The URL can be used to link to this page

05-14-01 CCCLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 14, 2001 TO: Judy Hudson Attached is the Claims List for the City Council- For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Registers 4-26-2001 $ 27,534.71 Manual 5-3-2001 200.00 5-7-2001 57,676.22 5-9-2001 30,283.74 GRAND TOTAL $ 115,694.67 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO Check Summary Register Thursday, April 26, 2001 Check Amt tot0o BANK OF ELK RIVER $54.02 UnPaid GRANITE CITY LEASING INC $27,500.69 UnPaid JERRY OLSON Total Checks $27,534.71 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid GRANITE CITY LEASING INC Thursday, April 26, 2001 E101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $34.02 LEASE OF TOSHIBA FAX Total GRANITE CITY LEASING INC $34.02 Unpaid JERRY OLSON E 101-42410-390 Contracted Services $27,500.69 APRIL - 2001 Total JERRY OLSON $27,500.69 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $27,534.71 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, May 03, 2001 Check Summary Register's �� Nems Check Data Check Amt moo BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid BANK OF ELK RIVER - CASH $200.00 Total Checks $200.00 CITY OF OTSEGO Thursday, May 03, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 1 of 1 Check Amt Invoice Comment .\..7�<a�, <a., Cux<+:X:•:«k•:;,5:•.<:r -+.r.>;r.£>S;;'�:a:•., �titiw;::•:.:.•:•s�.:v:r\\.+.,;; 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER Unpaid BANK OF ELK RIVER - CASH E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $200.00 SUPPLIES FOR CLEAN UP DAY Total BANK OF ELK RIVER - CASH $200.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER CITY OF OTSEGO Check Summary Register I:= 10100 BANK OF ELK M1vr-n BLOCK AND PRECAST, INC. Unpaid AMCON BRAUN INTERTEC Unpaid BREZE INDUSTRIES Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO Unpaid COMMUNITY RECREATION Unpaid ROOFING COMPANY Unpaid DIVERSIFIED ECM PUBLISHERS INC Unpaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE Unpaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO Unpaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC Unpaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST Unpaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS Unpaid MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER Unpaid Unpaid ONRAMP, INC PEOPLE SERVICE INC. Unpaid RANDY'S SANITATION Unpaid RICHARD MATHIES Unpaid Unpaid US FILTER COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE Unpaid WRIGHT CO-OP ELECTRIC Unpaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN Unpaid ZIEGLER INC Tota! Checks Monday, May 07, 2001 Page 1 or 1 Check Amt $729.53 $9,992.25 $74.55 $2,789.00 $3,712.67 $350.00 $617.12 $102.35 $94.19 $24,922.28 $331.92 $328.37 $4,125.00 $39.95 $5,572.00 $2,018.33 $1,000.00 $188.54 $578.50 $92.73 $16.94 $57,676.22 CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Monday, May 07, 2001 Page 1 of 3 Check Amt Invoice Comment ir�awn°�'��t'�2wA'k;:xx'��1�?�"C9+•iry.'�3\•'.:iG:ia'✓�:'�r�.fG�'�:x4taX'rT^�G � .'• y: Yi xi\ .... 2.\�) � \ ��. �xa''..�:. �:: r.`3+� :%>i';::�?>:*':,��\`•�t:3i%•.;;sa.3:rH:Y.�.d•�jiit': 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER JSSttSSWt•:Crtt4r:V:vStivti•\f'^.R�f.:<!M.}�v\:.Y'.:!.::/(•:n\•!Mn/prYXOM<•pOUm�+,Y<IX!!9C[OMv:lr.:<!tt<KM_%Vwwv<+r<n. rx:::xx:::::: Unpaid AMCON BLOCK AND PRECAST, INC. E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $729.53 19455 CONTAINMENT VESSEL Total AMCON BLOCK AND PRECAST, INC. $729.53 .,r:.:r..r..:.........n..:.,,.:,:...... ate,:;�: a. �WWw: wx:W:cvo--ravocox.�a..v:aavxewroox.snzw00000000000000raiaooxxic;;cr»rr+,x.:;;.xr,:.:.::;s:.;:ti..rr:rcnrw+x:xxiw:<�n•.::::.::...,:,•.v:.,:•n:•:...::..:. Unpaid BRAUN INTERTEC E 422-43100-390 Contracted Services G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S G 701-21941 Pulte Homes G 701-21915 Crimson ponds/Backes 99-7 G 701-21946 Crimson Ponds 2nd G 701-21912 PLT 99-4, D. Ullmer G 701-21947 Prairie Creek 3rd Addn G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge G 701-21922 Pheasant Ridge G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge #rd & 4th G 701-21951 Pulte's W & S QUADAY/78TH/PAGE Total BRAUN INTERTEC $431.50 403198 88TH AVENUE $2,614.50 403199 QUADAY AVE $425.75 403200 PARSON AVE $1,571.75 403214 PRAIRIE CREEK 2 $1,449.75 403215 CRIMSON POND 1 $90225 403216 CRIMSON POND 2 $321.25 403217 PRAIRIE CREEK 1 $925.25 403218 PRAIRIE CREEK 3 $304.50 403219 PHEAST. RIDGE 1 $104.50 403220 PHEAST. RIDGE 2 $263.00 403221 PHEAST. RIDGE 3 $67825 403222 QUADAY/78TH/PAGE $9,992.25 ::---�r_r:...rrn„•x„�oo>o„WW�<:W�,,,F,w„�,„,W;,W„sW,,,w,,,,,,, Unpaid BREZE INDUSTRIES E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $74.55 9864 GLOVES Total BREZE INDUSTRIES $74.55 ::•iCK!VCVOP9ttS']P00054CCV:SWCC'M:f/.M!G•:C\�CaNOCSiMOW0000000WOMM0]ttOJJI�(O. .q:CgK«+a:VltrpWW90IXYrJ00Y .+.vvvnrw:.v:n:wr:x:: nvvv.•.v:x.•:::rvnvx:m+vM....vv:xnv<x:xnvm•:::: rrmmvv:r:.v Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO E 213-42200-390 Contracted Services $2,690.00 6639 FIRE E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $99.00 6639 ANIMAL CONTROL -MARCH Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $2,789.00 m,v,vvv,+vvnvvwWvwmvn»wnr�v>yyyv�w.:vvvjyvyx<mwxuewW+v++nvn:vv:+:::vvw:.:w:.vvvvx:x•.vwnvxnv.nvn+W,vwv,»yr,S9S:KttC•:CtiSW.<9CKSMSPiGY.V. Unpaid COMMUNITY RECREATION E 101-45100-390 Contracted Services $3,712.67 4262001 MAY & JUNE 2001 Total COMMUNITY RECREATION $3,712.67 :%aaii%�,w>aa>�<>,W�W:<„r%.lm�r�.1.,,,„od,�>ow�,tl,,,,�,,,,ro,,,�>va..•<n�,::::..r.,n,�.w<,,,,�.<xxx<.w«„<.�,<.xxx�....r.�,,.rrnrMw,�.rx.,,.wx:,:rxr Unpaid DIVERSIFIED ROOFING COMPANY E 101-41940-402 Repairs/Maint Buildingss $350.00 CITY HALL ROOF REPAIR Total DIVERSIFIED ROOFING COMPANY $350.00 �<,�,.>,W�•%.�,�«<W�.� �� !<nnw:x:.r:n.:x:xxx.r:<xx::x:x<:xx<n,«x<,w.wxrrnx.:x<x<.r Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC x E 101-41400-347 Newsletter $209.80 WATER/COOLER/CUPS OTSEGO VIEW E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $231.00 109730 CLEAN UP DAY AD E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $62.22 109979 STAR NEWS AD -ORDINANCE E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $49.26 109980 AD-S&Z INVEST E 101-41400-347 Newsletter $64.84 54567 OTSEGO VIEW Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $617.12 . .vhvprvdtlooCn..Wz<'oMMM[M'KYlIH.trllvk<:<xvw.w:r!<:<nv.�vvxxn.nrvv,wryrxnemvvv««.v+vvvrxxxxwrrxxxwrnrvwrnvww.vv,nrwwww:<xvw.r.v.vn-x:::rrrrrr.wrrrrrrxrr:rrrxi: wrrrrr%/<:v:ri.%!ra%/:r%N.�niN iiVrlal:Oi�iiiV%!i. Unpaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $23.28 WATER/COOLER/CUPS E 101-41950-310 Miscellaneous $29.82 RENTAL HOUSE E 101.41950-310 Miscellaneous $23.90 HEAD START -SALT E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $25.35 CITY HALL Total FINKEN'S WATER CARE $102.35 CITY OF OTS EGO Monday, May 07, 2001 Page 2 of 3 Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment ?•n„�n�\\\\.ti�,w'rri�v�vifurir.,�':?i:�K<w iYh,�`�v riw/.Q,\\��,�Rm��x 'rSrn: ��\i�ti�v LiiSi,U'J��'tiA}l:N"•w� � �v;vitxr ',WO%a„nmx„nwxm.m\x„m nmm•.,,m rrm .,,. n nv. m,,,,,v.,m\U\ 1 GNNR\I�MK<aaJ00%ON00W000ONuCCJcfr;li..vvv.K,V:JNv, Unpaid FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO \Ul\,W(Jn\U\\UW\,J4 E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) $40.19 PW - MAY E 101-41400-130 EmpkW Paid Ins (GENERAL) $54.00 ADMIN - MAY Total FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO $94.19 •,r,•,..w:.w::::::r: rnr:::::. �:::.,-. �:::::::::.,-:::...:.a.�\�\\v _...w:�awa»•.ccavawvaaaxvvw aorn: w.r>xxcm:.r.-x<.N,-,>:.r\,�N>N::ovx:.aw:.N-r.cx.x::.,:.N,>;::.,:avx>x>:J:cauv.,.m,w.,,,,,w:.,,+>•.n,.www,. Unpaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC G 701-21977 Stone Gate 2nd $833.70 3372 STONEGATE G 701-21976 Judy Vetsch $75.00 3373 VETSCH G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge #rd & 4th $105.88 3374 PHEASANT RIDGE 3 G 701-21970 Bulow/Luconic $225.00 3375 MEADOWLANDS G 701-21973 Pheasant Ridge 5th $1,699.72 3376 PHEASANT RIDGE 5 E 418-43100-302 Engineering Fees $4,529.26 3379 QUADAY AVE G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00 $75.00 3445 MISSISSIPPI PINES G 701-21942 Ranch Acres $787.50 3446 RANCH ACRES-GRUPA G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates $75.00 3447 STONEGATE G 701-21944 Bauerly/Bajari $75.00 3448 1-94 WEST INDUST E 413-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,532.50 3451 ODEAN 98.05 E 406-43100-302 Engineering Fees $710.03 3452 EASEMENT LEFEBVE CREEK E 415-43251-302 Engineering Fees $420.00 3453 PUMP HOUSE 98.02 E 422-43100-302 Engineering Fees $35.00 3455 88TH STREET S/W #00.03 E 601-49400-302 Engineering Fees $1,120.00 3456 WELL 1 REDEV E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $795.28 3460 MSAA E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $1,085.00 3464 MISC ENG E 602-49450.302 Engineering Fees $612.25 3465 WASTEWATER/SANITARY SEWER E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $474.38 3468 VERIZON WIRELESS G 701-21940 The 'Pant' - Big Ed's $14.16 3474 THE POINTE - PULTE E 420-43100-302 Engineering Fees $189.76 3475 PAGE AVE G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge #rd & 4th $2,313.15 3476 PHEASANT RIDGE 4 G 701-21974 Prairie Creek 4th $2,254.52 3477 PRAIRIE CREEK 4 G 701-21972 Quest $848.13 3478 QWEST E 101-41400-348 Maps $254.40 3479 CITY MAP G701-21980 Hidden Creek Trail Subd $254.40 3481 HIDDEN CREEK G 701-21967 River Pant Landing $2,173.20 3482 RIVERPOINTE 1ST E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $1,320.06 3513 ENG MANUAL E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $35.00 3514 STAFF MEETING Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $24,922.28 Unpaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST G 101-21705 Other Retirement $130.00 PPE 4/28/01 E 101-41400-121 PERA $201.92 PPE 4/28/01 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $331.92 •YiYiOann,6>'„Nx:.vdN;.,,.,Y,,::v„>.,,.::nni,,,„,-.v,,,,an, ro�mmne.,vvn+eenW v..:.vm,rvwrrrnmw�>wwv.w+.,w„,..n.:n.v:.::n.,rry,nv:r:n,•nnvvriw..v,w,.W00[.M`C Unpaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS �/..>:.xrt;n;CR>:A•nV4CY.SJiC•:C>. E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $328.37 96165 TOSHIBA COPIER Total MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $328.37 .....w,,..,.,�..,,,,..av> rr:rn..n.:,,,,,,,::r.rwr.w.k...N.n,wr:r:n:........nn...::...:..,......,.r:.n:,rrrrnr,:r>�:<J,•:J:.,.•;,;.�,,,.,::•xx::,,�� ,�„r,,,,,,.J:�... .r .:...:........: ....<:.ri,�w.�rr.w«.,,�r.�„.w.,k,.wr..,,,,,r,.•:::::nwrr,r:rrr• Unpaid MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER ............................ :.. G101-21801 BUILDING PERMIT SURCHARGE $4,125.00 1ST QTR SURCHARGE Total MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER $4,125.00 �.rAp.Yi::AVirFa\W:l///J].a rrirrn,,,,viiiiN Unpaid ONRAMP, INC .mwrrrrrr+�r^'^,r:r....nv,vxrrrrrrw,rnvrnrvrrN+:rr/++,r,/N1NW!/N/lf.� %N+:<tiV4i///N:t%I. CITY OF OTSEGO Monday, May 07, 2001 Page 3 of 3 Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $39.95 974073 MONTHLY WEB HOST Total ONRAMP, INC $39.95 _ xxw„�.vn.,�w�,.,..,.,,:...n,.n....,•::.r:.�:.,�,::«..>,a•..,,:�?:•. .:�„�,N„�„a,,�«,n,�«,a„w;,.,�,,,;�,...,.xxx,•.,•:PEOPLE SERVICE INC. Unpaid E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $5,572.00 4383 MONTHLY SERVICE Total PEOPLE SERVICE INC. $5,572.00 '.V„va,TWi:JWppi::.YG>::Jhw,iHIO:JINJ00'+n,xv.�xx•.vmx,,,:,,,vnnv.+axt„xw.,svwn,wvn�[as: vMMv+nNd„xvnvx:vn,syn,xn,,,,::.vxnx::x•:.wmnuvxvnvvnv:::::nvv:n•:.•.v:::V???:4:v:4::N•??:R':C.SK`:J???:. Unpaid RANDY'S SANITATION E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $1,928.75 736 RECYCLE E 101-41940-325 Garbage Service $89.58 737 GARBAGE Total RANDY'S SANITATION $2,018.33 Unpaid RICHARD MATHIES R 702-38090 ESCROW DEPOSIT $1,000.00 ESCROW REFUND Total RICHARD MATHIES $1,000.00 �µ r/pwp(yppnettxMv.\vG,xMVMx[xw Ka'.v/x+.v�w+nvn•::x::.w:/nwx:+.waw.wxnvmwnvxmwnriV.t?:4R>\�lC>::•?i,�:OXA:P%+1C+n Unpaid US FILTER E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $188.54 7316183 SUPPLIES Total US FILTER $188.54 w�oxaxow:ooexevxaw:ma�nwx�ow�xm,,.vnxm..xx..,.ww,wnw.:.,,w.,xw.w.w.w.,,,,,xw.•xs«.rw..a. r: vcww:wYu Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE $35,00 8118-500-202100 PAID FULL $35.00 R118-500.202102 PAID FULL $37.50 R118-070-077100 1ST HALF $82,00 R118-164000110 1ST HALF $389,00 R118-070-078010 1ST HALF $578.50 wn,�.x„w..w,�,,,.ww,.�w,,,,,,x�,.w.,�„xx,,,,,.,,,,,,www,,.,�,,.,�w .,w.w,.ww.x�a�««mn<«..•.Y:<n.:v :�:xn:w�«�.,�.:nw«n<:,M Unpaid WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC E 101-43160-322 Utilities $92.73 6503 MAINT STREET LIGHTS Total WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC $92.73 •x.:,.,�,.�w..K,.,,�,.,�.v,.�,wax,.,,w.,,,�..,w,,,�M.xx.w.wxw.., xx,�w �:?.? .>��.,� �,;.,w<.,��.?��»>.,,;.?x,.;,�:. Unpaid ZIEGLER INC E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $16.94 PCOSM82830 ADAPTER Total ZIEGLER INC $16.94 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $57,676.22 CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, May 09, 2001 Pagel of 1 Check Summary Register ROOM Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION $179.60 UnPaid AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES $435.54 UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $21.95 UnPaid BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER $372.00 UnPaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $4,641.00 UnPaid D & T LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION $182.59 UnPaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $139.69 UnPaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $70.29 UnPaid FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY $2,251,58 UnPaid G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $632.85 UnPaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY $4,155.87 UnPaid JACQUIE ROGNLI $1,000.00 UnPaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $329,73 UnPaid LONG & SONS $498.13 UnPaid MERIDIAN AGGREGATES CO $59.66 UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $120.00 UnPaid MOORES EXCAVATING INC $230.00 UnPaid NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $11.69 UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $5,452.31 UnPaid PAUL B YOUNG $1,000.00 UnPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $483,90 UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,014.76 UnPaid SCHARBER & SONS $13.07 UnPaid ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC $30.70 UnPaid STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO $839.40 UnPaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $1,086.65 UnPaid SUPERIOR SERVICES $460,00 UnPaid T & S TRUCKING BUFFALO INC $3,944.00 UnPaid TROPHIES PLUS $11.37 UnPaid UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $335.00 UnPaid WASTE MANAGEMENT $124.41 UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER $156.00 Total Checks $30,283.74 CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Wednesday, May 09, 2001 Page 1 of 4 :A��\'\\�'$ ~,�:.''��."•:r'.�-x,�\i<a::i.:.:a,4:rr/.!aQ��v:a•.:i<'a.:4:. S.G D .,.yp+c a)%:c}�,,�v,,.v .� :.` ."c•\: ��.. ;;� \;D:':.��:,�>},,,�.\..\\ z 7>��.�' .�c�3'a:'�v: ti�:.,«.:.,��::,<'..<..'•�"nc\�'�¢.Zd�:�:;..'iu�',`a.,\`�''•\.�:�';::`:�>2�i`ia'•,�w.��,�y'av:.,,...:c.<rx.,.x:::n��\`+\�a�t�> 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UPV[C(909JC:«4DDDDKVDDtV,W,.�VR«FSO,mK4Y+hVD0,V,1. VDyiDD.�,n,.m•.vD,..rrnnn,vrr::::.:r:.,.::r:nv4„v,,,•nr:rn„[c,w,,,r:rvvm.vwm,+,.,,•nn.rvwn..»..,,,,,.,,�n„•n:.. npaid AFFORDABLE SANITATION E 101-45200-410 Rentals (GENERAL) $179.60 SP 1085 APRIL/MAY RENTAL Total AFFORDABLE SANITATION $179.60 uvv.vwmnvm,,,,•.vvx:nv.,:wx�vnnw.w:nY,\\\VJP: A:]CV: A.>%i%gW:•�gpR\,<., � Y.xqy«4}��•,�,�.��<«M:Oi.%Vi:A+a+Ovx«.WODD!:\'dN<h�UM\,lNCppvs\-,,,•.m,v.,,,vv:x,,,,vnw::::. Unpaid AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES E 101-43100-370 Sand anclGravel $141.60 5263210 GRAVEL E 101-43100-370 Sand anclGravel $150.04 5263229 GRAVEL E 101-43100-370 Sand anclGravel $143.90 5263244 GRAVEL Total AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES $435.54 E101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $21.95 105921717 ACET/HAZMAT/OXYGEN Total AIRGAS, INC. $21.95 .<C.AfOCIX9000 V}•.«J..•VDD:KOpx«:<,<«fMDDDDCDDDDU�[t.,\+.e .w,.w+n.xmr�pH<dMtt.�H,2<«Nt:x n.,n«<xn<Mv:vm,.,y..v.�.ron.dn.rvi::.,n.r.v.,i,..,un...:n:,,..w::: n:w:n.::.vv:: nw.nw.::::.w: n•..v.,•x::::::nvptW:gCph�NDpA%000OpYnpNq Unpaid BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $372.00 04001-0429 RECYCLING Total BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SER $372,00 -: aDa«�Dc�+ecszo:<-:<ar.««�.w:..>a:+.w:,xos:x.�wuoaonn,:,w„:nnn:n,,.vna,.n„•.w.vox,,,,r.�ennwon»w::n,,,.,,•n,vw.,,wnv::n,:,.....w.,,,,,wnw...,.w,;,,,,,,,;,;,w.,,,,,:,,:,,•..w:::.,•:.,:-: n:::,•:.,:w:: n:..w: n:,sacc<catt;Fw:<4:<w:a:,c<rrvr Unpaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $110.00 512001 STONEBRIDGE LEASE E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $2,430.00 512001 GENERAL E 413-43100-301 Legal Services $601.50 512001 ODEAN AVE G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge #rd & 4th $475.00 512001 PHEASANT RIDGE 4 E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $300.00 512001 COKLEY LITIGATION G 701-21973 Pheasant Ridge 5th $187.50 512001 PHEASANT RIDGE 5 G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates $92.00 512001 STONEGATE G 701-21972 Quest $70.00 512001 QWEST- WATER TOWER G 701-21974 Prairie Creek 4th $62.50 512001 PRAIRIE CREEK 4 E 418-43100-301 Legal Services $62.50 512001 78TH STREET E 415-43251-301 Legal Services $250.00 512001 WASTEWATER Total COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $4,641.00 .�,D�DD.,D�,D,�DD.DM.,,,w.�n.,,,.,,�,,,..n•Mw�,,.r.�,,.,,,.V.,,nrr<n•Hn,..�..,r:,�w.r.w.....M.n,.,,. Unpaid D & T LANDSCAPING &IRRIGATION E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services $182.59 3322 SPRINGLER SYSTEM Total D & T LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION $182.59 �Y/f.Si90CSLiV4i0CCt«WAc4GVngDODDDDDDO!ODttbv, E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $67.91 420854 MISC E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $5.18 423015 MISC E 101-43100.310 Miscellaneous $9.87 425680 CONCRETE E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $36.99 426347 COFFEE URN E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $19.74 426703 CONCRETE Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $139.69 ADUADOxFOMOOt«w000�/pHVDvmr,�.v.,,,v:viiiiyM�r.,,v<.<yrcnvnv.rrryy„nynxvw,rrn„nD•yvrrnv/fiTx<4/.•xi%irrT?%I:%i%i:%•:«4N h%i:%r. '«.,w::.vwrrrrr:n„vn•.w.,,,w:rrrrrn•:n:..v::v:nwr: :vnw:: rr: rr:nwr::.vvr::r:.vrrY Unpaid ELK RIVER PRINTING &PARTY PLU E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $70.29 012888 BLDG PERMITS Total ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY pLU $70,29 :««�Dd%,��«,aDD.�<«.�,r«<.%:D,..�D,..:r,.r,,.,wrr,,,,,,�,...,.�,..,:....«..,,.w:r:.r.�.nV..«,,.M..,,�n,.rr,w,r,,,.n,wk....«,,,,.:.rte-,.:rr:,.,-.:,-.,:.n•:: n.,:r,w,rr::k.,:.r,:rr,:r:,,,,......,.�,:«,: ,,.-.r„r•: r<, rD�.,�..H,,,,,,;D>. Unpaid FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY E 415.43251-310 Miscellaneous $2,251.58 643538 INSTALL LOCKS CITY OF OTSEGO Check Detail Register Wednesday, May 09, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Unpaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil Check Amt Invoice Comment :i.`�?��.„*;;"x�'&s?%r�z3.?"•`f<>c::°s'�<�%k't&85ii� 'g`a?: %Y/ '•.d4��£5��'�"c�;C,\\Q'.��r<�'�i;�?>zo;,c"�`,��zw�z�3�;ii��•�` E 101-43100-203 Total FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY $2,251.58 Gas & Oil E 101-43100-202 «,:,�,•«.:,:,:.,:n�.k.:,p:.,,�. Unpaid .o,m„w,.n.�...w,::s,,.:,M.��.w.,,,...x.,�,.,,,.v.w,.,�,::,.,:•::N....,,,,,,.�ww.w. G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM Gas & Oil 39898 E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $98.92 500827 UNIFORMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $80.17 500828 MATS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $60.62 505712 UNIFORMS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $60.62 510622. UNIFORMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $80.17 510623 MATS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $70.46 515475 UNIFORMS E 101-43100-225 Uniforms $101.72 520368 UNIFORMS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $80.17 520369 MATS Total G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEM $632.85 Unpaid H G WEBER OIL COMPANY E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil E 101-43100.203 Supplies - General E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil E 101-43100-202 Gas & Oil 39898 Total HG WEBER OIL COMPANY $581.40 39815 DIESEL $495.62 39816 GAS $530.54 39818 SKID TANK $615.32 39832 DIESEL $31.95 39875 GAS HOSE $636.88 39898 DIESEL $443.35 39933 GAS $820.81 39935 DIESEL $4,155.87 Unpaid JACQUIE ROGNLI MM E 101-41400-347 Newsletter $1,000.00 2001-1 OTSEGO VIEW Total JACQUIE ROGNU $1,000.00 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MN CITIES E101-41400-355 Dues & Memberships $34.73 2001 DIRECTORY E 101-41100-360 Education/Training/Conferences $295.00 SUZANNE ACKERMAN - CONFERENCE Total LEAGUE OF MN CITIES $329.73 �.�,�•.�«�.,�<�.��...�.a.�,..:,w.�...,,..�..,�,......wv..:,..wN....w,.y,M..,..,.M.,::.,.,,..�w..�.,,,:..w..,,w,.�,>,�;::•,N>iN>,:,,>,�»Y,n Unpaid LONG do SONS E 101-41400-389 Cleaning Services E 101-41400.203 Supplies - General E 101-41400-389 Cleaning Services E 101-41400-203 Supplies - General $498.13 Total LONG & SONS $30.40 TAX $37.80 TOWELS $400.00 APRIL CLEANING $29.93 1 CASE TP $498.13 :4Y.Y..W//.'/fIMS[Y.lRN,,..,,.•.fv:.;Vd%dGU ROOVn//%CGO:O'OY,CryYA4«�.: ,.w.,v:/K..w.,..MMM.M..wtMKx.....vnm..w.n.v.:.::.v:::::..::..::.:.::::<n w•.:::::...:...w:.:.::...:.:..:.:::.:.... Unpaid MERIDIAN AGGREGATES CO E 101-43100-392 Culverts $59.66 8824832 70TH CULVERT Total MERIDIAN AGGREGATES CO $59.66 Unpaid,M• MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $120.00 220 APRIL PICK UPS Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $120.00 N///l i%RSyYII/Nti,titiv}. /iN:.,vN.hYincv N>nl/d!!,vo/Xywnwle.MmMveirnf�veM�Ylvn+„vvv.v::m•:im::::nrH:�rmw::.v:::::.v::::.v: nv:::.v:.•r.•:.v.v::.,w.v: :w:v::::+v:+ !Unpaid MOORES EXCAVATING INC G 701-21961 Pheasant Ridge #rd & 4th $230.00 REPLACE CURB STOP 81ST CR Total MOORES EXCAVATING INC $230.00 CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, May 09, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 3 of 4 Check Amt Invoice Comment .:.,•. ..... ............ �;.,xo, $;:>xn:^� �:,�,,,,.,,s�.a,n��:5m3;st�?S�s:ss;;a.::;z:;:::: NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC w:.w.mw,.�.,utta�.rvh, r...,.,,.w xr,,,•:::.,..,,,,,,»„•:n,..,,»»•:.,,'> E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $11.69 832534 MISCELL Total NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $11.69 11n aidP-�nn`��xff•y�� NORTHWEST ASSOC CONU w LTANTS .....a G r::•x•» <.:,...: wa <»waKwx a w. x vww w cx «xuo->�u«v a 701-21977 Stone Gate 2nd $244.92 10053 G 701-21980 Hidden Creek Trail Subd $619.54 10053 G 701-21970 Bulow/Luconic $606,75 10053 G 701-21973 Pheasant Ridge 5th $501.28 10053 G 701-21978 Kreuser CUP $421.54 10053 G 701-21983 Site Pian/Knghorn $276,00 10053 G 701-21982 Prairie Creek 5th $198.00 10053 G 701-21979 Benson Rezone $146.57 10053 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $198,90 10054 E 203-45210-303 Planning Fees $16.20 10054 E 430-43100-303 Planning Fees $15.30 10054 E 203-45210-303 Planning Fees $664,29 10054 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $343.02 10054 E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $1,200.00 10055 Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $5,452.31 STONEGATE 2 HIDDEN CREEK MEADOWLANDS PHEASANT RIDGE 5 HOOFBEATS KINGHORN PRAIRIE CREEK 5 BENSON/DAVIS COMM STABLES SCHOOL KNOLL W. SEWER PLAN PARK & TRAIL GENERAL GENERAL .v.v..v:: w,::::m<rm.v.�wattwaocnowm»»::m: w�.x�n,:>r»a.»nay:»>wa>aarav«r<r»r.•aw:aocrfaw: ww.,:xu;rw»wvowwxo->:ow .. .....:.»:•::..:.w<n»-.:mmmrm.:•+w<wv::<:.,v.«<.,,•mvw<..w<m..< . Unpaid PAUL B YOUNG R 702-38090 ESCROW DEPOSIT $1,000.00 ESCROW REFUND Total PAUL B YOUNG $1,000.00 raau�0000mwawrwo-w.rowcvu«x,+x.-ceowzoa>va.:+a.+nv<.v.,,,,o-v.»,n"•<m+me�eeee+eerm,.wn•<.<maw.a»mw+o»w<.<m«.,,...,,,.m,.-<n,-:.:.:n.::::::::.»„».�:..,•<»nww,w.,,»,.,.. «nxeoxn:�eoc-.eec<aax«•x<svx Unpaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP E 101-41400-123 Health $243.02 ADMIN - INSURANCE E 101-43100-123 Health $240.88 PW -INSURANCE Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $483.90 •mnw,>w,.nm.,w«m•....,,,-..n-:.,..,•:.w..,n„ww:mw.ww..,,,,,,.,w...w�,.•mnw,»„w..M�.wm«< nc•..::::ac<xxxooccuw.<•rxaxcvoa .aocvx<umw:u:.oe. +or:ozaa-.•,uc..r..,w:« Unpaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD G 101-21704 PERA v aw«.: a aid Un $485.41 PPE 5/2/01 E 101-43100-121 PERA $274.79 PPE 5/2/01 E 101-41400-121 PERA $182.04 PPE 5/2/01 E 101-41550-121 PERA $72.52 PPE 5/2/01 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $1,014.76 J0000>%OOWeOwY'xHl.'<µ,,,,,,ww»»v^,•�yyy""^DaafeMfrornvdwnmaMyMw.vy„w,,,,,,,nrnr�.w,wm<,vv,vn,awnv,v::nv::n,»wmxv<nv<:mnvmvw.v:<mkMMWC•'l.VlA:,'!vx«•:Kh]C•: Unpaid SCHARBER & SONS C(Vi•N.•!i:«T•in E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $13.07 245047 FUEL FILTER Total SCHAR13ER & SONS $13.07 Unpaid — MY » .< ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $30.70 V103211 93 CASE TRACTOR Total ST JOESPHS EQUIPMENT INC $30.70 STANDARDM� mn-mm..,.ww,.,M.,.,::.:n.....:.:,:n„x.�wm.N:mn P TRUCK &AUTO E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $839.40 275950 92 FORD TRK Total STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO $839.40 Unpaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW n»w m m m� w :..............:::.m..»,mm «:: n:« ,« xa„<.�« <,•x ,. «:,,,,•..:,.,.,,x•A E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $190.00 585 SPTING CLEANUP CH E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $266.33 585 FERTILIZE CITY OF OTSEGO Wednesday, May 09, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 4 of 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . Check Amt Invoice Comment E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $160.00 585 PUMP HOUSE E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $66.32 585 TAX E 101-41950-310 Miscellaneous $69.00 585 OLD CITY HALL E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $50.00 585 WATER TOWER E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $295.00 585 WOODED PARK Total SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $1,086.65 "Ud-npai SUPERIOR SERVICES E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $460.00 204691 APRIL Total SUPERIOR SERVICES $460.00 Unpaid T & S TRUCKING BUFFALO INC E 101-43100-390 Contracted Services $3,944.00 370 ST SWEEPING Total T & S TRUCKING BUFFALO INC $3,944.00 Unpaid TROPHIES PLUS E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $11.37 NAMEPLATE Total TROPHIES PLUS $11.37 E 101-41400-360 Educabon/Training/ConfGrences $335.00 CLERKS INSTITUTE Total UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $335.00 E 101-43610-390 Contracted Services $124.41 0102960-1593- RECYCLING Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $124.41 RECORDERUnpaid WRIGHT COUNTY E 101-41400-340 Recording Fees $58.50 VETSCH E 101-41400-340 Recording Fees $19.50 KREUSER E 101-41400-340 Recording Fees $19.50 WIEDENBACH E 101-41400-340 Recording Fees $58.50 1-94 WEST Total WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER $156.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $30,283.74 4P. / . HONTIA IST ASSOCIATIto 1110c, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 8 May 2001 RE: Otsego Meadowlands; Planning Commission Review FILE NO.: 176.02 - 01.04 Please be advised that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the above referenced application on April 16, 2001, which was continued to May 7, 2001 to allow for proper notice to be made and for the applicant to correct technical issues with the plat design. Several property owners surrounding the proposed plat spoke at the public hearing. Most were supportive of the changes in overall density made to the plat from the original concept plans. Concerns raised by these persons included storm water capacity in the northeast comer of the parcel, the range in lot sizes and potential extension of 87"' Street. The City Engineer will need to provide additional information on the storm water issue, otherwise the issues were satisfactorily addressed. The Planning Commission discussion focused on the elimination of the common septic system that was part of the previous concept plans. Several Planning Commissioners stated that they would not support the project including individual septic systems were it not for the regional storm water improvements being provided by the applicant. The Planning Commission also discussed the access issue, recommending that the proposed easement be widened to a width determined by the City Engineer to provide adequate access and maintenance area. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted in separate motions to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning and PUD- CUP/preliminary plat by 6-0 votes. Resolutions and findings supporting the Planning Commission's recommendations are attached for consideration at the May 14, 2001' City Council meeting at 6:30 PM. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Ron Wagner George Sanford Chris Bulow 2 RESOLUTION NO.: 00 - CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY ATTACHED EXHIBIT A WITHIN THE LONG RANGE URBAN SERVICE AREA AND DESIGNATE IT FOR FUTURE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE. WHEREAS, the parcel legally describe by attached Exhibit A is within the Urban Service Area Reserve established by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update; and, WHEREAS, the City has received a request from S&Z Investments and Bulow Incorporate for approval of a PUD -CUP and preliminary plat for development property with 43 single family residential uses; and WHEREAS, the developer has requested a Comprehensive Plan amendment to expand the Long Range Urban Service Area to include the entire parcel described by Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update outlines polices for further development that must be satisfied for the Planning Commission and City Council to allow for additional development within the Long Range Urban Service Area, which may also be applicable in evaluating the present request: Unsewered residential development within the long range urban service area shall be allowed when the City determines that such development will result in at least one of the following: a. Completion of an unfinished street network. Finding: The project as presented does not provide for extension of any local street network, although a future connection to 8r Street may be possible. b. Such development shall have the result of the correction or improvement of a demonstrated area drainage problem. Finding: A drainage problem exists during high rainfall seasons where the lake on the subject property overflows and floods existing residential areas to the east. As part of this project, the applicant is proposing to correct this issue by paying for and installing storm water drainage facilities on the subject property and Nashua Avenue. C. The dedication of lands to a legitimate public purpose (i.e., desired parks, public facility structures, right-of-way dedication, etc.). The project provides for the dedication of necessary storm water drainage facilities. WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, at their regular meeting on 7 May 2001, to consider the request, preceded by published notice and, upon review of the application and evidence received closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve the amendment of the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update to include the entire parcel described by Exhibit A within the Long Range Urban Service Area and guide it for future low density residential use, based upon a finding that the amendment is consistent criteria established by the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO THAT; the request to amend the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update to include the entire parcel described by Exhibit A within the Long Range Urban Service Area and guide it for future low density residential use is hereby APPROVED. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 14th Day of May 2001. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 CITY OF 5-8-01 OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Zoning Map Amendment Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant: S & Z Investments and Bulow Incorporated Request: Consideration of a Zoning Map amendment to rezone property located northeast of Nashua Avenue and 85th Street from A-1 District to R-3 District to allow development of single family uses as part of the Meadowlands Preliminary Plat. City Council Meeting Date: 14 May 2001 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact.- The act: The legal description of the property is described by attached Exhibit A. 2. The 99 acre property lies within the Long Range Urban Service Area and is guided for low density residential land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update, as amended. 3. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District; The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned to R-3, Residential Long Range Urban Service Area to allow for development of the preliminary plat entitled "Meadowlands"; Single family uses are permitted uses of the R-3 District. 4. The Department of Natural Resources has designated a natural environment lake within the subject property. As such, portions of the property are also within the Shoreland Overlay District. 5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the Zoning Map amendment with theirjudgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment is found to be consistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Unsewered residential development within the long range urban service area shall be allowed when the City determines that such development will result in at least one of the following: a. Completion of an unfinished street network. The project as presented does not provide for extension of any local street network, although a future connection to 8r Street may be possible. b. Such development shall have the result of the correction or improvement of a demonstrated area drainage problem. A drainage problem exists during high rainfall seasons where the lake on the subject property overflows and floods existing residential areas to the east. As part of this project, the applicant is proposing to con-ect this issue by paying for and installing storm water drainage facilities on the subject property and Nashua Avenue. C. The dedication of lands to a legitimate public purpose (i.e., desired parks, public facility structures, right-of-way dedication, etc.). The _project provides for the dedication of necessary storm water drainage facilities. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject property is surrounded to the east and northeast to by one acre, non-sewered development, which are in the Long Range Urban Service Area. Properties to the north and south are designated for continued agriculturaUrural land uses as part of the Urban Service Area Reserve. City Hall is west of the subject site. The development of suburban single family lots on the subject site would be compatible with these existing and planned uses. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed project will be required to conform to all applicable requirements of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed development may have a positive effect on the area by correcting the existing drainage problems. Potential negative impacts to the area involve potentially siphoning development interest from the Sanitary Sewer Service District and expansion of on-site septic systems. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding. Although no study has been completed, no negative impact to area property values is anticipated to be caused by the project. F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The property is served by Nashua Avenue, which is designated as a minor arterial street by the Comprehensive Plan. This street has adequate access to serve traffic generated by the project. Provision of a second access to the project is an issue. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: Of primary concern in allowing on-site septic systems is the potential future need for municipal sanitary sewer service. Outside of utilities, the development is located in close proximity to other developed areas requiring City services such as street maintenance, park facilities, policeffire protection, etc. 6. The planning reports dated 13 April 2001 and 1 May 2001 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 7. The engineering review dated 4 May 2001 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 16 April 2001 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice, which was continued to 7 May 2001. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve the Zoning Map amendment based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Zoning Map amendment is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th day of May, 2001. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO M Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant: S&Z Investments and Bulow Incorporated 5-8-01 PUD -CUP & Preliminary Plat Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Consideration of a PUD -CUP and preliminary plat entitled uMeadowlands" for development of 43 single family and one outlot on a 99 acre property located northeast of Nashua Avenue and 85' Street. City Council Meeting Date: 14 May 2001 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. 2. The 99 acre property lies within the Long Range Urban Service Area and is guided for low density residential land uses by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update, as amended. 3. The property is zoned R-3, Residential Long Range Urban Service Area District; Single family residential uses are permitted uses of the R-3 District. 4. The Department of Natural Resources has designated a natural environment lake within the subject property. As such, portions of the property are also within the Shoreland Overlay District. 5. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the PUD -CUP with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: A. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment is found to be consistent with the following policies of the Comprehensive Plan: Unsewered residential development within the long range urban service area shall be allowed when the City determines that such development will result in at least one of the following.- a. ollowing. a. Completion of an unfinished street network. The project as presented does not provide for extension of any local street network, although a future connection to 8r Street may be possible. b. Such development shall have the result of the correction or improvement of a demonstrated area drainage problem. A drainage problem exists during high rainfall seasons where the lake on the subject property overflows and floods existing residential areas to the east. As part of this project, the applicant is proposing to correct this issue by paying for and installing storm water drainage facilities on the subject property and Nashua Avenue. C. The dedication of lands to a legitimate public purpose (i.e., desired parks, public facility structures, right-of-way dedication, etc.). The project provides for the dedication of necessary storm water drainage facilities. B. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject property is surrounded to the east and northeast to by one acre, non-sewered development, which are in the Long Range Urban Service Area. Properties to the north and south are designated for continued agriculturaUrural land uses as part of the Urban Service Area Reserve. City Hall is west of the subject site. The development of suburban single family lots on the subject site would be compatible with these existing and planned uses. C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed project will be required to conform to all applicable requirements of the City's Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. D. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed development may have a positive effect on the area by correcting the existing drainage problems. Potential negative impacts to the area involve potentially siphoning development interest from the Sanitary Sewer Service District and expansion of on-site septic systems. E. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no study has been completed, no negative impact to area property values is anticipated to be caused by the project. 2 F. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The property is served by Nashua Avenue, which is designated as a minor arterial street by the Comprehensive Plan. This street has adequate access to serve traffic generated by the project. Provision of a second access to the project is an issue. G. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: Of primary concern in allowing on-site septic systems is the potential future need for municipal sanitary sewer service. Outside of utilities, the development is located in close proximity to other developed areas requiring City services such as street maintenance, park facilities, policeffire protection, etc. 6. The planning reports dated 6 April 2001 and 1 May 2001 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 7. The engineering review dated 4 May 2001 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 16 April 2001 and continued it to 7 May 2001 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 6-0 vote that the City Council approve the PUD -CUP and preliminary plat based on the aforementioned findings. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested PUD - CUP and Meadowlands Preliminary Plat is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: The developer install storm water improvements shown on the submitted plans to correct area drainage problems, as approved by the City Engineer. 2. The design and construction of all streets is subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. Secondary access to the subdivision is provided as determined by the City Council with recommendations from the Planning Commission and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Notation is made on the deeds to Lots 8-10, Block 2 that no provision for resubdivision of the lot has been made if sanitary sewer and water services are made available. 5. Side yard setbacks for the principal buildings shall be ten (10) feet 6. Documentation of a cemetery site on the property is subject to further review and comment regarding significance by the Historic Preservation Commission. 7. Easements are provided over the lake, no -mow zone and 150 foot shoreland impact area and all easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. All grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. Park and trail dedication shall be subject to review and approval of the City Council. 10. Application for final plat approval shall be made within 100 days and approval of the final plat shall require execution of a development contract. 11. Comments of other City Staff or DNR Staff as appropriate. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14th day of May, 2001. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk MAY. 7.2001 3:17PM NO. 978 P. 2/E;-- --- dere° ENGINEERING REVIEW Review No. 2 A-'o� Preliminary Plat Review ners Residential Subdivision Assoc., Inc. for the City of Otsego Hakanson And by e on Assoclates, Inc. Submitted to: Mike Robertson, Administrator CC., Judy Hudson, CRY Clerk, Dan Licht, City Planner Andy MacArthur, City Attorney S & Z Development, Developer Bogart, Peterson & Assoc., Inc., Developers, Engineers & Land Surveyors Reviewed by; Lawrence G. Koshak PE Ronald J. Wagner, PE Date: May 4, 2001 Proposed Development: Meadowlands Street Location of Property; N1/2 of the NE % and N X. S1/2 of Section Range 23 20 Township 121 Applicant: S & Z Development 11469 193RD Ave. P.O. Box 87 Elk River, MN 55330 Developer S & Z Development Owners of Record: Myrtle C. LuConic 8922 Nashua Avenue N.E. Elk River, MN 55330 Purpose: Jurisdictional Agencies: (but not limited to): Rezone from A-1 to R-3 under PUD/CUp for Development of 44 single family Lots within a Shoreland Overlay District. City of Otsego Permits Required (but not Ilmited to):NPDES DNR Undo ti6hered Dcc+WlunlctPRI%AOT8LrO0%223IWt223tREW .dx MAY. 7.2001 3:17PM TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION AVAILABLE PRELIMINARY PLAT (SHEET 1) NO. 978—P.3i6 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN (SHEET 2) PRELIMINARY GHOST PLAT W/GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLANSH OTHER COMMENTS PLAN(SHEET 3) 1WA01%Sharad Doa%MunkjpmMOT98GoW3jkgM,REVW2.doc MAY. 7.2001 3:17PM N0.978 P.4/6 INFORMATION AVAILABLE Preliminary Plat of Meadowlands, 3/23/01, by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, (Pc. Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan of Meadowlands, 3/23/01, by Bogart, Pederson & Associates, Inc. Preliminary Ghost Plat w/Grading & Erosion Control Plan of Meadowlands, 3/23/01, by Bogard, Pederson & Associates, Inc. City of Otsego Engineering Manual, March 1999, revised-Aft2/27/01 Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4410 — EAW Requirement City of Otsego Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, February 1991 National Wetland Inventory Map, 1991 ALL SHEETS 1. The bar scale is fine, but the written scale should be removed because of reduction problems (all sheets), COMPLETED PRELIMINARY PLAT (SHEET 1) 1. Label & show soil boring locations on Preliminary Plat. NOT COMPLETED 2. Additional Soil Borings shall be required on Lot 2, Block 1 to determine buildability of the lot. COMPLETED, LAYOUT HAS BEEN REVISED. 3. Show horizontal road curve data. COMPLETED 4. Convect vicinity map. NOT COMPLETED, ITS NASHUA AVENUE NE NOT NW. CHANGE ON GRADING PLANS ftp ,"o. 5. We have concerns over the lack of a standard 2ND entrance into the plat. Currently the plat exists as a 3000' cul-de-sac. Maximum length of the proposed 20' access easement is paved and clips a wetland, Our concern is that much of the year this. access road will be impassable to the heavy emergency vehicles. This proposed access route will be difficult to maintain and may invite unwanted traffic. Also, the MN Fine Rules state that any fire access must be a 20' all weather road. This will be difficult to construct on a 20' easement. It is our opinion atypical street section from street B to 90TH Street in Otsego acres is needed to ensure proper emergency access for the public safety of the proposed plat. An option to this would be to construct the 87THStreet connection (southeast corner) to Vasseur's Oak Grove Estates concurrently with plat development. THIS WILL BE DISCUSSED WITH THE CITY. PUB 2 M101%Shared Doc WunfdpallgOTSEGo12231\Ot2231REVW2,doc MAY. 7.2001 3:17PM NO. 978-P. 8. The southeast end of street A must be aligned so as to allow for proper horizontal road radius for connection to 87r" Street. This must be ghost platted for future reference. COMPLETED 7. A temporary cul-de-sac at the Southeast end of street A is also required with the proper temporary easements shown. NOT COMPLETED, SHOW THE WIDTH OF THE TEMPORARY EASEMENT. Y GRADING & EROSION CONTR 1 • Statement certifying the environmental condition of the site. (21-6-2,13.10), 2. Show Roadway widths. COMPLETED 3. Minimum road slope is 0.6% (see engineer manual), COMPLETED 4. Revise typical road cross section to match Otsego standard plate 101. NOT COMPLETED, AS DISCUSSED, THE SECTION SHOULD MATCH PLATE 104. IT SHOULD BE 12 FEET FROM CENTERLINE TO GUTTERLiNE, CLARIFY ON THE DETAIL. ALSO, UPDATE THE MiX DESIGNS. 5. Revise typical curb to match Otsego standard plate 704. COMPLETED, AS DISCUSSED THE CURB SHOULD MATCH PLATE 104. 6. Storm Ponds — Sedimentation basins must have skimmer structure. NOT COMPLETED, PONDS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE STANDARDS SET IN APPENDIX C OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO ENGINEERING MANUAL. 7. Please review and revise the typical house pad excavations. Several are confusing, same house type yet different elevations spread front to back (exp. Lot 20 and Lot 21 of Block 1 are labeled as FB-SWO and one is 4' different and the other 8'). NOT COMPLETED, THE ELEVATIONS FOR WALKOUTS AND LOOKOUTS ARE CONFUSING, THE PADS SHOULD BE LABELED WiTH THE GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION AND THE LOWEST OPENING. DRAINAGE 1. The outlet elevation of the DNR wetland is shown at 900.5 in the plans & 900.7 in Your report. The 1 00y flood elevation is also labeled as 900,7. Flood storage is not allowed below the elevation of the outlet. Revise the computations. To make the. most of the storage available in the DNR wetland and reduce the potential for flooding, we request the outlet elevation be as low as allowed by the DNR. 2. Each water quality pond must be sized to hold the runoff from a 2.5^ rainfall event & have a skimmer structure. The water quality ponds and skimmer structures must meet the standards in the Otsego Engineering Manual. Design calculation showing how the pond sizes were obtained is required. Page 3 %%Hn011Shared Dcc3\MunidpaM0TSE40\2231%a=1REVW2,doc mp�,. 7. 2001 3:18PM N0.978 t' . b/b 3. The peak flow & runoff volume should be checked for both impervious area only & the weighted curve number for each drainage basin. in many instances with large lots, the peak flow & runoff volume is larger using only the impervious area and curve number. The larger runoff volume/peak flow must be used in the storm water design. 4. A stage/discharge curve is needed to determine the adequacy of the proposed 12' outlet pipe from the DNR wetland. Our preliminary designs had shown the need for a 24" outlet due to the limited pipe slope available. 5. A copy of the plans must be submitted for review and approval by the DNR. Ma0119hand Pape 4 %0M31REWY2.doc (01 "OlItTowtsT ASSOCMATID ca"SULTANTS" Mot, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 1 May 2001 RE: Otsego - Prairie Creek 5th Add.; Final Plat FILE NO.: 176.02 - 01.14 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Ulmer Construction, Inc. has submitted an application for final plat approval of Prairie Creek 5th Addition consisting of 35 single family lots. The subject parcel is currently platted as Outlot A of Prairie Creek 3`d Addition and is zoned R-4, Residential Urban Single Family District. The proposed final plat would represent the final phase of single family lots within the Prairie Creek Subdivision. Exhibits: A: Site Location B: Preliminary Plat C: Final Plat D: Findings of Fact ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat Consistency. The proposed final plat is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat for Prairie Creek. There have been minor adjustments to the various lot lines as illustrated on the preliminary plat, which do not significantly alter the character of the plat or conformance with applicable development regulations. The changes do result in one additional lot. All of the lots conform to the minimum R-4 District lot area and width requirements, so the additional lot does not cause any concern. Park/Trail Dedication. No park land is to be dedicated as part of this phase of the final plat. A trail corridor is provided between Blocks 1 and 2 to provide access to Otsego Elementary. In satisfaction of park dedication requirements, the applicant must pay$1,075 per lot cash fee in lieu of land or $37,625. Sewer Capacity. The proposed final plat is to be served by municipal sanitary sewer and water services. This parcel was specifically exempted from the subdivision moratorium currently in place based upon available capacity to service existing preliminary plats. Construction Plans. The applicant has previously submitted construction plans for Prairie Creek 5th Addition along with grading and drainage plans. Said plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. Development Contract. With approval of the final plat, the applicant is to enter into a development contract with the City. At the time the development contract is executed, all required securities and fees must be paid. The development contract is subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION The proposed final plat of Prairie Creek 3rd Addition is generally consistent with the approved preliminary plat and provisions of the City's Zoning and Subdivision regulations and the Comprehensive Plan. As such, our office recommends approval of the application subject to the following conditions: The applicant pay appropriate cash fees in lieu of land in satisfaction of park and trail dedication requirements equivalent to $1,075 per lot equal to $37,625. 2. All construction plans, grading and drainage plans, easements and utilities are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and post all required securities and pay all applicable fees, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 4. Comments of other City Staff. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Ron Wagner Dennis Ulmer -2- �u N/. C ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD � _■ ` S �� ,vi � : a �. 3 fit? Io 9. JJ MINH imp Am a/ lool Is 2 "N 31 ix e r ! D: ( r i n . � .e , +.� y a" d _ i_ / Ids.-�.� -• . �. a �'� —i. _�' •iw �Ij. �- i_ __ i��."'.� �31 . a,.• r r a i - jam•, i3y,i it .a a A- jl —17 �" � . w ,. s :.� a i! . r• Qi �.` I F 3;jtri,a a !� islA as-,. .,•q - .��i\\a �� 1 t ae / /*. �� ,3•�f s8...a�.�t�"f >: �'. a ,��, •r, r rs�, i 7+;3i tY . J�•'•�!' � f!!l!!!:�t _ice. . •iA � ; �•, ; � e :O :�- _ � �::�ka�lfl�: � �� .• �T+r�'+i�1' .� rris�•.:: w y.4t� `N%fi = i.r„ v 4. - .e • "c ✓ EXHIBIT B ._•.41. i��J'YiJ9Y•.. !ri. ':�'' n�� .39q !'f�" .. 'IP[•y.-:t._ G.I- .. v.�..... -.� (U...(U...a.+r.. 1 I I la 1 'k 1 I I 1 � I � , J I / I '1 I 1 ' , , V I 50 1 t5 / I . ' I - ' - ' I 1 I 41 I � I i 31 r --- I I 1 I , I e~M S I �`aal•�Li +asma"�r. ss rtrnroc I�: -.a iikfF ' ' a I 1..1)hi.l l�� I I � I fit• L--_. I � d 50 �I .lean 50 r . 1 I Y ►W ar � r.+a 4 r. �.... m x x 0 PR.41R1� CRAG bTHW=ITION 16 24PARGUE'Tr E`UE `H� ' I I : Vr' � 15 i t; fa IC I � t7 , m I I 1401 NORTH OA�-� VM 1 •, A. t6 4j. I 5 I 1 4 I I t I I 3 �aw MW wri. ■ •+ b.p + fY . I � I I I I r�o t5 / ._ .L _ AVENK `p - I 1 _ - — — 4' I 1 o.a.•au..o . . e 41 I J, f a AF y� • a ¢ e~M S I �`aal•�Li +asma"�r. ss rtrnroc W r 13 SCI x I _ q (0 Lra�_IvarrU �' � o Y � I ' -� K � 4 I 5 �/ ° I I • r i I __ _ 'm _ 3 I 4 I LLl 1 9 14 1, _ I — I 1- — I l / = I GRAPHIC SCALE P,46Uaa -IIfPLYL , J 4 ' p Cjjt L / Ylu f0 `, ! \4 b • >" r �4 ��/ 11 _ av�r•w-r i to I oavua . "U" 1• rx s.ar. wa �� ✓� 9 ci �01> °' I eao-a -aoo fi �a lI �- 3 1 ,.. F" 00o I c, �/U� ► j� w R _ P\ Y Y �/ . Yj..•.r ,1 U1 a s �"g lPAQK r ` 6� % ., r"�^ ap ' ` X% u 40 1 h i 5y �'M'w•+ OUTLOT Ai — I r" I I I' H E A 5 A !I T H I U0 E I I i Aa JL I L� xvevm Mrw f N f r+� CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA Applicant's Name: Ulmer Construction, Inc. 5-1-00 Final Plat Findings of Fact & Decision Request: Request for final plat approval of Prairie Creek 5th Addition, consisting of 35 single family residential lots. City Council Meeting Date: 14 May 2001 Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: 1. The legal description of the property is as Outlot A of Prairie Creek 3`d Addition. 2. The property lies within the Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for low density residential land use by the 1998 Comprehensive Plan Update. 3. The property is zoned R-4, Residential - Urban Single Family District Service District; single family uses are a permitted use within said District. 4. The R-4 District requires a minimum lot size of 12,000 sq. ft. and minimum lot width of 75 feet, measured at the front setback line. All of the lots within the final plat conform with these minimum requirements. 5. The Prairie Creek Preliminary Plat was approved by the Otsego City Council on 14 June 1999. 6. The proposed final plat consists of 35 single family residential lots. 7. The planning report dated 1 May 2001 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 8. The final plat application is processed in accordance with the provisions of Section 21-3-3 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the requested Prairie Creek Vh Addition Final Plat is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant pay appropriate cash fees in lieu of land in satisfaction of park and trail dedication requirements equivalent to $1,075 per lot equal to $37,625. EXHIBIT D 2. All construction plans, grading and drainage plans, easements and utilities are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 3. The applicant shall enter into a development contract with the City and post all required securities and pay all applicable fees, subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. 4. Comments of other City Staff. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 14h day of May, 2001. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO 0 Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 lP . '� 0411kT TWIST A$$OCIATRD CONSULTANTS, INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 10 May 2001 RE: Otsego - Hidden Creek Trails; Park Dedication FILE NO.: 176.02 - 01.12 The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed park dedication of land and trails for the Hidden Creek Trails project at their meeting on May 9, 2001 Trails. The developer stated that they now wish to keep the trails private in order to maintain the 10 foot design width and ensure permanent access to the trails by residents of the subdivision for horseback riding. The Parks and Recreation Commission agreed to keep the trails private on a 4-0 vote based upon compatibility issues, the trails not providing a destination and the trails not being a necessary element for Prairie Park. Outlot A. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 4-0 to accept the 7.08 acre outlot as partial satisfaction of park dedication requirements. The Commissioners believed that adding this area to Prairie Park would add a potential destination to the area around Otsego Creek and offset the detachment of wetlands from the balance of the park caused by the extension of 90th Street. 90"' Street. The Parks and Recreation Commission also discussed the effects of the proposed extension of 90'hStreet to Prairie Park. The conclusion was that the street would allow greater access to the active portions of the park developed on the eastern two-thirds of the parcel. However, the street extension could also be viewed as detrimental to the western portions that are maintained as restored prairie. The Commissioners noted that the desired access could be provided from a private driveway and that a street was not necessarily critical for development of the park. Overall, they believed that obtaining access via this street would be positive and voted 4-0 to support the project. Again, the extension of 900' Street is required so that the project conform with the Comprehensive Plan for allowing four units per forty acre density on the back parcels currently without street frontage. The developer had suggested as part of the Parks and Recreation Commission discussion that an alternative loop street could be provided on their property. We would view such a street as problematic given the location of the designated lake on the property and access spacing requirements to CSAH 39. Such a street would also absorb more land within the project for rights-of-way and there would likely not be significant cost savings as the length of the parcel north to south is greater than the distance from the property to Nashua Avenue. Construction of 90th Street is a better alternative for the project, with the added benefit to the City's park facilities. This application will be considered by the City Council again at their meeting on May 14, 2001 at 6:30 PM pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Ron Wagner Russ Martie Joyce Mickelson 2 (0- L1 111,4101IRTHWItST ASSOCIATIto 71141c♦ 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 8 May 2001 RE: Otsego - Comprehensive Plan; Townhouse uses FILE NO.: 176.08 At their meeting on May 7, 2001, the Planning Commission discussed the issue of continued townhouse development within Otsego. A story in the Star News about Elk River establishing a moratorium on additional townhouse development raised the question among the members as to whether Otsego has had enough of this type of land use in terms of providing a balanced housing supply. This issue had been raised initially during their discussion of Pheasant Ridge 5th Addition. At that time, staff provided information that the total number of townhouse units preliminary plated represented 50 percent of the total units preliminary platted within the sanitary sewer district and 25 percent of the total housing stock at full build out. The Planning Commission discussed factors that have influenced the level of townhouse development in the community to date including changing population, location and access to utilities and the variety of townhouse styles. The main concern of the Planning Commission was for the long term marketability of these units for the numbers being developed within the area and maintenance given their transient nature. Staff noted that all of the available sanitary sewer capacity for residential uses has been allocated for both the first and second phase of the waste water treatment plant and that no new preliminary plats are likely to be accepted. Staff also noted that townhouse units often provide the most property tax "bang for the buck" because their higher densities offset slightly lower unit costs and private streets reduce City expenses. Long term maintenance issues can be addressed by adoption and implementation of housing maintenance codes to address blight problems if they occur. Following their discussion, the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend to the City Council and staff that there is an adequate supply of townhouse units within the City and that additional townhouse development should be discouraged within the immediate future in consideration of the Comprehensive Plan policy to maintain a balance in the availability of quality housing choices throughout the City, existing townhouse units preliminary platted and available sanitary sewer service capacities. This motion was adopted by a 6-0 vote. The City Council should vote either to accept or decline the Planning Commission's recommendation. If the Council supports the recommendation, City Staff can use this information in responding to development questions and inquiries in advance of formal applications. Should a townhouse project proceed to an application, the interim land use plan maintaining A-1 District zoning and Comprehensive Plan policies would provide adequate support to deny the necessary rezoning application. The advantage is that City Staff can provide the City's present policy position upfront to a developer, saving them time and expenses in preparing an application. It should also be noted that such a policy statement is not necessarily binding. The City could evaluate and approve specific development proposals that in some measure provided additional balance to the housing stock. Specific examples would be senior housing projects or higher density uses such as apartment buildings. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Ron Wagner N RESOLUTION NO.: 00 - CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY ON ADDITIONAL TOWNHOUSE UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY TO MAINTAIN A BALANCE IN THE SUPPLY OF HOUSING CHOICES. WHEREAS, the City adopted a Comprehensive Plan in 1998 guiding areas for development of medium-high density residential uses; and, WHEREAS, since adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, the City has preliminary or final platted 664 townhouse units within the sanitary sewer service district ; and WHEREAS, City staff estimates that the number of townhouse units preliminary or final platted within the sanitary sewer service district represents fifty (50) percent of the total units preliminary or final platted within the sanitary sewer service district and twenty five (25) percent of the total housing units within the City; and, WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan includes the following policy: A balance in the supply of quality housing choices throughout the City shall be maintained. (Policy Plan, p. 46) WHEREAS, the Otsego Planning Commission discussed the issue of housing choice within the City at their meeting on May 7, 2001, expressing concern regarding the number of townhouse units within the City relative to other housing choices and issues of long term marketability and maintenance. WHEREAS, based upon the number of townhouse units presently preliminary or final platted relative to other housing choices, available sanitary sewer capacity and available locations, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend establishing a policy of discouraging additional townhouse preliminary plats for the immediate future except in unique circumstances to provide a balanced housing supply consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO THAT; additional townhouse unit preliminary plats are to be discouraged for the immediate future, except in unique circumstances, based upon the number of units presently preliminary platted, available sanitary sewer service capacity and the Comprehensive Plan policies encouraging a balance of housing choices. It ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 14th Day of May 2001. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 HQ1kTHWRST ASSOCIATt4 CONSULTANTS, INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 10 May 2001 RE: Otsego - Parks and Recreation Commission Items FILE NO.: 176.08 The Parks and Recreation Commission discussed the following items at their meeting on May 9, 2001: • Mighty Kicks Grant. Mike Roden of the area soccer association' attended the meeting to discuss a grant application for funds to install irrigation systems for the soccer fields at Prairie Park. Mr. Roden submitted a similar grant application for facilities at the VFW fields last year, but did not receive funding. Mr. Roden hopes to improve the chances of receiving funds by including City facilities. If awarded a grant, the City must provide matching funds for the cost of improvements. A summary of grant funds awarded in the last cycle is attached for reference. The Parks Commission discussed installing an irrigation system for the soccer fields and baseball diamonds, as well as adding an "under -10" soccer field that would improve the application's qualifications. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council authorize the City Engineer to prepare an estimated cost for a irrigation system for Prairie Park and that City staff prepare the formal application. Applications are required to be submitted by June 15, 2001, although Mr. Roden would like to provide a copy earlier in order to get feedback from an individual involved in the review process and allow time for changes. School Knoll perk. The Parks and Recreation Commission voted 4-0 to recommend that the City Council authorize the seeking of bids for development of School Knoll Park based upon the present concept plan and City Engineer's cost estimates. Prior to seeking bids, City staff is to investigate the cost of adding bathroom facilities, a drinking fountain and kitchenette facilities on one end of the large shelter. Staff is also to review on-site parking to determine if it will be adequate in consideration of the expanded shelter and report back possible design changes. pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Lang Koshak Ron Wagner 0 Recipient Project Description Grant Awacd 1'd congressional District (10 total grants) City of Fadbault Soccer, scftbal fields $19,000 City of Rochester Soccer, football, baseball fields $100,000 City of Stewartville Soccer feels renovation $11,500 City of Blue Erth Baseball, Softball field upgrade $22,500 City of Northfield Soccer fields $28,000 City of Owatonna Soccer Fields $50,000 City of Goodview Soccer Fields $32,000 City of Elgin Soccer field, footbal equipment $9,522 City of Austin Soccer fields, track stadium $25,000 City of North Mankato Soccer fields $75,000 2"d Congressional District (10 total grants) City of Marshall #1 Soccer fields $100,000 City of Marshall #3 Irrigated soccer fields $69,000 City of Carver Soccer field $10,000 City of St. Michael Soccer fields $10,000 City of Worthington Soccer fields $100,000 City of Monticello Soccer fields $20,000 City of Madelia Land acquisition, soccer field $23,300 City of New Ulm Soccer field $25,000 City of Buffalo Field lighting, storage $4,000 Chaska Sch Dist #112 Soccer fields $40,000 3`d Congressional District (7 total grants) Westonka Sch Dist #277 Soccer fields $20,000 Hennepin County Parks Golf practice facility $100,000 City of Bloomington Soccer fields, baseball fields $100,000 City of Rockford Soccer fields, playground $61,500 City of Dayton Soccer fields $14,350 City of Robbinsdale Soccer fields $25,000 4d' Congressional District (5 total grants) City of Roseville Soccer field const. & renov. $10,000 City of St. Paul Soccer fields $99,000 White Bear Township Soccer fields $75,000 City of South St. Paul Soccer fields $8,300 So. St. Paul Sch Dist CODP $100,000 5'h Congressional District (2 total grants) City of St. Louis Park Soccer fields $100,000 Mpls Parks & Rec Soccer field $81,000 fth Congressional District (11 total grants) Preliminary Engineer's Estimate School Knoll Park .A. Item Estimated Estimated No. Descri tion Unit Unit Cost Estimated Estimated Description Unit Unit Costtity QuantityCost Cost 1 tion LS 84.000.00 EEsated S4,CCO 2 &Stnp psoil CY 52.500 110 $3.375 3 e Preoeration SY $2.000 2 $2,700 4 White Stri in (E o SY $2.00 7110 $14,220 6 blishmentAC LS $2.000.00 1.5 53.000 Svstem LS $5,000.Co 1 $5,000 Trees EA 1 $250.00 50 $12,500 8 Benches EA $200.00 10 $2,000 9 Bike Racks EA $450.00 3 $1,350 Schedule "A' Totals $48;145 Schedule 'B' -Bike Path Item No. ted Estimated Descri tion Unit Unit Costtity Cost 1 Class 5 A r to Base4 TN $9.50 E324 $3,078 2 Bituminous Bike Path 2") TN $45.00 $5.850 Schedule 'B' Totals $8,928 Schedule *r'- Racircffi.11 r`�,�.a� Item Estimated Estimated No. Descri tion Unit Unit Cost Estimated Estimated Description Unit Unit Cost QuantityCost $3,990 1 Class 5 A r to Base TN $9.50 240 $2.280 2 Bituminous (2' Thick TN $45.00 110 $4,950 3 Hoo sw/Poles EA $1,200.00 2 $2,400 4 White Stri in (E o LF $0.50 800 $400 ocneuuia t, i orais $10,030 Schedule "D' -Tennis Courts t. , Schedule 'F' - Plavn--A QL41111 J29.59U Item Estimated Estimated No. Descri tion Unit Unit Cost Quantity Cost ass 5 A r to Base TN $9.50 420 $3,990 04$Nets uminous (2' Thick) TN $45.00 200 $9.000 2 rfacin (4 Coat Color S stem w/ Lines LS $4,800.00 1 54,800 3 Ra Structures EA $400.00 2 $800 les EA $250.00 4 $1,000 6 Galvanized Chain Link Fence - 10' Hi (2 Gates) LS $10,000.00 1 $10,000 Schedule 'F' - Plavn--A QL41111 J29.59U Item No. Estimated Estimated Description Unit Unit Cost QuantityCost 1 Clean Sand CY $10.00 165 $1,650 2 Lands a Timbers (2' x 10 'Green Treated) LF $3.00 280 $840 3 Ra Structures LS $30,000.00 1 $30,000 Schedules F• _ .�hoiro� .,,—Ulu Z iu4ui $32,490 Item No. Estimated Estimated Description Unit Unit Cost QuantityCost 1 Class 5 A r TN $9.50 62 5589 2 7Base Concrete Slab SF $3.50 2475 $8,663 3 Construct Shelte30') $16.000.00 1 $16,0004 Construct Shelte15') LS $8,000.00 1 58,000 5 Picnic Tables EA I $300.00 20 1 $6,000 .��neuwa r i oiais $39252 TOTAL FINAL AMOUNT: 1$168,435/ j dHa01/Shared Docs/municipal/Aotsego 2219/schoolknoliparkEngEst 4/26/2001 tF. MEMO Date: May 8, 2001 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: City Attorney's Meeting with City Commissions At the last Council meeting the Council had directed the City Attorney to recommend a few dates at which he could hold a meeting with all City Commissioners to go over the legal requirements of their position, what they can and can't say, and answer any questions they might have. Since the Commission with the most authority is the Planning Commission, we looked at holding this meeting as part of a Planning Commission meeting. The dates Andy has free in the next few months would be Monday, June 18, 2001, Monday, July 16, 2001, and Monday, August 20, 2001. We could hold the meeting either at the start of the Planning Commission meeting or a little earlier. Michael G Couri- Andrew J. MacArthur Robert T. Ruppe- 'A Lm licensed in /thnou "ALso licaued in Califomia April 9, 2001 City Council Members City of Otsego c/o Mike Robertson 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, MN 55376 COURT & MACARTHUR Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-2599 (FAX) couriandmacanhur®pobox. com RE: Day Property Proposed Developer's Agreement Dear Council Members: Enclosed for your review please find a draft copy of the proposed Developer's Agreement for the Day property. As you may recall, at the time of approval of this Preliminary Plat staff was directed to bring the developer's Agreement to the Council prior to final plat approval because of the unique nature of the approved deferred performance standards. The draft has been transmitted to the developer. Myself and Mike Robertson met with the Days and went over the Agreement and they had no substantial objections to the Agreement as written. I will be available at the regular City Council meeting next Monday to answer any questions you might have regarding the proposed Agreement. Very 7 ours, rew J. cArthur COURI & MACARTHUR Encl. cc: Mike Day Ron Wagner Dan Licht DRAFT- February 8, 2001 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OTSEGO BUSINESS PARK AGREEMENT entered into this day of , 2000 between the City of Otsego ("City"), a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and TMH Development ("Developer"). 1. Request for Plat Approval. The Developers have requested that the City approve a plat entitled OTSEGO BUSINESS PARK referred to in this Agreement as "the Plat") and legally described as follows: (See attached Exhibit A) With regard to such parcel of land, Developer has requested approval of the plat of OTSEGO BUSINESS PARK which is zoned B -W, consisting of 5 lots and 1 Outlot. 2. Conditions of Plat Approval. The City hereby approves the plat on condition that the Developers enter into this Agreement, furnish the security required by it, and record the plat with the Wright County Recorder or Registrar of titles within one hundred (100) days after the City Council approves the final plat. Any restrictive covenants for the subject subdivision shall be submitted to the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded prior to sale of any lots within the plat. 3. Right to Proceed. Within the plat or land to be platted, the Developers may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the Zoning Administrator, and all conditions contained in the Agreement have been met, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the plat has been recorded with the Wright County Recorder's Office, 4) Developers have initiated and attended a pre - construction meeting with the City Engineer, and 5) the Zoning Administrator has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developers may proceed; or until such time as approval to commence earlier construction is specifically approved by the City, and Developers have fully complied with all conditions set forth by City staff. 4. Changes in Official Controls. For two (2) years from the date of this Agreement, no amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, or official controls shall apply to or affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout or dedications of the approved plat unless required by state or federal law or agreed to in writing by the City and the Developers. Thereafter, notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the full extent permitted by State law, the City may require compliance with any amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, official controls, platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement. 5. Development Plans. The plat shall be developed in accordance with the plans attached to this Agreement and the conditions stated below. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Agreement, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A Final Plat, OTSEGO BUSINESS PARK dated 2001, prepared by Ulteig Engineers, Inc. Plan B Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control Plan, dated , 2001, prepared by Ulteig Engineers, Inc. At the end of the deferment period granted herein Developer shall supply all needed plans for road and infra -structure completion for review and approval by the City Engineer. Developer shall comply fully with all such required and approved plans, and shall enter into additional agreements, if necessary to insure completion of all required facilities both on and off the Plat. 6. Improvements. The Developers shall ultimately install and pay for the following: A. Streets (including portions not within the Plat) B. Street lights C. Site grading and ponding D. Underground utilities 2 E. Setting of lot and block monuments F. Construction surveying and staking G. Traffic control signs Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards, ordinances, and the plans finnished to the City and approved by the City Engineer. The Developers shall obtain all necessary pen -nits before proceeding with construction. The City shall provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure acceptable quality control, which will allow certification of the construction work. The City may, when reasonably required to do so and at the Developer's expense, have one (1) or more City inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work. Within thirty (30) days after the completion of the improvements and before any security is released, the Developers shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as built" plans and two (2) complete sets of blue line "as built" plans prepared in accordance with City standards. Before the security for the completion of utilities is released, iron monuments shall be installed in accordance with Minnesota Statutes 505.02. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City certifying that the monuments are installed. 7. Time of Performance and Deferment. The Developers shall install the following improvements by January 1, 2004; removal of existing building from Lot 3, Block 1, construction of a commercial building meeting all then existing requirements of the City and subject to City approval, construction of all improvements necessary to meet performances standards related to the B -W district including, but not limited to, construction of parking facilities adequate for the use proposed including any required paving and curb and gutter, connection to City sewer and water and proper abandonment of existing septic system and well, construction of driveway meeting all City standards from the newly constructed building to the required constructed extension of &' Street and abandonment of existing gravel driveway. Developer must also at that time, or prior to that time if early development occurs, construct the entire extension of 85th as set forth in the Plat. Until January 1, 2004 or further development of the Plat, whichever occurs first, Developer may use the existing house and driveway in their present condition and with no substantial improvement for purposes of conducting its business. Outside of the immediate performance standards specifically identified and deferred in this Agreement, Developer must fully comply with all applicable City Ordinances, State statutes and rules, and all applicable federal laws and regulations. 8. Construction of Extension of 85"' Street and Related Improvements by City, and Assessment and Reimbursement for Related Costs. At the end of the Deferment 3 period set forth above, or at such time as earlier development of the plat occurs, Developer shall timely petition the City for construction of the extension of 85`h Street and related improvements (including storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water lines, street lighting etc.) as shown on the Plat, including that portion lying off of the Plat to the north. Prior to the petition, Developer shall obtain from the owner of the property to the North all necessary easements, including all permanent right of wy and temporary construction easements needed for City construction of the extension of 85 Street and related improvements. If, prior to January 1, 2004, or within a reasonable time prior to application for early development, Developer is unable to obtain easements for the extension of 85`x' from the property owner to the North he shall inform the City and request that the City proceed to attempt to negotiate an easement or commence eminent domain proceedings in order to obtain the necessary parcels. In the event that it becomes necessary for the City to become involved in land acquisition, Developer shall pay any and all costs, including, but not limited to engineering fees, appraisal fees, attorneys fees and all actual costs paid for the acquisition of the property necessary to extend 85th Street. All land acquisition costs will be added as a portion of the project cost for the extension of 85`x' Street and related improvements. Developer agrees to waive any and all claim for irregularities in assessment procedures and further waives any and all appeal rights of any kind or any nature, including any and all Constitutional claims relevant to assessment of the property herein described for costs related to the required extension of 85th Street and related improvements. Further, Developer agrees to execute and present to the City prior to City approval of a City project, if deemed necessary by the City, a similar waiver in the specific amount of assessment against the subject property as determined by the City. The Security provided for in this Agreement may be drawn down at any time at the sole discretion of the City, to pay any assessment against the subject property, and any costs related to construction of the extension of 85`h Street and related improvements off of the Plat, but subject to reimbursement as set forth in the following paragraph City shall cause that portion of the costs related to the constructed extension of 85th Street and related improvements to be assessed against any other property benefited by the improvements and subject to City ordinances and State law. City shall reimburse Developer for any costs expended by Developer related to construction of the extension of 85th Street not assessed against the subject property, up to the amount actually received by the City. Said reimbursement will be made within a reasonable time period after actual receipt of said funds by the City from the assessed property owners. 4 9. Right of Entry. The Developers hereby grant to the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a right of entry to enter the plat to perform any and all work and inspections necessary or deemed appropriate by the City during the installation of improvements by Developers or the City, or to make any necessary corrective actions necessary by the City. Except in emergency situations, as defined by the City, the City shall give the developers five (5) business days notice stating the deficiencies and necessary corrections prior to making any corrective action. Said right of entry shall continue until the City finally accepts the improvements. 10. Erosion Control. After the site is rough graded, but before any utility construction is commenced or further building permits are issued, the erosion control plan, Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developers and inspected and approved by the City. If the City Engineer determines that it would be unreasonable to require full implementation of the erosion control plan prior to utility construction or issuance of certain building permits, he shall state in writing what construction can take place and what particular building permits can be issued prior to full implementation. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or any supplementary instructions, the City may, with reasonable notice, take action as it deems appropriate. 11. Grading Plan. Plat grading shall be in accordance with the grading plan. Ponds, swales, and ditches shall be constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. Within thirty (30) days after completion of grading and before any security release, the Developers shall provide the City with an "as built" grading plan including certification by a registered land surveyor or engineer that all ponds, swales, and ditches have been constructed on public easements, or land owned by the City. "As built" plans shall include field- verified elevations of the following: A. Cross sections of ponds B. Location and elevations of swales and ditches C. Lot corners and house pads Occupancy pernlits shall not be issued until the grading and drainage plan is certified as set forth above. 12. Clean Up. The Developers shall promptly clean any and all dut and debris from streets resulting from construction work by the Developers, their agents or assigns. 5 13. Ownership of Improvements. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Agreement, improvements lying within public easements shall become City property without further notice or action. 14. Streets. The Developers agree to maintain the streets in the plat until the bituminous surfacing has been accepted by the City. Should the City be required to grade the street prior to paving, the cost of such grading shall be paid by the Developers and drawn from the Developer's letter of credit. Should snow plowing be necessary prior to street paving, the Developers shall be responsible for such plowing. If, upon the Developer's request, the City agrees to plow the street prior to acceptance, such work will be done upon agreement that the Developers will hold harmless and indemnify the City from any and all liability claims related to such work and pay all costs associated with that work. Any plowing undertaken by the City will constitute no acceptance or evidence of acceptance of the street(s) in question. Upon final completion of streets and acceptance by the City, the Developers shall guarantee to the City for a period of one year that the streets have been constructed to City standards. The warranty period shall not commence until such time as street construction is completed and the streets are accepted by the City. 15. Sewage Treatment and Water Service. No occupancy permit for any newly constructed building in the plat will be issued by the City unless the City Building Official has inspected and approved the sewer and water hookups to the building. 16. City Engineering Administration and Construction Observation, And Legal And Administrative Fees Escrow. The Developers shall pay a fee for consulting engineering administration. City engineering administration will include monitoring of construction, observation, consultation with Developers and their engineer on status or problems regarding the project, monitoring during the warranty period and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be three percent (3%) of the estimated construction cost of the improvements to be inspected, assuming normal construction and project scheduling. The Developers shall pay for construction observation performed by the City's consulting engineer. Construction observation shall include part or full time inspection of proposed street construction and will be billed on hourly rates estimated to be five percent (5%) of the estimated construction cost of the improvements to be inspected. In the event of prolonged construction or unusual problems, the City will notify the Developers of anticipated cost overruns for administration and observation services. The escrow account shall include estimated fees for Administrative and Legal expenses and Signs and shall be established at the time that improvements are commenced. No further use of the 0 lots within the plat may commence or continue until escrow in an amount approved by the City is posted with the City. The escrow amount shall be submitted to the City at the time that further development within the plat is undertaken or at the date that the deferment granted herein terminates, whichever is sooner. All administrative and legal fees related to plan review, drafting of the Developer's agreement and any other necessary items shall be paid to the City prior to execution of the plat and Developer's Agreement. Any amounts not utilized from this escrow fund shall be returned to the Developers, with interest, when all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, and the required "as built" plans have been received by the City. An estimate of the proposed escrow is set forth. The estimate is based upon current engineering and fee projections and is a minimum estimate. The City reserves the right to increase the proposed escrow amount at the end of the deferment period if prices for materials or other items rises above the amount projected, or if City established fees are raised or lowered. ESCROW (CASH)- Deferred until January 1, 2004 Legal service (1% of $268,880.00) City Administration (1% of $268,880.00) City Construction Administration and Utility and Street Inspection ( 8% of 217,530.00) Trunk Water and Sewer Access Fees 1. Trunk Sewer (SAC) 2. Trunk Water (WAC) $2,668.00 $2,668.00 $17,402.40 To be determined at time of development. To be determined at time of development. Trunk Storm Water Management Impact Fees To be determined at time of development. Park and Trail Dedication Fee (5 Lots x $1075/ Lot) $5,375.00 (or alternative fee as determined by Council) Street and Traffic Control Signs (4 Signs x $150.00/ Sign $600.00 TOTAL ESCROW- CASH M 17. Immediate Escrow During Deferment Period. In order to provide the City with Security to insure immediate and complete development of the site after the deferment period and to insure that the interim use is promptly, completely, and fully abandoned at the end of the period Developer shall provide the City with an Interim Escrow to be held through the deferment period in the amount of $ . Said interim escrow is also to insure that existing and newly created uses within the Plat connect to municipal sewer and water immediately at the end of deferment period. In the event that Developer fails to develop the property immediately at the end of the deferment period the City may use the Interim Escrow to take any action that the City, at its sole discretion, determines will accomplish the purpose of the City approval and the goals of this Agreement. The City may require either cash escrow or posting of an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit, in a form and for a term acceptable to the City. 18. Drainage. The Developers shall fully comply with the Grading, Utility and Erosion Control Plan (Plan B). The City has established a fee for the impact of the Plat upon storm water drainage within the watershed. The fee is based upon engineering studies completed by the City. The established fee for Storm Water Management within the Plat will be determined and paid at the time of further Plat development or the end of the deferral period, whichever occurs first. Construction of the retention pond and related improvements located upon the Outlot within the Plat will be constructed by Developer in phases or at one time as determined by the City Engineer. In the event of failure by the Developer to timely construct such facilities, the Security established in this Agreement may be drawn down by the City and used to construct the facilities. In the event that sufficient Security is not available, the City may require and Developer agrees to make timely payment for the retention pond or post additional Security to insure construction of the pond and related improvements. 19. Security. To ensure compliance with the terms of this Agreement and construction of all public improvements, the Developers shall furnish the City with "security" N in the amount of $268,880.00, said amount calculated as follows: Site Grading, Erosion and Sediment Control and Wetland Protection $42,350.00 Sanitary Sewer- Lateral Sewer $62,664.00 Watermain- Lateral and Trunk $40,224.00 Storm Sewer- Lateral $33,608.00 Streets $81,014.00 Engineering and Surveying Construction Services $9,000.00 Utilities $ NA Street Lights (by Elk River Utilities) $ NA TOTAL $268,880.00 The issuer and form of the security shall be subject to City approval, and shall be substantially in the form(s) attached hereto as Exhibit B. The security shall be for a term ending December 31, 2004. The City may draw down the security for any violation of the terms of this Agreement, or upon receiving notice of the pending expiration of the security. It shall be the responsibility of the Developers to inform the City at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the security of the impending expiration and the status of the project relative to the security and this Agreement. If, for whatever reason, the security lapses prior to complete compliance with this Agreement, the Developers shall immediately provide the City with either an extension of the security or an irrevocable letter of credit of the same amount upon notification of the expiration. If the required improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw down the security. If the security is drawn down the proceeds shall be used to cure any default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City approval, the security may be reduced from time to time down to the amount of any warranty security required by the City Engineer and based upon 9 estimates of the actual costs of improvements required to be constructed. It shall not be reduced below this amount until such time as an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of the warranty as determned by the City Engineer shall be posted with the City as set forth in paragraph 19 of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the posting of warranty security, the security shall not be reduced below twenty five percent (25%) of the actual cost of all improvements to be constructed. Said twenty five percent (25%) shall be retained until all improvements have been completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied (which includes posting of warranty security), and the required "as built" plans have been received by the City. This security amount shall be submitted to the City prior to execution of the plat and Developer's Agreement. All administrative and legal fees related to plan review, drafting of the Developer's agreement and any other necessary items shall be paid to the City prior to execution of the plat and the Developer's Agreement. The security for this Agreement shall be an Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $268,880.00. 20. Interim Security. In order to insure compliance with this Agreement, conditions of approval and conditions of deferment, at the signing of this Agreement Developer shall submit to the City in the form of an Irrevocable Standby Letter of Credit in form and for a term acceptable to the City, in the amount of $ . Said Letter of Credit may be used to cure any default in the terms and conditions of this Agreement the same as the Security provided in Paragraph 18 above. This Interim Security and Interim Escrow established in Paragraph 16 of this Agreement may be combined into one Letter of Credit, at the sole discretion of the City. 21. Landscaping. The Developers shall submit to the City for approval, prior to or at the time the deferment period ends a Landscaping Plan. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City and thereafter the Developer shall be responsible for full and complete implementation of the plan. In order to insure compliance with the Plan, Developer shall submit to the City security to insure implementation of the Plan in an amount, term and form to be determined by the City at the end of the deferment period and based upon the ultimate plans for development of the site. Said security may be used to cure any deficiency in the Landscape Plan, and to insure any warranties required by the City. Developer shall enter subsequent Agreements, if necessary, to insure that such security is established. If the landscaping is not timely completed, the City may enter the lot, perform the work, and apply the security toward the cost. 10 Upon satisfactory completion of the landscaping, the security, without interest and less any draw made by the City, shall be returned to the Developer or any other person who established the security for the benefit of the City. The Developer, or owner of each lot providing any trees, grass, seed, and sod shall maintain said plantings and warrant them to remain alive, of good quality and disease free for twelve (12) months after planting. Any replacement shall be warranted for twelve (12) months from the time of planting. The Developer or owners shall post security, as set forth above, to the City to secure these warranties. 22. Warranty. The Developers warrants all work required to be performed by it against poor material and faulty workmanship for a period of one (1) year after its completion and acceptance by the City. The amount of posted warranty security for public improvements to be posted by the Developers shall be in the amount of $52,500.00 (estimate). The amount, has been determined by the City Engineer, and is based upon the costs of the raw materials and labor, which would be necessary to correct the most common deficiencies in such public improvement. Calculations for the Warranty Letter of Credit and other Escrow and Security are set forth on the attached Exhibit B. 23. Claims. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others that perform work required by this Agreement, and the sums due them have not been paid, and the laborers, materialmen or others are seeking payment from the City, the Developers hereby authorizes the City to commence an interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22, Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts, to draw upon the letters of credit in an amount up to one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the claim(s) and deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developers shall release, discharge, and dismiss the City from any further proceedings as it pertains to the letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine attorney fees pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that the Developer desires to make a cash deposit instead of drawing down the letter of credit if a claim is made as stated above, they shall immediately notify the City of this intent at the time the claim is made and shall delivery one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the claim to the City within ten (10) days of such notice in the form of cash or certified check. 24. Restrictions. The following restrictions apply to the property and all lots thereon shall be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following conditions and restrictions which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of the plat and insuring that all conditions imposed by the City in this Agreement are properly recorded against the property. Said conditions shall run with the real property and be binding on all parties having 11 a right, title or interest in the plat or any part thereof, their heirs, executors, representatives, successors and assigns: None. 25. Park and Trail Dedication. The Developers shall pay a cash contribution of $ in satisfaction of the City's park and trail dedication requirements. This charge is calculated as follows: ( Park and trail dedication to be determined and paid upon further development of the Plat or by the end of the deferment period, whichever occurs first.) 26. Street and Traffic Control Signs. Before the City signs the final plat, the Developers shall pay to the City $600.00 for installation of traffic control signs (stop signs, street signs, dead-end signs). The said amount was calculated as follows: 4 signs at $150.00 per sign. Using these funds, the City shall purchase and install the street and traffic control signs. 27. Street Light Construction. The Developers shall pay for the operation and maintenance of the street lights for a period of one (1) year or until such time as the plat is ninety percent (90%) built out, whichever occurs first. The first year of operation and maintenance shall not commence until such time as the final plat is accepted by the City and it is formally recorded. 28. Responsibility for Costs. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developers shall pay all costs incurred by them or the City in conjunction with the development of the plat, including, but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering, and inspection expenses incurred in connection with development of said plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the plat. B. The Developers shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from plat development. The Developers shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. C. The Developers shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the 12 enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering fees, attorney's fees, and costs and disbursements. D. The Developers shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat development work and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits for lots which the Developers may or may not have sold, until all bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per year. 29. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developers as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the City may then draw down the security established in Paragraph 17 to pay for any work undertaken, provided the Developers are first given notice of the work in default, not less than seven (7) days in advance. This notice provision does not apply if the work performed by the City or its contractors is of an emergency nature, as determined at the sole discretion of the city. Should such emergency work be required the City will make all reasonable efforts to notify the Developers as soon as possible. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part pursuant to any applicable statutes or ordinances. 30. Miscellaneous. A. The Developers represents to the City that the plat complies with all City, County, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to, Subdivision Ordinances, Zoning Ordinances, and environmental regulations except where specifically excluded by this agreement. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developers does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developers shall cease work until there is compliance. B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement. C. Breach of any of the terms of this Agreement by the Developers shall be grounds for denial or revocation of building permits. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the 13 validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement. E. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public improvements, the Developers shall assume all liability for the costs resulting in any delay in completion of public improvements and damage to any public improvements caused by the City, the Developers, is/her contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No one may occupy a building for which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface, unless a specific exception is approved by the City. F. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Agreement. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parries and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreement shall not be a waiver or release. G. This Agreement shall run with the land, shall be recorded against the title to the property, and shall be binding on all parries having any right, title or interests in the plat or any part thereof, their heirs, successors, and assigns. After the Developer has completed the work required of them under this Agreement, at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developers a release or partial release (s) of this Agreement. H. The Developers shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and any claims for property damage which may arise out of the Developer's work or the work of their subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall not be less than $500,000.00 for one person and $1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City shall be named as an additional named insured on said policy, and the Developers shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City prior to the City issuing further building permits. I. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other 14 agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. J. The Developers shall pay for all local costs related to drainage improvements required to complete the construction according to the plans and conditions that are a part of this Agreement. K. Should development of the plat proceed at a pace slower than anticipated, and for that reason, specific terms of this agreement become onerous or unduly burdensome to the Developers, upon his/her application, the City will enter into negotiations regarding those specific terms and shall not unreasonably withhold consent to appropriate changes in the terms of this Agreement. L. A soil report for on-site sewage disposal systems shall be provided. M. Developers shall demonstrate and maintain compliance with the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. N. Developers shall be responsible for all on site drainage as well as for any affects that their actions may have on adjoining properties. Specifically, Developer shall maintain existing drainage tiles on site, and shall be responsible for any and all drainage problems related to either the site drainage tiles or problems with on-site drainage facilities to be constructed in accordance with this agreement and plat approval. 31. Notices. Required notices to the Developers shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developers, their employees or agents, or mailed to the Developers by registered mail at the following address: Suite 310, 3200 Main Street, Coon Rapids, MN 55448 . Notice to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk at the following address: City of Otsego, City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE, Otsego, MN 55330, Attention: City Clerk or Deputy City Clerk. CITY OF OTSEGO 15 IM M Larry Fournier, Mayor Elaine Beatty, City Clerk DEVELOPER: TMH DEVELOPMENT, INC. :• Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, by Larry Fournier, Mayor and by Elaine Beatty, City Clerk, of the City Otsego, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. Notary Public 16 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT The foregoing instrument 2001, by respectively of DRAFTED BY: Couri & MacArthur Law Office 705 Central Avenue East P.O. Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376 (612) 497-1930 was acknowledged before me this day of the and 17 NOTARY PUBLIC Bonestroo 0 Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects May 1, 2001 City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego MN 55330 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G Bonestroo. PE. • Marvin L Sorvala. PE • Glenn R. Cook. PE Robert G. Schunicht. PE. • Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. Senior Consultants: Robert W Rosene. PE. • Joseph C. Anderlik. PE. Richard E. Turner, PE. Susan M. Eberlin. CPA. Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon, PE, Robert R. Pfefferle, PE, Richard W Foster, PE. -David O. Loskota. PE. • Robert C. Russek. A.LA. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. Michael T Rautmann. PE. • Ted K. Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolfs, PE. David A. Bonestroo. M.B.A. • Sidney P Williamson, PE.. L.S. • Agnes M. Ring, M.B.A. • Allan Rick Schmidt, PE. Offices: St. Paul. St, Cloud. Rochester and Willmar. MN • Milwaukee. WI Website: www.bones(roo.com Attn: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Re: Engineering Report for West Otsego Wastewater Treatment Plant Our File No. 503-01-103 Dear Mike: This report describes the proposed wastewater treatment facility in the western portion of the City of Otsego to serve figure residential and commercial development in the surrounding area. The report has been prepared to meet 1r1PCA requirements for a new treatment facility that is to be constructed without State or Federal funding. 1. Location Determination of an exact site for the proposed facility was beyond the scope of this study. The approximate location of the facility is adjacent to or near County Road 19 approximately 1/2 to'/4 mile north of the Otsego/Albertville corporate boundary. Exact site location is to be established before an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the facility is to be prepared. After a site is determined, preparation of an EAW is expected to be the next step in the planning of the proposed facility. 2. Service Area The service area for the new facility has been established only as an approximation. The approximate service area is adjacent to the Interstate 94 corridor west of Albertville and portions of Sections 35 and 36 in T32N, R27W immediately north of Albertville. 3. Capacity The proposed capacity of the facility is 300,000 gallons per day (gpd) of average flow. This capacity is expected to serve an equivalent population of 3,000, or 1,200 equivalent residential units. The exact breakdown of connections in the service area according to 2335 West Highway 36 . St. Paul, MN 55113 • 6S1-636-4600 a Fax: 651-636-1311 Gest Otsego W;PTP Report, 22 land use is to be established. See Section 5 of this report for other design capacity criteria. 4. Discharge Point The proposed discharge point for treated effluent is Otsego Creek in T32N, R27W, Section 25, approximately %z mile north of and downstream from Mud Lake. 5. Design Conditions The proposed facility is to be designed for the following conditions: 6. Effluent Limits NvIPCA provided the following preliminary effluent limits for the proposed facility: Design Conditions Parameter ::=uantity Limit Rationale Average Flow 300,000 gpd 3,000 population 100 gpcd Average Wet Weather Flow 360,000 gpd 120% of average flow Average Dry Weather Flow 240,000 gpd 80% of averse flow Peak Hourly Flow 1.05 bIGD Peaking factor of 3.5 Peak Instantaneous Flow 1.26 MGD 120% of peak instantaneous flow BOD 510lb/day 0.17 ppcd TSS 6001b/day 0.20 ppcd TKN 60 lb/day 0.02 ppcd Phosphorus 20 lb/day 8 mg/1 @ average flow 6. Effluent Limits NvIPCA provided the following preliminary effluent limits for the proposed facility: 7. Treatment Process Based on the capacity and effluent requirements of the facility, it is proposed that the facility be an activated sludge process with chemical phosphorus removal. The activated sludge process will be a conventional process without considerations for ammonia PreliminaryEffluent Limits Parameter Limit BOD 15 mgn TSS 30 mg/1 Ammonia No limit Phosphorus Probable 1 m Chorine Residual No limit 7. Treatment Process Based on the capacity and effluent requirements of the facility, it is proposed that the facility be an activated sludge process with chemical phosphorus removal. The activated sludge process will be a conventional process without considerations for ammonia 'Vest Otsego WWTP Report 23 removal. Sludge will be treated by thickening and aerobic digestion, and then stored on- site for 12 months prior to land application. 12 -month storage is proposed in lieu of less storage to (1) eliminate the need for spring land application and (2) guarantee vector attraction and Class B pathogen requirements are met. Effluent disinfection will by UV -disinfection. 8. Facility Description The treatment facility is described in the following table: Proposed Facility Description Unit No. Size Comment Influent Flume 1 6 -inch Sized for ultimate peak of 2.52 MGD Mechanical Screen 1 %4 o enin s w/ manually cleaned screen as bypass Grit Tank 1 2.52 MGD Vortex w/ grit washer RAS Mix Box 1 6' dia. ME Aeration Tank S litter Box 1 2'6" weirs Aeration Tanks 2 64,000 gal. ea. 30 ppd BOD per 1,000 cu.ft. Chemical Mixing Point 1 6' dia MH Alum feed point, w/mixer Final Clarifier Splitter Box 1 2'6" weirs Final Clarifiers 2 28' dia. ea. 900 d/s .ft. @ PHWW UV Disinfection 1 2.52 MGD w/ bypass channel RAS Pumps 3 100 gpm each 100% of avg. flow WAS Pumps 2 50 gpm Unthickened sludge storage 1 29,000 gallons 4 -days storage of 1% sludge Thickener Feed Pumps 1 75 gpm 150% of thickener capacity Thickener 1 %2 meter 5 hrs/da , 5 days/week operation Thickened sludge storage 1 7,300 gallons 4 -days storage of 4% sludge Thickened sludge pumps 2 75 gpm 2" pump is stand-by for both thickener feed and thickened sludge pumps Aerobic digester 1 36,500 gallons 20 days detention of 4% sludge Sludge storage 1 700,000 gallons 12 -month storage + freeboard Generator 1 100 kw 100% of plant load Chemical system 6,000 gal. tank I Alum or ferric chloride West Otsego WWTp Report 9. Other Features The facility will include: • Control building and office • Pump basement for RAS and WAS pumps • On-site well for potable and non -potable water supply • Building for blowers and chemical system • Building with lower level for thickener and thickener equipment • Perimeter fence • Stormwater pond on-site IO.Estimated Costs The estimated capital cost of the facility is $4,370,000. The estimated annual operation and maintenance cost when treating 300,000 gpd is $190,000. The facility labor requirements are 1 %i full-time people. Laboratory testing for permit requirements is to be done by an outside lab. 11. Area The required area for the proposed facility—including space for a future expansion to 600,000 gpd—is 7 %Z acres. 12. Facility Classification The proposed treatment facility will be a Class B facility. Respectfully submitted, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. duP 1'z� 4" Ted K. Field Associate Principal VI 4 Date: May 9, 2001 To: Mayor & Council From: City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Next week's schedule Judy will be on vacation Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Monday (May 14) - City Council meeting at 6:30 p.m. Tuesday - Meeting with Sewer Subcommittee and Charlie Pfeffer at 4:00 p.m. Wednesday - Nothing scheduled. Thursday - There will be a joint EDA-EDAAC meeting at 6:30 p.m. cc: City staff mikcsch&wps