occurred last weekend. Jerry says that the
homeowner was one of the people who attended the
hearing on this issue a few months ago and that the
builder was well aware of the City's ordinances
because Jerry had explained it to him several
times.
This is now the fourth driveway in Lin -Barr Estates
that has installed wider than allowed by City
Ordinance. The City has escrow money deposited by
the builder on driveways, typically either $1,000
or $2,000. Jerry has been in contact with the
other homeowners who have installed wider driveways
and they have basically told him to keep the escrow
because they want a wider driveway. The word is
apparently out that if you want a wider driveway
you just do the work on a weekend and forfeit your
escrow money.
The City is left with an unenviable choice;
(1) Let people ignore our ordinances.
(2) Hire a contractor to go in and cut the
driveways down until they are 24 feet wide at the
right-of-way line.
crnr ot.
�TSEGO
8899 Nashua Avenue. N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 4414414
Elle River. MN 35330 Fac: (612) 441-8823
PETITION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
DATE: _ 51
TO: City Council, Ci of Otsego, Minnesota
_- -
We, the owners of the following described or identified real property, do hereby petition
for the improvement as described herein with the entire cost of such improvement,
including indirect or administrative costs, to be assessed against our property. We
hereby agree to pay all costs as may be incurred by the City, and to pay the entire
project cost as apportioned by the City to each property. The improvement and
assessment shall be as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429.
A) Description of the requested Improvement:
B) List of Owners and Properties
Signature of Owners Property I.D. Property Address
� _ ► i g - S o a- ZZ �. X73 � s%� .
Note to Property Owners: If your mailing address is different than the property address, please
provide a mailing address on the reverse side of this petition.
C) Certification by City Cleric
This petition was received on the date identified below. I have reviewed the
nature of the requested improvement and find that the signatures and properties
identified above appear to be located such as to benefit from the requested
improvement and that the total number of property owners signatures appear to
represent approximately % of the probable benefited parcels or
approximately °%o of the probable benefited property frontage.
Otsego City Clerk
Date: 1999
C:1Shara\MunlclpaPAOTSEGO19011ot901 PM.doc
A
JABonestroo
0 Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
August 3, 1999
Mr. Mike Robertson
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Bonestroo, Rosene. Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Acrion/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. • Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E.
Glenn R. Cook. PE. • Robert G. Schunicht. P.E. • Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E. -
Robert W. Rosene. P.E.. Richard E. Turner. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin. C.P.A.. Senior Consultants
Associate Principals. Howard A. Sanford. P.E. • Keith A. Gordon, P.E. • Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E.
Richard W. Foster, PE. • David O. Loskota, PE. • Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann. PE. • Ted K.Field, P.E. • Kenneth P Anderson, P.E. • Mark R. Rolfs. P.E.
Sidney P Williamson. P.E.. L.S. • Robert F. Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. P.E.
Offices: St. Paul. Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud. MN • Milwaukee. WI
Website: www.t)onestroo.com
Attn: Mike Robertson, Administrator
Re: City of Otsego
Wastewater Treatment Facility
BRA File No. 50399100-P.R.
Dear Mr. Robertson:
C, �Z �Dr
Transmitted herewith are four (4) copies of Request for Payment No. 3 from
Gridor Constr., Inc. for the above referenced project for the period ending July 26 1999.
The requested payment amount is $220,165. I recommend approval of this pay request
by the City.
Please return one signed copy of the approved pay request to our office. Send two to the
Contractor along with his check, one for him and one for the Bonding Company. Keep one
final copy for your files along with the supporting documentation.
If you have any questions regarding this letter or the requested payment amount, please
call me at 651-604-4851.
Sincerely,
BONESTR�OO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
0-1 C/
Donald C. Burgardt
Cc: Bob Meyer, Gridor Constr., Inc.
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311
August 4, 1999
Mr. David Sahli
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Rd N
St Paul, MN 55155-4194
Re: Progress Report #3 (July)
Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facility
Otsego, Minnesota
BRA File No. 503-99-100
Dear Mr. Sahli,
The construction of the Otsego WWTF is coming along per the Contractor's schedule. The prime contractor
is Gridor Construction. The following is a progress report for the month of June.
July, 1999 - Concrete installation continued on the structures. Foundation walls were poured for the
digester and oxidation ditches. GME was on site for all pours to test the quality control of
the concrete and test the suitability of the soils. Pipes were placed from the control building
to the sludge storage, digester, oxidation ditches, and clarifiers. Backfilling procedures
began the last week of July around the control building and oxidation ditches. NSP hooked
up power to the site and placed the main transformer. There were some days of rain in July
but due to the sandy materials in excavated areas the Contractor was able to work those days.
Overall the project seems to be on track with the Contractor's schedule. If you have any questions
concerning the progress report or the Contractor's schedule please call me at (651) 604-4888.
Sincerely,
BO S 00, RO NE, ANDE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Glenn Gustafson
cc: Mike Robertson, City of Otsego
Shirley Slater, City of Dayton
Ted Field, BRAA
Don Burgardt, BRAA
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311
Bonestroo
Bonestroo. Rosene, Anderlik and Associates. Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. P.E. • Joseph C. Anderlik, P.E. • Marvin L. Sorvala. PE.
4"Glenn
Rosene
R. Cook. P.E. • Robert G. SChunicht. P.E. • Jerry A. Bourdon. P.E.
Robert W. Rosene. PE.. Richard E. 7Urner, P.E. and Susan M. Eberlin. C.P.A.. Senior Consultants
NEM Anderlik &
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, P.E. • Keith A. Gordon. P.E. • Robert R. Pfefferle. P.E.
Richard W. Foster. P.E. • David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, P.E. .
Associates
Michael T. Rautmann. P.E. • Ted K.Field. P.E. • Kenneth P. Anderson. P.E. • Mark R. Rolls. P.E.
Sidney P. Williamson. P.E.. L.S. • Robert F Kotsmith • Agnes M. Ring • Allan Rick Schmidt. PE.
Offices: St. Paul, Rochester. Willmar and St. Cloud, MN • Milwaukee, WI
Engineers & Architects
Website: www.bonestroo.com
August 4, 1999
Mr. David Sahli
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Rd N
St Paul, MN 55155-4194
Re: Progress Report #3 (July)
Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facility
Otsego, Minnesota
BRA File No. 503-99-100
Dear Mr. Sahli,
The construction of the Otsego WWTF is coming along per the Contractor's schedule. The prime contractor
is Gridor Construction. The following is a progress report for the month of June.
July, 1999 - Concrete installation continued on the structures. Foundation walls were poured for the
digester and oxidation ditches. GME was on site for all pours to test the quality control of
the concrete and test the suitability of the soils. Pipes were placed from the control building
to the sludge storage, digester, oxidation ditches, and clarifiers. Backfilling procedures
began the last week of July around the control building and oxidation ditches. NSP hooked
up power to the site and placed the main transformer. There were some days of rain in July
but due to the sandy materials in excavated areas the Contractor was able to work those days.
Overall the project seems to be on track with the Contractor's schedule. If you have any questions
concerning the progress report or the Contractor's schedule please call me at (651) 604-4888.
Sincerely,
BO S 00, RO NE, ANDE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Glenn Gustafson
cc: Mike Robertson, City of Otsego
Shirley Slater, City of Dayton
Ted Field, BRAA
Don Burgardt, BRAA
2335 West Highway 36 • St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311
GRIDOR CONSTR., INC.
1886 BERKSHIRE LANE
P.O. BOX 41246
PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 612-559-3734
owner CITY OF OTSEGO, Mi 1 Date 7/26/99
For Period 6/28/99 TO 7/26/99 Request No. 3
Engineer BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC.
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
SUMMARY:
1
ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT
2
CHANGE ORDER - ADDITION
3
CHANGE ORDER - DEDUCTION
4
REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT
5
VALUE COMPLETED TO DATE
6
MATERIAL STORED
7
AMOUNT EARNED THIS PERIOD
8
LESS RETAINAGE - 5%
9
SUB -TOTAL
10
LESS AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY PAID
11
AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST
Recommended for Approval by:
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC.
Z��a_ I -
(Project Engineer)
Approved by Contractor:
GRIDOR CONSTR., INC.
ROBERT MEYER i
(Project Manager) V 7/26/99
Specified Contract Completion Date: 7/1/00
PAYXLS 7/26/99 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
Approved by Owner:
CITY OF ...
Date
$ 2,031,323
$ 2,031,323
$ 575,660
$ 217,706
$ 793,366
$ 39.668
$ 753,698
$ 533,533
S 220,165
UNIT BID
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
PAY ESTIMATE NO.
3
OTSEGO, NLN
6/28/99 TO 7/26/99
AMOUNT
AMOUNT
TOTAL
ITEM
CONTRACT
PREVIOUSLY
COMPLETED
COMPELTED
NO
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
APPROVED
THIS PERIOD
TO DATE
1
SILT FENCE
3200
1.30
4,160
3,715
3,715
2
EROSION- HAY BALES
150
5.00
750
250
250
3
18" PVC, SDR 35, 0'-8' DEEP
500
25.50
12,750
12,622
12,622
4
24" PVC, SDR 35, 0'-8' DEEP
520
35.50
18,460
18,460
18,460
5
24" PVC, SDR 35, 8'-10' DEEP
200
37.00
7,400
7,770
7,770
6
24" PVC, SDR 35, 10'-12' DEEP
25
38.00
950
950
950
7
24" PVC, SDR 35, 12'-14' DEEP
40
39.00
1,560
1,560
1,560
8
24" PVC, SDR 35, 14'-16' DEEP
45
42.00
1,890
1,470
1,470
9
24" PVC, SDR 35, 16'-18' DEEP
140
45.50
6,370
6,370
6,370
16
18" DIRECTIONAL BORING
130
242.00
31,460
31,460
31,460
17
4 FT. SANITARY MANHOLE
5
1682.00
8,410
8,410
8,410
18
4 FT. MANHOLE OVER 8' DEEP
32
90.00
2,880
1,989
1,989
19
CONC. COLLAR OVER HDPE
1
1160.00
1,160
1,160
1,160
20
FOUNDATION MATERIAL
1300
0.01
13
0
21
SLBGRADE EXCAVATION (EV)
4900
1.75
8,575
8,575
8,575
22
CLASS 5 AGGREGATE
3300
5.80
19,140
17,388
17,388
23
SELECT GRANULAR BORROW -C
3800
6.20
23,560
16,895
16,895
24
18" RCP CLASS 5
42
37.00
1,554
1,184
1,184
25
18" RCP APRON W/ TRASH GRD.
2
830.00
1,660
1,660
1,660
26
4" PERF. DRAIN TLLE W/SOCK &
108
6.00
648
564
564
27
GEOTEXTILE FAB. TYPE V-STR
4000
1.30
5,200
4,485
4,485
28
SEED W/ TOPSOIL & FERT.
6.5
2830.00
18,395
0
29
SOD W/ TOPSOIL & FERTILIZER
9000
2.20
19,800
0
30
WELL MOBILIZATION
1
19000.00
19,000
16,150
16,150
31
DRILL, CASE & GROUT 6" WELL
150
34.00
5,100
5,440
5,440
32
DRILL HOLE THRU IRON'TON-G
50
16.00
800
1,680
1,680
33
DEVELOP WELL BY JETTING
20
160.00
3,200
0
34
DEVELOPMENT OF WELL
20
160.00
3,200
640
640
35
TEST PUMPING
16
105.00
1,680
0
36
6" SCREEN IN PLACE
20
50.00
1,000
0
37
15" RCP, CLASS 5
70
32.50
2,275
1,040
1,040
38
15" RCP, APRON W/ TRASH GRD.
4
790.00
3,160
1,580
1,580
39
12" RCP, CLASS 5
24
24.50
588
588
588
40
12" RCP, APRON W/ TRASH GRD
1
655.00
655
655
655
41
RIP RAP - CLASS 3
20
62.50
1,250
500
500
42
AND'L. 4' WIDE SIDEWALK / L.F.
150
5.80
870
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SUBTOTAL PART 1
239,523
175,210
0
175,210
MATERIAL STORED
0
0
0
(CHANGE ORDERS)
0
0
TOTAL
239,523
175,210
0
175,210
ITEM
NO
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
LS BID
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
OTSEGO, N[
DESCRIPTION
BOND AND MOBILIZATION
EXCAVATION & BACKFILL
FINE GRADE SITE
CHAIN LINK FENCE
CONCRETE WORK 1300 C. Y. 270.00
REINF. STEEL 125 TON 1000.00
PRECAST CONCRETE
MASONRY
MISC. METALS, WEIRS & BAFFLES
CARPENTRY & ROOFING
F. R. P. DOMES & COVERS
NSUT.ATION
METAL SIDING & TRIM
CAULKING
DOORS, FRAMES & FIN. HDW.
WINDOWS
PANTING
FINISH CEILINGS
SPECIALTIES
CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
SUBMERSIBLE PUMPS
PROGRESSIVE CAVITY PUMP
FINAL CLARIFIERS
BLOWERS
AERATION
MECHANICAL AERATORS
SUBMERSIBLE MIXER
CHEMICAL TANKS & PUMPS
SAMPLER & PARSHALL FLUME
FLOW METERS
U -V DISINFECTION
ODOR CONTROL
LAB EQUIPMENT & FURNITURE
PROCESS PIPE, VALVES - MATERIALS
PIPE LABOR - EXTERIOR
PIPE LABOR - INTERIOR
PLUMBING
VENTILATION
ELECTRICAL
SUBTOTAL
MATERIAL STORED
(CHANGE ORDERS)
UNIT PRICE ITEMS
TOTAL
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 3
6/28/99 TO 7/26/99
AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL
CONTRACT PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED COMPELTED
AMOUNT APPROVED THIS PERIOD TO DATE
25,000
20,000
20,000
142,000
74,000
74,000
3,000
0
15,000
0
351,000
97,000
114,700
211,700
125,000
35,000
40,000
75,000
5,000
0
32,000
0
46,000
0
33,000
0
60,000
0
1,000
0
28,000
0
800
0
12,000
0
6,000
0
39,000
0
4,000
0
4,000
0
23,000
0
7,000
0
19,000
0
60,000
0
27,000
0
11,000
0
96,000
0
13,000
0
22,000
0
7,000
0
6,000
0
43,000
0
23,000
0
19,000
0
110,000
0
72,000
1,000
10,000
11,000
8,000
1,000
1,000
34,000
4,750
2,000
6,750
24,000
0
236,000
1,000
1,000
0
1,791,800
232,750
167,700
400,450
153,654
64,052
217,706
0
239,523
175,210
175,210
2,031,323
561,614
231,752
793,366
STORED MAT'L
153,654 84,052 20,000 217,706
TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED 64,052
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
MATERIAL STORED
OTSEGO, NIN
PAY ESTIMATE NO.
3
ITEM
PREVIOUS THIS
NET
NO.
DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIER
AMOUNT AMOUNT INSTALLED
AMOUNT
6
MISC. REINF.
AMBASSADOR STEEL
37,011
3,754 20,000
20,765
11
F R P DOMES & COVER FIBERGLASS STRUCTU
56,763
56,763
26
MECH. AERATORS
BAKER HUGHES
9,319
9,319
28
CHEMICAL PUMPS
MILTON ROY
12,244
12.244
31
U -V DISINFECTION
TROJAN
41,961
41,961
34
D. I. PIPE
PLANT & FLANGED
42,009
23,368
65,377
34
SUNIP BASKET
TRI STATE PUMP
532
532
34
PVC PIPE & FITTINGS
INDELCO PLASTICS CO
490
490
34
MANHOLE CASTINGS
NEENAH
605
605
34
HYDRANTS
KUPFERLE FOUNDRY
2,550
2,550
38
HVAC
GREEN MECH.
4,000
3,100
7,100
153,654 84,052 20,000 217,706
TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED 64,052
X
AUG. 5.1999 3:03PM
TO:OTSEGO
3601 Thurston Avenue
suite 101
Anoka, MN 55303
(612)427-5860
(812)427-0520 fax
haaanoka(Maol.com
Fax
NO. 287 P.1/9
Hakanson
Anderson
Associates,
Inc.
To: Elaine Beatty, Clerk From: Ron Wagner
Fax: Pages: 9 including cover
Phone: Date: 8/5/99
Re: Bid Tabulation CC:
❑urgent ❑ For Review ❑ Please Comment ❑Please Reply ❑Please Recycle
The Bid Tabulation for the 1999 Otsego Roadway Imp. Proj, follows, along with the
Engineer's Estimate.
Please include in Agenda Item #5.2.
Thanks
AUG. 5.1999 3:25PM
N0.297 P.2/9
r,son BIDDER'S LIST � G OT336
CITY OF OTSEGO 1999 ROADWAY IMP. PROJECT
AUGUST 5, 1999 @ 10:00 A.M.
ADDENDUM BID
NAME RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT
1.
Bauerly Companies
X
X
$1,187,606.70
2.
North Valley, Inc.
N_
x_
$1,365,135.70
3.
Richard Knutson, Inc.
X
X
$1,423,066.84
4.
W.B. Miller
X
X
$1,486.270.45
5.
Midwest Asphalt
X
X
$1,607,322.65
6.
Hardrives, Inc.
X
X
$1,719,512.90
7.
Buffalo Bituminous
X
X
$1,950,376.00
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
$1,435,000.00
*indicates corrected amount
Received and opened by:
Ronald J. Wagner
Michael Robertson
X AUG. 5. 1999 3: -SPM N0.297 P.3/9
ctty of Otsego
Estimate of Construction Cost
_
ti 1999 Street Improvement Project
vProject #99.01
July 16,1999
Totals
CostlUNIT
Tota! Cost
ttam A
8 Rat Item Description
Unit
1
2021.501 IMobilization
LS
1
$50 000.00
000x)0
2
2101.507 Grub Stump)
SA
3
$200.00
$600.00
3
2104 Setvage Retaining Well
EA
2
1100.00
$200.00
4
2104-501 Remove Cuhverts 4" or less
LF
838
$7.50
$8,262.50
5
2104.501 Remove 60'CMP
LF
50
$15.00
$750.00
6
2104.503 Remove Bit, Pavement
BY
9500
$2.00
$19000.00
7
2104.503 Remove Concrete Pavement
SY
90
$2.00
180.00
8
2104.513 Sawcut Bit. PavemarY
LF
1750
$2.00
53.500.00
9
2104.513 Sawcut Concrete
LF
325
$200
$M.00
10
2105.501 Common Excavation CVP
CY
23700
$4.00
$94,800.00
11
2105.511 Channel Excavation CV
CY
70
$25.00
$1.750.00
12
2105.521 Grarular Borrow CVP
CY
10300
$5.00
$51,500.00
13
2105.605 Minor Gra
Road Sts 1
325
$25.00
$8,125.00
14
2112.602 Subgrade Prepartation
SY
9500
$1.00
;9,500.00
16
2120.501 Earth Shoulders o
CY
36W
$15.00
$52,5W.00
16
2211.501 Acgregate Base CI 5
Ton
59W
$7.50
544 250.00
17
2211.501 Base CI 5
Ton
125
$10.00.
S1.250.00
18
2211.501 lAgqr2gste Base CI 6 oh
Ton
575
$15.00
S8,625,00
19
2221,503 Aggregate Shoukfe C12
Ton
240
$15.00
$3.600.00
20
2221.503 Aggregate Sh2uld, C16
Ton
1070
T10.00
$10,700.00
21
2231.5177 Crack Fillity Material
LB 1
10200
$0.75
37 650.00
22
2232,501 Reclamation of Bituminous Surface
SY
66355
$1.00
$86,355M
23
2232.601 Reclamation of B uminous Surface & Transport
SY
16150
$1.50
524 5.00
24
2340.508 Type 41 Weer
Ton
22810
$24.00
$547.440.00
25
2340.508 Type 41(patch)
Ton
210
$34.00
57 14000
26
2356.505 Bit. Mat for Seal Coat
Gel
220DO
$1.00
000.00
27
2358.507 Seal Coat A=MMIc FA2
Ton
1645
$20.00
$32,900.00
28
2357.602 Bit. Mat for Tack
Gal
4540
$1.00
$4,540.00
29
2401.521 Structural Excavation CIU CVP
CY
300
$10.00
53 600.00
30
2451.511 Course Filter A t ate
CY
60
510.00
$600.00
31
1.516 30" RCP End Section
EA
1
.00
3600.00
32
2601.515 24" RCP Ern! Section
EA
12
43000
55 160.00
33
2501.515 15" RCP End Section
EA
20
$300.00
56000.00
34
30" RCP FES Trash Guard
EA
1
$250.00
$250.00
35
2502.541 3" PERF PE PIPE DRAIN
LF
1600
S4.00
$6,400.00
36
2502.601 Connect to 5xtstft Drain
EA
4
$250.00
$1,000.00
37
2503 SW SPAN RCPA
LF
64
$450.00
$2B 600.00
30
2503 88" SPAN RCPA FES
EA
2
54,0M.00
$8,000.00
39
2503 30'RCP
LF
734
$80.00
$44,040.00
40
2503.511 24 " RCP
LF
328
$30.00
$9 840.00
41
2503.511 18" RCP
LF
1037
$30.00
531 110.00
42
2503.511 15" RCP
LF
614
$25.00
$15,360.00
43
2503.602 Connect Existing Drain Pipe to Storm Sewer
EA
1
$250.00
$250.00
44
2503.603 Ducde Iron PIpe
LF
100
$20.00
$2,000,00
45
2506 Construct Dratrace Structure C d N or H
EA
13
$1,0M00
$13,000M
46
2506.502 Construct DrelaW Structure 48' 4020
EA
1
$1,500.0_Q
47
2506.502 Conatruct Dralrom Structure 54.4020
EA
1
__31,500.00
$1 750.00
$1.750.00
48
2606.502 Construct OTainam Structure 60" 4020
EA
2
S3 000:00
$6,000.00
49
2511,501 Random Riprap CI N
CY
92
$75,00
$619M.00
50
2511.501 Random R CI 11
CY
75
$50,001
$3,750.00
51
2611.515 13eotextlle Fabrlo Type V
SY
870
55.00
$4,350.00
52
2631.507 6" Concrete Ddymay Pavement
BY
40
bb0.
$2,C00.00
53
2540.602 Relocate Mailbox SyR22rt
EA
376
8150.00
56 400.00
54
2563.601 Traffic Control
LS
1
10 000.00
$1 D 000.00
55
2564 602 Reloce Sion
EA 1
6
$50,00
$300.00
65
2564.803 4" Double Solid Yellow - Epoxy
LF 1
21110
10.50
S10,565.00
56
2564,603 4" SoOd White - Epoxy
LF 1
90000
025
$22,500-00
57
2564.603 4' Dashed Yellow - Epm
LF
5060
025
$1 26500
2584.804 Skp PaneFs Type C
SF
9
$2000
$180.00
69
2573.501 Bale Check
20
$10.00
$200.00
80
2573.602 SIR Fence Type Preassembled
LF
1000
;1P.00
$10,()00.00
61
2575.501 Seeding
Acre
10
000.00
$20.0()0.00
62
Instal Retainft RetainWall
EA
1
$1,000,D0
$1000.00
83
Install Bitumkraua Flume'
EA
4
$260.00
$1,000-00
$1 434 94250
AUG. 5.1999 3:28PM
NO. 287 P.4/9
R
(N�
i.
(N�
N
N
NN
N
y�NNy
N
tptpl
+
�+
NN
tNl�
NNV1
L1
N
N
N
N
.L1
Ilm
T
p
W
p
N
17Y111
p
.N+
p
p
X71
p
L1
p
U1
A
�+
�11
y�
;u
A
D
C
1
1
OI
N
fJl
<
p
•l
W
I
OO
O
O
O
fly
O
O
N
Vt
O
S
�
N
�
�
N
�
O
S
S
N
W
fmNn
mm
<[
D
CJ1
S
S
O
S
S
S
(/1
S
m
V
00
N
S
W
N
W
O
O
S
ON1
S
S
S
S
S
S
o
cn
a
O
S
S
S
O
O
O
S
H
O
fl1
fJl
O
S
S
S
N
O
N
8
(WJ1
O
S
O
S
N
W
S
S
S
a
-<
-<
X
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
N
cvn
8
8
8
8
S
8
8
8
9
8
i
v�Ajj
b
H
S
b
S
S
N
N
N
N
S
S
Ld
50
4
H
$
N
O
lJ1
O
N
N
S
O
VI
vi
S
8
S
AUG. 5.1999 3:29PM
A�q
VI
k
N
V
N0.287 P.5/9
K!
8
t
to
f
it
It
G
lit
t
01
O
Ol
SI
ffi
IV,
w
it,
�1
1!1
N
�
�
m
T
m
(A
O
dl
UI
8
8
8
8
8
S.
8
ig
8
T
t,8(pp
gff-
O
V
tp�D
y
a
Cal
s
8
S
�
P
S
8
N
H
H
S
14
8
T
O
O
V
ta
S
S
S
u'i
8
S
A�q
VI
k
N
V
N0.287 P.5/9
K!
8
t
to
f
it
It
G
lit
t
lit
8
8
SI
ffi
IV,
w
it,
�1
1!1
1!
all
gff-
y
a
Cal
a
m
�
o
0
2r
R
�
S
o.
o
w
Iq
mr8-mmi.rI-
O
Opo
�
O
�
�
A11
3
S
p�
8
S
pO
S
pO
O
O
H
pO
O
S
O
S
(~l�
S
vp
O
H
pO
O
p�
O
S
CD
y�
O
41
fOp
O
pO
O
y„Qa,
44
yO�
8
OSf
S
O
S
C
S
O
N
S
q
c1f
S
O
ffi
(T
O
8
[�tS
[�TS
(QTS
[QTS
O
O
�y
rl
O
Ui
tT
O
O
V
t(Al��
flt
{A�
A
V
GpO
(N�
N
O
d
i
i
i
f0
-m`Vp1
y
S
S
N
Li
S
S
S
�7
O
S
O
8
S
H
( 11
N8
O
vF
pH
v}Of
/99
'
}�
mm
44
r�
tQnl
W
0�0
QI
J
f
Loff
O
S
p�p
9
S
O
S
H
S
O
S
O
S
S
S
O
H
O
S
AUG. 5.1999 3:30PM
Aa
m
e
�m
O
NO . c37 P.6/9
a
s
o
Y
rr
m
c
n
W
N
ZII
o
Vl
y
(pN�
W
(Nps
W
o
N
Oyp�
A
(T1
ai
Lz
O
O
O
y
n
hn
rrrt
i
�
�
8
O
tq
j
�w
flt
O
Wp
N
L
O
N
N
O
Wco
W
[p
a
0
6
v
o?
p
D
W
Of
lD N
o
a
s
p�O
1
8
S
AAe
S
p
O
p
S
8
((oo,'fT 111
Cri
8
V
�
W
(1
N
cn
NO . c37 P.6/9
0
Y
N
ZII
o
Vl
o
lh
(pN�
W
(Nps
W
o
N
N
t+
A
(T1
i
�
�
8
co
p
Wp
N
L
a
p�O
1
8
S
8
S
p
O
p
S
8
8
8
pN
ppol�
[iJ f
LS
8
a
8
8
g
g
8
b
N
3
�YY¢¢"pnn
NI
NMp
C
In
m
O
N
(Il
p
8
p
8
V�1
pM
0±O{
'
0
AUG. 5.1999 3:31PM NO.287 P.7i9
8
8
W
V
O
w
A
W
N
O
W
V
O1
in
A
W
N
G
�
pe
a
ppb
N
p�
O
i8�
O
O
9
p
O
A
O
{V�
flf
N
VI
I
I
I
N
(71
i
!
�p
O
W
(n
N
W
S
S
�
O
O.
S
N
O
S
O
O
S
N
b
S
N
cJil
5
S
O
O
iT
fA
O
(�11
S
O
o
AG
i
w
10
V1
OD
O
(ll
O
W
O
N
VI
Vt
O
[r
O
O
.-WJ
:V
O
O
UI
O
p
8$
8
8-8
8
8
8
i
co
g
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
bi
'8
44
e
W
p
8
8
p
}{,��
pU
M
�py�
pN�
Gyp
A
r
mpN
M
A
Iq
ppm
f�1
8
m
AUG. 5.1999 3:41PM
Fn
m
I
01
4
N
G1
1@
NN
OI
lip
In
r-
j
NW
N
L.
QN!
(J?1
W
N
AO
b
Oi
T
W
(9
A
W
N
tl
[t
$
EX
8
8
&
}}ig
STI
�
Q
(ll
t11
tJ1
bf
m
W
kA
fll
(l�
<I1
(11
S
H
O
S
H
O
T
�q
Oa
ink
O
�p
N
t��f
OM
O
(A
O
O
H
$
8
o
8
�
8
8
NO. 287
P. S,/9
QN!
(J?1
W
N
AO
b
Oi
V
W
(9
A
W
N
tl
[t
N�
(ll
t11
tJ1
bf
m
W
kA
fll
(l�
<I1
(11
(T
CI
�
T
R
s
O
O
O
l0
O!
Qf
S
V1
N
W
H
LA
A
V
AA
3
D
E;
Ig!
D
(n
IT
T
rn
mil
�T7
y
H
S
S
M
O
S
S
CS
H
N
SH
tR
H
H
H
H
H
O
o
O
O
N
�
61
O
bl
O
<n
S
O
yLn
8
8
$
$
$
8
$
8
8
8
H
8
$
$
$
8
$
$
£S
$
$
8
8
H
H
O
S
H
S
H
S
S
O
S
S
O
S
O
S
S
O
S
S
S
G. 5.19 5 a:a P
j
;
§
/
�
�
;
,
§
g
q
§
§
m
e
s
_
°
�
ƒ
k
2
q
ƒ
\
}
e
7
A
§
�
)
%
. %
§
�
§
E
E
o
\
(
)
2
.
e
¥
\
$
}
\
)
\
q)
9
g
G))
r
!
b
)
§
q
\
q
»
q
B
¢
§
<
d
)
\
(
#
)
\
\
\
\
§
\
8
§
\
■
§
/
�
�
;
,
§
ƒ
\
}
e
7
A
§
�
)
%
. %
§
�
3
2
g
q)
9
g
G))
r
!
b
)
§
q
\
q
»
q
B
¢
§
<
d
)
d
q
(
#
)
\
\
\
/
\
\
�n
f
]
ƒ
s
s
8@
8
8
8@
S
\
\
2
2
#
#
\
-
(
\
\
k
/
d
\
?
§
§
\
§
\
§
§
(
#
q
d
§
)
§
§
§
§
2
§
§
/
�
�
;
,
§
09
CLAIMS LIST
CITY COUNCIL
August 9, 1999
CITY OF OTSEGO Saturday, July 24, 1999
Check Summary Register Page 1 of 1
Total Checks $268,464.46
Name
Check Date Check Amt
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
UnPaid
AT&T
$104.45
UnPaid
BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE
$106.25
UnPaid
BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER
$317.50
UnPaid
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
$151.53
UnPaid
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
$169.24
UnPaid
BOYER TRUCKS
$2,038.59
UnPaid
BRANDON G. MAIER
$290.00
UnPaid
CAROL OLSON
$66.00
UnPaid
CITY OF MONTICELLO
$2,015.75
UnPaid
COMMUNITY RECREATION
$495.00
UnPaid
CORROW TRUCKING
$1,501.25
UnPaid
COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
$6,069.60
UnPaid
CYNTHIA REWITZER
$330.00
UnPaid
ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$1,060.90
UnPaid
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
$564.06
UnPaid
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
$4,566.73
UnPaid
GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
$3.78
UnPaid
GRIDOR CONSTR., INC.
$220,165.00
UnPaid
JERRY OLSON
$9,962.62
UnPaid
LONG & SONS
$553.80
UnPaid
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIP
$526.33
UnPaid
MENARDS
$230.46
UnPaid
MINNEGASCO
$99.99
UnPaid
MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION
$20.00
UnPaid
MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL
$30.00
UnPaid
RANDY'S SANITATION
$253.75
UnPaid
ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC
$37.20
UnPaid
STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY
$362.50
UnPaid
STEVE BOIE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
$2,500.00
UnPaid
SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW
$1,358.94
UnPaid
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
$435.52
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE
$10,626.88
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
$234.00
UnPaid
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC
$1,216.84
Total Checks $268,464.46
CITY OF OTS E G O Saturday, July 24, 1999
Check Detail Register Page 1 of 4
_ Check Amt Invoice Comment
`?:•\\,,»T-<�\`\:S: 'lei::+ \;Lii:'•i:^}:•?>:iiiii:^}:ii: ': ,+� �.(:..v-::..:i'+�.'4%i^\�,`\1`C'^
.,... j!;,\\C,:�ti:<:G:iax\A,isx\.xJ�JfS\\��<;4>'ixJi:•>i>:tiJiii:ii:;::\\+*i.,�kitiA'A,t\��\1+;e`:fl,S\\;iini-.'+-+,+%��\\\M`n\n\•:'�k.\+[�Q\\-1'1+\ti`n•:,+v<.\y0+ygG)yq
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
UnPaid AT&T
E 101-43100-320 Telephone
$21.01
Public Works
E 101-414CO-320 Telephone
$63.66
City Hail
E 201-45000-320 Telephone
$19.78
Warming House
Total AT&T
$104.45
UnPaid BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services
$106.25
July recycling
Total BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE
$106.25
UnPaid BFI - W OODLAKE SANITATION SER
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services
$317.50
July recycling
Total BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER
$317.50
Unpaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
E 101-41400-203 Supplies - General
$151.53 716626
Office supplies
Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
$151.53
:,+>;;:�>:.:�>x: :.,-::.>+�.tt•:a:>a:�»x•>:;vx,>:,.w.xwwa,:-..:u'.r,;rao»>rao»a,,e.:mee,.o,w>-..,.:.o,w>v.»:>+,.»,o,.,.o>,,.w»r<�-:..K,.-.,..m«...,,+....�m.e,.w....�.,m...,-.,,.
UnPaid BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees
$169.24 063375
Meeting Otsego resid
Total BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
$169.24
UnPaid BOYER TRUCKS
E101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$5.22
Ford Tractor
E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$24.02
IH Truck
E 101-43100-4C0 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$2,009.35
92 Ford
Total BOYER TRUCKS
$2,038.59
UnPaid BRANDON G. MAIER
R101-38992 CITY HALL RENT
($110.00)
Less Bldg Super fees
G 101-21803 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
$400.00
Damage Dep Refund
Total BRANDON G. MAIER
$290.00
................
Unpaid CAROL OLSON
.
G 101-21706 Hospitalization/Medical Ins
$66.00
Medical reinbursement
Total CAROL OLSON
$66.00
:::-> •>: x<;::... -,+>x<.:;.:<;.»»:<•;»:,;-:�,<;.;;:v>:.:<.:«.�;.,><.>:;,.:,�:,�>w><«.,,�,>;:;.::,«««�:«.�.x.�.,.,..<«�...,w:..�.,�..,«�.<u.:.»,m,.�«<.>,K.,:a,..«<.,:.»-«�««».<.,x«<:N<.,«4.,-,.-::F.,:.w,::,.,-.,,,,.rom...,,,...,,�:.
UnPaid CITY OF MONTICELLO
E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services
$327.00
Animal Control
E 202-42200-390 Contracted Services
$1,688.75
Fire Protection
Total CITY OF MONTICELLO
$2,015.75
.................................................
::.,:.,,,,:,,s,.»»•:.,...w.,,.,.-:H:wn.,»•::,�»-,,,..:,.�,,.M.,V,,,,,:.»»w.».�....,,,�,,,-:.,M,�.-r,.•.,-.,,:,.,wx.,,»•:.,ter,,,
Unpaid COMMUNITY RECREATION
,.:.,w,.,..�,,,.,.w,..,.,.,
E 201-45000-310 Miscellaneous
$495.00
Winter/Spring Prog
Total COMMUNITY RECREATION
$495.00
UnPaid CORROW TRUCKING
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services
$1,501.25
June recycling
Total CORROW TRUCKING
$1,501.25
....:................M+.,...,..,,,..�...,..,,.,�,.,
�UnPaid«COURIY(viACARTHUR+LAW OFFICE„».,::.:<.:.,..,::::::,.k::..::::.:...�,:,::,,,:::�..,..,.,,,::,:,:.M.�
E 101-41700-301 Legal Services
$1,633.90
General Legal
G 701-21901 CUP 98-10 ER COLLISION
$24.00
Elk River Collision
E 101-41700-301 Legal Services
$76.80
1999 Overlay project
E 418-43100-301 Legal Services
$229.70
78th St Const
E 415-43251-301 Legal Services
$230.40
Dauphinais Condemn
G 701-21914 Grenings - Miss Hills 99-6
$297.50
Grening Hills
E 418-43100-301 Legal Services
$637.50
78th St. Const
G 701-21915 Crimson ponds/Backer 99-7
$663.00
Crimson Ponds
E 415-43251-301 Legal Services
$678.50
Wastewater Treat
CITY OF OTS E G O Saturday, July 24, 1999
Check Detail Register Page 2 of 4
Total ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES $564.06
�UnPaid•:.......:..:....r...:......,..,.w.,...�.::.k.,:w:. EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO,xn..,.,.r..::..,:....,...,..,,.....,,.,,...,.N:..,.w�.,,,..:H..:..�.,,..,.,.:.:,,,,.M,,.,,,�..,.....,,,,.w�.�,.
E 415.43251-390
Contracted Services
Check Amt Invoice
Comment
:N;:>,���:.:n};..}o-:.}:;}r_J:c:;:;J>�:x:::.`%S>;tir»r:;�:.:awy±r/yp,>>��,.`+��>n•/.p(�� v>onry)p(p,+p >N>++r>NxcrN:wr o `Nrr.}r!c•N>±»;w� r. vNNoavw voavx>rrx����:,:.mxc r
.J:::±: ±:: ... /.:':::N\+.0±:.:: N. a.}n.:.}. ,y>T"�`. Z. MNL,.N±>: •}>Nrxry..
•:}:, .,.••. `�, �'P'lV�i,��"»r'/.•r!>::>Y.•±•^xxxN\\��±�x'f[�Cl.:rx.\`�i�aw\�>,:ir�xTr:\?,:N?N±xN>S::»x^:J,�.`�•x�',aRNx.
G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer
$680.00
Prairie Creek
E 413-43100-301
Legal Services
$918.30
Odean Avenue
Total COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
$6,069.60
E 101-43100-220
Unpaid±r:a.:...,.....,a..,,.:....,..,rxM.,.,
CYNTHIA REWITZER
PUP Trailer
Total GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
G 101-21803 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
$400.00
Damage Dep Refund
R101-38992 CITY HALL RENT
($70.00)
Less Bldg Super Fees
E415-43251-500
Total CYNTHIA REWITZER
$330.00
Unpaid::.,....: ...........................,.,
,,.,..:,.:..ECM PUBUSHERS INC ..,...�.v...
w
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$56.58
Bid
E 101-414CO-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$636.54
Bid
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$63.65
Ord 99.5
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$49.51
Arcon PH
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$47.15
Lefebvre PH
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$47.15
Bridgeland PH
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$42.44
Valdez PH
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$18.86
Operator Bid
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$18.86
Budget Workshop
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$80.16
Bid
Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$1,060.90
N.•.,,ww,..�,r,�.,.�.......,,,.:...,,,,>,•: <:,,.,.w.
UnPaid
........:....M.�,,,. V„wMw,,.,..,..,,,,,.,,�,,,,..,w:..,.,,w:..,w...,,w.,��,,..M,..w�,•.w.,,,.,,,,..w.,,,..w.,.:::.,-.,:.-,w,,..,,,,.,.,,�.w,.,,.,,,..vw.,...,..,..�,�.M„�,,..w^......
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$7.99
39 & Page
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$33.55
OH 42 & Parrish
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$46.65
Country Ridge
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$41.22
39 & Parrish
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$250.17
39 & 101
E 101-43160-3292
Utilities
$39.41
96th St
E 101-41950-322
Utilities
$38.88
Old City Hall
E 101-43160-3292
Utilities
$32.28
39
E 101-43100-322
Utilities
$23.65
Public Works
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$16.93
101 & 130
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.78
85th & Parrish
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$7.77
94th & Nashua
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.78
Parrish & 88th
Total ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES $564.06
�UnPaid•:.......:..:....r...:......,..,.w.,...�.::.k.,:w:. EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO,xn..,.,.r..::..,:....,...,..,,.....,,.,,...,.N:..,.w�.,,,..:H..:..�.,,..,.,.:.:,,,,.M,,.,,,�..,.....,,,,.w�.�,.
E 415.43251-390
Contracted Services
$969.70 8507
S&W ROW
E 413-43100-390
Contracted Services
$3,597.03 8507
Odean ROW
Total EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
$4,566.73
rl.•r%ri �J:!CC.-r: i!!: �•r:!•:i!?:C»fi»^:Sii?>vro�v,':.iw.:N.�i.,iarwr;
UnPaid
w�uca�x � �wu! m uv.,w.rmnrar.mnm.rvr..w..,.,...
GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
a....,...,r.. ru.n.., urorur.Y.vm em-nrn r..wv..r.r,w..-.rr...mw...:.-.w..,.vn..
E 101-43100-220
Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)
$3.78 00132235
PUP Trailer
Total GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
$3.78
w::N,:,:,:, �:.,.. �.,:.:,:.,,.::::.,:::N.,-..,k.,.,-.,,,.::,.,.::.,,..�w...�,.,,,,w.r.:r:,,..w,,,,.,,,..k.,.w.�,,,:N.�..w:..,.,,..,,,w.�..,,.H.�r,.,.,,.:.,•:::,..:.,.:.:.:::.,.:.,.:::,:,.,.,,k::.,,,,�,,..,.w,w:,.,.,,,.........M...w.,..,,.,•
Unpaid
GRIDOR CONSTR., INC.
...............�.,.........
E415-43251-500
Capital Outlay (GENERAL)
$220,165.00
Pay #3 Treat Fac
Total GRIDOR CONSTR., INC.
$220,165.00
Unpaid
,...
w ..,.,,....
JEE �,.RRY OLSOSON
E 101-42410-390
Contracted Services
$9,962.62
July Services
Total JERRY OLSON
$9,962.62
..UnPaid
LONG & SONS
E 101-41940-389
Cleaning Services
$33.80
Tax
E 101 -41 940-389
Cleaning Services
$75.00
7-24-99 Rent Clean
E 101-41940-389
Cleaning Services
$75.00
7-31-99 Rent Clean
CITY OF OTSEGO Saturday, July24, 1999
Check Detail Register Page 3 of 4
Check Amt Invoice
Comment
:•;:<-}::<,,:;;;„,: ;,}}};
�..,}> :':Y:.}ti:: ....
::.:.v.]�-->\�3:;1i;}}.+..•::::::::::::::ai}.:}}ih»v:
�, � :}.,ate ,yt.� :.veS
»•,,.,}..-;,.
na;..- ........a„•}iv:.::...,\.\\1•.\ras.•'>\�\\fs'}:•i:•:\C}. r.. .•;:�::
ii.... �\ �. •}::;+>}: +'�;°�' "n} 24�2•�
<:.v::<a:u::::: �n'��...,A`,.� \,.}.\\�\...,::y::.,\i \lta.,,»\
E 101-41940-389
Cleaning Services $370.00
City Hall Cleaning
Total LONG & SONS $553.80
\UnPaid 4•>x....,...,\..�,.......�»rr
:..p•�� LONG LAKE TRACTOR &EQUIP
E 101-43100-220
RepainMaint Supply (GENERAL) $526.33
Ford Tractor
Total
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIP $526.33
..UnPaid<:.__..................._...,..,.:,,.,,.,...-:MENARDS»
n...,,Y.<,»,..,,»»:.......»»,,.,-,:<,»„�,,:.,,»�,.,,:�..»..,.M...................,:..:.,,.,.,.,,....,....,,.»v..,,,-........:.....,,...,,,,.....»„v:.,.,,
E 201-45C00-310
Miscellaneous $230.46
Repair hayrack
Total MENARDS $230.46
:.UnPaid::.................................:......................MINNEGASCO
,•..» ..:.,,., ...,...,,,r...»,,,,.,...kx.,,»:..,::.................,.,,,.............,........,.,,.,,....,.....
.:,....M.N.. ,. .
E 101-41950-322
Utilities $24.01
Public Works
E 101-41940-322
Utilities $75.98
City Hall
Total MINNEGASCO $99.99
Unpaid
MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION
E101-41100-355
Dues & Memberships $20.00
1999 Mayor's Assoc
Total MN MAYORS ASSOCIATION $20.00
UnPaid
MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL
E 101-42710-390
Contracted Services $30.00 87
Animal Pickup 7-14-99
Total
MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $30.00
UnPaid':........................:......w<...,..,...,...,.:.RAND
*,-,YS-SAN-ITA-TION ..,... ...,.::.v .,, »..::.k..»....,................,...........:..:...,...........................,
» � N::. »
E 101-43610-390
Contracted Services $253.75
July recycling
Total RANDY'S SANITATION $253.75
UnPaid
ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC
E 101-43100-220
Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $37.20
Case Tractor
Total ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC $37.20
....................<.............,..:::STE
P H EN � CON ROY,�ATTORNEY .w.<:.:::..,.<.::..::...<......,...............:<....<......................................,.,,:,,.�.,,.,,..,.,,..,.,�,,,.:,
E 101-42420-301
Legal Services $362.50
July Services
Total
STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY $362.50
Unpaid
STEVE 801E CONSTRUCTION, INC.
E 702-41400-310
Miscellaneous $2,500.00
Escrow Ref P98-120
Total STEVE BOIE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $2,500.00
UnPaid
SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW
E 101-45200-390
Contracted Services $217.00 409
Swale & South Woods
E 101-45200-390
Contracted Services $504.00 409
VB, NW BF, SB field
E 101-45200-390
Contracted Services $345.00 409
Prairie Park
E 101-41950-310
Miscellaneous $98.00 409
Old City Hall
E 101-41940-390
Contracted Services $82.94 409
tax
E 601-49400-390
Contracted Services $52.00 409
Well & Oakwood lot
E 101-41940-390
Contracted Services $60.00 409
City Hall
Total SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $1,358.94
�UnPaid,�:....:...............,...,,.�..,,,,,�»W,<«
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS.»..�,�.�,..�a�,.�.7«<a..,:.,,...<.,»,.,..,,
..........:....::..,,.,.,,.v...:,.w...,,...�::,.,:,,...,r.»:�.,.,....:..
E 101-43100-320
Telephone $34.93
Warming House
E 101-43100-320
Telephone $43.01
Public Works
E 101-41400-320
Telephone $357.58
City Hall
Total US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $435.52
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE
E 101-42100-390
Contracted Services $10,626.88 Patrol -8
August Services
Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $10,626.88
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees $19.50
Lefebvre CUP
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees $19.50
Pheasant Ridge Zone
CITY OF OTSEGO Saturday, July 24, 1999
Check Detail Register Page 4 of 4
Check Amt Invoice Comment
;v4.*} • \ .. ti -v 4�.v,.rn• , r �..: Yy �•. W�'�i4:!S!'w"SO+i 4'.n\\ \\!i!!Cn\\�1�2`:C:'.ih„`�,�iC`.vn .tw,� �.w +m, t w.vr.•,�
\
A `i\\?:�ri'C: =:lh:� 4Y �'` \ :i:.�f/:'+n ����:dGLi6.r. Mi::�:. •. f/hi'.iri'i`!,�\�' t ei. �.5�`•..'.C�,,tt".,:: �%�.i�,?` �� �
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Pheasant Ridge PP
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Crimson Ponds PP
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Midwest Station CUP
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Lefebvre variance
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
JKO variance
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
JKO P/FP
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Grenings rezone
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Crimson Ponds rezone
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
JKO zoning amend
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Grenings PP
Total WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
$234.00
UnPaid
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN C0 -0P
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$8.56
Odean & 37
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$205.00
Signal Light
E 101-41960-322
Utilities
$25.07
Shed
E 601-49400-322
Utilities
$19.49
Well :1
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Rolling Ridge Creek
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Ogren Light 2 N
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Ogren Light 1 s
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Oday Acres
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Meyer Addition
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Lin Bar
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$8.86
Ouadylay & 42 siren
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$8.56
Country Ridge
E 10 1 -43160-322
Utilities
$8.56
37 & Odean
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$7.50
Country Ridge
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$7.50
City Hall Pkg Lot
E 101-41940-322
Utilities
$657.80
City Hall
E 101-43160-322
Utilities
$12.24
Heritage Hills
Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN
CO-OP ELECTRIC
$1,042.58
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
$268,290.20