10-23-95 CCOCT 18 '95 14:28 HAKANSON ANDERSON
Hakanson
Anderson
11—H1As5oc-jnc.
Octobcr 18, 1995
Elaine Beatty, Clerk
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Lef-Co Feed Lot C.U.P.
Dear Elaine:
222 Monroe Street
Anoka, Minnmota 55303
612/4D -58W
Fax 6121427-3401
As of the date of this letter we have nor received drawings and data required in our
letter of 8/31195 and NAC report dated 8/28/95 for the above mentioned C.U.P.
The required site plan along with a grading & drainage plan has not been available to
US Lo review and comment upon. We therefore, are unable to provide a
recommendation on the engineering issues at this time.
It is my opinion without compliance to City Ordinance on the above issues, we would
recommend against approval on 10/23/95 Council Meeting.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Yours truly,
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES INC.
renc G. oshak, P.E.
kas
CC. Andy MacArthur
Bob Kirmis
Jim Lefebvre
Thomas E. Casey
File: 0t21 a6.cb
Engineers
LA-'%cerw. Archltrds
Surwym%
P. 1
William S. Radzwill
tndrew J. MacArthur
.Michael C. Court
October 19, 1995
RADZWILL & CO URI
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Boz 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
City Council Members
City of Otsego
c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: Lef-Co Farms, Inc., Application For Conditional Use Permit
Dear Council Members:
I would like to briefly set forth for the Council some of the legal
issues involved in the application mentioned above, which is up for
Council approval on Monday, October 23.
Pursuant to the City Zoning Ordinance (20-4-2,N), approval of the
Conditional Use permit requires a 4/5 vote of the Council.
The applicant has already received a permit from the MPCA for
construction of the facility. Present case law indicates that the
MPCA preempts the City in regards to pollution issues. Board of
Supervisors of Crooks Township Renville County v. Valadco, 504
NW2d 267 (Minn. App. 1993).
MPGA rules specifically indicate that land use decisions are left
up to local governments. Minn. Rules 7020.0100.
My interpretation of the above is that the City can determine
whether or not the use is acceptable and that the criteria for a
Conditional Use Permit have been met based upon the usual criteria
used in evaluating a Conditional Use Permit, but cannot second
guess MPGA regarding issues related specifically to pollution. As
long as any factor to be considered by the City relates in whole or
part to non -pollution related issue the City can fully evaluate
that factor.
By adoption of the Comprehensive Plan and classification of the
property as agricultural the City has already indicated that the
Letter to Otsego City Council
October 18, 1995
Page 2
proposed use is acceptable as long as it meets all restrictions
imposed by ordinance and proves to have acceptable compatibility
with surrounding uses, and does not tend to depreciate the value of
surrounding properties.
Compatibility with surrounding uses and possible diminution of
property values are two issues which are, in my opinion, key to
this application. Some evidence was presented at the Planning
Commission relative to these issues. It is up to the Council to
weigh and evaluate what has been presented by both sides and
determine whether or not the respective parties have provided
enough substantial evidence to prove the positions that they are
advocating.
The City can enforce all applicable setbacks contained within the
City Ordinances, specifically that required 1000 foot setback from
bodies of water. In my opinion, this setback should be strictly
construed since it is contained in that portion of the Ordinance
which specifically regulates Commercial Feedlots. Although the word
"Public waters" is not contained within that section of the
Ordinance it is my opinion that the City must insert this word to
allow for a common sense interpretation of the ordinance.
The City can also place all appropriate conditions on the project
if there is approval, including conditions related to drainage
concerns, and proper conditions to assure operation of the facility
in a manner conducive to public health, safety and welfare.
The City Planner and myself are providing alternative findings in
this matter relative to both approval and denial. The Council can
either adopt these findings entirely, adopt them with additions or
deletions, or reject them entirely and order that new Findings be
drafted by Staff. We have been presenting alternative findings for
consideration as a matter of course in particularly controversial
matters.
I will be available to answer any questions you might have at the
City Council meeting on Monday, October 23.
Verytruly yours,
Andrew J % MacArthur
RADZAILL & COURI
cc: Bob Kirmis, NAC
Larry Koshak, Hakanson Anderson
Dave Lenhardt, Attorney
Tom Casey, Attorney
OCT -19-1995 11:13 FROM
October 19, 1995
TO 4418823 P.02
JON B. TESSIER & ASSOCIATES, APPRAISERS INC.
APPRAISERS & VALUATION CONSULTANTS
4109 West Broadway
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422
Phone 612 533 5513
Yaz 612 533 %FY15
Mr. & Mrs. LaVonne Berg
6939 Packard Avenue NE
Otsego, MN 55330
RL: Construction of Confinement Dairy Operation
Lef-Co Farm
Northwest 1/4, Section 34
Otsego, MN
Dcar Mr. & Mrs. Bcrg:
At your request, I have inspected the property located at 6939 Packard Avenue NE, Otsego, for
the purpose of determining what, if any, damages would be caused by construction of a confined
dairy operation immediately across Packard from your residence and your neighbors in Otsego.
I have began my study by review of the documentation provided by you, on the application of the
conditional use permit and related data I have searched appraisal literature and discussed odor
problems with people familiar with cases in numerous areas. Environmental pollution has made
us more and more aware over the past fifteen years or so. Our awareness was prompted by large
disastrous problems many times maiming or killing people. As environmental issues become part
of every day life, we see that these problems may happen on a micro basis, not just on a macro,
large, disastrous basis. Odors are a relatively new aspect as far as their impact on property value,
although odor problems have occurTed associated to factories and other sources for more than
one hundred years. The observed result is generally residential decline and outward migration
from these areas. A confined dairy operation and the associated activity is tantamount to placing
a factory with smoke stacks on this site. This activity is something beyond family farming, more
or less an agricultural factory.
Otsego appears to be in a transitional area of rural to suburban use. Zoning can be used to
preserve the neral attractiveness of an area, but as urban sprawl continues outward, certain land
uses are more productive to meeting the demands of the market. To this point in time, it appears
that this area has sustained continued farming, hobby farming and residential use. This appears to
be consistent in land use and in meeting the objectives of zoning and planning. An attempt to turn
to a heavy agricultural use does not appear to be consistent with the general land use pattern,
OCT -19-1995 11:15 FROM TO 4418823 P.04
I believe your efforts to preserve your quality of life at this site are well fntindeci Certainly, no
one wishes to disturb farming or the family farm as a way of life. Too many farms have been
allowed to pass out of existence. But the proposed use is, more consistent with use outside of the
metro area, in areas with far less population, areas where the use will represent the highest and
best use of the site. The current proposed use is not consistent use in this area nor does it
cnnform tn current coning nrdinances.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service in your valuation needs. If you have any further
questions or concerns, please call me.
Very truly yours,
JON B. TESSIER & ASSOCIATES, APPRAISERS, INC.
Jon B. Tessier, ASA
Certified General Real Property Appraiser
State of Minnesota License #4001824
OCT -19-1995 11:25 FROM TO 4418823 P.01
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
LIABILITY,' LIMIT, READERSHFP, CHANGES. -
The client is considered to be the person or entity paying consulting fee, even if through a second
party, absent written agreement to the contrary.
Client, by acceptance and use of the consultation and consulting report, hereby certifies that
information furnished to the appraiser is complete and correct to the best of his knowledge -9nd
also by such acceptance and use of consulting report indicates acceptance of all limiting
conditions and assumptions as itemized here in these immediate pages and as may appear
elsewhere in the report.
The liability of Jon B. Tessier & Associates, Appraisers Inc. firm and employees is limited to the
client only and to the fee actually received by appraiser / consultant_
Furthermore, there is no accountability, obligation, or liability to anyone or any third parry other
than the client. If this report is placed in the hands of anyone other than the client, the client shall
make such party aware of all the limiting conditions and assumptions of the assignment and
related discussions. The appraiser is in no way to be responsible for any costs incurred to
discover or correct any deficiencies of any type present in the property; physically, financially,
and/or legally. No change of any item in the report shall be made by anyone other than the
appraiser and/or officer of the firm. The appraiser and firm shall have no responsibility if any such
unauthorized change is made.
Waiver, in any form of any part of these Limiting Conditions and Assumptions does not affect any
other part or item.
This consulting report is written on the premise that the reader is basically familiar with the
valuation and analysis process, real estate markets and procedures normally used. If you are not,
please call us about questions you have.
In the case of limited partnerships or syndication offerings or stock offerings in real estate, client
agrees that in case of lawsuits (brought by lender, partner or part owner in any form of ownership,
tenant, or any other party), any and all awards, settlements of any type in such suit, regardless of
outcome, client will hold appraiser completely harmless in any such action.
OCT -19-1995 11:27 FROM TO 441ee23 P.03
It is assumed that the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or
property lines of the property descnbed and that there is no encroachment or trespass unless
noted in the report.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS:
This consulting report was -made, assuming thatall. public improvements• of any kind. affecting this -
property under analysis are fully paid for, unless otherwise specifically set forth in the property
description.
USE OF THE CONSULTING REPORT:
Possession of this report,. or a copy thereof, does not carry with it the right of publication, nor
may it be used for any purpose by any but the applicant and then only with proper qualifications.
The Bylaws, research, expertise and' Regulations of the Appraisal Institute and the American
Society of Appraisers require each Member and Candidate to control the use quid the distribution
of each report signed by such Member or Candidate; except as hereinafter provided, the client
may distribute copies of this consulting report in its entirety to such third parties as he may select;
however, selected portions of this consulting report shall not be given to third parties without the
prior written consent of the signatories of this report and selected portions may not be copied,
distributed, or in any way communicated to others in such manner as may possibly mislead
another person or entity. Neither all nor any part of this consulting report shall be disseminated to
the general public by the use of advertising media, public relations, news, sales or other media for
public communication without the prior written consent of the appraiser / consultant. (See fiist
and last item concerning matters of liability of appraiser and responsibility of client).
This report is to be used only in its entirety and no part is to used without the whole report. No
portion of the report may be used in any way, verbally or orally, in part or totality, to mislead,
poorly inform, or defraud any other person or entity. Ail conclusions and opinions concerning the
analysis as set forth in the report were prepared by the Appraiser(s) whose signature(s) appear on
the report. Be advised that some of the people associated with Jon B. Tessier & Associates,
Appraisers Inc, and possibly signing the report may be independent contractors.
DISTRIBUTION OF VALUE:
The distribution of the total valuation, if any, of this report between land and improvement applies
only under the existing program of utilization. The separate valuations for land and buildings
must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if used.
TOTAL P.03
OCT -19-1995 11:1? FROM TO 4418823 P.O?
Appraisal report and the market value estimate subject to change if physical or legal entity or
financing different than that envisioned in this report or upon change in (or discover of certain
influencing) market conditions or property condition as well.
It is assumed that the property which is the subject of this report will be under prudent and
competent ownership and management; neither inefficient nor super -efficient, with adequate
capital and management skills for such endeavor.
REVIEW
Unless otherwise noted herein, if the "review appraiser" has viewed and signed the report, such
review is made only to check general appropriateness of techniques and format, and has not
necessarily inspected the subject or market comparable properties unless indicated or signed. as
"concurring" or "co -appraiser".
DISCLOSURE:
Disclosure of contents of this report is governed by the Bylaws and Regulations of the Appraisal
Institute, by the American Society of Appraisers, and by the Uniform Standards of Professional
Appraisal Practice (USPAP).
Neither all nor part of the contents of this report (especially any conclusions as to value, the
identity of the appraiser or firm with which he is connected, or any reference to the Appraisal
Institute or the American Society of Appraisers), shall be disseminated to the public through
advertising media, or any other public means of communications without prior written consent
and approval of the undersigned.
ACCEPTANCE OF, AND/OR USE OF, THIS CONSULTING REPORT BY CLIENT OR
AN YONE ELSE (OJi AN Y -THIRD J'AKJ'Y") CON STITU'1 ES AC;C;EJ.'TAN CE OF THE
ABABOVE
ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMTITNG CONDITIONS AND ANY OTHER
NT)ITIONS STATED IN THE RF. PO31T. APPRAISER LIABJLiT Y TrN-Dg oNLY
TO STATED CLIENT, NOT SUBSEQUENT PARTIES OR USERS, AND APPRAISER
LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE ACTUAL AMOUNT OF FEE RECEIVED BY
""RAISER / CON SULTANT.
OCT -19-1995 11:18 FROM TO 4418823 P.09
Various Mini Seminars by AIREA, SREA, & ASA.
EMPLOYMENT BACKGROUND
Jon B. Tessier & Associates, Appraisers Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1991 - present_
Associated as Staff Appraiser -.C. R. Pelton & Associates, St. Paul, Minnesota,
1983-1993.
Staff Appraiser, Patchin Appraisals then Patchin Division of American Appraisal Company,
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1981-1982.
Independent Fee Appraiser associated with Appraisal Services, Inc., Robert N. Frissell,
MAI, Fargo, North Dakota, 1980-1981.
Independent Fee Appraiser associated with Michael J. Barnard, MAI, Green Bay,
Wisconsin, 1978-1980.
Real Estate Broker and Salesman, Green Flay, Wisconsin, 1977-1979.
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
.Includes residential, multiple dwelling, cor mercial, industrial, special use, rural and
recreational properties for purposes such as acquisition, financing, sale, insurance, taxes, rentals,
right of way and condemnations.
More specifically, Mr. Tessier's experience includes the appraisal of agricultural land and
buildings; commercial, office, retail and wholesale space; light to heavy manufacturing plants and
warehouse space; apartment buildings, motels, houses and residential lots and subdivisions;
recreational land including parks, wetlands and wilderness -type areas; special use single purpose
properties; all types of land, including partial takings and right of way easements.
COURT EXPERIENCE
Qualified as an wLVvi L w1Luess iii DisulcL Court, Tax Coui L, FW=al Bwiluuptcy Court;
County Commissioners Hearings. Also serves as court appointed commissioner for County
Commissioners Hearings.
TEACkIING EXPERIENCE
Minnesota School of Real Estate - Foundations of Real Estate Appraisal, Appraising the
Single Family Residence, Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, Environmental
Issues in the Real Estate Transaction, Valuation of the Single Family Residence Utilizing
Marshall Valuation Service - 1995
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS
American Society of Appraisers - Designated as Senior Member, ASA; Twin Cities
Chapter # 53 President, 1989-1990.
Appraisal Institute - MAI Candidate.
Yr
GRANITE CITY APPRAISAL St. . e°� 2
. Cloud. MN 56302
Farm - Residential - Commerical Business (612', 251-3648
Certified Federal General Appraiser
Residence 16' 2) 253-0903
October 16, 1995
TO: Otsego Council Members
FROM: Ronald C. Zitzow, Certified General Real Property Appraiser,
and owner of "Granite City Appraisal", St. Cloud, MN
RE: Mr. Greg LeFebvre
15033 - 70th Street
Elk River, MN 55330
11400 Cow", Parlor, Free Stall Barn Dairy Expansion.
Dear Council Members:
I have appraised real estate in rural, suburban and urban areas of
Minnesota since 1972. For the period January 1, 1990 and December 31,
1994, I have completed appraisals on 644 single family homes and 352 farmE
and rural commercial properties. Twenty-six large specialty farms were
appraised as follows: 4 -large hog farms, 9 -turkey farms, 7 -chicken broilE
farms, and 6 -dairy farms between 150 and 400 head capacity.
I am an affiliate member of the St. Cloud and Brainerd "MLS" and the Regic
Seven Commercial Data Exchange. Granite City Appraisal completes
appraisals in twelve central and East central Minnesota counties from
Alexandria to the Wisconsin boarder, North and West of the Minneapolis/St.
Paul metro.
Mr. LeFebvre asked me to review his plans for his dairy expansion and to
provide my input into some of the differences between the "40-120" cow tie
Mali Hairy and the modern parlor/free stall barn being built on his fami_
farm. He also indicated several neigrizors rndve -L - L_ �
placement of the "new dairy" in relationship to their residences located
West of the new dairy.
Differences: Between 1960's and 1970's style dairy (vs.) 1990's Dairy
Farm.
1) Milk production and herd health has been better in the new 1990's "Fre
Stall" open air style housing facilities.
VIM
2) The milk quality and bacteria counts have improved with the new parlor
technology providing consumers with higher quality milk, cheese, ice
cream, and yogurt products.
3) Worker "Dairyman" health is better in the new parlor because there is
not a repeated bending down to milk the cow. Many dairymen in their
401s, 50's and 60's have bad knees and hips from the continual bending
to milk cows.
4) Manure pit storage or "Lagoon" storage is a much prefered way of
handling livestock waste over the daily haul. The manure lagoon
enables the operator to incorporate 50% of the manure directly into
the soil with an irrigation "airway" tool. The automatic incorporation
is a natural fertilization of the cropland and decreased the need for
commercial fertilizers. The incorporation also reduces leaching and
runoff into area waterways. The everyday hauling adds little to no
benefit when applied on frozen fields and increases runoff potential tc
wetlands and waterways. The "Lagoon" system fills from the bottom and
forms a "crust" on the surface with the liquids and sledge located
below. The odors are very minimal to none when crusted. In the winter
months the frozen "crust" raises in the lagoon as the cow manure is
loaded into the bottom daily. The lagoon will typically be cleaned
either one or two times per year before crops are planted and after
harvest before freeze up. The manure odor will typically last from
seven to fourteen days at each cleaning. The lagoon is located South
of the proposed dairy facilities and cleanout odors should move to the
Southeast because of the prevailing winds and "away" from the single
family housing area adjacent to the West. A security fence is
installed around manure lagoons to prevent livestock or young children_
from drowning in the storage pit.
5) The trend in family farms is to better operation and financial
management. Family farmers are concerned "like everyone else" about
pollution, odors, spills, and the communities well being. The larger
"new style" dairy units permit the owner to maximize his management
abilities, produce more higher quality milk, closer to the consumer,
and also provide employment opportunities to the area labor force. The
subject will employ five to six full-time people on site in addition tc
the local vet, feed sales, truckers, milk processors, etc.
6) The simple fact is that many of the 501s, 60's and 70's barns are worn
out. The stalls, pipelines, waterlines and manure handling systems are
fully depreciated generally after 20 years of service.
7) A 1977 Aerial photo of the subject is enclosed for references. This
photo shows a rural Otsego Township with few rural home sites. The
subject's owners "family farmers" owned and operated the farm.
Rural home owners have changed building styles and utilized new technology
every year since the date the LaFebvre's occupied their first dairy site.
It is my judgement that the new dairy facility will not create any greater
odor or physical impediment to the landscape than the existing dairy
facility, but will be better for the environment and community for all of
the above stated reasons. The new dairy facility will further afford
educational opportunities to the rural home owners children by giving them.
an opportunity to learn about animal husbandry, milk production, and the
origin of the milk in their refrigerator.
Issue: Valuation of Existing Dwellings if the New Facility is Built.
1) The single family residences located West of the subject are generally
"first time" home owner housing. People are not all alike and likewise
buyers are not all alike. Residential demand is created by many things for
example - Location, community services, schools, proximity to work,
affordability, building and site upkeep, traffic counts, access to major
roadways, etc. Otsego Township's population has increased 9.4% between
1980 and 1990 per census data to 5,219. Otsego population has increased
3.4% since 1990 to 6,023. Based upon the above growth history, it appears
the subject's rural neighborhood has had growth and therefore housing
demand has been good. The new dairy facility will not adversly effect the
marketability of adjacent housing. Not all rural home owners are adverse
to feed lots (see examples below).
2) Two examples of feed lots with new single family residential built
adjacent. One feed lot in Sherburne County and one in Benton County with
new homes built within 250' to 2,000' of the Feed Lot.
Comp #1 - is a confinement hog operation of 6,160 SF, farrow to finish
building, 240 sow capacity, finish barn with 220 head capacity. Built in
1987 with manure pit, cleaned out two times/year. Four new homes have been
constructed around the confinement hog unit since it was built. See
Photos.
Comp 42 - 32,000 Hen Layer Barn, "weekly manure haul" because of design. t
new home was built 250' North of this poultry barn in 1995.
3
Vr
a M M 44 M in Jim M M M M&) M M M
In Conclusion:
The LaFebvre's have always managed their farm with the cropland, livestock,
enviroment and community in mind. Greg tells me he plans to landscape the
new dairy facility and lagoon area. The fact is not many farmers in rural
areas landscape their dairy barns and lagoons.
The LaFebvre's have produced good quality milk for years. Perhaps it's
time their "rural home owning neighbors" realize that it was their choice
to move to the country. The farmers and cows were there when they moved
in. T�rq subjectiis zoned Agricultural, not Single Family Residential.
Ronald C. Vitxo9
Cert. Gene/ral--'I�eal Prop.
"MN Lic. #4000345
"Granite City Appraisal"
RCZ/jmz
EAST EAST
PART OTSEGO PART FRANKFORT T120-121 N7R.23
coU
N1q
N6104 E?10
N4E?10
.Qor4�nY rynp pu64., Inc
�,,�)ijerburmCountp THE ELK RIVERCQO
ATOMIC SHOPPER
e
tar
DOMINANT ADVERTISING MEDIUM FOR THE ELK RIVER BUSINESS COMMUNITY
Commercial Offset and Instant Printing
PHONE: 441.3500 ❑ 649 MAIN STREET ❑ ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA
r.,
w.
Will.. c
. ON
T7
ff
�06
lei
ch. •ft
Av A
PP
IMP
WE
r' Y A Al
A a 0A A i A i i 1■■n i
m mm mmm mm mmmmmmmpgYnnnnnnnnnmgi mm mmg mg m` tet Q'mg�mm m mmgammD
° m p
or, m a' n n n m m D m o n m f. o ° a :0 n ret ° m 0 (1 m m ba
mmmp 9ynnnnnnnnn��m 4m4 GGm m m m mmmm�� m mmmmmmD
• • + n n ^ + ". n � ^ � I I � I I � I I " r " " o. � = °' ^ . 3 3 3 �
20 00 0 D
0. D DDS �• D _
g'q 9Q•yolQyylQ1- v vrMF rdoo
i i .<$ Y 8 <pp G P P N O 3 0 • w r Q Q 6 C ,°[ �! d• ; 4
P P N 0 6 _ _. 3 3 P° 3 d a O 3 - - °' 3 3 3
-
_
- 3, - _ - __ PPN w 33300 NPr •°. o,^�, 8Y! -'� 00 003 33 _ 33'�a.. _ _
set �+ 8S RXlyy S° Nm UN oo" x33 a _
3 y°j "!$ �8 8 $ �y$
�•;s •
-3 0$ s • n =l+;
_ 3'-
,- = S = o a
° >
mgo°set>n
�
'CO
S�
T T T S Z Z
ii Z S Z ZZ Z Z vI Sa 2
�m O
m
Z c-
u nm►
g 8�
°
(1
N► m m !1 D
u u
CDM► u�m
00 unmet 00 n D
C
• - -_v
•^"`"`"BS Oi o_'•-'�ZI`�IIx
N
! ! r'
Z! S 3 3'! _ Y • v v$$
o +
g; S; S
8 ¢33
;::'aS3�R:
0-
3 3
"Yq 3
_sai
- _ �•s
'' ln3^o^�aooQQagoyoQy3
g x
3
SS €
3 3 $ e8
8
aoaoa�desoRS�Q-oa--o-s=-
�Po. 00x0 _° 4 i' o N
°
g3'�83333 3g 3:
=-=a'
i 3 3 °_
i"•- _
P 3
y 3 3 3 ^- 3 y �
3 3 3 3 3
<
Q Q o 3 3 S
1 3 3 g 3 S 3 t 3
8 3 3
3 3 3 1 3
-=
'i 3 9 3<•< ' <.••
S,
8+^
�'grr
3
3
w
Q' o
o
• 333
!+ 3 0
^i
•'_ --°_° P
QQ
3 3 g i
n•
3• S• i
o
3 0 0 0
o o 8
P __
o a p
'o
o0Q 8
r
- - ► -
o-
•
v-- a 0 p e'1 �'
83S
o P P N N
O O o¢;3O .0 O
_ P P
N O NIn U ,N„
m- NPy
y y3 yp
3 3
li33
3 3 3
Pv i
�•¢n'
°?4' s33
U
- - 00 00
00 4q4 g
-
0P0N�l�
!+ - PP No m
No
:
o
0 00
0 o
°•°
30
y
•. ��
33 333
""
33
o ! '" or
"•r
3 9 9 3
yr �
i
:.
s a SS �yg
00
gBYY
-;sQ;o
SS
P P
Q
OK
'
S S
� •t
+ N
�
0.
° >
mgo°set>n
�
m D 'kX'IC 8'8'� AA ArDa3 o i i €= rrrr '�
u N y u m m n m m n m n n m m D m► m D 0 O n m m
N o
vEESS33j-•0^ZR34
3___ o
! !X'X'X�X'X'iS'�'X' Ao oaoiv, z �i44
R ����•• 0 0 0 0 0 o L' n e�� i i o o
i_ r o
ss+i 3:
i o' � �" n i o Z q
g 8�
°
0 J� Q 4 n 1
<3333' o
^ 8
"
!
•^"`"`"BS Oi o_'•-'�ZI`�IIx
N
! ! r'
Z! S 3 3'! _ Y • v v$$
o +
o N N o 3
Q o 0 0° 4 3
0
Z 3 3
t_= PNS S
i l
0-
3 3
p
+fig 3 g o' o
a a' i 'a u n
e o P
g x
3
!
�Po. 00x0 _° 4 i' o N
°
3 a
0 0 c 3
i 3 3 °_
P 3
y 3 3 3 ^- 3 y �
_
•
3�
o g^!+
--
S,
�'grr
3
Y$
�N
• 333
•8R
S� YYR
� ^88
si��-
<! ��
83S
.
z
Table 2
Manure volumes
and content
Animal
Size(lb)
Total manure production
Nutrient content (Ib/day)
cubic
Phosphorus
Ib/day
ft/day
gal/day
Nitrogen
pentoxide'
Potash"
Dairy cattle -150
12
0.19
1.5
0.06
0.023
0.048
250
20
0.32
2.4
0.10
0.045
0.084
SQQ
41
0.66
0.20
0.082
1,000
82
1.32
9.9
0.41
0.166
0.325
1,400
115
1.85
13.9
0.57
0.232
0.458
Beef cattle
500
30
0.50
3.8
0.17
0.127
0.145
750
45
0.75
5.6
0.26
0.191
0.229
1,000
60
1.00
7.9
0.34
0.250
0.289
1,250
75
1.20
9.4
0.43
0.318
0.373
Cow
63
1.05
7.9
0.36
0.273
0.313
Swine
Nursery pig
35
2.3
0.038
0.27
0.016
0.0118
0.012
Growing pig
65
4.2
0.070
0.48
0.029
0.0223
0.024
Finishing pig
150
9.8
0.16
1.13
0.068
0.050
0.054
200
13.0
0.22
1.5
0.090
0.068
0.071
Gestating sow
275
8.9
0.15
1.1
0.062
0.048
0.048
Sow and litter
375
33.0
0.54
4.0
0.230
0.173
0.181
Boar
350
11.0
0.19
1.4
0.078
0.059
0.061
Sheep
100
4.0
0.062
0.46
0.045
0.015
0.039
Poultry
Layers
4
0.21
0.0035
0.027
0.0029
0.0025
0.0014
Broilers
2
0.14
0.0024
0.018
0.0024
0.00123
0.0009
Horse
1,000
45
0.75
5.63
0.27
0.105
0.205
Source: American Society of Agricultural Engineers
' Elemental P (phosphorus)
= 0.44 x phosphorus pentoxide (P205)
" Elemental K (potassium) = 0.83 x potash (K20)
z
K s` M 'a f A A a f AJFM s M A
Soil
TABLE 1. --TEMPERATURE AND PRECIPITATION
[Recorded in the period 1951-75 at Collegeville, 14inne3ota3
A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth. It can be calculated by adding t
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for the principal crops in the area (500 F).
I
Precipitation
I
Temperature
I
Avera
years
10 will
In
have-- I
Average
2 years
will have--
in 10
I Average
number of
Maximum
Minimum I
Month IAveragelAveragelAveragel
I
I
number oflAveragel�-
growing I
Less I
More (days withlsnowf
inchl
I daily I daily
Imaximumlminlmuml
Itemperature
I
temperature)
degrge I
1
than--(than--10.10
I or more I
I I 1
higher I
lower I
days
than--
_
than--
F
nits
n
In
n
r
F
_
9.2 I
43
-P9
0
0.95 10.31
1.45 I 3
It
January ---- I 18.4 I
0.1
11
February ---1 24.8I
5.4
15.1
47 I
I
I
88
22
1.40 3
11 I 1 I
F
March ------1 35.4 i
17.0
i 26.3
62
i -17 I
10 i
1.47 I
57
12.19 4
1:
April ------1 53.1 1
33.2
I 43.2 1
83
I 12
I 35
1 2.35
1
11.12
1 3.34 I 5
1
1
May -------- 67.9
1 45.5
I
I 56.8
I 90
I 27
I 234
1 3.64
I
12.00
14.97 I 7
I
I
I
June -------1 76.9
( 55.5
1
1 66.2
1
94
I
39
I 486
4.47
I
12.42
i 6.14 8
I
July -------1 81.7
1
1 60.u
71.1
I 9
.
1.u3
71
I
I
August -----1 79.5
I
1 58.5
II
I 69.1
I 94
I 44
i 592
4
i .44
2.69
1
16.01 1 7
1
September--] 68.8
1
48.6
I
58.8
II
I 88
30
271
I 2.84
11.28
4.10 I 6
October---- 58.9
I
I 39.2
49.1
i 82
I 19
113
IIi
2.02
.62
3.13 i 4
I
November ---I 39.3
23.8
31.6
II
65
-4
31
53
3I
111.94II
December --- 25.2
I
I
I8.9
17.1
47
I
I
22
0
.92
I
.27
I
1.42 3
Year -----1 52.5
I 33.0
42.8
96
-29
2.395
28.29
23.51
!
601
32.85 I
a
A growing degree day is a unit of heat available for plant growth. It can be calculated by adding t
maximum and minimum daily temperatures, dividing the sum by 2, and subtracting the temperature below which
growth is minimal for the principal crops in the area (500 F).
L
B A L D W I N T 3 5 N.- R. 2 6W
S
t��
M/LLE LACS C Univ L
I
/. fa beth •�
a cord ,t
Y y�•
hn ✓/e
Lo,a wti.
he r
.: • l • y,
//t s t `
es �CO
..r
7*
T.tNF'.,
1'
• /e
btl•
t
r
T
XJ.d: tlQ�`j •Jt.!
rbrr
hI/
'ZF.
Y� � & Fea•rn
ti
3d,n,e Y,
J7
r �
h'. ..,:•^.•,• Vie•
slE
7 r
rcrj
re)dVna
!rs--r
0a"rfR
eE c
6/a
h,wryy7
n.
pN-�C?
••
/Jh
rs
4
hatlaFf�
r)/-:
-1
tr
w.
•e)/
dnJ0f:"Z3•
Hafc
s•,/•
4�D/t,i
IT'i
sr:,nc
nrTna
doca
tQuit/yZaJ
e.,
•r',
e
r
nr�s
L�nI1sl
/
ni
.t
9•t,.yi
c
su�FlQ`hls'21
-
Z7r<
.,„,e
.r
i/.p/•,.
eA
'•15s_
S.•
JackJon
1
,v.k
1e
--sr�.,R"a�r
FeoErro,r/
,.•Y�`E
r.
w•f:�/eV:
rJ'•
'y
_
ch,. � ,
_•n
n,
_
•rPtnswr
.vs 7, w)
—a�ae•v
_
1
u
/e.,!Q[i
.w.S',a,•
hAw:
n'rnroS
aneF'�nsJt
IN'.ls
nr
FOtCw//
e"
JJaEdECee/m.e
r�f,
v
i•�n'n^
tsnNC
?
-::. e
i .i.....a.
:�n` .:::.: ,eF
ria2t-
Cher
•
En"
R/
rd
•
Vwen 3Pe
::tl
:
.:.
n
n�J'3Wpp07er
Bun/v
•'fJly./lS<7ao,o..�5u.e,a,.ra...�•
/�V�f
'e1
•:c
L
-r
-•�/3
"t
:oco!l�dJr
c�1:'
�♦nltea7
47M
6
avo
t
[tN,,
„.
"Prt,a'n
<J'
T
s��t?-VVv/
/o,P.T/vw,e/aNr�aofrq'o//r��Yy
h
s
zn
�d•w
t
Cotr(
./
w�oeArT
dn
n
qels_ee/Jspao 1,
�;J-�
<il'i.nah1�dosyyut:r1ce
CC�rp
oy�
�n'•
,fst
,��wt'np�
• .Fa A
.•\N,1.l
°aAMAT
f6//d
—J
�n.•:
afc:N
I
K
.,a
�d/
l
J
4enr[r
a'a•+,
+
•C_o./
CaM
Q>6t
1 5dta0(�d)f
.o4hn,yrn•
.�
u':
c�
rese
y+r
9f
m"huhV
r9pZ
z_4d
.
`.,
H
,
Bern,
ro .,Owo
>-uce
y
Il [ice •rOC i`
pV!
<ir...-.•'
le—At
w-Z
z
/y<Yn
77.5 torn
,s.
C>ns�.sy
� rri,.r
a
,1p,�1
�,
7
'40
^rn� •i
/4n
.SnnC.nrn
ti
Ec
,eFa
•,r
(.
♦
Tohn ^
.t` rr ve/ao
.•.. BO
$ t• a
ryCry
C •�
�C y
��
„/ e
5 I� r /
a R r..c.,
.
nn /
u)`/'}.1
r• su n
& S t+ ve.
o •
x.
�'y Tr
Nrr.n.I . ,..
//..r rA g
af��, .r wr
•.
a
��•.
fr.
l
I�
/-:...
i Or en
arg�C
p
<h'
fi
)
17C cc
rhea ! .eta,
el
L ..
�,
_ ,...,,
J
CL .-.7,yu
• ort
ata
N,P \•+..
yV
M
T•S
..
Cj
II �1�� "'��1���"'S55
vj oven
• a;> •:a,.
•V,r.':. •r.
Io00
a: .r
VC
•
E/¢r
rwm.,.,.
.,v•;:.
•, e..,. t N g,,,r.n •
•
nM
x,n
[:nr/`
D`
n fia C
i,.iet-•
to /t
G /h,,.•r n s • u e
Q �'
a^ wn ^n.,
>..a, r
,/.ND
/L•,r,,, //
h
C
An
W �� .✓"�
,N/,
/�n�n J„.-. • Te R,
huk
•.,/
• Ga-i,./�
'H// r.
av -4 t
���!I ��J� 7 p
W tq<rh ro
Pr, r<h urcC, s�/
N•u
d d,Yh
.(-rrr,r•s
n
'cYna ti fTrn�,. J. 72.J
.rn lmnn ,ay,.r,r �
M./
R<.M
.,.r„�,
ti�.:
�`I'•iai'
h
'
V�
4. ,.
,; .� ias l .•
l,Jbi cl. li,�� J4 r
tie err
_
1 �.r
.In Pe
r7n9., er d tr,yr
r, 1•
��
J
_
r/tr r
'a,•skc
4 ♦ <.t
,•a
H t L CO
n/a ar; P,
/�l/ f 1,'ia C
�n
:' ♦
,r `1, :. 1
• •
- Cn<r
1-•.
/OfS,
n` <• ur<r _o
oB t ,� •
'Aiy,
7 C
�
r/ rv✓• ��
`1',
;.
�
[eo,..
r„/r,`
�1
v`Anrc
of ha+,t4
Gi ral �rr'vtTe
1'// /ln
fr,r
ei -/rk ^lrvs%
.t1
�'�'
r,
'rnn
�;
IA 111,
1�
i^_ a� � esw
40
� $
cirr/�
io r//m%.ter/
�
rpt,
'
��
"•s?`
r�
l
����
ZCa�o��
'fro •.Wymona
i;eae/ •
��.
io
�'rrbn
p��
,,.,
,n4
u
°Ot i
l
[}k -,:ter ./>!
C a,
/.,r ., .
v..,,,.
� f,��.,
i �; ^/
'...
�
``` J
a
q
r•t y
7,nt
v �
J •
C
.•n _
•r
y�
< its �
/ fu•• '
Nmd
a// �4�
'
yi/,
✓.,
.✓, r..:
/, ii<� ,•
� '/F
' C
%n'r n•"•.'/. tq
fir- Mir
b I
•:-�' Lrt
Jsa/ ` ;'
„`
, Suuo:r rso
S
NTL/N
+
•�
/•/, /t4
:.n ♦nr
w
•C-
46Js L.
''
,cn/
..,
..tea•
�...
<
ra,er,•
ANDYi
L.
w•1' •v
.vt,rdr.a [,,tr +
,r ,^
t f iy
/Ja /ter
r,n,//•trr
\•
,r
I
- ..n
.. .n,
:_<+•., r`a,
1 !, f • ..n It • 1°=
A
I24
-
a Je. t
�
dle w V .
cia•.,r r
G/Ao,rE �” • 4,11”
• .q •t ti
if
0
`CC
,,
�
V
1. •!
fir,.
�A .,
/,( //,t
/4• r
trNJt'
b
at, /,hifcn
' ' r
,,
J cde r,rA !,
w Z, Onrlh .fa, _•
•
M
•../
rine
Mu h
r i
}
V�
•
,v
` ; z IG
? •':^Ir.
; aw /AN
,k! r A �n N Jr
e4 nn.x.n
<'ene
/4[•
l
i �
` <i.,.,..
�;4
- ,
y rt
s �•
•t ,le ,O e) ro 1 /%/I N.,`r•
•
ti
AAI,,,y
�
, � a
r / .r
nny
F •' as tLl
P
::� rrr.i
ure Sten
< �S d /es K EaT. ,/['
Slr�er
.!, ea
le0
rvu S t / e �A -•i
rr� u + i
/i!•n,-/ Ha ,J '•
li'/C Dr.4
� 4
s0
blit .�.. >tua: rs_
Aua
.d7Eie
a�� a J9
• v
bt �
.rr •S riser eo
,e,7 FnrAf rd Hap 4,6h, Inc., Rer /ea7 > EE PAGE /9 fj
-- r,I•„me Caw ry, M,r,n
T� �► 6 jitgAl %I cm��
I, -
O. G. HANS011r& S010
PHONE: 389-2722
GOULDS CHEV-OLDS CO.
SAND AND GRAVEL
Interstate 94 and Highway 25
m4.
Monticello, Minnesota 55362
CONCRETE PRODUCTS
READY MIX AND _
CONCRETE BLOCKSa
295-2911 or
o
427.2047 (To// Free)
Route 3 -
Princeton, Minnesota 55371 Q
L
-31 1i
N,
w
C7
Z
CEQ
M
0
u
v;
U.
L
C
C
C;
Ik"
ME rnp!----- CO. '�-- BLDGS.: SEC. __!`�-- TWP3Sd RANGE A� DATE:
WATAB T. 37 N - R. 31 W
LANGOLA TWP PIO 1
,Ms m��ry.elsew • "» St.....t I � 3 •
tso vt G.:J<e rr� na•r k l /rr?,r = Nansew
• Gawule.a Iwlr.w<r,�.11 R«'� l � ZBI
� , �:.ri s. r � tan se lu • Fl eyd D Wd4r ! �
IJello
1t31, .,.n r.... w4t• 1 160
wIII
IJ�e Z Tr"<re 1 ' ►w ► ' [Jeer•
Ikw�y o. 1"'. vYJ. �# � + vk}II,. a �+�o It 1$0
►.ynir m. • I i• �• t �, �• E•ewenn i
Fvrcn t�• '
31 • 1 83 L Is To aen I{D I
1'l0. b j 54wr1 f IW r � .Jrw IIan+ItRa
to nom. s ° p'yka °s 1 CI -. �..,r. w 1... i •
to [ / . P 1 wr<y� , `••sem.. [r., ii
` tmo, ill., r~" ;� oma 1.'
• ; f s.+< °-f I .••
N ■ � ' j t a+!! xn � m y II•Ir IIJ.e.Ja
ry/JSiS s, •h JI
D.- F -
1.56,
.
h a Yfu t�j WeJ/ewew.r< Iw 14131 • T•.•�r 1 •
L•� tot„ � t! ��� Ik0 lD.,wa In
' sl si kewl
} SAUK w.aa; r a
<»M V wrn, < t z SdaP�r
Ya P uMr<rc z1o.a •'*t• RI CIS :Ny •.w� w. [. +o car ,.re y
T—low.. Tna�• f1
Lo
•Is e! 1. ���"
I.— Its .
r� 9.w• •a <.wr I1.0 u
u [.r. ICE to b a
N 411.1 l
_tel J..w r eo4<wl
tl.u.k 90 ►r 3a,/ t a GOOSE 4 . ui
Y
W t t H'�4.F n<I, 3 a.(. [Ilrr•.r 1, 710 785
33 of4{ 80
R E F U l
1/I tt,
II111
or. • 12 5
• yJ
Gr�a...'\t.
IJ.l1 w Da..<II 1 Rme _
C ,. ", a 11 73 IT
Awwa [rr <Ila Store nrn
i to �'•' T—f. e<l,.lw i Jd,r•n tr,.. j Q
t-
,o tivaa ' sr�,.illnt LLw 120 i; Ilio wi<Z Izo
er WATAB • rO l
-7 �.
».wrt�a t;;U
po
Y s Jack Fnd Ine �e y,y,.•M..e 1
t9 le eo
? Devt 26
< nov
/ Ja<,e. Iw/ e1M1rJlw .%J �a4 arr �� I .dw<I
H• [•rMl Ta�� Fl •• I
•+� D. y adn•n w1e �� Ny»J rw
t1.i
11.0
t r... ,7•s Ilo
♦4.11 ��' Irrl
33�.i fan •y 4 r t-t''»:.ii*- -i M� :••3
f.,us L�ieo,
Lirf• b K N 40
r
• n,Ls,s!
ft
J'�" i l09 4.J• �• tors.• awr r••w •
Cara / Jt sl Ma •• Dp Yal•a +53.6
Lw.
SAUK RAPIDS TWP PI
F
ri
-11
Mot Of
r+,
• �l:�j� ei `
is i
I �
.= I
" GRANITE CITY APPRAISAL "
Areas of Specialization
Agricultural Real Estate Valuation
Agricultural Personal Property Valuation
Agricultural Business Valuation and Cash Flow Analysis
Residential Real Estate Valuation
Commercial Real Estate Valuation
QUALIFICATIONS - RONALD C. ZITZOW
- RONALD C. ZITZOW - Certified General Real Property Appraiser, License
#4000345, Owner of "Granite City Appraisal", Address: 22 1/2 Wilson
Avenue NE, P.O. Box 6121, St. Cloud, MN 56302.
- 23 Years of Appraisal Experience.
- Bachelor of Science Degrees: University of Minnesota - Agricultural
Economics, 1972 - North Dakota State University; Agriculture/Animal
Science, 1970.
- Senior Appraiser for the "Farm Credit System" (1978 to 1987) with
over 1,000 farm appraisals completed from 1973 to 1987.
- Member of "Minnesota Rural Appraisers and Farm Managers, Inc.".
- President - "Federal Land Bank" of St. Cloud, Minnesota (1977 to
1986).
- Vice President - "Twin City Federal Savings and Loan" Commercial and
Corporate Banking Division (1987).
- Senior Special Accounts Officer - "Farm Credit Services", Louisville,
Kentucky; February 1, 1988 to June 1, 1988.
- Vice President Special Accounts & Credit - "Farm Credit Services",
St. Cloud, MN; 1986 to 1987 (21 County Region).
- Review Appraiser - "Farm Credit Services", 1980 to 1986.
- Senior Appraiser - "Farm Credit Services", 1977 to 1987.
- FHA/HUD Panel Appraiser - Sherburne, Wright, Stearns, Todd, Morrison
and Benton Counties.
- USDA/FmHA Contract Appraiser - 1987 to Current.
OTHER EDUCATION AND EXPERIENCE
- Chairman of Appraisal Committe - "The American Society of Farm
Managers and Rural Appraisers", Minnesota Chapter, 1987 and 1988.
(Committee member 1989, 1990 and 1991).
- Construction Superintendent - "Enviro/Master, Inc. (Custom Home and
Condominium construction), Colorado Springs, Colorado; 1972 to 1973.
- Designed and constructed personal residence, 1977. (Addition 1987).
- "Advanced Appraisal of Rural Properties", Peoria, Illiniois, 1981 ;
(36 CEU's).
- "Report Writing", Des Moines, Iowa, 1983 (8 CEU's).
- Presentation to the Minnesota County Assessor's, 1982.
- "Professional Standards Seminar", Minneapolis, MN; August 11, 1988,
(4 CEU's).
- "Applied Residential Property Valuation", Society of Real Estate
Appraisers, (Course 102, March 1990 - 39 CEU's).
- "Professional Standards Seminar Instructor", Minnesota Chapter ASFMRA
September 25, 1989, (15 CEU's).
- "Advanced Financial Management & Calculating the Agricultural Value
of Farm/Ranch Land", January 4, 1990 (16 CEU's).
- Passed "CERTIFIED FEDERAL GENERAL" Exam on March 16, 1991.
- "Office Building & Retail Building Appraisal", December 1991
(15 CEU's).
- "Investment & Financial Analysis", December 1991, (15 CEU's).
- "Wetland History and Acquisition, MN Land Institute, 1992(3 CEU's).
- "Real Estate Expo & Conference", Las Vegas, Nevada, 1993(15 CEU's).
- "University of MN Property Valuation Short Course I & 2, 1992 & 1994,
(30 CEU's).
.n
Ronald C. Zitzow Qualifications Continued:
PARTIAL LIST OF CLIENTS
- Liberty Savings, Inc., First Bank, Zapp National Bank,
TCF Mortgage,
Citizens Savings, Stearns County National Bank, First
American
National Bank, - St. Cloud, MN.
- Norwest Bank - Sauk Rapids, and St. Cloud, MN.
- Farm Credit Services - St. Paul & St. Cloud, MN; Louisville,
KY;
Amery, WI; La Fayette, Ind.; River Falls, WI; Sales
Division,
Willmar, MN.
- First State Bank - Swanville, MN.
- Security State Bank - Holdingford, MN.
- Total Agri/Business Services - Albany, MN.
- FmHA Offices - Milaca, St. Cloud, Little Falls, Mora,
Cambridge,
North Branch and Buffalo, MN.
- Private Individuals.
- Local Attorney's - (Ex.)Gordon Hansmeier; Barrett Columbo; Paul
Steil; Hugh's Law Firm; Tom Zupanc; Rodger Schmidt;
Et Al.
- Farmers and Merchants State Bank - Pierz, MN.
- First State Bank - St. Joseph, MN.
- Princeton State Bank - Princeton, MN.
- Rice Sportsmens Club - Rice, MN.
- FHA/HUD Affiliated Lenders.
- Melrose State Bank - Melrose, MN.
- Mutual of New York.
- Jennie -O Foods - Koronis Mills Division.
- Wollak Hardware - Rice, MN.
- North Branch Fur Farm - North Branch, MN.
- Jack Frost, Inc. - St. Cloud, MN.
- Royalton State Bank - Royalton, MN.
- Community State Bank/Peoples Bank - Princeton, MN.
- Avon State Bank - Avon, MN.
- Farmers State Bank - New London, MN.
- First National Bank - Cold Spring, MN.
- "FDIC" - Rosemont, IL.
- St. Johns University - Collegeville, MN.
- St. Benedict Convent - St. Joseph, MN.
- St. Peter Ag Appraisal Service - St. Peter, MN.
- State Bank of Kimball - Kimball and St. Augusta, MN.
- Rural American Bank of Braham - Braham, MN.
- Benton County Attorneys/Commissioners.
DANIELS APPRAISAL COMPANY
10341 YORK LANE
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55431
JOHN DANIELS (612) 831-0544
John & Carol Holland #95463
LaVonne & Lisa Berg October 13, 1995
Len & Theresa Sanoski
In re: Conditional Use Permit-Lef-Co Farm, Inc
SEC Co. Rd. 37 & Packard Avenue N.E.
Otsego, Minnesota
Ladies & Gentlemen:
At your request I have made a study of the effects upon the
neighborhood within (about) one mile from the property that
is referenced above. Based upon a survey of the area,
reviewing two "typical" properties across the street from
the subject site, consideration of my past experience in
appraising similar "cattle milking operations" in other parts
of the state, and a study of the demographics of the City of
Otsego relative to its past growth and its present and future
potential as a part of the greater Minneapolis, St. Paul
metropolitan area.
The report is submitted. It contains description of the
property, the proposed development under discussion, and a
summary of significant factors influencing the conclusions
that have been made. The Appraiser's Definition of Market
Value, the Appraiser's Qualifications, and a summary of
Underlying Assumptions and Contingent Conditions are also
included.
Information in this report was gathered from sources believed
reliable, but it is not guaranteed. It has been a pleasure
to serve you, and should you desire further assistance,
please call at your convenience.
Sincerely;
J hn Danie s, GAA CMAS CCRA
D niels Appraisal Company
Census figures since 1960 have been considered and analyzed.
Current residential property sales have been researched in
the city during the last year.
The present land use of the property under discussion is for
agricultural land uses, ie, the growth and harvesting of
crops for sale upon the open market. It has been stated that
the present, and prior, families have operated this property
for over 100 years.
The proposed use is to construct and operate an intense
milking operation for 400 cows. Auxiliary facilities will
consist of a feed lot for 40 cows and a lagoon to be
constructed along the southwest corner of the site for the
collection and storage of residue from the livestock.
The question at hand is: will the collection and storage of
animal residue create a deposit that will discharge an odor
that can be recognized for a considerable distance.
The zoning ordinance indicates that land zoned agriculture
does not require any additional permits or consideration for
the purpose of growing and harvesting of crops, however, it
is specific that a permit is required for any other use that
requires special housing or construction for uses other than
"farming" operations.
The existing land uses surrounding the subject of this report
include vacant and agricultural lands to the east and south.
Properties to the west include several single family
residences with farmlands and single family housing beyond.
To the south are several single family residences with
farmlands beyond. Within a one mile radius of the subject
there are several existing single family residences, a dairy
farm along the north side of Co. Rd. 37, and a proposed
residential development to encompass 100 single family
residences. This proposed project is within 1/2 mile of the
proposed dairy operation.
The original Otsego Township, that was incorporated in 1990,
had population figures as follows:
1960
1,080 people
1970
1,546 , increase of 41.3%
1980
4,769 , increase of 212.5%
1990
5,219 , increase of 09%
-1-
•
The demographics indicate that (about) 4,300 people, or about
84% of the total city population are 45 years or younger.
The average family is 3.27 persons.
During the year 1995 through September there were only 3
houses sold on the re -sale market as indicated by the
Minneapolis Area Board of Realtors within the limits of
Otsego. This indicates that the present population likes the
city and want it to stay secure and grow into a good quality
suburban community. Also, new developments will be in strong
demand for the expanding population.
The 1993 estimated census by the Stats Demographer for Otsego
was 5,689 and the total household number was 1,754.
The 1994 estimated census by the State Demographer for Otesgo
was 6,023, and the total household number was 1,859.
A study of these figures clearly indicates that the city is a
desirable place to live and the expanding suburban
residential development is continuing and will be more so if
the city does not allow an in -harmonious environment within
the community.
-2-
a
The following quotes are taken from the 10th addition of the
Appraisal of Real Estate textbook published by the Appraisal
Institute in Chicago, Illinois. This publication is accepted
as the primary "textbook" by several institutions that
conduct educational courses for appraisers. They include the
University of Minnesota, The University of Wisconsin, The
Appraisal Institute and recommended by the Appraisal
Foundation.
ANTICIPATION
Anticipation is the perception that value is created by the
expectation of benefits to be derived in the future.
CHANGE
Change is the result of the cause and effect relationship
among the forces that influence real property value.
ENVIRONMENT
Environmental considerations include factors such as the
local climate, availability of groundwater, pattern of
drainage, quality of air, designation in whole or in part as
a federal wetland, presence of wildlife habitats, location in
a floodplain or along the earthquake fault, and proximity to
streams, rivers, lakes, or oceans. Air and water pollution
are by-products of increased population and urbanization.
Public concern over pollution has promoted political action
and legislation to protect the environment.
CHARACTERISTICS OF AGRICULTURAL RESOURCE LAND
Environmental Controls:
Cropping patterns are influenced by regulations on
herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, air and water
pollution, and wildlife protection. Underground storage
tanks, asbestos in farm buildings, and cattle vats are common
environmental liabilities.
DEPRECIATION
Defined as a loss in property value from any cause.
My conclusions are based upon my investigations, inspection
of the area, analysis of two typical residential properties
within the area, background knowledge of accelerated dairy
operations throughout the state, a study of the population
expansion, and research and review of influences as outlined
within the appraisal industry as to environmental influences
upon real property values. -3-
DAC
The subject of this discussion is the proposed dairy
operation that will house and care for 400 cows that are
within an enclosure and the surrounding land area. Included
upon the subject land is to be a holding pond for the
storage of cattle residue.
Otsego is a newer suburban incorporated community that has
recognized the need to prepare for a major change in the
demographics of the city from a rural area to a new suburban
community that is indicating positive signs that residential
land use is going to increase. Along with this change will
be the demands for uniformity of land use and restriction of
land uses in order to compliment their new subdivisions.
Churches, schools, parks, playgrounds, local and community
shopping and other service facilities, and controlled
commercial and industrial development areas.
The present housing nearby and surrounding the proposed dairy
operation, in my opinion, will experience a drastic reduction
in the acceptability of them in the resale market.
The proposed subdivision to the northwest of the subject site
has been postponed until this matter is settled. I have been
informed that the project probably will not go forward if the
conditional use permit is issued.
As indicated from the textbook of the Appraisal Institute,
the Appraiser is obligated to report any environmental
condition that, in the mind of the Appraiser, will have an
adverse value influence upon the market value of his subject
assignment.
Also, articles that outline the guidelines' for FNMA
sponsored mortgages require that full disclosure be made, and
if the institution believes that there is an adverse value
impact, the mortgage will be either greatly reduced or
refused in full. (See exhibit page)
In conclusion, it is my opinion that this proposed
development will adversely influence the market value of any
residential property within a one mile radius of the subject.
This opinion is based upon my years of experience in the
appraisal of a wide variety of properties, preparing and
testifying in many court cases involving the effects upon
value due to many types of restrictions of property rights.
The reduction in value will range from at least 50% for
adjacent properties to about 20% for those properties along
the perimeter of the one mile radius.
-4-
DAC
The following is offered as an addendum to my qualifications
that are exhibits within this report.
I have been an independent appraiser since 1960. Previously
I was a real estate salesman for several years.
Since 1960 I have completed over 275 hours of specialized
appraisal education. This has been reviewed and accepted by
the Minnesota Department of Commerce as part of the
requirements for real estate licensing. As stated as exhibits
in this report I have a 'Certified General Real Property'
license No. 4000468 expiring 8-31-96.
My appraisal qualifications have been accepted and I have
testified in over 1,200 trials in district and federal courts
and commission hearings relating to real property rights
being acquired either in part or in whole. Testimony has been
in 14 districts in Minnesota, 6 districts in North Dakota,
Tulsa, Oklahoma, and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Federal
courts in Fargo, North Dakota, Knoxville, Tennessee, and
Minneapolis, Minnesota.
I have completed appraisal assignment in 28 states appraising
many varied properties. Many of these properties were such
that environmental issues were addressed or considered. Some
properties involved petroleum products, chemical producing
plants, and agricultural land uses.
Several "feed lot" properties for the care and feeding of
livestock, including cows and hogs, have been appraised.
I have appraised over 8 properties involving accelerated
dairy operations throughout southern Minnesota.
-5-
DAC
APPRAISING QUALIFICATIONS OF
JOHN DANIELS
EDUCATION
Hamline University, St. Paul, Minnesota
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers
Courses I and II, University of Wisconsin, Madison,
Wisconsin. Elective Courses V and VII.
Society of Real Estate Appraisers, Apartment Case Study
Accredited with over 275 hours of approved appraisal
education for license certification by the Minnesota
Department of Commerce.
LICENSE
Certified General Real Property License #4000468
Expiring on August 31, 1996
APPRAISAL EXPERIENCE
Real estate experience since 1958. Since 1960 have been
independent fee appraiser making market value estimates
on all types and classes of real estate. Associated with
Newcombe & Lawrence Appraisals for 12 years. Founded the
Daniels Appraisal Company in 1972.
Appraisal assignments have been completed in 28 states.
Assignments have included formal appraisals on many
parcels of real estate including residences, apartments,
nursing homes, motels, service stations, commercial and
office buildings, whole and parcel takings for condemn-
ation, mortgages, feasibility studies, fractional
interest studies, business interests, attorneys,
investors, and taking authorities.
MEMBERSHIP
National Association of Real Estate Appraisers with the
designation CCRA. Member Minneapolis Area Board of
Realtors. Member National Association of Realtors
with designation GAA. Certified appraiser by Minnesota
Department of Revenue with the designation CMAS.
Approved instructor for continuing education courses for
Real Estate Agents and Appraisers at Normandale Community
College, Minneapolis Community College, and Minnesota
School of Real Estate.
-6-
DAC
TESTIMONY
Qualified as an expert witness in District Courts in
Hennepin, Ramsey, Dakota, Washington, Anoka, Scott,
Sherburne, Stearns, Nicollet, Blue Earth, Wright, Clay,
Douglas and Otter Tail Counties in Minnesota.
District Courts in Cass, Richland, Ward, Dickey, Ramsey,
and Griggs Counties in North Dakota.
District Court in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Federal District
Court in Knoxville, Tennessee and Fargo, N. D.
PARTIAL LIST OF COMPANIES PROVIDED WITH APPRAISALS.
Mobil Oil Corporation
Gulf Oil Corporation
Continental Oil Company
The Texas Company
Phillips Petroleum Company
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Connecticut General Life Ins.
Prudential Life Ins. Co.
Continental Bankers Life Ins.
Country Kitchen Restaurants
Taco Bell Restaurants
Steak & Ale Restaurants
Kentucky Fried Chicken Corp.
Eastman Kodak Company
United States Steel Corp.
General Motors Corporation
Chrysler Corporation
Peavey Company
Davisco Corporation
Robert Williams Company
University of Minnesota
Signal Bank
Marquette Bank
Northland Mortgage Company
Centrust Mortgage Company
Fidelity Financial Services
Citizens Mortgage Company
Federal Bankruptcy Court
Hennepin County Highway Dept.
City of St. Louis Park
City of Minneapolis
Resolution Trust Corporation
-7-
Shell Oil Company
Amoco Oil Company
Union Oil Company
Murphy Oil Company
Hudson Oil Company
New York Life Ins.Co.
Co. Viking Life Ins. Co.
Teachers Annuity Ins. Co.
Co. Eberhardt Company
Quarterback Clubs
Mr.Steak Restaurants
Pannekoeken Restaurants
Perkins Restaurants
Pako Corporation
IBM Corporation
Ford Motor Corporation
Honeywell Inc.
3M Company
Probate Courts
Arcadia Corporation
Norwest Banks
First National Bank
Federal Deposit Ins. Co.
Commercial Credit Company
Community Credit Company
F.H.A. (Hud)
Beta Mortgage Company
City of St. Cloud
City of Hopkins
City of Bloomington
City of Richfield
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Appraisal Section
recognizes
JOHN M DANIELS - Founding Member
is a Member of the NA77ONAL ASSOCIATION OFREJlTORSVAppraisal Section, whose objective is to
advance the professional development and recognition of its aparaiser members through specialized services,
programs, informanon mid related products.
® t i
REAL
ESTATE
FA
De��C A t Chairman, Real Estate Appraisal Committee
r[9 SrECT10N. R E A LT O FF
AZOCWMCF"=W'
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
133 East Sevea& St -
SL Pail, MN 55101
(612)296-6319
APPRAISER LICENSE
CERT GENERAL REAL PROP
F -=ices 813L96
30 Hrs CE due by 8131/96
30HN M DANNIA
10341 YORK LANE
HLOOMNOTON, MN 55431-0000
cu -00-43
�A
-v C
APPRAISERS DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE
The most probable price which a property should bring in a
competitive and open market under all conditions requisite
to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently
and knowldegeably, and assuming the price is not affected by
undue stimulus. (1) Buyer and seller are typically motivated.
(2) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and each
acting in what they consider their own best interest. (3) A
reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market.
(4) Payment is made in cash in U. S. dollars or in terms of
financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) The price
represents the normal consideration for the property sold
unaffected by special or creative financing or sales
concessions* granted by anyone associated with the sale.
*Adjustments to the comparables must be made for special or
creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are
necessary to those costs which are normally paid by sellers
as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs
are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in
virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative
financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property
by comparison to financing terms offered by a third party
institutional lender that is not already involved in the
property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be
calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the
financing or concession but the dollar amount of any
adjustments should approximate the market's reaction to the
financing or concessions based on the appraiser's judgment.
DAC
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. That no survey of the property has been made by the
appraisers and no responsibility is assumed in connection
with such matters. Representations in this appraisal report
are included only to assist the reader in visualizing the
property.
2. That no responsibility is assumed for matters of a legal
nature affecting title to the property nor is an opinion of
the title rendered.
3. That information furnished by others is assumed to be
true, correct and reliable. A reasonable effort has been
made to verify such information; however, no responsibility
for its accuracy is assumed by the appraisers.
4. That all mortgages, liens, encumbrances, leases, and
servitudes have been disregarded unless so specified within
this appraisal report. The property is appraised as though
responsible ownership and competent management.
5. It is assumed that there are no hidden or unapparent
conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures which
would render it more or less valuable. No responsibility is
assumed for such conditions or for the engineering which may
be required to discover them.
6. It is assumed that there is full compliance with all
applicable federal, state, and local environmental
regulations and laws unless nonconformity has been stated,
defined, and considered in this appraisal report.
7. It is assumed that all applicable zoning and use
regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless
a nonconformity has been stated, defined, and considered in
this appraisal report.
8. It is assumed that all required licenses, consent, or
other legislative or administrate authority from any local,
state or national governmental or private entity or
organization have been or can be, obtained or renewed for any
use on which the value estimate contained in his appraisal
report is based.
-10-
DAC
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND CONTINGENT CONDITIONS
(continued) ;
9. It is assumed that the utilization of the land and
improvements are within the boundaries or property lines of
the property described and that there is no encroachment or
trespass unless noted within the appraisal report.
10. It is assumed that the proposed improvements conform to
the Certificate of Occupancy as issued by the appropriate
municipal agency.
11. It is assumed that rental information as furnished to
the appraisers is accurate.
12. It is assumed that all of the necessary and required
permits and licenses are, or will be, in full force and
effect.
13. It is assumed that the forecasted income and operating
expense estimates are based, in part, upon projections based
upon local conditions obtained through contractors, vendors,
and those usually in contact with similar income producing
operations.
14. It is assumed that a final approved survey will be
submitted, conforming to the sketches and estimates as
represented in this appraisal report.
15. It is assumed that the estimated land area as provided
by public records and the owners of the property is accurate
and was utilized as the total land area throughout this
appraisal report.
16. It is assumed that the building area as ascertained from
the owners of the property, city records, and the
architectural floor plans are accurate and was utilized
throughout this appraisal report.
17. If the reader is making a fiduciary or individual
investment decision and has any questions concerning the
material contained in this appraisal report, it is
recommended that the reader contact the undersigned.
-11-
DAC
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND CONTINGENT CONDITIONS
(continued)
r
18. Projections, as utilized in this appraisal report, are
based on certain assumptions and estimates concerning future
events and circumstances. Future valuation estimates may be
affected by events that are beyond the control of the
property. These may be local, national, or international in
scope. It must be understood that actual results achieved
during projection periods may vary from those indicated and
the variations could be material.
19. That this appraisal report is meant to be presented in
its entirety. If this report is presented in any form other
than its complete form, it becomes invalid.
20. That this appraisal report represents a summary of
findings of the data gathering process and the appropriate
appraisal analysis. All input data would be too voluminous to
include in this report. The exclusion of same does not
preclude the appraisers from referring to this data at a
future date. If the occasion arises, the appraisers reserve
the right to refer to any of the source material used in this
appraisal.
21. That, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the
statements of fact contained in this appraisal report upon
which the analysis, opinions, and conclusions are based, are
true and correct; subject to the statement of Assumptions and
Limiting Conditions herein set forth.
22. That this appraisal report sets forth.all Limiting
Conditions (imposed by the terms of our assignment or by the
undersigned) affecting the analysis, opinions, and
conclusions expressed herein.
23. Demographic and economic projections used herein may be
based in whole or in part on information obtained from
outside sources. The undersigned takes no responsibility for
the accuracy of this information.
24. Unless agreements have been made previously, the
appraiser will not be required to give testimony or appear in
court as a result of having made this appraisal with
reference to the property in question. Additionally, this
appraisal report was not prepared for court submission
purposes.
-12-
DAC
UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS AND CONTINGENT CONDITIONS
(continued)
25. Possession of this appraisal report, or a copy thereof,
does not carry with it the right of publication. This
appraisal may not be used for any other purpose or any
person other than the party to whom it is addressed without
the written consent of the appraiser and, in any event, only
with properly written qualifications and in its entirety.
26. The appraisers have not investigated environmental
conditions and their possible significant effect on value.
It is possible that either toxic or hazardous waste is
present on the property. The appraisers recommend that an
environmental study be undertaken. The appraised value
assumes that no environmental problems are present.
-13-
•
i --
r
-
�
i
Admk
X.1 am
ut dew IT.
Ak�I
_ "°"-
% I r t ^ _ i
-ma rr B- i AIEMi
B-2 HOW
B-3 GE34E
Nam �.., ., $-W BUS*
-41
GENE
PtM PLAN
sHof:
A-1 .% zoamum Jw
A- 1
NJ
1 ' -�
AL aft somw
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 95-37
RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ODER THAT
PORTION OF THE CITY GRAPHICALLY DEPICTED ON EXHIBIT A HERETO
ATTACHED FOR THE PURPOSES OF STUDIES ALREADY INITIATED REGARDING
THE FEASIBILITY OF CONSTRUCTING A JOINT WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT
SOMEWHERE WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DESCRIBED AREA.
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego, the City of Dayton, and Frankfort
Township have entered into a contract with the engineering firm of
Bonestroo, Rosene & Anderlik to study the feasibility of joint
construction of a wastewater treatment facility to serve the three
communities; and
WHEREAS, all three communities are in immediate need of such a
plant in order to facilitate proper and orderly development within
the area and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare; and
WHEREAS, severe restrictions exist on the discharge of effluent
into the Mississippi River; and
WHEREAS, restrictions on discharge of effluent into the Crow River
are less than those affecting discharge into the Mississippi; and
WHEREAS, preliminary findings have indicated that the area set
forth in the attached Exhibit A is the most likely location for a
facility that would serve all three of the communities involved in
this joint project; and
WHEREAS, the present ongoing study will likely result in
designation of the described area as the location for a facility;
and
WHEREAS, designation of the described area as the location for such
a facility will necessitate changes in the City's Comprehensive
Plan and official controls; and
WHEREAS, the City, or a joint powers entity, may have to purchase
or otherwise obtain properties within the described area for
construction of said wastewater treatment facility; and
WHEREAS, the City Engineer (Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,Inc.) has
preliminarily indicated that this general location will be the most
viable spot for the construction of a wastewater treatment
facilities; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that no major development occur in this
area until such time as it is determined where within the
designated area the proposed wastewater facility will be located
and proper amendments can be made to the City Comprehensive Plan
and local controls.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO
that a Moratorium on development shall be established within the
described area upon the terms and conditions set forth within the
interim ordinance.
ADOPTED this 23d day of October, 1995.
IN FAVOR: Norman F Freske, Mayor, Council Members Ronald Black,
Larry 0popggj i, Vern Heidner, and Suzanne Ackerman
No One
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
CIT OF OTSEGO
Norman F.Freske, Mayor
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF ARIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. q5_.6
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE TEMPORARILY PROHIBITING APPROVAL OF CERTAIN
DEVELOPMENT REQUESTS WITHIN THAT AREA OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO
GRAPHICALLY ILLUSTRATED ON EXHIBIT A.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO ORDAINS:
Section 1. Definitions. The following terms whenever used in this
ordinance shall be interpreted to mean:
Development: The division of a parcel of land into two or more
parcels; the construction, reconstruction, conversion, structural
alteration, relocation or enlargement of any structure; any mining
excavation, landfill or land disturbance, and any use or extension
of the use of land.
Governmental Projects: A development undertaken by any
department, commission, independent agency or instrumentality of
the United States, State of Minnesota, Wright County, City of
Otsego, authority, district, or other governmental unit.
Section 2. Intent. It is the intent of this Interim Ordinance to
allow the City of Otsego to complete a previously authorized study
of the area in order to explore the possibility of this area being
used as the site of a proposed joint waste water treatment
facility, and to insure that during the period of time over which
the study is conducted that no development occurs within the study
area which may ultimately be incompatible with either the proposed
use of the area or surrounding uses, or that would result in
development which would not be in accord with sound planning
principles.
Section 3. Authority and Purpose. The City Council is empowered by
Minn. Stat. 462.355, Subd. 4 to pass an interim ordinance
applicable to all or a portion of its jurisdiction for the purpose
of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and
welfare of its citizens.
Section 4. Temporary Prohibition. For one year after the effective
date of this ordinance ,or until such earlier time as the Otsego
City Council determines by resolution that the reasons for the
moratorium no longer exist, no new development applications or lot
splits shall be approved or accepted for lands lying within that
area graphically described on Exhibit A, attached hereto and herein
incorporated by reference. Exceptions to this ordinance shall
include the following:
1. Property for which properly completed applications for
development approval were filed on or before October 23, 1995.
2. Building permits associated with projects approved on or before
October 23, 1995, 1995.
3. Building permits associated with governmental projects.
4. Building permits for garages or accessory buildings as allowed
by current City ordinance, or minor improvements to the
property.
Section S. Misdemeanor. Any person, persons, firm or corporation
violating any provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.02, Subd. 3, or as subsequently
amended,plus costs of prosecution.
Section 6. Injunctive Relief. In the event of a violation of this
ordinance, the City may institute appropriate actions or
proceedings, including requesting injunctive relief to prevent,
restrain, correct or abate such violations.
Section 7. Separability. It is hereby declared to be the intention
that the several provisions of this ordinance are separable in
accordance with the following: If any court of competent
jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this ordinance to be
invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions of
this ordinance not specifically included in said judgment.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect from
and after its passage and publication and shall remain in effect
until one year after the effective date, unless a shorter period of
time is approved by proper resolution of the Otsego City Council.
PASSED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 2-1 tray of
1995.
IN FAVOR: Norman F Freske, Mayor, Council Members Ronald Black,
Larry Fournier, Vern Heidner and Suzanne Ackerman
OPPOSED:
No One
.ACITY OF OTSEGO
Norman F. Freske, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
Posted: Otsego City Hall 10/26/95
Published: Star News of Elk River on 11/1/95
OC7-04-1995 16:07 NAC
612 595 9837 P.02i02
i109v3V
SJNIIM m
Nn8N1rN
9NINNVN
Ndloomya
aNMSNYM
wlinrr
C.
NMINlvd
Z
auaiavn
f-
mN7va
O
U-
mIno
LL. A7lolno
30wHino
CN73no
ayno
►rvno
3n3alryvno
3'lvno
,wavno
NOSWYd
NSivuld
EXHIBIT
TOTAL P.02
City of Otsego
Engineer's Agenda Items
City Council Meeting
October 23, 1995
8.1 Improvement Project 94-2 CSAH37 and Odean Avenue;
Consider approval of Partial Payment Estimate #3, Buffalo Bituminous in the
amount of $21,567.38.
8.2 Any Other Engineering Business;
NOTE: Next Council Meeting we hope to address the following items:
1. M.S.A. Screening Committee Report.
2. Well issues relating to correspondence with School District.
3. Consideration of creating a storm sewer taxing district in the
Northwest watershed.
4. Preliminary design report on Isle View Estates project.
agenda 10.23
Item 8
PAY ESTIMATE 3
Buffalo Bituminous Inc.
PO Box 337
Buffalo, MN 55313
RE: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO 94-2
NE 70TH STREET (CSAR 37) & ODEAN AVENUE
(MSAP 217-105-01, MSAP 217-020-02, SAP 86-637-22)
BID AMOUNT: $307,979.25
AWARD DATE: May 23, 1995
COMPLETION DATE: September 2, 1995
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS, INC.
BID SCHEDULE "A" - CITY OF OTSEGO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N0. 94-2
Estimated
Contract
Used
Item No.
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
To Date
Extension
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2021.501
Mobilization
1
Lump Sum
$1,000.00 LS
$1,000.00
1 LS
$1,000.00
2104.501
Clearing
33
Tree
35.00 TR
1155.00
37 TR
1295.00
2101.507
Grubbing
33
Tree
35.00 TR
1155.00
37 TR
1295.00
2104.501
Remove pipe culverts
188
Lin. Ft.
4.00 LF
752.00
210 LF
840.00
2104.501
Remove fence (Wire)
90
Lin. Ft.
3.00 LF
270.00
225 LF
675.00
2104.501
Remove fence (Wood)
100
Lin. Ft.
3.00 LF
300.00
100 LF
300.00
2104.505
Remove bituminous pavement
8150
Sq. Yd.
1.00 SY
8150.00
8447 SY
8447.00
2104.505
Remove concrete slab
155
Sq. Yd.
1.00 SY
155.00
155 SY
155.00
2104.509
Remove sign
27
Each
8.50 EA
229.50
27 EA
229.50
2104.509
Remove timber cattle pass
70
Lin. Ft.
15.00 LF
1050.00
70 LF
1050.00
2104.513
Sawing bituminous pavement
74
Lin. Ft.
2.00 LF
148.00
96 LF
192.00
2104.521
Salvage fence
135
Lin. Ft.
5.00 LF
675.00
0 LF
0.00
- 901
Common excavation
34537
Cu. Yd.
1.80 CY
62166.60
34537 CY
62166.60
03
Motor Grader (60th St. maint.)
60
Hour
60.00 HR
3600.00
8.5 HR
510.00
301
Water (60th St. maint.)
60
M Gal
15.00 GAL
900.00
117 GAL
1755.00
2211.501
Aggregate base class 5
6886
Ton
6.00 T
41316.00
5603.3 T
33619.80
2211.501
Agg. base c15 (60th St. maint.)
1295
Cu. Yd.
7.00 CY
9065.00
816 CY
5712.00
0331.601
2" bit. wearing course (driveways)
787
Sq. Yd.
4.50 SY
3541.50
591 SY
2659.50
2340.508
Type 41 wearing course mixture
1482
Ton
23.50 T
34827.00
1473.1 T
34616.68
2340.514
Type 31 base course mixture
1977
Ton
20.50 T
40528.50
1838.6 T
37691.10
2357.502
Bituminous material for tack coat
919
Gallon
1.00 GAL
919.00
700 GAL
700.00
0412.602
Relocate mailbox
4
Each
60.00 EA
240.00
5 EA
300.00
2501.511
15" RC pipe culvert class V
208
Lin. Ft.
26.00 LF
5408.00
160 LF
4160.00
2501.511
18" RC pipe culvert class V
140
Lin. FT.
28.00 LF
3920.00
132 LF
3696.00
2501.515
15" RC pipe apron
10
Each
280.00 EA
2800.00
8 EA
2240.00
2501.515
18" RC pipe apron
4
Each
315.00 EA
1260.00
4 EA
1260.00
2503.511
15" RC pipe sewer class III
567
Lin. Ft.
22.00 LF
12474.00
616.7 LF
13567.40
2503.573
Install conc. apron storm (15")
2
Each
280.00 EA
560.00
2 EA
560.00
2506.508
Construct manhole storm
3
Each
1300.00 EA
3900.00
3 EA
3900.00
2506.509
Construct catchbasin storm
3
Each
1000.00 EA
3000.00
3 EA
3000.00
2511.501
Random riprap cl III w/ geo. fab.
36
Cu. Yd.
40.00 CY
1440.00
36 CY
1440.00
2531.501
Conc. curb and gutter design 8618
1450
Lin. Ft.
5.20 LF
7540.00
1454.5 LF
7563.40
2531.501
Conc. curb and gutter design 0418
1264
Lin. Ft.
5.25 LF
6636.00
1259 LF
6609.75
2531.507
6" concrete driveway pavement
33
Sq. Yd.
26.00 SY
858.00
43.7 SY
1136.20
0557.603
Wood fence 6' high
254
Lin. Ft.
47.50 LF
12065.00
270 LF
12825.00
0563.601
Traffic Control
1
Lump Sum
3000.00 LS
3000.00
1 LS
3000.00
0564.602
4" broken line yellow - tape
864
Lin. Ft.
0.25 LF
216.00
0 LF
0.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (stop)
2
Each
165.00 EA
330.00
2 EA
330.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (stop ahead)
2
Each
165.00 EA
330.00
2 EA
330.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (winding road)
2
Each
115.00 EA
230.00
2 EA
230.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (advisory speed)
2
Each
42.00 EA
84.00
2 EA
84.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (cross road)
2
Each
115.00 EA
230.00
2 EA
230.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (dead end)
1
Each
115.00 EA
115.00
1 EA
115.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (two way traffic)
2
Each
115.00 EA
230.00
2 EA
230.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (hidden driveway)
1
Each
115.00 EA
115.00
1 EA
115.00
0564.602
F & I sign panel (pavement ends)
1
Each
115.00 EA
115.00
1 EA
115.00
05- 602
F & I street name sign
1
Each
165.00 EA
165.00
0 EA
0.00
02
Pavement mess. (left arrow) paint
2
Each
20.00 EA
40.00
2 EA
40.00
02
Pavement mess. (right arrow) Paint
2
Each
20.00 EA
40.00
2 EA
40.00
0!3- 602
Pavement mess. (only) paint
4
Each
40.00 EA
160.00
4 EA
160.00
0564.603
24" stop line white - paint
30
Lin. Ft.
1.25 LF
37.50
38 LF
47.50
0564.603
24" solid line yellow - paint
368
Lin. Ft.
0.80 LF
294.40
547 LF
437.60
0564.603
4" solid line white - paint
6680
Lin. Ft.
0.15 LF
1002.00
6215 LF
932.25
0564.603
4" double solid line yellow - paint
4165
Lin. Ft.
0.30 LF
1249.50
2501 LF
750.30
0565.602
Furnish and install street light
2
Each
0.00 EA
0.00
0 EA
0.00
0565.603
2" PVC Conduit
307
LF
5.00 LF
1535.00
307 LF
1535.00
2573.501
Bale check
160
Each
6.00 EA
960.00
35 EA
210.00
2573.503
Silt fence, preassembled
7190
Lin. Ft.
1.65 LF
11863.50
5136 LF
8556.?0
APPROVALS
CONTRACTOR: Certification by Contract: I certify that all items and amounts
shown are correct for the work completed to date.
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC.
Signed:
Title:
ENGINEER: HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES INC.
Signed:
Title:
OTHER: CITY OF OTSEGO
Signed:
Title:
OT323PE3.wk3
Date:
Date:
Date:
Estimated
Contract
Used
Item No.
Description
Quantity
Unit Price
Amount
-- --
To Date
Extension
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2575 501
Seeding
3.41
Acre
100.00
AC
341.00
3.5
AC
$350.00
2575.502
Seed Mixture 800
170.5
Pound
3.00
LB
511.50
200
LB
600.00
2575.505
Sodding, type lawn
5265
Sq. Yd.
1.50
SY
7897.50
6312
SY
9468.00
2575.511
Mulch material type 1
6.80
Ton
150.00
T
1020.00
7.9
T
1185.00
2575.519
Disc anchoring
3.41
Acre
25.00
AC
85.25
3.5
AC
87.50
2575.523
Wood fiber blanket type regular
1100
Sq. Yd.
1.00
SY
1100.00
1835
SY
1835.00
2575.531
Commercial fertilizer, 20-10-10
0.86
Ton
300.00
T
258.00
------------
1
T
300.00
------------
TOTAL BID S01EDULE "A" - Total work completed
to date
$307,979.25
$288,866.98
Original
Work
Contract
Completed
Schedule A
------------
$307,979.25
------------
$288,866.98
SUMMARY
4,443.35
Less 5% Retainage:
1444,158.6
Less Pay Estimate #1
Less Pay Estimate #2
-108,697.644
TOTAL ESTIMATED AMOUNT DUE TO CONTRACTOR:
$307,979.25
$21,567.38
WE RECOMMEND PARTIAL PAYMENT OF:
$21,567.38
APPROVALS
CONTRACTOR: Certification by Contract: I certify that all items and amounts
shown are correct for the work completed to date.
BUFFALO BITUMINOUS INC.
Signed:
Title:
ENGINEER: HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES INC.
Signed:
Title:
OTHER: CITY OF OTSEGO
Signed:
Title:
OT323PE3.wk3
Date:
Date:
Date:
Claims List for Approval
For the period 10/10/95 to 10/19/95
TO WHOM PAID
� ROBERT_HII I FRFN
FOR WHAT PURPOSE
RFFIIN[1 FSC'RAW RAI ANCF
DATE
10/1O/9r+
CLAIM
NUMBER
10'16
TOT
CLA
_5.00
MARGARET CIELINSKI
REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT
10/10/95
1037
400
MN STATE TREASURER
SURCHARGE PAYABLE -3RD QUARTER
10/10/95
1038
780
j_ _RI.\iTF A_HnMFS
RFFt1NO FSCROW nFPOSTT
10110/95 1039
_1.000
I ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
DEFERRED COMP -PAY PERIOD 10/7/95
10/10/95
1040
300
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FUND
MONTHLY & PAY PERIOD END 10/7/95
10/10/95
1041
827
STATE CAPITAL CREDIT UNION DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE - 10/7/95 10/10/95 1042 100
BANK OF- ELK RIVER FFD WTTH,SS,MFO-MQNTHI Y X 10/7/95 _10/10/95 1(n) ______695
COMPUTABILITY CONSUMER ELECTRONICS
TONER CARTRIDGE -NEC
10/18/95
1044
181
- TARGET STARES
nnRCLSTANn X RATTFRTFS
10/1R/95
1Ods
1h
!LUND TRANSPORTATION
BUS TRIP -SITE INSPECTION-GLENWOOD
10/18/95
1046
378
'ORDABLE SANITATION
TOILET RENTAL,
10/18/95
1047
106
. ---WM RATI-LARGPON-
ZAS
1n/18/95
10AR
9
ANOKA RAMSEY FARM & GARDEN
STRAW MULCH
10/18/95
1049
2,236
i BRAUN INTERTEC
TESTING SERVICE -37TH & ODEAN
10/18/95
1050
579
_ 00 LAKE SANITATION SERVICE
RErvr' TNG FOR SFRTFMRFR
10/1A/QS
1051
'321
I BIG LAKE BODY SHOP
PAINT OF SIREN
10/18/95
1052
94
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES'
10/18/95
1053
365
CQ MIINTTY RECREATION
CITY SWARF ENTERTAINMENT IN PARK
10/18/95
101.5.4
•i OTSEGO LIONS
FILM
10/18/95
1055
11
i COMPONENT TECHNOLOGY INC
REPAIR PTO -FRONT MOUNT
10/18/95
1056
210
- CORROt+.TRUCKING
SERTFMRFR Yf 1 TNG
1 0/1 8/95
1 057
1 142
EAST TONKA SANITATION
SEPTEMBER RECYCLING
10/18/95
1058
293
i ELK RIVER FLORAL
FLORAL ARRANGEMENT FOR LARRY K
10/18/95
1059
19
--G--&--K-T9 T
10/18/95
106.1
--.--306
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC
SEPTEMBER ENGINEERING
10/18/95
1062
5,379
1 1AC QUIE RnrNI T
NFLISI FTTFR
Claims List for Approval
1066
325
For the period 10/10/95 to
10/19/95
10/18/95
1067
26
ST JOSEPHS EQUIPMENT INC
TO WHOM PAID
10/18/95
FOR WHAT PURPOSE DATE
CLAIM
NUMBER
TOTE
CLA:
HAI I
MINNESOTA MUTUAL
NOVEMBER
LIFE AND SHORT TERM DISAB 10/18/95
1063
117
i'
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
FITTINGS,TUBING,SEAL,FILTERS,VBELT
10/18/95
1064
129
1071
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
SEPTEMBER
PLANNING 10/18/95
1065
4,612
1 1AC QUIE RnrNI T
NFLISI FTTFR
1 O/1 f3/95
1066
325
STAFF TIRE & RETREND
TIRE REPAIR
10/18/95
1067
26
ST JOSEPHS EQUIPMENT INC
PARTS
10/18/95
1068
667
HAI I
n/las/gn
1 OA9
7b
INCI
jj(�LSMTTFn FI-EGTRTf N
G WEBER OIL COMPANY
RFPATR4 (1 -TTY
FUEL OIL, GREASE,GAS & OIL
10/18/95
1070
893
IjH
WRIGHT COUNTY RECORDER
RECORDING FEES
10/18/95
1071
39
7T;rr�l PP -LNJC--
�_- TRAUT WELLS
PARTS
REPLACEMENT OF WELL MOTOR
10/18/95
1073
4,352
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP
ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP FOR 1995
10/18/95
1074
50
FEHN GRAVEI R EXCAVATING INC
OTTf H C' EANTNG,
� Q/1Q�QS
_1(160—_-2,OL
i_ DENNIS-.
+ Fno M -NTH
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE 597'2
-�7y2nivull— -
-1-- w� ------
YAA
vV -4, . 0 ,r.) U'
1995-96 SKATING ANNK EXPANSION
An Equal Opportunity Employer
STATE OF MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL BOARD
475 McColl Building
366 Jackson Street
(5th & Jackson)
St. Paul, Minnesota 551 01-1 925
TO: Interested Parti
FROM: Starlene J. HolmaP, Office Services
DATE: October 19, 1995
SUBJECT: D-311 Otsego/A-5384 Albertville
D-312 Otsego/A-5402 Albertville
Phone: (612) 296-2428
Fax: (612) 296-9926
Twin Cities TDD: (612) 297-5353
Greater MN TDD: 1-800-627-3529
For your information, the Minnesota Municipal Board will hold
a deliberation meeting regarding the above -entitled proceedings on
Thursday, November 9, 1995 at 9:30 a.m. in the Municipal Board Office,
Suite 475, McColl Building, 366 Jackson Street, Saint Paul, Minnesota.
You are welcome to come in and listen to any meetings or
conference calls that may occur because of these proceedings. If you
wish to attend any of these, you must come to the Municipal Board Office
in Saint Paul.
For special accommodations, please contact the Minnesota
Municipal Board, 475 McColl Building, 366 Jackson Street, St. Paul,
Minnesota 55101-1925 (612) 296-2428; Twin Cities TDD (612) 297-5353; or
Greater Minnesota TDD 1-800-627-3529.
sjh
CITY OF OTSEGO
SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
OCTOBER 12, 1995 - 6:30PM
The Special Meeting was called to order by Norman F Freske, Mayor at 6:30PM
Roll Call:
Norman F Freske, Mayor, Ron Black, Larry Fournier, Vern Heidner and Suzanne
Ackerman, Council Members were present as was Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning
Administrator and Charmaine Barranco, Reporter for the Star News.
The Mayor and Council reviewed a letter addressed to the City of Albermille regarding
the border issues for Albertville/Otsego.
C.M. Black motioned to have the City of Otsego respond to the City of Albertville
with the purpose of the response being the letter as drafted. Suzanne Ackerman
seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously.
Ron Black noted that the proposals are something that we can live with.
It was noted by Mayor Freske that he had a call from Joy Swenson and there is a Heritage
Day scheduled for Sunday, October 22, 1995 and the Mayor and Council are invited.
It was noted that the Met. Council will be spreading the rite stuff mixed with their
mixture on the Doug Lindenfelser farm on October 17, 1995 and the Mayor and Council
is invited to attend the test site application.
Vern Heidner motioned to adjourn the meeting. Ron Black seconded the motion.
Motion carried unanimously.
CITY OF OTSEGO:
Norman F Freske, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Adm.
(City Seal)
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
REGARDING CITY OPERATIONS
OCTOBER 30, 1995 - 6:30PM
1 Mayor Norman F Freske will call meeting to order
Mayor Freske called the meeting to order at 6:30PM
ROLL CALL:
Norman F Freske, Mayor, Council Members Larry Fournier, Ronald-
Black,
onaldBlack, Vern Heidner and Suzanne Ackerman were present.
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator, Phyllis Boedigheimer,
Business and Finance Director, Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk and Carol Olson,
Clerk/Secretary were also present.
2 Discussion of City Operations - Organization:
Elaine Beatty read a memo to the City Council regarding her work experience and
asked the City Council for their support regarding daily operations of the City and
supporting the City Clerk as the one in charge. She also presented a schedule of when
and how the reorgizination would be done. The Council supported the schedule.
Ron Black explained the Administration Staff Meeting of October 25, 1995 at
3:30PM and we had reviewed Job Descriptions, but need more time to complete them.
He also explained that the Administrative Staff was asked to determine if we wanted to
hire a consultant to help with the reorganization of the City or do it in house. The City
Staff has determined it should be done in house. There seemed to be a Council
consensus on this.
The City Staff will do a study and make a recommendation to the City Council as
to the City organization makeup. After this is brought to the November 13, 1995 Council
Meeting, the Job Descriptions will be defined and the regular City Operations will be
more defined in house.
Elaine Beatty discussed a Management Seminar at Anoka Ramsey. It is a
5 day seminar over a few months -1/2 day at a time in the AM at a cost of $195.00.
She would like the Council to approve her attendance of this conference.
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL MEETING REGARDING CITY OPERATION OF
OCTOBER 30, 1995 AT 6:30PM - PAGE 2 -
Jobs and pay equity were discussed and the fact that the City is in compliance
now and needs to refile by January 31, 1998. We do have some time to reorganize the
job descriptions.
Discussion of the professional staff, their contracts and who authorizes when we
use them.
Ron Black brought up that he likes the way we currently are contracting with our
professional staff. Some organizations try to save money on professional services and
end up paying for it. Policy needs to be clarified.
Ron Black and the Finance Director are working with the City Attorney to
negotiate a contract directly with him. (Details were discussed)
There was discussion of the Township/City and how we are evolving and need to
reorganize and have written, set policies.
Discussion of employee evaluations and a policy on same. Staff will research and
recommend a policy to the City Council.
A change in the Budget Workshop from November 16th at 6:30PM to November
15, 1995 at 6:30PM, (prior to the Planning Commission Meeting ) at the request of the
Finance Director due to a conflict of schedule. This will be on the Nov. 13, 1995
Council Meeting.
Discussion was had on City Policy regarding the City Hall rental to political
parties.
Larry Fournier motioned to adjourn. Ron Black seconded the motion. Motion
carried unanimously.
NORMAN F FRESKE, MAYOR
ATTEST: ELAINE BEATTY, CITY CLERK
(CITY SEAL)