08-23-99 CCof a planned unit development, each lot shall have access
directly onto an abutting, improved and City accepted
public street. Exception to this access requirement may
be allowed as a conditional use permit pursuant to
Section 4 of this Chapter.
3. Within Structures: The off-street parking requirements
may be furnished by providing a space so designed within
the principal building or one structure attached thereto;
however, unless provisions are made, no building permit
shall be issued to convert said parking structure into a
dwelling unit or living area or other activity until
other adequate provisions are made to comply with the
required off-street parking provisions of this Section.
4. Lot Circulation: Except in the case of single, two-
family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking areas shall be designed so that
circulation between parking bays or aisles occurs within
the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a
public street or alley. Except in the case of single,
two-family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking area design which requires backing
into the public street is prohibited.
5. Intersection Separation: No curb cut access shall be
located less than sixty (60) feet from the intersection
of two (2) or more street rights-of-way. This distance
shall be measured from the intersection of lot lines.
6. Lot Design: Except in the case of single family, two-
family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking areas and their aisles shall be
developed in compliance with the standards on the Parking
Lot Dimension Table.
7. Curb Cut Size: No curb cut access shall exceed twenty-
four (24) feet in width unless approved by the City
Engineer.
8. Side Yard Setback: Except with special approval from the
Zoning Administrator, curb cut openings shall be a
minimum of five (5) feet from the side yard property line
in all districts.
9. Curb Cut Spacing: Driveway access curb openings on a
public street except for single, two-family,
quadraminium, manor home, and townhouse dwellings, shall
not be located less than forty (40) feet from one
another.
10. Grade: The grade elevation of any parking area or
driveways shall not exceed four (4) percent.
116
104
'r
CITY OF C)TSECiO
REQUEST FOR COU -N -Mi, ACTION
AGENDA SECTIOti: DEP--)LRT'ME-N'T: -N EETItiG DATE:
DEP.kRTMENT: PREPARED BY:
n. Llan Licht. assistant Ciry Planner: Elaine Beata_-. City Clerk, Au--ust 23. 1999
v 6:30P -i
ITUNI NUMBER: ITE`I DESCRIPTIO\:
6.1. Highway = it) 1 Business
6.2. Discussion sof Citti• Ordinance Re: Lawn Watering Poliev (CM _ cRerman)
6.3. Any- Other Planning Business
BAC -KGRnT. 'N`D.
6.1. This item came to the Council's attention at the last Council lieeting and thee° asked
the Staff to r:sear:.h this further and have it come back to this Council --Meeting.
Dan Licht has r-,-n,iew d the businesses along T101 aLid a report is attached. He will
be pr.-s1--n.,-o discuss farther vv-ith Council.
6.22. Dan will explain, per request by Suzanne Ackerman.
6.3. For am ad di Jon:il Planning Business that may arise.
RE C ONES iENDATI O\ :
This is for Council' consideration and ani: decision.
Thanks, r
1,4
EL -tine
AUG -18-1999 14:44 NAC 612 595 '_-8:37 P-02
N
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM. -
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
BACKGROUND
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - OES'ON - MARKET RESEARCH
Otsego Mayor and City Council
Daniel Licht
18 August 1999
Otsego - Code Enforcement; Highway 101 Corridor
176.08 - 99.08
Our office was directed to undertake an inventory of existing uses along the Highway 101
corridor to document existing violations of the City Code and Zoning Ordinance. This
survey was directed by the City Council at their meeting on August 9, 1999 In response
to an inquiry regarding the use of property along Highway 101.
Tine inventory consisted of visual inspections of the properties along the Highway 101
corridor and file research to identify any past approvals or agreements allowing existing
illegal or non-confcrning uses. Ten properties with illegally established uses and/or
existing performance standard violations have been identified and are outlined herein.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A: Map of Non -Conforming Properties
Exhibit B: Photographs
5775 1NAY7ATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2.595-9036 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NACC WINTERNET,C:0N1
J
Site 4 - SE Comer of T.H. 101 / CSAH 42 (Darkenviald - D -n -R Liquor)
Zori, ac: B-3 District
�'�cn-Ccniorrnities: Signage (banner signs)
Comments: A tenant of the principal building has erected banner signs advertising off -sale
Nqucr products. Such signs require a permit from the Zoning Administrator per Section 20-
37-2.H of'.he Zoning Ordinance. Banners signs may not be displayed for more than 10
--crsecutive days, three times every ,'Nvelve months, per the Zoning Ordinance.
Sita 5 - iT-N Corner of T,H. 1011CSAH 37 (Ed Dauphir.ais)
Zonula: A-1 District
ic! ;-Conf�rrritie3: Retail saies / Signage
Ccmments: Tle prop oximer is engaged in the sale of horse trailers on the subject
Pr.-,Ptir y. 7,9 trailers are displayed to traffic on T.H. 101 with a temporary message ,sign
a,!,d a !ar er sign at the intersection of T.H. 1CIICSAH 37. Commercial retail sales,
cutsilde sale and display and the existing signs are prohibited in the A-1 District,
Ti -:a City enterad into an agreement with the property owner in 1995 regarding the illegal
Ms's. The agraemant reccyniZed that t;^e existing use as "interim' until the upgrade o=
T. H. 101 virould likely trigger application to deveiop the property wit;n a commercial use.
T .is agreement included a sunset date of 1 September 1898 or the completion of the T.H.
1 improv--ernents. Bath of these events have occurred, making t;the agreement expired.
,-.s s +=h, the horse trailer sa ns and related signs ara once again illegal non -conforming
'-159S.
Cf note, ',here is one 32 square foot sign associated with the legally established grading
c^era,;on.
Ho,,,, -ever, Section 20-37-S.A does not allow for business identification or
advertising signs Wthin the A-1 District_ The existing sign is an illegal non -conforming sign
and is raquired to be removed per Section 20-37-7 of the Zoning Ordinance.
4
Site 6 - MV Quadrant of T.H. 101 1 65th Street (Steve's Lawn and Snow)
Z�n�n : A-1 District
Noc___ ,or_,_formities: Home Extended Business/ Signage
Comments: A portable message board advertising a home extended business has been
lcceted on the subject site so as to be visible from T_H. 101. Signs associated with home
extended businesses are limited to a size of 2 square feet identifying the business per
Secticn 20-37-5.A of t;^e Zoning Ordinance. As such, the sign is illegal and is required to
to removed Per Section 20-37-7 of tt~e Zoning Ordinance.
The I-cme _-.:ended cusiness on the property may e., st ss a interni ase per section 20-29-
= :f :-e Zoning Ordinance. Under these provisions, the use must be terminated in 21XI.
More detailed research would be necessary to determine the date at which the home
a;r;ended business ,rias established.
Site 7 - Sc Quadrant of T.H. 101/ 60th Street (60th Street R -O -W)
Zonis : N/A
Non -Conformities: Outside sales and display / on -street parking.
C .�m,ments: A cul-de-sac was constructed at tine terminus of Mth street with the
i. provements to T.H. 101. This cul-de-sac has become a location for displaying used cars
Ucr sale. Recently, a skid -loader tractor with an accompanying "for rent" sign has been
iocatad in t^e R-O-bN. Parking un -licensed vehicles in the public right-of-wAiay is a
fivi�tion o. tha Ci .1 Code. The location of the cars may or may not be associated with
similar activities on the abutting Elk River Collision site,
Site 8 - SE Quadrant of T,H, 101/ 60th Street (Elk River Collision/ Hanson Welding)
Zoning: 1-1 District
van-consormities: Outside sales and display / exterior storage / required screening / un-
licensed vehicles / trash containers
Comments_ This site ,,vas the subject of a 1998 PUD -CUP application to allow two principal
structures. A site inspection has identified a number of elements of the approved site plan
that have not been implemented, as well as a number of illegal non -conforming activities
that violate the conditions of the approved PUD -CUP.
5
1-1:43 NPC b.? 595 38 7 P.07
There is substantial outside storage of palettes, metal and scrap material on the north side
Of the neNN structure constructed on the property. Per the 1998 CUP all outside storage
was to be :xnfined to an area beMeen the two structures that would be screened be a new
fence. This fence has not been constructed to date. There are also two outside trash
containers, which under the 1998 PUD -CUP, are to be screened from view within an
enclosure.
Finally, the parking lot fronting T.H. 101 is being utilized for the storage and display of
used vehicles for sale. This includes vehicles that do not have licence plates displayed_
The 1998 PUD -CUP speci�icaliy limited outside storage on the subject property to the
designated area. The storage and display cf vshicles is not permitted under the, PUD -CUP
and must be terminated.
Sitz 9 - NE of T,H. 1011CSAH 36 (Pracis;cn Lina Nlotorscorts)
ZoninG: B-3 District
Non-ccr•fc�rmities: Signage / 9:dericr trash containers
g-mments: This property was the subject of a 1998 PUD -CUP to allow construction of a
second principal structure. A condition of approval of the PUD -CUP was that site signage
,,vculd be limited to Nvo wall signs per structure and one free standing sign. At the time
of application, Staff had identified a significant number of additional signs above that
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. To date, the property owner has not removed the illegal
ncn-ccr-forming signs consisting of ore portable message board, one banner sign, and t.�,n
freestanding signs. An additional free standing sign advertising warehouse space for rent
has also been added to the site. These signs violate the conditions of the approved PUD -
CUP.
The PUD -CUP also required that all exterior trash c or7tainers be stored within an enclosure
and screened from vie\N. On the day of the inspections for this report, the trash containers
are ^ct stored within an enclosure and are clearly visible from T.H, 101 or Queens Avenue.
Again, this is a violation of the conditions of the PUD -CUP.
Site 10 - SE Quadrant of T.H. 101 1 CSAR 36 (Crow River Rental)
Zoning: B-3 District
Non -conformities: Signage
Comments: The subject site displays a portable message sign in addition to the one
permitted freestanding sign. Both the portable sign and the freestanding sign are possibly
located within the T.H. 101 right-of-way.
M
ALG -18-1399 14:48 NIf;C G17 5'55 58:x- F. oe
CONCLUSION
An inventory of the Highway 101 corridor has identified numerous violations of Otsego's
existing Codes and Ordinances on 10 separate sites. Some of the identified properties
have been documented previously. However, others are uses that have expanded over
time without necessary approvals or violate approvals that have been granted.
This effort again brings attention to an issue that must be addressed by the City Council.
In the past, certain properties adjacent to Highway 101 have been allowed to continue
illegally established uses or uses that do not meet performance standards of the Zoning
Ordinance. The City has deferred code enforcement activities because of the expansion
of Hi0h1,Yay 101 and t; :e potential extension of municipal sanitary sewer and water service,
rYn(Ci; 'Yvould result in a higher, long term, use of the propertj. This ar.tici.ated
developmentlredeveiopment v;culd be expected to eliminate many of the existing illegal
or non -conforming situations over time. Certain property owners entered into interim
agreements with the City establishing the conditions for continued use and deferr►ng City
enforcement action until Highway 101 was compiete or 1 September 1098.
In that both benchmarks have passed, the City Council must again make a policy decision
regarding allowing continued use of non -conforming or illegally established uses in this
area of the community. A factor in this decision may be that sanitary sewer and water
service to the area is expected to be available within the short term. However, the City's
past approach to enforcing its adopted Codes and Ordinances in this area is problematic
in that it leads to an unequitabie application of the regulations. Some of the documented
violations in this area should be addressed regardless of the anticipated future use of
property and status of the sanitary sewer and water systems for they do not effect the
issue at hand and are a blight to the community_ Signage violations would be an example
of such a situation.
The City Council must provide direction to staff on how to proceed. Options include
beginning contacting the property owners to notify them of the all of the identified
violations, targeting specific violations (i.e., signage) or taking no action. Other properties
and uses are expected to meet the standards of the City Code or Zoning Ordinance.
However, the identified properties in the Highway 101 are blatant and highly visible
examples of the City's regulations being violated and not enforced. As such, our office
v,ould recommend that the City Council direct City Staff to begin making contact with the
owners of the properties identified herein to pursue bringing these properties into
conformance +,+nth applicable City Codes and Ordinances.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Jerry Olsen
Andy MacArthur
7
CITY 01
01
14:49 � 512 55'5 5- P. 09
SANITARY SEINER SERVICE
DISTRICT
NAC
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
8.15E "11,1
■ � ■ AfSCG.,A'fC.
MAY 19"
ti0rz,
13 FOR PLkr-Q%'Ll G
YLY AND HOULD
USF.D FOR MALT
.W--%st-R MEN -L
SGAt�:
N O RTH
EXHIBIT A
W
ki2 CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEP ART LENT: MEETING DATE:
DEP ART-MENT: PREPARED BY:
7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk August 23, 1999
6:30PM
ITEM N`Li iBER: ITUM DESCRIPTION:
7.1. Discussion of Overlay Project Assessments
7.2. Consider Approval of 78TH St. Improvement Bids
7.3. "Wetland Permit - Crimson Ponds"
7.4. Any Engineering Business
BACKGROUND:
7.1. Is for Discussion
7.2. The bids will be opened at 1 1A on Monday the 23RD, so the information will be
available to you on Monday night.
7.3. Information prepared by Mike Robertson - demo is attached.
',Mr. Koshak will attend this meeting and be available to answer questions.
See Attached Information)
7.4. Is for any other Engineering Business that should arise.
RECO,'vIIVIEN-DATION:
This is for Council consideration and approval where necessary.
Thanks, .
Elaine
73
MEMO
Date: August 18, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Crimson Ponds - Wetland Permit
As part of the Crimson Ponds development, the City
Council has to approve a Wetland Permit for Dennis
Bakes. This permit is required because Backes is
altering wetlands as part of his development.
Backes has proposed filling of approximately 1.5
acres of wetland and, by State law, will be
replacing them with over 3 acres of new wetlands.
These wetlands are in addition to the stormwater
ponds he is creating on site. Though the City
Council is the Responsible Government Unit (RGU)
that makes the decision on the permit, the permit
application was submitted to State and County
agencies for comments.
Written comments were received from the DNR. They
are enclosed along with a written response to DNR
from Backes' wetland specialist. We also met on
August 4, 1999 with representatives from Wright
County Soil & Water Resources and Board of Water &
Soil Resources (BOWSR) to discuss their concerns.
They had some technical questions which were
satisfied by receiving information from Backes'
engineers.
The one issue that was not resolved was their
concerns about a proposal of Backes to fill a
finger of wetland in order to create two buildable
lots. They recommended that the finger of wetland
not be filled. After the meeting, Backes' wetland
specialist suggested a way that the lots could be
redesigned so that the wetland would not need to be
filled and the lots would not be lost. Backes'
engineer said they would be getting a redesigned
plat to us but we have not received it yet.
Backes' engineers should be at the Council meeting
Monday to address this issue.
AUG.1e.1S99 1:15PM
TO:OTSEGO
C-7 H nson
Anderson
As$oc., Inc.
vil & Municipal onglneering
Land Surveying
ITEM 7.1
City
CITY OF OTSEGO
CITY ENGINEER
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
8/23/99
No. 651 P.1%'2
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
1999 STREET IMPROVEMENTS, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, SEAL
COAT AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS.
Consider setting the assessment hearing date for the bituminous overlay
for the above mentioned project. Assuming the assessment needs to be
filed at the County by the end of November 1999, we would suggest the
council consider a date for the hearing in late October or early November.
It is important to consider this early due to the large number of property
owners on the assessment roll. The assessment roll will take several
weeks to prepare, revlew and get council to approve the preliminary draft
of the roll.
There are approximately 500 plus units being assessed with adjustment to
be considered for number of units assessed to large units where the
zoning is agriculture.
It is legal to assess a project before the completion when we have a bid
price for the asphalt overlay and can set the assessment amount.
Our original assessment was $1290/unit. We realized a lower asphalt unit
price of about 9.6% from our estimate given at the public hearing.
However, the number of units will drop from the number projected in the
feasibility report due to zoning issues and relief consideration given to
agricultural land receiving the burden of multiple assessed units.
The revised assessment amount could be difficult to establish until the roll
Is ordered to be prepared.
Council Agenda Items
Pagel 1 of 2
Augu t 18, 1999
Wa0114hared docslMunlclpaMOT5E0019011ot901agenda8-23-99,doc
AUG.1e.1999 1:16PN NO.651 P.2/2
IT
IT
7.2 CONSIDER AWARD OF THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BID FOR THE
QUADAY AVE., 78TH STREET AND PAGE AVENUE SANITARY
SEWER, WATERMAIN AND STREET CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
The bids will be taken at 10:00`a.m. the 23rd of August. Since this date Is
the same date as the Council meeting, results of the bidding will be
provided at the Council meeting and will not be in this packet.
The recommendation will bei to award the contract to the lowest
responsible bidder, assuming the bid amount is reasonable and within the
pre-bid estimate.
We would also recommend that the award be conditioned upon the
financial commitment of the developers of Prairie Creek, Pheasant Ridge
and Crimson Pond. The financial commitment should be through a signed
and executed developer's agreement, or by temporary letter of credit until
the developer's agreement can: be completed. It would, in our opinion, not
be in the City's best interest to move forward with this project until the
developers are committed to sower capacity. Temporary letters of credit
could get the project started in early September if the final details of the
developer's agreement cannot be worked out until later. Mike has set a
meeting for the Developers and staff for Tuesday 8/24/99 to discuss this
issue with them.
7.3 CRIMSON PONDS — WETLANb PERMITS
We are recommending approval of the Wetland Mitigation Plan for
Crimson Ponds with the following revisions:
1. Combine Lots 8 & 9 into ,one lot in Block 3. The wetland loss is the
issue, and combining will reduce the impact.
2. Do not disturb the w000ed area on the. island. The reason is to
provide upland and retain mature vegetation in this area. It will also
provide some screening between the existing plat and Crimson
Pond.
We do not have the actual approval letter available at the time of
this writing since the information being provided by the Developer's
engineer has not arrived yet. We hope to have this completed by
the Council meeting on 8/23/99.
7.4 ANY OTHER ENGINEERING BUSINESS
City l ngineer Council Agenda Items Hakanson
Pag 2 of 2 Anderson
Aug sf 98, 9999 Assoc., Inc.
I%He01 hexed docsWunkipaAAOTSEGOWOI1 ot901egenda8-23-99.doo
STATE Of
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL
RESOURjL
CE �
PHONE NO. Division of Fish and Wildlife - Ecological Services FELE NO
1601 Minnesota Drive, Brainerd, Minnesota 56401
Phone: (218) 828-2433
July 29, 1999
Mr. Mike Robertson, City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue, N.E.
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
Dear Mr. Koshak:
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has reviewed the Wetland Conservation Act
replacement plan submitted by Backes Companies, Inc. to place fill into 1.53 acres of Type 2,
3, and 4 wetlands for construction of roadways in association with development of a residential
subdivision in the west half of Section 22 and 27, T. 121 N., R. 23 W., in Otsego. Mitigation
is proposed by wetland creation on site.
The applicant has requested sequencing flexibility be applied because the farmed areas of
wetland are degraded. We do not believe sequencing flexibility is appropriate in this case,
because if farming ceases - as it will when the site is converted to a residential subdivision -
emergent wetland vegetation will readily re-establish itself. In other words, the degradation
that has occurred is noi`Teversible. The area of farmed wetland has established hydric soils and
a seed bank that cannot immediately be created at a replacement site. Furthermore, our
Montrose Area Fisheries Office staff consider this a quality wetland. Therefore, we believe
that appropriate mitigation sequencing, starting with avoidance and minimization, must be
followed.
We have two basic concerns with the project as proposed. First, we believe that most of the
wetland impact in the southwest corner can be avoided. This could be accomplished by
locating the road AT the narrowest point in the wetland, not just NEAR the narrowest point as
is currently proposed, and shifting part of Padget Avenue to the east; and by redesigning 79'b
Way to come in from the southeast. This would still preserve Lots 1-5 off of 79th Way, but
would require eight other lots to be reconfigured into a smaller number of lots. A marked up
copy of Figure 2 is attached to clarify this recommendation.
Our second concern is that an extension of Padget Avenue to the south of this parcel would
impact a large wetland there. Figure 4 shows that Padget Avenue is located 33.7% of the way
across the bottom of the parcel, from west to east. However, the National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) map (see Figure 3 of the wetland delineation report) shows that there is a large
palustrine forested wetland on the south side of the subject parcel extending from 17-51 % of
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
the way along the same border. In other words, it appears any extension of Padget Avenue to
the south would run through the middle of this wetland area. There is no information in the
WCA replacement plan to indicate whether this wetland is accurately depicted on the NWI
map.
Lastly, we suggest that an EAW is mandatory on this project, as it is clearly a connected
action to the 78' Street and Page Avenue project, and it is clearly a connected action to any
development of the parcel to the south. It is also arguably a connected action to the Pheasant
Ridge project since they share Page Avenue and are connected through the 78'b Street and Page
Avenue project. The definitions of connected actions are contained in Minnesota Rules
Chapter 4410.0200 Subp. 9B. A precedence for combining two subdivision projects into one
EAW can be found in the Eagle Ridge Estates and Redtail Ridge project in Sherburne County
that was out for review in March 1999. Preparation of an EAW would allow for alternative
layouts to be considered, and for cumulative impacts to be evaluated, especially regarding
impacts to adjoining wetlands such as the one south of the proposed Crimson Ponds
development.
We remind you that Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3100 Subp. 1 prohibit any government
decisions, approvals, or permits until a negative declaration on the need for an EIS is made
(i.e., the EAW process is completed). If a decison is made on this wetland replacement plan
under WCA rules, please notify us of the decison within the period for appeal, as required by
WCA. If you have any questions about these comments, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
Michael R. North
Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist
cc: C.B. Bylander
C. Christianson
G. Fox
K. Grow
J. Hiebert
L. Kramka
M. McNamara
M. Maurer
D. Norris
'N8W25'17"W 40.01
WETLAND ` II
.I-
10
,A,T
WETLAND-
` Mta nry to..ruoAs w MAY 16 111111111
` \
ccof
( o
� m
WETLANa A
i
� \,.\� � /' tea` � � � -: '. \ r •� /
`\ N00'5�:2�iN 17,82 1
wx
wne.o trlF✓
w/Dl an.la
v,iJJn �YIQ
Ww Ws.
Otl,trT WINKYRvq.TC I
S-rI TA-. 2C.0 �t•rtl�
STING ZONING = A-1STMI
:m'
sot pLY.r1O, �.
slteT,a
-LT roes
o . urn•.
CAUTION .eu go."
Ta lY9Di 9r � a 9r" A TII CMM. 891.0m "LL
@f lA O ffi16tlOQ A 1 TQ .Y9D.O MO= CRIYOO rx=
!+T D dM ww T0. CTlO• a R !!• �.YmT
0M1111111111t MAM TO � ■ 199D1T TD rMM 9EtIIIIIIIIIID CO.I.OD/. r m
r mmm R Ta am" is Olts anmwm AM.CNL
DI\IRI�.A M mow`
rr. LL%ICTLALCArIi w ®Oa,EAr.. SCI—Il' :.-Cc
ENVI.,OTAL TDt10ES CSor /O./se. qo.. L
cA=ra: u.c _ — —
1r1\.Ol L✓wr —- — —
1O.OiRA.-IC O.T. DOTAIMM n1O- n,E CITY OF Ory:p;Fmww�c .
.DLOCAIIOI x==—
MCWA
J .D..,,. O.A,IR,L.
�E49 71 LI
CRIMSON
PONDS
I
� I OTSEGO
i� Otf Tla atAT ■lVa IOAD
BACKES
COMPANIES
Wo-'yartc Kau owlet warts
7.1 RtDO1O.TM 90tAiY,1.TD
9ROOKLTM CENTM mm 33429
FAX (•12) SN -,623
I DD3..
f'/m/
r� 1 ova i
rr.. I� .a— b...
.
::xis, tNC CONDriONS PLAN
sxttr z or z
IDLdZi
L-- � i-2
FIGURE 2
August 5, 1999
KjoLHAuGENVIRONMENTAL SERVIC
Providing Sound. Balanced, Comprehensive Natural Resource Solutions
Mr. Mike Robertson, City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
RE: Crimson Ponds
Dear Mr. Robertson:
IEC��M��.
9 I
We have received a copy of the July 29 letter sent by the DNR commenting on the
Crimson Ponds wetland replacement plan application. As the primary preparer of the
application, we are responding to these comments on behalf of the project proposer. We
are limiting our responses to the DNR's comments on the wetland replacement plan
application. Some of these comments will be repetitive of the discussion which occurred
during our August 4 Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) meeting and overlap with
comments that you will receive from the project engineer, Loucks Associates, Inc.
I would concur with the DNR's comment that Wetland 3 is a quality wetland in the
permanently flooded portion along the west property line. However, shallow fringe areas
of the wetland that extend into the crop field are significantly lower in quality due to
farming impacts and the presence of invasive weedy plant species. I would also concur
with the DNR that impacts to these degraded areas are not irreversible. However, this
argument can be made with just about any degraded wetland area in an undeveloped
setting. Given enough time from cessation of farming activities, many farmed wetlands
will eventually revert to a more natural and less degraded state. Even partially drained
wetlands will eventually become wetter due to non -maintenance of drainage systems. In
regard to this project, the development would result in converting the area surrounding
these farmed wetland areas from crop field to lawns, driveways, streets, and homes. In
this setting it is unlikely that natural features of the wetland will develop. Because of the
seasonal and temporary hydrology of these farmed wetland areas, they will inevitably be
subject to impacts from homeowners during dry periods including mowing and dumping
of yard wastes. In addition, runoff of fertilizers and chemicals will likely influence the
type of plant species that re -colonize the areas. Thus, sequencing flexibility is applicable
because the cessation of farming activities and conversion to residential development will
not allow the farmed wetlands to revert to a natural state.
We had a discussion at the TEP meeting regarding the DNR's suggested alternative for
the southeast corner of the project. As pointed out by Loucks Associates, the alternative
is not feasible or safe. The proposed angle at which the cul-de-sac is coming off of
4767 Richmond Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 • Phone: 6t2-472-4875 • Fax: 612-472-1040
Padget Avenue creates an unsafe intersection and would not be allowed by the City as
was discussed at the TEP meeting. In addition, shifting Padget Avenue to the east as the
DNR's alternative shows results in the street heading directly into a wetland area south of
the property. The alignment as proposed by the developer allows the street to stub
directly into an upland area south of the property.
Wetland boundaries were field mapped on the property south of the proposed Crimson
Ponds development prior to aligning Padget Avenue. The PF01C designation on the
NWI map is wrong. This area is a wooded, upland knob surrounded by lowland with
partially drained wetlands. Any future extension of Padget Avenue would extend onto
this upland knob and would not run through the middle of a wetland area as the DNR
suggests.
If you have any questions on these comments, please contact me at 612-944-7630.
Sincerely,
Kjolhauugg Environmental Services Company, Inc.
Ken Powell
Wildlife Biologist
cc: Jeff Shopek, Loucks Associates
Jeremy Boots, Loucks Associates
Mark McNamara, Wright County SWCD
Lynda Peterson, BWSR
Michael North, DNR
Padget Avenue creates an unsafe intersection and would not be allowed by the City as
was discussed at the TEP meeting. In addition, shifting Padget Avenue to the east as the
DNR's alternative shows results in the street heading directly into a wetland area south of
the property. The alignment as proposed by the developer allows the street to stub
directly into an upland area south of the property.
Wetland boundaries were field mapped on the property south of the proposed Crimson
Ponds development prior to aligning Padget Avenue. The PFO1C designation on the
NWI map is wrong. This area is a wooded, upland knob surrounded by lowland with
partially drained wetlands. Any future extension of Padget Avenue would extend onto
this upland knob and would not run through the middle of a wetland area as the DNR
suggests.
If you have any questions on these comments, please contact me at 612-944-7630.
Sincerely,
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc.
Ken Powell
Wildlife Biologist
cc: Jeff Shopek, Loucks Associates
Jeremy Boots, Loucks Associates
Mark McNamara, Wright County SWCD
Lynda Peterson, BWSR
Michael North, DNR
August 5, 1999
KJOLHAUGEN-VIRONMENTAL SERVIC
Providing Sound, Balanced. Comprehensive Natural Resource Solutions
Mr. Mike Robertson, City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
RE: Crimson Ponds
Dear Mr. Robertson:
We have received a copy of the July 29 letter sent by the DNR commenting on the
Crimson Ponds wetland replacement plan application. As the primary preparer of the
application, we are responding to these comments on behalf of the project proposer. We
are limiting our responses to the DNB's comments on the wetland replacement plan
application. Some of these comments will be repetitive of the discussion which occurred
during our August 4 Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) meeting and overlap with
comments that you will receive from the project engineer, Loucks Associates, Inc.
I would concur with the DNR's comment that Wetland 3 is a quality wetland in the
permanently flooded portion along the west property line. However, shallow fringe areas
of the wetland that extend into the crop field are significantly lower in quality due to
farming impacts and the presence of invasive weedy plant species. I would also concur
with the DNR that impacts to these degraded areas are not irreversible. However, this
argument can be made with just about any degraded wetland area in an undeveloped
setting. Given enough time from cessation of farming activities, many farmed wetlands
will eventually revert to a more natural and less degraded state. Even partially drained
wetlands will eventually become wetter due to non -maintenance of drainage systems. In
regard to this project, the development would result in converting the area surrounding
these farmed wetland areas from crop field to lawns, driveways, streets, and homes. In
this setting it is unlikely that natural features of the wetland will develop. Because of the
seasonal and temporary hydrology of these farmed wetland areas, they will inevitably be
subject to impacts from homeowners during dry periods including mowing and dumping
of yard wastes. In addition, runoff of fertilizers and chemicals will likely influence the
type of plant species that re -colonize the areas. Thus, sequencing flexibility is applicable
because the cessation of farming activities and conversion to residential development will
not allow the farmed wetlands to revert to a natural state.
We had a discussion at the TEP meeting regarding the DNR's suggested alternative for
the southeast corner of the project. As pointed out by Loucks Associates, the alternative
is not feasible or safe. The proposed angle at which the cul-de-sac is coming off of
4767 Richmond Road, Mound, Minnesota 55364 • Phone: 612-472-¢875. Fax: 612-472-1040
A.
File. RCA -C:- --VPS
22
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTXIE�sTT: PREPARED BY:
9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk August 23,1999
6:30P -M
ITELI NLtiiBER: ITE -I DESCRIPTION
9.1. A. Approval of Community Recreation Year ?000 Budget.
B. Any Other Council Business
BACKGROUND:
9.1. A. Attached is a memo dated August 18, 1999 from Xlike Robertson. He will
be present to discuss with tilayor and Council.
B. This is for any other Council Business that may be added.
RECO NCVIENDAT10N:
This is for Council discussion and any consideration for approval.
Thanks,
Elaine
MEMO
Date: August 18, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Proposed Community Recreation 2000 Budget
I have enclosed a copy of the Joint Community
Recreation Board's proposed 2000 budget along with
supporting information (shown on pages 1, 3, & 4).
This budget was adopted unanimously at their
regular meeting on Monday, August 16, 1999. The
Joint Board is asking all of its members to let
them know if the budget, and the proposed
assessment, is OK.
Otsego's proposed assessment (shown on page 5)
would rise from $19,882 in 1999 to $21,328 in 2000.
This is an increase of 7.3%. The increase is
caused solely by a large increase in the number of
Otsego residents participating in the Joint Board's
program (shown on page 6).
The Joint Board is using the same assessment
formula (page 5) as in 1999. Last year's figures
are shown on page 7. The 2000 assessment shows
that Otsego's population (in the Elk River School
District) decreased from 5,271 to 5,128. This
lowered our costs for this part of the assessment
formula. The number of participants increased from
610 to 757, which increased our costs for this part
of the formula. While I doubt that our population
actually decreased, I certainly didn't object to
this because it worked in Otsego's favor.
In addition, the Board took action in their meeting
of Monday, August 16 to reallocate spending for the
1999 budget (shown on page 2). They are taking the
money saved due to the departure of Jeff Asfahl and
spending it for some new office equipment and
remodeling of some new office space.
The new office space is the Emporium, which is the
former Northbound Liquor. This space is owned by
the City of Elk River and is currently being used
by a youth group. The City of Elk River has to
approve all of this, but has been involved in all
of the discussions and planning for this. This
move is expected to be a short-term move of 3-5
years. Somewhere during that time, Elk River
expects to receive an offer for the land that it
can't refuse.
cc: Park & Recreation Commission
C->
Proposed 2000 Community Recreation Budeet
LINE
BUDGET ITEM
1999 ADOPTED
$102,619
$21,025
1999 TO DATE
(AS OF 6/30/99)
$51,310
$16,752
1999 REMAINING
1999 EST. EXP.
(7/1/99-I2/31/99)
2000 PROPOSED
$112,467
$0
$112,467
$0
$0
$0
$35,000
$4,260
$3,500
$18,789
$4,260
$2,600
$1,200
ITEM I
REVENUE
City Assessments
$51,310
_...--------•
$2,000
-----
2
Non Resident Fees/Surcharge
3
TOTAL
$123,644
$68,062
$53,310
$29,335
$2,903
$2,196
$12,252
$1,()95
$1,478
$9,102
-- $1,095
--- - -----
$1,036
-$230
$0
EXPENSES
4
Director
$47,968
5
Benefits
$4,000
$1,097
$3,754
$13,498
$1,305
$1,592
$9,065
$1,305
$1,144
$1,430
$0
$0
$16,875
$1,305
$1,592
$9,083
$1,305
$1,144
$2,500
6
FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
$5,950
7
Program Supervisor/Manager
$25,750
$2,400
$3,070
8
Benefits
9
FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
10
Secretary/ Receptionist
$18,167
11
Benefits
$2,400
12
FICA/PERA/WC/eic.
$2,180
13
Support Staff for Office (includes FICA, etc.)
$1,200
14
Program Assistant
$0
$0
$0.
$11,440
15
Benefits
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$1,144
16
FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
$0
$0
17
Program Assistant
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$11,440
$0
$1,144
$1,300
18
Benefits
$0
$0
19
FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
$0$0
$452
$0
$1,348
$0
$500
20
Mileage
$1,800
21
Dues/Conf/Training
$800
$290
$510
4536
$235
$1,614
$414----
$370
---
-$163
$0
$450
$500
$300
$2,400
$5(X)--
$5W
- ------
$0
$10,336
$8,000
$1,400
$2,4W
$1,500
$6,500
-.$2,500
$1,40
See Dues/Conf.
$690
22
Office Equipment
$0
$536
23
Office Supplies
$800
$4,(XX)
$1'0()
$0
$o
$565
$2,386
$1,604/$782
$1,086---.-
$630
-
$163
$0
24
PrintinF_____
25
Brochure Printing/Deliverer---
Advertisirkg/Marke
26
Postale-
Staff Training
27
28
29
Technology_
Office Construction
30
TOTAL
$122,985
$58,932
$64,053
Re - serve , from * 1",9 -,-
$57,290
$1 - 12,467
131
4a&b
4a
Proposed Amended '99 Community Recreation Budget/Line
Item Explanations for Remaining Expenses
This amended budget allows the board to invest in the equipment, technology and space
needs to maximize the ability to offer quality programs in an efficient manner and will
enable future growth.
I
LINE
I EXPLA�INATION
ITEM #
i
2 Cost of purchasing a credit card machine and running a phone line
I
_
28 13 computers at $1,200/each=$3,600
13-1T' monitors at $300/each=$900
1 laser printer $1,000
12 Office2000 Premium packages at $149/each=$298
1 Office2000 Professional package $99
1 League Scheduler $149
12 QuarkXPress $1,400
1 Activity Registration package (2 user)+1 year maintenance $2,890
29 The Communitv Education building is not a good work environment for anyone to work in. It would
in everyone's best interest to find another location to work from until such time as another facility is
constructed. It would cost approximately $6,000 for construction at Emporiums. We would also
;need phone lines, shelving for storage, etc. $2,000 would be for a sign and any additional needs to
complete the offices and storage space.
I
31 !This is the reserve from the 1999 budget after technology needs are met and offices are complete.
This amount would be applied against the 2000 budget.
Fil
Proposed 2000 Community Recreation Budget Line Item 46
lan ti
LINT (FXPI A N e'T'Tnt�r Ex n
:M #
1'Total city assessments applied to 2000 budget
2; Eliminate surcharge fee
I To promote an increased interest in providing recreational opportunities, 50% of all non-resident fees
Icollected would be paid to the cities in which the program was offered. The remaining 50% would
stay with the Community Recreation Board to build a reserve in the event of unforseen expenses.
3 2000 budget total
4 No Director Position
5 No Director Position
6 No Director Position
i
7 Michele's proposed salary
8 Suggest benefits offered are consistant with the payroll agent's plan. This would mean a maximum
of $355/month. Any difference between the City's contribution and the premiums for single health,
e dental, and single life insurance may be used to reduce the employee's share of the family
FE H.!'healthinsurance premium.
9! Cost of FICA/ PERA /WC/ etc.
i
10 RaeAnn's proposed salary, based on scale set in 1997 plus 3%
11 Suggest benefits offered are consistant with the payroll agent's plan. This would mean a maximum
of $355/month. Any difference between the City's contribution and the premiums for single health,
single dental, and single life insurance may be used to reduce the employee's share of the family
health insurance premium.
12 Cost of FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
13 Support staff includes additional staff for projects, busy times, coverage for receptionist time off, etc.
14 20 hrs per week for a programmer. Proposed to hire a person at 25 hrs. per week, 20 hrs charged
to administrative budget and 5 hrs. to be charged against programs they work. They could work
more than 25 hrs. total if they wanted to work other programs they plan. These additional hours
j would also be charged back to the programs worked.
15 No benefits expense to the Rec Board.
16 Cost of FICA/PERA/WC/etc.
17'20 hrs per week for a programmer. Proposed to hire a person at 25 hrs. per week, 20 hrs charged
Ito administrative budget and 5 hrs. to be charged against programs they work. They could work
I more than 25 hrs. total if they wanted to work other programs they plan. These additional hours
would also be charged back to the programs worked.
4Q -Wt o
4b
Proposed 2000 Community Recreation Budget Line Item
Exvlanations
18' No benefits expense to the Rec Board.
19,Cost of FICA/ PERA /WC/etc.
I
20 Mileage for all administrative staff.
i
21;This includes'.,vWA dues, WIL.S dues, staff training/ workshops, etc.
i
22 Cost of copier lease agreement at $200/month.
23 . '-Miscellaneous office supplies such as paper, pens, etc.
24 Cost of printing our brochure and additional flyers needed for marketing. The additional flyers
would be sent out for printing.
25 Covers the cost of additional marketing such as newspaper ads, etc. This would include joint mktg.
efforts with Community Education and ECFE.
26 Postage expenses.
i
27, Included in Dues, Conferences, Training (see line 21)
28 Cost of maintaining web site and annual maintenance fee for RecTrac.
29 No expenses for 2000.
30 Total of 2000 budget expenses.
O
4b
Community Assessment Information
Community Assessments
1999 Total 2000 Population' 2000 Participation
2000 Total ;Difference
Population Fall 1997/ Fad 1998
X $2.61
Dayton
$3,185
78 =2%
895/890
$2,323
$794
$3,117
-$68
Elk River
$62,028
2352 = 61%
15,000/15,483
$40,411
$24,230
$64,641 ;
$2,613
Hassan Township
$8,306
251=6%
2,221/2,419
$6,314
$2,383
$8,697
$391
Otsego
$19,882
757 = 20%
5,271/5,128
$13,384 j
$7,944
$21,328
$1,446
Rogers
$9,218
424 =11%
1,821/1,979
$5,165
$4,369
$9,535
$317
i
Program Fee Surcharge
$12,900
$0
Non -Resident Fees
$8,125
$0 i
Reserve from 1999
$5,149
TOTALS j
$123,644
$72,745
$39,722
$112,467
2000 Budget Amt.;
$112,467
4b
Growth Comparison for Program Users
YEAR; MUNICIPALITY
USERS
DIFFERENCE
19971 Elk River
2222
1998Elk River
2352
+6%
I
1997]
Otsego
610
1998;
Otsego
757
+19%
19971 Dayton
79
1998; Dayton
78
-1%
1997 Rogers
393
1998 Rogers
424
+7%
1997: Hassan
201
1998' Hassan
251
+20%
Proposed 1999
Revenue
Expenditures
1997
1998
Participant
Personal Service
Population/'97
(Population x 2.61)
M of $36,900)
Office Equip/Supplies
895
Dayton
$2,336 +
$849 =
$3,185
15,000
Elk River
$39,150 +
$22,878 =
$62,028
2,221
Hassan
$5,797 +
$2,509 =
$8,306
5271
Otsego
$13,757 +
$6,125 =
$19,882
1821
Rogers
$4,753 +
$4,465 =
$9,218
Program fee Surcharge
$12,900
Non -Residents
$8,125
25,208
(53.2%) $65,793 (46.7%)
557.851 = $123.644
Actual identified
registrants as of 7/27/98 = 4646
Expenditures
O
1997
1998
1999
Personal Service
$96,820
$105,710
$111,885
Office Equip/Supplies
$800
$800
$800
Trans/Training/Dues
$2,300
$2,400
$2,600
Advert/Broch/Print
$5,800
$5,500
$5,500
Postage
$900
$900
$1,000
Support Staff Cont.
$300
$800
$1,200
$106,920
$116,110
$122,985
O
A
3i
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: IlEETL`G DATE:
DEPART'MEN T: PREPARED BY:
9. COUNCIL ITEMS: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk August 23, 1999
6:30PNI
ITEtit N`LAMBER: ITEti[ DESCRIPTIO`:
9.2. Mike Robertson, Citv Administrator - Update:
A. Discussion of driveway width issues (Cont. from 8/9/99)
B. Budget 2000 - Assessor Costs
C. Request from Rudy Thibodeau for Sewer and Nater Service
D. Any Other Administrative Business.
BACKGROUND:
A. Mike Robertson will be here to explain this and answer questions. See attached
Memo and Ordinance information dated August 12, 1999 prepared by Mike
Robertson (A review of surrounding communities asked for by the Mayor and
Council at last Council )vleeting).
B. See attached memo dated August 3, 1999 from Mike Robertson.
(Note: No. 7. from the City Ordinance, "Curb Cut Size" may need to be reviewed as other
Cities say "right-of-way line" (It may be confusing). (Page #116 20-22-4)
C. See attached Memo from Mike Robertson dated August 18, 1999.
D. Is for any other Administrative Business that may arise.
RECOVLVIEND ATION:
This is for Council consideration and any approval needed.
Thanks,
Elaine
MEMO
Date: August 12, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Driveway width comparisons
with surrounding communities
I have reviewed the surrounding communities'
regulations regarding driveway width for
residential developments, both in their urban areas
and in their rural areas. They are listed below.
ELK RIVER - Maximum 30 foot width at the right-of-
way line. 5 foot setback from side property line
required for driveway. No difference between rural
and urban areas.
MONTICELLO - Maximum 24 foot width at the right-of-
way line. 3 foot setback from side property line
required for driveway. No difference between rural
and urban areas.
ST. MICHAEL - Maximum 25 foot width at the right-
of-way line. 5 foot setback from side property
line required for driveway. No difference between
rural and urban areas.
ALBERTVILLE - Maximum 24 foot width at the right-
of-way line. 5 foot setback from side property
line required for driveway. No difference between
rural and urban areas.
DAYTON - Maximum 24 foot width at the right-of-way
line. 5 foot setback from side property line
required for driveway. Rural residential (non-
agricultural use) areas with driveways over 150
feet can add a 2 foot gravel shoulder to either
side of the driveway.
All cities allow someone (City Engineer, Zoning
Administrator, etc.) the ability to allow an
increase in the size of a driveway opening. All
cities also allow an appeal to the City Council.
cc: City Staff
2
3.
Within Structures: The off-street parking requirements
may be furnished by providing a space so designed within
the principal building or one structure attached thereto;
however, unless provisions are made, no building permit
r .
shall be issued to convert said parking structure into a
L
dwelling unit or living area or other activity until
other adequate provisions are made to comply with the
required off-street parking provisions of this Section.
4.
Lot Circulation: Except in the case of single, two-
family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking areas shall be designed so that
circulation between parking bays or aisles occurs within
_
the designated parking lot and does not depend upon a
public street or alley. Except in the case of single,
two-family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking area design which requires backing
into the public street is prohibited.
5.
Intersection Separation: No curb cut access shall be
located less than sixty (60) feet from the intersection
of two (2) or more street rights-of-way. This distance
[
shall be measured from the intersection of lot lines.
6.
Lot Design: Except in the case of single family, two-
family, townhouse, quadraminium, and manor home
dwellings, parking areas and their aisles shall be
developed in compliance with the standards on the Parking
Lot Dimension Table.
-
7.
Curb Cut Size: No curb cut access shall exceed twenty-
four (24) feet in width unless approved by the City
Engineer.
8.
Side Yard Setback: Except with special approval from the
Zoning Administrator, curb cut openings shall be a
!1 minimum of five (5) feet from the side yard property line
in all distrItts.__,.:
9.
1
Curb Cut Spacing: Driveway access curb openings on a
public street except for single, two-family,
quadraminium, manor home, and townhouse dwellings, shall
not be located less than forty (40) feet from one
another.
10.
Grade: TY trade elevation of any parking area
driveways s. ._1 not exceed four (4) percent.
G
MEMO
Date: August 18, 1998
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Budget 2000 - Assessor Costs
I have checked out the prices for assessing in
surrounding areas and listed them below.
WRIGHT COUNTY
I spoke with Wright County Assessor. He said
Wright County is charging $7.50/parcel, which is
$0.25/parcel more than what Pete Merges proposed to
charge. He said that Wright County bases its
charges on what private property appraisers are
charging since they want to stay close to market
costs. What this means is that Wright County does
not want to subsidize the costs of assessing for
any of the local governments that use its services.
SHERBURNE COUNTY
I spoke with the Sherburne County Assessor. They
charge $2.00 a parcel. He says they subsidize
everyone's assessing costs because they believe its
all the same pot of money and they want to provide
a consistent property assessment for the entire
County. Obviously at that price every government
in the County contracts with them.
When asked if they would be willing to do someone
outside the County for that price he said no. He
said he didn't know what his contract price would
be but thought it would probably be close to ten
dollars an hour.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
The Wright County Assessor also had the figures for
costs in Hennepin County. Hennepin charges
$9.00/parcel for residential lots and over
$30.00/parcel for commercial lots. Hennepin County
also charges an additional $500.00 plus time for
any parcel they have to defend in Tax Court.
9.a G
MEMO
Date: August 18, 1999
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Request for Sewer & Water Service
from Rudy Thibodeau
I have received a request from Rudy Thibodeau for
sewer and water service. I have also been told
that Tom Thumb would like sewer and water service
but have not received a request from them. It
would be difficult, if not impossible, to provide
sewer and water to these two properties without
digging up and repairing/reconstructing the
frontage road. I directed John Harwood to prepare
a quick estimate of costs of providing sewer and
water to these properties. That report is
enclosed. I have talked with Rudy and met with his
builder, and they would like to start construction
in October and hook up to City sewer and water
within a month.
There are several options that the City Council can
consider;
1) Consider John Harwood's report a feasibility
study, set a public hearing date, and invite all of
the commercial property owners in this area to the
hearing to gauge their interest in being connected
to City Water & Sewer. The level of interest shown
would determine the timing and size of the
improvement.
2) Provide service only to Rudy' restaurant and
Tom Thumb, upon Tom Thumb's request. Repair the
portion of the road that is disturbed rather than
reconstruct it. This option would be based on the
assumption that the rest of the road will be
disturbed in the near future to provide sewer and
water to the rest of the businesses, and that the
road could be reconstructed then. This request
could probably be processed as a Change Order to
the current sewer and water project and constructed
some time this fall.
3) The same as Option #2 but just provide service
to Rudy's restaurant.
In addition, John Harwood's report discussed
several different options for assessing the cost of
the improvement to benefiting properties. When a
decision is made about the improvement a decision
will also need to be made about how the improvement
is assessed.
cc: City Staff
011
7= Ell
Hakanson 3601 Thurston Avenue
Anderson g ._ _._ suite lol
1 �/'J I�j•�•.
Assoc., Inc.
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
,il & Municipal Engineering 612/427-0520 Fax
Ad Surveying ►--- - r
r►T-r�►T,us] ZT-11 \ d 11► 1
TO:
Mike Robertson, Otsego City Administrator
FROM:
John A. Harwood, PE
DATE:
August 16, 1999
RE:
Engineering Report and Feasibility Study
Extension of Lateral Sewer and Water
Mississippi Shores 6th & 7th Additions
Commercial Area, Northwest Quadrant CSAH 42 & 39
The trunk sewer and water project will construct a 16 -inch watermain and a 12 -inch
sanitary sewer to the northwest quadrant of the intersection. This review examines and
evaluates extending the sewer and water to service the commercial zoned properties at
that corner.
The attached detailed quantity and cost estimate shows the following:
Sanitary Sewer, East & South Frontage Road $40,300
Water Main, East & South Frontage Road $32,700
Site Work, Removals and Restoration 8148,200
Total Estimated Project Cost $221,200
The quantity and cost data is based on extension of services to the property line. The
data assumes removal of the existing service road and restoration to city standards with
concrete curb & gutter. The cost data assumes that there will be no responsibilities
within the study area for current or future utility cost in Park Avenue north of the
improvement area. This would be true if no sewer and water service were provided
from Park Avenue to properties in this study area. It should be noted, however, that
some properties will be responsible for future street improvements on Park Avenue. All
properties will be separately responsible for on-site utilities including the piping and site
restoration work associated with the private sewer and water work. Also, each property
will be responsible for connection charges based on the number of equivalent
connections determined by property use.
Related to allocation of cost, the intent will be equity, with a formula selected to fairly
assess the costs. Several options are available including an allocation based on front
footage, an allocation by area or a division of cost on a unit basis. For discussion
purposes, an assessment based on the average of all three methods is shown.
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\922\ot922mr3.doc
Mike Robertson
Page 2
August 16, 1999
Parcel
i
Frontage Area
Frontage Area
Basis Basis
Unit
Basis
Average
Percentage
Based on
Average
A
382.85 43,560
30.9% 14.0%
20%
21.6%
$47,800
B
223.82 82,818
18.0% 26.5%
20%
21.5%
$47,600
C
208.65 31,385
16.8% 10.0%
20%
15.6%
$34,500
D
208.65 74,945
16.8% 24.0%
20%
20.3%
$44,900
E
216.26 79,612
17.5% 125.5%
20%
21.0%
$46,400
1240.23 312,320
TOTAL COST:
$221,200
Our recommendation is that the city call a public hearing as authorized by Minnesota
Statutes Chapter 429, to consider the making of a public improvement that has special
benefit to property. The hearing would be for sewer, water and street improvements to
the commercial district that comprises the Mississippi Shores 6th & 7th Addition.
The recommended project is shown on attached sketch sheets. The project as
configured provides sewer and water service to the entire commercial district and
constructs sewer and water facilities that conform to the city overall utility planning. The
project is feasible as proposed and can be constructed as a single project. Assuming
public hearings scheduled this fall, the project can be designed and bid over the winter
for early spring construction and substantial completion about the middle of July, year
2000.
I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision
and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under State of Minnesota Statutes 326.02 to
326.16.
11047 August 17, 1999
J A. Harwoo-d, PE Reg. No. Date
Attachment: Cost Estimates, Sanitary Sewer, Watermain & Street
Exhibit I - Location Map
Exhibit II - Excerpt from City Comprehensive Sewer Plan
Exhibit III - Sketch Map, Parcel Area and Frontage
Exhibit IV - Sketch Map of Proposed Sewer & Water Facilities
Exhibit V — Sketch Map, Summary of Utilities
\\Ha01\shared docs WlunicipaiNAOTSEGO\922\ot922mr3.doc
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
SEWER AND WATER UTILITIES
Mississippi Shores 6th and 7th John A.
Date: 8/16/99
Harwood, PE
1. Sanitary Sewer
$1,200
900 LF 8 -inch PVC to 10 ft depth @ $18.00/LF
$16,200
400 LF 8 -inch PVC to 20 ft. depth @ $28.00/LF
$11,200
5 EA Standard Manholes @ $1,200.00
$6,000
20 LF Extra Manhole Depth @ $120.00
$2,400
5 EA Service Wyes @ $80.00
$400
150 LF 4 -inch Service Pipe @ $10.00
$1,500
Subtotal Construction:
$37,300
30% Contingency & Indirect:
$11,300
Total Estimated Project Cost:
$48,600
Less Trunk Cost - Extra Depth:
$8,300
Total Estimated Lateral Cost:
$40,300
2. Watermain
1260 LF 8 -inch DIP Watermain @ $14.00 $17,640
3 EA Hydrants, 6 valve & Lead @ $1,400 $4,200
2 EA 8 -inch Gate Valves @ $900.00 $1,800
5 EA 1 -inch Service Stops @ $40.00 $240
5 EA Curb Box for 1 -inch Service @ $80.00 $400
150 LF 1 -inch Copper Service Line @ $6.00 $900
Subtotal Construction: $25,180
30% Contingency & Indirect: $7,520
$32,700
3. Site Work, Removals & Restoration
Remove Existing Bituminous 1300 FT X 24 Ft = 3500 SY @ $1.50
$5,250
Remove Bituminous at Driveways & Parking Areas, 1 Lump Sum
$1,200
Aggregate Base Class 5 1400 X 40 X 6" = 2200 TON @ $6.50
$14,300
Concrete Curb & Gutter 2700 LF @ $7.50
$20,250
Driveway Entrances 6 EA @ 28 ft. x 30 = 600 SY @ $12.00
$7,200
Bituminous Frontage Road 1300 X 32 @ 3 Y2" = 1050 TON @ $26.00
$27,300
Topsoil and Fill 2800 FT x 20 FT x 6' = 1100 CY @ $7.00
$7,700
Sod Restoration 2800 FT x 20 FT = 6000 SY @ $2.00
$12,000
Boulevard Plantings, 20 TREES @ $170.00
$3,400
Catch Basins, 6 EA @ $800.00
$4,800
Manholes, 3 EA @ $1000
$3,000
Storm Pipe, 12" to 18", 400 LF @ $30.00
$12,000
Subtotal Construction:
$114,000
30% Contingency and Indirect:
$34,200
$148,200
Total Estimated Project Cost, Street and Utilities: $221,200
Hakanson
\\HaOl\.shared docs Wlunicipal\AOTSEGO\922\ot922mr3.doc Anderson
1111 Assoc., Inc.
Elul
Ulillll 1 ■�A �■ ■� ���'
ffi%4 bf
KIM �► ,,
.■.1111111111! .����. ��•:.:
COUNTY HIGHWAY RlGlii-OF—WAY PLAT NO. 8 _a A
!L Z
MAY N0. 10T
I /
J C.S.A.H. NO, 42 (N.E
C
- Sf1EgyUANE CG
oti `
AVE.)
SIDE FARK
�I
8
'PS8 1 A
`8 5 5
2\7
872
>
8
8
_l-j.0RES 870
876\ 817-2. $1 P_ :L
Act
-870
IDDMONI
860
879.8
861;.5
<
8 7,en IN
875,.7
.0
aa' 1 8y
863 867
7
I LLj 857
868-9`• ` 8. �3,; `
...872 aqcL-
562 CN
876
868
6 7-a
.10
187-.2
854.5
875:'9, 88
I s; r,
8
Cf�
6
1806
$64.5 7 '2,
i
rd-
_�j L 859.5 ��W'7 17) 4 7
TZ5L� 00'
-8 6
PP!
'
H1 0 p C' d A: �D rl
8 7,4 5 8671 S `__�� 18
877
7 8.17
873 \3-
893.3
8 6-/' 852-
866
T_
5.3 % /848.5
867.9
_874- 8'6s.7 5
g- 858- 846
�5_48 5
/87
7.8v•
8 6
!OR, 13
LLJ ILJ
62..
i en oilTint
44. 9 862-
8 6' 8
oDr-
0
..,86;6
]bum=
BAP'Q-iFl 76 t
872
?4 b b
87 -3-4 852.9
863.81 8!
843.91
i r SL
rh
x
7%
MISS/SS/PP/ SHORES 6 T" A DDI TION
Otsego Township Wright County Minnesota
4Vffl
•^-----11a •L+92.7? -,68.01•- e
Lr/74.62..
�• $O w _
FON F.OGE Z2342
• FAo.v�nct 2/6.2 6 , � � < " = �'
/ 4/169 79.6/Z
sr
so- 11
'f3 Ane.vrnae 2o e. G S' ., � F.wNrnFt; iB.Z•8S/
<.,o� IP6CH 71 9/8 4 iAo"Ijed Vas Lf /1aCN %3s6o1��• e� 1� ti
SBS' I
� / - �-- -_ a 1 V �• A.m.„ 111]]7
'_.113.01— '_•
SERV/CE
--{AO/A S/NLFf N(�0 - - -711.17•__ V -til 99
solo Jrec[v
r.(.h o _ -• LA1�9
SwUlIw, AIIM SwI/1 s11M 3[1/4, S.c. 15 T.y.11l, pny.I1� N
'OUAq—=)
M
MISSISSIPPI SHORES 6T'l ADDITION
Otsego Township Wright county Minnesota
192.72 5.
2
6)c///9 /T
MISSISSI_' SHORES 6TH ADDITION
Otsego Township Wright County Minnesota
�-,
Off
I))��;•\ \..F �� _��1� y4--- L-92.72 y505•
X61 L:/T�.62,• 1 m v o ' 2 zo8.6jFr 74r 1/8*r�
h ' 2s=( Lei--) _ � � , ; , t z l6 • d6 ('. 7 y, 6 r L r <
U
12,Y6• 23 % 31 z, 3 SJ
. �� � tim � ' :� 3 I x-25• w _
BL O i 220.57
v —
„ t N ...�
— —209.55— t`+ ---------- 04
N:
c.� 1 209.55 — '
iE
1.
W 6
ir I
'SOB iJ �
qq
�•' O d Pi6�2(-/3.05 a •
di� do
9� - 90/h STREET NE ` a� gY,- _ _ •a1i�
go STREET N.E. h - •-- ,'' a9 -- - _;__,-� _�
768.92 o lz 901). rnE f STA a+riE AND
°! n \ iTaa6laa] wST
o, .-SoulA line of the SW l/4 of lt.a SEl/4, Sec. � 1 lyt!_
0' /f�/1—..} -'Orl 1A' IEE
�" OV/ ►/ /`C.S.A.N. N ]4 t i (3 GOQ
Centerline an conalrucleC /P•'—_--'2
,fil.v/r�NY i6wEk Cv/�TG�• !2//l�..�-��-_�X�' --- cw��•" - ---` -= `sem -
EfOU LF B r' TO /U r OGare
" 7 c%PP 86o G/r 8 '��( 4in Cdi/�Q.r.�..,.i,. •tt, a +, 4,�t•, '•
(W.4rCn.r1.41•0 4 ,.•,y
nvNoc��
L=
F,
S- PitJ c nY C 6 z C/I 8 1 gArC I/Ac it6-
I J
iE J 4 .i ll/ G ,
"
A
kqAAr CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: X EETLNG DATE:
DEPART-MENT: PREPARED BY:
9.6. Council Closed Meeting Elaine Beatty, City Clerk' August 23, 1999
6:30PM
ITE'NI NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
9.6. Closed Meeting - Re: Odean Ave. Easement.
BACKGROUND:
Attached is information Re: 9.6 Above. City Attorney Andy MacArthur will be present to
conduct this closed meeting.
At this time Bill Waytas has not given us his evaluation. Hopefully we will have it by
Mondav the 23RD to copy to the Mayor and Council.
RECONLVIENDATION:
This is for Council consideration as Andy Mac Arthur will explain.
Thant ,
Elaine
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc
To: City of Otsego
3601 Thurston Avenue
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
(612) 427-5860
(612) 4273404 Fax
0520
8899 Nashua Ave. N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
Attn: Mike Robertson
{� _..
17 ;.
❑ 103 Pine Street
Monticello, MN 55
(612) 295-5800
(612) 295-4488 Fa
Date: August 16, 1999
Project: Odean Avenue Reconstruction
"Morrisette Pond" Memo
ot334
We are sending you: Attached x Separately by Messenger
❑ Shop Drawings
❑ Prints
❑ Specifications
❑ Reports
❑
Change Order
❑
Inspection Report
❑
Contracts
❑
Memorandum
No. of Drawing or
Copies Ref. No Description
Memo regardinq "Morrisette Pond"
These are transmitted as checked:
❑ No Exceptions Taken ❑ Note Markings ❑ For Your Use
❑ Rejected ❑ Comments Attached ❑ As Requested
❑ Revise & Resubmit ❑ Review & Comment ❑ For Signature
Remarks:
cc
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
Andy MacArthur, Attorney
William Waytas, Lyle Nagell
By.
Ron d . Wagner,
4.
1:_n]Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
it & Municipal Engineering
-and Surveying
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE, Otsego City Engineer
FROM: Ronald J. Wagner, PE, Odean Avenue Project Engineer
RE: Morrisette Pond — Odean Avenue
FILE: OT334
DATE: August 13, 1999
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
I have reviewed previous drainage calculations performed when the Morrisette property
applied for the Conditional Use Permit. We also performed additional drainage
calculations on the proposed condition, and offer the following comments:
1. In 1994, when Frank Morrisette was applying for approval of a plat, a drainage
study was performed by Kevin Kielb, P.E., then of Hakanson Anderson
Associates, Inc., and Mr. Willis Gilliard, P.E. representing Mr. Morrisette. The
study determined a watershed of 26 acres drained to the low land now labeled
"Morrisette Pond" on the attached exhibits. This drainage area was determined
from U.S.G.S. Quad maps with 10' contour lines and a scale of approximately 1"
= 2,000'. (Most accurate information available at that time without performing a
survey.) The land was divided into two TR55 curve number groups. Impervious
Area (roads, houses, DW, patios, etc.) with a curve number of 98, and Crop Land
with a curve number of 81. A weighted average curve number of 83 was
determined to represent the "Morrisette Pond" water shed. However, it was
decided to use a curve number of 65 for the calculations of runoff because of the
probability that this area would be developed into low density residential. Using a
curve number of 65 and 26 acres, a 100 -year event was determined to flood to
925.7 and was the basis for the drainage easement configuration.
2. Using Mark Hurd elevations purchased in 1995 by the City of Otsego, a more
accurate drainage area for the "Morrisette Pond" was determined. Existing
conditions show a drainage area of 15.57 acres. Using SCS curve numbers of
98 for roadway area and 81 for Crop Land a weighted curve number of 81.6.
This requires a volume for a 100 -year event of 5.19 acre ft. Existing _ground
elevations show a 100 -year flood elevation of approx. 924.
3. The construction of Odean Avenue will increase both the amount of roadway and
cropland drained to "Morrisette Pond." Using Mark Hurd in conjunction with
Odean Avenue plans a drainage area of 18.54 acres was determined. A
weighted CN of 85 was determined using 98 for Roadway and 81 for Crop Land.
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\334\ot3341k1.doc
Larry Koshak
Page 2
August 13, 1999
The volume of runoff for the 100 -year rainfall event would produce 6.64 acre ft.
Subtracting this amount from the 5.19 acre ft. currently reaching the "Morrisette
Pond" an increase of just under 1.5 acre ft. is realized. Therefore, the volume of
proposed excavation at "Morrisette Pond" is 1.5 acre ft. This is to accommodate
the additional runoff. The elevation of the 100 -year flood is 924.
4. The elevation of the 100 -year flood pre and post Odean Avenue reconstruction
projects are identical.
5. When development eventually occurs in the drainage area of "Morrisette Pond",
an outlet structure and piping or ditching will set a new maximum elevation for
the pond (lower than current). The outlet goes to Corbins low area, then to a
wetland to the east below the ridge, then into Lefebvre Creek and eventually into
the Mississippi River. (See exhibit.)
Part of any developments in the area will require platting and dedication of
drainage easements to facilitate this.
CONCLUSION: The reconstruction of Odean Avenue will not change the 100 -year
flood elevation at "Morrisette Pond" and the existing drainage easement will not need to
be changed.
\\Ha01\shared docsWunicipal%AOTSEGO\334\ot3341kl.doc
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
N2
I - -0
M
----------------
< z 'o
z u
-t77
0 u
%I
-- ------------------
-t77
%I
V
...n.l r \ ..+ 1 . ..... .. ... ...
I
0
_ r � �t. ' • V
sj-'I
W
Q w H
w=ate
V
Q < Z O
ZaV0`
Ow0V
a
ul
Al \
..f.i•-.�•'. � 111.1.11\ 11
1.
\1 \ .
V
...n.l r \ ..+ 1 . ..... .. ... ...
I
0
_ r � �t. ' • V
sj-'I
W
Q w H
w=ate
V
Q < Z O
ZaV0`
Ow0V
a
-'v
AUG -23-1999 1130
INC
TRANSMITTAL
NAC 612 595 9837 P.01i02
S T. L O U I S PARK, MINNESOTA 5 5 4 1 6
PHONE (6 12)595-963e
DATE:
TO
1 I
NUMBER
OF PAGES
INCLUDING
COVER:
I
Z
FROM:
QUANTITY: MATERIAL/DESCRIPTION:
r
VIA: REMARKS:
MAIL
FAX
El
1
PICK IJP
0
DELIVERY
11
PROJECT:
JOB NUMBER: l��•.o�
DATED:
AUG -23-1999 11:31 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02/02
1001
REGULATION OF THE USE OF WATER AND SEWER
AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO AND REGULATING THE USE OF WATER AND SEWER IN
THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS IN THE CITY AND MATTERS
RELATING THERETO, INCLUDING ALL PROPERTIES, MAINS, RATES AND CHARGES IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH AND ESTABLISHING AN INDUSTRIAL USER STRENGTH
CHARGE IN ADDITION TO THE CHARGE BASED UPON THE VOLUME OF DISCHARGE BY
AN INDUSTRIAL USER AND ESTABLISHING TAX LIEN AGAINST PROPERTY SERVED IN
CONNECTION WITH SUCH STRENGTH CHARGE AND SEWER AND WATER RULES AND
REGULATIONS AND REPEALING ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT THEREWITH.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS, WASHINGTON COUNTY,
MINNESOTA, DOES ORDAIN:
1001.01 EstablishMent of Dement.
There is hereby established a Public Utilities Division of the Department of Public
Works of the City of Oak Park Heights which shall be under the supervision of the
Director of Public Works. The water and sewer systems as they are now constituted
or shall hereafter be enlarged or extended shall be operated and maintained under the
provisions of this ordinance subject to the authority of the City Council at any time
to amend, alter, change or repeal the same. The City Council shall have
responsibility for the management, maintenance, care, and operation of the sewer and
water systems of the City subject to the delegation of such authority to City
employees, individual Council members, or the City Clerk as the Council shall make
from time to time.
1001.085 Water ConservatiQn.
To secure the conservation of municipal water as a resource for the benefit of the
people of the City of Oak Park Heights, all water sprinkling and irrigation systems
and practices shall be regulated to allow water sprinkling and irrigation systems to
operate in the following manner: as to all properties which property address ends in
an even number, those properties will be allowed to sprinkle or irrigate on even
numbered calendar days. As to all properties whose property address ends in an odd
number, their right to use sprinkling and irrigation systems shall be limited to
calendar number days ending in odd numbers.
TOTAL P.02
0B-23-1999 04:56PM FROM Couri & MacArthur
tAtor�a�CsFnadrLaLrt�
�•rIIa�atta�eti►t :qac
696"n i
08-23-1999 04:56PM FROM Couri & MacArthur TO
F.
4418823 P.03
3JVYo •rR ,:w Iq 9D1'* +4+rs 1
,/' •� _ .ol +
J It i + + r•'r "rte~^ ~~ "�•• `wti ' •,• `+ � S , • �` • •, 1 i•
0. pit
le
�� !• •_� f Ir +��'`'�w"."�r'�+.'\� � � f~�\ `� '+ �`� f` fir, ! ! f�
� \'�l •• � �� � �1 1 j J irJ''%l
,,•s, ', 1, •,944_ �'�, +"• , +. �!r�j r �,'� .'f •ter' '^ -�J �1{� t i
err•"'We
+r..y .r .. -.r• 1�-ir��.r •• w.�.� .�= •� �Jrr .•w rn .•Y \'�•_wrr .rte---.•w.•^�Y.. r rM -
mow, '• A � n'� w ^ � .. r..r^•.
CBd�•d fr'� .rl OZiC'FO 1� G1B9`� F �� f
Z , �
�• ' •til• .- n. .. n .r��y.'•i . � �.r�..=r�r.++ ;�;�+•� •.. ....Y..r +.•..-- •••.rte ��— . ^♦ ^^. �
GNOd tEULLES11JUON
'�•�1 n • h•—�YL 1 •N .. raw. -✓, ���.. •w-+.t,.�.
TOTAL P.03
F
Hakanson
Anderson
IIIIAssoc.,Inc.
,il & Municipal Engineering
..nd Surveying
August 23, 1999
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Quaday Avenue, 78th Street and Page Avenue
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer and
Street Construction Project — COP #99.02
Dear Mayor and Council Members,
3601 Thurston Avenue
Suite 101
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
612/427-0520 Fax
At 11:00 a.m. today, August 23, 1999, Mike Robertson, Administrator, Elaine Beatty, Clerk,
and I received bids for the above mentioned project.
The bidders are listed below in order of lowest first:
LaTour Construction, Inc.
$1,348,570.12
Barbarossa & Sons, Inc.
$1,386,996.30
Northdale Construction Co.
$1,449,922.41
S.R. Weidema, Inc.
$1,473,954.12
Ryan Contracting Co.
$1,568,070.65
Richard Knutson, Inc.
$1,605,151.57
Arcon Construction Co., Inc.
$1,729,452.06
Our engineer's estimate was $1,587,793.20.
We have worked with LaTour Construction, Inc. recently in the cities of St. Michael and
Anoka, where they have successfully completed those projects. The company has been in
the sewer and water contracting business for at least 10 years, and we have worked with
them in the past also._
We recommend award to LaTour Construction Inc. in the amount of $1,348,570.12.
The award is assumed to be contingent on Developer's commitment to the project,
Acquisition of the R.O.W. and easements, and clearance of the E.A.W.
If you have questions on the project, I will be available at the meeting on August 23, 1999.
Yours trul
La)�tey(ce G/KgAak, PE
/clk
cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
ATTACHMENT: Bid Tabulation
\\Ha01\shared docs\MunicipalAOTSEGO\613\ot613cc1.doc
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th SL - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
Otsego Street S Utility Improvements
NORTMOALE CONSTRUCTION
Bid Schedule "A" - Roadway LATOUR CONSTRUCTION, INC. BARBAROSSA d SONS. INC. CO.
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estlmated
Quanti
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
1
2021.501
Mobilization
1
LS $20.380.00 LS
$20.380.00 535,500.00 LS
S35,500.00 511,000.00 LS
$11,000.00
2
2101.511
Clearing 8 Grubbing
1
LS
$7,800.00 LS
57,800.00
$8,000.00 LS
58,000.00
$8,073.00 LS
$8,073.00
3
2104.501
Remove Fence
2500
LF
$0.90 LF
$2.250.00
51.00 LF
S2,500.001
$0.75 LF
$1,875.00
4
2104.503
Remove Bituminous Pavement
160
SY
$1.50 SY
$270.00
$2.00 SY
$360--L52.50
SY
$450.00
5
2104.513
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
425
LF
51.50 LF
5637.50
$2.00 LF
$850.00
$4.50 LF
$1,912.50
6
2105.501
Common Excavation
32535
CY
$1.25 CY
S40.668.75
$1.60 CY
$52,056.00
$1.26 CY
$40,994.10
7
2105.505
Muck Excavation
2550
- CY
$2.15 CY
$5,482.50
$2.00 CY
S5,100.00
$2.23 CY
$5.686.50
8
2105.535
Salvaged Topsoil
36900
CY
$1.20 CY
S44.280.00
51.00 CY
$36.900.00
$1.22 CY
$45,018.00
9
2211.501
jAggregate Base Cl 5
12875
To
$8.00 Ton
$77.250.00
56.30 Ton
$81,112.50
S6.47 Ton
583,301.25
10
2340.508
T pe 41 Wearing Course Mixture
4610
To
$23.50 Ton
$108,335.00
$24.70 Ton
$113,867.00
$24.32 Ton
5112,115.20
11
2340.514
Type 31 Wearing Course Mixture
4510
To
$22.00 Ton
$99,220.001
$21.50 Ton
$96,965.00
$22.77 Ton
$102,692.70
12
2357.502
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
1600
Gal
$1.00 Gal
$1,600.00
$1.20 Gal
51,920.00
$1.04 Gal
$1.664.00
13
2501.511
42" RC Pipe Culvert Cl 3
144
LF
569.90 LF
510.065.60
$70.00 LF
$10,080.00
$71.96 LF
510,362.24
14
2501.515
42" RC Pipe Apron
1
Ea
$1,085.00 Ea
$1,085.00
5750.00 Ea
5750.00
$981.34 Ea
$981.34
15
2501.602
IInIet Structure (16-1)
1
Ea
$3,300.00 Ea
$3,300.00
$1,700.00 Ea
$1,700.00
$3,403.94 Ea
$3,403.94
16
2511.501
Random Riprap Class 111
14.9
CY
S45.80 CY I
S682,421
$40.00 CY
$596.00
$73.50 CY
S1,095.15
17
2531.501
I Concrete Curb 8 Gutter Design 6618
10670
LF
$6.45 LF 1
$68,821.50
$6.50 LF 1
$69,355.00
$6.68 LF
571,275.60
Subtotal"A" $492,128.27 $517,611.50 5501,900.52
Bid Schedule "B" - Storm Sewer
Item 0
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
18
2501.515
12" RC Pipe Apron
2
Ea
$310.00 Ea
$620.00
$270.00 Ea
5540.00
S295.91
Ea I
$591.82
19
2501.515
15" RC Pipe Apron
3
Ea
$325.00 Ea
$975.00
$280.00 Ea
5840.00
$312.57
Ea
5937.71
20
2501.515
24" RC Pipe Apron
4
Ea
5410.00 Ea
$1,840.00
5350.00 Ea
$1,400.00
5379.92
Ea
$1,519.68
21
1 2501.602
Trash Guard for 12" Pipe Apron
2
Ea
$135.00 Ea
$270.00
5130.00 Ea
$260.00
$189.14
Ea
5378.28
22
2501.502
Trash Guard for 15" Pipe Apron
3
Ea
$160.00 Ea
$480.00
$160.00 Ea
5480.00
$215.93
Ea
5647.79
23
2501.602
Trash Guard for 24" Pipe Apron
4
Ea
$275.00 Ea
$1,100.00
$280.00 Ea
$1,120.00
$336.87
Ea
$1,347.48
24
2503.541
12" RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
239
LF
516.70 LF
53,991.30
$21.00 LF
$5,019.00
$19.40
LF
$4.636.60
25
2503.541
15" RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
419
LF
$17.90 LF
$7,500.10
$22.00 LF
$9,218.00
$20.70
LF
58,673.30
26
1 2503.541
18' RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
220
LF
$19.80 LF
$4,356.00
$23.00 LF
$5,060.00
$22.62
LF
54,976.40
27
2503.541
21" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3
598
LF
$21.90 LF
$13,096.20
$24.00 LF
$14,352.00
$24.83
LF
$14,848.34
28
2503.541
24" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3
798
LF
$23.80 LF
$18.992.40
$25.00 LF
519,950.00
$26.75
LF
$21,346.50
29
2503.541
30' RCP Design 3006 CI 3
2513
LF
S33.40 LF
$87,274.20
538.00 LF
599,294.00
$37.53
LF
598,065.89
30
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
72' 4020
5
Ea
$2.755.00 Ea
$13,775.00
52,650.00 Ea
513,250.00
52,692.09
Ea
$13,460.45
31
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
84" 4020
1
Ea
53.257.00 Ea
53.257.00
$3.700.00 Ea
$3,700.00
$4.34867
Ea
54,348.67
32
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
A or F
12
Ea
$940.00 Ea
$11,280.00
$1,180.00 Ea
S14,160.00
51,173.04
Ea
514,076.48
33
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
C or G
2
Ea
$940.00 Ea
51,880.00
$1.030.00 Ea
$2,060.00
$1,332.79
Ea
$2,665.58
34
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
H
12
Ea
5800.00 Ea
$7,200.00
5960.00 Ea
$11,520.00
$879.19
Ea
$10,550.28
35
2506.502
I Construct Drainage Structure Design
Special
2
Ea
$1,065.00 Ea
$2.130,001
51,300.00 Ea I
52,600.00
$1,400.95
Ea 1
$2,801.90
38
2511.501
Random Ri)rap Class III
50.7
CY
$45.80 CY
$2.322.06
$40.00 CY 1
$2,028.00
$68.50 CY 1
$3,472.95
Subtotal"B" $182,139.26 $206,851.00 $209,346.10
&23/99
Bid Tabulation
Page 1 of 6
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th St. - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION
Bid Schedule "C" - Sanitary Sewer LATOUR CONSTRUCTION, INC. BARBAROSSA d SONS, INC. CO.
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
52
Extension
37
2503.511
Ea
12" SDR 26 PVC Pie (12'- 16)
89
LF
$45.70 LF
$4,067.30
540.00 LF
53,560.00
S70.62
LF
$6,285.18
38
2503.511
$5,860.00
12" SDR 25 PVC Pie (24'- 28')
416
LF
$61.70 LF
$25,567.20
$64.00 LF
$26,624.00
$70.62
LF
S29,3T7.92
39
2503.511
$2,000.00
12" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (28'- 321
1 644
LF
$67.70 LF
$43.598.80
$84.00 LF 1
$41,216.00
$70.62
LF
$45,479.28
40
2503.511
$3.120.65
1 18' SDR 26 PVC Pie (16'- 20')
309
LF
$63.10 LF
$19,497.90
$72.00 LF
$22,248.00
584.20 LF
526,017.80
41
2503.511
57
18" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (20'- 24')
1823
LF
S68.10 LF
$124,146.30
$72.00 LF
$131,256.00
584.20
LF
5153.496.60
42
2503.511
8" Water Main -Duct Iron Ci 52
18" SDR 28 PVC Pipe (24' - 28')
150
LF
574.10 LF
$11,858.00
$72.00 LF
311,520.00
$84.20
LF
$13,472.00
43
2503.511
LF
18" SDR 26 PVC Pie (28'- 32')
1560
LF
$80.10 LF
$124,956.00
$72.00 LF
$112,320.00
$84.20
LF
5131,352.00
44
2503.511
$4,585.00
18" SOR 26 PVC Pipe (32'- 36'
856
LF
$86.10 LF
$73,701.60
$72.00 LF
561,632.00
$84.20
LF
$72,075.20
45
1 2503.511
8" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (all depths)
400
LF
549.70 LF
$19,880.00
$25.00 LF
$10,000.00
$30.00
LF
$12.000.00
46
2503.602
1 Construct Outside Drop
4
Ea
S1,565.00 Ea
56,260.00
$1,200.00 Ea
54,800.00
$2,418.75
Ea
$9,675.00
47
2503.602
8" PVC Plug
6
Ea
$14.00 Ea
584.00
$20.00 Ea
$120.00
$33.96 Ea
$203.78
48
2503.602
12" PVC Plug
2
Ea
$35.00 Ea
$70.00
$50.00 Ea
$100.00
$52.50
Ea
5105.20
49
2503.602
Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1
Ea
$600.00 Ea
5600.00
$1,000.00 Ea
$1,000.00
S1,000.00
Ea
$1,000.00
2506.602
Construct Sanita Manhole
16
Ea
$1,600.00 EaE$25,600.00
$1,200.00 Ea
$19,200.00
$1,388.59
Ea
$22,217.44
Fol
2506.603
Extra Depth Manhole (over 8 ft)
270.96
VF
$102.70 VF7.59
$80.00 VF
$21,676.80
582.11
VF
522.248.53
Subtotal"C" $507,812.69 $467,272.80 $545,005.91
Bid Schedule "D" - Water Svstem
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
52
2504.602
Connect to Existing Watennain
4
Ea
$250.00 Ea
51,000.00
$1,000.00 Ea
54,000.00
$500.00 Ea
$2,000.00
53
2504.602
Hydrant
4
Ea
$1,465.00 Ea
$5,860.00
$1,500.00 Ea
$6,000.00
$1,412.46 Ea
$5,649.84
54
2504.602
6" Gate Valve 8 Box
4
Ea
5460.00 Ea
$1,840.00
$500.00 Ea
$2,000.00
$467.64 Ea
$1,870.56
55
2504.602
8" Gate Valve 8 Box
5
Ea
5620.00 Ea
$3,100.00
$600.00 Ea
$3,000.00
5624.13 Ea
$3.120.65
56
2504.602
12" Butterfly Valve 8 Box
10
Ea
$835.00 Ea
$8,350.00
$850.00 Ea
$8,500.00
$850.53 Ea
$8,505.30
57
2504.603
6' Water Main -Duct Iron Cl 52
44
LF
$10.40 LF
$457.60
$16.00 LF
$704.00
$15.39 LF
5677.16
58
2504.603
8" Water Main -Duct Iron Ci 52
375
LF
$13.00 LF
$4,875.00
$18.00 LF
$6,750.00
$18.00 LF
$6,750.00
59
1 2504.603
12" Water Main -Duct Iron Cl 52
4954
LF
$19.10 LF
$94,821.401
$22.00 LF
$108,988.001
$22.63 LF I
$112.109.02
60
1 2504.82
1 Ductile Iron Fittings
3275
Lbs
$1.40 Lbs
$4,585.00
$2.00 Lbs
$6,550.00
$1.03 LbsS3,373.25
Subtotal"D" $124,689.00 $146,492.00 $144,055.78
6/29199
Bid Tabulation
Page 2 o/ 6
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th St - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
NORTHOALE CONSTRUCTION
Rid G-hnd, do 'F'. T-fr- Control LATOUR CONSTRUCTION_ INC_
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quant;
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
61
2554.602
Permanent Barricade
4
Ea $225.00 Ea
$900.00
$250.00 Ea
$1,000.00
$253.58 Ea
$1,014.32
62
2563.601
Traffic Control
1
LS $500.00 LS
$500.00
$1,000.00 LS
$1,000.00
$3.500.00 LS
$3,500.00
63
2564.603
4" Double Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
4820
LF $1.10 LF
$5,082.00
$1.20 LF 1
$5,544.00
$1.64 LF
$7,578.80
54
2564.603
4' Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
720
LF $0.55 LF
$396.00
$0.70 LF
$504.00
$0.58 LF
S403.20
65
2564.603
4" Solid Line White -E xy
10780
LF $0.50 LF
$5,390.00
$0.60 LF
$6,468.00
$0.50 LF
S5,390.00
66
2564.603
12' Crosswalk Line White -Epoxy
640
LF $1.50 LF
5960.00
$1.60 LF
$1,024.00
$1.55 LF
$992.00
67
2564.603
8" Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
520
LF $1.50 LF
$780.00
$1.60 LF
$832.00
$1.55 LF
$806.00
68 1
2564.604
Crosswalk Markin -E xy
2520
SF $2.00 SF
$5.040.00
$2.10 SF 1
$5,292.00
52.07 SF 1
$5,216.40
89 1
2564.604
1 Sin Panels Ty e C
183
SF $21.30 SF
$3,897.90
$35.00 SF I
S6,405.00
$21.99 SF I
$4,024.17
Subtotal "E" $22,945.90 $28,069.00 $28,922.89
Rid Schedule "F" - Restoration & Lands caoe
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
$20,700.00
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
- Roadway
Extension
70
2573.502
Silt Fence, Type Pre -Assembled
E2000
$182,139.26
$1.00 LF
$2.000.00
51.80
LF
53,600.00
$1.50
LF
$3.000.00
71
2575.501
Seedin
$144.055.78
$250.00 AC
$1,750.00
5190.00
AC
$1,330.00
$196.65
AC
$1.376.55
72
1 2575.502
Seeding Mixture 500
490
Lbsl
$2.00 lbs
$980.00
$4.50
Lbs 1
$2,205.00
$4.66
Lbs
$2,283.40
73
2575.505
Sodding Type Lawn
6000
SY
$1.80 SY
$10,800.00
$1.80
SY
510,800.00
$1.86 SY
$11.160.00
74
2575.511
Mulch Material, Type 1
14
To
$100.00 Ton
$1,400.00
$120.00 Ton
$1,680.00
$124.20
Ton
51,738.80
75
2575.519
Disk Anchoring
7
AC
$50.00 AC
$350.00
565.00
AC
$455.00
567.28
AC
$470.96
76
2575.532
Commercial Fertilizer, 20-10-10
3150
Lbs
$0.50 Lbs
$1.575.00
$0.20
Lbs
$630.00
$0.21
Lbs
5661.50
6123199
Bid Tabulation
Page 3 of 6
Subtotal "F"
$18,855.00
$20,700.00
$20,691.21
Summary of Bidding:
Bid Schedule "A"
- Roadway
$492,128.27
$517,811.50
$501.900.52
Bid Schedule "B"
- Storm Sewer
$182,139.26
$206,851.00
$209,346.10
Bid Schedule "C"
- Sanitary Sewer
$507,812.69
5467,272.80
$545,005.91
Bid Schedule "D"
- Water System
$124,689.00
$146,492.00
$144.055.78
- Bid Schedule "E"
- Traffic Control
$22,945.90
$28,069.00
$28,922.89
Bid Schedule "P'
- Restoration & Landscape
$18,855.00
$20,700.00
$20,691.21
TOTAL BID:
$1,348,570.12
$1,386,996.30
$1,449,922.41
6123199
Bid Tabulation
Page 3 of 6
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th St. - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
Otsego Street & Utility Improvements
Bid Schedule "A" - Roadway S.R. WE/DEMA, INC. RYAN CONTRACTING CO. RICHARD KNUTSON, INC. ARCON CONST. CO., INC.
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity I
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
1
2021.501
2501.515
Mobilization
1
LS
$68,417.00
LS
$68,417.00
$27,200.00
LS
$27,200.00
$16,000.00 LS
$16,000.00
S80,000.00 LS
$80,000.00
2
2101.511
2501.515
Clearin & Grubbing
1
LS
5500.00 LS
$500.00
$10,000.00
LS
$10,000.00
$5,000.00 LS
55,000.00
$7,800.00 LS
$7,800.00
3
2104.501
20
Remove Fence
2500
LF
S1.00
LF 1
$2.500.00
$2.50
LF
$6,250.001
S2.50 LF I
56,250.00
$0.90 LF I
S2,250.00
4
2104.503
21
Remove Bituminous Pavement
180
BY
S3.00 BY
S540.00
$2.00
BY
$360.00
51.00 BY
S180.00
$4.00 SY
$720.00
5
2104.513
$540.00
Sawing Bituminous Pavement (Full Depth)
425
LF
$2.50
LF
51,062.50
$2.00
LF
$850.00
$2.50 LF
$1,062.5b
$3.00 LF
51,275.00
6
2105.501
$900.00
Common Excavation
32535
CY
S0.97
CY
$31,558.95
51.50
CY
$48,802.50
$2.85 CY
$92,724.75
$1.22 CY
$39,692.70
7
2105.505
$1,680.00
Muck Excavation
2550
CY
$0.97
CY
$2,473.50
$3.50
CY
$8,925.00
$2.65 CY
$6,757.50
$2.15 CY
$5,482.50
8
2105.535
25
Saivacied Topsoil
36900
CY
S0.97
CY
$35,793.00
$1.20
CY
S44.280.001
$2.65 CY
$97,785.00
$1.18 CY
543,542.00
9
2211.501
26
Aggregate Base Cl 5
12875
To
$6.25
Ton
$80,468.75
$7.25
Ton
$93,343.75
56.80 Ton
$87,550.00
56.25 Ton
$80,468.75
10
2340.506
27
Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture
4610
To
524.65
Ton
$113,636.50
$24.50
Ton
$112,945.00
$24.00 Ton
$110,640.00
$23.50 Ton
5108,335.00
11
2340.514
28
T pe 31 Wearin Course Mixture
4510
To
$21.35
Ton
$96.288.50
$22.50
Ton
$101,475.00
$22.45 Ton
$101,249.50
522.00 Ton
$99,220.00
12
2357.502
29
Bituminous Material for Tack Coat
1600
Gal
$1.20
Gal
$1,920.00
$1.00
Gal
51,600.00
$1.05 Gal
$1,680.00
51.00 Gal
$1,6W.00
13
2501.511
30
42" RC Pipe Culvert Cl 3
144
LF
577.80
LF
$11,203.20
$90.00
LF
$12,960.00
587.01 LF
59,649.44
$92.38 LF
$13,302.72
14
2501.515
31
42" RC Pipe Apron
1
Ea
$1,029.75
Ea
$1,029.75
$1,420.00
Ea
$1,420.00
$879.97 Ea
$879.97
$1.120.00 Ea
$1,120.00
15
2501.602
32
InletSWcture(16-1)
1
Ea
53,100.00
Ea
$3,100.00
54.000.00
Ea
54,000.00
$3,635.00 Ea
$3,635.00
$4,640.00 Ea
$4,640.00
16
2511.501
33
Random Riprap Class III
14.9
CY
S95.20
CY
$1,418.48
S50.00
CY
$745.00
$47.00 CY
$700.30
574.00 CY
51.102.60
$2.660.00
2531.501
2506.502
Concrete Curb & Gutter Design B618
10670
LF
$6.45
LF
$68.821.50
56.50
LF 1
$69,355.00
$6.60 LF
$70,422.00
56.45 LF
$68,821.50
Subtotal"A" $520,731.63 $544,511.25 5612,165.96 $559,372.77
Bid Schedule "B" - Storrn Sewer
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
Unit Price
Extension
18
2501.515
12" RC Pipe Apron
2
Ea
$412.10
Ea
$824.20
$425.00
Ea
$850.00
$275.48 Ea
$550.961
$435.00 Ea
$870.00
19
2501.515
15" RC Pipe Apron
3
Ea
$452.55
Ea
$1,357.65
$445.00
Ea
$1,335.00
$292.60 Ea
$877.80
5455.00 Ea
$1,365.00
20
1 2501.515
24" RC Pipe Apron
4
Ea
$639.55
Ea
$2,558.20
$520.00
Ea 1
$2.080.00
$371.82 Ea
51,487.28
$590.00 Ea 1
$2,360.00
21
2501.602
Trash Guard for 12" Pipe Apron
2
Ea
5272.55
Ea
$545.10
$265.00
Ea
$530.00
$154.86 Ea
S309.72
$270.00 Ea
$540.00
22
2501.602
Trash Guard for 15' Pipe Apron
3
Ea
$283.25
Ea
$849.75
$300.00
Ea
$900.00
$181.97 Ea
$545.91
$300.00 Ea
$900.00
23
2501.602
Trash Guard for 24' Pipe Aron
4
Ea
$293.90
Ea
$1,175.60
5425.00
Ea
$1,700.00
5308.28 Ea
$1,233.12
5420.00 Ea
$1,680.00
24
2503.541
12' RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
239
LF
$25.90
LF
$6,190.10
$19.00 LF
54,541.00
$18.06 LF
$4,316.34
$29.74 LF
$7,107.86
25
2503.541
15' RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
419
LF
527.45
LF 1
511,501.55
$21.00
LF
$8.799.001
$19.42 LF 1
$8,136.98
$31.14 LF 1
$13,047.66
26
2503.541
18" RCP Design 3006 Cl 5
220
LF
S29.25
LF
56,435.00
$25.00
LF
$5,500.00
$21.34 LF
$4,694.80
533.04 LF
$7,268.80
27
2503.541
21" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3
598
LF
$27.05
LF
$16,175.90
$28.00
LF
$16,744.00
$23.70 LF
$14,172.60
$32.92 LF
$19,686.16
28
2503.541
24' RCP Design 3006 Cl 3
798
LF
$28.85
LF
$23,022.30
$30.00
LF
$23.940.00
$25.34 LF
$20,221.32
534.52 LF
$27,546.96
29
2503.541
30" RCP Design 3006 Cl 3
2613
LF
538.95
LF
$101,778.35
540.00
LF
5104,520.00
$35.40 LF
$92.500.20
$44.82 LF
$116,592.06
30
2506.502
Construct Draina a Structure Design
72" 4020
5
Ea
52.659.50
Ea
$13.297.50
$2,400.00
Ea
$12.000.001
$3,286.01 Ea
$16,430.05
$3,430.00 Ea
$17.150.00
31
2506.502
Construct Draina a Structure Design
84" 4020
1
Ea
$3,252.70
Ea
$3,252.70
$3,250.00
Ea
$3,250.00
54,628.11 Ea
$4,628.11
$4,840.00 Ea
$4,840.00
32
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
A or F
12
Ea
51,353.50
Ea
518,242.00
$1,475.00
Ea
$17,700.00
$1,297.75 Ea
$15,573.00
$1,370.00 Ea
$16.440.00
33
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
C or G
2
Ea
51,353.50
Ea
$2.707.00
$1,165.00 Ea
52.330.00
$1,356.82 Ea
$2,713.64
$1,330.00 Ea
$2.660.00
34
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
H
12
Ea
$726.95
Ea
$8,723.40
$925.00 Ea
511,100.00
$802.94 Ea
$9,635.28
5890.00 Ea
510,680.00
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure Design
Special
2
Eal
$3.100.00
Ea
$6,200.00
$1,555.00
Ea
$3.110,1301
52,466.26 Ea
54,932.52
$2.230.00 Ea
$4,460.00
2511.501
Random Ri rap Class III
50.7
CY
$95.20
CY 1
$4,826.64
$50.00
CY I
S2.535.00
547.00 CY
$2,382.90
$74.00 CY 1
$3,751.80
Subtotal "B" $227,660.94 $223,464.00 $205,342.53 $258,946.30
6/23199
Bid Tabulation
Page 4 of 6
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th St. - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
.,_ ..r•• c--.. .....". RVAIU (`nIJTDArTrun - Rrr`rJ- --cm. Illr ARr rw r nAi zr rn wx
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Unit
Price
Extension
37
2503.511
12" SOR 26 PVC Pipe (12' - 16')
89
LF
$63.35
LF
$5,638.15
$77.00
LF
$6,853.00
$71.51 LF
$6,364.39
$57.42
LF
$5,110.38
38
2503.511
12" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (24' - 28')
416
LF
$65.70
LF
527,331.20
$77.00
LF
$32.032.00
$79.51 LF
S33,076.16
$74.42
LF
$30,958.72
39
2503.511
12" SDR 26 PVC Pipe 28' - 32')
644
1F
$67.40
LF
$43.405.60
$77.00
LF
$49,588.001
S84.51 LF
$54,424.44
$83.32
LF 1
$53,658.08
40
2503.511
18" SOR 26 PVC Pipe (16'- 20')
309
LF
$74.70
LF
$23,082.30
$89.00
LF
$27,501.00
$84.26 LF
$26,036.34
$75.62
LF
$23,366.58
41
2503.511
18" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (20'- 24')
1823
LF
$75.85
LF
$138,274.55
$89.00
LF
$162,247.00
$86.26 LF
$157,251.98
$82.12
LF
$149,704.76
42
2503.511
18" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (24' - 28')
160
LF
$77.25
LF
S12.360.00
$89.00
LF
$14,240.00
$91.26 LF
$14,601.60
S89.82
LF
$14,371.20
43
2503.511
18" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (28' - 32')
1560
LF 1
$78.90 LF
5123,084.00
$89.00
LF
$138,840.00
$96.26 LF
$150,165.601
$98.72
LF
$154,003.20
44
2503.511
18" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (32'- 36')
856
LF
$86.95
LF
$69,293.20
$89.00
LF
$76,184.00
$101.26 LF
$86.678.56
$109.62
LF
$93,834.72
45
2503.511
8" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (all depths)
400
LF
$62.50
LF
525,000.00
$50.00
LF
$20.000.00
$15.20 LF
$6,080.00
$63.12
LF
$25,248.00
46
2503.602
Construct Outside Drop
4
Ea
$1,518.00
Ea
$6,072.00
$3,035.00
Ea
$12,140.00
$2,800.00 Ea
$11,200.00
$2,040.00
Ea
$8,160.00
47
2503.602
8" PVC Plug
6
Ea
S7.20
Ea
543.20
$50.00
Ea
$300.00
- $19.00 Ea
S114.00
$36.00
Ea
5216.00
48
2503.602
12" PVC Ptug
2
Ea
S29.40
Ea
$58.80
$90.00
Ea
$180.00
$38.00 Ea
$76.00
566.00 Ea
$132.00
49
2503.602
Conned to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1
Ea
$1,182.50
Ea
$1,182.50 $10,000.00
Ea
$10,000.00
5637.50 Ea
$637.50
$260.00
Ea
$260.00
50
2506.602
Construct Sanitary Manhole
16
Ea
$1,523.15
Ea
$24,370.40
$1,450.00 Ea
$23,200.00
$1,779.00 Ea
$28,464.00
$1,570.00
Ea
$25,120.00
51
2506.603
Extra Depth Manhole (over 8 ft)
270.96
VF
$86.35
VF
523.397.40
$85.00
VF
S23,031.60
$80.00 VF
521,676.80
586.00
VF
$23.302.56
Subtotal "C" $522,593.30 5596,336.60 $596,847.37 5607,446.20
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
52
2504.602
Conned to Existing Watermain
4
Ea
5349.00
Ea
$1,396.00
$1,500.00
Ea
$6.000.00
$285.00 Ea
$1,140.00
S130.00 Ea
$520.00
53
2504.602
Hydrant
4
Ea
$1,462.35
Ea
$5,849.40
$1,420.00
Ea
$5,680.00
$1,438.23
Ea
$5,752.92
$1,540.00 Ea
$6,160.00
54
2504.602
6" Gate Vatve & Box
4
Ea
5410.85
Ea 1
$1,643.40
$410.00
Ea
51,640.00
$407.64 Ea
$1,630.56
$515.00 Ea
$2,060.00
55
2504.602
8" Gate Valve & Box
5
Ea
$559.95
Ea
$2,799.75
$565.00
Ea
$2.825.00
$574.13
Ea
$2.870.65
5755.00 Ea
$3,775.00
56
2504.602
12" Butterfly Valve & Box
10
Ea
$767.60
Ea
$7,676.00
$780.00
Ea
$7,800.00
$750.51
Ea
$7,505.10
$1,011.00 Ea
$10,110.00
57
2504.603
6" Water Main -Dud Iron Cl 52
44
LF
$24.00 LF
$1,056.00
$15.00
LF
$660.00
$21.84
LF
$960.96
$27.09 LF
$1,191.9e
58
2504.603
8' Water Main -Duct Iron Cl 52
375
LF
$20.80
LF
$7,800.00
$17.00
LF
58,375.00
$22.38
LF
$8,392.50
$29.69 LF
$11,133.75
59
2504.603
12" Water Main -Dud Iron Cl 52
4954
LF
$24.30
LF 1
$120,382.20
$24.00
LF
$118,896.00
$21.07
LF
$104,380.78
S28.77 LF
$142.526.58
60
2504.62
Ductile Iron Fittings
1 3275
Lbs
$1.45
Lbs 1
$4,748.75
$1.05 lbs
$3,438.75
$1.20
Lbs
$3,930.00
$2.00 Lbs
$6.550.00
Subtotal "D" $153,351.50 $153,314.75 $136,563.47 $184,027.29
8/23/99
Bid Tabulation
Page 5 of 6
BID TABULATION
Quaday Ave. - 78th St - Page Avenue
City of Otsego
.. ., ,.,r,.. �... ,., ... . . _ rcnu rur• aonnu nnucr r
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
61
2554.602
Permanent Barricade
4
Ea
$225.00 Ea
$900.00
$225.00 Ea
$900.00
$230.00 Ea
S920.00
$225.00 Ea
$900.00
62
2563.601
Traffic Control
1
LS
$4,500.00 LS
$4,500.00
$8,500.00 LS
$6,500.00
$8,000.00 LS
$8,000.00
$1,000.00 LS
51,000.00
63
2564.603
4' Double Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
4620
-LF
$1.20 LF
55.544.00
$1.08 LF
$4.989.601
$1.11 LF
$5,128.20
57.50 LF
$34,650.00
64
2564.603
4' Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
720
LF
$0.65 LF
5468.00
$0.54 LF
$388.80
$0.55 LF
$396.00
53.70 LF
$2,564.00
55
2564.603
4 -Solid Line White -Epoxy
10780
LF
$0.60 LF
$8,468.00
$0.48 LF
$5,174.40
$0.49 LF
$5,282.20
53.60 LF
$38,808.00
66
2564.603
12' Crosswalk Line White -Epoxy
640
LF
$1.60 LF
51,024.00
S1.50 LF
5960.00
$1.53 LF
$979.20
$6.00 LF
$3,840.00
67
2564.603
8' Solid Line Yellow -Epoxy
520
LF
$1.60 LF
$832.00
$1.50 LF
$780.00
$1.53 LF
$795.60
S8.00 LF
54,160.00
68
2564.604
Crosswalk Mari(ing-Epoxy Marking-Epoxy
2520
SF
$2.10 SF
S5.292.00
$2.00 SF
55,040.00
$2.93 SF
$7,383.60
53.50 SF
$8,820.00
69
2564.604
Sin Panels Type C
183
SF
521.25 SF
$3,888.75
$21.25 SF
53,888.75
521.88 SF
53,967.44
$22.50 SF 1
$4,117.50
Subtotal"E" $28,916.75 $28,621.55 $32,852.24 $98,959.50
Item #
Spec.Ref
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Price
- Roadway
Extension
Unit
Price
Extension
Unit
Price
Bid Schedule "B"
Extension
Unit
Price
$223,464.00
Extension
70
2573.502
- Sanitary Sewer
Sift Fence, Type Pre -Assembled
2000
LFI
S1.80
LF
$3,600.00
$1.00 LF
$2,000.00
$1.85
LF
53,700.00
$1.80
LF
$3,800.00
$32.852.24
2575.501
Bid Schedule "F"
Seeding
7
AC
$190.00
AC
$1.330.00
$200.00 AC
S1,400.00
$194.00
AC
$1,358.00
$190.00
AC
$1,330.00
2575.502
Seeding Mixture 500
490
Lbs
54.50
Lbs
$2,205.00
$3.00 Lbs
$1,470.00
S4.60
Lbs
$2.254.00
54.50
Lbs 1
$2.205.00
73
2575.505
Sodding Type Lawn
6000
SY
$1.80
SY
S10.800.00
$2.35 SY
$14,100.00
$1.85
SY
$11,100.00
$1.80
SY
$10.800.00
74
2575.511
Mulch Material, Type 1
14
To
$120.00
Ton
$1,680.00
$100.00 Ton
$1.400.00
5122.50
Ton
$1,715.00
$120.00
Ton
$1,680.00
75
2575.519
Disk Anchorin
7
AC
$65.00
AC
5455.00
$50.00 AC
$350.00
$66.50
AC
$465.50
565.00
AC
5455.00
76
2575.532
lCornmercial Fertilizer, 20.10-10
3150
Lbs
$0.20
Lbs
$630.001
$0.35 Lbs 1
$1,102.50
$0.25
Lbs
$787.50
$0.20
Lbs
5630.00
Subtotal '7" $20,700.00 $21,822.50 $21,380.00 $20,700.00
Summary of Bidding:
Bid Schedule "A"
- Roadway
$520.731.63
$544,511.25
$612,165.96
$559,372.77
Bid Schedule "B"
- Storm Sewer
$227,660.94
$223,464.00
$205,342.53
$258.946.30
Bid Schedule "C"
- Sanitary Sewer
$522,593.30
$596,336.60
$596,847.37
$607,446.20
Bid Schedule "D"
- Water System
$153,351.50
$153,314.75
$136,563.47
$184,027.29
- Bid Schedule "E"
- Traffic Control
$28,916.75
$26.621.55
$32.852.24
$98,959.50
Bid Schedule "F"
- Restoration ✓f< Landscape
S20,700.00
$21,822.50
$21.380.00
$20,700.00
TOTAL BID:
51,473.954.12
51,568,070.65
51,605,151.57
51,729.452.06
6123,99-
Bid
/23/99-Bid Tabulation
Page 6 of 6
,tate of MinnQsota
SECRETARY OF STATE
�'?" g � -, "'7- Z -Z4 -
CERTIF':CATE OF INCORPORATION
✓•.
I, Mary
do certify that:
Kiffineyer,. Secretary of State of Minnesota,
Articles
and acknowledged
Inco, have
under oath,
Incorporation, duly signed
been filed
in the Office of
incorporation
the Secretary
on this date
of State, for the
of
accordance with
the following
the
corporation, under and in
`...
Statutes listed
provisions
below.
of the chapter of Minnesota
This corporation is now legally organized under the
laws of Minnesota.
Corporate Name: WRIGHT/SIERBURN£ CHAPTER OF MINNESOTA
WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
Corporate Charter Number: 1T-194
Chapter Formed Under: 317A
This certificate has been issued on 03/30/1999.
ecreta of State.
TAX EXEMPT LAW OFFICE OF EVE ROSE BORENSTEIN
3754 PLEASANT AVENUE S., # 107
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55409
612.822.2677
Fax: 612.822.2626
eve@taxexemptlaw.org
April 8, 1999
Mike McGinty
Minnesota Waterfowl Association
5701 Normadale Road
Minneapolis, MN 55424
Re: Wright/Sherbure Chapter
Dear Mike:
Enclosed please find the original Articles of Incorporation for Wright/Sherburne Chapter of
Minnesota Waterfowl Association stamped by the Secretary of State.
If you have any questions please call.
Sincerely,
4o
Tamara a ey
Administrative Assistant
REPRESENTATION AND PLANNING ON FEDERAL TAX AND STATE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW MANDATES FOR
TAX-EXEMPT AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
ale of Minnes
of -
c
SECRETARY OF STATE
CERTIF:'_CATE OF INCORPORATION
�-
I, Mary
do
Kiffineyer,. Secretary of State of Minnesota,
-;"
certify that:
Articles of
Incorporation, duly signed
and acknowledged
under oath, have
been filed on this date
in the Office of
the Secretary
of State, for the
"=
incorporation of
the following
corporation, under and in
accordance with
the provision:-
of the chapter of Minnesota
Statutes listed
below.
This corporation is now legally organized under the
laws of Minnesota.
Corporate Name: WRIGHT/S".IERBURNE CHAPTER OF MINNESOTA
WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
Corporate Charter Number: 1T-194
Chapter Formed Under: 317A
This certificate has been issued on 03/30/1999.
i
ecreta� of State.
Tj `T•J
7- ! ?�Z ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
OF
WRIGHT/SHERBURNE CHAPTER OF MINNESOTA WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION
The undersigned incorporator, a natural person 18 years of age or older, in order to form a corporateems.
under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 317A, adopts the following articles of incorporation.
ARTICLE I
NAME/REGISTERED OFFICE
The name of this corporation shall be: WRIGHT/SHERBURNE CHAPTER OF MINNESOTA
WATERFOWL ASSOCIATION�-The corporation's registered office address shall be located at: 5701
Normandale Road, Minneapolis, MN, 55424.
ARTICLE II
PURPOSE
This corporation is organized exclusively for charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 501(c)(3)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now enacted or hereafter amended, including, for such purposes,
the making of distributions to organizations that also qualify as Section 501(c)(3) exempt organizations.
To this end, the corporation shall protect, preserve, restore, develop, enhance and maintain wetland
habitats, waterfowl and wetland wildlife, and educate the public to the benefits of same, including the use
and appreciation of wetland habitats, waterfowl and wetland wildlife. All funds, whether income or
principal, and whether acquired by gift or contribution or otherwise, shall be devoted to said purposes.
ARTICLE III
LIMITATIONS
At all times the following shall operate as conditions restricting the operations and activities of the
corporation:
No part of the net earnings of the corporation shall inure to any member of the corporation not
qualifying as exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now
enacted or hereafter amended, nor to any Director or officer of the corporation, nor to any other
private persons, excepting solely such reasonable compensation that the corporation shall pay for
services actually rendered to the corporation, or allowed by the corporation as a reasonable
63558 of
allowance for authorized expenditures incurred on behalf of the corporation; '.
2. No substantial part of the activities of the corporation shall constitute the carrying on of propaganda
or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, or any initiative or referendum before the public,
and the corporation shall not participate in, or intervene in (including by publication or distribution
of statements), any political campaign on behalf of, or in opposition to, any candidate for public
office;
3. Notwithstanding any other provision of these articles, the corporation shall not carry on any other
activities not permitted to be carried on by a corporation exempt from federal income tax under
Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as now enacted or hereafter amended; and
4. The corporation shall not lend any of its assets to any officer or Director of this corporation, or
guarantee to any person the payment of a loan by an officer or Director of this corporation.
ARTICLE IV
DIRECTORSIMEMBERS
The corporation shall have voting members, and such membership, if any, and classes thereof, shall be as
defined in the corporation's bylaws. The corporation shall have a Board of Directors, who shall manage
the affairs of the corporation as defined by statute, this Article, and the corporation's bylaws. No member
or Director shall have any right, title, or interest in or to any property of the corporation devolve from their
relationship to the corporation as a member or Director.
ARTICLE V
DEBT OBLIGATIONS AND PERSONAL LIABILITY
No member, officer or Director of this corporation shall be personally liable for the debts or obligations
of this corporation of any nature whatsoever, nor shall any of the property of the members, officers or
Directors be subject to the payment of the debts or obligations of this corporation.
ARTICLE VI
DISSOLUTION
Upon the time of dissolution of the corporation, assets shall be distributed by the Board of Directors, after
paying or making provisions for the payment of all debts, obligations, liabilities, costs and expenses of the
corporation, for one or more exempt purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the Internal
Revenue Code, or the corresponding section of any future federal tax code, or shall be distributed to the
federal government, or to a state or local government, for a public purpose. Any such assets not so
disposed of shall be disposed of by a Court of Competent Jurisdiction of the county in which the principal
office of the corporation is then located, exclusively for such purposes or to such organization or
organizations, as said Court shall determine, which are organized and operated exclusively for such
purposes.
ARTICLE VII
INCORPORATOR
The incorporator of this corporation is:
Eve Rose Borenstein
Attorney at Law
3754 Pleasant Avenue South, ¢107
Minneapolis, MN 55409
The undersigned incorporator certifies both that she/he/they executes these Articles for the purposes herein
stated, and that by such execution, she/he/they affirms the understanding that should any of the information
in these Articles be intentionally or knowingly misstated, she/he/they is/are subject to the criminal penalties
for perjury set forth in Minnesota Statutes 609.48 as if this document had been executed under oath.
L -ti110—
signature
date
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
FILED
MAR 3 0 1999
`�° f 7-7
sea*W-V of sl*
Minnesota Lawful Gambling
Page 1 of 2
10/98
For Board Use Only
Fee Paid
Application for Exempt Permit - LG220
Check No.
Organization Information
InitialsReceived
Organization name ` ' I Previous lawful gambling exemption number
Cr. .
Street City
State/Zip Code County
Name of chief executive officer (CEO) of organization
Daytime phone number of
First name Last name
� _ C,- � l /'�
CEO: (LP i a— ))II ""
C -P lj C�4
Name of teasurer of organization
First name Last name
Daytime phone number of
treasurer-
C,_ — �p 'IY')
Type of onprofit Organization
Check the box that best describes your organization:
❑ Fraternal ❑ eligious
❑ Veteran Other nonprofit organization
Check the box that indicates the type of proof your organization attached to this application:
❑ IRS letter indicating income tax exempt status
❑ Certificate of Good Standing from the Minnesota Secretary of State's Office
A charter showing you are an affiliate of a parent nonprofit organization
❑ Proof previously submitted and on file with the Gambling Control Board
Gambling Premises Information
Name of premises, where gambling activity will be conducted (for raffles, list the site where the drawing will take place)
c
Address (do not use PO box) City StateZ Code \County
D e(s) of activity (for raffles, indicate the date of the drawing) `
9 CZ1 `\WKA
Ch cic the box or boxes that indicate the type o gambling activity your organizati n will be conducting:
❑ -Bingo P Raffles ❑ 'Paddlewheels FI -Pull -Tabs ❑ 'Tipboards
'Equipment for these activities must be obtained from a licensed distributor.
This form will be made available in alternative
format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. The
information requested on this form (and any
attachments) will be used by the Gambling
Control Board (Board) to determine your
qualifications to be involved in lawful gambling
activities in Minnesota. You have the right to
refuse to supply the information requested;
however, if you refuse to supply this information,
the Board may not be able to determine your
qualifications and, as a consequence, may refuse
to issue you a permit. If you supply the
information requested, the Board will be able to
process your application.
Your name and and your organ'ization's name
and address will be public information when
received by the Board. AD the other information
that you provide will be private data about you
until the Board issues your permit. When the
Board issues your permit, all of the information
that you have provided to the Board in the
process of applying for your permit will become
public. If the Board does not issue you a permit,
all the information you have provided in the
process of applying for a permit remains private,
with the exception of your name and your
organization's name and address which will
remain public.
11
Private data about you are available only to the
following: Board members, staff of the Board
whose work assignment requires that they have
access to the information; the Minnesota
Department of Public Safety; the Minnesota
Attorney General; the Minnesota Commissioners
of Administration. Finance, and Revenue; the
Minnesota Legislative Auditor, national and
international gambling regulatory agencies:
anyone pursuant to court order, other individuals
and agencies that are specifically authorized by
state or federal law to have access to the
information; individuals and agencies for which
law or legal order authorizes a new use or
sharing of information after this Notice was given;
and anyone with your consent.
Application for Exempt Permit - LG220 Page 2 of 210/98
Organization Name
L_Uv_C% vI Lvvvcl1u1rnn[tacKnowieagment
If:th
city.
hin atyaimits,'the 1
On behalf of the city, I acknowledge this application
and three options for the city:
1. Approve the application: By taking no action,
the city allows the Board to issue a permit after
30 days (60 days for a first class city),
2. Waive the above -noted waiting period: The
city allows the Board to issue a permit before
30 days (60 days for a first class city). Docu-
mentation attached.
3_ Deny the application by passing a resolution
within 30 days (60 days for a first class city).
Print name of city:
(Signature of city personnel receiving application)
Title
Date
Required by Statute)
;If�the amb �n prem�lg&s�is lgcated) j owii'siup;�boUT
Zftles. �il +�. w . .n"""`�rnustsignhis'a'i'p`'cation ~x
On behalf of the county, I acknowledge this application
and three options for the county:
1. Approve the application: By taking no action, the
county allows the Board to issue a permit after 30 days.
2. Waive the above -noted waiting period: The county
allows the Board to issue a permit before 30 days.
Documentation attached.
3. Deny the application by passing a resolution within
30 days.
Print name of county:
(Signature of county personnel receiving application)
Title
Date / /
On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the
organization is applying for exempted gambling activity
within the township limits.
A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny
an application (Minn. Stat. sec. 349.213, subd. 2).
Print name of township:
(Signature of township official acknowledging application)
Title
Date
Chief Executive Officer's Signature
The information provided in this application is complete andZj urate to the best of my knowledge.
Chief Executive Officer's signature�{a „,
Q,, [k,Q,A
Name (please print) n l_ n f� F L ( G Date_ /�d
Mail Application and Attachment(s)
At least 45 days prior to your scheduled activity date send:
• the completed application;
• a copy of your proof of nonprofit status -and
• a $25 application fee (make check payable to "State of Minnesota"). Application fees are not prorated,
refundable, or transferable.
Send to: Gambling Control Board
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
Roseville, MN 55113
If your application has not been acknowledged by the local unit of government, do not send the application to the
Gambling Control Board.
ication for Exem
Permit - LG220, Information Sheet
10198
Who may be issued an An exempt permit can be issued to nonprofit organizations conducting lawful gambling activity
exempt permit? on five or fewer days, and awarding less than $50,000 in prizes during'a calendar year.
Separate applications Complete a separate application for each occasion. An occasion may be either.
required 1. One day of gambling activity.
• If your organization wants to conduct gambling activity on April 5, May 5, and June 5, you
must submit a separate application and fee for each activity date.
-OR-
2. Two or more consecutive days of gambling activity.
• If your organization wants to conduct gambling on July 3, 4, and 5 at the same site, you may
submit only one application and one fee.
If you are conducting a raffle, each day a drawing is held constitutes one day of gambling. If
drawings are held on more than five days in a calendar year, your organization must obtain an
organization license, a gambling manager's license, and a premises permit.
How to Obtain a Copy of Proof of Nonprofit Static
rinanciai report and • On the first working day of the month in which your gambling activity is being held, the Gambling
recordkeeping required Control Board will
send your organization a financial report form and instructions.
• Complete and return the financial report form to the Board within 30 days of your date of activity.
Your organization must keep your gambling records for 3-1/2 years.
Questions? Call the Licensing Section of the Gambling Control Board at -651-639-4000. If you use a TTY, you
can call the Board by using the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 and ask to place a call
to 651-639-4000.
I
CITY OF
Oi SEGO
.,899 Nashua Avenue N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414
Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: (612) 441-8823
NOTICE OF WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION
Name of Applicant: Dennis Backes
Application Number: OT2198
Type of Application (check one): ❑
Exemption Decision
❑
No Loss Decision
®
Replacement Plan Decision
❑
Banking Plan Decision
Decision on Application: ❑ Approved
❑ Denied
❑ Postponed
® Approved with Stipulations
Date of Decision: August 23, 1999
Location of Project: Within Sections 22 and 27, T121N, R23W, City of Otsego, Wright County
Summary of Project: Backes Companies is proposing to develop a 120.5 acre site for 181
single-family homes in the City of Otsego. Development activities will include an internal
roadway system with nine cul-de-sacs, ten water quality treatment ponds, and installation of
sanitary sewer and water services. The applicant proposes to fill 64,033 SF of wetland and create
104,108 SF of new replacement wetland. The applicant proposes 295,337 SF in public value credits.
List of Addresses:
Keith Grow, BWSR
Mark McNamara, Wright SWCD
Robert Hance, DNR.Region 3 Administrator
Doug Norris, DNR Wetlands Program Coordinator
Gary Elftman, COE
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Jeff Shopek, Loucks and Associates
Dennis Backes, Backes Companies
You are hereby notified that the decision of the Local Government Unit on the above -
referenced application was made on the date stated above. A copy of the Local Government Unit's
Findings and Conclusions is attached. Pursuant to Minn. R. 8420.0250 any appeal of the decision
must be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal to the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources within fifteen (15) days of the date of the mailing of this Notice.
Date of mailing of this Notice:
August 23, 1999
CITY OF OTSEGO
Title:
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
.,899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Elk River, MN 55330
CITY OF
OIS,G0
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING OF NOTICE OF
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT DECISION
(612) 441-4414
Fax: (612) 441-8823
The undersigned certifies on August 24, 1999, he/she mailed copies of the attached
Notice of Wetland Conservation Act Decision to the addresses listed thereon by depositing the
same in the United States Mail in the City of Anoka, County of Anoka and State of Minnesota,
properly enveloped with prepaid first class postage.
By:
Title:
Date: August 23, 1999
Keith Grow, BWSR
Mark McNamara, Wright SWCD
Robert Hance, DNR Region 3 Administrator
Doug Norris, DNR Wetlands Program Coordinator
Gary Elftman, COE
Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Jeff Shopek, Loucks and Associates
Dennis Backes, Backes Companies
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
CITY OF
Sn' G 0
j899 Nashua Avenue N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414
Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: (612) 441-8823
CRIMSON PONDS — WETLAND PERMIT APPLICATION
LIST OF STIPULATIONS
Name of Applicant:
Application Number:
Project Name:
Project Location:
Dennis Backes
OT2198
Cr=imson Ponds
Within Sections 22 and 27,
Wright County
T121 N, R23W, City of Otsego,
The Wetland Permit Application for Crimson Ponds dated July 7, 1999 has been
approved with the following stipulations. -
1
tipulations:
1. Receipt of Escrow in the amount of $15,000 to be returned to applicant after
wetland mitigation is complete after 5 year period.
2. Execute Affidavit of Landowner and record Declaration of Restrictions and
Covenants for Replacement Wetlands and Consent to Replacement Wetland
following review by city staff. Specific and detailed legal descriptions shall be
written for each replacement area.
3. Provide Proof of Property Ownership
4. Wetland impact has been reduced by revising the grading plan for Lots 1 and 2
of Block 4 (shown as lots 8 and 9 of Block 3 in the Permit Application). Also new
wetland creation has been reduced to save existing trees. The tree area shall
remain as a conservation easement. Revise the wetland impact areas, public
value credit areas, and wetland creation area shown in the plan.
5. Revise all applicable numbers and figures in the Wetland Permit Application and
resubmit a final document.
6. The new wetland creation area which was revised to save trees does not meet
the requirements of the permit application. The area is shown deeper than 4.5
feet and the shoreline and bottom is not undulating. Revise the grading plan.
7. Place silt fence between the wetland replacement areas (at the normal water
elevation) and uplands.
8. Revise the grading plan north of Lot 5, Block 3. The grading does not match the
impact limits shown in the permit application.
Applicant Signature Date
LGU Official Signature Date
Ma01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
CITY OF
TSEGO
,)899 Nashua Avenue N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414
Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: (612) 441-8823
Name of Applicant:
Application Number:
Type of Application:
I. INTRODUCTION
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Dennis Backes
OT 2198
Replacement Plan
Backes Companies is proposing a 181 single-family home development on 120.5
acres of existing farmland in Otsego, Minnesota. The proposed development
includes an internal roadway system with nine cul-de-sacs, ten water quality
treatment ponds designed to National Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards,
and areas of existing and newly created wetlands set aside as permanent.open
space. Future access to undeveloped properties to the east and south is
provided by stubbing roadways at the property boundaries. This will provide for
proper traffic flow if the adjacent properties are developed in the future.
The proposed plan involves 1.47 acres of wetland fill and 2.39 acres of wetland
creation. The following text describes existing conditions on the site, the
proposed replacement plan, and a sequencing discussion. Figures and
appendices referenced in this application are included.
II. SITE LOCATION
The site of the proposed single-family housing development and subsequent
wetland filling is located in Sections 22 and 27 of Township 121 North, Range 23
West, City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota. Specifically, the site lies
southwest of the intersection of Page Avenue and 85th Street just east of Packard
Avenue.
III. FINDINGS
• Currently, the property consists of an old farmstead, row crop fields, wetlands,
and a small portion of deciduous woodland. In general, the site is relatively
flat with wetlands occurring in distinct depressional areas. There are 5
wetland basins on the site including wetland types 2,3,4, and 6. Wetlands
were delineated in October, 1998 and field reviewed by the Wright County
Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD). Soils on the site are sandy and
relatively well -drained. Hydrology for wetland areas is driven by a
combination of groundwater and surface water runoff.
Page 1 of 3
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
• The total proposed wetland impact is 65,033 SF. The deminimus is 400 SF.
The proposed project results in wetland impact of greater than 10,000 SF
over the deminimus. TEP members have been notified with a complete
wetland permit application plan and have submitted comments. The impact is
through fill.
• The project is not exempt.
• The wetlands are not DNR protected waters.
• The applicant has,,demonstrated that the activity will minimize wetland
impacts through modifying the size, scope, configuration, and density of the
project.
• The applicant suggests that no feasible alternative project configurations exist
that would totally avoid all wetlands while allowing access to all portions of the
site, allowing potential future access to adjacent properties, and providing for
an economically feasible development plan.
• The applicant suggests that sequencing flexibility may be applied because the
wetland to be impacted has been degraded to the point where replacement of
it would result in a certain gain in function and public value.
IV. WETLAND REPLACEMENT PLAN
A wetland replacement plan has been submitted. A replacement plan application
has been submitted. A complete wetland replacement plan has been sent to
TEP members for comment. A TEP meeting was held on August 4, 1999.
Declaration of Restrictions, Affidavit of Landowner, Consent to Replacement, and
Proof of Property Ownership have not been completed for replacement wetland.
Replacement is proposed to be through creation, conservation easement and
storm water quality ponding at a ratio of 2:1.
1. The replacement plan proposes a wetland elevation of 871 ensuring
adequate supply of water.
2. Hydrology will be supplied by pre-treated stormwater, groundwater, and
drainage from adjacent upland.
3. Hydrophytic vegetation will be provided through volunteer.
4. The created wetland is proposed as an'overall Type 4 complex, and the
shore line and bottom contour are undulating.
5. Side slopes are not steeper than 5:1.
6. Best management practices and erosion control measures are not shown
around the entire replacement site.
7. Sandy soils of the area are anticipated to provide an appropriate substrate
for wetland establishment. If soils are found to be inappropriate for
wetland establishment, the area will be topsoiled with soils taken from
impacted wetland areas.
Page 2 of 3
\1Ha01lshared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
8. Fringe areas of the created wetlands above the anticipated normal water
level will be seeded with an appropriate temporary cover crop following
initial construction.
9. Placement of sod and planting of bluegrass lawn will not occur within
specified new wetland creation areas.
10. A monitoring plan with photo points has been submitted.
11. Replacement is proposed to be through creation of 104,108 SF of new
wetland and 295,337 SF of public value credit.
1.
Page 3 of 3
\\HaOI shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGOO98\OT2198NOTICEWCADec.doc
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
WETLAND REPLACEMENT AND/OR BANKING PLAN
Compliance is reached when all required signatures below are complete, at which time monitoring of replacment wetland is
complete. The landowner is perpetually responsible for the success of the replacement wetland as outlined in the Declamtin of
Restrictions and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. Escrowed funds, if any, will be returned after required annual monitoring
report(s) have been received and corrective measures have been taken.
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Dennis Backes
Name(s) of Applicant
7026 Brooklyn Blvd.
Street Address
Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
City, State, Zip Code
(612) 566-1524
Check one:
® Replacement Plan: Project Number: OT2198
❑ Banking Plan: Account Number:
Project Location: T 121N R 23W S 22 and 27
UTM Coordinates: X: Y:
Country Name/Number: Wright
Mark Kjolhaug
Name(s) Authorized Agent
4767 Richmond Road
Street Address
Mound, MN 55364
City, State, Zip Code
(612) 4724875
Project Name: CRIMSON PONDS
Major Watershed Name/Number: Mississippi River/# 17
(For LGU use only)
CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE
For Replacement Plans Only: LGU certifies that a qualified LGU representative has performed a site inspection,
and finds that construction of the replacement plan identified above has been completed according to plan on
(Date).
(LGU Official Signature) (Date)
(For LGU and TEP use only)
MONITORING COMPLIANCE FOR REPLACEMENT AND BANKING PLANS
❑ Year One Report Received on (Date) ❑ Year Two Report Received on (Date)
❑ Year Three Report Received on (Date) ❑ Year Four Report Received on (Date)
❑ Final Report Received on (Date)
❑The Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) members certify by signature below that replacement is fully functional
prior to five years following construction of the replacement plan and that a complete five years of monitoring is not
necessary. (LGU write "Not Applicable" on lines for annual reports which were not deemed necessary.)
(Signature of LGU Representative on TEP) (Date) (Signature of SWCD Representative on TEP) (Date)
(Signature of BWSR Representative on TEP) (Date)
❑ LGU certifies by final signature below that a qualified LGU representative has performed a final site inspection
and finds that monitoring of the replacement site or banldng site has been completed as required, any problems
identified have been adequately addressed and remedied, and the goal of the replacement or banking plan has been
achieved.
(LGU Official Signature) (Date)
\\Ha01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\ot2198CertofCom.doc
WETLAND MONITORING REPORT COMPONENTS
After completion of the wetland mitigation areas, monitoring must be conducted for a five year period to evaluate
the success of the mitigation area, to identify maintenance and management needs, and to correct any identified
problems with the mitigation. During the growing season of each year, hydrologic and vegetative parameters should
be measured in each of the mitigation areas. If standing water is expected, the hydrology of the mitigation areas will
be monitored by installing staff gauges immediately upstream from each control structure and measuring water
levels on a monthly basis during the growing season. In cases where there is little or no standing water, soil pits
must be dug, depth of standing water recorded, and the location of each soil pit located on a site plan of the
mitigation site. Wetland vegetation must be both quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated once per year during the
period of July through August in each mitigation area. Hydrology should also be monitored from early May to
mid June. Documentation photographs. should also be taken during the months of July through August from fixed
reference points established at each wetland within the mitigation plan. At the end of the five years, a wetland
delineation may be conducted to verify that the areas have met the three parameter wetland criteria and the results of
the delineations should be addressed in the final report submitted
A monitoring report must be prepared annually during the five-year monitoring period. The report should describe
the status of the wetland mitigation, summarize the results of the vegetative and hydrologic monitoring, and discuss
management activities and corrective actions conducted during the previous year as well as activities planned for the
upcoming year. The report must be submitted to the LGU by December 31 of each year. At a minimum, the
annual report must include the following information:
• In the first report only, a comparison of the as -built specifications with the design specifications and an
explanation for significant modifications.
• A brief description of the wetland mitigation areas, including location, size, vegetative and hydrologic
monitoring reports, current wetland types and desired wetland types.
• For each subsequent year, a comparison of existing conditions in the wetlands with as -built specifications and
an explanation for any significant differences.
• A summary of water level measurements or soil pit data collected to date and a determination as to whether the
hydrology in the wetlands meets the design elevations and wetland hydrology criteria as defined in federal
wetland delineation manuals. Data for at least one soil pit near the wetland edge must be submitted.
• A summary of plant species growing in each wetland and a determination whether the vegetation meets the
wetland criteria as defined in federal wetland delineation manuals. For wetland mitigation areas greater than
0.5 acres, plant species data from at least two sample locations must be collected and their locations indicated
on a site plan included with the monitoring report. Mitigation areas less than 0.5 acres only need plant species
indicated for one sample location. Percent dominance should be recorded at each location with emphasis placed
upon dominant species present.
• A summary of management activities and/or corrective actions conducted in the wetlands during the previous
year and activities planned for the following year (i.e. burning, retilling, regrading, herbicide application,
reseeding and mulching).
• Color photographs of the wetland mitigation sites taken in July through August of each year at the designated
photo -reference points. At least one photo should be taken from each reference point. Photo -reference points
should include views of any control structures and enough additional points to adequately depict the entire
project. The direction in which the picture is taken should be specified.
NOTE: The LGU may reserve the right to extend the wetland monitoring period beyond five years and withhold or
cash any monitoring escrow required as part of an approved wetland replacement plan in the event that the wetland
monitoring requirements are not met. It is possible that, based on a TEP determination, wetland establishment
criteria will be achieved prior to completion of the five-year monitoring period, at which time monitoring report
requirements may be terminated.
Ma01\shared docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2198\ot2198CertofCom.doc
WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
CERTIFICATE OF REPLACEMENT PLAN (CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL)
'Compliance is reached when all monitoring requirements have been satisfied. At which time the LGU will complete a
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Certificate of Compliance of Wetland Banking and/or Replacement Plan. The
Landowner is perpetually responsible for the success of the replacement wetland as outlined in the Declaration of Restrictions
and Covenants for Replacement Wetland. Escrowed funds if any, will be returned after the required annual monitoring report(s)
have been received and corrective measures have been taken.
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
Dennis Backes, 7026 Brooklyn Blvd., Brooklyn Center, MN 55429, 612-566-1524 .
(Name, address, and phone of applicant)
Crimson Ponds, Single Family Residential
(Description of project/Name of development)
Within Sections 22 and 27, T121N, R23W, City of Otsego, Wright County
(Location of work: Township, Range, Section, Qtr. Section, Lot, Block, Subdivision, City, County)
Wetland activity at the above site is in compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) for the
following reason: Wetland has been replaced as per approved plan.
This Replacement plan certification expires 12-31-00.
(Date)
Description of Proposed Replacement (See attached stipulations):
The replacement plan dated July 7, 1999 with stipulations has been approved. Wetland impacts.cannot
exceed 64,033 square feet, or permit is null and void. Created wetlands must meet minimum standards
per 8420.0550, Subp. 2, Items A -H, and all added restrictions, monitoring requirements must be satisfied
or permit is null and void.
The information provided for this determination is truthful and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
(Applicant Signature)
(Dated)
(LGU Official Signature) (Dated)
'THIS CERTIFICATION ONLY APPLIES TO THE WCA OF 1991. Permits from local, state, and federal agencies
may be required. Check with the appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. The Combined Project
Notification form can be used for this purpose.
FOR ALL APPROVED REPLACEMENT PLANS: A landowner draining or filling a wetland under an exemption
shall ensure that; appropriate erosion control measures are taken to prevent sedimentation of the water, the drain or fill does not
block fish passage, and the drain or fill is conducted in compliance with all other applicable federal, state and local requirements,
including best management practices and water resource protection requirement established under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
10311.
\\hlaOl\shared docsWtunicipal\AOTSEGO\2198\ot2198WCACertofRP.doc
k
1'l-\.VIV�;
cnu.r.r;tVr.rattvc;
I_1VII tit nve\INO
nV\'I If
:\tIr'1
q' c'1�fiML1�iS,
May 26, 1999
Mr. Mike Robertson
City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 N.E. Nashua Avenue
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: Crimson Ponds
Loucks Project No. 98-187
Dear Mr. Robertson:
In our discussions with Greg Downing with the EQB and reviewing the Minnesota State Statutes it has become
apparent that our site does not meet any of the thresholds for requiring an EAW. The thresholds that were in
question are as follows:
MANDATORY CATAGORIES
4410.4300 MANDATORY EAW CATEGORIES
Subp. 19 Residential Development
A. (4) 250 unattached units
The proposed subdivision and all other property owned by our client does not exceed 250 units using the existing
zoning and comprehensive plan.
Subp. 28 Agricultural and Forestry
D. Conversion of 80 or more acres to a more intensive land use.
The general layout of our subdivision includes large open spaces. Thus the total acreage that has been converted to
a developed land use is approximately 75 acres.
It is also our understanding that the City \\ill be completing an EAW as part of the construction of Page Ave N. and
78" street.
If you have any questions. please Jeff Shopek or myself at 612-424-5505.
Sincerely.
LOUCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Jeremy S. Boots
Project Engineer
cc: Dennis Backes
\.a.i,it I o -_t AIIItvi nt,l.,N\1 !i Itttt•\lu•tI ;I (t I itit) iit_• I:. u.i_ -1_1 -..I . tl_ 1!LiN_'
�• nt.n1 lout L��.�tnutlt nt•t •tct•tt{r,l;;r lnt{t �n�\r\� I noun llt•1-It.ut! ti,
1'�•i 1: \I•! .• •.d is c ..c. \., itn.,.i I111d1' . \h",-it-ti I:. •til_ 17.' t.L', t:7S1,t..'
ouds
August 17, 1999
Mr. Mike Robertson
City Administration
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, Minnesota 55330
Re: Crimson Ponds
Loucks Project No. 98-187
Dear Mr. Robertson:
1°L.\NNING
CIVIL ENGINEERL\G
LAND SURVEYING
ENVIRONMENTAL
ARCFL\EOLOGY
We are responding to the comments per the DNR letter dated July 29, regarding the wetland
replacement plan for Crimson Ponds. Kjolhaug Environmental prepared a letter dated August 5,
1999, in response to the wetland issues. Our respond will address the water table issues, the cul-
de-sac layout sketch in the southwest corner of the site and the EAW comments.
Soil borings were conducted by GME Consultants in December of 1997. Their report indicates
water table ranging in elevation from 870 to 872. In addition, Loucks & Associates, Inc. has been
monitoring the water elevation in four wetlands over the spring and summer months. The water
elevation has varied from 871 to 869. We also conducted approximately 10 soil test pits with a
backhoe which indicated groundwater at the elevations indicated by the borings and wetlands.
Therefore, these soils boring, tests pits and wetland monitoring indicate that the proposed
mitigation will be adequately saturated to obtain the desired wetland characteristics.
The cul-de-sac sketch in the southwest corner appears not to impact wetlands, but when
positioning homes around the cul-de-sac it will actually result in more impact to wetlands than
the proposed cul-de-sac on the preliminary plat. In addition, the angle between this cul-de-sac
and the main road is such that it would be an unsafe intersection.
The EAW issue was discussed with the EQB in May, 1999. The attached letter indicated the
issues regarding the requirement of the EAW. We have contacted the EQB and sent them the
DNR letter for their review.
Please call me if you have further questions.
Sincerely,
Loucks & Associa�,s, Inc.
✓ z
Je rey A. Shopek, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Encl: GME Soil Report
Water level shots in wetland & Map
EAW letter dated May 26,1999
cc: Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
y L()l (:Ks & Asso c1.\rrs, hc. • 7200 Hrw.ocK L.\.`E, Suar. 300 • MAPLL GmYVE, MINNESOTA 55369-5592 • "r1t1.: (612) 424-5505 • F.\x: (612) 424-5822
e-mail. loucks@minn.nel . web page: lilrp://w,,wv t . mirin.nev-IOLicks/
F'.u.1. R. St SON • 6015 C:\1111.1. A\um.L E.\ST • INVER GwAL I hoictrrs. N11NNLSOT.\ 55076 . Tel.: (613) 457-364. • F.": 1612) 457.8643
Hakanson BIDDER'S LIST
I—IN
Anderson OT613
Assoc..Inc. OTSEGO STREET & UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS
August 23, 1999 @ 11:00 A.M.
ADDENDUMS BID
NAME RECEIVED BOND AMOUNT
1. LaTour Construction
2. Ryan Construction
t 3. Arcon Construction
4. S.J. Louis Construction
5. Richard Knutson, Inc.
6. Bonine Trucking
7. Progressive Contractors
8. Kenko Contractors
9. Barbarossa & Sons
10. Northdale Construction
1. R.L. Larson Excavating
12. North Valley, Inc.
13. Buffalo Bituminous, Inc.
14. Bauerly Companies
15. Hardrives, Inc.
16. Brown & Cris
' 17. S.R. Weidema, Inc.
18. S.M. Hentges & Sons"
19. Thielen Construction Co., Inc.
20. Rud Construction, Inc.
21
22.
23.
24.
''�.. $ D.12- i
$ 70. 667
✓ $ 70-12.9ss? .06
fi
�5g7,1�.za
io
CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, August 18, 1999
Check Summary Register Page 1 of 1
The above Claims List was on the August 23, 1999 City Council Agenda
for consideration of approval.
Name
Check Date Check Amt
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
UnPaid
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
$114.50
UnPaid
AIRGAS, INC.
$30.18
UnPaid
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
$92.38
UnPaid
BARBAROSSA & SONS
$372,436.58
UnPald
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
$19,634.35
UnPaid
CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
$469.80
UnPaid
CORROW TRUCKING
$1,513.75
UnPaid
CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT
$57.37
UnPaid
EARL F ANDERSON INC
$82.67
UnPaid
EAST SIDE LEASING CO
$237.92
UnPaid
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
$6,033.41
UnPaid
G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$373.70
UnPaid
GME CONSULTAMT,. INC.
$3,747.50
UnPaid
GROEN GARY CPA
$1,170.00
UnPaid
H G WEBER OIL COMPANY
$467.34
UnPaid
MINNESOTA MUTUAL
$58.60
UnPaid
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
$4,619.69
UnPaid
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP
$226.99
UnPaid
RUM RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
$704.00
UnPaid
SOFTRONICS
$475.00
UnPaid
SUPERIOR SERVICES
$460.00
UnPaid
SUSAN NYSTROM
$280.00
UnPaid
TRUE VALUE
$45.68
UnPaid
USF DISTRIBUTION
$127.80
UnPaid
VALENTINE KRALJIC
$280.00
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE
$847.00
UnPaid
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
$128.00
UnPaid
ZIEGLER INC
$836.27
Total Checks $415,550.48
The above Claims List was on the August 23, 1999 City Council Agenda
for consideration of approval.
CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, August 18, 1999
Page 1 of 3
Check Detail Register
Check Amt
Invoice
Comment
.............
�::.�::.
.::................w
....... ...............».......................,,.........,.,..............,.......
10100BANKOFELKRIVER
UnPaid
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
E201-45000-410
Rentals (GENERAL)
$114.50
990836
July Unit Rental
Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION
$114.50
�UnPaid».,.,,,.<�,.,..�.k,Ma„<.,........................::AIRGAS,
INC.:.........:..:...,,,,,,,.......:......,..,.w..»..,.......<............,............................,..,....,...,•...,...:..:....,,,�<...w..xw:.:...xx.»,,...,.
E 101-43100-410
Rentals (GENERAL)
$12.66
903340
Tank rental
E101-43100-210
Operating Supplies (GENERAL)
$17.52
912768
Oxygen
Total AIRGAS, INC.
$30.18
UnPaid
AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS�f
E 101-41940-400
Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$92.38
42277
Phone Line
Total AUDIO COMMUNICATIONS
$92.38
nw::.
::.yiiv3,yl.:C:.:::.P>:J . :.�000•:w,:T T�,?]Pl�,ri-:FTTa±c.,•a+„x--..:.
UnPaid
�.,»-.v::.aw:: n„-:: n.:::::.a..::: n„v.,a,-:: m,w,-:.r»„w.,a,-n.n„mw.»a,»-mwn+n»w:xnvrxx,vnvw„xxx,axx•.»w.w:
BARBAROSSA & SONS
m-.,,-.,»w::::::.vn-.,w::::.,,vn,x:.::::::
E415-43251-500
Capital Outlay (GENERAL)
$372,436.58
Pay #3
Trunk Sewer & Water
Total BARBAROSSA & SONS
$372,436.58
::.UnPaid~:...�,,,..,.,....Y..,....x
..................::BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK:.».,....,.............................,..........................................,,,..xx..ax,
wM.:.<..,w.....
E 415-43251-302
Engineering Fees
$19,634.35
063704
WW Treatment Plant - Eng
Total BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK
$19,634.35
�UnPaid.:.........................,.....:.r.<.<.<,...::;..,�::CONSTRUCTION
BULLETIN:..,...w>..>..,�,.....,,.,«.<a..«..,.«.<„<....�.�..,>..,<.>,...,,,<�.,�.«.....,.....<,,,<M.,w,.,,M«.,,....,.,...,.:.k..
E 420-43100-310
Miscellaneous
$108.75
C865624
Page St Bid Advert
E 416-43100-310
Miscellaneous
$252.30
CB65624
Overlay Bid Advert
E 418-43100-310
Miscellaneous
$108.75
CB65624
78th St Bid Advert
Total CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN
$469.80
UnPaid
CORROW TRUCKING
E 101-43610-390
Contracted Services
$1,513.75
July recycling
Total CORROW TRUCKING
$1,513.75
:;•:UnPaid<:.........a,.......,..<,....,,,«.:,�<,..x<v.<..-<..,CROW
�RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT
..:.......:.....:.:..........:...........,:..:....:..:..:.,,,,:....,....,,:...:..<..:................:..
E 101-43100-220
Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)
$57.37
70136
Miscell supplies
Total
CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT
$57.37
Unpaid:�...•<.�.,m,,,..>,................................:..EARL
F �ANDERSON�INC::...............................,.....,.....................................................................,.,.,..,.-.:..xx.,x,.,.,.,,.,,.
E101-43100-393
Street Signs
$82.67
18779
Street Signs
Total EARL F ANDERSON INC
$82.67
.:.....:......:.:......,...:............,.:.,,.....,...........,...,-::::.:.:....:.::::.,.:L-E-:::..,,:.:..,.........,............
Unpaid •-��-�� � ��������-���� ��
����� ����������� ���EAST SIDE LEASING�CO � ���-��������
E 101-41400-410
Rentals (GENERAL)
$237.92
4978
Monthly rental
Total EAST SIDE LEASING CO
$237.92
Unpaid
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
E 413-43100-390
Contracted Services
$4,070.71
8534
Odean Ave ROW Agt
E 415-43251-390
Contracted Services
$1,962.70
8534
W&S ROW Agent
Total EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO
$6,033.41
:....:...........................................
:::::::::::::::::::.::.::::::::::.•::::,:::.,.<.,x:.::.,•:::::::::..•N
Unpaid
.: <::.._:::::::•.:::::::::::::•::::.,•::::.»•:.,,:.::::::-N....w..
G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
::. www :.:.::,
E 101-43100-225
Uniforms
$218.68
Uniforms
E 101-41940-390
Contracted Services
$77.51
Supplies
E101-43100-210
Operating Supplies (GENERAL)
$77.51
Supplies
Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$373.70
,.................
::::<.»:•::::::,•::::.:::::::::<::::::::::::
Unpaid
•::::::::::::.::.:.,•:::<:.,,,::.:.,.. M :.:•:::::..x.::::::::.,:.::::.a-:::::.,•:.
GME CONSULTAMT,. INC.
�:.. xx »
N . :NkM w<::. ,.<.wN::H.H w . .................
E 417-43251-302
Engineering Fees
$180.00
3537
Washed Grad Tests
E 417-43251-302
Engineering Fees
$377.50
3537
MDH Grout Backfill
E 417-43251-302
Engineering Fees
$3,190.00
3537
Geotechnical report
Total GME CONSULTAMT,. INC.
$3,747.50
�UnPaid:..<::...........<.........,.<::....:..<.<:....x..a,
'<.<:.:...:<....N......:.:<:.:.,.....w:::,,w..:::.<............<......<.<..:.:.:<...<.,:.:<.::..::.::.<....a.w..M...,V,,...H,.,.M.<.,,.,:.<,..x<,�.
GROEN GARY �CPA
E 101-41600-390
Contracted Services
$1,170.00
July Services
CITY OF OTSEGO
Check Detail Register
Wednesday, August 18, 1999
Page 2 of 3
Check Amt Invoice
Comment
(
Total GROEN GARY CPA
$1,170.00
.............M,,.,..........,....
n.........:........,......,,.,,,.,,..::.H:.G WEBER OIL COIvIPAIV`(•::....,.»,•.n.».<n,�.
E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil
$21.70
Tax
E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil
$197.80
Gas
E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil
$247.84
Diesel Fuel
Total HG WEBER OIL COMPANY
$467.34
..0 nP aid::........................................,,-......:::.fv11 N N ESOTA MUTUAL :.............,:.,....»..:...
n.,k..n.:........:....................................................:..,.,......,n.,,.,»»:»:.,:»::.,,:»,,,
E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL)
$29.00
Employee Life Insurance
E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL)
$29.60
Employee Life Insurance
Total MINNESOTA MUTUAL
$58.60
UnPaid NORTHWEST .................................... • ' - `NORTHW EST ASSOC CONSULTANTSw�,�..�.<,.<.V.<.,�.«.M�w.,.<.,.««n�.<,.:..,,,..:a,,..»,.,,...�.»»,:,,.,,.»..,.»
G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge
$374.71 8843
Pheasant Ridge PP
G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer
$30.00 8843
Prairie Creek PP
G 701-21921 Midwest Station
$150.70 8843
Midwest Stat CUP
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$199.75 8844
Eng Guidelines Review
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$414.16 8844
General Planning
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$446.72 8844
Miss Wild & Scenic
G 701-21918 Bridgeland/Luconic
$466.19 8843
Bridgeland PUD
G 701-21920 JKO Holdings
$589.83 8843
JKO Rezone/Site Plan
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$750.00 8845
Meetings
G 701-21923 Lefebvre 99-12
$922.19 8843
Lefebvre CUP/Var
G 701-21914 Grenings - Miss Hills 99-6
$275.44 8843
Grenins Miss Hills
Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
$4,619.69
.....:.�:•::..:..:....:n..vn:,,,e.,,:nw.,��,n,�::.<::n_::n_:::n,.::<:n:.::::::::n.::::::.::::.:n:.::::::::n,.:::.�.,.:::::::.::::.::.w:n»:..,»::..,:..:,,.::n,,..-<n:»,.::::..:.:::::.::n:_:::::::::::::::.�n,:.::._:::::n�n,.::n,:»::..,,:.:.,::..»:::::-.,,.:::,,
Unpaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP
E 101-43100-123 Health
$82.23
Employees Dental Coverage
E 101-41400-123 Health
$144.76
Employees Dental Coverage
Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP
$226.99
UnPaid RUM RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services
$704.00 157
Mason Ave Patch
Total RUM RIVER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
$704.00
UnPaid SOFTRONICS
E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services
$475.00 1762
9.5 hours of labor -Financial S
Total SOFTRONICS
$475.00
:: «: «,,,•<.,,..<<.,..,,,,. w.,..,,,.<,,,,,.:.,: x::::. _ ::::.,•:::::::: <:::::::: n,.:. � : n, .:::::::::::.» � ::::: nw:: n w.».:::::
UnPaid SUPERIOR SERVICES
n,-::::::::::::::::: n,.: n,.:.»-<:::.,•:::::::::::::::::::::::::
n _ :::::::::::::: n � :: n _ : n,..w::<:..,,...,,,wn,,..<..,,..,......:n.,..,..:».<..w,..
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services
$460.00 89321
July recycling
Total SUPERIOR SERVICES
$460.00
.�.UnPaid�n..........:....................,......<N....:,.,,.nSUSAN NYSTROM,»...,....:..n»...,.:,n.,,,,,,,�.�,�,�.»,::ww.n.,,n„w..,...»..n,:,:.n.,�..,,.:,�.,.,.,...........,...,..,.,..._,........»...
G101-21803 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
$400.00
Damage Depost Ref
R101-38992 CITY HALL RENT
($120.00)
Less Bldg Sup Fees
Total SUSAN NYSTROM
$280.00
n:....,..,.»„vv......:..,.. m...........<..
v.,.�.}r4WiiSi:.iYTF.,.:S.. .,,..,�,....w,rna,v ra.... n, n,.,n.....
UnPaid TRUE VALUE
n..,....... rc....,...,..-.v<:.m,,,:.....,mn
n,...... n-.�...::n. n........ n.w.......,
E101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)
$45.68
Miscell supplies Public Works
Total TRUE VALUE
$45.68
UnPaid USF DISTRIBUTION
E 415-43251-310 Miscellaneous
$127.80 5559575
Signs for Gate Values
Total USF DISTRIBUTION
$127.80
UnPaid < VALENTI N E•-KRALJ ICS.:..».........,........:::nn..nnn..:n.
R101-38992 CITY HALL RENT
($120.00)
Less Bldg Sup Fees
G 101-21803 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
$400.00
Damage Deposit
Total VALENTINE KRALJIC
$280.00
CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, August 18, 1999
Check Detail Register Page 3 of 3
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $836.27 240740 Cutting Edges
Total ZIEGLER INC $836.27
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $415,550.48
Check Amt Invoice
Comment
....., ............................,,.,,,..,..,,,,
@:a;:x.:,,:;;::;o,22k:}>
��i'z,::<:�>?:'•oris`?::z>3�>s?EY:`'�
...... .....................................»........
UnPaicl
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR
-TREASURE
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$114.00
118-066-000030
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cant (equip)
$180.00
118-066-000010
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$114.00
118-066-000020
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cant (equip)
$49.00
118-802-012100
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cont (equip)
$41.00
118-010-077100
E 101-41950-400
Repairs & Maint Cant (equip)
$349.00
118-010-078010
Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE
$847.00
UnPaid`:;.,..Y.,.,...,..,, .,... ..h
K,..,........::: WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER::.....,.........,..,........::.............:..................................,.,,.......,..,.
.»...,......:.,,...,.,....
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Darkenwald lot line
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Lefebvre Adm Sub
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Lefebvre Deed Restric
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$19.50
Specht Lot Line
E 101-41400-340
Recording Fees
$50.00
Add recdg fees due
Total
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
$128.00
ri:•:+^C•Tim•:•w�•nN}H}}}NiJiP:t5JFF4}\•:•:•: TriVw.,h./w�,.oY.aeaaa<•'w}:va."-
UnPaid
ZIEGLER INC
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $836.27 240740 Cutting Edges
Total ZIEGLER INC $836.27
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $415,550.48
BANG OF ELK RIVER
. JL dY' SLK RYVER
Member F�iC
July 29; 1999
City of Otsego
Attn: Judy
8899 Nashua Ave.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Otsego MN GO IMP 1991
P.1/1
Dear Judy:
The interest and principal due on the above bond is as follows:
Interest Due 8--1-99 $3,906.25 L{ O ex) —
Principal Due 8-1-99 $25,000.00 3 O l_ L�-� D 0 O 1
Thank you! I apologize for the late notice.
Sincerely,
Chery A. Dehmer
Cashier
MAIN STREET OFFICE SCHOOL STREET OFFICE OTSEGO OFFICE
630 Main Street 846 Froepott Avenue 15800 88th Street NF-
Elk
EElk River, MN 55330 Elk River. UN 55330 Otsego, MN 55330
(612)441-1000 (612)441-9000 (612)441-7700
Fax (612) 441-0847 Fax (612) 441-0791 Fax (612) 441-7755