The URL can be used to link to this page

06-14-99 CC25 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DERARTl1-fENT: PREPARED BY: 4A. Special Presentations Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator June 14,1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 4.A.1. 1999 Series A & B Bond Sale - Tom Truszinski , Juran & Moody $2,595,000 & $1,800,000 4.A.2. 1999 Cash Flow Projection - Gary Groen, City Accountant BACKGROUND: 4.A.1. Tom Truszinski, Juran & Moody will be present to explain the Preliminary Official Statement dated May 27, 1999 for the City of Otsego 1999 Series A & B Bond Sale. (See Attached booklet of information). He will be available for questions from the Council. 4.A.1. Gary Groen, City Accountant will hopefully be available to discuss the 1999 Cash Flow Projection with the City Council. RECO.I DAENDATION: This is for Council consideration and any action needed. Realtors Invitation Letter Objective: tive: To inform local Realtors of the opportunities that exist and the services that will be provided by the City of Otsego . Develop a mailing list of local Realtors using the Elk River area phone book. . Letter from the Mayor explaining the opportunities and the process that the city will use to encourage industrial and commercial development. . Provide an agenda for the Land Owners Open House . Mail the letter 2 weeks prior to the Land Owners Open House. Development Marketing Phul ')tsego ConGdenfial nc 11999 City ofOTSEGO EDAAC Land Owners Open House Objective: To assemble the Land Owners acid Realtors into an informa- tion session hosted by the City Council Agenda: . Welcome visitors to the session. . Provide status update on the sewer & water installation schedule. . Explain the incentive the City will provide for early development in Commer- cial &Industrial zone. . Explain and provide an agenda for the upcoming Developers Open House. . Explain that the Realtors are there to introduce themselves to the land owners and offer their services. . Using a trade show style setup, have Otsego staff and Realtors inform and sell their services to the land owners. Development Marketing Plan Otsego Confidential June 3,1999 City of OTSEGO EDAAC Developers Invitation Letter Objective: To inform local Developers of the opportunities that exist and the services that will be provided by the City of Otsego . Develop a mailing list of local Developers using the Elk River area and Twin City phone books. . Letter from the Mayor explaining the opportunities and the process that the city will use to encourage industrial and commercial development. . Provide an agenda for the Developers Open House . Mail the letter 2 weeks prior to the Developers Open House. Development Marketing Plan Otsego Confidential ie 3,1999 City of OTSEGO EDAAC Invitation Letter to Developers Open House Obiective: To provide Land Owners and Realtors that represent land owners the time and date and agenda of the Developers Open House Develop a mailing list of Land owners/Realtors that want to be involved in the Developers Open House . Letter from the Mayor providing the agenda for Developers Open House . Mail the letter 2 weeks prior to the Developers Open House. Development Marketing Plan Otsego Confidential Junc 3,1999 City of OTSEGO EDAAC Developers Open House Ob,iective: To assemble the developers and the representatives of the land owners together in an environment that encourages action. Agenda: Welcome our guest to the `Developers Open House . Provide status update to the sewer & water installation . Explain the incentive the City is providing for early development City Staff to show map of available land and the name of the Realtors • Using a trade show format, have the Otsego staff and Realtors available to meet the developers. . Provide several private break out areas for business discussions. Development Marketing Plan City of OTSEGO Otsego Confidential ie 3,1999 EDAAC Developers Information Packet Objective: To Provide the Developers with all of the necessary information to take advantage of Development Opportunities in the City of Otsego. . Map of the General Area (Otsego, Elk River & Rogers) • Map of the Highway 101 Industrial & Commercial Zone . List of all available properties and Realtor contacts • City of Otsego - `Incentive Description' • City of Otsego - Key contacts representing the City Development Marketing Plan Otsego Confidential Jwie 3,1999 City ofOTSEGO EDAAC Otsego Development Incentive Objective: To provide the property owners and developers an incentive to develop Industrial & Commercial properties in the Otsego Highway 101 economic zone by Date xx/xx/xx Use the dollar savings from the lower than expected bids . Provide an Incentive that requires projects to be completed by 12/31/2000 . Example: The City will provide City staff expertise to the develop- ers at no charge to assist in making development in Otsego a time saving endeavor. The cost of a permit will also be a token amount. The City will provide delegation of authority to the Cities chosen representative (Mike Robinson) to prepare the prospect for rapid approvals with Planning & Zoning and the City Council. Development Marketllig Plan City of OTSEGO Otsego Confidential ne 3,1999 EDAAC Land Owners Invitation Letter Objective: To inform the land owners that have property in the development area targeted for Industrial and Commercial develop- ment. To provide information on the services that will be provided by the city to encourage early development. . Develop a mailing list using names from the property tax list. . Letter from the Mayor explaining the opportunities and the process that the city will use to encourage industrial and commercial development. . Provide an agenda for the Land Owners Open House . Mail the letter Z weeks prior to the Land Owners Open House. Development Marketing Plan Otsego Confidential June 3,1999 City ofOTSEGO EDAAC Development Sign Objective: To inform motorist that the City of Otsego is growing and that prime development exist. Place signs at both ends of Highway 101 entering Otsego Development Marketing Plan ")tscgo Confidential is 11999 City of OTSEGO EDAAC (:1jN&m) Duran & Moody A DIVISION cm MI1A.EK, 1011NS N &- Kul -:11N, INCO tr<ni-vil-.n TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND WATER REVENUE BONDS OF 1999, SERIES A AWARD: DATE OF SALE: INSURANCE: STANDARD & POOR'S RATING: U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY MONDAY, JUNE 14, 1999 FSA AAA BIDDER INTEREST RATE NET INTEREST COST (RATE) U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY 5.20% - 2006/2015 NORWEST INV. SERV.) CO -MGR. 5.25% - 2016/2020 PURCHASE PRICE: $2,556,075.00 $2,281,435.42 - (5.3191%) BERNARDI SECURITIES, INC. 5.55%-2006 6.00% - 2007/10 5.40%-2011 5.05%-2012 5.10%-2013 5.15%-2014 5.20%-2015 5.25%-2016 5.30%-2017 5.35% - 2018/20 PURCHASE PRICE: $2,556,095.40 $2,317,385.43 (5.4029%) DAIN RAUSCHER, INC. 4.750% - 2006 4.850% - 2007 5.000% - 2008/10 5.200% - 2011 5.250% - 2012 5.300% - 2013 5.375% - 2014 5.400% - 2015/2017* 5.500% - 2018/2020* PURCHASE PRICE: $2,556,075.00 $2,345,580.94 (5.4686%) *TERMED BONDS (Continued) ,,,,,,,:.,,., ,:.,,,: ("1110,, ' l .:.t �•I r t : u; l r :24 1500 ;.;1 1 �, ;:•.!ali', :1% ,.., ,,.:. < :, <'I�.:n�.uir, l 1. \li+ li., .\1\ St. I'mil. \I\ i lou ton:, A CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA $2,595,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION SEWER AND WATER REVENUE BONDS OF 1999, SERIES A PAGE 2 CRONIN & CO., INC. *TERMED BONDS 4.600% - 2006 4.700% - 2007 4.800% - 2008 5.000% - 2009/11 5.100% - 2012 5.125% - 2013 5.125% - 2014/15* 5.125% - 2016/17* 6.000% - 2018/20 PURCHASE PRICE: $2,560,726.10 $2,360,984.11 (5.5045%) (:2) Duran & Moody DIVISION OF a\411A.Flk. JOHNSON & KuEH\. INCORPOKNITI) TABULATION OF BIDS CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA $1,800,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999, SERIES B AWARD: DATE OF SALE: INSURANCE: STANDARD & POOR'S RATING: �f . U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY NORWEST INV. SERV.) CO -MGR. CRONIN & CO., INC. UNITED BANKERS BANK :Inn .'„rri.i Ira.tr t ;ntcr INTEREST RATE U.S. BANCORP PIPER JAFFRAY MONDAY, JUNE 14, 1999 FSA AAA NET INTEREST COST (RATE) 4.25% - 2000/04 4.35%-2005 4.50%-2006 4.60%-2007 4.70%-2008 4.75%-2009 PURCHASE PRICE: $1,773,000.00 $515,376.88 (4.7565%) 4.30% - 2000/04 4.40%-2005 4.55%-2006 5.65%-2007 5.75%-2008 5.85%-2009 PURCHASE PRICE: _ $1,773,344.75 $521,439.21 (4.8135%) 4.10%-2000 4.20%-2001 4.30%-2002 4.40%-2003 4.50%-2004 4.60%-2005 4.70%-2006 4.80%-2007 4.90%-2008 4.95%-2009 PURCHASE PRICE: $1,774,800.00 $533,147.50 (4.9206%) siIX (61 "4 1;00 (Continued)), Q;0 460,0 Il ni.t m, f\ CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA $1,800,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1999, SERIES B PAGE 2 DAIN RAUSCHER, INC. 3.900% - 2000 4.100% - 2001 4.250% - 2002 4.375% - 2003 4.500% - 2004 4.625% - 2005 4.750% - 2006 4.875% - 2007 5.000% - 2008/09 PURCHASE PRICE: $1,776,643.90 $534,816.20 (4.9360%) DATE MATURITY 6- 1 16 6- 1 3 6- 1 16 6- 1 16 6- 1 6- 7 6- 7 6- 7 6- 8 6- 8 6- 8 5- 8 J- 8 6- 14 6- 14 6- 14 6- 14 16 11 20 20 11 23 27 16 22 30 12 21 10 MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BOND SALES JUNE 1999 MUNICIPALITY AMOUNT Lyon County S 675,000 Lake Elmo 525,000 Long Lake 820,000 Duluth 6,855,000 Duluth 3,900,000 Slayton 350,000 Brandon 360,000 Chaska EDA 9,160,000 Blue Earth County 210,000 Yellow Medicine County 3,330,000 Redw000d Falls 900,000 Watertown 1,580,000 St. Michael 6,435,000 Audubon EDA 660,000 Rosemount 3,715,000 Otsego 2,595,000 Otsego 1,800,000 TYPE RATING NTC G.O. Bonds G.O. Bonds, Series A AIR 4.88 G.O. Bonds NR 4.28 G.O. Bonds NR 4.97 G.O. Bonds, Series C AAA 4.83 A 3 AAA G.O. Bonds G.O. Bonds, Series D AAA 4.86 Aaa AAA G.O. Bonds G.O. Bonds NR 4.81 G.O. Bonds NR 5.31 G.O. Bonds Baa 2 5.50 G.O. Bonds A 1 4.74 G.O. Bonds Aaa 5.15 G.O. Bonds A 3 S.23 G.O. Bonds NR 5.08 G.O. Bonds Aaa 5.07 G.O. Bonds NR 5.49 G.O. Bonds Aaa 4.69 G.O. Sewer & Water Revenue FSA 5.31 Series A AAA/S&P G.O. Improvement, Ser. B FSA 4.75 Series A AAA/S&P JURAN & MOODY, a division of MILLER. JOHNSON J-- KUEHN, INCORPORA7LD � � CJl L1 CJ1 L1 (7 Cii � Co O N o CD G1 Gti -4 O N CD G1 CD CD o 6/12/97 -' 7/7/97 E 8/1/97 I E 8/26/97 � � D 9/20/97' .. E 10/15/97 fE E _ o 11/9/97 .. € € �. 12/4/97 r-- 12/29/97 1 i E< 1/23/98 2/17/98 3/14/98 n 4/8/98 � E: D 5/3/98 E j 5/28/98 fy fFEt ..w Si jv4 •'r •: i� .''' t .f fit{ t#{>+i.:w:ii .rY {its-'..{tri;:•' 3'. .v.i e ,� ''ii..-j:i1.i{»%•• -jjnC ;� �"� .} � � } � .......{a.: p'}:�'. «�. 4fhA:j.'•:4.r•.v.%r}r4r}riij•V.ji\�% � 6/22/98 :x r h.;....... € 7/17/98 z 8/11/98 p 9/5/98 C 9/30/98 ...� 10/25/98 rn 11/19/98 12/14/98 1/8/99 > } } 2/2/99 2/27/99 x 3/24/99 >v > > '�L::jx.:�j 4/18/99 .w frx x?tt{!? {:?•jffiYF`�,>y-:i± y r x� :'S: >fY;>i:'t:>.:.-.....: } 3 :�„•.,, i ..<j{�..{ •:,:ifiiy.�t..'�'{.: .]6L"::;..;};;{?r ::>jr > s r 5/13/99 • rri.r....:.:.::?: : :?.:i-: is � i}}.; :... n::3:{?:Ly 2:>..»}.'•:.j{{C:{Si .::::.}::.:: i:t}i:: i}ii•n•r}: } } nS• j L /7/99 ,.<: .: ...:;.::E i:ii �F y;}:?},$ !j:�; .'• _:� k12 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTIXIENT: PREPARED BY: 6. Dan Licht, Assistant City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6.1. Consider Applicant Frank P and Annick C Muller 8416 Oakwood Ave NE, Otsego, Mn. PID #118-034-001030 in Sec. 20, Twp 121, R23, Lot 3, Bl. 1. Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 3RD Add. Oakwood Ave NE & S of 85TH ST NE, 1 Acre Zoned R-3 Residential Request is as follows: A. A Conditional Use Permit to consider relocation of a building (Residential dwelling) in an R-3 Residential Zoned Area. 6.2. Consider applicant Dennis Ulmer, Ulmer Construction, Inc. "Prairie Creek" Development 8019 River Rd. INE, Edmond N and Iviariette LeFebtiTe, owners of record. PID #118-500-271100 80 -Acres and PID 118-500-224401, 2.65 Acres in Sec. 22, Twp. 121, R23 Randal N LeFebvTe and M. Matheny, owners of record. Total of 82.46 Acres. Request is as follows: A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Re: Lower Density- B. Rezone from A-1, General Ag. Rural Service District to R-4 Residential - Urban Single Family District and R-5 Residential - Single and Two Family District C. PUD/CUP (Planned Unit Development'Conditional Use Permit to allow unit and base lot subdivision D. Preliminary Plat BACKGROUND: 6.1. This item came before the P.C. on June 7 1999 at 8PM. Hearing was held. There was no discussion of this item except for the applicant noting that they are working on upgrading the septic system. Motion was unanimous to recommend approval to the Council of this application for CUP W/conditions in NAC's Report, to allow a move in home. (See NAC's Findings of Fact) 6.2. Dan Licht's Report of May 18th, 1999 explains the P.C. discussion and information needed. After review at the Planning Commission Meeting of May 17, 1999. (See Attached Memorandum) (See attached P.C. Minutes recommending approval as indicated to the Council). T\/Ir. Licht will be present. (See NAC's Findings of Fact) RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council consideration for approval. The P.C. has recommended approval with the conditions as written by NAC. Thanks, Elaine .� ze2,_�� CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES XIONDAY, JUNE 7, 1999 - 8PM 1. Chair Carl Swenson will call meeting to order: Chair Swenson called the meeting to order at 8PNf. ROLL CALL: Planning Commission: Chair Carl Swenson, Bruce Rask, Richard Nichols, Patrick Moonen, Eugene Goenner and Christian Mbanefo, Alternate. Arleen Nagel, excused absence, Jim Kolles, absent. Council Members: Vern Heidner Staff: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator and Daniel Licht, City Planner. 2. Consideration of the PlanninLy Commission Minutes of: A. MU 17, 1999 PC Meeting BRUCE RASK MOTIONED APPROVAL OF THE P.C. MINUTES OF MAY 17, 1999 SPM MEETING AS WRITTEN. RICHARD NICHOLS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. Continued Hearing by Applicant Chris Bulow. Bulow, Inc P.O. Box 506, Elk River, Nrfor owners Donald and Phyllis Greninger 9383 Kadler Ave. NE, Otsego, MN PID #118-800-142402 in Section 14, Township 121, Range 24. Property is NE of Co. Rd. #39 and Kadler Ave NE and is approximately 82.46 acres total Request is as follows: A. Rezone from A-1, General Agricultural to R -C, Residential Open Space Cluster District. B. Concurrent Concept/Development Stage PUD -CUP to allow a privately owned commercial recreational use as required open space and establishment of proposed staggered setbacks for residential lots in an R -C District. C. Preliminary Plat NOTE: Attached is a letter from Applicant Chris Bulow asking for this item to be continued to the June 21 1999 - 8PM P.0Agenda due to more information being gathered. (INCO1PLETE INFOR114ATIO\ Chair Swenson noted that this item was continued from May 17, 1999 P.C. Meeting. He noted that Mr. Bulow has asked to have the P.C. continue this item to the June 21, 1999 8PM P.C. Agenda. RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO CONTINUE GRENINGS MISSISSIPPI HILLS HEARING TO JUNE 21, 1999 AT 8PM. PATRICK MOONEN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 7, 1999 AT 8PM - PAGE 2 - 4. HEARING for Applicant/owners Frank P. and Annick C. Muller 8416 Oakwood Ave NE Otsego MN. PID #118-034-001030 in Section 20 Township 121. Range 23 Legal description is Lot 3, Block 1. Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates 3RD Addition Property is on Oakwood Avenue NE and South of 85TH ST NE This is a 1 -acre parcel zoned R-3 residential. Request is as follows: 1. A Conditional Use Permit to consider relocation of a building (residential dwelling) in an R-3. Residential Zoned Area. Elaine Beatty noted that the proper publication, posting and mailings had been completed. Dan Licht, City Planner explained his June 1 st Staff Report. He noted that it is the intent of the CUP to determine if the move -in structure is compatible. NAC recommended approval of the CUP subject to 5 -conditions on Page 2 of NAC's planning report. Chair Swenson asked the applicants if they wished to add anything. Mr. Muller noted that the septic system is being updated. Chair Swenson explained the public hearing procedure. HEARLti'G WAS OPENED TO THE PUBLIC. No one spoke. Discussion was brought back to the P.C. There was no discussion. Chair Swenson opened discussion back to the public. No one spoke. Chair Swenson CLOSED THE HEARING. RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE REQUESTED CO_NDITION4L USE PERMIT TO ALLOW RELOCATION OF A BUILDING (HOME), SUBJECT TO THE FIVE (5) CONDITIONS IN NAC'S REPORT. CHRISTIAN MBANEFO SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. It was noted that this item will be on the June 14, 1999 City Council Agenda at 6:30PM. 5. Any other P.C. Business a. Update on Council action by CM Vern Heidner None 6. Adjourn by 10PM BRUCE RASK MOTIONED TO ADJOURN THE P.C. MEETING. RICHARD NICHOLS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 8: IOPM. ARLEEN NAGEL, SECRETARY MINUTES BY: ELAINE BEATTY, CITY CLERK - RECORDING SECRETARY EB CITY OF OTSEGO Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Frank and Annick Muller Request: Request for approval of a conditional use permit to allow relocation of an existing single family structure to Lot 3, Block 1 Vassuer's Oak Grove Estates, 3rd Addition City Council Meeting Date: 14 June 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: The legal description of the subject property is: Lot 3, Block 1 Vassuer's Oak Grove Estates, 3rd Addition 2. The subject property lies within the Long Range Urban Service Area as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The subject property is zoned R-3, Residential Long Range Urban Service District (General). 4. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use The seven effects and findings regarding them are: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed building relocation may be viewed as a positive improvement by providing a dwelling unit that is larger (with a basement), in better condition and likely has a higher value than the existing manufactured home. The following policies support the applicant's request: The character of individual neighborhoods shall be reinforced, maintained and upgraded. (Policy Plan, pg. 40) A high quality residential environment shall be maintained through rehabilitation or where necessary, redevelopment of substandard units via private means and/or public action, when feasible. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding. The area is developed with low density single family residential uses, which are planned to continue by the Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding. As noted above, the subject site and relocated structure conform with all applicable performance standards. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding. The relocated dwelling and single family use of the property will not have a negative impact to the area. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The relocated structure will not generate any additional traffic. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. 5. The planning report dated 1 June 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 6. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 7 June 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested conditional use permit is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. A building permit is applied for and approved by the Building Official prior to relocation of the structure. 2 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six (6) months from the date of location on site, subject to approval of the Building Official. 3. The existing septic system and well are evaluated and subject to review and approval of the Building Official. 4. A security as required by Section 20-19-3 of the Zoning Ordinance as determined by the building official is posted. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th Day of June, 1999 Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 1 June 1999 RE: Otsego - Muller Building Relocation CUP FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.08 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Frank and Annick Muller are proposing to relocate an existing single family dwelling to their property at 8416 Oakwood Avenue (Lot 3, Block 1, Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates, 3rd Addition). The proposed building relocation would replace an existing mobile home located on the subject site. The one acre subject site is zoned R-3, Residential - Long Range Urban Service District (General). Single family uses are a permitted use in this District. The relocation of existing buildings to lots within the City requires consideration of a conditional use permit (CUP) as per Section 19 of the Zoning Ordinance. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Site Survey (Existing Conditions) Exhibit C: Site Plan (Proposed) Exhibit D: Photographs Recommendation The proposed relocation of an existing single family dwelling to Lot 3, Block 1, Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates, 3rd Addition is generally consistent with the requirements for building relocations, as well as Comprehensive Plan policies supporting neighborhood improvements. As such, our office recommends approval of the requested CUP, subject to the following conditions: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM 1. A building permit is applied for and approved by the Building Official prior to relocation of the structure. 2. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six (6) months from the date of location on site, subject to approval of the Building Official. 3. The existing septic system and well are evaluated and subject to review and approval of the Building Official. 4. A security as required by Section 20-19-3 of the Zoning Ordinance as determined by the building official is posted. 5. Comments of other City Staff. ISSUES ANALYSIS Building Relocation. The relocation of existing structures to lots within the City of Otsego requires compliance with the performance standards outlined in Section 20-19-2, below. A. Upon relocation, the building shall comply with applicable requirements of the State Uniform Building Code. Comment: Building relocations require a building permit prior to moving the structure. Conformance with the Uniform Building Code should be made a condition of any approval, subject to review and approval of the Building Official. B. The proposed relocated building shall comply with the character of the neighborhood in which it is being relocated as determined by the City Council. Comment: The neighborhood is fully developed with single family dwellings consisting of a mix of manufactured housing and stick built structures. The existing structure to be located to the subject site is a one level structure consistent with this character. C. The relocated use will not result in a depreciation of the neighborhood or adjacent property values. Comment.- Provided the structure has a similar assessed value as adjacent dwellings, and conforms to all applicable performance standards, no depreciation is anticipated. Planning Report - Muller CUP Page 2 D. The relocated structure shall be similar to the market valuation of adjacent principal structures as determined by the City or County Assessor. Comment: The structure was valued at approximately $65,500 (including a detached garage) by Anoka County. For comparison, the existing structure on the lot is valued at less than $20, 000 and the dwellings on the neighboring properties have an estimated market value of $30,600 and $76,600 ($53,650). The value of the property following relocation of the structure is therefore likely to increase to a level consistent with values of neighborhood properties. E. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six (6) months from the date of location on site. Comment. This requirement should be made a condition of any approval. Lot Standards. The following table illustrates required performance standards for single family lots and dwellings in the R-3 District. As indicated, the subject property and proposed location of the relocated single family house will conform with applicable performance standards. Single Family Dwelling Standards. Section 20-17-11 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines minimum design standards for single family uses. These standards apply to the existing dwelling to be located on the subject site. The basic requirements are for a perimeter foundation, minimum dimensions of 30 feet by 24 feet, a shingled roof, and minimum overhangs of 1 foot. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, the existing structure is in conformance with these requirements. Additionally, the structure has lap siding consistent with the requirements of Section 20-17-4 of the Zoning Ordinance. CUP Criteria. In considering CUP applications, the Planning Commission and City Council must also take into consideration the possible adverse impacts of the building relocation based upon (but not limited to) the following factors outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Planning Report - Muller CUP Page 3 Lot Area Lot Width Lot Depth I Lot Cover Building Height Setbacks Front I Side Rear Required 1.0 ac. 150 ft. 100 ft. 30% 2.5 stories 35 ft. 15 ft. 20 ft. Proposed 1.0 ac. 150 ft. 1 291 ft. 5% 1 story 58 ft. 31/64 ft. t209 ft. Single Family Dwelling Standards. Section 20-17-11 of the Zoning Ordinance outlines minimum design standards for single family uses. These standards apply to the existing dwelling to be located on the subject site. The basic requirements are for a perimeter foundation, minimum dimensions of 30 feet by 24 feet, a shingled roof, and minimum overhangs of 1 foot. Based upon the information provided by the applicant, the existing structure is in conformance with these requirements. Additionally, the structure has lap siding consistent with the requirements of Section 20-17-4 of the Zoning Ordinance. CUP Criteria. In considering CUP applications, the Planning Commission and City Council must also take into consideration the possible adverse impacts of the building relocation based upon (but not limited to) the following factors outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Planning Report - Muller CUP Page 3 Comment. The proposed building relocation may be viewed as a positive improvement by providing a dwelling unit that is larger (with a basement), in better condition and likely has a higher value than the existing manufactured home. The following policies support the applicant's request. • The character of individual neighborhoods shall be reinforced, maintained and upgraded. (Policy Plan, pg. 40) • A high quality residential environment shall be maintained through rehabilitation or where necessary, redevelopment of substandard units via private means and/or public action, when feasible. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. The area is developed with low density single family residential uses, which are planned to continue by the Comprehensive Plan. As such, the proposed use will be compatible with present and future land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: As noted above, the subject site and relocated structure conform with all applicable performance standards. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The relocated dwelling and single family use of the property will not have a negative impact to the area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment. Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The relocated structure will not generate any additional traffic. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment. The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. Planning Report - Muller CUP Page 4 Septic System. The City's policy for relocated structures requires an evaluation of the existing septic system and well. These element are subject to review and approval of the Building Official. Security. Section 20-19-3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that a security escrow be posted for the relocation of existing structures. This security is required primarily to cover any costs that may be incurred due to damage of public facilities or infrastructure during the relocation. Such a security as determined by the building official must be required as a condition of approval. CONCLUSION The applicants' request to replace their existing mobile home unit with an existing single family unit relocated from another lot is generally consistent with all applicable performance standards. Further, the applicant's request is, in our opinion, a valuable improvement to the property that will benefit the neighborhood as well. Such improvements are encouraged by the Comprehensive Plan as a means of improving the quality of the existing housing stock and neighborhoods within the community. Our specific recommendation is outlined in the executive summary of this report. pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Jerry Olsen Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Frank and Annick Muller Planning Report - Muller CUP Page 5 NAC ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD EXHIBIT A-2 I 1 e n n n v • N.E. -5 —th STREET _ #035 /2010 R 01Q10 1L a,a 1 1 ; 1 r X13 4 Itt = 2 p:0 2 2 2 SUB CT QITE 2 tzwzo2 64J9-v / _ :.:...:::::.. . 3 Q 3 3 5::::::: MIS-D MIS--Jo 111V 1?;.;.;.; •: .•:. ^� /lob /z7oo {zo.o a,,..,D :-3 4 30 4 4 "7-M LYF-30 L07_D l,ob flow 5 Q jzm �f295 " /two {10 00 o- �e 4 e LIL-D pow W 6 ma -D 135&-.vL A pow / C\ Mao 28 /10.0 26 Llu-30 m,-17o w2-30 LD1-30 /,an 7 1 2 �0 4200 7 uml-30 &7u-30 L7o]- 30 L70y.,30 /low /z=w ars-A l��o OLnOT 8 26 $ 8 1 yo .77.-30 { ow =7a-30 /moo neao \ {,oao 1.1 /Ip�pp O 30 #low Q /If00 /zzb /z,00 W {'°°° „oo {.o 10 w 24 10 kji Z v Q15-30 >Q -I--D C,S-sl j 'a!s 30 111,0 r=" :c./ fano ¢ /n,o 11 6�{� 11 g 23 Q 11 7 1195-30 --QI==�/2120 O 01120 /1070 Q 12 w22 12 � 12 O .157-30 Z 41570 4157-30 Y .ISa-30 .200 01170 /22,0 21 O /11.M 13 O 11170 13 pow .129-30 w O� .I7J-70 .,JO-A E T<F {,,.o Z {zoo /1, b W /,1 b � A vC) 14 20 7 14 z 14 y ,1,50 1 9 1215o /1,50 9O 9 (n 15 �T71-D .co ` .17 a-D 15 .073.30 15 177_30 O /y W 16 GJ {1170 /2150 /I Iw 16 V) wu 70 �� 8 R 17 17 ,1,w _ - ?� 17 2 21 .x.7-70 N. E. 80th STREET w, 30 +291101 2928 WALESC lm-7o ii 71 i EXHIBIT A-2 EXHIBIT B a � r a OAKWOOD A VENUE :,rte a -� PLA i a5' ROaO o D !NORTH 150.00 ' ;UNIT TO BE REMOVED u "' NOBII.f ,HQME d x AES : `�1-1 ti T,t:r F-3 q m tog r � O � O / r r / / O a •� A y e a ti N ti a -yfB✓_. -re. may_ . SOUTH It 00 'bO Y a o r 2 a ~ OAR m Z rT 2 ^ r a � ` Hca Z = � rA a •� m � L 2 M � r n n C � ► � 2 � a' < q EXHIBIT B 3l - LOCATION OF m x n fit i,t; 41 C MAY -18-1999 11 05 NAC 612 595 9837 P.01/02 NF,Nc NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM - via tax transmission TO: Elaine Beatty FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 18 May 1999 RE: Otsego - Prairie Creek; Planning Commission Recommendations FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.03 The following is the language used by the Planning Commission in recommending approval of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat, provided for your reference: 1. Motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan to guide the entire single family portion of the subject site for low density residential development. 2. Motion to rezoning the single family residential portion of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat from A-1 District to R-4 District. 3. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP Concept Plan for development of 68 twin home units in a base lot / unit lot configuration, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to guide the subject parcel for low density residential development. b. Approval of a rezoning from A-1 District to R-6 District. C. Approval of a PUD -CUP Development Stage application 4. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Prairie Creek, subject to the following Conditions: a. Proposed access to CSAH 42 is subject to review and approval of the Wright County Highway Department. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541 6 r irr PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC @WINTERNET.COM MAY -18-1999 11:06 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02i02 b. The proposed access to Quaday Avenue shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. The preliminary plat is revised to designate the proposed twin home units as Outlot A. d. The preliminary plat is revised such that all cul-de-sacs are not longer than 500 feet. e. All park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied at the time of final plat approval. f. The proposed street names shall be revised in accordance with the County naming pattern and City Policies, subject to review by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council. g. A landscape plan be submitted for all proposed ponding areas providing appropriate low maintenance plantings in areas subject to intermittent flooding. h. An EAW is prepared (if determined to be necessary) and processed pursuant to Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance_ 1. A phasing plan is submitted for anticipated development of the subdivision. j. Comments of Other City Staff. If you have any questions regarding these motions, please do not hesitate to call me. 2 TOTAL P.02 CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 1999 - 8PM - PAGE 5 - 6. Public Hearing for [11mer onct tion, Ind, Dennis Ulmer "Prairie reek" Development - Prope is located in Section 27, TyW. 12.1, Range 23, City of O ce�o 8019 River Road NE Edmond N and lVlariette LeFebyre, owner of record. PID #118-500-271100 80 A r c and PID #118-500 X4401, 2 65 acres in Se tion 22, THD_ 121. Range 23 Randal N LeFebyre and M Matheny-, owners of record, Total of 82.46 Acres. Rea eSt is as follows• A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Re• Density B. Rezone from A-1, General Agricultural Rural Servi Distrit to R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District and R-5, Residential - Single and Two Family District C. P TD/C UP (Planned Unit ileyelonment/Conditional Use Pei,. t to allow unitand base lot s ubdi, :cion T D. Preliminary Plat Dan Licht gave NAC's Planning Report dated May 10, 1999. (See attached). The engineering issues are reviewed in Larry Koshak's report of May 13, 1999 (See Attached). Mr. Koshak noted that most of the issues are solvable and he can recommend approval. He explained the issues in his report, including the statement that the County would not allow an access to County Road #42. Hearing Opened to the Public by Chair Swenson. Greg Strommen - 8433 Palmgren Ave NE - Questioned why the twinhomes. Maybe should have all single family units. Mr. Licht stated that portion of the land was guided in Otsego's Comprehensive Plan for medium density development. Mr. Robertson noted that a Comprehensive Plan amendment is needed because this plat actually has less density than called for in the Comprehensive Plan. Hearing brought back to Planning Commission. Mr. Goenner - Would like the City Engineer's comments on setting up an emergency access to County Road #42. Mr. Koshak said that in most cases it is not practical. The other option is an emergency route from 78th Street to the cul-de-sac. Two accesses to the subdivision are needed for safety and traffic circulation. As the density of the twin home area is higher, it should be connected to the other neighborhoods. He suggested an access to the N. cul-de-sac by the multi -family twin home area. He said that widening the entrance with an entrance median is also worth looking at. Christian Mbanefo asked if a 4 -lane entrance was appropriate for this density? Mr. Licht noted that an emergency access is common but the width is the safety concern. Mr. Robertson said he met with the school district regarding trail access to the south side of the school and no decisions have been made yet. He thought the trail would go from the north road between two lots. CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 1999 - 8PM - PAGE 6. Mr. Plowe - Some areas of the back yards are being used for stormwater treatment and nerp ponds at a 10 to 1 slope grade and so would be unsuitable for a trail. Eugene Goenner - Has a concern whether the high density and low density areas should be connected. He also was concerned with the amount of cul-de-sacs and would like some eliminated. Mr. Licht said they could recommend a connection as part of approval. Hearing brought back to the public. Dennis Ulmer, Developer, felt strongly that the design should not be changed. He also indicated he didn't want a road connection between the single family and multi -family areas as it would have a dramatic affect on both sides of the creek due to topography and ponding concerns. Hearing no further comments the Public Hearing was closed by Chair Swenson. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO REZONE THE PRAIRIE CREEK DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY FROM A-1 (GENERAL AGRICULTURAL) TO R-4 RESIDENTIAL. ARLEEN NAGEL SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO RESCIND THE PREVIOUS MOTION. RICHARD NICHOLS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. PREVIOUS MOTION WAS RESCINDED, 1. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO GUIDE THE ENTIRE SINGLE FAMILY PORTION OF THE SUBJECT SITE FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. RICHARD NICHOLS SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2. ARLEEN NAGEL MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO REZONE THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PORTION OF THE PRAIRIE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT FROM A-1 DISTRICT TO R-4 DISTRICT. JIM KOLLES SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PUD -CUP CONCEPT PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF 68 TWIN HOME UNITS IN A BASE LOT/UNIT LOT CONFIGURATION, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS. a. APPROVAL OF A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO GUIDE THE SUBJECT PARCEL FOR LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17,1999 -SPM- PAGE 7- b. APPROVAL OF A REZONING FROM A4 DISTRICT TO R-6 DISTRICT. c. APPROVAL OF A PUD -CUP DEVELOPMENT STAGE APPLICATION. CHRISTIAN MBANEFO SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANL IOUSLY. 4. RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO RECOMMEND TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR PRAIRIE CREEK, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. a. PROPOSED ACCESS TO CSAH 42 IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. b. THE PROPOSED ACCESS TO QUADAY AVENUE SHALL BE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER. c. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS REVISED TO DESIGNATE THE PROPOSED TWIN HOME UNITS AS OUTLOT A. d. THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS REVISED SUCH THAT ALL CUL- DE-SACS ARE NOT LONGER THAN 500 FEET. e. ALL PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS ARE SATISFIED AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT APPROVAL. f. THE PROPOSED STREET NAMES SHALL BE REVISED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNTY NAMING PATTERN AND CITY POLICIES, SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL. g. A LANDSCAPE PLAN BE SUBMITTED FOR ALL PROPOSED PONDING AREAS PROVIDING APPROPRIATE LOW MAINT- ENANCE PLANTINGS IN AREAS SUBJECT TO INTERMITTENT FLOODING. h. AN EAW IS PREPARED (IF DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY) AND PROCESSED PURSUANT TO SECTION 39 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE. i. A PHASING PLAN IS SUBMITTED FOR ANTICIPATED DEVELOP- MENT OF THE SUBDIVISION. j. COMMENTS OF OTHER CITY STAFF. AFTER DISCUSSION, ARLEEN NAGEL SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED WITH EUGENE GOENNER VOTING NO. CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION iNIEETLNG MINUTES OF MAY 17, 1999 - 8PNI - PAGE 8 Discussion: Cul-de-sac issue has to be resolved, along with a decision if the high-density area is to be connected to single family residential area, and how to provide a second entrance into the high density area. Mr. Goenner noted that there are viable options other than connecting the two uses. They could use a divided entrance or emergency entrance on to County Road 42 if it is OK'd by Wright Co. Mr. Nichols - Did not feel with this plan we should connect the two uses. Planning Commission members were in consensus to not connect the two areas. Mr. Ulmer was told that a cul-de-sac length change could be a variance and that it would be a public hearing before the Planning Commission. THIS ITEM WILL BE ON THE COUNCIL AGENDA FOR CONSIDERATION MONDAY, JUNE 14, 1999 AT 6:30PM . 7. Public Hearing by Applicant Chris Bulow, Bulow, Inc P O box 506 Elk River Mn for owners Donald and Phyllis Greninger, 9383 Kadler Ave -NE, Otsego, MN. PID #118-800-142402, in Section 14, Township, Range 24.Property is of CO #39 and Kadler Ave.NE and is approximately 82 46 acres total Request is as follows: A. Rezone from A-1, General Agricultural to R C, Residential Open Space Cluster District. B. ("oneurrent Concept/Development Stage PUD ITP to allow a privately owned cc�rnmerciaf recreational use as required open space and establishment of proposed s aggered setbac s for residential lots in an R -C District. C. Preliminary Plat Elaine Beatty noted that the proper publishing, postings and mailings had been completed. Dan Licht reviewed NAC's Planning Report dated May 12, 1999 (See attached). NAC is not recommending approval at this time. Larry Koshak reviewed his report dated May 3, 1999 (See attached). He noted that he could not make a recommendation due to lack of information. Mike Robertson gave the Parks and Recreation report in which they recommended a sidewalkfbike trail be put on Kadler from County Road 39 to the north. Chris Bulow gave an overview of his project. The parcel is 82 acres plus. There are 20 single family lots proposed. There are some dramatic topography changes which put limits on development, but are good for a golf course. Kadler Ave. will be improved by them from their lot line south to County Road 39. He met with the Park Board and they recommended a trail (bike/walking) on the west side of Kadler. A park next to a golf course is extremely dangerous and not realistic. He is on a fast track schedule to construct the golf course. He would like to grade and seed by the middle of August in order to open in June 2000. 6. NNORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: NAC FILE NO.: CITY FILE NO.: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission Daniel Licht 10 May 1999 Otsego - Prairie Creek; Preliminary Plat 176.02 - 99.03 99-04PLAT Ulmer Construction Inc. has submitted a preliminary plat for a 186 unit subdivision entitled Prairie Creek, consisting of 118 single family units and 68 twin home units. The 83.7 acre parcel is located south of CSAH 42 and west of Quaday Avenue, to the south of Otsego Elementary. The subject property is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District. This project is intended to be serviced by municipal sanitary sewer and water systems. Development of this project will require the following approvals: 1. Comprehensive Plan amendment re: density 2. Zoning amendment to R-4 District for urban single family uses. 3. Zoning amendment to R-6 District for urban twin home uses. 4. PUD -CUP to allow unit/base lot subdivision for twin home units. 5. Preliminary Plat. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B. Preliminary Plat Exhibit C: Grading Plan Exhibit D: Utility Plan Exhibit E: Comprehensive Plan - Land Use Map 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595.9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Recommendation The decision as to the appropriate use of land as guided by the Comprehensive Plan and implemented through application of the Zoning Ordinance is a policy issue that must be determined by City Officials. Therefore, our office makes no specific recommendation regarding the Comprehensive Plan amendment or Zoning Ordinance amendment applications. The requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning Ordinance amendment are generally consistent with the specific provisions of the Comprehensive Plan for development of a range of housing types within the Sanitary Sewer Service District. If City Officials make a similar finding in consideration of the established policies of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted Ordinances, the respective applications may be approved. If the City Council approves the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning Ordinance amendment, the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat and PUD -CUP twinhome concept plan applications may be considered. The submitted preliminary plat and PUD -CUP twinhome concept plan generally satisfies the applicable performance standards of the Zoning Subdivision Ordinance. Therefore, our office recommends approval of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat and PUD -CUP twinhome concept plan subject to the conditions listed below under items A.4 and A.5. The Planning Commission and City Council have the following options for action on the submitted applications: A. Approval (each approval should be made as a separate motion): Motion to amend the Comprehensive Plan to guide the east 43.7 acres of the subject site for low density residential development. 2. Motion to rezone the single family residential portion of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat from A-1 District to R-4 District. 3. Motion to rezone the twin home portion of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat from A-1 District to R-6 District. 4. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP Concept Plan for development of 68 twin home units in a base lot / unit lot configuration, subject to the following conditions: a. Approval of a PUD -CUP Development Stage application 5. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Prairie Creek, subject to the following Conditions: Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 2 a. Proposed access to CSAR 42 is subject to review and approval of the Wright County Highway Department. b. The proposed access to Quaday Avenue shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. C. The preliminary plat is revised to designate lot and block numbers for the proposed twin home units. d. The preliminary plat is revised such that all cul-de-sacs are not longer than 500 feet. e. All park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied at the time of final plat approval. f. The proposed street names shall be revised in accordance with the County naming pattern and City Policies, subject to review by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council. g. A landscape plan be submitted for all proposed ponding areas providing appropriate low maintenance plantings in areas subject to intermittent flooding. h. An EAW is prepared (if determined to be necessary) and processed pursuant to Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance. A phasing plan is submitted for anticipated development of the subdivision. Comments of Other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment based upon a finding that the proposed use is inconsistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the applicant regarding necessary information to be submitted for the Planning Commission and/or City Council to act on the application). Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 3 ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan guides the east 43.7 acres of the property for medium-high density development, with the west 40 acres designated for low density residential development. The Comprehensive Plan defines medium -high density development as at least 5 d.u./ac. The proposed density of the twin home portion of the project is 3.24 d.u./ac. As such, a Comprehensive Plan amendment is necessary to designate the entire parcel for low density residential use. Although the twin home element does not qualify as medium-high density, the Comprehensive Plan identifies this type of dwelling unit as an intended development in this area. The addition of twin home units is highly positive in that it introduces a new dwelling unit type into the housing stock in Otsego, which is promoted by the Comprehensive Plan. The following policies from the Comprehensive Plan should be cited either in support of or against the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment: • The development of patio homes... to supplement existing conventional single family homes shall be recognized giving due consideration to local market demands. (Policy Plan, pg. 45) • The City Shall provide housing opportunities which attract persons of all ages and income levels and which allows them the ability to maintain residence within Otsego throughout the various stages of their lives. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A mix of housing types in a manner consistent wit the City's land use plan shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg 46) Zoning. The subject property is zoned A-1 District. Platting of the single family portion of the plat requires rezoning to R-4, Residential - Urban Single Family District. The development of the proposed twin homes requires a rezoning to R-6, Residential - Townhouse, Quadraminium, and Low Density Multiple Family District. In considering requests for rezoning, Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the following factors as part of their decision: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment. The Comprehensive Plan guides the subject parcel for urban density development. Provided the City Council approves the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment, the rezonings are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The same policies noted above may be cited in support of the requested rezonings. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Planning Repos` - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 4 Comment. This area is planned for urban density residential development. Adjacent parcels are anticipated to develop with similar land uses. In the interim, the urban density development is anticipated to be compatible with the rural land uses guided by the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The preliminary plat's consistency with applicable performance standards will be evaluated in subsequent paragraphs. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment. The proposed development will not have an negative impact to the area in that the use is anticipated and will be developed within all performance standards. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The preliminary plat is to be adequately served by public streets serving the property. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment. The Comprehensive Plan anticipated the development of the proposed use. Therefore, the preliminary plat is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. Preliminary Plat. The following paragraphs outline issues specific to consideration of the single family portions of the preliminary plat. In general, it should be the City's philosophy to allow cul-de-sacs only when physically necessary. Cul-de-sacs are discouraged from the perspective that they reduce neighborhoods to small groupings of lots, while adding to service needs. To this end, the applicant has been encouraged by the Planning Commission and City Staff to reduce the number of cul-de-sacs. Revisions to the preliminary plat consist of eliminating one cul-de-sac to provide a connection to the property to the west. Our office would recommend that more of the existing cul-de-sacs could be eliminated from the proposed plat. Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 5 • Access. The twin homes are to have access via proposed intersections with CSAH 42, designated as a minor arterial, and Quaday Avenue, designated as a collector street. Section 21-7-7.N of the Subdivision Ordinance requires at least 500 feet of separation between intersections to arterial and collector streets. The distance between the street access to Quaday Avenue and future 78th street is slightly less than 500 feet and will need to be approved by the City Engineer. There are to be two accesses with future 78th Street to serve the single family units In addition, there is one connection made to land west of the subject parcel, which is planned to develop with single family lots. The school property to the north is a physical barrier that prevents any connection in this direction. • Blocks. In order to provide for traffic circulation and an integrated development pattern, Section 21-7-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance limits block length to 1,200 feet. Block 1 exceeds this requirement. A through street could be provided in the area of the proposed cul-de-sac, although there are ponding areas that could justify the longer block length. Proposed Block 2 has a length over 3,500 feet, which is due to the school property and drainage ditch, which are physical barriers warranting a longer block length. The preliminary plat does not include a block designation for the proposed twin homes. The preliminary plat should be revised to indicate that the twin home units are Block 5 of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat, with lots numbers for each lot. The common open space should be plated as an outlot. • Right-of-ways. The streets illustrated within the preliminary plat provide a 60 foot right-of-way and cul-de-sac streets are provided 60 foot radius, as required by the Engineering Manual. Section 21-7-6 of the Subdivision Ordinance limits the lengths of cul-de-sacs to 500 feet. Two cul-de-sacs illustrated on the preliminary plat exceed 500 feet, including "Fisherman's Court" and "Prairie Creek Alcove". The preliminary plat should be revised to reduce the length of these cul-de-sacs or eliminate them by extending the street through. • Lot Performance Standards. For the single family developments, the R-4 District requires a minimum 12,000 sq. ft. lot size and minimum 75 ft. lot width at the setback line. Section 21-7-6 of the Subdivision Ordinance requires that the minimum lot width is increased to 94 feet for lots on the turn around of a cul-de-sac. The proposed single family lots range in size from 12,021 sq. ft. up to 60,386 sq. ft., with an average lot size of 17,139 sq. ft. All of the proposed lots meet the minimum 75 ft. lot width requirement and all lots on the radius of a cul-de-sac are at least 94 feet wide. All of the proposed single family lots also meet the minimum 100 foot depth requirement. Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 6 The R-6 District requires a minimum 7,500 sq. ft. of lot area per unit for the twin home portion of the project. Based upon 20.95 acres and 68 units, there is approximately 13,420.3 sq. ft. per unit. Therefore the lot area per unit requirement is satisfied. • Setbacks. The setbacks of the R-4 District and R-6 District are illustrated below. Within the twinhome portion of the project, the setbacks apply only at the periphery of the project. Internal setbacks for the twinhome project are based upon structure height. All proposed lots have sufficient buildable area within required setbacks. Front/Side Corner: 35 feet (local street) 65 feet (collector/arterial street) Side: 10 feet Rear: 20 feet • Twin Home Concept Plan. The preliminary plat includes a concept plan for development of 68 twin home units. The proposed layout of the units is generally appropriate at a concept level. The only concern is the proximity of second structure on the east side of Farm Road and a unit on Prairie Creek Alcove. The rear of each unit face each other and the separation between these two units is only 50 feet. In order to provide greater privacy, one or both of these units should be reoriented or a landscape buffer provided at the time of General Plan application. More detailed plans will be expected as part of a development stage PUD application, which will allow a more detailed review. • Parks and Trails. No dedication of parkland is proposed as part of this plat. The applicant will be required, therefore, to make an appropriate cash donation in lieu of land to the City's Park and Trail fund at the time of final plat approval as required by Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance. • Street Names. The preliminary plat includes proposed street names which are inconsistent with the City's street naming pattern and policies that are outlined in Section 21-7-7.Q of the Subdivision Ordinance. Street names should follow the County naming pattern. North -south routes are to be designated as "avenues" and east -west routes as "streets". Cul-de-sacs less than 300 feet should continue the street designation of the intersecting street. • Ponding Areas. The preliminary plat includes several stormwater ponding areas for which a landscape plan should be provided. A landscape plan should be submitted for planting materials within the drainage easement. The landscape plan should provide low maintenance vegetation in the areas subject to intermittent flooding to ensure that the area does not result in a negative visual impact. Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 7 • EAW. An EAW may need to be processed for this project depending on the Environmental Quality Board's certification of the City's Comprehensive Plan. If required, the EAW shall be subject to the provisions of Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance. • Grading, Drainage and Utility Plans. These plans have been submitted and are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. • Phasing Plan. If the project is to be developed in phases, the applicant will be required to provide a phasing plan. Although subject to market conditions, the phasing plan will aid the City in its service and infrastructure planning efforts. • Development Contract. The applicant will be required to enter into a development contract with the City and post all required escrows, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION The decision as to the appropriate use of land as guided by the Comprehensive Plan and implemented through application of the Zoning Ordinance is a policy issue that must be determined by City Officials. The requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning Ordinance amendment are generally consistent with the specific provisions of the Comprehensive Plan for development of a range of housing types within the Sanitary Sewer Service District. If City Officials make a similar finding, the respective applications may be considered appropriate. The submitted Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat and PUD -CUP twinhome concept plan generally satisfies the applicable performance standards of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. Outstanding issues that must be addressed are limited to cul-de-sac length and approval of grading, drainage and utility plans. Additionally, it is our recommendation that the plat should be further revised to eliminate cul-de-sacs by providing through streets where feasible. Our Specific recommendation is outlined in the Executive Summary of this report. PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Dennis Ulmer Matt Davich Chuck Plowe Planning Report - Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat Page 8 CITY C OJ SANITARY SEWER SERVICE DISTRICT m/AC ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD BASE MAP HCI=VM ArXJer=n MAY 1"s NOTE: FOR PL1.`rNLYG Y AND SHOULD IED FOR F.YACT 4FASLREMLNT. SCALE: NORTH EXHIBIT A -Site Location 9- -j z LJ X LLJ j\� � ��}}}}� �\ � I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PRAIRIE CRI Otsego, ----------------------------------- 107- %4 22 20 to 23❑ 11 r❑❑ o O 0 O :��.�0 x� 14 5 14 .1 V1,1331 f� ✓� �� O � �❑� L2J E,❑I MIA( 2 FF1 J 29 GENERAL NOTES FL OWE ENaWEAW Ac. tt-4ECCASMUCTKW EXHIE - UTILITY PLAN LAND USE- PLAN SANITARYSEWER SERVICE AREA NAC BA.0 MAV ArAn Aa=.,irc. NQTL: THIS MAY LS MR PW1111110 YVn-C] Oe'LY / 10 SHOULO Nar DC u3CO MR CUCr MWU11CMCrr. -Iq FIF NORTH SCALE: if00 0 HYD � rvi �1 lin :1 Low Density Residential IBM NJ Medium/High Density Residential El Commercial ❑ Industrial ❑ Public & Semi - Public OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK MAY.17.1999 9:43PM N0.753 P.12i25 Review No. 2 ENGINEERING REVIEW Hakanson Residential Subdivision Anderson for the City of Otsego Assoc., Inc. by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. Submitted to: Mike Robertson, Administrator cc: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk, Jurisdictional Agencies: (but not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County Permits Required (but not limited to):NPDES Considerations: CASheraWlunkipalWOTSF-zG0121961ot2196RVYV2,doc Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Ulmer Construction, Developer Ernest Rud, Surveyor Charles Plowe, Developer's Engineer Reviewed by: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE Ronald J. Wagner, PE [late: May 13, 1989 Proposed Development: Prairie Creek Street Location of Property: N %2 NE 1/a Section 27, T121, R23 and portions of S1J2 SE % of Section 22, T121, R23 83 t Acres, South of CSAR 42 and West of Quaday Applicant: Ulmer Construction 1633 Highway 10 NE Spring Lake Park, MN 55432 Developer: Ulmer Construction Owners of Record: Edmond N. and Mariette Lefebvre 7891 River Road N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 Purpose: Mixed single family detached and twin home residential development Jurisdictional Agencies: (but not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County Permits Required (but not limited to):NPDES Considerations: CASheraWlunkipalWOTSF-zG0121961ot2196RVYV2,doc MAY.17.1999 9:44AM TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE GRADING SUBDIVISION CONFIGURATION, LOT SIZE, DENSITY LOT BUILDABILITY STREETS CUL-DE-SACS SOILS & EROSION CONTROL WETLANDS/FLOOD PLAIN SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT TRAFFIC/ACCESS ISSUE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ENVIRONMENTAL OTHER CONSIDERATIONS SUMMARY AND/OR RECOMMENDATION CA8harsWlunlcipaM0T8EG3012l Wat2106RVW2.doc N0.753 P.13/25 MAY.17.1999 9:56AN INFORMATION AVAILABLE N0.753 P.14i25 Preliminary Plat of Prairie Creek, 4/2/99, by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., Land Surveyor Preliminary Grading Plan of Prairie Creek, 4/2/99, by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc., Land Surveyor Preliminary Utility Plan of Prairie Creek, 4/6/99, by Plowe Engineering, Inc. Stormwater Computations, 4/6/99, by Plowe Engineering, Inc. City of Otsego Engineering Manual, March 1999 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4414 EAW Requirement Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for Portions of Lefebvre Watershed, March 1999 City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, February 1991 National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE (5/13/99) Geotechnical Exploration of Prairie Creek, by GME Consultants, 5/5/99 Prairie Creek Drainage Report, by Plowe Engineering, 5/11/99 Prairie Creek Drainage Areas Map, by Plowe Engineering 5/11/99 INFORMATION REQUIRED BUT NOT SUBMITTED See attached excerpt, City of Otsego Subdivision Ordinance with Preliminary Plat Submittals GRADING 1. Verify that the grading in Block 3 does not impact the existing wetland. COMMENT 5113/99; Grading Plan shows work up to edge of wetland, therefore no impact should take place. 2. Grading plan needs to be signed by a certified civil engineer, (pg. 6, Section 111,5.g) COMMENT 5/13199; Not Completed SUBDIVISION CONI=IGU ATIQN, L4T SIZE DENSITY 1. Minimum single family lot area must be 12,000 sq, ft. The Preliminary Plat shows that all lots meet this. Page 9 CAShere\Mun1c}pa1\A0T8EG0121981o22196RVw2.doc MAY.17.1999 9:57AM N0.753 P.15/25 2. Minimum lot width must be 75' on through roadways at setback, and 94' at tangent to the midpoint of the setback on cul-de-sacs. The Preliminary Plat shows several lots are below this requirement. COMMENT 5/13199: All lots comply. 3. Setback of 65' doesn't apply to lots with back facing a collector street. COMMENT 5113199: Revise lots 14,15,16 of Block 4; Lots 6,7,8,13, and 14 of Block 1. LOT BUILDABILITY 1. The proposed low floor elevation for each lot needs to be tabulated on the plans. COMMENT 5/13199: Completed. Low Floor elevation will be evaluated when a more complete storm water study is submitted. 2. Temporary Piezometers need to be installed to establish existing and anticipated high groundwater elevations. The anticipated high groundwater elevation shall be established by a certified geotechnical engineer. COMMENT 5113199: Piezometers installed. A high ground water must be established by a certified geotechnical engineer. Provide City Engineer with data when available. STREETS 1. Soil borings need to be performed for the site to verify street design. A soils report shall be submitted and certified by a geotechnical engineer. The report shall include a recommended pavement section for the development (see 21-6-2,13,11 and 21-8- 2.0). COMMENT 5113199: Completed. 2. Curb radii need to be shown and it appears the curb radii from collector to local roadways does not meet 50' minimum (see 21-7-7.0). COMMENT 5/13/99: Curb radii onto 78th St. (collector) now appears to meet 50' minimum. Curb radii still needs to be labeled as typical or throughout the plan. Curb radii onto Quaday Ave. (collector) must be shown @ 50' and labeled. 3. The minimum roadway centerline curvature shall have a 250' radius. Many curves throughout the preliminary plan do not meet this (see 21-7-7G). COMMENT 5/13199: Two centerline curvatures still do not meet the 250' minimum radius. Station 11+00 to 12+00 R=100' on Prairie Creek Lane and Station 3+00 to 6+00 R=230' on Farm Road. 4. Roadway profiles are required showing street grades, sanitary storm sewer (size, type, slope and inverts), storm sewer (size, type, slope and inverts), and water (size, type and min. depth). (See page 6, Section 111.5.h of Engineering Manual), COMMENT 5/13199: Not completed. Completion required for next review. Page 2 G;1ShareWlunlcipaN4OTSF-c30121961ct21 B6RWV2.doc iAY.17.1999 9:58AN N0.753 P.16i25 5. Roadway cross-sections are required showing right-of-way and easements. Cross culverts, if any, or catch basin leads should be shown to verify minimum cover. (See page 6, Section 111.5.i of Engineering Manual), COMMENT 5113/99: Not completed. Completion required for next review. 6. Right-of-way 40' wide from centerline along Quaday Avenue must be dedicated to City for future reconstruction of Quaday to collector street status, COMMENT 5/13/99: A 50' wide right-of-way from centerline along Quaday Avenue must be dedicated rather than 40' as stated before to accommodate turn lanes in area. A ITIONAL STREET ISSUES (5113/99).- 7. Cul-de-sacs must be centered on attached street. Two cul-de-sacs need revisions to comply. SOIL AND EROSION CONTROL I. Silt fence will be required around the existing wetland in Block 3. COMMENT 5/13/99: Completed, 2. Silt fence detail does not meet the requirements of Standard Plate No. 501. COMMENT 5113199: Completed. 3. Show riprap on the grading plan for outlet pipes. COMMENT 5113199: Completed. WETLANDS 1. All site wetlands need to be delineated in accordance with the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the Wetland Conservation Act. The limits of the wetland shall be shown on the grading plan. COMMENT 5113199: Completed, 2. Submit a delineation report for review. COMMENT 5113199: Not submitted. Submittal required for next review. SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT The information submitted does not allow for a detailed review of the surface water management features for the proposed development. A number of items need to be resolved prior to finalizing the review. These items are as follows: a. Submit a Stormwater Drainage Report, which includes all of the information discussed in the City Policy on Stormwater Drainage. COMMENT 5113199: Submitted, but review not completed pending submittal of additional data. Page 3 C:1ShareWuniclpa RAOTSEGO12198tot2198RVW2. doc MAY.17.1999 9:5ePM NO.753 P.17i25 b. Sketch the proposed drainage divides on a copy of the grading plan. COMMENT 5/13199: Submitted. Subdrainage areas to backyard drainage areas must be shown. C. Submit storm sewer computations. COMMENT 5/13199: Must be submitted before next review. d. Submit computations on street spread. COMMENT 5/13/99: Not submitted. Submittal required for next review. e. See Appendix C, section 6,0 of the Engineering Manual on Stormwater Drainage for information that needs to be shown on the plans. COMMENT 5/13/99: Not completed. 1) Normal level, 2 -year, 10 -year, 100 -year shown for each basin. 2) Locations of any bale check, wood fiber blanket, temporary seeding, sod, mulch or other erosion control features must be shown on Erosion Control Plan. 3) Typical section for any ditches to be used must be shown. 4) Details of skimmer structures showing appropriate pipe sizes, elevations, and MH size must be shown on Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. 5) Any skimmer structure, backyard inlet or culvert entrance must have some type of access by easement. Access must be outside any drainage easements. 2. Not all of the ponds shown on the grading plan match the ones shown on the utility plans. COMMENT 5113199: A drainage easement must be shown around wetland in Block #3 up to the 100 year MW. Ponds are shown on Utility Plan incorrectly. Pond 1V mislabeled as Pond III on Utility Plan. Need HW for backyard ponding. 3. 100 -year flood elevations need to be set for all backyard inlets. COMMENT 5/13199: No 100 -year flood elevation shown on Block 3 Wetland. Since no outlet Is shown, the wetland HW must be shown for back to back 100 -year storms. 4. A positive outlet should be provided for the wetland in Block 3, COMMENT 5113199: Not completed. Outlet overland onto street shall not be accepted. 5. A minimum curve number of 85 must be used for the area east of the creek. See table 1 of the City policy on Stormwater. COMMENT 5/13199: Stormwater was not evaluated for area east of the creek. Page 4 CASharaWun1clpsM0TSEG012188bt2196RVW2.dac Y. 17. 1999 9:59AN N0. 753 P. 18/25 6. On the grading plan an outlet is not shown for pond 1. COMMENT 5/13/99: Completed. Pond 1 Is a NURP pond, and must have a skimmer structure (Standard Plate No. 402) detailed appropriately. Skimmer structure details also apply for North NURP pond. 7. A trunk storm sewer is planned along the west property line. Additional easement may be needed to install the trunk storm sewer. COMMENT 5/13/99: Adjacent development layout is being reviewed and trunk sewer may be located in that plat. 8. As discussed in the Lefebvre Watershed Study, the existing outlet under C.S.A.H. 42 needs to be improved in conjunction with the proposed development. COMMENT 6113/99: City will provide this improvement through impact fees. ADDITIONAL ISSUE; 9. Removal of existing field entrance culvert at north end of proposed North NURP pond must be removed. Clean out the ditch north to CSAH 42 to specifications outlined In Lefebvre Watershed Study. TRAFFIVACCESS ISSUE 1. Entrance road off of Quaday Avenue appears far enough from C.S.A.H. 42 so as to avoid conflict with tum lanes proposed for Quaday Avenue. 2. Wright County may have reservations or concerns with the location of the entrance road onto CSAH 42. A grading plan must be submitted and sent to the County for their review. City policies on intersection spacing for collector and arterial streets require wider spacing for CR 42. COMMENT 5/13199: In a meeting with the County Engineer, it was determined that the distance for an access to CSAH 42 must be 1320' away from any other street entrance, so the entrance shown will not be allowed. Farm Road must end as a cul,de-sac unless connected with Prairie Creek Alcove. We request the revised layout be submitted. ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC/ACCESS ISSUES (5113/99); 3. Prairie Creek Alcove does not meet the 500' minimum cul-de-sac length requirement. 4. Farm Road cut -de -sac's at Sta 13+00 to 14+00 will not meet 500' length cul-de- sac. An option would be to extend Prairie Creek Drive across the creek to Farm Road. This also gives the townhome phase of the plat two access ,points. Two accesses would allow for acceptable circulation and provide additional traffic safety and emergency services in the plat. Page 5 C:1Sh aro1Mu nicipal\AOT56Do\21961ot2186RWV2.doc MAY.17.1999 10:000M NO.753 P. 19/a, SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEM 1, Location, size, type and grades of sanitary lines must be shown on the preliminary plat (see 21-6-2,C,3 and 21-6-2.C.4). COMMENT 5113/99: Review not completed. Completion required for next review. WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM 1. Location, size and type of watermain must be shown on preliminary plat (see 21-6- 2.C.3 and 21-6-2,C.4). COMMENT 6113/99: Not Completed. Completion required for next review. ENVIRONMENTAL 1, A review and statement related to environmental concerns is necessary. Is there any surface or buried waste within the boundaries of the property? Are there any other known environmental concerns with the site? The City has a request pending before the EQB to revise the mandatory EAW threshold from 100 unattached units to 250 units. That request is expected to be approved prior to this plat approval, COMMENT 6113/99: Not Completed. 1. Street names will be ultimately selected by the City in accordance with street naming guidelines (see 21-7-7.p). 2. Any existing utilities along Quaday Ave. and/or CSAH 42 need to be shown (see 21- 6-2,B.5). COMMENT 5113199: Easements are shown, but actual utilities line must be located and shown. The Wright County plat for CSAH 42 is not shown. 3. Benchmarks need to be shown on Engineering Manual), COMMENT 5/13199: Not Completed. each sheet (see page 7 Section 111.14 of 4. Drainage and utility easements on lots abutting non -platted parcels must be a minimum 10' wide, COMMENT 5/13/99: Not Completed. SUMMARY AND10-R RECOMMENDATION A revision is required in the multi -residential layout due to access revisions. There are several other missing data items as noted above. Therefore, we are unable to recommend either approval or denial. Page 6 CASh ara\Mun IcIpsNA0TS EG0121961ot2196RVW2.doc NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED C< NF1 C COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MA MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE- 8 June 1999 RE: Otsego - Prairie Creek; Preliminary Plat FILE NO.: 176.02 - 99.03 N S U, T_A T S F?ZKE.T RESEARCH The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their meeting on May 17, 1999 to consider the above reference plat. It was clarified at this meeting that the applicant is not seeking preliminary plat approval of the twin home concept at this time. As such, our office recommended that the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests only be considered for the single family portion of the project. Maintaining the medium density designation for future land use and interim A-1 District zoning will protect the City's review authority with regard to the twin home project to ensure that it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission was generally supportive of the proposed subdivision in terms of Comprehensive Plan consistency and rezoning the single family portion of the project to R-4 District. Motions to recommend approval of these applications were approved unanimously by a vote of 7-0. The Planning Commission also considered the PUD -CUP Concept Plan application for the twin home portion of the project. There will need to be modifications to the concept plan because the access to CSAH 42 needs to be eliminated. However, the Planning Commission was favorable to the concept and the opportunity to resolve the access issue as part of a development stage application. One item that was discussed regarding access was a preference of the Planning Commission not to have a connection between the two elements of the Preliminary Plat. The Planning Commission discussed several elements of the proposed preliminary plat, including the number of cul-de-sacs, the need for a trail access to the school property and length of the Fisherman's Court" cul-de-sac. The majority of the Planning Commission was comfortable with the layout of the preliminary plat. The trail connection to the school property is an issue that is still being discussed with School Officials. This issue may ultimately need to be resolved at the time of final plat consideration. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM The Planning Commission was of the opinion that the length of the cul-de-sacs should adhere to the 500 foot limit. Unless the preliminary plat is revised to provide the revised cul-de-sac length, a variance will need to be processed in advance of a final plat application. Variance from the Subdivision Ordinance requires the applicant to demonstrate the same physical hardship as required in a zoning variance. In that this is a new plat, it is difficult to conceive a physical hardship that would warrant variance. In review of the preliminary plat, the Planning Commission voted 6-1 to recommend City Council approval, subject to the conditions outlined in the planning report. As part of any City Council approval of the preliminary plat, our office and the City Attorney are also recommending that an additional condition be included stating that preliminary plat approval does not guarantee sanitary sewer service capacity. Such service capacity is only to be guaranteed for final plats or with a financial commitment. It is anticipated that developers may elect to make such a financial commitment as part of the development contract. In considering the applications, the City Council has the following three options. Option A, approval of the applications, reflects the recommendation of the Planning Commission and City Staff. Appropriate Resolutions, Ordinances and/or findings of fact have been attached as exhibits. A. Approval (each approval should be made as a separate motion): 1. Motion to approve a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to guide the entire single family portion of the subject site for low density residential development. 2. Motion to approve a Zoning Ordinance amendment rezoning the single family residential portion of the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat from A-1 District to R-4 District. 3. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP Concept Plan for development of 68 twin home units in a base lot / unit lot configuration, subject to the following conditions.- a. onditions: a. Approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to guide the subject parcel for low density residential development. b. Approval of a rezoning from A-1 District to R-6 District. C. Approval of a PUD -CUP Development Stage application 2 4. Motion to approve the Preliminary Plat for Prairie Creek, subject to the following Conditions: a. Approval of the Preliminary Plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only guarantee such service to approved final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development. b. Proposed access to CSAH 42 is subject to review and approval of the Wright County Highway Department. C. The proposed access to Quaday Avenue shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. d. The preliminary plat is revised to designate the proposed twin home units as Outlot A. e. The preliminary plat is revised such that all cul-de-sacs are not longer than 500 feet. f. All park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied at the time of final plat approval. g. The proposed street names shall be revised in accordance with the County naming pattern and City Policies, subject to review by the Planning Commission and approval of the City Council. h. A landscape plan be submitted for all proposed ponding areas providing appropriate low maintenance plantings in areas subject to intermittent flooding. An EAW is prepared (if determined to be necessary) and processed pursuant to Section 39 of the Zoning Ordinance. k. A phasing plan is submitted for anticipated development of the subdivision. Comments of Other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment and Zoning Ordinance amendment based upon a finding that the proposed use is inconsistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and adopted Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. 3 C. Motion to table the application (specific direction should be provided to the applicant regarding necessary information to be submitted for the Planning Commission and/or City Council to act on the application). Attached for Reference: Exhibit I: Resolution Amending the Comprehensive Plan Exhibit II: Findings of Fact and Ordinance amending the Zoning Ordinance(map) Exhibit III: Findings of Fact approving the Preliminary Plat/PUD-CUP Concept Plan pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Dennis Ulmer Matt Davich Chuck Plowe 4 PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO.: 99 - CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE PLAN MAP TO DESIGNATE CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE FOR THE PURPOSED OF SUBDIVIDING SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AS PART OF THE PRAIRIE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT. WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Ulmer Construction, Inc. for approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to amend the Land Use Plan map for property included within the proposed Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat; and, WHEREAS, the request is that the use of the property be changed from Medium/High Density Residential land use to Low Density Residential land use as illustrated Exhibit A and B; and, WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 17 May 1999, to consider the request, preceded by published and mailed notice; and, WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission Upon review of the application and evidence received closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the requested amendment of the Comprehensive Plan based upon a finding that the amendment is consistent with the following policies: • The development of patio homes... to supplement existing conventional single family homes shall be recognized giving due consideration to local market demands. (Policy Plan, pg. 45) • The City Shall provide housing opportunities which attract persons of all ages and income levels and which allows them the ability to maintain residence within Otsego throughout the various stages of their lives. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A mix of housing types in a manner consistent wit the City's land use plan shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg 46) NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO THAT; the request to amend the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan map as illustrated on Exhibit B is hereby APPROVED. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 14th Day of June 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO BY.- Larry Y:Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk. 2 L A N D U S E P L A N SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA F1 Low Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential Commercial Public & Semi - Public NSC BASE :MAV 19 J , Assoc-InHakcnson Andewc. NORTH T is MAP is MR vwuuHc PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD SCALE: �� Q ,!m 7000 HOT BE USED MR EXACT M EASUREMEIT. tial x RD OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 111 EXHIBIT A-1 LAND USE PLAN (CURRENT) NSG 15ASE: AP. Hakcnson ArxJefson Assoc.,tr1C. NOTE. nus MAP IS FCR PIANNIND PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD HOT BE USED FCR EXACT MEASUREMENT OTSEGO 0 NORTH SCALE: I!m _J IiW ]QA ]Ga: H �Eff 4- PLANNING . PLANNING DISTRICT I L] Low Density Residential DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 161 EXHIBIT A-2 - PLANNING DISTRICT 1 (CURRENT) : pmgE NSG 15ASE: AP. Hakcnson ArxJefson Assoc.,tr1C. NOTE. nus MAP IS FCR PIANNIND PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD HOT BE USED FCR EXACT MEASUREMENT OTSEGO 0 NORTH SCALE: I!m _J IiW ]QA ]Ga: H �Eff 4- PLANNING . PLANNING DISTRICT I L] Low Density Residential DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 161 EXHIBIT A-2 - PLANNING DISTRICT 1 (CURRENT) BASE�MAP i�7Lf Assoc.,hc. MOTE: THIS MAP LS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY ANO SMOULO MOT BE USEO FOR EXACT MEASUREMENT. LAND USE PLAN SANITARY SEWER SERVICE AREA SCALE: 1m 0 tlfd .1000 LYl M iy! Low Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential Commercial Public & Semi - Public OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 111 EXHIBIT B-1 - LAND USE PLAN (REVISED) P LAN N ING D I S T R I CT I Ll Low Density Residential ® Medium/High Density Residential Commercial 0 Industrial Public & Semi - Public Z Principal Arterial Street ZMinor Arterial Street Z Collector Street Z Existing Trail Immediate Trail Future Street / Trail NSC `14/ BASE MAP 'm Hakonson AAssoc.,lnc. NORTH NOTE: r T M MAP is FOR PLANNING SCALE: PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EXACT Yom' MEASUREMENT L i OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE �g� DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK EXHIBIT B-2 - PLANNING DISTRICT 1 (REVISED) EXHIBIT II -1 CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Ulmer Construction Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a Zoning Ordinance amendment (map) to rezone the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property') from A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service Area to R-4, Residential - Urban Single Family District. City Council Meeting Date: 14 June 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service Area. 5. Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed amendment, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment. The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for urban density development. The following policies from the Comprehensive Plan supports the requested rezoning: • The development of patio homes... to supplement existing conventional single family homes shall be recognized giving due consideration to local market demands. (Policy Plan, pg. 45) • The City Shall provide housing opportunities which attract persons of all ages and income levels and which allows them the ability to maintain residence within Otsego throughout the various stages of their lives. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A mix of housing types in a manner consistent wit the City's land use plan shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg 46) B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. This area is planned for urban density residential development. Adjacent parcels are anticipated to develop with similar land uses. As such the proposed land use will be compatible with the uses guided by the Comprehensive Plan. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The preliminary plat is consistent with applicable performance standards.. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment: The proposed development will not have an negative impact to the area in that the use is anticipated and will be developed within all performance standards. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The preliminary plat is to be adequately served by public streets serving the property. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The Comprehensive Plan anticipated the development of the proposed use. Therefore, the preliminary plat will not have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. 6. The planning report dated 10 May 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 7. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 17 May 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th Day of June, 1999 Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY INCLUDED AS PART OF THE PRAIRIE CREEK PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the following described property (the "property"). See attached EXHIBIT A Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from an A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District designation to an R-4, Residential -Urban Single Family District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th day of June 1999. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT III CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Ulmer Construction Incorporated Request: Request for approval of a PUD -CUP Concept Plan for the development of residential twinhome dwellings on the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property"). City Council Meeting Date: 14 June 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The property is guided by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update for Medium/High Density Residential land uses. 4. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural - Rural Service Area. 5. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use, with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the following factors: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Comment: The Comprehensive Plan guides the property for urban medium/high density development. The following policies from the Comprehensive Plan supports the requested conditional use: The development of patio homes... to supplement existing conventional single family homes shall be recognized giving due consideration to local market demands. (Policy Plan, pg. 45) The City Shall provide housing opportunities which attract persons of all ages and income levels and which allows them the ability to maintain residence within Otsego throughout the various stages of their lives. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, pg. 46) • A mix of housing types in a manner consistent wit the City's land use plan shall be developed. (Policy Plan, pg 46) B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Comment. This area is planned for urban density residential development. Adjacent parcels are anticipated to develop with similar land uses. As such the proposed land use will be compatible with the uses guided by the Comprehensive Plan. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Comment: The concept plan is generally consistent with applicable performance standards. A more detailed evaluation of compliance will be made at the time of a Development Stage PUD -CUP application. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Comment. The proposed development will not have an negative impact to the area in that the use is anticipated and will be developed within all performance standards. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Comment. Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact area property values. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Comment: The preliminary plat is to be adequately served by public streets serving the property. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Comment: The Comprehensive Plan anticipated the development of the proposed use. Therefore, the preliminary plat will not have a negative impact to the City's service capacity. 6. The planning report dated 10 May 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 7. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 17 May 1999, to consider the proposed conditional use permit, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve the PUD -CUP Concept Plan based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Ordinance amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: Approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment to guide the subject parcel for low density residential development. 2. Approval of a rezoning from A-1 District to R-6 District. 3. Approval of a PUD -CUP Development Stage application PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th Day of June, 1999 CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Attest: Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE EXHIBIT A CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: Ulmer Construction Incorporated PRELIMINARY PL, l Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for approval of a preliminary plat for entitled Prairie Creek" consisting of 118 single family lots and one outlot conceptually planned for development of twin home residential dwellings on the property legally described by Exhibit A ("the property"). City Council Meeting Date: 14 June 1999 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the property is: See attached EXHIBIT A. 3. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District as identified in the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 4. The portion of property described in EXHIBIT B is guided for low density residential development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned R-4, Residential Urban Single Family. 5. The portion of the property legally described in Exhibit C is guided for medium/high density residential development by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update and is zoned A -I, Agricultural - Rural Service Area. 6. The Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat consists of 118 single family lots and one outlot conceptually planned for development of residential twin home units. 6. The planning report dated 10 May 1999 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. 7. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 17 May 1999, to consider the request, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-1 vote that the City Council approve the Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat based on the aforementioned findings. ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE EXHIBIT B I ' I- •-KIH tl Mr~iA I p4Yrt Y , y � i I sfit JL is f, g ±at d + 4� i �I , I _' Y • =3 3 : e> ea �} cPgi�ua�p[�ic f' A ,`�•� \_ ' u 4a � / iV io f• ii \ Ate` \ 1 � .0Az � N )u O a"9 ft 3��agpi¢ OZ I `tee ' ,�1 ` /fid e' SRI I�•I i{ i°P11191. Ar Is'a I I I Lj s�p3 *4 1 Ar C ts JL OD 1,6 y I - tom° ± •I ,» '2/ / /e 1919 lit Vb � i I 1 Fixf � • •r � 1 B s'$A m F z ¢.'1 131 �44 VO....:::.:::..... 41+19.IF o Pc ! M yr, o4g eF'K Z a�i q � �� bos��s��xrr�� go �O �L M 5 ♦ 4 Gt.,,. -1 /��/ �! n b tP r6dae LL is P iS a. » �7` Iii I I PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN PRAIRIE CREEK Otsego, Minnesota G719C SCAM .. �_......Aq.....a..r...w...............................Sy�,i:r.a....•.v[+w.-: raww'w•. �`Y+S.3t.+av+: a....._.�.._ ...�'n17i�r._...w. ✓.l:w�.A:..._._.�.w.V t.'.:•:. ....,...�.1.iS_.s .......w.t.... ......i..:.L.. _ .... .... .. r..�.� 3_.... GENERAL NOTES EMMG UTUTES SANTMY SERER LEGEND 1) Th. afW tui[lYp utli tlrot yrontW ap xaral. w d F W... X. centro lw I[ [upm. q. tar mok q n. o.n 1) SonXory S..r [M W e PK SDR MI'munl.0 oNr.b[ rold 2) s..r SrMcw boolbn. r a b 4' PMC SDR 26 un.a utn«... wlsl �D ~M M ep) s •nn. 1)—>— p..•1. [I•Xy Lucy S.w M1rmMlbn m to N. tyP. rW loc" . of WIIIM..a may b n.c..wy b aw10 ovnaq. to N.w u111U.' =R ti��'^o LK.• N �]�']X.}�/ IW MVIN ro uC pwtr [.MYy [blrnrw � _I _ Db..�.l..r •^..P..•'1 �Lrr f — R.w nya..a Low Lir T) 1T. Cmboclw Ndl b ngm.N. fw oYUnp vtRXy IocoUonw Da[ GoPn St— Dn. al 4,% 00 b IocaUon.. YA fF) ftt 1) Watrmaln Nd b p' arW p" DIP Om 52 unlet oNrM.e nold 2) 'Mott S.-.. M b 1 Yw>t caper t," K ��j� �• ..�(� .a[ ■`(/`./, A•'�'I If /rR Ul S4Ap (W n•-a>s . (er � ya-tau .. �_......Aq.....a..r...w...............................Sy�,i:r.a....•.v[+w.-: raww'w•. �`Y+S.3t.+av+: a....._.�.._ ...�'n17i�r._...w. ✓.l:w�.A:..._._.�.w.V t.'.:•:. ....,...�.1.iS_.s .......w.t.... ......i..:.L.. _ .... .... .. r..�.� 3_.... ki2 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL, ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 7.1. Consider Resolution Ordering the Improvement of Odean Avenue 7.2. Consider Resolution Ordering Overlays of City Streets. 7.3. Consider Approval of partial payment to Barbarossa & Sons in the amount of $166,107.50 for Trunk Sewer and Water Project, COP #98.04. 7.4. Consider Approval of final payment to Traut Wells in the amount of $3,805.19 for construction of Well #2, COP #98.01. 7.5. Any other Engineering Business (Discussion of 78TH ST EAW) BACKGROUND: Items 7.1 through 7.4. has information prepared by the City Engineer, Lary Koshak. Attached is the information needed for these items for your review. Mr. Koshak will attend this meeting and be available to answer questions. 7.5. Is for any other Engineering Business that should arise. (See Memo from Mike Robertson Re: Discussion of 78TH ST EAW) RECONLN1 ENDATION: This is for Council consideration and approval where necessary. ��i JUN. 9.1999 4.36PM NO.232 P.1i6 TO:OTSEGO Hakanson 3601 Thurston Avenue Anderson Suite 101 Assoc.,Inc. Anoka, Minnesota 55303 CITY OF OTSEGO 612/427-5860 I & Municipal Engineering CITY ENGINEER 612/427-0520 Fax Land Surveying COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS COUNCIL MEETING 6/14/99 Item 7.1 Consider Resolution ordering the Improvement Project for Odean Avenue (CSAR 37 — CSAH 39) A resolution will be available to act on in your packet at the meeting. This action follows the public hearing held for the above mentioned project. Item 7.2 Consider Resolution ordering the Improvement Project for the entire Overlay Project of the City streets. Refer to the packet for the appropriate resolution. Item 7.3 Consider approving partial payment #1 for Barbarossa & Sons on the Trunk Sewer and Water Project, COP #98.04. The amount is $166,107.50 and the partial payment Is approximately 7.6% of the original bid amount. The project is on schedule. Item 7.4 Consider approving the final payment for Mark J. Traut Wells The final payment is $3,805.19. We are asking to approve the payment but not disburse the check until the three items listed on the bottom of the pay estimate form are received. We need to release the contractor as the pumphouse contractor is starting to build the structure. Item 7.6 Any other Engineering Business a) Environmental Worksheet for 78th Street and Page Avenue We have estimated that the EAW preparation, mailings and review of comments will cost about $2,500 In fees. The time spent on the work will depend on comments after the publication of the document. 11CIndy\shareWlunbipelWOT3EGO\901 \ot901 JuneAgenda.doc JUN. 9. 11399 4:37PM N0.232 P.2/6 PAY ESTIMATE #1 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watertllain Project City of Otsego Project 998.04 June a, 19999 For Work through June 4, 1111111 Barbarossa & Sons 4 11000 93rd Avenue North MVI 7.3 P.O. Box 367 Cssec, MN 56369 RE: City of Otsego, Sanitary Sewer and Watermaln Tnuink Facilities t3RI oQuetlura Work or Spec Estimated Estimated previous this Total to Previous or Item Rat. Descrl tionQuant! Iters Contract Price Work Period Date Work Extension 00 27 5.00 1 2021 lAotxllzaUon Maximum 39S 1 LS 565,000.00 L3 0 0.3 O.o LS S 2 500.00 2 2101 Cleer and Grub Sta 38+00 - 94+00 1 LS $ 2.5w.00 LS 0 1 1 LS S 41000.00 1,00 CY 2101 Clear and Grub Sta 7+00 - 35+00 1 LS S 4,000,D0 LS 0 1 1 LS S 12000 TN 3 21 OA Reiccate Bank S n L9 000.00 LS 0 0 LS I S 2301 6' Concrete Pavement 95 SY 2104 Relocate L ht oie a cA $ 1,500.00 0 0 EA 3 3 21 2340 T e 31 Bit. Base Course 2104 Remove Barb ad Wine & Electric Fence 570 L: 3 1.00 LF 0 0 LF 0 TN 1-2104 2104 Remcve Barbed Wire Fence 1800 LF 3 1.00 LF D 0 LF S 0 TN _0r, $ S 2104 Remove Bituminous Pavement 2,800 SY $ 1.50 SY 0 0 9Y S 0 AL 2104 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter 965 LF 3 1.80 L 0 0 LF S 0 0 2104 Remove Concrete Pavement 95 SY S 4.00 SY 0 0 SY S $ - 160.00 0 Remove Pi Culverts 1,6c0 LF S 2.00 LF 0 80 80 140 LF S 12 2104 Salvage and RelnstaU I raft and other Signs 26 EA 3 37.50 EiA 0 0 EA 3 86 13 2104 Satva a Mailbox and Reinstall on new Standard 5 EA 3 105,00 EA 0 0 EA 3 2564 4' Solid White Paint 14 2104 Sawout Bltuminous Pavement 835 LF $ 1.00 LF 0 0 L.= 1 E 29 15 2104 Sawcut Concrete Pavement 70 LF S 5,00 LF 01 0 LF S 3 62 16 St 2104 Remove and Salva a one Retains Wali 2 EA 3 500.00 EA0 110.00 EA 0 EA 0 0 EA 17 2104 Remove end 9atva a Wood Retainln Wall 2 EA 3 5CO.00 EA 0 0 EA S 0 TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A": $ 34,180.00 SJL),iU 1tUULC -o or Spec Estimated Previous or Total to Iters Spec Estimated Price Work Previous this Total to 38 Item Rei. Descrl tion Quandt Contract Price Work Parlod DatajExtans[ond18 40 2501 15" C5 Cuh r' 2105 ropsoll Borrow 2500 CY S 1,00 CY 0 0 0 CY 41 19 2211 Class 5 A r ate Base 12000 TN 3 6.50 TN 0 0 0 TN 42 20 2301 6' Concrete Pavement 95 SY 3 27.00 SY 0 0 0 SY 43 21 2340 T e 31 Bit. Base Course 300 TN S 44.00 TN 0 0 0 TN 22 2340 41 BIL Wear Course 250 TN $ .00 TN 0 0 0 TN _0r, $ S 23 2357 Bit Material for Tack Coat 100 GAL $ 1. 0 GAL 0 0 AL 48 2 m4 2511 Bitunous Fiume 4 A S 300.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 25 2531 B612 Concrete Curb & Gutter 1,200 LF $ 8.00 F 0 0 0 S $ 26 2531 8618 Concrete Curb & Gutter 140 LF S 8.75 LF 0 0 0 LF q9 27 2564 4" Double Yellow Paint 86 S 3.70 LF 0 0 0 Lr S 28 2564 4' Solid White Paint 413 L= $ 1.85 0 0 0 LF $ S 29 2564 Pavement Point . Left Tum Arrow 2 EA 3 90.00 EA 0 0 0 EA 62 30 2564 Pavement Paint -'On 1 EA $ 110.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 31 2584 Pavement Paint -Right Turn Arrow 2 EA S 90.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 32 2564 Trafrlo Control 1 LS S 4 000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 33 2573 Tem Eroalon Control 1 LS S 3 OOC.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 34 2575 A ricultural Restoratkm 25 AC S 400.00 AC 0 0 0 AC S 38 25 5 Seedl a Fletd Restoration SO AC 5 520.00 AC 0 0 0 AC S 36 2575 Seedln - e Lawn ReatoraUon 3 AC 3 680.00 AC 0 0 0 AC 3 37 2575 Vletland Restoratbn 5 AC S 1 200.00 AC 0 0 0 AC S 38 2575 Sad 7000 SY S 1.90 SY 0 01 0 SY is TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "B": $0.00 til U .S 1, i1CUULr- or Spec Estimated Previous this Total to Iters Rel. Description quantityContract Price Work Parlod Date extetulon 38 2501 8' C$ PIRe Culvert 22 L.F S 15.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 40 2501 15" C5 Cuh r' 128 LF 3 18.00 LF 0 0 0 LF ___0_LT_ S 41 2501 58 )4" Span RC Arch PI 32 is S 104,00 LF 0 0 42 2501 58 Y,' Span RC Arch Apron 2 A $ 880.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 43 2 03 12' RCP Cess n 3006 CIS 24 LF S 22.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 44 2503 12' CPApron 2 A $ 300.00 EA 0 0 a. A S 45 2503 15' RCP Design 3008 CI 5 706 LF S 23.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S $ 48 2503 15' RCP Apron 38 EA 3 325.00 EA 0 0 0 47 2503 18' RCP Desl n 3006 CI 3 102 LF $ 24.00 LF 0 0 0 LF = 48 250 18RCP Apron 4 EA 3 373.00 EA 0 0 0 EA 0 LF $ 3 q9 2503 24' RCP Des n 3008 CI 3 344 LF 3 28.00 0 0 S 60__2O3 24' RCP Apron 13 EA 3 400.CO EA 0 0 0E A 0 LF 3 51 2503 30' RCP Cee n 3006 C13 24 LF $ 38.00 LF 0 0 3 62 2503 3G' RCP Apron 1 EA 3 475.00 EA 0 0 0 A ;0.00 TOTAL 810 SCHEDULE "C": BlarerAlW ala aw0tnevolote l2Nt ,18 n_,,,, , ,,, ., 8!4199 i :JUN. 9.1999 4:39PM PAY ESTIMATE #1 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Watermaln Project City of Otsego Project #98.04 For Work through June 4, 1999 BID SCHEDULE "D" . WATERMAIN N0.232 P.3i6 Spec Item Ref. Description Estimated Quantity Contract Price Prevlous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 531 26MI241 Steel Pipe Casing-Jacidr.q 370 S 140,00 LF 0 0 0 lF $ —541-2811 lConract to Existing Watermaln 4 EA S 850,00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 56 281118* Cl 52 DIP Watermaln 1250 LF $ 18,00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 58 281111 V CI 52 DIP Watermain 15258 LF S 3200 LF 0 0 0 LF S 57 2811 DIP FMI a 11500 LS S 2.00 LB of 0 OILS S 58 2611 8' Gate Valve 1 EA $ 860.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 39 2811 18' Butterfly Gate Varve 23 EA $ 1.360.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 60 2611 4" Watermaln Insulation 9 Sy $ 15.00 SY 0 01 0 SY S 61 2811 6' CL 52 0 I Watermaln Hydrant Leads 200 LF 3 17.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 62 2611 8' Gate Valve – hlycrant 15 EA 3 460.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 63 2611 Hydrant 15 EA S 1,6CO.CC EA 0 0 0 EA S TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "D": BID SCHEDULE "E" • SANITARY SEWER $0.00 Spec litam Ret, Description Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension 54 u'$b� 2800 24' Steel PI a Casln Ja "+: •? :y^d` ,..Z v w?:�F�Z:r ,:ScRoy..^`;` 530 $ 160.00 LF 0 0 "�+••YV.J t;. ';<:.�F.$p 0 LF `;ri�{t.� ..`.; �;�. $ 661 262118' SCR 26 PVC PI all de the 30 LF $ 40,00 LF 0 0 0 L $ 681 2621 15' SCR 26 PVC PI 16'-20' 400 LF $ 44.00 LF 1 0 0 0 LF S a7l 2621115' SCR 26 PVC Pi 20'-24 4500 LF $ 45.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 681 2621115" SCR 26 PVC Pipe(24'-281 1335 LF S 48.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 89 2621115" SCR 28 PVC Pi 28'-32 600 LF $ 47,00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 701 262118" PVC Pipe Plug 2 EA $ 20.00 EA 0 0 0 EA $ 711 2621115' PVC PIpe Ptug 1 EA S 75,00 EA 01 0 0 EA 1 $ 72 Deleted per Addendum No. 1 1 LS 35 300.00 LS 0 0 0 $ 73 2621 16' DIP Server 100 LF 5 65.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 74 2621 18' RCP Sewer 18' LF $ 55,00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 75 2621 Sanitary Sewer MH to 8Ceep 23 EA S 2,060,00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 78 2621 JExtra Depth Sanitmy MH > 8' 352 VF S 60.00 VF 0 0 0 VF is 77 2621 tCon3truct Outside Oroo 3 EA $ 1,600.00 EA 1 0 0 0 EA 1 $ Spec Item Ref. Description Estimated Quantity Contract Price Previous Work Work this Period Total to Date Extension ;y<�c: w^ 6'?F,' �4 y� max• y >h •t F . ..? ' W.. .1. :«4�w y • •yy y;• .'i"!.?f`.e.;s �:,, ��>ro . '%� �g... > bi>- ' ; • ° 3i• Jl�.y'�i•�.Wn 9:§..k�.51..r •��c s: ;k,��'..�;y;y .r. \$. V 781 2600 18" Steel Ploe Casl –Jacking 295 LF 125.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $. 79 262118* DRI 3 0900 CL 50 PVC Forcemain 18100 LF 23.00 LF 0 5300 5300 LF S 121 SCO 00 80 -1 2621 DIP Fittrn s 870 LS 2.00 LB 0 270 270 LH S 540.00 81 2521 Cleanout MH – Fcrcemain 3 4,075.00 EA 0 2 2 A $ 8,150.()0 82 2821 Air Release MH – orcamain 2 EA 3,100.00 EA 0 2 2 EA $ 8 200.00 83 2621 8' Gate Valve – Force Maki 7 EA 860.00 EA 0 8 6 EA S 3,900.00 ..r, v 84 2621 LA Station Electrical 1 5200,00 LS 0 0 0 LS S 85 2621 Lift Station Mechanical 1 LS 13000!00 LS 0 0 0 LS S 86 2621 Lift Station Pumos 1 LS 35 300.00 LS 0 0 0 LS S 87 2621 Lift Station Structure 1 LS 72 525.00 LS 0 0 0 LS S 88 2821 ILA Station Valve MH F-8 1 LS 3 800.00 LS 0 0 0 LS 5 89 2621 ILrt Station Site Grading 1 LS 1,000.00 LS 0 0 0 LS I S TOTAL BID SCHEDULE E1, E2, AND E3: 8here/6ttxVclpalAteevdae 12Ct�ds 140,690.00 ;-JUN. 9.1999 4:40PM PAY ESTIMATE #1 Trunk Sanitary Sewer and atermain Project City of Otsego Pro ect #98.04 BID SCHEDULE "F" - SPECIAL CROSSING OFFaXM through J I une 4, 1999 NO. 232 P.4/6 Item spec Rar. Descrl tion Estimated Quant Co act Price Previous Work or this Period Total to Date Extension 901 g 2600 16" Steel Pipe Caslng-J*cLd , Sanitary Sewer 120 3 128,00 LF 0 0 0 LF 3 911 2621 Construct Outside Oroo 1 EA 3 300.00 EA 1 0 0 0 EA S 92 262118* DIP Sewer 128 LF 3 30.00 LF 0 0 0 y $ 93 2621 DIP FAII s 45 LB 3 2.00 LB 0 0 0 LB $ 94 2564 Traolc Contra W. of CSAH 42 1 LS S 500.00 LS 0 0 0 LS $ 98 96 2575 Seedl& Restoration W. of CSAH 42 2600 tl6' Steel Casiry-JackIng Watermain 0.3 AC 80 LF 3 3 000.00 AC 125.00 ILF 0 0 0 0 0 AC 0 LF 3 S 97 2811 DIP Fittin 300 LS 3 2.00 LS 0 0 0 Le $ 88 2811 8' CL 52 OIP Watemtafn 100 LF 3 18.00 LF 0 0 0 LF 3 99 251115" CL 62 DIP Watermain HVdrant Leads 10 LF s 17.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 100 2811 8" Gate Valve • Hwrart 1 EA 3 500.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 101 2611 Hydrant 1 EA $ 800.00 EA 0 0 0 EA 3 102 2600 16' Steel Pipe Casing, Jacking, Sarltart Sewer 110 L,° $ 125,00 LF 0 0 0 13 1Q3 2821 8' SDR 26 PVC Pt ell depths) 128 LF $ 30.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 104 2621 8' PVC Pipe Plug 1 EA 3 10.00 EA 0 0 0 EA 3 t 05 2584 Traftlo Control West of CSAH 42 1 LS S 500.00 LS 0 0 0 L9 S 108 2575 Seedl & Restoration West of CSAH 42 0.3 AC S 000,00 AC 0 0 0 AC S Item Spec Ret'. Description Estimated Quantity Cor tract Price Previous Work ork this Period Total to Date Extension BID SCHEDULE "C" - CULVERTS AND DRAINAGE .fl'I lR 1 ?t�hl' ewr 1.Q . •iC>F4- '. h ',�C>'biF e; a�.a. $ - BIO SCHEDULE "E1, E2 & E3" - SANITARY SEWER": 107 2104 Remove PI Cut"" 82 LF $ 4.00 LF 0 0 0 1 LF $ S 2800 18" Steel PI Casin , Jackie Watermaln 100 LF 3 125.00 LF 0 01 0 LF 2811 DIP Fittin a 300 LB $ 2.00 LB 0 0 0 LS 3 2611 8'CL52 DIP Watermain 130 318.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 2611 8' C: - 52 DIP Watermain dent Leeds 10 LF 3 17.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 2811 8' Gate Valve - drant 1 EA 's 500,00 EA 0 0 0 EA 3 2611 rant 1 EA 3 8CO.00 EA 0 0 0 EA s I 2600 18' Steel Pi Casl JackI Sanita Sewer 130 LF s 125.00 LF 0 0 0 LF $ 8" SCR 26 PVC Ploe All deothsl 158 LF $ 28.00 LF 0 0 0 LF S 8" PVCPI a Plu 1 EA $ 10.00 EA 0 0 0 EA S 15'RCP A n 2 EA 5 325.00 EA 0 0 0 EA 315" RCP Deal n 3008 CI 5 A21715 00 LF $ 23LF0 0 0 LF $ Traffk: Control West of CSAH 42 1 LS $ 500.00 LS 0 01 0 LS S 120Seeolng & Restoration West of CSAH 42 0.3 AC $ 0,CCO.00 JAC 0 01 0 AC 3 TOTAL 810 SCHGOUL8 F1, F2 and Fat 50.00 810 SCHEDULE "A" - REMOVALS $ 34,100.00 BID SCHEDULE "8" - RESTORATION $ BID SCHEDULE "C" - CULVERTS AND DRAINAGE $ ' BID SCHEDULE "D" WATERMAIN $ - BIO SCHEDULE "E1, E2 & E3" - SANITARY SEWER": $ 140,090.00 810 SCHEDULE "F1, F2 & F3" - SPECIAL CROSSING: $ ' TOTAL USED TO DATE: $ 174,860.00 LESS 5% RETANAGE: S 8,742.50 WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF: S 168,107.50 APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR; Cenlfk;at1w BARBAR099A S Ig ned: True: ENGINEER: I recommend pt HAKANSON ANDERS< Signed: Title: X� CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Contractor, I cadry that all Items and amounts sha+n are correct for the work completed to date. e#4zAt6iiAF +C -g c Date: Q for Items and amount of work as shown. Date: Cate: !h!r W( �V t Blois12bt.A* .__ .., ... Paas 3 of 3 6MM JUN. 9.1999 4:41PM PAY ESTIMATE #3 (FINAL) N0.232 P.5/6 OWNER June 9, 1999 1 ITEM 7.4 Mark J. Traut Weds 141 - 28th Avenue S. Waite Park, MN 56387 RE: Municipal Well #2 Construction, COP #98.01 Contract Amount: $49,890.00" Award Date: September 29, 1998 Completion Date: March 1, 1999 Bid Schedule "A"- COMMUNITY P UBLIC WATER SUPPLY FOR THE CITY OF OTSEGO Estimated Item Description..................................................... .. Quantity Unit Price Contract Price .......I ................1111........................... Used to Date ...Y................................. Extension ...........�. �......• 1':Mobillzation/Demobldzatian ...................... ............ ................. ............. ..... 1�bS .............i......... ...................... i $5,000:003LS ... $5,000.00 ............ 1 0 LS { s $5,000,00 1111.. 2E ,Ori11 nominal 24-1!2 Open Hole 1801!LF .. $85.00 1111. LF i $15 300.00 1... $14,620:00. 3 F11118alf Open Hole . 8 CY 1 $130.00 1111.. CY ; 8ICY $1,040.00 ...........................P............................................................... 4; Set 18" Casino 1201 FT i $40.0 ...... ,,,,$1,040:00 ... j FT $4 800 00 .,. .a 120! FT $4 B00 00 ....................... ..................................... 5ilnstall Grout ...'......tali... Gro., ............................................................................. .....?........f..................:..... 8•.CY 1 $325.00 ........... , ............ .................................s............. CY e „X1,950,00 ...................................................... 10iCY i 1...L.............. $3,,250.00 SiBlest _.................................................................................. 2�LB $50.00 LB 1 $100.00 .................._.............................. 231LB 1 $1 150:00 !F;I;R,.Development...qulpme►rt ................................I................................a....................................... ..... 11LS ............. $4 000; 00 ........ ............................ LS ? $4 000.00 1 LS .............. 4 000;00 X000 ..... .... Well/Sandstone Removal .............................. .. 801HR � $100 00 HR $8,000.00 „1 110:HR $11 00 .81Develap 8iF.1.R. Test Pum E ui ment P.... q 1 L§- $2 50Q.00 �....................... L8..1.. $2 500.00 I.............. 1.1.L81.s............$2,500.66' y.......................................... .... ...P.......................................... 1111... .. .... 1111... 101Test Pump Well .........:................. 60:`HR $55.00 ...................1111 HR : $3 300.00 26iHR E $1,443;75 1111 ............................................ 11 Disinfect Well .1.11...1...... 1 ELS ................. $150.00 1111.. .. 7 ............................ 1- $150.00 .. ............ ry ..,........... 1 LS t........... $150.00 .-........................................................................................ ........ 12iGamme Logy"!! .................................. ,...................... A........ 1 SLS ... ..,....... ......................... ........................4............. $800.00 { LS $800.00 .........,.............. ............... ............. 1;LS ..................... .$800;00 13iVldeo Record Well X800;00 L3 1 $800.0Q 2 LSI $1 600;00 ,. .........................................I....................... 141WaterAneiysis ReporUPermit/Submtttals „1ILS '......... 1 LS $450.00 LS 1 $450.00 .. 1.LS $450 00 ........................................................ ............ ..................... ;151Sfte Restoration 1 iLS 3 1111... $1,500;00(LS ... ..4............................ „ „$1,500;00 ..........,.,........,.................................. 1.0 iL5 1 „ .$1,500;00 TOTAL: $49,690.00 $53,303.75 "Contract price per Change Order No. 1 USED TO DATE: . $53,303.75 LESS PAY ESTIMATE #1: $24,899.50 LESS PAY ESTIMATE #2: $24,599.06 WE RECOMMEND FINAL PAYMENT OF: $3,805.19 Please verify the amount of previous payments, If any, and the receipt of the following items prior to making payment. 1. Certificate of claims payment (lien waiver), 2. Affidavit of payment of States taxes (MN State TAX Form 134), 3. Letter of consent from surety ftrm. APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR; Certification by Contractor, I certify that all Items and amounts shown are correct for the work completed to date. MARK J. TRAUT WELLS Signed: Title: Date: ENGINEER: I recommend payment for items and amount of work a ho HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Signed: Title: Date: OWNER: CITY OF OTSEGO Signed: Title: Date: FILE: Shafe\ExceMCtee0obt6084txfe SHEET: PAY ESTIMATE 03 FINAL Page t ate" JUN.14.1999 1:02PM NO.303 P.2i2 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS FOR OTSEGO 1999 BITUMINOUS OVERLAY PROGRAM WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 8th day of February, 1999, fixed a date for a Council hearing on a bituminous overlay program including improvement of all existing roadways within the following described areas: Halls let, 2nd & 3rd Additions, Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates 1"t, 2nd 3r & 4th Additions, Hidden Valley Acres, Deerfield Acres and Walesch Estates 1 et & 2nd Additions, which hearing was held on the 18th day of March, 1999, and; WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted the 12th day of April, 1999, fixed a date for a Council Hearing on a bituminous overlay program including improvement of all existing roadways within the following described areas: Otsego Acres 10 and 2nd Additions, Great River Acres 1�, 2nd and 3rd Additions, and Mason Ave. (CSAH 39 to 83rd St. N.E.), 83rd St. N.E. (Marlowe Ave. N.E. to Mason Ave. N.E.), Marlowe Ave. N.E. (83rd St. N.E. to 801h St. N.E.), 801h St. N.E. (Marlowe Ave. N.E. to CSAH 19) of the City of Otsego, which hearing was held on the 4th day of May, 1999; and WHEREAS, the City Council may order construction of all or parts of the bituminous overlay program within the areas described above and desires preparation of plans and specifications on said improvement areas. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: Hakanson Anderson Associates, inc.' is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer is hereby authorized and directed to prepare plans and specifications for such improvements within the two areas described herein. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 14th day of June, 1999. Honorable Mayor Larry Fournier Elaine Beatty, City Clerk \\Clndy\ahare\ Municipal\AOTSEGOM7\ot337RESORDPLN3.doo JUN.14.1999 2:30PM RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND PREPARATION OF PLANS N0.307 P. 2/2 WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council adopted the day of _ , 1999, fixed a date for a council hearing on the proposed improvement of Odean Avenue from CSAH 37 to CSAH 39 including excavation, aggregate base, curb and gutter, bituminous surfacing and drainage improvements. AND WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 1st day of June, 1999, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the Feasibility Report dated December 1998, and in the council resolution adopted day of .1999. 2. Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement, and are hereby directed and authorized to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Adopted by the council this day of Clerk C:\Share\MunicIpaMOTSF-GO\334lot334RES2.doc 1999. Mayor 7..s MEMO Date: June 10, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: EAW - Collector Roads Staff has been reviewing the State laws governing preparation of Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW's) for new development. This review was caused when we heard from some developers that Paul Jacobs of HRUA has been showing up in some communities around here and claiming that cities are illegally allowing development to proceed without State required EAW's. One of the requirements to do an EAW is when a City constructs more than a mile of new collector street. Our plans for the construction of 78th Street and Page avenue extensions seem to meet this requirement. The City Attorney will be ready to discuss this issue at the next Council meeting. I have also asked the City Engineer to have an estimate of time and cost to prepare an EAW for those streets. cc: City Staff si CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 8.1. Hearing for the following Liquor Licenses: 1. Pattern Station, Inc DEA Riverwood Inn and Conference Center, 10990 - 95TH ST NE, (Otsego) Monticello, Mn, 55362 to consider: A. Renewal of an On Sale/Sunday Liquor License 2. Riverview Liquorette/Elk River, Inc., Trade Name: Riverview Liquorette, 15682 NE 90TH ST, Elk River, Mn. 55330 to consider: A. Renewal of an Off Sale Liquor License 3. Carron, Randal & Deborah, Trade Name: D & R Liquors, 7767 NE River Road Otsego, Mn. 55330 to consider: A. Renewal of an Off Sale Liquor License 8.2. Approval of Payments for Odean Avenue Easements 8.3. Discussion of HRUA Permit Application/Resolution 8.4. Discussion of Darkenwald Meeting 8.5. Any other Legal Business BACKGROUND: 8.1. Andy MacArthur will be present to explain Hearing and I have attached signed documents and information on Liquor License Renewals. 8.2. Andy will discuss information with the Council on Payments for Odean Avenue Easements. 8.3. Andy will explain the HRUA Permit Application/Resolution information with Council. See attached information Memo from Mike Robertson. He will also be present to comment. 8.4. Andy will be present for discussion of Darkenwald/Otsego Sub -Committee Meeting as will Mike Robertson. 8.5. This item is for any other legal business that may arise. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council consideration and any approval needed. Thanks, CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT Notice of a Public Hearings to be held for the purpose of considering the following Liquor Licenses: 1. Pattern Station, Inc. DBA Rtverwood Inn and Conference Center,10990 - 95TH ST NE, (Otsego) Monticello, Mn, 55362 to consider: A. Renewal of an On Sale/Sunday Liquor License 2. Riverview LiquoretWElk River, Inc., Trade Name: Riverview Liquorette,15682 NE 90TH ST, Elk River, Mn. 55330 to consider: A. Renewal of an Off Sale Liquor License 3. Carron, Randal & Deborah, Trade Name: D & R Liquors, 7767 NE River Road Otsego, Mn. 55330 to consider: A. Renewal of an Off Sale Liquor License This Hearing will be held at the City of Otsego Council Meeting at 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330 at 6:30PM on June 14, 1999, or as soon thereafter as time petnuts to consider the above application for license for either acceptance or denial. All interested parties wishing to be heard either in favor or opposition to these Liquor License Renewal requests will be heard at this time and questions will be answered. If you would like further information, please call Otsego at 441-4414 in advance of this meeting. CITY OF TSEGO: Q6- A Aff—neBeatty, Cierk/Zoning Adm. Dated and Posted: May 25, 1999 2 -Boards, Otsego City Hall Published: June 2, 1999 - ELK RIVER STAR NEWS Council Hearing: June 14 (Monday) 1999 - 6:30PM Fie: HEARWPS Publish: June 2, 1999 Elk River Star News Posted: Otsego City HAll - Both Boards - 5/25/99 Minnesota Department of Public Safety 1d09 Na Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement€ 444 Cedar St., Suite 133 St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 ' .. 612-296-6430 • TTY 612-282-6555 • FAX 612-297-5259'''= RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, `VINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Liquor Control •..`:_" Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by NI.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code CI`+SS License Period Ending 06 / 30 /.1999 ID # 269 City/County where license approved Ot s e g o Licensee Name Pattern Station Inc. Trade Name Riverwood Inn & Conferenc-e Center Licensed Location address 10990 95th St NE City, State, Zip Code Mo n t i c e 11 o, MN 55362 Business Phone ( 612) 441-6833 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale S On Sale S 4, 000. 00 Sunday $ 150.00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report anv of the followine will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) NIS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100, 000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. Licensee Sinnatureci�/��' ��,�-CC. Date (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and license has been approved by city/county: City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. County Attorney Signature Date County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). x Police/Sheriff Signature / (Signature certifies license violations (criminaUcivil). Date el I., 'or associates h not b en cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law Report violations on back, then sign here. DC �Tl; 'Rai. CRY OFMEGO 4 -OWNENASHUAAVE. gF. RM R. MN vi� MV) 441.4414 : a.. k 6 5 17k- Thank YOU tv ust mer's,der Phone No. 1 10, -13 MEMILdWAFAII! If fo oil aty. I Description I Price I Amount KUM W4701M All Claims and relumed goods MUST be wcompanied by this bill. __ Tax Rec'd. 7V*' �By _w e4' &/ Total � I a.. k 6 5 17k- Thank YOU tv Minnesota Department of Public Safety ," Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement€'`'] 444 Cedar St., Suite 133 St. Paul, NIY 55101-5133 6•t'_-296-6430 • TTY 612-282-6555 • FAX 612-297-5259W RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN L4&&Control Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by NI.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code OFSL License Period Ending 06 /30 / 1999ID # 1205 City/County where license approved 01W s e g o Licensee Name Riverview Liquorette/Elk Rvr Inc. _ Trade Name Riverview Liquorette Licensed Location address 15682 NE 90th St City, State, Zip Code E 1 k River, MN 55330 Business Phone ( 612) 441-7685 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale S 150.00 On Sale $ Sunday $ By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Aanlicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100 ash or securities or $100, 000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. ; A 1 1 -n n Licensee Signature Date S, (Signature certifies all above information to correct and cense has been approved by city/county. City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. County Attorney Signature County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff SiC,qZ/� (Signature certifies licensor assoc -X, violations (criminal civil). Report vi Date Date Ove not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law ns on back, then sign here. PS 05/17/1999 10:35 6127816514 JIM NESSER _ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUE PAGE 01 DATE MWOONY) 5-17-99 (612)362-9020 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Jim N(?sser Agency ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 636 Broadway N.E. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE Minneapolis, NN._ 55413-- maulaen INSUREa A: —$'t . �a 111 COf 1p a n 1 2 5 Riverview LiquoreG,2 of Elk River,. Inc. �wsuaERe _ _ _ .._. __. —• -••-- Ri vervi ew Li quore-c-ce of Elk River.INSIIREac: -t;i S 15682 N.E. 9Gt-re2 V F INSURE �. -- - E l k eR i Y r, IMN . 553.30 INSURER e: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BE N ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMEU AbQVt rvH { nrrvLn.I' rcn�w •� • ��• •--- • • • - OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONOITION OF ANY C NTRACT OR HEREINIS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE ICIES'DE3CRIBED POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEE REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. £-6Y EXPIRATIONuMfTS ` . _—..-- • • - - ' FOIIC�PFECT{V— INSR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLJCM NUMBER LTH EACH OCCURRENCE S . GENERAL UABILMY -_ • . II COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIAB4ITY I Ir i DAMAGE (Arty ani fral 3 _•_ - t CLAIMS MADE I OCCUR II I �F�IRE MED EXP (MY one Person? _ - PERSONALS ADV IPLIIJFIY_ $ . . GENERAL AGORWATE i ... .. .._ �GEN1 AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER. 11I1i PRODUCTS _COMPfOP AGCi f .. •-- _ POLICY P to JECT I LOC AUTOMOBILE UABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT s (Es acdoent) ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS gpOILY INJURY f (Per parson) SCHEDULED ALTOS _ —• — • _ •—I I HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY f (Par aradenl) ' NON.OWNED AUTOS _ .— • • - — PROPERTYDAMAGE S —.. ..----- (Per eccWwt) dAAAGE DABILTy AUTO ONLY - GA ACCIDENT f, THER THAN FJACCS [A.UTO ANY AUTO --• -•-- - ONLY: AGG f E.-" LIAOIUTY EACH OCCURRENCE f _ AGGREGATE _ _ OCCUR I CLAIMS MADE S DEDUCTIBLE _ RETENTION S f ST TU- OTM WORK):R9 CONAPENSATION AND TORY LIMfTSFA- E.L EACH ACCIDENT EMPLOYSRS' LIABILITI ' E.L. DISEASE - £A EMPLOYE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMB ! f OTHER { LimitA of Liability Liquor Liability RB06648SQ7 7-1-99 7-1-00 1,,000/2,000,000 1,000000 DEscRrFrION OF OPERAT)OtMLOCATION9/VO40LE&fVXCLUSK)HO ADDED BY ENOORSEMENTMPECUL PR9VISION9 CERTIFICATE HOLDER I ADomoN City of Os'cego rl'-tn: Elaine P -x # 441-8823 INSURED' INSURER LETTER: CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE MUMO INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTWICAT'E HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURNI TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UABILrIY OF ANY KIND UPON THE WMMEA, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORED REPRESENTATIVE 0 Iviinnesota Department of Public Safety a� Alcohol and Gambling EnforcementJf"S7 -. 441 Cedar St., Suite 133 v' St. Paul, NIN 55101-5133 2 'err.,,,,,.•' 6l_, -_96-6-130 •TTY 612-282-6555 •FAX 61.:297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, OR CLUB LICENSE No license will be approved or released until the $20 Retailer ID Card fee is received by MN Ligtwr'ConCrol Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code OFSL License Period Ending 06/30/ 19991D ## 2899 City/County where license approved O t s e g o Licensee Name Carron, Randal & Deborah Trade Name D & R Liquors Licensed Location address 7767 NE River Rd City, State, Zip Code Otsego, MN 55330 Business Phone ( 612) 241-9353 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ 150.00 On Sale $ Sunday $ By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership or the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report anv of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100, 000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liability. Licensee Signature (Signature certifies all above Date (S , n to be correct and license has been approved by city/county. City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above. unty Attorney Signature unty Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). XPolice/Sheriff Signature,2�'1/ (Signature certifies lic see or assoc' res violations (criminal/civil). Report violati Date Date e not blen cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law on back, then sign here. N Customer's Order No. Phone No.• 7 8 3 hank You. -18.1. Y 0F.Mido *VM MW ISM (6=441.4414 I Price I Amount MEWME Customer's Order No. Phone No.• 7 8 3 hank You. -18.1. oty. Description I Price I Amount MEWME I WINE 0194 - &JJW Tax __ Total 7 8 3 hank You. -18.1. m;4pi:n. CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTtH Ur INr%JMMAIIUN Burns & Wilcox Ltd ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR 1 7 4 0 Rice Street #300 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES B St. Paul 1110 5 5 1 1 3 I COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE i 0 9'7 Deborah and Randall Carron dba: D & R Liquor 7767 NE River Road Ostego MN 55330 COMPANY A Mt. Vernon Fire Insurance Company COMPANY -- B r COMPANY C II� COMPANY ' `1 D UU V Cnra%aL.— THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. j POUCY EFFECTIVE POUCY EXPIRATIONLIMITS CO TYpE OF INSURANCE I POLICY NUMBER DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MMIDD/YY) LTR , GENERAL AGGREGATE $ GENERAL LIABILITY i PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGG S COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY i PERSONAL 3 ADV INJURY $ �— CLAIMS MADE OCCUR J — I � EACH OCCURRENCE $ OWNER'S & CONT PROT FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ MED EXP (Any one person) $ i AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO 1 ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS { HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS I ' GARAGE UABILITY ANY AUTO IA I D EXCESS UABILITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' UAB ILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL PARTNERS/EXECUTNE EXCL OFFICERS ARE: OTHER :Liquor Liability'To Be Determined Location: Hwy 101 at County Road 42 CERTIFICATE HOLDER City of Ostego j 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. j Otsego MN 55330 i I I X6/30/99 I� COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT S BODILY INJURY S (Per person) BODILY INJURY S (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE S AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH ACCIDENT S AGGREGAim $ EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ S STATUTORY LIMITS EACH ACCIDENT $ DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DISEASE - EACH EMPLOYEE $ 6/30/00 $1,000,000 Each COmmOL Cause Limit $1,000,000 Aggregate CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOF 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO r -T, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR UABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES- AUT EPRESENTATIVES- LRMORIZ A -U ,ESENTA,V�� :'~� J Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk Plan f= '— Standard Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Policy kDa Contract Administrator Berkley Administrators W2 4 � P.O. Box 59143 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55459-0143 Phone (612) 544-0311 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE The Certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the Certificate Holder. This Certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the Policy listed below. 1. The Insured: Policy Number: WC -22-04-093497-00 D and R Liquor Association File Number: 2899329 7767 NE River Road Otsego, MN 55330 Tax ID#: F 411903385 UIC #: 2324317-000 Policy Period: From: 6/30/1999 To: 6/30/2000 This is to certify that the Policy of Insurance described herein has been issued to the Insured named above for the policy period indicated. Notwithstanding any requirement, term or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which this Certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the Policy described herein is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of such Policy. TYPE -00 -INSURANCE, ., i• it- ..13"''—Y1 Kit �'Ct'SSia. r 'MsUMRS OF LABILITY 7_P -..c ')ne ers' Compensation Statutory Bodily Injury by Accident $100,000 each accident. Part Two Employers' Liability Bodily Injury by Disease $500,000 policy limit. Bodily Injury by Disease $100,000 each employee. Should the above Policy be canceled before the expiration date thereof, the Company will endeavor to mail 30 days written notice to the below named Certificate Holder, but failure to mail such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any kind upon the Company. Certificate Holder's Name and Address: City of Otsego 8899 National Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 ;y Name and Address F-410977807 Burmeister And Assoc 7412 Lyndale Ave So Rlchfleld, MN 55423 OFFICERS NOT COVERED. Date Issued: 5/18/1999 ' Hor.t• •P.��nt�ti rr• BA3140 0208 23846 I . .. _ ... �i 'l •t.. 1•. ;� - .rs Sr►_ — - ��.-:r.;-►:-' Vit.. ;:_.� . - . pate 1 Phone No. Customer rder No. Address -� - S -s33 n ACCL : Mdse. e, q cna a ;Bard zt,, ,�-••Y is sola By cash V . i ,rte$. i '`. ,6r•� :. _ ..e .ice`, .><..{ -u-•: 4 W.Zk v 9. i ,. - 4' IN "�� -M�i4,d.� �, i•' •i 1 •�� , FIM • - 'T�['�''''YK•="'I[.,��i�i�.,��•�- '� .-e �?{ vc'- `-f. �1°.' .. • - .,,,-t �y.�,p•�t_ a..� �i .. � ac r t^"-a�^'K � �'�-r'i �r ..:�{Yt'�ir (4 �i?.I ��6.� �- 1 i .. �i•"�Y�.� •t i��' .......-r-- ... Li.' � _Ez._... ' x''�'i. w••,i1 a'� •_. _ _ . '; _. '_' -'2 - i i'T'Sa..n+3S .rs Sr►_ — - ��.-:r.;-►:-' Vit.. ;:_.� . - . Tax Tota! ,�-••Y is �� . • L.':�u'. ,trot \ I13 �, i•' •i 1 •�� , 1 vl�� BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK i 6516361311 . 06/04/99 11:42 ff :02/02 NO:393 Councilmcntbcr introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: RESOLUTION OPPOSING HEADWATERS RURAL, UTILI,rY ASSOCIATION ST n DISPOSAL SYSTEM 13EIZNUT Wit ERVA►S, the I Icadwatcm Rural Utility Auzmlution has Applied for a State Disposal System Permit for the entire Upper Mississippi River basin; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has sent the permit information to the City of Annandale for public comment; and WHEREAS, issuance of mid permit will restrict the City's ability to manage drainaga issues within the City limits; and WHEREAS, issuance of n permit rhr the entire Upper Mississippi Rivitr basin is unprecedented and unsound; and WHEREAS, the proposed tf14011eitt technology is unproven; and WHEREAS, pe nits should he issued on an area apcuiftc basis; and WHEREAS, Plans antl .Specifications for the prnlmScd project arc nat available, and WHEREAS, the C:lty has reviewed the permit information and opposes issuance v the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED th,jt 1114- City Council « f Annatulale, Wright County, Minnesota resolves as follows: I. That the City of Annandale orlx-)grs the issuance of a State Disposal System Permit to the Hca dwatvrs Rurol Utility Assoclation and strongly encourage$ MPCA to dsny the permit. 2. The City of Annandtolc hereby petitions for u Contu5lcd Case Hearing an the permit Issunncv. 3, 'ihc ov orAnnandala hereby request.11jol the Commissioner of the MPCA inform the City ot'all future decisions regarding this neurit. The foregoing reanlution was duly suppoiled by C'nunciimember _ upon a vote being taken thereon, the following ntcrnbers voted in favor therenf: r_.. the fallowing members voted against: �,1hu folowing members absinincd: the following rnernbers were: absent: WIJERLUI'ON, said resolution w4 Ovc;I Crud duly passed and adopted this Jay of . 1999. City Clerk Fle RCA CC. 77'. 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTviENT: MEETI.N'G DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk' June 14 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUlN11BER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 9.1. A. Discussion of Utility Costs B. Discussion of Cost Estimate for Electrical Update C. Updates by CM Wendel (Post Office, Albertvi]le-Otsego WateriSewer and Otsego Creek Updates) D. Any Other Council Business BACKGROUND: 9.1. A. Mike Robertson will be present to discuss costs of utilities with the Council. B. vlike Robertson has obtained a quote for electrical update for the Shed on the New City Hall property at PRC's Request. (See attached information). C. Attached is information from CM Wendel on the Post Office. CM Wendel will zive Council information of the other two items. D. This is for any other Council Business that may be added. RECOiNDdENDATION: This is for Council discussion and any consideration for approval needed. k-4-7-� Laine Q--- , �'� ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL Mr. Mike Robertson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Ave. NE Elk River, MN 55330 322 King Avenue Elk River, :Minnesota 53330 Phone (612) 441-2020 Fax (612) 441-8099 Subject: Water and Waste Water Construction Project F, MAY 2 UTILITI �i May 21, 1999 Dear Mike, We would like to thank you and John Harwood for the time spent with us addressing our concerns for your water/ waste water project. As we discussed, your project will require the Elk River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) to expend a considerable amount of time and effort to accommodate this construction along CSAH 42. This is particularly disconcerting considering we have permits from the Department of Highways of Wright County for our facilities in this right-of-way and the heavy handed approach taken by some of your representatives. Please keep in mind this electric line is the only source of electrical power to our portions of Otsego and Dayton. In permitted right-of-way situations, the "utility facility and installation shall not interfere with any existing utility facility on the county highway right-of-way ". The interfering utility typically reimburses the existing utilities for costs incurred to do the new construction. This is the case at hand when Otsego requires other utility owners to move to make way for this project. During our discussion, you made the case that all effected utility companies will benefit by Otsego installing a water/ waste water system. Therefore these effected utility companies should be willing to relocate their utilities at no cost to Otsego. Although we do not totally agree with this agreement we will accept it in the spirit of cooperation except for two instances. The Bank of Elk River and a private residence on the east side of CSAH 42 and 85th Avenue will require new electric service lines to accommodate your construction project. The service line serves only these two customers. The cost to replace these two service lines is estimated to be $9,000. We request Otsego to reimburse ERMU the cost of replacing these two electrical services for a cost not to exceed $9,000, and in turn ERMU will absorb the remaining costs incurred by us to accommodate construction of your water/ waste water project. gBesregards, � Bryan C. Adams, P.E. General Manager cc: File Glenn Sundeen, Line Superintendent JUN 4 '99 05:26 FROM UN.L TMI D ELECTRIC, INC. I0486 80TH STREET N_E. MONI'ICELLO N N 55362-8117 PHONE (612) 497-4312 FAX 497-4983 !NAME/ADDRESS I OTS£GO CTTY HALL 8399 NASHUA AVE N -E. I ELK RIVER MN 55330 TO OTSEGO CITY HALL PAGE.002i002 cl, i Estimate DATE ESTIMATE 0 03199 233 J PROJECT WIRING IN POLE SH... I ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY TOTAL A9010 I BID PRICE 1 1,365.00 WIRING OF POLE SHED AS PER MACE ROBERSON AND JEFF BARTHEL i -FTX YARD LIGHT (PHOTO EYE) AND WIRE THEM SO THEY C COME ON WITH 1 BREAKER -PUT EXISTING OUTLETS ON GFT (TOTAL 3 CIRCUITS) -CLEAN UP EXISTING WIRING (WITH.LN REASON) � i -MOVE SWITCH FROM WARNUNG HOUSE AREA BY DOOR i k AND ADD ANOTHER 3 WAY FOR NEW LIGHTS BY BACK OVER HEAD g DITIOTSTAL OF 7 OUTLETS it 3 SHED ADDITION 2 � QUOTES ARE GOOD FOR 30 DAYS! CALL WITH QUESTIONS OR TO AUTHORIZE WORK! TOTAL x1,365.00 ** TOTAL PAGE.002 ** 06-08-1999 11:43AM FRCM Couri & MacArthur TO Andrww I 362CAidmr Ai:Gi m4D At Lmv . Afar= W. bmr 705 C&WW ,!amus E= PO Bas 369 (612) 497-2930 (612) 4-qX2S99 (FAQ FACSD41LE COVER PAGE 4418823 P.01 �-a FROM: DATE: ( T;Dvi iE: AlMl /PM TOTAL PAGES (NCLiJDING COVER SHEET):Z ADDITIONAL CONLIvtENI'S: s Tci" US THIS FACWtILE TR.��SilvIISSION IS CONFIDENTIAL. IT MAY BE PRIVMEGED AND IS I14TE DED FOR TBE iUSE OF THE ADDRESSEE ONLY. IF YOU ARE NOT TBE ADDRESSEE (OR A PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING THIS TRANSMLSSION TO THE ADDRESSEES DO NOT READ, COPY, OR USE THIS TRAN&NffSSION IN ANY WAY, BUT PROMPTLY CON -fACi' THE SENDER BY TELEPHONE TO ARRANGE FOR TBE RETURN OF THE ORIGINAL DOCUMENT TO US. 06-06-1999 11:43AM FROM Court & MacArthur TO 4418823 P.02 I CITY OF OTSEGO/ODEAN AVENUE AMOUNT FOR THE PARTIAL TAKING OF PROPERTY Advance Masonary 4300 Wiliston Road Minnetonka, NiN 55234 ' $794.00 Crary Anderson 8017 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $3,806.00 Matthew and Jodi Augustsoa 14483 81 st Street Otsego, MN 55330 $2,144.00 Morley Brechlin 14576 84th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,098.00 ichard and Nancy Brunell 4526 89th Street Otsego, NIN 55330 $3,172.00 William and Naomi Carlson 8490 Odell Avenue NE ` Otsego, NLN 55330 $4,219.00 Robert and Rachel C llinan 7005 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 ' $2,367.00 Phyllis Dahlheimer 8601 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,962.00 I 06-08-1999 11:44AM FROM Couri 8 MacArthur TO Karen DeMario 8231 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $3,499.00 Kenneth and Christine Dequaine 8856 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, TAN 55330 $1,688.00 Rhonda Dillion and Scott Monger 7860 O'Day Circle NE Otsego, NLN 55330 $2,959.00 Elk River ALANO Society, enc. c/o Pat Mortie or Sheldon Brie 9231 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,124.00 Elsie Erickson 7200 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $3,260.00 Mark Faue 14526 88th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 $4,905.00 Larry Feela 14464 87th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 $4,021.00 Harry and Audrey Friedman 2500 Medicine Lake Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55441 $2,050.00 Stephan Fritz 8060 O'Day Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $3,334.00 2 4418823 P.03 o6 -o8-1999 11:44AM FROM Couri & MacArthur TO 441ee23 P.04 Elmer and Marion Gelhar 8720 Odean Avenue NE 1 ')tsego, NIN 55330 1,726.00 (parcel 43) and 51;,626.00 (parcel 44) Eileen Gerads 14398 85th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 ' $2,623.00 Greg Griswold 14462 88th Street NE Otsego, NN 55330 $1,778.00 Ronald Guenther : 7848 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $130.00 i Thomas and Patricia Hendric�cson 14501 92nd Street NE Otsego, MN . 55330 $2,840.00 _eritage Landing 17evelopm4nt 19278 Vernon Street NE Elk River, MN 55330 $1,081.00 Gary and Clara Inman 7262 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,340.00 r Jerry Johnson 7676 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,340.00 Robin Kittridge 8894 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,188.00 3 w-oe-1999 11:47AM FROM Court 8 MacArthur TO 4418823 P.01 Gregory and Edna Knoll f 8100 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,215.00 Steve and Nancy Knox 14461 89th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,107.00 i Mark and Jo Ann Kolles 7377 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,902.00 Christian Builders 21000 Rogers Drive f Rogers, MN 55374 ' $1,713.00 Roger Lingen 9022 Odean Avenue Otsego, MN 55330 ` $2,591.00 Gregory and Joy Maher 8086 O'Day Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 ` S3,738.00 Frank and Janie Miles 8188 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $797.00 Frank and Melanie Moirisette 7460 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $985.00 Mark and Bonita Nolden 7771 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,426.00 4 06-08-1999 11:47AM FROM Caurl 8 MacArthur TO 4418823 P.02 r e North American Mortgage Company P.O. Box 808004 etaluma, CA 94975-8004 ! .960.00 Mr. and Mrs. Oelke 7330 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $732.00 Rex and Karen Osterbauer 7380 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $435.00 Robert and Kerry Playle 7890 O'Day Circle NE Otsego, MN 55330 ! $11.00 Robert and Clarise Reichardt 14525 89th Street i Otsego, IVIN 55330 $4,088.00 Robert Richter 7490 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, NIN 55330 $4,205.00 Wayne and Laura Rude 8357 Odell Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,732.00 Elmer and Doris Sachs 8949 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,690.00 Vladimir and Joan Sarafanoi 8871 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,145.00 5 06-08-1999 11:48W FROM Court & MacArthur TO 4418823 P.03 Delvin and Mary Ann Struss. 14521 78th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 $1,783.00 Jerry and Carol Struthers 8465 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $7,318.00 Tony Emmerich Construction Inc. 10738 Hanson Blvd Coon Rapids, MN 55433 $2,377.00 Linda Vasseur 8280 Odean Ave. NE Otsego, MN 55330 $4,649.00 Kum Olson 8228 Odean Avenue Otsego, MN 55330 $4,308.00 Carol Williams 8197 Odean Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 $2,768.00 Viola, Richard and Stacy Zobel 14436 85th Street NE Otsego, MN 55330 ° $2,803.00 Homer Thompkins ' 7100 Northland Circle #108! Minneapolis, NN 55428.. $3,246.00 (parcel 5) and $2,561.00 (parcel 11) TOTAL AMOUNT FOR -iHE PARTIAL TAKING OF PROPERTY $130,359.00 6 TOTAL P.03 MEMO �1 . J Date: June 9, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: HRUA Permit Request before the MPCA The HRUA has requested a State Disposal System (SDS) permit from the MPCA. This permit would be for the entire Mississippi River headwaters (everything north of Anoka) an area that includes the City of Otsego. This permit request, a copy of which you received last week, has been put out for a 30 day public comment period which ends Wednesday, June 23, 1999. I have listed below several different options for responding to this permit, along with what I see are the pros and cons of each option. PERMIT RESPONSE OPTIONS 1. DO NOTHING. Pros - The law creating water quality cooperatives, which is what the HRUA is, prohibits them from working in a City where they do not have an agreement with the City. Therefore, the City Council can keep them out of Otsego if it does not want to deal with them. Cons - I would like Andy's opinion on whether there is any language in this permit that would over rule the State law governing water quality cooperatives. 2. PETITION FOR A PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL MEETING Pros - This would be a meeting held by the MPCA Commissioner. This would be a forum in which to discuss our concerns about this permit with the MPCA. It would probably delay issuance of the permit and would allow more affected governments to be informed about the proposed permit, analyze it, and express their concerns. It would also be a forum in which to suggest alternatives to the MPCA and HRUA. Cons - There would be a certain amount of staff time spent in preparing materials for the informational meeting, contacting other interested parties, and staff time to attend the actual meeting. In addition, The HRUA has admitted that there is a "list" of people and organizations that it regards as impediments to the establishment of water quality cooperatives in Minnesota. Further objection to their plans by the City of Otsego would probably move us higher up the list. 3. PETITION FOR THE PERMIT TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE MPCA BOARD Pros - This is a viable option if the informational meeting doesn't address the City's concerns. The MPGA Board may be less subject to political - pressure on this issue than MPCA management is. Cons - There will be a certain amount of staff time required to prepare information for this meeting and to attend the meeting. Also, you never know what the decision of the MPCA Board could be. 4. PETITION FOR A CONTESTED CASE HEARING Pros - This is a formal evidentiary hearing before an administrative law judge. It is my understanding that the cities of Annandale, Rockford, Maple Lake, and Milaca have asked or will be asking for a contested case hearing. I have enclosed a copy of Annandale's resolution which they are also asking us to support. Cons - A Contested Case hearing is supposed to focus on just disputes of material issues (facts), not on policy issues. The cities would have the burden of proving that one or more of the facts in the permit is wrong. I think that what Otsego and 2 other cities are concerned with here is more a policy issue than a fact issue. In addition, this would require a great deal of time to develop information for the hearing, and a certain amount of time just being at the hearing and making presentations. Andy could give us a much better idea of the time and estimated cost for this. Also, I have never observed the HRUA staff do a good job of presenting to elected or appointed officials. It is possible that their style of presentation would be better received and understood by an administrative law judge. RECOMMENDATION At this point I would recommend asking for an informational hearing, and reserving our right to ask for a hearing before the MPCA Board. Andy may have a different recommendation, and we should hear from him. 3 BONESTR00 ROSENE ANDERLIK i 6516361311 06/04/99 11:42 I5 :02/02 NO:393 Councilmcmbcr ., _ introdtxcd the following resolution and moved for its adoption; RESOLUTION OPPOSING MADWATFRS RURAL UTILITY ASSOCIATION STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM PERM, T WHERCA,S, the t lcadwatcm Rural Utility Antic lotion has applies! for a Mute Dispoul System Permit for the entire Upper Mississippi River basin; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Pollutian Control Agency has sent the permit information to the City of Annandale for public comment; and WHEREAS, issuance of said pctmit will restrict the City's ability to manage dralnagG issues within die City limits; and WHEREAS, issuance of a permit for the entire tipper Missimippi Rivitr bdsln is unprecedented and unsound; and WHEREAS, the ptopvscJ (04011eeu technology la unproven; and WHEREAS, pe mits shiiuld he issued on an area specific basis; and WHEREAS, Plans and ,Specifications Por the prnposcd Project arc nat available; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the perniit information and opposes issuancc of the permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that tic City Council nrAnnandale, Wright County, Minnesota resolvei w follows: I. That the City or Annandale oprmses the issuance of a State Disposal Systein Permit to the Headwater Rural Utility Association abet strongly encourages MPCA to deny the permit. 2. The City oCAnnandale hereby petitions for a Contt:sted Case t tearing on the permit issuance. Z, 'the pity oPAnnandala I*rthy regijeast,. thoi the Commissioner of the MPCA inform the City crall [`uturc decisions regarding this permit. The foregoing reiolution was duly supix-Med by C'nunciinntember .,,upon a vote being taken thereon, the following members voted in favor tllerenf: the fntlowing memhers vmed aEainst: ;, tlsc Pitllawin�+ mc�nthc�rs abstained: _the • 1'ullowing mcmbs:rs were absent: WI1L•RLUPON, said resolution was ctcaturud duly passed and adopted this Jay of 1999. City Clark File: RCA-CC.WPS 12 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 9.1. A. Discussion of Utility Costs B. Discussion of Cost Estimate for Electrical Update C. Updates by CM Wendel (Post Office, Albertville -Otsego Water/Sewer and Otsego Creek Updates) D. Any Other Council Business BACKGROUND: 9.1. A. Mike Robertson will be present to discuss costs of utilities with the Council. B. Mike Robertson has obtained a quote for electrical update for the Shed on the New City Hall property at PRC's Request. (See attached information). C. Attached is information from CM Wendel on the Post Office. CM Wendel will give Council information of the other two items. D. This is for any other Council Business that may be added. RECONMENDATION: This is for Council discussion and any consideration for approval needed. ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITI4. Mr. Mike Robertson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Ave. NE Elk River, MN 55330 322 King Avenue Elk River, Minnesota 55330 Phone (612) 441-2020 Fax (612) 441-8099 Subject: Water and Waste Water Construction Project I , MAY 2 41998 �✓ i May 21, 1999 Dear Mike, We would like to thank you and John Harwood for the time spent with us addressing our concerns for your water/ waste water project. As we discussed, your project will require the Elk River Municipal Utilities (ERMU) to expend a considerable amount of time and effort to accommodate this construction along CSAH 42. This is particularly disconcerting considering we have permits from the Department of Highways of Wright County for our facilities in this right-of-way and the heavy handed approach taken by some of your representatives. Please keep in mind this electric line is the only source of electrical power to our portions of Otsego and Dayton. In permitted right-of-way situations, the "utility facility and installation shall not interfere with any existing utility facility on the county highway right-of-way ". The interfering utility typically reimburses the existing utilities for costs incurred to do the new construction. This is the case at hand when Otsego requires other utility owners to move to make way for this project. During our discussion, you made the case that all effected utility companies will benefit by Otsego installing a water/ waste water system. Therefore these effected utility companies should be willing to relocate their utilities at no cost to Otsego. Although we do not totally agree with this agreement we will accept it in the spirit of cooperation except for two instances. The Bank of Elk River and a private residence on the east side of CSAH 42 and 85th Avenue will require new electric service lines to accommodate your construction project. The service line serves only these two customers. The cost to replace these two service lines is estimated to be $9,000. We request Otsego to reimburse ERMU the cost of replacing these two electrical services for a cost not to exceed $9,000, and in turn ERMU will absorb the remaining costs incurred by us to accommodate construction of your water/ waste water project. Bes regards, . la4e-1 C✓ Bryan C. Adams, P.E. General Manager cc: File Glenn Sundeen, Line Superintendent JUN 4 '99 05:26 FROM UNLZWrED ELECTRIC, INC. 10486 80TH STREET N.E. MONI'ICELLO MN 55362-8117 PHONE (612) 497-4312 FAX 497-4983 NAME/ADDRESS OTSEGO CITY HALL 8899 NASHUA AVE N.B. ELK RIVER MN 55330 ITEM —VIV DESCRIPTION TO OTSEGO CITY HALL PAGE.002i002 Estimate DATE EST]MATE 613199 233 n.,, rumen WIRING OF POLE SHED AS PER MIKE ROBERSON AND JEFF BARTHF.L -FTX YARD LIGHT (PHOTO EYE) AND WIRE THEM SO THEY COME ON VaM 1 BREAKER -PUT EXISTING OUTLETS ON GFI (TOTAL 3 CIRCUITS) -CLEAN UP EXISTING WIRING (WITHIN REASON) -MOVE SWITCH FROM WARMING HOUSE AREA BY DOOR AND ADD ANOTHER 3 WAY FOR NEW LIGHTS BY BACK OVER HEAD -ADD TOTAL OF 7 OUTLETS IN SLED ADDITION 2 CIRCUITS I PROJECT I WIRING IN POLE SH... QTY i TOTAL 11 1,365.00 I QUOTES ARE GOOD FOR 30 DAYS! CALLWITH QUES77ONS OR TO AUTHORIZE WORK! TOTAL s1,36s.00 ** TOTAL PAGE.002 ** q, /C UNITED STATES A POSTAL SERVICE June 2, 1999 To: Virginia Wendel City Council Dayton Minnesota Thank you for bringing the request for community identity for the residents of Otsego to the Postal Services attention. The data needed for this request has been entered into our National Address Management Database. If the residents of Otsego wish to address their private mail with the city line of Otsego MN and the assigned ZIP code (55330,55301,55362,55327), their mail will be processed and delivered as it is today. However, the residents will not be able to change their city line of their addresses with any of their publisher suppliers or large mailers. The matching software that large corporations use will not accept the change. This will limit the amount of mail that residents of Otsego receive with their community name in the last line of their address. Again, thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. If there is anything else that I can be of service with, please let me know. Sincerely, r DUB P f9� Cynthia M. Larson Manager, Post Office Operations 553 Fnx: SENATOR MARK OURADA Ranking Minority Member. Election Laws Committee District 19 145 State Office Building 100 Constitution Avenue St. Paul, NIN 551»-1206 Phone: (651) 296-5981 Fax: (651) 296-5211 Home: 1110 Innsbrook Lane Buffalo, MN 55313 Phone: (612) 682-5021 Fax: (612) 682-1106 June 2, 1999 Virginia Wendel 9357 65 h St. NE Albertville, Mfl 55301 Dear O1: OwWin i B iL;j,-Tt —vfi 9 v iiirrirr-*�t i Y nxrnr Senate State of Minnesota Thank you very much for your letter. I apologize for the delay in returning a response. I would like you to know that I have contacted Cynthia Larson with the United States Postal Service. She has informed me the criteria used for the establishment of additional locations of local post offices is based on delivery needs. They see no problems with the delivery service in Otsego, MN. A new local post office would be more convenient for Otsego residents, but the United States Post Office is an operating business and needs to act accordingly. Because the postal service is run at the federal level, I have forwarded your letter to Congressman David Minge. His office would more appropriately be able to deal with your request. Cynthia Larson is also checking further into the idea of using the Otsego city name along with the current zip codes for a mailing address. She has agreed to inform me of the United States Post's Office decision on this matter. I know she will be in contact with you also. If I can provide you with any additional information or assistance, please feel free to contact me. Since , MA OU A State Senator i, COMMITTEES: Election laws • Jobs, Energy & Community Development • Transportation • State ar,•y,r,dP n„•,• Jnr, p,,.,t. Government Finance • Economic Development Budget Division • Transportation Budget Division [',,,,.remrr Fil"." E-mail: sen.mark. ourada@se nate. leg. state. in. us .1gw" Option A: Multi -Community Joint Powers Agreement. (ex: currently Cities of Elk River, Otsego, Rogers, NW Dayton and Hassan Township) t� QA d�. ? N►a d � a'� r Option B: Contractual Agreement with a City. (ex: City of Elk River Park and Rec. Department) Option C. Joint Powers Agreement with School District (ex: Community Education and Formal Agreement on use of facilities) L `- Mission Statement of Community Recreation Program: To provide, develop, and initiate year-round recreation programs, services, and facilities that enhance the lives and increase the enjoyment and well-being of all residents of the Community Recreation Board. Community Recreation Board's 1998 GOALS& OBJECTIVES: Option A: Multi -Community Joint Powers Agreement. (ex: Currently Cities of Elk River, Otsego, Rogers, NW Dayton, and Hassan Township.) 0 Independent Department -Employees of the Joint Powers Group. 0 Shared Office Space in Community Education Building. 0 Reliant of District facilities for a significant amount of Programming. 0 Advisory Board with personnel, budget and other sub committees as needed. Positions: Director Program Coordinator Secretarial -Receptionist Position Seasonal -Part time Activities Specialists Option B: Contractual Aereement with a City (ex: City of Elk River Park & Recreation Department.) o Expanded park and Recreation Department o Likely Offici& within City Facilities o Reliant on District Facilities for a significant amount of Programming o City Park & Recreation Board with Potential Advisory Sub Committee Positions: Department Head (Director or Supt.) Secretarial -Receptionist Position Program Coordinator Seasonal -Part time Activities Specialist •N -u. • •••Q_$g- Option C.- Joint : Joint Powers Agreement with School District (ex: Community Education & Formal Agreement on use of Facilities.) 0 Expanded Community Education Department. 0 Share Office, Receptionist, and Front Desk. 0 Use of District Facilities for a significant amount of Programming. 0 Advisory Board Positions: Existing Director Expanded Secretarial -Receptionist Position Additional Program Coordinator Additional Seasonal -Part time Activities Specialist • ( -p - . I• �L.• IF ■ Develop strong program staff network ■ Networking of and joint planning with the surrounding Park and Recreation Commissions ■ Expand programming to utilize/feature municipal parks and facilities ■ Advocacy with Community Education and ECFE for improved office and program space. ■ New marketing strategies ■ Increase awareness of our program service value and benefits ■ Continue to increase programs and participation ■ Continue to be part of solutions to better serve teens ■ Eliminate transportation barriers ■ Continue to partner facility development and maintenance considerations 728 Area Recreation I. Mission Statement CEO provide, develop, and initiate year -around recreation programs, services, and facilities that enhance the lives and increase the enjoyment and wellbeing of all members of the 728 .area recreation program II. Objectives A. To provide support services to park and recreation facility improvements B. To maintain harmony between 728 Area Recreation Board and the Elk River Community Education department to ensure maximum effort and greatest service to the community C. To provide support services to area associations to supplement their efforts D. To develop a balance of quality programs and facilities to meet the needs and interests of the population at a competitive cost E. To maintain a level of earnings to support our growth and sustain the confidence of those we serve F. To provide a challenging and rewarding environment for staff III. Steps to meet these objectives A. To provide support services to park and recreation facility improvements 1. Comprehensive understanding of all community developments 2. Research needs of the community 3. Initiate development/work with contractors 4. Research and follow through on grant opportunities B. To maintain harmony between 728 Area Recreation department and the Elk River Community Education department to ensure maximum effort and greatest service to the community 1. Maintain open communication between the two departments 2. Agreed-upon, written delegation of responsibilities 3. Understanding of Recreation Board and Community Education programming parameters C. To provide support services to area associations to supplement their efforts 1. Conduct registration process 2. Aid in the scheduling/comprehensive utilization of all facilities 3. General supervision of facility maintenance 4. Department authority over outdoor facilities D. To develop a balance of quality programs and facilities to meet the needs and interests of the population at a competitive cost 1. Conduct interest inventories of 728 Recreation Board communities 2. Have leaders and participants in activities do evaluations on a regular basis 3. Remain open to all public opinion 4. Strive for creativity and innovativeness 5. Accessible to all, regardless of economic status E. To maintain a level of earnings to support our growth and sustain the confidence of those we serve 1. Effective use of available resources 2. Fiscal accountability 3. Equitable service to all community residents F. To provide a challenging and rewarding environment for the staff 1. Motivate creative and innovative thinking among the staff 2. To empower staff to serve the consumer with understanding and satisfaction 3. Emphasis on continuing education/professional development CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 14, 1999 TO: City Council Attached are the Claims List for your consideration. The following is the breakdown of the grand total you are considering: Batch 06-09-99 $ 431,695.71 Batch 05-27-99 $ 12,478.38 Batch 06-02-99 $ 12,384.05 GRAND TOTAL $ 456,558.14 NOT INCLUDED IN THE $456,558.14 ARE THE PAYMENTS FOR THE ODEAN AVENUE EASEMENTS WHICH ARE BEING CONSIDERED UNDER THE LEGAL ITEMS. If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Judy Hudson Deputy Clerk/Treasurer 9 Jun 1999 Claies List Page 1 Wed 10:58 AM CITY OF OTSEGO Name Batch Name 060899 AIRGAS, INC. ALLEY EEXCAVATING, INC. AMCON BLOCK AND PRECAST, AT&T AT&T AT&T B & D PLUMBING & HEATING BANK OF ELK RIVER BARBAROSSA & SONS BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE BEVA L. OLSON, TREASURER 8Fi - WOOOLAKE SANITATION Dept Description Hwys, Streets, & Roads Administration INC. Hwys, Streets, & Roads INC MCFOA SER BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNTING BUSINESS FORMS AND ACCOUNTING CHOUINARD OFFICE PRODUCTS CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF MONTICELLO CORROW TRUCKING CORROW TRUCKING CORROW TRUCKING CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT DEMCON DISPOSAL INC DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - NOTRN DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE - NOTRN OUERRS WATERCARE SERVICE DUERRS WATERCARE SERVICE EAST SIDE LEASING CO ECM PUBLISHERS INC ECM PUBLISHERS INC ECM PUBLISHERS INC ECM PUBLISHERS INC ECM PUBLISHERS INC ECM PUBLISHERS INC EDMOND N & MARIETTE E LEFEBVRE ELK RIVER FLORAL ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Hwys, Streets, & Roads Culture and Rec (GENERAL) Administration General Govt Buildings -8899 Administration Sanitary Sewer Construction Recycling Administration Recycling Administration Finance Finance Administration Fire Protection Animal Control General Govt Buildings -8899 Hwys, Streets, & Roads Recycling Hwys, Streets, & Roads Administration Administration Administration Hwys, Streets, & Roads General Govt Buildings -8899 Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Administration Sanitary Sewer Construction Administration Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Street Lighting Comments Oxygen Refund from P-99-10 Fuel Tanks Containments Due 6-21-99 Due 6-21-99 Due 6-21-99 Repair restroom toilets Safe Deposit rental Pay Est#1 wk thru 6-4-99 June Recycling Mun Clerks Membership Fee May Recycling Office supplies Check envelopes Checks Repair/clean typewriter 2nd Qtr Fire Contract 99 Animal Control Charges City Hall pickup Shop pickup April Recycling Parts Roll offs/landfill fees Renew Notary - Judy H Renew Notary - Elaine B Shop supplies City Hall salt Copier rental PH Bulow PH Ulmer PH Muller PH MN State Aid Not of CC Meeting change PH Backes Company W & S Easement Settlement Flowers funeral 96th Street Lights 101 & Cty Rd 130 St Light 39/101 Traffic Signal 42/Parrish Street lights Parrish/88th Street Light Flashers 39/Parrish 85th/Parrish Street Light Cty Rd 39 Street Light Antelope Park St Lights Country Ridge St Lights 39/Page Street Light 39/Nashua Street Light 94th/Nashua Street Light Transaction Batch Amount Name 12.66 060899 15.00 060899 1,634.24 060899 12.84 060899 13.19 060899 27.53 060899 92.50 060899 44.00 060899 166,107.50 060899 106.25 060899 30.00 060899 317.50 060899 100.14 060899 58.00 060899 330.31 060899 70.00 060899 1,688.75 060899 198.00 060899 54.35 060899 10.00 060899 1,485.00 060899 61.43 060899 5,193.90 060899 40.00 060899 40.00 060899 22.20 060899 32.40 060899 237.92 060899 44.79 060899 54.22 060899 37.72 060899 80.16 060899 16.50 060899 51.87 060899 642.00 060899 49.10 060899 39.41 060899 16.93 060899 245.50 060899 33.55 060899 12.78 060899 26.44 060899 12.78 060899 32.38 060899 62.20 060899 46.65 060899 7.99 060899 12.78 060899 7.11 060899 9 Jun 1999 Claims List Page 2 Wed 10:58 AM CITY OF OTSEGO Dept Transaction Batch Name Description Comments Amount Name Batch Name 060899 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Hwys, Streets, & Roads Shop 43.09 060899 ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES Old Town Hall Old City Hall 63.76 060899 r"YLE'S EXCAVATING & HONEY WAG Old Town Hall Pump septic/Old City Hall 115.00 060899 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Hwys, Streets, & Roads May rental 152.68 060899 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Hwys, Streets, & Roads May rental 137.73 060899 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Hwys, Streets, & Roads May rental 137.74 060899 GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. Sanitary Sewer Construction 41 payt 2-16-99 to 6-1-99 224,337.00 060899 H G 'WEBER OIL COMPANY Hwys, Streets, & Roads Fuel Tanks 5,200.80 060899 H G WEBER OIL COMPANY Hwys, Streets, & Roads Fuel 148.04 060899 H G WEBER OIL COMPANY Hwys, Streets, & Roads Diesel Fuel 203.66 060899 H G WEBER OIL COMPANY Nays, Streets, & Roads Diesel Fuel 250.33 060899 HOFSTEDE MERRILEE Damage Deposit Refund 400.00 060899 HOFSTEDE MERRILEE Less Bldg Super Fees -130.00 060899 ISD 728 Recreation - Joint Rec Program May and June 1999 3,313.68 060899 LONG & SONS General Govt Buildings -8899 Supplies 37.80 060899 LONG & SONS General Govt Buildings -8899 May Cleaning - Comm Rooms 156.00 060899 LONG & SONS General Gout Buildings -8899 Sales Tax 36.65 060899 LONG & SONS General Govt Buildings -8899 May Cleaning - City Hall 370.00 060899 MERLIN BRISBIN Sanitary Sewer Construction -1,289.00 060899 MERLIN BRISBIN Sanitary Sewer Construction Org offer-Easemt Condemnt 242.00 060899 MICHAEL & NICOLE MARTIN_ Administration Refund from P-99-82 341.25 060899 MINNEGASCO General Govt Buildings -8899 City Hall May Service 116.96 060899 MINNEGASCO Old Town Hall Old City Hall May Service 39.24 060899 MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL Animal Control 4-14-99 Dog Pickup 30.00 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Parts 14.35 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Miscell Parts 90.50 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Grader Parts 5.07 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Miscell Parts 6.38 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads PUP Trailer parts 5.74 060899 NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Miscell parts 7.32 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Administration American Institutional 313.46 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Administration Muller 140.00 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Administration Pheasant Ridge 291.79 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Prairie Creek 317.51 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Grenings 412.86 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Crimson Ponds 156.67 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS Planner Darkenwald WWTP 540.93 060899 NORTHWEST ASSOC, CONSULTANTS Planner Meetings 750.00 060899 PITNEY BOWES Administration Rental Charges/Equipment 213.10 060899 RANDY'S SANITATION Recycling May Recycling 257.50 060899 RICHARD & PATRICIA LEFEBVRE Sanitary Sewer Construction W & S Easement Settlement 258.00 060899 RIVER VALLEY LUMBER INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Plywood for Grader 70.10 060899 SCHARBER & SONS Hwys, Streets, & Roads Lawn mower parts 40.89 060899 STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Leg Fees 850.00 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW Old Town Hall Old City Hall/Shop 196.00 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW Old Town Hall Sales Tax 12.74 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW General Gout Buildings -8899 Sales Tax 23.66 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW General Gout Buildings -8899 City Hall/Well/other lot 364.00 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW Parks Maintenance Sales Tax 65.07 060899 9 Jun 1999 C14111 Litt Page 3 Wed 10:58 AM CITY OF OTSEGO Dept Transaction Batch Name Description Comments Amount Name Batch Name 060899 SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW Parks Maintenance Lawn Care Parklath fields 1,001.00 060899 T H CONSTRUCTION OF ANOKA INC Administration Escrow Ref 7094 Odell 1,500.00 060899 TRAUT WELLS Sanitary Sewer Construction Final payt Well 12 3,805.19 060899 TRUE VALUE Hwys, Streets, & Roads Miscell supplies 13.45 060899 TRUEMAN-'WELTERS INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Disc Mower parts 165.10 060899 TRUEMAN-WELTERS INC Hwys, Streets, & Roads Lawn Mower parts 54.59 060899 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Culture and Rec (GENERAL) Shed Phone Service 36.64 060899 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Hwys, Streets, & Roads Shop Phone Service 62.67 060899 'JS WEST COMMUNICATIONS Administration City Hall Phone Service 390.37 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting OOell Cir Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 71st St Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Signal Light 172.00 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Otsego City Hall St Light 7.08 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 72nd St Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Oday Cr Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Parell Street Light 7.98 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Parell Street Light 7.08 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Parell Street Light 7.08 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Ogren Ave Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Quaday/42 Siren 6.77 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Shed & Other Buildings Stied 22.27 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC General Govt Buildings -8899 City Hall 529.14 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Water Utilities (GENERAL) Well 41 21.28 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 83rd Cul Street Light 7.08 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 72nd St Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Heritage Hills St Lights 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Rolling Ridge Creek 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Rolling Ridge Creek 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Palmgren Street Light 7.98 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Palmgren Street Light 7.08 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Palmgren Street Light 7.99 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Ogren Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting Ogren/71st Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting OOean Street Light 11.82 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting OOean Street Light 7.98 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street Lighting 00ean/37 Street Light 7.98 060899 WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC Street lighting Lannen Street Light 11.82 060899 ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC Administration Escw Ref 9385 Naughtor 600.00 060899 ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC Administration Escw Ref 9424 Nason Ave 600.00 060899 ZIEGLER CONSTRUCTION CO INC Administration Esw Rf 8445 Ochoa Freitag 3,000.00 060899 Grand Total 431,695.71 27 May 1999 Unpaid Summary Check Register Page 1 Thu 2:20 PM CITY OF OTSEGO Check Number Date ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Vendor Amount T00001 00605 DARLENE COTA 67.00 T00002 00232 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO 80.69 T00003 00080 JERRY OLSON 8,818.49 T00004 00105 MINNESOTA MUTUAL 56.45 T00005 00117 NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS 250.75 T00006 00615 WAYNE & BEVERLY LAHN 3,205.00 Grand Total 12478.38 2 Jun 1999 Unpaid Summary Check Register Wed 10:54 AM CITY OF OTSEGO Page 1 Check Nur-`,:�r Date Vendor Amount --------------------------------------------------------------------- T00001 T00002 T00003 T00004 T00005 T00006 T00007 T00008 T00009 00082 CAROL OLSON 00609 D&Y Family Limited Partnership 00075 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST 00248 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 00121 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD 00610 Ronald L & Delores Pouliot 00620 SHELLY WESOLOWSKI 00147 STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION 00612 Thomas & Mary Beth Juergens 77.00 6,732.00 614.70 886.18 698.67 2,201.00 232.50 50.00 892.00 Grand Total 12384.05 22 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9 COUNCIL ITEMS: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 9.2. Mike Robertson, City Administrator - Update: A. Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Draft RFP BACKGROUND: A. Mike Robertson will be here to explain this and answer questions. RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council consideration and approval needed. Thanks, Elaine 141 4 0 Date: June 10, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Wastewater Treatment Plant Operator Request for Proposals I have enclosed a copy of a draft of a Request for Proposals (RFP). This will be advertised and mailed to companies who have indicated an interest in serving as Otsego's Wastewater Treatment Plant operator. The RFP is a generic RFP that has been used by several communities. I got a copy from St. Michael and made some minor modifications to it. Council should review the RFP and let me know if there are any areas that they would like changed. At this point in time we have received calls from three companies that are experienced in operating wastewater treatment plants on a contract basis. I hope that I will be able to locate more companies at the League of Minnesota Cities conference. The three companies that have said they will bid are Professional Services Group (PSG), America's Water Services, and PeopleService, Inc. Request Qualifications and Price Proposal for the Operation, Maintenance and Management of the WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT for the City of Otsego, Minnesota JUNE, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL BACKGROUND ....................... 1 H. PRE -PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND FACILITY EVALUATIONS .............................. ... 1 III. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION .................. 2 1V. REQUIRED STANDARDS ........................ 3 V. EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE CITY ............... 3 VI. PROJECT PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE ............. 4 VII. SUBMITTAL FORMAT AND CONTENT ............ 5 VIII. SCHEDULE OF EVENTS .......................... 9 IX. SCORING OF SUBMITTALS ....................... 10 X. EXCLUSIONS .................................... 13 XI. NEGOTIATIONS WITH HIGHEST SCORING FIRM ... 14 RIEEKHAZN► � i ► The City of Otsego is requesting Statements of Qualifications and Price Proposals (SOQ/PP) from firms interested in providing operations, maintenance and management services to the City's wastwater treatment plant. The City expects the SOQ/PP to address all activities of the wastewater treatment plant. It is understood that the SOQ/PP and the innovative approaches, guarantees and experience demonstrated therein shall be the general basis for selection of a firm to provide these professional services. The City expects to select the highest scoring firm based on a structured point scoring evaluation of first, the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) and then second, the Price Proposal. The scoring evaluation (Section VIII) shall consider the innovative approaches, ability to make financial and technical guarantees, experience, technical expertise and price of services of each competing firm. After the City has selected the highest scoring firm, the City will immediately begin negotiations. Should the negotiations fail to result in an executed agreement, the City may elect to terminate negotiations with the first -ranked firm, begin negotiations with the second - ranked firm, and so on, or cancel the process. ***** If the City Council wants to advertise for proposals soon, there obviously would not be much of a facility to tour and we would skip this part of the RFP. ********** The City will conduct a pre -proposal conference and tour of the facilities on to begin at a.m./p.m. at Otsego City Hall, located at 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, Minnesota. Attendance at the pre -proposal conference and tour is mandatory. The purpose of the pre -proposal meeting is to answer questions regarding the Request for Qualifications and Price Proposals (RFQ/PP). All contractors interested in submitting an SOQ/PP should contact City Administrator Mike Robertson by no later than to indicate their intent to attend the pre -proposal conference. Fach interested contractor should ensure that they meet or exceed the Required Standards set forth in Section III of this document_ To ensure that each firm has sufficient information to submit a proposal, the City will make available on the day of the tour construction plans and specifications, design reports, NPDES compliance reports and shop drawings, operating budgets and other pertinent data. At the time of the tour, each firm will have an opportunity to schedule a maximum of three consecutive eight-hour days for an independent evaluation of the facilities in order to familiarize themselves with the current operation and maintenance practices and to research additional records that will be made available at the time of the individual facility evaluations. Arrangements for the inspection and/or copying of documents shall be coordinated through the City Administrator and a fee of $.10 a page will be charged for photocopies of any documents not already printed for distribution. All questions concerning the RFQ/PP shall be submitted in writing to: City Administrator Mike Robertson Otsego City Hall 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 Contact with other City officials is prohibited and can be considered as grounds for disqualification from the selection process. Questions must be received at least 10 days prior to the SOQ/PP due date. Copies of all questions and answers, and any addenda to supplement the RFQ/PP, will be sent to each firm no later than three days prior to the SOQ/PP due date. Only formal written responses to properly submitted questions will be binding. ILI) oil lei V) R05 04 0 Mei Each selected Contractor must respond to each of the following requests/questions in a clear and comprehensive manner. Failure to do so may result is disqualification. Provide the full name, tax identification number and main office address of the entity (hereafter referred to as the "Contractor") which would ultimately enter into a contract with the City. 2. Identify when the Contractor was organized and, if a corporation, where incorporated and how many years engaged in providing Contract Operations Services under that name. 3. Provide a listing of all full-service contract operations, maintenance and management contracts which the Contractor has currently, including the gross annual amount of each contract; the contract start date; the anticipated completion date; the name, address, contact person and telephone number of the owner; and the size and type of facility. Full service operations, maintenance and management contract means, at a minimum, providing all labor and management, paying all O & M expenses, guaranteeing a maximum cost, and guaranteeing regulatory agency compliance. 4. Does any councilman or other officer, employee, or person who is payable in whole or in part from the City have any direct or indirect personal interest in the Contractor? If so, describe the circumstances. 5. Identify the firms that you intend to subcontract or otherwise use to perform work on this project. 6. Contractor must furnish a copy of a fully executed contract with another community for services similar to those requested by the City. This section establishes certain standards of experience and financial capability that the City requires for a Contractor to be considered qualified. The City, in its sole discretion, will decide if a Contractor meets the standards. Scoring of the qualified firms will be as described in Section IX. Contractor must have been in business of providing contract operations, maintenance and management of water and wastewater treatment facilities for at least five (5) years. 2. Contractor must operate at least five (5) or more water and/or wastewater treatment facilities of similar or larger size to the Otsego facility. 3. Contractor must furnish liability and property damage insurance of not less than $10,000,000 combined single limits for bodily and/or property damage. Enclose an insurance certificate. 5. Contractor must demonstrate the ability to provide a performance bond of at least $5,000,000. All land, buildings, improvements and permanent equipment which are presently in place, or new facilities which will be added by the construction projects, shall remain or become the property of the City. Should the contractor fund the implementation of any facility improvement at the request and approval of the City, such facilities shall become the City's after the completion of a repayment schedule. All existing facilities shall be made available to the contractor for his use in providing the services under the contract. Expendable supplies and spare parts which are on hand on the day and date of the contract execution shall be inventoried. The Contractor shall have access to these materials during the duration on the contract, but shall maintain the inventory such that at the end of the contract period, the City inventories shall be replenished for materials used or substituted, with City approval, during the term of the contract. The Contractor shall maintain all land, buildings, improvements, vehicles and permanent equipment that are within the scope of the agreement. Equipment and vehicle maintenance shall be performed by the Contractor in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations or good industry practices and the Contractor will be required to provide proof thereof to the satisfaction of the City. Separately, the City and the Contractor may arrange for the contractor to purchase, maintain, and replace the rolling stock and transportable equipment currently in use by the City. Such purchase prices shall have buy-back provisions to enable the City, upon contract completion or early termination, to buy back the same or similar inventory, if such equipment is still in use or being used under conditions similar to those under which the Contractor purchased same from the City. The purpose of this project is to operate, maintain and manage the City's wastewater treatment facilities more cost effectively and more cost efficiently. The objective is to save the City money, operate in compliance, improve maintenance, consider innovations to lower the capital and operating costs of any and all aspects of utility operations and continue local purchases of supplies, consumable and services, wherever practical. 1401 11 111 11 X ) The submittal document for complying with the SOQ/PP is suggested to contain at least the chapters that follow: Executive Summary Required Standards/Contractor Information Qualifications/Related Experience Operating Plan Business Considerations Draft Contract The SOQ shall identify any and all non -monetary terms and conditions associated with the services included in the SOQ. After selection of the highest scoring firm, the scope of work shall be clarified, any changes shall be negotiated along with the Agreement, beginning with the Draft Contract submitted in the SOQ. Following are further discussions relative to the content of each of the suggested chapters of the SOQ. Executive Information/R_egnired Standards -- Responses to questions contained in Sections III and IV of this Request. Qualifications/Related Experience -- A brief discussion of contractor's experience in similar type and size of projects. Oneratin4 Plan -- The Operating Plan should discuss the following topics: a. Provide a listing of the specific individuals assigned to the Management Team and to Technical Support that the Contractor will assign to this contract during the transition and operation, and provide the background and experience of those individuals. b. Provide a detailed staffing plan indicating the type and quantity of the various positions the contractor feels is necessary to provide the services requested. C. Discuss the transition procedure and the impact of any surplus employees and the Contractor's plan to accommodate them. d. Provide an operating plan for the facilities and other responsibilities that indicate how the Contractor will provide operations, maintenance and management services. Provide description of any deficiencies observed in operations and maintenance of the City's facilities. Business Approach -- Discuss contractor's position on such business issues as assumption of risk, future years' price adjustments, capital versus repair issues and guarantees. Draft Contract - Include a draft contract for City review. The City is requesting a Draft Contract as a part of the SOQ/PP. However, a summary of some of the general provisions the City will expect to see in any final contract are as follows: Provision of liability without any dollar limit for the payment of fines and/or civil penalties levied against the Contractor and/or the City by any regulatory agency having jurisdiction, as a result of failure to comply with the terms and conditions of any duly authorized permit, court order, administrative order, law, statute, ordinance, etc. for reasons resulting from the Contractor's negligence during the period of the contract. Provisions for compliance with State of Minnesota and other EPA & OSHA regulations regarding treatment and reporting requirements and a process control system which furnishes complete and accurate records. System should be capable of readily providing historical data and trends. Provision of indemnification and hold harmless of the City and its agents, officers, assigns, employees, etc. from any loss or liability for claims, damages, lawsuits for reasons resulting from the Contractor's negligence during the period of the contract. Such indemnification shall include indirect, consequential and pollution damages. Provision of comprehensive liability insurance policies naming the City as additional insured for bodily injury and/or property damage in an amount of not less than ten million dollars ($10,000,000); a certificate of such insurance shall be submitted to the City upon signing of the Contract. Provision of a fixed dollar value for Repair and Replacement such that the contractor's obligations will be explicit as to maintenance of the City's equipment and facilities. Such Repair and Replacement limit will not include Contractor's on- site labor. A specific method of decision making concerning the use of funds for repair and replacement should be outlined. Provision that the Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining all manufacturer's warranties on new equipment purchased by the City and assist the City in enforcing existing equipment warranties and guarantees. Provision that the Contractor shall provide a sufficient number of certified qualified personnel, including management, administrative, operational, technical, laboratory and clerical, who meet relevant State of Minnesota requirements and certifications regarding wastewater treatment operations and maintain the facility. Provision for termination of the contract if performance is unsatisfactory. si CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9.5. A. Closed Meeting due to Pending Litigation Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ June 14, 1999 6:30PM ITEM NUiViBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: 9.5. A. Closed Meeting BACKGROUND: See attached Memo from Mr. Robertson (This is for Council and Staff.) RECOMMENDATION: This is for Council consideration and approval and decisions necessary. Thanks, Elaine Date: June 8, 1999 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Darkenwald EAW I would like direction from the City Council on whether I should attend the MPCA Board meeting on Tuesday, June 22, 1999 to oppose the proposed Darkenwald EAW permit. I have had several discussions with MPCA staff about the Darkenwald EAW. I told them that I thought that the City of Otsego would not contest the Darkenwald EAW if MPCA provided a direct and unambiguous statement that they would not issue a Discharge (NPDES) permit to the Darkenwalds until such time as the City approved their development plan. The lower level staff of the MPCA wanted to send this letter. They were overruled by upper level MPCA staff who were worried about the legal ramifications of sending such a letter. If we do decide to oppose the Darkenwald EAW, we have to decide what strategy to take. Our comments on the Darkenwald EAW call for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to be done. The MPCA staff response to our comments is that they don't think an EIS is needed. If directed by the Council, I will push for an EIS before the MPCA Board. Another option would be to ask the MPCA Board to direct staff not to issue the Discharge (NPDES) permit until such time as the City has approved a development plan of the Darkenwalds. Clearly this is what some of the lower level MPCA staff want. It was also a request of the DNR in their comments on the EAW. Another option would be to not oppose the Darkenwald EAW permit, and to wait to see what the conditions are on their Discharge permit before deciding whether or not to oppose that permit.