12-23-96 CCCITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
4. OPEN FORUM
CITY CLERK
Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
4.1. Special Presentation by Pat Sawatzke, Second District
Commissioner Re: Hazardous Waste Collection at Otsego (See
information enclosed).
BACKGROUND:
Pat Sawatzke will be here to ask the Council if you would like to
host a hazardous waste collection day in the Spring of 1997. They
have moved this around and had it in different places in Wright County
in the past. If possible they would like to hold it at the Otsego
Town Hall on Co. Ru. #39 to accommodate residents on the Eastern side
of the County.
STAFF RECONMNDATION:
This is a Council -decision as how to go with this. Staff feels that
this kind of an event for our residents is always well recepted and
there is a need.
Thank you,
C,
Elaine
JN -r Y C)
� 2
= Z
M
00d O
dy
7855
RICHARD W. NORMAN
County Coordinator
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
Ms. Elaine Beatty
Clerk, City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Otsego, MN 55330
Dear Elaine:
10 2nd Street NW, RM 235
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1188
Tel: (612) 682-7378
1-800-362-3667
Fax: 612-682-6178
COMMISSIONERS
KEN DUDE
First District
PAT$AWATZKE
Second District
JACK RUSSEK
Third District
JUDIE ROSE
Fourth District
DICK MATTSON
Fifth District
December 6, 1996
Enclosed is a note from Chuck Davis, requesting the use of your
facility for a hazardous waste collection.
As I mentioned to you, there have been a number of requests from
Otsego residents regarding hazardous waste drop off sites. This
service is provided free -of -charge to all Wright County residents.
In the past, we have found that residents generally will not travel
more than ten miles for such a collection. Therefore, we try to
spread the site locations around the County.
We will advertise and ask for pre -registration so we can stagger
the delivery times (to eliminate traffic problems) ; and, also to be
prepared for the appropriate amounts and types of hazardous waste
to be received. However, we will not turn away unregistered County
residents who show up on collection day.
The County will provide for volunteers; but, any additional
volunteers from the City would be appreciated.
The following household materials are acceptable:
oil filters, solvents, acids, antifreeze, oil -base paints
and lacquers, etc. Fluorescent bulbs are accepted up to
ten per household, with a small fee for amounts over ten.
As a rule, we do not accept the following:
Latex paints (can be handled easily at home), large
volume pesticides, commercial industrial waste, etc.
I will be in attendance on December 23 to answer any questions you
may have on this or other issues. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerel
Pat S watzke
Second Dis ict Commissioner
PS:lmg
Enc.
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
01* ii e t)t'
PLA XLVLN'G AND ZO.A-ING
MEMORANDUM
Date: November 25, 1996
To: City of Otsego, Council Members & Employees
From: Wright County Environmental Health Department
Re: Household Hazardous Waste Collection for Spring of 1997
The Wright County Solid Waste Task Force has scheduled a collection for household
hazardous waste for April of this coming year. if possible, they would like this collection to
be held the Otsego town hall on County Road #39, to accomodate residents on the eastern
side of the County.
As done with all such collections, the County will indemnify the City of Otsego, so that all
liability concerning the collection will be on behalf of Wright County. All hazardous wastes
collected will be packed and removed the same day by Aptus, the State's hazardous waste
contractor.
Tentative dates for the collection are Saturday, April 12th or Saturday, April 26th. Please
let us know if these dates would be acceptable to the City. We are waiting to hear back from
Aptus with regards to which days they are avaiiabie.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please call with any questions at 682-7331 or
682-7337.
Printed ,int paper.
Equal Opp,,rtuntty l%/irer,tttrr A( r-11 Empll) ,"r
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
11 AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE ---]I
5 CONSENT AGENDA Elaine Beatty Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:302M
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
5.1. Approval for Phyllis Cokley to use accrued vacation hours in
1997.
BACKGROUND:
Request has been made by Phyllis Cokley through her Attorney that
vacation hours earned in 1996 be extended for use in 1997. The City
Attorney recommends that this request be granted.
STAFF RECOMENDATION:
This is a Council Decision. The City Attorney recommends granting this
request.
Thank you,
4L
Elaine
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION DEPARTMENT
MEETING DATE
CONSENT AGENDA
December 23, 1996
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
PREPARED BY:
5.2 Volunteer Recognition Dinner
Judy Hudson, Deputy Clerk
The Volunteer Recognition Dinner is an opportunity for the City to recognize persons for their
volunteer work and contributions for 1996. The City has budgeted for this to pay for the dinners
of the volunteers and their spouses and/or guests (excluding staff and council who pay for their
own dinners). The suggested guest list includes all of the commissions, volunteers from Clean Up
Day and the members who served on the Feedlot Ordinance Committee.
Recommended date for the Council to set February 15, 1997 (Saturday) for this event. This date
will enable the staff to have a Valentine Day theme.
DEC -23-96 MON 03:22 PM TERRA ENGINEEEING 593 9325 P.01
TERRA ENGINEERING, INC.
6001 Glonwood Ave.
CIVIL ENGtNEERING - LAND PLANNING - CONSULTING Minneapolis, Minnesota 65422
(phone/tax) 593-9325
December 23, 1996
Elaine Beatty
City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Ave. NE
Ells River, MN 55330
Ite: Concept Plan Review at City Council Meeting
Sadowski Property (120 acres)
Otsego, MN
Dear Ms. Beatty:
As we discussed, we understand that two of the City Council members will be new
in 1997. We therefore request that this project be tabled at the City Council meeting
tonight, and that our concept plan be reviewed at the January 13, 1997 City Council
meeting.
If you have any questions, please call.
sincerely,
r
Peter J. Knaeble
TEWU ENGINEERING, INC.
CC: Neat Krzyzaniak, Bridge -land Development Co. (fax 469-5906)
Fabian Sadowski, Property Owner
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. DAVID LICHT, CITY PLANNER Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED 6Y: Ea,cc
6.1.Consider Lin -Bar Development, Inc. 5475 Parnell Ave NE, Rogers,
PID #118-500-284300: (Cont from previous Agendas)
A. Planned Unit Development (Concept Plan)
BACKGROUND:
This item has been continued many times and was continued from the
Agenda of December 9, 1996 for further comment and recommendation by
the Building Official, Jerry Olson. Attached is his information and
recommendation.
STAFF RECOMENDATION:
This is a Council decision and Jerry Olson has given you the
information.
Thank you,
2-9-& .
Elaine
X
fate:
CITY OF OTSEGO
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: December 17, 1996
From: Mayor, and City Council:
Subject: Jerry Olson, Building Official
Lin -Bar Development
I have been directed by the City Council to comment on the proposed Lin -Bar
Development requirement for a collector septic system. First, I would like to offer
some history on this particular parcel of land. I am sure you are all aware that this parcel
was at one time considered as the Third Industrial Site. This proposed Industrial Site
consisted of 31 lots ranging in size from one acre to three and a third acres with 22 of
these lots sized from one to one and one half acres and eight lots sized from one and one
half to three and one third acres.
This proposal was initiated by the City, but was ultimately denied due to public
opposition. This was after Lin -Bar had gone to considerable expense preparing surveys,
site plans, landscaping plans, etc.
However, a collector system was never a requirement for approval of the industrial
park. The only reference to the type of sewer system that would be utilized in the
proposed Industrial Park is in a letter from Hakanson Anderson Assoc. to Northwest
Associated Consultants dated 11-29-93, in which Hakanson Anderson states that sewage
treatment would be by means of individual tanks and drainfields. This letter goes on to
state that "a collector system should be considered, however, individual systems will
function adequately". A copy of this letter is enclosed with this report.
Lin -Bar is now proposing a 34 lot residential development on this site with lots a
minimum of one acre in size. Five lots have already been approved under the 1 per 40
development rights. These lots will have individual septic systems. On October 14, 1996,
this property was re -zoned by the City Council from A-2 to Planned Unit Development
(PUD) This motion was amended to include a condition that a collector sewage treatment
system be implemented. The motion carried unanimously.
While I have no doubt that this motion was well intended, it could be questioned
whether the council had been given any information or had done any research on collector
systems before this motion was passed. At this council meeting it was stated that the City
Engineer and Lin -Bar's engineer come to a "joint conclusion".
Memorandum to Mayor and City Council
December 17, 1996
Page 2
This is improbable in that the developer and the City Engineer have different concepts as
to lot size, placement of sewer lines, number of homes per system, etc.
I will offer some information on collector systems. This information is from the
"MPCA Sewage Treatment Manual, Section G".
I have prepared copies of this chapter and distributed them to the council
previously for their review, but I would like to highlight some excerpts from this chapter.
From Page G.1:
A collector system is defined as a system having two or more sewage sources
with a common -soil treatment unit. The collector system as suggested in this
manual should rarely be used for more than 15 homes.
Unfortunately, in many instances municipal sewer collector design techniques
have been used to design high-cost collector system that result in the
dispersal of a large amount of liquid wastes into the soil at one location.
Severe problems have been created by this process. Large amounts of sewage
being discharged into a concentrated location in the soil either will not be
accepted hydraulically or else will create nutrient or nitrate problems as the
liquid percolates downward. Those who have designed large collector
systems that use the soil as the ultimate treatment facility have not
recognized these limitations. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency has
drafted specific standards for large size soil absorption systems.
From page G.2
Before even considering a collector system, thoroughly investigate all
possible on-site alternatives. These alternatives include the following:
Wastewater flow reduction devices
The use of elevated bed systems (mounds)
Repairing -and adding to an existing drainfield trench system
Using a holding tank for part of sewage wastes
Locating a common soil treatment unit on the boundary line of
adjacent lots.
Obtaining variances on setback distances from lot lines or other lot
boundaries
Relocating water supply well (particularly if shallow and presently of
minimum cost and more than 20 years old)
Other alternatives
Memorandum to Mayor and City Council
December 17, 1996
Page 3
Only after investigating these alternatives should a collector system be
seriously considered. Far too much time and money have been committed
to the design and installation of collector systems, with too little effort
directed to appropriate use of available on-site technology.
From page G-4
Collector systems should rarely be used to develop new home sites. Better
sewage treatment will result and fewer problems will develop if an adequate
area of suitable soil is provided on each lot for the installation of an
individual sewage treatment system. Newly platted lots should be of
adequate size and should have soils suitable for proper sewage treatment.
This would include a secondary site on the property.
From page G.5
When property owners join together in such a project, competent legal
advice is needed to develop an agreement on such issues as the following:
Easements for the collector and pressure sewer lines
Mutual ownership of portions of the sewage treatment system
Operation and maintenance responsibilities and costs for
mutually owned portions
Maintenance schedule for individual septic tanks
Assessment of initial costs to each lot
Other uses for the common soil treatment area
Additions or deletions to the system
Other similar questions
Property owners must agree on organizational and operational details before
the sewage treatment system can be designed. Success of the group system
depends on mutual cooperation and understanding by all participants as well
as proper design, installation, and maintenance.
As you can see a collector system presents many potential problems from legal,
technical, and maintenance view points.
I would agree with Lin -Bar's engineer that coordinating the location of a collector
system so as to tie into a future city sewer would be largely a matter of guess -work and
most likely subject to reconstruction. Also, water lines would not be installed at this time
so in any case future reconstruction would seem to be inevitable should city services
become available.
Memorandum to Mayor and City Council Page 4
December 17, 1996
I will now address the issue of failing septic systems. This would certainly seem to
be a problem in some areas of the city that were platted 20 to 25 years ago. However, in
my opinion, the majority of these failures are due to improper installation techniques and
improper maintenance. Many systems were installed too deep, were undersized, or had
less than three feet to mottled soil or saturated soil. With today's technology and licensing
requirements a properly installed and maintained septic system can be expected to last for
an average of 25 to 30 years. As two septic sites are required on every newly developed
lot there would be a total of at least 50 years of treatment capacity per lot.
I have attempted to provide the necessary information regarding collector systems.
I hope that this information will aid you in your decision addressing the Lin -Bar
Development.
JO/co
BLDONSPAVM
Ot 3.
of November 25, 1996, cont'd. Page
CM Fournier_expl ^ that normally the City fills commission position in January of each
year and urged Mr: Bengtson to reconsider withdrawing his application.
Mr. Bengtson responded his applicationshouldhave been considered in January of 1996.
/ • 4+•n11Y hMl': t'. YY �.1 •+Tlf.• -
/// 5_ Consent Agenda,•
5-1- Approval of Monticello Fire Service Contract (removed and placed under
Item 91
5-2_ Approval of Alhertville Fire Service Contract -
5 -3 -
.on rac5-3_ R . .iv . Sewer nd Water Information Report and set Workshop
for Monday. December 2- 1996 at 6:30 PM. (Removed and placed under
Item 9-1
CM Black motioned approval of the Consent Agenda as amended. Seconded by
CM Ackerman. All in favor. Motion carried.
6-1- Consider Lin-Rar Development, Inc., 5475 Parnell Ave_ NE. Rogers
PID 118-500-284300_ (6ontinued from 10-14-96 and 10-28-96 and 11-
12 96 Agenda) (See attached letter from Enginepr)-
A_ Planned Unit Development (.onc , to Plan)
Mr. Koshak reviewed with the Council the meeting he had with Lin -Bar's Engineer and
Surveyor. Together they reviewed the cluster systems. He stated a joint conclusion was
not arrived at. The developer wants the one acre lots with sewer lines in the street with 3
or 4 lots on a cluster system. Mr. Koshak's concept of a cluster system was with urban
size lots.
CM Fournier motioned to continue this matter until the next City Council Meeting
in order to give time to the Building Official time to comment on the feasibility of
both systems in regards to how they protect the environment. Seconded by CM
Black.
Voting For the Motion: CM Ackerman, CM Black, CM Fournier, CM Heidner.
Voting Against the Motion: Mayor Freske
Motion carried four (4) to one (1).
CM Heidner needed clarification if a motion was needed. He stated this plat was
previously approved provided a cluster was put in.
Mr. Kirmis stated he is correct and that a cluster system is part of the conditions. If the
Building Official shows no support for a community system, than it would appear that a
new motion would be needed.
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
November 20, 1996
Mayor & City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue
Otsego, MN 55330
RE: Lin Bar PUD
Dear Mayor & Council Members:
3601 Thurston Avenue
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
Fax 612/=427-3-�- 0520
NOV 2 1
At the October 28, 1996 Council Meeting, the Developer's Engineer, Thor Meyer, and myself were
asked to come back to you at a later meeting with a recommendation.
We did meet on November 7, 1996, at the City Hall. Elaine Beatty, Thor Meyer, Bob Rohlin, and
myself were in attendance.
Mr. Meyer presented a concept of a cluster system. In the proposed plat I believe he had shown
three such cluster drainfields. Sanitary sewer lines were conceptionally placed in the streets with
a plan to ultimately direct the sewage to the northeast of the plat by gravity. It is conceivable that
in the future, sanitary sewer could be available to this area from the east and that a trunk sewer
would serve this plat at the northeast corner.
The concept as presented assumed 1.0 acre residential lots. Thus, each drainfield would serve
approximately 10-20 lots. This proposed concept is not the type cluster system we had in mind.
We would propose small urban lots served by several cluster drainfields with open space between
clusters. The same density as proposed would be considered but with smaller lots and more open
space between the clusters.
The developer desires to develop 1.0 acre lots only. According to Meyer Rohlin, that is the
developer's goal. - -
Our concept of cluster differs from their proposed system. It was stated by Meyer Rohlin that the
cluster proposal is not cost effective for the developer. We tend to agree that the proposal is not
cost effective. We also agree that 1.0 acre lots can be served by septic tank drainfields in this
area with a minimum number being mound systems.
We do not recommed that the Council approve a 1.0 lot subdivision in this area. The proposed
plat is outside of the�mmediate service area as currently established. The proposal, if approved,
also could open to other requests of similar nature for plating outside the immediate sewer area.
Continued development of 1.0 acre lots without a sanitary sewer plan will cause serious problems
in the future when existing septic drainfield systems begin to fail in significant numbers.
Eiil-invers Landscape Architects Surveyors
Mayor & City Council
Page 2
November 20, 1996
We recommend before consideration of this proposal that the Council complete the Comprehensive
Plans including sanitary sewer collection and treatment plan. Then, after the planning and
engineering issues are considered and adopted, if this area is within the plan for development as
1 .0 acre lots, it could be concluded that adequate consideration was given to the proposal and the
concept of 1.0 acre lots with septic tank/drainfields in this area is approved.
This proposal, in our opinion, however, is premature at this time.
Watershed issues for this area have not been dealt with to a level to allow further development.
This proposal is on the top end of two watershed and which both watersheds are not developed
to meet further development. We recommend that any development allowed in the area prior to
an approval plan be required to have ponding to hold two single event 100 year storms with
release of only the existing runoff.
We would also recommend if the proposal is approved septic tank/drainfields shall be standard
systems. No mound system would be allowed to support a residential unit.
Our recommendation first is not to consider approval of the plat until the revised Comprehensive
Plan is approved.
If our recommendation is not considered, then we would recommend special conditions be applied
to the Stormwater Drainage and Septic Tank/Drainfield design of this proposal.
We will be available to discuss this matter with you at the Council Meeting.
Sincerely,
HAKAN$.QN ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
gy
rrkn—cWG. 46shak, PE
Jig
cc: :Elaine Beatty, Clerk
Bob Kirmis, NAC
Andy MacArthur, Attorney
Hilary Barry
Wilfred Lindenfelser
OT2176.may
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
Mr. Bob Kirmis
Northwest Assoc. Consultants, Inc.
5775 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 555
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Re: Third Industrial Park Site
Engineering Issues
Dear Bob:
,W
222 Monroe Street
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
fax 612/427-3401
We have reviewed the preliminary layout and sketch plan for the
development and have the following to offer:
CSAH37 ROW
Item 1 - When platted a
Wright County Highway
portion related to the
Avenue intersection.
City Streets
total ROW of 50 ft. will
Dept. In our exhibit,
current correction of th
be required by the
we show only the
e CSAH37 and Odean
Item 2 - We recommend that the plat be developed with 80 ft. ROW
street as per the City's ordinances. We are also recommending for
commercial property to have at least a 36 ft. wide street
constructed as a rural section. It would provide for 2-1•2 foot
driving lanes and 2-8 foot shoulders. The wider street is required
to accommodate the truck and trailer traffic.
Storm Water Drainage
Item 3 - The most important element of the engineering analysis is
the storm water plan for this proposed development. Storm water
drainage for the site is evenly divided between two major
watersheds. Natural drainage exists to the northeast corner of the
property, to the middle of the southern property line and a minor
flow to the southeastern corner of the property. No established
off-site drainage easements currently abut the property. Until a
drainage system is developed for the area, all flows should be
detained on site. Proposed pond locations and preliminary sizing
were analyzed and are shown on the attached exhibit. The surface
areas of the ponds will vary based on water table depths and future
grading requirements.
Engineers
Landscape Architects
Surveyors
J
Mr. Bob Kirmis
Page 2
November 29, 1993
Storm water will drain to the ponds by means of street ditches if
a rural section is constructed or by curb and gutter if an urban
street section is constructed. Grading on the site will also help
provide positive flow pattern to the ponding areas.
Phasing
Item 4 - Based on the preliminary calculations, there will be three
storm water ponds required. Phasing alignment will need to be
adjusted to accommodate the drainage basins. The first phase would
drain to the south central pond and phase two will drain to a
southeasterly ponding area. The final phase will drain to the
northeast. The ponding area will take a minimum of 2.0 acres for
surface area for each site except perhaps the area in the southeast
which will require less than two acres.
Water System
Item 5 - The City of Otsego does
distribution system at this time. Water
form of individual wells for the area.
have proven to be a reliable source of
Sewer System
not have a public water
supply is generally in the
The aquifers in this area
water.
Item 6 - Sanitary sewage disposal will be by means of individual
septic systems and drain fields. The on-site soils are loams and
sandy loams. Percolation rates for these soil types have been
measured between 20 and 40 minutes per inch (MPI) in the
surrounding area. Based on this information, individual septic
systems are a feasible means of sewage disposal for this site.
A cluster soil absorption system should also be considered as a
means for disposal. However, if the waste water flow is no greater
than that of domestic use, then individual systems will function
adequately. Large volume water users should be discouraged from
the site.
Item 7 - Cost Estimates - Without reliable contours and a grading
plan, any street cost estimate will be only a rough figure.
Generally, for a 36 ft. wide rural street paved full width, the
cost per linear foot constructed in clay soils could be between
$55/lineal foot to $75/lineal foot. This would vary depending on
size of the project, cuts and fills, drainage facilities, etc.
Site grading will be necessary to prepare the site drainage and
ponding area.
Mr. Bob Kirmis
Page 3
November 29, 1993
Kevin Kielb of our staff reviewed this matter for us and if I am
not available, Kevin will be glad to answer any questions you might
have.
Yours truly,
HAKANSON ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC.
/mlc
Enclosure
cc: Elaine Beatty, Deputy Clerk ✓
File: OT9:01-11
f
_1
---t---r—
�i J
� I
I
C-11 3nrr�nr �\\
� I f—
N
L
�
Q
�i J
� I
I
C-11 3nrr�nr �\\
� I f—
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. DAVID LICHT, CITY PLANNER Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:302M
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
6.2. Concept Plan Review for Fabian Sadowski property SW of 85TH ST &
Page Ave NE (Neal Krzyzaniak, Bridgeland Development Co. and Peter J.
Knabele Terra Engr, Inc (Questions as to Zoning and Subdivision) PID
#118-500-223200, 80.37 Acres, Section 22, Twp 121, R23 and PID #118-
500-172200 - 40 Acres, Section 27, Twp 121, R23.
BACKGROUND:
Fabian Sadowiski has 120 acres, 40 Acres which is in the Immediate
Urban Service Area now. He wants to sell all 120 to Bridgeland
Development Co as stated above. They have a sketch plan and are
looking for indication if they can develope all 120 acres into one
acre lots (R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area). The
property is all zoned A-1, General Agricultural now. This property is
in the area proposed to be the area for sewer and water if we
go ahead with that project. Fabian Sadowski said he is ready to
retire and sell his land and wants to be able to sell the 120 acres
for development. He also said he has watched development all around
him and it is his time to develope now. The Planning Commission
indicated that without any direction from the Council on sewer and
water it was hard to make a commitment. They did indicate that the 40
acres is the immediate urban service area could possibly be developed.
They asked Larry Fournier about the status of sewer and water.
STAFF RECOMENDATION:
This is a discussion item and Fabian Sadowski is looking for
indication of Council direction on this.
Thank you,
Elaine
8I ST ST.
WA
N.
'1— — — — —
85TH SI.
(Es. Farmstead)
S
—J SL
I 91 I Co —{I 0
— I u
I
F29LOts Rh. 1
F-
g3RD
R-J ZONING:
' I Mill. IOI SII.e 1.0 ac.
I Min. lot width I0 A.
Cul tt/W radius (a)'
Street R/W
_ ► I I Strcel \vldtll 32'M
Collector R/W W)'
mp I I I Collector width 44' B -B
Future lot size 12,0(1) sr
— — — Future lol width 75'
LAND OWNRR,
ti I Fabian Sadowski
15237 NE 145111 St.
Olscgo. MN 53330
A-1 (441-2328)
DEVELOPER:
33 Lots h. 2— I — — I Nrd Krzweland Diak
I' 20141 land Dcv. Co.
Lnkc llcl MI Tr.
Likcvillc, MN 55110(0(
� (714,5-5gA1)
CIVIL FINGINEER,
I I Petcr Knocblc. PE
Tcrra Engineering, list.
(A)I Glenwood Avc.
Mpls.. MN 55422
I(517- 932 f)
SITS FDAD I
a° I Sitc area m 120 0(e.
PON'
Scc. 22 h 27; Twp. 121; Ranby 13
— I29 Lot PIi. 3 I
— �— CONCEPT PLAN
I 12/2/96
1" = 300'
A-1. A-1
\
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. DAVID LICHT, CITY PLANNER Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:302M
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
6.3. Richard Kincanon and Dennis Chuba of Heritage Landing
Development, 19276 Vernon St, Elk River, MN 55330. Owner is Alvin F
and Germaine Beaudry, 12900 - 77TH ST NE, Otsego, MN for PID #'s 118-
500-213100, property located on 85TH ST SW of Odean Ave NE, in Section
21, Twp 121, R23. Request is as follows:
A. Rezone property from A-1 (General Agricultural) to R-3,
(Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area).
BACKGROUND:
This is a rezoning request from A-1, General Ag to B-3, Residential
Immediate Urban Service Area. The Planning Commission, at their
Meeting of December 18, 1996 voted unanimously to rezone this
property, after Hearing one residents concerns of traffic and safety
on 85TH Street. See attached report from NAC and Findings of Fact.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Rezone this property from A-1, General Agricultural to B-3,
Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area.
Thank you,
4/� .
Elaine
DEC -19-1996 09.21 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02i07
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IN RE:
REZONING
APPROVAL
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Mr. Richard Kincanon and Dennis Chuba on behalf of Heritage Landing
Development, Inc. to rezone the following described land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural
Sery ice Area Zoning District designation to an R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service
Area zoning designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
On 23 December 1996, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Heritage Landing Development to rezone the above described
land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning District designation to an R-3,
Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area zoning designation. Based upon the
application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the evidence received,
the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant Is requesting a rezoning of the following described property from an
A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning District designation to an R-3,
Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area zoning designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
2. The subject property lies within the City's designated Immediate Urban Service
Area.
DEC -19-1996 09:22 NAC 612 595 9837 P.03i07
3. Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and
City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the requested rezoning.
The seven effects and the findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and
provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Land Use Plan which
suggests low density residential use of the subject property. The proposed
use is also consistent with a specific policy of the Comprehensive Plan which
encourages infill development.
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of
the area.
The proposed use is compatible with present and future land uses of the
area.
C. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards
contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
As a condition of subdivision approval and building permit issuance, the
proposed use shall be required to meet applicable performance standards
of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed rezoning and low density residential use will not adversely
affect the subject area.
e. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which
it is proposed.
While no specific study has been conducted, similar situations indicate that
the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect property values in the subject
area.
f. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of
streets serving the property.
Traffic generated from the rezoning will be within the capabilities of 85th
Street which serve the property.
2
DEC -19-1996 09:22 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04i07
g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, streets, utilities, and its potential to overburden the
City's service capacity.
The rezoning and resulting land use will not overburden the City's service
capacity.
4. The planning report dated 5 December 1996, prepared by Northwest Associated
Consultants, Inc. is incorporated herein.
5. On 18 December 1996, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing to consider the proposed rezoning preceded by published and mailed
notice. Upon review of the rezoning application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City
Council approve the rezoning based on the aforementioned findings.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request
to rezone that property legally described in attached Exhibit A from An A-1, Agricultural
Rural Service Area Zoning District designation to an R73, Residential, Immediate Urban
Service Area zoning designation is approved in its present form.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23rd day of December 1996.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Norman F. Freske, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
3
DEC -19-1996 09:23 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05/07
j FGAL• DESCRIPTION
North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21 in Township 121. Range 23, EXCEPT
THEREFROM: a 15 acre tract in the North Half of the southwest Quarter of Section 21,
Township 121, Range 23, described as follows: The North 990.00 feet of the East 650.00 feet
of soid Southwest Quarter more particularly described to -wit: Beginning at the Northeast
corner of said Soouthwest Quarter of Section 21; thence West along the North line of said
Southwest Quorter 660.00 feet; thence Southerly parallel with the East line of said Southwest
Quarter 990.00 feet; thence Easterly parallel 'with the North line of said Southwest Quarter
650.00 feet to the East line of said Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly 990.00 feet more or
less to the point of beginning.
Containing 62.76 Acres '/-
EXHIBIT A
DEC -19-1996 09:23 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06i07
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The official zoning map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby
amended to change the zoning classification of the following described property:
See Attached Exhibit A
Section 2. The above described property is hereby rezoned from an A-1,
Agricultural Rural Service Zoning District designation to an R-3, Residential Immediate
Urban Service Area District zoning designation.
Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate
change in the official zoning map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning
classification as set forth above.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage
and publication.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 23d day of December 1996.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
ATTEST:
Norman F. Freske, Mayor
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
DEC -19-1996 09:24 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07i07
LECAL DESCRIP DON
North Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 21 in Township 121, Range 23, EXCEPT
THEREFROM: a 15 acre tract in the North Hoff of the southwest Quarter of Section 21,
Township 121, Range 23, described as follows: The North 990.00 feet of the East 660.00 feet
of said Southwest Quarter more particularly described to --wit: Beginning at the Northeast
corner of said Soouthwest Quarter of Section 21; thence West along the North line of said
Southwest Quarter 660.00 feet; thence Southerly parallel with the East line of said Southwest
Quarter 990.00 feet; thence Easterly parallel 'with the North line of said Southwest Quarter
660.00 feet to the East line of said Southwest Quarter; thence Northerly 990.00 feet more or
less to the point of beginning.
Containing 62.76 Acres `/-
EXHIBIT A
TOTAL P.0?
NF,mc
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RE5EArck.n
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
Otsego Planning Commission
FROM: Bob Kirmis / David Licht
DATE: 5 December 1996
RE: Otsego - Beaudry Property Rezoning:
FILE NO: 176.02 - 96.25
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Heritage Landing Development
Background
Mr. Richard Kincanon and Mr. Dennis Chuba,
on behalf of Heritage Landing Development,
have requested a rezoning of a 65 acre tract of land located Residen8al immediate to U ban
5th Street and west
of Odean Avenue from A-1, Agricultural Rural Service to R 3and is
Service. The subject site currently lies within the immediate urb n ser i endre pursue
bounded on all sides by platteda late rdaial te.subdivision The applicants
subdivision of the property
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A:-
Site Location
Exhibit B:
Detailed Site Location/Zoning
Exhibit C:
Land Use Plan
Recommendation
Matters of land use appropriateness are considered policy ehe s ve Plan (Land Use Plan
),
City officials. Based on current City policy and the Comprehensive
li ant's rezoning request. Should the
however, justification does exist to approve the app
City determine that low density residential use of the subject property is appropriate, our
T LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 S
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
office would recommend approval of the requested rezoning of the property from A-1.,
Agricultural Rural Service to R-2, Residential Immediate Urban Service.
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Rezoning Judgement Criteria. As noted previously, the subject site is currently zoned
A-1, Agricultural Rural Service District which allows one single family residential dwelling
unit per forty acres of land. To accommodate single family residential development (upon
one plus acre lots) over the entire parcel, a rezoning of the property to an R-3, Residential
Immediate Urban Service area designation is necessary.
In consideration of rezoning requests, Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs
the City Council and Planning Commission to consider the possible adverse effects of the
proposed amendment. Their judgement should be based upon, but not limited to, the
following factors:
1. The proposed actions consistency with the specific policies and provisions
of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
As shown on attached Exhibit C, the City's Land Use Plan suggests low density
residential use of the subject property. The subject property also lies within the
City's immediate urban service area in which "infill" development is encouraged.
It should be noted that a premise of the current Comprehensive Plan is the future
extension of sanitary sewer service from Elk River. Without such service
availability, genuine concern exists in regard to the continued allowance of
unsewered lots within the City which are not consistent with sanitary sewer planning
efforts. Of particular concern is the impact of such uses on the City's ground water
supply. Such continuance will need to be carefully examined as part of the
Comprehensive Plan's Update efforts. As it presently exists, however, the
proposed use is consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the
area.
In considering the compatibility of the proposed use, it is considered beneficial to
examine land uses (and zoning designations) which surround the subject site. The
following is a listing of such uses and zoning designations.
2
As shown above, the subject property ert is surrounded on all sides by platted
p
residential subdivisions. Exceptingas
development to the north,
all
lld surrounding
5 acre
ro
residential developments exhibit one acre lots (property Y to north
lots).
the proposed use is considered
In review of surrounding residential uses,
compatible with present and future land uses in the area.
3
The proposed uses conformity with all performance standards contained
herein.
ate subdivision approval, the proposed use will be required
As a condition of ultim
to comply with all applicable performance standards including, but not limited to, R-
3 and Shoreland Overlay District provisions.
4. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed use is not expected to adversely affect the area in which it is
proposed.
5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is
proposed.
n conducted,
the proposed use is not expected to
While no detailed study has bee
negatively impact area property values. To be specifically noted is that the subject
P
roperty is bounded by "mobile home subdivisions
con's d
moderate to low value (less
than $40,000 per 1990 Comprehensive erat on of the City's current
p Plan). In
single family dwelling standards, it is expected that
homes dineructed upon the
subject property would greatly exceed the value of
surroun
$
Use
Zoning
Direction
R-2
North
Single Family Residential
(Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates)
South
Single Family Residential
R-3
(Walesch Estates)
Single Family Residential
R-3
East
(Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates)
West
Single Family Residential
R-3
(Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates)
As shown above, the subject property ert is surrounded on all sides by platted
p
residential subdivisions. Exceptingas
development to the north,
all
lld surrounding
5 acre
ro
residential developments exhibit one acre lots (property Y to north
lots).
the proposed use is considered
In review of surrounding residential uses,
compatible with present and future land uses in the area.
3
The proposed uses conformity with all performance standards contained
herein.
ate subdivision approval, the proposed use will be required
As a condition of ultim
to comply with all applicable performance standards including, but not limited to, R-
3 and Shoreland Overlay District provisions.
4. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed use is not expected to adversely affect the area in which it is
proposed.
5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is
proposed.
n conducted,
the proposed use is not expected to
While no detailed study has bee
negatively impact area property values. To be specifically noted is that the subject
P
roperty is bounded by "mobile home subdivisions
con's d
moderate to low value (less
than $40,000 per 1990 Comprehensive erat on of the City's current
p Plan). In
single family dwelling standards, it is expected that
homes dineructed upon the
subject property would greatly exceed the value of
surroun
$
6. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets
serving the property.
Undoubtedly, an increase in traffic generation will result from the development of
the subject property. The vast majority of such traffic would utilize 85th Street which
borders the property one the north. According to the Institute of Transportation
Engineers, a detached single family generates approximately 10.0 vehicle trips per
day. Assuming the subject 65 acre property may accommodate 50 single family
dwellings, a total of 500 vehicle trips per day could be expected. Such traffic is
within the capabilities of 85th Street (a collector street) which is being considered
for upgrade in 1997.
7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, street and utilities and its potential to overburden
the City's service capacity.
The proposed use will increase service demands. Such demands shall, however,
be lessened through the imposition of park/trail and storm water impact fees.
Considering that the proposed use constitutes infill development and maybe
adequately served by 85th Street, the proposed use is not expected to overburden
the City's service capacity.
Sanitary Sewer Planning. As noted previously, the City's existing Comprehensive Plan
is based on a premise that future sanitary sewer service would be extended from the City
of Elk River. Since the plan's adoption, however, the City of Elk River has indicated that
such service will not be made available. As a consequence, the City of Otsego has
initiated efforts to study the possibility of jointly constructing a waste water treatment plant
in the southeast area of the community (with the City of Dayton). Recognizing the relative
uncertainty of the sanitary sewer issue, the lack of a definitive sewer plan and the potential
ground water pollution problems associated with unsewered one acre development, some
question exists as to the advisability of continuing to allow such development within the
City at this time. Pending the resolution of this matter, the possible establishment of a
development moratorium should not be disregarded by City officials.
CONCLUSION
Matters regarding land use appropriateness are considered City policy decisions to be
determined by City officials. Considering, however, that the subject property lies within the
immediate urban service area, the proposed use is consistent with the Land Use Plan
(existing) and that development of the subject site would constitute "infill" development,
justification does exist to approve the rezoning request.
4
pc: Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
Heritage Landing Development
R ys
1. lffil�m
r 6
s1. ML p /�
!T.
ti cz
Cm "KL/ ` — } 4-� I �` ewe IT. � i r'
INS * J Y r-{ 3 -- �►� i L
PLL
/rr,
<::::::
IS I�`'�
r1 Z
� � I t R. \fir � � ; � ■
r _
1E 711r n
y
A J
r
I
c z w K (KL row IT.) no.
111. row T711[ZT
EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATION/ZONIN
co
Co
Otsego,
rMinninenfn
......... .
.
7
1
15
14
4
18
.....
.
—P CATL
92-3 $T
i
and
SEPTEMBER 1989
cenic DistrictBounJary
M
NOTL 7"S W.' 15 FIA KAJ...G
rLso-osts cKv NO UCL"
WT " Lwo .nl. cw
z ...
..........
BASE MAP SOURCE
67th ST
..........
22
23
24
1�1 9
35 65ti, S
?,Sth ST
3
—E2rj S_
011
"d ST.
...........
...........
BM ST
50th ST
X
.... .
...............
77th ST
X,
:. . x.
77th ST
........
.......
............
-27
75th ST 25
4 30
29
.........
........
ST
26
M
.....
. t:...:
..........
•
................
...........
..........
...................
.......... ........
70th ST
70th ST
70th ST
1 2 2
67th ST
I
5
_-,36
31
32
3
34 1
ST
T
RIC
1h,
Y
Otsego,
rMinninenfn
62nd ST
60th ST rc
Agricultural Highway Commercial (134 ac.)
Low Density Residential Industrial (536. ac.) -
Land Use PREPARED BY:
Plan
Park/Public Facility
Medium/High Density Residential (229 ac.)
Neighborhood Commercial m m Land uses dependent upon Hwy. orthwest
FN
101 upgrade and sewer availibility Associated Inc.-
Consultants,
1
.5 0
SCALE IN MILES
—P CATL
SEPTEMBER 1989
NOTL 7"S W.' 15 FIA KAJ...G
rLso-osts cKv NO UCL"
WT " Lwo .nl. cw
A.L.1
BASE MAP SOURCE
WWW COu4Ty
9-RVEYORS OFFICE 7-2589
35 65ti, S
3
—E2rj S_
011
62nd ST
60th ST rc
Agricultural Highway Commercial (134 ac.)
Low Density Residential Industrial (536. ac.) -
Land Use PREPARED BY:
Plan
Park/Public Facility
Medium/High Density Residential (229 ac.)
Neighborhood Commercial m m Land uses dependent upon Hwy. orthwest
FN
101 upgrade and sewer availibility Associated Inc.-
Consultants,
ON THE GREAT RIVER ROAD
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
ION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
7. ANDY Mac Arthur, CITY ATTORNEY: Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:302M
n v . n r•
ITEM NUMBER: 1'i'LM rZ% rru i —.
7.1. Information Re: Special Assessments of unpaid amounts charged
for false alarm calls in the Monticello Fire Service area (Cont. from
12/9/96)
A. Consider Ord. for false alarm charges to be redrafted with
recommend changes by Attorney
B. Consider approval of Monticello Fire Service Contract (Cont.
from last Agenda).
BACKGROUND:
Two meetings ago, the Council asked the City Attorney to check into
the legalities of this Ordinance and if it could be put on Special
Assessment. At the last meeting the Council noted the contract would
need to be changed and suggested that the City Attorney contact
Monticello and get their approval of the suggested changes and that
the Ordinance be changed as recommended.
STAFF RECOIy MMDATION :
Attached is the Ordinance for review, which has the suggested changes
and Andy MacArthur has called Rick Wolfsteller, Adm. for Monticello to
get them to redraft the Fire Contract with the proposed changes.
If you agree with the changes, recommendation is to approve.
Thank you,
c� 91&
Elaine
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF OTSEGO ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO DEFECTIVE OR
MALFUNCTIONING EMERGENCY ALARM SYSTEMS WITHIN THE CITY
OF OTSEGO.
It is hereby ordained by the City Council of the City of Otsego, County of Wright, State
of Minnesota as follows:
Any false alarm call to an individual, or business that, in the opinion of the Monticello
Fire Chief, was the result of a defective or malfunctioning alarm system will receive a
notice outlining this policy, indicating a second false alarm call within the calendar year
will subject the property owner to a $100.00 charge. The notice will also indicate that
three or more false alarms during the calendar year will result in the property owner
being charged $250.00 for each additional false alarm.
Any unpaid service charge shall be placed as a special assessment against the property
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 429.101, after proper notice and hearing.
Adopted this day of , 19
CITY OF OTSEGO:
Norman F Freske, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
(City Seal)
William S. Radzwill
Andrew J. MacArthur
Michael C. Court
Megan M. McDonald
December 19, 1996
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
Monticello City Hall
250 Broadway East
Monticello, MN 55362
RADZWILL & CO URI
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Boz 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
RE: Monticello- Otsego Fire Contract
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller,
VIA FACSIMILE AND
U.S. MAIL
The Otsego City Council has reviewed the proposed fire contract
with the Joint Fire Department. They have also reviewed the
proposed ordinance for false alarms and will pass the same with
changes necessitated by the fact that the City's authority to
assess service charges comes from a different statute, Minn. Stat.
429.101.
Because of this necessary assessment procedure, the City is willing
to assess for the charges and provide to the Joint Fire Department
whatever amounts are paid off as they are collected, however, they
are unwilling to bear responsibility for all such charges unpaid
after a certain date, as set forth in the proposed contract.
The City would propose changing Article IV, D of the proposed
agreement to read as follows: "Any false alarm charge billed
directly to an individual or business by the Joint Fire Department
under this Agreement that remains unpaid shall be referred to the
City by September 15 for assessment proceedings. Upon payment of
the amount unpaid and assessed to the City, the City shall transmit
that amount to the Joint Fire Department."
I discussed this matter with you yesterday by telephone and
indicated that you did not see any problem with the proposed
change. If this is the case, could you please make the requested
change and provide the City of Otsego with a corrected Fire
Contract so that they can review and possibly act upon it at their
meeting on Monday, December 23.
Letter to Rick Wolfsteller
December 19, 1996
Page—2
If you have any.questions or concerns please feel free to contact
me.
Very truly yours,
Andrew J; MacArthur
RADZWILL & COURI
cc: City of Otsego
||�
§
Rm9E HILLS
_� m
a@aAamw
A�m Orver
Z t %.1E
_ } 3 h,
`
DEK
'
�:
,
e \
PRELIMINARY &#
/ _. __
\
_`,
MONTICELLO
Office of the City Administrator
250 East Broadway December 20, 1996
Monticello, MN 55362-9245
Phone: (612) 295-2711
Metro: (612) 333-5739
Ms. Elaine Beatty
City Clerk
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Re: Revised fire contract
Dear Elaine:
nt ? 3
Your City Attorney, Andrew MacArthur, had requested that the fire contract between the Joint Fire
Board and the City of Otsego be revised to include different language regarding the assessment
procedures for unpaid false alarm charges. I do not have a problem with the new language as
proposed and I am enclosing a copy of the new contract that should address your concerns.
If this new language is acceptable, I will forward additional copies of the contract that have been
signed by the joint fire department representatives. At that time you may sign all three copies and
keep one for your records.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at your convenience.
Sincerely,
CITY OF MONTICELLO
(1 -4 d , N.W
Rick Wolfstelle
City Administrator
RW/glk
cc: Fire department contract file
This AGREEMENT between the City and Township of Monticello, Minnesota, hereafter referred
to as the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT, and the City of Otsego, hereafter referred to whether in
whole or in part as the CITY, both agree as follows:
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT agrees to furnish fire service and fire protection to all
properties subject to the terms of this agreement, within the CITY area, said area being set forth
in EXHIBIT A, attached hereto.
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT will make a reasonable effort to attend all fires within the
CITY area upon notification of such fire or fires, and under the direction of the JOINT FIRE
DEPARTMENT fire chief, subject to the following terms and conditions:
A. Road and weather conditions must be such that the fire run can be made with
reasonable safety to the firemen and equipment of the JOINT FIRE
DEPARTMENT. The decision of the fire chief or other officer in charge of the fire
department at the time that the fire run cannot be made with reasonable safety to
firemen and equipment shall be final.
B. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall not be liable to the CITY for the loss or
damage of any kind whatever resulting from any failure to furnish or any delay in
furnishing firemen or fire equipment, or from any failure to prevent, control, or
extinguish any fire, whether such loss or damage is caused by the negligence of the
officers, agents, or employees of the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT or its fire
department, or otherwise.
The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT further agrees:
A. To keep and maintain in good order at its own expense the necessary equipment
and fire apparatus for fire service and fire protection within the town area so
serviced.
B. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT shall provide sufficient manpower in its fire
department to operate fire equipment.
D. The JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT will submit a summary to the City of all fires on
a monthly basis.
PROTECT.AGR: 12/20/96 Page 1
The CITY agrees:
A. " " To pay an annual fee of $35 for each tax identification parcel as determined by the
Otsego City Assessor and/or Wright County Auditors office for years 1997 through
1999. These fees shall include all standby charges and fire call costs. The total
annual fee for the first year of this contract is estimated to be $6,650.00 based on
an estimated 190 parcels @ $35 each. The annual fee shall be adjusted for years
1998 and 1999 at the same $35.00 rate per parcel for additional parcels added
within coverage area.
B. Annual fee shall be paid as follows:
prior to January 1 of each year - 25%
prior to April 1 of each year - 25%
prior to July 1 of each year - 25%
prior to October 1 of each year - 25%
C. Any false alarm call to an individual or business that, in the opinion of the
Monticello Fire Chief, was the result of a defective or malfunctioning alarm system
will receive a written notice outlining this policy, indicating a second false alarm
call within the calendar year will subject the property owner to a $100 charge. The
notice will also indicate that three or more false alarms during the calendar year
will result in the property owner being charged $250 for the alarm call.
D. Any false alarm charge billed directly to an individual or business by the Joint Fire
Department under this agreement that remains unpaid shall be referred to the City
by September 15 for assessment proceedings. Upon payment of the amount unpaid
and assessed to the City, the City shall transmit that amount to the Joint Fire
Department.
E. All payments must be made in accordance with this schedule to render this
agreement effective for each calendar year of the contract.
In case an emergency arises within the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT while equipment and
personnel of the fire department are engaged in fighting a fire within the CITY area, calls shall
be answered in the order of their receipt unless the fire chief or other officer in charge of the fire
department at the time otherwise directs. In responding to fire calls within the CITY area, the
fire chief or other officer in charge shall dispatch only such personnel and equipment as in his
opinion can be safely spared from the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT.
PROTECT.AGR: 12/20/96 Page 2
In cases where the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT receives a notification of an emergency other
than a fire, and its assistance is requested in the area defined in Exhibit A of this contract, it
shall respond to such emergency in the same manner as a fire as outlined in this contract.
Charges for. such service shall be as outlined in ARTICLE VI.
The CITY agrees to make a fire protection tax levy or otherwise to provide funds each year in an
amount sufficient to pay the JOINT FIRE DEPARTMENT the compensation agreed upon.
This AGREEMENT shall be in force for a term of three (3) years beginning on January 1, 1997,
and ending on the 31st day of December, 1999. This contract may be terminated upon a six-
month notice by either party.
CITY OF MONTICELLO
By:
Mayor
Atte
Clerk
Signed this day of
1996.
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
By:
Chairperson
Attest:
Clerk
Signed this day of
, 1996.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
Signed this day of
1996.
PROTECT.AGR: 12/20/96 Page 3
EXHIBIT A
This EXHIBIT is a part of the attached FIRE PROTECTION AGREEMENT, and its purpose is
to designate the area covered under this AGREEMENT and referred to herein as the CITY area.
Therefore, the CITY area in which protection for fires is agreed to involves the following sections
of the CITY herein: (SEE ATTACHED MAPS)
Range (Unplatted Areas)
Section 10
Section 11
Section 14
Section 15
Section 22
Section 23
N1/2 of Section 27
Plata:
Billstroms Riverview Addition
Island View Estates
Arrowhead Estates
Riverwood PUD
TOTAL NO. OF PARCELS
At $35.00 per Parcel = $6,755.00
CITY OF MONTICELLO
I:5
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
TOWNSHIP OF MONTICELLO
By:
Chairperson
Attest:
Clerk
193
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Mayor
Attest:
Clerk
PROTECT.AGR: 12/20/96 Page 4
CITY OF OTSEGO
REOT TEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
7. ANDY Mac Arthur, CITY ATTORNEY: Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESC:K-LPTiUN: rtsi:
7.1. Information Re: Special Assessments of unpaid amounts charged
for false alarm calls in the Monticello Fire Service area (Cont. from
12/9/96)
A. Consider Ord. for false alarm charges to be redrafted with
recommend changes by Attorney
B. Consider approval of Monticello Fire Service Contract (Cont.
from last Agenda).
BACKGROUND:
Two meetings ago, the Council asked the City Attorney to check into
the legalities of this Ordinance and if it could be put on Special
Assessment. At the last meeting the Council noted the contract would
need to be changed and suggested that the City Attorney contact
Monticello and get their approval of the suggested changes and that
the Ordinance be changed as recommended.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Attached is the Ordinance for review, which has the suggested changes
and Andy MacArthur has called Rick Wolfsteller, Adm. for Monticello to
get them to redraft the Fire Contract with the proposed changes.
If you agree with the changes, recommendation is to approve.
Thank you,
Elaine
ORDINANCE NO.
CITY OF OTSEGO ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO DEFECTIVE OR
MALFUNCTIONING EMERGENCY ALARM SYSTEMS WITHIN THE CITY
OF OTSEGO.
It is hereby ordained by the City Council of the City of Otsego, County of Wright, State
of Minnesota as follows:
Any false alarm call to an individual, or business that, in the opinion of the Monticello
Fire Chief, was the result of a defective or malfunctioning alarm system will receive a
notice outlining this policy, indicating a second false alarm call within the calendar year
will subject the property owner to a $100.00 charge. The notice will also indicate that
three or more false alarms during the calendar year will result in the property owner
being charged $250.00 for each additional false alarm.
Any unpaid service charge shall be placed as a special assessment against the property
pursuant to Minn. Stat. 429.101, after proper notice and hearing.
Adopted this day of 119
CITY OF OTSEGO:
Norman F Freske, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk
(City Seal)
William S. Radzwill
Andrew J. MacArthur
Michael C. Court
Megan M. McDonald
December 19, 1996
Mr. Rick Wolfsteller
City Administrator
City of Monticello
Monticello City Hall
250 Broadway East
Monticello, MN 55362
RADZWILL & CO URI
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(612) 497-2599 (FAX)
RE: Monticello- Otsego Fire Contract
Dear Mr. Wolfsteller,
VIA FACSIMILE AND
U.S. MAIL
The Otsego City Council has reviewed the proposed fire contract
with the Joint Fire Department. They have also reviewed the
proposed ordinance for false alarms and will pass the same with
changes necessitated by the fact that the City's authority to
assess service charges comes from a different statute, Minn. Stat.
429.101.
Because of this necessary assessment procedure, the City is willing
to assess for the charges and provide to the Joint Fire Department
whatever amounts are paid off as they are collected, however, they
are unwilling to bear responsibility for all such charges unpaid
after a certain date, as set forth in the proposed contract.
The City would propose changing Article IV, D of the proposed
agreement to read as follows: "Any false alarm charge billed
directly to an individual or business by the Joint Fire Department
under this Agreement that remains unpaid shall be referred to the
City by September 15 for assessment proceedings. Upon payment of
the amount unpaid and assessed to the City, the City shall transmit
that amount to the Joint Fire Department."
I discussed this matter with you yesterday by telephone and
indicated that you did not see any problem with the proposed
change. If this is the case, could you please make the requested
change and provide the City of Otsego with a corrected Fire
Contract so that they can review and possibly act upon it at their
meeting on Monday, December 23.
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
7. ANDY MAC ARTHUR, CITY ATTORNEY Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
7.2. Discussion of Petition for Local Improvement (88TH ST NE) MRD
Commercial Park
BACKGROUND:
This Petition is a result of the lot split for Ensminger in MRD
Commercial Park. The Council Required the road be extended. See
attached petition.
STAFF RECOWENDATION:
Andy MacArthur will be here to explain the process for this petition
and local improvement.
Thank you,
Elaine
Petition For Local Improvement
(100 percent of property owners)
Otsego, Minnesota November 19, 1996
To the City Council of Otsego, Minnesota:
Re: Request for a Roadway Feasibility Study,
MRD Commercial Park, 2nd Addition,(see attached)
We, all owners or real property abutting on N. E. 88th Street along
the North side of proposed Lot 1, Block 1, MRD Commercial Park
Second Addition, hereby petitions for a City initiated project
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes to:
(1.) Construct of roadway & drainage extension of N. E. 88th
Street approximately 430 LF Eastward, to the proposed
Quaday Avenue.
(2.) The use of MSA funds for the project.
(3.) The entire remaining costs be assessed to the abutting
property owners..
Signature of Owners.
1. Outlot A, MRD Commercial Park, 2nd Addition
zv'r"" 4 , =PI
ary R. Dare
2. Christ Lutheran Church of Elk River
by
3. Roger L. Ensminger Christine W. Ensminger
Examined, checked and found to be in proper form and to be signed
by the required number of owners of property affected by
the;making of the improvement petitioned for.
City Clerk
We fiurther request waiver of Public Hearing.
FROM : CITY OF OTSEGO
OCT. 2. 1996 9:16AM P20
PHONE NO. : 612 441 441.3
..
..
....
r
r
......
,o,a n,;a
.�...
88th STREET ,
�r�wwwww r �'
♦
t am
� `
r nrsr as tnr.
h-- s.
�' � F'
17
•� j �
PROVIDE SEPARA
ON•Ir utt
•mxp x4wo $WA
SIDEWALK AND/OilSPL—ArMN
-
:
i
PROYIDE PERIME�
; �1III/ y mz'
POSTPONE
DRIVEWAY
VaR'
GONSaUCTIO'N•
�
���_ =
t
'''
•
LZ
J ..
..........
27 1100 It fM')w„� _
`—...�1 r�sva.• —ins — �'
• _
�`�
PROVIDE,Y ADDITIONAL HANDICAP
STALL
EXHIBIT G- SUGGESTED SITE PLAN MODIFICATIONS
City of Otsego
Engineer's Agenda Items
City Council Meeting
December 23, 1996
8.1 ANNUAL CERTIFICATION OF MILEAGE FOR MUNICIPAL STATE AID
Mileage Certification is required to be done annually and is important to Otsego
MSA program. Two conditions, population and certified mileage, dictate the
amount of monies appropriated to the City for Funding. Population is now
adjusted each year by the State Demographer and every ten years by the
Census. Mileage Certification and the formula to determine the eligible MSA
mileage provides the "needs" amount which establishes that portion of the
appropriation.
Normally, the only additions the City has to the system are the streets added
through development. This year the City had an annexation and detachment
along with development. Attached to this packet are copies of our calculations
for the Certification. No action is necessary by the Council since this is a
required submittal. The Certification for this year determined that the City has
about a '/2 mile that needs to be designated MSA. The Council needs to
consider which streets to add to the system. We will need to do this in late
January or early February 1997, preferably at a workshop since that decision
needs to be submitted by March 15, 1997.
8.2 ANY OTHER ENGINEERING BUSINESS
agenda12.23
Item 8.2
I hereby certify that a tai Improved Mile go (CoI.XI. Line 7 + 11) in the Municipality of
Signed
Otsego
Title City Engineer
llakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 Is
Date l0Z 90�
101.58
Miles.
Municipal h 9
Revisions During
Municipi age 11
as of Dec. 31, J95 I
Current Year ( + or
-) "
as of Dec.... , 1996 '
ANNUAL CERTIFICATION
�,
>
_
�,
>
OF MILEAGE
Z 'X
E
a
-
° �
z
n
E
n.
�
Z
�
E
°
n
LU
f°
E
c
E
See enclosed Instructions
c
E
C:
Record revisions on back of form
IIS
IV
L V
VI
VII
VILI
X'
X _
- XI XI
MILEAGE
NOT CONSIDERED
IN
THE COMPUTATION
OF BASIC MILEAGE
--
--
6.60
6.60
--
--
0.10
0.10
--
--
6.70
6.70
1. Trunk Highways
2. Trunk Highway Turnbacks
--
--
--
(Designated as MSAS - mileage above 20%)
-_
3. County State Aid Highways
--
--
25.50
25.50
--
- _
1.33
1.33
__
__
26.83
26.83
(Exclude mileage designated as MSAS)
4. County State Aid Highway Turnbacks
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
(Designated as MSAS - mileage above 20%)
5. County Road Turnbacks
--
--
--
--
(Designated as MSAS - mileage above 20%)
- -
--
--
--
--
--
--
6. County Municipal State Aid Streets
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
(Jointlydesignated - Count State Aid & MSAS)
7. Total Mileage of Line 1 Thru 6 Previous 32. lU
-F
ju m -1 1.43
Adjustment
33.53
Current =
BASIC MILEAGE:
MILEAGE CONSIDERED IN THE
COMPUTATION OF ALLOWABLE MILEAGE
8. Municipal State Aid Streets
2.78
--
10.12
13.08
0. 18
--
--
--
2.96
__
10.12
13.08
(Exclude Trunk and Count Highway Turnbacks)
9. County Roads
0.74
0.74
--
0.74
0.74
Exclude mileage designated MSAS
10. Other Local Roads And Streets - not designated
--
--
55.65
55.65
--
--
1.54
1.54
--
--
57.19
57.19
(Include T.N. & CSAH frontage roads)
66.51 (+ or 1.54 68.05
11. Total Improved Basic Mileage (Total Ilne 8+9+10) Previous Adjustment = Current =
0.20
12. Percentage Limitation Allowed by Statute X
13. MAXIMUM MILEAGE ALLOWED FOR M.S.A.S. DESIGNATIONS (Col XI, Line 12 Times Line 11). 13.61
14, Total Municipal State Aid Street Designated (Colum XII, Line 2 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 8) . 13.08
n/a n/a
15. Total MSAS One -Way Street Mileage Included In Col. XII, Line 6 & 8 . Mlles Divided By 2 = (-)
(Only If considered as 1/2 Mileage - per Screening Board approval)
n/a
16. Total Mlles of T.H. & County Turnbacks Designated as MSAS Above 20% (Col. XII Line 2 + 4 + 5). I 1
17. Mileage designated MSAS - not Including One -Way 112 Mileage, T.H. and C.R. Turnback mileage (Line 14 minus Line 15 & 16). 13.08
18. Municipal State Aid Street Mileage Over/Under Maximum Allowed. (Line 13 minus line 17. 0.53
I hereby certify that a tai Improved Mile go (CoI.XI. Line 7 + 11) in the Municipality of
Signed
Otsego
Title City Engineer
llakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
as of December 31, 1996 Is
Date l0Z 90�
101.58
Miles.
JAN. 1 TO DEC. 31, 1996
MUNICIPAUTY Otsego
REVISIONS DURING CURRENT YEAR
MUNICIPAL STATE AID STREETS
Route
Number
Original
Miles
MILEAGE CHANGE + OR -
Revised
or new
Miles
Date
of
Change
Reason
Indicate if
Needs were
Received
in 1996
Non-
Existing
Un-
improved
Improved
( Total
�
101
3.15
--
__
3 15
--
--
--
102
2.28
--
--
--
I --
2.28
--
--
--
103
0.50
--
--
--
--
0.50
--
--
--
104
1.92
--
--
--
--
I 1.92
--
I --
'-
105
2.26
--
--
--
--
2.26
--
--
Yes
106
0.84
--
--
--
--
0.84
--
I --
--
107
1.95
0.18
--
--
--
2.13
--
--
--
T__T
12.90
0,18
--
--
--
13.08
TOTAL NET CHANGE
COUNTY ROADS or COUNTY STATE AID HIGHWAYS
TRUNK HIGHWAYS
TOTAL NET CHANGE
TOTAL NET CHANGE
City of,Otsego
MSA Mileage Certification for Changes in 1996
1/21/96 KPK
INCREASE IN MILEAGE FROM FORMER FRANKFORT TOWNSHIP
Trunk Highway Mileage
Route Lineal Feet Mileage
HWY 101(1/2 of total) 2039 0.39
CSAH Mileage
Route Lineal Feet Mileage
CSAH36 9669 1.83
Local Mileage
Route
57th Street
Quilley Avenue & 56th
Street
Queens Avenue & 60th
Street
Quenroe Avenue, 59th
Street & 58th Street
Lineal Feet Mileage
471 0.09
3004 0.57
3573 0.68
3263 0.62
LOCAL TOTALS 10311 1.95
City of Otsego
MSA Mileage Certification for Changes
in 1996
11/21/96 KPK
DECREASE IN MILEAGE DUE TO ALBERTVILLE ANNEXATION
Trunk Highway Mileage
Route
Lineal Feet
Mileage
1-94
1508
0.29
CSAH Mileage
Route
Lineal Feet
Mileage
CSAH37
1324
0.25
CSAH19
1330
0.25
CSAH TOTALS
2654
0.50
Local Mileage (All Are 1/2 of Total)
Route
Lineal Feet
Mileage
Kadler Avenue
2617
0.50
MacIver Avenue
1325
0.25
70th Street
5254
1.00
LOCAL TOTALS
9196
1.74
City of Otsego
MSA Mileage Certification for Changes in 1996
11/21/96 KP K
INCREASE IN MILEAGE DUE TO LOCAL CONSTRUCTION
Local Mileage
Route
Quam Avenue
Lin -Bar Estates
Ogren Avenue
Sorenson Ridge
Naughtor Avenue,
93rd Street and
Nason Avenue
94th Street
Heritage Plains
O'Brian Avenue
Rivers Glen
92nd Street
LOCAL TOTALS
NET TOTALS
CLASSIFICATION
TRUNK HIGHWAY
CSAH ROUTES
LOCAL ROUTES
Lineal Feet Mileage
1000 0.19
788 0.15
3199 0.61
0.07
950 0.18
713 0.14
6650 1.33
LINEAL
FEET
531
7015
7765
MILEAGE
0.10
1.33
1.54
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
9. COUNCIL ITEMS Elaine Beatty Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:302M
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
9.1. Discussion of letter received from Joan Vasseur - Re:
Snowplowing
BACKGROUND:
The Council voted to discontinue snowplowing of driveways as of
January 1, 1997. This letter is a result of that. Larry Fournier
asked to have this item on for discussion. I want the Council to know
that Dave Chase spent a whole day on that driveway and two vehicles
were stuck. We had a lot of calls because the roads were not plowed
in the normal, timely fashion, because of the equipment being stuck on
this driveway.
STAFF RECObS4ENDATION:
Larry Fournier asked to have this on for discussion. Staff strongly
recommends that snowplowing of driveways not be changed from the
decision that was made. Other Cities do not plow driveways. This is a
job for private contractors. Let them have the job.
Thank you,
Elaine
DEC - 90
December 5, 1996
City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue N.E.
Elk River, MN 55330
Members:
This letter is in response to your letter notifying me of the discontinuance of snowplowing
of private driveways.
It is unreasonable and unconscionable to discontinue such a service in the middle of the
snow season with only 3 weeks notice - a service that I have used for the past 15 years.
It is equivalent to receiving a notice from your electric company notifying you on
December 4th that on January 1 st your electric service will cease. Where would you
receive alternate service? Could you purchase a generator with adequate capacity to
serve your needs? Could you afford such an expense with 3 weeks notice? Could you
survive without this service?
Of course not! Well that's exactly the position we are placed in. I realize you are not a
public utility but you have performed a service with the same critical need We need
adequate notice which should be at the end of the snow season on May 15, 1997.
I think, however, that you also must differentiate between homes and farms, i.e.,
"private driveways" which a small blade would clear and a long farm road such as mine.
Snowblowers, pickups with blades and even tractors with dumps are all inadequate to
clear long farm driveways. Otsego township recognized the need of its rural clientele and
plowed long farm roads for that very reason. I would hope the City would also recognize
this.
I ask that all Council members read this letter and reconsider their action. I await your
written reply. Thank you.
Sincerely
Joan Vasseur
6187 Rawlings Ave.
Rogers, MN 55374
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
11 AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
9. COUNCIL ITEMS
Elaine Beatty
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION:
9.2. Discussion of Memo from Merland Otto Re:
(City) match for trail enhancement projects
Dec. 23, 1996 -
6:30PM
PREPARED BY: EB, CC
ISTEA money for local
BACRGROLM :
See attached information from Merland Otto. This may be a way to have
a grant and not have to match the grant with City monies. This is
for the Council to Discuss.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
This is a Council Decision as to what should be done.
Thank you,
Elaine
Hdkanson)noka,
3601 Thurston Avenue r-_� 103 Pine Street �Q
Minnesota 55303 Monticello, MN 55362 I
Anderson (612) 427-5860 (612) 295-5800
Ass -6c., Inc. (612) 427-3401 Fax (612) 295-4488 Fax
Memorandum
•CTrTo: Fl. Date:
Subject: Ey q g
Attn: File #:
Narrative:
k�4 LQ
cc:
M
COOPERATIVE TRAIL GRANT PROGRAM
Information Sheet
October 14, 1996
Deadlines/ To receive an application, sponsors must submit an AI)olication Request Form no later than January 31,
Important Dates: 1997. The complete application is due on March 31, 1997 to be eligible for this funding cycle.
Reimbursement grant awards will be announced in August 1997.
Program purpose: The emphasis of this program is to promote trail access between people and desirable destinations, not
to develop significant new recreation facilities. Its primary purpose is to complete trail connections or
remove barriers to use between where people live (e.g., residential areas within cities, and communities)
and significant public recreation facilities (e.g., parks and other trails). Priority will be given to residential
connections to state and regional facilities. A secondarily purpose is to link existing trail segments.
How it works: This program provides reimbursement grants to local units of government for trail development or serves as
a partial local "match" for ISTEA trail Enhancement projects.
Eligible applicants: Cities, counties, and townships.
Minimum Project must result in a trail linkage that is immediately available for use by the general public. There
Requirements: must be demonstrated compatibility of the uses provided by the project proposal with uses provided by
the recreation facility. Local/area support must be demonstrated.
Eligible projects: Land acquisition and trail development However, acquisition of trail right-of-way will only be eligible
when it is proposed in conjunction with trail development
Reimbursement A maximum of fifty percent of the total eligible project costs. Minimum -55,000. Maximum -550,000.
t --nt Amount: —
_I match: 501/6 "hard match" for eligible elements of the project proposal. Neither this funding source nor the
"hard match" can be used for labor services and/or to meet existing payroll (i.e., only contract services,
materials and supplies are reimbursable). Match must not be state funds or Metropolitan Council
G rants.
Project period: Funded projects will need to begin promptly after an agreement as been completed between the State
and the applicant Funding for these projects is only available through December 31, 1999.
Disbursement of funds: Grants are reimbursable. Costs must be Incurred and paid for before reimbursement can takeplace.
Submit Application Recreation Services Section
Request Forms to: Trails and Waterways Unit
Department of Natural Resources
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155-4052
Contacts: Dan Collins
Statewide
612/296-6048
Ardon Belcher
Northwestern MN
218/755-2265
Les 011ila
Northeastern MN
218/3274263
Tim Browning
Central MN
218/828-2693
Craig Mitchell
Southeasten MN
507/285-7176
Dave Wolff
Southwestern MN
507/359-6068
William Johnson Twin Cities Metro Area
612/772-7936
Claims List f. - ;al
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSECO
TOTAL
43
ACCOUNT
I V, 611{r tG1 LVV
lam/ 1/. /U VV lei 1l / 7V
86.00
101-21707-000
86.•^_'
(
23.61
101-43100-220:•
3 1,582.74
101-43100-202
'1.582 i4
3
...
101-431W;220
...
C AI M -.
r
s
^AROL ^.. OLSON
SECTION 125 REIMBURSEMENT
12/17/96
2115
213.00
•
SOUT`! BICE LUMBER COMP"NY
SUPPLIES INV.2110631
12/17/96
2116
Qr
sNAPA
Ul tLK RlVkR INU
PART5 & b
2352.57
•
H G WEBER OIL,,COMPANY
DECEMBER DELIVERIES-�FUEL,
ETC._ 12/17/96
101=41400=123
°$
•
BOYER TRUCKS',
PARTS- INVOICE 540407
12/1746
k01 4310?z123
8$.42,
1
=-. • JPH010UHAPHYJu.
101-43100-400
12/1"
117.16
(
11
BFI - WOODLAKE SANITATION
SERVICE NOVEMBER RECYCLING
12/17/96
2'21
12
AFFORDABLE SANITATION
NOV.-DEC. RENTAL
12/17/96
2.
2
123.65
73
UNLIMXItU tLtUlKIf,;. INC
�:Htr 4H & MAINlLNANQt-lNV.I6VV„•.
63.00
(
14
CORROjk.TPCKING
NOY MBERGYCl.1NCa
1,41 ,,A1600-130 '
101 •43104 130
36.60
`
2
101-43100-373
4,405.40
t.
$0 966.55 ,� ,
30,966.55-
0,966.55-
(
1
17
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE
PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES-
12/17/9
to
PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE
INSURANCE CO. DENTAL 12/15-1/14/97
12/17/9612
8' `
1Oa.
� .�3t�'^ �� �'":.F
';
?•y
21
(
z3
ANDEXXER, INC. HVAC
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE
12/17/96
2
0'
24
TROPHIES PLUS
PLAQUES
12/17/96
2
a
(
s
� .NORTHERN AIRGAS
QX �«t'► �T�e�
y
X196'.
2
�n
!!-TROPOQITAN GRAVEL 'CO 'TNG 3 e �`t
2! „GNU.
+ �
29
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE
PRODUCTS OFICE SUPPLIES -INV. 207311
124.17/96
;
26
30
MINNESOTA MUTUAL
LIFE & STD -JANUARY
12/17/96
2;V7
Z33.
't. _
:t •fir �, ,^?� E�6s b E ;: W e
#
,.:
13
x31
33
WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY
DEPT SALT & SAND-INV.1243
12/17/96
2
9
TOTAL
43
ACCOUNT
ACCOUNT
86.00
101-21707-000
86.•^_'
23.61
101-43100-220:•
3 1,582.74
101-43100-202
'1.582 i4
.s
14.81
101-431W;220
14.81
317.50
101-41610-390
317.50
213.00
101-45200-410
213.00
248.75 ,s•
„.pl-:0. 48.75
w m, b 9,f�.::
'Q6`r79 •',
Qr
06.79`'
2352.57
-161-414007-201
352.57
296.92
101=41400=123
132.63
y 01`-4%60'_123
15.83
k01 4310?z123
8$.42,
321.00
101-43100-400
321.00
117.16
101-41100-310
117.16
zp
'A 55.67'
,
1 43100-243 -
55.67t,
_4 Q -431J0-,24
1,
2Q.45
123.65
101-41400-201
123.65
164.20
101-41400-130
63.00
101 45104-130
36.60
1,41 ,,A1600-130 '
28.00,;,
101 •43104 130
36.60
`
4,405.40
101-43100-373
4,405.40
$0 966.55 ,� ,
30,966.55-
0,966.55-
I
1
CITY OF OTSEGO
CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCES BY FUND
11/30/96
FUND NAME
General
Fire
Park Development
Insurance Reserve
Capital Equipment
Debt Service
Municipal Building
MSA Construction
Watershed Project
Project 94-2 & Odean
Island View 95-01
Mississippi Shores
Municipal Well
GO Improvement Bonds of 1996
Developers Escrow
Builders Escrow
TOTAL CASH & INVESTMENTS - ALL FUNDS
CASH &
INVESTMENT
BALANCE
$ 165,184.20
$
25,170.63
$
(57,714.98)
$
6,649.08
$
(6,050.83)
$
236,839.56
$
130,690.99
$
123,416.49
$
7,871.20
$
(58,683.92)
$
51,042.09
$
48,732.73
$
(3,673.15)
$
87,866.41
$
(15,039.97)
$
8,998.80
$
751,299.33
TO THE COUNCIL:
THIS SCHEDULE SUMMARIZES THE CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCES BY FUND
BASED ON THE INFORMATION IN THE FINANCE SYSTEM OF THE CITY.
I HAVE ALSO ATTACHED AN INVESTMENT SCHEDULE OF THE CITY'S
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO AS OF NOVEMBER 30. PLEASE INDICATE IF YOU WOULD
LIKE ANY OF THIS INFORMATION AND HOW OFTEN. THANK YOU.
GARY
Page 1
CITY OF OTSEGO
INVESTMENT SCHEDULE
FYE 12/31/96
Totals $ 452,733.37 $ 362,808.09 $197,908.68 $ 617,632.78
Smith Barney -Money Funds $120,266.24
Toptal cash & Investments excluding Bank of Elk River $ 737,899.02
Par- 1
Interest
Earned
$1,315.11
$ 776.21
Investment
Purchase Maturity
Balance
1996
1996
Balance
Investment Broker
Type
Date
Date
1/1/96
Purchases
Sales
11/30/96
Edward D. Jones
Lasalle CD
7/14/95
12/2/02
$
22,176.00
$
22,176.00
Edward D. Jones
FHMA
7/14/95
12/10/98
$
98,750.56
$
98,750.56
Smith Barney
MBNA -CD
7/18/95
5/10/99
$
51,274.17
$
51,274.17
Smith Barney
FNMA
7/18/95
3/10/97
$
50,932.95
$
50,932.95
Dain Bosworth
FNMA
7/19/95
4/13/98
$
78,572.81
$
78,572.81
Marquette Bank
CD
7/24/95
1/24/97
$
50,000.00
$
50,000.00
Smith Barney
FNMA
8/2/95
2/18/97
$
49,855.00
$
49,855.00
Smith Barney
FNMA
12/27/95
8/12/98
$
51,171.88
$
51,171.88
Smith Barney
FNMA
7/10/96
5/21/99
$
-
$
50,291.34
$
50,291.34
Edward D. Jones
FHLM
7/19/96
7/9/98
$
-
$
25,080.21
$
25,080.21
Dain Bosworth
FHLB
7/25/96
3/5/01
$
-
$
29,885.87
$
29,885.87
Smith Barney
Comm. P
8/8/96
11/4/96
$
-
$
98,684.89
$ 98,684.89
$
-
Edward D. Jones
T -Bill
8/9/96
10/10/96
$
-
$
99,223.79
$ 99,223.79
$
-
Dain Bosworth
FHLB
10/8/96
3/6/01
$
-
$
59,641.99
$
59,641.99
Totals $ 452,733.37 $ 362,808.09 $197,908.68 $ 617,632.78
Smith Barney -Money Funds $120,266.24
Toptal cash & Investments excluding Bank of Elk River $ 737,899.02
Par- 1
Interest
Earned
$1,315.11
$ 776.21
M'.!NIt IPAI_ OF CITY OF
!r!TFnTM i"lN/',NCI,",L �=ORT
2
GENERAL FUND
sVariance
Favorable
6
z
p u
g g
71c t'T
unTaVOral5l
6
R:;"�aiptz:
91
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
0.00
2,307.40
2,307`.40
„
BLDG PERMIT SU!?CHG PA'f;.BL
0.00
1,569.6C
1,569.68
,2
SALES T X PAYABLE
0.00
=.71.49
671.49
14
PROPERTY TAXES
0.00
333,934.x;5
333,934.85
15
DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAXES
0.00
9,385.88
9,385.88
17
DOG ,_.CENSES-
0.00
145.00
, 0M,.So
145.00
,6
BUILDING PrRMITS
0.00
.39,376.23
39,376.28
20
WETLAND REVIEW FEES'
0.00
21100.00
2,100.00
21
WEIGHT PERMITS
0.0022
70.00
70.04
LUCAL UUVt:j<114mr-ll4l HIL)
.
,446.J
J ,4a
23
HOMESTEAD CREDIT
0.00
70,289.50
70,289.50
24
RECYCLING GRANT/AID
0.00
4,177.21
4,177.21
26
MSA MAINTENANCE
0..00
76,496.00
- 76.,496.0027 �
CHARGES FOR SERVICES -GENERAL
0.00
3,11F>.25
3,116.25 - 1
29
SUBDIVISION FEES
0.00
1,300.00
1,300.00
ZONING/TEXT AMENDMENT FEE
0.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
a,
72
ASSESSMENT/SEPTIC SEARCHES
00
0.00
100.00
- 3,265.00
loo.ou
3,465...00
SNOW PLOWING
0.00
11306.10
1 ,306 ..1.0
„
-J+ J .J r J
TOrO SALES
0.00
4,535.60
4,535.60
36
RECR`ATION FEE`'
0.00
253.00
253.00
J J 1:.
36
INTEREST EARNINGS
C.00.
12,349..69
12,349.69
DONATIONS
0.00
:995.00
995.00
39
40
1. L,. I SITLL)
.4
, Q ... ..
..
41
OLD CITY t-IALL4'PE,'1V`Y !ISE RENT
0.00
3,480.00
8,480.00
42
FRANCHISE FEES
0.00
7 ,0-13 .?4.
7,043.94 .
43
44
CLEAN UP DAY
QQ
0.00
16 . b...
3,344.00
3,344.00
46
REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
0.00.
15,742.14
15,742.14
47
�J Ci i� ir:GE.S
0 C0
0 .7115
0 .50
Total R.. oma-_
0 �0
.;'
703 35''.34
49
50
Other--nancin3 Sources
51
5i )F INVESTMENTS
�,-!I.I r._ I n 11L r'�C" �� i r.,/ nr' rl i _' I �•..
IrIrE�Ir� FIrI^Irlcl.aL ^c^c?T
1
l'1J
i J
-
2
3
FUND
"
s
Var ianc
6
F ,vorabl
s
Disbursements=
;
s
10
11
,1DrtIHISTRATION
U.uv
0.00
150,727 .87
tV/
( 150,727.37)
12
ELECTIOriS
0.^0
282.92
( 282.92)
13
14
PLANNING COMMISSION
0.00
15
ASSESSOR
'i
0.00
1.1,8'33..25...(
.:11,893.25)
14
iul I L
4
17
PLANNER
0 -00
41,496.45
( 41,496.45)
1s
FIFIANCE
0.00
53,023.37
( 53,023.37)
20
LEGAL SERVICES
0.00
57,5?1.70
( 57,531,70)
21
0.00
0.00
0.00
22
23
_C0110111k.,
CITY HALL
0.00
'10:3 .1s
24
^CLICE
0.00
80 ,05c• -:�7
( 80,056.67)
25
W01=1111n
_
26
HIGHWAYS, STREETS & ROADWAYS
0.00
237,F,b9,16
.:� r.. G
( 237,,b69,16)
27
STREET LIGHTING
0.00
11,098.13.(
11,098.13)
29
RECREATION PROGRAMS
0.00
36,052.44
( 36,952.44)
30
PARKS MAINTENANCE
0.00
25,596.22
( 25,596.22)
31
32
,..
0 .00_
67 .93
i. 67 .93)
33
Total Disbursements
0.00
872,230.66
( 872,230.66)
3.
35
36
�Dthor Financing Uses
37
FURCMASE OFF iNVES11011S
16
TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS -
0.00
t0
11
C:.ginning Cash Balance
n n0
12
t3
t3
t
Cash Balance as of 11/30/96
t7
Le
t9
it
..
1
-♦
MUNICIPAL. OF CITY Of OT ;EGA'
INTERIh? FIPI^, ICI^.L FE -P=
z
3
GENERAL FUND
s
Variancz
a
Favo••acic '
e
Receipts:
9
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
0.00
2,307.40
2,307.40
10
c
11
BLDG PER'1IT SURCHG PAYABL
0.00
1,569.68
1,569._3
iz
SALES T.,,< PAYABLE
0.00
671.49
S71 .49
14
PROPERTY TAXES
0.00
333,934.85
333,934.85
15
DELINQUENT, PROPERTY TAXES
0..00
9,.385,88
9,385,88 .._
16
J -
J
�, J. t'u
8,005.50
17
DOG LICENSES
0.00
145.00
145.00
1e
BUILDING PERMITS
0.00
39,376.28
39,376.28 �G
19
s
s.
20
WETLAND REVIEW FEES
0.00
2,100.00
2,100.00
1
WEIGHT PERMITS -
0.00
TG .00
70.00
23
HOMESTEAD CREDIT
0.00
70,289.50
70,289.50
24
RECYCLING GRANT/AID
0.00
4,177.21
4,177.21
e
VuLlt_t AIL),
MSA MAINTENANCE
.
0.00-
76,496.00
.
76,496.00
CHARGES -FOR: -SERVICES --GENERAL
0.'.00 '.
3,116.25
3,116.25 .
J J
_' ,
29
SUBDIVISION FEES
0.00
1,300.00
1,300.00
30
ZONING/TEXT AMENDMENT FEE
0.00
1,100.00
1,100.00
31
32
ASSESSMENT/SEPTIC SEARCHE$
-0.00
3,265.00
_.3,265.00
331
SNOW PLOWING
0.00
1,306.14
1,306.10
34
33
TOPO SALES
0.00
'4,535,60
4,535.60
36
RECREATION FEES
0.00
253.00
253.00
37
. Qv
0 .
3e
INTEREST EARNINGS
_ 0.00
12,349.69
12,349.69
39
DONATIONS
:.0.00
.995.00
- .. ...995.00.:
40
41
OLD CITY HALL/PEAVEY IiSE RENT
0.00
3,480.00
8,430.00
42
FRANCHISE FEES
0.00
7,043.94
7,043.94
44
CLEAN •11P DAY.
-0 .00
3,344.00
3,344.00
45
REFUNDS &'REIMBURSEMENTS
.0.00
15,7<42.14::
'.15,742.14..
46
� r ��
_V eJ, r t
,.�,,./.3.. .
4�
SURC lllRG`S
.01�'
0.S0
n 0
v . J
Total. ^_,,,nue-::;
0 00
`' 'D
703 ''J2.`3^
4
50
Other Financing Sources
91
SA4 .INVESTMENT$.
1 i.F 1. ,1 Pum U I I IER F U r I LIT,
d�
52
53
ice
z
L-.
�1.`Ta
I"ITC,,..K1 I Ii!.�rIt- _ I .^;L f1`11Or7
1 '. ,
1
a
2
1
' •
�1.`Ta
I"ITC,,..K1 I Ii!.�rIt- _ I .^;L f1`11Or7
1 '. ,
1
2
FUND
3
4
V•]Y 1: ..c
0
F iJl vilul�
o
7
Disbursements:
6
CITY COUNCIL'
9
6
to
WAGES & S^ILAf:IE S
0.00
23' 375 .00
( --C,375.00)
11
12
EMPLOI'CP. COPIT,^.IQ-rE,^.A
GGPIT.^ 0
0 .!;0
159.84
( 159 .>;4 )
17
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
339.39
(' 339.39)
14
MISCELLANEOUS
WTIPAQ
0.00
0 00
624.77
7 28
( 624.77)Is
;z 28-
16
DUCS & MEMBERSHIP
0.00
4,405.00
( 4,406.00)
17
in
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
^TWAGES,&
0.00
231.00
( 231.00)
19
SALARIES,.
0,.00
77,916.41
( _77.,91.6.41)
20
21
OVERTIME
0.00
6,223.99
( 6,223.99)
3.30 44
22
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
3,769.52
( 3,769.52)
3
EMPLOYER CONTRIG SOC .SEC.
0.00
4,897.16
( 4,897.16)
24
25
0,.00
0.00
0.00
6
7
21
EMPLOYER: CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
1,145.49
( 1,145.49)
OFFICE sUPPLIES
0.00
4,755.47
( 4,755.47)
29
GAS & OIL
o.�o
0.00
0.00
30
G6PP6!F=G r NERA6
;.GG
294.9G
71
INSURANCE
0.00
16,969.00
( 16,969.00)
32
32
ELECTION SUPPLIES-
0,00
1,483.55
( 1,483.55)33.
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
0.00
250.20
( 250.28)
35
x
PROFESS SERVICES -LEGAL-
0.00
0.00
0.00
n
PROFESS SERVICES -PLANNER
G.Ge
0.00
9.GG
0.00
0.00
x
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
$9.,30
( 89.30)
79
2;z
05-19
40
41
MILEAGC/TRAVEL
0.00
306.49
. 27)
( 306.49)
42
!JTILITICS
GARBAGE
0.00
O,nO
0.00
,.
RECORDING FEES
0.00
299.15
(' 299.15)
45
NEWSLETTER
0.00
3,339.46
(-" 3,339.46)
b
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
0.00
213.00
( X213.00)
47
CDUC^ITIOLJ,'TR.'IINING/COtlF .
0.1)0
'S .CO
( 6115. 00 )
4
CONTRACTED SERVICES
0.00
,116.00
( ,116.00)
51
0.00
0,00
0.00
52
93
_
6 54
MISC . OTHER CHARCES
0.^0
36
EQUIPMENT
ELECTIONS:
9.66
A
OPERATING SUPPLIES 0`.00 32,92 ( 282.92)
`
s
Variance
6
Favorable
Disbursements:
..
WAGES & SALARIES0.00
O:OQ10
j
411
WAGES & SALARIES
0.00 1,620.00 ( 1,620.00)
12
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
0.00 100.44 ( 100.44)
11
14
EpiptOYER c01qTftf5 MEDIC AI'Ms
SUPPLIES GENERAL r(`
Y f?r3 r,FRi°-39
0.00 167 93 ( 167 93)
A
15
,ASSESSOR a
3;
• i
16
V.VV Iv,J140.k�V
17
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00 518.78 ( 518.78)
16
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
0.00 717.96 ( 717.96)EMPt
�
20
MILEAGE!<TRALIEL: f' '�
"3 �'f
21
�+K �.}�yp^^yy�• k��^
Et7UCA'rt�<t /a'TRhN����V VIYF'ig,f,�f '< 7VV ( f :•7•VQ)
�, 3ya♦v0
$r',.
22
23
PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER 0.00 42,620.01 ( 42,620.01)'
"•
24
CONTRACTED SERVICES
0.00 415.00 ( 415.00)
'° `}'"
r,
26
S'x'4, Pf20 S' VICES Pir �R �` f?x X45x1 965
<. �
��•.• {�! $' �� ?ttq �
� 44 q.. r� �'`� �:rh. f $1 �'�c:h'3,. Jk
� 7..,. ..�.,.
27
• l`1 r-� >�>< 1<. 11..
1yY
,; 9<''s':s
.: T�. :es5 S,'.:�� Y9,, :x 1 `e �
29
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00 1,845.17 ( 1,845.17)
ao
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC
0.00 2,543.74 ( 2,543.74)
1
., :. - :; ., 1:. jvmg'
y•.0
hii:.��332.fi'.%M ,
;a. 'F T .{Cu•!'"�: x
u
::.`,c,:,.: Hzx;R:'sx]]
::. ,�,°�
'=3a ...may i�3ko ;Y; , z
' ^aS� .^'M4tiq
''
D
m
_. x4:f':Y fa.�C7.1-VAN
<,�:.. .° <au� e Y ,,
; 1-
�„
SUPPLIES -GENERAL•
0.00 54.87 ( 54.87)
;='*
36
PROFESSIONAL SER' -AUDIT
0.00 3,985.00 ( 3,985.00)
7.'..
36
Yy ,Y <.' S:. h£ C' . j�
aY" a a•y... f � Y RxR a ib:; 3�`,$ $ p'�'` <i? i'?.�'�'x .>k �'Y�-i � �:• 7.; Y �':f
Q(�..•1 '. ,MV ri� i:. :. f .? ', '. L� ,�l ; Y �`ic Y �1 i' Y P ;f: r Yv.3?": �'q�
•. .1 t.... sk., -' F 'a f.;.. �'1 '.t't' • `a b R., .d:l �s�}a t'Si �. ,': �`.i;: � Y '"T .:� � �+' 4.:� o i;+i,> .:'�` 7 �' �..
° <. ' �.\%
j ,•'
t......
��.+ ..'-" 1 .4:.
,. ..Y L,:.0
n .. �' x�..
Y ' )i 3 '':: & . l^:,.'�.. d 5ws ,� � e R ;Y'' f�.':�;.<. sAf
,.°<y� .:.:.irk'.." f.w ":� rR
Q,'�:a �+�� �' �a�('yRx a. i x "
�?',''
7 .¢ .'.t•:f. .3c� ..
R<. %Y,. `�<£ .. ...:. .r. Z
t�
40
41
RECYCLING
42
CONTRACTED SERVICES
0.00 24,613.07 ( 24,613.07)
4.
s ,WA�•G> S f ',rS>' FA @a�z»+x ' A k o-x Y ,0` !. 00 `i ay''o-,f' tt's 3
a43 1 ,232 Qb 1 2320
�._; t "°, s,�. y
Es :'.-.. 'r
T
} xr$.
>'
PROF 2
64S
,299.700
,
'
,o:Y;s
kbk
x.�ic,r•::a'
AW..
46
X47
PROFESSIONAL SER - AUDIT
0.00 0.00 0.00
46
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY49
•,
50
t OL
r
.Y
7i
1�, �}�y .y1.[�
EMP49':YFF' 'J'S
'i4 h� /�..fr% Y D J S` :
'f, b4i'%e6NJY'
,• ... � �6 Y` t'
'.,
a�Ya ,:. &� My,�
s9.t' Fx�.w•c., ,;M
92
rMF.
•
„
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0.00 31.93 ( 31.93)
54
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
0.00 1,000.00 ( 1,000.00)
SS
CI1 Y10L'x�i7 :.: ' 3 _r7 ,_ t Cis .
"1. M_..
<111 3'3° a
0,11"'Na.k"'.
U
C
0
b
4L
z'
3
GENERA(.- FUND
4
7
V v
Disbursements:
9
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
:;0.00
4.99
(
_.4.99
10
v -
11
REPAIR & MAINTEMANCE SUP.
0.00
1,120.00
(
1,120.00)
12
UTILITIE`F,
0.00
5,305.96
(
5,805.?-)
13
1 w% `
f 131 ITC
1,131.
14
CLEANING SERVICES
0.00
7,152,56
(
7,152.56)
„
CONTRACTED..: SERVICES
0 ,OGS-.
2 , 285 .2 .:
C
:2,.285..28 ).: ..
16
._.J
17
& M GUIDING
0.00
136.00
(
136.00 )
16
R & M IMP.OTHER IER Tt I Af l BLDG
0.00
43 .90
(
4 3 .90 )
19
R E 14 1 h L J
Vvv
11 f
>
20
MISC. OTHER CHARGES
0.00
1,059.20,(
1,059.20)
21
POLICE
23
BUILDING INSPECTOR
24
SUPPLIES --GENERAL
0.00
315.55
;.
y
6
CONTRACTED SERVICES
4.00
21,002,39
(
21,002.39)
27
HIGHWAYS, STREETS <& ROADWAYS
29
OVERTIME
0.00
3,601.03
(
3,601.03)
30
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
2,589.36
(
2,589.36)
31
32
t:O
EMPLOYER CONTRIS-HEALTH '!
U.vu,
0 .00.
3 ,`347 .59
(
,
3,941.59) ,941.59)
33
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE � QyOt.:�
905.43
(
905,43)
e
35
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION
0.00
1,003.57
(
1,003.57)
36
GAS & OIL
0.00
13,718.01
(
13,918.01)
36
INSURANCE '
. 0 ,00
3,561.00
3,561.00)
39
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUP�
�� � .: 0.00
13,452.29
(
13,452- )
40
I `�
. vu
, ..%
1 , 7,64 . J i,
41
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
0.00
200.22
(
200.22)
42
PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER
0.00
6,694.6-8
(
G,b94.�L?)
44
TELEPHONE
0,00
602.03
(
602.03)
45
UTILITIES
0.00
1 ,-',S6e ,07
(
1,668.07)
46L
i t -L M .,' 3,
Gi .J
v l
47
SALT
0.00
1,88.03
(
1,888.03)
46
SALT AND SAND MIX
0.00
8,933.32
40
,
,
50
CULVERTS
0.00
406.95
(
406.95}
51
STREET SIGNS
0.00.:
1,397.22.:(.
:`1,397.22}.:.
52
1 LUO i F MLi I i•v
J, V.�.�
v,�1V. .
53
REPITALS
0.00
4,360.00
(
1 , ^_•60 .00 )
S4
MISC. OTHER CHARGES
0.00
21014.32
SS
. '1
40 ,
,
s6
CRACKFILLING
0.00
227,895.56
(
27,895.56)
BLACKTOP PATCHING
0,00
4," 00_(
4,140.00)
JI1\LLI JWLLf-11YV avv L, ✓V ` L,i��l/�.
W(
L.
0
c
L1
�q
4
I
2
a
GENERAL FUND
4
V:1'i"1anc
s
Favo i aL 1
e
7
n
e
Disbursements;
D
EQUIPMENT
-. 0.00
20,424.70
(,. 20,424.70)
10
11
L i L I GH
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0.00
49.17
( 19.17)
12
UTILITIEc
C.00
11,48.9�
11
14
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUP.
0.00
0.00
0.00
15
RECREATION PROGRAMS
16
n
OVERTIME
0.00
577.89
( 577.89)
1e
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
1,302.98
( 1,302.98)
1D
20
LMPLUYLH.V.0,v,
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-HEALTH
-. 0.00
o0u. 70
1 ,943.15
l'uou./o)
( 1,943.15)
21
.. EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
':. 0.00.
421.15
( 421.15)
22
EMPLOYER K. --S . TERM
0 00
.L
3 4 .L
23
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
13.96
( 13.96)
24
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
0.00
1,481.41
( 1,481.41)
25
e
PAHKb� MAIN CL
WAGES & SALARIES
0.00
13,577.27
( 13,577.27)
27
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
413.46
( 413.46)
-
1 . Q ()
6Ut,. 48
v
29
EMPLOYER CONTRI3-MEDICARE
0.00
160.34
( 160.34)
,o
GAS & OIL
0.00
301.05
( 301.05)
] 1
32
5UPPLIES-GENERAL
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUP..
0.00.
0.00
1 .59
.d
(` - 1..59) .
33
PROFESS -SERVICES. -ENGINEER
%.0.00.
``7,328.16
( .7,328..16)
3A
35
I _ .1
PRINTING & PUCLISHING
.
0.00
177.10
( 177.18)
34
R & M IMP.OTHER THAN BLDG
0.00
10.65
( 10.65)
37
,e
HLNIAL5
MISC. OTHER CHARGES
0.00
356.66
( 856.66)
,D
RECREATION. PROGRAMMING
0.00'1 425.58
( 425.58)
40I'INL'�LRVAiION
41
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0.00
317.36
( 317.36)
42
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
1,590.03
( 1,570.03)
43
144
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONE.
00
0.00
100.00
J
( 100.00)
43
47
EMPLOYER CONTRI3--SOC .SEC .
0.00
34.72
( 34.72)
4a
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
8.12
49
MUNI uls5ursame?7s
Q.QQ
so
s
i�r financing ��
sa
PURCHASE OF INVESTMENTS
0.00
54
TRANSFER" TO OTHER FUNDS
0.00
ss
, Begin Cash Balance
4.Or
M -11
I`IUf�ICIP,,L OF CIT'( OF JT��GJ
IfITL:IM FIfIAfICI1;L REPORT
1
AJ i J
2
3
GENERAL FUND
..
4
5
11 -or the Month
ended Nov3mber
'(,>ar
to -date
e
Va-ianc
7
Favorable
e
9
Receipts=
Budget
Actual (Unfavorable)
Budget
Actual
11
DUE FROM OTHER GOV'T
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
23,871.09
12
CLDG PERMIT suPc iG r^,Y,^,3L
0.00
291.00
21)1.00
0.00
1 ,569 .68
13
r
14
DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,250.00
15
PROPERTY TAXES
0.00.
0.00 ':'.
0.00
0.00
333,934 .85
16
17
BUSINESS LICENSES/PERMITS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
8,005.50
1e
DOG LICENSES
0.00
5.00
5.00
0.00
145.00
19
0 100
6 F3bQa
20
SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMITS
0.00
1,125.00
,
1,125.00
0.00
7,050.00
21
WETLAND REVIEW FEES
0.00
280.00
280.00
0.00
2,100.00
23
LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
37,446.50
24
HOMESTEAD CREDIT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
70,289.50
a
POLICE AID
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,660.05
27
MSA MAINTENANCE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
76,496.00
29
\ LJ FUH bLHViUEt,-ULNU-'0Lv..
CONDITIONAL USE/VARIANCE FEES
0.00
0.00
. .iJ
0.00
0.00
2,350.00
30
SUBDIVISION FEES
C.CO
0.00
0.00
0.00
1,300.00
31
LUNINWILXI AMLNUMEN1 t-tt
U.00
IbQ.UU
IbOXV
'
32
INTERIM USE .FEES
0.00
0.00 :..
0.00
0.00
100.00
33
ASSESSMENT/SEPTIC SEARCHES
0.00
210.00`
210.00
0.00
3,265.00
e
MAPS/COPIES/MISC.SALES
0.00
7.00
7.00
. Uv
0.00
768.24
36
TOPO SALES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,535.60
37
-
3e
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS -
0,00
0..00
0.00
0.00
0.00
,9
INTEREST EARNINGS
0.00
245.54
245.54
0.00
12,349.69
40
J
U ...
., . Qu
., V
1 7 J .
41
CULVERT SALES
C.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90.00
42
OLD CITY I I ;LL/ PEAVEY HSE REFIT
0.00
400.00
400 . "0O
111.00
6,480.00
43
44
OTHER/MISCELL
0.00
0.99 (
0.99)
0.00
16.55
43
CLEAN UP DAY
-. 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,344.00
47
CITY HALL REFIT
0.00
320.00
320.00
0.00
,,384.40
4e
OU,^,!"H -GE 1:1
0.00
0.50
n �,C�
n nn
0 n
-
49
loval Haverlues
J •
.•
J .J J
so...:
-
,1
Other Financing Sources
=. I irlvLJ
52
53
1.
TI?• _RS FROM OTHER FUNDS
n,00
0.00
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
IrITERIM FIN ANCL L RE^ORT
For
the Month entad November
Y .ar
-to-,J.a' 3
Variance
;ari,3nca
FavoratUe
F
avorable
Buri�et
Actual
(Unfavorable)
BUd(-4et
Actual
(Unfavorable)
t�
_lL
0.00
600.00
( 600.00)
0.00
600.00
(
600.00)
,.._. r ;LARICS
0.00
1,87S.00
( 1,875.00)
0.00
23 ,375 .00
(2-3,37,-.00)
NrLOY_ 1 -
J
t^LOYER CONTRIB--SOC,SEC.
0.00
117.80 _
( 117.80)
0.00
1,450.80
(
1,450.80) '
,'!rLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.04
27.56'
( 27.56)
0.00
339.39
(
339.39)
i. -,-L L J
X7
; GE.'TPAVEL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.28
(
7 .28 )
" 1 MEMBERSHIP
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4,406.00
(
4,406.00)'
I�TRATION
`'" '
`
.^.G[5 & SALARIES&�
,,
i , 030 , O1
( 7 , 030 .O1)
0 .00
77 , 916 .41
(
77 ,956 :41) '
LE^TION JUDGES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
130.64
(
X130.64)
,I^LOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
314.95
( 314.95)
0.00
3,769.5-
(
3,769.52)
. -
417.24
-16
M^COYER CONTRIB-HEALTH
0.00
132.63
( 132.63)
0.00
5,595.10
(
5,595.10)
' `ER
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
- \
'^^
LYER C0NTR . --S . TERM
0.00
63 .00
( 63 .00)
0.00
1,145.4)
693.00
(
X 693.00) =
7!cE SUPPLIES
0.00
400.40
( 400.40)
0.00
4,755.47
(
4,755.47)'
U^PLIES-GENERAL
0.00
34.14
( 34.14)
0.00
294.93
(
294.93)`
Nc,URANCE
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
16,969.00
(
16,969.00);
LECTION SUPPLIES
0.00
678.00
( 678.00)
0.00
.l.• rr
C GE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1 soc ' C
.2J
(
C 4
108.60 )
...,LL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.2u
(
� J0._8 )
,-,OFESS -
ROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER
0.00
0.00
0,00
0.00
0.00
0.00
"FESS SERVICES -PLANNER
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
J1. L
ELE^t IONS00
0.00
352.19
( 352.19)
0.00
• . 3'
3,678.2"
(
- -
3,678.27)=
'-E.`,CE!TR(1VEL
0.00
;.o0
0.00
0.00
306.49
(
306.49) _
TILITIES
ARBAGE SERVICE
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0,00
ECORDING FEES
0.40=.,
0.00
0.00
0.00
299.15
(
299.15)E
L. _LLI L\
Ir;TI;JC 3 f VELISa1iNG9731.7-
.
0 .00
.24
37/.L4)
( 973 .7V)
0.00
0 .00
..J,JJ. 1l
3 301.'
o1,300.0
(
E
-)J
E
, .0'3
J
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
7
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
2 )
�. 4
n":CDUES & MEMBERSHIP
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
R�#CTEp SERVICES
RENTALS
;MISC. OTHER CHARGES
a
'a,`WAGES & SALARIES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ASS SSOR- <
" >=WAGES & SALARIES
'7"; EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
ENGINEER
In
)
Variance
Variance
7
z�#•;: :.vµ. ?"r,y.+',,: ., ,�
�Ye
`•'
L it sk ak :. :'
Y
(
Unfavorable)Byid9e
t
Actual
('U
nfavorable )
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
213.00
(
213.00)14
J
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
635.00
(
)
635.00Q0,00
a
0.00 x
4.00 (
0.00
4.00)
0.00
0.00
221 -11
116.00
(
.221
116.00')
17
I e
)
0.00
(00
0.00 ,
0.00
0.00
0.00
.
21
0.00
237.92 (
237.92)
0.00
4,599.30
(
4,599.30)22
,
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
364.17
(
364.17)
2.
0 go
i45.
26
'S 0.0 xl
(Au
ft
782 92)
0 `00 28292
` (
282.92 }
27
\t rry .`.. t. %i'i. .:w :. ...:: ..! ,S:s.;_..➢`o':f F..
sa. 't,.,,^�
:r;1,+,iz �",' f •„1.
;.'.Y
2
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2
31
3
ul x
k*+a s 10gx0
....,.•ww.
¢�
�r 100544':
{
X10vv
0.44)
)
e 30:
0<
23.49)
i
a
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,348.00
(
10,348.00)'
O C?Q
:�� ► i 0.00
:717.96
(
717.96)
4 1
.
)
A
F 6 s 0 .00
167 91,,
(
167.91)
4
.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
95.00
(
95.00),
47
4T`gar
'
��
} ` , 0.00
9R
r
415.00
(
.
415.00)
48
,9
'
g
_: "•xt
51
•
,
, ..... i
57
0.00
3,476.16 (
3,476.16)
0 .00
41 ,187 .60
(
41 , 187 . (.C)
54
55
S6
0.00
215.52 (
215.52)
0.00
2,543.74
(
2,543'74 )5
0.00
15 83 (
15.83)
0:00
1,681.98
(
1,681.98),,o
If
t.to
5991. t9l
0.00
28.00 (
28.00)
0.00
235.20
(
235.20
62
6]
6,
)
IR
;
20A
666
67
In
.1!.;.tl':.. ,'.L _� ..'�• '� ,fir._. ��.
_ ...� � .�.. ,i 1.. .. ,1,i_
1
f i J
z
rUND
4
,
Favol ablei-a
s
Budget
Actual
CUnfavorabla)
BUd9St
Actual
(tjnfavcrable`
9
Disbursement--=
,o
1,
_
err I;:>= •surrLI 1
0.00
0.00
C.00
C. .co
.3o .32
Iz
SU^rL=--GENCPAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
X1.37
(
54.8-
13
14
-
PRINTED FORMS
0.00
75.50
(
75.50)
..
0.00
416.44
(
, . CC
416.4,
15
PRINTING & PUBLISHING
_. . +0.00.-.
..0.00
0.00
0.00
396.0.=.
(
396.0£.
1e
Lu I MILMUL1.ter
✓
_34 C_
„
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONT.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
to
rEcYCLIG
19,O
-
J.
2
,C,
2 , ,
zo
LEGAL SERVICES
21
WAGES & SALARIES
0.00
1,232.00
(
1,232.00)
0.00
1,232.00
(
1,232.00
23
morESSIONAL SER - AUDIT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
c.00
o.c-_
z3
e
WAGES & SALARIES
E
0.00
613.44
(
613.44)
0.00
7,268.40
(
7,268.4C
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
27.4$
(
27.48)
0.00
325.62
(
325.6-2
20
2
z9
\ .�
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
J8.90
(
II.90)
0.00
-. t�
105.16
!
_
. c,-
105.4`:
30
SUrPLIES-GENERAL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
31.93
a,jL)Utb
,z
& MMULK5HIH
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
Q.UQ
0.00
u.uu
0.00
V.()V
0.00
V.VV
0.00
1,000.0o
415.00
(
.
X415.00
y,
CITY HALL
35
EF'?LOYERJCONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
0.00
11.32
(
11.32)
0.00
L'1.32
(
21.?--
36
EN,PLOYE^ CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
2.65
(
2,_'-.)0.00 )-1
0.00
I
4 7
n
x
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE;SUP.
0.00
$8.16
(
i
58.16)
0.00
1,120.00
(
.2';
1,120.00
79
UTILITIES
''0.00
206.35
(
206.35)
0.00
5,805.96
(
5,805.9"
40
.. .L,.V -J . ..
.-,u
._
. 1
. C
-
41
: _EANINGSERVICES
0.00
715.68
(
715 .513)
0 .00
715.'_ .56
(
7,152.-,-
,152.5-
42
4z
CCNT^^iCTED `_'.ERVICES
0.00
272.64
(
272..',1)
0.70
285
2,285.L--
43
4,
\
R & M BUIDING -
.0.00
L.J4 VtJ
13".00
(
._
136.00)
..
0.00
136.00
(
�
136.0
45
R & M IMP.OTHER THAN BLDG
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43.90
(
43.9C
as
47
N'Lll I tr
t1I�C. OTHER CHARGES
0.00
0.00
. v U
0.00
U. _ _
0.00
.... -
1,05^.20
(
It '6737.
1,0119.11-
46
LICE
4
so
51
..'.
S
57
34
7
U Y
V Y
y U
•
4 •
S V°
O
L j W
N �S
O O J
O Y�
Y I.. W
O '• O
V P M•
U N
"-' O O
O J O
Y• W
N- O
O O J
P U•
W N-
_.
f�
r'•
-1
Gi
c
r 7
CT
- _
C
O
r r
Ln
o
r)c)
7i7C
CIRC
c,) r- c
-i3 1Cnc.
Hoi c
cmr.
mm r
z Y
0:1 V
Jn
at
-�
�,�
r.l
co
vH
rnH
3Z
ZC
-'
3
! '>
O H
H O r'
9
o-
>:6
rz r
r-nl-
r - (n c
>-
(nv(
rl-)
9-o
rn%)
z 7
z
cu
rl
0 < C
r
< --1
-i rn r
m n
r- -n :
c 4a
r- r
r r- r
-7 r'1 c
-1 (i
n -A
:3r•l:
Nm.
..a
mm
zr
vm •
r -o
xr
70
00
4ir)
xm
:o
r*
-i -
-1 r
r
X D 2
Cn -
.S r- Q
_0 7
D "
r
-< -<
"D
r-
'" >
C,
(
H
n
-10 1
mr
pr v
�a
z c
ori r;
mm r~roc
mr
rC)-
.7v
J) --I c
r-
ZD
OU) k
oU)
-<77.
;o ;J
n
-iDt
(,-) --I
F-
r 0-
_
m
v
m z
O
m f r
a
v) 7
m z f
'7r l
rl
Hz
C
O
fl.
m r
r
c)
mn
r)(l
D r
Orl .
mr7
n
z -+.
o
m
z o c
0o c
F-r:O.
n
,-
cls
a(
to2
_0
c
z
z 2
ZZ2
D>
cnc 2
�0
D
m c
m
N
0
m
-i
-i -1
;0 C
m (r) r
o rl
_.
(>
_m
:U
77
X
l 77 7
A
H
73 7,
�o
n_r
-iM
<
3
r:
D0'
HH
mC
<
H,
H
; 1
H
r
a ,
:. a) cc
In
H
H
L
z
O i
-1
1
z
7(.,') ,
f 1 f
(7
n
0
m
�,
o
m.
3: (A
c
m
m
(n
7
ar
m O
N
cn
r.
-.n m C
D C7
D v
-i a C
-1 N
ry
�o c
H -7.2m
rl
-i
o .
0
C
N
Z
s �6+
(D
O
(DOC
O O
O O
CI•'.-
O O c
O O
O O
O O
0 0
O Q c
O
o•
oo'
ooD
oo"
o0
00
00•
00C
oo•
OO
oo
00
0
0
oo
o0
00
0o
qo±o0
c
00 c
o0
o0
oo
00 c
0
V
C^
w
n
H
V
T
r f
N
A t`
CT
r
r*
C;
Ln
V
O
W
0 O
r
r
oc
00C
oor
o0
o
coo
0C^ c
0010
Dol
o7Wc•
010
PJo c
o
C
S
r
C
O
O A
0 0
0 0•
0 0
0 0:
Orr
O N..
OCT
A W Y•
O Cn
.D O
�?
oc
0"Ic
000,000
OO
,DOC
Or
00
OO
NCn0
OC^
AO C
0
n
}+.
rJ
L+
V
t
r
N
Al
C*
'►�
C
-
0
co
OP
cCr1
V
O
W
mot
r
r
Cn
r
OC
00COOC
oof'oowooc,cooc
oLhc
000
O C^ Z
COW0
O 'D
N O c
0
U,
C,
O
-0A
00
AO
00
OO.
Or -r
_O��
OC^
A W
OCn
ADO•
0
W
O C
O N C
v
0 0 0,
O O 0,
0 0
,D O C
O r
v
o OC
v
O O
u
N CT V
vv
O C.
v
A O c
O
co
O r
O O
00
O c
O O c
O O c
0 0 c
00
0 0 c
O O
00
O O c0
CL
(r
0
00
:3 C)
00,
O(D
00•
00
00
or
00•
OO
00•c
r?
00 CU0
00 C
00 C
00 C
00 C
00
0C> c
00 C
On
00 c
0
rJ L
r
Ln
rJ
JJ
r'
VOr
0
N
r
W h
WCO
r
0
-
•
.
•
'
"
O
U.
CD V
�J r J
ACPU
0)
C^ - D
rJ Cn
0 W
O h
�D �
� r
O
�?
r*
O
0 '4
i� r
0 �0
W C^ G,
0 Ln
0 OD Ci
P A
0 0 C
A V C
0
O
N
C
V <
CnO
0C••
CT r7 Cm
C) A (,o
Nto Z
0s>f
r W Cj
W r,) C,
r,
r -•C:,
NCn Ol
r^
r'
O
NV
r?�Jr
vJ �-'
0Cn
00
fJ Cn r
OCn
Cn C^
CaOC
O(O
CJO -
in
C^CTF
OCnf
Cn CTF
W 0
w0
ri Cr,
Or
V OC
SCD:
W O^
an OC
'J
C. -
-� •
t,
N A
n
N
A
4• C
-
r-'
Not
NC
r
rC
W r+C
r'
W Wr
W i0
< -
"
.
y
O
4
(J r
co V
W t.)
y (P
CJ 0
(h N
rJ (,n
Cn W
0
D CO
O C
1)
-t r-
0IDV
C;,r
Oa
CL) (I
0 L
OCOC
0�A
OO
A V
O+�
O r
rn
a)
?
`•J r
Cn o
(d a, -
CT D
CO `J C,
N Cn 4
o .r, r
r w 0
w f)
rJ 0 c
!•-•
U
OC
Cn V
OFJr
D�'
OCn
00
fJ(nr
O(n
tnCT
CnOt
0
W 0C
CT
oc
C� C, r4
vu
OCnt
(.n0
vu
W O 11
WO C,
v�.,i
t.)0•
Oma'
..iv
-10
l
ID CO
uv
W CT
.DO
J V J V
U♦ W
V J V P
N- O 1D
P P P P
O V P U•
pp O O P
W N-
Y U U
S O P J
Y Y U U
P Y♦ W
Y U Y♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
N- Q b
P V Y♦
-
W W W
Y W W
U W N
-
N N N N
V P U
N N N N
P W N-
�1 --
O O O V
P Y♦ W
N- O O
O V P Y♦
W N-
C
,� yy yy yy yy yy- yy 0 � • • t
J O M Y Y u '• L W N• O O V O 4 I+ N y 0 P O V g Y• U N N O O P J P Y• V N- O O P J O Y . Y N-
r•
"1
G1
C
•11
�
-
U
Z
-)
m -
O
r
p3
:7
70 O
i 7,
00
mm E
U);0
M pj rr
mm c
Erl:
c cr
rlm
cH
>m
m
m;0
CD
33 D
m
3-i 3
33 <
D'_>r
--i c
-i c):.
3
rnN
; r)r
>Qe
r0
ON•
) ) c30
v7
7
•0'D r,
0-i
-
N
f
Ut (7
fl -)
-i
m '•l ;
-0
r r rrb
r r-
r- r ;c
m �. `
r
r -+
m r
m
D3
-jrn
r- re
JO V
m r
J U c
00
V) C')
r••I
H -0.
rt
fN r-
) _.
r^ t.
T (")
"
-< -<
Z D F
-< -<
-<<
-
-i
cl 3
U)
r"
:') i
N 1.4
O_ Cn
m O
m m
-i -•1
mm
mm3
r-
rr
m y
3DC
rlr.-
3
C
NHi
:7;D
mH T
'O?):
Ail rT
F
M
-+_
rn Z 1
c', 1) -_
"0
Mi co
1 r
b
Z O 2
Cl) ;)
N!
H --I
'
3 m c
ri z r•m
G)
n c) 1,
b Z
C) Cl
o o
D O
L
Z r•
coo
>)
o
�D
m c
o o
z c
o o c
o o
r- L) 5
rr
C) r•
-
m e 2:
'7
-17
<
Z 2
Z Z D
0 '0 C
Z7 2
ZZ
_, ;J
-
x
C) T
M r
m r7`D:
H H
Gil
H
""
m (l
H
ip:
um
r
c) ca
;D
CO CC
CAW
N
0
L
-I C
i
t
D
in
P r
z rr
m
(n 0
3
3
(j1'U
3 C
t D
2 c
fT
O m
X
� m r
O m
_
H
z 2
C) rt
c
n j
H
m o 1
o;0
H
D
Z
;O HA
L)
iD.
z C
n
M
a n
0
C
r.
Frim
D
m
0
m
x
n
�D
,,
c.
_:.,17
rr
m
•
cooc
coo
OCOOCOOCOOCOOC
O
0 0
O.O
O c
O.
(D
0
0 O`
0 0
O
0 0
O O
O
0
O
cooc
OCOOCOOCOOCOOC
o
OO
Oo
O C
a
O
rJ
A
p
W W
W D
tJ
�D
ooc
rl)c
ooc
O O c
oocoocC
C^ F-• CLJ
Q`C
O c
A <11
O
C,C
OO
r
00
00'
00
00
A
CSN
AV
O
V
O
OO
r)
OO
r -•o
Oo
o O
r
OO
I -IJ
o
O
r,
7 U
<
c,
c,
0
-,
r
N
r<
-.
r•
to
L
N
-.
?
- `p
CJ W Ol
W 0._;.
N
JJ
n
•c
OO
F)c
ooc
OO
OO
OO
�
(I r
WT c
O c-'
A c
O
0, G,
6:
00•
00•
00
00•
00
A
CN r,)
JA, 4
O
V
O
00
rJ
00.
r o
00
00
"COO
.
"Ij
o c
%ac
0
C.
O O c
(D c
O O
O O
O O
O O
oc
O O C
0 0 c
O c
O
O
fT
00
00
O
00
00
:J
O c
00 C
C
00 C
00 C
00 C
0 0 C
O C
00.
00 C
O
O c
O
IJ
r
rJ
F-'
t+
'J
C
r+
r t+
•J
r
O
D
_
n
Ln
U
O
W
r W
C` ? (.
A
CO W C
O
(l �D
1 (.1
O` r`
0 t)
p 0 OlC
r
p
J; r)
00"
G•
A:
r?
00,
0(1
Cn0
C-) 07)
Ar C
W
ON
V
p
W
00
a(
OC^
Jr-•C
p0
_ Ar
A
I�r
VSO,
O c.
.Or
,1
OW
c:-, c.,
Obi aV
C>.
(5 Ln I
'JO`
rC,r_,Cnc
Op Ic
0
O`
n
a
"
-•h c
L�
1
F
IJ
r
r
V
r
t•+ �•+
•9
O
<
r.
-
Lt
(n l
J- C
O
W
C'•A r
A
CJ J-
p W
,>
O
J•
-t
(n •Or
fJC
QEF+
OrJ
p0
i.Jr�
p
AN
001,
Cr`
D
r)
L,
,•
00
(.n C,
Cn0
Q) 0)
AN
Ln W
r
?rC
ON
J
p
t.
Q r
,.,
0 0
Cn C
OUB •
.D
V .O •'o
0 W(t
(D
0 (n
'J m
W 0
p O`
r
0 Ln C
0 W
0
0
O
o v p u ♦ �. �