10-23-00 CCk1i
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
5. CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ October 23, 2000
(Non -Controversial Items) 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION•
5.1. Approve Fire Service Amounts for the following:
Albertville Fire Service Elk River Fire Service
Monticello Fire Service Rogers Fire Service
5.2. Approve extension of the Effective Date to December 1, 2000 for Operation and
Maintenance Agreement between City of Otsego and PeopleService, Inc. (See
attached letter for Mayors signature).
BACKGROUND:
5.1. Albertville Fire Service according to Linda Goeb, Administrator estimates it slightly
higher than 2000, but with fund surplus we can leave the amount at $53.00 per
parcel and be safe.
Elk River's Fire Service according to Lorrie Ziemer, Assistant Finance Director
estimates remain the same as 2000. The fund has a surplus for any overrun and the
amount of $40.00 per parcel should be safe. The reconciliation of the 1999
numbers we paid $840.51 additional amount which was paid for by surplus funds.
Monticello's proposed Fire Service amount according to Rick Wolfsteller,
Administrator is $40.00 per parcel which is an increase from $35.00 per parcel. It is
contract renewal time for another 3 year contract and Rick will be forwarding a
contract for Council consideration. The Monticello Fire Service Contract has
always been at $35.00 per parcel. This is a straight amount and not estimated.
Rogers Fire Service proposed amount according to Brad Fiest, Fire Chief
will remain the same at $50.00 per parcel. This is a straight amount and not
estimated.
I need to send these fire service numbers in to Wright County Auditor to be placed
on the assessment rolls by the end of October. Thank you for your consideration.
5.2 Is self explanatory as it is just a contract amendment.
OCT 18 100 10:41AN CITY OF MONTICELLO
MONTICELLO
Ms. Elaine Beatty
City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua NE
Elk River, MN 55330
Re: 2001- 2003 Fire Service Contract Renewal
Dear Elaine:
October 18. 2000
P.2/3
The Monticello Joint Fire Board met October 17-h to discuss fire service contract renewal terms for cities and
townships served by our fire department. As you know, our current contract expires December 31, 2000,
The Joint Fire Board reviewed the proposed budget for operating the fire department in the year 2001 and noted
that our present $35 fee per parcel has not been increased since 1994. Recormizina that the fire department
costs have continually increased over the years for equipment purchases and operating
expenses, the Joint Fire Board will be recommending to the Monticello City Council and to the Monticello
Township Supervisors that the per parcel fee be increased to $40 starting in the year 2001.
The Joint Fire Board would like to continue with three year contracts and is proposing that the $40 fee remain
the same for all three years. The $40 fee was arrived at as a compromise amount after reviewing what the fee
would have been if it had been adjusted at 3% annually since 1994. I -lad a 3% inflation adjustment been used,
the fee should have been approximately $43 for the first year of the contract increasing, to $45.50 by the third
year. The Joint Fire Board felt that an increase to $40 at this time was warranted and should be adequate to
cover our costs for the entire three year contract.
Upon ratification by the City Council and Township Supervisors, a new three year contract will be forwarded to
you for your approval. In the meantime, should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at your
convenience.
Yours truly,
F MONTICELLO
Rick Wolfstell
City Administrator
RW/dg
Enclosure: Contract Data
cc: 2000 Fire Contract File
Monticello City Ball, 505 Walnut Strcct, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd., Monticello, MN 55362 • (763) 295-3170 - Fax: (763) 271-3272
OCT 18 '00 10:42AM CITY OF MONTICELLO
FIRE CONTRACT RENEWAL
CPI ADJUSTMENT
(g, 3% Annually)
Base Fee 1994
$35.00
1995
$36.00
1996
$37.25
1997
$38.25
1998
$39.50
1999
$40.50
2000
$41.75
2001
$43.00
2002
$44.25
2003
$45.50
P.3/3
PAGE 2 - CONSENT AGENDA
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration and approval. If Council has any questions or need to
discuss further, the item should be removed to another section of the Agenda. The only
change is Monticello Fire Service amount and is in line with the other fire service amounts.
Thanks,
Elaine
PeopleService I N C
1815 Capitol Avenue
Omaha, Nebraska 68102
October 12, 2000
Mr. Larry Fournier, Mayor
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. NE
Elk River, MN. 55330-7314
Dear Mayor Fournier,
71-1
j OC? 1 6 2000
9,a
Article 1.1 of the Operation and Maintenance Agreement between the City of Otsego and
PeopleService, Inc. dated April 10, 2000 states that the Agreement will be effective "July 1, 2000, or such
other date mutually acceptable in writing .to PeopleService and Owner". By letter dated July 6, 2000, the
parties had agreed to delay the Effective Date to October 1, 2000.
Since it now appears that flows through the new Otsego wastewater treatment plant will not begin
before December 1, 2000, the purpose of this letter is to change the "Effective Date" of the Operation and
Maintenance Agreement referenced above.
We would propose that the "Effective Date" be changed to December 1, 2000, unless changed by
the parties via a letter similar to this letter. If you concur with the delayed "Effective Date", please
indicate your concurrence by signing in the space provided below. I have enclosed two originals of this
letter, and would ask that you sign both of them, keeping one for the City's files and returning one to me
for our files.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of continuing service to the rapidly expanding number of
residents in Otsego. If at any time in the future you have questions, please don't hesitate to contact Curt
Reetz our Regional Manager, or myself.
Yours truly,
G� 07 _, --
Alan F. Meyer
President
We accept December 1, 2000 as the revised "Effective Date" for the Operation and Maintenance
Agreement dated April 10, 2000.
For the City of Otsego,
-arty Fournier, Mayor
ki2
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEP PREPARED BY•
6. Dan Licht, City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk October 9, 2,000
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION•
6.1. Consider Final Plat of Stonegate Estates
6.2. Consider Final Plat of Bauerly's Industrial Site7Bajari Land
6.3. Any Other Planning Business
BACKGROUND:
Dan Licht will be present to explain and discuss the following items.
6.1-., 6.2, See attached reports from Dan Licht-. Larry Koshak will. also be present for any
questions or comments. These items were continued from the October 9, 2000 meeting.
6.3_ This is for any other planning business that .needs discussion.
R -E C QM114iENDA T1 QN:
These items are for -Council consideration for approval or denial
Thanks,
Elaine
Date: October 18, 2000
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator
Re: Proposed Stonegate
Extension of road
Mike Robertson
Final Plat
to connect with
83rd Street
City Attorney Andy MacArthur and I met with John Anderson of
Tollefson Development and his attorney Sean Kelly. Mr. Anderson
maintained that Tollefson was never told that the City would
require them to pay for the construction of the road across City
property (the John Lefebvre access easement) to tie in with 83rd
Street in Country Ridge subdivision. I maintained that we had
informed them of this requirement during staff discussions and
that it was not listed as a specific condition because there was
no objection to it. I have checked with City Engineer Koshak and
City Planner Licht and their recollection is the same as mine.
The City Engineer and Tollefson have estimated this cost as
approximately $17,000-20,000. I maintained that Tollefson is
saving more costs than this through PUD flexibility and being
allowed narrower streets than required under City ordinances.
Mr. Anderson offered a compromise. He offered that Tollefson
would pay for the costs of grading and removal in the disputed
section of street if the City paid for the costs of blacktop.
gravel, curb & gutter, and utilities. After some discussion of
the difficulty of putting an actual costs to these items, Mr.
Anderson made a second offer.
Mr. Anderson's second offer was to split the costs of the
disputed section of street 50-50 with the City. The City's 50%
would be paid for by credits on the developer's agreement, so the
City would not have to write Tollefson a check.
I agreed I would present this offer to the City Council in the
Council agenda packet so that they would be ready to discuss it
at the Council meeting, and that City staff would not make a
specific recommendation on the compromise offer.
CC: City Attorney Andy MacArthur
City Engineer Larry Koshak
City Planner Dan Licht
John Anderson, Tollefson
Sean Kelly, Larkin/Hoffman
stonegtwps
Michael C. Couri-
Andrew J. MacArthur
Marcus W. Miller
Robert T. Ruppe—
'Also licemed in II&uns
**AW licensed in Califomia
October 23, 2000
City Council Members
City of Otsego
c/o Mike Robertson, City
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
COURT & MACARTHUR
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376-0369
(763) 497-1930
(763) 497-2599 (FAX)
couriandmacarthur®pobox. com
Administrator
RE: Stonegate Estates- Construction of Extension of 83rd Avenue
Dear Council Members:
Enclosed please find correspondence received from Attorney Sean Kelly relative to off
plat construction of the proposed extension of 83rd Street as a condition of plat approval
for the above-mentioned plat. As per Mike Robertson's memo, it is Tollefson's position
that the fact that they would have to pay for this extension was never conveyed to the
Developer. City staff believe that this condition was clearly conveyed and understood.
Also enclosed you will find my response letter which sets forth the City staff position. As
indicated in that letter I spoke with Mr. Kelly has to whether or not a meeting could result
in anything productive. We did determine that it would be worthwhile to meet with the
Developer and subsequently myself and Mike met with Mr. Kelly and John Anderson
from Tollefson. At that meeting the Developer proposed that they pay 50% of the cost of
the road construction and that the remaining 50% be credited to them in the Developer's
agreement as a credit against City fees.
Mike and myself indicated that we would present this to the Council without comment at
tonight's meeting.
Since this is a matter that could potentially result in litigation, the Council should be
aware of this during any discussion. I will present the matter and outline options available
to the Council at the meeting this evening.
Letter to Otsego City Council
October 23, 2000
Page 2
Very trul ours,
ew J.ta ur
COURI&CARTHUR
Ends.
cc: Sean Kelly, Attorney
Tollefson Development
Dan Licht, City Planner
Larry Koshak, City Engineer
Michael C. Couri-
Andrew J. MacArthur
Marcus W. Miller
Robert T. Ruppe•-
*ALso licensed in tl6nois
••ALso licmW in Califomia
October 16, 2000
COURI & MACARTHUR
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376-0369
(763) 497-1930
(763) 497-2599 (FAX)
courian&nacarthur@pobox. com
VIA FACSIMILE AND
U.S. MAIL
Sean D. Kelly
Larkin, Hoffman, Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.
1500 Wells Fargo Plaza
7900 Xerxes Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55431-1194
RE: Plat of Stonegate Estates- City of Otsego
Dear Mr. Kelly:
I am in receipt of your correspondence to City Administrator Robertson dated October
13, 2000. Obviously, the City takes exception to your characterization of the facts in this
case. The idea that the Developer was informed that he would have to pay the cost of
extension of 83`d Street to the cul-de sac within the plat of Country Ridge for the first
time at the City Council meeting on October 9 is simply untrue. As a matter of fact, Mr.
Anderson called me prior to the meeting to complain about this fact. It is obvious that the
Developer knew or should have known about this condition long before the Council
meeting for consideration of final plat.
This matter was discussed in meetings between your client's engineer and the City
Engineer and other staff. The City Engineer feels that it was clearly conveyed on more
than one occasion that this would be a Developer responsibility. The proposed road
construction was included on your own Engineer's submittals. Minutes of the August 21
Planning Commission indicate that the issue of this street extension was raised and it was
clearly not be an assessed City project.
Thus, it is obvious that this matter was discussed previously, yet at no time did your
client raise any objection to construction of this extension or any request for
reimbursement. Obviously, if your client had assumed that the City would be
constructing this extension there would have been some conversation regarding when this
would be done and by whom, and possible coordination with contractors. No such
inquiries were ever made.
Letter to Attorney Kelly
October 16, 2000
Page 2
What further aggravates City officials and employees, is that your client has received
substantial density increases through a PUD -CUP, has been allowed to construct private
streets that do not meet the City's requirements for public streets (which has probably
saved them substantially more money than the cost of the required street extension), and
has been allowed to proceed through the plat process rapidly, even though they have not
timely submitted all documents for review.
In your letter, you request a meeting between the City and developers to try and reach a
compromise. I have been informed that the City Administrator would be available to
meet on Wednesday afternoon. However, prior to any such meeting I would like to
discuss this matter further with you to determine whether or not such a meeting could
actually be productive. I have talked to the various City staff and they are quite firmly of
the opinion that your client knew about this requirement early on, and if they maintain
that they did not know of this they should closely examine their own internal
communications and procedures.
Although you may have an argument in the purely technical sense, the logical implication
of your argument would result in plats within 108 conditions rather than 8. Most of the
issues related to plat approval are contained in general language and much is left to the
Developer's Agreement, which is itself a condition of plat approval. To do it otherwise
would result in escalated costs for the City and enormous additional costs and required
submittals by your client.
Please give me a call tomorrow to further discuss this matter.
VenwJ.
rs,
Arthur
COURI & MACARTHUR
OTSEGO CITY ATTORNEY
cc: City of Otsego
Larry Koshak, City Engineer
Dan Licht, City Planner
ROBERT HOFFMAN
GERALD H. FRIEDELL
EDWARD J. ORISCOLL
GENE N. FULLER
JOHN D. FULLMER
FRANK 1. HARVEY
CHARLES S. MODELL
CHRISTOPHER J. DIETZEN
LINDA H. FISHER
THOMAS P. STOLTMAN
MICHAEL C. JACKMAN
JOHN E. DIEHL
JON S. SWIERZEWSKI
THOMAS J. FLYNN
JAMES P. QUINN
TODD I. FREEMAN
GERALD L SECK
JOHN B. LUNDQUIST
OAYLE NOLAN'
JOHN A COTTER'
PAUL 8. PLUN(ETT
ALAN L KLDOW
KATHLEEN M. PICOTTE NEWMAN
MICHAEL B. LESARON
GREGORY E KORSTAD
GARY A VMI CLEVE'
TIMOTHY J. KEANE
ALAN M. ANDERSON
MICHAEL W. SCH/LEY
RONN B. KREPS
TERRENCE E. BISHOP
GARY A. RENNEKE
CHRISTOPHER J. HARRISTHAL
KENDEL J. OHKROGGE
BRUCE J. DOUGLAS
ILL
WIAM C. GRIFFITH, JR.
JOHN R. HLL
PETER J.COYLE
LARRY D. MARTIN
JANE E. BREMER
JOHN J. STEFFEN AGEN
MICHAEL J. SMITH
October 13, 2000
Michael Robertson
City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. N.E.
Elk River, MN 55330-7314
LARKIL . HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN,' :D.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1500 WELLS FARGO PLAZA
7900 XERXES AVENUE SOUTH
BLOOMINGTON, MINNESOTA 55431-1194
TELEPHONE (952) 835-3800
FAX (952) 896-3333
Re: Final Plat Application for Stonegate Estates
Dear Mr. Robertson:
XT 1 6 Zia.
ANDREW F. PERRIN
FREDERICK W. NEBUHR
RENEE L JACKSON
WILLIMI G. THORNTON
CHRISTOPHER K. LARUS
DOUGLAS M. RAMLER
ANN M. MEYER
STEPHEN J. KAMNSKI
THOMAS F. ALEYANDER
DANIEL T.KADLEC
SHARNA A. WAHLGREN
JOHN F. KLOS
ADAM S. HUHTA'
NICHOLAS AJ. VUETSTRA
C. ERIK HAWES
JAMES M. SUSAG
DANIEL J. BALUNJTINE
JOHN A MACK
JEFFREY O. CAHILL
SEAN 0. KELLY
SONYA R. BRAUNSCHWEIG
JOSEPH J. FITTANTE. JR.
JONATHAN J. FOGEL
CYNTHIA M. KLAUS
MARK O. CHRISTOPHERSON
NEAL J. BLANCHETT
TAMARA O'NELL MORELAND
JAMES A. MCGREEVY, III
THCMMAS A GUMP
TOM A TAYLOR
CHRISTOPHER J. DEIKE
MARLA M. ZACK
OF COUNSEL
JAMES P. LARKIN'
JACK F DALY
D. KENNETH UNOGREN
ALLAN E. MULLIGAN
JOSEPH GTTIS
ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN
SENT VIA FAX AN U.S. MAIL
As you are aware, our firm has been retained by Tollefson Development, Inc. (the "Developer") in
connection with the Final Plat application for Stonegate Estates. After tabling the Final Plat approval at
the October 9, 2000 City Council meeting, the Developer was informed by the Council that it would be
required to pay for roughly 200 feet of roadway connecting Stonegate Estates to another subdivision
located to the west. Based on our review of applicable legal authority and the City's past actions
regarding this subdivision, we conclude that the imposition of this requirement as a condition to the Final
plat is an improper exercise of the City's subdivision authority. The purpose of this letter is to outline our
legal conclusions and request a meeting next week to try to resolve the issue.
BACKGROUND
Stonegate Estates is a planned unit development consisting of detached single-family homes and
townhomes. Immediately adjacent to the western boundary of the subdivision is a strip of property owned
by the City and utilized for a recreational trail system and park (the "City Property"). Immediately to the
west of the City Property is the Country Ridge subdivision. When the Developer originally submitted
plans for this development, City Staff expressed a desire to connect the Country Ridge and Stonegate
Estates subdivisions by extending 83rd Street east across the City Property to the Stonegate Estates
subdivision (the "Road Extension"). For this reason, the Developer's preliminary plat application
included a depiction of the Road Extension to be connected with Stonegate Estates.
LARxm, .WFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTL
Michael Robertson
October 13, 2000
Page 2
On August 21, 2000 the Otsego Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
Preliminary Plat and the PUD -CUP Concept Plan for Stonegate Estates. On September 25, 2000 the City
Council approved the Preliminary Plat and PUD -CUP Concept Plan subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the preliminary plat shall not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The
City shall only guarantee sanitary sewer service to approved final plats with signed
contracts or through a financial commitment for such services to assure the City of timely
development.
2. The separation between individual townhouse structures shall be at least one-half the sum
of adjacent building heights.
3. The design of all public and private streets is subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. The landscaping plan is revised to eliminate proposed plantings within Outlot A, provide
two staggered rows of plantings spaced not more than 20 feet on center along 85th Street
and CSAH 42 and provide a more formal landscape treatment within the traffic circle,
subject to City Staff approval.
5. Park and trail dedication requirements are satisfied through combination of cash fee in lieu
of land and dedication of Outlot A subject to review and approval of the Parks and
Recreation Commission and City Council.
6. The subject parcel shall be included within the LeFebvre Creek Watershed District, subject
to applicable impact fees. All grading, drainage, utility and easement issues are subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer.
7. The 40 foot easement conveyed to the John LeFebvre Loving Trust in the agreement dated
April 16, 1990 is terminated.
8. Upon approval of a final plat, the applicant shall enter into a development contract with the
City, provide documentation of a homeowners association and pay all fees and post
required securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
In connection with its approval, the City Council made various findings establishing the subdivision's
compliance with City regulations and its Comprehensive Plan. With respect to traffic capacity in
particular, the City found that:
The proposed development is adequately served by 85th Street, which is designated as a
collector street based upon the City's functional classification system. This street has
adequate capacity to carry the potential traffic generated by the proposed development.
At the October 9, 2000 City Council meeting the Developer was instructed that approval of the Final Plat
would be conditioned upon the Developer paying for the proposed Road Extension. None of the
documentation submitted by the Developer to date has indicated any willingness on its part to pay for
LARKIN, _ IOFFNIAN, DALY & LINDGREN, LTL
Michael Robertson
October 13, 2000
Page 3
such off-site improvements. Moreover, with the exception of an October 12, 2000 Engineering Review
that was received well after the Road Extension issue had been brought to light, the Developer has not
received any documentation from the City identifying this obligation. Understandably, the Developer has
assumed that the City would pay for a roadway to be constructed across the City Property to an adjoining
subdivision.
DISCUSSION
Section 462.358, Subd. 3b of Minnesota Statutes mandates that the City approve the Developer's Final
Plat for Stonegate Estates within sixty (60) days of submission if:
...the applicant has complied with all conditions and requirements of applicable
regulations and all conditions and requirements upon which the preliminary approval is
expressly conditioned either through performance or the execution of appropriate
agreements assuring performance. (emphasis added)
Section 21-3-3 of the City's Subdivision Ordinance mirrors the foregoing statutory requirements.
As per the findings made in connection with the Preliminary Plat approval, the Stonegate Estates planned
unit development is consistent with City development policies and complies with all applicable
regulations contained in the City's Ordinance Code. With respect to roadways specifically, the
subdivision complies with Section 21-7-5(D) and (E) regarding the continuation of existing streets in
adjoining areas. The Final Plat extends 83rd Street to the western boundary of the subdivision at a
location that would accommodate the Road Extension. The Subdivision Ordinance does not require the
Developer to construct roadways past the boundaries of the subdivision.'
Nor can the requirement for the Road Extension be implied by virtue of any general access requirements
contained in the City's Ordinance Code. In approving the Preliminary Plat, the City Council made the
express finding that Stonegate Estates was adequately served by 85th Street to the north.
In addition to such general regulations contained in the City's Ordinance Code, the Final Plat complies
with, or will comply with, the express conditions of the Preliminary Plat identified above. In particular,
the Developer's opposition to paying for the Road Extension does not constitute a violation of any of the
Preliminary Plat conditions. The only condition even remotely related to this issue is condition (3)
stating, "The design of all public and private streets is subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer." This condition does not even mention construction of the Road Extension, much less dictate
what party is responsible for the cost. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 462.358, Subd. 3b set forth above, any
such requirement must be expressly stated as a condition to the Preliminary Plat in order to be valid
condition to Final Plat approval.
' Similarly, the Country Ridge subdivision complied with Section 21-7-5(E) by "stubbing" 83rd Street at its eastern boundary
with a cul-de-sac in anticipation of future development to the west. If Country Ridge and Stonegate Estates were contiguous,
there would be no need for the Road Extension. This requirement arises due to the location of the City Property between the
two subdivisions.
LARKr�, AOFFMAN, DALY & LtNDGREN, LTL
Michael Robertson
October 13, 2000
Page 4
In sum, the Developer has satisfied (or will satisfy under the terms of a development agreement) all of the
City's general regulations applicable to Stonegate Estates and all of the special conditions upon which the
Preliminary Plat was approved. According to the plain language of Minn. Stat. 462.358 and the City's
own Subdivision Ordinance, the Final Plat must, therefore, be approved and the City is prohibited from
imposing any additional requirements related to the Road Extension.
CONCLUSION
The Developer never anticipated that it would be required to pay for the Road Extension, given the fact
that the improvement would be constructed over the City Property and would benefit the City and the
Country Ridge subdivision to the west. To the contrary, the Developer logically assumed that the
benefited parties would pay for the Road Extension. The City, on the other hand, apparently assumed all
along that the Developer would pay for the Road Extension, but did not identify this obligation as
condition.
Notwithstanding the legal conclusions outlined above, the Developer would like to seek a compromise
with respect to the Road Extension. To this end, we request an opportunity to meet with City officials
some time next week to attempt to resolve the issue to both parties satisfaction. Please advise as to
whether the City is agreeable to such a meeting and, if so, a suggested time and place.
Thank you for your time and consideration. I am hopeful that the parties can resolve this matter and avoid
incurring additional legal expense.
Since ly,
Sean I3 elly, for
L�, HOFFMAN, DALY & LINDGREN, Ltd.
cc: Andy McA,rthurL City Attorney.
John Anderson ""4v
William C. Griffith, Jr.
::ODMA\PCDOCS\LIB I\623668\1
"0N't"WIST ASSOC1*Tab ca"Sumk"T34, INC,
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 5 October 2000
RE: Otsego - Stonegate Estates; Final Plat
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.18
BACKGROUND
Tollefson Development, Inc. has submitted an application for final plat approval of the first
addition of Stonegate Estates. The proposed final plat consists of 16 single family lots, 46
townhouse unit lots and seven outlots. The subject site is within the sanitary sewer service
district and is zoned R-4 and R-6 District. The preliminary plat of Stonegate Estates was
approved by the City Council on September 26, 2000.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A: Site Location
Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C: Final Plat
ANALYSIS
Preliminary Plat Consistency. The proposed final plat is consistent with the design of
the approved preliminary plat. The applicant must still address the condition of approval
that no townhouse structures are located closer than one half the sum of adjacent building
heights with submission of scaled building elevations. One other issue is that the final plat
indicates a 50 foot NSP easement bisecting the property, where as a 30 foot Minnegasco
easement is shown on the preliminary plat. This easement crosses into a large portion of
several unit lots, reducing the buildable area. If the additional easement includes area
that is to be vacated with relocation of the power lines to the perimeter of the site, this
should be resolved prior to recording the final plat.
Lot Requirements. The single family lots are subject to the performance standards of the
R-4 District, which requires a minimum lot size of 12,000 square feet and 75 foot minimum
lot width. All of the proposed single family lots meet or exceed these requirements. The
townhouse element of the project is subject to per unit lot area requirements. The area
provided for the proposed townhouse units is consistent with the space allocations of the
preliminary plat, which exceeded the minimum lot area per unit requirements.
Outlots. The final plat includes six outlots. Outlot A is the parcel being dedicated to the
City in partial satisfaction of park and trail requirements. Outlots B and C are intended to
allow for monument development signs in accordance with Section 37 of the Zoning
Ordinance and the Subdivision Ordinance. Outlots D and E are the common open space
of the townhouse portion of the first addition. Finally, Outlot F and G are large parcels
reserved for development of future phases.
Landscape Plan. A condition of preliminary plat approval is submission of a revised
landscape plan. This plan has not been submitted and is required prior to finalization of
the development contract. The preliminary plat approval made the revised landscape plan
subject to review and approval of City staff.
Park and Trail Dedication. The applicant is dedicating Outlot A to the City as partial
credit for park and trail dedication requirements. The applicant will be required to satisfy
the balance of the park dedication with a cash fee in lieu of land, based upon a percentage
of the total requirement.
Construction Plans. The applicant has provided construction plans addressing grading,
drainage, streets and utilities. These elements must be consistent with the provisions of
the Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Manual subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer. It should be noted that all public streets proposed on the preliminary plat
will be constructed during the first phase of the development, including the extension of
83`d Street and removal of the temporary cul-de-sac.
Easements. The final plat provides perimeter easements around all of the single family
lots as required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Drainage and utility easements will also
be required over Outlots D and E in accordance with City policy. All easement issues are
subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Development Contract. If the City Council approves the final plat, the applicant must
enter into a development contract with the City. The development contract requires the
applicant to pay applicable fees and dedications and post required securities. The
development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
-2-
CONCLUSION
The requested Stonegate Estates Final Plat is consistent with the approved preliminary
plat, although some additional information is required regarding building height and
revised landscaping. These issues may be verified by staff upon approval of the final plat,
prior to recording. As such, our office would recommend approval of the application
subject to the following conditions:
Documentation is provided that the 50 foot NSP easement is vacated with
relocation of the power lines to the east and north boundary of the subject site.
2. The applicant provide scaled elevations for the proposed townhouse structures
such that City staff can verify compliance with required setbacks.
3. The applicant submit a revised landscape plan in accordance with the conditions
of preliminary plat approval, subject to City staff review and approval.
4. Park and Trail dedication requirements are satisfied with a combination of land
dedication and cash fee in lieu of land, subject to review and approval of the Parks
and Recreation Commission and City Council.
5. All construction plans and easements are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
6. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and pay all
applicable fees and securities, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
7. Comments of other City Staff.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
John Anderson
Gary Harris
-3-
m
x
x
Em
a
N/. C
vvvvName
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
.+J»..✓•'JI .. COa �J..y ✓•, u, ... .. _r.,.., ,.JMy IM,1. :.c . ,�. ,.,. cL [UUu JNh
4 ,
C _ _
ha A
�iSQ -
"�a >; r
2 ag, 56s ea .H 3 go $4 R ' p� r Etitas a
(�
a rrAFf:� 222ra1 tri
as 6i! 9r 'il FY e9y@5 t Cq Y fa
►� rrr ayyrr�t� rrrrr t ���3a'9� !��
agi
FAR ;•''��%� 0�
X
2
m \N a
m u'
OTSEGO• MN., OMve, A Assoc/�fe�,Y o, w""'^'•'W
FOR ••,w.-�. r...,.,, a... ..., .. m'. iY,
TOLLEFSON DEVELOPMENT
PRELIMINARY PLAT @ .. A.„w ,,,,, „ �•� pL�r"�
PHASING/SITE PLAN iI ;..._,.......
7 � _
Q_'� i
7 � _
` OCT -19-2000
10:12 NAC
612 595 9837
P.01/04
'I WAY
..
�O�xrwxx ���o�y�►x��
�0��1r����►�x�,
IINC..
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac®winternet.com
MEMORANDUM - via fax transmission
TO: Mike Robertson / Elaine Beatty
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 19 October 2000
RE: Otsego - Stonegate Estates; Revised Landscaping
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.18
PAGES: 4
Our office has received another revised landscape plan (Exhibit A) for the above project.
This revision is intended to address the comments outlined in our correspondence of
October 17, 2000 regarding the previous submissions. The changes to the landscape plan
include:
Provision of additional planting materials along 851 Street and CSAH 42 necessary
to provide staggered planting rows with trees within each row not more than 20 feet
on center. We would also note that there is no minimum number of trees that must
be provided for the townhouse element of the project. Each development is
required to provide whatever landscaping is necessary to meet the screening and
amenity needs as determined by the Planning Commission and City Council The
City does establish minimum landscape requirements for single family lots as part
of the development contract, requiring that two trees be planted for each lot.
A berm has been provided behind the townhouses block designated as block 5 of
the second phase. According to the applicant, this is the extent of berming that can
be provided in consideration of necessary site drainage and the existing gas line_
The landscape plan for the traffic circle has been revised to provide a formal
arrangement of shrubs surrounding a single Pin Oak tree. We would also suggest
that perennials could be added at the outside perimeter of the proposed shrubs to
further enhance the amenity.
OCT -19-2000 10:12 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02iO4
• The plantings previously proposed to be installed on Outlot A have been removed
from the landscape plan_ The City will be responsible for design and development
of the future park.
It is our opinion that the revised landscape plan satisfactorily addresses the intent of the
preliminary plat approval condition, provided that additional plantings are added to the
traffic circle area as recommended above_
If there are further questions on this issue prior to the City Council meeting on Monday,
October 23, 2000, please do not hesitate to call me.
pc_ Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
John Anderson
Gary Harris
Page 2 of 4
OCT -19-2000 10:13 _ NAAACY�']��ff� 612 595 9837
MO '. C � I V�sw..n�G iv +�I DSV»-+ � ... .. v.�w.♦ w .1.iG1 IV IV L�
'ONI LN3MdO'MA3Q Noscr i `1
"^^iO0 k^' � w°�°r—• —:mo = „„ „�,� � -�sa Y.r.FrosaY � Sao way S31v153 31VJ3N0 7�
cis G if C
VC II� 4 I
i
1.71 f !+ ,
x I
S� f
a uH m I �a�Jd0A7xac�-q
;, I
rrn.nor inrwr: nrrn
o3 ° I
I I I
I. I
II I
I
I
I
P. 03/04
EXHIBIT A-1
OCT 1 620
{L f;eVuieuu. ND 1 1;
ENGINEERING REVIEWS-e��
Hakanson Residential Subdivision UTILITY PLANS
Anderson for the City of Otsego
Assoc., Inc.
by
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
Submitted to: Mike Robertson, Administrator
cc: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk, :
Dan Licht, City Planner
Andy MacArthur, City Attomey
John Oliver & Assoc., Developer's Eng. & Surv.
John Anderson, Tollefson Development
Reviewed by: Lawrence G. Koshak, PE
Ronald J. Wagner, PE
Date: October 12, 2000
Proposed
Development: Stonegate Estates 1St Addition
Street Location
of Property: NW 1/a SE'/a Section 22, T121, R23
37.4 ± Acres, South of 85th Street and West of CSAH 42
Applicant: John Oliver & Associates
201 W. Travelers Trail, Suite 200
Burnsville, MN 55337
Developer: Tollefson Development
Purpose: 16 single family detached homes with 144 townhomes, quad
homes & 6 piexes.
Jurisdictional Agencies:
(but not limited to): City of Otsego, Wright County
Permits Required
(but not limited to):NPDES
Considerations:
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2219\ot2219RVWiCP.doc
INFORMATION AVAILABLE
Final Plat of Stonegate Estates 1St Addition, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc., Land Surveyor
Final Grading Plan of Stonegate Estates 1 st Addition, 9/26/00, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc.,
Land Surveyor
Final Construction Plan of Stonegate Estates 1 st Addition, 9/29/00, by John Oliver & Assoc.,
Inc., Engineer
Stormwater Computations, 10/5/00, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc., Eng.
City of Otsego Engineering Manual, March 1999
Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410 — EAW Requirement
Stonegate Estates Preliminary Tree Planting Plan, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc. 8/3/00
Trunk Stormwater Facilities Study for Portions of Lefebvre Watershed, March 1999
City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, February 1991
National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991
Geotechnical Exploration of Stonegate Estates, by American Engineering Testing, Inc.,
6/9/00
Stonegate Estates Stormwater Drainage Report, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc., 10/5/00
Stonegate Estates Specification & Proposal, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc. 9/00
Stonegate Estates 1 st Addition Specifications & Proposal, by John Oliver & Assoc., Inc. 9/00
SHEETS 3 TO 13
1. Written scale in upper right corner of profile must either be removed or replaced with
a bar scale due to half size plans which may cause confusion.
2. A note to the affect of calling out all outlots being covered with a drainage & utility
easement.
3. Lighten future phases & label phases in profile. (water main lengths should reflect
Phase 1 only)
Page 1
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2219\ot2219RVW1CP.doc
SHEET 2
1. Replace the dashed line with a solid bold line for the line which separates Phase 1
from future phases.
2. Lighten future phases & label future phases.
SHEETS 3 TO 7
1. Sanitary manhole inverts must be labeled for each individual invert & must have a 10'
drop for same size pipe or match 8/10 point for different size pipe.
2. A note referencing the hydrant distance of 5' from back of curb must be shown.
SHEET 6
1. Correct watermain length to reflect Phase 1 installation.
SHEET 7
1. Hydrant 7 is to be included in Phase 1 and the phase line must be adjusted and the
length of watermain shown in profile.
SHEETS 9,12 & 13
1. Catch basin information (inverts, rims) must be shown.
SHEET 11
1. Note to the affect that barbwire fences should have been removed during grading.
2. Note to the affect that the woven wire fence was removed between right of way of
83`d St. at Developer's cost.
3. Note to the affect of removal of gravel driveway to pump house and location of curb
cut at Developer's cost.
4. Vertical curve data for all curves must be shown.
5. Curb cuts and bike path removal at the location of 83`d St. must be shown. Removal
and curb cuts at Developer's cost.
6. Note to the effect that the removal of 83`d St. cul-de-sac and re -shaping of inslopes is
required by the Contractor, and it is at Developer's expense.
SHEET 14
1. Wooden skimmer structure is not allowed.
Page 2
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\2219\ot2219RVW1CP.doc
SPECIFICATIONS
1. Page GC 4 of 4 should read "Otsego" not "Belle Plaine".
2. The special provisions must include the requirement of televising sanitary sewer
regardless of weather or not all visual inspection, leakage testing and deflection
testing passes. This is in contradiction to the existing CEAM spec found in 2621 Pg.
15 Part M.
3. Televising of sanitary sewer must be included in the bid schedule.
Storm sewer calculations have been checked, and we have the following comments:
1. The pipe from CBMH 110 to CBMH 109 carriers a flow of 27.87 cfs at 0.45% and
must be sized to a 30" RCP.
2. CB106 must be lowered approximately .5' to allow 2' minimum cover over top of pipe.
We have included a set of redlined plans to assist you in your corrections or additions.
Please send us two sets of plans for our review & one original cover sheet for signature and
final approval.
For clarification, when this set of plans meets approval it is for Phase 1 only. Phase 2 and
Phase 3 construction plans will be approved separately.
Stormwater pond review is being completed and will be ready soon.
If you have any questions or comments you may contact me at 763/427-5860.
Sincerely,
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
Ronald agne E
rjw/pm
Enclosure
Page 3
\\Haot\Shared Docs\Municipaf\AOTSEGO\2219\ot2219RVW1CP.doc
NOIRTIAWIST ASSOCMAxRID CONSULTANTS, yNC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 18 October 2000
RE: Otsego - 1-94 West Industrial Park; Final Plat Revisions
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.31
Rhea Development, Inc. has submitted revised plans for their final plat application. This
application had been tabled to allow the developer to address issues with the final plat and
development plan for this industrial park. Subject to further comment from the City
Engineer regarding the revised plans, the City Council may approve the final plat subject
to the following conditions:
1. All existing residential and agricultural buildings are demolished.
2. All grading and easement issues are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer and the Otsego Creek Watershed Board.
3. The applicant shall demonstrate that all lots have adequate area for primary and
secondary septic systems and well facilities, subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer.
4. Park and trail dedication shall be made as a cash fee in lieu of land in accordance
with the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to review of the Parks and Recreation
Commission and approval of the City Council.
5. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and post all required
securities and fees, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
6. Comments of other City Staff.
pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
NORTOWRST AS$OCMATto CONSULTANTS" INC,
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 4 October 2000
RE: Otsego - 1-94 West Industrial Park; Final Plat
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.31
BACKGROUND
, 3
Rhea Company has submitted a final plat for a 12 lot industrial subdivision located at
Jalger Avenue/70 Street in the southwest portion of the community to be titled 1-94 West
Industrial Park". A preliminary plat, entitled "Bauerly Industrial Park", was previously
approved concurrent with a rezoning to 1-2, General Industrial District on August 12, 2000.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A: Site Location
Exhibit B: Preliminary Plat
Exhibit C: Final Plat
ANALYSIS
Preliminary Plat Consistency. The proposed final plat is generally consistent with the
number of lots and layout of the approved preliminary plat. Specific issues related to the
preliminary and final plat are identified in subsequent paragraphs. The final plat must be
revised to include all title sheets and information required by the Subdivision Ordinance
and Engineering Manual, including items outlined in the City Engineer's memo of October
2, 2000.
Existing Buildings. There is an existing residence and agricultural buildings on the
subject site. With the rezoning of the site, these uses are non -conforming and
incompatible with anticipated industrial development. A condition of preliminary plat
approval was that these structures be removed.
Lot Requirements. The 1-2 District requires a minimum lot size of 2.0 acres and minimum
lot width of 200 feet. All of the proposed lots, including Lot 1, Block 2, meet or exceed
these minimum requirements.
Grading and Drainage.
Grading and Drainage. The applicant has submitted a revised grading and drainage
plan. Easements have been provided at the perimeter of each lot and over proposed
ponding areas and wetlands. All grading and easement issues are subject to the City
Engineer's approval. The plat may also be subject to review and approval by the Otsego
Creek Watershed Board.
Utilities. The proposed lots are to be served by individual septic and well systems. The
applicant must provide information demonstrating that there is adequate area on each lot
for a primary and secondary septic system. There is specific concern with regards to the
western portion of the parcel which was disturbed during construction of the MNRoad
facility. All utilities are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Streets. The final plat includes a public street intersecting 70m Street to provide internal
access for all of the proposed lots. The street has a right-of-way of 84 feet consistent with
Plate #102 of the Engineering Manual. The design and location of all streets shall be
subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Park Dedication. Section 7 o the Subdivision Ordinance requires park and trail dedication
for industrial properties of 10% of the estimated market value of the property prior to
development, in lieu of land. The applicant will be required to make an appropriate
dedication in lieu of land with approval of the final plat.
Development Plan. The City requires that a development plan be submitted that
illustrates the plat and information regarding buildable area, drainfield locations drainage
and lot sizes and dimensions. This plan must be provided prior to issuance of any building
permits.
Development Contract. If the final plat is approved, the applicant will be required to enter
into a development contract with the City and post all required fees and securities. The
development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
CONCLUSION
The proposed final plat is consistent with the approved preliminary plat and applicable
conditions of approval. There is a number of information details that must yet be provided
or revised prior to the final plat be suitable for recording. As such, we would recommend
that the City Council approve the 1-94 West Industrial Park Final Plat subject to the
conditions outlined below or table the application.
-2-
1. All existing residential and agricultural buildings are demolished.
2. The final plat is revised to include all information required by the Subdivision
Ordinance and Engineering Manual, subject to City Staff review and approval.
3. All grading and easement issues are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer and the Otsego Creek Watershed Board.
4. The applicant shall demonstrate that all lots have adequate area for primary and
secondary septic systems and well facilities, subject to review and approval of the
City Engineer.
5. A development plan illustrating buildable area, drainfield locations, setbacks and
lot dimensions is submitted prior to issuance of any building permits, subject to City
Staff review and approval.
6. All the design of all streets shall be subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
7. Park and trail dedication shall be made as a cash fee in lieu of land in accordance
with the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to review of the Parks and Recreation
Commission and approval of the City Council.
8. The applicant shall enter into a development contract and post all required
securities and fees, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
9. Comments of other City Staff.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
Steve Scharber
-3-
NF.n.kC
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
r \ c
AY
IN
I \
•\ � ti _
\ q _
Y
r_
P<
I y
r -
s'
,(:- 0 �R.a :'r,P.^.F ��...: R::J:� ... .. �nC. a ---t
t Mebebftt a:0
e4 .
W=X= x•2� Gt (aNn be
-EM: a� m.rr. w
�
�'rtsxrt
-
11) SeMe MYeC 6. NE
by teeth lII !1J)')-WM
h (3101 !tD-?TS)
EXHBIT 8
O TSEGO INDUSTRIAL PARK
EXHIBIT C-1
Jon Oliver 6 Aeaodsf*s.
SKEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS
"I
N
xptin EwE P rME SOUrn I/: 121"61151
ME SE i/t, SEC
III
-- N89'41'39'W 2625.25--
I II 700,pp---------------1
1 I I
I
ssa \
1 1
I II
81
uil
&
-I
GRAPHIC SCALE
I
loo a 5o 190 zoo
II
I r.l l
J
I
SCALE IN FTET
1 LIQ
W
I 811
JI
utility Eoe.menl.
U�>_
nparN
EnS] tine a rnf spvrR IR
/
U.E K ixE SWM - fEET Di inf SE. I/t Or' rfK
a(a
W OI EE inf iE 1/1
I �f'z2• I I ,,
Z OD
r'
W
327.82 a.`I I _r \
1
J
>
s n
Z
iii
C ___
Q -I
e.in la rest r, . en ouwoe a
cose
—Na9'!I'39'W— 35201 \,p3��J•
f \
. l
a �ghtpor'o a e.
mn9 s fr«i
yAok.G4
_
/,,�,
—
71ST STREET N.E_ t"�L�o ` \�
_ I
N
aidtx, a oNwl� and ads
lot„e. e. en..n ant . 0.1
f--
of
Z
II ?BJ \ \'iI
oI
J
nth
�t
of Sec 27� T'at. .aw
121. 2t .med
89'39'33' rest
olt E wq
MW E W r
I
0 coots. a/2 incn x Ia inch hon monum.nt
! t .IN pl "ti, plug "—p” 21)29.
—
2 mlI I
aI
I
I
.Denote. I/2 Inch . It Inch iron on —
811 rrni
R
rilh o plastic plug at=ped R.L.S. 21729.
tot b. 0V itt in IoteEr of r._,ding this plot.
�n n
- _
LN's'P, pA5P4E.\'7' ��y-r,���
I
• Denotes 'con monument found.
T
—I
"I
II---Jlie G,90'JJ�jI'r—_
'2
�_„33.0
29500
zao.91 !7s
_–:M�Ij�K
�'.
0'.�0 I 1489'38 55'E
„
-39.33-W
3W.71
�ry
N89 1148,82-p
3
n tits a rrc a 1/e a ixE sE 1/t. tMc 17 ... �.. -� t_ ;: u caoua ci rlc sWTn 1 ��'
.— . - V red sf Ira. SEn :n r 1
EXHIBIT C-1
Jon Oliver 6 Aeaodsf*s.
SKEET 3 OF 3 SHEETS
�9/18/00
1 /
L_��__
-IX
/.r
y.
3
flaIf
x
v .-
/ tip•/\\ :�
rc,1 r.L
/
.Z•. / ,r?j• / r� ///b�
1
L\i
A
, +n
At
n
\
p
LY
G� /av / I •�S \ L -
1
\)
Co FC
I 1
1
y04
��----t40.Se__ -il = NOo'le'21'E 57Loe J �'i
r------- ------ -
_----- _--------------------
I
• - • 0
0 30 So 00 659
'
q
I
IL o
li�
1
E�
Cg • ns
E �C'•
I 1 1
13$ cin ui a nc sx. I/• I 1 x
W ,Ix sE 1/4. MC. n.
I
".YA SA
co
18
Ig
A
IPPO
A
•u0� I le'21i s71.51 L__- I � q
1
+ y
GIN
/
!-
Q
I y
I
•'eg �g
•
a
\ �
MATCH LINE
N
m
x
m
1
0
W
OTSEGO INDUSTRIAL PARK
OTSEGO, MN
GRADING PLAN
John OMver d Aasocletes, Arc.
ayvNnY• r..n( n.nwou
E33g Ovdye Avn•ve
A'Ik RWer, Nvn•«uta SSJ90
(6IEJ1(I-R0>E (PAIJI(I-6386
EDI I. hav,4re 00
tlornevlll•. Afinneeob 3399)
(6IEJ9Y1-90(S (PAXJ391-90(9
er OY cerllfY that IhM Dbn.
iciliuolion, w newt wa pf
uerWaf my difeal uI
IwIMI I c Lwanpd Pro
linear un3e IhD laws of Ihi
Mir�na�ola.
9/11/00 Reg. No. 26777
DESIGN BY: DLC
DRAWN BY: TCL
CHECKED BY: DLC
ND.: 7928 10-01
DESCRIPTION
iiia
$
A
�FQ � �
I
YYYYY
m
x
m
1
0
W
OTSEGO INDUSTRIAL PARK
OTSEGO, MN
GRADING PLAN
John OMver d Aasocletes, Arc.
ayvNnY• r..n( n.nwou
E33g Ovdye Avn•ve
A'Ik RWer, Nvn•«uta SSJ90
(6IEJ1(I-R0>E (PAIJI(I-6386
EDI I. hav,4re 00
tlornevlll•. Afinneeob 3399)
(6IEJ9Y1-90(S (PAXJ391-90(9
er OY cerllfY that IhM Dbn.
iciliuolion, w newt wa pf
uerWaf my difeal uI
IwIMI I c Lwanpd Pro
linear un3e IhD laws of Ihi
Mir�na�ola.
9/11/00 Reg. No. 26777
DESIGN BY: DLC
DRAWN BY: TCL
CHECKED BY: DLC
ND.: 7928 10-01
DESCRIPTION
(D
0) co co
0 0 0 0
3n 160
m John -0#Ver& Assocletea, Inc.
x OTSEGO INDUSTRIAL PARK
i OTSEGO, MN A--
ED —1.Aft
I (14X)141-5611
0 71ST STREET NE
v PLAN AND PROFILE
TE: 9/14/00
BY.. mc
poser umlar Ina lows °1 Iha 31uIa DRAWN BY: TGL
MinnafalU. CHECKED BY: OEC
I)EXT —_HONE
X R". N°. X ME NO.: 792a.10-0.1
DESCRRIM
a
m....
iaD-E'E
w....
1R Et NE:
w
'972.40
.............
..........
.1.40...... !
.9*46
w
9706y
(,v',1I
F
.......... 9745
.50
97.195
.w iyc
02
w
....
OD
. ..........
+00 0" (Q".Do)
..
....
RPM,
M....
9¢i si
a
d ....
q
m 9-25
. .........
gq
7
a
m......
w ....
M ....
00 0R
. ......
..........
.... ....
.... ....
.... ....
0
w ....
IDO
G��DC BREAK
p
.........
.... . ....
....
m....
m.... m ....
(D
0) co co
0 0 0 0
3n 160
m John -0#Ver& Assocletea, Inc.
x OTSEGO INDUSTRIAL PARK
i OTSEGO, MN A--
ED —1.Aft
I (14X)141-5611
0 71ST STREET NE
v PLAN AND PROFILE
TE: 9/14/00
BY.. mc
poser umlar Ina lows °1 Iha 31uIa DRAWN BY: TGL
MinnafalU. CHECKED BY: OEC
I)EXT —_HONE
X R". N°. X ME NO.: 792a.10-0.1
DESCRRIM
Michael C. Couri-
Andrew J. MacArthur
Marcus W. Miller
Robert T. Ruppe•-
•Also licrosad in RGnou
•'ALw licmW in California
October 17, 2000
City Council Members
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: Restrictive Covenants
Dear Council Members:
COURI & MACARTHUR
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376-0369
(763) 497-1930
(763) 497-2599 (FAX)
couriandmacarthur®pobox. com
In general, the City does not become involved in private restrictive covenants. These
covenants are agreements regarding land use within a certain plat, or other defined area,
which run with the land and are recorded against all affected properties. Because they are
recorded all property owners purchasing property to which the covenants apply take that
property with notice of the contents of the covenants, and by purchasing property with
knowledge of the covenants they have agreed to those restrictions.
Restrictive covenants contain their own internal language regarding enforcement and
amendment. Typically, it is up to the Homeowners Association or the other property
owners in the subdivision or area in question to enforce the covenants.
The covenants do not affect City Ordinance control over the area, and the City would not
normally make an inquiry regarding whether or not an activity was allowed under private
covenants when an individual property owner applies for a City permit or other approval.
The covenants also do not affect the restrictions contained within a City approval or a
Developer's Agreement.
Generally, City review of proposed restrictive covenants is only to the extent that they
relate to and are consistent with conditions imposed by the City on the development, or
relate to assurances that private facilities will be properly maintained.
In general, it is best that the City have no direct involvement in these private Agreements.
Letter to Otsego City Council
October 18, 2000
Page 2
I will be available to further discuss this matter at the regularly scheduled Otsego City
Council meeting on Monday evening.
Very yours,
ew J a
COURI & MACARTHUR
k12
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk October 23, 2000
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
7.1. Addition of The Pointe Plat and North Pine Aggregate (Emmerich)
Property to LeFebvre Watershed Storm Water Impact Fee District -
by Resolution and as shown on Exhibit E Attached.
7.2. Addition of Stonegate, Country Ridge and the SW 1/4 of NE 1/4 of Sec.
22, Twp. 188, R.23 Property to LeFebvre Watershed Storm Water Impact
Fee District by Resolution ad as shown on Exhibit E Attached.
7.3. Consider Approval of Addendum #1 to Trunk Storm Water Facilities Study
For Portions of LeFebvre Watershed - March 1999 by Resolution.
7.4. Consider Approval of Partial Payment to EnComm Midwest for
Construction of the Pumphouse #1 in the amount of $8,393.18. The
retainage is at 1% of the total, or $3,937.05.
7.5. Consider approval of Change Order No. 1 to COP 00-03, 88th Street
Sanitary Sewer, Water -main and Storm Sewer. The Change Order to S.R.
Weidema is for $2,979.00 for larger size storm sewer manholes.
7.6. Any Other Engineering business
BACKGROUND:
7.1. through 7.5. Larry Koshak, City Engineer will be present to review these items with
the Council. See attached information.
7.3. This is for any other Engineering Business that may arise.
RECONMI ENDATION:
These items are for Council discussion and decision.
Thanks,
Elaine
Michael C. Couri- COURT & MACARTHUR
Andrew J• MacArthur
Attorneys at Law
Marcus W. Miller
705 Central Avenue East
Robert T. Ruppe--
PO Box 369
st. Michael, MN 55376-0369
*A Lw ruemed in 11fi,ois
(763) 497-1930
«ALso licMW in Califomia
(763) 497-2599 (FAX)
couriandmacanhur®pobox. com
October 23, 2000
City Council Members
City of Otsego
c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: Resolution Regarding Storm Water Impact Fee
Dear Council Members:
In reference to the City Engineer's agenda items, please find enclosed a proposed
resolution recalculating the storm water impact fee for portions of the Lefebvre
Watershed District as set forth in the Engineer's Report. These figures are based upon
amending the current Lefebvre Storm water Improvement District to include The Point
and the Northern Pine Aggregate property to the south, on which will be located a
regional pond.
Amendment of the Lefebvre Storm Water Improvement District to include The Point and
Northern Pine Aggregate property requires a public hearing. We would recommend that a
public hearing for that purpose be scheduled at the next City Council meeting.
The plat of Stonegate Estates is already located within the existing Lefebvre Storm Water
Improvement District.
nrew
urs,
cArth
COURI & MACARTHUR
Encl.
cc: Larry Koshak, City Engineer
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECALCULATING STORM WATER IMPACT FEE
WITHIN THE ESTABLISHED LEFEBVRE STORM WATER
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, the Otsego City Council previously held a public hearing and
established by resolution the Lefebvre Storm Water Improvement District; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has ordered and approved engineering studies to
establish fees for storm water impacts resulting from projected development
within areas of that watershed; and
WHEREAS, the City has constructed wastewater treatment facilities and water
facilities within areas of the watershed, which has greatly increased development
pressures; and
WHEREAS, engineering studies indicate that the established Lefebvre Storm
Water Improvement District should be amended to include additional lands to the
South; and
WHEREAS, the additional development will require further storm water drainage
infrastructure and acquisition of easements to be constructed earlier than
contemplated, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the engineer to recalculate the present
storm water impact fee based upon these additional costs, and taking into account
increased projections for easement acquisition based partially upon the increased
land values in the area; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer has prepared a Trunk Storm Water Facilities Study for
Portions of the Lefebvre Watershed District dated October, 2000 and attached
hereto and herein incorporated by reference; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to schedule a public hearing shortly for the purpose
of amending the established Lefebvre Storm Water Improvement District to
include lands to the south, specifically the recently approved plat of The Point and
the land south of that presently owned by Northern Pine Aggregate which will be
the site of a proposed regional pond.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF OTSEGO as follows:
1. That the Otsego City Council hereby adopts the Trunk Storm Water Facilities
Study for Portions of the Lefebvre Watershed dated October, 2000 prepared by
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., as the basis for reevaluating the storm water
impact fee for certain portions of the Lefebvre Storm Water Improvement District.
2. That based upon the report, the impact fee for the referenced portions of the
Lefebvre Storm Water Improvement District is hereby established at $1,500.00 per
gross acre.
ADOPTED BY THE OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL this day of October,
2000.
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
OCT. 23. EU0W j
TO:OTSEGO
Hakanson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303
1�01H Anderson phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520
Assoc., Inc.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Andy MacArthur, Attorney
oo; Mike Robertson, Administrator
laine Bea Cle
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak, P.E., City Engineer
DATE; October 23, 2000
RE: Taxing District Land Exchange
The Lefebvre Watershed Taxing District will increase land area with the platting of the
Pointe and inclusion of North Pine Aggregate property in Section 26, 27, 34 & 35.
A. That land taken out of the Rice -Foster Lake Taxing District is as follows;
• The North 500' of the West 750 feet of NW 1/4 of NW 1/4 of Section 35, Twp.
118, Range 23.
The East 400' of the NE'/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 34, Twp. 118, Range
23.
SE '/4 of SE '/4 of Section 27, Twp. 116, Range 23.
SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 of SE �/4 of Section 27, Twp. 118, Range 23.
• SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 26, Twp. 118, Range 23.
B. That land taken out of the South Mississippi Taxing District is as follows:
+ The west 750 feet of NW 1/4 of NW 1/a of Section 35, Twp. 118, Range 23,
except the N 500 feet thereof.
All of the SW '/4 of SW 1/4 of the Section 26 except the SW 1/4 thereof.
Civil &Municipal
Engineering
Land Survryingfor
Maa11Shared DocsWunicipaMOTSEG04419\ct419am2.doc
1�11Assoc.,
Hakanson 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303
Anderson Phone:763/427-5860 Fax:763/427-0520
Inc.
CITY OF OTSEGO
CITY ENGINEER
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
10/23/00
Item 7.1 Consider passing a Resolution adding the Pointe Plat and North Pine
Aggregate (Emmerich) property to the Lefebrve Watershed Storm Water
Impact Fee District. Refer to attached Exhibit E in Item 7.3 for location of
the area.
Item 7.2 Consider passing a Resolution adding the proposed Stonegate Plat,
existing Country Ridge Plat, and the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/a of Section 22,
Twp. 118, Range 23 (Kevin Lefebrve) to the Lefebrve Watershed Storm
Water Impact Fee District. Refer to attached Exhibit E in Item 7.3 for
location of the area.
Although the Lefebrve Watershed covers a large area, not all of the
watershed lies within the Storm Water Impact Fee District. The study
approved by council on April 8, 1999 constitutes the original Impact Fee
District. With the approval of plats for the Pointe and Stonegate, the City
needs to bring these and adjacent properties into the fee district to assist
in providing funding sources for the trunk storm water facilities. We
recommend passage of both Items 7.1 and 7.2.
Item 7.3 Consider a Resolution approving Amendment #1 to the Trunk Storm
Water Facilities Study for portions of Lefebrve Watershed — 4/8/99.
Amendment #1 incorporates the new added area noted in 7.1 and 7.2
along with the cost of trunk facilities required to add these areas. A
recalculation is provided in the Amendment #1 for the impact fee on a
gross acre basis. The recommended new gross acre fee is $1,500. The
amount the City has been using since 4/99 is $1,250. The increases are
largely due to obtaining easements for the trunk facilities. Land value
shows significant increases in the past 18 months.
See the attached Amendment #1.
Civil 6' Municipal
Engineering 2 5
Council Agenda Items, Page 1 Land Surveying for
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEG0\901\2000\ot901agenda 10-23-00-doc
Item 7.4 Consider approval of a Partial Payment to EnComm Midwest for
construction of the Pumphouse #1 in the amount of $8,393.18. The
retainage is at 1 % of the total, or $3,937.05. The checklist item has been
taken care of except the Operation & Maintenance Manuals, and several
minor building items at the pumphouse.
We recommend the partial payment approval.
Item 7.5 Consider approval of Change S
O �1Sewer. Order r The Order # Oe Street
to
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain an
S.R. Weidema is for $2,979.00.
The reason for the change is that the manufacturer of the manholes will
not guarantee that the manholes specified are large enough to accept the
pipes being placed in the manhole. The smaller manholes would not have
structural integrity. The inside area of the manhole needs an appropriate
space to form the inverts, and the smaller ones did not have adequate
room.
We concur with the manufacturer that a larger size will facilitate more
working room and maintain the structural integrity. We recommend
approval of the Change Order.
Item 7.6 Any Other Engineering Business
A. Request Council to approve resolutions for the COP Project 00-02
and 00-03, the 88t Street & Quaday Ave. Sanitary Sewer,
Watermain and Storm Sewer Project. The Council awarded the
bids to S.R. Weidema at the last meeting, however, there needs to
be a resolution instead of a motion on this project.
Hakanson
HUM Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
Council Agenda Items, Page 2
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\901\2000\ot901agenda I0-23-00-doc
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Trunk Storm Water Facilities Study
for Portions of the
Lefebvre Watershed
October 2000
City of Otsego
Prepared by:
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
3601 Thurston Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
(763) 427-5860
I hereby certify that this Plan, Specification or Report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under State of
Minnesota Statutes 326.02 to 326.16.
e G. KoshaV,, PE
J12 -A
Reg. No.
Ron Id J. agner .E. Reg. No.
h)//0G/1100
Date
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
Page
Table 2, Summary of Cost Estimate 1
Table 3, Impact Fee Re -Calculation 2
Construction Cost Estimates
Structure 611, 612, 613, 712 3
Structure 631, 651, 662 4
Structure 721, 841, 851 5
Structure 871, 872, 881 6
Structure 431 L, Quaday Ave. (72nd St. to 78`' St.) 7
North Pine Aggregate Regional Pond, CSAH 42 to Ditch Segment 551 8
Ditch Segments 551, 641 9
Ditch Segments 651, 871 10
Exhibits and Figures
Exhibit A Benefited Area
Exhibit E Proposed Additional Impact Fee Area
Figure 1 Lefebvre Watershed Study Area
Figure 2 Lefebvre Watershed Overall Plan
Figure 4 Proposed Land Use Map for Lefebvre Study Area
AMENDMENT NO. 1
to
Trunk Storm Water Facilities Study
for Portions of the
Lefebvre Watershed
October 2000
City of Otsego
INTRODUCTION
The Amendment No. 1 was prepared with council approval of the Pointe Plat and the
Stonegate Plat, and other adjacent property that was outside of the study area.
The costs of trunk storm water facilities required to accommodate the storm water runoff
addition of the proposed developments and adjacent property was added to the original costs
in the 4/99 study.
With the added cost of trunk facilities, it was determined that the calculation for the gross acre
unit cost of the impact fee needed recalculation. The cost of facilities shown in following
pages divided by the total number of gross acres total in the revised impact fee area resulted
in a revised fee.
The following pages of the amendment detail the method of calculation of trunk facilities.
Some facilities have already been constructed by City Projects and Developments. Other
facilities are about to be constructed by the spring of 2001.
The construction of the proposed facilities will continue to be put in place to accommodate
the ultimate development of the area.
Amanrlmant Nn 1 — IntrnriuCtion
Table 2
Summary of Cost Estimate for
Trunk Stormwater Facilities
Lefebvre Watershed Study Area
(REVISED October 17, 2000)
NOTE. Italicized and Bold Represents Actual Cost
Sha rel M uncpaVOtsegd406a/ot419Trun kStormwaterFacilities.xls -
n1i ainn
EST. COST
EST. COST
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION
STATUS
March 1999
October 2000
Stormsewer Construction
Structure 611
Constructed COP 99-02
$85,500
Structure 612
Constructed COP 99-02
$72,300
$106,606
Structure 613
Constructed COP 99-02
$61,300
Structure 712
Constructed COP 99-02
$74,500
Structure 631 (48' under CSAH 42)
Not Yet Constructed
$40,900
$43,050
Structure 651 ( 42' under 78th St.)
Constructed COP 99-02
$34,100
$15,140
Structure 662
Not Yet Constructed
$34,600
$34,600
Structure 721
Not Yet Constructed
$28,000
$28,000
Structure 841
Not Yet Constructed
$21,000
$21,000
Structure 851
Constructed as part of Crimson Pond 1A
$11,600
$3,665
Structure 871
Not Yet Constructed
$26,800
$26,800
:ure 872
Not Yet Constructed
$28,600
$28,600
Structure 881
Not Yet Constructed
$16,200
$16,200
Structure 431 L
Will be constructed as part of Stonegate
$8,300
Quaday Ave. Structure (72nd to 78th Street)
Will be constructed as part of COP 00-02
$172,900
North Pine Aggregate Regional Pond
Not Yet Constructed
$208,850
Ditch Restoration
Ditch Segment 541, CSAH 42 to Ditch Segment 551
Not Yet Constructed
$36,500
Ditch Segment 551 - Highway 101 to County Road 42
Not Yet Constructed
$72,300
$72,300
Ditch Segment 641 - County Road 42 to Future 78th Street
Portion Const. By Prairie Creek 1st Add.
$22,200
$22,200
$7,246.30
Ditch Segment 651 - Future 78th Street to DNR Wetland 6W (East side)
Not Yet Constructed
$23,700
$23,700
Ditch Segment 871 - DNR Wetland 6W (West side) to Structure 841
Portion Constructed by Backes
$48,400
$48,400
No Credit Yet
North of 42 Ditch Easement Acquisition (11.4 Acres @ $23,000 per Acre):
$262,200
South of 42 Ditch Easement Acquisition (19.5 Acres 0 $7,700 per Acre):
$150,150
SUBTOTAL:
$702,000
$1,329,161
Overhead: Including Engineering, Legal, Administration
'Contingency (30% :
$210,600
$398,748
Easement 22.8 acres ® $7000/Acre
$159,600
TOTAL:
$1,072,200
$1,727,909
NOTE. Italicized and Bold Represents Actual Cost
Sha rel M uncpaVOtsegd406a/ot419Trun kStormwaterFacilities.xls -
n1i ainn
March 1999 Benefited Area = 831 Acres
October 2000 Additional Benefited Area = 320 Acres
831 + 320 = 1151 Acres Total Benefited Area
Impact Fee Calculation:
$1,727,909 (from Table 2)
1151 Acres
Impact Fee —> $1,500 /Gross Acre
Construction Cost Estimate
Structure 611, 612, 613, & 712
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
30" Storm Sewer
2610
LF
$33.40
$87,174.00
2
84" Manholes
1
EA
$3,257
$3,257.00
3
72" Manholes
5
EA
$2,755
$13,775.00
4
Work Completed by
Pheasant Ridge
1
LS
$2,400
$2,400.00
Total $106,606.00
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406a/ot419TrunkStormwaterFaciIities.As ^
. .. ,. � nig amn
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 631
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
48" Storm Sewer(Jacking)
88
LF
$375
$33,000
2
48" Flared End Section
2
EA
$2,000
$4,000
3
Riprap
75
CY
$50
$3,750
4
Granular Filter
40
CY
$20
$800
5
Restoration
1
LS 1
$1,000
$1,000
6
Traffic Control
1
LS 1
$500
$500
Total $43,050
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 651
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
42" Storm Sewer
144
LF
$69.90
$10,065.60
2
42" Flared End Section
1
EA
$1,085.00
$1,085.00
3
Spill Way Structure
1
LS
$3,300.00
$3,300.00
4
Riprap
15
CY
$45.80
$687.00
Total $15,137.60
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 662
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
21 " Storm Sewer
500
LF
$45
$22,500
2
21 " Flared End Section
1
EA
$700
$700
3
Junction Manholes
2
EA
$5,000
$10,000
4
Riprap
7
CY
$50
$350
5
Granular Filter
4
CY
$20
$80
6
Restoration
1
LS
$1,000
$1,000
Total $34,600
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406a/ot419TrunkStormwaterFaciIities. As
Sheet: 631,651,662 Amendment No. 1 - Page 4 10/18/00
Cost Estimate
Structure 721
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
36" Storm Sewer 2)
128
LF
$100
$12,800
2
36" Flared End Section
4
EA
$1,400
$5,600
3
Riprap
60
CY
$50
$3,000
4
Granular Filter
30
CY
$20
$600
5
Restoration
1
LS
$1,000
$1,000
6
Remove & Dispose of Existing Pie
50
LF
$20
$1,000
7
Berm Construction
1
LS
$4,000
$4,000
Total $28,000
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 841
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
36" Storm Sewer
88
LF
$100
$8,800
2
36" Flared End Section
1
EA
$1,400
$1,400
3
Spillway Structure
1
LS
$5,000
$5,000
4
Riprap
30
CY
$50
$1,500
5
Granular Filter
15
CY
$20
$300
6
Berm Construction
1
LS
$4,000
$4,000
Total $21,000
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 851
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
21 " Storm Sewer
115
LF
$21.90
$2,518.50
2
21' Flared End Section
2
EA
$380.00
$760.00
3
Riprap
8.4
CY
$45.80
$384.72
Total $3,663.22 1
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406x/ot419TrunkStormwaterFaciIities. As
Sheet: 721,841,851 Amendment No. 1 - Page 5 10/18/00
Construction Cost Estimate
Structure 871
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity_Price
Unit
Unit
Extension
1
30" Storm Sewer 2)
192
LF
$80
$15,360
2
30" Flared End Section
4
EA
$1,000
$4,000
3
Riprap
40
CY
$50
$2,000
4
Granular Filter
20
CY
$20
$400
5
Restoration
1
LS
$1,000
1 $1,000
6
Berm Construction
1
LS
$4,000
1 $4,000
Total $26,800
Construction Cost Estimate
Structure 872
Item
Description
Estimated
Quanti
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
33" Storm Sewer 2
176
LF
$90
$15,840
2
33" Flared End Section
4
EA
$1,200
$4,800
3
Riprap
50
CY
$50
$2,500
4
Granular Filter
25
CY
$20
$500
5
Restoration
1
LS
$1,000
1 $1,000
6
Berm Construction
1
LS
$4,000
1 $4,000
Total $28,600
Construction Cost Estimate
For Structure 881
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
18" Storm Sewer (2)
88
LF
$40
$3,520
2
18" Flared End Section
2
EA
$600
$1,200
3
Spill Way Structure
1
LS
$5,000
$5,000
5
Ri rap
24
CY
$50
$1,200
6
Granular Filter
12
CY
$20
$240
7
Restoration
1
LS
$1,000
$1,000
8
Berm Construction
1
LS
$4,000
$4,000
Total $16,200
Sh are/Mu nici pal/Otsego/406a/ot419Tru nkSto rmwaterFaci I i ti es. xl s
Sheet: 871,872,881 Amendment No. i - Page 6 10/18/00
Construction Cost Estimate For
Structure 431 L
Surge Basin on 42" Arch Equivalent Under
County Road 42
Item Description Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit Extension
Price
1 Sure Basin 1.0
EA
$7,300 $7,300
2 Rip Rap 20
Cy
$50 $1,000
Total $8,300
Construction Cost Estimate For
Quaday Ave. Structure (72nd St. to 78th Street)
Item No.
Description
Estimated Number
of Units
Unit
Unit Cost
Extension
26
18" RC Pipe Apron
1
EACH
$354.55
$354.55
27
Trash Guard for 18" Pipe Apron
1
EACH
$194.00
$194.00
'8
15" Dia. Concrete Plug
4
EACH
$59.60
$238.40
-9
15" RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V all depths)
725
LF
$21.62
$15,674.50
30
18" RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
8
LF
$30.66
$245.28
31
30" RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL III (all depths)
1746
LF
$38.95
$68,006.70
32
30" RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V all depths)
800
LF
$63.80
$51,040.00
33
Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
1
EACH
$423.00
$423.00
34
48" Storm Manhole w/Castin (11.7' and 11.8')
2
EACH
$1,425.50
$2,851.00
35
60" Storm Manhole w/Castin 12.4' to 18')
6
EACH
$2,583.00
$15,498.00
36
72" Storm Manhole w/Castin 9.6' and 7' and 10.7')
3
EACH
$3,080.00
$9,240.00
37
Furnish and Install Box Structure
1
EACH
$4,486.00
$4,486.00
38
Random Riprap Class III
5.9
CY
$72.20
$425.98
5ubotal $1bb,b[I.41
Permanent Drainage Easement 0.14 ACRE 1 $30,000 $4,200
TOTAL $172,877.41
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406a/ot419TrunkStormwaterFacilities.xls
Sheet: 431 L, Quaday Amendment No. 1 - Page 7 10/18/00
Construction Cost Estimate For
North Pine Aggregate Regional Pond
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Pond Easement
4.0
Acre
$15,000
$60,000
2
Pond Excavation
41,900
Cy
$3
$104,750
3
Skimmer Structure
1
EA
$2,500
$2,500
4
36" RCP
50
LF
$50
$2,500
5
36" RCP FES
1
EA
$500
$500
6
24" RCP
400.0
LF
$30
$12,000
7
24" RCP FES
2
EA
$300
$600
8
24" RCP Jacked
80
LF
$300
$24,000
9
48" MH
2
EA
$1,000
$2,000
Total $2U8,8bU
Construction Cost Estimate For
Ditch Segment 541
CSAH 42 to Ditch Segment 551
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Clear and Grub
7.2
Acre
$400
$2,880
2
Excavation
4,000
CY
$5
$20,000
3
Restoration
7.2
Acre
$1,500
$10,800
4
Erosion Control
1
LS
$2,820
$2,820
Total 4iJb,bUU
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406a/ot419TrunkStormwaterFacilibes.xis
Sheet: North Pine Agg Pond, 541 to 551 Amendment No. 1 - Page 8 10/18/00
Construction Cost Estimate For
Ditch Segment 551
1800 L.F. Ditch Restoration
State Highway 101 to County Road 42
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Clear and Grub
4.2
Acre
$5,000
$21,000
2
Flow Control
1
LS
$8,000
$8,000
3
Excavation
2,200
CY
$10
$22,000
4
Riprap
200
CY
$50
$10,000
5
Granular Filler
100
CY
$20
$2,000
6
Restoration
4.2
Acre
$1,500
$6,300
7
Erosion Control
1
LS
1 $3,000
1 $3,000
Total $12,300
Construction Cost Estimate For
Ditch Segment 641
1850 L.F. Ditch Restoration
County Road 42 to Future 78th Street
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Clear and Grub
4.3
Acre
$400
$1,720
2
Excavation
2,200
CY
$5
$11,000
3
Restoration
4.3
Acre
$1,500
$6,450
4
Erosion Control
1
LS
$3,000
$3,000
Total $22,200
Sha re/M un i c i pal/Otsego/406a/o t419 T ru n k S to r m wa to rFaci Ii ties. A s
Sheet: DITCH 551, 641 Amendment No. 1 - Page 9 10/18/00
Construction Cost Estimate For
Ditch Segment 651
2,000 L.F. Ditch Restoration
Future 78th Street to DNR Wetland 6W (East side)
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Clear and Grub
4.6
Acre
$400
$1,840
2
Excavation
2,400
CY
$5
$12,000
3
Restoration
4.6
Acre
$1,500
$6,900
4
Erosion Control
1
LS
$3,000
$3,000
Total $23,700
Construction Cost Estimate For
Ditch Segment 871
4200 L.F. Ditch Restoration
DNR Wetland 6W (West side) to Structure 841
Item
Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Extension
1
Clear and Grub
9.70
Acre
$400
$3,880
2
Excavation
5,000
CY
$5
$25,000
3
Restoration
9.70
Acre
$1,500
$14,550
4
Erosion Control
1
LS
1 $5,000
$5,000
Total $48,400
Share/Municipal/Otsego/406a/ot419TrunkStormwaterFaciI ities. xls
Sheet: DITCH 651, 871 Amendment No. 1 - Page 10 10/18/00
ITEM 7.4
PAY ESTIMATE #12
October 12, 2000
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Pumphouse #1
Contractor. EnComm Midwest, LLC.
Contract Amount: $392,736.00
Award Date: April 29, 1999
Completion Date: Substantial Completion by November 15, 1999, Final Completion by July 1, 2000.
Dear Council Members:
The following work has been completed on the above referenced project:
PART 1
BID SCHEDULE "A"- SITE WORK
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A": S 14,425.00
BID SCHEDULE "B" - YARD PIPING
kern 1Description
i Quantity i Unlit j
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extenslon
1 15 14" Soil Pipe
1 1801
LF I $
26.007
LF
90
$
2,340.00 i
r-16 4' Dia. Seepage Manhole
2
EA i $
2,100.00 1
EA
2
S
4,200.00 1
1 17 16" DIP Class 52
1 261
LF ; $
80.00 1
LF
26
$
2,080.00
18 10" DIP Class 52
; 61
LF 1 $
126.50
LF
6
$
759.00 €
1 19 1 8" DIP Class 52
25i
LF 1 $
48.00
LF
25
$
1,200.00
20 !Fittings
520!
LB 1 $
3.35 i
LB
520
$
1,742.00
21 1 6"Flushing Hydrant including valve & piping
11
LS { S
2,700.00E
LS
1
$
2,700.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "B":
BID SCHEDULE "C"- WELL PUMP AND APPURTENANCES
S
15,021.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE C: S 15,100.00
TOTAL PART 1: $ 44,546.00
1\ha0113hared douimuniapallaolsego1ot507o1507b1 PAY ESTIMATE #12 10/18/00
PART 2
BID SCHEDULE "A" -
Item Description
Mechanical
and Protective
j Unit i Unit Price
11 LS i $ 69.150.00! LS
1 LS j $ 45,250.00 SLS
11 LS i $ 6,200.00 1 LS
!d to Date Extension
1.0
1 $
69,150.00
1.0
$
45,250.00
1.00
$
_
6,200.00
1.0
$
_
6_5,980.00
1.000
i 9 —
84.920.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "A":
BID SCHEDULE "B" - CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Estimated
Extension
I $ 1,109.00.1
$
271,500.00
Item ;Description
Estimated
Ouantlly i Unit Unit Price
Unit Price
Used to Date !Extension
33 :Chlorine Gas Treatment
1 i
LS j $ 19,800.00 !
LS
h 1 $
19,800.00
34 ': Fluoridation & Polyphosphate Treatment
1 !
LS 1 S 5,780.00
LS
€ 1 S
5,780.00
35 I Process Water Piping for Chemical Treatment
1;
LS 1 $ 1,200.00 ^LS
$
1 $
1,200.00
38 :Booster Pump
1
LS j $ 780.00
LS
1 $
780.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "B":
BID SCHEDULE *C"- PERMITS
Item !Description
$ 27,560.00
Unit Price
$
27,560.00
SUMMARY OF COMPLETION:
PART 1:
Bid Schedule "A" - SITE WORK
Bid Schedule "B" -YARD PIPING
Bid Schedule "C" - WELL PUMP & APPURTENANCES
Total Part 1:
PART 2:
Bid Schedule "A"- PUMPHOUSE
Bid Schedule "B" - CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Bid Schedule "C"- PERMITS
Bid Schedule "D" - MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION
Total Part 2:
Altemative "A"- GENERATOR
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE:
LESS 1% RETAINAGE:
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #1
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #2
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #3
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #4
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #5
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #6
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #7
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #8
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #9
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #10
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #11
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF:
MaMshared docs\ muniapal\aotsagolot507bt507bt
Work Order #1:
Work Order #2:
Change Order #1:
Total:
$ 14,425.00
$ 15,021.00
$ 15,100.00
$ 44,546.00
$ 271, 500.00
$ 27,560.00
$ 1,214.58
$ 7,000.00
$ 307,274.58
$ 37,000.00
Unit Price
Estimated
Extension
I $ 1,109.00.1
1 $
1,109.00
Item ;Description
Quantity Unit i
Unit Price
Used to Date:
1 $
Extension
37 Permits—
1: LS $
2,000.00 ( LS
0.607
$
1,214.58
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "C"
$
3,937.05
$
1,214.58
BID SCHEDULE "D'- MOBILIZATION AND DEMOBILIZATION
$
21,522.94
$
42,576.18
Estimated
$
30,510.10
$
Item !Description
Quantity 1 Unit
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extension
38 Wobilization & Demobilization
1i LS 1 $
7,000.00 ; LS
i 1
$
7,000.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE "D":
39,478.20
$
$
7,000.00
TOTAL PART 2:
12,336.98
$
$
307,274.58
ALTERNATIVE "A": Portable Power Generator
i Estimated'
Item ;Description
I Ouardity I Unit ?
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extension
39 'Portable Power Generator as per Section 16201 s 1 ILS 1 $ 37,000.00 ; LS
1
$
37,000.00
SUMMARY OF COMPLETION:
PART 1:
Bid Schedule "A" - SITE WORK
Bid Schedule "B" -YARD PIPING
Bid Schedule "C" - WELL PUMP & APPURTENANCES
Total Part 1:
PART 2:
Bid Schedule "A"- PUMPHOUSE
Bid Schedule "B" - CHEMICAL TREATMENT
Bid Schedule "C"- PERMITS
Bid Schedule "D" - MOBILIZATION & DEMOBILIZATION
Total Part 2:
Altemative "A"- GENERATOR
TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE:
LESS 1% RETAINAGE:
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #1
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #2
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #3
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #4
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #5
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #6
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #7
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #8
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #9
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #10
LESS PARTIAL PAYMENT #11
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF:
MaMshared docs\ muniapal\aotsagolot507bt507bt
Work Order #1:
Work Order #2:
Change Order #1:
Total:
$ 14,425.00
$ 15,021.00
$ 15,100.00
$ 44,546.00
$ 271, 500.00
$ 27,560.00
$ 1,214.58
$ 7,000.00
$ 307,274.58
$ 37,000.00
Unit Price
Used to Date i
Extension
I $ 1,109.00.1
1 $
1,109.00
$ 535.14
1 $
535.14
1 3,240.00 i
1 $
3,240.00
S 4,884.14 '
$
4,884.14
$
393,704.72
$
3,937.05
$
19,674.81
$
21,522.94
$
42,576.18
$
30,510.10
$
41,405.28
$
118,688.91
$
22,377.06
$
27,720.62
$
39,478.20
$
5,083.41
$
12,336.98
$
8,393.16
PAY ESTIMATE #12
10/18/00
APPROVALS:
CONTRACTOR:
Certification by Contractor. I certify that all items and amounts are correct for the work completed to date.
Signed:
Title:
Date:
ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer. We recommend payment for work and quantities as shown.
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Signed:
Title:
OWNER:
CITY OF
Signed:
Title:
Date:
Date:
AhaMsharsd docslmuniGpailaotsego\ot5071ot507bt PAY ESTIMATE #12 10/18/00
Hakanson ITEM 7.5 Order No. 1
—
Anderson
Assoc., Inc. Date: October 18, 2000
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
Project: City of Otsego Project 2000-03
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer
Owner: City of Otsego
To: S.R. Weidema
(Contractor)
You are hereby requested to comply with the following changes from the contract plans and specifications:
Description of Changes INCREASE
(Supplemental Plans and Specifications Attached) in Contract Price
Item
No.
Shop Drawing
Proposed
Price
Bid Price
Difference
25
72" Diameter MH #18-1
$3,910.00
$2,830.00
$1,080.00
26
84" Diameter CB/MH #18-2
$4,332.00
$3,400.00
$932.00
28
96" Diameter CB/MH #18-6
$4,788.00
$3,821.00
$967.00
Totals: $ $2,979.00
Net Change in Contract Price: $ $2,979.00
kation: Three storm sewer structures required an increase in size to ensure the integrity of the
structures was not compromised and/or to allow enough room within the structure itself.
Due to the change order, the contract period will be: unchanged
Original contract Amount $ 247,750.98
Previous contract changes, Change Order # N/A to # N/A $ 0.00
Prior approved contract amount $ 247.750.98
Change in contract due to this change order $ 2,979.00
Total contract including this and previous change orders $ 249,729.98
Original contract period: 20 working days
Changed contract period from previous Change Order N/A
Contract period including this and all previous change orders: 20 working days
This document will become a supplement to the contract and all provisions will apply hereto.
Recommended:
cted
Approved by:
(Owner's Arch itect/Engineer)
(Contractor)
For the Owner (Name and Title)
Date
Date
Date
This information will be used as a record of any changes to the original construction contract.
\\Ha01 \Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\615\ot615C01 .doc
ITEM 7.6A
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer on Quaday Avenue from 72nd Street to 78th Street,
(COP #00-02) bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the
following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
S.R. Weidema
$316,939.72
Richard Knutson Inc.
$342,935.92
Landwehr Constr. Inc.
$344,411.91
Redstone Construction
$361,001.05
LaTour Construction
$374,587.46
Barbarossa & Sons
$377,345.90
Arcon Construction
$384,658.18
Northdale Construction
$414,771.84
R.L. Larson Excavating
$422,711.56
Burschville Construction
$449,306.65
Nodland Construction
$492,677.70
AND WHEREAS, it appears that S.R. Weidema of Maple Grove, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with S.R. Weidema of Maple Grove, Minnesota in the name of the city of
Otsego for the improvement of Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer on Quaday Avenue
from 72nd Street to 78th Street (COP #00-02), according to the plans and specifications
therefore approved by the city council and on file in the office of the city clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful
bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this day of
Mayor
Clerk
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\615\OT615ResACCEPT BID.doc
.2000.
ITEM 7.66
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BID
WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the improvement of
Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer on 88th Street from CSAH 42 to Quaday
Avenue (COP #00-03), bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and
the following bids were received complying with the advertisement:
S.R. Weidema
$247,750.98
Richard Knutson Inc.
$271,674.22
Redstone Construction
$274,629.17
Landwehr Constr. Inc.
$281,062.65
Barbarossa & Sons
$292,056.30
Arcon Construction
$298,254.34
Burschville Construction
$306,199.50
R.L. Larson Excavating
$306,638.35
Northdale Construction
$309,201.97
LaTour Construction
$313,138.90
Nodland Construction
$351,968.40
AND WHEREAS, it appears that S.R. Weidema of Maple Grove, Minnesota is
the lowest responsible bidder,
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO
MINNESOTA:
1. The mayor and clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a
contract with S.R. Weidema of Maple Grove, Minnesota in the name of the city of
Otsego for the improvement of Sanitary Sewer, Watermain and Storm Sewer on 88th
Street from CSAH 42 to Quaday Avenue (COP #00-03), according to the plans and
specifications therefore approved by the city council and on file in the office of the city
clerk.
2. The city clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all
bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful
bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed.
Adopted by the city council this day of 12000.
Mayor
Clerk
\\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\616\OT616ResACCEPT BID.doc
ki5
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney Elaine Beatty October 23, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
8.1. See 9.5. below
8.2. Discussion of City Relationship to Private Development Covenants
8.3. Any Other Legal Business
BACKGROUND:
8.1. The Council Meeting will be closed under Attorney -Client Privilege for discussion.
8.2. See attached letter from Andy MacArthur dated October 17, 2000 Re: Restrictive
Covenants. Andy will be present to discuss and explain this letter.
8.3. This is for any other Legal Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration and any approval needed.
Thanks,
Laine
File RCA-CC.WPS
Li2
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY
9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk October 23, 2000
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
9. Council Items:
A. Discussion of Sheriffs hours for 2001.
B. Discussion of Purchase of Public Works Equipment
C. Discussion of Dave Eide's Annexation Request
D. Discussion of City Hall Rental - CM Wendel
E. Any Other Council Business
BACKGROUND:
A. This item was continued from the October 9, 2000 Council Meeting.
B. This item was added at the request of Councilmember Suzanne Ackerman
and was continued from 10/9/00 agenda for further information.
C. Mr. Eide's letter is enclosed.
D. This item was requested to be on the Agenda by CM Wendel.
E. This is for Any Other Council Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration, discussion and any decisions needed.
Thanks,
Ze�
�El
September 26, 2000
MIDWEST LANDSCAPES
PROPOSAL TO CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
and
CITY OF OTSEGO
Midwest Landscapes owns 50 acres of land currently operated as a tree nursery
located in Otsego on the border with Albertville.
There are two parcels and, as you can see in the attached map, the 20 acre piece
sticks out into Albertville adjacent to the sewer ponds.
My proposal is that Otsego allow the 20 acre parcel to be annexed into the city of
Albertville in exchange for sewer access to the 30 acre parcel.
The city of Albertville would get tax revenue from 20 acres of high-end
commercial property with adjacent freeway access. The city of Otsego would get tax
revenue from 30 acres of commercial property, also adjacent to freeway access.
Each city gains and as a by-product, the boundary between the cities becomes a
straight line.
Please consider my proposal at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
David B. Eide
15050 93RD AVENUE NORTH • MAPLE GROVE, MN 55369.612-420-4201
ki2
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
9.1. City Administration Elaine Beatty, City Clerk October 23, 2000
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
A. Discussion of Study of Wastewater Treatment Options in SW Otsego
B. Consider Acceptance of Elaine Beatty's Resignation/Retirement
C. Consider Recommendation for City Staff Restructuring
D. Discussion of Driveway Width Requirements
E. Any Other Administrative Business
BACKGROUND:
A. Attached is a report from Bonestroo and Mike will be present to review also.
B. Attached is a letter from Elaine Beatty and Mike will review.
C. Mike has a memo re: same and it is attached. Mike will review.
D. Attached is a memo from Dan Licht.
E. This is for any City Administrator Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
This is for Council consideration and any approval needed.
Thanks,
�-nom
Elaine
Bonestroo
0 Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
October 9, 2000
Mike Robertson
City Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Otsego MN 55330
Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. Is an Affirma
Employer and Employee Owned
Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo, PE. • Marvin L. Sorvala, P.E. • Glenn
Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. • Jerry A. Bourdon, PE.
Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, PE. • Joseph C. Anderlik, F
Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A.
Ecctj.)rtllhi
LJ C.i�
i
• I`
oCT 0 2000 1 '
E. Turner. �E. • '� 1
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford, PE. • Keith A. Gordon, PE�'�2
Richard W. Foster, P.E. • David O. Loskota, P.E. • Robert C. Ruszek. A.I. . • Mark A. Hanson, P.E.
Michael T. Rautmann, P.E. • red K. Field. P.E. • Kenneth P. Anderson, P.4,7'TI 71MITS. F.£:'s t
David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. • Sidney P. V ern M.B.A. • Allan Rick Schmidt, PE.
Offices: S[. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester
Website: www.bonestroo.com
Re: Wastewater Treatment Options in SW Otsego
Our File No. 503-99-100
Dear Mike:
Thank you for meeting recently to discuss possible wastewater treatment options to serve
development in the southwest portion of Otsego. This letter is our proposal to conduct a
feasibility study that will conceptually develop four treatment and disposal options and
estimate the total costs of each option.
Description of SW Area
The study area is Section 34 in the southwest corner of the City, minus a portion of the
section that is north of Interstate 94. The study area is bounded on the east by the City of
Albertville. The study area is approximately 600 acres, zoned 50% single-family
residential and 50% industrial.
Options to Evaluate
We propose to develop conceptual plans for four treatment and disposal options:
I . Connection to Albertville treatment system
2. Conveyance to newly constructed Otsego plant in SE part of the City
3. Treatment plant close to the study area, with discharge to drainage ditch to the
Mississippi River
4. Treatment plant close to the study area, with on -land disposal
Study Report
We will prepare a letter report with the results of the study. For each option, the report
will contain a description of the facilities to be constricted for the option, land
requirements, estimated capital costs, estimated annual operation and maintenance costs,
and implementation schedule. The same estimated collection system costs will be
included in each option, to be based on a rough estimate to construct gravity sewers in the
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311
proposed area, rather than basing the estimate on a detailed plan that shows lots, streets,
and actual locations of collection lines.
We will include a map showing proposed locations of facilities for cost estimating
purposes.
Scope of Work and Fee Estimate
Our proposed fee to perform the study and produce the letter report is based on the
following scope of work and estimated hours:
Task
Proiect Man a er
Project Engineer
Drafter
Estimate wastewater flow from
the study area
1
1
Collect background data from
Albertville
3
Collect effluent standards data
fi-om MPCA
2
Develop Option 1
1
1
Develop Option 2
1
1
Develop Option 3
1
3
Develop Option 4
1
3
Prepare cost estimates
4
Prepare map showing options
1
4
Prepare letter report
1
6
Present letter report to City
Council
4
1M1AL HOURS 1 10 25 1 4 II
We propose to perform the scope of work described above for the lump sum amount of
S3,300, including reimbursable expenses.
Thank you for this opportunity to propose our services to the City of Otsego. We look
forward to continuing our good working relationship with the City. Call me anytime with
questions or comments at (651) 604-4832.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Ted K. Field
October 18, 2000
Mayor Fournier and Council Members
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Otsego, Minnesota 55330
RE: ELAINE BEATTY'S RETIREMENT FROM
THE CITY OF OTSEGO AS CITY CLERK/
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
Honorable Mayor and Council:
As I informed you verbally when Mike Robertson was hired, I will be retiring after
the first of the year 2001. The reason I decided on this date, is because it is the first
Council meeting in January. At this meeting, the Mayor and Council Members elected
on November 7th will be sworn in and receive Certificates of Election. You will also be
appointing a Deputy Clerk and City Clerk.
The last 13 years and 9 months has been quite a learning and growing experience for the
new City of Otsego and for me. I could probably write a book, and may. I appreciate
this great opportunity to work for Otsego's Mayor and Council and residents and will miss
all of you and the City Staff. I am ready to retire and am looking forward to travel, being
able to finish my projects and enjoy my grandchildren. I wish all of you continued success
with all the upcoming projects. This is a great City and certainly is in a "growth mode".
The City is in good hands and Otsego's future looks bright. Thanks to all of you.
Sincerely,
CITY OF OTSEGO
Elaine Beatty,
City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
eb
MEMO
Date: October 18, 2000
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: Retirement of Elaine Beatty
City Staff Restructuring
Though we've all known that it was coming eventually,
it was a sad day when Elaine Beatty officially informed
me she was retiring as City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
effective the beginning of 2001. We have scheduled an
open house/retirement party for Elaine on Thursday,.
December 21, 2000 from 1:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m. Elaine
will take the following two weeks off to use up her
vacation and then work one day in January, 2001 for tax
purposes. Her last Council meeting will be Monday,
January 8, 2001 where her final act as City Clerk will
be swearing the new Council in.
CITY STAFF RESTRUCTURING
City _1 rk/ zoning A mini st-rafinr - To fill the City
Clerk/Zoning Administrator position upon Elaine's
retirement, I recommend the promotion of Judy Hudson
from Deputy Clerk to City Clerk/Zoning Administrator.
Judy has been an employee of the City of Otsego since
July, 1989. She became Deputy Clerk in 1995 when
Elaine was promoted to City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
upon the retirement of Jerry Perrault.
In my opinion Judy is very qualified to be City
Clerk/Zoning Administrator. She has performed those
duties admirably in Elaine's absence. She has been
attending the training conference put on each year by
the Municipal Clerks Institute and soon will take her
test to become a certified municipal clerk. Her job
performance as Deputy Clerk has been good, and I
anticipate no problems with her performance as City
Clerk/Zoning Administrator.
Deputy Clerk - To fill the position of Deputy Clerk
upon its vacation by Judy Hudson, I recommend the
promotion of Carol Olson from Secretary to Deputy
Clerk. Carol has been an employee of the City since
May, 1993.
In my opinion Carol is very qualified to be Deputy
Clerk. She has performed those duties very well in
Judy's absence. She has been learning the Deputy
Clerk's position since she started with the City. That
training has been intensified this year as it became
apparent that Elaine was going to retire sometime in
2001. Carol's job performance has been,good, and I
anticipate no problems with her performance as Deputy
Clerk.
Secretary - To fill the position of Secretary upon its
vacation by Carol Olson, I recommend the promotion of
Karee Rowell from part-time Secretary to full-time
Secretary. Karee has been an employee of the City
since May, 2000.
In my opinion Karee is very qualified to be Secretary.
She has learned her duties quickly, has worked full-
time as Secretary when Carol has been absent and her
performance has been good. I anticipate no problems
with her performance as Secretary.
Part-time Secretary - To fill the position of part-time
Secretary upon its vacation by Karee Rowell, I
recommend that the City advertise for a new part-time
Secretary. I would anticipate the advertising starting
after Thanksgiving and the interviews for the position
taking place in early January, 2001.
cc: City staff
elaine.wps
2
NORTIAWRST ASSOCIATRD CONSULTANTS* INC,
iw
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM J
I
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 18 October 2000
RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance; Residential Access
FILE:
BACKGROUND
176.08 - 00.14
The City Council has directed staff to provide information regarding the existing
regulations for driveway width for single family residential properties. At issue, is whether
the maximum width of driveway should be increased to allow a straight back access to a
third (or even fourth) garage stall. This question has been raised specifically in reference
to LIN -BAR Estates, where there are a number of newly constructed houses with
driveways that exceed the allowed maximum width. Because the driveways that were
installed exceed the Zoning Ordinance and Engineering Manual allowances, the City is
withholding a construction security until such time as the driveway is corrected.
This same issue was previously discussed by the City Council in June 1999. At that time,
staff explained the basis for the current regulations. The decision of the City Council at
that time was not to direct the Planning Commission to consider amending the standard.
The City Council did clarify the interpretation of the existing provision by adopting a
standard plate as part of the Engineering Manual illustrating the maximum allowed
driveway dimensions. This plate is attached to all building permits issued by the building
official.
Exhibits:
A. Standard Plate No. 705
ANALYSIS
Existing Standard. Section 20-21-4.H.7 of the Zoning Ordinance limits the size of access
within the public right-of-way to not more than 24 feet. Accesses to the public right-of-way
are intended to be minimized to the extent practical for traffic management, snowstorage,
on -street parking, increase green space and minimize construction within the right-of-way.
The combination of the access width as provided for by Plate 705 included within the
Engineering Manual and the 35 foot setback should be sufficient to allow access and
circulation to/from single family properties, including backing trailers into a third garage
stall.
The Zoning Ordinance does allow exception to the 24 foot standard approved by the City
Engineer. This exception is intended to accommodate traffic circulation for commercial
and industrial properties. Large commercial developments may have three or four lane
access to public streets to allow for turn lanes. Industrial developments may require wider
accesses to allow tractor -trailers to circulate into/out-of a site without crossing traffic lanes
on streets that carry more volume than a local residential street. To date, the exception
has only been allowed for industrial properties within the Otsego Industrial Park and those
northeast of TH 101 and CSAH 36.
Application. The present standard for residential accesses is applied uniformly for all
Zoning Districts. The application of the driveway width standard should not be considered
unique to LIN -BAR Estates for the following reasons:
• The Lots within LIN -BAR Estates have a minimum width of 150 feet which is the
standard for all unsewered single family lots within the A-1, A-2, R-1, R-2, or R-3
Zoning District. Therefore, there is no unique circumstance that would justify
allowing a different driveway standard in LIN -BAR versus other subdivisions within
the Long Range Urban Service Area.
• Single family uses within all Zoning Districts are allowed at least the same 1,000
square feet of attached garage space. As such, it is allowed to construct a garage
larger than four stalls on any residential property, provided applicable setback
requirements are satisfied. If the City justifies increasing the access width on the
basis of garage size, then this standard would be applicable to all other single
family residential uses.
• The lots within LIN -BAR Estates are subject to a resubdivision plan that anticipates
division of the existing acre lots with the future availability of sanitary sewer. As
such, it may be anticipated that lots within this development may have a future width
of 75 feet. An issue is trying to distinguish between 150 foot wide unsewered lots
and 75 foot wide sewered lots. If the standard were increased for 150 foot lots, the
existing driveways would be non -conforming upon subdivision. It would also be
problematic to deny the newly created lot the same driveway access as the original
lot when each has the same dimensions and garage area allowance.
This situation also creates a precedence for increasing the access width for
sewered single family uses within the R-4 District. The impact of a driveway width
greater than 24 feet is likely greaterfor 75 foot wide lots given the percentage of the
lot frontage that would be taken by the access and the increased frequency of
access points along a given street.
CONCLUSION
Based upon the factors outlined herein, it is still staff's opinion that the present driveway
width allowance for residential uses is an appropriate balance between providing access
to properties and protecting the City's interests relative to traffic management, snow
storage, on -street parking and limitations on construction in the right-of-way. We would
also suggest that there is no unique circumstance that would justify application of a
different driveway access standard to LIN -BAR Estates or even large unsewered lots
within the Long Range Urban Service Area, due to future resubdivision potential. Any
change to the Ordinance that may be contemplated must be done uniformly for all
residential lots on the basis of public safety and transportation policies. Such a change
would also require an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance, which would need to be,
processed by the Planning Commission before final action by the City Council.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Judy Hudson
0Ison
Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
RESIDENCE
I
w
ZZF
J
CO
D
U I
J
R.O.W. LINE
5' RADIUS OR
45° TAPER—�
(TYPICAL)
BUMPOUT RECOMMENDED
FOR CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS
CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER 1
2' TAPER FOR .
VERTICAL FACE
CURB AND GUTTER
AND BIT. CURB
'--CURB LINE
40' MIN. FROM LOCAL STREET
50' MIN. FROM COLLECTOR/
ARTERIAL STREET
ACO
w
Z
J
}
H
W
CL
O
d
DRIVEWAY
TRANSITION TO
GARAGE APRON AT Z
PROPERTY LINE IS
OWNERS OPTION. ;
24' MAX.
34' MAX. 1 I 5' MIN.
ENTERLINE ENTRANCE
Q�
700 TO 900
VARIABLE
Q�
HALF PLAN PERSPECTIVE Q
m
RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY ACCESS =
ALONG URBAN STREET SECTI ON W
NO SCALE
OF
STANDARD P AIE No.
705 .
nwc NAME CURB-705.DWG
CLAIMS LIST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 23, 2000
Attached is the Claims List for your consideration. For more detail, please refer to the
Check Detail Registers.
If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know.
Claims Register
/�Update 10-19-00 2$2205,118.96
Gl :'si p`T IQ -49-09---_---------$4-8-,3-20-9i------
Claims Register 10-16-00 2,923.77
Claims Register 10-12-00 395.47
Claims Register 10-12-00 67,235.00
Claims Register 10-11-00 200.00
GRAND TOTAL'
$275,873.20
If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me
know.
Judy Hudson,
Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
JH/co
CITY OF OTSEGO 10/23/003:59 PM
Page 1
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
Claim Type
Claim#
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
Claim# 1 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
Cash Payment G 101-21705
PPE 10-14-00
$412.78
Invoice
Cash Payment E 101-41400-121
PPE 10-14-00
$201.92
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$614.70
Claim#�+l 2 AFFORDABLESANITAT70N
Cash Payment E 201-45000-410
Oct. Unit Rental
$139.63
Invoice 1024
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$139.63
Claim#3 BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW # 11
$163.43
Invoice
sh Payment E 101-43100-220
PW # 7
$348.48
Invoice
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW #6
$74.73
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
WJiiti4>TJJJ:iiJ%i9%•iYRYrYiiP::�.•}>:J"F.CiP}X•iJJ%.�:iTi»XgJJJ:J}}p:�F.JY.:VOPJX:isRJJJ}}iJ:tiYJJi,WJXVJi,"i}}JYRX4%•}J:>WYR%A\ViJTJYiiF::•XFitv?yX•JRYF.-X:R�
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$586.64
Claim# 4 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUC
XC:•>TT:-XJCtiY:i-}i}X•J:
G'Fn•»J: J}X•]PJNJJi:
i>iiJX.>JJ.
Cash Payment E 101-41400-201
Office Supplies
$271.16
Invoice 836572
Transaction Date 10/23/2000 M
MY•v�Y��µ��xf���mm��x�f�A��I+H�+��lxxm-��r--ll�r+H
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$271.16
Claim#N,,.,.,Mw 5 BONESTROO ROSENEANDERL/K
Cash Payment E 415-43251-302
Wastewater Tremnt Plant
$7,003.97
Invoice 503-99-100
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
., a•.,�,,,,,�,...,x„�:.�.,.,•�..:.�.•�..,�b„y.,yv,1:.Y,•;.�Y;,;�,va,,.;,�:�.:,d,.A,•.>:a:,,,,.n,:u�,::::..,>N,Y;..:.�,:�,,,.,.
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$7,003.97
Claim# 6 COUR/ MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE
Cash Payment E 101-41700-301
General
$1,926.00
Invoice
Cash Payment E 415-43251-301
Wastewater Treatment
$272.00
Invoice
Cash Payment E 101-41700-301
Lin -Bar Estates
$25.50
Invoice
h Payment E 413-43100-301
Odean Ave
$1,020.00
Invoice
CITY OF OTSEGO 10/23/003:59 PM
Page 2
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
Cash Payment E 418-43100-301
78th Street
$918.00
Invoice
Cash Payment E 418-43100-301
Quaday Ave
$170.00
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21940
Pulte 'The Pante'
$340.00
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21936
Miss. Pines
$42.50
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21947
Prairie Creek III
$170.00
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21946
Crimson Ponds II
$42.50
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21922
Pheasant Ridge II
$42.50
Invoice
Cash Payment G 701-21949
Stonegate
$365.50
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
.::._..::..........1.::;uGG G«G GG.%:G«GGGG.:,.....,,,�:<:•:�::::.:::..,,:..,�:,,:.::.:.: %...%�:<...::<:,,%.:•.
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$5,334.50
jm# 7 CUB FOODS ELK RIVER
� :,,:::<,v::•,:%«:.,�.-:�«:•��:::�«r,::.:,�-f:�.:�:r:,�.:......::::,
:x�f::,kw:•;i%,<:.%::.:..
ash Payment E 101-41400-203
Supplies
$56.03
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$56.03
Claim# 8 CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
$99.00
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$99.00
Claim# 9 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
$183.28
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
:c•:G•::-:.;:o:u:a.nr.:v..ur.::.%xwl.,:avw.w-.w;.»:c::a:>a:u:.weacxtiw�xiaaxi�,yr;;Jaz;.xia:w:r.:a:.:s>:a:::.wn,:::;:x.:aw;,::.wx.:,;axfr:::::;:ca;...,..u.ww..,w,c.
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$183.28
Claim# 10 CORROW TRUCKING
...............w.........,,..../.:....,........a....../
Cash Payment E 101-43610-390
Sept. Recycling
$1,627.50
Invoice
Cash Payment E 101-41400-390
City Services
$83.07
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$1,710.57
......1..:%•%•%riin!%%%/!ff/fM'R%!/.•Y.Cv:4"!.r/XftJ%S:f.(•:Wftt\VCYNIff� :GWR:4%4:tittC!�4'FlF.f•'!.ti?%•iiF.•:W/ffffffl.LSWIf/JK-:%fffiFiCrR"f!.%lfNff!/f/.rff/fFFFft%Fii:•f.:rf.?:vi%4%ti!rF/.rii'f.%ff.:•%ii:
Claim# 11 DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND
i'/. f::%/ff/fffi
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW #9
$34.64
Invoice 00363139
sh Payment E 101-41940-402
Shop Maintenance
$136.00
Invoice 030471
CITY OF OTSEGO
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
10/23/00 3:59 PM
Page 3
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100
Total $170.64
Claim# 12 G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM
$413.04
Clairn# 13 GME CONSULTAMT. INC.
Cash Payment E 101-43100-225
9/4/00
$57.24
Invoice 358426
Cash Payment E 418-43100-302
Project 8508 A
Cash Payment E 101-43100-225
9/11/00
$66.57
Invoice 363073
Cash Payment E 101-43100-225
9/18/00
$91.47
Invoice 367731
10100
Total
Cash Payment E 101-43100-225
9/25/00
$57.24
Invoice 372410
Cash Payment E 101-41400-390
9/4/00
$70.26
Invoice 358427
$10.00
Invoice 8/31/00
Cash Payment E 101-43100-225
9/18/00
$70.26
Invoice 367732
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210
IN290605
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$413.04
Clairn# 13 GME CONSULTAMT. INC.
Cash Payment E 418-43100-302
Project 8508 A
$648.96
Invoice
.'ransaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$648.96
Claim# 14 HAWKINS CHEMICAL
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210
DM45593
$10.00
Invoice 8/31/00
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210
IN290605
$825.02
Invoice 9/14/00
Cash Payment E 601-49400-210
DM47305
$10.00
Invoice 9/29/00
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$845.02
Clairn# 15 H G WEBER OIL COMPANY
Cash Payment E 101-43100-202
$957.83
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$957.83
Claim# 16 MACS WELL & PUMP SERVICE
Cash Payment E 101-41940-400
Well Chlorination
$110.00
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$110.00
Claim# 17 GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW #7
$121.48
Invoice 202640016
Ash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW # 1
$12.87
Invoice 202650041
CITY OF OTSEGO 10/23/003:59 PM
Page 4
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW #3
$4.60
Invoice 202690031
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
PW # 3
$237.93
Invoice 202720063
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
.-. •: �f .... .fFF.AC]CFNVXf.WOCS�TU004«W%`OP N/ ?T>:S:
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$376.88
Claim# 18 MENARDS
�Y%^%4F.•:SrAPV09:4:SSSVIHirhCVTg4::4:41AOvF<:•:V:i.XSYfRC?:4%:�i>}}%•'f.✓.•}}riV'F.•:Y.G}riv:•Y.V>}}};
TT:•?:tir�'S::rn'MTU
Cash Payment E 201-45000-203
Haunted House
$80.50
Invoice 56494
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Told
$60.60
Claim# 19 MON77CELLO ANIMAL CONTROL
Y
Cash Payment E 101-42710-390
September Service
$60.00
Invoice 175
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$60.00
Claim# 20 DARLENE DETERMAN
Cash Payment G 101-21803
Deposit
$400.00
Invoice
Cash Payment R 101-38992
Bldg. Supervisor
-$90.00
Invoice
ash Payment R 101-38992
Table Damage
-$90.00
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
::::....:: <.>:»»-:xx-::•a>--.n:«•x.x«c»». xoavx>»x«w: naxoa�rco.eocaxao-N:ss}rncec«anc:�+w:<wr.:,c�wx:veewcw>-r::acavxex.:.awr»>>:.,z:ay.:.»»>»:v.-
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$220.00
Claim# 21 NORTHERN STATES POWER COM
W xx ,.. <,.F: -o.
- - ,.
Cash Payment E 601-49400-322
Wastewater
$222,31
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
..::.}..rr.,..»ux��<..«.}:��,�,.�•%,�.�}>�>}}k%�x<r}:�M};�>.��;�>-R�.««�,>}}}}ra
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$222,31
Claim# 22 ROAD MACHINERY& SUPPLIES C
}..�}}
.,�..�}%w}x�>::7.�F.�%,:,.:,x...,...r.....:r::.N
Cash Payment E 101-43100-202
10 Gal for 20 hr demo
$17.50
Invoice 81056
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
r,.k<r<,�,,,,<�,..,�,.,„�.x«r:,,,,rw,,:r,:•,<,<.,,,r.,,.r<rrr-:r",...kr,,,.,:.»,...„„»,k<,.,:.v«<krrrr:::::::...::....r:r:::..:...r.:.rr:r..r.....rrrr<.
�RMR
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$17.50
Claim#23 SERVICES, INC.
Cash Payment E 601-49400-203
Water Meters
$1,681.78
Invoice 2000-373
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
r..rrr:::.,..:,rrrr::.rrrrrw.r:..r.»:..,»..,.:rr.,.•.y„».,rrrrk.,,,�„Krr,,:,.•,<.,.<.,.<r..,,,.»,».N.�,.<rr-,-..w::,,•r::k,,,.:�,,.r�r.,•k,:.»..:.rr::�,r.,v:r,:r:.:-,.,..::<r:::::::.
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$1,681.78
Claim# 24 STS CONSULTANTS LTD
�:.:,:::::::::.:::,.::,:�::::r:::::::::::::,rr:,.,
Cash Payment E 413-43100-302
Odean Const. Testing
$3,826.90
Invoice 209640
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
.«:.r:,r.,:..:.r::krrM,rr,:.:.r.>,.»»,::v..,.:.,.....vr.,,.,�,»,»,.F,,.�,<«.x.,,�,�,•«r..�..y.Y,..<.K.�.<.,y,..,y,,�.,,..�,�r«�„«r�,7<..�<.,.M,,.e.�.».,,.<.Y,•r.«.k.,,:rr,,,<:,<«:.�<r.�<,rr.:r..:.:<r,«
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$3,826.90
aim# 25 GROEN GARY CPA
sh Payment E 101-41600-304
Acctg Sept 19 -Oct 13
$455.00
Invoice
CITY OF OTSEGO 10/23/003:59 PM
Page 5
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$455.00
Claim# 26 MN REAL ESTATE JOURNAL INC
Cash Payment E 101-41900-430
EDAAC Ad
$810.00
Invoice 391887
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$810.00
Claim# 27 SUPERIOR SERVICES
Cash Payment E 101-43610-390
Sept. Recycling
$460.00
Invoice 162338
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$460.00
Claim# 28 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC.
Cash Payment E 601-49400-302
Pay Estimate # 12
$8,393.18
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$8,393.18
Claim# 29 ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220
V102262
$213.82
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$213.82
,im# 30 AIRGAS, INC.
3h Payment E 101-43100-210
IN105594571
$20.99
Invoice
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE
10100
Total
$20.99
Clairn# 31 ZIEGLER INC
Cash Payment E 414-43100-530
2000 Loader
$149,699.94
Invoice G6522201
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 PW #5 $762.55
Invoice PC000353860
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 PW#5 $503.12
Invoice PC000356460
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 Credit ..$86 61
Invoice PR00039064
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 $36.61
Invoice PC00035604
Cash Payment E 101-43100-220 $364.55
Invoice PC000353861
Transaction Date 10/23/2000 BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100 Total $151,330.16
Claim# 32 CHRISTIAN BUILDERS INC
Cash Payment E 702-41400-310 Escrow Refund $1,000.00
Invoice
-insaction Date 10/23/2000 BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100 Total $1,000.00
Claim# 33 PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
CITY OF OTSEGO 10/23/003:59 PM
Page 6
Claim Docket
OCTOBER 2000
Cash Payment G 101-21704
PPE 10/14/00
$441.98
Invoice
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment E 101-41400-121
PPE 10/14/00
$237.88
Invoice
Park & Rec
$117.50
Cash Payment E 101-43100-121
PPE 10/14/00
$244.13
Invoice
Cash Payment
E 101-45300-390
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
S? ^::SST•tiS:�?:ttL•:SS:SL•:S•:%SLVLS?]:ttM'CC:^%tt^"f.•tL!Stt9 fFlYRCPCCPCC90%A4f'fi0.UYYffffflA4LMSF:SVC.
BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100
Total $923.99
Claim# 34 BRIGGS & MORGAN
!.£U}SSSSC.9C4YA9000KS90049PPKf.4:ttL4'F.AOYfffn\LK^t•:•:SiKStt4•.F"•tit•?"f.SF.tiC:S•:tiC::�ii
n ^i::Jiti4:Ltit•: tiS•:{SR
Cash Payment E 416-43100-301
Overlay Bond Sery
$3,610.00
Invoice
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment E 415-43251-301
Sewer Bond Sery
$5,168.00
Invoice
Miss. Pines Prelim
$38.80
Transaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100
Total $8,778.00
Claim# 36 MINNESOTA LIFE
Cash Payment
G 701-21940
Cash Payment E 101-41400-123
Adm. Life
$29.00
Invoice
Cash Payment E 101-43100-123
PW Life
$34.20
Invoice
Invoice 9645
7ansaction Date 10/23/2000
BANK OF ELK RIVE 10100
Total $63.20
.:,:�,.:., . ,.<,-H.w . ,,:«:<.:,.,.�,.•,�, <.�.e,,,,.<.�„ Wit.,.«k.,:N,..0
Claim# 37 NORTHWESTASSOCCONSULTAN
...::M.:,, . �., ..�:.:�.-t,-.>,.<. _ ..�:.�, N.
:,..>,: :N,::: ::::., .::.
Cash Payment
E 101-41400-348
Zoning Map
$252.51
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment
E 201-45000-300
Park & Rec
$117.50
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment
E 101-45300-390
HPC
$131.60
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment
E 101-41570-303
General
$335.28
Invoice 9646
Cash Payment
G 701-21936
Miss. Pines Prelim
$38.80
Invoice 9645
Cash Payment
G 701-21940
The Pointe
$23.27
Invoice 9645
Cash Payment
G 701-21949
Stonegate
$635.83
Invoice 9645
Cash Payment
G 701-21957
Winter Addition
$117.87
Invoice 9645
Cash Payment
G 701-21959
D & J - Barthel
$59.65
Invoice 9645
06ash
Payment
G 70 1-21 960
JKO-Pioneer Marine
$104.19
Invoice 9645