11-27-00 CCL5
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARFI) RY•
4.A. Special Presentation Michael Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION•
4.A.1. Senator Mark Ourada
4.A.2. Hall Rental Financial Analysis
4.A.3. Discussion of Junk Complaint at Long Haul Trucking
BACKGROUND -
4.A. 1.
ACKGROUND:4.A.1. State Senator Mark Ourada will be present to discuss the next State Legislative
session and any other matters the Council is interested in.
4.A.2. This analysis was carried out at the request of Council. There is a moratorium on
the rental of the hall for weekend activities until December 31, 2000. A memo on this
issue is enclosed.
4.A.3. This item was carried over from the previous meeting because Long Haul had
made some improvements. I will have Building Inspector Jerry Olson check out the
property the day of the Council meeting for an update on their progress. I have enclosed a
letter sent to Long Haul.
RECOMMENDATION
This is for Council information and action.
Thanks,
Mike
MEMO
Date: November 22, 2000
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: City Hall Rental Issues & Financial Analysis
Currently the City is charging $250, with $100 for
kitchen use, to residents for hall rental. The City
charges $350, with $150 for kitchen use, to non-
residents. As part of the examination of renting City
Hall, I have asked City Accountant Gary Groen to
examine the financial costs of renting, cleaning, and
maintaining the hall as a rental property. The
expenses are listed below on a per event basis. We
have assumed an average of 25 events a year.
HALL RENTAL ESTIMATED EXPENSES
1. Cleaning $100
Cleaning costs are based on the invoices from Long
& Sons, and average $100 per event.
2. Staffing (Building Supervisor) $130
A building supervisor is necessary to make certain
the building is used by the renters in accordance with
its intended use. The building supervisor also is
there to assist the renters with any questions. The
average event typically runs from early afternoon to
past midnight. Renters are required to remove personal
belongings and garbage the night of the event.
Estimated time is 12 hours at $10/hour plus payroll
taxes.
3. Administrative Time $ 70
Approximately 5% of Judy Hudson's time is dedicated
to rental issues. This includes receiving phone calls,
showing the hall, follow-up phone calls, assisting
renters the day they decorate, and billing questions.
4. Supplies $ 40
Supply costs are based on a percentage of supplies
invoiced by Long & Sons, including towels, toilet
paper, etc.
5. Payroll $ 2.25
Payroll cost is about $2.25 per payroll check and
the building supervisor is assumed to be paid every
payroll period.
6. Accounting Time $ 6
This represents Gary & Carol's time for accounting,
billing, check issuance, etc.
7. Utility Cost $ 26
Utilities include electric, heating, and air
conditioning. City Hall would be closed from Thursday
evening to Monday morning without weekend use. Utility
costs are estimated at 10% of the total.
8. Capital Replacement
This is an estimate of the per event cost of
replacing tables, chairs, carpet, tile floors, kitchen
appliances, and wall redecorating. The lifetime of
each of these items is impacted by the heavier use
during rental. The cost of these items attributed to
rental events varies and the percentage is listed with
the item.
Tables & Chairs- 95% $ 72
Tile & Carpet 95% $ 80
Kitchen Appliances 100% $ 60
Redecorating 75% $ 14
The total per event cost, including capital
replacement, is estimated at $600 per event. Capital
costs are $226, which means that the City requires $374
per event to cover on-going costs. That means that the
City is probably covering on-going costs now but that
taxpayers are subsidizing renters on the capital costs.
In addition, we have discussed previously with Council
two rental problems unrelated to rental costs, the
difficulty hiring building supervisors and the
difficulty of hiring police officers.
4
The City has always had a problem finding building
supervisors because the work is on weekends, occurs on
an irregular basis, and is not highly paid. Recently
Penny Houck quit, so the only person we have now is Lu
Luconic. Lu has also given us a one year notice that
she will not work past 2001. She has also indicated
that she won't work late hours, which would eliminate
her from most weekend events. We have occasionally had
events where no building supervisor has been available
and Judy Hudson has had to fill in. Since Judy's pay
is higher and the weekend is overtime that means that
the City is really losing money when that occurs. Plus
Judy and other staff has indicated they are not willing
to do that any more.
We have also had an increasingly difficult time getting
police officers. Both because there are a lot of other
venues competing for them and because officers are less
willing to work these kinds of events. We either have
to pay a lot higher wages or not allow alcohol, which
is the same as not allowing weekend events. If we have
a weekend event without officers, we are then counting
on the renters to control the alcohol use, which is
asking for trouble. Also, we often do not know whether
we will have an officer until a day or two before the
event. Several times we have had to let a scheduled
event go forward without an officer, which is also
asking for trouble. -
RECOMMENDATIONS
1) We should raise the wages and start advertising for
more building supervisors immediately. If we can find
one, we would be able to keep renting as we have been.
If we can't find anyone, we have nobody who will work
evening hours, and we will not be able to rent for most
weekend events.
2) We should look at offering more money to the
officers to work the weekend events. If we can't get
officers, we could look at hiring private security.
The trouble is the good firms cost as much or more than
police officers, the bad firms aren't worth whatever
they cost, and both have to call the sheriff anyway if
there is a problem.
3) We should increase our rental charges to $600 per
event so that taxpayers are not subsidizing renters.
3
The money should be placed in a specific fund and used
for capital replacement of those items specifically
affected by rental use such' -carpets.
4) We should either reduce the resident discount or
tighten up the eligibility. Right now we are familiar
with instances where people wanted to rent the hall and
went searching until they found an Otsego resident who
would rent it for them. We suggest the discount be
limited to actual residents and their children or
siblings.
5) We should assume that the kitchen space has a
relatively short life. As the City grows and more
staff are added, eventually that kitchen space will be
needed for offices or storage.
ha112.wps
4
r
ki2
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT• PRFPA RFn gy
5. Consent Agenda Michael Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM Ni1MRER• iTFM ilFCrurirrrO T
5.1. Approval of 2001-2003 Monticello Fire Service Contract Renewal
BACKGROUND:
5.1. The proposed contract is enclosed.
RECOMM .NDA TIONS:
This is for Council information and action.
Thanks,
Mike
MONTICELLO
November 15, 2000
IIs. Elaine Beatty
City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 553;0
Re: 2001-2003 Fire Service Contract Renewal
Dear Elaine:
►n� 1 Ui��7i 1 r
NOV 15 20m
Enclosed you will find three executed copies of the revised fire protection agreement between the
Monticello Joint Fire Department and the City of Otsego. We have added the parcels you identified
as new subdivisions and areas being added to the contract. Please review these areas to confirm the
number of parcels.
Please execute two of the copies and return them to me for distribution. Should you have any
questions, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
CITY MONTICELLO
Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
R W/dg
Enclosure: Fire Protection Contract (3)
cc: Fire Contract File
Monticello City Hall, 505 Walnut Street, Suite 1, Monticello, MN 55362-8831 • (763) 295-2711 • Fax: (763) 295-4404
Office of Public Works, 909 Golf Course Rd.. Monticelln MN IMA') . fir,'Ai *)oca v 7n . v..... /,7fn% ,),7 i 2,),,1
FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT
This AGREEMENT between the City and Township of Monticello. Minnesota, hereafter referred to as the
JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT, and the City of Otsego, hereafter referred to whether in whole or in part as the
CITY. both agree as follows:
ARTICLE I
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT agrees to furnish fire service and fire protection to all properties subject to
the terms of this agreement, within the CITY area, said area being set forth in EXHIBIT A, attached hereto.
ARTICLE II
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT will make a reasonable effort to attend all fires within the CITY area upon
notification of such fire or fires, and under the direction of the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT fire chief, subject
to the following terms and conditions:
A. Road and weather conditions must be such that the fire run can be made with reasonable safetv
to the firemen and equipment of the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT. The decision of the fire
chief or other officer in charge of the fire department at the time that the fire run cannot be made
with reasonable safety to firemen and equipment shall be final.
B. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall not be liable to the CITY for the loss or damage of anv
kind whatever resulting from any failure to furnish or any delay in furnishing firemen or fire
equipment, or from any failure to prevent, control, or extinguish any fire, whether such loss or
damage is caused by the negligence of the officers, agents, or employees of the JOINT FIRE
DEPARTMENT or its fire department, or otherwise.
ARTICLE III
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT further agrees:
A. To keep and maintain in good order at its own expense the necessary equipment and fire
apparatus for fire service and fire protection within the town area so serviced.
B. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall provide sufficient manpower in its fire department to
operate fire equipment.
D. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT will submit a summary to the City of all fires on a monthly
basis.
Page 1
ARTICLE IV
The CITY agrees:
M
r
A. To pay an annual fee of $40 for each tax identification parcel as determined by the Otsego City -
Assessor and/or Wright County Auditors office for years 2001 through 2003. These fees shall
include all standby charges and fire call costs. The total annual fee for the first year of this
contract is estimated to be $10,760.00 based on an estimated 269 parcels cL $40 each. The
annual fee shall be adjusted for years 2002 and 2003 at the same $40.00 rate per parcel for
additional parcels added within coverage area.
B. Annual fee shall be paid as follows:
prior to January 1 of each year - 25%
prior to April 1 of each year - 25%
prior to July I of each year - 25%
prior to October 1 of each year - 25%
C. Any false alarm call to an individual or business that, in the opinion of the Monticello Fire Chief,
was the result of a defective or malfunctioning alarm system will receive a written notice
outlining this policy, indicating a second false alarm call within the calendar year will subject
the property owner to a $100 charge. The notice will also indicate that three or more false alarms
during the calendar year will result in the property owner being charged $250 for the alarm call.
D. Any false alarm charge billed directly to an individual or business by the Joint Fire Board under
this Agreement that remains unpaid by October 31 of each year shall become the responsibility
of the City for reimbursement.
E. All payments must be made in accordance with this schedule to render this agreement effective
for each calendar year of the contract.
ARTICLE V
In case an emergency arises within the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT while equipment and personnel of the fire
department are engaged in fighting a fire within the CITY area, calls shall be answered in the order of their
receipt unless the fire chief or other officer in charge of the fire department at the time otherwise directs. In
responding to fire calls within the CITY area, the fire chief or other officer in charge shall dispatch only such
personnel and equipment as in his opinion can be safely spared from the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT.
ARTICLE VI
In cases where the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT receives a notification of an emergency other than a fire, and
its assistance is requested in the area defined in Exhibit A of this contract, it shall respond to such emergency
in the same manner as a fire as outlined in this contract. Charges for such service shall be as outlined in
ARTICLE VI.
Page 2
ARTICLE VII
The CITY agrees to make a fire protection tax levy or otherwise to provide funds each year in an amount
sufficient to pay the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT the compensation agreed upon.
ARTICLE VIII
This AGREEMENT shall be in force for a term of three (3) years beginning on January 1.2001, and ending on
the 3 I st day of December, 2003. This contract may be terminated upon a six-month notice by either party.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
Mayor
Attestc�
Clerk
Signed this 17 day of
f6)'h' 6" , 2000.
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
B .19
,Chairperson
Attest:
Clerk
$ianed this 6 day of
LRM 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
Signed this day of
.2000.
Page 3
EXHIBIT A
This EXHIBIT is a part of the attached FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT, and its purpose is to designate
the area covered tinder this AGREEMENT and referred to herein as the CITY area. Therefore. the CITY area
in which protection for fires is agreed to involves the following sections of the CITY herein: ` (SEE
ATTACHED ),/IAPS)
Range 24 (Unplatted Areas)
Section 10
Section 11
Section 14
Section 15
Section 22
Section 23
N1/2 of Section 27
Plats:
Billstroms Riverview Addition
Island View Estates
Arrowhead Estates
Riverwood PUD
Island View Estates III
Vintage Golf Course
Mississippi Pines
TOTAL NO. OF PARCELS 269
At $40.00 per Parcel = $10,760.00
CITY OF MONTICELLO CITY OF OTSEGO
Att
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
By:-
airperson
Attest:
C� C
C erk
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
Page 4
22
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTM .NT• PRFPARFiI Rv
6. Dan Licht, City Planner: Mike Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER' ITEM DESCRIPTION
6.1. Consider Amendment of Existing CUP (Conditional Use Permit) to allow
addition to existing building & Text Amendment - Anoka Equine Veterinary
Services - 16445 NE 70th Street, Otsego.
6.2. Consider Rezoning from A-1 (Agricultural) to BW (Business -Warehouse) &
Preliminary Plat Approval - Today Properties - 8500 Parrish Avenue,
6.3. Consider CUP (Conditional Use Permit) to allow transfer of development
rights to allow an administrative One -per -forty subdivision - Floyd & Beverly Roden
- 8337 LaBeaux, Otsego.
6.4. Consider Concept Plan Approval - Otsego's Waterfront - Cascade III Land
Company - Highway 101 & County Road 39, Otsego
6.5. Discussion of Feedlot Ordinance
6.6. Any Other Planning Business
BACKGROUND•
Dan Licht will be present to explain and discuss the following items.
6.1., 6.2, 6.3., 6.4. See attached reports from Dan Licht. City Engineer Ron Wagner will
also be present for any questions or comments.
6.5. This item was discussed at the last Council meeting and continued for further
review. Staff has prepared the attached memo which lays out the interpretation of this
ordinance. Council should review this memo and let staff know if there are any changes or
different interpretations that it wants considered.
6.6. This is for any other planning business that needs discussion.
These items are for Council consideration for approval or denial
Thanks,
Mike
"ORT"WIST ASSOCIATR4 �O���i���►��$� INC.
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM C
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 21 November 2000
RE: Otsego - Anoka Equine Clinic; CUP Amendment
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.32
Please be advised that the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the
above referenced request on November 6, 2000. The public hearing was continued to
November 20, 2000 to allow staff to provide additional information on the building
construction requirements.
The main issue discussed by the Planning Commission was the construction and exterior
appearance of the arena portion of the expansion. Staff confirmed with the Building
Official that this portion of the structure would be considered a pole building, which is not
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance as a principal structure. The Building Official also
suggested alternative construction methods that would meet the City's requirements, while
minimizing costs to the applicant. At the Planning Commission meeting, the applicant's
representative indicated that they were looking at this other construction method and use
of siding that would match the front portion of the existing building.
Based upon this discussion, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP
amendment by a 6-0 vote. The Planning Commission also voted 6-0 to recommend denial
of the applicant's request for a text amendment to allow pole building construction as a
principal building.
This application will be considered by the City Council at their meeting on November 27,
2000.
PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Judy Hudson
Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Dr. Thomas Juergens
CITY OF
0 T S E G 0
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
11-20-00
CUP Amendment
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Applicant's Name: Anoka Equine Veterinary Clinic
Request: Consideration of a CUP amendment to allow expansion of an existing veterinary
clinic located within an A-1 District.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based -upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A.
2. The subject property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for
commercial land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District; Veterinary clinics are allowed
in said District as a conditional use.
4. A conditional use permit was approved to allow the veterinary clinic use in February 1993
and amended for an expansion in June 1998.
5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the CUP amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the
criteria outlined in Section 20-4-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding. The subject site is planned for future commercial uses that would take
advantage of access and visibility to TH 901 and available sanitary sewer. In the
interim, the site is planned for continued agricultural uses. The existing use is an
appropriate bridge between the interim plan and ultimate land use plan as it is both
agricultural and commercial in nature. However, the a portion of the proposed
building is inconsistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan to encourage
the highest quality building construction and materials within planned commercial
areas in that pole construction with vertical metal siding is proposed, which is not
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance.
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding: As a condition of CUP approval, all performance standards must be met.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding. The single family residence should have no negative effect within the area
it is proposed.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: While a detailed analysis has not been conducted, similar situations have
demonstrated no negative impact upon area property values.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: Traffic generated by the proposed single family dwelling will be minimal and
will be within the capabilities of 801' Street which serves the single family property.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
Finding: The proposed single family dwelling will not overburden the City's service
capacity.
5. The City Council approve a similar CUP for the applicant in 1996, which the applicant did
not implement. In accordance with Section 20-4-6 of the Zoning Ordinance, the previous
CUP is considered to be expired one year from the date of issuance.
6. The memorandum dated November 15, 2000 and planning report dated April 23, 1996
prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Lic., is incorporated
herein.
8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 20, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission
closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve
the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested
conditional use permit is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information
received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. A site plan (based on a certificate of survey) is submitted and found to comply with
applicable A-1 District performance standards.
2
8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 6, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
The public hearing was continued to the regular Planning Commission meeting on
November 20, 2000 to allow additional"- information to be provide Upon review of the
application and evidence received, the'Otsego Planning Commission closed the public
hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve the CUP
amendment based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested CUP
amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date,
subject to the following conditions:
1. The site is developed in conformance with previous CUP conditions and the following plans
and specifications, except as may be amended herein:
(1) Site Plan dated 10/16/00
(2) Building and Floor Plan Sheets A1 -A4 dated 10/16/00
2. The site plan is revised to provide all information outlined by Section 20-4-4 of the Zoning
Ordinance, unless specifically exempted by City Staff.
3. All animals are kept in compliance with the performance standards of Section 27 of the
Zoning Ordinance.
4. The building plans are revised to provide a continuous foundatic for the arena, use
horizontal lap metal siding for the arena and color schemes that are consistent with the
existing structure.
5. The applicant provide documentation as to staff levels and the ratio of parking stalls
provided on site.
6. All waste is handled in accordance with applicable regulations, agency rules and the
Otsego Zoning Ordinance.
7. Lighting installed on the subject site must have a 90 degree horizontal cut-off.
8. All grading and utility issues are subject to review and approval o` e City Engineer.
9. The applicant provide documentation that MNDoT access permits requirements have been
satisfied related to this current expansion.
3
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
21
CITY OF
OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Anoka Equine Veterinary Clinic
11-21-00
Zoning Ordinance Amendment
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Consideration of an amendment to Section 20-17-4 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow
pole building construction for principal structures.
City Council Meeting Date: 21 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
The Zoning Ordinance was amended on October 9, 2000 to remove language that allowed
use of pole building construction for principal buildings.
2. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the Zoning Ordinance amendment with their judgement based upon (but not
limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: The following policies were cited in support of the amendment that removed
the allowance of pole building construction for principal buildings. Amending the
Ordinance to again allow such buildings would be inconsistent with the previous
policy findings.
Predetermined development standards shall be established to ensure quality
of development desired by the community. (Policy Plan, P. 49)
Within the T.H. 101 corridor, high quality commercial development shall be
strongly encouraged which takes advantage of the visibility and access along
the corridor. (Policy Plan p. 49)
All public facilities shall be developed, improved and maintained according to
the highest adopted standards of design and performance to serve as
examples for private development. Public facilities shall present a positive
aesthetic expression and strive to create a source of community pride.
(Policy Plan p. 66)
B. The proposed amendment's compatibility with present and future land uses of the
area.
Finding: The upgrade of required building materials for commercial and institutional
uses would not be anticipated to negatively impact existing development, but
encourage a higher standard of development within these areas of the community.
Amending the Ordinance again to allow pole building construction would be contrary
to this finding.
C. The proposed amendment's conformity with all performance standards contained in
the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding: Not applicable.
D. The proposed amendment's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: The approved amendment will have a positive effect on the community's
image and character in anticipation of development of the City's commercial and
institutional areas, which are the primary gateways to the community. Amending the
Ordinance again to allow pole building construction would be contrary to this finding.
E. The proposed amendment's impact upon property values of the area in which it is
proposed.
Finding: Although no study has been completed, the approved amendment is not
anticipated to negatively impact area property values. Amending the Ordinance
again to allow pole building construction would be contrary to this finding.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: Not applicable.
G. The proposed amendment's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the
City's service capacity.
Finding: The approved amendment will require greaterinvestmentin commercial and
institutional development thereby improving the City's tax base situation, which would
have a positive effect on the City's service capacity. Amending the Ordinance again
to allow pole building construction would be contrary to this finding.
3. The planning reports dated September 8, 2000 and November 1, 2000 prepared by the City
Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
4. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 6, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
The public hearing was continued to November 20, 2000 to allowthe Planning Commission
to receive additional information. Upon review of the application and evidence received,
the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0
vote that the City Council deny the -Zoning Ordinance amendment based on the
aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information, the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment is
hereby denied.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
Attest:
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM d--J
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM; Daniel Licht
DATE: 21 November 2000
RE: Otsego - Otsego Business Park; Rezoning/Preliminary Plat
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.05
The Planning Commission opened a public hearing to consider the above referenced
application on November 6, 2000. The matter was tabled until November 20, 2000 to allow
the City Council to decide whether to reconsider the request, which was similar to an
application that had been previously denied on March 27, 2000, pursuant to the Zoning
Ordinance.
At the meeting on November 20, 2000, the applicant indicated that they were willing to
enter into a development contract requiring demolition of the existing structure and/or
improvement of the property within two years from the date of approval. The applicant also
indicated that they would be willing to pay applicable SAC/WAC fees at this time, although
no connection is planned initially.
Planning Commission discussion focused on the shorter time frame for the interim use of
the property and the City's plans for development in the Sanitary Sewer Service District.
Based upon the applicant's proposal, the Planning Commission voted to recommend
approval of the rezoning, preliminary plat and site plans by separate 6-0 votes. The
Planning Commission amended the proposed conditions to stipulate a two year period for
deferment of applicable improvements.
Findings of fact reflecting the Planning Commission's recommendation are attached for
review by the City Council. We have added two additional conditions to the findings for
the preliminary plat. The first is the standard language the City includes with all
preliminary plats within the Sanitary Sewer Service District. The second condition
addresses potential access issue with any proposal to final plat a second buildable lot,
which may not have frontage to an existing public street.
pc. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Judy Hudson
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Today Properties, Inc.
-2-
CITY OF
0TSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Today Properties, Inc.
11-21 00
Zoning Amendment - Approval
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance (map) to rezone the property legally described
by Exhibit A from A-1 Agricultural Rural Service Area District to B -W, Business Warehouse District
to allow for a contractor office/warehouse use.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
The legal description of the property is described on Exhibit A.
2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for industrial land
use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned A-1, District; Consideration of a Zoning Ordinance amendment (map)
to designate the Site as being within the B -W District is necessary to allowfor the proposed
use of the site as a contractor office/warehouse.
4. The applicant's made a similar application that was denied by the City Council on March
27, 2000. In accordance with Section 20-3-2.P of the Zoning Ordinance, the City Council
voted 5-0 on November 13, 2000 to allow reconsideration of the request based upon the
finding that the circumstances involved with the application had changed significantly.
5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria
outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: The subject site is within the Sanitary Sewer Service District designated by
the Comprehensive Plan and is guided for industrial development. The
Comprehensive Plan anticipates that this area is to develop with industrial uses with
high performance standards and connection to municipal utilities, which take
advantage of the visibility and accessability of the area.
The preliminary plat would provide opportunities for new industrial development
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. However, the applicant's proposal also
does not include bringing the site up to conformance with the performance standards
for industrial uses or immediately connecting to the sanitary sewer and water
systems. The Planning Commission and City Council have cited the following
policies that support rezoning the parcel at this time:
The Highway 101 corridor... shall be promoted as the primary focus for
industrial development and operations. (Policy Plan, p. 50)
Industrial development shall be strongly encouraged to create new job
opportunities and expand the local tax base to assist in paying for needed
services and reduce tax impacts on housing costs. (Policy Plan, p. 50)
B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding: The applicant has provided for the removal of exterior storage and waste.
on site, improving compatibility with surrounding uses. The only concern is that long
term utilization of the existing structure may be an impediment to the City's goals for
the area depending on redevelopment of higher value industrial buildings and
connection to the sanitary sewer and water system.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding: As outlined in the paragraphs that follow, the proposed use of the subject
site does not satisfy performance standards for development within the 8-WDistrict.
Any approval of the requested rezoning should be conditioned upon all applicable
performance standards being satisfied either at the time of development or by a
contract for temporary use of the site in its present condition, with an adequate
security to ensure compliance.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding. The applicant's proposal may ultimately lead to the type of development
intended for the area with the sale and development of adjacent lots. Approval of
a zoning amendment to accommodate a reuse of the site in a manner that does not
meet required performance standards and does not connect to sanitary sewer and
waterservice at such a highly visible location may establish undesired precedencies.
The applicant has indicated that the substandard conditions would exist no longer
than two years. The primary concern of the City should be that is a security or
guarantee the site will be redeveloped and/or brought into conformance with
applicable standards. Such arrangements have proven problematic in the past. As
such, if the applicant's request to use the site as is were approved, an adequate
security must be required. It must also be emphasized that any new construction or
users would be expected to meet all performance standards and connect to
municipal utilities.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: Although no study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated
to negatively impact area property values. The City would receive additional
property tax revenue based upon a change from residential to industrial tax ratios.
However, because the proposed use of the site does not include required
improvements for industrial uses, the substandard site would not be expected to
have the value of an industrial development that conformed to these standards.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: The subject site has direct access to CSAH 42 which is designated as a
minor arterial by the Comprehensive Plan. The capacity of this road should be
sufficient to_ accommodate the conversion from residential to industrial use.
However, the access location is offset with the CSAH 42 and 851' Street intersection.
The City Engineer and Wright County Highway Department should review the
location of the present access and its design for potential conflicts with the CSAH
42185th Street intersection.
The Comprehensive Plan calls for eliminating direct access to CSAH 42. To this
end, it is anticipated that 85' Street will be extended east of CSAH 42 to connect to
a future north -south frontage road through the planned commerciallindustrial area,
which would provide local access. The submitted preliminary plat provides on -half
of the necessary right-of-way for the future street extension. The other half would
be acquired with development of the adjacent property to the north to ensure that the
extension aligns with the existing 851' Street.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
Finding: The proposed use is not anticipated to have a negative impact to the City's
service capacity. However, because connection to the sanitary sewer and water
system is not proposed, the re -use of the site does not support the financing of these
systems as anticipated by the Comprehensive Plan. The change to a more intensive
use of the site does provide an opportunity to require connection to municipal utilities.
If the City Council defers connection at this time, a specific agreement for connecting
to sanitary sewer and water services must be provided for.
6. The planning report dated November 1, 2000 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
7. The memorandum dated November 6, 2000 from the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
and Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 6, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
The public hearing was continued to November 20, 2000 to allow the City Council to
determine whether the request, which was similar to one denied March 27, 2000, should
be reconsidered. Upon review of the ' application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the
City Council approve the amendment (map) based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested
amendment (map) is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received
to date.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Atte§t:
Blaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
CITY OF
0TSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, rlI�i tNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Today Properties, Inc.
11-2100
Preliminary Plat - Approval
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Consideration of a preliminary plat entitled "Otsego Business Park consisting of five
lots to be developed for future industrial uses.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is described on Exhibit A.
2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for industrial land
use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned B -W District by action of the City Council taken on November 27,
2000. The B -W District requires a minimum lot size of two (2) acres and minimum width
of 200 feet, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. All proposed lots meet these standards.
4. The planning report dated November 1, 2000 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
5. The memorandum dated November 6, 2000 from the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
and Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
6. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 6, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
The public hearing was continued to November 20, 2000 to allow the City Council to
determine whether the request, which was similar to one denied March 27, 2000, should
be reconsidered. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the
City Council approve the preliminary plat based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Otsego
Business Park Preliminary Plat is hereby approved based on the most current plan and
information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the preliminary plat does not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The
City shall only guarantee such service to approved final plats with signed contracts or
through a financial commitment for such service to assure the City of timely development.
All street rights-of-way are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
2. Approval of any final plat shall be contingent upon adequate access being provided to all
lots, either through construction of 85th Street or prior approval of indirect access as may
be allowed by the Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of the application.
3. All grading, drainage and utility issues are subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer.
4. Park and trail dedication requirements for the project are satisfied at the time of final plat
approval.
5. The applicant enter into a development contract that provides for required improvements
within 24 months of the date of approval, pay required fees and post necessary securities,
subject to review and approval of the City Attorney.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
CITY OF
OTSEGO
11%-������
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Today Properties, Inc.
11-21-00
Site Plan Review - Approval
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Site and building plan review to allow for a contractor office/warehouse use within
an existing structure located at 8500 Parrish Avenue NE.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based -upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is described on Exhibit A.
2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for industrial land
use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned B -W, District by action of the City Council on November 27, 2000;
contractor office/warehouses are a permitted use in said District.
4. The planning report dated November 1, 2000 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
5. The memorandum dated November 6, 2000 from the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson
and Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein.
6. The Otsego Planning Commission considered the application at their regular meeting on
November 6, 2000, which was continued to November 20, 2000. Upon review of the
application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission recommended by a
6-0 vote that the City Council approve the site and building plans based on the
aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested site and
building plans are hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to
date, subject to the following conditions:
1. Application is made for final plat approval that provides a lot for the existing structure that
conforms to the requirements of the B -w District.
2. Access to CSAH 42 is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer and Wright
County.
3. All trash shall be stored within the principal building or within an enclosure approved by the
Building Official.
4. All exterior signage shall require approval of a sign permit, subject to review and approval
of the Zoning Administrator.
5. Existing septic and well systems are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
6. All grading, drainage and easement issues are subject to review and approval of the City
Engineer.
7. The applicant enter into a development contract and post appropriate securities for
installation of all deferred improvements and connection to municipal sanitary sewer and
water utilities within 24 months of the date of approval.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
Attest:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
2
NOIRxIAWItST ASSOCkATto C003%jiLTANTS, INC,
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 21 November 2000
RE: Otsego - Roden Density Transfer CUP
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.35
Please be advised that the Planning Commission considered the above referenced
application at a public hearing on November 20, 2000. The applicant was not present at
the meeting and no comments were received of the public.
The Planning Commission did not discuss the request in any detail and voted 6-0 to
recommend approval of the CUP application. The application is to be considered by the
City Council at their meeting on November 27, 2000.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Judy Hudson
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Floyd Roden
CITY OF
0 T S E G 0
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Mr. Floyd Roden
11-20-00
Conditional Use Permit
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Consideration of a conditional use permit to allow a "one per forty" transfer of
development rights for land located northwest of 80th Street and Kadler Avenue (CSAH 19) for the
purpose of creating a 1.5 acre lot on which to construct a new residential dwelling.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A.
2. The subject parcel is located within the Agricultural Preserve Area and is guided for
agricultural land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District.
4. Transfer of development rights from one parcel to another parcel with street frontage under
the same ownership is allowed by conditional use permit in the A-1 District.
5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible
effects of the conditional use permit with their judgement based upon (but not limited to)
the criteria outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance.-
A.
rdinance:
A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the
official City Comprehensive Plan.
Finding: The City's Comprehensive Plan allows for density transfers under the
conditions outlined in the Zoning Ordinance.
B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area.
Finding: Land uses in this area of the City are primarily agricultural. The proposal
to construct a single family home on a 1.5 acre lot is compatible with surrounding
land uses and also protects existing farming activities in the area.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the
Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
Finding. As a condition of CUP approval, all performance standards must be met.
D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: The single family residence should have no negative effect within the area
it is proposed.
E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed.
Finding: While a detailed analysis has not been conducted, similar situations have
demonstrated no negative impact upon area property values.
F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Finding: Traffic generated by the proposed single family dwelling will be minimal and
will be within the capabilities of 801" Street which serves the single family property.
G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including
parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service
capacity.
Finding. The proposed single family dwelling will not overburden the City's service
capacity.
5. The City Council approve a similar CUP for the applicant in 1996, which the applicant did
not implement. In accordance with Section 20-4-6 of the Zoning Ordinance, the previous
CUP is considered to be expired one year from the date of issuance.
6. The memorandum dated November 15, 2000 and planning report dated April 23, 1996
prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated
herein.
8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on
November 20, 2000 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice.
Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission
closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve
the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested
conditional use permit is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information
received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. A site plan (based on a certificate of survey) is submitted and found to comply with
applicable A-1 District performance standards.
2
2. Consideration is given to shifting the proposed building site +/- 1,300 feet to the west to
comply with the "clustering" directive of the Zoning Ordinance. This issue should be
subject to comment/recommendation of the City Engineer.
3. The properties involved in the development rights transfer are under the same ownership.
4. The applicant pursue subdivision of the property in a manner substantially similar to that
conceptually illustrated by Exhibit C of the Planning Report dated April 23, 1996. Such
subdivision shall be subject to approval by the Zoning Administrator.
5. A deed restriction is place upon the parcel from which the development right has been
transferred to prohibit additional development, unless there is a change in the City's
Comprehensive Plan and/or Zoning Ordinance.
6. Findings are made that the subject site is capable of accommodating a private well and
septic system.
7. The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to drainage and utility
easement establishment.
8. The City Engineer provide comment/recommendation in regard to site access.
9. The proposed subdivision is subject to park dedication requirements as determined by the
Park and Recreation Commission, subject to approval by the City Council.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
Attest:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Daniel Licht
DATE: 21 November 2000
RE: Otsego - Otsego Waterfront PUD Concept
FILE NO.: 176.02 - 00.33
Z_
At their meeting on November 20,2000, the Planning Commission received a presentation
of a concept plan for a commercial development of the northeast and northwest quadrants
of the TH 101 and CSAH 39 intersection. The developer had made two revisions to their
concept plan to address comments in the staff report regarding building location adjacent
to CSAH 39 and sidewalks.
The Planning Commission was generally very favorable to the concept plan. Specific
questions from the Planning Commission members focused on issues with the WS District,
and site elements such as on -street parking and loading. These were all issues that the
Planning Commission would seek to explore further as part of an anticipated development
application.
Based upon the concept plan and presentation, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to
recommend approval of the concept, subject to the conditions outlined in the staff report
and necessary processing requirements. The concept plan will be presented to the City
Council at their meeting on November 27, 2000.
PC. Mike Robertson
Elaine Beatty
Judy Hudson
Larry Koshak
Andy MacArthur
CITY OF
OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
Applicant's Name: Cascade III Land CO. LLC.
11-21-00
Concept (Sketch) Plan
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Consideration concept (sketch) plan for a commercial development located at the
northeast and northwest quadrants of T. H. 101 and CSAH 39.
City Council Meeting Date: 27 November 2000
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning
Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the
following findings of fact:
1. The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A.
2. The subject property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for
commercial land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update.
3. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District; The subject properties are
also within the WS, Wild, Scenic and Recreational River Overlay District.
4. The planning report dated November 16, 2000 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest
Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
5. The Otsego Planning Commission considered the concept (sketch) plan at their regular
meeting on November 21, 2000. Upon review of the application and evidence received,
the Otsego Planning Commission recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council
approve concept (sketch) plan based on the aforementioned findings.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the proposed concept
(sketch) plan is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date,
subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval of the concept plan is subject to submission and approval of applications for
zoning amendment(s), development stage PUD and preliminary plat.
2. All accesses are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer, Wright County or
MNDoT as appropriate. The design of all public and private streets is subject to review and
approval of the City Engineer.
3. The concept plan and/or draft development standards are revised to address staff
comments on building materials, building height, building setbacks, landscaping, lighting
signage, parking and loading.
4. The applicant shall provide a more detailed allocation of building space by use and plans
for loading areas and procedures, and snow storage.
5. All construction plans and grading/drainage, utilities and easement issues are subject to
review and approval of the City Engineer.
6. The developer provide a preliminary phasing schedule, if applicable.
PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 27th day of November, 2000.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Attest:
Elaine Beatty, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk
NO&TNWIST A$$OC111*►TI110 CONSUILTANTS4, INC,
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO.:
Background
Otsego Mayor and City Council
Daniel Licht
21 November 2000
Otsego - Zoning Ordinance; Feedlots
176.08
At the November 13, 2000 City Council meeting, the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
dealing with feedlots were discussed in regard to a potential residential lot split request.
During this discussion, it was clear that there is a lack of understanding or consensus on
the administration of these provisions and numerous interpretations.
City Staff met on November 16, 2000 to review the feedlot regulations, discuss there intent
and reach agreement on interpretation of the Ordinance at a staff level. Mayor Fournier
was also in attendance at this meeting as he happened to be at City Hall. The purpose
of this memorandum is to summarize the provisions of the feedlot regulations and outline
City Staff's interpretations of various sections.
Exhibits:
A. Feedlot Ordinance Summary
B. Feedlot Ordinance
Analysis
Intent. The existing feedlot regulations were derived from specific discussions during the
Comprehensive Plan, which directed that measures be taken to protect existing agricultural
activities in the Rural Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan guided these measures only
for the Rural Service Area due to anticipated development east of Nashua Avenue and the
number of feedlots in the Urban Service Area being limited to the Vernon Kolles farm, Jerry
Struthers farm and possibly Midwest Station.
The changes made to the feedlot regulations allow existing feedlots in the rural service.,,,,
area opportunities to expand buildings or build new buildings and expand animal units.
To protect these operations from encroachment by residential uses, the Ordinance
included a setback requirement that was intended to separate any new residential use
from existing feedlots that participate in the City's registration program. Those feedlots
that did not participate in the registration or those in the Urban Service Area would not be
allowed animal unit expansions or be protected by the new residential dwelling setback.
Registration. The registration process outlined by Section 20-27-2.13 establishes abase
line of information on which the City can use to regulate future operations of existing
feedlots when they may pursue animal unit expansions. The registration is also supposed
to provide the necessary information about existing facilities in order to administer the
reciprocal setback provisions.
Registration of existing feedlots applies only to those facilities within the Rural Service
Area, which are the only operations allowed animal unit expansions and reciprocal new
dwelling setbacks. Applications for registration of existing feedlots were to have been
received by October 1, 2000. The City Council had directed that the farmers be allowed
to provide all of the necessary information for registration over time, but that progress was
to be made to have all information submitted. City staff is reviewing files to determine the
extent of the information provided by those feedlots that attempted to register in advance
of the October 1, 2000 deadline.
A feedlot owner may terminate their registration. Such action forfeits the imposition of
reciprocal setbacks and any future animal unit expansions. The use is considered a legal
non -conforming use and may continue operating in the same manner. This is the same
approach to regulating any feedlots in the Urban Service Area and any unregistered
feedlots in the Rural Service Area.
Animal Units. Only existing feedlots in Rural Service Area that registered by October 1,
2000 qualify for expansion of animal units per Section 20-27-4. The expansion of animal
units is based upon the number of animal units allowed by the operator's current MPCA
permit. If the number of units is less than 400, the number of animal units may be
increased 300 percent. If the number of animal units is greater than 400, the number of
animal units may be increased 200 percent.
New Buildings/Expansions. Section 20-27-5 outlines the procedures for allowing new
feedlot buildings or expansion of existing buildings. Existing feedlots in the Rural Service
Area that registered by October 1, 2000 may expand existing buildings or construct new
buildings with administrative approval provided that:
1. The building is within 300 feet of an existing building used to house animals
(measured from edge of building to edge of building).
2. The building is not closer than 1,000 feet to any residential property (the farmstead
residence is not included in this setback).
-2-
The expansion of existing buildings or new construction of new buildings for registered
feedlots in the Rural Service Area that meet these location requirements is allowed
administratively because the setbacks are intended to offset any negative impacts that
may occur with the expansion. If the location criteria cannot be met, the feedlot operator
may apply for a CUP to either encroach within 1,000 feet of an existing dwelling or locate
a new building farther than 300 feet from an existing building used to house animals. In
considering the CUP application, the operator must demonstrate a physical reason for not
being able to meet the location requirements and satisfy the conditions outlined in Section
20-27-5.C. It must be noted that each of the existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area
that did register would likely require a CUP for any expansion due to the proximity to
existing dwellings.
Existing feedlots in the Urban Service Area or feedlots in the Rural Service Area that did
not register may expand existing buildings or construct new buildings by CUP subject to
the conditions summarized below. These operations were allowed new or expanded
buildings such that they could maintain their operations over time. However, these
operations are not allowed any animal unit expansions.
1. The building is within 300 feet of an existing building used to house animals.
2. The building is not closer than 1,000 feet to any residential property (the farmstead
residence is not included in this setback).
3. The criteria of Section 20-27-5.0 are satisfied.
CUP Criteria. Section 20-27-5.0 of the feedlot regulations outlines criteria for considering
CUP requests for the following:
1. Registered feedlots within the Rural Service Area that cannot meet the location
requirements for expanded or new buildings.
2. Any expansion or new building for an existing feedlot in the Rural Service Area that
is not registered. (No additional animal units allowed)
3. Any expansion or new building for and existing feedlot in the Urban Service Area.
(No additional animal units allowed)
During the discussion at the City Council Meeting on November 13, 2000, Council Member
Heidner noted Section 20-27-5.C.3 states the building expansion must "minimize the
impact on surrounding properties". This section applies only to the above situations where
a CUP is required.
Reciprocal Setbacks. Section 20-27-9 states that no new residential use may be
established within 1,000 feet of a registered feedlot within the Rural Service Area. Staff s
interpretation of this provision is that the setback is measured from the feedlot building to
the residential use property line. The reason is that the residential use is represented by
the entire yard, lot or parcel. In keeping with the intent of the Ordinance, the direction is
to keep new residential uses away from those feedlots anticipated to continue operations
at present or expanded intensities to limit future conflicts.
-3-
The Zoning Ordinance does not include specific provisions for exceptions to the reciprocal
setback requirement. The discussion during the Zoning Ordinance update was that a new
dwelling should only be allowed within the.1,000 foot separation distance when there is
no other reasonable alternative. The following issues have been discussed for requests
to locate a new dwelling within 1,000 feet of a registered feedlot in the RSA.
Wavier. A waiver mechanism that would allow the operator to agree to allow
subdivisions within the 1,000 foot setback would be problematic. The operator
could grant themselves waivers to allow subdivision of lots from their property while
denying such a waiver to adjacent property owners. Or the operator may arbitrarily
allow one adjacent property owner to subdivide while denying another the same
opportunity. Such a process may not in fact be legal in that it transfers the City's
Zoning authority to a private landowner.
CUP. The Ordinance could include a provision allowing exception to the 1,000 foot
reciprocal setback, which was discussed during the Zoning Ordinance Update.
Although the City could establish criteria for such a request, allowing exceptions by
CUP does not impose the more stringent standards that there is no other
reasonable building site on the property.
Variance. By not including any exception mechanism for the residential setback,
it was stated that a variance may be justified for any property completely
encompassed by a 1,000 foot buffer area. The extent to which a property is denied
a reasonable use is a policy issue yet to be decided. The more strict interpretation
is that one building site per parcel is a reasonable use regardless of area.
Alternatively, City Officials may consider approval of a variance in situations where
the property owner cannot achieve the maximum density guided for the property
by the Comprehensive Plan under a more liberal interpretation of reasonable use.
Conclusion
Outlined above is a summary of regulations applicable to feedlots and where necessary,
staff's consensus interpretation of the Ordinance. The purpose is this memorandum is to
allow the City Council to review the feedlot Ordinance to determine if the regulations are
what was the intended product from the Comprehensive Plan update and Zoning
Ordinance update processes. The City Council, in reviewing this summary and the actual
Ordinance, may concur with City staff's conclusions, establish different interpretations or
direct the Planning Commission to consider amendments to the Ordinance as currently
adopted.
PC. Mike Robertson Elaine Beatty Judy Hudson
Jerry Olson Andy MacArthur Larry Koskak
-4-
SUMMARY OF FEEDLOT ORDINANCE PROVISIONS
• Registration of existing feedlots applies only to those facilities within the Rural
Service Area.
• Applications for registration of existing feedlots must have been received by
October 1, 2000.
• Only existing feedlots in Rural Service Area that registered by October 1, 2000
qualify for expansion of animal units.
• A feedlot owner may terminate their registration. Such action forfeits the imposition
of reciprocal setbacks and any future animal unit expansions. The use is
considered a legal non -conforming use and may continue operating in the same
manner.
• Existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area that registered by October 1, 2000 may
expand existing buildings or construct new buildings with administrative approval
provided that:
1. The building is within 300 feet of an existing building used to house animals.
2. The building is not closer than 1,000 feet to any residential property (the
farmstead residence is not included in this setback).
3. Exceptions to these location requirements may be approved by CUP.
• Existing feedlots in the Urban Service Area or Rural Service Area that are not
registered may expand existing buildings or construct new buildings by CUP
provided that:
1. The building is within 300 feet of an existing building used to house animals.
2. The building is not closer than 1,000 feet to any residential property (the
farmstead residence is not included in this setback).
3. The number of animal units is not increased.
• During the discussion at the City Council Meeting, Council Member Heidner noted
Section 20-27-5.C. states the building expansion must "minimize the impact on
surrounding properties". This provision pertains to the list of conditions evaluated
as part of a CUP application for:
1. Registered feedlots within the Rural Service Area that cannot meet the
location requirements for expanded or new buildings.
2. Any expansion or new building for an existing feedlot in the Rural Service
Area that is not registered. (No additional animal units allowed)
3. Any expansion or new building for and existing feedlot in the Urban Service
Area. (No additional animal units allowed)
• No new residential use may be established within 1,000 feet of a registered feedlot
within the Rural Service Area, as measured from the feedlot building to the
residential use property line. Proposals to establish a new residential use within
1,000 feet of a registered feedlot in the Rural Service Area would require approval
of a variance.
EXHIBIT A
SECTION 27
FEEDLOT REGULATIONS
Section
20-27-1:
Purpose
20-27-2:
Allowed Feedlots
20-27-3:
Prohibited Feedlots
20-27-4:
Expansion of Animal Units
20-27-5:
Structures for Housing Animals
20-27-6:
Existing Feedlots: Compliance With MPCA Requirements
20-27-7:
Odors
20-27-8:
Feedlot Setbacks
20-27-9:
New Dwelling Setbacks
20-27-10:
Manure Stockpile/Application Setbacks
20-27-11:
Destruction of Existing Animal Feedlots
20-27-12:
Facility Closure
20-27-13:
Abandonment
20-27-1: PURPOSE: The purpose and intent of this Section is to prohibit the establishment
of new animal feedlots within the City of Otsego and to regulate existing feedlot
operations within the City of Otsego in a manner conducive to the health, safety,
and welfare of the citizens of Otsego. These controls are needed due to the recent
incorporation from township status to City status and the unique location of the
municipality in relation to the Metropolitan Area. These regulations are also
necessary to promote the planning process within the City and to protect the health,
safety, and welfare of the residents of the City as -well as to:
A. Establish conditions under which existing animal feedlots within the City can
continue to operate.
B. Prohibit the establishment of new animal feedlots within the City.
C. To prohibit the expansion of existing animal feedlots to levels not conducive with
the present character of the City.
D. To provide regulations which can be applied in a fair and equitable nature, but that
take into account the inherent fluid nature of an ongoing farm operations and the
difficulty of applying strict numbers as criteria for control of an ongoing operation.
E. Promote best farm management practices.
F. Protect valuable groundwater and surface water resources.
27-1 EXHIBIT B
G. Protect human and animal health.
H. Implement specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
I. Promote compatibility of uses.
J. Promote continuance of agricultural uses while protecting the residents from
nuisances caused by large, non-traditional, and intense agricultural uses.
K. Coordinate and assist state agencies in the administration of state-wide statutes
and regulations governing livestock operations.
20-27-2: ALLOWED FEEDLOTS:
A. Urban Service Area: Those feedlots presently existing within the Urban Service
Area, designated by the Comprehensive Plan, may continue operations as provided
for in this section, subject to the following:
1. Existing feedlots may continue operations as legal nonconforming uses as
set forth in Section 15 of this Chapter, and as long as they do not constitute
a potential pollution hazard. Such feedlots may only continue on the
condition that they obtain approval from MPCA, if necessary.
a. Interpretation of Section 15: It is understood that by its nature the
raising of animals and farming creates a situation where there are
seasonal, natural, fluctuations in the number of animals within a
facility. It is also understood that to remain viable, a farming
operation must have a reasonable ability to limited expansion. Due
to these peculiar circumstances, and only for purposes of this
Section, the phrase "enlarged" contained in Section 15 of this
Ordinance shall be construed as an enlargement of a legally
established pre-existing use in the following circumstances:
(1) In a case where a new structure is constructed or is proposed
for construction for the purpose of housing additional animals.
(2) In a case where a lagoon or earthen basin associated with an
increase in animal units is constructed or proposed for
construction.
(3) In a case where an existing animal feedlot is not in compliance
with the terms and conditions of an MPCA permit or interim
permit.
27-2
(4) In the case where additional animal units place the facility in
violation of current City ordinances regarding the care of
animals.
(5) Any increase of the total number of animal units in an existing
animal feedlot which raises the cumulative total of animal units
above twice the number present upon the facility at the date of
adoption of this Ordinance.
(6) Any construction, outside of normal maintenance, which has
the effect of increasing the size of a building used for the
purposes of housing animals which is done without the
conditional use permit required by this section.
(7) Ongoing violations of other City ordinances.
B. Rural Service Area: Those feedlots presently existing within the Rural Service
Area, designated by the Comprehensive Plan, may continue operations and be
allowed limited expansion opportunities as provided for in this section, subject to
the following:
1. Registration: All existing feedlots shall be registered with the City within six
(6) months of 1 April 1999 by administrative permit, subject to the
procedures set forth in and regulated by Section 7 of this Chapter.
a. An application for an administrative permit to register an existing
feedlot shall include the following information:
(1) Owner's and operator's name and address.
(2) Location of the animal feedlot including quarter, section, range
and township.
(3) Animal types and existing number of animals of each type
confined at the feedlot and maximum number of animal units
allowed in conformance with MPCA permits and guidelines.
(4) A scale drawing clearly indicating the dimensions of the
feedlot and showing all existing homes, buildings, existing
manure storage areas and/or structures, lakes, ponds, water
courses, known wetlands, dry runs, rock outcroppings, roads
and wells within one thousand (1,000) feet of the feedlot.
27-3
(5) Plans for buildings and structures as required -by this
Ordinance and/or other County and State ordinances and
regulations.
(6) A manure and waste management plan as required by the
MPCA.
(7) Leases or agreements allowing disposal of manure on land
other than that of the feedlot owner/operator. No land may be
subject to more than one (1) such lease or agreement.
(8) Documentation of compliance with all MPCA rules and
regulations and approval of MPCA permits, as may be
applicable.
(9) Information identified in Section 20-7-3 of this Chapter, as may
be applicable.
b. Amended Registration: An amendment to a registration may be
applied for and shall be administered in a manner similar to a new
registration application. Amended registration shall be required for
any of the following:
(1) Ownership of an existing feedlot is changed, including but not
limited to the following:
(a) A change in ownership of buildings and/or land.
(b) A lease for the use of buildings and/or land is entered
into, modified or terminated.
(2) There is a substantial change in operation of the feedlot.
(a) The number of animal units is increased two hundred
(200) percent above the number of animal units existing
at the feedlot on the date of registration.
(b) Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing
buildings capable of housing animals.
(c) Any change in the operation of a feedlot that would
affect the storage, handling, utilization or disposal of
manure.
27-4
C. Termination. Registration of an existing feedlot shall be valid
indefinitely provided that the operation is in full compliance with the
provisions of this Chapter and County and/or State regulations, as
may be applicable. The owner of a feedlot may terminate an
approved registration at any time by submitting a written request to
the Zoning Administrator. Once terminated by a feedlot
owner, registration shall be permanently forfeited and not be re-
established under any circumstances. Any feedlot for which
registration was terminated may continue operations as a legal non-
conforming use as outlined in Section 20-27-2.A.1 of this Section.
d. Any feedlot not registered with the Zoning Administrator within six (6)
months of 1 April 1999 may continue operations as a legal non-
conforming use as outlined in Section 20-27-2.A.1 of this section.
20-27-3: PROHIBITED FEEDLOTS: No new animal feedlots shall be established within the
City. No existing animal feedlot is allowed to expand beyond its level of operation
at the date of 8 March 1999, subject to Section 20-27-2 of this section. No
operation or facility established with ten (10) animal units or less may expand to
more than ten (10) animal units.
20-27-4: EXPANSION OF ANIMAL UNITS: An existing feedlot in the Rural Service Area,
as defined by the Comprehensive Plan, which is registered pursuant to Section 20-
27-2.13 may be allowed to increase the number of animal units, subject to the
following:
A. The increase in number of permitted animal units shall be based upon the following
provisions:
1. For existing feedlots allowed not more than four hundred (400) animal units
by MPCA permit on the date of registration, the number of permitted animal
units may be increased up to three hundred (300) percent.
2. For existing feedlots that are allowed more than four hundred (400) animal
units by MPCA permit on the date of registration, the number of permitted
animal units may be increased up to two hundred (200) percent.
3. The number of animal units of any existing feedlot shall not be increased to
more than one thousand five hundred (1,500) animal units.
B. There is existing building and animal holding areas necessary to adequately house
the increase in animal units, in conformance with applicable City ordinances. Any
construction of a new building or expansion of an existing building necessary to
27-5
adequately house the increase in animal units shall be subject to Section -20-27-5
of this section.
C. The feedlot owner/operator shall own or have sufficient land under contract for
spreading of manure generated by the expanded feedlot operation.
D. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2.13 of this
Chapter.
20-27-5: STRUCTURES FOR HOUSING FARM ANIMALS: The construction of new
buildings or expansion of existing buildings intended to house animals in
association with an existing feedlot that is in full compliance with this Section shall
be subject to the following provisions:
A. Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing building for the purpose of
housing farm animals is allowed for existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area, as
defined by the Comprehensive Plan, which are registered per Section 20-27-2.13
provided that:
1. Any new building intended to house farm animals is within three hundred
(300) feet of an existing building that houses farm animals, except by
conditional use permit.
2. Any new building or expansion of an existing building intended to house farm
animals may not encroach within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing
residential use, except by conditional use permit.
3. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2.13 of this
Chapter.
B. Construction of new buildings or expansion of existing buildings for the purpose of
housing farm animals for existing feedlots in the Rural Service Area that are not
registered in accordance with Section 20-27-2.13 and existing feedlots in the Urban
Service Area shall be subject to the provisions of 20-27-5.A above and require
approval of a conditional use permit.
C. Conditional Use Permits: Application for a conditional use permit under this
section shall be regulated by Section 4 of this Chapter. Such a conditional use
permit may be granted provided that:
1. Applicant provide proof that the proposed building or building expansion is
the necessary to provide sufficient room for the number of animal units to be
added, and that the number is allowable under this section.
27-6
2. That the proposed building or building expansion is the minimum expansion
necessary to adequately house said animals, and to comply with existing
City ordinances.
3. That the building or building expansion is to be constructed in such a
manner as to not increase the non -conformity; to minimize the impact on
surrounding properties; and as may be allowed below:
a. For proposed buildings located beyond three hundred (300) feet of an
existing building used to house animals, the applicant must
demonstrate physical justification for the increased separation and
that the distance from existing buildings is the minimum necessary.
b. - For allowed feedlots within 1,000 feet of an existing residential use,
the proposed building or building expansion may not encroach closer
to said residential use.
4. The applicant provide documentation of compliance with all MPCA rules and
regulations and approval of MPCA permits, as may be applicable.
5. Approval of an amended registration, as outlined in Section 20-27-2.13 of this
Chapter.
6. The provisions of Section 20-4-2.F of this Chapter are considered and
determined to be satisfied.
20-27-6: COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA REQUIREMENTS: All existing animal feedlots
operating on 1 April 1999 shall continue operating only in strict compliance with all
applicable MPCA rules and regulations:
20-27-7: ODORS:AII animal feedlot operations shall take responsible measures to minimize
odors which have the effect of creating an adverse impact on the environment and
quality of life for the residents of the City.
20-27-8: FEEDLOT SETBACKS: Lawfully established feedlots existing prior to 1 April 1999
may be continued in the location existing on such date.
20-27-9: NEW DWELLING SETBACKS: No building permit shall be issued for a new
dwelling unit within one thousand (1,000) feet of an existing feedlot that is
registered under the provisions of Section 20-27-2.13, which also qualifies as a farm
as defined by Section 20-2-2 of this Chapter. This provision shall not apply to
dwellings constructed as a principal residence on the same parcel and under the
ownership of the owner/operator of the registered feedlot.
27-7
20-27-10: MANURE STOCKPILE/APPLICATION SETBACKS: The following - manure
stockpile and application setbacks are required for all existing animal feedlots:
CATEGORY
MANURE APPLICATION
STOCKPILES
Surface/
Incorporated or
Irrigation
Injected
Public lake, river, or
300 feet
100 feet -lake 50 feet-
300 feet
stream
river/ stream
Public streets (as
25 feet -surface 300
10 feet
25 feet
measured from the
feet -irrigation
outer boundary of the
right-of-way)
"
Platted Subdivisions
300 feet -surface
300 feet
300 feet
1,000 feet- irrigation
Municipal wells
200 feet
200 feet
300 feet
Private wells
200 feet
200 feet
200 feet
Public or private ditch
300 feet
100 feet
300 feet
(including those in a
public rights-of-way)
Residence other than
300 feet -surface
300 feet
300 feet
landowner or operator
1,000 feet -irrigation
20-27-11: DESTRUCTION OF EXISTING ANIMAL FEEDLOTS: Notwithstanding Section 20-
15-3.J of this Chapter, any animal feedlot lawfully existing as an allowed use under
this Section 20-27-2 of this Chapter and any structures or buildings lawfully existing
and which are used for the purpose of containing animals associated with an
allowed feedlot use, which are destroyed or partially destroyed to the extent of more
than fifty (50) percent of its fair market value, may be restored and the same use
resumed (if such use was lawfully existing as an allowed use, pursuant to Section
20-27-2 of this section, prior to such damage and destruction)or any conforming use
established, provided that such reconstruction be completed within twelve (12)
months after the date of such damage or destruction.
20-27-12: FACILITY CLOSURE:
A. Responsible Parties: The landowner, owner and operator of an existing animal
feedlot shall be responsible for the ongoing management of manure and the final
closure of the facility including the cleaning of buildings and the emptying and
proper disposal of manure from all manure holding facilities.
27-8
B. Closure: If an existing feedlot operation ceases operation, the owner and/or
operator shall be responsible for the following:
1. All wastes from the feedlot operation and its waste control system shall be
removed and disposed of on land or in some other legally permissible
manner as soon as practical, but no more than six (6) months, and in a
manner conducive to the public health, safety, and welfare.
2. Closure of the operation may be postponed for a period of twelve (12)
months if the property is posted for sale.
3. Notification to the City that the feedlot operation has been discontinued, and
that the property is in compliance with this Section of the Zoning Ordinance.
4. If the property is for sale, notification shall be given to all potential buyers of
the status of the feedlot use of the property which must comply with all
presently applicable zoning ordinances if the feedlot operation is
discontinued for a period of six (6) months, as well as the other provisions
of section 15 of this Chapter.
20-27-13: ABANDONMENT: Owners and operators of animal feedlots, either at the time of
abandonment or after, shall have joint and several liability for clean up, closure or
remediation of abandoned feedlot sales.
27-9
12
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
7. Larry Koshak, City Engineer: Mike Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
7.1. Approval of Partial Pay Estimate for Page Ave Rough Grading
(79th St to 83rd St)
7.2. Approval of Partial Pay Estimate for Quaday Avenue & 88th Street
Sanitary, Stormsewer, & VWatermain Improvement
7.3. Discussion of Changes to R.iverpointe Plat (Orrin Thompson)
7.4. Approval of Partial Payment for 1999 Street Improvement
7.5. Any Other Engineering business
BACKGROUND -
7. 1.
ACKGROUND:7.1. and 7.2. See enclosed information.
7.3. After discussion with the developers, the 57th Street cul-de-sac in the Riverpointe
development is proposed to be shortened and not used as a route for sludge trucks to
travel from the Sewer plant to County Road 36. The reasons were repeated runs of heavy
trucks could damage residential streets, sludge dripping on streets would not be desirable,
and trucks tracking mud from fields on to the streets would not be desirable. This gives
more room for the well and pumphouse that will provide water for the development and
will not cause the loss of any lots. This does not require any action by Council but staff
wanted you to be informed.
7.4. This payment finals out the project except for the remaining work scheduled on
80th Street.
7.5. This is for any other Engineering Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION•
These items are for Council discussion and decision.
Thanks,
Mike
CITY OF OTSEGO
CITY ENGINEER
COUNCIL AGENDA ITEMS
COUNCIL MEETING
11/27/00
Item 7.1 Consider approval of Partial Pay Estimate for Page Avenue Rough
Grading (79 h St. to 83"d St.) COP #00.04.
Item 7.2 Consider approval of Partial Pay Estimate for Quaday Ave. & 88th St.
Sanitary, Storm Sewer and Watermain Improvement Project COP #00.02
& 00.03
Item 7.3 Discussion on RiverPointe (Orrin Thompson Development on Thomas
Koerwitz property)
On November 16th, the City Engineer & City Administrator met with the
Developer's team and requested that the cul-de-sac on 57th St. be
shortened as not to extend outside of the plat.
Reasons:
1. We do not want City sludge trucks & City service vehicles
driving through residential streets for numerous reasons.
a. Safety of residents
b. Loaded sludge trucks are heavy and repeatQd use of
City street could detrimentally affect the City streets
C. Sludge trucks may drip sludge onto City streets
d. Sludge trucks drive into & through muddy fields &
may track or drop mud on return trip through City
streets
An acceptable alternative was reached. The 57th St. cul-de-sac is
removed without the loss of any lots. This gave more room for the well
and pump house. The well & pump house can be accessed from the east
using the same road which currently accesses the wastewater treatment
plant. This alternative maintains the separation between City services &
City service vehicles and the residential area. Screening between the
back of the lots and the City buildings is also now possible.
Since no changes in lot total occurred and no changes in density of plat
occurred no action is needed by Council.
Item 7.4 Consider approval of partial payment for 1999 Street Improvement
Project — COP #99-01
Final out project excepting overlay work on 80th St. from McIver to CSAH
19. Retainage has been lowered from 5% to 2.5%.
\\Ha01\Shared oocs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\901\2000\ot901agenda 11-27-OO.doc
PAY ESTIMATE #1
Item 7.1
November 17, 2000
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. NE
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: COP 00-04
Page Avenue
79th St. to 83rd St.
Rough Street Grading
Contractor: Dennis Fehn Gravel & Excavating
Contract Amt: $45,295.00
Award Date: Oct. 11, 2000
Dear Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project.
Item No.
Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Contract
Price
Used
to
Date
Extension
1
Mobilization
1
LS
$1,200.00
1.0
$1,200.00
2
Clear & Grub
1
LS
$1,500.00
0.5
$750.00
3
Common Excavation (P)
2020
CY
$2.00
13,583
$27,166.00
4
Haul & Place Common Borrow (L\/)
6250
CY
$2.00
2,754
$5,508.00
5
Furnish & Place Granular Borrow (LV)
8685
CY
$3.00
3,674
$11,022.00
Total to Date: $45,646.00
Less 10% Retainage: $4,564.60
We recommend payment of: $41,081.40
—A a::�# , / '7
Contractor Si nature
Engineer I ature
City Signature
shared dccs/municipal/aotsego/3381OT338QuoteProForm
Sheet: Pay Estimate 1
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1 ITEM 7.2
COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th St. NE, CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
November 17. 2CC0
Honorable Mayor & City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego. MN 55330
RE: IP 00-02, Utility Imp. On Quaday Ave., 72nd to 78th S-
IP -OG -03. Utility Imp. On 88th St. N.E., CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
Contractor. S.R. Weidema
Contract Amount: 5564,690.70
Award Date: October 10, 2000
Complebon Date: Final Compledon by June 1, 2001
Dear Council Members:
The following work has been completed on the above referenced project
PART A - COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
Item
No.
Spec. Ref. Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit I
Unit Price
Used to Date Extension
1
2021.501 Mobilization
1
LS
$2.365.00
0.50 $1.182.50
2
2101.502 Clearing
5
TREE
$250.00
2501.602 Trash Guard for 18' Pipe Apron
3
2101.507 Grubbing
5
TREE
$100.00
28
4
2104.501 Remove and Salvage Concrete Culvert
60
LF
$7.44
1.00
5 1
2104.501 Remove Concrete Curb
80
LF
$2.15
30.00 $64.50
6
2104.503 Remove Bituminous Pavement
1600
SF
$0.15
18' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
7
2104.509 Remove Concrete Apron
4
EACH
580.55
1.00 580.55
8
2104.513 Sawing Bit Pavement (Full Depth)
140
LF
$3.00
$26.680.75
9
2104.521 Salvage & Reinstall Driveway Culvert
28
LF
S9.66
$63.80
10
2104.521 Salvage & Reinstall Sign
4
EACH
565.00
EACH
11
2104.521 Salvage & Reinstall Barbed Wre Fence
365
LF
53.00
48- Storm Manhole w/Casting (11.T and 11.8')
12
2104.521 Salvage & Reinstall Mailbox
3
EACH
$80.00
35
13
2104.521 Salvage & Relocate Woven Wire Fence
315
LF
$3.00
150.00 S450.00
14
2104.521 Salvage & Relocate Barbed Wire Fence
325
LF
53.00
EACH
15
2105.501 Common Excavation (P)
3600
CY
S2.14
I Furnish and Install Box Structure
16
2105.507 Salvage & Replace Class 5 Aggregate
1200
CY
$2.05
38
17
2105.535 Salvage & Replace Topsoil
1500
CY
SO.01
18
2211.501 Class 5 Aggregate
800
TON
56.65
19
2340.508 Type 41 Wearing Course Mixture
20
TON
565.00
20
2340.514 Type 31 Base Course Mixture
24
TON
565.00
21
2531.501 Concrete Curb & Gutter Design 8618
80
LF
S20.00
22
2563.601 Traffic Control
1
LS
$1,400.00
0.50 5700.00
23
2573.502 Silt Fence, Type Machine Sliced
200
LF
53.30
100.00 $330.00
24
2575.501 Seeding -Type Lawn Restoration
7
ACRE
S1,400.00
25
2575.505 Sodding
90
Sy
S4.00
Total - Bid Schedule "A'
$2,807.55
Item
No.
Spec. Ref.
Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
26
2501.515
18' RC Pipe Apron
1
EACH
$354.55
1.00
$354.55
27
2501.602 Trash Guard for 18' Pipe Apron
1
EACH
5194.00
1.00
$194.00
28
2501.602
15' Dia. Concrete Plug
4
EACH
559.60
1.00
$59.60
29
2502.541
15' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
725
LF
521.62
30
1 2503.541
18' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
8
LF
$30.66
8.00
$245.28
31
2503.541 30- RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL III all depths)
1746
LF
538.95
685.00
$26.680.75
32
2503.541
30- RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
800
LF
$63.80
33
2503.602 Connect to Existing Storm Sewer
1
EACH
5423.00
34
1 25C6.501
48- Storm Manhole w/Casting (11.T and 11.8')
2
EACH
51,425.50
35
2506.501
60' Storm Manhole w/Cason (12.4' to 18')
6
EACH
S2.5a3.00
1.00
52,583.00
36
2506.501
72- Storm Manhole w/Cason (9.6' and T and 1 O.T)
3
EACH
53.080.00
3.00
59.240.00
37
25C6.501
I Furnish and Install Box Structure
1
EACH
54.486.00
38
251 1 501
Random Riprao Class III
5.9
CY
S72.20
Total - Bid Schedule -B'
$39.357.18
shared docNmuroapauaouega6154ot6t5BP.As PE - 1
11/17!00
Pav Estimate 1
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th St. NE, CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
Item
No.
Spec. Ret Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
39
2503.511 12' SOR 26 PVC Pipe (0'- 17)
145
LF
$24.60
145.00
$3.567.00
40
2503.511 12" SDR 26 PVC Pipe (17 - 16')
1126
LF
$24.60
794.00
519.532.40
41
2503.511 17 SOR 26 PVC Pipe (16 - 20')
1263
LF
$24.60
1.263.00
$31.069.80
42 1
2503.602 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1
EACH
$425.00
1.00
$425.00
43
2503.602 12'X 4' PVC Wye - SDR 26
3
EACH
$118.25
3.00 1
5354.75
44
2503.602 12'X 6' PVC Wye - SDR 26
1
EACH
5124.40
1.00
$124.40
45
2503.602 4" PVC Plug
4
EACH
$1.00
4.00
54.00
46
2503.602 6' PVC Plug
1
EACH
54.00
1.00
54.00
47
2503.603 4' PVC Service Pipe - SOR 26
112
LF
57.80
62.00
$483.60
48
2503.603 6' PVC Service Pipe - SOR 26
45
LF
$8.65
23.00
$198.95
49
2621.603 24" Steel Casing Pipe (Jacked)
100
LF
$158.00
100.00
515,800.00
50
2506.501 48" Sanitary Manhole w/Castro ((Y to 8')
8
EACH
$1,658.00
7.00
511,606.00
51
2506.603 1 Extra Depth 48" Sanitary Manhole (over E')
58.03
LF
$122.80
51a
2621 ITelevising
2534 1
LF
50.45
Total - Bid Schedule "C"
$83,169.90
Item
No.
Spec. Ref. Oesc3ipdon
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Unit Cost Used to Date Extension
52
2503.603 6' Sewer Pipe Ductile Iron CL 50
20
LF
521.00
53
2503.620 Ductile Iron Fittings
635
LB
$1.55
54
2504.602 1' Corporation
4
EACH
$28.70
55
2504.602 1' Curb Stop 8 Box
4
EACH
587.50
56 1
2504.602 Conned to Existing Watennain
1
EACH
5317.90
57
2504.602 6- Gate Valve and Box
1
EACH
$473.50
58
2504.603 1' Copper Pipe
208
LF
$8.00
59
2504.605 7 Watemnain Insulation
1
320
SF
$1.30
Total - Bid Schedule "D'
Summary, PART A:
Bid Schedule W:
Bid Schedule "B":
Bid Schedule "C':
Bid Schedule'D':
Total PART A - COP 00-02:
$2.807.55
539,357.18
583,169.90
S 125.334.63
feared 4ocymumcipauaouegW6151016150P xu PE - 2
t 11171 C0
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th St. NE, CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
PART B - COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th Street N.E., CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
c�.c�nuiIn'F• - Crrocre
Item
No.
Spec. Ref. Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
1
2021.501 Mobilization
1
LS
54.000.00
0.50
$2.000.00
2
210x.501 Remove Concrete Curb
500
LF
52.05
500.00
S1,025.00
3
2104.501 Salvage & Reinstall Driveway Culvert
65
LF
$6.80
32.00
$217.60
4
2104.503 Remove Bituminous Pavement
1100
SY
S1.15
1,100.00
$1,265.00
5
2104.513 Sawing Bit Pavement (Full Depth)
500
LF
52.50
500.00
51,250.00
6
2104.523 Salvage & Reinstall FES
2
EA
5183.00
1.00
$183.00
7
2104.523 Salvage & Reinstall Sign
1
EA
S65.00
16.00
$572.80
8
2105.501 lCommon Excavation (P)
4100
CY
$1.30
8.00
$428.80
9
2105.507 Salvage & Replace Class 5 Aggregate
180
CY
$2.63
417.00
$40,699.20
10
2105.535 Salvage & Replace Topsoil
1500
CY
S2.54
558.00
544.444.70
11
2211.501 Class 5 Aggregate
135
TON
$6.40
1.00
$2.830.00
12
2340.508 Type 41 Wearing Course
50
TON
$65.00
1.00
53.400.00
13
2573.501 Bale Checks
50
LF
$3.00
1.00
S3,665.00
14 1
2575.501 Seeding -Type Lawn Restoration
1
ACRE
$1.400.00
1.00
$3,821.00
Total - Bid Schedule *E'
- c.n pie -c• - cr.,.... c-
$5.940-60
Item
No.
Spec. Ref. Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
Unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
15 1
2501.515 48' RC Pipe Apron
1
EACH
5989.00
1.00
$989.00
16
2501.602 1 Trash Guard for 48' Pipe Apron
1
EACH
$655.00
1.00
$655.00
17
2501.602 15' Dia. Ccnaete Plug
1
EACH
555.65
1.00
555.65
18 1
2501.602 27- Dia. Concrete Plug
2
EACH
586.15
2.00
$172.30
19
2501.602 30' Dia. Concrete Plug
1
EACH
$94.65
1.00
594.65
20
2502.541 15' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
8
LF
523.25
8.00
$186.00
21
2503.541 27" RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL III (ail depths)
16
LF
$35.80
16.00
$572.80
22
2503.541 30' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL III (all depths)
8
LF
$53.60
8.00
$428.80
23
2503.541 42' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL V (all depths)
433
LF
597.60
417.00
$40,699.20
24
2503.541 48' RC Pipe Sewer Design 3006 CL III (all depths)
550
LF
579.65
558.00
544.444.70
25
2506.502 66' Storm Manhole w/Castin (11.6')
1
EACH
$2.830.00
1.00
$2.830.00
26
25C6 502 78' Storm Manhole w/2 Castings (7.8')
1
EACH
53,400.00
1.00
53.400.00
27
2506.502 84' Storm .Manhole w/2 Castings (6.6')
1
EACH
53,665.00
1.00
S3,665.00
28
2506.502 90' Storm Manhole w/2 Castings (6.9)
1
EACH
53.821.00
1.00
$3,821.00
29
2511.501 Random Riprap Class III
20
CY
S63.25
15.00
$948.75
30
2521.541 Jack -Bore 42' RCP CL III
80
LF
$477.00
88.00
$41,976.00
j 7 44,9Jt7.CJ
Change Order x1 - Otsego Project 2000-03
66' to 72' Storm Manhole w/ Castings (MH 18-1) 1 EACH $1.080.00 1.00 51,080.00
25.T2506502
26a 1 2506.502 78' to 84' Storm Manhole w/ Castings (MH 18-2) 1 EACH $932.00 1.00 5932.00
28a I 25C6.502 1 0-0-!o 96' Storm Manhole w/ Castings (VH 18-6) 1 EACH 5967.00 1.00 5967.00
Total - Bid Schedule 'F'
SZ,9/9.UV
S147.917.85
Item
No.
Spec. Ref. Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit
unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
31
2503.517 8- SDR 26 PVC Pipe (17 - 16)
59
LF
525.55
66.00
$1.686.30
32
2503.511 8- SOR 25 P`/C Pipe (16'- 2(r)
400
LF
525.55
400.00
S10.220.00
33
2503.511 8- SCR 25 PJC Pipe (20' - 24')
384
LF
525.55
384.00
59.811.20
34
2503.511 8' SOR 26 PVC Pipe (24'- 28')
90
LF
525.55
90.00
$2.299.50
35
2503.602 Connect to Existing Sanitary Sewer
1
EACH
$794.00
1.00
S794.00
36
2503 602 8"X 6' PVC Wye - SOR 26
2
EACH
556.85
2.00
5113.70
37
2503.602 6- PVC Plug
2
EACH
53.32
2.00
56.64
38
2503.603 6' PVC Ser.tce Pipe - SOR 26
64
LF
518.80
63.00
51.184.40
39
2506.501 48' Sanitary Manhole wlCastin (a to 8')
3
EACH
S1.658.00
3.00
$4.974.00
40
25C6.603 Extra Depth 48' Sanitary Manhole (over 5)
29.3
LF
5122.80
40a
2621 Televising
933
LF
50.45
Total • Bid Schedule 'G'
$31,089.74
shared doe3lmuniaV3v ouega6 l 51ot6158P .0 PE -3
11/1 TC
Pav Estimate 1
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th St. NE, CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
Ri'l 'H' - W.t- Sorvicww
Item
No.
Spec. Ret. Description
Estimated
Number of
Units
Unit I
Unit Cost
Used to Date
Extension
41
2503.603 12" Ductile Iron CI 52
900
LF
$22.65
900.00
520,385.00
42
2503.603 8' Ouctile Iron C152
84
LF
$17.00
84.00
$1,428.00
43
2503.603 6' Ductile Iron CL 52
47
LF
$17.00
50.00
5850.00
44
2503.620 Ductile Iron Fittings
2570
LB
$1.301
2,570.00
33.341.00
45
2504.602 Conned to Existing Watennain
1
EACH
$371.00
1.00
5371.00
46
2504.602 6' Gate Valve and Bax
4
EACH
5435.00
4.00
$1,740.00
47
2504.602 8' Gate Valve and Box
1
EACH
5612.00
1.00
5612.
48
2504.602 12' Butterfty Valve and Box
2
EACH
$878.00
2.00
51,756.00
49
2504.603 Hydrant Extension
2
LF
$422.00
50
2504.603 Salvage 8' DIP
20
LF
$7.30
20.00
$146.00
51
2504.602 Salvage 16' x 8' Reducer
1
EACH
$159.00
1.00
$159.0
52
2504.602 Salva a 8' DIP Plug
1
EACH
S26.50
1.00
526.5
53
2504.605 2' Insulation
775
SF
$1.00
755.00
$755.00
54
2504.602 Hydrant
2
EACH
S1,468.00
2.00
$2,936.00
55
2621 Relocation of 16' Watennain
1
LS
54,151.00
1.00
54.151.00
56
2621 Temporary Water Service
1 1
LS I
S7,280.001
1.00
57.280.
Total - Bid Schedule "H"
Summary, PART B:
Bid Schedule'E':
Bid Schedule "F':
Bid Schedule *G':
Bid Schedule "H":
Total PART B - COP 00-03:
SUMMARY OF WORK TO DATE:
PART A. Bid Schedules A,B,C.D:
PART B, Bid Schedules E.F.G.H:
WORK COMPLETED TO DATE:
LESS 5% RETAINAGE:
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF:
$45,936.50
$5,940.60
$147,917.85
$31,089.74
545,936.50
$230.884.69
$125,334.63
$230,884.69
$356,219.32
517,810.97
$338,408.35
snares aoa/mun,upauactsega615101615eP xts PE - 4
11117/00
Pav Esumate t
PAY ESTIMATE NO. 1
COP 00-02, Utility Imp. on Quaday Ave. 72nd to 78th Street
COP 00-03, Utility Imp. on 88th St. NE, CSAH 42 to Quaday Ave.
CONTRACTOR SR WE=V^
C-0144bn by Ce oc I Cealh Mal ap�— and p4r4mb w!ag3aW we W" mrProroa to
ow—C'i
ENGINEER: Certi6cabon by Engineer. We recommend payment for work and quandbes as shown.
HAKANSON AN SON ASSOC
Signe .
Title:�ECT �,.riV'EL�K Date: �� O
OWNER:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Signed:
Title:
Date:
snared dorymutuuGaUaotsego/61 Slot61 SBP A3 PE - 5
11117/GO
Pay Esumate t
pl n,/� 1 '•Y W v- J• .k W u- W G APRON -4' /
�III��,,I(, v lO� V
r YYY
t
1 W W W W W •. O W W .' CBM 3
GF 904.0 J v v W'.• I 60:
I WO W W I
\ 9
OF 896.0
o 1 894
� a�
- .g �to,
'
889\500
i
'GF 897.0 �
LO OO
A ' LO 892.0 ,
BF 889.0
89
GF 899.5
WO 394
BF 891.5
896.
i
GF 896.5
WO
CBMH-16 00 2 p / i� 6 BF 888.5
Oi� 89
7 0
)A D BARRICADE
y
GF 897.0
%
WO
86.00
BF 889.0
CBM -15
�/ GF 898.0
6 0
�
WO
896.00 BF 890.0
0 -
GF 898.5
FB
00
BF 890.5
00
898 894.75
896 CBMH-
�TREETN.E. _
4.
CBMH-
a
_
8 0
8
STANDARD BARRICADE CB.4 14
8 I
GF
I.fWO
r 5
00
q
I 896.0
'OSED CONTOUR
I I
/
I BF 888.0
894. 0i
894.
GF 898.0
'
0
r
LO \
3 ,
r
r 886.83•
LO 893.0GF
895.0
BF 890.0 STMII-1
WO
4_
Opi
� 13F887.0
_
?
r
r
4.06."g207-_
892.
4
00
1
GF 893.0
•Mane
W W
rc n
J• W v- .-.; 1'.......
�-
2• . 2• .sed or M1 fence vat
5' mIal- I-2th st
a fabric- faWlc
6'and fwim at
2' hirW.
Loy fabric h N. 4nah
i
fabrk nolwrege 4nM
Docent 4nM .IM
� lempd n.tard .01
1
at, St
e•
STM
881
U1C
Rock .Ire should be 1' to 2• .11. sash a. WOW CA -1 or
CA -2 tour.. aggregate.
Ag tlsAl fabric may
be and ands the rock to prevent
nlgretof lM flog .al late U. atm..
3 .�.•.
Lj
33 4
34
37 38
L• 2 /
25Pik
26 MWL
.•��.••-. i -
o::
7
27
'W
291�0 • HWL•8 .5.---•-• L.J
c
9 / I
�\ - •_0�_ O O I
IC�Rf.Yl. `
2 I
•-1 1`� I1
— J
12
7 M1017 18 15 �\
VESLA
]I
8 9
10 13 14
11 12 \
IO
,1
EXCEPTION
� ►w +i v i
8
5 ,
13 14
8
12
•VETEAND-Ml• -
I
7 "'• VC_879.5•
�r 11 10 H _
4 5
8
6 10 -
1" ' \
__ o
------- �..
---- 2 4 3 i
ETLa�AND 4
I -
- --- --- HV
i
2 -------------"-
3 4 EXCEPTION
3 NI
' nloPom aw �y
w>zD�
� Nx I
N '
I EXCEPTION OUTI/YT 1I
Pay Estimate #5
November 20. 2CC0
Honorable Mayor 8 City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: 1999 Street Improvement, COP #99.01
Contractor. Bauedy Bros., Inc.
Contract Amount: 51,187,606.70
Award Date: 8/10/99
Completion Date: June 30, 2000
Dear Council Members: The following work has been completed on the above referenced project:
BID SCHEDULE A - OVERLAY, RECLAMATION AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION
Page 101`4
-fem 7.4
Item #
Spec.Ref.
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Contract Price
Used to Date
Extension
1
2021.501
Mobilization
1
LS
$6,200.00 /LS
1
$6,200.00
2
2101.507
Grub. 36" Stump)
3
EA
5125.00 /EA
3
S375.00
3
2104
Salvage Retaining Wall
2
EA
$250.00 /EA
1
$250.00
4
2104.501
Remove Culverts 24" or less
835
LF
56.00 /LF
887
$5,322.00
5
2104.503
Remove Bit. Pavement
9500
SY
S1.00 /SY
244
5244.00
6
2104.503
Remove Concrete Pavement
90
SY
S2.00 /SY
66
$132.00
7
2104.513
Sawcut Bit. Pavement
1750
LF
$3.00 /LF
2725
$8,175.00
8
2104.513
Sawcut Concrete
325
LF
S7.00 /LF
175
$1,225.00
9
2105.501
Common Excavation CVP
23700
CY
S4.56 /CY
23700
$108,072.00
10
2105.521
Granular Borrow CVP
10300
CY
S5.66 /CY
10300
$58,298.00
11
2105.605
Minor Grading
325
RD STA
530.25 /RD STA
357
$10,799.25
12
2112.602
Sub rade Preparation
9500
SY
S0.30 /SY
1434
$430.20
13
2120.501
Earth Shouldering To Soil
3500
CY
S7.50 /CY
2521
$18,907.50
14
2211.501
A re ate Base Cl 5
5900
Ton
56.18 /Ton
9076.1
556,090.30
15
2211.501
Aggregate Base Cl 5 DW
125
Ton
56.82 /Ton
466
$3,178.12
16
2211.501
Aggregate Base Cl 5(patch)
575
Ton
$6.18 /Ton
275
$1,699.50
17
2221.503
Aqqrecate Shouldering, Cl 2
240
Ton
520.00 /Ton
260
55,200.00
18
2221.503
Aggregate Shoulderin , Cl 5
1070
Ton
56.82 /Ton
981
$6,690.42
19
2232.501
Reclamation of Bituminous Surface
863551
SY
S0.68 /SY
84,564
557,503.52
20
2232.501
Reclamation of Bituminous Surface & Transport
16150
SY
S0.97 /SY
15169
S14,713.93
21
2340.508
Type 41 Wear
22810
Ton
S23.18 /Ton
19,566.5
$453,551.47
22
2340.508
Type 41(patch)
210
Ton
535.00 /Ton
280
S9,800.00
23
2357.502
Bit. Mat for Tack
4540
Gal
50.75 /Gal
3270
S2,452.50
24
2401.521
Structural Excavation, Cl U, CV P
300
CY
S2.00 /CY
210
5420.00
25
2451.511
Course Filter Aggregate
60
CY
S14.00 /CY
60
$840.00
26
2501.515
30" RCP End Section
1
EA
5470.00 /EA
1
$470.00
27
2501.515
24" RCP End Section
121
EA
S390.00 /EA
22 1
S8,580.00
28
2501.515
15" RCP End Section
20
EA
S320.00 /EA
26
$8,320.00
29
2501
30" RCP FES Trash Guard
1
EA
5895.00 /EA
1
$895.00
30
2502.54113-
PERF PE PIPE DRAIN
1600
LF
S5.45 /LF
1600
$8,720.00
w"1141Idred doavnanICIPai4Wouegob076%012--68P us 11/21/00
Pay Estimate #5
Page 2 of 4
Item #
Spec.Ref.
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extension
31
2502.601
Connect to Existing Drain
4
EA
5255.00 /EA
3
$765.00
32
2503
30" RCP
734
LF
537.80 /LF
719
527,178.20
33
2503.511
24 " RCP
328
LF
528.60 /LF
517
514,786.20
34
2503.511
18 " RCP
10371
LF
523.95 /LF
1037
$24,836.15
35
2503.511
15" RCP
614
LF
$22.05 /LF
615
$13,560.75
36
2503.602
Connect Existing Drain Pipe to Storm Sewer
1
EA
$350.00 /EA
1
$350.00
37
2503.603
Ductile Ircn Pie
100
LF
526.70 /LF
50
51,335.00
38
2506
Construct Drainage Structure C,G, N or H
13
EA
$820.00 /EA
13
$10,660.00
39
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 48" 4020
1
EA
5930.00 /EA
1
5930.00
40
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 54" 4020
1
EA
$1,780.00 /EA
1
$1,780.00
41
2506.502
Construct Drainage Structure 60" 4020
2
EA
S2,115.00 /EA
2
$4,230.00
42
2511.501
Random Riprap Cl II
751
CY
545.00 /CY
72.5
53,262.50
43
2531.507
6" Concrete Driveway Pavement
40
SY
$40.00 /SY
125
55,000.00
44
2540.602
Relocate Mailbox Support
376
EA
$75.00 /EA
427
$32,025.00
45
2563.601
Traffic Control
1
LS
54,000.00 /LS
1
$4,000.00
46
2564.602
Relocate Sin
6
EA
$50.00 /EA
0
$0.00
47
2564.604
Sign Panels Type C
9
SF
$22.00 /SF
9
$198.00
48
2573.501
Bale Check
201
EA
$6.00 /EA
0
50.00
49
2573.502
Silt Fence, Type Preassembled
1000
LF
$1.60 [LF
0
$0.00
50
2575.501
Seeding
10
Acre
$600.00 /Acre
11.7
$7,020.00
51
1 Install Retaining Wall
1
EA
5500.00 /EA
1
$500.00
52
Install Bituminous Flume 1
41
EA 1
$150.00 /EA
6
5900.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE A:
BID SCHEDULE B - SEAL COAT AND CRACK FILLING
S1.010,871.51
53
2231.507
Crack Filling Material
10200
LB
50.91 /LB
22.225
520,224.75
54
2356.505
Bit. Mat for Seal Coat
22000
Gal
50.99 /Gal
24,056
$23,815.44
55
2356.507
Seal Coat A gregate FA2
1645
Ton
519.00 /Ton
1,296
$24,624.00
56
2564.603
4" Double Solid Yellow - Epoxy
21110
LF
$0.49 /LF
29,780
514,592.20
57
2564.60314*
Solid White - Epoxy
90000
LF
$0.22 /LF
84,351
518,557.22
58
2564.60314-
Dashed Yellow - Epoxy
50601
LF
50.36 /LF
2,812
51,012.32
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE B: $102,825.93
\\na07Vnareo oogVnuruup3Aouegob[336\ot3368P <u 111211C0
Pay Estimate #5
BID SCHEDULE C - OTSEGO CREEK (83RD ST.) CULVERT REPLACEMENT
Page 3 of 4
Item #
Spec.Ref.
Item Description
Estimated
Quantity
Unit Price
Used to Date
Extension
59
2104.501
Remove 60" CMP
50
LF
$10.00 /LF
50
$500.00
60
2105.511
Channel Excavation, CV P
70
CY
$8.70 /CY
70
$609.00
61
2401.521
Structural Excavation, Cl U, CVP
300
CY
$4.00 /CY
300
$1,200.00
62
2503
88" SPAN RCPA
64
LF
$207.00 /LF
64
$13,248.00
63
2503
88" SPAN RCPA FES
2
EA
$1,740.00 /EA
2
$3,480.00
64
2105
A re ate Bedding Material
15
CY
$16.00 /CY
15
$240.00
65
2015
Common Borrow
150
CY
$4.20 /CY
176
$739.20
64
2511.501
Random Ri.prap Cl IV
1001
CY
$47.00 /CY
45.02
$2,115.94
65
2511.515
Geotextile Fabric Type V
870
SY
$1.20 /SY
780
$936.00
TOTAL BID SCHEDULE C:
SUMMARY OF BIDDING:
USED TO DATE:
LESS 1% RETAINAGE:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE 91:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #2:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #3:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #4:
LESS PAY ESTIMATE #5:
WE RECOMMEND PAYMENT OF:
$23,068.14
BID SCHEDULE A:
$1,010,871.51
BID SCHEDULE B:
$102,825.93
BID SCHEDULE C:
$23,068.14
TOTAL USED TO DATE: $1,136,765.58
$1,136,765.58
$11,367.66
$218,697.21
$341,225.46
$52,280.50
$381,513.01
$67,235.00
$64,446.74
lVLW 13rWed ddC3Vnwuapanaolsegob133ftt3368P sls 11/21/00
Pay Estimate #5
C0NTfiACT0fL- PJAMY➢ROC., INC.
C+r"Cat t py a I orA lhq ai$ Ito•n+ and anountn are oonnd brim writ m nplaud to dab
sow:
Tel. t: r�=3{,•.zcL- c.� !/- 2 / —oa
ENGINEER: Certification by Engineer. We recommend ay for work and quantities as shown.
HAKANSON AND N ASSOCIATES,
Signed:
Title: Date: 1/-21—
OWNER:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Signed:
Title:
Date:
Page 4 of 4
IVWOtl XLO cocs�municio�.wt3egobt3J6bt3mBP �s 11/21/00
15
CTI'Y OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
8. Andrew MacArthur, City Attorney Mike Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: -ITEM DESCRIPTION
8.1. Approval of changes to the Lefebvre Stormwater District
8.2. Any Other Legal Business
BACKGROUND:
8.1. This hearing is required under State law because we are increasing the size of one
stormwater district (LeFebvre Creek) and reducing the size of two other districts (Rice -
Foster Lake and South Mississippi. The Council discussed these changes at its October
23, 2000 meeting. Because of these changes the Council voted at the same meeting to
increase the Storm Sewer fee for development in the LeFebvre Creek district.
8.2. This is for any other Legal Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration and any approval.
Thanks,
Mike
Fik: RCA•CC.WPS
12
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST :FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
9. Council Items: Mike Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION
9. Council Items:
A. Consider Approval of Winterfest Radar Run.
B. Councilmember Wendel report on Community Recreation
Board meeting
C. Councilmember Wendel report on River Rider meeting
D. Any Other Council Business
BACKGROUND:
A. See enclosed memo.
B. This item is on the Agenda so CM Wendel will not have to add it.
C. This item is on the Agenda so CM Wendel will not have to add it.
D. This is for Any Other Council Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION:
These are for Council consideration, discussion and any decisions needed.
Thanks,
Mike
DEAR COUNCIL MEMBERS,
ATTACHED IS A SKETCH OF THE GENERAL AREA THAT A SNOWMOBILE RADAR RUN
WOULD BE LOCATED. THIS RUN WOULD BE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ANNUAL
OTSEGO WINTERFEST. IT WILL INVOLVE JUST ONE SNOWMOBILE AT A TIME WITH A
PERSON TIMING THE RUN WITH A RADAR GUN. THE RUN WILL BE PUT ON BY THE
OTSEGO GREAT RIVER RIDERS SNOWMOBILING CLUB. THE PARKS AND REC.
COMMISION WILL BE RUNNING THE REGULAR ACTIVITIES AT THE SAME TIME.
THE DATE FOR THIS IS JAN. 20, 2001. THERE WILL BE SOMEONE FROM THE WRIGHT
COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT AND QUALIFIED MEDICAL PERSON PRESENT ALL
DAY. THE SNOWMOBILE CLUB WILL USE SNOWFENCES AND MEMBERS TO MAKE
SURE THAT NO PEOPLE ARE IN THE WAY OF EACH RUN.
THANKYOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOUR TIME TO LOOK AT THIS.
TOM CONSTANT
PARKS AND REC. COMM.
-;7= -
NVIp - I•
N1-t . I'
a J
J V Z I
•11MF
_ z _
t '� -
ISI I
Ouj}` :1 1
CC
J ¢.
v
-4 .4
� � 2
r , J
.•p r•'+ Lu
W - Q,tu
}l . r. 1 •I Ir fi
an. FF11
a = • (Xti
j I.•. W V Q
a09C . 1
M (gym
zo(A; n 8
ow i
cc
W
a.
•� my
1 �
I 1
1 At ,I
ONL
♦ ,1
1 � ♦♦♦ II
I ,\
I
l
MEMO
Date: November 21, 2000
To: Mayor & Council
From: City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: River Rider Meeting
Mayor Fournier, Councilmember Wendel, and I met with the
following people on Monday, November 20, 2000 to discuss
improving River Rider bus service. Mayor Wayne Kessler,
Councilmember Tom Hagerty, and City Administrator Bob Derus of
St. Michael, Wright County Commissioners Pat Sawatzke and Elmer
Eichelberg, Marianne Charbonneau and Mary B??? of Wright County
Human Services, and Heather Carolis, manager of the River Rider
service.
The discussion showed that everyone was in general agreement that
River Rider service needed to be improved. Consensus was to
implement a system whereby the River Rider bus circulated between
Otsego, Albertville, and St. Michael on an on-call basis, with
only rare trips scheduled outside these communities. This is the
type of service currently offered in Buffalo and it is very
popular and draws more than senior riders. Consensus was that
while everyone would prefer- that this service be 5 days a week 8
hours a day, it would have to start out on a more limited basis.
Marianne Charbonneau said that she had spoken with Albertville
City Administrator Linda Goeb, who indicated that Albertville was
ready to join the River Rider system. Heather Carolis said that
she would look at what could be changed to allocate more bus time
to this proposal. She also needed to talk with the State about
this since the State is the main source of funding.
Commissioner Sawatzke said that costs should not change since
they are based on last year's ridership figures. He said that if
this proposal increases ridership that costs should not change
much in the future. Everyone agreed to discuss this with their
respective Councils and wait for Heather's report.
15
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST :FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY:
9.1. City Administration Mike Robertson November 27, 2000
City Administrator 6:30PM
Did NIN"05 : 05 111 WIfel Ili 1J 10
B. Any Other Administrative Business
B. This is for any Administrative Business that may arise.
RECOMMENDATION•
This is for Council consideration and any approval needed.
Thanks,
Mike
CLAIMS LIST
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
NOVEMBER 279 2000
Attached is the Claims List for your consideration. For'more detail, please
refer to the Check Detail Registers.
Total Claims List 11-20-00 $ 561,201.52
If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further,
please let me know.
Judy Hudson,
Deputy Clerk/Treasurer
JH/co
CITY OF OTSEGO Monday, November 20, 2000
Cheek Summary Register Page 1 of 2
Name
Check Date Check Amt
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
UnPaid
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
$114.63
UnPaid
AIRGAS, INC.
$21,69
UnPaid
ANDERSON DELLA
$117.00
UnPaid
B & B MASONRY, INC
$17,232.00
UnPaid
BEAUDRY GERMAINE
$65.00
UnPaid
BLACK PAM
$65.00
UnPaid
BLESI JUDITH
$117.00
Ur.Paid
BOIS DENISE
$107.25
UnPaid
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE: PRODUCTS
$74.12
UnPaid
BRAUN INTERTEC
$3,400.00
UnPaid
BREZE INDUSTRIES
$35.15
UnPaid
CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO.
$126.42
UnPaid
CASSADY ROSE
$120.25
UnPaid
CELLULAR+
$111.90
UnPaid
CORROW TRUCKING
$1,729.32
UnPaid
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, INC.
$471.11
UnPaid
DUERR NANCY
$117.00
UnPaid
ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$1,397.36
UnPaid
GABRIEL DAVIS
$107.25
UnPaid
GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC
$7.70
UnPaid
H & L MESABI
$2,828.90
UnPaid
H G WEBER OIL COMPANY
$2,379.05
UnPaid
HENNICK LORENE
$107.25
UnPaid
ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
$614.70
UnPaid
J -CRAFT INC
$71.87
UnPaid
JEFF BARTHELD
$34.39
UnPaid
JUDY HUDSON
$148.62
UnPaid
LINDENFELSER ARLENE
$118.63
UnPaid
LUCONIC M.C.
$169.00
UnPaid
MADLAND SHIRLEY
$107.25
UnPaid
MARTIN JOANN C
$65.00
UnPaid
MEDICA
$3,462.98
UnPaid
MINNESOTA LIFE
$63.20
UnPaid
NAGELARLEEN
$52.00
UnPaid
NICHOLS JOAN M
$65.00
UnPaid
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO
$350.65
UnPaid
ONRAMP, INC
$39.95
UnPaid
PACKER PATRICIA
$110.50
UnPaid
PEOPLE SERVICE INC.
$7,804.00
UnPaid
PRECISION FRAME & ALIGNMENT
$56.00
UnPaid
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
$969.70
UnPaid
RADIOSHACK
$687.90
UnPaid
RMR SERVICES, INC
$5,884.92
UnPaid
RODEN JULIES C. PEARSON
$91.00
UnPaid
SCHOEN JULIE
$107.25
UnPaid
SCHUCK STEVE
$110.50
UnPaid
SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION
$8,126.50
UnPaid
SCHULTZ LILLIAN
$65.00
UnPaid
SHELQUIST LORRAINE
$13.00
UnPaid
SHIERTS BONNIE
$120.25
CITYOF OTSEGO Monday, November 20, 2000
CITY
Page 2 of 2
Check Summary Register
Ino11e
Check Date Check Amt
UnPaid
SILVERNESS JUDY
$169.00
UnPaid
STRATER BRENT
$107.25
UnPaid
STS CONSULTANTS LTD
$2,203.70
UnPaid
SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLY
$205.17
UnPaid
SUPERIOR SERVICES
$460.00
UnPaid
SWENSON JOY
$fi5.00
UnPaid
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
$205.37
UnPaid
US BANK
$497,088.75
UnPaid
US FILTER
$59.42
UnPaid
VETSCH BERNADETTE
$118.63
UnPaid
XCEL ENERGY
$157,12
Total Checks $561,201.52
CITY OF OTS E G O Monday, November 2o, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 1 of 6
Check Amt Invoice Comment
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER
Unpaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION
E 201-45000-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $114.63 Nov. Unit Rent
Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $114.63
Unpaid TAIRGAS, INC.
E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $21.69 5645540 Acet/Oxygen
Total AIRGAS, INC. $21.69
.vmx•:emw00,\Cf .Ar'•!.Y•:g000C,1Y. A9N000CCMW9J9f9000JOP%OOOP1�V9000G0>MP>T 6Pi>:000KJ)WOJObXShCL90WO VGOIW]C>MU,000Y»}l00>� .: VSN[?�OnHYA1 v,6+M
Unpaid ANDERSON DELLA
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $117.00 Election Judge Pay
Total ANDERSON DELLA $117.00
Unpaidx' B & B MASONRY, INC
E 101-41940-402 Repairs/Maint Buildingss $17,232.00 11002 PW Bldg Repair
Total B & B MASONRY, INC $17,232.00
,,,,,•:.w :::....:...:....... ..x,•m w.vx, xxw ,x xw ,xvt«<«K«t«•: t<rt>�«a <�«
Unpaid BEAUDRY GEFIMAINE
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total BEAUDRY GERMAINE $65.00
xmw:,,.•m,,,•.xw.,,nacfCA�9Ci9c'X`: t� >i0994CC:1�nfQQCG00090]9CCOP:M^xMWtt9P4Gtt?Y.MttA:060000000000rMi00WP)OOOOYAJaW000p0000WCO00C(.M4GO�OPJ000POOpOpP>JPJOM�Yb000000En»+Avrt,f?,vA,!MM�bx�e[gMp
Unpaid BLACK PAM
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total BLACK PAM $65.00
•xvwrr:r:wwr:::n.:.:.:::::r:nw::. •:.,wvm,vn,::t: :;.;>
-B
Unpaid BL::; LEST:4J Wi.:;:.:isc:ryF;-]pDITH
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $117.00 Election Judge Pay
Total BLESI JUDITH $117.00
!.•nY:sM'a>:.>v4,W„'.,v4v: nvv:.,,xv.,,ave,v::: x:: nv.,w:.v:.w:.v:.v::.v:.,m„vvw.vxnxxxvx,�vmxxv:.vv,,,x,x•.�YKL;[S�.t FACG t^.:IXgYhKC`::'ft•T:Ytt4::trl.:tt<^.:.%:tt t:^!. t^.9: t::t t::tt:^(:[SS:'1..: MGCOGOOOOO:LO%;,tl,':AOCC<OK: A
Unpaid BOIS DENISE
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total BOIS DENISE $107.25
m� .mm� ./ Gym•:. ..,•:<.>.:, xvm:::::r:::::::• :::.,• wm,,,,:.wm,,,.::.rr<.xwr::::»:w•. �m:» :>:, :::: rt > r:7:>:�u v o2 G� : :,,>:>:, «,,» :.>:,,>,>,A :<.;»
Unpaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
E101-41400-201 Office Supplies $74.12 4531349 Supplies
Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $74.12
Unpaid •:.BRAUN INTERTECy
G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S $3,400.00 402628 88th ST Quaday Storm
Total BRAUN INTERTEC $3,400.00
»Y]%NGUIHAGOMGGOJOY»ba,AiYGX00009... x,.xw�.r:!„v.,,, .•• •... �v.,em,N.•v.:...Mnn.m.nm.a::n:..v,..wn::..v.,,...v..:::::rrr:rr:rrm.x.rrrrrrmv,nv:::::.,...<!./... f•:94:f:;;::<•:C...... L.<.,.
xw:r:.xx�x w
Unpaid BREZE INDUSTRIES
E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $35.15 8624 Gloves
Total BREZE INDUSTRIES $35.15
lwbvilivimr.Y.,ft+.eorr.,vorrr,l.,vv::rv:m,,,w.vrrrr:vrrrm•:x:::::n.nv:.k:rryrrrmvrrri,:rrmr,.w.vrnwrxrr:,.vrFFLWWp/!ryp!/lpyl. NAWMOG,v:>nR: H liq///lAOP:rN/I aM%l///!/I �GGGY///l!/Y/rY+GYII/.Y.G>N.KroiillAY!!.
Unpaid CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO.
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $126.42 1908 PW # 11
Total CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIP. CO. $126.42
Unpaid CASSADY ROSE
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $120.25 Election Judge Pay
Total CASSADY ROSE $120.25
CITY OF OTSEGO
Check.Detail Register
k AmtY rttInvoice» i
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $111.90 103599
Total CELLULAR+ $111.90
Monday, November 20, 2000
Page 2 of 6
rM>+>.w�eMM/a„»„xv�rnv:mxw:.wm,,,,wnvHM,n
aIPpOCQ00000P00%MrFINCFIOCOWPJOC90C0.'CKY.CO4tIXV.\^A!P":SJT.b tiOP�WW00!W]G'•"wY4' 'rF.0.lYwWfLOGtO
Unpaid CORROW TRUCKING
E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $83.07 Nov. Hauling
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $1,646.25 Oct. Recycling
Total CORROW TRUCKING $1,729.32
Unpaid CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, INC.
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $100.96 Ref.# 66895 PW # 3
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $370.15 Ref.# 914 PW # 3
Total CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL, INC. $471.11
4»��..�..»»%4;,�%:ro»%,~,»%��.�»�i»»>..��>»>��•::.».•..w�.».>,.,,ra>,.,»»,�>,aw.,,»>,:.•.,>x»»w,,.,,,,,,,.,�>wN,,.,xw.,
Unpaid DUERR NANCY
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $117.00 Election Judge Pay
Total DUERR NANCY $117.00
w.wxmrnx,xwrnx>vw.vvx.:.,,vmvxv�nv+/.YCM::!!V%VX•X^Hifi.^:^.:K•iP.WCS;•:OC�T:!Q9PJf?'.
Unpaid
ECM PUBLISHERS INC
'C9q^M(VONCCPJC4000OWOOQP]OOCOWOP+OOWWOQ>Y:t-0d%•%:.>%4:!.:
iSXKidd OOCe%M>Y.'nNOfNdfKKd
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$62.22
101029
Election Notices
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$36.30
101032
NSP
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$44.07
101035
Thonas Juergens
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$230.73
101037
Ord. 00-17
E 101-41400-350
PrintBinding (GENERAL)
$365.54
101038
Ord. 00-18
E 101-41400-350
PrintBinding (GENERAL)
$46.67
101039
Today Hearing
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$248.88
99656
Ad for Bids
E 101-41400-350
Print/Binding (GENERAL)
$362.95
99661
Ord. 95-21
Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC
$1,397.36
Vnp_mwwwroo-.co v. mcm»w..:sxa%,n00000row,w:aaowwr.
Unpaid
»-ra:.:s:rm,ranaoxarnxwarnxa,oawwaoa»xoao»wm»,exmmmxK.>vane»:oo-r»x.»mrrosre.»m»xaY.»neem»,+uemrn.,nnr.•nr
GABRIEL DAVIS
v.>„w.x+xx.•r xvxx•:.V.x
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total GABRIEL DAVIS $10725
UP-ai : % %•>. !-f K4% »», » T
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL
r� a» � .x,•a>.�% 4w w�ew � �w � • w : w ,x. � w.w r.
INC
E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $7.70 100580 Billable Ticket Locates
Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC $7.70
.n..:: n .... ... .. .....:Vi\...M:V:;Viri!•:iCi:!.::..vv,\!4:i:":ii4wTi:%^%.isYi:4?isiiii:!G:::ii;:::::.isitii:BY.pY3fi3»'A000G060Y.+�> YM:M:x,v>xw:r{:L•r.,
Unpaid H & L MESABI
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)
E 101-43100.220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL)
Total H & L MESABI
$2,227.18 Ref.046193 DE Oder # 46193
$300.86 Ref.046492 DE Order # 46492
$300.86 Ref.046554 DE Order # 46554
$2,828.90
Unpaid<: .......,y:...,,,.r.....H G: WEBER OIL COMPANY::.:., ! «« �. �!,,:: <,f.•: �,ff.-, f. fff .:,.. �f/f w%. ,,, ,«�:,Y:,.!:!!%r, fY.»«
E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil $2,379.05 Oct. Del. Gas -Diesel PW# 13
Total H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $2,379.05
Unpaidr.rrM•..,»..wrrrx....,:..r.rx...rrrrrrrrr.r,:•FIENNICK�LOREME :rrrr.::,...,..N.,r...r .���:� a•%•:.•,.;vff.,,....,,�>:»,f, �,W.>-a.,ti>Y,;:<:atiYn»Y,�.w .
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total HENNICK LORENE $107.25
M>YY////I/I: ApYII/YA%OONY.,Y/%//q(�y(Nrnvm„wriiiiirrrr.»,�v:nv:n„v.,vrr::rrnv.,,w.w.•rrvrrrnwM:y:nvxvnvw.»vrrw.vrrrmrn•.w.,w.vrrrnx„v.,v:.•.v.v: xrrrrrrrrw.x,wrrvrrNNNirr/m t/✓1////N.M1l/M�C'•MSMi/.!/.+.!!�A
Unpaid ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION
CITY OF OTSEGO Monday, November 20, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 3 of 6
Check Amt Invoice Comment
Com`\tea£ �s
E 101-41400-121 PERA $201.92 PPE 11/11/00
G 101-21705 Other Retirement $412.78 PPE 11/11/00
Total ICMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATION $614.70
-CRAFT INC
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $71.87 1002
Total J -CRAFT INC $71.87
.,,,..,,.w:.,,_:M>,,,.�•,�,,.,.:.�w,.w.,,,�,�,.,a..,,..,,w.,,,�,.x„w.•.x:.w�w.,,V,..,wx.w,.x.,�„wy.w.wxx�„ .�,�
Unpaid JEFF BARTHELD
E 201-45000-203 Supplies - General $34.39 Haunted House
Total JEFF BARTHELD $34.39
Unpaid JUDY HUDSON
E 101-41400-205 Election Supplies $148.62 Supplies & Milage
Total JUDY HUDSON $148.62
Unpaid n LINDENFELSER ARLENE w. w,Ar.A.....
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $118.63 Election Judge Pay
Total LINDENFELSER ARLENE $118.63
OUn%A:wIA)CLJCvk iOGwJJJOb%w:3'.Oi>Yu:wi.�.W>.iiOP,':<::.:.•.•x:xxLx::UG:.>vvavS'.'xnenv�•.wiexl:.'.:..!UsxmYOUwrmmv:m,•mwevwlrxnwrr vrx:r:rv:.v:w,,,vww.,wvx:xmxxmwm�MMC%�0�.^:!.£;iC%MT:L:A�LA?%
paid EONIIC Myp±+C M.C.
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $169.00 Election Judge Pay
Total LUC0141C M.C. $169.00
xUnpaid �� MADLAND SHIRLEY F
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total MADLAND SHIRLEY $107.25
Unpaid MARTIN JOANW C
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total MARTIN JOANN C $65.00
,.w%o:4«�.�.,�
Unpaid MM E DICA
E 101-43100-123 Health $1,432.27 PW Ins.
E 101-41400-123 Health $2,030.71 Adm. Ins.
Total IAEDICA $3,462.98
xxxrxr::.vxxrr.�•;�,�>�>�wr>,�>a,-,�,�•�„du,.�.>�f,..x.:•,»wuu„�>��>a,•� .;>,�
Uripaid � Mw.,wr,��M�..,xxfxxxxx,x�+MINNESOTALIFE
E 101-41400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $29.00 Adm. Life Ins.
E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $34.20 PW Life Ins.
Total MINNESOTA LIFE $63.20
Unpaid,....,.w.,....,.,............,..,...,.,.,,,.,..,..:::NAGELARLEEIV::....,............................................................<.....,........................:,. 7:;>:«.� �, �<%«� , ..,....<..�
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $52.00 Election Judge Pay
Total NAGEL ARLEEN $52.00
Unpaidµr NICHOLS
IM
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total NICHOLS JOAN M $65.00
Unpaid xNORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT COwo,�,�
E101-43100-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $63.86 19290510 ASSY KIT
CITY OF OTS E G O Monday, November 20, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 4 of 6
Check Amt Invoice Comment
E 101-43100-240 Small Tools and Minor Equip $286.79 19387911 TON HYD SYSTEM 4 ~
Total NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT CO $350.65
.�J,tlOTtgj RAC»YY f006FNC�N'!0:6::1.<4Y»J4iV!/.A+,..,,»,ve�r.,.<n„»»•::nv»,,,»»•:.»».m»neeenvFdOvw«<i:<M,,vn,>m,+n»,}»„»r„w.»mn,,,,»•.w«nwm„+,,,»n,,,ww<imn,+,,,,,,,»n»»,w.v+v.,»,,,35tiC,r,5Jf;4]C4:4p:4K4pCOppppppt
Unpaid ONRAMP, INC
E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $39.95 C00001 Web Host
Total ONRAMP, INC $39.95
Znac4:c<ue:kv!e,xw.ceea,,e:c<:<ox<.»c«w<e..>,.,,»e<.w:.w:,..:: n,.:..:<m,»-::<f< IIICIA eeex�e<u:i«.+««:.w«..»,»„wr.ww...«.<.<...«.<.r:<:n.::::.w:.»w..,»•n•:::n•.,.:.»•.,::r::::.»wnw<:<:n,,•w:e::.rv.4::x«<xrm. >:v
Unpaid PACKER PATFtICIA
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $110.50 Election Judge Pay
Total PACKER PATRICIA $110.50
»K:n,,,,n,»rvr„nv»,HC90:4CC«tiiS4:70�MSK940C<994«
Unpaid PEOPLE SERVICE INC.
E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $27.00 Add. To Ck W1035082
E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $5,572.00 0003888 Dec. Mon. Fee
E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $2,205.00 11/15/00 Labor Oct.
Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $7,804.00
Unpaid PRECISION FR�4ME &ALIGNMENT
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $56.00 281006 PW # 11
Total PRECISION FRAME & ALIGNMENT $56.00
Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD
E 101-43100-121 PERA $250.64 PPE 11/11/00
E 101-41400-121 PERA $255.21 PPE 11-11-00
G 101-21704 PERA $463.85 PPE 11/11/00
Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $969.70
>rr.�«�;;.>.»>v,.,,>;:<,:.>�.:;.>:.:;<«.:.»:.::.:._-::_--.�-...:::n•;:::.::............ :::::.;<::.>,..��.r.,:<vr.»�..�,.«�,..»:»,.::.v„,,,».n,.rn:.:n.::...n,:::n:.n:.::n..»•:::::n»::.::::::.,:.::.:::::•::::n•::::':.�:::>:;.»»:•»>:;•;:;>;,;:�;;>•
Unpaid RADIOSHACK
E201-45000-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $687.90 047621 Haunted House
Total RADIOSHACK $687.90
.,,•n:•::n:n•:n>,:»,�,»»».,-»--r,->,•.»,rr.»„<r„»-,.,,�,,.»» k.»»•r::n rn, n».: »•:::Nr :»vr:<.:»:,,:.:::-4a,< ;;� ;kw<:< 4
Unpaid RMR SERVICES, INC
E 601-49400-203 Supplies - General $5,884.92 00-408 Water Meters
Total RMR SERVICES, INC $5,884.92
�, o ENJ CIES «v RS
Unpaid RODEN JULIES 1:. PEARSON
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $91.00 Election Judge Pay
Total RODEN JULIES C. PEARSON $91.00
--------S:—CH
v:4TM%/Ff.-----:4v3<,\,T,TVAwiw...:,U•—JULIE
A.AW000OCOOQTtWCaXOK, ownKeerommeOmMo[cherenN.,>Y<Km,se!rea<mu<[4h,,,»etiu»t4eMeruew •«:<rm+w.wm,»w:rrrrrmrnr
�llripaicl•xSCIiOEN JULIEW
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total SCHOEN JULIE $107.25
:.,.,:,,:,..,,:.:.>;;,:.>YY.>::Y,.•Y.»>:::Y:;;.:4>:«.»:�.,.,:>,,,;:>,>,:;..,;,:>Y>:4>:,;;4�:....:.Y>:.::.Y»::H»�4�>Y:�.:;;:«.�r.:n>�<:<nn»�.•«..�»,..x.�<.,<.,�<r<:n,>•:...>.r„r;.:;;arH..,»,,,.r«.,�,»».rr•<n,»>»».r:,rrrr.
Unpaid SCHUCK STEVE
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $110.50 Election Judge Pay
Total SCHUCK STEVE $110.50
!/l!///l/Y/l.V.^>Yii�i:.'f.0\v?i/.!rn«l,T::J:<!<•YYJMt•Y%//A/lrgYY\\<n::«:M'l..Y>n::.r,ry�:A>Y�Y'IJfRY.<ON% NJ•UVY%4:.v«:m+r«t<K<mmMvae,v<yiiri:<.v.»•:: r:nv::r::i<isi::.vn,»vrii:nw<+wiiw•rrr.,,virrr:.vnvrrrvn•.w.,wxvrrxr
Unpaid SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION
E 601-49400-310 Miscellaneous $8,126.50 5953 Oct. Pumping
Total SCHUENDER CONSTRUCTION $8,126.50
SCHULTZ,,, w<LILLILLIAIY «4 M
P IV
CITY OF OTSEGO Monday, November 20, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 5 of 6
Check Amt Invoice Comment
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total SCHULTZ LILLIAN $65.00
maaorwwwox000aaoowii ,::amwa::cera.::a.,,.:.�.v.�.,%.w.,,,:....w.,,,,,,,w..-N},.,,,,,m}%.,+ew.,.,,:,-:..-.,:w.,,,,,},.,�,v,.w.,vw..,wM.wnnw.w.w:.,,,,,%�,%.,w„%:xM,w....•.,„,,,,,w�,,,,,...,,,a�wttsmecrrrr .:exk�e�-.•.m:ec
Unpaid SHELQUIST L.ORRAINE
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $13.00 Election Training
Total SHELQUIST LORRAINE $13.00
'—
ooa.::::.•..�..�..�,.:..%:.:{..,..�,:, SHIERTS BONw{M%.ww..%.r ..r..eK
NIE x...k xx..,..:,.•..w:{.w:...w,w...,v vwvwn,w�..,wxmr x�aan m:oaanvcanwx
Unpaipd
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $120.25 Election Judge Pay
Total SHIERTS BONNIE $120.25
Unpaid SILVERNESS; JUDY
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $169.00 Election Judge Pay
Total SILVERNESS JUDY $169.00
....,.::::.,<,:.::............... H.w:.,...,.:.:...:,......,,;�;�s,�,;�:;,�a�;;o:«<:,.«,�.�;,��,em:«.},�wmr.}%�,�„•Ka,..}:},:s•�,U,},:}%.,�,�,.•<x,e,�Kxa,em�„wx,.w.x,:,w.xM�xwwM
Unpaid STRATER BRIENT
E101-41400-103 Election Judges $107.25 Election Judge Pay
Total STRATER BRENT $107.25
?:^Ti^ilC•iC:t•:K<n'SSQCCSSI”fnY•:?.hY'.«•:SSvvT?::f{:-:t«LvUre}T:'w'«.ti«.:i.:i.:i-:«.:<iitnp;{{,.%i.T:.::K«i4�X8Q4'a:<K<«0.%«{vUU000CyeNpvlxxM•6.rofKM%MKA!A: KKKN?0.%{Av{KM'fx{{Mw.%{Kp1%.%x{xn yUpnuv.:{:: {.uwww{x:: xvvn
Unpaid STS CONSUL1rANT'S LTD
E 416-43100-390 Contracted Services $2,203.70 206350 1999 ST IMP PROJ
Total STS CONSULTA14TIS LTD $2,203.70
Unpaid SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLY
E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $205.17 S1815578 Fluorescent Lamps
Total SUPERIOR LAMP AND SUPPLY $205.17
M'+P:06Y»Pa"".. riiCJ»:.iP?JG9?iOCViGPTT\vt9:ti9CYJOJOi:•3YTVi>iii]F1}:e»i;.:.vv._;;qi:>?wOW>:OD]�nY%tib000Wi)6.UPi}]1�V06a%AXAOOOFHfMn'affe0�00M00P0ET�U+A'.wm:aeOY.w.'MO%doe.»fO}fM+A}nwm{{±M +eex}}}s}vx,v�mu}uumwi.,•xnv.,
Unpaid SUPERIOR SEIRVICES
E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $460.00 168171 Oct. Recycling
Total SUPERIOR SERVICES $460.00
««:-tar.«o. m:taraa;;•:t;-,�;•tax•iso;;t;-rc:•:fx.«axuii:<o::.:.-:.r««<::t•.•nxaw:.+c:um%«.:.oc<«.,<cc:<uw,::-:x«dawxro±:< a�v�eer m
Unpaid SWENSON JO`(
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $65.00 Election Judge Pay
Total SWENSON JOY $65.00
,u,vA'(S9C+U"CCGV.^.P:xtA:GVYtn;gx.}i:::<}\•CA \Y90M\YP !P:a. \UC«StlNt•:< YCNChY-0.tl0.)OPGOOWOOWG%A+%Ohy06XCOJ6Y.CM,.K:«•:RIX«OeJ000WY1f•10.�v1}%4vKMtF\\4vn}vdF1\ 'uW[.:r'{dK.w
UnpaidTERMINAL SUPPLY CO
E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $205.37 72225-00 SHRINK TERMINALS
Total TERMINAL SUPPLY CO $205.37
,�•.:.w:..%.w.w.x.w::.,•::r iixi:r:r.:ra>i>xi -' --::,»:xr.•:>ia»uwm:«ai»xancvr;;x.,ro::-u»;aoi»r»xi»narairnouwwaiwf...i::«.ww�twr.:ar..»:.rora.}iriaooi}r:wi.::::%.w.%,,,.::::...:.,,,:..,:,:%::.r..;:,.•.
Unpaidrx US BANK
E 316-47000-620
Fiscal Agent's Fees
$39,791.25
Dec 1, 00
Interest
E 315-47000-620
Fiscal Agent's Fees
$67,782.50
Dec 1, 00
S & W Rev 1999 A
E 315-47000-602
Bond Interest
$110,000.00
Dec 1,00
S & W Rev 1998 A
E 316-47000-602
Bond Interest
$170,000.00
Dec 1, 00
Improvement 1999 B
E 315-47000-620
Fiscal Agent's Fees
$109,515.00
Dec 1,00
Interest
Total U.S BANK $497,088.75
.am.,a,«ae.�».v:<-�:•.�.�.,�„�e;ex.>w,ii:d-a.,>cwar::>w:,:ae�,;e-. ao,�..�,Y,,,..,...ro.,..,,,M..r�:,:,,�.....,.,.�,�,•.,�.,�.,�.,�,.a...,w�.....,,,.,..,,,,�..�.,,w,M,x,,,.w
{Unpaid US FILTER
E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $59.42 6860676
Total US FILTER $59.42
'G—n iian,caw>oowc<eacw.w.a:«<Dune docorvw.cc«ocu<axdx.ox<«<cH`BE R NA
Unpaid VETSCH BERDL4DETTE
CITY OF OTSEGO Monday, November 20, 2000
Check Detail Register Page 6 of 6
Check Amt Invoice Comment M
E 101-41400-103 Election Judges $118.63 Election Judge Pay
Total VETSCH BERNADETTE $118.63
Unpaid XCEL ENERGY M ,,.r,,,,.:,.
E 602-49450-322 Utilities $157.12 071-308 W WTP Service
Total XCEL ENERGY $157.12
10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $561,201.52