02-10-97 CCCITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
5. CONSENT AGENDA (NON -CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS) FEBRUARY 10,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC
5.1. Set Board of Review date for April 22, 1997 at 7PM
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a letter from Doug Gruber, Wright County Assessor in which
the Board of Review -has been tentatively set for Tuesday, April 22,
1997 at 7PM. If we don't agree with this date, we need to set a date
and notify them.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Approve date as noted for Tuesday, April 22, 1997 at 7PM. I hope this
does not interfere with Mayor Fournier. If it does we will have to
change it.
Thank you,
Laine
January 31, 1997
Elaine Beatty
Otsego City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
RE: 1997 Local Board of Review
Dear Ms. Beatty:
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER FEB 3
Wright County Assessor
Wright County Government Center
10 2nd Street N. W. • Room 240 i— ..__.__---------- --
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1183
Phone: (612) 682.7367 / (612) 682-7368
FAX: (612) 682-6178
The 1997 Otsego City Board of Review has been tentatively set for Tuesday, April 22 at 7:00
p.m. If this date will not work for you please let me know before February 15, 1997.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
ncerely,
Dougal M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
DMG/df
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
CITE" OF OTSEGO
REQ17EST FOR COUNCIL AC; 110`
.XGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
5. CONSENT AGENDA (NON -CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS) FEBRUARY 10,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB , CC
5.2. Approve Contracting with ADP Payroll Service for City Payroll
BACKGROUND:
'this _teM was discussed at the Soecial Council mee_�ng of uanuary 31,
1997 and a consensus was to go ahead with implementing this program
with ADP Payroll Services. We can have our first payroll be done,
along with Council checks from timesheets at Feb 10, 1997 Council
Meeting for Wednesday, Feburary 12th delivery of checks. Gary Groen
and .myself have set up with John Lundrigan, District Manager of ADP to
get this accomplished.
STAFF RECOb1MENDATION:
Approve Contracting with ADP Payroll Service for City of Otsego
payroll.
Thank you,
Elaine
T
yp
Simplify hur Ira -hoarse Payroll With .-SDP's EasyPat'
:- i;,v .,(:es -:.s'/? y 5;rn it;r/ Your ?ar/r.ii?
Jusc before paydace. you gice us your hours and changes and we do the rest:
Calculate and print payroll checks and direct -deposit Vouchers.
Produce reports summarizing payroll data.
Guarantee compliance with the latest tax regulations.
Offer expert advice about payroll. payroll taxes and benefits.
Payroll Taxas Become Lass Taxing
We take full responsibility; we:
Calculate, deposit, file and reconcile all payroll taxes.
Ensure you aren't overpaying for state unemployment insurance—
your only controllable tax. .
Process and file responses to state unemployment insurance claims.
Respond to all agency inquiries.
Protect you from tax penalties.
The One -Point Seryice Difference
When you call ADP with a question or request, you jet answers and action ... from
your own Client Service Representative. One person dedicated to satisfying your
payroll needs. No hourly fees or costly "900" numbers to deal with. Make one phone
call to our payroll and tax professionals and quickly jet the answers you need. "-hen
ADP manages your payroll, you have more time to manage your business.
ADP Makes Payroll Easier From Start -Up Through Processing
Set up historical employee data from your forms.
Input your payroll by phone, fax or PC.
Issue professional checks with easy -to -read pay- stub, printed ofd site for
greater confidentiality.
Receive printed reports with your payroll checks to free your computer
resources for other business casks.
Obtain answers to your questions from dedicated payroll service
professionals.
End Year -End Headaches
IXE us help make year-end a celebration by handling all returns and
filings, including:
Laser -printed W-2 and Employee Earnings Summaries in an
8 1/2„ x I I" format.
W-2 information reported dirccdy to the proper tax authorities.
(:lear and simple statements of all deposits and Pilin --s.
V \l )l' ime Clic cnd %ILII ,, If , ,1 he t,. noc a Nirdcn.
��11I rccci\�:
l:yery Pa\roll
l)a\chcck; and (.:hcck Rc,i�wr.
TAX ,Ind Department .Summarics.
Lison, of Chan -es and nc%% hirci iit ,incl.
Pa-, roll WOrksheec for the next pa\- periml.
Other reports on request... most at no chane, such as Master Lia.
Employee List and icar-To-Dace Rcporc.
Every Quarter
Quarterly Recap.
Wage and Tax Register.
Employee Earnings Records.
Statements of Deposits and Filings.
At Year -End
Laser NV -2 and Employee Earnings Summaries in an 3 112** x 11" format.
Near -end totals of all taxes filed.
Statements of Deposits and Filings.
Additional Services
.SDP offers a variecc of other services that can save your business time
and expenses.
Direct Deposit improves employee efficiency with reduced Crips to the bank.
Pre -signed paychecks in envelopes save you time by laser -imprinting your
signature and inserting checks into envelopes.
Specialized reports help you manage your business with detailed information
in a format you design.
Third -party payment checks made out for 401(k) or garnishments, can save
you time in check preparation.
Premium Only Plan can save both you, the employer, and your employees
money if your employees are making post-cax contributions to a health plan.
:\stomatic Data Processing, Inc.
One ADP Boulevard
RoSCland, New Jersey 07068
04 i )Q.W 5 Ir0M ?nnesl .n U;A • 1')95. 1 OOd A.,b).ufw Onto Pnxevwg. InC
CITY OF OTSEGO
U ENT k'ux CO U N CIL AU TWIN
II AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE II
II5. CONSENT AGENDA (NON -CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS) FEBRUARY 10,1997 - II
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC
5.3. Approve the following Re: Sewer and Water:
a. Update of Bonestroo's Report on Wastewater Treatment Facility
Plan
b. Discharge of wastewater to the Crow River
c. Trunk facilities plan for Sewer and Water by Larry Koshak
( HAA)
d. Approve Mayor Fournier to meet with property owners Re:
Sewer Site
e. Approve mechanical sewer plant
BACKGROUND:
The above items a through e came to a consensus of the Council to.
approve at the Workshop Meeting of January 31, 1997. Larry Koshak has
more information on his portion of the agenda re: Bonestroo's report
and what information we need to have updated and he will also have a
quote for trunk facilities for water and sewer and what he will do for
what price. Mayor Fournier will update us on the meeting with the
residents Re: sewer site at 6PM before this Council Meeting.
STAFF RECCb1MENDATION :
Approve a, b, c, d, e above with review of information from Larry
Koshak.
Thank you,
4e�� �.
Elaine
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. BOB KIRMIS, Asst. City Planner: FEBRUARY 10,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
6.1. Lin -Bar Development (Discussion regarding re -subdivision of lots
BACKGROUND:
This item is on the agenda to get a consensus of what type of re-
subdivision of lots would be accepted by the Council (Consensus of
Council). The reason we are bringing this to the Council is to save
the time and money expended to have the plat done and not have the
Council agree. Bob Kirmis has written a memo which addresses this
which is attached. Andy MacArthur will also be here to discuss this
issue.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The developer would like a Council consensus of what would be
acceptable for overlay of their plat.
Thank you,
laine
MUmn S. Radzwill i
Andrew J. MacArthur
Michael C. Couri
Megan M., McDonald
February 10,• 1997
RADZWJLL & COUKJ
Attorneys at Law
705 Central Avenue East
PO Bax 369
St. Midtael, MN 55376
(612) 497-1930
(61 Z) 497-2599 (FAX)
city council Members
City of Otsego.'
c/o Elaine: Beaty,. City Clerk
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN X5330
RE: Lin-Bar'Resubdivision Plan
Dear Council Members:
I have reviewed the Planner's memorandum of February 7 xegax
alternative re5ubdivisi.on plans for the proposed plat pf. I
Estates II Itis my understanding that the developers seek t
the lot size at 1 acre and to place the proposed homes
middle of each: lot. In. seeking to meet that objectivie, . v
proposals have been presented by the planner as options. I
that there shc#uld be flexibility on the part of the C:
considering a range of resubdivision options, however some a
are better.thaz others.
ing a
n -Bar
keep
z the
rious
agree
:y in
tions
As stated in the Planner's memo, section 21--7-5, G requires a
resubdivision pian for proposed one acre lots. section 21-6-2,E, 6
also requires 6 resubdivision plan as part of the subzaitta s for
plat approval. ,
Further, since the Comprehensive Plan and subdivision ordinary
both predicated upon the eventual delivery of sewer . and
'
services to ihe:area, the requirement of such a plan is ac con
reasonably.rela,-ed to both the plan and the ordinances.;
"The regulations may permit the municipality to conditic
approval on com liance with other requirements reasonah�Xy ri
to the provisions of the regulations and to execute, dbvel,
contracts embodying the terms and conditions of approval:tt
Stat. 462.358,Subd. 2a.
ce are
water
lition
n . its
dated
patent
Minn.
ZO'd ZZ88T1717 01 1+j0 mvl Iino0 8 11SmzP28 W021d WdZZ:ZO L66T-OT-ZO
£0 ' d _Id101
Letter to Otsego City Council
February`10, 1997
Page 2
Having rev,iew�d the proposed options set forth by.the Planner, it
is my opin:lon!that the collaborated owners option may greaie more
problems than !,'it solves. In the normal resubdivision pl n, the
option of resubdivision is given to the property owner in or er, in
part, to alleviate a large assessment on a tract of. land tha could
bear two assessments. thus, it is up to,the property owner to sell
this property1when sewer arrives for his own financial interest,
which has :the 1 affect of making it possible to deliver sever -and
water service *bre efficiently.
In:the collabovated version two parties must agree simulta eously
to split portions of their land for sale. This, ckeat s -the
potential for: one property owner to effectively 'blo any
resubdivision on three potential lots.
Such a plan also would establish a "precedent„ on what the City
viewed as an ;acceptable "normal" resubdivision .plan.. Th .City
should always;;be open to different plans if there are unique
circumstances wthich would justify it. In this instance;I h ve not
been provided '.with any information on such unique circumst noes.
This issue should be taken very seriously at this time w' the
possibility of:a.sewer plan shortly. Such resubdivision:pla will
have a great ekfect upon the City's ability to repay :any bonded
indebtedness through assessments.
If you have any questions regarding this matter please feed free to
contact me.
Ze
uly.youics,
w5V�Al:thur
RAD2WILOURI
cc: Bob Kirmis;; NAG
Larry Kosh4k,'Hakanson Anderson
£01d £Z88tibb Ol 1$}0 mvl Tinoo 8 ilTmzpvN W[38J WdZZ:ZO L66Z-0T-ZO
NA
FEB -07-1997 1137 NAC
612 595 9837 P.02i09
N WAe011* NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis / David Licht
DATE: 7 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Subdivision Ordinance. Resubdivision
FILE NO: 176.08
The purpose of this memorandum is to reiterate the City's current resubdivision
requirements as contained in the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
Section 21-7-5.G, Street Design Standards, of the Ordinance specifically addresses the
issue of resubdivision and reads as follows:
G. Provisions for Resubdivisions of Large Lots and Parcels: When a
tract is subdivided into larger than normal building lots or parcels
which have the potential for further subdivision with the installation of
public utilities, such lots or parcels shall be so arranged as to permit
the logical location and openings of future streets and appropriate
resubdivision, with provision or adequate utility connections for such
resubdivision.
It should be noted that the Subdivision Ordinance has been written in recognition of
possible future sanitary sewer service. As such, the reference to "large lot" is interpreted
to mean lots of a size which could potentially be resubdivided if sanitary sewer service
were available (to create 12,000+ square foot lots). In this regard, all platted one acre
single family residential lots (with the exception of one per 40 splits) are considered "large
lots" which have a potential for resubdivision.
This matter will be discussed at the forthcoming 10 February City Council meeting,
Pc: Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 55S ST, LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 8 1 2-595-91536 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
FEB -07-1997 11:3?
N45110% e "
INC
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO:
BACKGROUND
NAC
612 595 9837 P.03i09
CONSULTANTS
Otsego Mayor and City Council
Bob Kirmis / David Licht
7 February 1997
Otsego Subdivision Ordinance: Resubdivision Plans
176.08
As part of the processing of the Lin -Bar development proposal, question has arisen as to
the preferred configuration of the required resubdivision plan.
While the Subdivision Ordinance specifically requires developers to demonstrate how
large (unsewered) lots may be resubdivided upon the advent of sanitary sewer service, it
is not speck as to a "preferred" resubdivision design concept. The City's Comprehensive
Plan does include some illustrative examples of resubdivision plan design possibilities, but
does not endorse a specific configuration. in this regard, the burden of demonstrating
future resubdivision has been placed on developers. Routinely, resubdivision plans (for
one acre lots) illustrate the placement of homes upon one-half of a 150 foot wide, one acre
lot. The remaining half of the lot is then reserved for potential resubdivision.
As you may be aware, the developers of the Lin -Bar PUD have expressed a desire to
locate homes in the "center" of their lots. Such home location is not possible using the
"typical" resubdivision plan concept which has been routinely considered by the City in the
past. This is not to say, however, that the central location of a home on a lot is not
possible. In fact, several alternative resubdivision plan design concepts simply have not
been used In the City of Otsego.
So as to expedite the processing of the Lin -Bar PUD development proposal, as well as
minimize the applicant's possible expense, staff requests that the City Council provide
some guidance as to the preferred resubdivision alternative. To aid in this determination,
we have compiled a listing of advantages and disadvantages associated with two primary
resubdivision concepts.
5778 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 585 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 0
PHONE d 1 2-50$-0636 FAX 6 1 2-508-9837
FEB -07-1997 11:38 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04i09
RESUBDIVISION CONCEPTS
Individual{ Property Owner Resubdivision (see Exhibit A for reference)
This type of resubdivision plan allows a property owner to split his or her own property,
at such time as sanitary sewer service is available. Such concept does not require
collaboration with an adjacent property owner and includes the "standard" resubdivision
plan typically processed by the City. Three examples of this resubdivision concept are
illustrates on attached Exhibit A. The following is a listing of advantages and
disadvantages associated with this concept.
a es
• No agreement with an adjacent property owner is necessary to subdivide.
• Property owners are given the flexibility to split their lot as a means of lessening the
financial burden associated with sanitary sewer service.
• While not often utilized, this resubdivision plan concept may be configured to allow
homes to be centralized upon lots (see Option B). It should be noted, however,
that such home centralization would require an additional street frontage (i.e.,.225
feet).
• Through covenants, homes may be required to be placed consistently upon a
specified side of a lot. As such, the subdivision can have the visual "appearance"
of uniform structure spacing.
• Implementation of the plan would not require the vacation of utility and drainage
easements.
Disadvantages
The"standard" or °typical'° resubdivision plan requires homes to be "offset" on lots.
If not addressed through covenants, such plan may result in a visually fragmented
subdivision design with significant setback variations between residences.
The placement of structures upon the "future lot" may be restricted.
2
r
FEB -07-1997 11;39 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05i09
Collaborated Property Owner Resubdivision (see Exhibit B for reference)
A second possible means of accommodating the central location of a home upon an
unsewered lot would be to dedicate 37.5 feet along each side lot line of a standard 150
foot wide lot for future resubdivision. Should sanitary sewer become available, adjacent
property owners could collaborate to create a new 75 foot wide sewered lot.
This type of resubdivision plan varies from those typically processed by the City as
collaboration with an adjacent property owner is necessary to "create" the resubdivided lot
to which sanitary sewer service may be provided. An example of this resubdivision
concept is illustrated on attached Exhibit B. The following is a listing of advantages and
disadvantages associated with this concept.
AWYantages
Such concept allows homes to be centralized upon 150 foot wide lots, resulting in
a uniform, generally aesthetic pleasing subdivision design.
If implemented, the resubdivision plan will result in an efficient use of land.
The plan does provide for future Resubdivision.
_Disadvantages
Collaboration of two adjacent property owners is necessary to implement the
resubdivision plan. It is anticipated this plan could be difficult to implement (due to
lack of agreement amongst property owners).
implementation of the plan may require the vacation of utility and drainage
easements.
The placement of structures in side yard areas may be restricted.
CONCLUSION
There are both advantages and disadvantages associated with the two alternative
resubdivision concepts discussed above. We believe as long as resubdivision plans are
provided, the City should be flexible and design be left to the developer's discretion and
relate to the uniqueness of each situation. This is, however, a policy matter to be
determined by the City Council.
3
FEB -07-1997 1139 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06i09
A representative of our office will be in attendance at the forthcoming 10 February Council
meeting to discuss this matter In detail.
PC- Elaine Beatty
Lary Koshak
Andy MacArthur
4
FEB -07-1997 11:40 NAC
612 595 9837 P.07i09
15d' 150'
Option A
Scale: I"= 1 OV
Y
!
;
!
■
�' 5'
75' 75'
75' 75'
75' 75'
!
75' 7S
75' 75'
75'
75'
■
,
a
15d' 150'
Option A
Scale: I"= 1 OV
Y
75'
75' 7S
75' 75'
75'
75'
0
!
41
i
/
■
225' 225' 225'
Option B
Scale: I"= 100'
EXHIBIT A
Individual Property Owner Resubdivision
5
FEB -07-1997 11:40 NAC
612 595 9837 P.08i09
-------- ---------
---------r---------
---------5--------
...-----�--------
■
i
i
i
i
.
.
1
_71
1
x. •
PAVED STREET
E 150, �s ISO, EE 150, 's
Option C
Scale: 1"= 120'
EXHIBIT A-2
■
I
_71
1
x. •
E 150, �s ISO, EE 150, 's
Option C
Scale: 1"= 120'
EXHIBIT A-2
FEB -07-1997 11:41 NAC
612 595 9837 P.09i09
37.5'- 75' Be 37.5' 37.5'9 75' 37.5'137.5'; 75' 37,5' 37.54 75'
• ! i
I � i •
•
:
1W NO 150' 150' 150'
Scab: 1" = 100'
EXHIBIT B
Collaborated Property Owner Resubdivlslon
TOTAL P.09
CITY OF OTSEGO
ENGINEER'S AGENDA ITEMS
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FEBRUARY 10, 1997
8.1 Proposal for Engineering Services to Study the Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water
Facilities.
Find attached separate proposals; 8.1 a (trunk sanitary sewer) and 8.1 b (potable
water) for the study of trunk sanitary sewer and water facilities in the east
portion of the City. The areas under study would be the Long Range Service
Area including the TH 101 corridor.
We request approval of the proposal and authorization to start as soon as
possible with a draft completed for Council review by March 10, 1997,
followed by a workshop review of the study.
8.2 Suggested revisions to the Bonestroo Report on Waste Water Treatment Study.
Find attached our suggested list of items to be addressed and/or changed in the
report.
8.3 Any other Engineering Business
a. Find accompanying this packet a draft policy on storm water drainage
submittals by the Developer's Engineer to the City. Drainage issues
appear in the ordinance some 15 times. The City needs to consolidate
the data and add specific detail to the data to assist the Developer's
Engineer in preparing the submittals. Should further discussion be
required perhaps this could be fitted in at a workshop. It will be
appropriate to adopt this during the monitorium on development.
b. Other business
f
8.1 a
PROPOSAL FOR
SANITARY SEWER TRUNK FACILITIES STUDY
FOR
CITY OF OTSEGO
Scope
The purpose of the proposed study is to provide the best alternative for the
collection and transportation of wastewater to the Proposed Wastewater
Treatment Facilities.
The goal is to provide the most efficient system to meet both the current and
long term needs wastewater collection in the City of Otsego.
The area of study is referred as the Long Range Service Area, which includes
the TH 101 Corridor. The study area is located in the northeast and east
portions of the city. The area is similar to the study area proposed for the
Potable Water Study.
The study will be consistent with the Comprehensive planning document being
prepared by NAC, City Planner.
II Study Objectives
The study's object is to provide a documented plan for the City of Otsego for
collection of wastewater. The study will provide location, size and capacity
information for the trunk sanitary sewer facilities proposed to be constructed in
conjunction with the Wastewater Treatment Facilities.
Cost estimates for the proposed facilities will be provided. Options and
recommendations on project financing will be discussed and presented in the
report.
Where lift stations are required, the capacities and estimated costs will be
reviewed. The service area of the lift stations will be identified and the required
capacity's of the stations will be reviewed.
Where alternative collection routes are possible, a recommendation will be made
on the preferred route.
Hakanson
1 Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
Major trunk lines will be sized for long range flow conditions. Estimates related
to shares of capacity for each trunk line will be determined based upon areas
served.
Lateral collection systems will not be reviewed except where existing
commercial properties have been determined to require immediate service.
III Existing Reports & Data
The study will utilize the data provided in existing reports related to the
collection system for this area.
The BRA report for Wastewater Treatment Facilities will be utilized for the data
and projections related to treatment capacity.
The original Comprehensive Sewer Study, dated 11/90, and referred to as
Phase I Planning System Overview, will be reviewed and incorporated into the
study as applicable.
We will also, given the assumption of treatment service from Elk River, provide
the concept and cost for that treatment alternative. Previous data will be
reviewed in relation to the proposed Elk River/Otsego Sewer service plan.
City topography will be utilized to develop preliminary profiles for trunk sewer
collection system.
IV Estimate Service Fees
The Study consists of the following phases with estimated hours as shown:
-- - 1 . Review existing data and reports 16 hours
2. Determine capacity requirement for study area. 48 hours
Develop flow projections. Determine long range
and 10 year flow rates based on future land use
planning and wastewater treatment plan staging.
3. Consider location of treatment facilities and/or 8 hours
service locations. Review method of transportation
(gravity main or forcemain) from wastewater
sources to the treatment facilities.
Hakanson
2 1111 Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
4. Layout proposed trunk system on topography maps 50 hours
including pipe sizing. Prepare map of the proposed
system.
5. Estimate costs of trunk sewers and lift stations. 24 hours
6. Review financing alternative and prepare a findings 12 hours
plan.
7. Prepare final report including exhibits 12 hours
Total Estimated Work Efforts 170 hours
Estimated Service Fee based on Fee/Hours:
Project Engineer 120 hours @ $62.60 $7500
Staff Engineer 20 hours @ $50.00 1000
Clerical & CADD Technicians 30 hours @ $45.00 1350
Total maximum not to exceed estimate of study costs $9850
The estimated cost for the complete study and report is considered a maximum
amount that will not be exceeded without specific authorization, if the scope of work
would change. The proposed study was based on using all existing data available.
No costs were included for soil borings or ground water testing. The study and report
as described in the proposal will be accomplished within a budget set by the maximum
authorized fee.
ot607.pro
Hakanson
3 Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
MW
CITY OF OTSEGO
FEBRUARY, 1997
POTABLE WATER STUDY
(Source, Storage and Distribution)
Background
The study area is located in the northeast and east portions of the City referred
to in the attached exhibit as the Long Range Service Area.
The Phase I and II areas shown represent the undeveloped portion of the Long
Range Service Area that have been projected to utilize potable water service
first. The area includes sections 10, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27,
28, west '/Z of 35 of the Township 121, Range 23 and Section 2, Township
120, Range 23, the City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota.
The City's comprehensive Plan is being revised by NAC. The Comprehension
Plan includes a master land use plan that will serve as a future development
guide. The water study will become a portion of the overall comprehensive
planning document.
II. Study Goals
The potable water source, storage and distribution study will provide a basis for
future growth of the City's water system. The study will provide details for an
efficient water system growth to serve the needs of the population. An
efficient water system will provide required service at the least cost to the
residents.
The potable water source portion of the study will provide a review of the
existing City well, and will make recommendations related to additional source
-- - requirements. Size, location and number of future wells will be determined
based upon growth projections for the area. Treatment of the water will be
considered based upon current Minnesota Department of Health requirements.
The number and capacity of the wells will be determined based upon Ten States
Standards recommendations, as follows:
1. The total developed groundwater source capacity shall equal or
exceed the design maximum day demand and equal or exceed the
design average day demand with the largest producing well out of
service.
2. A minimum of two sources of groundwater shall be provided.
Hakanson
1-111 Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
The potable water storage portion of the study will provide a review of storage
requirements, storage types and recommended storage locations. The type of
storage, ground storage or elevated storage, will be reviewed to determine the
most cost effective alternative. Locations will be analyzed based on projected
system growth and land availability. Storage sizing will be based upon the Ten
States Standards, as follows:
1. Fire flow requirements established by the appropriate state
Insurance Services Office should be satisfied where fire protection
is provided.
2. The minimum storage capacity (or equivalent capacity) for systems
not providing fire protection shall be equal to the average daily
consumption. This requirement may be reduced when the source
and treatment facilities have sufficient capacity with standby
power to supplement peak demands of the system.
The potable water distribution system will be analyzed to insure that an
adequate quantity of water can be delivered at an acceptable pressure to any
point in the service area. Location and sizing of water mains and laterals will
be determined based upon the projected growth of the City.
After the source, storage and distribution requirements are determined, all three
components will be analyzed simultaneously in a computer modelling program.
Watercad, developed by Haestad Methods, will be utilized to analyze several
potential water system alternatives for the City. The computer simulations will
be analyzed to insure an efficient water system is provided for the City.
An implementation strategy, including phased construction, associated costs,
and potential funding alternatives will be reviewed. A user cost will be
determined based upon system cost and the funding alternative selected.
-- 111. Estimate Work Effort and Service Fee
The proposed study consists of the following phases with estimated level of
effort as shown:
1 . Assemble data on existing water system.
2. Assemble data on long range development:
a. From land use planning, estimate long
range service population, domestic
demand, and commercial/industrial usage.
Develop data for long range average day,
peak day, and maximum hour usage.
2 hours
12 hours
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
b. Identify and incorporate standards for 8 hours
maximum/minimum design pressure, required
operational storage, recommended storage
reserve, and required fire protection flow.
C. Identify sizes and locations for required 16 hours
source, treatment, storage, and major trunk
facilities.
d. Model the system, review pipe sizing, 24 hours
and optimize the sizing of all proposed
or identified facilities.
3. Prepare cost data with potential funding sources. 8 hours
Determine required user costs.
4. Prepare and present the system report 20 hours
TOTAL ESTIMATED WORK EFFORT: 90 hours
Estimated hourly fee based on:
Project Engineer: 60 hours @ $62.50/hour = $3,750
Clerical & Technicians: 30 hours @ $45.00/hour = $1,350
Total maximum not to exceed estimate of study cost: 15. 10
The estimated cost of the complete study and report is considered a maximum
amount that will not be exceeded without specific authorization, if the scope of
work would change. The study and report as described in the proposal will be
accomplished within a budget set by the maximum authorized fee.
G27-97.ots
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
'•�`d.0•i•✓rte.`• 'd� � �'�•.-�
Hakanson
Anderson
--ml ASSOC., InC.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Lawrence G. Koshak
City Engineer
DATE: February 6, 1997
RE: Bonestroo Report
Wastewater Treatment Facilities Plan
3601 Thurston Avenue
Anoka, Minnesota 55303
612/427-5860
Fax 612/427-3#@fi- 0520
We were directed to comment on what needed to be addressed and/or changed in the
report before the report can be considered for acceptance.
• Limit report contents to Wastewater Treatment Facilities. City will
initiate the Trunk Sanitary Sewer Study themselves.
• Limit location of treatment facilities site to locations(s) based on Mayor
discussion with the landowners.
• Incorporate previous addendums and correspondence in report.
• Adjust flows and plant capacity to reflect a proposed increase in capacity
for Dayton.
• Remove the Riverbend Mobile Home Park from the capacities
requirement. The Trailer Court is now served by a permitted wastewater
treatment facilities.
The portion of the flow capacity in the plant designated for St. Michael
(Frankfort Township) should be either removed from the report or a new
agreement of participation must be obtained from St. Michael.
• The selection treatment process must be explained in more detail.
Although it is an Activated Sludge process, the exhibits label this plant
as extended aeration and in the cost summary the terminology refers to
Oxidation Ditches. This entire process needs to be explained in the text
in a manner in which these terminologies can relate to each other.
Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors
Memorandum
Page 2
February 6, 1997
A demonstration of how the treatment plant can be expanded to the
stages recommended must be provided. This is important in the land
acquisition process. Areas of the ultimate site should be estimated with
some engineered approach. A graphic description is necessary in this
matter.
• Sludge disposal is a critical issue in the plants operations. More detail
needs to be presented on the options for the plant disposal of sludge.
The difference between class A & B sludge treatment needs explanation
and cost estimates. The question also arises about land available to
dispose of minimally treated sludge disponed on dairy related farm lands
in Otsego and/or Dayton.
• A sample of the agreement between Dayton and Otsego should be
provided for discussion.
• In the financial analysis the treatment facilities charges should be
determined by connection charges and/or some portion for debt
retirement collected through the quarterly service fee. If over bonding is
advised the justification should be presented.
The Council should also be interested in the approximate number of units
needed to hook up per year to pay for annual debt retirement for the
treatment facilities.
• The above items should be addressed in a revised single document not
as attachments, addendums, appendixes, etc. to the existing report.
OT607b.mem
Hakanson
I-V] Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
Memorandum
Page 2
February 6, 1997
• A demonstration of how the treatment plant can be expanded to the
stages recommended must be provided. This is important in the land
acquisition process. Areas of the ultimate site should be estimated with
some engineered approach. A graphic description is necessary in this
matter.
Sludge disposal is a critical issue in the plants operations. More detail
needs to be presented on the options for the plant disposal of sludge.
The difference between class A & B sludge treatment needs explanation
and cost estimates. The question also arises about land available to
dispose of minimally treated sludge disponed on dairy related farm lands
in Otsego and/or Dayton.
A sample of the agreement between Dayton and Otsego should be
provided for discussion.
• In the financial analysis the treatment facilities charges should be
determined by connection charges and/or some portion for debt
retirement collected through the quarterly service fee. If over bonding is
advised the justification should be presented.
The Council should also be interested in the approximate number of units
needed to hook up per year to pay for annual debt retirement for the
treatment facilities.
• The above items should be addressed in a revised single document not
as attachments, addendums, appendixes, etc. to the existing report.
OT607b.mem
r�
12-10H
Hakanson
Anderson
Assoc., Inc.
8.3a
POLICY ON STORMWATER DRAINAGE
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR DEVELOPERS
CITY OF OTSEGO
Prepared by:
Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc.
3601 Thurston Avenue
(612) 427-5860
(612) 427-0520 fax
Adopted by the City Council on :
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 . Purpose and Intent
2. Established Ordinances (City Codes)
3. Incorporation by Reference
4. State and Federal Requirements
5. Calculations and Considerations
a. Storm Events
b. Curve Numbers
C. Ponding
d. Storm Sewer Sizing
6. General Requirements - Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan
7. Storm Drainage System Submittal Requirements
POLICY ON STORMWATER DRAINAGE
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
FOR DEVELOPERS
CITY OF OTSEGO
1.0 Purpose and Intent
This policy is intended to provide Developer's Engineers with a standardized
format for submittal of drainage plans and calculations to the City for review.
A standardized format will provide the following: 1 . reduced preparation time
for submittals by providing direct guidelines for Developer's Engineers to follow,
2. reduced review time required by the City's Engineer by insuring a complete
and comprehensive drainage plan and calculations are submitted, and 3. insure
that the City will receive the best possible protection of its resources, which
could be adversely affected by inadequate stormwater management planning.
2.0 Established Ordinances (City Codes)
A.
Section 20-16-9, Drainage Plans and Soil Erosion and Sediment Control
B.
Section 21-6-2-C-13, (Preliminary Plat Grading Plan)
C.
Section 21-6-2-E-7 (Preliminary Plat Erosion and Sediment Control)
D.
Section 21-6-3-M (Final Plat Drainage and Utility Easements)
E.
Section 21-7-4-H (Lots - Watercourses)
F.
Section 21-7-4-J (Lots - Drainage)
G.
Section 21-7-11 -D, Storm Water Drainage Facilities
H.
Section 21-7-11-E, Storm Water Drainage Standards
I.
Section 21-7-14, Drainage
J.
Section 21-7-15-A, Drainage and Utility Easements
K.
Section 21-7-15-B, Drainage
L.
Section 21-7-16, Erosion and Sediment Control
M.
Section 21-7-19, Dedication of Storm Water Holding Areas or Ponds
N.
Section 21-8-8, Drainage
0.
Section 21-9-1-G, Drainage Facilities
The above listed articles are a comprehensive list of previously approved
ordinances related to stormwater drainage. Other related sections of the City
Code not listed above remain in effect. The ordinance sections listed provide
authority for City to require and review drainage plans.
Page 1
we,
5.0
Incorporation by Reference
Protecting Water Quality in Urban Areas (Best Management Practices for
Minnesota) prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Division of
Water Quality, latest edition, shall be incorporated by reference into this policy.
Recommendations set forth in the above referenced manual shall be
implemented by the Developer's Engineer. All recommendations set forth within
the above referenced manual shall be termed "required" when applicable.
State and Federal Requirements
State and Federal Ordinances, Codes, Regulations, and Requirements shall be
adhered to by the Developer.
Calculations and Considerations
FA
Storm Events
The following rainfall values shall be used in calculations for Otsego:
Event
1 year, 24 hour
2 year, 24 hour
10 year, 24 hour
25 year, 24 hour
50 year, 24 hour
100 year, 24 hour
Curve Numbers
Rainfall (inches)
2.30
2.71
4.11
4.70
5.24
5.85
The following Curve Numbers (CN) shall be utilized in design. Hydrologic
soil groups shall be determined based upon the Soil Survey for Wright
County, Minnesota as published by the United States Department of
Agriculture Soil Conservation Service in Cooperation with Minnesota
Agricultural Experiment Station.
Page 2
Cover Description
Curve numbers for hydrologic
soil group
Cover type and hydrologic condition
A
D
C
D
Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established)
Open space (lawns, parks, golf courses, cemeteries,
etc.) .................................
49
69
79
84
Impervious areas:
Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc.
(excluding right-of-way) ...................
98
98
98
98
Streets and roads:
Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding
right-of-way) .........................
98
98
98
98
Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) ....
83
89
92
93
Gravel (including right-of-way) ..............
76
85
89
91
Dirt (including right-of-way) ................
72
82
87
89
Urban Districts:
Commercial and business ...................
91
94
95
96
Industrial ..............................
84
90
93
94 .
Residential districts by average lot size:
1/9 acre or less (town houses) .................
81
88
91
93
Y4 acre ................................
68
80
86
89
1/3 acre................................
64
78
85
88
'/Z acre................................
61
76
84
88
1acre................................
59
75
83
87
2 acres and above ........................
55
72
81
86
Undeveloped areas
Agricultural land (all current uses) ...............
53
68
77
82
Pasture, grassland, or range - continuous forage for
grazing................................
49
69
79
84
Meadow - continuous grass, protected from grazing
and generally mowed for hay ................
30
58
71
78
Brush - brush-weed-grass mixture with brush the
major element ...........................
35
56
70
77
Woods - grass combination (orchard or tree farm) ....
43
65
76
82
Woods.................................
36
60
73
79
Page 3
C. Ponding
1. Permanent ponding shall be based upon the runoff rate for the 100
year storm event. The developed condition runoff rate shall be
less than the existing condition runoff rate for the 100 year storm
event.
2. Sedimentation storage ponding shall be based on the 2.0 inch
rainfall event. The area considered shall be the entire area of the
plat. Curve Numbers utilized shall be consistent with the
developed condition of the plat.
3. Skimming devices shall be utilized for each pond. Provide details
for skimming devices used.
4. Where discharge from the pond is not possible, the permanent
pond must be sized for two 100 year events back-to-back.
5. Discharge must be made to a receiving stream, ditch, or another
pond or an approved discharge route as shown in the Storm Water
Management Plan.
D. Storm Sewer Sizing
Storm sewer sizing shall be based upon the 10 year storm event. Inlet
capacities and roadway spread at each inlet shall be determined. The
maximum allowable roadway spread at any inlet shall be one-half of the
travelled lane.
Storm sewer inlets shall be spaced to insure that not more than '/2 of the
travelled lane is inundated during the 10 year storm event. Manning's
equation shall be utilized to determine the flow in the street at each
catchbasin for verification of actual spread. A manning's n of 0.020
shall be utilized for asphalt pavement. Additionally, grate inlet capacities
shall be verified at the maximum allowable depth of flow to verify that
the proposed grates will pass the 10 year flows.
6.0 General Requirements - Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan
Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plans shall be provided by the Developer
in accordance with the City Code. Several items critical to the review of the
drainage system must be adequately depicted on the plan by the Developer's
Engineer. The following key elements must be depicted on the plan:
Page 4
A. Existing and proposed contours at a minimum of 2' intervals. A minimum
of a 1 ' contour interval shall be used where conditions dictate. The
determination of contour interval shall be made based upon clarity and
readability of the plans.
B. Pond locations as depicted by the proposed contours. Normal pond
water level and 100 year flood water levels shall be depicted on the plan
for each pond. Sedimentation ponds are required at each outfall point
from the proposed plat. Sedimentation ponds shall be designed based on
a 2.0 inch rainfall for fully developed conditions. Permanent
sedimentation ponds may be utilized as construction sedimentation
ponds, provided they are cleaned after permanent erosion control
measures are established. Design features of the sedimentation ponds
shall be as described in the BMP Manual.
Flood control ponding shall be defined as that portion of the stormwater
pond above the normal water level of the pond. Sedimentation storage
volume may not be utilized when determining the 100 year flood
elevation of the pond.
C. Locations of silt fence, bale checks, wood fiber blanket, rock construction
entrances, storm drain inlet protection, outlet projection, rip rap,
temporary seeding, permanent seeding, sod, mulch, or other erosion
control features proposed to be implemented for the project.
D. Storm sewer facilities, when utilized, shall be adequately depicted on the
drawings. As a minimum, the following must be shown on the plan:
1. Storm sewer pipe length, grade, type of material, and size
between each catch basin and manhole.
2. Catchbasin and manhole structural data including size or diameter,
depth, and material of construction. A typical section depicting
each different type of catchbasin or manhole used shall be shown
on the drawing. Type of casting utilized shall be referenced for
each catchbasin or manhole. Elevations for the top of inlet and
each invert shall be referenced on the drawing.
3. A typical curb section for urban design streets shall be shown on
the drawing.
4. If ditch sections are used, a typical section shall be shown on the
drawing depicting bottom width and side slopes of the ditch.
Page 5
5. Details of skimming devices utilized.
7.0 Storm Drainage System Submittal Requirements
A. Storm water calculations shall be performed utilizing the United States
Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Engineering
Division, Technical Release 55, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds
method. Unless prior approval is received from the City Engineer, no
other method of performing storm water calculations will be allowed.
B. The stormwater drainage report shall be comprised of the following
sections to provide the City Engineer with adequate base information for
which to review the report. The following data must be included in the
report:
1. Title Page. The title page shall list the project name, project
location, date prepared, and preparer's name, title, and company.
2. Table of Contents. The table of contents must provide• a
description of the major categories of the report and also list each
hydrograph and reservoir report presented in the report.
3. Summary. The summary must provide descriptions of items
critical to the review of the entire report. Assumptions and results
of the calculations shall be included in the summary. As a
minimum, the following items must be discussed in the summary:
a. Pre (existing) site conditions
1 . Total site area
2. Description of subareas, as required.
3. For each area, or subarea, provide the following
information:
-- _ a. Area in acres
b. Curve number with justification
C. Average slope
d. Length of runoff
e. Runoff rate and runoff volume
b. Post (proposed) Conditions
1. Total site area
2. Description of subareas, as required
3. For each area, or subarea, provide the following
information:
Page 6
a. Area in acres
b. Curve number with justification
C. Average slope
d. Length of runoff
e. Runoff rate and runoff volume
C. Comparison of existing to proposed runoff rates and
volumes.
d. Discussion of temporary and permanent erosion control
measures utilized.
e. A discussion of the storm sewer system, if applicable, to
include a summary of flows to each catchbasin and the
depth of water over each catchbasin during the ten year
event.
4. Drainage maps depicting pre -development and post -development
conditions. The maps may be 22"x34" plans, but preferably shall be
11 "x17" reductions. The plans shall delineate drainage area and sub -
drainage area boundaries. All areas shall be labelled and referenced to
those presented in the report.
5. Computer printouts of all hydrograph and reservoir files shall be included
at the back of the report for reference.
OT901.pol
Page 7
CITY OF OTSEGO
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
11 AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE II
II9. COUNCIL ITEMS CITY CLERK FEBRUARY 10,1997 - II
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC
9.1. DISCUSSION OF INFORMATION FROM GARY WALE RE: BLANDEN
FOUNDATION GRANT
BACKGROUND:
At the Council Meeting of January 27, 1997 I handed out information
from Gary Hale Re: Blanden Foundation. Gary called one day and faxed
over this information. He had asked for a grant from Blanden back
when the four communities were working out annexation/consolidation
issues. He would like Otsego to get a steering committee formed and
go through the training process. The Council needs to decide if this
is something we are interested in at this time and if so, we need to
get a steering committee together. I have not contacted Gary as of
yet, as I was waiting for the Council to look at this and determine if
it is something they feel would be beneficial to our community.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The Council review and discuss and determine what action if any they
would like to take on this.
Thank you,
e74�
Elaine
JAN -1S-97 SAT 11:42 AM CITY OF A HERTVILLE
BLANDIN FOUNDATION
eG
Mau 31 1995
Garrison L. Hale
City Administrator
4�?,
61122497 3210
s
5975 Main Ave NE S e�,-]� 8 G J- 3
PO Box 9 '
�f 7
Albertvile MN 55301 (o I (o uJ - up. �F 6. 3 s Y , 98
I am pleased to delighted hear that the cities of Albertville, Otsego, ,,c:: . • s
St. Michael and the Township of Frankfort are interested in the Blandin
Community Leadership Program. While I have tentatively scheduled a
leadership retreat for your communities on September 28 -October 3, 1997,
the following steps need to be taken to complete the "application process."
A. The nucleus of a steering committee needs to be formed. This group
should include leaders/spokespersons/gatekeepers who represent:
- education - media
- human services - business
- health care - industrial base
- churches - service organizations
- agriculture - local government
- labor - minorities
B. This steering committee is brought together to meet with the recruiter
for the leadership program, Alan Judd. Alan works for us part-time.
He is the Community Education Director in Staples and can be
reached at 218-894-2497. Please contact him directly to set up a
meeting time.
At this meeting, the program is explained in detail and the group must
reach agreement that the program is appropriate for the four
communities and that they will support and be involved in the
recruitment process. The group will also be asked to identify the
short and long-term challenges facing these communities, as well as
the area's assets. This will serve as the bases for designing
recruitment strategies which will bring forth applicants who can help
these communities deal with their challenges and build on their
resources. The group will also be asked who else should be on this
steering committee.
C. Based on the results of this meeting, Alan will give me his
recommendation as to whether these communities should be
accepted, rejected or delayed until later.
100 NORn
6-0523 0 FAX: 218/327-1949
JAN -13-97 SAT 11:43 AM CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 612 497 3219 P 0
ING COMMUNITY NEEDS &
The following is a list of "areas" from conuiauiiities that have gone through
the process of identifying conununity issues & resources - as your comnuuiity is
about to do. You may use the structure listed below or organize the "areas" of
your community in a different fashion. You may add or delete "areas" as you
Profile your coirununity.
The list below will allow your steering coiiunittee to divide and work in four
or two groups, or stay in one group.
l.) Education
Youth Issues
TecluioIogy
Senior Issues
Media
2.) Health Care
Churches
Enviroiuncntal
Human Serv.
Prof. Services
3.) Government
Utilities
Transportation
Law Enforcem.
Finance/Banking
Cultural Diversity
4.) Recreation
Retail
Tourisi»
Ec. Developm.
Industry
Housing
("as
le c2�/ Q;? 7�re
Claims List for Approval
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
CLAIM TOTAL
T4 Llwnm QATn ;rnR uWAI OIIDD(SE QATF NI IMRFR f I ATM
DMHUUKT U1L LUMVHNT PROPANE vu Vai -c
ECM PUBLISHERS INC JANUARY SERVICES 02/03/97 2264 503.75
37
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST
PPE 1/25/97
02/03/97
2243
473.2E
'
•
JERRY OLSON
JANUARY PERMITS
02/03/97
2244
2,242.05
_
7
s
9
MINNEGASCO
16121ANT SANTTATTnN TNr
SERVICE TO 1/27
FEBRUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
Q2/01/97
2267
22(,R
1,450.98
1 02 72
f0
II
I2
MIKE BOIE
WINTERFEST MEDALLION
02/03/97
2246
400.00
13
14
G & K TEXTILE LEASING SYSTEMS
JANUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
2248
299.62
i6
NAPA OF ELK RIVER INC
PARTS
02/03/97
2249
7.12
17
H G WEBER OIL COMPANY
1/22 DELIVERY
02/03/97
2250
338.77
1e
BOYER TRUCKS- --,, --PARTS
02/03/97
2252
598.63
19
m°
THE HARDWARE STORE'
SUPPLIES
02/03/97
2253
31.10
_...
rii 1
WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE CO
TIRES
02/03/97
2256
1,265.55
23
DARLENE SOLBERG
WINTERFEST EXPENSES
02/03/97
2257
21.99
24
25
CUB FOQQS
WINTERFEST FOOD:_ .,. x
02/03/97
2258
134.28
26
,.::
HAKANSOI FASSOC�`Z4OW2 PARK COMMISSION, SERVICES
02/03/97,..
2259
1,119.65
.ANDERSOt4 ,
w
2A
SOFTRONICS
COMPUTER SOFTWARE & SERVICE
02/03/97
2260
716.53
29
ELK RIVER PRINTING & PARTY PLUS
SUPPLIES
02/03/97
226%
186.11
30
31
-121
ELK RIVER MUNICIPAL UTILI[ S yam.
SERVICE TO 1/,*
v,
02/43/97
2262
883.15
33
DMHUUKT U1L LUMVHNT PROPANE vu Vai -c
ECM PUBLISHERS INC JANUARY SERVICES 02/03/97 2264 503.75
37
U.S. WEST COMMUNICATIONS..
PHONE SERVICE
02/03/97
2266
442.59
x
40
41
42
MINNEGASCO
16121ANT SANTTATTnN TNr
SERVICE TO 1/27
FEBRUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
Q2/01/97
2267
22(,R
1,450.98
1 02 72
o
s
AT & T
JANUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
2269
16.14
4
STEPHEN CONROY, ATTORNEY
JANUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
2270
22.00
47
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDITOR -TREASURER
— —
FEBRUARY SERVICE
02/03/97
2271
8,395.00
4
s1
s
s3
s
ssj
s61
.,i
1
Claims List for Approval
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
For the period 02/03/97 to 92/03/97 02/03/97
0 WHOM PAID CLAIM TOTAL ACCOUNT ACCOUNT
FOR WHAT PURPOSE DATE NUMBER- CLAIM
..aARY A. GROEN, CPA JANUARY SERVICE 02/03/97 2273 2,050.00 101-41600-390 ,
TOTAL FOR MONTH 26,465.59
TOTAL YEAR TO DATE 448,402.09 448 402
l'
73
2