02-24-97 CCIt is my opinion that the engineering firms of Hakanson Anderson and Bonestroo Rosene
Anderlik, Associates would be putting their best foot forward (like Paul from the bonding
company) and provide these engineering reports to the city at no charge.
I find it interesting that engineering firms [ Hakanson Anderson/ Booestroo ) find it
necessary to bill for these reports, when they have so much to gain by getting
this project approved.
(S22,700 vs $1,200,000)
" Cost of doing business "
" Question is : do these engineering firms really want Otsego's business. **
It is clear to me that Paul from the bonding company wants Otsego's business.
Although I feel that it would be of the best interest of the engineering companies to supply this
information to the city at no cost. I do understand that we all like to get paid, especially not
knowing if the city will commit to the project. So I suggest the following two options:
Reports = Bonestroo $7,700
Hakanson $15,000
Be paid for by the city
ecides to proceed with project (Future date]? 0-2 Project Ends
Option 1.
Both engineering firms
Hakanson & Bonestroo
Refund the city the report
fees collected out of the
overall project fee they collect
for the project.
Example:
(20%* Project cost] - [Report fees]
91.2 million - $22,700
Option 2.
Since the reports are paid for
by the city, the reports should
be considered city property.
Engineering should be put out for
bid with other qualified firms.
This is the 90's. I am not sure if 20%
project fee is the best rate for the city.
City has the most to gain from this option.
Example:
20% of $6 million = S 1.2 million
18% of $6 million = S 1. 08 million
2% of S6 million = S120,000
Sheet1
j
Otsego SewerlWater Projected Engineering Costs
■ Reports
■Total Project 20°k
Reports $ 50,000.00
Total Project 200/6 $ 1,200,000.00
I figure the cost of the mechanical sewer plant and water to be greater then $ 6 million.
20% of $ 6 million is $1,200,000, for just engineering fees.
It is my opinion that the reports being discussed will be utilized as a basis for the overall
engineering project, should the city commit to the project.
Page 1
CITY OF OTSEGO
ULh'I r'ux UUUINUtL At. 1 ivly
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. Bob Kirmis, Asst. City Planner FEBRUARY 24,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: pi<EL-AFhai til: ES,cu
6.1. Barthel Bros. Dairy/Chris Bulow - Cond. Use Permit to allow the
following:
1. Cond. Use Permit to allow transfer of property rights of one
per forty subdivisions to allow a 7 -lot clustered
subdivision
2. Variance for cul -du -sac length
3. Preliminary plat approval
BACKGROUND:
NOTE: You have the P.C. Minutes from 2/19/97 P.C. Packet
As you know, this request was originally heard at the Planning
Commission and was sent on to the Council with the Recommendation to
deny (unanimously). The Council, at the advice of the City Attorney,
returned this request to the Planning Commission to re -hear it to be
able to create more of a findings of fact to deny if that was their
intent. The Planning Commission re -heard this request at the Planning
Commission Meeting of February 5, 1997. After Re -Hearing, the
following motion was made:
Richard Nichols - Having heard testimony and reviewed all the written
materials, including the letter from the City Attorney, under those
conditions, I motion to approve the request for the Conditional Use
Permit to allow the one per forty of transfer of development rights.
Ing Roskaft seconded. Richard Nichols, Ing Roskaft, Carl Swenson and
Arleen Nagel voted in favor. Bruce Rask, Jim Kolles, Eugene Goenner
opposed. Motion carried four to three (4 to 3), Hence, the P.C.
Recommends Approval on a split vote. Preliminary plat approval and
variance was approved unanimously. (Findings Attached)
STAFF RECOWENDATION:
Staff Recommendation is approve the following:
1 CUP to allow transfer of propeM rights of one per forty
subdivision to allow a 7 -lot clustered subdivision.
2 Preliminary Plat Approval
3 Variance to allow a cul-de-sac to exceed 500 feet in lenglh.
Thank you,
e74��A-
VARIANCE APPROVAL
CUL-DE-SAC LENGTH
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Barthel Brothers Dairy to allow a variance from the City's maximum 500 foot
cul-de-sac length requirement.
On 24 February 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Barthel Brothers Dairy to allow the aforementioned variance.
Based on the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the
evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The property to which the variance is to be applied is legally described as follows:
See Attached Exhibit A
2. The subject property is zoned A-1,Agricultural Rural Service.
3. The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 21-7-6 of the Subdivision
Ordinance which stipulates that cul-de-sac streets may not exceed 500 feet in
length.
4. The applicants are proposing a cul-de-sac measuring approximately 580 feet in
length.
5. Section 21-10-4.A of the Subdivision Ordinance states that a variance shall only be
approved when the City Council finds that a variance may not be issued unless
certain criteria are satisfied. The criteria and findings regarding them are:
a. That there are special circumstances or highly unique conditions
affecting the property such that the strict application of the provisions
of the Subdivision Ordinance would deprive the applicant of the
reasonable use of his land.
The existence of a drainageway near the central portion of the property
establishes that a cul-de-sac length in excess of 500 feet is necessary to
access the southern portion of the property and provide reasonably sized
building pads.
b. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public
health, safety and welfare or injurious to other property in the territory
in which property is situated.
The granting of the variance shall not be detrimental to the public health,
safety and welfare to property in the area.
C. That the granting of the variance will not increase the flood hazard or
flood damage potential.
The granting of the variance shall not increase the flood hazard or flood
damage potential to the subject site or other surrounding properties.
d. That the use proposed by the applicant would not result in a stage
increase violating the requirements of Minnesota Statutes, Chapters
104 and 105, as such chapters may be amended or replaced from time
to time, and any applicable requirements imposed by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
Approval of the requested variance shall not result in a violation of the
requirements of Minnesota Statutes Chapters 104 and 105.
e. That the variance is to correct inequities resulting from an extreme
physical hardship such as topography.
Approval of the variance is necessary to allow the subject to be put to
reasonable use and responds to development limitations established by the
site's contained drainageway.
f. Hardships relating to economic difficulties shall not be considered for
the purpose of granting a variance.
Granting of the hardship is not a result of economic hardship.
2
1
g. That the hardship is not a result of an action or actions by the owner,
applicant, or any agent thereof.
The hardship is not a result of an action by the owner, applicant or any agent
thereof.
The hardship is not a result of an action by the property owner, applicant, or
agent thereof.
6. The planning report dated 11 November 1996 and memorandum dated 23
December 1997, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is
incorporated herein.
7. In conjunction with the requested variance, the applicants have also requested
approval of a conditional use permit to allow a transfer of development rights.
Denial of the said conditional use permit request would have the result of variance
denial.
8. On 20 November, 4 December and 18 December 1996, the Planning Commission
conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed variance and associated
conditional use permit preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of
the cited conditional use permit application and evidence received, the Planning
Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the Otsego City
Council deny the conditional use permit based upon various findings. Because
approval of such conditional use permit is necessary to consider the requested
variance, the Planning Commission resultantly recommended that the Otsego City
Council deny the variance request.
9. On 13 January 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the variance application of Barthel Brothers Dairy. Having
received the recommendation of the Planning Commission for conditional use
permit (and resultant variance) denial, the City Council directed the Planning
Commission to hold another public hearing at which the public record and basis for
such recommendation may be expanded and further justified.
10. On 5 February 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
to consider the conditional use permit (and variance) applications preceded by
published and mailed notice. Upon review of the variance application and the
evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
recommended that the City Council approve the variance.
3
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations, and the applicable City Ordinances, the applicant's
request for variance from the City's cul-de-sac length requirement is approved in its
present form, subject to the fulfillment of the following condition:
1. Final plat approval of the Rolling Ridge Creek Subdivision.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 24th day of February 1997
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
LEGAL DESCRIPTION TO BE ADDED
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPROVAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Barthel Brothers Dairy for a conditional use permit to allow a "one per forty"
transfer of development rights within an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Zoning District.
On 24 February 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Barthel Brothers Dairy for a conditional use permit to allow the
aforementioned.
Based on the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the
evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow "one per forty" transfer
of development rights within an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Zoning District
specifically.
2. The Legal description of the sources of the density transfer are as follows:
See Attached Exhibit A
3. The legal description of the property to which the development right is being
transferred is as follows:
See Attached Exhibit B
4. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and
City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional
use permit. The seven effects and findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and
provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The resulting "one per forty" density which shall result from the proposed
density transfer is consistent with the provisions of the City's Comprehensive
Plan as the loss of productive agricultural land will not result.
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of
the area.
Land uses in this area primarily consist of agricultural activities on large
parcels of land, usually containing single family homes. The proposal to
cluster seven available development rights upon marginal farm land is
compatible with the surrounding land uses and also protects large,
contiguous farming activities in the area.
C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained
herein (i.e.,' parking, loading, noise, etc.).
As a condition of pending subdivision approval, all applicable performance
standards shall be upheld.
d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposal is not anticipated to adversely affect the neighborhood. The
proposed use and density is compatible with the surrounding area.
e. The proposed use's impact upon the property values of the area in
which it is proposed.
While a detailed analysis has not been conducted, similar situations have
demonstrated no negative impact upon area property values. In fact, the
construction of seven new homes in the area may increase surrounding
property values.
f. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of
streets serving the property.
It is anticipated that the seven proposed dwellings will generate
approximately 70 vehicle trips per day upon County Road 39 (per Institute
of Transportation Engineers). Such traffic is within the capabilities of County
Road 39 which serves the property.
2
g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to
overburden the City's service capacity.
The applicable A-1 Zoning District allows a residential density of one
dwelling unit per 40 acres of land. It is the applicants' intent to cluster their
available development rights into a single location. The proposed single
family dwellings will not overburden the City's service capacity.
5. The planning report, dated 11 November 1996 and memorandum dated 23
December 1996 prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., are
incorporated herein.
6. On 20 November, 4 December 1996, and 18 December the Otsego Planning
Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed conditional use
permit application preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the
conditional use permit application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning
Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council deny
the conditional use permit.
7. On 13 January 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled
meeting to consider the conditional use permit application of Barthel Brothers Dairy.
Having received the recommendation of the Planning Commission for conditional
use permit denial, the City Council directed the Planning Commission to hold
another public hearing at which the public record and basis for such
recommendation may be expanded and further justified.
8. On 5 February 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
to consider the proposed conditional use permit application preceded by published
and mailed notice. Upon review of the conditional use permit and new evidence
received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
recommended that the City Council approve (on a split vote) the conditional use
permit.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinance, the applicant's request
for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a "one per forty' transfer of development rights in an
A-1 Zoning District is approved in its present form and subject to the following stipulations:
The properties involved in the development rights transfer are under the same
ownership.
3
2. A deed restriction is placed upon the parcels from which development rights have
been transferred to prohibit additional development.
3. The City approve the Rolling Ridge Creek final plat.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 24th day of February 1997.
ATTEST:
M
CITY OF OTSEGO
M
Larry Fournier, Mayor
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
4
LEGAL DESCRIPTION .
SOURCE(S) OF DENSITY TRANSFER
To be added
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION .
RECIPIENT OF DENSITY TRANSFER
To be added
EXHIBIT B
CITE' OF OTSEGO
REOUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
AGENDA SECTIOY: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE I
6. Bob Kirmis, Asst. City Planner FEBRUARY 24,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
6.2. Don and Phyllis Greninger/Michael W. Emberton, Allied Mortgage
1. Comprehensive plan amendment to bring area into the
Immediate Urban Service Area.
2. Rezone from A-1 (General Agricultural) to R-3 (Residential,
Imm. Urban Service Area).
BACKGROUND:
NOTE: You have the P.C. Minutes from 2/19/97 P.C. Packet
This item was originally heard at the P.C. and recommendation of
denial was made. The applicant pulled their application before it
came to the City Council. They reapplied for the area North of Co Rd.
#39 and East of Kadler South of Is_and View Estates. This request was
heard by the Planning Commission on February 5, 1997 at 3PM.
Bruce Rask motioned to amend the Comp Plan to bring the area into the
Urban Service Area. Jim Kolles Seconded. Bruce Rask, Jim Kolles, and
Arleen Nagel voted in favor of the motion. Richard Nichols, Ing
Roskaft, Carl Swenson and Eugene Goenner opposed. Motion failed on a
split vote of 4 to 3. (refer to the P.C. Minutes) Motion to deny
rezoning was passed to deny on a 5 to 2 vote. See Findings of Fact
Attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommendation is that this is a Council decision as to the area
if it should be developed now or not. It is currently in the Long
Range Service Area. Keep in mind that the recommendation was to deny
by the P.C. on a 4 to 3 split vote and the Professional Staff feel
this is premature. This is a policy decision.
Thank you,
Elaine
NW^ 441100% NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC %NWOOdIll"COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 17 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Greninger Request
FILE NO: 176.02 - 97.01
Attached please find the following items applicable to the Greninger Comprehensive Plan
amendment and rezoning request:
1. Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval
2. Findings of Fact - Rezoning Approval
3. Zoning Amendment
4. Resolution - Comprehensive Plan Amendment Denial
5. Rezoning Denial
Please note that findings have been prepared both "for" and "against" the requests.
Regardless of the decision made by the City Council, it is important that the Council
include adequate discussion to support such action.
This matter is scheduled for City Council consideration on 24 February.
PC: Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 5 1 2-595-9836 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT APPROVAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN TO EXPAND THE IMMEDIATE URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES TO
INCLUDE THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Emberton on behalf of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center,
Inc. has submitted a request to rezone the property legally described on attached Exhibit
A from A-1, Agricultural Rural Service to R-3, Residential Immediate Urban service; and
WHEREAS, the subject property currently lies within the City's Long Range Urban
service area; and
WHEREAS, inclusion of the subject property within the Immediate Urban Service
area is necessary to justify approval of the requested rezoning action; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the amendment and has
recommended that the City Council deny the request; and
WHEREAS, the lands do not qualify as a premature development in that:
a. The land holds adequate stormwater drainage capacity.
b. The land has a safe water supply.
C. Adequate roads serve the property.
d. The site holds the ability to accommodate a safe sewage disposal system.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF OTSEGO RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the City Comprehensive Plan be and hereby is amended to include the
property legally described on attached Exhibit A from the Long Range Urban
Service Area and placing it within the Immediate Urban Service Area.
a
2. That the text of the Comprehensive Plan and all maps showing the subject property
attached to and incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan shall be adjusted to
show the changes made in the boundary around the subject property.
3. That the City Council disagrees with the recommendations of the Otsego Planning
Commission and recommendations of staff included in the Northwest Associated
Consultants, Inc. report, dated 21 January 1997 for the aforementioned reasons..
Passed this day of 1997
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
2
ATTACH PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE
EXHIBIT A
REZONING
APPROVAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Mr. Michael Emberton on behalf of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center to
rezone the following described land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning
District designation to an R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area zoning
designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
On 24 February 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center to rezone the above
described land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning District to an R-3,
Residential Immediate Urban Service Area zoning designation. Based on the application,
the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the evidence received, the City
Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the following described property from A-1,
Agricultural Rural Service to R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area
zoning designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
2. In conjunction with the rezoning request, the City Council has approved a requested
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to include the subject property in the
City's designated Immediate Urban service Area.
3. Section 20-3-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and
City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed rezoning.
The seven effects and findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and
provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Land Use Plan which
suggests low density residential use of the subject property. The proposed
use is also consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan policies:
• Land use allocations are to be balanced with economic market
demands and service availability.
• All development proposals shall be analyzed on an individual basis
from a physical, economic and social standpoint to determine the
most appropriate uses with the context of the community as a whole.
• Land use development shall be related to and reflect transportation
needs, desired development and community priorities.
• Once established, geographic land use designations and related
zoning classifications shall be changed only when it can be
demonstrated that such modifications are in the best interest of the
community on a long range perspective and .such changes will
promote land use compatibility and predetermined goals and policies
of the Comprehensive Plan.
• The housing needs of the entire community shall be addressed and
responded to.
• To the extent possible, a variety of housing types, styles and choices
is to be created and maintained.
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of
the area.
The proposed use is compatible with the Island View Estates single family
residential subdivision which borders the site on the north and east.
C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained
herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
As a condition of subdivision approval and building permit issuance, the
proposed use shall be required to meet applicable performance standards
of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed rezoning and low density residential use will not adversely
affect the subject area.
e. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which
it is proposed.
While no specific study has been conducted, similar situations indicate that
the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect property values in the subject
area.
f. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of
streets serving the property.
Traffic generated from the rezoning will be within the capabilities of County
Road 39 which serves the property.
g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to
overburden the City's service capacity.
The rezoning and resulting land use will not overburden the City's service
capacity.
4. The planning report, dated 21 January 1997 prepared by Northwest Associated
Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
5. On 5 February 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
to consider the proposed rezoning application preceded by published and mailed
notice. Upon review of the rezoning application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended (on a split vote)
that the City Council deny the rezoning based on the aforementioned findings.
3
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinance, the applicant's request
to rezone the property legally described in attached Exhibit A from A-1, Agricultural Rural
Service Area Zoning District designation to an R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service
Area zoning designation is approved in its present form.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 24th day of February 1997.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk and Zoning Administrator
4
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(TO BE ADDED)
EXHIBIT A
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO
TO PROVIDE FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The official zoning map of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance is hereby
amended to change the zoning classification of the following described property.
See Attached Exhibit A
Section 2. The'above described property is hereby rezoned from A-1, Agricultural
Rural Service Zoning District designation to an R-3, Residential Immediate Urban Service
Area District zoning designation.
Section 3. The Zoning Administrator is hereby directed to make appropriate
change in the official zoning map of the City of Otsego to reflect the change in zoning
classification as set forth above.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage
and publication.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 24th day of February 1997.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(TO BE ADDED)
EXHIBIT A
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT DENIAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
RESOLUTION DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OTSEGO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TO EXPAND THE IMMEDIATE URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES TO INCLUDE
THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED ON ATTACHED EXHIBIT A.
WHEREAS, Mr. Michael Emberton on behalf of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center,
Inc. has submitted a request to rezone the property legally described on attached Exhibit
A from A-1, Agricultural Rural Service to R-3, Residential Immediate Urban service; and
WHEREAS, the subject property currently lies within the City's Long Range Urban
service area; and
WHEREAS, Inclusion of the subject property within the Immediate Urban Service
area is necessary to justify approval of the requested rezoning action; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the amendment and has
recommended that the City Council deny the request; and
WHEREAS, inclusion of the subject property within the Immediate Urban Service
Area is, at this time, considered premature for the following reasons:
1. A determination cannot be made that the proposed use is consistent with the City's
sanitary sewer planning efforts.
2. Development of low density residential uses upon the subject property will result in
an inefficient delivery of public services.
3. The proposed use will encroach into an agricultural area of the City. Such
encroachment is specifically discouraged by the City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY OF OTSEGO RESOLVED that the
recommendation of Comprehensive Plan amendment denial by the Otsego Planning
Commission is hereby adopted in its entirely along with the Northwest Associated
Consultants staff report dated 21 January 1997.
Passed this day of 1997
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
2
ATTACH PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION HERE
EXHIBIT A
REZONING
DENIAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
IN RE: FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Mr. Michael Emberton on behalf of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center to
rezone the following described land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning
District designation to an R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area zoning
designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
On 24 February 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application of Allied Mortgage of Brooklyn Center to rezone the above
described land from an A-1, Agricultural Rural Service Area Zoning District to an R-3,
Residential Immediate Urban Service Area zoning designation. Based on the application,
the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the evidence received, the City
Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the following described property from A-1,
Agricultural Rural Service to R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service Area
zoning designation.
The subject property is legally described as:
See Attached Exhibit A
2. In conjunction with the requested rezoning, the applicants have also requested an
amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to include the subject property in the
immediate urban service area. Containment of the subject property within the
Immediate Urban Service Area is necessary to justify the requested rezoning action.
In consideration of the applicant's request to include the subject property in the
Immediate Urban Service Area, the recommendation of the Planning Commission,
and the evidence received, the City Council determined that such inclusion is, at
this time inappropriate
3. Section 20-3-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and
City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed rezoning.
The seven effects and findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and
provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the City's Land Use Plan which
suggests low density residential use of the subject property. The proposed
use is also consistent with a specific policy of the Comprehensive plan which
encourages infill development.
The proposed use is further consistent with the following Comprehensive
Plan policies which discourage the proposed use:
Residential development especially within the Long Range Urban
Service Area of the City needs to be aware of impacts resulting from
agricultural uses which exist and will continue to operate in such
locations. Unless public health or some other such issues are found
to exist, agricultural activities will not be curtailed due to negative
impacts upon residential development.
Protect and preserve prime agricultural lands and the economic
viability of farming operations.
Permit growth on a phased basis providing for a logical extension of
urban growth and related community services.
Boundary limits for urban expansion shall be clearly delineated and
non -farming type uses shall be prohibited from encroaching into
agricultural areas.
2
• All development proposals shall be analyzed on an individual basis
from a physical, economic and social standpoint to determine the
most appropriate uses within the context of the community as a
whole.
• Land use development shall be related to and reflect transportation
needs, desired development and community priorities.
• Encourage continued but orderly growth in Otsego.
• The spread of small scale, non-farm subdivisions in agricultural areas
shall be prohibited.
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of
the area.
The proposed use is compatible with the Island View Estates single family
residential subdivision which borders the subject property on the north. The
proposed use is not, however, compatible with agricultural uses which lie
south of the subject property.
C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained
herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
As a condition of subdivision approval and building permit issuance, the
proposed use shall be required to meet applicable performance standards
of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed rezoning and low density residential use may adversely affect
neighboring agricultural uses in the area.
e. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which
it is proposed.
While no specific study has been conducted, similar situations indicate that
the proposed rezoning will not adversely affect property values in the subject
area.
3
f. Traffic generation of the proposed use in relation to capabilities of
streets serving the property.
Until an actual development plan is submitted, it is unknown whether traffic
generated from the rezoning will be within the capabilities of County Road
39 which serves the property.
g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to
overburden the City's service capacity.
The rezoning and resulting land use will negatively impact the City's ability
to deliver sewer service in an efficient and cost effective manner.
4. The planning report, dated 21 January 1997 prepared by Northwest Associated
Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
5. On 5 February 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
to consider the'proposed rezoning application preceded by published and mailed
notice. Upon review of the rezoning application and evidence received, the Otsego
Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended (on a split vote)
that the City Council deny the rezoning based on the aforementioned findings.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinance, the applicant's request
to rezone the property legally described in attached Exhibit A from A-1, Agricultural Rural
Service Area Zoning District designation to an R-3, Residential, Immediate Urban Service
Area zoning designation is denied in its present form.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 24th day of February 1997.
4
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk and Zoning Administrator
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(TO BE ADDED)
EXHIBIT A
CITE' OF OTSEGO
REQ17EST FOR COUNCIL .ACTIO`
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE
6. Bob Kirmis, Asst. City Planner FEBRUARY 24th,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC
6.3 Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance
1. Proposed Amendment of Ordinance Re: Antennas
2. Proposed Amendment of Ordinance Re: Business Signs
3. Proposed Amendment of Ordinance Re: Administrative Permit
Approvals
BACKGROUND:
NOTE: You have the P.C. Minutes from 2/19/97 P.C. Packet
These Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance came before the P.C. for
hearing on 2/5/97. After Hearing and discussion all three were
approved unanimously by the Planning Commission. (See Minutes and
Findings of Fact attached.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommendation is approval of the following:
1. Proposed Amendment of Ord. Re: Antennas
2. Proposed Amendment of Ord. Re: Business Signs
3. Proposed Amendment of Ord. Re: Administrative Approvals
Thank you,
Elaine
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 10 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance Revision: Antenna Regulations
FILE NO: 176.08 - 96.15
In consideration of advancing wireless communication technology and the provisions of
the 1996 Telecommunication Act, a draft amendment to Section 33 of the Zoning
Ordinance relating to antennas has been prepared.
The 1996 Telecommunication Act basically stipulates that wireless communication is a
necessary service which must be reasonably accommodated by municipalities.
In review of the draft amendment text, please make note of the following:
1. Various antenna types have been specifically defined.
2. Satellite dishes, short-wave radio dispatching antennas and ham radio antennas
are listed as allowed accessory uses in all zoning districts.
3. Within agricultural and residential zoning districts, satellite dishes may measure up
to 3.5 meters in diameter. Such dishes which measure greater than two meters in
diameter, however, require the processing of an administrative permit. Satellite
dish antennas may extend a maximum of 15 feet above the height restriction of the
applicable zoning district (greater heights allowed by a conditional use permit).
4. Amateur radio service antennas may extend up to 70 feet in height (greater heights
allowed by a conditional use permit).
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
5. Antennas other than those listed in Item No. 2 above are considered "principal
uses" and referenced in the amendment accordingly (either as permitted or
conditional uses).
6. An attempt has been made to encourage personal wireless service (i.e, cellular
telephone) antennas to locate upon public structures by listing such facilities as
permitted uses in all zoning districts without a maximum height requirement.
Conversely, personal wireless service antenna alternatives (i.e., mounting on non-
public structures or ground poles) would require a conditional use permit (except
in industrial districts) and would need to adhere to various height restrictions.
7. The following antenna types are listed as conditional uses and allowed only in the
City's industrial districts.
a. Commercial, private and public satellite dishes in excess of 3.5 meters.
b. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas: and
public utility microwave antennas.
8. Section 20-17-3.13 of the existing Zoning Ordinance text (addressing building height
exceptions) has been expanded to reference antennas and antenna support
structures.
This item is scheduled for City Council consideration on 24 February.
pc: Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE NO. 96 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 33 OF THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE
REGARDING THE REGULATION OF ANTENNAS (COMMUNICATION RECEPTION/
TRANSMISSION DEVICES).
THE CITY OF OTSEGO ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 20-2-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(Definitions) is hereby amended to delete the following
definitions:
Essential Services
Satellite Dish
Satellite Dish Height
Section 2. Section 20-2-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(Definitions) is hereby amended to add the following definitions:
Antenna, Personal Wireless Service. A device consisting of a
metal, carbon fiber, or other electromagnetically conducive rods or
elements, usually arranged in a circular array on a single
supporting pole or other structure, and used for the transmission
and reception of wireless communication radio waves including
cellular, personal communication service (PCS), enhanced
specialized mobilized radio (ESMR), paging and similar services and
including the support structure thereof.
Antenna, Public Utility Microwave. A parabolic dish or cornucopia
shaped electromagnetically reflective or conductive element used
for the transmission and/or reception of point to point UHF or VHF
radio waves in wireless telephone communications, and including the
suouortinq structure thereof.
Antenna, Radio and Television, Broadcast Transmitting. A wire,
set of wires, metal or carbon fiber rod or other electromagnetic
element used to transmit public or commercial broadcast radio, or
television programming, and including the support structure
thereof.
Antenna, Radio and Television Receiving. A wire, set of wires,
metal or carbon fiber element(s), other than satellite dish
antennas, used to receive radio, television, or electromagnetic
waves, and including the supporting structure thereof.
Antenna, Satellite Dish. A device incorporating a reflective
surface that is solid, open mesh, or bar configured and is in the
shape of a shallow dish, cone, horn, or cornucopia. Such device is
used to transmit and/or receive radio or electromagnetic waves
between terrestrially and/or orbitally based uses. This definition
shall include, but not be limited to, what are commonly referred to
as satellite earth stations, TVROs (television, receive only) and
satellite microwave antennas and support structure thereof.
Antenna, Short -Wave Radio Transmitting and Receiving. A wire, set
of wires or a device, consisting of a metal, carbon fiber, or other
electromagnetically conductive element used for the transmission
and reception of radio waves used for short-wave radio
communications, and including the supporting structure thereof.
Antenna Support Structure. Any pole, telescoping mast, tower,
tripod, or any other structure which supports a device used in the
transmitting or...receiving of radio frequency energy.
Essential Services. The erection, construction, alteration or
maintenance by public utilities or municipal departments of
underground or overhead telephone, gas, electrical, communication,
water or sewer transmission, distribution, collection, supply or
disposal systems, including poles, wires, mains, drains, sewers,
pipes, conduits, cables, fire alarm boxes, police call boxes,
traffic signals, hydrants and other similar equipment and
accessories in connection therewith for the furnishing of adequate
service by such private or public utilities or municipal
departments. Transmission/reception support structures and
antennas shall not be considered an essential service.
Secondary Use: A use of land or of a building or a portion
thereof which is subordinate to and does not constitute the primary
use of the land or building.
Structure, Public. An edifice or building of any kind, or any
piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined
together in some definite manner which is owned or rented, and
operated by a federal, state, or local government agency.
Section 3. Section 20-17-3.A of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(allowable height increases) is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Allowable Increases: Except in the Wild and Scenic
Recreational River District, building, antenna and
antenna support structure heights in excess of those
standards contained in the district provisions and any
2
other sections of this Chapter may be allowed through a
conditional use permit, provided that:
1. Demonstrated need is established for the increase
in height and said increase will not violate the
intent and character of the zoning district in
which the structure is located.
2. The site is capable of accommodating the increased
structure size.
3. The potential increased intensity and size of use
does not cause an increase in traffic volumes
beyond the capacity of the surrounding streets.
4. Public utilities and services are adequate.
5. For each additional story over the district
limitation or for each additional ten (10) feet
above the maximum allowed per district, front and
side yard setback requirements shall be increased
by, ten (10) percent.
6. The construction does not limit solar access to
abutting and/or neighboring properties.
7. The provisions of Section 20-4-2.F of this Chapter
are considered and satisfactorily met.
Section 4. Section 20-17-3.B.14 of the Otsego Zoning
Ordinance (Building Height Exceptions) is hereby amended to read as
follows:
14. Antennas and antenna support structures as regulated by
Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 5. Section 20-32-5.B of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(Conditional Essential Services -Transmission Facilities) is hereby
deleted in its entirety.
Section 6. Section 20-32-5.0 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(Conditional Essential Services -Lots) is hereby renumbered as
Section 20-32-5.B.
Section 7. Section 20-33 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(Communication Reception/Transmission Devices) is hereby amended to
read as follows:
3
SECTION 33
ANTENNAS
Section
20-33-1 Purpose
20-33-2 General Standards
20-33-3 Accessory and Secondary Use Antennas
20-33-4 Personal Wireless Service Antennas
20-33-5 Satellite Dishes
20-33-6 Commercial and Public Radio and Television Transmitting
Antennas, and Public Utility Microwave Antennas
20-33-1: PURPOSE: The purpose of this section is to establish
predicable, balanced regulations for the siting and
screening of wireless communications equipment in order
to accommodate the growth of wireless communicating
systems within the City of Otsego while protecting the
public against any adverse impacts on the City's
aesthetic resources and the public welfare.
20-33-2: GENERAL STANDARDS: The following standards shall apply to
all personal wireless service, public utility, microwave,
radio and television broadcast transmitting, radio and
television receiving, satellite dish and short-wave radio
transmitting and receiving antenna.
A. All obsolete and unused antenna shall be removed within
twelve (12) months of cessation of operation at the site,
unless an exemption is granted by the Zoning
Administrator.
B. All antenna shall be in compliance with all City building
and electrical code requirements and as applicable shall
require related permits.
C. Structural design, mounting and installation of the
antenna shall be in compliance with manufacturer's
specifications and shall be verified and approved by a
registered professional engineer.
D. Unless the antenna/antenna support structure and land is
under the same ownership, written authorization for
antenna erection shall be provided by the property owner.
E. No advertising message shall be affixed to the antenna
structure.
4
F. The height of the antenna shall be the minimum necessary
to function satisfactorily, as verified by an electrical
engineer or other appropriate professional.
G. Antennas shall not be artificially illuminated unless
required by law or by a governmental agency to protect
the public's health and safety.
H. When applicable, proposals to erect new antenna shall be
accompanied by any required federal, state, or local
agency licenses.
I. If a new antenna support structure is to be constructed,
it shall be designed so as to accommodate other users
including but not limited to other personal wireless
service communication companies, local police, fire and
ambulance companies.
J. Antenna support structures under two hundred (200) feet
in height shall be painted silver or have a galvanized
finish to reduce visual impact,' unless otherwise required
by federal law.
K. Except as may be applicable in cases where a conditional
use permit is required, antennas and support structures
for federally licensed amateur radio stations and used in
the amateur radio service are exempt from sub -paragraphs
C, F, and I above, and must comply with Subd. L. below.
L. Amateur radio support structures (towers) must be
installed in accordance with the instructions furnished
by the manufacturer of that tower model. Because of the
experimental nature of the amateur radio service,
antennas mounted on such a tower may be modified or
changed at any time so long as the published allowable
load on the tower is not exceeded and the structure of
the tower remains in accordance with the manufacturers
specifications.
20-33-3: ACCESSORY AND SECONDARY USE ANTENNAS: The following
standards shall apply to all accessory and secondary use
antennas including radio and television receiving
antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs three and one-half
(3.5) meters or less in diameter, short-wave radio
dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the
operation of electronic equipment including radio
receivers, federally licensed amateur radio stations and
television receivers.
5
A. Accessory or secondary use antennas shall not be erected
in any required yard (except a rear yard) or within
public or private utility and drainage easements, and
shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from all lot
lines.
B. Guy wires or guy wire anchors shall not be erected within
public or private utility and drainage easements, and
shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from all lot
lines.
C. Accessory or secondary use antennas and necessary support
structures, monopoles or towers may extend a maximum of
fifteen (15) feet above the normal height restriction for
the affected zoning district, except support structures
and antennas used in the amateur radio service may extend
a maximum of seventy (70) feet for the affected zoning
district.
D. The installation of more than one (1) support structure
per property shall require the approval of a conditianal
use permit.
20-33-4: PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE ANTENNAS:
A. Agricultural and Residential District Standards.
1. Antennas located upon public structures: Personal
wireless service antenna located upon public
structures shall require the processing of an
administrative permit and shall comply with the
following standards:
a. The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a
coverage/ interference analysis and capacity
analysis prepared by a registered professional
engineer that location of the antennas as
proposed is necessary to meet the frequency
reuse and spacing needs of the personal
wireless service system and to provide
adequate portable personal wireless service
coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be
adequately served by locating the antennas in
a less restrictive district.
b. Transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment shall be housed within an existing
structure whenever possible. If a new
equipment building is necessary for
transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear
0
1
yard of the .principal use and shall be
screened from view by landscaping where
appropriate.
C. An administrative permit is issued in
compliance with the provisions of Section 20-9
of this Chapter.
2. Antennas not located upon a public structure:
Personal wireless service antenna not located upon
a public structure shall require the processing of
a conditional use permit and shall comply with the
following standards:
a. The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a
coverage/ interference analysis and capacity
analysis prepared by a registered professional
engineer that location of the antennas as
proposed is necessary to meet the frequency
reuse and spacing needs of the personal
wireless service system and to provide
adequate portable personal wireless service
coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be
adequately served by locating the antennas in
a less restrictive district.
b. The antennas shall be located on an existing,
non-residential structure, if possible, and
shall not extend more than fifteen (15 ) feet
above the structural height of the structure
to which they are attached.
C. If no existing, non-residential structure
which meets the height requirements for the
antennas is available for mounting purposes,
the antennas may be mounted on a single ground
mounted pole provided that:
1) The pole not exceed seventy-five (75)
feet in height.
2) The setback of the pole from the nearest
residential structure is not less than
the height of the antenna. Exceptions to
such setback may be granted if a
qualified structural engineer specifies
in writing that any collapse of the pole
will occur within a lesser distance under
all foreseeable circumstances.
7
LIM
d. Transmitting, . receiving and switching
equipment shall be housed within an existing
structure whenever possible. If a new
equipment building is necessary for
transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear
yard of the principal use and shall be
screened from view by landscaping where
appropriate.
e. Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing,
non-residential structure, a security fence
not greater than eight (S) feet in height with
a maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent shall
be provided around the support structure.
f. The conditional use permit provisions of
Section 20-4 of this Chapter are considered
and determined to be satisfied.
Business and Institutional District Standards:
1. Antennas Located Upon A Public Structure. Personal
wireless service antenna located upon a public
structure shall comply with the following
standards.
a. Transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment shall be housed within an existing
structure whenever possible. If a new
equipment building is necessary for
transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear
yard of the principal use and shall be
screened from view by landscaping where
appropriate.
b. An administrative permit is issued in
compliance with the provisions of Section 20-9
of this Chapter.
2. Antennas Not Located Upon A Public Structure.
Personal wireless service antennas not located upon
a public structure shall require the processing of
a conditional use permit and shall comply with the
following standards:
a. The applicant shall demonstrate by providing a
coverage/ interference analysis and capacity
analysis prepared by a registered professional
engineer that location of the antennas as
proposed is necessary to meet the frequency
reuse and spacing needs of the personal
wireless service system and to provide
adequate portable personal wireless service
coverage and capacity to areas which cannot be
adequately served by locating the antennas in
a less restrictive district.
b. The antennas shall be located on an existing
structure, if possible, and shall not extend
more than fifteen (15) feet above the
structural height of the structure to which
they are attached.
C. If no existing structure which meets the
height requirements for the antennas is
available for mounting purposes, the antennas
may be mounted on a single ground mounted pole
provided that:
1) The pole not exceed seventy-five (75)
feet in height.
2) The setback of the pole from the nearest
residential structure is not less than
the height of the antenna. Exceptions to
such setback may be granted if a
qualified structural engineer specifies
in writing that any collapse of the pole
will occur within a lesser distance under
all foreseeable circumstances.
d. Transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment shall be housed within an existing
structure whenever possible. If a new
equipment building is necessary for
transmitting, receiving and switching
equipment, it shall be situated in the rear
yard of the principal use and shall be
screened from view by landscaping where
appropriate.
e. Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing
structure, a security fence not greater than
eight (8) feet in height with a maximum
opacity of fifty (50) percent shall be
provided around the support structure.
f. The conditional use permit provisions of
Section 20-4 of this Chapter are considered
and determined to be satisfied.
0�
C. Industrial District Standards.
1. Antennas Located Upon A Public Structure.
Personal wireless service antennas located upon a
public structure shall require the processing of an
administrative permit and shall comply with the
following standards:
a. An administrative
compliance with the
of this Chapter.
permit is issued in
provisions of Section 20-9
2. Antennas Not Located Upon A Public Structure.
Personal wireless service antennas not located upon
a public structure shall require the processing of
an administrative permit and shall comply with the
following standards:
a. The antennas shall be located upon a structure
if possible.
b. If no existing structure which meets the
height requirements for mounting the antennas,
the antennas may be mounted upon a supporting
pole or tower not exceeding one hundred fifty
(150) feet in height. Such pole or tower
shall be located on a parcel having a
dimension equal to the height of the pole or
tower measured between the base of the pole or
tower located nearest the property line and
said property line, unless a qualified
structural engineer specifies in writing that
the collapse of the pole or tower will occur
within a lesser distance under all foreseeable
circumstances.
C. An administrative permit is issued in
compliance with the provisions of Section 20-9
of this Chapter.
20-33-5: SATELLITE DISHES:
A. Agricultural and Residential District Standards. Single
satellite dish TVROs located within agricultural and
residential zoning districts of the City shall comply
with the following standards:
1. All accessory and secondary use provisions of
Section 20-33-3 of this Chapter are satisfactorily
met.
10
2. The lot on which the satellite dish antenna is
located shall be of sufficient size to assure that
an obstruction -free receive window can be
maintained within the limits of the property
ownership.
3. The satellite dish antenna is not greater than
three and one-half (3.5) meters in diameter.
B. Business and Institutional District Standards.
Satellite dish antennas within the business and
institutional zoning districts of the City shall be
limited to those listed as permitted accessory and
secondary uses in the applicable zoning district subject
to the provisions of Section 20-33-2 and 20-33-3 of this
Chapter.
C. Industrial District Standards. Commercial, private and
public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas
in excess of three and one-half (3.5) meters may be
allowed as a conditional use within industrial districts
of the City and shall comply with the following
standards:
1. All accessory and secondary use provisions of
Section 20-33-3 of this Chapter are satisfactorily
met.
2. The lot on which the satellite dish antenna is
located shall be of sufficient size to assure that
an obstruction free transmit -receive window or
windows can be maintained within the limits of the
property ownership.
3. The conditional use permit provisions of Section
20-4 of this Chapter are considered and determined
to be satisfied.
20-33-6: COMMERCIAL AND PUBLIC RADIO AND TELEVISION TRANSMITTING
ANTENNAS, AND PUBLIC UTILITY MICROWAVE ANTENNAS:
Commercial and public radio and television transmitting
and public utility microwave antennas shall comply with
the following standards:
A. Such antenna shall be considered an allowed conditional
use within the I-1, Limited Industrial District of the
City and shall be subject to the regulations and
requirements of Section 20-4 of this Chapter.
11
B. The antennas, transmitting towers, or array of towers
shall be located on a continuous parcel having a
dimension equal to the height of the antenna,
transmitting tower, or array of towers measured between
the base of the antenna or tower located nearest a
property line and said property line, unless a qualified
structural engineer specifies in writing that the
collapse of any antenna or tower will occur within a
lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances.
C. Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing structure,
a fence not greater than eight (8) feet in height with a
maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent shall be provided
around the support structure and other equipment.
Section 8. Section 20-51-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 9. Section 20-51-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 10. Section 20-51-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 11. Section 20-52-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-2 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
12
Section 12. Section 20-52-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-2 District Accessory Uses) is hereby -amended to add the
following:
H. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 13. Section 20-52-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(A-2 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 14. Section 20-53-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 15. Section 20-53-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 16. Section 20-53-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
13
Section 17. Section 20-54-2. of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-2 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 18. Section 20-54-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-2 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 19. Section 20-54-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-2 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 20. Section 20-55-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-3 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 21. Section 20-55-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-3 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
14
Section 22. Section 20-55-5. of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-3 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 23. Section 20-56-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-4 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 24. Section 20-56-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-4 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Radio -and television receiving antennas including'single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 25. Section 20-56-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-4 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
E. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 26. Section 20-57-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-5 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 27. Section 20-57-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-5 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
15
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 28. Section 20-57-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-5 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 29. Section 20-58-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-6 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 30. Section 20-58-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-6 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 31. Section 20-58-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-6 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
C. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 32. Section 20-59-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-7 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
H. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
16
Section 33. Section 20-59-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-7 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 34. Section 20-59-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R-7 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 35.- . Section 20-60-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -MH District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
B. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 36. Section 20-60-3 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -MH District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 37. Section 20-60-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -MH District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
A. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
17
Section 38. Section 20-61-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -B District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 39. Section 20-6-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -B District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs, short-wave radio dispatching
antennas, or those necessary for the operation of
household electronic equipment including radio receivers,
federal licensed amateur radio stations and television
receivers, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 40. Section 20-61-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(R -B District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
H. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 41. Section 20-62-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
J. Personal wireless service antennas located on a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 42. Section 20-62-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
M
Section 43. Section 20-62-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
B. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 44. Section 20-63-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-2 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
P. Personal wireless service antennas located on a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 45. Section 20-63-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-2 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio..and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 46. Section 20-63-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-2 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 47. Section 20-64-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-3 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
UU. Personal wireless service antennas located on a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
19
1
Section 48. Section 20-64-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-3 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 49. Section 20-64-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B-3 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service
on a public structure, as
Chapter.
towers and antennas not located
regulated by Section 33 of this
Section 50. Section 20-65-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -W District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
N. Personal wireless service antennas located on a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 51. Section 20-65-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -W District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 52. Section 20-65-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -W District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
E. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
20
Section 53. Section 20-66-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -C District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Personal wireless service antennas located on a public
structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 54. Section 20-66-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -C District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 55.- . Section 20-66-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(B -C District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located
on a public structure, as regulated by Section 33 of this
Chapter.
Section 56. Section 20-67-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
G. Personal wireless service towers and antennas, including
necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 33
of this Chapter.
Section 57. Section 20-67-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
21
Section 58. Section 20-67-5.of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
E. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting
antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
F. Commercial, private and public satellite dish
transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of three and
one-half (3.5) meters in diameter, as regulated by
Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 59. Section 20-68-3 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-2 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
I. Personal wireless service towers and antennas, including
necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 33
of this Chapter.
Section 60. Section 20-68-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-2 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 61. Section 20-68-6 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(I-2 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
F. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting
antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
G. Commercial, private and public satellite dish
transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of three and
one-half (3.5) meters in diameter, as regulated by
Section 33 of this Chapter.
22
Section 62. Section 20-69-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(INS District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Personal wireless service towers and antennas, including
necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 33
of this Chapter.
Section 63. Section 20-69-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(INS District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
D. Radio and television receiving antennas including single
satellite dish TVROs three and one-half (3.5) meters or
less in diameter, short-wave radio dispatching antennas,
or those necessary for the operation of electronic
equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed
amateur radio stations and television receivers, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 64. Section 20-69-5 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance
(INS District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the
following:
L. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting
antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as
regulated by Section 33 of this Chapter.
Section 65. This ordinance shall become effective immediately
upon its passage and publication.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this day of
1997.
CITY OF OTSEGO
Larry Fournier, Mayor
ATTEST:
By:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
23
N W, 6#,% e " 1*4 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 10 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance: Business Signs
FILE NO: 176.08 - 96.13
Attached please find a proposed amendment to the City's sign requirements which would
allow business identification signs which abut the Interstate 94 corridor to exist at heights
up to that imposed in the applicable base zoning district for principal buildings. This
amendment reflects the Planning Commission's recommendation on this matter.
Currently, a maximum freestanding business sign height of 20 feet is imposed upon all
commercial and industrial uses, regardless of business location (i.e., adjacency to the
interstate highway). As a result of ordinance adoption, the following maximum sign height
requirements would be imposed along the interstate corridor (depending on zoning
designation).
Zoning District
Maximum Height of
Freestanding
Business sign
B-1
35 feet
B-2
35 feet
B-3
35 feet
B -W
30 feet
B -C
30 feet
1-1
35 feet
I-2
35 feet
INS
40 feet
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9836 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
A-
This item is scheduled for City Council consideration on 24 February.
pc: Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
K
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ADDRESSING
BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGN REQUIREMENTS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 20-37-5.C.4 of the Otsego City Code (Business Identification
Sign Requirements) is hereby amended to read as follows:
4. - Business Identification Signs. Total sign area shall not exceed fifteen (15)
percent of the total front building facade except that both front and side
facades shall be counted on a comer lot. Signs chosen to comprise the total
gross sign area shall be consistent with the following provisions:
a. Freestanding. Not more than one (1) double sided freestanding sign.
Sign area may not exceed one hundred (100) square feet each side
with a maximum height of twenty (20) feet except that for signs
abutting the Interstate 94 corridor, the principal structure height
requirements of the applicable zoning district shall apply.
b. Wall, Canopy or Marquee. Not more than one (1) wall, canopy or
marquee sign per building. However, on corner lots, two (2) such
signs shall be allowed, one (1) per street frontage. Individual sign
area shall not exceed one hundred (100) square feet.
C. Advertising messages shall not comprise more than twenty-five (25)
percent of any freestanding or wall sign.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage
and publication.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this day of 1997.
CITY OF OTSEGO
M
ATTEST:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
BY:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
2
N W^OM% NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC VNI111IM0 COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 10 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Zoning Ordinance: Administrative Permits/Approvals
FILE NO: 176.08 - 96.18
Attached please find a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would
establish an administrative permit procedure for various applications which currently
require City Council approval.
The amendment reflects specific recommendations of the Planning Commission made at
the Planning Commission's previous 4 February meeting.
The following is a listing of specific ordinance changes which would result from ultimate
amendment adoption.
ITEM (SECTION)
PROPOSED CHANGE
Time extension for conditional
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
use permits (Section 20-4-6)
the following conditions: 1) maximum of one
extension; and 2) maximum sixty (60) day limit
Time extension for variances
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
(Section 20-5-4)
the following conditions: 1) maximum of one
extension; and 2) maximum sixty (60) day limit
Time extension for temporary
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
dwelling units (Section 20-16-
the following conditions: 1) maximum of one
2.E)
extension; and 2) maximum sixty (60) day limit
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
Erection of model homes
Changed to allow administrative approval. Model
(Section 20-20-2)
home intentions should be identified as part of
subdivision review
Off-street parking surfacing
Changed to allow administrative approval
exceptions for industrial uses
(Section 20-22-4.H.12.c.4)
Reduction to loading berth
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
sizes for non-residential uses
the following condition: applicant demonstrate
(Section 20-23-6.A)
ability to provide "full size" berth if need arises.
Reduction to required number
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
of loading berths (Section 20-
the following condition: applicant demonstrate
23-7.D)
ability to provide required number of berths if need
arises
Temporary sale of farm
Changed to allow administrative approval _
products produced "on-site"
(Section 20-26-8.B)-'
Indoor limited retail sales
Changed to allow administrative approval subject to
accessory to allowed uses in
same conditions as currently imposed
the B -C District (Section 20-66-
5.C)
This material is scheduled for City Council consideration on 24 February.
pc: Elaine Beatty
Jerry Olson
Andy MacArthur
Larry Koshak
ORDINANCE NO. 97 -
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OTSEGO ZONING ORDINANCE ADDRESSING
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVALS.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OTSEGO HEREBY ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 20-4-6 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Cancellation of
Conditional Use Permits) is hereby amended to read as follows:
20-4-6: CANCELLATION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS:
A. Unless otherwise specified by the City Council at the time it is authorized, a
conditional use permit shall be null and void and expire if the applicant fails
to utilize such conditional use permit and fulfill each and every condition
attached thereto within one (1) year from the date of its authorization unless
a petition for an extension of time in which to complete or utilize the use has
been granted by the Zoning Administrator provided that:
1. The extension is requested in writing and filed with the City at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the initial conditional use
permit request.
2. The request for extension states facts demonstrating that a good faith
attempt has been made to complete or utilize the use or activity
permitted in the conditional use permit.
3. A maximum of one (1) extension shall be granted.
4. The extension shall not exceed sixty (60) days from the initial
conditional use permit expiration date.
B. There shall be no charge for the filing of petition for the extension described
in Subsection A, above.
Section 2. Section 20-5-4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Lapse of Variance)
is hereby amended to read as follows:
20-5-4: LAPSE OF VARIANCE:
A. Unless otherwise specified by the City, if within one (1) year after granting
a variance the use as allowed by the variance shall not have been initiated
or utilized, then such a variance shall become null and void unless a petition
for an extension of time in which to complete or utilize the variance has been
granted by the Zoning Administrator provided that:
1. The extension is requested in writing and filed with the City at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the initial variance request.
2. The request for extension states facts demonstrating that a good faith
attempt has been made to complete or utilize the variance that has
been granted..
3. A maximum of one (1) extension shall be granted
4. The extension shall not exceed sixty (60) days from the initial
variance expiration date.
B. There shall be no charge for the filing of a petition for the extension
described in Subsection A, above.
Section 3. Section 20-16-2.E.9.d of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Temporary
Dwelling Unit Processing) is hereby amended to read as follows:
d. If the work authorized under a permit has not been initiated
within sixty (60) days after the date of issuance, the permit
shall be null and void except in cases when a time extension
is granted in conformance with Section 20-16-2-E.13 of this
Chapter.
2
Section 4. Section 20-16-2-E.13 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Temporary
Dwelling Unit Permit Expiration) is hereby amended to read as follows:
13. Permit Expiration.
a. The temporary dwelling unit permit shall expire ninety (90)
days from the date of permit issuance or within three (3) weeks
after the date of certificate of occupancy permit issuance for
the principal residential dwelling, whichever first occurs,
unless a petition for an extension of time has been granted by
the Zoning Administrator and provided that:
1) The extension is requested in writing and is filed with
the city at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of
the initial permit.
2) The request for extension states facts demonstrating
that a good faith attempt has been made to complete or
utilize the permit that has been granted.
3) A maximum of one (1) extension shall be granted.
4) The extension shall not exceed sixty (60) days from the
initial permit expiration date.
b. There shall be no charge for the filing of a petition for the
extension described in Subsection A, above.
Section 5. Section 20-20-2 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Model Homes
Procedures) is hereby amended to read as follows:
20-20-2: PROCEDURE: The erection of a model home(s) shall require approval of
an administrative permit as regulated by Section 9 of this Chapter.
Section 6. Section 20-22-4.H.12.c.4 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Off -Street
Parking Surfacing Requirements) is hereby amended to read as follows:
(4) For industrial uses which experience frequent heavy
equipment utilization which could be expected to destroy or
damage required surfacing materials, an exemption to the
surfacing requirements may be allowed by an administrative
permit pursuant to Section 9 of this Chapter and provided that:
3
(a) General public and employee access driveways and
parking areas shall not be included in the exemption.
(b) At such time as the presence of heavy equipment is
reduced or eliminated, the surfacing of exempted areas
shall be completed in compliance with this Chapter.
(c) All other performance standards related to parking and
driveways shall be met.
(d) The provisions of Section 20-9-2.D of this Chapter are
considered and determined to be satisfied.
Section 7. Section 20-23-6.A of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Loading Space
Size Requirements) is hereby amended to read as follows:
A. Non -Residential Developments. Unless otherwise specified in these zoning
regulation's, 'the first loading berth shall be not less than seventy (70) feet in
length and additional berths required shall be not less than thirty (30) feet
in length and all loading berths shall be not less than ten (10) feet in width
and fourteen (14) feet in height, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering space.
Reductions to loading berth size may be granted by the Zoning Administrator
upon demonstration of need.
Section 8. Section 20-23-7-D of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Loading Space
Reductions) is hereby amended to read as follows:
D. Space Reductions. Subject to the review and processing of an
administrative permit as regulated by Section 9 of this Chapter, the Zoning
Administrator may reduce the number of required off-street loading spaces
when the use can demonstrate in documented form a need which is less
than required. In such situations, the Zoning Administrator may require land
to be reserved for loading space development should use or needs change.
Section 9. Section 20-26-8.B of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (Temporary Sale
of Farm Products) is hereby amended to read as follows:
B. Other Zoning Districts. The temporary, seasonal sale of products produced
solely on the site of the respective farm may be allowed in zoning districts
other than Agriculture A-1 Districts subject to the approval of an
administrative permit provided that:
51
1. The standards and requirements as specified in Subsection 20-26-
&A are complied with.
2. The provisions of Section 20-9-2.D of this Chapter are considered
and determined to be satisfied.
Section 10. Section 20-66-3A of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (B -W District Uses
Allowed by Administrative Permit) is hereby amended to add the following:
C. Indoor limited retail sales accessory to allowed uses provided that;
1. Location.
a. All sales are conducted in a clearly defined area of the
principal building reserved exclusively for retail sales. Said
sales area must be physically segregated from other principal
activities in the building.
b. The retail sales area must be located on the ground floor of
the principal building.
2. Sales Area. The retail sales activity shall not occupy more than
fifteen (15) percent of the gross floor area of the building.
3. Access. The building where such use is located to one having direct
access to a collector or arterial level street without the necessity of
using residential streets.
4. Hours. Hours of operation are limited to 6:00 AM to 10:00 PM.
5. Adequate parking is provided for the retail sales activity in
compliance with Section 22 of this Chapter.
6. The provisions of Section 20-9-2.131 of this Chapter are considered
and determined to be satisfied.
Section 11. Section 20-66-5.0 of the Otsego Zoning Ordinance (B -W District
Conditional Uses -Accessory Indoor Limited Retail Sales) is hereby deleted in its entirety.
5
Section 12. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage
and publication.
ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this day of
CITY OF OTSEGO
M
ATTEST:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
BY:
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator
0
1997.
CITE' OF OTSEGO
RLVliLS1 POR COUtNCIL A(- I IVA
AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE I
6. Bob Kirmis, Asst. City Planner FEBRUARY 24th,1997 -
6:30PM
ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB, CC
6.4. Kenneth and Patricia Zimmer
1. A Conditional Use Permit to allow relocation of a
building (home)
BACKGROUND:
This item came before the P.C.for Hearing on 2/19/97. After Hearing
and discussion the Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve
the C.U.P. (See attached Findings of Fact) Sorry, the P.C. minutes
are not available as meeting was last night. The reason this is on
the Council Agenda now is that Kenneth and Patricia Zimmer need a home
and the move in home is waiting. They want to get it moved in before
weight restrictions are placed on the roads.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Recommendation is approval of the following:
1. A Conditional Use Permit to allow relocation of a building
(Home) contingent on the Administrative 1 per 40 split being done by
and deed restriction by the Zoning Administrator.
Thank you,
Elaine
FEB -20-1997 07:56 NAC
612 595 9837 P.02i0?
N Wwxe",%� NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKBT RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Otsego Mayor and City Council
FROM: Bob Kirmis
DATE: 20 February 1997
RE: Otsego - Zimmer CUP
FILE NO: 176.02 - 97.02
Attached please find a findings of fact applicable to the Zimmer conditional use permit
request.
Please note that the findings reflect the Planning Commission's recommendation on the
matter.
This item is scheduled for City Council consideration on 24 February
PC: Elaine Beatty
Andy MacArthur
Lary Koshak
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 1558 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5S4 1 6
PHONE O 1 2-393-9030 FAX 451 2-898-1:1837
FEB -20-1997 07:57
1N RE:
NAC 612 595 9837 P.03/077
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPROVAL
CITY OF OTSEGO
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
FINDINGS OF FACT
AND DECISION
Application of Kenneth and Patricia Zimmer for a conditional use permit to allow a
relocated single family residence to lie upon an existing lot of record within the City.
On 24 February 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to
consider the application for the conditional use permit. Based on the application, the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the evidence received, the City Council
now makes the following findings of fact and decision.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow a relocated single
family residence to lie upon an existing lot of record.
2. The subject property is zoned A-1, Agricultural Rural Service.
3. The placement of a relocated single family residence is a conditionally permitted
use in the City.
4. The legal description of the property is as follows:
See Attached Exhibit A
5. Section 20-4-2.17 of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and
City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional
use permit. The seven effects and findings regarding them are:
a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and
provisions of the official City Comprehensive plan.
The proposed use will be compatible with adjacent properties. As such, the
use Is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the
property's A-1 zoning designation.
FEB -20-1997 07:57 NAC 612 59s 9837 P.04i07
b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of
the area.
The enforcement of building code requirements shall ensure compatibility
with surrounding uses. In consideration of the residence's condition, design
type, and applicable building code requirements, the proposed use will be
compatible with present and future land uses in the area.
C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained
herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.).
The proposed use will conform to all applicable performance standards.
d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed.
The proposed use will not tend to or have an adverse effect upon the area
in which it is proposed.
e. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which
it is proposed.
The proposed use will not tend to depreciate area property values.
f. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of
streets serving the property.
Traffic generated by the proposed use is within the capabilities of Maciver
Avenue which serves the property.
g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities
including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to
overburden the City's service capacity.
The proposed use will not overburden the City's service capacity.
6. The planning report, dated 10 February 1997 prepared by Northwest Associated
Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein.
7. On 19 February 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing
to consider the proposed conditional use permit application preceded by published
and mailed notice. Upon review of the conditional use permit application and
evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and
2
FEB -20-1997 07:58 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05/07,
recommended that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on
the aforementioned findings.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinance, the applicant's request
for a Conditional Use Permit to relocate a single family residence to an existing lot of
record is approved in its present form and subject to the following stipulations:
1. The Zoning Administrator approve the "one per 40" split necessary to create the lot
on which the relocated residence is to be situated.
2. The relocated residence comply with all applicable requirements of the State
Building Code. This item should be subject to further comment by the City Building
Official_
3. The relocated structure meet all applicable A-1 District setback requirements.
4_ The relocated residence comply with applicable A-1 Zoning District height
requirements (2.5 stories or 45 feet).
5. The relocated structure is ready for occupancy within six months from the date of
location on the site.
6. The City Building Official and/or City Engineer determine that the site in question
can satisfactorily accommodate a well and septic system.
7. The applicant provide proof to the City that the house move is to be performed by
a licensed mover in accordance with applicable State requirements.
8. The applicant notify the City of the route and the exact timing of the move.
9. A performance security is posted in an amount determined appropriate by the
Zoning Administrator. The security should reflect anticipated improvement costs
(foundation work, etc.).
91
FEB -20-1997 0?:58 NAC 612 595 9837 P.06/0?
ADOPTED by the Otsego Council this 24th day of February 1997.
CITY OF OTSEGO
By:
ATTEST:
Larry Fournier, Mayor
By.
Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Loning Administrator
4
FEB -20-199? 07 59 NAC 612 595 9837 P.07i0"-
ATTACH PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
HERE
TOTAL P.07
City of Otsego
Engineer's Agenda Items
City Council Meeting
February 24, 1997
8.1 ACCEPT RESOLUTION APPROVING FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR 85TH STREET
PROJECT AND STORMWATER DRAINAGE STUDY FOR PORTIONS OF THE
HALL'S POND WATERSHED
Find accompanying this item a Resolution for accepting the report, and ordering
preparations of plans and specifications.
The Resolution also accepts the stormwater drainage study as a plan for
management of stormwater in this area as defined in the study.
Even though the only portion being ordered for design is 85th Street and the
Trunk stormwater facilities, the intent is to accept all of the report as an overall
plan for dealing with the storm water drainage issues in the area.
The cost of the feasibility study, field survey and plans and specifications will
be reimbursable under the MSA construction funding program. Land appraisals
and R.O.W. purchase and damages payments are also funded through the MSA
program. It is conceivable that if all of the above can be accomplished in 1997,
the project could be bid and constructed in 1998 and 1999.
Financing the project will be born through assessments and with the MSA
funding. We recommend passage of the resolution by the Council.
8.2 RECONSIDER THE SEWER AND WATER ISSUES
These items have been placed on the Engineer's Agenda for reconsideration
based on new information received in the interviews with the Bonding
Consultants.
8.3 ANY OTHER ENGINEERING BUSINESS
agenda2.24
EXHIBIT 8.1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORT AND
ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS
(85th Street and Hall's Pond)
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted April 8, 1996, a report has
been prepared by Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. with reference to the
improvement of 85th Street NE between Page Avenue NE and a point 700 feet east
of Nashua Avenue NE by reconstructing the street to Municipal State Aid Standards
and the proposed storm sewer system for the land adjacent to 85th Street NE which
lies in the Hall's Pond Storm Sewer District, and this report was received by the
Council on February 24, 1997.
AND WHEREAS, the report indicates in a preliminary way that the improvement and
portions of the improvement are necessary, cost-effective and feasible.
AND WHEREAS, the Council, in its judgement, has determined that the preparation of
Plans and Specifications will provide helpful information in determining the desirability
and feasibility of a portion of the project, said portion of the project being the
following:
1. Roadway construction of 85th Street between Page Avenue NE and a
point 700 feet east of Nashua Avenue NE and,
2. Storm sewer pipe construction located within the proposed Right of Way
limits of 85th Street from Page Avenue NE to a point 700 feet east of
Nashua Avenue NE and,
3. A regional pond located in the SW A of the NE'/4 of Section 21, adjacent
to 85th Street.
AND WHEREAS, costs associated with the preparation of the report and preparation
of the plans and specifications are reimbursable to the City through the Municipal State
Aid account,
AND WHEREAS, the Council has determined that information contained in the report
would be useful in establishing a basis for determining storm sewer impact fees for the
Hall's Pond Watershed District, said fees being subject to change over time.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF OTSEGO,
MINNESOTA:
1. The Council accepts the report prepared by Hakanson Anderson
Associates, Inc. and,
2. The Council orders Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. to prepare Plans
and Specifications for that portion of the project described above to
provide more detailed information to the Council and,
3. The Council considers the information contained in the report useful in
establishing a basis for determining storm sewer impact fees for the
Hall's Pond Watershed District, said fees being subject to change over
time.
Adopted by the Council this day of , 1997.
I��u�Li
Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
Mayor
Bonestroo
t� Rosene
Anderlik &
Associates
Engineers & Architects
February 21, 1997
Bonestroo. Rosene, Anderlik and Associates, lnc. is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer
Principals: Otto G. Opportunity P.E. • Joseph C. Anderlik, PE. • Marvin L. Sorvala PE •
Richard E. Turner, PE. Glenn R. Cook, PE. • Thomas E. Noyes. PE. • Robert G. Schunicht. PE,
Jerry A. Bourdon, PE. Robert W Rosene. PE. and Susan M. Eberlin, CPA., Senior Consultants
Associate Principals: Howard A. Sanford. PE. • Keith A. Gordon, P.E. • Robert R. Pfefferle, PE.
Richard W Foster. PE. • David O. Loskota. P.E. • Robert C. Russek, A.I.A. • Mark A. Hanson, PE.
Michael 7. Rautmann, PE. • Ted K.Field. P.E. • Kenneth P. Anderson, PE. • Mark R. Rolls, PE.
Sidney P Williamson, PE., L.S. • Robert F. Kotsmith
Offices. St. Paul. Rochester, Willmar and St. Cloud, MN • Mequon, WI
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Otsego
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Otsego, MN 55330
Re: Wastewater Treatment Supplemental Report
Proposal for Engineering Services
BRA File No. 970073
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
We are pleased at this opportunity to submit our proposal for professional engineering
services to prepare the Supplemental Report for Wastewater Treatment Facilities in the
City of Otsego.
This letter describes our proposal in the following sections:
Project Understanding
Issues Not Affecting the Supplemental Study
Service to Hassen
Project Approach
Work Plan
Schedule
Compensation
Project Understanding
The Cities of Otsego and Dayton seek to determine the feasibility of constructing joint
wastewater treatment facilities. A Facilities Plan prepared in June, 1996 estimated the
cost of a 400,000 gal/day facility to be $3.9 million, with capacity to serve portions of
Otsego, Dayton, and the Town of Frankfort for approximately 10 years. More recently,
the Frankfort area served by the facility has been incorporated into the City of St.
Michael; the service area in Otsego has been reduced; and the flow from Dayton in the
2335 West Highway 36 ■ St. Paul, MN 55113-3898 ■ 612-636-4600
future may be increased. The net effect of these changes on the treat
revision in its capacity and costs. treatment facility isa
The Facility Plan is to
be ended by a sup
revisions. Further, the report aismto address conceplemental report that addresses these
two cities on purchased capacity, cost sharing,
rns such as the agreement between the
financial analysis will be included to determine equi ed numberdisosaj Of sludge from the facility. A
the appropriate connection fee to meet the debt requirements of the f connections and
requires MPGA approval to be eligible for certain fundingproject. The plan
Pro gt'ams.
Issues Not Affecting the Supplemental
Study
Other project issues that are not to be re-evaluated in l the supplemental affect the scope of work of the study are; study and do not
1. Selected treatment process
2. Project site
I Receiving water for the treated effluent
These three issues are discussed briefly.
Selected Treatment Process
The June 1996 Facilities Plan identified the activated sludge process as t
treatment process. This process is considered a mechanical plant, as Opposed
stabilization pond that uses minimal mechanical equipment compared t
sludge pposed to a
8 process. The Facilities Plan also evaluated another t P ° an activated
process (trickling filters) and land application of treated effluent.type of mechanical plant
The cost-effectiveness of the activated sludge process will not be affected
capacity revision. With the capacity adjustment being considered in the su
tal
study, the activated sludge process is still recommended, by a small
emen
and flexibility for future upgrade. based on costs, effluentlquality,
significant changes are made in the study,ent such astreatinethe reals may be cost-effective if
approximate site location. required effluent quality or the
Project Site
Although a final site is yet to be determined, the study can proceed and develop
Plant descriptions, layout, and cost estimates based on the approximate
study will establish the necessary accurate
area of the site, which is useful duringsiteselect one I
The site selection will affect the cost of conveyance facilities, however, including the cost
of the outfall pipe to the river. Also affected will be the costs of piping to deliver Dayton
flows to the plant. Thus, the final cost
selected. estimate and cost sharing will require that a site be
Receiving Water for the Treated Effluent
The 1996 Facilities Plan recommended that treated effluent be discharged to the Crow
River. Effluent quality requirements were established by MPCA at normal levels that are
attainable without advanced treatment methods. The supplemental study will be based on
the Crow River as the receiving water for the plant discharge.
Service to Hassen
During the preparation of this proposal, the Town of Hassen indicated an interest in
Participating in the study and perhaps being served by the project. However, it is
recommended that the supplemental study be conducted based on the currently defined
area of service. While the needs of Otsego and Dayton and the interest of these two cities
in developing a project are well-defined, those of Hassen are not.
should first be established for certain area capacity and cost parameters; then ,the possible i i
advantages of expanding the service can be explored. This approach will streamlinthe
scope and schedule of the supplemental study.
Project Approach
Our project approach is twofold. First, we will provide necessary services to revise the
capacity, description, and costs of the project and to meet the scope of work requirements
identified in the February 6 memorandum from City Engineer Lawrence Koshak to the
Mayor and Council.
Included in this first phase is the description and estimated costs of the recommended
treatment facility, an estimate of cost sharing, and an estimate of Otsego connection fees
and other charges to cover treatment costs. This phase will conclude with (1) the
preparation of a Supplemental Report which will be presented to the City Council at a
regular meeting, and (2) discussion of the Report conclusions at a public information
meeting at a later date.
The second phase will be necessary only if the project appears feasible and affordable.
Pending acceptance of the recommended project at the council and public information
meetings, we will submit the Report to the MPCA along with the portions of the June,
1996 Facilities Plan that evaluate alternatives. Then, we will respond to MPCA
comments as necessary to get MPCA approval of the Report and its recommendation.
This phase will be necessary to meet the requirements for project funding through the
State Revolving Loan Fund and other possible funding programs. Included in this phase
will be preparation of an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW), documentation of
the need to replace on-site systems with a centralized treatment facility, and identification
of the owning/operating entity of the facilities. MPCA will also require a public hearing
after the recommended project has been established.
Work Plan
Our project approach becomes the basis of our detailed work plan. The individual tasks
included in our work plan are:
Phase 1: Prepare Supplemental Report
Task 1.1: Conduct Engineering Analysis
1.1.1 Tabulate design flows from the two cities
1.1.2 Develop the size and capacity of all units in the activated sludge process
1.1.3 Develop the size and capacity of Class A sludge facilities
1.1.4 Develop the size and capacity of Class B sludge facilities
1.1.5 Prepare cost estimates of activated sludge process
1.1.6 Prepare cost estimates for Class A and Class B sludge options
1.1.7 Estimate sludge quantities and land disposal requirements
1.1.8 Establish plan for expanding the facilities in the future
1.1.9 Estimate cost sharing between the two cities
Task 1.2: Conduct Mid -Course Meeting
1.2.1 Prepare technical memo containing results of Task 1.1
1.2.2 Distribute technical memo to council members
1.2.3 Conduct mid -course meeting to discuss contents of the memo
1.2.4 Revise plan, costs, sludge disposal plan, etc. as necessary
Task 1.3: Prepare and Present the Final Report
1.3.1 Report contents:
Executive summary
Introduction
Design conditions
Detailed description of facilities and processes
Drawing of facilities layout
Sludge disposal plan
Cost estimates and cost sharing
Agreement between cities
Financial analysis
Number of connections expected
Impact of expected connections on cost recovery
1.3.2 Deliver twenty (20) copies of the Report
1.3.3 Present Report at Council Meeting
1.3.4 Attend public information meeting
Phase 2: Gain Project Approval for Funding
Task 2.1: Gain MPCA Approval of the Facilities Plan
2.1.1 Submit Report to MPCA
2.1.2 Prepare EAW and submit to MPCA
2.1.3 Collect information for needs analysis that will:
a. Document condition of on-site systems
b. Establish need for centralized treatment system
2.1.4 Provide written response to MPCA questions and concerns
2.1.5 Conduct public hearing for the recommended project
2.1.6 Receive MPCA approval of the project
Schedule
We propose to conduct the supplemental study according to the following schedule:
Task
Weeks after receiving notice to proceed:
Prepare Technical Memorandum No. 1 2
Conduct Mid -Course Meeting 3
Prepare Final Report 4
Present Report at Council Meeting 5
Compensation
We propose to complete the Supplemental Report and provide the services described in
our work plan above for the lump sum amounts listed below.
Phase I: Prepare Report, Attend Council and Public Meetings $ 4,900
Phase II: Respond to MPCA requirements for approval $ 2,800
TOTAL- Phases I and II: $ 7,700
Thank you for allowing us to propose on this project. If there are any questions about
this proposal, please call Tom Noyes or myself at (612) 636-4600 anytime.
Sincerely,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
4-c�J K 4-LeAd
Ted K. Field, P.E.
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
C A S H C 0 N T R 0 L
NAME OF FUND
BALANCE _
RECEIPTS
DISBURSEMENTS
BALANCE
GENERAL FUND
$ 500,767.17 $
49,647.92
$ 162,424.23 $
387,990.86
FIRE FUND FUND
53,194.70
3,215.08
0.00
56,409.78
PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND
-50,901.48
373.01
953.75
-51,482.22
!NSURANeE RESERVE FUND
SECURITY DEPOSITS FUND
.
0.00
.
0.00
-6,649.06
0.00
0.00
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND
-6,050.83
0.00
0.00
-6,050.83
,001.15
4,215.67
59,631.25
210,585.57
PACKARD AVE CONSTRUCTION
FUND 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
BUILDING CONSTUCTION FUND
FUN@30,690.99
0.00
0.00
130,690.99
MSA CONSTRUCTION FUND
127,872.60
3,189 .30
0.00
131,061-90
WATERSHED PROJECT FUND FUND
7,871.20
0.00
0.00
7,871.20
PROJECT 94 -2 -37TH & ODEAN
FUN010,732.40
0.00
0.00
10,732.40
ISLAND VIEW PROJECT 95-01
FUND47,824.07
0.00
1,808.29
46,015.78
MISSISSIPPI SHORES FUND
48,732.73
0.00
0.00
48,732.73
G.O.BONDS OF 1996A FUND
96,052.71
0.00
0.00
96,052.71
MUNICIPAL WELL FUND
-3,734.33
263.20
111.93
-3,583.06
DEVELOPMENT ESCROW FUND
-11,855.32
350.00
2,728.56
-14,233.88
BUILDERS ESCROW FUND
10,198.80
300.00
0.00
10,498.80
TOTAL $1,234,045.64 $ 61,554.18 $ 227,658.01 $1,067,941.81
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
3!
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
4
S
6 GENERAL FUND
AS OF Ot,'31/97
7
6
For the Month
ended January
Year-to-date
9
Variance
Variance
10e
Receipts:
12
Budget
Actual
(Favoiabie Unfavorable)
Budget
Actual
(Unfavorable
13
14 SALES TAX PAYABLE
00
0.00
50
3.63
20i 50
3.63
0.00
. 50
3.63
2E)i
3.(
15 DAMAGE DEPOSIT PAYABLE
0.00
600.00
600.00
0.00
600.00
600.(
15
17 BUSINESS LICENSES/PERMITS
583.33
55,945.85
0.00
24,283.98)
( 583.33)
7,000.00
.85
0.00
.
( 7,000.(
e DOG LICENSES
8.33
15.00
6.67
100.00
15.00
( 85_(
19BUftbf146 PERIlff5,
to SEPTIC SYSTEM PERMITS
67
229.17
, 574.51
225.00
207.84
( 4.17)
50 1000.00
2,750.00
4,974.51
225.00
45,625. -
( 2,525.(
t, WETLAND REVIEW FEES
58.33
0.00
( 58.33)
700.00
0.00
( 700.(
s2 WEfePER.
,3 LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID
8,483.75
0.00
( 8,483.75)
101,805.00
0.00
( 101,805.(
,4 HOMESTEAD CREDIT
11,689.67
0.00
( 11,689.67)
140,276.00
0.00
( 140,276.(
[5
z6 RECYCLING GRANT/AID
250.00
0.00
( 250.00)
3,000.00
0.00
( 3,000.(
t, POLICE AID
666.67
0.00
( 666.67)
81000.00
0.00
( 8,000.(
M5A MAbITEMANeE
CHARGES FOR SERVICES -GENERAL
6,4t6.63-
416.67
0.00
0.00
416.67)
( X416.67)
77,OeO.00
5,000.00
0.60
0.00
.
( 5,000.(
30 CONDITIONAL USE/VARIANCE FEES
208.33
0.00
( 208.33)
2,500.00
0.00
( 2,500.(
31
32 ZONING/TEXT AMENDMENT FEE
33
83.33
00
150.00
66.67
06
1,000.00
•
150.00
( X850.(
33 ASSESSMENT/SEPTIC SEARCHES
175.00
245.00
70.00
2,100.00
245.00
( 1,855.(
34
35 MAPS/COPIES/MISC.SALES
41.67
140.72
99.05
500.00
140.72
X
( 359.1
36 TOPO SALES
208.33
0.00
( 208.33)
2,500.00
0.00
( 2,500.(
37 REeREAfION FEES
36 INTEREST EARNINGS
58
833.33
00
5,571.71
58)
4,738.38
2,575.()e
10,000.00
5,571.71
( 4,428.1
39 DONATIONS
0.00
775.00
775.00
0.00
775.00
775.(
40
41 FRANCHISE FEES
591.67
0.00
( 591.67)
7,100.00
0.00
( 7,100.(
a2 OTHER/MISCELL
-
50.00
0.00
( 50.00)
600.00
0.00
( 600.(
eLEAN UP DAY 43
44 CITY HALL RENT
00
416.67
.
900.00
483.33
5,000.00
900.00
4,100.(
45 Total Revenues
97,800.83
49,647.92
( 48,152.91)1,173,610.00
49.647.92
46
a7 Other Financing Sources
46SALE OF INVESTMENTS
0.00
0.00
49
SOI51
52
53
54
551
561
?7.
M'
I.
FUND
IPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
IM FINANCIAL REPORT
Ab Ut- V1/31191'
For the Month ended January Year-to-date
Variance Vari<
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual Unfavc
Disbursements=
WAGES & SALARIES
2,737.50
1,925.00
812.50
32,850.00
1,925.00
30
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
169.58
119.35
50.23
2,035.00
119.35
1
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
0.00
157.10
(
157.10)
0.00
157.10
MISCELLANEOUS
108.33
0.00
108.33
1,300.00
0.00
1
M1LtAUt/1KRVtL
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
16.67
325.00
0.00
20.00
16.67
305.00
200.00
3,900.00
0.00
20.00
3
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
137.50
390.74
(
253.24)
1,650.00
390.74
1
ADMINISTRATION
WAGES & SALARIES
7,280.00
6,730.37
549.63
87,360.00
6,730.37
80
UVEMIME
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
596.67
357.33
0.00
416.52
(
696.67
59.19)
8,:360.00
4,288.00
0.00
416.52
a
3
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
494.58
381.42
113.16
5,935.00
381.42
5
EMPLOYER -
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
115.58
89.21
26.37
, 200.00
1,387.00
548.04
89.21
6
1
EMPLOYER CONTR.-S.TERM
40.50
63.00
(
22.50)
486.00
63.00
SUFFLitZD
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
1,000.00
41.67
250.80
290.99
(
749.15
249.32)
12,000.00
500.00
250.85
290.99
ti
INSURANCE
1,625.00
0.00
1,625.00
19,500.00
0.00
19
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
12.50
0.00
12.50
150.00
0.00
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
35.95
(
35.95)
0.00
35.95
ItLtHHUNt
MILEAGE/TRAVEL
375.00
16.67
361 .06
0.00
13.94
16.67
4,500.00
200.00
361.06
0.00
4
RECORDING FEES
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
NtWt>LL11tK
MAPS
416.6"
250.00
400.00
0.00
16.67
250.00
5,000.00
3,000.00
400.00
0.00
4
3
PRINTING & PUBLISHING
583.33
124.95
458.38
7,000.00
300.00
124.95
t5O.t50
6
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
25.00
125.00
150.00
0.00
125.00i
125.00
1,500.00
0.00
1
CLEAN UP DAY
666.67
0.00
666.67
4t.67
8,000.00
500.00
0.00
8
UUMIRACIED SERVICES
R & M EQUIPMENT
41.67
41.67
0.00
0.00
41.67
SOO.00
0.00
RENTALS
625.00
929.67
(
304.67)
7,500.00
929.67
6
PLANNING COMMISSION
Mi .IPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
FUND
Variance
P
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual Unfav
Disbursements:
WAGES & SALARIES
258.33
0.00
258.33
3,100.00
0.00
3
OTHER PAY
0.00
1,250.00
(
1,250.00)
0.00
1,250.00 (
1
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
3.67
0.00
3.67
44.00
0.00
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
8.33
0.00
8.33
100.00
0.00
ASSESSOR
WAGES & SALARIES
1,081.50
1,000.00
81.50
12,978.00
1,000.00
11
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
67.08
62.00
5.08
805.00
62.00
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
15.50
14.50
1.00
186.00
14.50
ENGINEER
PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER
0.00
10,938.70
(
10,938.70)
0.00
10,938.70 (
10
PLANNER
PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER
4,991.67
0.00
4,991.67
59,900.00
0.00
59
PROFE5$ 5ERVIeE5 PLANNER
FINANCE
0.00
9,248.07
9,248.07)
0.00
9,248.0?
9
WAGES & SALARIES
3,948.50
4,089.60
(
141.10)
47,382.00
4,089.60
43
ett!TRIB PERA
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
t:76.92
244.83
t69.49
234.54
7.43
10.29
2,12S.00
2,938.00
169.49
234.54
i
2
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-HEALTH
161.50
180.35
(
18.85)
1,938.00
180.35
1
EMPLOYER CONTR.-S.TERM
11.50
28.00
(
16.50)
138.00
28.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
8.33
0.00
8.33
100.00
0.00
PRINTED FORMS
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
MILEAGE/TRAVEL
4.17
0.00
4.17
50.00
0.00
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
12.50
0.00
12.50
150.00
0.00
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
20.83
0.00
20.83
250.00
0.00
MISC. OTHER CHARGES
8.33
.
0.00
8.33
100.00
, 025.00
0.00
RECYCLING
LEGAL SERVICES
2,726.25
3a
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
FUND
Variance
Var
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual Unfav
Disbursements:
PROFESS SERVICES -LEGAL
2,500.00
14,494.80
(
11,994.80)
30,000.00
14,494.80
15
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
31.25
13.74
17.51
375.00
13.74
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
43.17
19.02
24.15
518.00
19.02
tMFLUYtH �,UNIKib-HLACIN
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
28-50
10.00
0.00
4.45
2s.50
5.55
342.00
120.00
0.00
4.45
EMPLOYER CONTR.-S.TERM
2.00
0.00
2.00
24.00
0.00
UF�-IUL t>UFFLILt
MILEAGE/TRAVEL
8.73-1
12.50
0.00
0.00
8.33
12.50
100.00
150.00
0.00
0.00
PRINTING & PUBLISHING
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
EDUCATION/TRAINING/CONF.
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
CONTRACTED SERVICES
166.67
0.00
166.67
2,000.00
0.00
2
MISC. 01HER CHARGES
CITY HALL
8.33
0.00
a. 3��
100.00
0.00
WAGES & SALARIES
180.00
0.00
180.00
2,160.00
0.00
2
tMPLUYLK UUMIKIU-SUU.�DtU.
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
11.17
2.67
V.VV
0.00
Lt.!/
2.67
i34.00
32.00
0.00
0.00
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
54.17
47.34
6.83
650.00
47.34
UNIFORMS
0.00
61.70
(
61.70)
0.00
61.70
2
UTILITIES
958.33
714.28
244.05
11,500.00
714.28
10
uRr�dRut ttKvlut
CLEANING SERVICES
104.1/
791.67
102.72
628.08
1.475
163.59
1,200.00
9,500.00
102.72
628.08
i
8
CONTRACTED SERVICES
333.33
0.00
333.33
4,000.00
0.00
4
R & M BUIDING
125.00
0.00
125.00
1,500.00
0.00
1
R & M IMP.OTHER THAN BLDG
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
HtNIRLb
MISC. OTHER CHARGES
3,758.33
45.83
33,547 .44
0.00
29,189.11)
45.83
4,5, 100. vv
550.00
33,547.44
0.00
ii
EQUIPMENT
0.00
315.10
(
315.10)
0.00
315.10
CONTRACTED SERVICES 8,395.00 24,455.00 ( 16,060.00) 100,740.00 24,455.00 76
BUILDING INSPECTOR
UUNIKILIUItU btKVIUtb 2,4".33 1, 67 3.33 785.00 29,500.00 1,67�5.5? 27
ANIMAL CONTROL
MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
FUND
Variance
Varia
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual (Unfavo
Disbursements:
CONTRACTED SERVICES
258.33
0.00
258.33
3,100.00
0.00
3,
HIGHWAYS, STREETS & ROADWAYS
OVERTIME
498.08
0.00
498.08
5,977.00
0.00
5,'
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
302.67
365.65
(
62.98)
3,632.00
365.65
3,
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-HEALTH
516.67
390.38
126.29
6,200.00
390.38
5,
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
98.00
117.02
(
19.02)
i.77)
1,176.00
418.00
117.02
a6.60
1,
GAS & OIL
34.83
966.67
36.60
3,048.73
(
2,082.06)
11,600.00
3,048.73
8,
SUPPLIES -GENERAL
41.67
308.33
1,128.50
0.00
(
1,086.83)
308.33
500.00
9
1,128.50
0.09
;3,
N50RANer:
OPERATING SUPPLIES
208.33
0.00
1,630.77
(
208.33
630.77)
2,500.00
12,000.00
0.00
1,630.77
2,
10,
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUP.
1,000.00
49.90)
1,560.00
i;Z�3._30
,
UNIFORMS
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
iso.00
41.67
±73.9e
0.00
41.67
500.00
0.00
4.00
MISCELLANEOUS
32.50
4.00
28.50
390.00
UTILITIES
216.67
365.68
(
149.01)
2,600.00
365.68
2,
SAND AND GRAVEL
1,250.00
0.00
1,250.00
950.00
15,000.00
11,409.00
0.00
0.00
15,
11,
tAtf
SALT AND SAND MIX
950.06
1,687.50
E).oe
6,020.16
(
4,332.66)
20,250.00
6,020.16
14,
CULVERTS
250.00
0.00
250.00
3,000.00
0.00
3,
R & M EQUIPMENT
0.00
393.39
(
393.39)
0.00
393.39
RENTALS
416.67
0.00
416.67
5,000.00
0.00
5,
SEALCOATING
2,314.25
0.00
2,314.25
27,771.00
0.00
27,
EQUIPMENT
1,702.08
10,212.35
(
8,510.27)
20,425.00
10,212.35
10,
UTILITIES
883.33
1,247.85
(
364.52)
10,600.00
1,247.85
9,
RECREATION PROGRAMS
2,918.50
21
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-PERA
0.00
121.84
(
X121.84)
0.00
121.84
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
0.00
200.50
(
200.50)
0.00
200.50
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-MEDICARE
0.00
46.89
(
46.89)
0.00
46.89
FUND
Disbursements=
EMPLOYER CONTR.-S.TERM
CONTRACTED SERVICES
MUi 1PAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO
INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT
Variance
Varia
Budget Actual (Unfavorable) Budget Actual Unfavc
0.00 36.60 ( 36.60) 0.00 36.60 (
1,560.42 0.00 1,560.42 18,725.00 0.00 18,
PARKS MAIMILMA!
1,508.00
332.00
1,176.00
18,096.00
332.00
17,
WAGES & SALARIES
64.67
0.00
64.67
776.00
0.00
OVERTIME
97.50
0.00
97.50
1,170.00
0.00
1,
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-SOC.SEC.
$3.33
0.00
83.33
1,000.00
0:00
11
EMPLOYER CONTRIB-HEALTH
5.67
0.00
5.67
68.00
0.00
EMPLOYER CONTR.-S.TERM
83.33
139.90 (
56.57)
1,000:00
139:90
GAS & OIL
100.00
0.00
100.00
1,200.00
0.00
1
REPAIR & MAINTENANCE SUP.
208.33
2,371.38 (
2,163.05)
2,500:00
2,371:38
PROFESS SERVICES -ENGINEER
02
16.67
0.00
16.67
200.00
0.00
PRINTING & PUBLISHING
16.67
0.00
16.67
200.00
0:00
DUES & MEMBERSHIP
366.67
0.00
366.67
4,400.00
0.00
4
CONTRACTED SERVICES
112.50
0.00
112.50
1,350.00
0.00
1
RENTALS0.00
233.33
0.00
233.33
2,800.00
0.00
2
RECREATION PROGRAMMING
HERITAGE PRESERVATION
25.00
0.00
25.00
300.00
0.00
SMALL TOOLS & MINOR PARTS
41.67
0.00
41.67
500.00
0:00
MISCELLANEOUS
250.00
0.00
250.00
3,000.00
0.00
3
CONTRACTED SERVICES
OTHER FINANCING USES
OTHER FINANCING USES -OPERATING TRANSFERS
7,308,33
0.00
(
7,308.33
87.700.00
0.00
87
1.01 2
161,279.52
6:3.478.69)1.173,610.00
3
Total Disbursements
97.800.83
161 279 52
Other Financing Uses 0.00
PURCHASE OF INVESTMENTS 0.00