02-09-98 CCCITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE
5.CONSENT AGENDA (Non -controversial items)Elaine Beatty
Council of 2/9/98 - 7PM
gNUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
5.3 Approve PC/Council Workshop to review Comp. Plan - Policy Plan Section for the regularly
scheduled PC Meeting of February 18, 1998 - 8PM.
BACKGROUND-
Depending on what happens on Wednesday night at PC/CC Workshop for
Comp Plan, Bob Kirmis called and felt that we should have this on the
agenda to keep the Comp Plan Process moving along. I agree.
RECOKdENDATION :
This is for Council information. Please approve.
Council/PC Workshop at the Feb. 18, 1998 P.C. Meeting at 8PM.
Thanks,
lame
JNT Y C.
pop
= m
X855
January 29, 1998
Elaine Beatty
Otsego City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: 1998 Local Board of Review
Dear Ms. Beatty:
5.2 FEB - Z
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER
Wright County Assessor
Wright County Government Center
10 2nd Street N. W. • Room 240
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1183
Phone: (612) 682-7367 / (612) 682-7368
FAX. (612) 682.6178
The 1998 Otsego City Board of Review has been tentatively set for Monday, April 20 at 7:00
p.m. If this date will not work for you please let me know before February 15, 1998.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
incerely,
Dougl M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
DMG/df
Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE
5.CONSENT AGENDA (Non -controversial items)Elaine Beatty
Council of 2/9/98 - 7PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPAEZED isr : ES, c.:c:
5.4 Approve Brad Kelash, Public Works Employee resignation.
BACKGROMM :
As you know, Brad Kelash, Public Works Employee gave his notice
verbally on January 28th and in written form on January 29th, 1998.
This item is on the Consent Agenda as a mere formality to approve his
resignation by the Council and have it in the permanent record. Brad
is already unemployed by Otsego. For your information, he has been
sent a letter informing him of his rights on Insurance, etc.
RECCbMENDATION :
This is for Council information. Please approve this Consent Agenda
Item.
T nks,
Elaine
WiU wn S. RadzwiU
Andrew J. MacArthur
Michael C. Couri
February 4, 1998
City Council Members
City of Otsego
C/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RADZ I I LLQ K COV Lel
Anorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
RE: Resolution Authorizing Eminent Domain For Acquisition Of Wastewater
Treatment Site
Dear Council Members:
Enclosed for your consideration at Monday's regularly scheduled City Council meeting
please find a proposed resolution authorizing commencement of Eminent Domain
proceedings for acquisition of the wastewater treatment site. This resolution authorizes
the initiation of the process and the quick -take provisions of Minn. Stat 117.
Initiation of these proceedings does not preclude acquisition of the property through
negotiation, it merely starts the condemnation process so, that in the event that
negotiations are not successful, the City can acquire the property within the time frame
necessary to begin timely construction of the facility.
The appraisal of the property has been completed, and hopefully myself, and the City
Administrator, will have met with the property owners and offered them the amount set
forth in the appraisal prior to Monday's meeting.
I have discussed the matter with Ted Field of Bonestroo and he indicated that the
property acquisition must be completed by July.
By adopting the enclosed resolution the City will authorize a taking within 90 days of
Notice to the property owners. A court order, after a hearing on the issue of public
purpose, is required to take possession of the property along with payment of the
Letter to Otsego City Council
February 4, 1998
Page 2
appraised value to, the owners or deposit of the same in court. Once that order is received
Commissioners are appointed and the only issue remaining is the amount of
compensation due for the taking.
The City is required to reimburse the property owners up to $500.00 dollars for appraisal
fees should they seek a separate appraisal.
I have provided the property owner's representatives with various documents regarding
site selection, which they requested. I have also indicated to them that I would notify
them of any significant actions regarding the property, which I am doing by copy of this
letter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter I will be available to answer them at the
City Council meeting on Monday.
Very urs,
ew J. A th
RADZ & COURI
Encls.
Cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator
Bob Kirmis, NAC
John Harwood, Hakanson Anderson
Ted Field, Bonestroo
Steve Szarke, Attorney at Law
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING COMMENCEMENT OF EMINENT
DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS.
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego has determined to proceed with construction of a
wastewater treatment facility to serve future needs of the citizens and in order to
address potential future environmental problems arising from septic system
failures; and
WHEREAS, the City has authorized Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlick,
professional engineers, to study the issue, to make recommendations to the City
Council, and to prepare a Facility Plan for submittal to the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency for review; and
WHEREAS, such a report was completed by Bonestroo, Rosene and Anderlik,
subsequently reviewed and revised, and put in final form and dated September,
1997; and
WHEREAS, Bonestroo determined that because of heavier discharge restrictions
placed upon discharge into the Mississippi River, due to its designation as a Rare
and Valuable Resource River, that the easiest and most cost effective discharge
point would be to the Crow River; and
WHEREAS the Facility Plan identified, in general, the plant site area for proper
discharge into the Crow River; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Facility Plan on September 15,
1997 at which time public comment was heard regarding the general area selected
for discharge, as well as the advisability of constructing the plant; and
WHEREAS, within that area identified generally for the plant site, the City
Council reviewed numerous specific sites, and the final site and area for
construction of roadway and discharge pipe to the Crow River was selected by the
Otsego City Council at a meeting on October 15, 1997; and
WHEREAS, said site is owned by Ralph Lahn (deceased) and Elsie Lahn, and is
upon that property legally described as set forth on the attached Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the site and easements required are described as set forth on attached
Exhibit B and B-1; and
WHEREAS, the City Council proceeded to order an appraisal of the designated
site; and
WHEREAS, said appraisal was completed on or about January 29, 1998,
indicating an appraised value for the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the amount of the appraisal was offered by the City to the owners of
the property, but has not been accepted; and
WHEREAS, the City has set forth a time line for proposed construction of the
facility, wherein access to the property to commence necessary testing,
preconstruction activities and to commence construction of the facility must be
secured by early summer of 1998; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it must commence action to insure
access to the site in a timely manner; and
WHEREAS, the construction of the wastewater facility and necessary pipes and
access roads constitutes a public purpose as set forth in Minn. S t. 117, and
WHEREAS, the City has authority to acquire property and easements for said
wastewater treatment plant pursuant to Minn. Stat. 412.211; an
WHEREAS, the City has the right to acquire the land and ease ents required
prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioners, pursuant to
Min. Stat. Secs. 117.011 and 117.042;
WHEREAS, the County of Wright has certain interests in that portion of the
easements crossing County State Aid Highway 36; and
WHEREAS, the City has been unable to successfully negotiate the acquisition of
the site and easements.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF OTSEGO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA as follows:
1. That it is determined that construction of a wastewater treant facility within
the City of Otsego serves a valid public purpose. ti
2. That the City Council of the City of Otsego hereby authorizes the acquisition of
said land and easements by eminent domain and to take title and possession of that
land prior to the filing of an award by the court appointed commissioners, pursuant
to Minn. Stat. Secs. 412.211, 117.011 and 117.042; and
3. That the City Attorney is requested to file the necessary petition therefor, and to
prosecute such action to a successful conclusion or until it is abandoned,
dismissed, or terminated by the City or the Court.
ADOPTED this day of February, 1998 by the Otsego Ci Council, Wright
County, Minnesota.
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
That part of the NW 1/4 and that part of the SW 1/4 of Section 1, Township 120,
Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the
southwest corner of said NW %4; thence on a bearing of north ( sumed bearing) at
the west line of said NW %4, a distance of 466.18 feet; thence S 3° 07' 30" E, a
distance of 237.23 feet; thence S 78° 11' 10" E a distance of 466. 11 feet; thence S
78° 32' 37" E, a distance of 1012.22 feet to the actual point of t eginning said
point being on the center line of Wright County Highway Numb tr 36; thence N 0°
13' 39" W, a distance of 2203.94 feet to the north line of NW !4; thence N 89° 41'
03" E along said north line, a distance of 941.80 feet to the no east corner of
said NW V4; thence S 0° 13' 39" E along the east line of said 1/4, a distance of
2359.48 feet to the centerline of said Wright County Highway ber 36; thence
N 88° 52' 54" W along said centerline, a distance of 77.97 feet; thence westerly
along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the north, having a radius of
1591.87 feet and a central angel of 10° 20' 17", a distance of 2E 7.23 feet; thence
N 78° 32' 37" W along said centerline tangent to said curve, a distance of 45.50
feet; thence S 23° 30' 58" W, a distance of 155 feet more or les to the waters
edge of the Crow River; thence northwesterly and westerly alon said waters edge,
a distance of 500 feet more or less to a line which bears S 0° 13' 39" E from the
point of beginning; thence N 0° 13' 39" W along said line, a distance of 124 feet
more or less to the point of beginning. I
EXHIBIT B
The north 800.00 feet of the west 550.00 feet of the following
scribed property:
That part of the Northwest Quarter and that part of the Southwe t Quarter of
Section 1, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota
described as
follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Northwest Quarter; thence
on a bearing of North (assumed bearing) at the west line of said
Northwest
Quarter, a distance of 466.18 feet; thence South 83 degrees 7 m
nutes 30 seconds
East, a distance of 237.23 feet; thence South 78 degrees 11 mini
ites 10 seconds
East a distance of 466.11 feet; thence South 78 degrees 32 mint
tes 37 seconds
East, a distance of 1012.22 feet to the actual point of beginning
aid point being on
the center line of Wright County Highway Number 36; thence North
0 degrees 13
minutes 39 seconds West, a distance of 2203.94 feet to the no
line of Northwest
Quarter; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 03 seconds East al
Dng said north
line, a distance of 941.80 feet to the northeast corner of said Northwest
Quarter;
thence South 0 degrees 13 minutes 39 seconds East along the east
line of said
Northwest Quarter, a distance of 2359.48 feet to the centerline c
f said Wright
County Highway Number 36; thence North 88 degrees 52 minul
s 34 seconds
West along said centerline, a distance of 77.97 feet; thence wesrly
along said
centerline on a tangential curve concave to the north, having a rius of 1591.87
feet and a central angle of 10 degrees 20 minutes 17 seconds, astance
of 287.23
feet; thence North 78 degrees 32 minutes 37 seconds West along
said centerline
tangent to said curve, a distance of 45.50 feet; thence South 23 C.egrees
30 minutes
58 seconds West, a distance of 155 feet more or less to the waters edge of the
Crow River; thence northwesterly and westerly along said waters
edge, a distance
of 500 feet more or less to a line which bears South 0 degrees 13
minutes 39
seconds East from the point of beginning; thence North 0 degrees
13 minutes 39
seconds West along said line, a distance of 124 feet more or less
to the point of
beginning.
Together with a permanent easement for utility, ingress and egr s over, under and
across the west 50.00 feet of the above described property lying southerly of the
north 800.00 feet thereof and northerly of the centerline of Comity State Aid
Highway No. 36.
Together with a permanent easement for utility purposes over, u
the east 40.00 feet of the west 80.00 feet of the above described
southerly of the centerline of County State Aid Highway No. 36
Together with a permanent easement for utility purposes over, u
the east 30.00 feet of the west 80.00 feet of the above described
northerly of the centerline of County State Aid Highway No. 36
and across
erty lying
and across
'erty lying
southerly of a
line 40.00 feet northerly of, as measured at right angles, and parallel with said
centerline. I
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes o
ver, under and
across the east 100.00 feet of the west 150.00 feet of the above described
property
lying southerly of the north 800.00 feet thereof and northerly of
he centerline of
County State Aid Highway No. 36, except the east 30.00 feet of
he west 80.00
feet of the above described property lying northerly of the cente
ine of County
State Aid Highway No. 36 and southerly of a line 40.00 feet no
erly of, as
measured at right angles, and parallel with said centerline.
Together with a temporary easement for construction purposes over, under and
across the west 200.00 feet of the above described property lying southerly of the
centerline of County State Aid Highway No. 36.
Said temporary easements to expire on December 1, 1999.
I � 1
I
I 8
I.1r .40.OW Sr
101ul .11.
PID 012401
I
n
...\. lao.00
IM « IM Mw l/. e/
PID 012401 /
PID 012404 .
I 3
b� IYf�\ c.w..l >Iw. Yl II1gw..r w. x
1
PID 012400
�.r
�\ -•0.00 Pin 24 1 - �...�..• _ __ _ __ _ Y �Y_4 �Q
012403 I _ -
Y �oo
fit
1{jU °'�«,w /
.�� Iw. wrul Iw. w I.. Sw I/. w
L 170.
•. f ffi�: .Y' Owwl.s avw.ewwl � I I
CITY OF OTSEGO
CONDEMNATION PROCESS: GENERAL OUTLINE
1. Pick facility site through engineering evaluation.
2. Preliminary check of ownership and title.
3. Order appraisal of property.
4. Determine what entity will acquire property. Will the property
be owned singly, jointly, or by a separate entity What will be the
formula for share of costs related to land acquisition?
5. City evaluates appraisal and Council action is taken to make
offer to purchase property. Authority to enter into purchase
agreement authorized.
6. Negotiate for acquisition of property by purchase.
7. Either close on purchase or consider authorization to go
forward with condemnation of proposed site.
8. Preparation of documents necessary to support Condemnation.
Proposed site plan for facility, proper legal de criptions of all
areas that will be subject to Condemnation, etc.
9. Serve and file Condemnation action on proper parties.
10. Schedule and hold hearing on Public Purpose a d Appointment of
Commissioners at the District Court. Agree on Commissioners to
review valuation of property.
11. Swear in Commissioners and schedule Commissioners viewing of
property.
12. Commissioners view property and set up hearing for award on
Condemnation.
13. Commissioners hold hearing on award. Both sides present
appraisals and other evidence.
14. Commissioners make award, money paid or deposited in Court,
time period for appeal of award to District Court: commences.
15. If appealed, matter is heard at trial in Dis rict Court.
16. District Court judge rules on Commissioner's award.
17. If early possession of the property is a neessity, the City
can proceed under 90 day "quick take" provision of Minnesota
Statute 117. 1
Wd mn S. Radzwill
Andrew J. MacAithur
Michael C. Couri
February 4, 1998
RADZWILL & COURI
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue Fast
PO Box 369
St. Midwel, MN55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
Steven Szarke
Attorney at Law
Szarke & Lenczewski Law Office
PO Box 485
11 NE I" Street
Buffalo, MN 55313
RE: Lahn Property- City of Otsego
Dear Mr. Szarke:
Please find enclosed and faxed to your attention the Summary page
received the other day on the Latin property. I would like to set up
yourself and your clients to discuss the appraisal and to offer them
compensation for the taking. I would like to meet either tomorrow
If you feel the offer is not acceptable and that a meeting would
let me know.
Could you please give me a call regarding this matter.
Very
J. Ma/ ur
VjT & COURI
Encls.
Cc: City of Otsego
Mike Robertson, City Administrator
of the appraisals
meeting with
hat amount as fair
r Monday if possible.
no purpose please
. I .
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
INTERIM ORDINANCE EXTENDING PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE CITY
OF OTSEGO.
Section 1. Purpose. This interim ordinance is hereby established for the following
reasons:
A. To halt present residential subdivision and subdivision applications within the
City of Otsego.
B. To extend the period of time required to complete revisions to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and official controls in light of changed circumstances,
including the City's decision to proceed with construction of wastewater treatment
facilities and potable water services within the City.
C. In order to protect the planning process, and insure proper land use controls.
D. To protect the City's ability to financially undertake a sewer treatment plant.
E. To protect the environment, and to provide for a safer City water supply.
F. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Otsego.
Section 2. Authority. The City Council is empowered by Minn. Stat. 462.355,
Subd. 4 to pass an interim ordinance, applicable to all or a part of its jurisdiction,
for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and
welfare of its citizens.
Section 3. Temporary Prohibition. For eighteen months after the termination of
the previous interim ordinance prohibiting residential subdivisions, or until such
earlier time as the Otsego City Council determines by resolution that the reasons
for the moratorium no longer exist, no application for any type of proposed
residential subdivision or application which will result in increased residential use
of property not specifically exempted from this interim ordinance, nor any
application for rezoning to any residential zoning designation shall be accepted or
processed by the City.
Section 4. Exceptions. Specifically exempted from this prohibition are the
following:
A. Applications for commercial or industrial subdivisions, which do not include
residential uses.
B. Allowable 1 per 40 land splits within agriculturally zoned areas.
C. The issuance of building permits for individual residences, or accessory
buildings upon lots which have been previously approved and which are in full
compliance with the applicable lot requirements for a buildable lot within the zone
in which they are located, or; if within a previously approved plat, in full
compliance with any additional restrictions placed upon building within that plat.
D. Applications for Conditional Use Permits, which do not result in increased
residential use of property.
E. Applications for variances.
Section 5. Misdemeanor. Any person, persons, firm or corporation violating any
provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.02, plus costs of
prosecution.
Section 6. Injunctive Relief. In the event of a violation of this ordinance, the City
may institute appropriate actions or proceedings, including requesting injunctive
relief to prevent, restrain, restrain, correct, or abate such violations.
Section 7. Separability. It is hereby declared that the several provisions of this
ordinance are separable in accordance with the following; if any court of
competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this interim ordinance to be
invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions of this ordinance not
specifically included in said judgment.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its
passage and publication, and shall remain in effect until eighteen (18) months
from the termination date of the previous interim ordinance prohibiting residential
subdivisions, unless a shorter period of time is approved by proper resolution of
the Otsego City Council.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this day of
February, 1998.
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
William S. Radzwill
Andrew J. M"Arthur
Michael C. Court
February 4, 1998
City Council Members
City of Otsego
C/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RADZWILL & COUN
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
RE: Interim Ordinance Extending Present Moratorium On Residential
Subdivisions
Dear Council Members:
Enclosed herein, as per your previous directive, please find a proposed Interim Ordinance
extending the moratorium on residential subdivisions and a proposed resolution adopting
the Interim Ordinance. The enclosed resolution would extend the present moratorium for
a period of eighteen months, however, the moratorium could be terminated earlier by
resolution of the City Council.
The purpose of the extended moratorium is to allow the City time to complete revisions
to the comprehensive plan and official controls due to changed circumstances, including
the decision to proceed with sewer and water projects.
Rather than review in great detail the enabling statutes and caselaw, I have enclosed with
this letter my previous correspondence from last year regarding Interim Ordinances.
At the last meeting their was discussion regarding some mechanism for providing review
of preliminary plats during the term of the moratorium in order for the City to have some
available mechanism to review proposed developments that wish to hook up to City
water and sewer services. It is my opinion that such a process would be unworkable since
it could lead to a situation where preliminary plat review and final plat (as well as
rezoning) would be under different and possibly contradictory standards.
Letter to Otsego City Council
February 4, 1998
Page 2
It has also been raised that review and consideration of a plan and controls exclusive to
the eastern portion of the City could be accomplished prior to the whole plan being
finalized. While this is theoretically possible, the potential conflict in policies applied
city-wide as a basis for the plan changes would probably add so much confusion and
additional cost as to make the idea impractical. I would note that David Licht disagrees
with me on this issue.
I would suggest that some alternative process be considered in relation to land banking
or expansion of the sanitary sewer area.
I will be available to discuss this matter at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting
on Monday evening.
Veryours,
drew acArthur
RADZ L & COURI
Encls.
Cc: Mike Robertson, City Administrator
Bob Kirmis, NAC
John Harwood, Hakanson Anderson
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION EXTENDING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE RESTRICTING
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE CITY OF OTSEGO
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego has previously established a moratorium upon
residential development applications within the City of Otsego, in order to proceed
with the studies and procedures necessary to amend its Comprehensive Plan and
official controls; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Otsego has previously determined
that said Comprehensive Plan and official controls are in need of revision; and
WHEREAS, the City has initiated the process of review of the existing
Comprehensive plan and official controls, which process is ongoing; and
WHEREAS, certain aspects of properly revising the Comprehensive Plan and
official controls were dependent upon a determination by the City as to whether or
not it would proceed with construction of a wastewater treatment facility within
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to proceed with construction of
such facilities, and has directed the City planner to proceed to complete work on
the Comprehensive Plans based upon the assumption that sewer and water services
will be delivered to certain areas of the City; and
WHEREAS, the present moratorium requires further extension in order to
properly complete revision of the Comprehensive Plan and local controls; and
WHEREAS, additional time is needed to complete the studies and procedure in
progress; and
WHEREAS, processing of applications for residential subdivision of land and any
proposed rezoning to residential designation, and evaluation of such proposals
under the existing plan and official controls would harm the ongoing planning
process.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF OTSEGO, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA:
I. That the attached Interim Ordinance establishing an extension of the existing
moratorium on residential development is hereby adopted.
2. That said interim ordinance is effective for a period of eighteen months from the
termination date of the previous interim ordinance prohibiting residential
subdivisions, unless specifically terminated at an earlier date by resolution of the
Otsego City Council.
ADOPTED this day of February, 1998 by the Otsego City Council.
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHJT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO.
INTERIM ORDINANCE EXTENDING PREVIOUSLY ESTABLISHED
MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE CITY
OF OTSEGO.
Section 1. Purpose. This interim ordinance is hereby established for the following
reasons:
A. To halt present residential residential subdivision and subdivision applications
within the City of Otsego.
B. To extend the period of time required to complete revisions to the City's
Comprehensive Plan and official controls in light of changed circumstances,
including the City's decision to proceed with construction of wastewater treatment
facilities and potable water services within the City.
C. In order to protect the planning process, and insure proper land use controls.
D. To protect the City's ability to financially undertake a sewer treatment plant.
E. To protect the environment, and to provide for a safer City water supply.
F. To protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of Otsego.
Section 2. Authority. The City Council is empowered by Minn. Stat. 462.355,
Subd. 4 to pass an interim ordinance, applicable to all or a part of its jurisdiction,
for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and
welfare of its citizens.
Section 3. Temporary Prohibition. For eighteen months after the termination of
the previous interim ordinance prohibiting residential subdivisions, or until such
earlier time as the Otsego City Council determines by resolution that the reasons
for the moratorium no longer exist, no application for any type of proposed
residential subdivision, nor any application for rezoning to any residential zoning
designation shall be accepted or processed by the City.
Section 4. Exceptions. Specifically exempted from this prohibition are the
following:
A. Applications for commercial or industrial subdivision.
B. Allowable 1 per 40 land splits within agriculturally zoned areas.
C. The issuance of building permits for individual residences, or accessory
buildings upon lots which have been previously approved and which are in full
compliance with the applicable lot requirements for a buildable lot within the zone
in which they are located, or, if within a previously approved plat, in full
compliance with any additional restrictions placed upon building within that plat.
D. Applications for Conditional Use Permits.
E. Applications for variances.
Section 5. Misdemeanor. Any person, persons, firm or corporation violating any
provision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction
thereof, shall be punished pursuant to Minn. Stat. 609.02, plus costs of
prosecution.
Section 6. Injunctive Relief. In the event of a violation of this ordinance, the City
may institute appropriate actions or proceedings, including requesting injunctive
relief to prevent, restrain, restrain, correct, or abate such violations.
Section 7. Separability. It is hereby declared that the several provisions of this
ordinance are separable in accordance with the following; if any court of
competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision of this interim ordinance to be
invalid, such judgment shall not affect any other provisions of this ordinance not
specifically included in said judgment.
Section 8. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its
passage and publication, and shall remain in effect until eighteen (18) months
from the termination date of the previous interim ordinance prohibiting residential
subdivisions, unless a shorter period of time is approved by proper resolution of
the Otsego City Council.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this day of
February, 1998.
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
William S. Radzwill
Andrew J. MacArthur
Michael C. Couri
Megan M. McDonald
January 23, 1997
RADZWILL & CO URI
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
City Council Members
City of Otsego
c/o Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 5530
RE: Proposed Moratorium- Draft Resolution And Optional Interim
Ordinances
Dear Council Members:
Please find enclosed for your consideration two options for a
proposed Interim Ordinance establishing a moratorium. The first
option establishes a moratorium over residential development within
the entire City. The second option establishes a moratorium over
only the "urban" portions of the City.
I have also enclosed a proposed resolution for adoption which,
hopefully, sets forth the salient facts upon which a decision to
establish a moratorium are based. In order to support such a
moratorium there should be such a resolution stating the reasons
for the City's action.
For the benefit of all
the applicable statute
Ordinance, Minn. Stat.
based upon a need for
particular action. In
the revisions to the
study.
Council Members, I have included a copy of
which allows the City to pass an Interim
462.355. Such an Interim Ordinance must be
the City to complete studies regarding a
this case the Council has already directed
Comprehensive Plan, as well as the sewer
The statute allowing the passing of an Interim Ordinance does not
list any specific requirement that there be a public hearing in
order to pass the ordinance. In fact, the Attorney General's Office
has indicated that the statute is separate from the provisions
establishing procedures for a regular rezoning which requires a
Letter to Otsego City Council
January 23, 1997
Page 2
public hearing and a 2/3 vote for approval. Op. Atty. Gen. 63b-14,
October 6, 1982.
Thus, passage of the Interim Ordinance does not require the usual
4/5 vote required for a rezoning, only a majority.
I will often recommend that a public hearing be held even if not
required, depending upon the situation. In this case, because of
the nature of the moratorium contemplated, the desire of the
Council to make a decision as soon as possible, the possible
adverse affect of the consideration of further applications until
this matter is resolved, and the potential overall affect on the
City, I think that the City would be justified in proceeding to
adopt an Interim Ordinance without public hearing. It is, however,
a Council decision.
Between the two options proposed, it is my strong recommendation
that the first option, a moratorium over the entire City be
implemented. A moratorium over only the eastern portion of the City
would defeat the whole purpose of the action.
The City can apply a moratorium to developments which have already
applied for processing. See Almquist v. Town of Marshan, 245 NW2d
819 (Minn. 1976) and Wedmever v City of Minneapolis, 540 NW2d 539
(Minn. App. 1995).
In the present case my recommendation is that all developments
already in process be allowed to continue through processing. I
have drafted the Interim Ordinance to be effective only after the
effective date of the Interim Ordinance, the date of publication.
In some Interim Ordinances specific exempted subdivisions are
listed within the interim ordinance. Another option would be to
change the effective date to give applicants a "window" in which to
submit an application.
The interim ordinance moratorium, as drafted, excludes commercial
and industrial development, individual residence construction on
already approved lots, CUPS, variances, and 1 per 40 splits. It is
specifically directed at residential subdivisions.
The proposed ordinance is also drafted to apply for a one year
period. It can be lifted at anytime by Council resolution. I have
drafted it this way in order to try and avoid the problems that
have occurred with other City moratoriums where we have had to come
back and extend a moratorium because the originally established
time period was too short. It is also unclear what time period
there would have to be in order to make needed changes once a
decision for or against sewer and water services has been made.
Due to the short time period given me to draft these documents
Letter to Otsego City Council
January 23, 1997
Page 3
there may be changes that become apparent to me prior to the
meeting. I will comment on any such changes at the meeting on
Monday.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.
Very ly yours,
An ew J. cArt
RADZWILL
COU
Encls.
cc: Bob Kirmis, Dave Licht, NAC
Larry Koshak, Hakanson Anderson
darkenwald, inc.
Industrial and Commercial Real Estate
auuoa•
'535 N.E. River Road
elk River, Minnesota 55330
(612) 441-3700
February 4, 1998
Mayor & City Council Members
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue
Otsego, MN 55330
,--1a
Re: Darkenwald Family Partnership
Hidden Lakes Planned Community
Dear Mayor & City Council Members:
darkenwald
REAL ESTATE
Based upon recent discussion with City staff and representatives in the City of Otsego, it
has come to our attention the City Council is considering extending the moratorium on
subdivision applications at its City Council meeting of February 9, 1998 The Dark enwald
Family Partnership does not support the continuation of the moratorium and would
appreciate the opportunity to speak to this issue at the February 9, 1998 council meeting if
possible.
As a follow-up to our July 1997 presentation of a concept plan for the 200 acre Hidden
Lakes Planned Community, we have been moving ahead with our preliminary plat
submission package. It was our intent to present an application to the City within the next
month to begin the city review and approval process. Our proposal is to provide sanitary
sewer and water services to the Hidden Lakes through privately constructed systems that
could be integrated with the City's proposed sanitary and water systems.
Our proposed integrated approach offers substantial cost savings to the City. It also offers
the City an alternate effluent route to the Mississippi River. This is particularly important
should the restrictions of the effluent limits to the Crow River continue to become nmre
stringent as anticipated. Finally, integrating the City's systems with the private systems
would offer a larger service area in the short term and in the long term through increased
treatment plant capacity and immediate construction of lateral sewers.
Mayor A City ComPAA Merubers
City of Otsego
Febroary 4. 1995
In the spirit of cooperation, we encourage you to consider allowing the moratorium to
expire without an extension and again consider an integrated approach to the
in&astrucwre design eurxeetly underway. Doing so would allow a collaborative effort
bem-con public and private sectors that will provide the residents of Otsego a cost
effective infrastructure system.
Sincerely,
The Darkenwald Family Grou
Joico arkenwald
cc. David Sahli, MPGA, Water Quality, Point Source Division
Paul Jacobs, Center for Rural Tedwology & Cooparative Developmcut (CRTCD)
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
February 3, 1998 FEB
Dear Friend of the Crow River:
The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has recently become aware of potential water
quality problems related to low dissolved oxygen (DO) in the lower Crow River (from the
confluence of the North and South Forks to the Mississippi River). The concern became
apparent during our review of three wastewater treatment facility (WWTF) permit applications
for new facilities proposing to discharge to the lower Crow River. As many communities in this
area are experiencing rapid growth and development, we want to apprise you of the current
situation so you can consider these factors in your planning activities and begin thinking about
solutions to the problem at hand.
The three WWTF projects currently under review are for the communities of Greenfield,
Rockford Township, and Dayton/Otsego. Based on current information regarding the proposed
capacities of these plants and the impacts of other existing WWTFs in the area on dissolved
oxygen levels in the lower Crow River, MPCA staff believes that the river's winter assimilative
capacity for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) will be reached or even exceeded under low -
flow conditions, if these projects are completed as proposed with conventional effluent limits.
This would have negative effects on the aesthetic quality and biological community of the lower
Crow River. Since the lower Crow River's assimilative capacity has been reached and it will not
be able to handle additional amounts of pollution, from this time forward, expansions of existing
WWTFs and construction of new facilities will be affected technically and financially. As
population increases in the area, future WWTF expansions and construction of new plants will
likely be more costly because they will need to remove higher percentages of pollutants, such as
BOD and possibly phosphorus, that cause low DO levels.
In addition to the impacts of WWTFs on the river, consideration must be given to other potential
pollution sources in the watershed, such as nonpoint source pollution effects from sources like
agriculture, feedlots, and urban runoff. The MPCA is in the process of performing some basic
rcomputer modeling of the North and South Fork Crow Watersheds to provide a better description
and understanding of current problems and their sources.
Considering the rapid growth projections for this area of Wright County and Hennepin County,
the situation is serious and poses a clear threat to the water quality of the lower Crow River.
Subsequently, the future trend will be toward even tighter permit limits. In addition to the three
projects currently under review, the MPCA is aware of other projects in the watershed in the
520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (Voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY)
Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester
Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20". fibers from paper recycled by consumers.
Page 2
development stage that will soon be applying for new or expanded discharges to the lower Crow
River. Local communities, resource managers, and decision -makers, the MPCA, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), and the Metropolitan Council need to work together
to determine how to best protect the water quality of the lower Crow River, while allowing for
sustainable economic gr,)wth in this area. Once some basic modeling is complete and
information has been gathered on the situation, the MPCA, MDNR and Metropolitan Council
intend to hold a watershed meeting to discuss the situation with resource managers in the
watershed and to begin discussions on how to address the situation. A meeting announcement
and invitation will be forthcoming.
We look forward to working with you and other local decision -makers in the Crow River
Watershed to find acceptable solutions to protect this valuable natural resource. If you have any
questions or comments on this letter, please contact Glenn Skuta of my staff at 612/296-7359.
Sincerely.
?RLodneyE. ssey, P.E.
Division Manager
Water Quality Division
REM.jae
CITY COUNCIL MEETING, FEBRUARY 9TH, 1998
ENGINEER'S AGENDA ITEMS
1) Design Report - Odean Avenue Reconstruction
A Right of Way map was transmitted to Andy MacArthur several weeks ago. Preparation of
an Owners and encumbrance report is under way. The Design Report shows the proposed road
with a single driving lane each direction, and a parking or disabled vehicle lane on each side.
Turn lanes are at 85th Street. The bike/walkway is on the west side The required council action
is to accept the report by motion. We will proceed with plans, specifications and definition of
Right of Way and easement as per the report.
2) Design Report - Sewer Collection & Water Distribution System
The report provides details of the proposed facility location. We request council review, input
as appropriate and approval by motion. If the council desires, a workshop session can be set
up to review the report, alignment, alternatives and costs in detail.
We need to transmit the selected alignment to Wright County, to Mn/DOT, and to the impacted
utility companies to solicit input and confirm the construction schedule. The Right of Way and
easements acquisition process must be initiated very soon.
3) Design Report - Water Supply and Storage
We have revised the Water Study recommendations by eliminating one of the three elevated
towers. The current system is based on two wells providing supply to a single location for
chemical treatment. We request Council approval of the report by motion and authorization to
seek quotations for the test wells.
4) Policy and Procedure for Right of Way and Easement Acquisition
For these projects and for any other project, we will be describing various types of Right of
Way and or easements to be acquired from many properties. The recommended procedure is
outlined in the memo. The City must follow good standard practice, treat everyone equitably
and have a procedure that can be concluded on an established schedule.
ot6l2.cc3
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED BY:
MEETING
DATE
9.COUNCIL ITEMS
Elaine Beatty
Council of 2/9/98 -
7PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC
9.1. Set date for Council/Board and Commission Workshop
BACKGROUND,
The above item was on the first of the year meeting agenda and the
Council asked it to be placed on the first meeting in February for
consideration. This workshop is intended to allow the Otsego Boards
and Commissions to interface with the Council/Staff and each other.
Also, to receive information regarding their Board and Commission
positions. We are looking at a date in March, but will let the
Council decide.
RECCbVENDATION :
This is for Council information and decision
Thanks,
Laine
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE:
DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED BY:
MEETING
DATE
9.000NCIL ITEMS
Elaine Beatty
Council of 2/9/98 -
7PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: Y�iLiYAkir+U tsz : r:ts, c:c:
9.2. Consider Board and Commission Member Appointments
BACKGROUND:
All the interviews should be completed by Wednesday, February 4, 1998
with Janet Bridgland and Gene Goenner being rescheduled for this night
before the PC/CC Workshop. Attached is a list of Board and Commission
openings to be filled. This is for the Council to decide after their
interviews with the candidates.
RECOMdENDATION :
This is for Council information and decision
Thanks,
Agg�
Elaine
CITY OF OTSEGO SPECIAL COUNCIL MEETING
FOR THE PURPOSE OF BOARD AND COMMISSION
INTERVIEWS
TUESDAY - January 27, 1998 - 7PM
Call to order by Mayor Larry Fournier
Roll Call
Fifteen minute (15 Min.) Interview as follows:
7:00
Ing Roskaft
Planning Commission
7:15
Joy Swenson
Heritage Preservation
Comm.
7:30
Steve Ackerman
EDAAC
7:45
Richard Nichols
Planning Commission
8:00
Joan Nichols
Heritage Preservation
Comm.
8:15
Michael Day
Park and Recs. Comm.
8:30
Janet Bridgland
Heritage Preservation
Comm. -,41-T.
8:45
Teri Kohler
Park and Recs Comm
(Alternate position)
9:00
Gene Goenner
Planning Commission
9:15
Russ Greninger
Planning Commission
Any other Council Business
Adjourn Meeting
Appointment Schedules for Commissions
file/ih/boards
Park and Rec. Board
Term
Appointed
Term Endin
Reappointed
Term
Term
Ending
Roche Martin
4 Vear
1-1-95
12-31-98
Tom Baftlargeon
4 vear
1-1-93
12-31-96
2-24-97
4 vear
12-31-00
Darlene Solberg
4 vear
1-1-93
12-31-96
2-24-97
4 vear
12-31-00
Ill Olson
4 Vear
1-1-95
12-31-98
Resigned as
a full-time
member
L10-96 replaced
by Jeff BaMeld
Tom Constant
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
Debbie Carron
3 year
1-1-94
12-31-96
Resigned as
of1-1-97
replaced
by Sue Kroll
Teri Kohler
3 year
1-1-95
12-31-97
Jeff Barthe/d
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
effective
6-10-96
Sue Kroll
4 year
2-24-97
12-31-00
Itemates:
ichelle Tarka 1 st Auer
9-25-97
'
ill Olson 2nd Alternate
6-10-96
file/ih/boards
Appointment Schedules for Commissions
Planning Commissior
Term
Appointed
Term Ending
Reappointed
Term
Term
Ending_
Carl Swenson
4ear
1-1-93
12-31-96
2-24-97
4 year
12-31-00
In Roskaft
4 ear
1-1-94
12-31-97
Bruce Rask
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
Jim Kolles
4 year
1-1-92
12-31-95
1-1-96
4 year
12-31-99
Eugene Goenner
4 year
1-1-94
12-31-97
Arisen Nagel
4 year
1-1-92
12-31-95
1-1-96
4 ear
12-31-99
Rkhard Nichols
4 year
1-1-94
12-31-97
nemate:
William Jones
2-24-97
resigned
9-25-97
file/jh/boards
Appointment Schedules for Commissions
file/jh/boards
DAAC
Term
Appointed
Term Ending
Reappointed
Term
Term
Rea ointed
Term
Term
Ending
Ending
Liz E. Wilder
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
LeRoy Lindente/ser
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
Rudy Thibodeau
4 year
1-1-95
12-31-98
uVem Klinkner
3 year
1-1-93
12-31-95
RESIGNED
END OF
1995
-epiacedby
Gabe Davis
Wally Odell
4 year
1-1-93
12-31-96
RESIGNED
Effective
10-14-96
2-24-97
4 year
12-31-00
David Sederberg..
2 year
1-1-95
12-31-96
RESIGNED
Effective
1-1-97
LplacedbyVincent
Peterson
Dadyn Kofoed
3 year
1-1-93
12-31-95
1-1-96
4 ear
12-31-99
resigned
7-14-97
Vincent Peterson
4 year
2-24-97
12-31-00
Gabriel Davis
4 ear
2-24-97
12-31-00
Itemate: OPEN
file/jh/boards
Appointment Schedules for Commissions
file/jh/boards
HerRage Preservation
Term
AppointedTerm
Ending
Reappointed
Term
Term
Ending
Janet Brld land
3 year
3-13-95
12-31-97
Arlene Holen
2 year
3-13-95
12-31-96
char to
Attemate
2-24-97
laced b
Ron Black
Frieda Lobeck
1 year
3-13-95
12-31-95
1-1-96
3 year
12-31-98
Joan Nichols
3 year
3-13-95
12-31-97
Elaine Norin
2 year
3-13-95
12-31-96
2-24-97
4 year
12-31-00
Joy Swenson3
year
3-13-95
12-31-97
Norman Schwanbec
1 year
1 3-13-95
12-31-95
1-1-96
3 year
12-31-98
Ron Black
4 year
2-24-97
12-31-00
Itemate:
Bene Holen
2-24-97
file/jh/boards
9.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP
January 15, 1998
Mayor Larry Fournier
16632 NE 70th St. NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Dear Mayor Fournier,
With the start of the new year, it has become time again to renew your annual support of
the Economic Development Partnership of Wright.
1997 was the Partnership's most successful year to date. Utilizing the Wright County
Enterprise Revolving Loan fund, the Partnership assisted in the expansion of Eden
Electronics in Montrose and Product Technologies in Maple Lake, creating nearly 45
new jobs for Wright County. Additionally, the Partnership expanded its services this
year to include grant writing assistance, site location and promotion, seminars and
workshops, and technical and resource assistance. The Partnership has also developed
relationships with regional and state economic development entities, held discussions
with our elected officials concerning development issues, and increased awareness of the
Partnership substantially.
The New Year appears to hold even more promise for the Partnership. Within the first
full week of 1998 I received two requests for assistance from new businesses looking to
start-up operations in Wright County. The Board of Directors recently met to identify
new goals and challenges for 1998, which include expanding the Wright County
Revolving Loan Fund and implementing a business retention and expansion program to
address the needs of existing Wright County businesses. Additionally, you can expect to
see the Partnership's web page come on line, and a variety of economic development
related workshops offered.
I encourage you to contact me should you have further questions about the Partnership. I
would be happy to meet with you to discuss its services, or the role it plays in economic
development at the county level, or how it may be of service to you in 1998.
Sincerely,
Marc Nevinski
Executive Director
CC: Mike Robertson
PO Box 525, 6800 ELEcnuc DRIVE, RocKFORD, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAX (612) 477-3054
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PRor-rr PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP
Invoice 1998
January 15, 1998
1998 Supporting Membership Dues for: City of Otsego
Municipality 1990 Pop. 5219 $1,000.00
Should you find this invoice incorrect or have questions as to how your dues amount was
determined, please contact Marc Nevinski at (612) 477-3086.
Please return a copy of this invoice along with your payment to:
Cathy Thisius
EDP of Wright County
Security State Bank
PO Box 449
Maple Lake, MN 55358
Thank you for your continued support. Should you have any questions regarding the
Partnership, please contact Marc Nevinski at (612) 477-3086.
PO Box 525, 6800 ELEcnuc DRIVE, RocKFORD, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAX (612) 477-3054
Economic Development Partnership of Wright County
1998 Membership Dues Structure
Wright County $ .50 per capita*
Municipalities < 1000 $ 100.00 plus .10 per capita*
1001-2500 $ 500.00
2501-5000 $ 500.00 plus .10 per capita*
> 5000 $ 1000.00 plus .10 per capita*
Townships _ $ 100.00 plus .10 per capita*
Utility Companies
Telecommunications Provider
Banks & Lending Institutions
$ 1000.00 plus .10 per capita*
$ 1000.00
$ 250.00 (deposits up to $25 M)
$ 500.00 (deposits of $25 M to $50 M)
$ 750.00 (deposits of $50 M to $75 M)
$1000.00 (deposits over $75 M)
Associate $ 50.00
(Includes non -business, non profit, schools and civic organizations)
Business 1 to 4 employees**
5 to 10 employees
11 to 20 employees
21 plus employees
Honorary Member
*Per capita rates are based on 1990 census.
$ 75.00
$ 100.00
$ 150.00
$ 200.00
No Dues Required
**Number of employees includes active owners and management and pertains to regular employees (over 20
hours per week) Part Time employees of 20 hours per week or less to be counted as 1/2 employees.
9.3 b
MEMO
Date: February 3, 1998
To: Mayor & Council
From: Interim City Administrator Mike Robertson
Re: EDAAC Recommendation & Requests
I attended the EDAAC meeting on Monday, February 2
and they made the following recommendation to the
Council.
1) The EDAAC by motion and unanimous vote
recommended that their regular meeting date be
changed from the first Monday in the month to the
third Monday in the month, change to take effect in
March, 1998. The reason for the proposed change is
that it would be easier for some members to make
the meeting on the third Monday.
The EDAAC also discussed a variety of speakers
which they would like to have attend their meeting
to provide them information. These speakers were;
City Financial consultant Gary Groen to provide an
overview of City finances; Interim City
Administrator Mike Robertson to discuss the role of
the City Administrator in Otsego; Dan Wilson to
make specific recommendations on economic
development in Otsego; An industrial development
specialist or realtor to discuss industrial
development in general and Otsego in particular; A
speaker to discuss water quality coops, which are
cooperatives set up to provide water and wastewater
treatment to individual homeowners who are not
connected to centralized systems.
The EDAAC also discussed again their mission. It
is clear that there are a variety of
interpretations of their mission. I would
recommend that the City Council re-examine the
EDAAC's mission and provide specific direction to
them.
cc: City Staff
Claims List for Approval
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
For the period 02/02/98 to 02/02/98
1/ / 02/02/98 3243 912.22
TILITIES
TOTAL FOR MONTH
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
1
22,611 .2=
50,081.5-
CLAIM
TOTAL
TO WHOM PAID
FOR WHAT PURPOSE
DATE
NUMBER
CLAIM
FC15----/�2/�8
14
5�-
MINNESOTA COUNTIES INS. TRUST
1998 DUES
02/02/98
02/02/98
3215
3216
50.00
1,830.00
GARY A. GROEN, CPA
JANUARY SERVICES
Oz
380.82
LAKELAND FORD TRUCK SALES, INC
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
02/02/98
3218
2,402.64
1,
r-G-7ESER 01L LOMPANY
NORTHERN HYDRAULICS INC
JANUARY
SUPPLIES
02/02/98
02/02/98
3220
3221
46.83
524.39
: NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
JANUARY SUPPLIES
--gIIpFfASHEET
CITY OF MONTICELLO�
C -
DECEMBER ANIMAL CONTROL CHARGES
02/02/98
3223
180.00
DJ'S TOTAL HOME CENTER
SUPPLIES
02/02/98
3224
8.58
35.70
02/02/98
3225
WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT
SUPPLIES & SALT & SAND
02/02/98
3226
4,400.57
:= CROW RIVER FARM EQUIPMENT
MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES -DECEMBER
02/02/98
02/02/98
3227
3228
33.99
63.45
NORTHERN AIRGAS
DECEMBER & JAN. SUPPLIES
02/02/98
3229
95.37
i 16 PR PAFE-6ELTV Y
02/02/98
3 O
tsLAUDRY OIL COMPANY
_,:BOYER TRUCKS
MAINT. SUUPPLIES
02/02/98
02/02/98
3231
3232
93.59
982.46
:,.ZIEGLER INC
MAINT. SUPPLIES
02/02/98
3233
237.92
zT LAbIII—S
CUB FOODS
WINTERFEST SUPPLIES
02/02/98
3234
77.37
zs
r. HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOC INC
DECEMBER WWTP BOUNDARY SURVEY
02/02/98
3235
2,066.27
117.15
AN R A
02/02/98
3236
23-
�.RANDY'S SANITATION, INC.
JANUARY RECYCLING
02/02/98
02/02/98
3237
3238
272.50
33.00
:,,ECM PUBLISHERS INC
PRINTING & PUBLISHING
3
8.1
_
L
/ 2 8
MARKHURD
AERIAL SURVEY SERVICES
02/02/98
3240
51000.00
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
02/02/98
3241
3242
168.93
467.64
= WEST COMMUNICATIONS
V
02/02/98
1/ / 02/02/98 3243 912.22
TILITIES
TOTAL FOR MONTH
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
1
22,611 .2=
50,081.5-
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF orscso
v ozsooessmswr esazsrsn
-
For the period 01/27/98 to 02/01/98 REGISTER
02/02/98
oxccx TOTAL ^ccuuwT occnowr
TO WHOM PAID
R��WHAT PURPOSE DATE NUMBER 10 -_ �L-_ -- .
63.00
101 -*1600-130 28.50
`
101-43100-130 106.70
101-41*00-123 1.225'19
'�-_- 525.23
["| �o�-�uzoo-z�o ------------��------�—��4���--
101-41400-121- 225'96
."'eAwx OF ELK nzvsn 91 zmpRnovsmsw1 eowo zwrsnssr 01/29/98 210e9 4,687.50 a01-47500-602 4,687.50
�
lie TOTAL FOR MONTH 7,978.03 7,978.03
a: TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
1201 2f
231
�
00 C.;
r�
..
r,
'-
='
------ ------------------------------------- ----
^—
��
Claims List for Approval
MUNICIPAL OF CITY
OF OTSEGO
For the period 02/02/98
to 02/02/98
_
CLAIM
TOTAL
'3 TO W M P ID
FOR WHAT PURPOSE
DATE
NUMBER
CLAIM
4 ECM PUBLISHERS INC
1/10 &1/21
PRINTING
02/02/98
3247
652.20
s
:'STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY
DECEMBER
SERVICES
02/02/98
3248
22.00
'.MICHAEL JOHN ROBERTSON
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES - JANUARY
02/02/98
3249
2,797.50
'3 LONG & SONS
JANUARY
SERVICES
02/02/98
3250
448.15
2'RADZWILL LAW OFFICE
JANUARY
SERVICES
02/02/98
3251
3,169.50
21BEST DISPOSAL SERVICE
FEBRUARY
SERVICES
02/02/98
3252
90.00
r3, AT & T
SERVICE
TO 1/21
02/02/98
3253
31.88
,a MINNEGASCO
SERVICE
TO 1/27
02/02/98
3254
826.09
,7
e WRIGHT—HENNEPIN CO—OP ELECTRIC
19
ao.
ASSN SERVICE
TO 1/14
02/02/98
3255
828.69
i
211
_
z4i
TOTAL FOR MONTH
---
8,866.0
'=al
121i TOTAL YEAR TO DATE
36,336.3
�I
30
32,
'33
38
4.i
:a
1