The URL can be used to link to this page

05-12-03 CCITEM 3.3_ CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP THURSDAY MAY S, 2003 4:30 PINI CITY HALL 1. Mayor Fournier will call the Workshop to order. Mayor Fournier called the Workshop to order at 4:38 PM. Roll Call: Mayor Larry Fournier; Councilmembers: Vern Heidner, Virginia Wendel, Jerry Struthers and Dan Scharber. Staff: Judy Hudson, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator, Ron Wagner, City Engineer and Shane Nelson. 2. Discussion of Engineering Manual with City Engineers. The Engineers went over the changes to the Engineering Manual which included the as builts for new construction, increasing the aggregate base and curb cuts. 3. Any other Council Items. Ron Wagner updated the Council on recent the Regional Transportation Meeting. 4. Adjourn. Workshop ended at 6:12 PM. ayor La Fournier ATTES . Ju y uds n, ity lerk/Zoning dm. CLAIMS LIST CITY COUNCIL MEETING MAY 12, 2003 TO: Judy Hudson ITEM 5 -7 - Attached is the Claims List for the City Council. For more details, please refer to the Check Detail Registers. If you have any questions regarding this service, please let me know. Claims Register 05-01-2003 $ 200.00 05-05-2003 $ 165,574.37 05-08-2003 $ 111,621.61 GRAND TOTAL $ 277,395.98 If you have any questions or if you would like to review this list further, please let me know. Kathy Grover Bookkeeper CITY OF OTSEGO *Check Summary Register© MAY 2003 Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid BANK OF ELK RIVER - CASH Total Checks FILTER: None $200.00 CLEAN UP DAY MONEY $200.00 05101/03 9:51 AM Page 1 CITY OF OTSEGO 05/01/03 9:51 AM Page 1 *Check Detail Register© MAY 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment 101.00 BANK OF. ELK RIVER Unpaid....:.....:..:..:.......:........... ............:BANK OF ELK RIVER- CASH..:........::.......,.v..,,....:.:.............:............,.,.,....,w...,K... ,..,,.,, ..r .:.v..,:,..,.,...,....:. E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $200.00 CLEAN UP DAY MONEY Total BANK OF ELK RIVER - CASH $200.00 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $200.00 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $200.00 $200.00 CITY OF OTSEGO *Check Summary Register© Name 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid BANYON DATA SYSTEMS, INC. UnPaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODU UnPaid CHESTER R & JEANETTE M HOL UnPaid DANNY TOWNSEND & MICHELLE UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC UnPaid ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES UnPaid HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC I UnPaid ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST UnPaid JAMES M NEILSON UnPaid JOEL & TERRI MIKOLICH UnPaid KEVIN M RUDEK UnPaid KRISTEN S KUEMPER UnPaid MCFOA UnPaid MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY UnPaid NORTHWEST ASSOC CONS ULTA UnPaid PAULGOEBEL UnPaid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP UnPaid PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREME UnPaid RAYMOND & RICHELLE KERN UnPaid REED BUSINESS INFORMATION UnPaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW UnPaid WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEP FILTER: None MAY 2003 Check Date Check Amt Total Checks $35.00 KATHY - SEMINAR $171.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES $745.50 85TH STREET EASEMENT $37.50 85TH ST EASEMENT $1,028.11 CLEAN UP DAY AD $18.44 13620 NE 95TH ST $136,033.28 RIVERPOINTE 1 $422.31 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 $2,050.00 ODEAN AVENUE EASEMENT $69.00 85TH ST EASEMENT $9.00 85TH ST EASEMENT $240.00 85TH ST EASEMENT $70.00 JUDY - MEMBERSHIP $100.00 MN HAZ MAT FEE $8,807.56 WATERFRONT PUD $720.00 85TH STREET EASEMENT $562.12 ADMIN - MAY $1,542.40 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 $7,470.00 85TH ST EASEMENT $243.88 85TH ST BID AD $915.90 CITY HALL - CLEAN UP $4,28335 COLD PATCH $165,574.37 05/05/03 3:14 PM Page 1 CITY OF OTSEGO *Check Detail Reqister© MAY 2003 05/05/03 3:14 FM Page 1 1:0100.: _BANK.OF ELK- RAVER_... ............... Unpaid P BANYON DATA SYSTEMS, INC. ...................................... E 101-41600-430 Miscellaneous (GENERAL) $35.00 10148 KATHY- SEMINAR Total BANYON DATA SYSTEMS, INC. :::.::.:::• $35.00 ............................. . ::::...............:......:.,..:.....:.......:.:.:::.:::::::::...,.,.,..:..,.,..:...:.,......:.:.....,....::.....:..:,.x......::..,,,,..:::.:.:: Unpaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS �. ..::,,:.,.M.:: ,,..."""..,,..._ ........ ......... E101-41400-201 Office Supplies $329.81 952626 OFFICE SUPPLIES E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies ($158.79) 997155 CREDIT 952626 Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $171.02 Unpaid CHESTER R-& JEANETTE M HOLM E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $745.50 85TH STREET EASEMENT Total CHESTER R & JEANETTE M HOLM $745.50 Unpaid DANNY TOWNSEND & MICHELLE MEYE ::,,...:.. """" """'"'""'""'"""""` E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $37.50 85TH ST EASEMENT Total DANNY TOWNSEND & MICHELLE MEYE $37.50 Unpaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $256.50 144205 NOTICE OF PH E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $62.70 144206 ORDINANCE 2003-08 E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $65.55 144207 ORDINANCE 2003-07 E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $51.30 144208 NOTICE OF PH E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $177.10 144320 CLEAN UP DAY AD E 101-41400-347 Newsletter $414.96 144610 OTSEGO VIEW Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $1,028.11 unpaid ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES E 101-41970-322 Utilities $18.44 13620 NE 95TH ST Total ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES $18.44 Pad HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC G 701-21927 O. Thompson CUP 99-18 $864.38 7804 RIVERPOINTE 1 G 701-21938 TMH Development $28.88 7805 TODAY G 701.21947 Prairie Creek 3rd Addn $34.29 7806 PRAIRIE CREEK 3 G 701-21949 Stone Gate Estates $64.63 7807 STONEGATE 1 G 701-21977 Stone Gate 2nd $110.00 7808 STONEGATE 2 G 701-21980 Hidden Creek Trail Subd $27.50 7809 HIDDEN CREEK G 701-21941 Pulte Prairie Crk 2nd $165.00 7810 THE POINTE G 701-22315 OTSEGO MEADOWS GOLF $640.80 7811 MEADOWS GOLF G 701-21988 Cummings $57.75 7812 INDUST PARK 5 G 701-22313 BLACKWOODS SITE $28.88 7813 BLACKWOODS G 701-22324 RIVERPOINTE 3 $55.00 7814 RIVERPOINTE 3 G 701-22331 PHEAST RIDGE 6 $82.50 7815 PHEAST RIDGE 6TH G 701-22329 QUADAY ADDITION $90.00 7816 QUADAY ADDITION G 701-22332 PHEAST RIDGE 7 $82.50 7817 PHEAST RIDGE 7TH G 701-22341 WATERFRONT FAM REST $118.88 7818 FAMILY REST G 701-22342 WATERFRON CONY STORE $90.00 7819 CONV STORE E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $782.40 782.40 STAFF MEETINGS G 701-22340 WATERFRONT LIQUOR STORE $176.63 7820 LIQ STORE G 701-22345 F&FMART REZONING $1,718.14 7821 F & F G 701-22356 KITTR CROSS PPRZ $630.00 7823 KITTREDGE CROSSING G 701-21936 Mississippi Pines PUD 00 $158.58 7824 MISS PINES E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $640.09 7827 W OTSEGO ST REPORT G701-22321 RIVERPOINTE 2ND $615.85 7828 RIVERPOINTE 2 G 701-22349 ARBOR CREEK $1,935.56 7830 ARBOR CREEK G 701-22346 HOTEL/WATERPARK $712.13 7831 HOTEL/WATER PARK E 203-45210-302 Engineering Fees $3,361.19 7832 LILY POND PARK CITY OF OTSEGO *Check Detail Reqister© MAY 2003 05/05/03 3:14 PM Page 2 E420-43100-302 Engineering Fees E 101-41400-348 Maps $180.95 7833 PAGE 79TH TO 85TH G 701-22350 SMITH MINI STORAGE $561.38 7835 CITY MAPS G 701-22347 RIVERWOODINN $396.90 7837 MINI STORAGE E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $90.00 7837 RIVERWOOD E 430-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,521.60 7838 SC E 203-45210-302 Engineering Fees $160.80 7839 W S W S EWER PLANT E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $1,916.36 7840 PRAIRIE PARK E 423-43100-302 Engineering Fees $12,353.78 7842 194 STUDY E 435-43100-302 Engineering Fees $4 34.10 7843 42/39 SIGNAL E 436-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,162.50 7844 85TH ST RECONST E 423-43100-302 Engineering Fees $2,745.00 7846 85TH ST RECONT E 435-43100-302 Engineering Fees $478.30 7847 QUADAY/91ST ST E 434-43100-302 Engineering Fees $1,315.17 7848 85TH STREET CONSTRUCTION E 101-41560-302 Engineering Fees $55.00 7849 85TH ST EXTENTION E 428-49400-302 Engineering Fees $1,808.52 7850 MSAA E 428-49400-302 Engineering Fees $102.13 7851 GROUNDWATER WELLS E 428.49400-302 Engineering Fees $39.848.50 7852 W WATER TOWER 1 E 428-49400-302 Engineering Fees $21,960.21 7853 W PUMP HOUSEITANK E 430.43100-302 Engineering Fees $11,874.00 7856 W WELLS 1 & 2 Total HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC $23 796.52 7857 W LIFT STATION E1 _ .. ::.................:........:............,..........ICMA` $136,033.28 Unpaid�«,�.. RETIREMENT TRUST E 101-41400-121 PERA $192.31 G 101-21705 Other Retirement PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 Total ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST $230.00 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 .::..............................................,,:::.JAMES $422.31 Unpaid M NEIL::: SON......................................................... E413-43100-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $2.050.00 Total JAMES M NEILSON $2,050.00 ODEAN AVENUE EASEMENT Unpaid JOEL & TERRI MIKOLICH ' " "" ^��~ w ^ ^- •••" •"--.......,,. E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $69.00 Total JOEL & TERRI MIKOLICH $69.00 85TH ST EASEMENT Unpaidl KEVINM RUDEK.:"..:...,.: E 425-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $9.00 Total KEVIN M RUDEK ,..... $9.00 85TH ST EASEMENT Unpaid KRISTEN S KUEMPER """"""." ,"„'""":" ""„ •:H•.••• E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $240.00 Total KRISTEN S KUEMPER 85TH ST EASEMENT ..:•:.�...,•.x:<.,-:kw.,�„«„a,•....<.,•.�:::.:.:.�:.:•:::::::::::.�::. $240.00 UnpaidMCFOA.:,.,,...,......"......,...:h:..,,...::.::..n ,.::...:.:...:.,:"...:..........:...:.,. ...................,...:.......................,:.,....,,",.n..,..,..:.M E 101-41400-355 Dues & Memberships $35.00 E 101-41400-355 Dues & Memberships KAREE - MEMBERSHIP $35.00 JUDY- MEMBERSHIP Total MCFOA $70.00 Unpaid.......:....:................:....:................:.MN DEPT OF .: •:..::::.:::.,•::.:::::. " ". "w PUBLIC SAFETY A. "...,,..".,..,.".....,.:.................,....,......v........ E601-49400-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $100.00 86999000302 MN HAZ MAT FEE Total MN DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY ....:�,aid`: ...........:............,. $100.00 ".......:...,.:.....,..,.<NORTHWESx ., .,",.:...,.:...,..,.:,",.:....,,,....,.:..:.:.................,..,:..............::...".,.,.,,...... T ASSOC CONSULTANTS G701-22318 RIVERVIEW BANK $121.28 12661 BANK G 701-22304 OTSEGO WATERFRONT $90.00 12661 G 701-22315 OTSEGO MEADOWS GOLF WATERFRONT PUD G 701-22351 ANOKA EQUINE $490.93 12661 OTSEGO MEADOWS G 701-22337 Quest Development $236.90 12661 EQUINE $278.80 12661 QUEST UEST CITY OF OTSEGO 05/05/03 3:14 PM *Check Detail Reqister© Page 3 MAY 2003 G 701-22352 ELK RIVER ALONON Pheck Amt $475.33 Invoice 12661 Comment ALANO G 701-22353 PLFRM ORRIN THOMP $510.42 12661 PLEASANT CREEK FARMS G 701-22349 ARBOR CREEK $522.65 12661 ARBOR CREEK G 701-22355 DAHLHEIMER ACRES $631.20 12661 DAHLHEIMER ACRES G 701-22354 ORRIN THOMO CONCEPT $694.99 12661 RIVERPOINTE CONCEPT G 701-22356 KITTR CROSS PPRZ $997.50 12661 KITTREDGE CROSSING G 701-22357 FRICKE $303.00 12661 FRICKE E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $392.05 12662 GENERAL E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $377.60 12662 TRANSPORT STUDY E 436-43100-303 Planning Fees $78.50 12662 85TH ST PROJECT E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $97.70 12663 5600 QUEENS E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $92.23 12663 ELK RIVER COLLISION E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $49.40 12663 JOHN SIRIOS E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $17.85 12663 SEFFINGER E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $17.85 12663 DIAZ E 101-42420-310 Miscellaneous $181.38 12663 LARSON - HEB E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $1,000.00 12664 MEETINGS E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $1,050.00 12665 CITY CODE E 101-41570-303 Planning Fees $100.00 12666 SIGN PERMIT REVIEWS Total NORTHWEST ASSOC CONSULTANTS $8,807.56 Unpaid •�..,«.�.,..w,,.�.,,.��:.�.,,vR:.x:....::,,.w:a:,.�...�.:,�w.,,,..,,..�.,.�.-..,,,:M PAULGOEBEL w .. ,.................,............,.......................... E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $720.00 85TH STREET EASEMENT Total PAUL GOEBEL $720.00 paid PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP E 101-41400-123 Health $298.66 ADMIN - MAY E 101-43100-123 Health $263.46 PW - MAY Total PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP $562.12 Unpaid .... .. .. , PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD G 101-21704 PERA E 101-41550-121 PERA $740.00 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 E 101-41400-121 PERA $157.05 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 E 101-43100-121 PERA $325.31 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 Total PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT FD $320.04 PPE 4/26 CK DTD 4/30 ::...r,..,.......:..........:...,......,,.........::RAYMOND $1,542.40 Unpaid & RICHELLE KERN.,:.:.ri .,,�.. w:nw:.:. r.ri .m �,:..h .,.....,.:..:.....,........:....:..:.,,..........,................. . E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $7,470.00 Total RAYMOND & RICHELLE KERN $7,470.00 85TH ST EASEMENT Unpaid ........... REED BUSINESS INFORMATION E 436-43100-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $121.94 2307481 85TH ST BID AD E436-43100-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $121.94 2310809 85TH ST BID AD Total REED BUSINESS INFORMATION $243.88 Unpaid SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW ::,.:::„•:•::.,:•,.• E 101-45200-390 Contracted Services $314.18 110 PRAIRIE PARK E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services $202.35 110 CITY HALL - CLEAN UP E 101-45200-390 Contracted Services $175.72 110 NW BALL FIELDS E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $53.25 110 WATER TOWER E 601-49400-390 Contracted Services $170.40 110 PUMP HOUSE .................... Total SUPERIOR LAWN & SNOW $915.90 Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT E101-43100-372 Salt & Sand $439.15 3749 SAND/SALT E 101-43100-434 Blacktop Patching $251.12 3750 COLD PATCH E 101-43100-372 Salt & Sand $3,593.08 3751 SAND/SALT UITY OF OTSEGO *Check Detail Reqister© MAY 2003 Total WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT $4,283.35 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $165,574.37 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 413 1998 ODEAN PROJECT 420 Page Ave. Street Construction 423 Ouaday Watefront Project 425 KADLER AVE PROJ 428 WEST WATER PROJ 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 434 85TH STREET EXTENT 435 85th Street Project - East 436 85th Street Project - West 601 WATER FUND 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $29,868.83 $5,277.55 $2,050.00 $180.95 $912.40 $9.00 $73,784.84 $23,957.32 $55.00 $11,759.67 $3,067.38 $323.65 $14,327.78 $165,574.37 05/05/03 3:14 PM Page 4 CITY OF OTSEGO 05/08/03 9:34 AM Page 1 *Check Summary Register© MAY 2003 FILTER: None Name Check Date Check Amt 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER UnPaid AIRGAS, INC. $20.38 ACET/HAZMAT/OXYGEN UnPaid AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTI $8,839.35 WEST WTP UnPaid AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUC $15,789.00 PARKS UnPaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODU $266.85 SILENT PPRINTER CARTRIDGE UnPaid CITY OF MONTICELLO $3,294.00 2 OTR FIRE CONTRACT UnPaid COURI MACARTHUR LAW OFFIC $17,325.25 GENERAL UnPaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER $163.37 CLEAN UP DAY UnPaid DAVID CHASE $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $51.74 RAKE BOW UnPaid ECM PUBLISHERS INC $1,271.45 CLEAN UP DAY UnPaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY P $83.07 BUSINESS CARDS UnPaid FINKEN'S WATER CARE $130.14 HEADSTART - SALT UnPaid GRANITE CITY READY MIX $2,133.62 RECYCLED CONCRETE UnPaid GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $55,993.00 WWTF UnPaid GROEN GARY CPA $2,138.00 APRIL 03 UnPaid J -CRAFT INC $20.60 2000 IH TRK UnPaid KNUTSON RICK $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE UnPaid LONG & SONS $463.20 CLEANING UnPaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $64.00 PICK UP 2 DOGS UnPaid NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $338.65 86 CHAVY PICKUP UnPaid SCHARBER & SONS $12.96 75 FORD TRACTOR UnPaid SERGIA & TRACY L BULASK $159.00 85TH STREET EASEMENT UnPaid SOFTRONICS $1,141.71 MICROSOFT WORD Paid TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS IN $211.83 COPIER Paid WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TRE $474.50 R118-500-202102 UnPaid XCEL ENERGY $45.31 RIVERPOINTE STREET LIGHTS UnPaid ZIEGLER INC $375.68 88 GRADER - DRUM Total Checks $110,886.66 FILTER: None CITY OF OTSEGO 05/08/03 9:35 AM *Check Detail Reqister© Page 1 MAY 2003 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER ........:.......:.............,..:......:.:.:AIRGAS -e corn k ":,:...........:.::...,.:.,::� Unpaid INC. ..,.:..,::.. ::.......:.,".,..:.....:..:...:.:...:.......................................:................... .........................................................................."::.":.":: E 101-43100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $20.38 105069375 ACET/HAZMAT/OXYGEN Total AIRGAS, INC. ...................... $20.38 Unpaid AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING " µ»+»» `»'»'"""""""` """" "" "".. E 430-43100-302 Engineering Fees $8,839.35 22452 WEST WTP Total AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING $8,839.35 Unpaid:::.: .................................... ....:.......::AMERICAN LIBERTY :...:. :»::: »::...:......:..:....:.....:..".::.........:..,.., CONSTRUCTION:.,». w:»:.::..,...:.: E 203-45210-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $15,789.00 PAY 1 PARKS Total AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION $15,789.00 ........................ ..................... Unpaid BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS _ E 101-41400-201 Office Supplies Total BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS $266.85 955173 SILENT PPRINTER CARTRIDGE $266.85 Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO •••�•-•-»•.•m.•-•.. E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services E 213-42200-390 $464.00 7300 ANIMAL CONTROL -MARCH Contracted Services $2,830.00 7300 2QTR FIRE CONTRACT Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $3,294.00 Unpaid:::,.:.::...,"..:»H:...::.,.::.. COURT MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE ""-""••'•-••--•--••••••-•• G 701-22304 OTSEGO WATERFRONT $487.50 E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $4,280.00 WATERFRONT E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $710.00 GENERAL E 101-42420-301 Legal Services $450.00 E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $150.00 ABATEMENT E 101-41700-301 Legal Services $80.00 ROAD ACCESS E 101-41700-301 Legal Services 87TH ST VACATION E 406-43100-301 Legal Services $50.00 $350.00 EST E 413-43100-301 Legal Services DRAINAGE EASEMENTS E 430-43100-301 Legal Services $940.00 ODEAN AVE G 701-22344 PLEASANT CREEK FARMS $530.00 WASTEWATER TREATMENT G 701-22345 FBFMART REZONING $537.50 PLEAST CREEK E 435-43100-301 Legal Services $487.50 F & F G 701-22303 BEAUDRY CUP $6,920.25 85TH ST/PAGE PROJECT G 701-22344 PLEASANT CREEK FARMS $30.00 BEAU D RY G 701-22315 OTSEGO MEADOWS GOLF $37.50 $87.50 ARR G 701-22312 FEMAFLOODAREAPARISH $110.00 OTSEGO GO MEADOWS G 701-21996 Vintage Pro Golf $187.50 AVE G 701-21988 Cummings $250.00 ULOW BULOWH G 701-21996 Vintage Pro Golf $287.50 GS G 701-22325 101 MARKET $312.50 VINTAGE VINTAG E E 428-49400-301 Legal Services NATHE 101 MARKET Total COURT MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE $50.00 WATER SYSTEM $17,325.25 Unpaid CUB FOODS ELK RIVER w E 101-41400-203 Supplies - General $78.76 E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $104.61 SUPPLIES Total CUB FOODS ELK RIVER :.......:...,........�.....:,r:.Y $183.37 CLEAN UP DAY .............":.,,., paid DAVID CHASE E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE Total DAVID CHASE $30.00 Unpaid: N.DXS TOTAL HOME CENTER:. E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $30.51 662732 PAINT/TRAY/MISC CITY OF OTSEGO 05/08/03 9:35 AM Page 2 *Check Detail Reqister© MAY 2003 E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $7.61 663110 PAINTBRUSH/THINNER E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $13.62 663444 RAKE BOW :::::. Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER $51.74 Un Paid ................................................... ECM PUBLISHERS INC ..................................................................................................... E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $47.00 144209 HELP WANTED E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $239.40 144641 AD FOR BID E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $230.85 144642 AD FOR BID E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $247.95 144643 AD FOR BID E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $282.15 144644 AD FOR BID E 101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $47.00 144645 HELP WANTED E 101-43620-390 Contracted Services $177.10 144763 CLEAN UP DAY Total ECM PUBLISHERS INC $1,271.45 Unpaid ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU E101-41400-350 Print/Binding (GENERAL) $83.07 17238 BUSINESS CARDS Total ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLU $83.07 Paid FINKEN'S WATER CARE ........ ................. E 101-41940-390 Contracted Services $33.55 CITY HALL E 101-41950-310 Miscellaneous $29.82 13620 90TH ST JUNE RENTAL E 101-41950-310 Miscellaneous $30.50 HEADSTART - SALT E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $36.27 13474 95TH ST Total FINKEN'S WATER CARE $130.14 ipaid GRANITE CITY READY MIX E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $805.14 50451 RECYCLED CONCRETE E 101-43100-310 Miscellaneous $1,328.48 50502 RECYCLED CONCRETE •:: -Un Total GRANITE CITY READY MIX $2,133.62 ....................................................... P d GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. ................................................................................................ E429-43256-500 Capital Outlay (GENERAL) $55,993.00 PAY 14 W WTF •: iv:?•:,Y"vi Total GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. $55,993.00 :•: Unpaid na:n•%v[.n[H::•: F.[VTFi,:CN:[�iif.•m[M�ucn. CJo:ev.-?:[+ttr;Yl:iw.on.<•w:[aacaua:x:.'vu!Vn':icuu�p>Mra:wxN..wff"w...a,�.vxa..w,�n,[.[.. GROEN GARY CPA .�n.�vn'[nnr[wxnvK[[e[••ra:[<+.,,v E 101-41600-390 Contracted Services $2,138.00 APRIL 03 Total GROEN GARY CPA $2,138.00 �Unpaid::........:.:.....................................:.:.,-. J -CRAFT INC::.:.,....,.:..:.,......,::...:...,..,.Mu.,,.:...::...:.nw.vv,.,.....:.,::..n.......................................:.,....,...,..,.,...-..,.,.:,....,H:..,..,,.,.H E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $20.60 32109 2000 IH TRK Total J -CRAFT INC $20.60 Unpaid....................................................::KNUTSON RICK:...........................,,.,.,...w.. ............,....... E 101-43100-320 Telephone $30.00 MAY CELL PHONE •Unpaid:.,.....,.,...,.,....,.:........,..: Total KNUTSON RICK $30.00 ...................,•:LONG &•SONS.:::.....::..,,.r....,,.:..,,,.,,:.,,..,..,..,,,,�,,,,.:.,r,,::.,.::..,:.......,,,.,,,.:.w.,.:....:.,.,,...:..,..,,....,.,.,:...,.,w.",.,.,.wN�.....k,.....,....v..,:. E 101-41940-389 Cleaning Services $428.27 CLEANING E 101-41940-203 Supplies - General $34.93 SUPPLIES Total LONG & SONS $463.20 Unpaid MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL E 101-42710-390 Contracted Services $64.00 368 PICK UP 2 DOGS Total MONTICELLO ANIMAL CONTROL $64.00 .Unpaid::..........:........... ......................:...,...,�NAPA OF�ELK �RIVER INC:..::...........:....:"„M:.,.,,,...x,:...:..:...:.:.....,,.,�,,,.:............:........,........:.::.,,.N,.::...�,...",::".•..a,a..V:,..a,,,.: E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $92.01 990746 67 PUP TRAILER E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $21.29 990966 67 PUP TRAILER E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $99.56 991212 86 CHEVY PICK UP CITY OF OTSEGO 05/08/03 9:35 AM *Check Detail Reqister© Page 3 MAY 2003 E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $375.68 593759 88 GRADER - DRUM Total ZIEGLER INC $375.68 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $110,886.66 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 213 Monticello Fire District 406 Lefebvre Watershed 413 1998 ODEAN PROJECT 428 WEST WATER PROJ 429 W W TP -East Phase 2 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 35 85th Street Project - East 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $15,671.06 $15,789.00 $2,830.00 $350.00 $940.00 $50.00 $55,993.00 $9,369.35 $7,079.25 $2,815.00 $110,886.66 E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $58.56 991269 86 CHEVY PICK UP E 101-43100-203 Supplies - General $9.78 991685 GASKET E 101.43100-203 Supplies - General $31.91 991761 HI DRY TOWELS E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $74.94 994050 AIR FILTER E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) ($74.94) 994210 CREDIT E 101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $25.54 996042 86 CHAVY PICKUP Total NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC $338.65 Unpaid:SCHARBER & SONS::..:....:..............r......,.:..:..........................,,.....................................................,......,......,,.........:. E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $12.96 290246 75 FORD TRACTOR Total SCHARBER & SONS $12.96 Unpaid:....,:>.t:...,,.::�.,...., ....:....................... SERGIA & TRACY L BULASK E 435-43100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $159.00 85TH STREET EASEMENT Total SERGIA & TRACY L BULASK $159.00 Unpaid SOFTRONICS E 101-41400-390 Contracted Services $375.00 2020 LABOR E 101-41400-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $766.71 2020 MICROSOFT WORD : Total SOFTRONICS $1,141.71 a :::::::::: : TOS:H, IBA A:ME,:R::ICA :INFO S.Y.S INC """""""""""'""'•'""••••-•--•••••••• E101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $211.83 35748237 COPIER Total TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS INC ::.:.......................:....:.,.......:.......,r::WRIGHT $211.83 Unpaid: COUNTY (AUDITOR -TREASURE :...,,..............., ., ..:.:....,..................:...........:......,x. M :. „ :..�.:.,.. E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $337.00 R118-010-078010 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $56.00 R118-077-000010 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $39.50 R118-010-077100 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $8.00 R1 1 8-1 68-00001 0 E 101-41400-310 Miscellaneous $34.00 R118-500-202102 :: ]:i-:Snri::M: Total WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURE �:::•f.4HT:4:4%ti•N;v $474.50 :SA'4Y" :ASP%tir:h •'.iFiY'-'N:MvrWkiv. .vvJ'aKi:•%rw•::•:[<r.4:Hn.LX.:V:•i✓ixC«th':.4:C.Y.4: E 101-43160-322 Utilities $45.31 086709125412 RIVERPOINTE STREET LIGHTS Total XCEL ENERGY $45.31 Unpaid:.... ....:...:......................:...........:.ZIEGLER INC:,•....,...........,...:...:...,., ...:.:......::...... ,..,. ,.:..,,..,nv..::....,................,:..::...:.....:.., ..:...... ,,..,..,,.......:....... E101-43100-220 Repair/Maint Supply (GENERAL) $375.68 593759 88 GRADER - DRUM Total ZIEGLER INC $375.68 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $110,886.66 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 213 Monticello Fire District 406 Lefebvre Watershed 413 1998 ODEAN PROJECT 428 WEST WATER PROJ 429 W W TP -East Phase 2 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 35 85th Street Project - East 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $15,671.06 $15,789.00 $2,830.00 $350.00 $940.00 $50.00 $55,993.00 $9,369.35 $7,079.25 $2,815.00 $110,886.66 Fund Summary 101 GENERAL FUND 203 PARK DEVELOPMENT 213 Monticello Fire District 406 Lefebvre Watershed 413 1998 ODEAN PROJECT 428 WEST WATER PROJ 429 W WTP-East Phase 2 430 West Trtmnt Plant -Phase 1 435 85th Street Project - East 701 DEVELOPMENT ESCROWS FUND CITY OF OTSEGO 05/08/03 9:18 AM Payments Page 6 Current Period: MAY 2003 10100 BANK OF ELK RIVER $15.671.06 $15,789.00 $2,830.00 $350.00 $940.00 $50.00 $55,993.00 $9,759.35 $7,079.25 $3,159.95 $111,621.61 Pre -Written Checks $734.95 Checks to be Generated by the Computer $110,886.66 Total $111,621.61 N Q W m to 0 (U M .. m N co tU +_11 ro U O In 1A z L to L V L N N APPLICATION AND CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT TO Ob'dIV1=R- Cdy of Otsego - Mike Robertson PROJECT: School 8899 (Nashua Ave. NE, Otsego, MAN 55330 Threc Parks: FROM CONTRACTOR: School Kn Knoll &Prairie Park American Liberty Construction. Inc. VIA ARCHITECT: Damon Farber Assoc. • Ellen Stewart P.O. Box 547, Rockford, MN 55373 CONTRACT FOR: 923 Nicolle',P�;all General Construction Mpls., MiN 55402 CID CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT ti Application is made for payment, as sho�m below, In v connection with the Contract. Continuation sheet is attached. 0. ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM . _ .... . 2) Net change by Change Order .. bJ,D?9,892.15 3). CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line 1 +/. Z) _ , , _ _ . 50.00 $1,019,892.16 4). TOTAL COMPLETED AND STORED TO DATE .... $19 (Column G on Cont Sheet) $]6,520.00 5). RETAINAGE: a). 5 0 of Completed .York $83'.0-D (Columns D + E on Cont. Sheet) b). S o Of Stored Material $0.00 (Column F on Cont. Sheet) Total Retainage (Line 5a 4 5b or Total In Column I o, wont. Sheet) .. _ .. . _ , _____1113', 00 6). TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE _ $1 S 780 00 (Line 4 less Line 5 Tot2l) 7) LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT. . (Line 6 iron previews Certificate) 1.0.00 8). CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ......... . 5). BALANCE TO FINfSH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE $15.789.D0 (',Inc 3 less Lire n) 51,00,,103.16 rn CD r__ 0 z x L_ F— :n z 0 v OK LLJ m Ld (CHANGE ORDER S1, 114PJ.:11RY i'O,: 11 ONS DEDUCT Notal c ,arges apprcved ;n I �revi�us moths by Owner I :ctz' 2 corred :his Wo'gl!h $O.OD t V. T0TA' S Sit r n Char.Ce Orcer ! SO GO MUTE: invoices unpaidatter 30 days incur interest from invoice date a; I8 � APR. Preparee t; A.n -icon Ci`•ert•: ,lr ;caen. ;nc Qt.'S Page One of 3 Mr- PI-ICAIICiV ZERO Distribution tet PERIOD TO: 4/22/03 3' 'OWNER PROJECT ;VS: 302 01ARCKTECr DFA# 02.142, 02.163, C2-179 Ci COMRA TOR CONTRACT DATE: ❑ 4/9/03 The undersigned Contractor cert lies that to the hast of I" Contractor's Kno.'Ic-o. on and belief, the Work covered by this App4cation for Payment has been ccnplefed in accordance with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Conlraclor for Work :or which previous Certificates for Payment veere issucd and payment s received from the C.vner, and that Current pay e t shown is her��r due. CONTRACTO .. . T��'1 By: Froward O. Jacobson Pres. I Date: 5/1/03 State o!: M,innesma County of: Hennepin Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1St day o; May, 2003 Notary Public: My Ccmmissiorl exoires 01/31/2005 ARCHITECT'S CERTIFICATION FOR PAYMENT In accordance v:ith the Contract Documents, cases on on-site obsenalions and the Bata Comprising this app'ic?;ion The Architect cer"hes ;o the Owner that :c the best of the Architect's kn;::iedge, inicrmalion and befiei the'vilo!k has prcgresscc as indicated, the gt:2li;y o. the':�ork is ir, accordance with tee Contract Documents. and I-"-: Conlraclnr is enj!l°d to payn^en' o.' the A:;:0UN7 CE'RTIFIrlD, AMOUNT CERT'=;ED_.................. I 116;. /69. "10 �r,ao.^5 ezpf2na'rcn :: ,;,T. C:i.7f Cerhh9d Criers i/Oq: i�: d/rrC:.:^; d}7,ni1^j :fir. :.T:'2: as l'e_fES or .^:S 50.00 arc�,;,7eCon':^uz;or,�reetPharater.^an 5� C� �o c� ay .bra., .,cr.n xz;e is no- nrja;:ani :he ': C-uad :' ;;_Q rrfl:p n p;vja7 � �-^n• .�L !e e rzcb�r oa nec F.ereir. 's•_ iasc:. ,a.m^rl end ecce;;ance e1 Raymer.: art :a!i:r_:- �rejLdiCe to a;-.-.. caa —at'" U.•.ner Dr Cr -itrac•o- urcer t. is Ccr.!rac; m H Jacobson lL Proj. b•; 0301 THREE CITY PARKS App1.: ONE Appl Date: 04/22/03 OSTEGO, AIN Pcriod From 04/09/03 o Tu:01l3 0; 03 Arch. Proj 0302 AB C D E F G N I Cal. Vo. Description Scheduled Prmious Work in Placc Alatl. Scored Completed Complete Value Applications This Period This Period and Stored % Balance to Finish Retainage M M 0_10(10 ! General Conditions 0(1600 556,950.00 50.00 i 51,900.00 I 50.00 S1,900.on I, 9% 552,050.00 52-05.00 0 Bond/Insurancc $11,720.00 $0.00 $11,720.00 SO-00 S11,720.00. 100%! 50.00 5586.00 N _ o jS(.BTOTAL SCHOOL KNOLL 568670.00 50.00 $16,620.00 ! SO.00 516,620.00 21`'/0 $52,050.00 5831,00 m 0172(1{s) Suncl 1 s6,5RQ00 50,00 ' 50.00 50.00 10.00 O:b 56,580.00 50.00 to �' 02100(sj Demolition _ $9,770.00 $0,00 $0.00 SO-00 50.00 ' 0% S°,770.00 S0.00 (13 c-� 02200- Sitetivark 519,590.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 S0.00I 0%j S19,5J0.00 SO.DO �, r` 025 [ 1(s) flsPhalt S>2,320.00 50,00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 0°/.I $52,320.00 50.00 02820 s Fcncin O g S8,090 oa 50.00 SO.Oo $0.00 $0.00 0% S8.090.00 SD.DD 0 02b i0(s) Sitz Furnishings $12,630.00 50.00 50.00 $(J.00 SO.OD 0"/01 S42,630 S0.00 M x 02871(s) Picnic Shelter Buildings $19,150.00 90.00 SD.00 $0.00 SO.OD 0%'• .00_1 S39,150 00 : $0.00 02881(s) PtaJ ound ui mcnt F9 P 551,950.00 SO.t)0 $0.00 SO.OD 50.00 0%; 551,930.00 -- SO.00 02885(9) Wood Fiber Play 5urtace $6,580.00 $0.00 So. DO $Q00 $0.00 0°c 56,580.00 ; $0.00 0 N N 029(10(9) Candscapin - 02930(5) Sod /Seed -- $40,200.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 50.00 • °/, 0 • ° S4^.X0.00 , S0.00 - z 01300(9) Concrete 59,160.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 0"/°' _ _ S9 160.00 ; SO 00 CD 518.560.00 SO.00 $0.00 SO.00 50.00 , 0%. $23.560 (:O 50.00 _ SUBTOTAL j S31456000 $0.00 S090 i SO.00 ! $0.00 0%; S31d,560.00 1 50.00 LQ YHAIRIE PARK M L m 01720(s) ISuney _ (12100(s)^Demolition 527,900.00 S0.00 SO.GO S0.00 - SO.00 i 0% -527.900.00 so. 0 e `� 02200(s) 1Sitetyor --- S [6,I 1Q00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.OrJ $0.00 0%i $16,140.00 50.00 Io a --� - 0�511(s) Asphalt $3;,690,00 S0.00 S0.00 50.00 Sum I 0%! S37.5y!`.00 SO.00 r 028rD(s) Irrigation 5206,810.00 S0.00 50.00 Son SU.OU 0'A S206.810.00 50.00 02570(9) i5itc Furnisltin -S,0,'7G.00 5;,,000.CO SG-00 50.60 SO.OD 50.00 ;%� S3U,7^.0.60 50.00 J s o--._-- 02851(9 Pia>-grot nd ui rnen;S50.560.00- Eq P SO.UO 50.00 SO.00 SD-00 ` - 0°,/.; S3:.ODO.r,1 - ---= -- SO.CD 02551(9) Skatepark Equipment - - 50.00 50.00 50.00 SO.00 ' - -- 0 SSr�.5G0.00 50.00 rn - 0i :_(12385(,) Wcod Fibcr Plati• Surlaca - 5;7,950 00 S0.00 SQ.DO SD.DO 30.00 �- ,�',n; ,. J ;-960.00 r 50.00 iv 02900(9) Lands.�pin -- 516.920.00 S71.GI0-00 SQ.00 SO.QD SU.UU SO.00: - - - -- - 0°" Slb,`1ZU.Oi} SO.00 - -k - - 029 0(s) 'Sodi Secd - .. --- 50.00 SU.00 50.00 50.00 ---SO 0%: S7 r I,�1� Ct, SD.Gp I r 1I --- --- 0;'.ti01c) 'Concrete 562,_92.:6 SG.00 50.00 S0.61) ("a 0;e: 552,)9215 I m S.BTOT,L S1;.Olr).U0 50.00 J,..GQ 57.1.0 50.00 _ 0% S13.010.60 ' SO.00 i o ------ Combirtcd Contract Amooni Su)5.6G2 15 ' SOGrI _ SO.CJ - -- -SO.GG SO.OJ --�---- S6=ti.n52.16 SOOO or -- -� ----- 51.')19.89=.16 ' 50.0'1 - - -- - --, 316 1 i J.1.;/p;c9ress+,arues;lI vIs AMERICAN LIBERTY CONSTRUCTION, TN-C. Schedule of V-' / PIN' Application o; 3 N at +) ro 0 0 N N <t L al A] L N LL C 0 E ra a 7 l P,til. R Jacobson Proj_ #: 0301 Appl. Dale 0-4/22/03 0 cirTwo ]3 Description rders: ng aoeecnOntrarrAntounr Change Orders (Unapproved) `Dc r - z I Thret �F�timated Contract Amount 0 !)i `proms ;ssr%jiscs 0 xl; C Scheduled Value 51,019,892.16 51,019,892.16 THRF'F: CITY PARKS OSTEGO, ,NIN Am: 4 0`'E Period From: 04r09/03 D E 'crk in Place cations This Period S0.00 $0,00 S0.00 50.00 50.00 S0.00 S0.00 516,620.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 SO -00 $0.00 50,00 i S16.620.00 $0.00 50.00. PDN/01----- s0.00Dn;'Or- S0.00 S0.00� bDTV/0! $0.00 ' $16,620.00 1 2% $ :11IERICAN LMERTP CONSTRUCTION, INC. Schedule of 1 -' / pay. •application so ao $0.00 72.16 50.00 50.00 50.00 S831.00 To.04/30/03 Arch. Proj e: 0302 G H I M± Matt. Srored Completed Complcle This Period and Stored % Balance to Finish Retainage S0.00 $0,00 #DIV/0! SUM ' 50.00 S0.00 30.00 #DN/0! _ $0.00 Sum 50.00 S0.00 ' #D111/01;-- SQ 00 SO.00 S0.00 . 516,620.00 i 2.o�_SI,003,272.16 j S831.00 $0.00 50.00. PDN/01----- s0.00Dn;'Or- S0.00 S0.00� bDTV/0! $0.00 ' $16,620.00 1 2% $ :11IERICAN LMERTP CONSTRUCTION, INC. Schedule of 1 -' / pay. •application so ao $0.00 72.16 50.00 50.00 50.00 S831.00 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects May 1, 2003 Mr. Mike Robertson City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Ave NE Otsego, MN 55330 po E M 5-3- Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action E ual O and Employee Owned g Opportunity Employer Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PF Marvin L. Sorval.i. PF. • Glenn R. Cook, PE. • Robert G. Schurncht, PE. Jerry A. Sourclon, P.E. • Mark A. Hanson, PE, Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. PE. Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. Richard E. Turner, PE. Susan M. Eberlin, CPA. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon, PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W Foster, PE. • David O. Loskota, PE. Michael T. Rautmann, PE. • Ted K. Field. PE, Kenneth P Anderson. RE. • Mark R. Rolls. PE. • David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. Sidney P Williamson, PE., L.S. • Agnes M. Ring, %I B A. • Allan Ricl< Schmidt. PE. • Thomas W. Peterson, P.E. James R. Maland. PE. • Miles B. Jensen, PE. • L. Phillip Gravel III, PE. • Daniel J. Edgerton. PE. • Ismael Martinez. PE. Thomas A. Syfko. PE. • Sheldon J. Johnson • Dale A. Grove. P.E. • Thomas A. Roushar. PE. • Robert J. Devery, PE, Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN • Milwaukee. WI • Chicago. IL Website: www.bonestroo.com Attn: Mike Robertson, Administrator Re: City of Otsego East Wastewater Treatment Facility Phase 2 Payment Request Number 14 BRA File No. 50301102-P.R. Dear Mr. Robertson: Enclosed are four (4) copies of Request for Payment No. 14 from Gridor Constr., Inc. for the above referenced project for the period March 31, 2003 to April 30, 2003. The requested payment amount is $55,993.00. I recommend approval of this pay request by the City. Note the retainage is shown as zero because Gridor Construction Inc planned the alternate retainage method. If this has not been completed yet the pay request should be contingent upon completion of the alternate retainage account. Please return one signed copy of the approved pay request to our office. Send two to the Contractor along with his check, one for him and one for the Bonding Company. Keep one final copy for your files. If you have any questions regarding this at (651) 604-4851. letter or the requested payment amount, please call me Sincerely, ONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. Joel W. Schmidt cc: Bob Meyer, Gridor Constr., Inc. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 GRIDOR CONSTR., INC. 1886 BERKSHIRE LANE PLYMOUTH, MN 55441 Owner CITY OF OTSEGO Date For Period 3/31/03 TO 4/30/03 Request No. Engineer BONESTROO ROS ENE ANDERLIK & ASSOC. REQUEST FOR PAYMENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY SUMMARY.• 1 ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT 2 CHANGE ORDER - ADDITION 3 CHANGE ORDER - DEDUCTION 4 REVISED CONTRACT AMOUNT 5 VALUE COMPLETED TO DATE 6 MATERIAL STORED 7 AMOUNT EARNED THIS PERIOD 8 LESS RETAINAGE - 5% 9 SUB -TOTAL 10 LESS AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY PAID 1 I AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST Recommended for Approval by: Engineer , 2,11 6R�'O&) Q0 (Project Engineer) Approved by Contractor: GRIDOR CONS R., INC. G Robert Meyer 4/30/2003 pecified Contract Completion Date: 4/1/2003 Approved by Owner: CITY OF... Date O:\BOB\Otsego 2001\Pay Estimate\PAY.XLS EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER 763-559-3734 4/30/2003 14 $ 2,217,700 $ 2,217,700 $ 2,113,620 $ 0 $ 2,113,620 $ 0 $ 2,113,620 $ 2,057,627 $ 55,993 PAY ITEMS WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY PAY ESTIMATE NO. 14 OTSEGO, MN 3/28/03 TO 4/30/03 TOTAL 2,217,700 2,057,627 55,993 2,113,620 4/29/2003 AMOUNT AMOUNT TOTAL ITEM CONTRACT PREVIOUSLY COMPLETED COMPELTED NO DESCRIPTION AMOUNT APPROVED THIS PERIOD TO DATE 1 BOND & MBILIZATION 60,000 60,000 60,000 2 EXCAVATION & BACKFILL 70,000 68,000 2,000 70,000 3 FINE GRADE SITE 7,000 1,000 1,000 4 FENCE 18,000 800 800 5 ROADS & WALKS 9,000 2,000 2,000 6 TREES & SHRUBS 6,000 0 7 CONCRETE 1300 CY @ $340.00 442,000 440,000 2,000 442,000 8 REINF. STEEL 130 TON @ $1,200.00 156,000 156,000 156,000 9 PRECAST CONCRETE 22,000 22,000 22,000 10 MASONRY 46,000 46,000 46,000 11 MISC. METALS - FRP - HATCHES 70,000 68,000 2,000 70,000 12 CARPENTRY 22,000 21,000 1,000 22,000 13 WOOD TRUSSES 9,000 9,000 9,000 14 FRP DOME 41,000 41,000 41,000 15 INSULATION & SHINGLES 28,000 28,000 28,000 16 METAL SIDING & TRIM 44,000 44,000 44,000 17 CAULKING 5,000 4,000 4,000 18 DOORS & WINDOWS 22,000 21,000 21,000 19 FLOOR TREATMENT 6,000 0 20 PAINTING 45,000 25,000 15,000 40,000 21 SPECIALTIES 3,700 2,500 1,200 3,700 22 VORTEX GRIT PUMP 13,000 13,000 13,000 23 POLYMER FEED EQUIPMENT 10,000 8,500 1,000 9,500 24 W DISINFECTION 20,000 19,500 19,500 25 FINAL CLARIFIER 58,000 52,000 3,000 55,000 26 CENTRIF. NON -CLOG PUMPS 21,000 0 27 PROGRESSING CAVITY PUMPS 25,000 22,000 3,000 25,000 28 GRIT CYCLONE & CLASSIFIER 20,000 20,000 20,000 29 FORCED VORTEX GRIT CHAMBER 28,000 28,000 28,000 30 CYLINDRICAL FINE SCREEN 82,000 82,000 82,000 31 GRAVITY BELT THICKENER 112,000 106,000 106,000 32 CARROUSEL MECHANICAL AERATOR 55,000 54,000 54,000 33 ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM 61,000 61,000 61,000 34 PROCESS PIPE, VALVES, METER - MATERIAL 110,000 106,000 2,000 108,000 35 PIPE & EQUIPMENT LABOR EXTERIOR 56,000 54,000 2,000 56,000 36 PIPE & SLEEVE LABOR INTERIOR 15,000 13,000 13,000 37 PLUMBING 31,000 30,000 30,000 38 VENTILATION 77,000 72,000 2,000 74,000 39 ELECTRICAL 264,000 252,000 9,000 261,000 40 SCADA SYSTEM 28,000 16,120 16.120 SUBTOTAL 2,217,700 2,004,920 108,700 2,113,620 MATERIAL STORED 52,707 0 (CHANGE ORDERS) 0 0 TOTAL 2,217,700 2,057,627 55,993 2,113,620 4/29/2003 WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY OTSEGO, MN STORED MAT'L MATERIAL STORED PAY ESTIMATE NO. 14 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PREVIOUS THIS NET SUPPLIER AMOUNT AMOUNT INSTALLED AMOUNT 14 FRP DOME FIBERGLASS STRUCT. 34,602 24 W DISINFECTION TROJAN 18,105 34,602 0 18,105 0 52,707 0 52,707 0 TOTAL COMPLETED & STORED 4/29/2003 Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects April 30, 2003 City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Otto G. Bonestroo. PE. • Marvin L. Sorval.a, PF. • Glenn R. Cook, PE. • Robert G. Schunicht, P.E. Jerry A. Bourdon, PE • Mark A. Hanson, PE. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene, P.E. Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. • Richard E. Turner, P.E. • Susan M. Eberlin, C.P.A. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon, PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Richard W. Foster, P.E. • David O. Loskota• P.E. Michael T Rautmann. P.E. • Ted K. Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson. PE. • Mark R. Rolls. P.E. • David A. Bonestroo, M.B.A. Sidney P Williamson, P.E.. L.S. • Agnes M. Ring: M.B.A. • Allan Rick Schmidt, PE. • Thomas W. Peterson. PE. James R. Maland. P.E. • Miles B. Jensen, P.E. • L. Phillip Gravel III, PE. • Daniel J. Edgerton, PE. • Ismael Martinez, P.E. Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. • Sheldon J. Johnson • Dale A. Grove, P.E. • Thomas A. Roushar. P.E. • Robert J. Devery, P.E. Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud, Rochester and Willmar, MN • Milwaukee. WI • Chicago, IL Website: www.bonestroo.com Attn: Mike Robertson, City Administrator Re: Geotechnical Invoice for West Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facility Our File: 503-02-107 Dear Mike; Attached is the invoice from American Engineering Testing, Inc for subsurface exploration and geotechnical review of the West Otsego Wastewater Treatment Facility Site. Work included 12 penetration test borings, laboratory testing of soils, geotechnical engineering analysis of data collected and presentation of data in the "Report of Subsurface Exploration and Geotechnical Review", also enclosed. The invoice for $8,839.35 was found to be in order and payment for services is recommended. If you have any questions please call me at 651-604-4875. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES,iNC. Ql (��ul_ � • 1�� Karen A. Cavett 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 American Engineering Testing, Inc 550 Cleveland Avenue North St Paul, MN 55114 (651)659-9001 OTSEGO, CITY OF C/O BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLI 2335 WEST HIGHWAY 36 ST PAUL, MN 55113 BILLING CONTACT: TED FIELD PROJECT: OTSEGO WEST WATER TREATMENT PLANT OTSEGO, MN SEE ATTACHED ITEMIZATION Amount due this Invoice INV IQF CLIENT NUMBER NUMBER DATE 22452 4/24/03 OTS001 PROJECT MANAGER: VOYEN, JEFF CONTRACT ID: 01-01485 SCOPE OF WORK: GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES An Affirmative Action Employer AET Federal ID #41-0977521 APS Federal ID #41-1646054 Duluth • Mankato • Marshall • Rochester • Wausau • Saint Paul • Rapid City • Pierre Saint Paul Phone 651-659-9001 Fax 651-659-1379 $8,839.35 AMERICAN ENGINEERING -� TESTING, INC. CONSULTANTS • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • ENVIRONMENTAL TOTAL 8839.35 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North - St. Paul, MN 55114 •651-659-9001 • Fax 651-659-1379 Duluth • Mankato • Marshall • Rochester • Wausau • Rapid City - Pierre • Sioux Falls AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER FEE ITEMIZATION PROJECT: Otsego West WWTF AET #01- 01485 Otsego, Minnesota UNIT UNIT RATE EXTENSION I PERSONNEL TIME A. Word Processing Specialist 3.60 Hours 48.00 172.80 B. Drill Technician 63.50 Hours 65.00 4127.50 C. Senior Technician III 3.00 Hours 72.00 216.00 F. Engineer II Hours 98.00 0.00 H. Principal Engineer 7.20 Hours 131.00 943.20 II VEHICLE MILEAGE A. Personal Auto Miles 0.45 0.00 B. Auxiliary Drill Truck 392 Miles 0.60 235.20 D. 1 -ton Drill Rig Miles 0.80 0.00 E. 1.5 to 2.5 -ton Drill Rig 76 Miles 0.90 68.40 F. Tractor/Lowboy Trailer 118 Miles 1.25 147.50 III EQUIPMENT RENTAL Al. Rotary Drill on 4WD 1 -ton Truck Hours 47.00 0.00 A2. Rotary Drill on 1.5 to 2.5 -ton Truck 6.00 Hours 57.00 342.00 A3. Rotary Drill on All -Terrain Vehicle 20.25 Hours 87.00 1761.75 131. Auxiliary Drill Truck 32.25 Hours 12.00 387.00 D8. GPS Mapping System 1.50 Hours 10.00 15 00 IV LAB TESTING A. Water Content 19 Tests 13.00 247.00 Cl. Atterberg Limits 2 Tests 88.00 176.00 E. Sieve Analysis Tests 80.00 0.00 I. Unconfined Compression Tests 63.00 0.00 V EXPENSES A. 1.15 x cost 0.00 TOTAL 8839.35 This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North - St. Paul, MN 55114 •651-659-9001 • Fax 651-659-1379 Duluth • Mankato • Marshall • Rochester • Wausau • Rapid City - Pierre • Sioux Falls AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER ITEM G -1 - NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 7 May 2003 RE: Otsego — Fricke Rezoning/CUP NAC FILE: 176.02 — 03.13 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 5 May 2003 to consider the above referenced application. There were no comments from the public or the applicant. City Staff noted that we are not recommending that a concept plan for the subdivision of the property be provided as the parcel is in the rural residential preserve area designated by the Comprehensive Plan. Ghost platting is only to be required for parcels in the urban service reserve area where urban services are more likely to occur in the near future. The Planning Commission also discussed the issue of the 85th Street parkway. This roadway would end approximately one-quarter mile east of the subject site. Staff raised the issue as to whether the parkway should be planned to extend further west. The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to adhere to the current transportation plan. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the application. The request will be considered at the City Council meeting on 12 May 2002 at 6:30 PM. Decision 1: Zoning Map Amendment A. Motion to approve a Zoning Map amendment rezoning the 74.4 acre site from the A-1 District to the A-2 District based on a finding that the request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request for rezoning from A-1 to A-2 is inconsistent with the direction of the Comprehensive Plan. C. Motion to table the application until further review. Decision 2: Conditional Use Permit A. Motion to approve a CUP allowing for a residential parcel to be less than the minimum 20 acre lot requirement based on a finding that the proposed parcel meets the requirements listed in the Zoning Ordinance, subject to the following conditions: Parcel B is to be redesigned in a manner that will increase its width to 260 feet and extend the northern lot line 389 feet north to the section line to the north, thereby eliminating the need for further irregular lots. 2. All lots are found capable of accommodating a private well and septic system, subject to approval of the City Building Official. 3. Parcel A shall be deed restricted to not more than six development rights subject to the requirements of the A-2 District. Parcel B shall be deed restricted prohibiting further subdivision unless the property is rezoned. 4. Park dedication requirements are to be satisfied with a cash fee in lieu of land equal to $2,100 to be paid prior to release of the minor subdivision. 5. Right-of-way is to be dedicated for 85th Street in accordance with the Transportation Plan. 6. The minor subdivision is subject to review and approval of the Zoning Administrator and recorded with Wright County. 7. Comments from other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on a finding that the request does not meet the conditions for granting approval as illustrated in Section 20-52-5.H of the Zoning Ordinance. PC. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Steve Fricke 0 CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Steve Fricke 05-07-03 FINDINGS & DECISION ZONING MAP AMENDMENT APPLICATION: Request for a Zoning Map amendment from A-1, Agriculture Rural Service Area District to A-2, Agriculture Long Range Urban Service for a 74.4 acre property located in the Rural Residential Preserve. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 May 2003 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Rural Residential Preserve and is guided for rural residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-1 District. The applicant is request rezoning of the property to an A- 2 District designation for the purpose of subdividing one rural residential lot. D. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the Zoning Map amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural Residential Preserve, which allows for residential development at a density of 4 units per 40 acres. The proposed lot is consistent with the allowed density and intended character of the area. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses off the area. Finding: Low density residential use is compatible with the surrounding area, which consists of farms, farmsteads, and large lot residential use. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained within the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: With the approval of a CUP, allowing a lot to be under the required minimum lot area of 20 acres, the proposed use is and will be required to be consistent with the standards contained within the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Manual. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use will have little effect on the surrounding area. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no specific study has been completed, the proposed use will have no impact on the property values of the surrounding area. 6. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The proposed Zoning Map amendment and CUP will not have significant traffic impact to N.E. 85`h Street even if all seven development rights are utilized. CSAH 19, to the east of the subject site, is designated as a minor arterial street by the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, school's, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: There will be no impact upon the City's service abilities related to the proposed rezoning. E. The planning report dated 30 April 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 5 May 2003 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a Zoning Map amendment rezoning the property from an A-1 District to an A-2 District designation is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 2 ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR 74.4 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL PRESERVE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property legally described by Exhibit A (the "property"). Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from an A-1, Agriculture Rural Service Area District to an A-2, Agriculture Long Range Urban Service Area District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Steve Fricke 05-07-03 FINDINGS & DECISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION: Request for a conditional use permit to allow for a minor subdivision of a residential lot less than 20 acres in area from a 74.4 acre property located in the Rural Residential Preserve that is zoned A-2, Agriculture Long Range Urban Service District. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 May 2003 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Rural Residential Preserve and is guided for rural residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned A-2 District. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow for a residential lot size less than 20 acres within a A-2 District for the purpose of subdividing one rural residential lot. D. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the Zoning Map amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Rural Residential Preserve, which allows for residential development at a density of 4 units per 40 acres. The proposed lot is consistent with the allowed density and intended character of the area. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses off the area. Finding: Low density residential use is compatible with the surrounding area, which consists of farms, farmsteads, and large lot residential use. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained within the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: With the approval of a CUP, allowing a lot to be under the required minimum lot area of 20 acres, the proposed use is and will be required to be consistent with the standards contained within the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Manual. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use will have little effect on the surrounding area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no specific study has been completed, the proposed use will have no impact on the property values of the surrounding area. 6. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The proposed Zoning Map amendment and CUP will not have significant traffic impact to N.E. 85th Street even if all seven development rights are utilized. CSAR 19, to the east of the subject site, is designated as a minor arterial street by the Comprehensive Plan. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, school's, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: There will be no impact upon the City's service abilities related to the proposed use. E. The planning report dated 30 April 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 5 May 2003 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a conditional use permit allowing for a residential lot with an area less than 20 acres within the A-2 District is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: Parcel B is to be redesigned in a manner that will increase its width to 260 feet and extend the northern lot line 389 feet north to the section line to the north, thereby eliminating the need for further irregular lots. 2. All lots are found capable of accommodating a private well and septic system, subject to approval of the City Building Official. 3. Parcel A shall be deed restricted to not more than six development rights subject to the requirements of the A-2 District. Parcel B shall be deed restricted prohibiting further subdivision unless the property is rezoned. 4. Park dedication requirements are to be satisfied with a cash fee in lieu of land equal to $2,100 to be paid prior to release of the minor subdivision. 5. Right-of-way is to be dedicated for 85`h Street in accordance with the Transportation Plan. 2 6. The minor subdivision is subject to review and approval of the Zoning Administrator and recorded with Wright County. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO In Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk -r EE FA 6_2 - NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 7 May 2003 RE: Otsego — Elk River Alano Society; CUP Amendment NAC FILE: 176.02 — 03.11 Please be advised that the Planning Commission held a public hearing on 7 April 2003 to consider the application for expansion of the existing Alano Society building located southwest of CSAH 39 and Odean Avenue. The Planning Commission tabled the application to their 5 May 2003 meeting to allow the applicant to work with City Staff to resolve issues raised as part of the public hearing. In response to the issues raised at the public hearing, the applicant has agreed to hours limitations for scheduled events and will install a fence and landscaping to improve screening of the property. The Planning Commission approved of these measures and also asked for tougher self -policing of the membership. However, the Planning Commission also recognizes that the Alano Society was at this location before most of the surrounding homes and that they too have a right to enjoy the use of the property. After taking additional public comments and discussion on 5 May 2003, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the CUP subject to the conditions outlined in the attached findings of fact. The application is to be considered at the 12 May 2003 City Council meeting at 6:30 PM. A. Motion to approve a CUP amendment, subject to the following conditions: The expansion is constructed in conformance with the plans submitted to the City on 17 March 2003 and 21 April 2003. 2. The proposed expansion is of the same color and building material of the existing structure. 3. The hours of operation shall be subject to the following limitations: a. All organized activities, events, or meetings shall be scheduled to end no later than 10:00 PM Sunday through Thursday. b. All organized activities, events, or meetings shall be scheduled to end no later than 12:00 Midnight on Friday and Saturday. C. All outdoor organized activities, events, or meeting shall be scheduled to end no later than 10:00 PM. d. Exceptions to the limitations on hours of operation may be approved by the Zoning Administrator for special events or activities, provided that: A complete description of the event, planned activities, anticipated attendance, and the name and phone number of a responsible individual(s) to be supervising the event is submitted not less than 10 days prior to the date of the event. 2. There shall be no more than six (6) exceptions to the hours of operation limits per calendar year. 4. A solid wall fence with a minimum height of five feet and maximum height of six feet shall be installed from the front line of the principal building to the front lot line along the south property line. A fence constructed of wood or other material requiring maintenance shall be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from the side property line. 5. Three to four foot tall Hedge Cottonester plants shall be installed at three feet on center in the yard between the parking lot and front lot line, subject to City Staff review and approval. 6. Future expansion of the parking area shall be subject to review and approval of City Staff for compliance with all setback requirements, and stormwater drainage. 7. Any impact to the on-site septic system or drainage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. Comments from other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the request based on a finding that it is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. C. Motion to table the application. 4 Pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Harry Dellwo Kevin Palmer CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Elk River Alano Society 05-07-03 FINDINGS & DECISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION: Request for a conditional use permit to allow for a 1,552 square foot expansion of the existing 2,736 square foot principal building at 9231 Odean Avenue NE. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 May 2003 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the Long Range Urban Service Area and is guided for low density residential land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended. C. The property is zoned R-2, Residential Long Range Urban Service District (Large Lot). Quasi -public community centers such as the existing use are allowed as a conditional use within this District. D. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the Zoning Map amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provision of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed action is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to provide community based organizations in a manner accessible and compatible with surrounding residential areas. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject site is surrounded by the uses outlined below: There are extensive mature pine trees and vegetation at the perimeter of the subject site to buffer the existing single family uses to the north, west and south. Odean Avenue is a physical barrier that separates the subject site from the existing single family uses to the east. The applicant will construct a fence along the south lot line of the property and add landscaping along the east lot line to further screen the existing use, improving the facility's compatibility with surrounding land uses. Land Use Plan Zoning Map Existing Use North LD Residential R-2 District Single Family East South LD Residential LD Residential R-3 District R-2 District Single Single Family Family West LD Residential R-2 District Sin le Family There are extensive mature pine trees and vegetation at the perimeter of the subject site to buffer the existing single family uses to the north, west and south. Odean Avenue is a physical barrier that separates the subject site from the existing single family uses to the east. The applicant will construct a fence along the south lot line of the property and add landscaping along the east lot line to further screen the existing use, improving the facility's compatibility with surrounding land uses. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained within the Zoning Ordinance. Finding: The proposed use will be required to conform to all applicable requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding: The proposed use will not have a negative effect on the surrounding area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no specific study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact property values as all applicable performance standards will be met. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: The subject site has access to Odean Avenue, which is designated as a collector street by the Comprehensive Plan. Odean Avenue was upgraded to an MSA standard in 2009 and has adequate capacity for traffic generated by the proposed use. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and its potential too over burden the City's service capacity. Finding: The expansion of the existing use will not negatively impact the City's service capacity. E. The planning report dated 2 April 2003 and 22 April 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. F. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 7 April 2003 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and table the application to allow City Staff and the applicant to resolve issues raised by the proposed use. G. The applicant submitted revised plans including additional screening and landscaping, which were reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting on 5 May 2003. After reviewing the revised plans and receiving additional public comment, the Planning Commission recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for a conditional use permit to expand an existing quasi -public community center is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: The expansion is constructed in conformance with the plans submitted to the City on 17 March 2003 and 21 April 2003. 2 2. The proposed expansion is of the same color and building material of the existing structure. 3. The hours of operation shall be subject to the following limitations: All organized activities, events, or meetings shall be scheduled to end no later than 10:00 PM Sunday through Thursday. b. All organized activities, events, or meetings shall be scheduled to end no later than 12:00 Midnight on Friday and Saturday. C. All outdoor organized activities, events, or meeting shall be scheduled to end no later than 10:00 PM. d. Exceptions to the limitations on hours of operation may be approved by the Zoning Administrator for special events or activities, provided that: A complete description of the event, planned activities, anticipated attendance, and the name and phone number of a responsible individual(s) to be supervising the event is submitted not less than 10 days prior to the date of the event. 2. There shall be no more than six (6) exceptions to the hours of operation limits per calendar year. 4. A solid wall fence with a minimum height of five feet and maximum height of six feet shall be installed from the front line of the principal building to the front lot line along the south property line. A fence constructed of wood or other material requiring maintenance shall be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from the side property line. 5. Three to four foot tall Hedge Cottonester plants shall be installed at three feet on center in the yard between the parking lot and front lot line, subject to City Staff review and approval. 6. Future expansion of the parking area shall be subject to review and approval of City Staff for compliance with all setback requirements and stormwater drainage. 7. Any impact to the on-site septic system or drainage shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED ITEM G -3 - CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council FROM: Daniel Licht DATE: 7 May 2003 RE: Otsego — Kittredge Crossing NAC FILE: 176.02 — 03.08 The Planning Commission held a public hearing on 21 April 2003, which was continued to 5 May 2003, to consider the PUD District, PUD Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat for the first phase of Kittredge Crossing. Mr. Mike Gair was present to represent the applicant and discuss changes to their project. In the Planning Report, an issue was raised about the density of the project and suggested changing Block 11 from row townhouses to single family or detached townhouse uses. Mr. Gair presented the reasoning behind the proposed site plan and the Planning Commission and our office agreed that it was a sound design and recommended no change. There were no comments from the public. After closing the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the applications as outlined in the attached findings, which includes a negative declaration on the need for an EIS. This application is to be considered by the City Council at their meeting on 12 May 2003. A. Motion to approve a Zoning Map amendment rezoning the subject site to PUD District, PUD development stage plan and preliminary plat for Kittredge Crossing, and negative findings on the need for an EIS, subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the preliminary plat shall not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only allocate sanitary sewer capacity to approved final plats with signed development contracts to assure the City of timely development. 2. The submitted EAW is processed in accordance with the provisions of Section 38 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of the preliminary plat is subject to a finding by the City Council that the project has no potential for significant environmental effects. 3. All non -single family lot uses within the PUD District shall be subject to site and building plan review as a separate PUD development stage application. 4. Uses within the PUD District shall be subject to the following requirements: a. Residential Uses: Residential uses shall be consistent with those described on the proposed development stage plans in terms of general unit type (single family, townhouse, multiple family) and density, subject to the most applicable requirements of the City's R- 6 Townhouse, Quadraminium, and Low Density Multiple Family District or R-7, Residential High Density District. b. Commercial Uses: 1. Areas designated for office showroom/warehouse, office, assembly/processing, or business park shall include those uses allowed in the City's B -W, Business Warehouse District, subject to the same performance standards. 2. Areas designated for retail uses shall include those uses allowed in the City's B-3, General Business District, subject to the same performance standards. C. Lot Requirements: The following lot requirements shall apply within the PUD District: d. Setbacks. The following setbacks shall apply within the PUD District: Front Single Family Attached Townhome Multiple Family Commercial Market Senior Minimum 9,000 Bldgs. Private Lot Area or Arterial or 5,OOOsf. 2,500sf. 1,OOOsf. 1.0ac. Lot Area/Unit Wetland Major Minor d. Setbacks. The following setbacks shall apply within the PUD District: Front Between Bldgs. Private Arterial or Local or Side Rear on Base Drives Wetland Major Minor Lot Collector Collector 2 65 ft. 35 ft. 10 ft. 1 20 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. 40 ft 1. All lot lines abutting a public right-of-way shall be subject to front setback requirements. e. Building Height: The height of all structures shall not exceed 3 stories or 35 feet, except as specifically approved as part of a development stage plan. 5. All street names are to conform to the County grid system unless approved by the City Council. 6. All intersections to 70th Street are subject to MNDoT approval. 7. Specific landscape plans indicating the type, size and quantities of proposed plantings will be required for construction along public rights-of- way and as part of each site development stage plan application with a minimum of two shade trees required for each of the single family lots on the preliminary plat. 8. Park dedication shall be satisfied with a combination land and a pro -rated cash fee line lieu of land to be paid at the time of final plat approval in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to review and approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission. 9. The grading plan must be revised to reflect the current preliminary plat and provide a minimum 20 foot buffer and conservation easement around all delineated wetlands in accordance with Section 20-16-9.E of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. The preliminary plat must be revised to provide drainage and utility easements for the perimeter of all single family and commercial lots and overlaying the common base lot of the proposed detached townhouse and townhouse sites, wetlands, and stormwater drainage ponds. 11. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with extending the trunk sewer lines to the proposed development, subject to a limited reimbursement agreement should other potentially benefiting properties connect during a specified time period. 12. All streets, grading, drainage, utilities, and easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 13. The applicant shall enter into a development contract upon approval of a final plat to include specific provisions for staging development of residential elements of the project in relation to commercial or industrial 3 uses are to be incorporated as part of subsequent zoning applications, subject to review and approval of the City Council. 14. Comments of other City Staff. B. Motion to deny the application based on with the policies of the Comprehensh Subdivision Ordinances. C. Motion to table. pc. Mike Robertson Judy Hudson Andy MacArthur Ron Wagner Lucinda Gardner Mike Gair David Nash IA a finding that the request is inconsistent Plan and intent of the Zoning and CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Darrel A. Farr Development Corp. 05-07-03 FINDINGS & DECISION PUD DISTRICT, DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN & PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION: Request a rezoning to PUD District, PUD Development Stage Plan, and Preliminary Plat approval for Kittredge Crossing. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 May 2003 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The property lies within the West Sanitary Sewer Service District and is guided for a mix of urban land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended on 9 December 2003. C. The property is zoned A-1, Agriculture Rural Service District. The applicant is requesting rezoning to PUD District to allow development of a mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses based on the submitted PUD Development Stage Plan. D. The Planning Commission and City Council must take into consideration the possible effects of the Zoning Map amendment with their judgement based upon (but not limited to) the criteria outlined in Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. Finding: The proposed PUD Development Stage Plan is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Plan amendment approved 9 December 2003. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Finding: The subject site is surrounded by the following existing or planned land uses outlined in the table below: Direction Land Use Plan Zoning Map Existing Use North Industrial A-1 District Agriculture East Commercial A-1 District Agriculture Rural Single Family South Industrial Light Industrial Agriculture West Kittredge Crossing A-1 District Agriculture Rural Single Family The proposed land uses provide an appropriate transition from intensive land uses along 70"' Street to the Otsego Creek on the north. No compatibility issues are anticipated. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained in the Zoning Ordinance (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). Finding: The proposed use will conform to the applicable requirements of the PUD District, Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and Engineering Manual. 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. Finding. The proposed use is an implementation of the City's land use plan for a nodal master planned community for this area. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. Finding: Although no specific study has been completed, the proposed use is not anticipated to negatively impact property values. 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to the capabilities of streets serving the property. Finding: Access to the property will be provided via 70th Street and a future connection to CSAH 19, both of which are designated as minor anterial roadways with capacity for the traffic generated by the proposed use. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Finding: The proposed use will utilize available sanitary sewer and water utilities and contribute to the City's tax base and is therefore not anticipated to negatively impact City service capabilities. E. The planning report dated 30 April 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein. F. The engineering review dated 14 April 2003 and 28 April 2003 prepared by the City Engineer Haakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. is incorporated herein. G. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 21 April 2003 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission continued the public hearing and tabled the application to allow City Staff and the applicant to resolve issues raised by the proposed use. 2 H. The applicant submitted revised plans that were reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting on 5 May 2003. After reviewing the revised plans and other evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council approve the request based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the request for approval of a PUD District, PUD Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat for Kittredge Crossing is hereby approved based on the most current plan and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: Approval of the preliminary plat shall not guarantee access to sanitary sewer service. The City shall only allocate sanitary sewer capacity to approved final plats with signed development contracts to assure the City of timely development. 2. The submitted EAW is processed in accordance with the provisions of Section 38 of the Zoning Ordinance and approval of the preliminary plat is subject to a finding by the City Council that the project has no potential for significant environmental effects. 3. All non -single family lot uses within the PUD District shall be subject to site and building plan review as a separate PUD development stage application. 4. Uses within the PUD District shall be subject to the following requirements: a. Residential Uses: Residential uses shall be consistent with those described on the proposed development stage plans in terms of general unit type (single family, townhouse, multiple family) and density, subject to the most applicable requirements of the City's R-6 Townhouse, Quadraminium, and Low Density Multiple Family District or R-7, Residential High Density District. b. Commercial Uses: Areas designated for office showroom/warehouse, office, assembly/processing, or business park shall include those uses allowed in the City's B -W, Business Warehouse District, subject to the same performance standards. 2. Areas designated for retail uses shall include those uses allowed in the City's B-3, General Business District, subject to the same performance standards. C. Lot Requirements: The following lot requirements shall apply within the PUD District: d. Setbacks. The following setbacks shall apply within the PUD District: Front Single Family Attached Townhome Multiple Family Commercial Market Senior Minimum Rear Bldgs. on Base Private Drives wetland Arterial Lot Area or 9,000 5,000sf. 2,500sf. 1,000sf. 1.0ac. Lot Area/Unit d. Setbacks. The following setbacks shall apply within the PUD District: Front Between Side Rear Bldgs. on Base Private Drives wetland Arterial Local or I or Minor Lot Major Collector Collector 65 ft. 35 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. 40 ft. 1. All lot lines abutting a public right-of-way shall be subject to front setback requirements. e. Building Height: The height of all structures shall not exceed 3 stories or 35 feet, except as specifically approved as part of a development stage plan. 6. All street names are to conform to the County grid system unless approved by the City Council. 7. All intersections to 701h Street are subject to MNDoT approval. 8. Specific landscape plans indicating the type, size and quantities of proposed plantings will be required for construction along public rights-of-way and as part of each site development stage plan application with a minimum of two shade trees required for each of the single family lots on the preliminary plat. 9. Park dedication shall be satisfied with a combination land and a pro -rated cash fee line lieu of land to be paid at the time of final plat approval in accordance with the Subdivision Ordinance, subject to review and approval of the Parks and Recreation Commission. 10. The grading plan must be revised to reflect the current preliminary plat and provide a minimum 20 foot buffer and conservation easement around all delineated wetlands in accordance with Section 20-16-9.E of the Zoning Ordinance. 11. The preliminary plat must be revised to provide drainage and utility easements for the perimeter of all single family and commercial lots and overlaying the common base lot of the proposed detached townhouse and townhouse sites, wetlands, and stormwater drainage ponds. 12. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs associated with extending the trunk sewer lines to the proposed development, subject to a limited reimbursement agreement should other potentially benefiting properties connect during a specified time period. 13. All streets, grading, drainage, utilities, and easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 14. The applicant shall enter into a development contract upon approval of a final plat to include specific provisions for staging development of residential elements of the project in relation to commercial or industrial uses are to be incorporated as part of subsequent zoning applications, subject to review and approval of the City Council. 4 PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO In Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk 5 ORDINANCE NO.: CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION FOR PROPERTY INCLUDED AS PART OF THE KITTREDGE CROSSING PRELIMINARY PLAT. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN: Section 1. The official Zoning Map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to change the zoning classification of the property legally described by Exhibit A (the "property"). Section 2. The property is hereby rezoned from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District designation to a PUD, Planned Unit Development District designation. Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning classification set forth above. Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. CITY OF OTSEGO BY: Lary Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk CITY OF 0 T S E G 0 WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA APPLICANT: Darrel A. Farr Development Corp. 05-07-03 FINDINGS & DECISION Negative Declaration for EIS APPLICATION: Consideration of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet related to the Kittredge Crossing preliminary plat. CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 12 May 2003 FINDINGS: Based upon review of the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council of the City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact: A. The legal description of the subject site is attached as Exhibit A. B. The project lies within the west sanitary sewer service district and is guided for a mix of residential, commercial and industrial land uses by the Otsego Comprehensive Plan, as amended on 9 December 2003. C. The project is zoned PUD District for development of the mix of land uses identified on the approved PUD Master Guide Plan. D. The project requires preparation of a mandatory EAW pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.4300 Subp. 19 and Subp. 36.A. E. The EAW was approved by the Otsego Zoning Administrator for distribution was published in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor on 31March 2003. The 30 day comment period ended 30 April 2003. F. Section 20-38-3.D.4 of the Zoning Ordinance required the City Council to base its decision on the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and the proposed scope of an EIS on the information gathered during the EAW process and on the comments received on the EAW. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, in deciding whether a project has the potential for significant environmental effects, the following factors shall be considered: a. Type, extent and reversibility of environmental effects. b. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects. C. The extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority. d. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, or of EISs previously prepared on similar projects. G. The EAW prepared by MFRA Inc. is incorporated herein. H. The planning reports dated 30 April 2003 prepared by the City Planner, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., are incorporated herein. The engineering reviews dated 14 April 2003 and 28 April 2003 prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., is incorporated herein. The Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their regular meeting on 21 April 2003 to consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission continued the public hearing to their meeting on 5 May 2003. K. The applicant submitted revised plans that were reviewed by the Planning Commission at their meeting on 5 May 2003. After reviewing the revised plans and other evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended by a 5-0 vote that the City Council make a finding that the request does not have the potential for significant environmental effects and preparation of an EIS is not necessary based on the aforementioned findings. L. The letter from the Department of Natural Resources dated 7 April 2003 is incorporated herein. No other comments regarding the EAW were received during the 30 -day comment period. DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the proposed Arbor Creek does not have potential for significant environmental effects and that preparation of an EIS is not to be required based on a review of the submitted EAW and evidence received, subject to the following condition: The project shall proceed in conformance with the preliminary plat and applicable stipulations approved 12 May 2003 by the City Council. PASSED by the Otsego City Council this 12th day of May, 2003. Attest: CITY OF OTSEGO By: Larry Fournier, Mayor Judy Hudson, Zoning Administrator/City Clerk Hakanson 1 Anderson Assoc., Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue, Suite 101, Anoka, MN 55303 Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax: 763/427-0520 CITY OF OTSEGO CITY COUNCIL CITY ENGINEER'S AGENDA MAY 12, 2003 Item 7.1: . Discussion of Drainage next to East Wastewater Treatment Plant. Item 7.2. Construction Update Item 7.3: Consider Awarding the Following Projects: a. Water Tower #2 (1 MGAL) b. Pumphouse #3 C. Lift Station #3 The bid opening is 2:00 pm, May 8, 2003, so info is unavailable for Council review until Monday, May 12, 2003. Item 7.4: Any other Engineering Business Civil e'rMunicipa! �� Engineering G:\Municipal\AOTSEGO\Agendasl2003\councilaieRY��bIoY*ing for Michael C. Couri- Andrew J. Ala cArthur Robert T. Ruppe-- David R. Wendorf -A&o licensed in f linois "Also licensed in California May 8, 2003 City Council Members City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 COURT & MACAR THUR Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376-0369 (763) 497-1930 (763) 497-2599 (FAA) couriandmacarthur@pobox.com RE: Christ Lutheran Church- Storm Water Fees Dear Council Members: I have received a copy of the letter from Jean Kincanon to the City Council dated May 1, 2003. In that letter she indicates her belief that there has been some misunderstanding regarding valuation of the Church property and that it should be valued as "improved" property. I will respond to that later in the letter, but first I would like to make it clear that the City Council is currently evaluating what credit ,if any, should be given for an easement that the City already has in hand. The City has no obligation to make any payment or give any credit for the easement. The City Council has discussed giving some credit to the church for the easement. The rationale for the credit is that the easement is an open ditch along the property line between the two lots owned by the church rather than a typical easement with buried facilities. At the public hearing, the church submitted an appraisal indicating a per acre value for the property exceeding $100,000.00 per acre. This appraisal was done with an effective valuation date approximately one year after the easement was conveyed. In other words the appraisal valued the property with municipal sewer and water services extended to its boundaries and in operation. At the time that the easement was conveyed it was for purposes of extending the street, storm sewer and delivering sanitary sewer and water services to the church all in one project. The issues that would later confront the church due to its location were discussed at the time that the church sought its first expansion. The church was on notice that it would be required to hook up to City sewer and water service upon further expansion. The City commenced condemnation actions to obtain easements on various parcels for the City sanitary sewer and water project in 1998. The City appraisals obtained for the Letter to Otsego City Council May 8, 2003 Page 2 condemnation were dated July 24, 1998. There were a number of them in the area of the church going southward along County 42. The appraisals were in the range of $8,000.00 per acre for unsewered land, guided for commercial and industrial development. Some of these easements were conveyed for the appraised price, some were further negotiated, and some went to Commissioner's hearings. The comparison becomes complicated because some easements were typical easements along the roadway while other easements bisected properties. In no case was a case either going to hearing or settled paid more than $30,000.00 per acre, in fact the vast majority of the cases, including those that went to Commissioner's hearings, were far below that. value in the range of $9,000.000 to $10,000.00 an acre, appraised as un-sewered. In entering into negotiations regarding the storm water easement required by MNDOT after the extension of 88th Street, the City offered $70,000.00 per acre as a bare land sale, since there was property in the immediate area with sewer availability which had arguably better and more direct access which sold in that range. In the course of those negotiations the City offered to consider payment for all or a portion of the easement already in hand in order to settle the matter. It was understood that the figures thrown out for the church were for the sake of negotiation since at that time neither party had an appraisal of that specific property. However, the idea that compromised payment could result in an amount in the hundreds of thousands of dollars caused the City to resolve the problem in another way. I do disagree with the assertion that somehow the Council was not being given accurate information. What was conveyed to the Council is what took place in the negotiations. The numbers that were relayed to the Council were obviously conveyed as a high end position, and it was clearly conveyed that it was a part of the negotiation process, and that the church was willing to reasonably negotiate. I believe that the $30,0000 dollar figure is a fair figure in light of the circumstances. I also believe that the Council has the discretion to adjust that number up or down within a reasonable range. The argument for raising the value would be related to the difference in the date of our appraisals, and the better access to Highway 101 that the church property has relative to those appraised. However, even if a higher per acre value for the property would be used, the resulting credit may include only credit over and above the value of the easement conveyed by the bank (a 25% take vs a 100% take), which may put the credit in the same range. Letter to Otsego City Council May 8, 2003 Page 3 It is my understanding that the Council will review the correspondence from the church, this letter, and the information previously provided by Ron Wagner and will arrive at a decision as to whether or not the church will be provided a credit, and what the overall storm water charge per acre will be. I will be available to discuss this matter further at the City Council meeting on Monday evening. Very truly rs, Z;wJ. r C CARTHUR Cc: Ron Wagner, City Engineer Jean Kincanon March 13, 2003 COMPLAINT LETTERS NAME ;. ADDRESS, COMPLAINT..., REASON 1ST SENT 2ND SENT COMMENTS FROM HOMEOWNER/DATE ACTION/DATE Phe affray & Karen Klonne he I Pratt avid & Rita Peterson 125 Ochoa Avenue NE 274 Oakwood Ave NE 14333 87th Street NE Junk, etc. Junk, etc. unk Cars, Junk, etc. 6-02 6-02 6-02 8-02 8-02 No Response realizes problem, wants more time 07-08 & 07-15.02 No Response Refer to Attorney 09-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 Ernest & Jane Davis 14299 87th Street NE rs, etc.6-02 leaned Up LOSED Robert & Dianne Cederber 14299 Obrian Ave NE unk Cars, Trash, etc ill be cleaned up in a couple of weeks 07-18-02 u & M Carroll 710 Obdan Ave NE Junk Cars, Trash, etc 6-02 8-02 o Response 42-001030 Curtis Rath & Alice Johnson 14605 88th Street NE Junk Cars, Junk 6-02 8-02 No Response Refer to Attorney 09-02 39-002170 Gary & Suzanne MaCrunnel 8886 Ogren Ave NE Junk 6-02 8-02 Refer to Attorne 09-02 42-003040 20-001020 15-002061 00-184203 Michael & N rea Thiel es Rosetta P. Statz Lyle A. Peterson Orland & ShirleyFurness 8527 Packard Ave NE 9504 Oday Ave NE 14269 91st Street NE 12655 95th Street EN Junk Cars Junk Cars, Junk, etc Junk Cars, Junk Junk Cars/Trucks 6-02 6-02 6-02 6-02 8-02 8-02 8.02 8-02 No Response No Response No Response No Response Refer to Attorney 09-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 10-084070 33-001010 John & Theresa Littman John & Cheryl Butler 9700 Nashua Ave NEJunk/Trash 39 Ogren Ave NE Junk Vehicles 6-02 6-02 8-02 8-02 What is considered junk? 06-19 & 06-24-02 Getting out of Auto Business - 06-29-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 Refer to Attorney 09-02 32-002020 Terri Ruschmeier 8439 Packard Ave NE Junk Cars, etc 6-02 8-02 Call returned 06-24-02 - nothing else happened Refer to Attorney 09-02 37-003130 Mary K Gunderson 14266 78th Street NE Junk Cars, Junk 6-02 8-02 No Response Refer to Attorne 09-02 37-005020 Matthew & Christine Hall 7849 Obrian Ave NE Junk Cars 6-02 ike extended this to - 09-01-02 37-002070 Thomas W. Smith 7888 Oday Ave NE Junk,Debds 6-02 Will clean up, wants to sell - 07-22-02 00-173401 Timothy & Kimberly Matcher 9217 Napier Ave NE Junk Cars, Junk 6-02 8-02 No Response 500-173402 Scot Meneley & Shelly Benson 9115 Nashua Ave NE Junk Cars, etc. 6-02 8-02 Called, gave us a hard time - 07-22-02 Refer fo Attorney 09-02 March 13, 2003 COMPLAINT LETTERS 36-001050 aren E Demario E unk 6.02 o Response 52-008010 Robert 8 Kimberl Johnson NE n'rree unk & Landscaping Materials 6-02 o Response 52-008030 Gelario & S. Marlow NE inside Storage of Bld Material 6.02 8-02 aidthe 'd build a store a shed b Labor Da33-001060 omm W & Carol M Lloyd NE iles of Tires 8-02 o Response 70-001170 Rand & Che I McFarlane 7835 Palm ren Ave NE Junk 8-02 o Response 40-004060 ccupant 15330 93rd Street NE oats, Cars. Junk 8-02 o Response 32.002060 dwin L & Barbara A Joseph 888 Packard Ave NE ehicles, Salva a Yard 8-02 No Response 32-002100 Steven L. & Suzanne Ackerman 8217 Packard Ave NE Garbage & Junk all over 8-02 Cleaned Up 00-333206 Timothy E. Ekeren 14126 62nd Street NE Junk & Outside Storage 5-02 10-02 -CLOSED Alot of clean up done gave 30 days 500-333205 Theresa G. Thell 14186 62nd Street NE Junk & Outside Storage 5-02 No Response 500-333204 had M. Lofgren 14166 62nd Street NE Junk & Outside Storage 5-02 No Response 166-001010 Trudell Trailers 9600 71st Street NE Outside storage 9-02 Cleaned Up LOSED 00-261201 Rand & Kathy Patton 10503 80th Street NE Junk Vehicles/Junk 4-02 No Response 52-010010 Jeffrey & Dena Bergman B497 Parell Ave NE Camper & Porta Po 6-02 Camper not used for living quarters/porta potty gone by Oct 36-002010 William R. Daby 8144 Ochoa Ave NE Garbage all around/burns trash 1-02 No Response 32-001120 Thomas & Elaine Osburn 8160 Packard Ave NEJunk 6-02 No Response 24-004150 Michael & Heather Fleischer 15389 95th St NE Junk Cars/Outside Storage 5-02 No Response 69-002150 Dscar Olivares 7817 Parquet Ave. NE arge blue tarp/storage 10-02 checked on 2 wks later and eveything is gone 00-222203 Sreg & Merri Rathmanner 15205 95th St. NE unk cars/for sale cars no letter checked on 2 wks later & most cars gonetno 2nd Itr sent 71.002090 jTroy & Sheila Bou r o ne 15021 81st Circle NE ids trs/car in drivewayo letter Toys in yards (normal) no junk no action taken 35-001170 len Zabel 013 Needham Ave. NE unk cars and snowmobiles 28/03 Said the would remove junk b clean u da alked to Mike March 13, 2003 COMPLAINT LETTERS 32-002060 Edwin & Barbara Joseph 333 Packard Ave. NE ans and Junk No letter Vans parked in front next to driveway pad 00-181101 eff Adamski 12796 95th St. NE utdoor signage and outdoor storage 10-02 no response 130-001010 ene DeCandia/Riverwood Inn 10990 95th St. NE utdoor sign offering outdoor storage 10-02 Sign removed CLOSED 32-001050 Dewayne Seffin a 3621'ackard Ave. NE unk Junk and more junk 4-03 37-003150 thony Diaz 14208 78th Street NE Junk 4-03 172-001020 ohn Sirois 16640 53rd Street NE Sign. junk 4-03 36-001020 oseph Gosiak 14320 82nd Street NE hunks of concrete, junk all over 5-03 26-002110 Lance Tree onin 14307 89th Street NE ehicles all over the and 5.03 1. 2. 3. NUISANCE ABATEMENT UPDATE May 12, 2003 6434 Quale Avenue NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 After complaints from City residents NAC investigated the above referenced property and identified numerous Zoning Ordinance Violations. NAC prepared a report which was forwarded to our office for further action. On April 26, 2003 pursuant to Section 20-11-1.B of the Zoning Ordinance a notice letter was sent to the property owner identifying the Zoning Ordinance violations and requiring abatement within 30 days. A follow up inspection of the property will need to be scheduled upon the expiration of the time period to determine whether the property owner has come into compliance. 12655 95`h Street NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 On March 25, 2003 our office pursuant to Section 6-2-3 of the City's Nuisance Ordinance and Minnesota Statutes Section 617.81 subd. 4, sent the property owner a written notice of the nuisance conditions existing on the property and requiring abatement within 30 days. The notice is required to be sent certified mail or personally served. As a cost saving measure we attempted to send the notice by certified mail. It was returned by the post office in the middle of April as the property owner did not claim the certified mail. On April 17, 2003 the notice was sent to the Wright county Sheriff s Department for service on the property owner. The Sheriff's Office personally served the property owner on April 18, 2003. A follow up inspection of the property will need to be scheduled upon the expiration of the time period to determine whether the property owner has come into compliance. The time period begins to run from the date the notice was served. 9700 Nashua Ave NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 On March 21, 2003 our office pursuant to Section 6-2-3 of the City's Nuisance Ordinance and Minnesota Statutes Section 617.81 subd. 4, sent the property owner a written notice of the nuisance conditions existing on the property and requiring abatement within 30 days. The notice is 5. required to be sent certified mail or personally served. As a cost saving measure we sent the notice by certified mail. On March 24, 2003 the property owner claimed the certified notice. The property owner contacted this office and I discussed the situation with him. He indicated that clean- up work had occurred and that he was waiting for the City's cleanup day to remove the old shingles from the property. The City's cleanup day occurred on May 3, 2003. A follow up inspection of the property will need to be scheduled to determine whether the property owner has come into compliance. 9115 Nashua Ave. NE Otsego, MN 55330 On March 21, 2003 our office pursuant to Section 6-2-3 of the City's Nuisance Ordinance and Minnesota Statutes Section 617.81 subd. 4, sent the property owner a written notice of the nuisance conditions existing on the property and requiring abatement within 30 days. The notice is required to be sent certified mail or personally served. As a cost saving measure we attempted to send the notice by certified mail. It was returned by the post office in April as the property owner did not claim the certified mail. On April 10, 2003 the notice was sent to the Wright county Sheriffs Department for service on the property owner. The Sheriff s Office personally served the property owner on April 25, 2003. A follow up inspection of the property will need to be scheduled upon the expiration of the time period to determine whether the property owner has come into compliance. The time period begins to run from the date the notice was served. 8439 Ogren N.E. Otsego, Minnesota 55330 This property has been a long term problem for the City. The City Council previously issued a resolution adopting a notice of abatement of the nuisance conditions existing on the property. On September 11, 2002 the property owners were served with a petition for order of entry for abatement of a public nuisance and the supporting documentation. This petition has as of yet not been filed in the district court. Prior to filing the petition our office concluded it would be advantageous to wait until spring to inspect the property to determine if the property owner has complied with the city order and if not determine specifically what nuisance conditions remain on the property. The inspection is to be scheduled with R1 the City's building official and the land owner. If the landowner does not cooperate with the inspection the City could seek an administrative search warrant. This winter our office did contact the dealer unit at the Minnesota Department of Commerce to determine whether or not the property owner was a licensed automobile dealer. There was no record of the property owner having been issued a dealers license. This inquiry was made because there were complaints that the property owner was attempting to sell multiple vans from the property. 1412662 nd St. N.E. Otsego, Minnesota 55330 This property has also been a long term problem for the City. The City Council previously issued a resolution adopting a notice of abatement of the nuisance conditions existing on the property. On September 11, 2002 the property owners were served with a petition for order of entry for abatement of a public nuisance and the supporting documentation. On October 8, 2002 the property owner's mother contacted our office requesting additional time to clean up the property. There was apparently some clean up work done on the property after the contact. The above referenced petition has as of yet not been filed in the district court. Prior to filing the petition our office concluded it would be advantageous to wait until spring to inspect the property to determine if the property owner has complied with the City order and if not, determine specifically what nuisance conditions remain on the property. This seemed prudent in light of the fact that some work had apparently been completed. An inspection is to be scheduled with the City's building official and the land owner. If the landowner does not cooperate with the inspection the City could seek an administrative search warrant. 7. 14166 N.E. 62nd St. Otsego, Minnesota 55330 This property once again has been a long term problem for the City. The City Council previously issued a resolution adopting a notice of abatement of the nuisance conditions existing on the property. On September 11, .13 a 10. 2002 the property owners were served with a petition for order of entry for abatement of a public nuisance and the supporting documentation. On October 8, 2002 the property contacted our office requesting additional time to clean up the property. There was apparently some clean up work done on the property after the contact. The above referenced petition has as of yet not been filed in the district court. Prior to filing the petition our office concluded it would be advantageous to wait until spring to inspect the property to determine if the property owner has complied with the City order and if not, determine specifically what nuisance conditions remain on the property. This seemed prudent in light of the fact that some work had apparently been completed. An inspection is to be scheduled with the City's building official and the land owner. If the landowner does not cooperate with the inspection the City could seek an administrative search warrant. 8274 Oakwood Ave NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 This property was identified by NAC as having a nuisance condition existing on the property. According to the NAC report there was some contact between NAC and the landowner. As of the date of this report NAC has indicated that the landowner has not addressed the issues concerning the property. One of the issues concerning the property is possible presence of junk cars. Further investigation is needed to determine if the automobiles in question are registered or obviously inoperable. 14269 91't Street Otsego Minnesota 55330 This property was identified by NAC as having a nuisance condition existing on the property. According to the NAC report there was no response from the landowner. There has been some confusion in this office concerning this property and 14333 87th Street. We will need to discuss the matter with NAC. 14269 91 S` NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 11. 12. This property was identified by NAC as having a nuisance condition existing on the property. Our office will be discussing this property with NAC to determine the current status. If the nuisance has not been abated our office will send a warning letter and can begin to take the necessary steps to bring civil abatement proceeding in district court. Prior to bringing such an action however an inspection by the building official will be required. This property was identified by NAC as having a nuisance condition existing on the property. Our office will be discussing this property with NAC to determine the current status. If the nuisance has not been abated our office will send a warning letter and can begin to take the necessary steps to bring civil abatement proceeding in district court. Prior to bringing such an action however an inspection by the building official will be required. 14333 87`h Street NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 This property was identified by NAC as having a nuisance condition existing on the property. According to the NAC report there was no contact between NAC and the landowner. As of the date of this report NAC has indicated that the landowner has not addressed the issues concerning the property. One of the issues concerning the property is possible presence of junk cars. Further investigation is needed to determine if the automobiles in question are registered or obviously inoperable. MEMORANDUM To: Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Ronald J. Wagner, PE Date: 10/10/02 cc: Mike Robertson, Administrator Judy Hudson, Clerk Andy MacArthur, City Attorney Re: Storm Water Impact Fee South Sub District The cost for Sub District of the East Commercial Area of the North Mississippi Watershed District is estimated at $208,500. Cost Includes: a. Construction b. Inspection c. Design d. Staking e. Testing f. Contract Administration g. Future work west of CSAH 42 h. Legal Does not include any right-of-way or easement acquisition costs as all required easements were granted by petitioning parties who are the Bank of Elk River (Bank) and Christ Lutheran Church (Church). , The study completed in February of 2000 and revised in July of 2000 estimated the storm water impact fee for the South Sub District to be $4,100/acre. There are several options, which we would like the Council to review concerning how much the impact fee will be and how the storm water impact fee will be instituted. Option 1 is to take the total estimated cost and divide it by the acreage disregarding any payment or credit given for easements granted by properties and only include areas that have not yet developed (i.e. exclude portions of Bank and Church property). $208,500/39.8 acres = $5,250/acre \\Ha01\Shared Docs\MunicipaMOTSEGO\418\ot418hmcc.doc Option 2 is to take the total estimated cost and divide it by the acreage disregarding any payment or credit given for easements granted by properties and include all properties (developed or not developed). $208,500/44.8 acres = $4,650/acre Option 3 is to take the total estimated cost plus equity granted for easements granted and divided by acreage only including areas that have not yet been developed. $223,000/39.8 acres = $5,600/acre Option 4 is to take the total estimated cost plus equity granted for easements granted and divided by all property area (developed or undeveloped). $223,000/44.8 acres - $4,975/acre Equity considered for easements granted was determined as follows: Bank 15' x 300' easement 0.10 acres @ $15,000/acre (1/2 estimated $30,000 value due to edge type easement) = $1,500 — Paid out of SAC and WAC 25' x 300' temporary easement 0.17 acres @ 10% value of $30,000/acre = $500 — Paid out of SAC and WAC Church 50' x 420' drainage easement 0.48 acres @ $30,000/acre (estimated value of easement, which divides the land) = $14,400 — Added to cost for South Sub District and paid out of South Sub District Fund 15' x 200' easement 0.069 acres @ $15,000/acre = $1,295 — Paid out of SAC and WAC 25' x 150' temporary easement 0.086 acres @ 10% value @ $30,000/acre = $258 We recommend Option 1 or Option 4. Option 1 excludes the existing developed properties that could argue they see no change due to the added storm sewer improvements. Any new properties coming in would be required to hook up to the trunk storm lines and pay as part of their development agreements with the City. Option 4 includes the existing developed properties, but gives them credit for easements granted. The Bank, which has 2.5 acres developed within the South Sub District, would be required to pay 2.5 acres @ $5,000/acre or $12,500, but would receive $2,000 back from SAC and WAC funds \\HaO I \Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\418\ot418hmcc.doc for easements granted and would be allowed to expand their building or parking with no further storm water impact fee. The Church which has 2.5 acres developed would also be required to pay $12,500, but would receive $14,400 back for drainage easement from the South Sub District or a positive $1,900. This could be given as a credit for any future expansion or given in cash. An additional $1,295 for other easements would be forth coming from SAC and WAC funds. All options are feasible although Options 2 or 3 may be more difficult for all properties to agree to because of inequities they may perceive.. \\Ha01\Shared Docs\Municipal\AOTSEGO\418\ot418hmcc.doc Bonestroo Rosene Anderlik & Associates Engineers & Architects May 1, 2003 Mike Robertson City Administrator City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego MN 55330-7314 Sonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, Inc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer and Employee Owned Principals: Orta G. Bonestroo. PE. -,Marvin L. Sorvala. P.E. • rlenn R. Cook, PE. Robert G. Schunicnt. PE. . Jerry A. Bourdon, P.E. • Mark A. Hanson. PE. Senior Consultants: Robert W. Rosene. PE. • Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. - Rich -. .. Associate Principals: Keith A. Gordon. PE. • Robert R. Pfefferle. PE. • Rich: Michael T Rautmann, P.E. - Ted K. Field. PE. • Kenneth P Anderson, PE. • Mai Sidney P Williamson, PE.. L.S. •Agnes M. Rrng, M B.A. •Allan Rick Schmidt, PE James R. Maland, PE. • Miles B. Jensen. PE. • L. Phillip Gravel III, PE. - Daniel Thomas A. Syfko. P.E. - Sheldon J. Johnson • Dale A. Grove. PE. - Thomas A. Offices: St. Paul, St. Cloud. Rochester and Willmar. MN - Milwaukee. WI - C - Website: www.bonestroo.com P Re: Environmental Assessment and Permit Application East Otsego WWTP—Phase III Our File No. 503-02-106 Dear Mike: ITEM 9_ A- COPIF -i t o c;y 4CIM. This letter describes an issue MPCA is raising with regards to the environmental assessment and the permit application for Phase III of the East Otsego wastewater treatment plant. The issue pertains to mercury in the plant effluent. At this time, the mercury issue appears to be the last to resolve before MPCA proceeds with the permit process. Description of the Issue MPCA is concerned about the increased mercury loading to the Crow River resulting from the plant expansion. In general, MPCA policy for all treatment plant expansions is to attempt to limit future mercury discharges to the level that is allowed under the current permit. In a letter to Gary Kimball of MPCA dated April 10, 2003, I proposed that the Otsego East plant would comply with this policy by a combination of two solutions: treatment at the plant and decreased loadings coming to the plant in the future. Gary did not approve of these solutions as a way to comply with MPCA policy. Instead, he offered the options that I will describe in this letter. Link Between Mercury and TSS Because the discharge permit does not contain a specific mercury limit, it is difficult to establish a current permitted mercury loading beyond which no increases are allowed. Instead, MPCA has declared that an association exists between mercury and total suspended solids (TSS) in treatment plant effluents. 2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113 ■ 651-636-4600 ■ Fax: 651-636-1311 One way to limit mercury discharges in the future is to accept a TSS "freeze" and control TSS in the effluent at levels no greater than the existing TSS mass limits. MPCA calls this option the "No Non -Degradation Demonstration Needed" option. The second option—referred to as "Non -Degradation Demonstration Needed"—requires a demonstration that mercury itself is being limited. The following is a description of how the two options may be applied to the East Plant. Option 1—TSS Freeze The current permitted flow at the East plant is 400,000 gallons per day (gpd). The effluent TSS limit is 30 milligrams per liter (mg/1). We are seeking an expanded capacity to 1,500,000 gpd, a 275% increase. To "freeze" TSS loadings, the plant must discharge decreasing TSS concentrations as flow increases. Ultimately, when the plant is treating 1,500,000 gpd, the effluent TSS must be no greater than 8 mg/l. MPCA draws a distinction between a "freeze" and a "limit". With a freeze, the permit does not necessarily include an 8 mg/1 effluent TSS limit. If we choose, we could accept a limit, but a preferable approach—accepted by MPCA—is to install a treatment technology that MPCA recognizes will control TSS down to the effluent concentration we need to achieve. Demonstration compliance with 8 mg/1 is not required. MPCA accepts specific treatment technologies for TSS freezing on the basis of their demonstrated performance at other plants around the state. Without mercury concerns, we are proposing that the East plant be upgraded with a biological phosphorus removal process. It will replace the existing chemical process for phosphorus removal. The reasons for the change include less costs and significantly less sludge quantities generated by bio -P. However, MPCA accepts chemical phosphorus removal as a technology that limits TSS down to the 8 mg/1 range, but not bio -P. In a telephone conversation on April 28`h, Gary Kimball of MPCA stated that chemical phosphorus removal—in combination with the activated sludge process employed at the plant—would be approved by MPCA as an equivalent TSS freeze at the East plant. In addition, if we were to select this option, the plant would be subject to quarterly effluent mercury monitoring. But there would be no mercury limit specified in the discharge permit. If we keep bio -P in the project, in order to satisfy MPCA with respect to the equivalent TSS freeze, the plant must be supplemented with a sand filtration process that will consistently reduce TSS to 5 mg/1 and below. A rough cost estimate for the process is $800,000. 2 Option 2—Mercury Non -Degradation If we do not choose to accept a TSS freeze as described above, then we must accept the mercury non -degradation route, including a mercury limit and mercury monitoring. The mercury limit would be 10 nanograms per liter on a monthly basis. Effluent monitoring to confirm that the limit is being met would be twice per month. Mercury testing is not cheap. Monitoring costs could be several thousand dollars a year. In addition, there are strict procedures to follow in taking samples to assure the validity of the results. An important question is whether or not the plant can meet the limit without installing treatment for mercury removal. According to MPCA, the median effluent concentration of municipalities in the state is 3 to 4 ng/l. There are several cities in the state that have chosen this option and are consistently below the limit. Generally, municipalities with higher than average mercury in their wastewater plant effluents are serving one or more industries that discharge mercury. To date, no municipal treatment plant in the state includes treatment for mercury removal. If we accept a limit and find in the future that it cannot be met, it is highly likely that a specific source or sources are responsible and steps to limit their discharges can be initiated. There is a third option to consider. Option 3: Permit for Phase I Only This option essentially delays final resolution of the mercury issue until Phase II. If the flow capacity of the permit were reduced to the Phase I capacity of 900,000 gpd, the TSS mass freeze is based on an effluent concentration of 13 mg/1. MPCA recognizes bio -P as a process capable of achieving this effluent concentration. So, with this option, we can install bio -P at the plant without any mercury concerns. However, the issues described above with respect to the need for sand filters or conversion to chemical phosphorus removal must be addressed in Phase II. By the time the Phase II became necessary, some conditions may be more favorable. MPCA policies may have changed or effluent mercury data collected after initiation of Phase I may show continuous compliance with the 10 nanogram/liter limit. Put another way, the issue may not have to be approached the same way it must be approached now. Discussion of Options Rather than selecting a particular option, it is easier to rule out the options that we definitely do not want to consider. Any option that results in the installation of effluent sand filters is highly unattractive and should be avoided. Sand filters will add considerable costs to the project. Also, the option of seeking only a 900,000 gpd capacity now will create the need to repeat the environmental and permitting process in the future. The remaining options to consider are (1) switching from bio -P to chemical phosphorus removal or (2) accept a mercury limit. Recommendation Of the two, accepting a mercury limit will allow us to install the preferred phosphorus removal technology. If we are to accept a limit, the next step would be to complete the environmental review for the project with our stated preference. From my perspective, it is the preferred option, as long as the city understands what is involved with accepting a limit. In my opinion, switching to chemical phosphorus removal just to satisfy the mercury issue is a "tail -wagging -dog" solution. This perhaps is an issue for which the wastewater committee should meet. Or, as an alternative, I could bring this to the council's attention. Give me your thoughts on the matter. Call me anytime at (651)604-4832. Sincerely, BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC. � lc Ted K. Field 4