10-09-00 CC31
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
4.A. Special Presentation Elaine Beatty, City Clerk September 25, 2000
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
4.A.1. Rose Kohler 14779 - 83RD ST NE, Otsego, MN. 55330 - Discussion of
neighborhood junk problem.
BACKGROUND:
Rose Kohler will be present. She has drafted a flyer and sent it to the neighbors
so she may have some neighbors present. She lives across the street from Karen Wilson
and Butch Rasmussen who have had an junk problem for quite a few years. Jerry Olson
has been working with this one for quite awhile. They clean up for awhile then bring it all
back in.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
This is for Council information and any action.
Thanks,
Elaine
22
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
5. CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ September 25, 2000
(Non -Controversial Items) 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION•
5.1. Approve Resolution No. 00-26 "A Resolution Approving An Increase in the
Tax Levy".
BACKGROUND:
5.1. Attached is a Resolution No. 00-26 as noted above. This is a required resolution
if we are increasing the Tax Levy, which we are.
RECOMMENDATION:
This is for Council consideration and approval. If Council has any questions or need to
discuss further, the item should be removed to another section of the Agenda.
Thanks,
Elaine
RESOLUTION NO. 00-26
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INCREASE IN THE TAX LEVY
WHEREAS, the Minnesota State Legislature has
enacted a law which requires local governments to
adopt a resolution approving a tax increase when
their tax levy increases from one year to the next;
and,
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego's tax levy was $838,883
in 2000;
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego's preliminary tax levy
for 2001 is proposed to be $877,787;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL
OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA:
1. That the higher tax levy for 2001 is hereby
authorized by the City Council. The City Council
reserves their right to lower the 2001 tax levy by
its Truth -in -Taxation public hearing on Monday,
December 4, 2000 at 6:30 p.m. The City Council
takes this action tonight because it is mandated by
state law to do so by October 20, 2000.
Dated this 9th day of October, 2000
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
3i
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
6. Dan Licht, City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Adm.
September 25, 2000 - 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION•
6.1. Consider Owners Kevin and Benita LeFebvre 8585 Parrish Avenue NE Elk
River. (Otsego) MN. Applicant is John Anderson, Tollefson Dev • Inc 900 W
128TH ST. Suite #107 Burnsville MN 55337. Property is PID #118-500-221302
described as the NW1/4 of the SE1/4, the S. 2 -RDS. Thereof and except the tract
described on Subdivision. #598371 and easements of record, located N of Otsego
Elementary School and W of County Rod #42 (Parrish Ave. NE). Request is as follows:
A. Comprehensive Plan Amendment (Map)
B. Rezone from A-1 (General Agricultural) to R-4
(Residential, Urban Single Family) and R-6
(Townhouse, Quadraminium and Low Density
Multiple Family District)
C. PUD/CUP, Planned Unit Development, Conditional Use
Permit (For Townhomes)
D. Preliminary Plat of "Stonegate Estates"
6.2. Consider a sketch plan review of a proposed Rezoning from A-1 to A-2 and
Preliminary and Final Plat for owners Floyd and Beverly Roden Applicants Bret &
Keri Schoen and Owners Donald and Vernon Weidenbach Applicant Thomas
Weidenbach. Request is as follows:
A Sketch Plan Review of Proposed Plat.
6.3. Any Other Planning Business
BACKGROUND:
Dan Licht will be present to explain and discuss the following items.
6.1. and 6.2. See attached reports from Dan Licht. .
6.3. This is for any other planning business that needs discussion.
Note: The P.C. Recommended Denial of 6.2. unanimously.
RECOMMENDATION:
These items are for Council consideration for approval or denial
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
N7mMINTC%e%M-"0*.!*COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING REPORT -addendum �^ I
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 20 September 2000
RE: Otsego - Stonegate Estates; Revised Plans
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.18
BACKGROUND
At the City Council meeting on August 28, 2000, the consideration of the applications for
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, rezoning, PUD -CUP and preliminary plat for
development of a single family/townhouse project on 34 acres southwest of CSAH 42 and
85th Street was tabled. The Planning Commission had recommended approval of the
applications subject to 17 conditions following a public hearing. The City Council tabled
the request to allow the applicant an opportunity to revise their plans to address these
outstanding issues. Staff met with the applicant on August 30, 2000 to discuss necessary
modifications to the plans. The applicant has revised the development plans and
resubmitted them for review on September 11, 2000.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A: Preliminary Plat / Site Plan
Exhibit B: Landscape Plan
Exhibit C: Grading Plan
Exhibit D: Utility Plan
ANALYSIS
Subdivision Design. The applicant has modified the subdivision design to address
previous concerns with the street layout and placement of structures within the project.
The revised plans provide for two public street accesses to 85' Street, with the majority
of the townhouse units being served by private streets, which intersect the public streets.
The extension of 83`d Street from the adjacent Country Ridge subdivision has been revised
to discourage through traffic as directed.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC�%a WINTERNET.CO
The applicant has also revised the placement of structures within the subdivision design
to address problems with building orientation, setback conformance and crowding. The
single family unit at the corner of 851 Street and the west public street has been replaced
with a 6 -unit structure, which we believe is more appropriate for this location. The revised
layout is a significant improvement in that many of the units back up to a central open
space and theat the different units types are more clustered together with similar units.
Lot Requirements. The revised subdivision design has two more units than the most
recent design, but is 14 units less than originally proposed. The subdivision now includes
16 single family lots that meet or exceed the R-4 District minimum requirements of 12,000
square foot lot area and 75 foot lot width. The breakdown of townhouse units and lot area
requirements is shown below.
Unit Type
# of Units
Required
Lot Area/Unit
Required
Lot Area
2 -Unit
30
7,500 sq. ft.
225,000 sq. ft.
4 -Unit
36
5,000 sq. ft.
180,000 sq. ft.
6 -Unit
84
5,000 sq. ft.
420,000 sq. ft.
Total
825,000 sq. ft.
Based upon the number of proposed units and lot area per unit requirements, the
townhouse element of the project must be at least 18.9 acres in size. The area devoted
to the townhouse project is 23.77 acres or 6,237 square feet per unit. This area is equal
to a density of 6.98 units per acre, which is consistent with the City's guidelines for
medium-high density housing outlined by the Comprehensive Plan. The present plan is
more dense than previous plans which ranged from 5.2 to 6.2 units per acre. However,
the higher density is offset by the better site design presented on the current plans.
Setbacks. Applicable setback requirements of the R-4 District have been illustrated on
the preliminary plat. The revised plans also indicate a required 65 foot setback from 85'
Street and CSAH 42 due to their functional classification designations by the
Comprehensive Plan. The townhome structures are all setback 35 feet from local public
street rights-of-way and 25 feet from the back of private streets. The 25 foot setback from
a private street is the absolute minimum necessary to allow vehicle parking in the
driveways in front of the units while protecting visibility. There is also adequate area
between the townhouse structure based upon the previous elevations and current site
design (no additional information on building design was provided).
Streets. Again, the applicant has provided two public street accesses to 85t�' Street and
revised the extension of 83`d Street to discourage through traffic from this project to the
west. The design of the public streets right-of-way and sections must be consistent with
the requirements of the Engineering Manual, subject to approval of the City Engineer.
Planning Report Addendum - Stonegate Estates
Page 2
The private streets intended to serve the majority of the townhouse units are 28 feet wide
back to back, or five feet narrower than a public street. The private streets also include
a traffic circle, which is a common traffic calming device in the eastern U.S. and England.
The traffic circle directs traffic in a one-way pattern around the intersection, with
intersecting streets yielding right-of-way. The traffic circle concept works best with a two
lane circle where the outside lane functions as a turn lane and the inside lane as a through
way. Given the low traffic volume that may be expected however, the 19 foot street width
may be acceptable, subject to further comment from the City Engineer.
With the reduced width of the street and without the public right-of-way, the cross section
distance from structure to structure across the street is reduced. Because the reduced
street width does not allow for on -street parking, the revised plans provide 75 guest
parking stalls. The 75 stalls is equal to .45 stalls per unit, or 8 stalls less than the ratio
suggested by the Planning Commission and City staff. However, the stalls that are
provided are well located and should be sufficient to meet peak demands.
Landscaping. The applicant has provided a revised landscape plan based upon the
current site plans and previous comments. The revised landscape plan includes a
includes a good variety of types of trees and shrubs. An issue with the project is the
provision of adequate screening at the perimeter of the site to minimize traffic and higher
land use impacts. The relocation of the power line easement to the north and east edge
of the project along 85t" Street and CSAH 42 limits the height of plantings that can be
proposed at these boundaries.
The single rows of proposed trees and shrubs along 85`x' Street and CSAH 42 are spaced
20 to 40 feet apart. Providing two staggered rows of more intensive plantings with
maximum spacing of 15 to 20 feet would provide a more complete screen between the
street and the back of the proposed townhomes, especially on the eastern boundary of the
site.
We would also recommend that the landscaping to be installed within the traffic circle be
revised. The traffic circle has the potential to be an attractive focal point and should
therefore be planted more intensively and formally. The landscaping of the traffic island
should include a variety of shrubs and perennials to provide variety and color.
Grading and Easements. The subject parcel is to be included in the LeFebvre Creek
watershed district and will be responsible for an impact fee related to the City's planned
improvement project. The preliminary plat does not illustrate required drainage and utility
easements at the perimeter of the single family lots as required by the Subdivision
Ordinance. As with other townhouse projects, drainage and utility easements will be
required over all of the common space outlots. Finally, the City needs to finalize an
easement along the southern property line that provides service to the pumphouse
building. This easement should be dedicated as part of the preliminary plat. All grading,
drainage and easement issues are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Planning Report Addendum - Stonegate Estates
Page 3
Park and Trail Dedication. The applicant is dedicating Outlot A to the City for
development of a future neighborhood park. The parcel is larger than on the previous
submission, with a current size of 1.96 acres. The configuration of this parcel is sufficient
to accommodate the facilities being considered by the Parks and Recreation Commission
for this park, which is intended to complement existing facilities at Otsego Elementary. As
the proposed dedication is less than required by the Subdivision Ordinance, the balance
of the applicant's park dedication requirements will need to be accounted for as a cash fee
in lieu of land.
LeFebvre Easement. There is a 40 foot wide easement within the City's trail corridor on
the west edge of the project. The easement provided for access to the LeFebvre land to
the south of the subject site. Under an agreement with the LeFebvre Trust, this easement
is to be terminated with development of the subject parcel. Termination of the easement
agreement should be acknowledged as part of any plat approval.
Development Contract. Upon approval of these applications and a final plat, the
applicant must enter into a development contract with the City and pay all fees and
securities. The development contract must also include provisions for a homeowners
association to ensure ongoing property maintenance of the townhouse common areas.
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
As outlined in our previous report of August 15, 2000, the proposed development plan is
consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan for the subject parcel. A transition
is being provided between existing unsewered residential areas to the west of the subject
parcel to the traffic and industrial uses planned to the east of the subject site. The
proposed development also serves to further broaden the housing choices within the
community to include alternatives to single family dwellings.
Overall, the project is consistent with the performance standards outlined by the Zoning
and Subdivision Ordinance. The revised plans also addresses the more subjective
concerns identified by the Planning Commission and City Council regarding the design
and function of the development plan.
Provided the City Council takes action to approve the necessary Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Map amendments, which are policy issue that we do not provide recommendations
for, we would recommend approval of the requested PUD -CUP for townhouse
development and Stonegate Estates Preliminary Plat as outlined below.
Planning Report Addendum - Stonegate Estates
Page 4
Decision 1 - Comprehensive Plan Amendment
A. Motion to approve a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan such that the
uses indicated on the Land Use Plan mirror the proposed development plan based
upon a finding that the request is consistent with the following policies:
Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at the
center or rear, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street,
or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers.
(Policy Plan, p. 39)
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be
accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact
on adjoining developments. (Policy Plan, p. 39)
A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City
shall be maintained.
B. Motion to deny the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment based upon a
finding that the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (A specific
finding or policy supporting denial of the application should be cited.)
C. Motion to table the application. (specific direction should be provided to the
applicant and/or City Staff regarding additional information to be presented.)
Decision 2 - Zoning Map Amendment
A. Motion to approve an Ordinance amending the Zoning Map to designate the parcel
within the R-4 and R-6 Zoning Districts as illustrated by the development plan
based upon a finding that the action is consistent with the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan (see above).
B. Motion to deny the requested Zoning Map amendments based upon a finding that
the request is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (A specific finding or
policy supporting denial of the application should be cited.)
Decision 3 - PUD -CUP Concept Plan and Preliminary Plat
A. Motion to approve a PUD -CUP Concept Plan and preliminary plat of Stonegate
Estates based upon the current plans and information received to date, subject to
the following conditions:
Approval of the preliminary plat shall not guarantee access to sanitary sewer
service. The City shall only guarantee sanitary sewer service to approved
final plats with signed contracts or through a financial commitment for such
services to assure the City of timely development.
Planning Report Addendum - Stonegate Estates
Page 5
2. The separation between individual townhouse structures shall be at least
one-half the sum of adjacent building heights.
3. The design of all public and private streets is subject to review and approval
of the City Engineer.
4. The landscaping plan is revised to eliminate proposed plantings within Outlot
A, provide two staggered rows of plantings spaced not more than 20 feet on
center along 85"' Street and CSAH 42 and provide a more formal landscape
treatment within the traffic circle, subject to City Staff approval.
5. Park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied through combination of
cash fee in lieu of land and dedication of Outlot A subject to review and
approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council.
6. The subject parcel shall be included within the LeFebvre Creek Watershed--
District,
atershedDistrict, subject to applicable impact fees. All grading, drainage, utility and
easement issues are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
7. The 40 foot easement conveyed to the John LeFebvre Loving Trust in the
agreement dated April 16,1990 is terminated.
8. Upon approval of a final plat, the applicant shall enter into a development
contract with the City, provide documentation of a homeowners association
and pay all fees and post required securities, subject to review and approval
of the City Attorney.
9. Comments of other City Staff.
B. Motion to deny the requested preliminary plat based upon a finding that the request
is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. (A specific finding or policy
supporting denial of the application should be cited.)
pc. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
John Anderson
Gary Harris
Planning Report Addendum - Stonegate Estates
Page 6
!j-.-
i�u
Q, I
/ %� <|/ m }! %\|, :,.�§� § !!§�(�� \q
\ ` ~ ` ., ) § §;d -fill
� � / �
mk, �� |}
15
1
E ATES
STONECATE ESTATES
0' EGO.
0 V T INC
OTSEGO. ON~ &
o. km
TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT INC. 1 - '" =-x -
P p rLM,
RELIMINARY PLAT &
P,
P r
IIA �,N,
SING/SIjE
PLAN
-7
I SHER STA ON elI
�..Ij
I
- I
I r
I �
.. I
_ I
I
I rt •
7.
�. �To-
f l 17
�: ►I; I\e➢�I y �n�..t. m. n ,.K
'All of ' • ,
01 -TUT A
--————— — — — — —-
mn►,...,_- =\- ---- ----- - �1R X BAR �.> a <
C:�:D .•vom w..-. -o. rW- W > w
Z o Z }
O
N
N W Z �
J A i
p J
CLt
EXHIBIT B
ILI NY d
10
ON V80 '?J3M3S "801S AdYNIM138d In
'ONI INRIdO13A30 NOS331101
OD3SIO
S31YIS3 31V03NOIS
x
LLI
01.1 q- 141, pp 411 p
v R gill
B4g- K 9 guy 68,40
pF i? -1X
I" Fyn r
N
ii
L
V V rWr e.1.. aW^1
GOPHER STA ON -AIL
r< *r rr« i-Ko-ax-nq
r
MNERAi 4OTFrt
en fK¢r u.e9u o K Mcu rtn rw
MTARY a R MOMS
w�TEa u�w Rom
_ "rr"i."n.o �wm aw. oe°Aa�nc
riu sn.n: Rw r v.o�
.K x a s eY wx veei.� �
i
x
n
i
pWJj�
V
f
I4
5
EXHIBIT D
ti
5
a
.j_
i
pWJj�
V
f
I4
5
EXHIBIT D
WHEREAS, the City Council tabled consideration of the application at their meeting
on August 28, 2000 to allowthe applicant an opportunity to address the outstanding issues
identified by the Planning Commission as part of their recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
OTSEGO THAT; the request to amend the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Plan Map to
such that the suggested land uses are generally consistent with that of the submitted
development plan is hereby APPROVED based upon a finding that the action is consistent
with the following policies of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update:
Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at the
center or rear, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street,
or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers.
(Policy Plan, p. 39)
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be
accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact
on adjoining developments. (Policy Plan, p. 39)
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 25th Day of September 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk.
2
CITY OF 9-20-00
OTSEGO
Zoning Map Amendment
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Findings of Fact
& Decision
Applicant's Name: Tollefson Development, Inc.
Request: Consideration of a Zoning Map amendment to rezone property located at the
southwest quadrant of CSAH 42 and 85' Street from A-1 District to R-4 and R-6 District to allow
for development of single family and townhouse uses of the Stonegate Estates Preliminary Plat.
City Council Meeting Date: 28 August 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A.
2. The 34.2 acre property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for low
density and medium to high density residential land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan
Update.
3. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District; The applicant is requesting
the property be rezoned to R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District and R-6, Low
Density Multiple Family District to allow for development of the preliminary plat entitled
"Stonegate Estates"; Single family uses and townhouse uses are permitted uses of the R-4
and R-6 Districts, respectively.
4. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the Zoning Map amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to)
the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding. The Comprehensive Plan calls for development of a range of urban
housing options addressing the lifecycle needs of the City including single family and
townhouse units, which supplement the City's existing housing stock consisting
almost exclusively of large lot single family dwellings. The location of single family
and townhouse elements of the project are generally consistent with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Plan. The following policies may be cited in support
of the proposed use:
Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at the
center or rear, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street,
or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers.
(Policy Plan, p. 39)
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be
accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact
on adjoining developments. (Policy Plan, p. 39)
A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City
shall be maintained.
B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding. The proposed uses have been anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan as
a transitional area at the edge of the Sanitary Sewer Service District. The proposed
single family lots are intended to be a transition between the existing large lot
dwellings to the west and planned medium-high density and industrial uses adjacent
to CSAH 42. The existing trail corridor further separates the proposed development
from existing residences.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding: The proposed development plan will be required to be consistent with all
applicable performance standards.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Development of the subject project represents infill of a vacant parcel within
the Sanitary Sewer Service District. As the development provides a transition
between large unsewered residential lots and planned medium-high density and
industrial uses, no negative impacts are anticipated.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated
to negatively impact area property values as it is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and applicable development regulations.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: The proposed development is adequately served by 85"' Street, which is
designated as a collector street based upon the City's functional classification
system. This street has adequate capacity to carry the potential traffic generated by
the proposed development.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
2
Finding: The subject parcel is within a planned service area directly adjacent to
neighborhoods already served by public facilities, public works, police and fire
services. As such, proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the
City's service capacity.
5. The planning report dated 15 August 2000 and 20 September 2000 prepared by the City
Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., are incorporated herein.
6. The letter dated 18 August 2000 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
7. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
21 August 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission
closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve
the Zoning Map amendment based on the aforementioned findings.
8. The City Council tabled consideration of the application at their meeting on August 28,
2000 to allow the applicant an opportunity to address the outstanding issues identified by
the Planning Commission as part of their recommendation.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning
Map amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to
date.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 25th day of September, 2000.
Attest:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.:
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY
INCLUDED AS PART OF THE STONEGATE ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN:
Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby
amended to change the zoning classification of the property described by attached Exhibit
A(the "property").
Section 2. The portion of the property described by attached Exhibit B is hereby
rezoned from an A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District designation to an R-4, Residential -
Urban Single Family District designation.
Section 3. The potion of the property described by attached Exhibit C is hereby
rezoned from an A-1, Agricultural -Rural Service District designation to an R-6, Residential -
Low Density Multiple Family District designation.
Section 4. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate
changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning
classification set forth above.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage
and publication.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 25th day of September 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
CITY OF
OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Tollefson Development, Inc.
9-20-00
PUD -CUP Concept Plan &
Preliminary Plat
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Consideration of preliminary plat for development of single family residential lots and
townhouse units platted in a unit and base lot configuration by Planned Unit Development -
Conditional Use Permit entitled Stonegate Estates.
City Council Meeting Date: 28 August 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A.
2. The 34.2 acre property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for low
density and medium to high density residential land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan
Update.
3. The property is zoned R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District and R-6, Low Density
Multiple Family District; Single family uses and townhouse uses are permitted uses of the
R-4 and R-6 Districts, respectively.
4. Section 20-17-10 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that townhouse units intended for
owner occupancy be platted in a unit and base lot configuration by Planned Unit
Development.
5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the PUD -CUP allowing with theirjudgement based upon (but not limited to) the
criteria outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: The Comprehensive Plan calls for development of a range of urban
housing options addressing the lifecycle needs of the City including single family and
townhouse units, which supplement the City's existing housing stock consisting
almost exclusively of large lot single family dwellings. The location of single family
and townhouse elements of the project are generally consistent with the intent of the
Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Plan. The following policies may be cited in support
of the proposed use.
Whenever possible, changes in types of land use shall occur either at the
center or rear, mid -block points so that similar uses front on the same street,
or at borders of areas separated by major man-made or natural barriers.
(Policy Plan, p. 39)
Transitions between distinctly differing types of land uses shall be
accomplished in an orderly fashion which does not create a negative impact
on adjoining developments. (Policy Plan, p. 39)
A balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City
shall be maintained.
B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding. The proposed uses have been anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan as
a transitional area at the edge of the Sanitary Sewer Service District. The proposed
single family lots are intended to be a transition between the existing large lot
dwellings to the west and planned medium-high density and industrial uses adjacent
to CSAH 42. The existing trail corridor further separates the proposed development
from existing residences.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding: The proposed development plan will be required to be consistent with all
applicable performance standards.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Development of the subject project represents infill of a vacant parcel within
the Sanitary Sewer Service District. As the development provides a transition
between large unsewered residential lots and planned medium-high density and
industrial uses, no negative impacts are anticipated.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated
to negatively impact area property values as it is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan and applicable development regulations.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: The proposed development is adequately served by 85"' Street, which is
designated as a collector street based upon the City's functional classification
system. This street has adequate capacity to carry the potential traffic generated by
the proposed development.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
Finding: The subject parcel is within a planned service area directly adjacent to
neighborhoods already served by public facilities, public works, police and fire
services. As such, proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the
City's service capacity.
6. The planning reports dated August 15, 2000 and September 20, 2000 prepared by the City
Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
7. The engineering review comments dated August 18, 2000 prepared by the City Engineer,
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
August 21, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission
closed the public hearing and recommended by a 7-0 vote that the City Council approve
the PUD -CUP concept plan and preliminary plat based on the aforementioned findings.
9. The City Council tabled consideration of the application at their meeting on August 28,
2000 to allow the applicant an opportunity to address the outstanding issues identified by
the Planning Commission as part of their recommendation.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD -
CUP concept plan and Preliminary Plat of Stonegate Estates is hereby approved based on the
most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
Approval of the preliminary plat shall not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The
City shall only guarantee sanitary sewer service to approved final plats with signed
contracts or through a financial commitment for such services to assure the City of timely
development.
2. The separation between individual townhouse structures shall be at least one-half the sum
of adjacent building heights.
3. The design of all public and private streets is subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The landscaping plan is revised to eliminate proposed plantings within Outlot A, provide
two staggered rows of plantings spaced not more than 20 feet on center along 851' Street
and CSAH 42 and provide a more formal landscape treatment within the traffic circle,
subject to City Staff approval.
3
5. Park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied through combination of cash fee in lieu
of land and dedication of Outlot A subject to review and approval of the Parks and
Recreation Commission and City Council.
6. The subject parcel shall be included within the LeFebvre Creek Watershed District, subject
to applicable impact fees. All grading, drainage, utility and easement issues are subject
to review and approval of the City Engineer.
7. The 40 foot easement conveyed to the John LeFebvre Loving Trust in the agreement dated
April 16,1990 is terminated.
8. Upon approval of a final plat, the applicant shall enter into a development contract with the
City, provide documentation of a homeowners association and pay all fees and post
required securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 25th day of September, 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
LSI
I N C
-u =-nu elaM9i1J 111
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
Otsego Mayor and City Council
Daniel Licht
19 September 2000
Otsego - Roden/Weidenbach Subdivision Concepts
176.02 - 00.29
The Planning Commission reviewed the concept plans submitted for division of two lots
from the Roden and Weidenbach properties northeast of CSAH 19/80th Street. The
summary of the Planning Commission member's comments were that they appreciated
what the property owners were trying to accomplish, but were concerned about the long
term implications for resubdivision of the access corridor and extension of future streets.
The consensus of the members was that they would not support a rezoning/plat application
based upon the submitted concepts.
Staff explained at the meeting that under the previous 1:40 density allowance, property
owners could subdivide parcels along existing/new streets in clusters, including transfer
of development rights from a back 40 to a front parcel. The present Comprehensive Plan
would allow for this same approach, as well as subdivision of large acreage parcels that
would absorb an entire property. The Comprehensive Plan was not specific as to howthe
density allowances for the rural areas would be permitted to be utilized either as clusters,
large tracts or combination thereof. This may be a topic for further discussion between the
Planning Commission and City Council.
However, an overriding concern with any rural subdivision is that it does not prelude future
resubdivision that may be possible with urban services. Further, rural subdivisions may
not create a barrier for the future extension of streets and utilities. Given that subdivisions
are permanent and the resulting lots subject to transfer, these considerations are critical
whether the area is likely to develop in one, ten or thirty years. This is the main issue with
the proposed subdivision concepts in that there is no feasible resubdivision of the 2500
foot access corridors and these same corridors would prevent the extension of future north
south streets/utiliites between the Roden and Weidenbach properties.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM
A possible alternative to the subdivision concepts presented by the property owners would
be to provide access from the west, off of Kadler Avenue where the Weidenbach property
has 250 feet of frontage. This approach would lessen the distance back from the main
street of the lots and make possible larger "square" lots. However, a public street would
be necessary off of Kadler such that both buildable lots would have the minimum required
frontage to a public street. City policy has always been that subdivisions will be allowed
only when the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance may be
complied with, including the construction of necessary streets to serve proposed lots. The
property owners could do a cluster of lots in this area, using the sale of other building sites
to offset the cost of a street. This suggestion is offered for discussion only and is not a an
endorsement from our office at this time.
The submitted subdivision concepts will be discussed by the City Council at their meeting
on September 25, 2000. Again, because no formal zoning/subdivision application has
been submitted, this item is for discussion only.
pc. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Larry Koshak .
Andy MacArthur
Floyd and Beverly Roden
Bret and Keri Schoen
Donald and Vernon Weidenbach
Thomas Weidenbach
-2-
RODEN/WEIDENBACH CONCEPTS
NOT TO SCALE
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL, ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Adm.
September 25, 2000 - 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
7.1. Consider Partial Payment of 1999 Street Overlay Project.
7.2. Discussion of future Page Ave. Between 78TH and 82ND St.
7.3. Any Other Engineering business
BACKGROUND:
7.1. through 7.2. See attached information from Larry Koshak.
7.3. This is for any other Engineering Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
These items are for Council discussion and decision.
Thanks,
Elaine
Hakanson
3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303
Anderson
1 Assoc., Inc. Phone: 763/427 5860 Fax: 763/427 0520
CITY OF OTSEGO
CITY ENGINEER
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
9125100
Item 7.1 Consider approval of Partial Payment Release for 1999 Street
Improvement Project COP #99.01.
This item is being placed again on the council agenda for consideration to
release the payment to the contractor. We are not aware of any changes
that would warrant release as of this writing.
Item 7.2 Discussion on future Page Avenue (between 79th and 82nd Street).
We are requesting that the city consider receiving quotes for the rough
grading of Page Avenue between 79th Street & 81St Street. (See exhibit)
The plats have been approved on either side of this section of street.
Pheasant Ridge 1St 2nd and 3rd Additions and Crimson Ponds 1St, 2nd and
3rd Additions.
There are several reasons the City needs to grade this section to
accommodate utilities and infrastructure.
The storm sewer line from a pond in Pheasant Ridge 2nd Addition needs to
discharge into a pond in Crimson Ponds 2nd Addition. If the pipes are
installed in the present condition, they will be exposed and unsupported by
trench placement. These facilities need to be covered with about 4 feet of
soil, which is required in the location at the crossing.
Wright -Hennepin and Qwest both have major crossings. Wright -Hennepin
would be able to loop 3 phases throughout the 78th Street area
development if a crossing is made at 81St Street at the correct elevation
and location.
If a digging cuts the electric power line now in the area, every house would
be out of power. If the loop can be made, then the additional phase will
allow for most of the area to remain in service.
Civil 6- Municipal ��
Engineering
Council Agenda Items, Page 1 Land Surveying for
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\901\2000\ot901agenda9-25-OO.doc
Item 7.3
As with the telephone, Qwest has installed a major crossing at Palmgren
Ave. and Page Ave. to allow for the telephone system to serve the majority
of the homes should an accident occur if the line is cut. They also need to
install at the correct grade and location.
The area shown is a fill section and one of the sources of soils material is
a stockpile at the intersection of 78th Street & Page Ave., of which the City
has ownership. The rest of the material would need to come from the north
of Page Ave. south of 85th Street. We are in the process of determining if
we have adequate source of material to bring up the grade between 79th
Street and 81St Avenue.
We recommend that the City allow us to receive quotes for the rough
grading. At least one contractor would be available to do this work this
fall, and more maybe also available as other projects start this fall.
The cost of this work would come from the road access fees or possibility
from State Aid fund. We believe the work would be under $50,000,
therefore quotes would be sufficient in this case.
Any Other Engineering Business
Council Agenda Items, Page 2
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipa]\AOTSEGO\901\2000\ot901agenda9-25-OO.doc
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
Li
CUT AREA
CRIMSOM
PONDS
2ND
WRIGHT - HENNIPEN
CROSSING
81st
CRIMSOM
PONDS
th
STORM SEWER
\
CRO i SING
w
Z
ITEM 7.2
N.E. 88th S:;.
QUEST
CROSSING
I
PROPOSED
I
ROUGH GRADING
CITY'S STOCKPILE
OF SAND
7
hAr-F- AWF7 (70TI•-I Tn R1 CT CTRP-P-T r-RAnINIr,)
WAS
ITEM 7.1
Pay Estimate M5
August 22, 2000
Honorable Mayor & City Counal
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: 1999 Street Improvement, COP #99.01
Contractor. Bauerty Bros., Inc.
ContractAmount: $1,187,606.70
Award Date: 8110199
Completion Date: June 30. 2000
Dear Council Members: The following worts has been completed on the above referenced project
BID SCHEDULF A - OVERLAY_ RECLAMATION AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Page 1 of 4
- --
Rom IF
-- - --
Spee.Ref.
Item Description
Estimated
Contract Price
Used to Date
Extension
1
2021.501
Mobilization
1
LS
56,200.00 /LS
1
$6,200.00
2
2101.507
Grub 36' Stump)
3
EA
$125.00 /EA
3
5375.00
3
2104
Salva a Retaining Wall
2
EA
$250.00 /EA
1
$250.00
4
2104.501
Remove Culverts 24' or less
8351
LF
$6.00 ALF
887
$5,322.00
5
2104.503
Remove Bit. Pavement
9500
SY
$1.00 /SY
244
$244.00
6
2104.503
Remove Concrete Pavement
90
SY
$2.00 /SY
66
$132.00
7
2104.513
Sawcut Bit. Pavement
1750
LF
$3.00 /LF
2725
$8,175.00
8
2104.513
Sawcut Concrete
325
LF
57.00 /LF
175
$1,225.00
9
2105.501
Common Excavation CVP
23700
CY
S4.56 /CY
23700
$108,072.00
10
2105.521
Granular Borrow CVP
10300
CY
$5.66 /CY
10300
558.298.00
11
2105.605
Minor Grading
3251
RD STA
$30.25 /RD STA
357
$10,799.25
12
2112.602
Su rade Preparation
9500
SY
1 $0.30 /SY
1434
$430.20
13
2120.501
Earth Shouldering o Soil
3500
CY
S7.50 /CY
2521
$18,907.50
14
2211.501
Aggregate Base Cl5
5900
Ton
$6.18 lion
9076.1
$56,090.30
15
2211.501
Base Cls D
125
Ton
$6.82 /Ton
466
$3.178.12
16
2211.501..Aggregate
.Aggregate
Base Cl 5(patch)
5751
Ton
$6.18 /Ton
275
$1,699.50
17
2221.503
Aqareaate Shouldering, C12
240
Ton
520.00 /Ton
260
S5•200•00
18
2221.503
Aggregate Shoulderin Cl 5
1070
Ton
$6.82 /Ton
981
$6,690.42
19
2232.501
Reclamation of Bituminous Surface
86355
SY
$0.68 /SY
84,564
557,503.52
20
2232.501
Reclamation of Bituminous Surface & Transport
16150
SY
$0.97 /SY
15169
514,713.93
21
2340.508
Tvoe 41 Wear
228101
Ton
S23.18 /Ton
19,252.8
5446,279.90
22
2340.508
T e 41 atch
210
Ton
535.00 /Ton
280
59,800.00
23
2357.502
Bit. Mat for Tack
4540
Gal
50.75 /Gal
2900
$2.175.00
24
2401.521
Structural Excavation CIU CVP
300
CY
S2.00 /CY
210
$420.00
25
2451.511
Course Filter Aggregate
60
CY
S14.00 /CY
0
$0.00
26
2501.515
30' RCP End Section
1
EA
5470.00 /EA
1
$470'00
27
2501.515
24' RCP End Section
12
EA
5390.00 /EA
22
58.580.00
28
2501.515
15' RCP End Section
20
EA
5320.00 /EA
22
57,040.00
2501
30' RCP FES Trash Guard
1
EA
5895.00 /EA
1$895.00
E
2502.541
3' PERF PE PIPE DRAIN
1600
LF
55.45 /1-F
1600
58.720.00
8123M
MSO I��/u�W dos a�mun�cb+M1+ot+egooOJBbQ'160P a4
ITEM 7.2
Pay Estimate #5
Page 2 of 4
Item a
Spec.Ref.
item Description
Estimated
tity
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extension
31
2502.601
Connect to Existing Drain
4
EA
5255.00 /EA
3
$765.00
32
2503
30' RCP
734
LF
$37.80 /LF
719
$27,178.20
33
2503.511
24 ' RCP
328
LF
$28.60 /LF
517
$14,786.20
34
2503.511
18 ' RCP
1037
LF
$23.95 /LF
1037
$24,836.15
35
2503.511
15' RCP
6141
LF
$22.05 /LF
599
$13,207.95
36
2503.602
Connect Existing Drain Pipe to Storm Sewer
1
EA
5350.00 /EA
1
$350.00
37
2503.603
Ductile Iron Pie
100
LF
$26.70 /LF
50
$1,335.00
38
2506
Construct Drainage Structure C,G N or H
13
EA
$820.00 /EA
13
510.660.00
39
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 48' 4020
11
EA
5930.00 /EA
1
$930.00
40
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 54' 4020
1
1 EA
51,780.00 /EA
1
$1,780.00
41
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 60' 4020
2
EA
$2,115.00 /EA
2
$4,230.00
42
2511.501
Random Riprap CI 11
75
CY
$45.00 /CY
63.5
$2,857.50
43
2531.507
6' Concrete Driveway Pavement
40
SY
$40.00 /SY
0
$0.00
44
2540.602
Relocate Mailbox Support
3761
EA
$75.00 /EA
405
$30,375.00
45
2563.601
Traffic Control
1
LS
54,000.00 /LS
1
$4,000.00
46
2564.602
Relocate Sin
6
EA
550.00 /EA
0
50.00
47
2564.604
Si n Panels Type C
9
SF
$22.00 /SF
0
$0.00
48
2573.501
Bale Check
201
EA
$6.00 /EA
0
50.00
49
2573.502
Silt Fence, Type Preassembled
1000
LF
$1.60 /LF
0
50.00
50
2575.501
Seedinq
10
Acre
$600.00 /Acre
8.7
$5,220.00
51
Install Retaining Wall
1
EA
$500.00 /EA
1
$500.00
52
1
Install Bituminous Flume 1
4l
EA 1
$150.00 /EA 1
0 1
$0.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE A:
BID SCHEDULE B - SEAL COAT AND CRACK FILuNn
$990,896.64
53
2231.507
Crack Fillino Material
10200
LB
$0.91 /LB
22,225
24,056
$20,224.75
$23.815.44
54
2356.505
Bit. Mat for Seal Coat
22000
Gal
$0.99 /Gal
55
2356.507
Seal Coat Aggregate FA2
1645
Ton
519.00 /Ton
1,296
$24,624.00
56 1
2564.603
4' Double Solid Yellow - Epoxy
21110
LF
1 $0.49 /LF
29,780
84.351
514,592.20
518.557.22
57
2564.603
4' Solid White - Epoxy
90000
LF I
50.22 /LF
58
2564.603
4' Dashed Yellow - Epoxy
5060
LF 1
$0.36 /LF
2,812
S1,012.32
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE B: $102.825.93
wua i w a .o eocrnwnc v.Nowpoba�sooseeP , r &23/00
REM 7.2
Pay Estimate #t5
BID SCHEDULE C - OTSEGO CREEK (83RD ST.) CULVERT REPLACEMENT
Page 3 of 4
tam •
Spec.Ret.
Nem De
Est4nated
Unit Price
Used to Date
Eslension
59
2104.501
Remove 60' CMP
50
LF
$10.00 Af
50
5500.00
60
2105.511
Channel Excavation CVP
70
CY
$8.70 /CY
70
$609.00
61
2401.521
Structural Excavation CI U. CVP
300
CY
$4.00 /CY
300
$1,200.00
62
2503
88' SPAN RCPA
641
LF
$207.00 /LF
64
313.248.00
63
2503
88' SPAN RCPA FES
2
EA
$1,740.00 /EA
2
33.480.00
64
2105
Aggregate Material
15
CY
$16.00 /CY
15
$240.00
65
2015
Common Borrow
150
CY
$4.20 /CY
176
$739.20
64
2511.501
Random Rlprap CIN 1
1001
CY
$47.00 /CY
45.02
$2,115.94
65
2511.515
Geotextile Fabric Type V 1
870
SY
$1.20 /SY
780
$936.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE C:
SUMMARY OF BIDDING:
USED TO DATE:
LESS 5% RETAINAGE:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #1:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #2:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE A3:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #4:
WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF:
$23,068.14
BID SCHEDULE A:
$990.896.64
BID SCHEDULE B:
$102.825.93
BID SCHEDULE C:
$23,068.14
TOTAL USED TO DATE: $1,116.790.71
$1,116,790.71
$55,839.54
$218,697.21
$341,225.46
$52,280.50
$381,513.01
$67,235.00
%Vuo randf ddoef~bCJP�ft490bQCM Wd8P..W 8/23100
'E
�L
Pile: RCA-CC.WPS
22
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY
9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Adm.
September 25, 2000 - 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
9. Council Items:
A. Any Council Business
1. Update on Community Recreation (Virginia Wendel)
2. Consider Manufactures 2000 Week Approval.
BACKGROUND:
I. Virginia Wendel has some information from the meeting she attended
and she will discuss with the Council.
2. Attached is a Manufactures 2000 Week Resolution for Council to consider.
Mike Robertson will explain.
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration and any decisions needed.
Thanks,
Elaine
Manufacturers
200OWeek
Whereas: Manufacturing has the largest total payroll of any business
sector in Minnesota. Providing $18 billion in 1998 wages, and
Whereas: Manufacturing produces $28.3 billion for the state economy and
is the second largest single share (18.9%) of our gross product, and
Whereas: Manufacturing exports brought nearly $9.2 billion into the Minnesota
economy in 1999, and
Whereas: Manufacturing provides high skill, high wage jobs which
significantly contribute to Minnesota's high standard of living
and economic vitality; and
Whereas: Manufacturing contributed nearly $232 million in corporate income
taxes in Minnesota, more than any other business sector, about 30%
of total corporate income taxes in 1999:
-Now Therefore,
Mayor of ,
Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of October 16-22, 2000 to be
Minnesota Manufacturers Week
In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand
and caused the Great Seal of the City of
Minnesota to be affixed at the City Office this
Sixteenth day of October, Two Thousand.
Mayor
City Administrator
CLAIMS LIST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
SEPTEMBER 25, 2000
Atteched is the Claims List for your consideration. For more detail,
please refer to the Check Detail Registers.
If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know.
Claims Register 9-14-00 $1,771.15
Claims Register 9-21-00 $103,457.10
Grand Total $105,228.25
If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further,
please let me know.
Judy Hudson,
Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
JH/co
CL.AIMS.WPS
CITY OF OTSEGO
Check Summary Register
Thursday, September 14, 2000
Check Date Check Amt
10100 1 •
FELKRIVER
UnPaid GODFATHER'S PIZZA $144.13
UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $614.70
UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,012.32
Total Checks $1,771.15
Page 1 of 1
CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, September 14, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 1 of 1
Check Amt Invoice
Comment
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
Unpaid GODFATHER'S PIZZA
.�..�r�.,�„m„�,,,wk
E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies
$144.13
Lunch
Total GODFATHER'S PIZZA
$144.13
UnPaid� ICMARETIREMENT TRUST
±±��'
G 101-21705 Other Retirement
$412.78
PPE 9/2/2000
E 101-41400-121 PERA
$201.92
PPE 9/2/2000
Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
$614.70
Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD'
G 101-21704 PERA
$484.23
PPE 9=000
E 101-41400-121 PERA
$228.84
PPE 9/2/2000
E 101-43100-121 PERA
$226.73
PPE 9=000
E 101-41550-121 PERA
$72.52
PPE 9/2/2000
Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
$1,012.32
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
$1,771.15
CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, September 21, 2000
Check Summary Register Page 1 of 1
gas" 111111111noll
Name
Check Date Check Amt
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
UnPaid
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
$114.63
UnPaid
AIRGAS, INC.
$21.69
UnPaid
B & B MASONRY, INC
$29,838.00
UnPaid
BANK OF ELK RIVER
$27,900.00
UnPaid
BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC
$254.54
UnPaid
CELLULAR+
$22.38
UnPaid
CHOUINARD OFFICE PRODUCTS
$21.29
UnPaid
COMMUNITY RECREATION
$3,707.50
UnPaid
CORROW TRUCKING
$83.07
UnPaid
DIGITAL IMAGING
$164.51
UnPaid
DXS TOTAL HOME CENTER
$11.26
UnPaid
EARL F ANDERSON INC
$715.17
UnPaid
ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$229.92
UnPaid
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFT. INC
$756.18
UnPaid
ELK RIVER LANDFILL
$4,586.28
UnPaid
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
$947.28
UnPaid
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO
$94.19
UnPaid
G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$431.19
UnPaid
GME CONSULTAMT,. INC.
$2,790.06
UnPaid
GROEN GARY CPA
$910.00
UnPaid
H G WEBER OIL COMPANY
$775.20
UnPaid
HAWKINS CHEMICAL
$10.00
UnPaid
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
$35.00
UnPaid
LONG & SONS
$489.90
UnPaid
MEDICA
$3,462.98
UnPaid
MINNESOTA LIFE
$63.20
UnPaid
MONTICELLO TIMES, INC
$32.00
UnPaid
NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
$192.19
UnPaid
NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
$5,586.34
UnPald
ONRAMP, INC
$39.95
UnPaid
PEOPLE SERVICE INC.
$2,204.50
UnPaid
PITNEY BOWES
$200.04
UnPaid
RMR SERVICES, INC
$4,707.94
UnPaid
ROSEANNA SCHULTE
$285.00
UnPaid
RUM RIVER CONTRACTING
$600.00
UnPaid
SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC
$67.10
UnPaid
SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION
$4,157.50
UnPaid
ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC
$213.82
UnPaid
STS CONSULTANT'S LTD
$6,043.80
UnPaid
SUPERIOR SERVICES
$460.00
UnPaid
WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC
$231.50
Total Checks $103,457.10
CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, Septernber 21, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 1 of 4
Check Amt Invoice Comment
00 BANKOFELKRIVER
E201-45000-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $114.63 9034
Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $114.63
UnPaid Al INC.
E101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $21.69
Total AIRGAS, INC. $21.69
UnPaid B & B MASONRY, INC
E101-43100-630 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $29,838.00 90002 Concrete/Door Main.
Total B & B MASONRY, INC $29,838.00
UnPaid BANK OF ELK RIVER
E 301-47000-602 Bond Interest $6,900.00 Interest
E 301-47000-601 Debt Sry Bond Principal $21,000.00 Principal
Total BANK OF ELK RIVER $27,900.00
BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $34.52 2800004379 PW# 3
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $220.02 2800005412 PW # 7
Total BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC $254.54
Unpaid � CELL LAR+.�.<�.,�„�,..,....,..�...�..M.<�..M.,.•<�.,,.«<.,�:,o:�Hx
E 101-43100-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $22.38 00-09-103537 Pagers
Total CELLULAR+ $22.38
Unpaid xCHOUINARD OFFICE PRODUCTS
E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies $21.29
Total CHOUINARD OFFICE PRODUCTS $2129
Unpaid COMMUNITY RECREATION
E 101-45100-390 Contracted Services $3,707.50 Sept. -Oct 2000
Total COMMUNITY RECREATION $3,707.50
UnPaid CORROW TRUCKING
<M
E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $83.07 Recycling
Total CORROW TRUCKING $83.07
UnPaid DIGITAL IMAGING
E 101-41400.348 Maps $164.51 059175
Total DIGITAL IMAGING $164.51
Unpaid DJ S TOTAL HOME CENTER
E 101-43100-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $11.26 PW# 9
Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $1126
�UnPaid � EARL F ANDERSON INC
E 101-43100-393 Street Signs $715.17
Total EARL F ANDERSON INC $715.17
>,,,,�,j mom.-.r-:,,:c:.......�._M,.�...�,,.. .0_ .... .. �.
�n�ard ECM PUBLISHERS INC
CITY OF OTSEGO
Check Detail Register
Thursday, September 21, 2000
Page 2 of 4
UnPaid ELK RIVER
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $4,151.00 0001574 Hauling Chips
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $43528 0001575 Hauling chips
Total ELK RIVER LANDFILL $4,58628
Unpaid FLOYD TAL SECURITY<��'�"�""`"""w"""""�<"'""""'�'"` '• '• -
E 101-41940-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $94728 621809 Re -Key Locks
Total FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY $947.28
- - - •<:�:�;.:-.�x<.�.�•:u�.,-<x.����x���,�.,«�•�.�.�%Y��••----------,.x.�.xxxwx<.,,.•::,,,.-,,... ,,:.,,�..,�,................
Unpaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO « w...•••.••<.••••.-•<.x<.•<.-.<•«.<,•••<� %�
E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.19 PW Disability Ins.
E101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $54.00 Adm. Disability Ins.
Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94.19
Unpaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
E 101-41400-410
Check Amt
Invoice
Comment
E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$54.44
1000098473
Legal Ord.#2000-15
E 101-41400 347 Newsletter
$64.00
IH 00050925
Distribute View
E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$111.48
IC00098474
Legal Ord.#2000-10
Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$229.92
Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$431.19
Unpaid ELECTION SYSTEMS &SOFT. INC
E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies
$93.46
437869
Dog License - Tags
E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies
$662.72
436505
Coding Services
Total ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFT. INC
$756.18
UnPaid ELK RIVER
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $4,151.00 0001574 Hauling Chips
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $43528 0001575 Hauling chips
Total ELK RIVER LANDFILL $4,58628
Unpaid FLOYD TAL SECURITY<��'�"�""`"""w"""""�<"'""""'�'"` '• '• -
E 101-41940-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $94728 621809 Re -Key Locks
Total FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY $947.28
- - - •<:�:�;.:-.�x<.�.�•:u�.,-<x.����x���,�.,«�•�.�.�%Y��••----------,.x.�.xxxwx<.,,.•::,,,.-,,... ,,:.,,�..,�,................
Unpaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO « w...•••.••<.••••.-•<.x<.•<.-.<•«.<,•••<� %�
E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.19 PW Disability Ins.
E101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $54.00 Adm. Disability Ins.
Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94.19
Unpaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
E 101-41400-410
Rentals (GENERAL)
$7026 339815 Rugs - Towels
E 101-43100-225
Uniforms
$91.07 349089
E 101-41400-410
Rentals (GENERAL)
$7026 349090 Rugs - Towels
E 101-43100-225
Uniforms
$66.57 344441
E 101-43100-225
Uniforms
1$57.24 339814
E 101-43100.225
Uniforms
$75.79 353748
Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$431.19
�•%�M•• "�1'�/'�M'?N'/M1'Y!fV�V�NO�+I�'Y<M"�M�Cq�p9y�<• <gp�<•k•<yy .40fMAd�t<Nq% ...•L.�«a„•Y/lN/xx±xx<x//WNM<w<xtwH.NnrwN�K<x</�`«/rx:.vxr<nvxNiv:: xrx
Unpaid GME CONSULTANT,. INC.
E 418-43100-302 Engineering Fees $2,790.06 8508A Const. Testing
Total GME CONSULTAMT,. INC. $2,790.06
Unpaid
E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $910.00 Aug. 18 - Sept. 18
Total GROEN GARY CPA $910.00
w x«x .v ri� %�, axri% ..n„ %%�<a �%,>%,.:,,xx xx«,:x:<„
Unpaid H G WEBER OILCOMPANY
E101-43100-202 Gas & Oil $77520 Deisel Fuel # 2
Total H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $77520
/uvivv»v.�nweaarvrinvncwwv�ewc<w aw0000:eooen»uv.w,cw.eoc<
/
Unpaid HAWKINS CHEMICAL
E601-49400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $10.00 DM45593
Total HAWKINS CHEMICAL $10.00
<xrxr<rr xw•«rx<ww�v«rr«i<r.vrxx<yR;• Wi/!////.T\\vv _M—NC-
.ryry/pyrpyN C%///Yi%nr/i%/<nliavOWz[o;p000%gY/gJpyp»yrY/NOMpYy
Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
E 101-41400-360 Education/fraining/Conterences $35.00 1-00004621 Meeting Registration
Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $35.00
CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, September 21, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 3 of 4
\\\ Check Amt Invoice Comment
Unpaid ���� LONG &SONS
E 101-41400-389 Cleaning Services $150.00 Windows
E 101-41400-389 Cleaning Services $310.00 Carpet Cleaning
E 101-41400.389 Cleaning Services $29.90 Tax
Total LONG & SONS $489.90
Unpaid ,e �MEDICA
E 101-43100-123 Health $1,432.27 100275114025 PW Health Ins.
E 101-41400-123 Health $2,030.71 100275114025 Adm. Health Ins.
Total MEDICA $3,462.98
UnPaid MINNESOTA LIFE
E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $29.00 Adm. Life Ins.
E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $34.20 PW Life Ins.
Total MINNESOTA LIFE $63.20
UnPaid MONTICELLO TIMES, INCµ« w
E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $32.00 Renewal
Total MONTICELLO TIMES, INC $32.00
UnPaid NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY
E 602-49450-322 Utilities $192.19 1320-312-071-2 WWTP
Total NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY $192.19
UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00
$308.12 9586
Miss. Pines Prelim.
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$1,400.00 9588
Meetings
G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates
$1,143.59 9586
Stonegate Estates
E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees
$704,90 9587
General
G 701-21959 Barthel 32-P&Z
$327.33 9586
D & J Estates
G 701-21935 JKO Industries
$297.73 9586
JKO -Pioneer Marine
G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge
$245.80 9586
Pheasant Ridge 3rd
G 701-21956 Olson CUP 00-31
$235.44 9586
Olson CUP
G 701-21957 Winter Sub 00-30
$342.40 9586
Winter Prelim
G 701-21944 Bauerly/Bajari
$157.23 9586
Bauerly/Bajari
G 701-21927 0. Thompson CUP 99.18
$62.60 9586
Koerwitz
E101-45300-390 Contracted Services
$47.00 9587
HPC
G 701-21941 Pulte Homes
$44.00 9586
Pulte -Prairie Crk 2nd
E 201-45000-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)
$29.85 9587
Park N Rec
E 201-45000-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL)
$240.35 9589
Parks Plan
Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS
$5,586.34
µw.w+.v.>,v�mmv.,mv<v.<mwn�OC4VCSWr/r/rfq\\'M%M:Y:IM%+W g00Y.COttS'�^.0:•:MPT}W 1.
Unpaid ONRAMP, INC
Yr:Y.'.:!V:M./»L%0�]M'A'MC•:[•W/.Y//A'/b/AT06'N/rbCACM:t<AW1.M'<.W/^Yti„vnro/i//<.,+w„vv<i«n•<.,,•<
E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services
$39.95 972719
Monthly Web -Host
Total ONRAMP, INC
$39.95
«.<rui.«<ww.c<erw•w.ww.r«.<r..•..w.w.«..w....<.<..<..M,.....«...w...w.«.«<..vm<.«.w..«<......«.<..,..:.�:....rnnrnno:riirmvs»»rrrrrnr:••x.:>.>.,»m>riirnrm:r<>mrxmrrrrdi n: »aw iiironariinrnrxoo:riiiin�.r
UnPaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC.
E 601-49400-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $2,204.50 0003691 August Services
Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $2,204.50
Unpaid �...,�.<.�,,.....,... PITNEY BOWES
E 101-41400-206 Postage $200.04 4705027 -SPO September Charges
CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, September 21, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 4 of 4
R 101-38992 CITY HALL RENT ($115.00) Bldg Supervisor Fees
G 101-21803 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE $400.00 Damage Deposit
Total ROSEANNA SCHULTE $285.00
Unpaid RUM RIVER CONTRACTING
E 101-43100-434 Blacktop Patching $600.00 573 Patching
Total RUM RIVER CONTRACTING $600,00
Un aid SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $67.10 00013729667 Oil Filters/Fluorescent LampsB
Total SAFETY-KLEEN SYSTEMS, INC $67,10
Unpaid SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION
E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $4,157.50 5671 August Rental
Total SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION $4,157.50
Unpaid ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $213.82
Total ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC $213.82
ar.�.vr. oaaenxKmanw.wn=vo:aaarounacacom: reeu meeeeee�emens+euaeaeneec�aewameaaar�su.r,.......`.w....w...........,.
Unpaid STS CONSULTANTS LTD ��
E 416-43100-310 Miscellaneous $6,043.80 208050 Odean Testing
Total STS CONSULTANT'S LTD $6,043.80
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $460.00 156728 August Recycling
Total SUPERIOR SERVICES $460.00
Un'Paid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC M � a °°° ��"'" `-'"`x '
E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $231.50 5331 Maintenance Fee
Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $231.50
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $103,457.10
SENATOR MARK OURADA
Ranking Minority Member, Election Laws Committee
District 19
145 State Office Building
100 Constitution Avenue
St. Paul, ININ 551.5.5-1206
Phone: (651) 296-5981
Far: (651) 296.5241
Home:
1110 Innsbrook Lane
Buffalo, hIN 55313
Phone: (612) 682-5024
Fax: (612) 682-1106
September 21, 2000
Larry Fournier
City of Otsego, Mayor
16632 NE 70th St.
Otsego, MN 55330
Dear Larry Fournier:
A Il t
EMU&&
flt'INIH-
Senate
State of Minnesota
I recently received notice of new grant programs being offered by the Minnesota Department of Trade
and Economic Development. I wanted to make you aware of these opportunities so that you may apply if
you desire.
A new initiative, known as the Technology Catalyst Grant Program, will provide funding to expand the
availability of high speed Internet access in Greater Minnesota. Funded by the 2000 legislative session,
this program will promote new telecommunications technology to maintain and promote future economic
growth. A total of $1 million will be made available through this initiative. Local units of government
are being encourage to apply.
Applications for the Technology Catalyst Grant Program are due November 15, 2000. If you are
interested in applying, please contact Connie Ireland at 507-389-1896 or e-mail
connie.ireland@state.mn.us for a copy of the application guidelines.
The Labor Force Assessment Grant Program will support pilot projects that determine the skill set and
experience of the available workforce in order to help local organizations identify new business
expansion prospects. This program has $750,000 available to local economic development agencies. For
more information, contact Kari Howe at 218-755-4478 or e-mail kari.howe@state.mn.us.
I encourage you to consider applying for the available grants. These programs offer an exciting
opportunity to encourage telecommunications infrastructure and labor force development in Minnesota.
If you have any questions or need assistance with the application process, please feel free to contact me
at 651-296-5981.
Sincerely,
MA A
State Senator
tJ
Rcryrled Pop,-,. COMMITTEES: Election Laws • Jobs, Energy & Community Development • Transportation • State
1016 P,,,,l. Government Finance • Economic Development Budget Division • Transportation Budget Division
o,,,.,,,,,,,, Fit"', E-mail: sen.mark.ourada@senate.leg.state.nin.us
Independent School District
ADMINISTRATION OFFICES
327 King Avenue
Elk River, MN 55330
September 19, 2000
Mr Mike Robertson, Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NW
Otsego, Mn 55330
Dear Mr Robertson:
DAVI FLANNERY
Suoeri €-6 m
(612) 241-3400 Fax (612) 241-3407
The School Board has scheduled a joint meeting with all city administrators, city councils,
mayors, township supervisors, township boards and county commissioners for Thursday,
November 16, 2000, at 7 p.m. in the band room at Meadowvale Elementary School, 12701
Elk Lake Road, Elk River (enter Door 7, first room to the right). School Board members
and district administrators would like to have the city officials discuss their comprehensive
planning processes, residential and commercial development plans and plans for utilities.
This kind of information is critical for our planning.
The School Board and I hope that at least some council members and staff can attend.
Please call me at 241-3401 or Londa at 241-3418 to let us know who will be attending.
The School Board and I appreciate your willingness to provide the information that is
necessary in our planning process. We look forward to meeting with you on November 16.
Sincerely,
David Flannery
Superintendent of Schools
Ml/mix/joint