Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02-23-98 CC
JNTY QIp v� 3 i � z O d O 7866 Wyman A. Nelson County Attorney Thomas N. Kelly Chief • Criminal Division Brian J. Asleson Chief • Civil Division December 9, 1996 Re: Rivers of Hope To Whom It May Concern: WRIGHT COUNTY Office of County Attorney Wright County Government Center 10 2nd Street N. W., Room 150 Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1189 Phone: (612) 682-7340 Toll Free: 1-800-362-3667 Fax: (612) 682-7700 Assistants Anne L. Mohaupt Thomas C. Zins Terry Frazier Kathleen A. Afoul Scott M. Sandberg Mark A. Erickson Victim/Witness Assistance Coordinator Barbara S. Johnson This office has utilized the services of Rivers of Hope over a period of years. The Wright County Attorney's Office prosecutes all cases involving domestic violence in Wright County, except for three cities who prosecute their own misdemeanors and gross misdemeanors. Rivers of Hope has been a very important element in providing services to victims of domestic violence. In my opinion, they provide excellent support to these victims while working within the framework of the criminal justice system. My endorsement of Rivers of Hope is wholehearted. Yours truly, n AWy'man A. Nelson County Attorney WAN:cjh NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS SERVED BY RIVERS OF HOPE (Denoted by Counties) JUVENILES Anoka County Jan 1, 1994 - Jan 1, 1995 - Jan 1, 1996 - Jan 1, 1997 - ADULTS Dec 31.1994 Dec 31.1995 Dec 31.1996 Dec 31.1997 Anoka County 10 9 18 24 Benton County 2 0 1 0 Hennepin County 7 12 25 12 Isanti County 3 1 4 2 Meeker County 0 0 4 2 Mille Lacs County 0 5 4 3 Ramsey County 0 0 4 4 Scott County 0 3 1 0 Sherburne County 217 332 384 424 Stearns County 2 2 2 2 Wright County 273 316 378 472 Miscellaneous Counties 3 1 2 39 JUVENILES Anoka County 1 4 5 3 Hennepin. County 1 3 4 0 McLeod County 0 1 3 1 Meeker County 0 9 28 17 Morrison County 0 0 1 0 Sherburne County 35 158 134 129 Stearns County 0 1 4 6 Wright County 2 49 116 153 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS SERVED 556 906 1122 1293 ("These figures do not include those individuals who remained anonymous when requesting referral services/information or attending support group) CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 4.OPEN FORUM (5-M_n. iimit)Elaine Beatty Council of 2/23/98 - 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC 4.1. Special Presentation: A. Rivers of Hope, P. O. Box 142, Elk River, MN. Tom Shroyer will acquaint Council with this organization and request financial support. BACKGROUND: Margaret Ostman, Executive Director of Rivers of Hope in Elk River is requesting that Otsego contribute $1,000.00 to Rivers of Hope for services to this community and to add Rivers of Hope as a line item on the budget for future consideration. Mr. Tom Shroyer will be present to explain the function of this organization and answer any questions. Attached is information from Margaret Ostman regarding Rivers of Hope in Elk river. RECOICNDATION : This is for Counc-1 information and consideration. Tanks, laine (612) 441-0792 Elk River Office Sherburne County February 17, 1997 RIVERS OF HOPE P.O. Box 142 Elk River, MN 55330 (612)682-6424 1-800-439-2642 Buffalo Office Outside the Metro Wright County Mayor Larry Fournier and City Council Members Otsego City Hall 8899 NE Nashua Otsego, MN 55330 Dear Mayor and City Council Members, dialing area Rivers of Hope has provided advocacy and support services to victims of domestic violence and their families within Sherburne and Wright Counties since 1989. We focus on four (4) primary service areas: • Advocacy and support services • Youth violence prevention/intervention services • Criminal justice intervention services • Community awareness and education The work we do at Rivers of Hope is unique in that we provide a myriad of services at no charge to victims of domestic violence. The basic service we offer is advocacy which requires qualified and specifically trained staff to work one on one with the hundreds of people who come to us for help every quarter. We also work with the Sheriff s Department, social services, the Sherburne County Attorney's office, District #728 Schools, churches and others to coordinate this community's response to domestic violence. We know this city is committed to maintaining a good quality of life for its young families, especially in the light of the alarming rise in youth violence. We know also that violence breeds violence and all the parks, teen centers, sports arenas, and special activities in the world cannot undo the violence perpetrated on family members within too many homes in Otsego. Children who witness domestic violence within their homes are at a higher risk of juvenile delinquency, including crimes such as burglary, arson, prostitution, running away, drug use and assaults. They also experience a 6 times greater likelihood of attempted suicide, a 24% greater likelihood of committing sexual assault crimes, they are 74% more likely to commit crimes against a person and have a 50% greater likelihood of drug and alcohol abuse. Rivers of Hope can and does have an effect on these kinds of statistics in Otsego. One of our youth advocates conducts a violence prevention/intervention program for secondary students and works at Elk River secondary schools two mornings a week. Young people are also welcome to call our office for advocacy. We can only carry on this important work with the support of our communities. We are asking the City of Otsego to contribute $1000 to Rivers of Hope for services to this community and to add Rivers of Hope as a line item on the budget for future consideration. You may be To Build a Community Free of Domestic Violence Through Advocacy and Education interested to know that the cities of Elk River, Becker and Buffalo have supported us and we will be visiting other cities in the next months. Please find attached our current budget, a chart with the number of individuals served by Rivers of Hope in the last three years, and letters of reference from the Sherburne County Sheriff, the Principal of Elk River High School, and the County Attorney. Please consider favorably a resolution to support this important and effective organization in 1998 and on a continuing basis. Sincerely, Margaret Ostman, Executive Director RIVERS OF HOPE PROPOSED 2 YEAR STATEMENT OF INCOME & EXPENSE FISCAL 1997 — JULY 1, 1996 - JUNE 30,1997 FISCAL 1998 -- JULY 1, 1997 - JUNE 30,1998 DISBURSEMENTS: Salaries FISCAL 1997 FISCAL 1998 RECEIPTS: JULY 1. 1996- JUNE 30. 1997 JULY 1. 1997 -JUNE 30. 1998 United Way $12,500.00 $ 17,500.00 Social/Human Services 49,750.00 52,500.00 MN Dept. of Corrections 89,000.00 103,000.00 MN Dept. of Economic Security 43,000.00 43,000.00 County Fine Money 2,995.00 3,000.00 Area Churches 7,000.00 3,000.00 Community/Service Organizations 20,500.00 7,500.00 Businesses 12,890.00 15,000.00 Individuals 8,000.00 8,000.00 Other Foundations/Grants 17.455.00 22.310.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS: $263,180.00 $274,810.00 DISBURSEMENTS: Salaries $182,310.00 190,825.00 Payroll Taxes/Workmen's Comp 17,220.00 18,015.00 Health Insurance 1,870.00 2,500.00 Travel 8,200.00 8,200.00 Publicity/Advertising 500.00 500.00 Office Expenses 2,250.00 2,000.00 Legal & Accounting Services 7,250.00 5,980.00 Contracted Services 750.00 500.00 Conference & Education 1,000.00 1,000.00 Dues & Subscriptions 275.00 280.00 Equipment Lease 1,540.00 1,540.00 Equipment Purchase 1,000.00 1,000.00 Meals 275.00 280.00 Insurance 4,600.00 5,500.00 Maintenance - Eqpt. 575.00 260.00 Resource Materials 975.00 980.00 Postage 1,100.00 1,600.00 Printing 1,200.00 1,200.00 Rent 17,280.00 23,890.00 Telephone 9,500.00 8,500.00 Outside Programs 3,000.00 — Misc. Expenses 510.00 260.00 TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS: $263,180.00 $274,810.00 NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS SERVED BY RIVERS OF HOPE (Denoted by Counties) Jan 1 - Dec 31.1994 Jan 1 -Dec 31, 1995 Jan 1 - Dec 31, 1996 ADULTS AnokaCounty 10 9 18 Benton County 2 0 1 Hennepin County 7 12 25 Isanti County 3 1 4 Meeker County 0 0 4 Mille Lacs County 0 5 4 Ramsey County 0 0 4 Scott County 0 3 1 Sherburne County 217 332 384 Stearns County 2 2 2 Wright County 273 316 378 Miscellaneous Counties 3 1 2 JUVENILES Anoka County 1 4 5 Hennepin County 1 3 4 McLeod County 0 1 3 Meeker County 0 9 28 Morrison County 0 0 1 Sherburne County 35 158 134 Stearns County 0 1 4 Wright County 2 49 116 TOTAL INDIVIDUALS SERVED 556 906 1122 ("These figures do not include those individuals who remained anonymous when requesting referral services/information or attending support group) January 12, 1998 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN RE: Rivers of Hope Sherburne County SHERIFF BRUCE M. ANDERSON The Sherburne County Sheriff's Dept. makes every effort to arrest and aid in the prosecution of individuals who commit domestic abuse. Victims of this crime need the services of law enforcement. Rivers of Hope, a community advocacy organization, is dedicated to working with victims, who are often overwhelmed by the system. This fine organization deserves your recognition and support. If you have further questions, please contact us at your convenience. (' i'!' w Sheriff Bruce M. Anderson SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT "OUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 880 Highway 10 _ k River, MN 55330-4609 Area Toll Free Numbers: Elk River - 241-2500 Fax - 441-7303 Other - 1-800-433-5245 900 School Street Elk River, Minnesota 55330 (612) 241-3434 Fax: (612) 241-3421 ELK RIVER AREA HIGH SCHOOL January 22,1998 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 728 I am pleased to write this letter in support for the programs and services offered by Rivers of Hope. I have been delighted to have Rivers of Hope provide support groups for my students in both of the schools in which I have been Principal. The groups are always conducted in a most professional manner. The students grow and benefit from this process. At the conclusion of each cycle, the facilitator conducts annonymous student evaluations of the group and I am always allowed to read them. I have always found them to be an indicator of how important these groups are to our students. The students speak of how their lives have changed and how they have learned to confront and deal with problems they must face in their lives. This has proven to be one of the most important services that we have provided for our students. I am in complete support of the programs and services provided by Rivers of Hope. I hope that we are always able to be involved with them. Sincerel V im Vo g Member North Central Association of Secondary Schools and Colleges pal Istant County in eys: Thomas N. Price Nancy J. Logering Thomas C. McNinch Kathleen A. Heaney Christopher J. Johnson Dean E. Emanuel Rosita Serrano Investigator: Gary E. Poslusny Victim Services Coordinators: Mary Bender Chris Meland Sherburne County Walter M. Kaminsky County Attorney Govemment Center 13880 Highway 10 • Elk River, MN 55330-4601 (612) 241-2565 Fax (612) 241-2575 1-800-433-5244 January 14, 1997 RE: Rivers of Hope Funding Dear Funding Provider: very year, more domestic violence cases require our review and prosecution. These cases are especially difficult because victims feel depressed, frustrated, powerless, and dependent on the abuser for economic and emotional survival. Your serious consideration of Rivers of Hope funding request will help these victims. Over the last ten years in Sherburne and Wright Counties, I have witnessed Rivers of Hope play a vital role in helping victims wade through our criminal justice system. Whether they be responding to a victim's after midnight crisis, explaining an Order for Protection, waiting with a victim and her baby for hours before the Court hears their case, assisting our staff, counseling teenagers, or educating a local police department, Rivers of Hope remains dedicated in the assistance of domestic abuse victims. In short, Rivers of Hope needs and deserves your support. I recommend without reservation Rivers of Hope's funding request. Sincerely, j V alter M. Sherburne WMK:Ic Wl ;s Battering? Pushing. h� ISOLATION EMOTIONAL ABUSE / €g\ E CONOM IC g INTIMIDATION POWER ABUSE 1 and t?. ° CONTROL USING MALE SEXUAL PRIVILEGE ABUSE &J �\ /THREATS I CUSING ' HILDREN her Battering, or the use of physical force, is part of a system of behaviors used to establish and maintain power and control over another person. Intimidation: Putting her in fear by using looks, actions, gestures loud voice, smashing things, destroying her property. Isolation: Controlling what she does, who she sees and talks to, where she goes. Emotional Abuse: Putting her down or making her feel bad about herself, calling her names. Making her think she's crazy. Playing mind games. Economic Abuse: Trying to keep her from getting or keeping a job. Making her ask for money, giving her an allowance, taking her money. Sexual Abuse: Making her do sexual things against her will. Physically attacking the sexual parts of her body. Treating her like a sex object. Using Children: Making her feel guilty about the children, using the children to give messages, using visitation as a way to harass her. Threats: Making and/or carrying out threats to do something to hurt her emotionally. Threatening to take the children, commit suicide, report her to welfare. Using Male Privelege: Treating her like a servant. Making all the "big" decsions. Acting like the "master of the castle". These behaviors are more powerful because they are reinforced liv thy Ilirv:it i,v- nw• nl' nh� cit ,�1 •.1v,.:,• Rivers of Hope P.O. Box 142 1,411f River RAN 1 61;11 l RIVERS OF HOPE (612) 441-0792 (612) 682-6424 1-800-439-2642 To Build a Community Free of Domestic Violence Through Advocacy and Education The Problem Domestic violence is abuse in a family or house- hold and includes woman/spouse abuse, child abuse, incest, sibling abuse, and elder abuse. It is a common and serious problem in the United States. For people who have this problem, it always gets worse unless there is some type of intervention. • Every 15 seconds a woman is assaulted and beaten. • Every day, 4 women are murdered by husbands or boyfriends. • 61% of all rapes are of women under 17 years old. • 29% of all rapes are of women under I 1 years old. • Prison terms for killing husbands are twice as long as for killing wives. • 25% of all crime is wife assault. • 70% of men who batter their partners sexually or physically abuse their children. • Domestic violence is the number one cause of emergency room visits by women. Victims of domestic violence and their abusers fit no specific category or stereotype. The abuse affects the lives of families from all walks of life, rich or poor, and from all races and religions. It is happening to members of this community. Sources: IVAC Stars: The Fans About Women (The New Press); Women's Work Programs. Liz Claiborne. Inc. Order for Protection Services Include: What is an Order for Protection? • A 24-hour crisis telephone line to answer emergency calls for assistance. • Referral to a network of safe homes to provide tem- porary emergency housing. • Advocacy services to help a woman identify her needs, feelings, and goals. An advocate can help with: Going through medical procedures Filing a police report Obtaining an Order For Protection Applying for economic assistance Going to court Looking for housing • Support groups so that women can meet with other women and share concerns about the violence in their homes and explore ways of breaking the cycle of violence. • Youth Advocacy and Violence Prevention / Intervention Programs to provide education and sup- port to young people with abuse issues. • Transportation services for women who have no means of getting to safety or necessary appointments. • Community education for the public at large to en- sure increased awareness about domestic violence and the need for social change. • Intervention information and referral for the abuser An Order for Protection (OFP) is an order the court makes to protect you from domestic abuse. It may direct the person who has abused you to: a. stop threatening or abusing you; b. leave your household; c. stay away from where you live, go to school, or work; d. pay support to you and your children if legally required to do so; e. enter a counseling program. An OFP may also award you temporary custody of your children and set up conditions for visitation. Who is elegible for an Order for Protection? You may file an OFP if you have recently been a vic- tim of an act of abuse, including pushing, shoving, grab- bing, slapping, punching, pulling hair, kicking, forc- ing sexual acts, or threatening with a weapon. You are eligible for an OFP if you and the person who has abused you: a. are married, or used to be married b. live together, or used to live together c. have a child in common d. are related by blood. Under certain conditions, you may also file an OFP on behalf of your child if she or he has been physically or sexually abused. What happens if an Order for Protection is violated? If the abuser assaults you, theatens you, or violates the order to stay away from you, call the police immediate- ly. In some cases, they are required to make an arrest. If the abuser doesn't follow another part of the order - for example, doesn't pay child support, doesn't attend counseling, harrasses you by phone, or doesn't abide by the child visitation order - Rivers of Hope can help you bring the case back to court. Where to go to get an Order for Protection For assistance in obtaining an OFP, or further infor- mation, call Rivers of Hope . CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE b. Consent Agenda (Non -controversial items) Elaine Beatty Council of 2/23/98 - 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY:EB,CC 5.1. Approve Special council Meeting Minutes as follows: A. January 27, 1998 B. February 4, 1998 5.2, Approve Resolution No. 98-5 A Resolution Supporting the Youth Initiative Bill and letter to Senator Ourada Re: Same. 5,3 Approve Resolution No. 98.6 Authorizing Gambling Permit (See Attached) BACKGROUND: 5.1: Attached are the minutes for consent agenda approval of the special meetings of Council for Board and Commission interviews. 5.2: Park and Recs. asked to have this Resolution on for Council Approval. Attached is a copy of a resolution and letter to senator Ourada for Council Review. This is just saying that you support this program for our youth and would like to see money put into this fund. 5.3. Attached is a resolution for the Council to consider to authorize a gambling permit for ABATE, the American Bikers Awareness Training and Education, a non- profit organization. This is requested so they can run a drawing fund-raiser at their April 18th gathering at Riverwood Conference Center. Attached also is a letter from Andy MacArthur explaining further why they need this resolution. I have also attached further information for your review. RECOMMENDATION: These are for CounCil information and consent agenda approval if you agree. Thanks, �t ��� Elaine AGENDA NO. 5.1 A&B CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING TO INTERVIEW BOARD AND COMMISSION MEMBERS JANUARY 27, 1998 - 7PM Mayor Larry Fournier called the Special Meeting to order at 7PM. The following were present: Mayor Larry Fournier, Council Members Vern Heidner, Virginia Wendel, and Suzanne Ackerman. Council Member Mark Berning was absent. Also present was Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator. Fifteen (15) minute interviews of the following prospective Board and Commission Members were conducted as follows: 7:00 Ing Roskaft Planning Commission - Re -appointment 7:15 Joy Swenson Heritage Preservation Commission - Re -appointment 7:30 Steve Ackerman EDAAC - New Appointment 7:45 Richard Nichols Planning Commission - Re -appointment 8:00 Joan Nichols Heritage Preservation Commission - Re -appointment 8:15 'Michael Day Park and Recs. Commission - New Appointment 8:30 Janet Bridgland Heritage Preservation Commission - From Re - (not present) appointment Regular Member to Alternate (per her request) 8A5 Teri Kohler Park and Recs. Commission - From Re -appointment Regular Member to Alternate (per her request) 9:00 Gene Goenner Planning Commission - Re -appointment (not present) 9:15 Russ Greninger Planning Commission - New Appointment The Council advised Staff to contact the people who did not show up and try to reschedule them for a date before another meeting. C.M. Ackerman motioned to adjourn. C. M. Heidner seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting adjouned at 9:35PM. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk (City Seal) Flk: cc�uv.wrs CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 4, 1997 7:30PM SPECIAL MEETING jMAYOR FO 1 NI .R WILL CALL MEETING TO ORDER Mayor Larry Fournier called the meeting to order at 7:30PM. Roll Calle. Larry Fournier, Mayor, and Vern Heidner, Mark Berning, Suzanne Ackerman, and Virginia Wendel, Councilmembers were present. Michael Robertson, City Administrator was also present. 2. INTERVIEW JANET RRIDGFLAND FOR THE HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Council interviewed Janet Bridgeland for the Heritage Preservation Commission. Ms. Bridgeland indicated that due to her large amount of business travel, she could only serve the Commission as an alternate. 3 INTERVIEW GENE GOENNER FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION Council interviewed Gene Goenner for the Planning Commission. Mayor Fournier thanked both candidates for their interest and told them that the Council would make its decision at their next meeting on Monday, February 9, 1998. Mayor Fournier adjourned the meeting at 8:00 p.m. CITY OF OTSEGO LARRY FOURNIER, MAYOR ATTEST: ELAINE BEATTY, CITY CLERK/ ZONING ADMINISTRATOR eb (CITY SEAL) CITY OF AGENDA ITEM 5.2 . TSEGO 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD (612) 441-4414 Elk River, MN 55330 Fax: (612) 441-8823 February 23, 1998 Senator Mark Ourada 145 State Office Building 100 Constitution Avenue St Paul, Minnesota 55255 RE: YOUTH INITLATIVE GRANTS Dear Senator Ourada: This letter is a short note regarding the above. This program was established in the 1996 legislative session and has been a great success. In the upcoming legislative session you will be asked to support this bill as it is extended to help support outstate cities, as well as Minneapolis and St. Paul. Last year Youth Initiative Grants helped make possible a number of projects benefiting the children of our state. In short, the money went to offering kids quality options for recreation and growth. The City of Otsego stands behind this program and the help it provides with our recreation programming for our youth. Please join us in support of the Youth Initiative Grant program. Sincerely, Larry Fournier, Mayor eb RESOLUTION NO. 98-5 CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA A Resolution Supporting the Youth Initiative Bill WHEREAS, the youth of our State need and deserve safe and attractive recreation facilities, WHEREAS, local governments often do not have the financial resources to completely address the need, and the City of Otsego is a recipiant of a $2,500.00 Grant for 1998, WHEREAS, a cooperative effort between the State and local governments would increase recreation opportunities across the State, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that: The Minnesota Legislature is encouraged to fund the $40 Million Youth Initiative Grant Program Adopted this 23RD Day of February, 1998 CITY OF OTSEGO LARRY FOURNIER, MAYOR ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk FEB.12.199e 2:34PM MRPA $40 MILLION OPPORTUNITY To: MRPA Professionals From: Legislative Committee Date: January 15, 1998 Subject: YOUTH INITIATIVE BILL, Minnesota Legislature NO. Sle P.2/5 In 1996, the Minnesota Legislature provided over $16 million to repair, replace or construct parks and recreation buildings throughout the state. Communities, such as Cloquet, Fridley, Mounds View, Duluth and Cook County were awarded Youth Initiative Grants. The grants matched every $1 of local money or in-kind contribution with $2 of state money. During the 1998 Legislative session, the Legislature will consider a $40 million Youth Initiative Bill. HOW CAN MY COMMUNITY BENEFIT FROM THE YOUTH INITIATIVE BILL? The current Youth Initiative Bill proposes an unprecedented $40 million in funding opportunities for Minnesota's communities. of the $40 million, $10 million will be used for projects within the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul and the remaining $30 million will be used for projects throughout the state, including communities outside the metropolitan area. In 1997, the City of Cloquet was awarded $400,000 to assist with the development of the 30 acre River Front Youth Recreation Complex, The City of Fridley also received funding to construct an additional 6,000 square feet onto their Community Center for Youth Activities.' All of the funding that was awarded was used to construct or replace youth oriented facilities. In 1998, this could be YOUR community. If passed, the Youth Initiative Bill will provide communities with real dollars to improve their youth recreational opportunities. However, in order to benefit from the Youth Initiative Bill, your support is necessary. HOW CAN I SUPPORT THE YOUTH INITIATIVE BILL? Enclosed is a sample fetter and city resolution that we would like you to personalize and send to your governing body' and legislator. After you have mailed the letter, contact your legislator and discus's the bill. Provide information on local projects that could benefit from this bili and improve your community. Also, contact local program participants and ask_ re theto contact their legislator to show their supo of the hill'. Even though all of Minnesot 's communities will na be awarded grant ir1 this funding period, all of us need to suppor the Youth Initiative Bill. WHEN SHOULD I TAKE ACTI N TO SUPPORT TH> : BILL? Immediately. Due to the fact the the 1998 Legislativ s ion is about to begin, immediate support and action is necessa � , Please do not million Youth a' to support the $40 pP Initiative $ill. Take the time to p rsonalize the letter and city resolution now. Your support and actions are critical in passing this bili. The MRPA Legislative Committe .thanks you for your upport and effortsI if you would like additional information, please 6tact the MRPA o lc at 825-2200. -FEB. 12. 1998 2:36PM N0.518' P.4i„ YO TH INITIATIVE. BILL Y ',,'d Minnesota Legislature +, y yi • �'r.l Jy y -y' •�",r 1,I, rlrr ,, .Cr. 1• '1•`�. l . MRPA $40 MILLION OPPORTUNITY 1lKEY ,FAC_ TS million to repair, replace or ✓', in 1996, 'the Minnesota 1<egislature provided over $16 m p construct parks and recreation buildings throughout the state. communities, such as' oquet, Fridley, Mounds View, Duluth and Cook County, were awarded Y uth Initiative Grants. f ?1'^of locai money or in contribution with $2 of - ' The grants matched ev iry state money. Dunn the 1998 Legislative session; the Legislature will consider a $40 ✓ g million Youth Initiative dill. COM UNITY BENEFITS V The current Youth Initiative Bill proposes an unprecedented $40 million in funding ;opportunities fo� Minnesota s communities. $10 mill Ion will be used for projects within the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul'an,6 the remaining $30 million will be used for projects throughout the state, including commuInities,,outside the metropolitan area. V. Ability tpp provide additional youth oriented recreational facilities to your com�nwhity- ' i HAA ACILrnWRPA-W, PD i i I i William S. Radzwill Andrew J. MacArthur Michael C. Couri February 6, 1998 Elaine Beatty City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 AGENDA NO. 5.3 CC/2/23/98 RADZWILL & CO URI Attorneys at Law 705 Central Avenue East PO Box 369 St. Michael, MN 55376 (612) 497-1930 (612) 497-2599 (FAX) Re: Resolution Authorizing Gambling Permit Dear Elaine: L. Please find enclosed a resolution authorizing American Bikers Awareness Training and Education ("ABATE") to conduct a drawing at the Riverwood Conference Center on April 18, 1998. The resolution authorizes gambling only on the specified date and premise. ABATE will need a signed copy of the resolution in order to obtain a gambling permit from the Minnesota Gambling Board. Please call me if you have any questions. Sincere , Andrew acArthur Radzwi and Couri enclosure pc: Ken Dewitt, ABATE CITY OF OTSEGO COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING GAMBLING PERMIT Resolution No. 98-6 WHEREAS, American Bikers Awareness Training and Education (hereinafter "ABATE"), a non-profit organization, requests approval to conduct drawings, a form of gambling, for various products and services as a fundraiser for the organization. WHEREAS, the drawings are to take place on April 18, 1998, at the Riverwood Conference Center, located at 10990 NE 95th Street in the City of Otsego, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the City of Otsego, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has authority to approve of gambling operations within the city under Minn. Statute 349.213. NOWTHEREFORE, the City of Otsego hereby grants approval of ABATE to conduct the drawings, a form of gambling, on April 18, 1998, at the Riverwood Conference Center located at 10990 NE 95th Street, Otsego, Minnesota. Dated: February 23, 1998 Larry Fournier, Mayor City of Otsego ATTEST: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk 01-28-1998 11:53AM FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi 1 is piCfMIS • M�itne�n>tri 7�»fill C..r.m.l�N�..•, TO 4418823 P.10 Class d p w dsas •patttk. (check ors Q A {Saco) PUZ4a0s. tic Q 8($20) Pus=s, til Q c (sago) smgo orgy BASE �R• �►acf< NMALS GATE • as is, meets. raffles, bfigo �. paddtevriteets, raises Name a� or�anizatoon , j I .. - i Susrness Address of Organization - Street or P. O Sox (Do-. not use the address of your gambling manager, Citic ! sterna Zip Code County . Qayth+epho"eetwnbor Name of Chief exectOve oifk*r (cannot be your gambling rn=wQK) Title Daytime phone numbw Bingo Qce"lous. If applyfng for a class A or C permit. J= is days and beginning &, ending hours of bingo occasions: No mrn�e than sedeu bingo occasions may be conducted by your orgma=ttonper WPeek. Day 8egt =W4/EztdL=B Hours DVy Beganixtgx rx ing Hours Day ! ; Begirt,aiag /Erdsng Hove to jo . F ��`� � � . • If bingo w3i1 not be � r • � � . ..� is conducted. checlic:hera Name or estaousnalent wtier'e garnowv wtu ba conojcteC strath Aacress (Oo not use a post C" ppgrnuffiwv� Is the O-M:es tocateC vAiun city &nd? Q Yes © No if no, is township Q organized = unorganizod unincorporated City and County where gamb&v premises is located OR Tpwnship and County where gambling premises is located if;out:ide of city kmits Name and address of iegaf owner of premises city State ZP Coda Dae$ ycur or4wvz= ion ov4i the buridirg where the gambling will be conducted? Q YES NO j if no, llttu:h the k4ovA : a copy of file tease (ham LC -42) with terms for at least one year. a copy of a sketch of the floor plan with dimensions, showing what portion is bft leased,. A tessv and sketch ars not required for Ctass 0 appficatton& 01-28-1998 11:54AM FROM Radzwill & Court Law Offi TO 4418823 P.11 AlInnesota Z=LV ie1 GanthUA9 Premise Permit Application - Part 2 of 2 ra+cin +�aaaA , ri 715 Mc I hereby corisent that kk=l law ordamoment offices. th4 board or agents of the board, or the commissioner of revenue or public safety, or agents of the eommiaaioners, may enter the promisee to enforce the law. Bank Records Tafor= ttIon The board is authorized to inspect the bar* records of the gambrmg account whenever necessary to fulfill requirements at currom; gambling rules and law. Cath I declare that: -i have road; ttas apprtcjSon and all information submitted to the boardi is true, accurate and =mpleto; •aA other rom irsd Worril s n, has been fully diatiosed; Signature of!chief executive officer •f am the chief s:coctrtive Cfflrar df th a orgar ation; •l assume tuft responsibility for thq fair and lawful opera- tlan of all activities to be c onductei l -1 will farn&vize mys0d wftfi the laws of Minnesota governing LuAui gambling and rulos'cf the board and agree, if frcensad, to abide by those laws and rules, Including amendments to them; , -any changes in application information wriA be submitted to the board:and lost unit of goverrtmant within 10 days of the change: and -1 understand that .'allure to provide: raquued infarmal4n or providing false or misleading information may result in the denial or revocation of the license. Dale 4. A csov of ttte lQotunft of ctiyemmerez resofution an - 1. The city 'must sign titis appi1=03on if the gambling prem- orovina I adoiicatfari must be attached to this aoortcatfory- ises is located within limits. 2. The coufity "`AND township"' must sign this appr=zdon I it if should not be tion is denied a the ocat unit of l Boar rterrt. r; should not be submitted to the C3ainblirsg Control Board. the gambling promises braced within a township_ 3. The brat unit government (cry of cotrrtty) must pass a Township: By signature below, the tcwnship acknowledges resolution specificafly approving; or denying this application. that the organization is applying for a:premises permit within township limits. i Ctty' or Countv" _ Township" City or County Name Township Name signature of person receiving arpilmton Signanue of person reCeivinq appliaatign Title Dana Received Tide Coke Recaived i Refer to tt,4 insauc6ons for required attachments. Mai! to: C.Amblina C"tmi' Board Etpsewcod Plan South, Zrd Floor 1711 W. C wity Road 9 . ab�.wai., taN sstts 16 . et LG21,4(Pan' 2 P«rf2Wv+i 01-28-1998 11:55AM FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO 4418823 P.12 Pl'Qrrfls�s P!ermlt Appllcatlo», Form LG214 Instructions jWif Ron owal or Check 011e box!whiich kids tes 'the siattu for whidt the premises permit is being applied -renewal or new. 1i You We applying, for a renews! permit, fib in your orgari¢auon's base°cerise number and the premises permit number., Check the'dass! of premises permit for which you are appfyinQ. The cfAss of the Prernises, permit must :correspond (be equal) to the class of Gcsrtsa of the organization. For example, if an zzaatAgg a applies for a, Class A it may apply for Class A, B, G, or D oremiap�.. If an =iaiza�dl1 aWligs for a class B ion � may. only .apply for class B or 0 Dremis� �, 2g=ita, an ocgia4z applies for a Class C it may only apply for. Class C preMises ne= tf an Oroon applies for a Class D 011ie tza ion' I^cr3nca 4 nay only apply for Class D Rr mia '4 a� its_ Be sure to include; a check for the amount of the fee with your application. Make the check payable to the "State of Minnesota" Permit fetes are not pro rated: transferrable, or ..refundable. - ' NOTE The expiration date of your organization's premises; permit w,il be the same as the expiration date of your organization's license. oyt'Q7Z12dtiQTT: ��n Name of;organlzatioq Fill in the,' of your organization as it appears on docurnentation filed;with the Minnesota Secretary of State's oIftee or the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Suslness;address and daytime phone number of organlzatlon Fill in your organization's address, county in which 17 Your organization .is located; and dime phone. number_ Your crganizatton's addiess may not be the address of the gambling manger_' Name of chief execuWe officerj(can not be b manager), tkTo, and daytime phone Fig in the name of your chlei' executive officer, title, and daytime phone number: *1 Bingo occasions if you, are applying for a Class!A or.b premises permit, fill in the days of the a+veek slid the beginning and ending hours of the binge'cc ois n. include whether it is AM or PM. A bingo occasion must be at least 1-1/2 hours and may not exceed 4 hours. If you will not be conducting birsgo, dhecc; the box. The total number of bingo oCCasioris conducted by Your organization may not exceed seven per week regardless of the number of premises permits. R b 5 ,Name ofestab lishment where garnbJing .will be conducted. t=ill in the name and str&et address of the premises at which gambcng will be conducted. DO not use a PO box number, Is premises located within CRY limits? Check one box. tf no, indicate the type of township the premises is located in. Location of gambling premises If the premises is, located within a city Jurisdiction, flu In the name of the city aELd coumy. If the premises is located outside of a city jurisdiction. fill in the name of the township= county_ Legal owner of gambling premises Fill in the name and address of the legal owner of ale gambling premises. Does your organization own the bolding. Where the gambling is. conducted? Check yes or no. It no, be sure to attach a copy of the lease (form LG202) with terms of at feast one year and a copy of the sketch of the floor plan with dimensions, showing what portion is being leased. 01-28-1998 11:48AM FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO 4418823 P.03 Eage!. ; 17itation Ti lex ?A § 34 .21311 Local, authority 56118 NMA. .$ 49.1113I ' NIIi�TNESOTA STATUTES AN-N, % GANHN'G i ;..C$AAPTEX349. LAWFUL GAMBLING AND GAA19IiJNG DE CES r Current thro gh End of 1996 Reg. Seen. � 349.213.1,0c 1 a athdrity Subdivision 1. al ftautation.� (a) Astatuto or home ruled or county has the authod t gent m ation o lawful iambliiifiw -" i4ijui^isdiicti incl the prohibition of lawful gambling,land m�y7ecluir?ei a t the conduct bf gambling exempt f bmllicensing phda section 349.166., The fee for a permit issued under. &'3' subdi his on not ezoeed $160.' The authority granted thts;.subdivision does bwot, ude the authority to require a license orp61 tit to act blu3g by organizations or sales by distrib orsjl censed by, tlQe board. T}ie authority granted by this subdivision doe's oot ineii� the ority to requiae an organization t4 , specific expenditures of more than ten percent from its net profits derived from la tiling.' For thei purposes of this; su sion, netprofits are: gross profits less amounts expended for allowable expenses And p in uses assessed on lawful gambltr g . statutory orhon exule charier city or acounty may notre4uire`aa organization ircting wful gambling within its jurisdictionsto in expenditure to the city or county as a condition to operate within that city or 'ounty,; xcept as authoiiaed under section 349. , subdivision 8,or 297E..02; provided, however, that an. r ment:th -such ganizations must contribute ten their net profits derived from lawful gambling conducted at premises, 'thin th;ciVs` r county's jurisdiction a. ii and regulated;by the responsible local unit of government without cost to such iviid, for "sbursement b f the ponsible local tai€govennment,of the receipts for lawful purposes, is not considered a" e; pends to the city or:county nor:a ta., 1.under section 297E 02,? and is valid And lawful. (b) A statirtoryior Home rule city or county may by ordinance require that a licensed organization ductin lawfid gambling: within its jurisdic 'n cnxnd all ora portion of its expenditures for lawful purposes on lawfiLd ipurposes conduc ed or located Within the city's or co} nty' trade area. Such an. ordinance must be limited to lawful purpose expenditures ofP oss pr6J its ,derived from lawfii. gambling cond at premises within the city's or county's jurisdiction, must define. the cat l�q or couz 's trade area, land must;specifv the pere caitage!of i , purpose expenditures which must be expended within the trade areEj. A trades ca de ed by a city under this subdivision ma si ' lode each ;city contiguous to the defining city. *56119 (c) A rd stringent regulation or prohibition of lawful gambling adoptee] by a #otitical sub •'visi ` under this suM, visieor must apply equally aliifiinvs of lawfulgambling within the jurisdiction of the political subdivision, 6eept a ir olitical subdivision may prohibit tieuse oipaddkwheels. 1 Subd. 2. L;Dcal pproyal.' Deforo issuing or. renewing a premises permit or bingo hall liconse, the bo -d. m notify the city eyouncii of the statutor� or h me rule city in which the organization's premises or the bingo hall is located or, if pre ses or hall is located outside a city,: the; t5,, board of the county and the town board of the town where the prenii*s or h I1 lova T-he board may require organilatior s.tio notify the; appropriate Iocal government at the time o� a�plicatio This quired notification is ffi sucient to ca�sti to the notice required by this subdivision_ The board may not issue or-renew a pr6a ises t or bin o hal license unless the o�anization submits a: resolution from the ci council or county board approving the 'remi namit or bin • o hall license. The rewlufionmust have been adopted withht 60 days of the date of application for, a new Or renewed permit or license; j Subd. 3. local gambling tax A statutory or home rule charter city that has one or more licensed organizations operating lawful Copyright (c) West Group 1997 No claim to original U.S. Govt. works 01-28-1998 11:49AM FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO i MSA § 349.2131 Local author4.ty nbhn& and a cotinty that has one,:or mom licensed organizations outside incorporated areas open .QW ambling oa eat licensed brganizatioli within the cit�s or county's jurisdiction. The tax amount to be rocei The tax.in p [ t gambling less'priz any pie. o b.er investigation .fees report with the tion calendar year, :and Laws 1984 a 501, ;ate 198$ a 710.5, § 1; Lan art 1. § 37 '56120Aincnded byL 51 § 96,• Zaws 1995, c. 4418823 P.04 Page. l be id by the city .or ;county i�peccssaryto covey the smts�cu>��the s�iv`or county Jho thi§!snbdlvlsto may not exceed three erccnt of the grow- receipts ofa+licensad or 'inizati actually paid out by the organization. A city or county may not'use mgncy collet; unde. au to regulate hiwful gambling. A tax imposed under this subdivision is in lie u.otf all ;Othea to I U gamblin*. A city or county that imposes a tax under this subdi4ision shad6ualt l M' 4 form prescribed by the board showing (1) the amount of revenue produced by! the ta% the use of the proceeds of the tax, CREDIT(S) 1990 Main Volume 2.$18, %�•'Mamh1, 1985. Amended bylaws 1986, a 467, § 25, s� June 1, 1986; !Lows 1987; c �j7, § s 1985 a 209 art 11, § 35; Laws 1989, c. 334, art 2, §¢ 44, 45, aff. July 1,1589, Lags 1989, c. 33 „art 1,1 t ' 1997 Electronic Update iI vs 1491, c. I99, cuff Z § 1;. L"s 1991, a 33.6, art 2..f 34, Laws 1994, c. 633, ar[: � §` 19, ejj:'.tlai 11, 19! 64,; *t. 17, § ll, eQ June 2, 1993. vlatarials fGM) = References, Annotations, or Tables> ' HISTORICAL NOTES i HISTORICAL AND STATUTORY NOTES 1997 Electronic Update I 1991 Legislan`on ;• i j Laws 1991, e: 199, !.ill 1,-iastnre4edthe revisor of statutes to make corrections to statutory rcfcrcnoes initfiis suction . Taws 1991, c: 3`36, i rt 1„§ 34, ih subd, 1 in par. (e) provides that a political subdivision may prohibit the ds� of padd ' is 1994 Lagi"oz �: f Laws 1994, c 633, �rt 2..j 19, ppr. (b), jnsWoted the revisor of statutes to make appropriate cross-rzfcrcnco changes •I Laws 1994, c 633, 5, ;§'96, lit subd; 1, in par. (a), inserted " pre - ding preding "profits", inserted "and pai4 in taxes asses{c�d "349.16, subdivision 8" `349.16, subdivision 4" and "297E.02" for "349.212", inserted "conducted at prcmisas within tho city,, par. (b), inserted a:provi 1 ;equinng an ordittanc a to "be limited to lawful purpose expendituresof gross profits dotivcd from! la�vf premises within file trity��; or cgitnty's j urisdict�on,". , I 1995 Legislation } Laws 1995; c: 264; 171 § 11, instruct6d the revisor of statutes to renumber § 297]x.02, subd. 5, as ¢ 349313, subd. 3, Ad salon accordingly. ;; ! 1990 Main Volume only if the ; ite lawful ganlblitlg I from a his subdivisioi, for Xal.taxes and. local by Much 15,:fi1e a 'by the preceding ;eff Jurrc I, Mt haws ?20; Laws 1990" a 590, Laws 1994, c 633; an on laut gaj ibling", substituted or c,, bjnty'spurisdiction"i and hi. it garrtbting conducted at !i j I change all reiemncus to that! i. Copyright (cl West Group 1997 No claim to original U.S.`Govt. works ' i 01-28-1998 11:50w FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO 4418823 P.05 i I Page; MSA § 349.2.31 Local authority ! i! The 1986: arnandg0it in subd. l mwfted the sentence limiting fccs for pwrnits to not exceed S1W and excluded from ? I grant of 6monty under thio diviAion the authority to:requin licenses or permits rcguiding saes by distributors, and in subd. 2 inserted "and the townlbdt jrd of the Down". The 1987: ampidn�ant added thb last throe sentences to subd. 1. The 1988 amendt ir="sed the notice period in subd. 2 from 30 to 60 days. I ' i Taws 1989; c: 209 was a reviser's instruction correcting, erronoous, ambiguous, and omitted text and obsolete ref I climinatiing certain redundant; conflicting, and aired.pAovisrons; and •making miscellaneous technical corrections to statutes andother 1014+..; Laws 1989;c. 3 art, 2, §§ 44,45 in subd. 1 added the provision allowing a city or county to require a iicinsed or1 wridlucting;gambling v9id in its jurisdiction to make all lawful purpoic expenditures within the city's or county's trade area; in subd, 2 oxtcnded appiioation of �e: subd: to bingo halls, inaeited provisions aff wii* thellbosidl to require organizations to notify the appropriate local government and providing &#rat such no lis suffi cont for the subd., and an the List sentence wbstitutc4 "notice of toe application" for "rm*cc of the license". *56121 XA" 198 , c. 335, art. �,.§ 220 in subd. 1 at the end of the first paragraph added the proviso making )✓slid andlla+fitl ordir ancc requiremie* thr(t ' organizations c scti g iswC gan4bling mum contribute 10 percent of net profits to local government funds l � (: ; The 1990 antertd in subd. t designated pars (a) and (b) as such, at the end of par. (b) added the sentence rcyuiring do areas io.include each city contiguous to the city, and added par. (e) regarding equal application of more stringent gambling regulations and prbhibitions,'and rewrote subd. Z which N-lerly read "Before issuing or gmcwing an organization license or bingo hall license, the board must notify the city council of the stat tory or Dome rule vity in which'thc organization's premises�Crr the bingo Mall is located or, if the pre nines or hall is located outside a city, the county board of thc�oo�my and 2to town board of Oic town where the premises or in is located.; no board may require organizations to notify rho appropriate tocol government at thojtimc of app4eatiom This required, no�on is surto c6n3tit1dZ,& notice required by this subdivision_ If the city council or county board adopts a resolution diup )roving the license, and sq informs the board within 60 days of i eeciving notice of the application, the license may not be issued or renewal " I I •I , f REFERENCES Ii I I: LIBRARY REFERENCES I ; I 2990 Main Volume ! i Lotteries <a-S,2ol , I :I WEST,LAW T.opico. 2d7. C.J.S. Lotterits § $ p 3. ?.�,. i � • . t ANNOTATIONS I II i NOTES OF DECISIONS In general 2 Nonprofit corpomtioes 3 Notice 4 Validity 1 1. Validity I is Subsection2ofWsl. veI I 2 sgation go �nittg renewal of charitable gambling license$ is not unconstitutionally vague, although suh�eciion 2 provides no stand4r4 for approving licenses ofoharitable garnbiurg organizations; Legislature intended to give local governments power to set those staadaN' s acid that 61agation was ; common and proper. (3itiatarDukuth,COACT v. City of Duluth, D.Nfinn.1998, 701 F.Supp. 1452. i 2. In general Local governments arc limited in their authority to license or refuse licensure of nonprofit organization& wishing to condr,et lawful $ambling within the local I Copyright (c� West Group 1997 No claim to original U.S. :Govt. works E 01-28-1998 11:51AM FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO 4418823 P.06 ' page MSA ,§ 34g.223� Local authority r i Laws 1545,.o. 419 game of Bingo as deftt 561:22 3. Nmpr Local units organ 4. Natice Village council cw frenumbered to § 349.1 Where an asso6ati and so. notified &a Wv body was rcquitrad utA Under § 614.0541 conduct "bingo" at the days before the -first ga If an organization • the conditions off 61.4 church or vetcra& car In OpAtty.". No. 733, July 29,1988. , omo oratoJ in ff 349.02 and 349.03 (repealed; we, now, § 349.11 ct soq,), did not piohibit city rpurioil from regulating by ordinance the is beat aht�. C1 AW.Gen_„733.11, Oct. 24,1945. merit may trot establish nonprofit corporations to carry out general govannterital functions. OpA�yJ'Cs . Nd. !73 July 29, 1988. : • f not have vAtived the requirement that the association conducting the game give 30 days' notice of bingo gams as required by § 61,4.054 (repealed, see, now, $ 349.11 et seq.)]. OpAtty.Gen., 733g. Dec. 21, 1956. us dcr § 614.054 (renumbered to § 349.03 (rcpoalcd; see, now, § 349.11 ct seq.)) doOrod to have bingo games on oertain days for a;yew ung subdivision or municipality at hno hast 30 days prior to the first game, the notice compried with § 61 1054, and action by governing th f governing body wished to forbid the game. OpAtty.Gcn., 733-0. Oct 8, 1947. �f tumberod to 1349,03 (repealed; see, now, § 349.11 et seq)], an association could stato in its noticetq a city Fwineii,'tttat it proposed to des and places sts;W therein, which times and places could have been one or many, provided the notice was given to the council at least 3C was to be conducted OpAtty.Cmt, 733.0, Sept. 26, 1947. 1 ieh Was entitled under § 614.054 (renumbered to § 349.03 (repealed; sec, now, § 34941 ct seq.)],to'xndu” a bingo. game, complied wit: 54 as to notice, and no objoafion was made by the governing body of the governmental subdivision; a mgo game could have been held in or at a state fair or earnival, or in fact in any place spocificd in a written notice. OpAttiy.Oen., 733''0} July 14;'1947. 1 1. r, • ii i i f i 1 • 1 (tC). Wetst GI 0,14p-'1997 No claim to original U. S . • Govt . works i CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 8. John Harwood, City Engineer: Eiaine Beatty Council of 2/23/98 - 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC 8.1• Discussion of financing for Otsego's Sewer and Water Project (Tom Truszinski, Juran and Moody will attend this meeting and be available to discuss financing issues) BACKGROUND: Attached is a Memo from Interim City Admin-4strator Mike Robertson Re: the above item. Mike, Tom Truszinski, Dave Licht and John Harwood Will all be here to explain and answer questions on the attached information. RECOWNDATION: This is for Council information, Discussion and consideration Thanks, r ilaine MEMO Date: February 18, 1998 To: Mayor & Council From: Interim City Administrator Mike Robertson Re: Sewer & Water Financing Plan Update I have enclosed an updated breakdown of the financing plan for the proposed 1998 Sewer & Water Revenue Bonds. These bonds will pay for the Sewage Treatment Plant, the Sewage Collection System, and the Water System. This memo will describe the financing plan, list the cost estimates and assumptions that have been made, walk you through the enclosed spreadsheets, and describe what numbers have changed and why they have changed. In reviewing the financing plan the City Council should think about whether or not it is comfortable with the cost estimates and assumptions of the plan. While we all seek certainty in an uncertain world, at this point we can only guess at final costs, interest rates, and the amount of growth the City will experience. SUMMARY OF FINANCING PLAN The financing plan is based on a series of estimates and assumptions, which we have tried to be as conservative as possible while making them. Staff will be reviewing these estimates and assumptions as we get closer to the bonding date. I would expect that we will go over these figures 2 or 3 more times with Council during that period. The total financing cost of the projects as proposed is $7,515,000. The total has dropped slightly from the project discussed this summer because the sewage treatment plant was reduced to 200,000 gallons in size. The connection charges of $7,729.00 have not been changed from this summers' estimates. The estimated amount of development has been increased from the equivalent of 80 new single family homes each year to 90. This provides an increased amount of financing in yearly connection charges. This increase is due to the increasing amount of development interest we are receiving as the project takes on more reality to developers and landowners. Because of this increased interest in development, staff feels that increasing the estimate to 90 homes a year is still conservative. The estimated usage charges have increased from an average of $22.59 a month ($271 per year) to $26.23 per month ($314.76 per year). This provides an increased amount of revenue in yearly usage charges. As the construction plans are further refined, staff will -be refining the financing plan. If more revenue is needed, the connection charges and/or the usage charges can be increased. If it turns out the costs go down, we can reduce these charges. MAJOR CHANGES The major changes are the loss of Public Financing Agency (PFA) low interest financing, the loss of guaranteed development from the City of Dayton, and the addition to the financing plan of previously incurred costs for professional services and the installation of Well #1 by Otsego Elementary School. 2 Toss of PFA Low Interest Financing - We have been informed by the PFA that for the first time in their existence they have more requests for assistance than they have money to fund. According to them this has been caused by the fact that the federal share of their dollars is drying up faster than they thought. In competing for this now limited pool of financing it is the judgment of staff that our projects, since they are serving new rather than existing development, will inevitably be rated lower than applications from communities with existing facilities. We have also been told this unofficially by PFA staff. At this point in time the public market interest rate for our type of bond is about 3/4 of 1% higher than the interest rate we would have received from the PFA. Though this interest rate is higher than the PFA rate, bond interest rates are as low as they have been in a while. Toss of Guaranteed Development from Dayton - As of this date, the City of Dayton has not yet signed an agreement with Otsego for sewer service. Though an agreement seems likely, we are not yet counting on Dayton to provide a guaranteed amount of sewer hookups. Obviously, if we reach an agreement with Dayton it will effect the financing plan and we will revise the numbers accordingly. A6A;t;nr of Previously Incurred Costs - We have added those costs incurred by the City in 1996 and 1997 as part of the sewer and water system planning process. We will continue to keep track of these costs in 1998 and add them to the final amount to be financed. 3 DESCRIPTION OF FINANCIAL SPREADSHEETS There are three spreadsheets which separately break down the cost estimates and revenue sources of the bonds paying for the Sewage Treatment Plant, the Sewage Collection System, and the Water System. These elements are separated to show how each contributes to the total cost. The column headings on each spreadsheet are the same. I will describe each column and the assumptions that go along with it. Year - This column lists the year in which the various payments and revenues occur. r;n_i]pal_ - This column represents the yearly principal payment on the money the City is borrowing. Tnterest Rates - This represents the interest rate for each year of the bond. This is an estimate based on the current bond market interest rate. Tntal Debt S_r� vice - This represents our yearly payment on the money we borrow. It is the sum of the Principal plus the Interest Rate. Please note that the financing plan is structured so that the debt payments are smaller in the first few years of the bond. FLture Debt - This column lists future debt payments. This is based on future expansions of the system. These future costs are estimates, as are the times of the future expansions. The estimates were obtained from Ted Field and John Harwood. In Q;Pration & Maintenance - This column lists the costs for operating and maintaining the systems after they are installed. These costs are estimates. The estimates were obtained from Ted Field and John Harwood. The costs increase 7% each year due to inflation for the treatment plant and for the sewer collection system, and 9% each year for the water system. This is also an estimate which comes from Ted Field and John Harwood. Annual System rost - This is the total yearly cost to the City. It is the sum of the Total Debt Service, the Future Debt, and the Operation & Maintenance costs. Capitalized Interest - Capitalized Interest is extra money the City takes upfront to make debt payments in the first two years before revenues start coming in. Otsego REC's Per Year - This represents the estimated amount of development each year. REC's stands for Residential Equivalent Charges. One REC is the equivalent of one new home being built. this is an estimate. This estimate comes from myself. This is an increase from the previous estimate, which was 80 REC's per year. This estimate has been increased due to the increasing amount of development interest we have received at this point. Cumulative REC's - This represents the cumulative amount of REC's over time. Coqt. per Cnnnprtinn - This represents the Connection Charge for hooking onto the system. The overall Connection Charge for hooking into the system has remained $7,729. The Connection Charges increase 2% each year to account for inflation. This is the item that is probably the easiest to change each year depending on whether more or less development is occurring and whether there is enough revenue to make the bond payments. 5 Annual rnnnprtion Income - This is the yearly amount of money the City will receive through Connection Charges. It is calculated by multiplying the number of REC's each year by the Connection Charge. Other System Revenue - This is the revenue obtained from user charges, i.e., the monthly or quarterly bills. This revenue is calculated based on an estimated usage of 15,000 gallons of water and wastewater a month. This estimate comes from Ted Field and John Harwood, and is the standard average for single family home monthly water usage. The revenue is calculated based on yearly estimated charges of $190.50 for use of the treatment plant, $71.66 for the use of the sewer collection system, and $52.60 for water usage. This is a total of $314.76 a year in usage charges, which translates to an average monthly water bill of $26.23. This is a change from previous estimates which were $128.00 a year for use of the treatment plant, $68.00 a year for the use of the sewer collection system, and $75.00 a year for the use of the water system, for a total estimated cost of $271.00 a year or $22.59 a month. Total System Tncome - This is the total income earned from the system. It is calculated by adding together the Annual Connection Income and the Other System Revenue. In the first year Capitalized Interest is part of this amount. Tnterest Income - This is the amount of interest that is earned yearly on the fund balance of the bond. This is an estimate. It is calculated by assuming an interest rate of 5.5% (today's rate) multiplied by the Bond Fund Balance. Annual Surplus /Deficit - This is the amount of yearly surplus, or (deficit) in the bond. It is calculated by subtracting the Annual System Cost from the Total System Income. M Bond Fund Balance - This is the amount of money remaining in the bond fund each year. It is calculated by adding or subtracting the Annual Surplus/Deficit from the previous year's Bond Fund Balance. cc: City Staff City Consultants 7 DATE OF ANALYSIS: 10 -Feb -98 CITY OF OTSEGO, MINNESOTA CASH FLOW ANALYSIS fSEGO TREAT ONLY 98-A GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER REVENUE. BONDS OF 1998 (MS 444) �APPLICdTlONUFFIJ[Tl)S-----------------i AMOUNT: $2,765,000 BONDS DATED: JULY 1, 1998 ;LESS MUNICIPAL CASH APPLIED 0.00: __T2 BONDS MATURE: DECEMBER 1. 2000 THROUGH 2019 1 CITY RESPONSIBILITY $190.50 INTEREST: DEC. 1, 1998 AND SEMI-ANNUAL THEREAFTER :ADD: OPTION: DECEMBER 1, 2002 Q 100 i ESTIMATED BOND PRI\TING 000 i MINIMUM BID: ESTIMATED REGISTRATION 600.00 CAP ESTIMATED FISCAL SERVICES COST PER EST. NET EFFECTIVE RATE 200% ESTIMATED LEGAL OPINION 1,333.33 RBGISTR. & PA: BONDS WILL BE BOOK: ENTRY FORM EST. DISCOUNT FACTOR (1.25%) 34,562.50 j TOTAL 19&86250' OPERATION ANNUAL INTEREST OTSEGO CONN. ANNUAL OTHER TOTAL INTEREST ANNUAL BOND INC 1.612-291.3037 INTEREST DEBT FUTURE AND SYSTEM 18 RECS CUM INFLATED CONN. SYSTEM SYSTEM INCOME @ SURPLUS/ FUND YEAR PRINCIPAL RATES INTEREST SERVICE DEBT MAINT. COST MONTHS PER YEAR REC'S 200% INCOME REVENUE INCOME 5.50% DEFICIT BALANCE 1998 0.00% 55,239.58 55,239.58 0.00 0.00 55,239.58 196,86250 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19$86250 $0.00 143.62292 143,62292 1999 0.00% 132575.00 132,575.00 0.00 0.00 132575.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 57,899.26 (124,675.74) 18,947.18 2000 60,000.00 4.10% 132575.00 192,575.00 0.00 76,000.00 268,575.00 90.00 90.00 2,766.00 248.940.00 17,145.00 266,085.00 51,04209 (1,447.91) 17,499.27 2001 80.000.00 4.20% 130,11500 210,115.00 0.00 80,940.00 291,055.00 90.00 180.00 2821.32 253,918.80 3.3,290.00 288,208.80 596246 (1.883.74) 15,615.53 2002 100.000.00 4.25% 126,75500 226,75500 0.00 86,201.10 312956.10 90.00 270.00 2877.75 258,997.18 51,43500 310,43218 5858.85 (1,665.07) 13.950.46 2000 120,000.00 4.30% 122,505.00 242505.00 0.00 91,804.17 334,309.17 90.00 360.00 293530 264,177.12 68.580.00 332757.12 5767.28 (784.78) 13.165.69 2004 130,000.00 4.40% 117,34500 257,345.00 0.00 97,771.44 355.116.44 90.00 450.00 2994.01 269.460.66 8572300 355,185.66 5724.11 793.33 13,959.02 2005 165.000.00 4.50% 111,185.00 276,18500 0.00 104,126.59 380,311.59 90.00 540.00 3,053.89 274,849.88 102,870.00 377,719.88 5767.75 (1.873.97) 12135.05 2006 185,000.00 4.60% 103,760.00 288,76000 0.00 110,894.81 399.654.81 90.00 630.00 3,114.97 280,346.87 120,015.00 400,361.87 5667.43 1,374.49 13,509.54 2007 210,000.00 4.65% 95,250.00 305,250.00 0.00 I1&10298 423.35298 90.00 720.00 3,177.26 285,953.81 137,160.00 423,113.81 $743.02 503:66 14,013.40 2008 235,000.00 4.70% 85,485.00 320,485.00 0.00 125,779.67 446,264.67 90.00 810.00 3,240.81 291,67289 154.305.00 445.977.89 5770.74 483.95 14,49735 2009 260,000.00 4.80% 74,440.00 334,440.00 0.00 133,955.35 468,39535 90.00 900.00 3.30563 297,506.34 171,450.00 468,956.34 S797.35 1.358.35 15,855.70 2010 65,000.00 4.90'.0 61,960.00 126,96000 225,000.00 14266245 494,62245 90.00 990.00 3.371.74 303,456.47 188.595.00 492,051.47 5872.06 (1.698.91) 14,156.78 2011 75.000.00 4.95% 5&775.00 133.77500 230.000.00 151,995.51 515.710.51 90.00 1,080.00 3,439.17 309.52560 205,740.00 515,265.60 5778.62 333.72 14,490.50 2012 90.000.00 5.00% 55,06250 145,06250 235,00000 161,811.31 541,873.81 90.00 1,170.00 3.507.96 315,716.11 222,885.00 538601.11 5796.98 (2475.'P-) 12014.78 2013 100.000.00 5.05:0 50,562.50 150,56250 240,000.00 172329.05 562891.55 90.00 1.260.00 3.578.12 322,030.43 2.40,030.00 562060.43 5660.81 (170.30) 11,844.47 2014 115,000.00 5.10% 45,51250 160.512.50 245.000.00 183.530.44 589,04294 90.00 1,350.00 3,649.68 328,471.04 257,175.00 585,646.04 5651.45 (2,745.45) 9,099.02 2015 125.000.00 5.15% 39,647.50 164.647.50 250.00000 195,459.92 610,107.42 90.00 1,440.00 3.72267 335,040.46 274,320.00 609,360.46 5500.45 (246.51) 8,85252 2016 140,00000 5.15% 33,210.00 173.21000 255,000.00 20&164.81 636,374.81 90.00 1,530.00 3,797.13 341.741.27 291,465.00 633,206.27 5486.89 (2681.65) 6,170.87 2017 150,000.00 5.20% 26,000.00 176,000.00 260.000.00 21,69552 657,695.52 90.00 1,62000 3,873.07 348,576.10 308.610.00 657.186.10 5339.40 (170.03) 6,000.84 2018 170.600.00 5.2014 1&2.00.00 188.200.00 260,00000 236.10573 684,30573 90.00 1.710.00 3.950.53 355.547.62 325.755.00 68130262 5330.05 (2673.07) 3.37/.78 2019 180,000.00 5.20% 9,360.00 189,36000 265,000.00 251,45261 705.812 61 90.00 1.8.00 00 4,0'5.54 36265857 342900.00 705.55857 5183.03 (71.00) 3.256.77 $2.765.000.00 S1,685.519.58 $4.450,519.58 52465.000.00 52,950,72.46 $9,866,243.04 $198,86250 56,04&587.24 $3.600.450.00 59,847,899.74 $21.600.06 �APPLICdTlONUFFIJ[Tl)S-----------------i (TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2564,645.00 1 BONDS DATED: JULY 1, 1998 ;LESS MUNICIPAL CASH APPLIED 0.00: __T2 BONDS MATURE: DECEMBER 1. 2000 THROUGH 2019 1 CITY RESPONSIBILITY 56-4,645.00 1 INTEREST: DEC. 1, 1998 AND SEMI-ANNUAL THEREAFTER :ADD: OPTION: DECEMBER 1, 2002 Q 100 i ESTIMATED BOND PRI\TING 000 i MINIMUM BID: ESTIMATED REGISTRATION 600.00 EST. AVG COUPON RATE: ESTIMATED FISCAL SERVICES 6,66667 i EST. NET EFFECTIVE RATE ESTIMATED LEGAL OPINION 1,333.33 RBGISTR. & PA: BONDS WILL BE BOOK: ENTRY FORM EST. DISCOUNT FACTOR (1.25%) 34,562.50 j CAPITALIZED MI EREST 19&86250' PREPARED BY: i SUBTOTAL LESS: EST. CONST. FUND INV. INCOME _806,670.00 i (4218&41)1 JURAN & MOODY TOM TRUSZINSKI SUBTOTAL 2 64,481.59 i O INC 1.612-291.3037 00000 ROUNDED FOR ISSUANCE. 52765, . u------------------------- 1.800.950.4666 WASTEWATER TREATMENT 62645.001998 REIMBURSE WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2502,000.00 2000 INIP WASTEWATER TREATMENT 2956,616.03 2011INIP 5,521,261.03 DATE OF ANALYSIS 10-Fcb96 CITY OF OTSEGO, b1INNESOTA CAST{ FLOW ANALYSIS jJOTSFG0 RATER ONLY '98-A GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS OF 1998 (RLS 444) iAPFLJ------ ---- - - - - -- -- A'110UNT: $2,455,000 ,TOTAL ,TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2347,400.00 1 BONDS DATED: JULY 1, 1998 LESS MUNICIPAL CASH APPLIED $5260 BONDS MATURE: DECEMBER 1. 2000 THROUGH 2019 1 CITY RESPONSIBILITY 2.347,400. 1 INTEREST: DEC. 1. 1998 AND SERI! -ANN UAL TI(EREAFTER POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 2347.400.00 2000 IMP :ADD: i CAP DECEMBER 1, 2002 Q 100 POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM COST PER 1 ESTIMATED BOND PRINTING 200% MINIMUM BID: POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 68.5,000.00 2003 IRIP ESTIMATED REGISTRATION 600.001 FST. AVG COUPON RATE TOTAL 1.377.202.00 2008 !RLP OPERATION ANNUAL INTEREST OTSEGO POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM CONN. ANNUAL OTHER TOTAL INTEREST ANNUAL BOND EST. DISCOUNT FACTOR (1.25%) 30,687.50 INTEREST DEBT FUTURE AND SYSTEM 12 RECS CUM INFLATED CONN. SYSTEM SYSTEM INCOME 40 SURPLUS/ FUND YEAR PRINCIPAL RATES INTEREST SERVICE DEBT MA1NT. COST MONTHS PER YEAR RECS 200% INCOME REVENUE INCOME 5.50% DEFICIT BALANCE 1998 0.00% 49,013.54 49,013.54 28,142.50 0.00 77,15604 117,632.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117,63250 $0.00 40,47646 40,47646 1999 0.00% 117,63250 117.632.50 28.050.00 0.00 145.68250 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 117,63250 5222621 (25,823.79) 14,65266 2000 85.000.00 4.10% 117,63250 202.63250 27.900.00 32000.00 262,-9250 90.00 90.00 2,858.00 257,220.00 4,734.00 261,954.00 5805.90 227.40 14,880.06 2001 95.000.00 4.20% 114,147.50 209.147.50 28.692.50 34,720.00 272560.00 90.00 180.00 2.91516 262364.40 9,657.36 272,021.76 5818.40 280.16 15,160.22 2002 110,000.00 3.25% 114)57.50 220,157.50 28,370.!X1 37,671.20 286,196.70 90.00 270.00 2973.46 267,611.69 14,775.76 2822,387.45 S833.81 (2977.44) 12182.78 2003 120.00400 4.30% 105,38250 225.48250 27,990.00 40,873.25 294345.75 90.00 360.00 3,032.93 272,963.9'-' 20.095.03 293,058.96 5670,05 (61674) 11,56604 2004 130.000.00 4.40% 100.32250 23032250 28.552.50 44.347.48 303,22248 90.00 45400 3.093.59 27$423.20 25.621.17 304,044.37 5636.13 1,458.02 13.024.07 2005 120.000.00 4.50% 94,60250 214,60250 53,57671 48,117.01 316,2962 90.00 540.00 3,15546 283.991.66 31.360.31 315.351.98 571632 (227.93) 1279614 2006 135,000.00 4.60% 89,20250 224,20250 54,037.92 52.20696 334447.38 90.00 630.00 3.21957 289,671.50 37,31877 326,990.27 5703.79 (2753.32) 1404282 2007 135.000.00 4.65% 8299250 227.99250 54,501.08 56,641.55 339.138.13 90.00 720.00 3.28294 295,464.93 43.503.02 338,967.95 5552.35 382.17 10,424.99 2008 160,00400 4.70% 76,250.00 236,250.00 54,96617 61,459.34 352,675.51 90.00 810.00 3.34860 301374.23 49.919.72 351.293.95 5573.37 (808.19) 9,61680 2009 175.000.00 4.80% 68,730.00 243,730.00 55,433.19 66,683.38 365846.57 9400 900.00 3.415.57 307,401.71 56,575.68 363.97739 5528.92 (1,340.26) 8,27654 2010 75,000.00 4.90% 60,33400 135330.00 168.294.14 72.351.47 375.97561 90.00 990.00 3.483.89 313.549.74 63,477.92 377,027.66 5455.21 1,507.26 9,783.80 2011 85.000.00 4.95% 56,65500 141,655.00 169,711.62 7$501.35 389,867.97 90.00 1.080.00 3,553.56 319,820.74 70.633.61 390.454.35 5538.11 1,124.49 14908.30 2012 95,000.00 5.00% 52447.50 147,447.50 171,134.81 85,173.96 4013,756.27 90.00 1.170.00 3,624.64 326.217.15 78,050.14 404.267.29 5599.96 1.110.98 12019.27 2013 105,000.00 5.05% 47,697.50 152,697.50 172563.68 92,413.75 417,674.93 90.00 1,260.00 3,697.13 332.741.50 85.735.07 418,176.57 5661.06 1,46270 13,481.98 2014 120,000.00 5.101v 42395.00 162395.00 173.99820 100,26891 436,66211 90.00 1350.00 3,771.07 339396.33 93,696.19 433,09251 5741.51 (2828.09) 10,653.89 2015 120.000.00 5.15% 36.27500 156.275.00 187.154.64 108.791.77 452,21.41 90.00 1,440.00 3.84649 346.184.25 101.941.45 448,125.71 S585.96 (3.509.74) 7,144.14 2016 130,000.00 5.15% 3409500 160,095.00 188.69692 118.039.07 466,830.99 90.00 1,53400 3.9223.42 353,107.94 110,479.05 463,586.99 S392.93 (2851.08) 4,293.07 2017 140,000.00 5.20% 23.40400 163,400.00 190,2,4512 128,07^-39 481,717.51 90.00 1,620.00 4,001.89 360,17410 119,31737 479,487.47 5236.12 (1,993.93) 2299.14 2018 150.00400 5.20% 16,120.00 166,120.00 191.799.22 138,958.55 496877.77 90.00 1,71400 4,081.93 367373.50 128.465.04 495,838.53 5126.45 (912.78) 138636 2019 160,000.00 5.20% 8320.00 168.320.00 191.799.2 150.770.02 510,889.24 90.00 1,800.00 4.163.57 374.720.97 137,930.88 512651.85 576.25 1.838.86 3.225.22 52455,000.00 S1.499.901.04 53.954,901.04 52275.610.14 $1,538.064.42 57,778,575.61 $117,63250 $6,249.769.46 $1.283.287.54 57,768.32.00 $13.47882 53,25.22 iAPFLJ------ ---- - - - - -- -- ,TOTAL ,TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2347,400.00 1 BONDS DATED: JULY 1, 1998 LESS MUNICIPAL CASH APPLIED 0.00 BONDS MATURE: DECEMBER 1. 2000 THROUGH 2019 1 CITY RESPONSIBILITY 2.347,400. 1 INTEREST: DEC. 1. 1998 AND SERI! -ANN UAL TI(EREAFTER POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 2347.400.00 2000 IMP :ADD: i OPTION: DECEMBER 1, 2002 Q 100 POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 0.00 20001RIP 1 ESTIMATED BOND PRINTING 0.00 1 MINIMUM BID: POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 68.5,000.00 2003 IRIP ESTIMATED REGISTRATION 600.001 FST. AVG COUPON RATE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 1.377.202.00 2008 !RLP 1 ESTIMATED FISCAL SERVICES 6,66667 EST. NET EFFECTIVE RATE POTABLE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM 137,720.00 2013 IVIP 1 ESTIMATED LEGAL OPINION 1,333.33 REGISTR. & PA: BONDS WILL BE BOOK ENTRY FORA! 4.547,322.00 EST. DISCOUNT FACTOR (1.25%) 30,687.50 CAPITALIZED INTEREST 117.631501 PREPARED BY: 1 SUBTOTAL LESS: FST. CONST. FUND INV. INCOMI 2504.3'0.00 1 (48.415.13) JURAN & MOODY TOM TRUSZINSKI 1 SUBTOTAL 245 ,904.88 i D 1 1 Illt 1.612-291-3037 :ROUNDED FOR ISSUANCE: ------ ------------------ S2.455_000.00i I.800.950.4666 DATE OF ANALYSIS 10-Feb96 CITY OF OTSEGO, 11INNFSOTA CASH FLOW ANALYSIS ST�7O COLLECT ONLY '98-A GENERAL OBLIGATION WATER AND SEWER REVENUE BONDS OF 1998 (%IS 444) AMOUNT: $2,295,000 $71.66 CAP COST PER 200% TOTAL OPERATION ANNUAL INTEREST OTSEGO CONN. ANNUAL OTHER TOTAL INTEREST ANNUAL BOND INTEREST DEBT FUTURE AND SYSTEM 18 RECS CUM INFLATED CONN. SYSTEM SYSTEM INCOME 40 SURPLUS/ FUND YEAR PRINCIPAL RATES INTEREST SERVICE DEBT MAINT. COST MONTHS PER YEAR RECS 200% INCOME REVENUE INCOME 5.50% DEFICIT BALANCE 1998 0.00% 46,378.13 46.37813 0.00 0.00 4437&13 166,961.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 166,961.25 $0.00 120,583.13 120.583.13 1999 0.00% 111.307.50 111307.50 0.00 0.00 111307.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5463207 (104,675.43) 15.907.70 2000 65.000.00 4.10% 111307.50 176.307.50 0.00 22,000.00 198,307.50 90.00 90.00 2,105.00 189.450.00 6,449.40 195,899.40 5874.92 (1,533.18) 14,374.52 2001 75.000.00 3.20% IM64250 183,64250 0.00 24,200.00 207,84250 90.00 180.00 2.147.10 193,239.00 13,156.78 206,395.78 5790.60 (656.13) 13.71&39 2002 85.00000 3.25% 105.49250 190,49250 0.00 26,620.00 217,11250 90.00 270.00 2190.04 197,103.78 20.129.87 217.233.65 S754.51 875.66 14,591.05 2003 100.000.00 430% 101,880.00 201,880.00 0.00 29,28200 231.16200 90.00 360.00 2,233.84 201,035.86 27.376.62 228,42248 580267 (1,936.85) 12657.20 2004 110,000.00 4.40% 97,580.00 207,580.00 0.00 32,210.20 239,790.20 90.00 450.00 2278.52 205,066.77 34.905.19 239,971.96 569615 877.91 13,53511 2005 85,000.00 4.50% 92740.00 177,740.00 42603.83 35,431.22 255,77505 90.00 540.00 2324.09 209,168.11 42723.95 251,89206 5744.43 (3,138.56) IQ39655 2006 95.000.00 4.60% 88,915.00 183,915.00 42603.83 38,974.34 265493.17 9000 630.00 2370.57 213.351.47 50,841.50 264,19297 5571.81 (73839) 9,66816 2007 110,000.00 4.65% 84,545.00 191.545.00 42603.83 42,871.78 280,02061 90.00 720.00 2417.98 217.618.50 59.266.67 276,885.17 5531.75 (2,603.69) 7,064.47 2008 120,000.00 4.70% 79,430.00 199,430.00 42603.83 47,15&95 289.19278 90.00 810.00 246634 221,970.87 68,00&50 289,979.37 5388.55 1,175.13 8.239.61 2009 135,000.00 4.80% 73,79000 208,790.00 42603.83 51,874.85 303.26868 90.00 900.00 251567 226.410.29 77.076.30 303,48659 5453.18 671.09 8,910.69 2010 75,000.00 4.90% 67,310.00 14231000 120.23258 57,06233 319.604.91 90.00 990.00 256598 230,93&49 84479.61 317,41&10 5490.09 (1,69672) 7.213.97 2011 85.00000 4.95% 63.63500 148,635.00 12023258 62768.57 331.63615 90.00 1.08000 261730 235.557.26 9422&22 331,785.48 5396.77 546.10 7,76007 2012 100.000.00 5.00% 59.427.50 159,427.50 120,23258 69,04542 348.705.50 90.00 1,17000 2669.65 240,268.41 106.332.18 346,600.59 5426.80 (1,67811) 6,081.96 2013 110.000.00 5.05% 54.427.50 164.427.50 120,23258 75,949.97 36Q610.05 90.00 1,260.00 2723.03 245.073.78 116,801.81 361,875.59 934.51 1,600.05 7,68`01 2014 125.000.00 5.10% 4887250 173,87250 12423258 83,544.96 377,65004 90.00 135000 2777.50 249,975.25 127,647.70 377,62295 5422.51 395.41 8077.42 2015 135,000.00 515% 42497.50 177,497.50 12492852 91,899.46 396325.48 90.00 1,440.00 2833.05 254.474.76 138,880.69 393.855.45 5444.26 (2025.77) 6,051.65 2016 150.000.00 5.15% 35,545.00 185,545.00 12492&52 101,089.41 413.56293 9000 1,53000 2889.71 260.074.25 150,511.95 41Q58&20 S33284 (2643.88) 3,407.77 2017 160,000.00 5.20% 27,820.00 187,8+x.00 12491-)852 111,198.35 425,946.87 90.00 1,62000 2947.51 265275.74 16255291 427,82864 5187.43 2069.20 5.47697 2018 180,000.00 5.20% 19,500.00 199.500.00 124928.52 12231&18 44$74670 90.00 1,710.00 3.00646 274581.25 175,015.30 445,596.55 5301.23 (284&92) 262805 2019 195.000.00 5.20% 10.140.00 205.140.00 12491.52 134,550.00 464618.52 90.00 1,800.00 3.06659 275,992.88 187.911.16 463.904.04 5144.54 (2569.94) 5811 52.295.000.00 $1.531.183.13 53.824183.13 $1,44$824.65 $1,260.049.99 $6.535,057.76 $166,961.25 $4,603,136.71 $1,748.29630 56,518.394.25 $16.721.62 $58.11 O (+) (+) APPLICATION OF FUNDS i TOTAL PROJECT COST: $2134,000.00 BONDS DATED: JULY 1, 1998 iLESS MUNICIPAL CASH APPLIED 0.00 i BONDS MATURE: DECEMBER 1. 2000 THROUGH 2019 1 CITY RESPONSIBILITY -.134.000.00 INTEREST: DEC. 1, 1998 AND SEMI-ANNUAL THEREAFTER SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION 1,395.000.00 2" ]NIP :ADD: OPTION: DECEMBER 1, 2002 0 100 SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION 739,000.00 2000 I$IP ESTIMATED BOND PRINTING 0.001 MININIUM BID: SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION 579,000.00 2003 MIP ES'TINIATED REGISTRATION 600.00 i EST. AVG COUPON RATE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION 1,055,000.00 2008 ENIP i ESTIMATED FISCAL SERVICES 6.666.67 i EST. NET EFFECTIVE RATE SANITARY SEWER COLLECTION 91,000.00 2013INIP ESTIMATED LEGAL OPINION 1.333.33 REGISTR & PA: BONDS WILL BE BOOK ENTRY FORM 3,859,000.00 EST. DISCOUNT FACTOR (1.25%) 28687.50 i CAPITALIZED INTEREST 166,961.25 i SUBTOTAL $2.338,24875 1 PREPARE5 BY: LESS: EST. CONST. FUND INV. INCOM) SUBTOTAL (44.013.75) _.'94.235.00 i JURAN & MOODY TOM TRUSZINSKI :ROUNDED FOR ISSUANCE: $''=.295,000.00 INC 1.612-291.3037 -------------------------------- 1-800-950-4666 5' r Hakanson 1 Anderson Assoc., Inc. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mayor and City Council, City of Otsego FROM: John Harwood, City Engineer DATE: February 23, 1998 RE: Summary from 2/19/98 Utility System Workshop 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 Fax 612/427--"W 0520 The discussion and decisions on the four workshop agenda items were: 1) Consensus was reached that it is necessary to use a consistent procedure, involving eminent domain, for all right of way and easement acquisition. Andy will prepare a policy statement for Council adoption on 3/9/98. 2) The work on Odean Avenue was reviewed, with general concurrence on the layout. We will proceed with right of way and easement descriptions based on the road section as shown, with the pavement centerline offset to the east to allow for a bike path on the west. We will proceed to right of way acquisition via Andy's office, and to plans and specifications without further Council review. We will bid the Bike path such that it can be deleted from the project if desired. Prior to calling for an improvement hearing, we will review with the Council the relative assessment data and cost for Odean Avenue as compared to 85th Street. 3) Water System We will solicit quotations for the test well program and will report the results to the Council. Assuming test well results do not change the well location or cost, we will immediately proceed with plans and specifications for the well and pumphouse. We will also proceed with the preparation of plans for the water tower. The base bid for the tower will be the less costly water spheroid type. We will allow a bid alternative for the fluted column type of tower to maximize competitive bidding. On March 9th, we will provide the Council with a system cost evaluation showing how the change from a 3 tower configuration to a 2 tower configuration has impacted overall costs and how much of the cost has been accelerated by construction of the recommended 400,000 gallon tank located near 70th Street. We will also present final right of way and easement descriptions on March 9th. Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors Mayor and City Council Page 2 February 23, 1998 4) Sanitary Sewer System We will revise the route for the force main to the WWTF. The new route will be on 65th Street east from TH 101 and on easement south of 65th Street to the WWTF. This route avoids reconstruction work to CSAH 36 and is significantly less costly. The remainder of the alignment, the route and the facilities will stay as shown on the design report. We will prepare final easement and right of way sketches and descriptions for the March 9th Council meeting. 5) Near Future Activities at Council Meetings include: Feb 23rd March 9th March 9th March 9th March 9th March 23rd March 23rd ot612=4 Authorize Test Well Program Adopt Right of Way Acquisition policy Authorize hiring of an appraisal and right of way acquisition consultant Approval of Right of Way drawings. Authorization for acquisition by negotiation and/or eminent domain Transmittal of all easement and right of way data to City attorney for acquisition Review quotations receivedfor test well. Award of contract for test well program Council review of construction schedule after completion of right of way drawings and after receipt of utility company input. Hakanson 1111 Anderson Assoc., Inc. F-EB.23.1998 12:29PM TO:OTSEGO Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. February 20, 1998 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue N.E. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Authorization for Quotation for Test Wells Dear Mayor and Council: NO. 660 P.1/2 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka Minnesota 55303 612/417-5860 Fax 612/427-3-49-10620 As described in the Water System Design Report and discussed at the 2/18/98 Utility System Workshop, we request authorization to solicit quotations for drilling test wells to investigate the aquifer and probable yield for City Well No. 2. The quotation will solicit costs on a unit basis for drilling, testing and restoration. We will budget the quotation for up to three test wells, but will stop the program when the adequacy of the Ironton/Galesville formation is verified. The budget for up to 3 wells is $14,000. The program could cost as little as $4,000 if success is immediate. The specific Council action requested is passage of a motion authorizing the City Engineer to solicit quotations for a potable water test well program. Sincerely, HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. Jo A. Harwood, PE clk ot505may.cn1 Engineers landscape Architects Surveyors February 18, 1998 FEB ! 9 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ----- The Honorable Larry Fournier Mayor, City of Otsego City Hall, 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, Minnesota 55330 Re: Facilities Plan Wastewater Treatment Facilities Project No. L272278-01 Dear Mayor Forseth and Mayor Fournier:. The Honorable Phil Forseth Mayor, City of Dayton City Hall, 12260 S. Diamond Lake Road Dayton, Minnesota 55327 The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) has reviewed the facility plan for the proposed wastewater treatment facility located in the city of Otsego. The following are questions and comments based on that review: It is unclear how the project is proposed to be administered. Will each city be requesting an individual loan for their portion of the project, or will it be done as a joint project? If it is proposed to be separate projects or separate treatment and collection projects, each project will require a separate Project Priority List (PPL) and Intended Use Plan (IUP) request. 2. In order to rank the proposed project for the PPL, a worksheet has been enclosed for you to complete to assist our calculation. A maximum impact zone is an important part of the points equation. The maximum impact zone is the area with the highest density of unsewered structures. In accordance with Minn. R. 7077.0105, subp. 21a., if the service area contains more than 50 unsewered structures, the maximum impact zone must contain at least 25 percent of the structures. This will also require an assessment of the condition of existing onsite treatment systems in the service area. If extra points are requested, please provide sufficient information to justify their addition. A determination of the existing need for wastewater treatment is an essential part of the facilities planning process for State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan projects. For areas that are currently unsewered, an evaluation shall be performed to identify whether individual onsite treatment systems in the proposed sewer service area are in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7080. This evaluation must be completed by a certified onsite treatment system inspector in accordance with the onsite rules. The information presented in the city's needs analysis dated September 22, 1997, does not give an indication of the condition of the onsite treatment systems in the city. It identifies systems that have been replaced, which are probably in good condition and in compliance. The MPCA has not received any information regarding the need or systems evaluation from the city of Dayton. The SRF funding rules are explicit in that a need must currently exist for a project to be fundable. 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (Voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20". fibers from paper recycled by consumers. The Honorable Larry Fournier Page 2 4. The Riverbend Manufactured Home Community located in the city of Otsego has an existing permitted discharge. The MPCA has also received an inquiry from another developer regarding a new development in the western side of town that includes a permitted discharge. With this proposal from the city, there is the potential for the city of Otsego to have three separate and independently owned and operated treatment facilities. Is the city concerned about this method of development? Have any steps been taken to investigate the possibility of combining these discharges or to develop a program to optimize the efficiency of the collection system by providing cooperative treatment? 5. How do wastewater treatment and conveyance issues factor into local land use and development planning? What are the city's future plans for sewer service to other parts of the city? 6. How will the treatment system and collection system administration be performed between the cities of Otsego and Dayton; under a contract for services or as a sanitary sewer district? A draft copy of all intermunicipal agreements is required to be part of the facilities plan. If there are any significant industrial users (SIL)) based on flow or loading, draft agreements must also be submitted. 7. A copy of the MPCA Design Flow Determination Guidelines has been enclosed. It contains worksheets for your completion. These flow parameters are necessary for permitting purposes and for administration of the State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan program. Minn. R. pt. 7077.0272, requires that information on future flows and loadings be based on a 20 -year planning period. Please provide the flow information for the proposed project and the future flows anticipated. 8. The "Wastewater Treatment Facilities Plan" and the "Sanitary Sewer Collection System Study" appear to be based on different design flows. The sewer system study estimated the residential equivalent connections(REC's) in the city to be 3,930 in the next twenty years. With an estimated average flow of 250 gallons per REC, the total flow projection for the facility is 982,500 gallons per day. By applying a typical design flow rate of 100 gallons per person per day to the city's population of 6,116 in 1995, the current total flow in the city is approximately 611,600 gpd. Is the proposed treatment plant intended to he the first nhase of a larger future project? If it is, the facility plan must address the total flows proposed for the ultimate design of the facility over a 20 -year planning period. Future phases of expansion need to be addressed to ensure that the final treatment system will be cohesive. 9. The MPCA has reliability criteria for wastewater treatment plants to ensure that an inventory of biological growth will be maintained at all times in the system and to protect the receiving stream. For treatment facilities with a flow of greater than 100,000 gpd or for those that have discharge limits more stringent than standard secondary limits, the criteria requires duplication of major treatment units. In discussions with your engineer and a letter from them dated January 27, 1998, we have been asked to consider a variance from the reliability criteria. The primary argument is that when the facility needs to expand in 6-10 years, the city will have an arrangement of an odd number of different sized units if duplicates are built now. With small incremental expansions every 5-10 years, the city will probably always have a Tchacklr.doc 1/94 The Honorable Larry Fournier Page 3 variety of different sized units. The avoidance of this problem for the initial phase, is not sufficient justification to construct only single units. The operation inconvenience and additional costs do not outweigh the concern to have a reliable treatment system. As you are aware, the growth in the Crow River watershed is among the fastest in the state. The number of dischargers to the river and the volume of these dischargers have resulted in the water quality of the river being very vulnerable. The city of Otsego has already been assigned discharge limits that are more stringent than standard secondary limits to protect water quality. Because of the need for advanced treatment and the vulnerability of the Crow River, the MPCA feels that it is reasonable to require duplicate treatment units for this proposed project. 10. The proposed collection system project costs must be divided into the costs associated with providing service to existing residences and the costs associated with extending service into undeveloped areas. The SRF loan program cannot pay to extend services to new developments. It appears that there are relatively few large lots that will be served in the Phase I service area. These lots will likely be subdivided to provide fill-in development. In this situation, only the percentage of the capacity of the collection system necessary to serve existing residents is fundable in the SRF program. The capacity to serve new development does not constitute an environmental need in the SRF program. The capacity for future development at the treatment facility is fundable, but not the sewer extension. 11. The plan identifies the need for a total of 48 acres of land needed for the biosolids land application program. Have any steps been taken to identify potential sites, or to determine the willingness of landowners to participate? If you have questions concerning technical, environmental or public participation matters, please contact me at (612) 296-8722. incerely, L David A. Sahli, P.E. Point Source Compliance Section Water Quality Division DS:gms Enclosure cc. Shirley Slater, Clerk, City of Dayton ylame Beatty, Cteick, City of Otsego Ted K. Field, P.E., Bonestroo, Rosene, Anderlik & Associates, St. Paul Kevin P. Kielb, P.E., Hakansan, Anderson Associates, Anoka Lee Koppy, RLK-Kuusisto, St. Paul Linda Ulland, MPCA Brainerd Regional Director Tchackindoc 1/94 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 9. COUNCIL ITEMS: Elaine Beatty Council of 2/23/98 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC 9 1 Discussion of Park and Recs. Meeting of 2/11/98 (Mark Bernina) BACKGROUND: Attached is a Memo from Mark Berning that explains briefly what happened at the February 11th Park and Recs. Meeting. The Resolution and Letter on Item No. 5.2. came from that meeting. Marx will be available to answer questions. RECOWENDATION : This is for Counc-1 information Thanks, Elaine 9.1. February 12, 1998 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Mark Berning RE: Park and Rees. Meeting of February 11, 1998-7PM The following is information from the above meeting for Council review at the February 23, 1998 Council Meeting - ( Per Mark Berning information to Elaine Beatty.) 1. Park and Recs. Commissioners will be working on a Mission Statement the next couple of months. (Mark gave them a copy of the Mission Statement he wrote and recommended) as an example and starting point. 2. The Park and Recs. Commissioners are not sure on the S 10.00 a meeting issue. They questioned if they can use that money in their budget instead, or donate it back to Park and Recs. 3. BUDGET - The Winterfest event came in under budget and the Commissioners want to know if they can transfer the remainder of the money to use elsewhere? 4. RESOLUTION - Merland Otto had a copy of a Resolution they can use as a sample to send to the legislature to ask for additional grants. (Elaine will get a copy from Merland and write the Resolution for Council Approval on Consent Agenda for 223/98 Council Meeting). 5. Commissioners are working on Friends of Parks issue - But they are going slow. 6. Tom Constant was appointed to research and obtain estimates for a .30'X 60' basic Park Shelter so Park and Recs. Commissioners will know the approximate amount they need for cost of a shelter. 7. Winterfest next year (1999) date is set for January 16th - January 23rd. CITY OF OTSEGO MEMO TO COUNCIL RE: PARKS AND RECS. MEETING OF FEBRUARY 11, 1998 7PM - PAGE 2 - 8. Family Fun Day: Commissioners questioned if there would be a problem with having the Lions run a beer stand just for the dance at night. They would look to Albertville or Elk River Lions to run it, as they have the liability insurance for same. The Family Fun Day will be a week later this year. 9. Commissioners want City Staff to look into obtaining a cash box for Parks to use for their events. 10. A representative from Park and Recs. will attend the February 19th (Actually February 26th) Heritage Meeting at 7PM Re: The Old City hall and funding issue. (The Commissioners for Park and Recs. have cided not to restore the Old City Hall.) They are interested in using some of the donated funds from the Vision Committee for a Park Shelter at Otsego Prairie Park. 11. Park and Recs. Members noted that they would like to see more Council participation in their events. They indicated that they get the feeling the Council does not care about their events, because of lack of Council participation. CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE: DEPARTMENT: PREPARED BY: MEETING DATE 9. COUNCIL ITEMS: Elaine Beatty Council of 2/23/98 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC 9.2. Any other Council Business A. Consider request for contribution to St. Michael -Albertville All Night Graduation Party. (See Attached Letter) BACKGROUND: The attached letter was mailed to the City to ask for your contribution. In the past the Council has not donated to this All -Night Graduation Party. We have sent a letter of explanation. RECCMdENDATION: This is for Council information and decision. Thanks, A Elaine Greetings from the St. Michael -Albertville All -Night Graduation Party Committee. The St. Michael -Albertville Senior Class will be graduating on May 29, 1998. As in the past, the parents of the graduates are planning an all-night party to provide an opportunity for the seniors to celebrate together in a safe, chemical -free environment. These parties have been extremely successful in the past, and the majority of graduating seniors actively participate. Our goal is to have 100% student participation. Sources of income for the party include fund-raisers, parent donations, and support from area businesses. Our budget is limited therefore we are asking for your support in the way of prizes, gift certificates, or cash donations. Please consider making a contribution to this cause. If you decide to make a financial contribution, please make your check payable to: "STMA Graduation Party Fund '98." STMA Graduation Party Committee P.O. Box 1 St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 If you prefer to donate merchandise or gift certificates, we will arrange for pick-up at your convenience, either now, or before April 30, 1998. If it is convenient for you, donations and merchandise may be dropped off at Hardware Hank, St. Michael. Please direct any questions / inquiries to: Kathy Pope 497-3464 (h) 497-6562 (W) We sincerely appreciate your continued support. Thank you. PLEDGE SLIP Item(s) or Amount: When Should We Pick-up?: Name of Company / Organization: Contact Person: Address: Phone: _ Claims List for Approval MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO For the period 02/17/98 to 02/17/98 = BRIAN BLAI_NE RELEASE OF PORTION OF ESCROW 02/17/98 3270 1,000.00 MINNESOTA MUTUAL MARCH PREMIUM 02/17/98 3271 198.20 ICA J. LUTTS REFUND RENTAL 02/17/98 3272 108.00 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 02/17/98 CLAIM TOTAL TO WHOM PAID FOR WHAT PURPOSE DATE NUMBER CLAIM CROW RIVER NEWS SUBSCRIPTION 02/17/98 3261 22.00 BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION SERVICE RECYCLING - JANUARY 02/17/98 3262 317.50 DUERRS WATERCARE SERVICE JANUARY SERVICE 02/17/98 3263 148.10 CORROW TRUCKING JANUARY RECYCLING 02/17/98 3264 1,310.00 =•BEAUDRY OIL COMPANY 2/4 DELIVERY 02/17/98 3265 91.92 AFFORDABLE SANITATION PORTABLE RENTAL 02/17/98 3266 106.50 `MAC'S WELL & PUMP SERVICE SERVICE CALL 02/17/98 3267 75.00 MINNESOTA UC FUND FIEDLER UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIM 02/17/98 3268 745.96 a NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS JANUARY SERVICE 02/17/98 3269 3,681.77 1 71 = BRIAN BLAI_NE RELEASE OF PORTION OF ESCROW 02/17/98 3270 1,000.00 MINNESOTA MUTUAL MARCH PREMIUM 02/17/98 3271 198.20 ICA J. LUTTS REFUND RENTAL 02/17/98 3272 108.00 STANDARD TRUCK & AUTO REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 02/17/98 3273 167.60 H G WEBER OIL COMPANY 2/6 DELIVERY 02/17/98 3274 135.80 PRECISION FRAME & ALIGNMENT WHEEL ALIGNMENT 02/17/98 3275 40.00 WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURER FEBRUARY SERVICES 02/17_/98 3276 8,650.50 ISD 728, COMMUNITY RECREATION BOARD JANUARY ASSESSMENT 02/17/98 3277 1,583.59 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL, INC JANUARY SERVICES 02/17/98 3278 4.00 BOYER TRUCKS 81 FORD ENGINE & CLUTCH 02/17/98 3279 11222.89. BRAD RAGAN TIRE, INC. 94 FORD TIRES 02/17/98 3280 1,716.27 SUPERIOR SERVICES - CENTRAL MN JANUARY SERVICES 02/17/98 3281 566.47 GLENS TRUCK CENTER INC TOTAL FOR MONTH TOTAL YEAR TO DATE SUPPLIES 1 02/17/98 3282 7.15 31,899.= 31,899.2