Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
11-13-00 CC
ki2 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 4.A. Special Presentation Elaine Beatty November 13, 2000 City Clerk 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION• 4.A.1. Long Haul Trucking - Hearing on Junk and Blight Complaints BACKGROUND: Attached is a letter written to John Daniels and Dino Buege regarding junk and blight. Mike Robertson will review this with the Council and have an update of the junk and blight. RECOMMENDATIONS: This is for Council information and action. T Elaine CITY OF TSEGO 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414 Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: (612) 441-8823 October 12, 2000 John Daniels/Dino Buege Long Haul Trucking 6600 Jansen Avenue NE Albertville, MN 55301 Re: Junk ordinance violations on Long Haul's property Dear John and Dino: When you received a permit to add your fueling facility to Long Haul Trucking, the City Council directed you to clean up the junk that was being stored outside on your property. That junk, consisting variously of old tires, metal, vehicles, trailers, and auto parts, has not been removed. Please have all of this material removed by Monday, November 13, 2000. I have scheduled a hearing before the City Council that evening at 6:30 p.m. If the materials are not removed by then, the City Council will consider taking action to remove the materials and assess you for all costs associated with the removal. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, Michael obertson City Administrator cc: City Council City Attorney 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 5. CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/ November 13, 2000 (Non -Controversial Items) ITEM NUMBER: _ ITEM DESCRIPTION: 6:30PM 5.1. Approve the Albertville Fire Service Contract for the Year 2001. 5.2. Approve Pay Estimate #6 for 78TH ST Water and Sewer for final lift of asphalt, sod, seeding and signs for Contractor LaTour Construction in the amount of $112,572.19. (See attached information) BACKGROUND: 5.1. Attached is a copy of the Fire Service Contract received from Albertville for the year 2001 for Council approval. The per parcel amount has been set at a previous Council Meeting. 5.2. Attached is the information on the above LaTour Construction Pay Estimate #6 in the amount of $112,572.19 for work on 78TH Street water, sewer, etc. RECOMMENDATION: These are for Council consideration and approval. If Council has any questions or need to discuss further, the item should be removed to another section of the Agenda. This contract with Albertville is the normal language that we have signed in the past. Thanks, Elaine i J 2001 FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF OTSEGO This agreement made and entered into by and between the City of Albertville, a municipal corporation of the County of Wright in the State of Minnesota, and the City of Otsego, in the County of Wright in the State of Minnesota. WHEREAS, Otsego desires the services of the fire department of Albertville in case of fires occurring in Otsego, as well as the emergency medical services of Albertville in case of a medical emergency, and WHEREAS, Albertville maintains a volunteer fire department with emergency medical response capability, which department is available to provide fire protection and emergency medical response services to properties located in St. Michael, and THEREFORE, it is agreed by and between said parties as follows: 1. Albertville, through its fire department, shall provide fire protection and emergency medical response services to those properties in Otsego. Such fire protection and emergency medical response services shall be provided from January 1 through December 31, 2001. 2. Otsego shall agree to pay Albertville $17,240.47 in' exchange for the provision of fire protection and emergency medical response services as described above. Payment due for the year 2001 shall be made in two installments of $8,620.24 on or before July 1, 2001, and $8,620.23 on or before December 31, 2001. 3. Albertville's obligation to provide fire protection service and emergency medical response shall be subject to the following: a. If road and weather conditions at the time of the call are such that the fire/medical run cannot be made with reasonable safety to men and equipment, and the decision of the Fire Chief or his Deputy in charge shall be final in such matter, no obligation arises under this agreement on the part of the City of Albertville to answer such call. b. In the event that a sufficient amount of the fire fighting/medical equipment and the number of volunteer firemen, or both, are committed at the time of the fire call, in sole judgment of the Fire Chief or his Deputy, to fighting pre-existing fires or attending pre-existing medical emergencies, so as to render the available equipment and manpower inadequate to answer a fire CAMy Documents\ re Service Contract - Otsego.doc l or medical call from Otsego, no obligation shall arise under this agreement to answer such call, and no person or party shall have recourse against the City of Albertville for refusal to answer such call. A pre-existing fire/medical emergency to which the fire department of Albertville is called previous to receiving the call from Otsego and which fire is still being fought or medical emergency is still being attended to by the Albertville Fire Department at the time the call from Otsego is received. c. In the event a fire call by Otsego is answered by Albertville, but before the fire in question is extinguished, the fire fighting equipment or volunteer firemen, or both, are needed to fight a fire in Albertville or protect property in Albertville from a fire, the Chief or his Deputy without liability therefore to any person or to Otsego under this agreement, may in their judgement recall the fire equipment and firemen to Albertville for the purpose of fighting the fire in Albertville. The judgement of the Fire Chief or his Deputy shall be final and no person or party shall have recourse against the City of Albertville for any damages or losses resulting from such action or decision. 4. The parties acknowledge the fact that Albertville may enter into similar contracts with other municipalities, and acknowledge that Albertville has entered into mutual aid contracts with other fire departments in other municipalities, and that a fire call under any such contract preceding a call in Otsego could be a valid and reasonable basis for the decision of the Fire Chief or his Deputy in refusing to answer a fire call in Otsego. 5. Because the City of Albertville has heretofore entered into mutual assistance fire fighting agreements with other municipalities possessing fire fighting equipment and firemen, which equipment and firemen could be called by the Chief or his Deputy to a fire in Otsego, the City of Otsego agrees to pay such additional cost as may be incurred thereby if in the sole judgement of the Chief or his Deputy, such additional fire fighting equipment and firemen are needed to fight a fire in Otsego and are in fact called to such fire by the Chief or his Deputy. C:Wy DocumentsTire Service Contract - Otsego.doc 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day of , 2000. BER E By ;'0 .Olson, Mayor ATTEST: :e' - L-4, Linda Goeb, City Clerk CAMy DocumentsTire Service Contract - Otsego.doc CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 3 2000 NET TAX CAPACITY FOR THE ALBERTVILLE FIRE DISTRICT 2001 CONTRACT YEAR CITY OF OTSEGO $407,164 CITY OF ST. MICHAEL $478,791 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE $2,786,546 TOTAL NET TAX CAPACITY $3,6729501 2001 FIRE BUDGET $169,980 2001 STATE FIRE AID (14,476) TOTAL COSTS ALLOCATED $155,504 TAX PERCENT OF PORTION OF COST CAPACITY TOTAL VALUE ALLOCATED ALBERTVILLE $2,786,546 75.87% $1179990.18 OTSEGO $4069164 11.09% $ 17,240.47 ST. MICHAEL $478,791 13.04% FIRE CONTRACT ALLOCATIONS.doc $ 20,273.35 I'IuV, a. 2000 6:c:9AM CM12 N0. 109 P. TOTAL CONTRACT: $1,410;187.36 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: 51,326,571.06 LESS 5% 99TAINAGE LESS PAY ESTIMATE 1: 7,23Z4S LESS PAY ESTIMATE 2: $697,232.46 LESS PAY ESTIMATE 3A: $667,206,70 $1074615.72 AMOUNT PAID BY CITY CHECK, PAYMENT 44: 561,927.24 LESS PAY ESTIMATEft WE RECOMMENDMENDPA PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: COPY �� b112,57'1. APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: Cerdacadorl by Cantractcr: 10150y that all llem$ and amounts are correct for the work completed to date, fined. Tile: Date: ENGINEER: Cartincedon by Engineer. We recommend payment for work and Quarpltl9e as shprm. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Slpned: NNER: T1tle: Data: CITY OF fcned: . Tills: Data. W")W.raaoraWM0G 4Asara4yd%aAIT mt3eP+r PAY FffWTE Ifo Summary o/ Old Schedule*: Work to Deta OW Schedule "A' - Roadway $4Al2&27 WN894,47 Old Schedule "B" - Storm Sewer5102,130.22 �! $189,723,88 Bid Schedule `C' - Sanitary Sewer $�`07,a1Z.99 (� f 5@a 279,@7 Old Schedule "P' - Water Syatam $124,a@8.0o 5117,884.90 Old Schedule "E" - TraNic Control $22,94&90 $18,041.98 Old Schedule "F" - Restoradon 4 Landeaape $18,855.00 S8,737.20 Added by Change Order. $81,927.24 TOTAL CONTRACT: $1,410;187.36 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: 51,326,571.06 LESS 5% 99TAINAGE LESS PAY ESTIMATE 1: 7,23Z4S LESS PAY ESTIMATE 2: $697,232.46 LESS PAY ESTIMATE 3A: $667,206,70 $1074615.72 AMOUNT PAID BY CITY CHECK, PAYMENT 44: 561,927.24 LESS PAY ESTIMATEft WE RECOMMENDMENDPA PARTIAL PAYMENT OF: COPY �� b112,57'1. APPROVALS: CONTRACTOR: Cerdacadorl by Cantractcr: 10150y that all llem$ and amounts are correct for the work completed to date, fined. Tile: Date: ENGINEER: Cartincedon by Engineer. We recommend payment for work and Quarpltl9e as shprm. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Slpned: NNER: T1tle: Data: CITY OF fcned: . Tills: Data. W")W.raaoraWM0G 4Asara4yd%aAIT mt3eP+r PAY FffWTE Ifo Nov. 8.2000 6:27AN NO. 109 P. PAY ESTIMATE #6 Npverrlber 7, 2000 Honorable Mayor a City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Oteago, MN 56330 70th street water a sewer Contractor. laTour Construction Odglnal Contract Amount: 51,348,570.12 Contract Including Change CrCers: $1,410,487.38 Award pate; September 21, 1999 Completion Ram: Filial cornptation on or before July 18, 2000. Dear Council Membarw The folk wklg work Mas been completed on the above referenco project througn January of 2000: AW -A+- nA1[1WAV Item 8 S Raf Item Deecrl tlon Eudmated Ouenblty Unit Price Unit Price Contract Price Used SO pate Extenalon 1 2021.501 MobM2atlon 1 LS $20 380.00 LS $20.380.00 1.00 =1380.00 2 2101.511 Claarina a Grubbing 1 LS $7,800.00 LS S7.8W.00 1 $7.800.00 3 2104.501 Remove Fence 2500 LF SOM LF 50.00 2.600 $2.250.00 4 2104.503 Remove 61bumlrwua Pavement 180 6Y Sim SY $M.00 180 $270.00 S 2104.513 Sewing 81tuminoua Pavement Fu11 Depth) 426 LF $1.50 LF 5837.50 225 $337.60 8 2105.501 Common Excavation 32535 CY 1.25 CY $40.668.75 32,000 W.000.00 8A 2103.501 Common Exec ,ati , Pondl O CY $1.30 CY $0.00 18.306 $25.214.80 7 2105.605 Muck Excavation 2550 CY 32.16 cy 55,482.50 5,800 $12,470.00 8 2105.535 SaIved Tolnon 38900 CY $1.20 CY $44.280.00 38,505 $43,W6,00 9 2211.501 AQW8qVe Be" CI 5 12875 Ton woo Ton V7260.00 8368,1 $50,196.60 10 2340.508 Type -41 Wearin Course Mixture 4810 Ton 823,50 Ton $108,336.00 3972.25 $93,347.88 11 2340.514 Type 31 WeaAn Course Mixture 4510 Ton 522.00 Ton 599.220.00 4197.18 $92,337.62 12 2357.502 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat 1800 Gal 51.00 Gal $11600.00 SSO $550.00 13 2901.511 42' RC 131pe Culvert 013 144 LF 569.90 LF 0 086.60 144 $10,085.60 14 2501.515 42' RC Pipe Apron 1 i:a $1,085.00 Fa 51,085.00 1 51,055.00 15 2601.802 Inlet Structure 18.1 1 Es $3,300.00 Ea 53,300.00 1 53.300.00 18 251 t.501 Random Class ill 14.8 CY S45.80 CY 82rt2 149 5662.42 17 1 2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design 6618 1 10670 LF 56.45 LF S88 821.60 11.2971 $72,801.15 Orlainal Contract 5492.128.27 $478,894.47 Bid Schedule +B° - Storm Sewer Item 0 S ec.Ref Item Descrf tion F-stimated Quantity Unit Price Extnnslon Used to Rata Exlsnslon 18 2501.515 12' RC Moo Aorw 2 E0 S310.00 Ea 1820.00 3 3930.00 19 25W.515 I 15' RC Rfpe Apron 3 Ea 5325.00 Ea $a75.00 2 5860.00 19A 2501.615 18' RCP ron 0 Ea I 5360.00 Ea $0.00 1 5380.00 19B 2501.515 21' RCP ron 0 Ea S380.00 Ea 50.00 1 $360.00 20 2301.515 24' RC Pipe ran 4 Ea I 5410.00 Ea 51,640.00 3 _$1,220.001 , 1v,epten,r,e aoraliwNclpsMalsWalultl�oleI39Pzts PAY ESTIMATE N8 11/X00 r ltDV . 8. 2000 9: c:7AN N0. 109 P. --. 21 2501.802 Train Guard for 72' PI e Apron 2 Ea $136.00 Ea $270,00 3 5405.00 22 2501.602 Tram Guard fOr 15' Plpe A ron 3 Ea $160.00 Ea 5480.00 2 5320.00 22A 2501.602 Trash Guard for 18' PIPS ron 0 Ea 5240.00 Ea 50.00 1 5240.00 229 2601.602 Trash Guard for 21' e Apron 0 Ea 5270.00 Ea 50.00 1 $270,00 23 2501.802 Trash Guard for 24' Pipe Apron 4 Ea $276.00 Ea S1,100,00 3 $825.00 24 2503,541 12' RCP DoriCin 3006 C1 5 238 LF Si B.70 LF 53.991.30 398 56,848.00 25 2503.541 15' RCP Devion 3008 Cl 5 419 LF $17.90 Lf S7,500.110 414 $7,410.60 26 2503,541 18' RCP Das;on 3008 Cl 5 220 LF $19.90 LF 54,358.00 936 518,513.00 27 2603.641 211 RCP Derlqn 3006 C13 698 LF 521.90 LF $13.496.20 644 V4,103.60 28 2503.541 24' RCP Deakgn 3006 CI 3 798 LF 523.80 LF $10,902.40 402 S9,587.80 29 2503.541 30' RCP Das n 3006 CA 3 2813 EA 533.40 EA $87274.20 2604 $86,973.00 29A 2503541 Construct Oralha a Structure 60' 0 LF $2.040,00 LF $0.00 1 S2,040.00 288 2503541 Revue Structure 14-4 0 Ea $722.00 EA $0.00 1 5722.00 30 2606.502 Construct DraMe a Stricture Design 72" 4020 3 Ea E2.755.00 Ea 513,775.00 S $13,775.00 31 2608,602 Conaltw Oralna Strlcturo Dee 84.4020 1 Fa 53,257.00 Ea $3,257.00 0 $0.00 31 a 25DB302 Construct Drainage ShicWr9 Des n 96. 4020 0 Ea $3,063.00 Ea 50.00 1 $5,063.00 32 2606.602 Construct Dram Structure Dest n A or F 12 Ea 3940.00 Ea $11.2W.D0 12 511,260.00 33 2508.602 1 Construct DrWmKe Structure D"lom C or G 2 Ea $940.00 F -a 51.880.00 Ill 510.340.00 34 2500.502 Cortstnxt Draimple Structure Desloo H 12 Ea 5600.00 Ea $7.200.00 3 $1 800.00 35 1 2508502 Construct Drainage Structure De eclat 2 Ea I S1 065.00 Ea $2190,00 3 53,195,00 36 1 2511301 Random Algrap Class Ill 50.7 CY 545.80 CY 1 $2,322.06 58,8 52 883.80 Original Contract: 51a2,139.26 5199,723,88 Ilrl Rr_horhila ^C• . R1nitAry Rarwer Itam # 37 SPMR@f 2503.611 Item D99cr1 Tian 12' SDR 26 PVC P 12' - In Estimated Quantity 89 LF Unit Prlca 545.70 LF Extanolon $4,067.30 us.a to Date 06 Extension S3,930.20 38 2503.511 12' SDR 20 PVC P 24' - 28' 416 LF $61.70 LF $25.667,20 340 $20.978,00 39 40 2503.511 2503.511 12' SDR 26 PVC PI (201- 32' 18' SDR 28 PVC Pfo9 1 T- 201 644 309 LF LF $67.70 563.10 LF LF $43.508.80 $19.497.90 623 304 542,177.10 $19,1OZ40 41 42 2503,511 2503.511 18' SOR 28 PVC Pte20' -24 18' 80A 26 PVC P'ae 24' - 201 1823 160 LF LF 568.10 574.10 LF LF $124,148.30 $11.856.00 1823 160 S 24 146.30 511 856.00 43 2603.51 t 118' SOR 26 PVC Pi 28' - 32' 1560 LF 580.10 LF S124,966.00 1580 $124,956.00 44 2503.511 18' SOA 26 PVC Pf a 32' - Sal 868 LF 586.10 LF $73,701.80 856 $73.701.60 45 2503.5118' 80R 28 PVC Pi afl the 400 LF S40.70 LF $19.680.00 333 516 550.10 4SA CO 42 Foundatlon Correcvon 0 TN $10.$0 Try $0.00 450 54,770.00 46 2503.602 COnatruct Outsldo Crop 4 Ea S1,585.00 Ea 58,280.00 3 $4.695.00 47 2603.602 B• PVC Plug 8 E2 $14.00 Es $84.00 5 $70.00 48 2603.602 12' PVC Pluq 2 Fa $36.00 Ea $70.00 2 870.00 49 2503.002 Connact to Exleding Sanhary Sawer 1 Ea 5800.00 Ea $800.00 2 51.200.00 3o 2506.802 CdnSMXI 32mitary Manhole 18 Ea $1.800.00 Ea 525,800.00 16 525,000.00 61 2506.603 Extra 000th Manhole over B ft 270.36 VF 5102.70 VF 527,827.59 27221 527,955.97 51A CC X12 Fumish and Haul Water for TorUalg 0 LS 51.200.00 LS 50.00 1 51,200.00 51 a CO d2 Place and Remove Temporary MH Costings 0 EA $160.00 EA 1 141 52,240.00 Original Contract s307,812.6a 6505,278.87 wwotwnar.e PAY ESTIMATE NB I 1117100 HOV . 8. 2000 e: 23AN i3id Sehedvie , O" _ Water Svatam NO. 109 P. ; Item S spec.per Item Description Estimated Quantity Unit Price extension Used to fate Extension 62 2604.602 Cannect to Existing Wwarmafn 4 Ea 5250.00 Ea S1,000.00 3 5750,00 53 2604.902Hydrant $900.00 4 Ea $1.405.00 Fa 51,860.00 2 $2.930.00 54 2504,602 6' Gala Valve 6 Box 4 Ea 1$$460.00 Es 51.840.00 2 $920.00 55 2504.602 B' Gate Valva 6 Sox 5 Ea 5620,00 tea $3.100.00 5 S3 100.00 68 2604,602 12' Bu darfly Valve 6 Box 10 Ea $835.00 Ea $8,360.00 7 53,845.00 57 2504,803 6' Water Mafn•Duct Iron Cl 62 44 LF S1o.40 LF 5417.80 681 560320 68 2504.603 1r Water Main -Duct Iron Ct 52 375 LF 513.00 LF $4.875.00 380 $0.940.00 59 2504.803 12' Water Msln Duct iron Cl 32 4954 LF $19.10 LF S94,021,40 4{ge1 $93,418.10 60 2504.62 Duotlts Iron FTWn= 3275 Lbs $1,40 Lbs 24,585,M 3849 S5,388.50 Original Canttaot: $124,689.00 $117,894.90 rkm c iw1,.L "F- . Tr fnn f!nnfrN Itam * S .Ref Item Deecri ion Estimated Quantiry Estimated Quontlty Unit Price Used to Date Extension , Extsnsivn used m oats Extenafon 61 2554.602 Psrmanent Barricade 0 30.00 4 Ea $226,00 Ea $900.00 4 $900.00 61A Co 02 TOMPorarV Bamcadss at MH's 490 Lbs 0 Ea $120.00 Ea 50.00 14 51,1380.00 82 2663.601 Tmftic Cmfrol 74 1 LS $300.00 IS 5$00.00 1 ¢`00.00 83 2684.603 41 Double Solid Line YsRow-Eooxv 530.00 AC 4820 LF $1.10 LF: S6 082.00 5230 $6,753.00 64 2594.803 4' Solid Una Yelfow 720 LF 30.35 LF S39B.00 0 50.00 65 2584.803 4' Solld Llne WhIte-EpoU 10780 LF 50.50 LF $5,390.00 9883 $4.931 50 09 2584.603 121 Croaswalk Una WhIWERM 640 LF $1.50 LF $860.00 0 50.00 67 2564.603 8' Solid Line Yellow - 620 LF $1,60 LF VS0.001 0 $0.00 88 2564.604 Crosswalk Marld 2520 SF $2.00 SF 55,040.00 480 $960.00 99 2584,604 1 Sign Peneta s C 183 5F 521.30 SF 53,B97.90 156.76 53.31748 ��/I'�0' �pc•��� Ulna) Contract: 522,845.90 518,041.88 Rrd tehwrfi,lw "F" . Re:1nrtf1nn R. I enA,e."ru Item 0 8 .pef Item Description Estimated Quantiry Unit Price Extension Used to Date Extension 70 2S73S02 Sat Fence, Typa Pre -Assembled 2000 IF V.00 LF $Z000.00 0 30.00 71 2575.501 IS#"Ir_q 7 AC 5230.00 AC $1,750.00 1_5 $376.00 72 2575502 Seedhia Mixture 500 490 Lbs 52.00 Lbs $080.00 0 50.00 73 2576.505 Sodding a Lawn 6000 SY $1.90 SY 510 800.00 4604 58.28720 74 2675.611 Mulch Material. D22 1 14 Ton SiCo.00 Ton 51 X0.00 o i $0•30 75 1 2575.519 1 Disk An~nq 1 7 AC 530.00 AC 5330.00 iS S75•00 7t Df?Q.G7a COMMs.4I2I 90e111yor 06 10 1A11fin 1 ha %n In I m Original contract: 518, 866.00 ;8,73720 Maallsn.rw oocaknunkp.n.oa,vowel ttsapaM P4Y ESTIMATE N6 I 11/7M 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY 6. Dan Licht, City Planner: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk October 13, 2000 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION• 6.1. Re -Consider Today Properties Application for rezoning "Otsego Business Park" 6.2. Discussion of Feedlot Setback 6.3. Any Other Planning Business BACKGROUND: Dan Licht will be present to explain and discuss the following items. 6.1. See attached Report Dated November 7, 2000 from Dan Licht. 6.2 See attached reports from Dan Licht and Mike Robertson. 6.3. This is for any other planning business that needs discussion. RECOMMENDATION: These items are for Council consideration for approval or denial Thanks, Elaine 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 7 November 2000 RE: Otsego - Otsego Business Park; Application Processing FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.05 Today Properties has submitted an application for rezoning and preliminary plat approval for development of an industrial business park and use of an existing single family home as a business -warehouse. The subject property is located at the intersection of CSAH 42 and 85th Street. The applicant had made a similar request in the spring of this year. The Planning Commission had recommended that the first application be denied based upon the finding that the site would not meet applicable performance standards and would not connect to municipal utilities. The application was considered by the City Council at their meeting on March 27, 2000. The application was denied based upon the failure to pass a motion to rezone the site from A-1 District to B -W District by a 2-3 margin. Section 20-3-2.P of the Zoning Ordinance prohibits a similar rezoning application being considered again for a property for at least one year from the date of City Council action. The intent of this provision is to discourage repeated applications when the issue has been denied unless there have been significant alterations to the request that may make it acceptable to City Officials. As such, the present application first requires a 4/5 vote of the City Council to reconsider the matter based upon a determination that the circumstances of the application have changed significantly. In reviewing the previous application, the City Council provided direction that they may look more favorably on the request if a full development plan for subdivision of the property as an industrial park were provided. The previous application had included a possible preliminary plat, but lacked the supporting engineering plans to evaluate whether the development could be built. The applicant has provided grading and utility plans as part of their present application. Our office and the City Engineer have reviewed the current information and provided comments in the form of a planning report and engineering review. The City Council should consider these documents not from the perspective of approving the development proposal, but whether the applicant has changed the circumstances involving their request such that it is worth reconsidering. In interpreting the Ordinance, it is our opinion that a motion to wave the 12 month waiting period represents a separate action from the rezoning motion that failed. As such, any member of the City Council may initiate a motion to reconsider an application to rezone the subject property within one year of the previous request. We have reviewed this opinion with the City Attorney, who concurs. Again, approval of such a motion requires approval by 4/5 of the entire City Council. pc. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak / Ron Wagner Mike Day / Robert Day 11/13/2000 11:39 6308589738 STONE DESIGN INC PF _ 01 bt"Tel: Systems USA, Ltd. 377 East Butterfield Rodd, Suitn 390 Lombard,'IL 60148 lel: 630-193.6000 Fox: 630-493.1170 systems www.cbtrys.com -Tot M*ike $'3 � Po r r 7�i-j Pr --,e . 0+--;e9v MY\) • 5-5-330 R15, a Y✓l L, r t r.� d V 2 Cq v 3 G t.v 4�� rx o i`-}�,vgr 1 rvi et`E -b +tit Gi oQpk&►v*, , Vern 4e i cl o o r- i s yb; infro die a. �'''' °-fig, --'-0 C.4,1100 -Toch, Pro - es -fo �e ��pp t� +or- rem?% rNq rid P r;e 1 +Mr n0,r f914+0 oLrou cL 4v- o, P rO edf- �'hd F- a GZ>d CI �p ,�o+,r crC� �' h j ro ' e &_ � b� r) �4 I c 0. Yl pr t'bY- � (3usi�ess ow�1�r- -�-.�,.c �-ok,�a . -T" \e Dev6IOPe� and or d"ue A°t P lam 9-0 U P -�o Sewev- ©r- u,aL � due f\ of pia, -j� a P ar-1e',"Yk) Lot o r d W nor w I tc( e % u p q rAden '1-0 Cove` xn•1 ireq Ui r M ev -s -% r' `vin e Av-eov 11/13/2000 11:39 6308589738 STONE DESIGN INC PA 02 CBT Systems USA, Ud. 377 Fos► Butterfield Road, Suite 390 Lombard, IL 60148 bt 7e1: 630.493-6000 Fox: 630-493-1170 systems www.ebftys.com 3-� Som VA� 47J�- i me. A�l�g a. 'v�r.� ��CccS-59L b v ,si�'Yi PSS , se rea ker 6i 15 15 C��� i e e 1�r`r� --�' ,r✓- y-1� e_- C, 4-1 � Se+ +k -c r'eCOen4-• j ( -� oil Flo u 3e Ca►'1 +0 S e l( q v e- C -v Proff Goe at/ G f o-� p �-��e o n e ego S Y� arG b ut c� i -� Y^ v #- c� o �e P y ------ a(fow Vr j e ci�1 coin, st L iv1 embers nat -f ire S u b Wt t O V �`�� ee- VN P j 5AY\ dar-w5 NORT"WIST ASSOCIIIATRID CONSUILTA"M MNC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com MEMORANDUM f TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht L DATE: 8 November 2000 - — -- RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance; Reciprocal Feedlot Setback FILE NO.: 176.08 Background The City Council has received two letters from Ms. Judy Vetch regarding her experience in trying to develop a residential lot for her son. Ms. Vetch attended a City staff meeting on June 8, 2000 to discuss her interest in subdividing one or two residential lots from their parcel of land located at the northeast quadrant of CSAH 19 and 80t' Street. Staff reviewed the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance, indicating that there is potential to subdivide additional lots with a rezoning to A-2 District and a preliminary/final plat. Staff also recommended combining a vacant parcel in the northwest portion of the property with the larger parcel, thus freeing up another potential building right. Ms. Vetch returned to City Hall on October 24, 2000 to obtain a second copy of the City's application form. Ms. Vetch was also informed that there may be an issue with their proposed building location and the City's requirement that new residential dwellings within the Agricultural Preserve area defined by the Comprehensive Plan be separated from registered feedlots by at least 1,000 feet. During our initial meeting with Ms. Vetch, we did not identify the feedlot setback issue. Exhibits: A. Comprehensive Plan Text B. Feedlot Ordinance C. Feedlot Location Maps (used during Comp Plan process) D. Beaudry and Barthel Feedlot Sketches Analysis Comprehensive Plan. A significant issue addressed by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update was the continuation of existing farms within the community as an economically viable use. The City received input from farmers saying that the policies and feedlot regulations in effect at the time did not allow for them to continue their operations, yet development was also not allowed. The need to provide opportunities for existing farms to continue has been recognized as an important growth management strategy to avoid development of small scattered subdivisions in rural areas of the community until such time as urban growth extends outward from existing growth centers. For this reason, the Comprehensive Plan outlined a strategy for allowing limited expansion opportunities for existing feedlots, to allow growth and expansion of these uses. This strategy also recognized the inherent conflict between residential development and modern agricultural practices. The feedlot strategy detailed imposition of reciprocal setbacks where no new residential use would be allowed within 1,000 feet of a registered feedlot and where no existing registered feedlot could expand to within 1,000 feet of an existing dwelling. In cases where an existing feedlot encroached within 1,000 feet of an existing dwelling, any expansion would be allowed conditionally provided that the expanded facilities were not closer to the existing residence. The strategy also suggested that new or expanded feedlot facilities be clustered among existing buildings to minimize the impact of the use to the area. This strategy, to be implemented only in the rural service area, shifted the focus of the feedlot regulations to provide more deference to existing farms than had been previously implemented. Feedlot Ordinance. Based upon the direction of the Comprehensive Plan, the City's existing feedlot regulations were revised during the first three months of 1999. The amended Ordinance included the concepts of feedlot registration with application of reciprocal buffer setbacks and limited expansion opportunities provided for those operations that did register. The amended feedlot Ordinance provided a six month opportunity for farmers to register with the City that expired on October 1, 1999 for the ability to take advantage of the reciprocal setback and limited expansion opportunities. The registration deadline was extended by the City Council in March 2000 until October 1, 2000, based upon a number of requests from farmers who said that they were not made aware of the new feedlot Ordinance provisions. The reason for the limited registration period was to avoid a situation where a feedlot would register after division of residential lots on the operator's property or adjacent properties, thereby defeating the purpose of the setback to separate feedlots that may continue operations at current or expanded levels and new residential uses. -2- Reciprocal Setbacks. The primary issue with Ms. Vetch's proposed application is the possibility that their preferred lot location will likely encroach within the 1,000 foot setback established for the Beaudry and Barthel farms. We would assume to apply the 1,000 foot setback from the location of the feedlot buildings to the property line of the residential parcel. This method is similar to the one used for defining the separation distances between adult uses and sensitive properties. Based upon the information provided during the Comprehensive Plan Update, the 1,000 foot setback applicable to the Vetch property is shown on Exhibit C. The information in City files regarding the location of the registered feedlot facilities (Exhibit D) isn't adequate to fully evaluate the setback question. The City Council had directed staff to not make the registration process burdensome to farmers in order to encourage participation. If this issue moves forward, more specific information on the location of the existing feedlots will need to be obtained. It must also be noted that there is a vacant parcel at the northwest comer of the property, which could be built on. At the staff meeting, Ms. Vetch indicated that this lot had been divided at the time that the abutting lot was created in order to meet the County's minimum area requirements. It had been staffs suggestion that this lot be recombined with the balance of the farm property to free a development right if they did not intend to utilize the site. Based upon the City's existing data for the area, it may be possible to utilize this site or divide additional lots from the north +/- 40 acre portion of the property, outside of the feedlot setbacks. Exceptions. As noted in a memorandum from our office dated January 13, 1998, no mechanism such as a conditional use permit, was included in the amended Ordinance to allow construction of a new residence within 1,000 feet of a registered feedlot. The philosophy behind this approach was that allowing either the operator or an adjacent property owner to request exception to the reciprocal setback would be contrary to the purpose of separating the conflicting uses. Even though the parties involved in the initial subdivision may acknowledge the potential compatibility issues, there would be no prohibition on sale of the residential property. The concern is that subsequent residents may not fully understand the intensity of agriculture and object to these ongoing activities. The memorandum notes that if the 1,000 foot setback completely encompasses an adjacent parcel, there may be justification for a variance. A variance may be justified based upon a finding that the 1,000 foot setback requirement would preclude reasonable use of the adjacent property. The definition of this hardship has not been evaluated as to whether a variance is justified in order to fully develop a property to the extent allowed by the Comprehensive Plan or to mean the utilization of at least one development right. Application Materials. One issue Ms. Vetch raises in her letters is the comprehensiveness of the application materials that the City provides to potential developers. The current information packet does include a list of materials that are required to be submitted for an application. The packet does not include a summary of all -3- of the applicable plans, policies and performance standards. Given the detail included within the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Manual such a summary would be problematic. In order to assist residents and developers, City staff has at least one meeting per month available to informally review development proposals and discuss how they relate to the City's policies and regulations. The intent of these meetings is to advise potential applicants on how to best accomplish their objectives and information they need to proceed with plans. We would agree with Ms. Vetch's comment that the reciprocal feedlot setbacks are an important consideration for this area of the community. To avoid a similar issue in the future, it is suggested that the City simply keep a map of the registered feedlots for reference if there is an inquiry about development in the rural service area. Conclusion The proposed subdivision of a lot or lots from the Vetch property is the first occurrence of a development proposal that may conflict with the strategies outlined by Comprehensive Plan for sustaining existing agricultural uses in the rural service area. In our opinion, this issue is not unexpected in that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are clear that it is the City's intention to separate residential dwellings and feedlots. In formulating the feedlot strategy and regulations, City Officials were provided information illustrating the effects of the reciprocal setback concept and its administration. Existing information that the City has from the Comprehensive Plan and registered feedlots suggests that it may be possible to use the existing vacant lot or divide a lot from the northern portion of this property, if not on 80"' Street. Alternatively, this may be one of the cases where the reciprocal setback may impose undue restriction on the use of the Vetch property, depending on the actual location of the adjacent feedlots. A case for hardship would also be dependent on the interpretation of the Planning Commission and City Council as to whether a variance is justified to allowthe maximum number of development rights guided for by the Comprehensive Plan or whether a reasonable use of the property is defined as having an opportunity for at least one development site. The need for City Officials to evaluate these types of requests as part of a variance or even as a conditional use permit is due to the inherent incompatibility between the residential and agricultural uses. The proper format for evaluating this issue is for Ms. Vetch to request approval of a variance along with the anticipated rezoning and preliminary/final plat applications. The City Council may, however, provide informal opinions as to the hardship interpretation. This may provide Ms. Vetch with direction as to whether to proceed with their plans. PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Judy Vetch -4- L A N D U S E GENERAL LAND USE PLAN ELEMENTS General Land Use Plan The Land Use Plan takes projected growth rates and applicable City policies and formulates a description of desirable locations for future land uses. The plan map, when used in conjunction with land use plan narrative, designated urban/rural service areas and development related ordinances, provides a graphic description of anticipated future land uses within the community. The Land Use Plan should serve as a graphic guide in assessing development requests and how they may affect or relate to the desired land use in a given area. In the sections that follow, the specific land use categories of rural, residential, commercial, and industrial land are described in greater detail. To aid in the detailed analysis of land use, Otsego has been divided into seven planning districts. A narrative description of existing and proposed uses within the planning districts is presented in the last portion of this document. Rural Uses Uses of an agricultural or rural character represent the predominant land use type in Otsego. It is estimated that about 79 percent of the land area within the City is either vacant or used for agricultural purposes. According to the Land Use Inventory, 15,866 acres of land within Otsego are currently used for rural/vacant/agricultural uses. Five basic forms of agricultural land are present in the City, including crop production, dairy farming, beef cattle, hogs and hobby farms. While these uses are scattered somewhat randomly throughout the City, crop and dairy production constitute the most dominant farm types. The need to preserve prime agricultural lands was a primary community objective in the City's 1991 Comprehensive Plan, however, this objective has (based upon Tactics interviews) become less important over time. While the preservation of prime agricultural lands has taken on less importance, growing concern has been evidenced in regard to managing urban growth in a fiscally responsible manner (particularly in response to the City's investment in sanitary sewer service). OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 104 EXHIBIT A L A N D U S E As a means of minimizing urban and rural conflicts as well as to protect the City's investment in sanitary sewer service, it is suggested that a maximum density of four dwelling units per 40 acres of land be applied to lands within the agricultural preserve area that have frontage on an improved street, which includes existing gravel streets. Those parcels without street frontage will be limited in density to one unit per 40 acres. Higher densities would be considered with approved City sewer and water services when available. The desired results of this approach are to maintain orderly community growth, discourage competition for necessary sanitary sewer hook ups and prevent leap frog development. As noted in the Policy Plan section of- this report, there is a strong need to preserve agricultural uses and prevent undue infringement upon prime land. To this end, the City has established the A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Zoning District. The establishment of the district is meant to preserve, promote, maintain, and enhance designated lands for agricultural purposes. In addition, the district is meant to aid in the realization of a major concern of the City in preventing scattered and leap frog non-farm development. As noted in the Concept Plan, the segregation of rural and non -rural uses is critical to the successful operation of both uses. The isolation of rural, agricultural type uses from an urban development area allow each use to function as intended and removes potential nuisance concerns. An issue related to preserving agricultural uses as viable in the community is allowing existing farm operations that qualify as an animal feedlot to continue operating with limited expansion opportunities. Establishment of new animal feedlots within the City is not considered to be consistent with existing levels of development or projected growth in the community and is to be discouraged. However, in that urban -type development is not anticipated to expand into the rural service area for at least 10 to 20 years, continued agricultural uses, including existing animal feedlots, may be appropriate. In planning for continued agricultural land uses in the rural service area, there is a need to anticipate the inherent conflict between agricultural uses and residential land uses and minimize it to the extent possible. To this end, the Comprehensive Plan outlines a strategy for the continued use and limited expansion of existing animal feedlots in the rural service area. However, it must be noted that this strategy will ultimately be implemented in revised feedlot provisions within the Zoning Ordinance. The key elements of this strategy are outlined below: Registration. Existing animal feedlots that intend to continue operations within the rural service area must register with the City. Registration may include documenting animal units, verification of Minnesota Pollution Control Agency permits and approvals, documenting existing buildings etc. Registration will enable OTSEGO 105 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK L A N D U S E the City to implement policies for the protection of animal feedlots, allow for limited expansion and protect the health, safety and welfare of the community. • Reciprocal Buffer Zones. So as to prevent residential encroachment to existing animal feedlots, a 1,000 foot buffer zone is to be established around registered animal feedlots. This buffer zone is intended to be in effect so long as the animal feedlot operator maintains the operation's registration. Conversely, a reciprocal 1,000 foot buffer zone will be established around all existing residential uses in the rural service area. No registered animal feedlot will be allowed to expand its operation into this buffer zone. For those animal feedlots that currently exist within the residential buffer zone, limited expansion may be allowed conditionally, provided that the animal feedlot does not become closer to the residential use. • Limited Expansion. Registered feedlots will be allowed to expand in terms of animal units existing on the date of registration based upon the following scale: Existing Animal Units Expansion Opportunity 400 or fewer a.u. Up to 3x number of existing a.u. 401 or more a.u. Up to 2x number of existing a.u. Maximum a.u. per registered feedlot = 1,500 a.u. Expansion of existing buildings or new buildings used to house animals for registered feedlots will be allowed provided that the animal housing building is within 300 feet of an existing building used to house animals and not within 1,000 feet of an existing residential use. Building expansions or new buildings for housing animals will be conditionally allowed beyond 300 feet of an existing building that houses animals provided that there are physical or health safety limitations that prevent constructing the building within the required 300 feet and that the expansion does not encroach to within 1,000 feet of an existing residential use. One issue of City concern relates to establishing standards and accepted locations for hobby farms within the community. In determining proper hobby farm locations, the City must establish policy in regard to the issue of animals within the urban and suburban areas. Typically, a hobby farm may be defined as a tract of land generally consisting of ten or less acres in size with a house and accessory buildings on which crops and often OTS EGO DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK 106 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE , L A N D U S E livestock are raised, but not as a principal source of income. As a means of complying to Otsego's policy of segregating urban and farm -type activities and still providing a logical and cohesive land use development patterns within the City, it is recommended that hobby farms be located along the northern and eastern borders of the City's agricultural preserve area within the designated rural residential preserve and urban service reserve areas where four per forty densities are to be allowed. Resultantly, hobby farms may be utilized as a "transitional" use between urban and rural areas. Due to the typically small tracts of land which constitute "hobby farms", their placement between urban and rural or agricultural area boundaries reinforce the concept of land use transition by presenting a gradual intensification of uses between the less intensive farming and urban uses. CrrS EG O 107 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK SECTION 27 FEEDLOT REGULATIONS Section 20-27-1: Purpose 20-27-2: Allowed Feedlots 20-27-3: Prohibited Feedlots 20-27-4: Expansion of Animal Units 20-27-5: Structures for Housing Animals 20-27-6: Existing Feedlots: Compliance With MPCA Requirements 20-27-7: Odors 20-27-8: Feedlot Setbacks 20-27-9: New Dwelling Setbacks 20-27-10: Manure Stockpile/Application Setbacks 20-27-11: Destruction of Existing Animal Feedlots 20-27-12: Facility Closure 20-27-13: Abandonment 20-27-1: PURPOSE: The purpose and intent of this Section is to prohibit the establishment of new animal feedlots within the City of Otsego and to regulate existing feedlot operations within the City of Otsego in a manner conducive to the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Otsego. These controls are needed due to the recent incorporation from township status to City status and the unique location of the municipality in relation to the Metropolitan Area. These regulations are also necessary to promote the planning process within the City and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of -the City as well as to: A. Establish conditions under which existing animal feedlots within the City can continue to operate. B. Prohibit the establishment of new animal feedlots within the City. C. To prohibit the expansion of existing animal feedlots to levels not conducive with the present character of the City. D. To provide regulations which can be applied in a fair and equitable nature, but that take into account the inherent fluid nature of an ongoing farm operations and the difficulty of applying strict numbers as criteria for control of an ongoing operation. E. Promote best farm management practices. F. Protect valuable groundwater and surface water resources. 27-1 EXHIBIT B G. Protect human and animal health. H. Implement specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Promote compatibility of uses. J. Promote continuance of agricultural uses while protecting the residents from nuisances caused by large, non-traditional, and intense agricultural uses. K. Coordinate and assist state agencies in the administration of state-wide statutes and regulations governing livestock operations. 20-27-2: ALLOWED FEEDLOTS: A. Urban Service Area: Those feedlots presently existing within the Urban Service Area, designated by the Comprehensive Plan, may continue operations as provided for in this section, subject to the following: 1. Existing feedlots may continue operations as legal nonconforming uses as set forth in Section 15 of this Chapter, and as long as they do not constitute a potential pollution hazard. Such feedlots may only continue on the condition that they obtain approval from MPCA, if necessary. a. Interpretation of Section 15: It is understood that by its nature the raising of animals and farming creates a situation where there are seasonal, natural, fluctuations in the number of animals within a facility. It is also understood that to remain viable, a farming operation must have a reasonable ability to limited expansion. Due to these peculiar circumstances, and only for purposes of this Section, the phrase "enlarged" contained in Section 15 of this Ordinance shall be construed as an enlargement of a legally established pre-existing use in the following circumstances: (1) In a case where a new structure is constructed or is proposed for construction for the purpose of housing additional animals. (2) In a case where a lagoon or earthen basin associated with an increase in animal units is constructed or proposed for construction. (3) In a case where an existing animal feedlot is not in compliance with the terms and conditions of an MPCA permit or interim permit. 27-2 (4) In the case where additional animal units place the facility in violation of current City ordinances regarding the care of animals. (5) Any increase of the total number of animal units in an existing animal feedlot which raises the cumulative total of animal units above twice the number present upon the facility at the date of adoption of this Ordinance. (6) Any construction, outside of normal maintenance, which has the effect of increasing the size of a building used for the purposes of housing animals which is done without the conditional use permit required by this section. (7) Ongoing violations of other City ordinances. B. Rural Service Area: Those feedlots presently existing within the Rural Service Area, designated by the Comprehensive Plan, may continue operations and be allowed limited expansion opportunities as provided for in this section, subject to the following: 1. Registration: All existing feedlots shall be registered with the City within six (6) months of 1 April 1999 by administrative permit, subject to the procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 7 of this Chapter. a. An application for an administrative permit to register an existing feedlot shall include the following information: (1) Owner's and operator's name and address. (2) Location of the animal feedlot including quarter, section, range and township. (3) Animal types and existing number of animals of each type confined at the feedlot and maximum number of animal units allowed in conformance with MPCA permits and guidelines. (4) A scale drawing clearly indicating the dimensions of the feedlot and showing all existing homes, buildings, existing manure storage areas and/or structures, lakes, ponds, water courses, known wetlands, dry runs, rock outcroppings, roads and wells within one thousand (1,000) feet of the feedlot. 27-3 (5) Plans for buildings and structures as required by this Ordinance -and/or other County and State ordinances and regulations. (6) A manure and waste management plan as required by the MPCA. (7) Leases or agreements allowing disposal of manure on land other than that of the feedlot owner/operator. No land may be subject to more than one (1) such lease or agreement. (8) Documentation of compliance with all . MPCA rules and regulations and approval of MPCA permits, as may be applicable. (9) Information identified in Section 20-7-3 of this Chapter, as may be applicable. b. Amended Registration: An amendment to a registration may be applied for and shall be administered in a manner similar to a new registration application. Amended registration shall be required for any of the following: (1) Ownership of an existing feedlot is changed, including but not limited to the following: (a) A change in ownership of buildings and/or land. (b) A lease for -the use of buildings and/or land is entered into, modified or terminated. (2) There is a substantial change in operation of the feedlot. (a) The number of animal units is increased two hundred (200) percent above the number of animal units existing at the feedlot on the date of registration. (b) Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing buildings capable of housing animals. (c) Any change in the operation of a feedlot that would affect the storage, handling, utilization or disposal of manure. 27-4 C. Termination. Registration of an existing feedlot shall be valid indefinitely provided that the operation is in full compliance with the provisions of this Chapter and County and/or State regulations, as may be applicable. The owner of a feedlot may terminate an approved registration at any time by submitting a written request to the Zoning Administrator. Once terminated by a feedlot owner, registration shall be permanently forfeited and not be re- established under any circumstances. Any feedlot for which registration was terminated may continue operations as a legal non- conforming use as outlined in Section 20-27-2.A.1 of this Section. d. Any feedlot not registered with the Zoning Administrator within six (6) months of 1 April 1999 may continue operations as a legal non- conforming use as outlined in Section 20-27-2.A.1 of this section. 20-27-3: PROHIBITED FEEDLOTS: No new animal feedlots shall be established within the City. No existing animal feedlot is allowed to expand beyond its level of operation at the date of 8 March 1999, subject to Section 20-27-2 of this section. No operation or facility established with ten (10) animal units or less may expand to more than ten (10) animal units. 20-27-4: EXPANSION OF ANIMAL UNITS: An existing feedlot in the Rural Service Area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan, which is registered pursuant to Section 20- 27-2.13 may be allowed to increase the number of animal units, subject to the following.- A. ollowing: A. The increase in number of permitted animal units shall be based upon the following provisions: 1. For existing feedlots allowed not more than four hundred (400) animal units by MPCA permit on the date of registration, the number of permitted animal units may be increased up to three hundred (300) percent. 2. For existing feedlots that are allowed more than four hundred (400) animal units by MPCA permit on the date of registration, the number of permitted animal units may be increased up to two hundred (200) percent. 3. The number of animal units of any existing feedlot shall not be increased to more than one thousand five hundred (1,500) animal units. B. There is existing building and animal holding areas necessary to adequately house the increase in animal units, in conformance with applicable City ordinances. Any construction of a new building or expansion of an existing building necessary to 27-5 adequately house the increase in animal units shall be subject to Section 20-27-5 of this section. C. The feedlot owner/operator shall own or have sufficient land under contract for spreading of manure generated by the expanded feedlot operation. D. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2.13 of this Chapter. 20-27-5: STRUCTURES FOR HOUSING FARM ANIMALS: The construction of new buildings or expansion of existing buildings intended to house animals in association with an existing feedlot that is in full compliance with this Section shall be subject to the following provisions: A. Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing building for the purpose of housing farm animals is allowed for existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area, as defined by the Comprehensive Plan, which are registered per Section 20-27-2.13 provided that: 1. Any new building intended to house farm animals is within three hundred (300) feet of an existing building that houses farm animals, except by conditional use permit. 2. Any new building or expansion of an existing building intended to house farm animals may not encroach within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing residential use, except by conditional use permit. 3. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2.13 of this Chapter. B. Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing buildings for the purpose of housing farm animals for existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area that are not registered in accordance with Section 20-27-2.13 and existing feedlots in the Urban Service Area shall be subject to the provisions of 20-27-5.A above and require approval of a conditional use permit. C. Conditional Use Permits: Application for a conditional use permit under this section shall be regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter. Such a conditional use permit may be granted provided that: 1. Applicant provide proof that the proposed building or building expansion is the necessary to provide sufficient room for the number of animal units to be added, and that the number is allowable under this section. 27-6 2. That the proposed building or building expansion is the minimum expansion necessary to adequately. house said animals, and to comply with existing City ordinances. 3. That the building or building expansion is to be constructed in such a manner as to not increase the non -conformity; to minimize the impact on surrounding properties; and as may be allowed below: a. For proposed buildings located beyond three hundred (300) feet of an existing building used to house animals, the applicant must demonstrate physical justification for the increased separation and that the distance from existing buildings is the minimum necessary. b. For allowed feedlots within 1,000 feet of an existing residential use, the proposed building or building expansion may not encroach closer to said residential use. 4. The applicant provide documentation of compliance with all MPCA rules and regulations and approval of MPCA permits, as may be applicable. 5. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2. B. of this Chapter. 6. The provisions of Section 20-4-2.F of this Chapter are considered and determined to be satisfied. 20-27-6: COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS: All existing animal feedlots operating on 1 April 1999 shall continue operating only in strict compliance with all applicable MPCA rules and regulations. 20-27-7: ODORS:AII animal feedlot operations shall take responsible measures to minimize odors which have the effect of creating an adverse impact on the environment and quality of life for the residents of the City. 20-27-8: FEEDLOT SETBACKS: Lawfully established feedlots existing prior to 1 April 1999 may be continued in the location existing on such date. 20-27-9: NEW DWELLING SETBACKS: No building permit shall be issued for a new dwelling unit within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing feedlot that is registered under the provisions of Section 20-27-2.13, which also qualifies as a farm as defined by Section 20-2-2 of this Chapter. This provision shall not apply to dwellings constructed as a principal residence on the same parcel and under the ownership of the owner/operator of the registered feedlot. 27-7 20-27-10: MANURE STOCKPILEIAPPLICATION SETBACKS: The following manure stockpile and application setbacks are required for all existing animal feedlots: CATEGORY MANURE APPLICATION STOCKPILES Surface/ Incorporated or Irrigation Injected Public lake, river, or 300 feet 100 feet -lake 50 feet- 300 feet stream river/ stream Public streets (as 25 feet -surface 300 10 feet 25 feet measured from the feet -irrigation outer boundary of the right-of-way) Platted Subdivisions 300 feet -surface 300 feet 300 feet 1,000 feet- irrigation Municipal wells 200 feet 200 feet 300 feet Private wells 200 feet 200 feet 200 feet Public or private ditch 300 feet 100 feet 300 feet (including those in a public rights-of-way) Residence other than 300 feet -surface 300 feet 300 feet landowner or operator 1 1,000 feet -irrigation 20-27-11: DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING ANIMAL FEEDLOTS: Notwithstanding Section 20- 15-3.J of this Chapter, any animal feedlot lawfully existing as an allowed use under this Section 20-27-2 of this Chapter and any structures or buildings lawfully existing and which are used for the purpose of containing animals associated with an allowed feedlot use, which are destroyed or partially destroyed to the extent of more than fifty (50) percent of its fair market value, may be restored and the same use resumed (if such use was lawfully existing as an allowed use, pursuant to Section 20-27-2 of this section, prior to such damage and destruction)or any conforming use established, provided that such reconstruction be completed within twelve (12) months after the date of such damage or destruction. 20-27-12: FACILITY CLOSURE: A. Responsible Parties: The landowner, owner and operator of an existing animal feedlot shall be responsible for the ongoing management of manure and the final closure of the facility including the cleaning of buildings and the emptying and proper disposal of manure from all manure holding facilities. 27-8 B. Closure: If an existing feedlot operation ceases operation, the owner and/or operator shall be responsible for the following: 1. All wastes from the feedlot operation and its waste control system shall be removed and disposed of on land or in some other legally permissible manner as soon as practical, but no more than six (6) months, and in a manner conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare. 2. Closure of the operation may be postponed for a period of twelve (12) months if the property is posted for sale. 3. Notification to the City that the feedlot operation has been discontinued, and that the property is in compliance with this Section of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. If the property is for sale, notification shall be given to all potential buyers of the status of the feedlot use of the property which must comply with all presently applicable zoning ordinances if the feedlot operation is discontinued for a period of six (6) months, as well as the other provisions of section 15 of this Chapter. 20-27-13: ABANDONMENT: Owners and operators of animal feedlots, either at the time of abandonment or after, shall have joint and several liability for clean up, closure or remediation of abandoned feedlot sales. 27-9 m x x s AGRICULTURAL AREA OTSEGO 1000 FOOT BUFFER N BASE MAP. . NOTE: THIS MAP IS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EXACT MEASUREMENT. SCALE: 0 NORTH MAP DATE: MAY 1998 a FARMSTEAD WITH ANIMALS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK FROM CITY OF OTSEGO 0 NOV. 8.2000 2:35PM P 3 PHONE NO. 612 441 4414 fx Al (K, duce 4. c qV) BEAUDRY EXHIBIT D-1 - k-7 0 NOV. 8.2000 2:35PM P 3 PHONE NO. 612 441 4414 fx Al (K, duce 4. c qV) BEAUDRY EXHIBIT D-1 NOV. 8.2000 2:35PM P 2 FROM CITY OF OTSEGO PHONE NO. 612 441 4414 S 1� ✓�l°a9y �-a,✓'� �v r, 3 lit � ly BARTHEL EXHIBIT D-2 14 t Lig CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney Elaine Beatty November 13, 2000 City Clerk 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 8.1. Consider Assessment Resolution 8.2. Any Other Legal Business BACKGROUND: 8.1. Attached is a Resolution Adopting Assessment and letter dated November 9 by Andy MacArthur. He will be present to explain and answer questions. This is in regards to the Thibodeaus Assessment for Sewer and Water Service, and they have waived their right to a hearing and right to appeal. 8.2. This is for any other Legal Business that may arise. R ECO.1V1_MF'NDATION• These are for Council consideration and any approval needed. Thanks, _ Elaine Michael C. Couri- Andrew J. MacAithur Marcus W. Miller Robert T. Ruppe•- •A Lao licemed in Illinois •'ALm licensed in Cnlifomw November 9, 2000 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, MN 55330 CO URI & MACARTHUR Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-2599 (FAX) couriandmacarthurQpobox. com RE: Thibodeau Property Assessment Dear Council Members: Please find enclosed for your consideration at Monday night's City Council meeting a proposed Resolution Adopting Assessment on the Thibodeau property for sewer and water service and related fees. The Thibodeaus have waived their right to a hearing and right to appeal. I will be available to answer any questions you might have regarding the resolution. Very Wt!l ours, 4dJ.c rth COURI & MACARTHUR Encl. cc: Mike Robertson Larry Koshak, City Engineer CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO: RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to petition for construction of certain improvements benefiting the property herein described and signed waiver of hearing, irregularities in process, and right of appeal signed by the affected property owners, Rudy J. Thibodeau and Margaret Thibodeau; said improvements, consisting of construction of sanitary sewer and water lines to provide municipal sewer and water services to the described property, have been completed; and WHEREAS, Owners have signed a waiver of their right to appeal and have agreed that their property (PID 118-038-001040) has been benefited by said improvements in the amount of $25,294.91. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA: 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and the tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2001, and shall bear interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this resolution until December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on the property, with interest accrued to the date of payment to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31of the next succeeding year. 4. The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessments shall be paid over in the same as other City taxes. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this day of November, 2000. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 31 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9.1. City Administration Elaine Beatty, City Clerk November 13, 2000 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: A. 3RD Quarter Budget Report B. Any Other Administrative Business BACKGROUND: A. Attached is a Memo from Mike Robertson Re: 2000 3RD Quarter Budget Report. Mike will be present to review his Memo. B. This is for any City Administrator Business that may arise. RECOMMEIN-DATION: This is for Council consideration and any approval needed. Thanks, �Cc�1c—J 9Elane MEMO Date: November 8, 2000 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: 2000 Elections The results for the Otsego City elections are as follows. Otsego set a new record as 3074 people voted. There were 549 newly registered voters. MAYOR Larry Fournier 2463 COUNC I LMEMBER Virginia Wendel 1199 Jerry Struthers 1176 Pauline Nelson 1110 Richard Nichols 1023 The new members will take office on January 8, 2001 when they are sworn in before the start of the City Council meeting. REVIEW OF 2000 ELECTIONS There were 3538 pre -registered voters as of 7:00 a.m. election day. When the 549 new registrants are added to that, it gives a total number of voters of 4077. 3074 voted, for a voter turnout of 75%. Given that many of the new registrants were already registered voters of Otsego and had to re- register due to a name or address change, our actual turnout is higher than 750. When reviewing the election process everyone was very satisfied. None of us received any complaints from voters about waiting in line or registering. Other than right at 7:00 a.m. when the polls opened, the longest wait occurred between 4:30-5:00 p.m. At that point about 20-25 people were waiting in line for a booth to open up so they could vote. The longest wait was probably 5-7 minutes. This is an improvement over the 1998 elections. Elaine, Judy, and Carol deserve praise for the changes they made to control a large amount of people and to help them vote with a minimum of waiting. I also think the weather caused many people to vote earlier in the day than they usually would. RECOMMENDATIONS 1) Before the next election we should purchase another 8-10 voting booths which can be set up along the west wall. This will allow voting to move faster at the busiest times. 2) We should also purchase another vote tabulating machine if state law allows us. Whenever the current machine jams it causes delays. There was a significant delay during the busiest part of the afternoon due to a jam. Two machines would both prevent that and allow people to move a little faster once they were done voting. 3) We also will do our best to accumulate voter registration cards during the next two years because the County never provides enough. We will continue to provide voter registration cards to new residents. CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 13, 2000 Attached is the Claims List for your consideration. For more detail, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. Claims List 11-01-00 Claims List 11-09-00 Grand Total $70,998.64 306,715.67 $377,714.31 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk/Treasurer JH/co CITY OF OTSEGO Check Summary Register 10100 BANK OF ELK UnPaid D & Y LTD PARTNERSHIP UnPaid DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND UnPaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER UnPaid DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. UnPald GILBERT L & BIWE DARKENWALD UnPaid HOMES PLUS UnPaid JAMES & JOYCE JOHNSON UnPaid JERRY OLSON Wednesday, November 01, 2000 Page 1 of 1 Check Amt $19,800.00 $136.00 $35.14 $1,000.00 $1.1,300.00 $2,000.00 $14,725.00 $22,002.50 Total Checks $70,998.64 CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid D & Y LTD PARTNERSHIP Wednesday, November 01, 2000 Page 1 of 1 G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $9,225.00 PID271400 Perm&TempEasemnt G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $10,575.00 PID274203 Perm&TempEasemnt Total D & Y LTD PARTNERSHIP $19,800.00 Unpaid DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND °`°Ci00C E 101-41940-402 Repairs/Maint Buildingss $136.00 Heating Service Total DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND $136,00 E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $35.14 00363139 PW # 9 Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $35.14 Unpaid DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 P 00-151 Landscape Escrow Total DRAKE CONSTRUCTION, INC. $1,000.00 Unpaid GILBERT L. &BILLIE DARKENWALD G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $7,250.00 PID274202 Perm&TempEasement G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $4,050.00 PID274202 Perm&TempEasement Total GILBERT L. & BILLIE DARKENWALD $11,300.00 Unaid« M.� w kx«• :I- P OMES P U3 E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 P00-259 Landscape Eswcrow E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 P00-57 Landscape Escrow Total HOMES PLUS $2,000,00 Un aid P ���JAMES•&JOYCE JOHNSON �� G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $14,725.00 PID274102 Perm&TempEasement Total JAMES & JOYCE JOHNSON $14,725.00 Unpaid. -JERRY OLSON E101-42410-390 Contracted Services $22,002.50 Bldg. Inspections Total JERRY OLSON $22,002.50 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $70,998.64 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, November 09, 2000 Check Summary Register Page 1 of Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $200.16 UnPaid BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC $1,326.20 UnPaid BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER $339.73 UnPaid BOYER TRUCKS $93.41 UnPaid CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO. $906,39 UnPaid CITY OF ALBERTVILLE $17,520.32 UnPaid CITY OF MONTICELLO $6,944.88 UnPaid COMMUNITY RECREATION $3,707.50 UnPaid CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $348,75 UnPaid CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $89.61 UnPaid DAVIDS PHOTOGRAPHY $27.00 UnPaid DEHN TREE COMPANY $1,491.00 UnPaid DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND $1,301.35 UnPaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $272.55 UnPaid DON'S BAKERY $39.25 UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $594.00 UnPaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $132,06 UnPaid ENCOMM $1,322.50 UnPaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE $63,71 UnPaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94,19 UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $548.49 UnPaid GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC $681.42 UnPaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $75,977.87 UnPaid HAWKINS CHEMICAL $10,00 UnPaid ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $450.00 UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $614.70 UnPaid JANSEN HOMES $1,000.00 UnPaid LATOUR CONSTRUCTION $112,572,19 UnPaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $60.00 UnPaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST $398.00 UnPaid LONG & SONS $621.52 UnPaid MEDICA $3,462.98 UnPaid MERGES ANDREW $165.76 UnPaid METROPOLITAN GRAVEL CO INC $247.50 UnPaid MINNESOTA COPYSYSTEMS $414.76 UnPaid MONARCH HOMES, INC. $1,000,00 UnPaid NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $178.32 UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $4,892.26 UnPaid ONRAMP, INC $39.95 UnPaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $1,936.27 UnPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $395.47 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,063.77 UnPaid RADIOSHACK $425.96 UnPaid RANDYS SANITATION $252.50 UnPaid RIVER CITY LANES $190,10 UnPaid SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. $58.68 UnPaid SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION $6,852.50 UnPaid SOFTRONICS $554.93 UnPaid SPRINT $188.16 UnPaid STAR TRIBUNE $3,931.20 Thursday, November 09, 2000 CITY OF OTSEGO Check Summary Register Page 2 of 2 UnPaid Name Check Date Check Amt UnPaid STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY $450.00 UnPaid STS CONSULTANT'S LTD $7,443.50 UnPaid SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLY $205.17 UnPaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $1,662.47 UnPaid TOM CONSTANT UnPaid TRICON, INC. UnPaid WASTE MANAGEMENT UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE UnPaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC UnPaid ZIEGLER INC $12.77 $26,210.00 $125.72 $13,999.50 $254.25 $352.47 Total Checks $306,715.67 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, November 09, 2000 Check Detail Register Page 1 of 7 \\\�,:�>:Y:............ ..vK.r n.: �>.ak',•-va�:M;r3:�3;1a;: •,':'l:�Si\`ri`�'v�w�avi�c��`"�>,�\`\"' �.iv;>� 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid � S, INC. E 101-43100-204 Insurance $200.16 105619836 PW # 9 Total AIRGAS, INC. $200.16 Unpaid x,n.,.xn.n...».xx:n~„».xx: E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) ($34.52) PM34992 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $2.25 0002 PW # 1 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $185.01 5969 Pumping Sery E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $26.00 6685 PW #8 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $12.50 6715 PW # 11 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $1,134.96 7377 PW # 1 Total BERLIN TIRE CENTER, INC $1,32620 Unpaid nBFI - W�OODLAKE SANITATION SER E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $339.73 October Recycling Total BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER $339.73 ,+,.vv?:S^>i0.:n:C^:C^:»:S•;y.•>Y.•p:v;w.-.-^(:;;tiq::pip>::!4:v<!.>i>:?;iii>?»>ri>:4>:i!ir.>:JhE.>' Unpaid BOYER TRUCKS .v.»var.!h\'� 11KM»tv. YnKJCN0EK2+KNM,vv:.,»vn,>wr»vn,»w::v E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $93.41 5631R PW # 2 Total BOYER TRUCKS $93.41 Unpaid CARLSON TRACTOR &EQUIP. CO. E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $906.39 2001842 PW # 10 Total CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO. $906.39 Unpaid CITY OF A�LLE E 211-42200-390 Contracted Services $17,520.32 10-23-00 Half of Contract Price Total CITY OF ALBERTVILLE $17,520.32 :.:!•»»fr.!!;o» •>:x!:•:>:;:> �r l� !^::::>x Unpaid � �:: .;::•>::a%::!!«:::cx!orrrn%n:.<c:.:.,carawr::ncuu..;xa'.xrmr>wlawooewnnavcmxanruaxmerm....r:n,:::•..ar:n:r!ax..w»+c:x:.xn:n:x..:.mrn+.vnw:/nn»•n.:..•„•.,.•:.w..::n.:n.: CITY OF MONTICELLO E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $228.00 August Anim Cont E 213-42200-390 Contracted Services $1,837.50 Fire Contract E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $4,681.38 Pumping Sery E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $198.00 Sept Anim Cont Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $6,944.88 UaidCOMMUNITY RECREATION AION E 101-45100-390 Contracted Services $3,707.50 Joint Power November -December Total COMMUNITY RECREATION $3,707.50 w:::::xxxmwnv:mn„vr:xx::.v.v: %F.!i^\:, �!�I/i/.!.ti!LCVa>:?:p,..}:�,+,.;;:.!yryfX!^.:MC!::KKS�:^.00!9(t90P.1+[M..�:OYf.00WA00Ct�MWYAU+bh�OPYAYIF!/AN/AfHA'fiOP•.6iMOMWA'/.VpXMrvwfb`h+nv+•:vxx<+�,•n,vx/::x::xn Unpaid CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN E 417-43251-351 Legal Notices Publishing $348.75 CB117885 Ad for Bids Total CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN $348.75 ..n..w.o>ma, iim awm»>nr�ror>ra»m'miiowwmnarriowno uwr.v as momoow .oa ,rw/n•.,y..xeema..,w:w..w..,•n Unpaid xx CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $89.61 10-2-00 78282 Total CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT $89.61 v::xxi::::xx::+::nv:n•.w: x:xx:: nvV/i!.:v:.!-/////u.!.iii:::ii.ii!•r»iilf/fi//liN.!:!H.iF�F/F////i /:F.•r:Ko:::•.'!.!•?%lAYN/!% l/k :ppgY% f/lir:.v!.:y�/i/F!!/!/l///lll1A'H/F//llNll!//%b'n+»•:::xx:nvx:::lnv::.vxxxxx::. Unpaid DAVIDS PHOTOGRAPHY E 101-41400-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $27.00 Photo Shoot CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, November 09, 2000 Check Detail Register Fags 2 of 7 Check Amt Invoice Comment � r> :�;Y s'« e • �rx::,..,>:�<Yrz �.;�::.>:.,;;;:...::;;.;.:^,;•.,;`•a��u;<�v: �^,owe t�'°� � �"/��...a''Q�1' `' Total DAVIDS PHOTOGRAPHY $27.00 mcc�vuwroveccwa�V.�a»»m'.vcz�c.:/ra.v:mmo.�����+x>x>x�Y•>:..vsrtr. +�e.aenaene+.a,+rewe^roan>.Mna�mn.meaMm,«nwY.,..,,,�.......�.,........... Unpaid DEHN TREE COMPANY E 207-45210-390 Contracted Services $1,491.00 146 Stump Grdg Brush Hauling Total DEHN TREE COMPANY $1,491.00 �:.. �a�•%lm>:..>:,,•,:�a»a»:�:1.,�. ��a�aaa��:�.;%,,>: Unpaid DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND E 101-41940-402 Repairs/Maint Buildingss $1,301.35 030730 Clean/ck Furnace Total DJ'S HEATING & AIR COND $1,301.35 Unpaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER E101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $68.32 365069 PW # 9 E101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $14.17 365411 PW # 9 E101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $10.06 369722 PW # 9 E101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $178.98 369722 E101-41940-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $1.02 sc110100 Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $272.55 w:m000voeooeee�oroaoa�, vvom:esu«eooaer�eu�w.wa-,oaavr..e:<,«•>000a+aenan,�vena�u«w�ex<s»ea,aas+ee.�•ee�xroex�e�w�« Unpaid DON'S BAKERY E 101-41900-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $14.65 EDAAC Mtg. Snack E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies $24.60 Brk Election Total DON'S BAKERY $3925 lJ >o, n a ..o %.V>•.wECMM PUBLISHERS .•<.,ti,»Y.,,,>H xa n. eaY n � %� �a � , � � � ro • � � ro ^. a � an �a paid HERS INC E 201-45000-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $594.00 Haunted House Adv Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $594.00 �aaa�:aan»a��..o�«�aave�>..<:.;>;a>•,.�,�,M:��aaanx•:<.>'«^.•,�„nk..,,y..s.,...>�.,,,<:.,�,ne.aro.^,aaaaaaaa�aaana,..,�,�..�,..V,,.,..,,.^aaa.ron�a.aa.ro<r.,...r p�,.�.7.�1.q Unpaid ELK RIVER PRINTING &PARTY PLU E101-41400-201 Office Supplies $132.06 011759 Office Supplies Total ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $132.06 J�:w-;G»:::A>>.,,\:.;i::<J::.F.v.;:<L;.A4::.::ntl-.:AWXw9««.•:<.v<::^.:,u-::<::::.,vv.,+r.4we<Ns•<aE:geNaeOK<JM<de00.YA-:,n««:^v:[M'On,,,.::.•M..hv^n,.•,.,n,:«: ^•x::.:::rr<::r::,:nn«nn,«nmv.vv<nn,.•«,.v^v:<^r««<nttKK^Y.r ..!!^?V^CYfY<%�IY.e•�TY.9 Unpaid ENCOMM E 415-43251-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $1,322.50 Well # 1 Transfer Total ENCOMM $1,322.50 W.. �OOWAOO�Wn\i�9O:0�WC'nr:4'i000JC]CTWOOOhY1A,;:+NNnYAw.:eJhvw:<.S>:A:.:SYF%ONOi,>::..r:.Ufd'/AbOJa4W>;CM%1.40ta.W>%:dA>fM'J<J>hHN.)hbaMeM06NM^4:,,v.\'^%x.%.n00a0UA%ANMEanY>YraOMMnM+nv<rwru„werrn,,,,,,v.nvrr�<+.�nwv Unpaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $29.82 Nov. Rental E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $24.30 3422 Solar Salt E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $9.59 5388 Nov. Rental Total FINKEN'S WATER CARE $63.71 Unpaid,�,wr,�,.,,,,.,,,,.<rx^:M..,..<ro.k::,,,,rrr..rr^ ,f �,�•,.�>a�<n:RY..<•:.::-,:� <�,a�Y. �-mlllm:,aa�:YY.,.�aaa<.Yll,�.,�u„�,.�>A FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.19 PW Life Ins. E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $54.00 Adm.Life Ins. Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94.19 HrY//!/!//IUNJ»NYrnn>.Y>Y/!/l!/lIMOO:GO<!b.G.h;4G%iiil!!h%.:.lh»»w:4'n.:i:.»'lK>%Ad»»W»Y✓/AYAWVI/.GO>WY:lAhvlrr/.%!mu.%iriY.v!!!!ldlrn,v.Yi<:nxuui!!/ii/^:v/irrr�•rv!/r!!i!i/!!ii/!/rrnwrr«r<w.nvrrrrrm•.»vviiirr:v+.w^ Unpaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $57.24 377123 Uniforms E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $73.86 377124 Rugs E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $66.57 381759 Uniforms E 101.43100-390 Contracted Services $91.89 386415 Uniforms E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $73.86 366416 Rugs CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Thursday, November 09, 2000 Page 3 of 7 �� iA�+�Z4�v v;:•w'•:>::i;^'+r'.•1:::?:w::: 'ri:ii::if;�\\\\��,::�:��'�« < Check Amt Invoice Comment .��: ai":<��:� •• :3::�•>;`:`:Baa"�'�i'srria3a�:�'���:a:��3�i<��i E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $57.24 391125 Uniforms E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $57.24 395862 Uniforms E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $70.59 395863 Rugs Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $548.49 Engineering Fees E 602-49450-302 DKV\^CT..\,•::�i;:in:YM:J:ni.:::•\i:: Unpaid f.'1.ii�\\\\\�lW YOS}i}\ W1+OPWiVW065.xNA+00n»N6n04x%+Av<,rx.vxxxti?+M•.41w.xvM\: GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC Engineering Fees ebAY� /.06�M1.xx,x E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $72.77 0017 PW # 9 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $201.33 0025 PW #2 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $8.37 0035 PW # 11 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $32.37 0052 PW # 9 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) ($35.89) 0059 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $5.36 0075 PW # 3 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $397.11 0080 PW #2 Total GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC $681.42 M\+roro0.M1'M••T+h1YK.vvM}vvpxxxb'.%.'{iy<prvnxxvxxxvvvx mxtiM�000SgLCp(p{plyprTK,y�M::'I.�iC:9:tM}090pC9fpCpOG(;SSSOOl9�C^hIXS�iA`• qC9C4Y,[4:9CYCH�KAQ,MOf�i000NMTT}JWfC-000pt Unpaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC E 601-49400-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41400-348 Maps E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees G 701-21940 The 'Point'- Big Ed's E 601-49400-302 Engineering Fees G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates E 416-43100-302 Engineering Fees E 602-49450-302 Engineering Fees E 602-49450-302 Engineering Fees G701-21958 Crimson Ponds III G 701-21915 Crimson ponds/Backer 99-7 G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer G 701-21927 O. Thompson CUP 99-18 G 701-21961 NO DESCR G 701-21938 TMH Development G 701-21940 The 'Point' - Big Ed s E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees E 416-43100-302 Engineering Fees G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge G 701-21941 Pulte Hanes $1,570.32 $702.00 $711.00 $759.82 $780.74 $814.39 $856.90 $574.30 $1,221.36 $268.84 $1,838.51 $1,101.98 $571.55 $490.00 $416.09 $414.66 $318.69 $182.63 $171.21 $112.50 $110.07 $50.88 $35.00 $3,810.38 $361.40 G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00 $3,068.98 G 701-21961 NO DESCR $3,978.00 E 101-43100-302 Engineering Fees $12,514.86 E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $16,939.13 E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $19,319.66 G 701-21947 Prairie Creek 3rd Addn $1,912.02 Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $75,977.87 Pump House 98.02 88th St S & W Easement Let. Crk Misc Eng Maps 1-94 West Ind. Park Lefebvre Watershed 78thSt S& W Pulte Pump House Des/Const. Pheasant Ridge 1 st Tollefson Dev. Overlay Proj Trunk San Sewer Trunk SanSewer 98.04 Crimson Ponds 3rd Crimson Ponds Prairie Creek 1 st T KoerMtz US Homes Pheasant Ridge 4th Today Prop/Swiggum The Pointe Muni St Aid Adm. Wetland Conserv Pheasant Ridge 2nd Prairie Creek 2nd Miss. Pines Pheasant Ridge 3rd Odean Ave Recon98.05 88thStS&W Quaday Storm Sewer Prairie Creek 3rd Unpaid,,,, HAWKINS CHEMICAL eM .x..,w„Kk-..,,,.,,,-..., E601-49400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $10.00 47305 Total HAWKINS CHEMICAL $10.00 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, November 09, 2000 Check Detail Register Page 4 of 7 E 101-41400-355 Dues & Memberships $450.00 192012 Membership dues Total ICMA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $450.00 ww»~,,,x..,.,�,.w�,:,,,,,»,x,•,.rnwK..rw.w,x�,.nx,�,,.,.n..ww.w�w.,,.w.,�.xx«,...,�,..x ..:4Y>,o>mm«.>.Y�:��«4�x>�., E 101-41400-121 PERA $201.92 PPE 10/28/00 G 101-21705 Other Retirement $412.78 PPE 10/28/00 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $614.70 .xxxv,,,.x,•.�,.,w.V,,,wwrrn..•r,�.,,,wn„rn�:�.�.�::t;::!t:4>.Y.� .. „�, E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 Landscape Escrow Total JANSEN HOMES $1,000.00 Un aid xxnMMMMMWM00:tMtM«MSC P LATOUR CONSTRUCTION E 417-43251-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $112,572.19 Pay Estimate # 6 Total LATOUR CONSTRUCTION $112,572.19 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E 101-41400-360 Education/Training/Conferences $60.00 4763 Conference Fee Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $60.00 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST '°°`""�""°°'' E 101-41400-204 Insurance $398.00 10-25-00 Work Comp Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INS TRUST $398.00 •:n.:,+n:•.vwvnwr:.:x„xxvxvnvw.vnvxvM,tit4;tpl,?;4;^>;S:C.`C4Y.M4:(rnY„?.vttittgtSMgpWOpOWMCtgOC^.OG Unpaid LONG &SONS VCMt4:9C9Krywgppppgt0ppp(gpp:pgp�pp�pp�N.4%�niitt. .04^.C9CIXCtt4:?SSKV:(Ynpgypppq}y/:pp[.•<xN.:•Nrdx,•:xrK..cwvrM E 101-41400-389 Cleaning Services $621.52 Oct. Cleaning Total LONG & SONS $621,52 UnpaidMEDICA .x:........:.>.>.....:.;»r:..................,...................r......rr.�,f.,.rn::. :::..,.:,:..:,.,,r::...,., E 101-43100-123 Health $1,432.27 PW Health Ins. E 101-41400-123 Health $2,030.71 Adm Health Ins. Total MEDICA $3,462.98 .wvw,.,,wn..,rrv...»rmx>ovorJmca:m»rrr.4ca:f4o-aavo:4a Unpaid MERGES ANDR n>ww»:or000mnu»ii now>oormua:Mnoovaa»r!.eaw..e,w,i....nerwv/.n:nx:wr,lrsw.w. E 101-41550-360 Education/Training/Conferences $165.76 Unid.»T>:ot•:VtCaS[l! ttt!M4:ME,\R4%G+/!CE<OGSIX! 4A>:tN[<VDKyRCEIOKWMtq[4:OCt4<I,$VO1:a6'»5:M.C7OO6 ppy,MCGop::/I.C:A::KfU.f.'l:A,>:Cr;4;::-.Ji%RLHS aOC METROPOLITAN GRAVEL CO INC d riC4:iLO;LHif/..:t://./.f4i'w•:.vrvreuvnw. w: rx;n•.v::: riir. E 101-43100.220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $247.50 Truck Repair Total METROPOLITAN GRAVEL CO INC $247,50 w.,,r,,,,..nvw,....»..r..,.,wr:..,:.nwa.:uc4»wrrn4rv:ta•»,w>:•>:.>,;;o»u.orn>»a:ww0000wwczv! mwuwar z000wow,woezar»wa+raro;.>w;:4kuays>.,rlln:asw,maerw:w:c4..:w>,>„w„J.w»,,,w.,vw., Unpaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $414.76 91446 Copier Rental Total MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $414.76 O NARCH .X—RZA...�,,r,!!.>,/!!!;.»•/!!,!!!,!!!!,>-.,-::::r„r,,.,,•.:.,:r,..x,,,w,,,,,.: Unpaid MOHOMES, INC. r. E 702-41400-310 Miscellaneous $1,000.00 Landscape Escrow Total MONARCH HOMES, INC. $1,000.00 vrri„i„i,,.vw•wvrnvn»,:w,rriv:rxwx,xv.,xw.v,,,,µxn•.•yµvxrrrnvwww,,,µyrw,xvyrrwxty,,.> Unpaid NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC ;ry;.,�vA,H/!//.V.Y,4 H.W.VCS4:SH////%%NJ///.4%/lt HNH%/%/!/.MAbw///% NM'//%/YA\\\YOU////!/!O E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $178.32 10/31/00 Statement CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Thursday, November 09, 2000 Page 5 of 7 Unpaid OKRAA.P� M � M � � ...:.,.:, � . � � ���� «,.4:<:_N,.:t::.4x :•:� ,<� 4 4WD, , r� ,,,�; -- �x�•��N�-�-«•�-- E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $39.95 972921 Monthly Web Host Total ONRAMP, INC $39.95 Unpaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $1,936.27 0003793 Sept Service Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $1,93627 Unpaid PRINCIPAL Fly AL GROUP.��,...�,..,.»,�,,,,w.,.k,.:..•,:::..::::::...,::::::::::::.,,:,,.�,,.,:...,,:„•...,.::N:nx-,....:4x::�::4�.:.r E 101-43100-123 Health $182.12 PW Ins. E 101-41400-123 Health $213.35 Adm. Ins. Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $395.47 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 101-41550-121 PERA $72.52 E 101-41400-121 PERA Total NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $178.32 $244.13 PDOOOMMV IX!:iML•NOCY.OYNY.9C.�. O:4Y!/.4K4:^.vIAJA\\\\\ \h6)OOpYf. ��„x Unpaid NORTHWESTASSOC CONSULTANTS $508.84 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $154.00 9701 Winter Front PUD E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $267.50 9701 Benson G 701-21944 Bauerly/Bajari $321.59 9701 Bauerly Ind Park G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates $1295.76 9701 Stonegate E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $198.00 9701 Anoka Equine G701-21940 The 'Point' -Sig Ed's $66.00 9701 The Pointe G 701-21952 JK Storage $134.28 9701 JK Mini -Storage E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $251.74 9702 Oct Gen Plan E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $79.90 9702 Bldg Mat Zone Ord. G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00 $85.95 9702 Miss Pines Park PI E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $225.60 9702 Park & Rec Comm. E 101-41570.303 Planning Fees $15624 9702 EDAAC Dev Mtg E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $368.85 9702 Zon Ord Rev -Driveway E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $127.05 9702 School Knoll Park E 101-45300-390 Contracted Services $159.80 9702 HPC Comm. E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $200.00 9703 10/23/00 CC Mtg E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $200.00 9703 10/4/00 EDAAC Mtg E 101-41570-303 Planning Foes $200.00 9703 10/13/00 CC Mtg. E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $200.00 9703 10/12/00 Staff Mtg. E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $200.00 9703 10/2/00 PC Mtg Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $4,892.26 Unpaid OKRAA.P� M � M � � ...:.,.:, � . � � ���� «,.4:<:_N,.:t::.4x :•:� ,<� 4 4WD, , r� ,,,�; -- �x�•��N�-�-«•�-- E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $39.95 972921 Monthly Web Host Total ONRAMP, INC $39.95 Unpaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC. E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $1,936.27 0003793 Sept Service Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $1,93627 Unpaid PRINCIPAL Fly AL GROUP.��,...�,..,.»,�,,,,w.,.k,.:..•,:::..::::::...,::::::::::::.,,:,,.�,,.,:...,,:„•...,.::N:nx-,....:4x::�::4�.:.r E 101-43100-123 Health $182.12 PW Ins. E 101-41400-123 Health $213.35 Adm. Ins. Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $395.47 Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD E 101-41550-121 PERA $72.52 E 101-41400-121 PERA $238.28 E 101-43100-121 PERA $244.13 G 101-21704 PERA $508.84 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,063.77 Unpaidx•:...,� `" "" " """ F2ADIOSIigCK "„ 4KWOWVW 4YR:4:O.V v%////%P Y YlM C4f HffNN/N// ,IAWY HF M\VJ OI/,/ A E 201-45000-203 Supplies - General $ _ 425__96 047583 Haunted House Total RADIOSHACK $425.96 Unpaid X� N �� """ RANDY'S SANITATION .Fi vmm 4nn»oxmr»vrr.:: wvx:r,nFy /ri:rvmr ri/i imswomnrum own na muariiiim E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $252.50 Oct Recycling Total RANDY'S SANITATION $252.50 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, November og,2000 Check Detail Register Page 6 of 7 r °%,}.•: •::: • C Amt Invoice `�`{KE/. awto { } t,; mac Cut t p RIVER CITY LANES ��� E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $190.10 Election Lunches Total RIVER CITY LANES $190.10 Unpaid M,h,x"„V,'.,u,,,,,'K,,,.".,""..""",V""„""•'SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. .�«,.�::`m`°ro°”�m`°`°°°°"m'°ro°m�"°`''wmw.-°""u`«`,"�'°"«`° E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $58.68 5702 Total SAFETY TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. $58.68 ..a.w..,,v:°,.�..�•..,,�,,..,,:vwMw<..•<..�.,,,.,,,,,,w�:..,,w.,,,,,w..,.....w..,w�w",.,...,w,.,...w,,..:,.,, E 602-49450-400 Repairs & Maint Cant (equip) $6,852.50 Total SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION $6,852.50 unpaid SOFTRONICS E 101-41400-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $554.93 1859 Total SOFTRONICS $554,93 E 101-41940-322 Utilities $188.16 Wastewater Treat. Phone Total SPRINT $188.16 Unpaid-.�,w..,..>�' STAR TRIBUNE ` E 101-41900-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $3,931.20 065850212 EDAAC Ad Total STAR TRIBUNE $3,931.20 Unpaid STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $450.00 Oct Code Enforcement Total STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY $450.00 ��«�,}>,.�:,;>:°M:w;.»:,,:°---.v,,.°vh•<:<.:.:.�:::....:.,....„�,,,�,,.,,.,w,.,,,,,,..,•s,.Kw.w.,,:.,.":.,,,,�.,V..r...w,.w<.,..,..,ww,..w.v.,,�..wf,�.�„oh.,,<°„<ttt. Unpaid STS CONSULTANT'S LTD E416-43100-390 Contracted Services $7,443.50 98.05 Odean Const Test. Total STS CONSULTANT'S LTD $7,443.50 �«,Y,:w,�»•,�>,�.,.,,,.,�d»k, ,.::,,.,,..,.:".�,,.,x,.�..,.N.,,wr,.,,,,...w,,.w,:.,�„w.,,.w,,,,,,,,.�..V.,<:,..,�,..,...,•":R�.-}�.}}�°.,.,.:•>t�;t•: Unpaid SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLYf xw�wN E 101-41400-400 Repairs & Maint Cont (equip) $205.17 S1815578 Total SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLY $205.17 Unpaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $80.00 571 Water Tower E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $350.00 571 Wooded Park Area E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $325.00 571 City Hall E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $270.00 571 Pump House E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $196.00 571 Old City Hall E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $190.00 571 Volleyball Area E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $98.00 571 Swale & South Woods E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $42.00 571 Oakwood Lot E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $10.00 571 Well # 1 E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $101.47 571 Tax Total SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $1,662.47 Unpaid T" CONSTANT <.. w.:,,ti,:.:°::.:w,,,,,. ,,,�. >,.,,.,,,��::.::.,:,,,,:::.,•<::",::.,,,,•..,"„".,::.. E 201-45000-203 Supplies - General $12.77 Haunted House CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Amt Invoice Comment Total TOM CONSTANT $1P.77 E 205-45210-390 Contracted Services $26,210.00 9 Park Shelter Total TRIGON, INC. $26,210.00 Thursday, November Og, 2000 Page 7 of 7 Unpaid WASTE MANAGEMENT«<x<m,�,Y,��..•ti.�.�.�.�<...�,�,�„�,�,M.�.,,,,,<M,,:•,N,«,N„,,.,„,„w.,w E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $125.72 1593-5 November recycling Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $125.72 Unpaid �1NR GI HT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE �°''"""""u'"""'-`�•' "'''''"" E101-42100-390 Contracted Services $13,999.50 Patrol -11 November Patrol Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $13,999.50 E 601-49404390 Contracted Services $254.25 5437 Monthly Main. Fee Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $254.25 Unpaid ZIEGLER INC ~amu<�^Ka E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $352.47 PC000362079 Total ZIEGLER INC $352,47 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $306,715.67 File: RCA-CC.WPS 22 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: 9. Council Items: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk November 13, 2000 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION 9. Council Items: A. Septic Pumper Requirements B. Canvass City Election Returns and Declare the Results of the Election C. Consider Acceptance of Jeff Bartheld Letter of Resignation. E. Any Other Council Business BACKGROUND: A. Attached is a Memo from Jerry Olson that explains the issue. B. Attached is a copy of the voting machine tape of the City Elections for the Council to review and hopefully approve. Also I have included the hand-written pages of write-in votes for your review and the section from 2000 MN Election Laws regarding this Canvass Board. Mike Robertson has also written a memo dated November 8th regarding 2000 Elections which is attached. C. Attached is a letter of resignation from Jeff Bartheld effective December 13, 2000 for your consideration. E. This is for Any Other Council Business that may arise. RECOMMENDATION: These are for Council consideration, discussion and any decisions needed. Thanks, 4&71T� Elaine D TO: The Mayor, & City Council 1� �r l FROM: Jeff Bartheld, Parks & Recreation Commission Chairmen Ladies and Gentlemen, It is with deep regret that I must announce that I will be resigining my position on the Parks & recreation commission effective the conclusion of the December 13, 2000 meting. 2000 has been a year of great change for my life, and I have had many new duties and responsibilities placed upon me, most notably is my election to the executive board to the Cushman Club of America, this is an international organization with over 6000 active members. In just 4 short years I will be President of this club, and in the interim, I have many duties that must be learned so the transfer of power will be smooth. I will truly miss the people that I have had the pleasure to work with. I can say with out a doubt, that these are some of the finest, and hardest working Commissioners that the city has, there has never been a project too large to detour them, and I hope that Council & Mayor appreciates the work they do. My time on the commission has been one I will never forget, and I am very proud of our accomplishments, The park shelter will be an addition that will be used by many, and the Haunted house should continue to be the premier event every October, I regret that I will not be able to be in the loop for all the new developments, most notably the LeFebreve property along highway 101, this is truly an exciting time for Otsego. The only disappointment I have, is that I do not have a full commission seated, when I leave, I have tried very hard to fill all the seats, but have not been able to do so. In conclusion, I hope that history will look favorably upon my time as Chairmen on this commission, I have always gave 1100/4, there was never another option. I want to thank everyone on the council, and the city staff, for their patience, and help, I truly appreciate the opportunity to serve you, and the good people of Otsego, and perhaps in the future, I will be able to once again do so. Sincerely Yours ,iJeffXartheld -1 � 91, fv� In these instances, emergency Setbacks are included in the inspection Ask Septic Helper pumping is allowed provided a form and part of routine inspections by Lori Frekot follow-up maintenance call is made to for completeness. An inspector is assure proper removal of septag2 and obligated to determine if a system is Q: I am a pumper and the rules to assure the baffles remain in place failing or an imminent threat. The require me to pump througlr the (i.e., were not broken off by pumping definition for imminent threat includes manhole. What cense vro atrons do through the inspection pipe.) "situations with the potential to Iface iflpump t roug a rnspec- immediately and adversel im act or tion pipe during emergency circum- stances or the property owner refuses to allow me dig up the man rolefor fear o estroying theiryard? A: Part 7080.0175 states "All accumulations of sludge, scum and liquids must be removed through the maintenance hole. The owner or the owner's agent shall install mainte- nance holes in sewage tanks in accordance with part 7080.0130, subpart 2, to allow for maintenance to take place..." Your obligations as a dumper are to inform the property owner ofthis Wile rtouirem,_ ent and educate the owner -in _W 4V rh;c ;� important. Explain the risk of damage to their soil treatment system and the associ- ated costs of an upgrade if solids are not completely removed from the tank and then move to the soil system, causing premature plugging and - failure. If cannot pump thresh the maintenance o e, st you mu document your actions in caseAe�._ MPCA receives a written rnmgjaiaL on your actions. Your documentation could include an affidavit of your discussions with the property owner or a statement signed by the property owner that s/he understands the risks associated with not pumping through the maintenance hole and accepts all potential ISTS problems or penalties administered by the MPCA or LUG. You may also consider notifying the LUG of the property owner's violation of 7080. Emergency pumping is not mainte- nance. It is assumed that emergency pumping is necessary because of an imminent threat to public health or the environment (basement backup or surface discharge). Enforcement actions will not be taken against pumpers who pump t oue inspection pipes of cesspools, dell se �nan . n;r nr IParhing-pits" altho ope-.you-infe t e property owne system does not meet code—requirements. `'°,. Q: Wlry aren't well setbacks included in the failing or imminent threat definitions? What are my obligations as an inspector? A: Original drafts of the rule con- tained well setbacks, but through many persuasive public comments, they were eliminated. The reasoning was to separate the ISTS requirements from the well requirements. Weii setbacks are established by the Minnesota Department of Health's (MDH) code and are referenced in Chanter 70Rn y e threaten public healh or safety." Well setbacks were established to protect public health. If a violation exists the inspector should ask if a setback variance was granted by MDH, identify it and perhaps recom- mend well samples be taken or that the property owner verify the well meets current construction requirements (these are typical responses of MDH when investigating a well setback variance). If the inspector has information that makes him or her believe a potential threat exists, the inspector has the authority to issue a Notice of Non- compliance for the system. Observing well setbacks is consistent with the intent of Chapter 7080 since meeting setbacks is required during site evaluation, design and construction of new Q: Must the installer always be independent of the inspector? A: Subdivision 5 of MN Statutes section 115.55 requires all new construction and replacement of an ISTS to be inspected. MN Rules 7080.0020, subp. 1 Ld. indicates that "compliance inspections must be conducted by a qualified employee or under a license independent of the owner and the installer." Compliance inspections are conducted on existing ISTS, new construction or replacement. The intent of the rule was to separate installers who install new or replacement systems from the person who inspects those systems. However, diligent local ordinance writers are now deciphering the rule and asking if the rule language also impacts the following scenarios: a) A business is licensed as a Designer I and an Installer. The business is requested to conduct a property transfer inspection. Can this business identify the system as failing and subsequently install a new system (for that property)? b) A business installs a system. Some time later, that same business is called for a property transfer inspection. Can this business conduct the inspection? The intent of the rule is that all new systems be inspected by someone independent of the installer to avoid conflicts of interest and to insure that the new system was installed correctly. The MPCA did not purposely intend to prohibit businesses in these situations from installing and inspecting under the above scenarios, although a rule change may be necessary to make this perfectly clear. We encourage you to send in written comments to Lori Frekot, if you have an opinion on amending the rule requirements. MEMO 91 Date: November 9, 2000 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: 2000 3rd Quarter Budget Report This is a report on the status of the 2000 budget through the end of the third quarter (September 30) . REVENUES At the start of the year we projected revenues of $1,473,068. At this point we have received revenues of $1,025,000. We are still due to receive another $390,000 in taxes in November and $59,000 in Local Government Aid (LGA) and $73,000 in Homestead Credit (HACA) in December. This means we will definitely have a surplus in revenues. There are several contributors to this surplus. We have already received $82,000 more in Building Permit revenues than expected. Other areas with sizable surpluses are $19,000 in Delinquent Taxes, $18,000 in MSA Aid, $11,000 in Conditional Use Permit Fees, and $10,000 in additional Mining Fees. EXPENDITURES At the start of the year, we projected expenditures of $1,473,068. As of September 30 we have spent $911,642, or 620 of the budget. Department expenditures vary from the Mayor & Council, which has spent only 320 of its budget, to Building Inspections, which has spent 1280 of its budget due to the larger than expected number of building permits. All consultants are currently under budget. Major expenditures remaining are approximately $76,000 in employee salary and related expenses; $45,000 in Police Contract expenses, about $20,000 for our liability and worker's comp insurance premiums, and $16,000 in Council and Commission salaries. The major remaining unknown expenditure would be overtime and other costs associated with large snowfalls. The Council also has $21,000 in Contingency funds remaining. At this point, barring a series of major snowstorms, I feel confident that the City will complete the 2000 budget year under budget in expenditures. cc: City Staff 2 L -M/ -C - League of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting excenence October 30, 2000 Dear City Official: NOV - 6 2000 145 University Avenue West, St. P6d,.MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281-1100--(800)'925-1-122 M)46W-28l7--1290'. _- LMC Fax: (651) 281-1299 • LMCIT Fax: (651) 281-1298 Weh Site: http://www.Imnc.org q� On behalf of the National League of Cities, we want to invite you to become an NLC Direct Member City - and to enjoy the true benefits of this level of membership. From our experience, the most important benefits of direct membership are the ability to participate fully in NLC's policy process and in leadership roles. NLC's Steering Committees, which only include Direct Member Cities in their membership, are where invaluable information -sharing happens among city officials, as well as in-depth examination of the policy issues that impact our cities. These Steering Committees also shape the National Municipal Policy that guides NLC's legislative efforts, ensuring that cities are involved in the development of federal laws and regulations. The knowledge we have gained from our colleagues across the nation through Steering Committees has helped us in working through the challenges that face our own cities here in Minnesota. Because of our experience with NLC Steering Committees, as well as other NLC programs and committees, we sought and attained elective office within NLC to make an even greater contribution to the future of the organization. Serving as members of the NLC Board and as an NLC Officer have been fulfilling experiences for us personally and very helpful to our communities - but if we had not joined NLC as Direct Member Cities, we would not have had these opportunities. Additional benefits of becoming an NLC Direct Member City include: • Reduced registration fees for the annual Congress of Cities, the Congressional City Conference, and regional conferences and workshops; • Free copies of Nation's Cities Weekly newspaper; • Reduced rates on other NLC publications; • Free inquiry services from NLC's Municipal Reference Service; and • Full voting rights on NLC elections and policy adoptions. And now, more than ever, NLC is making it cost-effective for cities of all sizes to become Direct Member Cities. Through a redeveloped program, new NLC Direct Member Cities save 50% on their first year's dues - this offer is good through December 31, 2000. Dues for small cities have also been significantly reduced to encourage cities of all sizes to join. A dues schedule showing regular rates, and the reduced first-year rates, is enclosed, as is a membership application form. Again, we encourage you to consider becoming an NLC Direct Member City. We believe it is a unique opportunity for personal growth and for your city to benefit AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER from the experiences of cities across the country. To sign up, please contact NLC's Membership Department at (202) 626-3190 or pa@nlc.org, or simply fill out the attached application form. And if you have any questions about NLC or the benefits of direct membership, please feel free to contact either of us directly. Sincerely, Karen Anderson Mayor, Minnetonka NLC Second Vice President Larry Bakken Councilmember, Golden Valley NLC Board Member National League of Cities - 2000 Membership Dues New NLC Direct Member Cities Save 50% on the First Year of Membership! Population Range 2000 Dues Special New Member First Year Rate Under 1,000 $9 $100 11000 - 2,500 $40-7 $204 2,501- 5,000 $444 $307 5,001 - 10, 000 $84 $425 10,001- 20,000 $1,132 $566 20,001- 30,000 $1,413 $707 30,001 - 40,000 $2,47 $1,238 40,001 - 50,000 $2,89 $1,449 50,001 - 60,000 $3,395 $1,698 60,001 - 70,000 $4-,103 $2,052 70,001 - 80,000 $4;322 $2,261 80,001 - 90,000 $5-,089 $2,545 90,001-100,000 $5--939 $2,970 Special offer for New Direct Member 50% discount will expire December 31, 2000, so act now - especially if you want to use your member discount for the NLC Congress of Cities conference in Boston, December 5-9, 20001 If you have any questions for the League of Minnesota Cities about the value of membership in the National League of Cities, please contact Mary -Margaret Zindren, Assistant to the Executive Director, at (651) 215-4034 or 1-800-925-1122, or by email at mzindren@lmnc.org " National League of Cities (NLC) Membership Application Acting on behalf of local governments, NLC's goals include influencing national policy and building under- standing and support for cities and towns. Membership also gives cities and towns of all sizes access to timely news, innovative ideas, and practical products. Our partnership with your state municipal league strengthens your voice in Washington, D.C., and gives your community a chance to influence issues at the national level. (In order to be a member of the National league of Cities you must be a member of your state league.) Q YES, please enroll my community as a member of the National League of Cities: Name of Community: State: Chief Elected Official's Name/Title: Term of Office Manager's Name: (Use name of city clerk in non -manager cities) Zip: Names of Council/Governing Body Members and Term of Office Expiration Dates: (To ensure that all members of your council begin receiving NLC materials promptly, please provide (or attach) their names, title and term expiration date.) Name Title Term exp. Name Name Title Name Municipal Office Address: Telephone Number: ( ) Term exp. Term exp. Term exp. Name Title Name Title Name Title Name Title Fax Number: Population of Community: Dues Amount Method of Payment: O Enclosed is a check payable to NLC for our dues Direct invoice to: Signed: SEND THIS FORM TO: Membership Department National League of Cities P.O. Box 85080 Richmond, VA 23285-4047 (202) 626-3190 (202) 626-3043 Fax term exp. Term exp. Term exp. Term exp. (Annual Duesplease refer to chart) O Please bill us. Title: del � +I QMNN AV61(N-E ` + 11 4 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 0 '.�9E November 1, 2000 Mayor Larry Fournier and Members of the City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, MN 55330 Honorable Mayor & Councilmembers: The Albertville City Council discussed selling sewer service to the City of Otsego as proposed at our sub -committee meeting. Our City Council wishes to develop plans for the properties lying within our own corporate boundary before continuing further discussion on serving portions of Otsego with sanitary sewer service. Should this Council revisit its decision, or if a future Council wishes to move forward with discussions, we will contact you to see if you still wish to pursue a joint operation. Sincerely, JoTm— A. Mayor MEMO Date: November 9, 2000 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Appointments to City Commissions The following terms on the following City Commissions are up at the end of 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION The seats held by Arleen Nagel and Carl Swenson. At the end of 2001 the seats of Richard Nichols, Patrick Moonen, and Steve Schuck are up. PARR & RECREATION COMMISSION The seats held by Tom Baillargeon and Tony Faust. The seats formerly held by Nicole Martin (2001) and Sue Kroll (2000) have not been filled. No other seats are open at the end of 2001. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The seats held by Elaine Noren and Ron Black. At the end of 2001, the seats held by Joy Swenson, Arlene Holen, and Joanie Nichols are up. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMISSION The seats held by Gabe Davis and Vince Peterson. There are no seats up in 2001. cc: City Council City Staff CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING 6:30 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS OTSEGO CITY HALL NOVEMBER 13, 2000 1. Mayor Larry Fournier will call meeting to order: Mayor Larry Fournier called the City Council Meeting to order at 6:30 PM. a. Roll Call: Mayor Larry Fournier; Councilmembers: Vern Heidner, Virginia Wendel, Richard Nichols. Suzanne Ackerman arrived at 7: 45 PM. Staff. Mike Robertson, City Administrator; Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator; Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk; Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney; Dan Licht, City Planner. Absent: City Engineer Larry Koshak Mayor Larry Fournier led in the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Consider agenda approval. CM Wendel requested to add under Item 9. Lb. Drug Task Force Meeting update by Mike Robertson. Mayor Fournier requested to add under Item 9.d. Floating Holiday Consideration, 9.f. LMC Letter dated October 30, 2000, 9.g. Leger from the City of Albertville, 9.h. Commission Members Terms and remove the Consent Agenda Items for discussion CM Nichols requested to add 9.e. Discussion of Haunted House and Winter Fest. CM Heidner motioned adoption of the November 13, 2000 City Council Agenda as amended. Seconded by CM Nichols. All in favor. Motion carried. 3. Consider Minutes: a. October 23, 2000 - Regular Council Meeting Minutej CM Heidner motioned adoption. Seconded by CM Wendel. All in favor. Motion carried. 4_A_ Special Pr .s .ntation• 1. Long Haul Trucking - Hearing on Junk and BlightComplaints Mayor Fournier opened the Public Hearing at 7:40 PM. Elaine Beatty attested that the proper noticing was done. Mike Robertson stated the owner has removed some but not all the junk and blight and he had pictures which were taken November 13, 2000 verifying this. Mayor opened for Public Comment at 7:44 PM There was no Public Comment. Mayor Fournier opened for City Council discussion. City Council Meeting of November 13, 2000, cont'd. Page 2. Mike Robertson recommended for the City to proceed with the abatement. CM Wendel stated she does not see the junk when driving by the Industrial Park. CM Ackerman arrived at this point. CM Nichols motioned for the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution for consideration at the November 27, 2000 Council Agenda. Seconded by CM Heidner. All in favor. Motion carried. 5. CONSENT AGENDA (Non -Controversial Items) Items removed from the Consent Agenda for discussion. CM Wendel motioned to approve the Albertville Fire Service Contract for Year 2001. Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. The Council requested to review fire contracts earlier in the year before setting the fire service amounts. 5.2. Approve Pay Estimate #6 for 78TH ST Water and Sewer for final lift of asphalt. sod, seeding and signs for Contractor L.aTour construction in the amount of $112.572,19, (,See attached Information) Mayor Fournier motioned to approve Pay Estimate #6 for $112,572.19 to LaTour Construction. Seconded by CM Wendel. All in favor. Motion carried. 6. Dan Licht. CityPl�r- 6.1. Re -consider Today Properties application for rezoning Dan Licht presented the Planner's Report. Mike Day, applicant, stated he feels he has conformed with what the City has requested. Mayor Fournier noted a letter from Jon Zachman was received opposing the reconsideration. CM Heidner motioned that based on a significant difference in this proposal that the application for rezoning be reconsidered. Seconded by CM Nichols. All in favor. Motion carried. 6.2. Discussion of Feedlot Setback Dan Licht went over his November 8, 2000 Report regarding Otsego's Feedlot Ordinance and Judy Vetch's request to locate a residence near a newly constructed feedlot building. Judy Vetch, LaBeaux Avenue, stated she has been working with city staff for several months on subdividing her 80 acre parcel into one or two residential lots for her children. She is upset because she was not informed by staff of the setback requirements from a feedlot. Because of the setback requirements the lot she has had surveyed will be within the setback. It was decided that clarification is needed of the Feedlot Ordinance. The Council also asked for an accurate sketch plan of the Barthel Dairy Operation showing the setbacks. This item was continued to the next Council meeting. None City Council Meeting of November 13, 2000, cont'd. Page 3. 7. Larry Koshak,City Engineer, There were no Engineering Items for this meeting. 8. Andrew MacArthur,CityAttorney* 8.1. Consider Assessment Resolution Mr. MacArthur went over the Resolution with the Council. Mayor Fournier motioned to approve Resolution No. , adopting assessment of certain improvements for property 118-038-001040, property owners Rudy J. and Margaret Thibodeau, in the amount of $25,294.91. Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. 8.2. Any Other Legal Business No other items. A. Se tip 'c Pumper Requirements Mike Robertson went over the attached Septic Pumper Requirements. Mike will write an article for the Newsletter informing residents of these requirements. B. Canvass City Election Returns and Declare the Results of the Flection Mayor Fournier thanked staff and the election judges for all their work and organization in making the Election go smoothly. CM Heidner motioned that the results presented for the 2000 General Election be certified. Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. C. Consider Acceptance of Teff Barrhelri Letter of Resignation CM Heidner motioned to accept Jeff Bartheld's Letter of Resignation from the Park Commission. Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Fournier requested a Letter of Appreciation sent to Jeff signed by the Council. D. Floating Holiday for Employ= The Council approved City Hall being closed on Tuesday, December 26, 2000. Staff will be using their 'floating holiday'. If a second Council Meeting is needed for December, it will be scheduled for December 19th. E. Parks Haunted House and Winter Fact CM Nichols reported the Haunted House was very successful, attendance was over 865 and approximately $3,500.00 was netted. January 20, 2001 has been set for the Winter Fest. The Parks Commission is planning to include a Radar Run for snowmobiles. F. LMC Letter of October 30 2000 Mike Robertson explained this letter is offering membership to the National League of Cities, which typically involves the larger metropolitan cities. G. Letter from Albertville Mayor Fournier noted the letter dated November 1, 2000 from the City of Albertville stating their Council has decided against selling sewer services to Otsego. Mike went over the current terms expiring at the end of the year. City Council Meeting of November 13, 2000, cont'd. Page 4. I. River Rider Meeting, Mike announced there will be a River Rider meeting at Otsego City Hall on November 20, 2000. 9.1. Mike Robertson. City Administrator -do ate: A. 3RD Quarter Budget Report Mike went over the 3rd Quarter Budget Report. B. Any Other Administrative Business The Council set December 4, 2000 at 4:30 PM for a "Grand Opening" of the Wastewater Treatment Plant at the Plant. • t' Beatty.pd. None 9.4. Consider Claims List for approval_. CM Wendel motioned to approve the Claims List as presented. Seconded by CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried. 9.5. Adjourn by 10 PM. CM Ackerman motioned to adjourn. Seconded by Mayor Fournier. All in favor. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 9:40 PM. Mayor Larry Fournier Attest: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Adm. Recorded by: Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk City Seal MEMO p Date: November 9, 2000 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Appointments to City Commissions The following terms on the following City Commissions are up at the end of 2000. PLANNING COMMISSION The seats held by Arleen Nagel and Carl Swenson. At the end of 2001 the seats of Richard Nichols, Patrick Moonen, and Steve Schuck are up. PARR & RECREATION COMMISSION The seats held by Tom Baillargeon and Tony Faust. The seats formerly held by Nicole Martin (2001) and Sue Kroll (2000) have not been filled. No other seats are open at the end of 2001. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION The seats held by Elaine Noren and Ron Black. At the end of 2001, the seats held by Joy Swenson, Arlene Holen, and Joanie Nichols are up. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ADVISORY COMMISSION The seats held by Gabe Davis and Vince Peterson. There are no seats up in 2001. cc: City Council City Staff CITY OF OTSEGO NOTICE OF SUB -COMMITTEE MEETING REGARDING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ALBERTVILLE/OTSEGO THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000 - 7PM Notice is hereby given that the Otsego Sewer Sub -Committee of Mayor Larry Fournier and C.M. Vern Heidner will meet with the City of Albertville Sewer Sub -Committee for further discussion of obtaining sanitary sewer service for a portion of Otsego from the City of Albertville. This meeting will be held at Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, Minnesota 55301 date and time as mentioned above. CITY OF OTSEGO Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator eb Posted: 10/10/00 Otsego City Hall Both Boards File: 2-SPMEET.WPS