The URL can be used to link to this page

06-09-97 CCCITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST YUK k;UUINI-M At, 11VP1 AGENDA SEMON: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE 4. SPECIAL PRESENTATION - Gary Groan, Review of April June 9,1997 Financial Statements 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTIVN : PKZYAKWU -bI : JOS, LA: BACKGROUND: Attached is the Financial information for April, 1997. Gary Groen will be here to give an overview of the 26nformation to the Council. REC014ENDATION : For Council Information and comment. Thanks A Elaine p4yA4�r_x_11p ` 9F CiTY--Qin-A3:6R_Ga INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT AS OF 04/30/97 GENERAL FUND BLDG PERMIT SU -RC XABL. SALES TAX PAYABLE+ �. PROPERTY TAXES BUSINESS LICENSES/PERMITS Favorable Budget Actual (Unfavorable) 0.00 819.45 819.45 101 .96 ` 101.96 ---35,945.85 4,440.00 722,758.00' 7,000.00 686,812.15) 2,560.00) WEIGHT PERMITS LOCAL GOVERNMENT AID MSA MAINTENANCE CHARGES FOR SERVICES—GENERAL SUBO.YV.IS.S ZONING/TE, A r -t- a-ucwf SNOW PLOWING MAPS/COPIES/MISC.SALES 50.00 101,805.00 30.00 101,805.00) bx 0 Cyt e 0W.0. .00 6kN zb, -rte _.V•�a 77,000.00 a .r1.�`�—.^7'�� 36,878.50 ( 40,121.50) 5,000.00 0 .00 ( 5,000.00) S1.1G1- n n n n 1 , 000` 00 f(,o-on �—�,� 9.50 ( 19. >0 -40-,1 ;980.50 ) 1:, , 000 00 150 .00 ( ;850.00 ) 1,100.00 500.00 450.00 256.50 650-00) 243.50) OLD CITY HALL/PEAVEY HSE RENT 9,300.00 3,010.00 ( 6,290.00) FRANCHISE FEES 7,100.00 8,285.02 1,185.02 CLEAN UP DAY REFUNDS & REIMBUR E1TY HA66' f�EAiT Total Revenues .. NEW&--- ...•Tse.• ••• •• • •• e•• ee • •• •: •: ... .. .. i�._• •. • •• • • SALE OF INVESTMENTS 0.00 TRANSFERS FROM OTHER FUNDS 0.00 n D 9F eE:ry 9F 9:r-sE-4rG 13 INTERIM FINANCIAL REPORT AS OF 04/30/97 6 .::.... .. k..:... i 10 Favorable ) 11 Budcjet Actual (Unfavorable) 12 1314 yax CITY C�k7 43, -:12,646-9 59 763 06 sxr: 16 -)17 PLANNING COMMISSION 3;700.00 1,339.00 2,361.00 18 ASSESSOR 14,750.00 4,485.20 10,264.80 19 20 �C[IYYr 21 8,018 92 LEGAL SERVICES 30,000.00 26,617.30 3,382.70 22 X23 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 14,790.00 37.21 14,752.79 A. s HIGHWAYS, STREETS & ROADWAYS 267,633.00 88,330.27 179,302.73 STREET LIGHTING 10,600.00 5,239.07 5,360.93 OTHER FINANCING USES Total Disbursements �I41I TRANSFERS TO OTHER FUNDS 87,700.00 0.00 87 -TO -0-00 1,173,610.00 404,939.82 768,670.18 �� kms' p{ � . �� x��:;z•z: 0.00 43 Beginning Cash Balance: 500.767 17: 45 a46 Cash Balance as of 04/30/97 239,014.54 47 l 4D 31 MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSE& C A S H C 0 N T R 0 L For the Period 01/01/97 to 04/30/97 MSA CO Ml PROJECT 94 -2 -37TH & ODEAN FUND10,732.40 BEGINNING TOTAL_ TOTAL ENDING NOUE OF FUND BALANCE RECEIPTS DISBURSEMENTS BALANCE GENERAL FUND 500,767.17 $ 143,187.19 409,644.33 $ 234,310.1 ROAD & BRIDGE FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.; FIRE FUND FUND 53,194.70 3,215.08 0.00 56,409. PARK DEVELOPHENT FUND . 50 , 901.4 7 ;198. 01 5,948,40 -4;9 , 651. INSURANCE RESERVE.. FUND & 649.08 0;00 0.00 6,649.E SFr13RITY DEPOSITS FUND O.00 0`'00 0.00 .. 0.1 CAPITAL EQUIPMENT FUND -6,050.83 0.00 0.00 -6,050.E DEBT SERVICE FUND 266,001.15 4,265.67 59,781.25 210,485.' PACKARD AVE CONSTRUCTION FUND 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.( BUILD D W94 O t)C 0 flO-1:30:*,€ MSA CO Ml PROJECT 94 -2 -37TH & ODEAN FUND10,732.40 0.00 0.00 10,732.1 ISLAND VIEW PROJECT 95-01 FUND47,824.07 0.00 1,808.29 46,015.; MISSISSIPPI SHORES FUND 48.732.73 0.00 0.00 48,732.; G'.O_BONDS; OF 1:9�� A FAQ x f ' ` 0 flO 0 .00 96,052 , MUNIC.IFaL' 54 .72 . �. nP'VEL'L7PIEiTSCR£fI 5:; k t5-; 6y>.34? ,:.. 55flb9.10 -20 ,4.89 _E _ :LDERS ESCROW FUND 10,198.80 800.00 0.00 10,998.1 $ 909,792.: CITY OF OTSEGO INVESTMENT SCHEDULE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 Investment Type Purchase Date Maturity Date Balance 12/31/96 1997 1997 Purchases Sales Balance 4/30/97 Lasalle CD 7/14/95 12/2/02 $ 22,176.00 $ 22,176.00 FHMA 7/14/95 12/10/98 98,750.56 98,750.56 MBNA -CD 7/18195 5/10/99 51,274.17 51,274.17 FNMA 7/18/95 3/10/97 50,932.95 50,932.95 FNMA 7/19/95 4/13198 78,572.81 78,572.81 CD 7/24/95 1/24/97 50,000.00 50,000.00 - FNMA 8/2/95 2/18/97 49,855.00 49,865•00 FNMA 12/27/95 8/12/98 51,171.88 51,171.88 FNMA 7/10/96 5121/99 50,291.34 50,291.34 FHLM 7/19/96 7/9/98 25,080.21 25,080.21 FHLB 7/25/96 3/5/01 29,885.87 29,885.87 FHLB 10/8/96 3/6/01 59,641.99 59,641.99 CD -Bk of ER 12/31/96 12/31/97 100,000.00 100,000.00 - FNMA 3/25197 11/10/05 65,330.59 65,330.59 CD -Bk of ER 12/31/96 12/31/97 100,000.00 100,000.00 - CD -Bk of ER 12/31/96 12/31/97 200,000.00 200,000.00 Totals $1,017,632.78 $ 65,330.59 $ 250,000.00 832,963.37 PLUS SMITH BARNEY FUNDS 1,549.62 TOTAL $ 834,512.99 Page 1 1^ CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE 5. CONSENT AGENDA (Non -Controversial Items) June 9, 1997- 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC 5.1. Approval of Park and Recreation Commission priorities for Otsego Prairie Park (See attached List). BACKGROUND: At the Last Council Meeting the Council agreed to loan the Park and Recreation Commission $12,850.00 on future -Park and Trail fees. the following are the items the Park and Recreation Commission wishes to purchase for Otsego Prairie Park: 1. Bike Rack $700.00 Approx. 2. Signage $400.00 3. Players benches $800.00 (for 4) 4. Basketball hoop/ Backboard $700.00 5. Fencing (Chrconite) $700.00 6. Line Marker $200.00 TOTAL AMOUNT APPROX $3,500.00 RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Park and Recreations purchase of above items for Otsego Prairie Park. Thank Elaine omsv P�P� CITY OF OTSEGO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OTSEGO CITY HALL MAY 21, 1997 8: PM 1 Chair Carl Swenson will call meeting to order: Chair Carl Swenson called the Planning Commission Meeting to order at 8:00 PM. ROLL. CALL! Present: Chair Carl Swenson, Commissioners; Ing Roskaft, Richard Nichols, Eugene Goenner, Arleen Nagel, Bill Jones. ' Council Representative; Mark Berning Staff: Bob Kirmis, City Planner, Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator, Carol A. Olson, Secretary Mayor, Larry Fournier, CM Suzanne Ackerman 2. Consideration of thommission Minutes of April 16,1997* Richard Nichols moved adoption. Ing Roskaft seconded. All in favor. Motion carried. 'i HEARING for Charles KI - . 8045 Ochoa Avenue NE, Otsego MN 55330 PID # 118-037-001140 described as Lot 14, Block 1, Walesch Estates, Second Addition in Section 21, Township 121, Range 23. right o m CMN Request is as follows: A Conditional Use Permit to allow relocation of a home (move in to replace single wide mobile home.) Mr. Kirmis - Mr. Charles Klein requested a CUP to allow a relocated singe family residence. Property is zoned R-3, Res. Immediate Urban service area. Driveway surface requirements are to be in accordance with existing ordinance or pending amendment. NAC recommends approval of the requested building relocation contingent upon the fulfillment of ten conditions in report dated May 15, 1997, which Mr. Kirmis read. Larry Koshak, City Engineer, had recommendations in letter dated May 19, 1997, wetlands need to be delineated, septic tank drainfield setback requirements need to be met. Also recommended the movers be responsible for any damage to the streets. Chair Swenson opened the Hearing to the public for any questions or comments. None Brought discussion back to the Planning Commission. Richard Nichols - Regarding Hakanson Anderson's letter dated May 19, 1997, had questions on septic systems that don't meet current wetland setbacks. Mr. Kirmis - Typically a CUP request with a non -conforming septic system is an issue for the Building Official or City Engineer. In this case the applicant plans to upgrade his system. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING of May 21, 1997 cont'd` r Eugene Goenner - Did not feel the mover should be responsible for road damage N,-ca the road is in such poor condition there. Mr. Kirmis - Mover is responsible for road damage. This is always the case just hasn't gotten into the reports before. Recommended adding a condition that there is no adverse impact. State permit may require insurance be in place to correct any damage. Elaine Beatty - In the past the mover has been required to be licensed and bonded. Eugene Goenner recommended adding the word excessive to the Engineers report. Chair Swenson - Asked the applicant if he wished to comment: Charles Klein - He will be having a new mound septic system put in by Dan Reed. The mover is licensed and bonded and does carry insurance. Also, he can provide any other information the city may need. Chair Swenson closed the Hearing RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED APPROVAL OF CUP REQUEST WITH 11 CONDITIONS OF NAC'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDED CHANGE TO ENGINEER'S REPORT ADDING "EXCESSIVE" DAMAGE. ING ROSKAFT SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. This will be on Tuesdays City Council Meeting May 27, 1997, 6:30 PM. 4 HEARING for Gregory M & Linda Strommen, 8433 P lame en Avenue NF, Otsego DINT 55330. Section 22 Twg121, Range 23, PID # 118-052-007030. Lot 3, Block 7, Country Ridge Development Request is as follows* A Conditional Use Permit to allow more than one Residential Driveway (curbcut) for a single family dwelling: Mr. Kirmis - Gregory and Linda Strommen have requested approval of a CUP to allow for a second curb cut for their lot located south of 85th and west of Palmgren Avenue NE. Access to the detached garage via the property's existing curb cut would present significant difficulties due to the location of a well and tree within the front yard of the lot. The City Engineer, in letter dated May 19, 1997, expressed concern with obstruction in the flow line of the ditch, possible precedent being set. The City Engineer objects to the second curb cut. (see attached) The ordinance does allow a second driveway with a CUP. NAC recommends approval of the CUP request to allow a second curb cut subject to 4 conditions listed in NAC's report dated May 12, 1997, which Mr. Kirmis read. Chair Swenson opened the hearing to the public for questions and comments. None Brought hearing back to Planning Commission for discussion. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING of May 21, 1997 cont'd Page 3 Richard Nichols asked the applicant if there was a culvert under the existing driveway and if the proposed garage could be accessed. Mr. Strommen - Yes there is a culvert, but if pulling a trailer it wouldn't make the turn with the well and a tree so close. Chair Swensnon - The City Engineer commented that it violates the subdivision overlay plans. Mr. Kirmis - Didn't see this as a major impact, however, if sewer comes they will be responsible for those costs. Richard Nichols - This would be the first 2nd curb cut, but there are limits to how close you can get to a well. He wouldn't object to allowing the 2nd curb cut.. Eugene Goenner - There is 17 feet from the ditch to the well. It appears could make that corner without a second curb cut. Could the paving be deleted? Mr. Kirmis - Accessory buildings housing mowers etc. do not require a driveway, however, vehicular accesses require paving. Richard Nichols - This is a newer development. Allowing the second curb cut with the driveway paved would be best. Arleen Nagel - Item #3, Recommendations, ne proposed driveway is surfa Pd it asphalt+ concret ., cobblestone, or a i g brick- Would this be subject to the proposed amendment? Mr. Kirmis - Except on gravel roads. It is intended to bring developments to current standards. Since 1992 if development is platted it needed to be paved. CM Berning - At the last City Council meeting it was brought to our attention that any upgrade (septic system, deck, etc.) over $2,500.00 a driveway upgrade is needed. This seems extreme. Eugene Goenner - Could it be required that the second curb cut be placed in such a way that at the time of re -subdivision it would become their driveway? Mr. Kirmis - It would be appropriate to consider where the second house would be built. Also asked if applicant intended to pave the driveway. Mr. Strommen - Yes. Chair Swenson - Went back to public for comment. None. Closed public hearing and brought discussion back to the Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING of May 21, 1997 cont'd Page 4 RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO APPROVE CUP REQUEST FOR A SECOND CURB CUT SUBJECT TO 6 CONDITIONS IN NAC'S REPORT DATED MAY 15, 1997. BILL JONES SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED 5 TO 1, RICHARD NICHOLS, BILL JONES, ING ROSKAFT, CARL SWENSON, ARLEEN NAGEL VOTING IN FAVOR. EUGENE GOENNER OPPOSED. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO AMEND - CURB CUT BE PLACED CONDUCIVE TO SUB -DIVISION OF THE LOT. ARLEEN SECONDED. AMENDMENT FAILED 4 TO 2 WITH EUGENE GOENNER AND ARLEEN NAGEL IN FAVOR AND CARL SWENSON, RICHARD NICHOLS, ING ROSKAFT, AND BILL JONES, OPPOSED. This will be on the City Council Agenda June 9, 1997, at 6:30 PM. A Conditional Use Permit to allow more than one detachedrin 'vate garage or accessory stnicbire for each singje family dwelling. Mr. Kirmis - Read applicants request for approval of a CUP to allow more than one detached accessory structure. The applicant requests constructing a 832 sq ft (26 x 24) detached garage. Presently there is a 1,008 sq ft detached accessory garage and a 64 sq ft utility shed on R-3 zoned property. NAC recommended approval of applicants request with five (5) conditions which he read. The City Engineer issues were that the applicant continue using the existing driveway and that the proposed building does not change the drainage patterns. Chair Swenson - Opened the Hearing to the public and asked if anyone wished to be heard. No one did. Brought discussion back to the Planning Commission. CM Berning asked if Item # 2, 3, and 4, under Recommendation are required. Mr. Kirmis - Whatever is decided by the City Council regarding the amendment will apply. RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO APPROVE CUP REQUEST TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE ACCESSORY BUILDING SUBJECT TO SIX (6) CONDITIONS IN 1 NAC'S REPORT. ING ROSKAFT SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. This will be on the City Council Agenda June 9, 1997 at 6:30 PM. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING of May 21,1997 cont'd Page 5 f Jul Mr. Kirm is -Attached is a draft amendment which would allow building relocations for newly constructed homes assembled off site via administrative permitting rather than CUP. ne y be satisfactorily addressed through the existing Potential adverse impacts may durn5, 1997. performance standards and security requirements. See E FUR HEARING May ING ROSKAFT ran MOTIONED JULY 29 1997 BE NIC HOLS SECONDED THE MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED. . will be at Dayton at CM Berning gave Sewer update. 'The next joint sewer sewer and water :pOPM, May 28, 1997. Also there meeting with Darken ds ds regarding ohas not on June 3, 1997. The City met with two developers on May 13, 1997. The City received a proposal yet. g _ Adiourni HE ING ROSKAFT MOTIONED TO ADJOURN. B DL JONES SECONDED T MOTION. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED - planning planning Commission Meeting adjourned at 9:10 PM. CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE 6. BOB KIRMIS, ASST. CITY PLANNER June 9, 1997- 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB , CC 6.1. Consider application for Greg Paumen Conditional Use Permit for the Following: a. Allow construction of more than one detached accessory building in association with a detached single family residential use. BACKGROUND: ' This item came to P.C. for Hearing on May 21, 1997. NAC recommended approval of the request with five conditions from their report. After Hearing and discussion the following recommendation was made to the Council: RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO APPROVE CUP REQUEST TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE ACCESSORY BUILDING SUBJECT TO SIX CONDITIONS IN NAC'S REPORT. ING ROSKAFT SECONDED. ALL IN FAVOR. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. See attached findings of fact, P.C. Minutes and NAC's Report. RECOMMENDATION: Council approval of the P. C. Recommendation above. Thanks Elaine CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION f Greg Paumen for a conditional use permit to allow construction of more than I accessory building in association with.a detached single family residential 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to application of Greg Pauman for the aforementioned conditional use permit. e application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the Lived, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision. FINDINGS OF FACT The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of more than one detached accessory building in association with a detached single family residential use. The subject property is zoned R-3, Residential -Immediate Urban Service Area. he subject property lies within the City's Immediate Urban Service Area, as istrated in Otsego's duly adopted Comprehensive Plan. e legal description of the property is as follows: Lot 6, Block 4, Walesch Estates 2nd Addition, City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota ection 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and amity Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. The seven effects and findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use of the subject property will be compatible with adjacent properties. As such, the use is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan and the property's R-3 zoning designation. b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. The proposed accessory storage building will be compatible with present and future uses in the area. C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise; stc.)..... The proposed use will conform to all applicable performance standards. d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed. The proposed use will not tend to or have an adverse effect upon the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use's impact upon the property values of the area in which it is proposed. While no detailed study has been conducted, similar situations dictate that the proposed use will not tend to depreciate area property values. f. Traffic generated by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within the capabilities of 78th Street which serves the property. g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. The proposed use can be accommodated by existing public service facilities. The proposed use will not overburden the City's service capacity. 6. The planning report dated 7 May 1997, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. E 7. On 21 May 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed conditional use permit application preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the conditional use permit application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to relocate a single family residence to an existing lot of record is approved in its present form and subject to the following.stipulations: 1. The subject site's driveway is surfaced in accordance with the directives of the City Council, either in compliance with existing ordinance requirements or pending amendment. If the City Council proceeds with the processing of an amendment, final CUP approval shall coincide and respond to the requirements of such approval (or denied) amendment. 2. The proposed accessory building is not used for home occupation/commercial related activities or the keeping of animals. 3. A building elevation (or elevations) is submitted which demonstrates compliance with City building height requirements. 4. The proposed accessory building match the site's principal building in color 5. Ten foot wide drainage and utility easements are provided along side and rear lot lines. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 9th day of June 1997. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor 3 ATTEST: By: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 151 INA t00% NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS N7 INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission Bob Kirmis 7 May 1997 Otsego - Paumen Accessory Building CUP 176.02 - 97.04 Mr. Greg Paumen has requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of more than one detached accessory structure upon his 1.1 acre lot located south of 78th Street between O'Brian and Odean Avenues (14223 78th Street). Specifically, the applicant wishes to construct an 832 square foot (26 feet by 24 feet) detached garage upon the property. Presently, a 1,008 square foot detached accessory garage and 64 square foot utility shed exist on the property. The subject site is zoned R-3, Residential Immediate Urban Service. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Detailed Site Location Exhibit C: Site Plan 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 Recommendation Based on the following review, our office recommends approval of a conditional use permit to allow more than one detached accessory building associated with a detached single family dwelling subject to the following conditions: 1. The subject site's driveway is surfaced in accordance with the directives of the City Council, either in compliance with existing ordinance requirements or pending amendment. If the City Council proceeds with the processing of an amendment, final CUP approval shall coincide and respond to the requirements of such approved (or denied) amendment. 2. The proposed accessory building is not used for -home occupation/commercial related activities or the keeping of animals. 3. A building elevation (or elevations) is submitted which demonstrates compliance with City building height requirements. 4. The proposed accessory building match the site's principal building in color. 5. Ten foot wide drainage and utility easements are provided along side and rear lot lines. 6. Comments from other City staff. ISSUES ANALYSIS CUP Review Criteria. As noted previously, the applicant has requested a conditional use permit to allow more than one detached (or second) accessory building upon his property. According to Section 20-16-4.1 of the City Zoning Ordinance, a conditional use permit for an accessory storage structure may only be granted provided that: There is a demonstrated need and potential for continued use of the structure and the purpose stated. 2. In the case of residential uses, no commercial or home occupation activities are conducted on the property. This prohibition shall include the storage of materials and equipment which are unrelated to the on-site residential use and facility. 3. The building has an evident re -use or function related to the principal use. 2 4. The accessory building shall be maintained in a manner that is compatible with the adjacent uses and does not present a hazard to public health, safety, and general welfare. 5. The provisions of Section 20-4-2.F of the Ordinance shall be considered and a determination made that the proposed activity is in compliance with such criteria (listed below). a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). d. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. f. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Existing Accessory Storage Space. Currently, a total of approximately 1,072 square feet of accessory storage space exists upon the subject property as summarized below: Square Footage Two Stall Garage (28' x 36) 1,008 square feet Utility Shed (8'x 8') 64 square feet 1,072 square feet Including the proposed 832 square foot accessory building, approximately 1,904 square feet of accessory storage space would exist upon the subject property. 3 Building Use. The CUP review criteria states that there should be a demonstrated need for the continued use of the structure and the stated purpose. The proposed garage is to be used for the storage of the applicant's personal recreational vehicles and equipment. As such, there appears to be a demonstrated need for the continued use of the structure. In accordance with Ordinance requirements, the structure may not be used for home occupation/commercial related activities or the keeping of animals. Building Type. According to Section 20-16-4.G of the Zoning Ordinance, the same or suitable quality exterior building materials (as determined by the Building Inspector) shall be used in all accessory buildings over 150 square feet as the principal building. The proposed detached garage is to be finished in 12 inch lap siding similar to that used upon the single family residence and existing detached garage. To ensure structure compatibility, it is recommended that the proposed accessory building be of a color which matches the site's principal structure. Setbacks. According to Section 20-16-4.B.5 of the Ordinance, accessory buildings may encroach into the required side and rear yard of a lot, except however no such encroachment may occur upon a required easement or within 10 feet of any lot line. As shown on the submitted site plan (Exhibit C), the proposed accessory building would lie 32 feet from the site's southern property line and 34 feet from the lot's western boundary. Thus, the proposed garage meets applicable setback requirements. Access. The subject property is currently provided access via a single driveway ± 24 feet from 78th Street. No change to the access is proposed as a result of the accessory building construction. Driveway Surfacing. The submitted site plan does not indicate whether a driveway is to be constructed to access the proposed detached garage. According to Section 20-22- 4.1-1.12.(b).2 of the Zoning Ordinance, detached single family uses within residential developments platted prior to 1 January 1992 must adhere to the following surfacing requirement: (b) Any residential use which undertakes an improvement requiring a building permit and the value of such improvement exceeds $2,500 shall be required to upgrade the driveway and parking area surfacing to asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick. The City Council is currently reconsidering its driveway improvement policy and the aforementioned ordinance requirement. As a condition of CUP approval, the applicant shall be required to adhere to City's driveway improvement requirements either as they presently exist or in accordance with a pending amendment. In this regard, approval of rd the applicant's request should coincide and comply with formal City action on the cited driveway surfacing requirements. Building Height. According to Section 20-16-4.F of the Zoning Ordinance, an accessory building within an R-3 Zoning District may not exceed 16 feet in height except via conditional use permit. As a condition of CUP approval, a building elevation should be submitted which demonstrates compliance with the maximum height standard. Easements. According to Section 21-7-15.A of the Subdivision Ordinance, 10 foot wide easements should be provided along lot lines to accommodate drainage and public/private utilities. It has not been indicated whether such easements have been established upon the site in question. As a condition of CUP approval, 10 foot wide drainage and utility easements should be provided along side and rear lot lines. Compatibility/Screening. According to CUP evaluation criteria, the proposed use must be judged to be compatible with surrounding uses. As shown on the submitted site plan, the proposed accessory building is to lie more than 30 feet from the subject site's southern and western lot lines. Considering that these setbacks are triple that required by ordinance and that a row of trees (species not identified) exists to the west (of the structure), the proposed use is considered compatible with the area in which it is proposed. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit subject to the conditions listed in the Executive Summary of this report. PC: Elaine Beatty Andy MacArthur Larry Koshak Jerry Olson Greg Paumen R EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCATIC •a.e J* Z 1 y (,lao Pala Pala ,Il.o 116 1 tin, ftft-ja /252100 4 0026-A 8017—V j12 13 14 n� jLJ 1261202 NF 7 '? a°'°2 �" I z W polo 0, 3 Z 1 ¢ 7924-30 7 � �qy ,� Q l0D1 w.t Ioo,aoo loo,a,a wA a 37 1-oo ,a,� O(n 0 "� pwo 7 la+ 090 // a� 10 ,.M''A aeo ImON � ,,�-� '1010 aaaa 5 >.ao-a uj ,lata "� 3 1 9 pl to 11 C Iw,ano Z 2 M p,a p 30 STR 7 8th 14 13 p,» 9 oma 8077 j 12 STREET F' 21y m 1 'l R Pam 0�. 1 r .. , ,a 3 a� @2 30 3 :v - 8 9 -10 -11 12 13 14 15 7 107799-.30 q,G nw '°. #4110 µt20 14130F#41#4150l30 ,40 , I /tea F. 4 Cn SITE 1262100 (261300 /284203 7490-30 EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATI01' ESTATES -ESCH Ito 21 , /1190 a POW /If00 19 1Tto '4. Q "s � a i 4b 0 5T. 3 3 2 pogo 2nd AD[ 90 ptao 1815 918 17 Tat m N.E. s s q14w wo Z 930 FO,o f-- Koro^ /fall 14090 /252100 4 0026-A 8017—V j12 13 14 n� jLJ 1261202 NF 7 '? a°'°2 �" I z W polo 0, 3 Z 1 ¢ 7924-30 7 � �qy ,� Q l0D1 w.t Ioo,aoo loo,a,a wA a 37 1-oo ,a,� O(n 0 "� pwo 7 la+ 090 // a� 10 ,.M''A aeo ImON � ,,�-� '1010 aaaa 5 >.ao-a uj ,lata "� 3 1 9 pl to 11 C Iw,ano Z 2 M p,a p 30 STR 7 8th 14 13 p,» 9 oma 8077 j 12 STREET F' 21y m 1 'l R Pam 0�. 1 r .. , ,a 3 a� @2 30 3 :v - 8 9 -10 -11 12 13 14 15 7 107799-.30 q,G nw '°. #4110 µt20 14130F#41#4150l30 ,40 , I /tea F. 4 Cn SITE 1262100 (261300 /284203 7490-30 EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATI01' FROM : CITY OF, OTSEGO Ob ss/ ` PHONE NO v, 3( 8' liir y T uT<<;•tr StvaAce 3< 612 441 4414 - 00 Nw YL %&D D Srkucw 3J � WrT, RIDGE G� 70 ' �wsnwJ" � 8l'l.61 S --n. 8' Jv m SToitA6E Dinr FI.s,.'S EY�STN9 D6rACAC D tto � EXHIBIT C - SITE PL AN Hakanson 7 Anderson Assoc., Inc. May 19, 1997 Ms. Elaine Beatty, Clerk City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Conditional Land Use Permits Dear Elaine: MAY 2 01991 I 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 Fax 612/427-341-- 0520 The three Conditional Land Use Permits to be presented at the planning commission on 5/21/97 require some comment as these requests relate to engineering matters. • Gregory Paumen 14223 NE 78th Street The only issue would be that the proposer continues to use the existing single driveway and that the proposed building does not change drainage patterns. These are issues the building inspector can monitor. • Gregory & Linda Strommen 8433 Palmgren Ave NE We object to additional driveways due to the culvert, which creates another obstruction in the flow line of the ditch. We also are concerned that in allowing this action, the City violates the subdivision overlay plans for Country Ridge. Allowing this may constitute a precedent. There may not be any other solution to this situation unless a common singular driveway can be accomplished. • Charles Klein 8045 Ochou Ave NE The item of concern in the Conditional Land Use Permit would be the wetlands and septic tank drainfield. Wetlands should be delineated with completion of the Certificate of Exemption or Compliance or No Loss Form. As for the septic tank drainfield, the building inspector should review the system for conformance to setbacks to the wetland. The mover should be responsible for any damage to the streets in Walesch Estates resulting from the move in. The streets in this area are in poor condition. Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors 0 Ms. Elaine Beatty May 19, 1997 Page 2 If you have questions on the above, please contact me. Yours truly, HAKANSON_ANDERSON ASSOCIATES, INC. ak, PE cc: Bob Kirmis, NAC Andy MacArthur, Attorney Jerry Olson, Building Inspector jmh OT901.eb9 CITY OF OTSEGO REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION AGENDA SECTION: DEPARTMENT: MEETING DATE 6. BOB KIRMIS, ASST. CITY PLANNER June 9, 1997- 6:30PM ITEM NUMBER: ITEM DESCRIPTION: PREPARED BY: EB,CC 6.2. Consider Application for Gregory and Linda Strommen for a Conditional Use Permit for the following: a. Allow the construction of a second curb cut access to a single family residential lot. BACKGROUND: This item came to P.C. for Hearing on May 21, 1997. Access to the detached garage via the property's existing curb cut would present significant difficulties due to the location of a well and tree within the front yard of the lot. NAC recommended approval of the request with 4 conditions from their report. The City Engineer, in letter dated May 19, 1997 expressed concern with obstruction in the flow line of the ditch and possible precedent being set and objected to the second curb cut. After Hearing and discussion the following recommendation was made to the Council: RICHARD NICHOLS MOTIONED TO APPROVE CUP REQUEST FOR A SECOND CURB CUT SUBJECT TO 6 CONDITIONS IN NAC'S REPORT DATED MAY 15, 1997. BILL JONES SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED 5 TO 1, RICHARD NICHOLS, BILL JONES, ING ROSKAFT, CARL SWENSON AND ARLEEN NAGEL VOTING IN FAVOR. EUGENE GOENNER OPPOSED. EUGENE GOENNER MOTIONED TO AMEND - CURB CUT BE PLACED CONDUCIVE TO SUB -DIVISION OF THE LOT. ARLEEN SECONDED. AMENDMENT FAILED 4 TO 2 WITH EUGENE GOENNER AND ARLEEN NAGEL IN FAVOR AND CARL SWENSON, RICHARD NICHOLS, ING ROSKAFT AND BILL JONES OPPOSED. See attached findings of fact, P.C. Minutes and NAC's Report. RECObdviENDATION : Council approval of the P. C. Recommendation above. Thanks Elaine CITY OF OTSEGO WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA IN RE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND DECISION Application of Gregory and Linda Strommen for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a second curb cut access to a single family residential lot. On 9 June 1997, the Otsego City Council met at its regularly scheduled meeting to consider the application of Gregory and Linda Strommen for the aforementioned conditional use permit. Based on the application, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a second curb cut access to their single family residential lot. 2. The subject property is zoned R-3, Residential -Immediate Urban Service Area. 3. The legal description of the property is as follows: Lot 3, Block 7, Country Ridge, City of Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota 4. Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance directs the Planning Commission and City Council to consider seven possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. The seven effects and findings regarding them are: a. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan specifically discourages direct lot access to major streets (i.e., arterials). Palmgren Avenue, from which the subject property is provided access, is classified as a "local" street. As a result, access limitations referenced by the Comprehensive Plan are not considered applicable to the lot in question. b. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. Single family residential development in the area has been platted consistent with an approved resubdivision plan. Thus, homes have been placed upon lots so as to accommodate future division as desired. While the majority of lots in the area do not have "second" driveways, the proposed "second" curb cut access is considered a necessary response to unique site conditions and is compatible with present and future uses in the area. C. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). As a condition of CUP approval, the proposed second curb cut and associated driveway shall be required to comply with all applicable performance standards. d. The proposed use's effect on the area in which it is proposed. Provided proper steps are taken to respond to site drainage issues (culvert sizing, etc.) the proposed second curb cut will not tend to or have an adverse effect upon the area in which it is proposed. e. The proposed use's impact upon the property values of the area in which it is proposed. While no detailed study has been conducted, the proposed use is not anticipated to depreciate area property values. f. Traffic generated by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. The amount of traffic generated by the proposed use will not increase as a result of the second curb cut. Thus, traffic generated by the proposed use is within the capabilities of Palmgren Avenue which serves the property. g. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. The proposed use can be accommodated by existing public service facilities and will not over burden the community's service capacity. 2 5. The planning report dated 12 May 1997, prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., is incorporated herein. 6. On 21 May 1997, the Otsego Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the proposed conditional use permit application preceded by published and mailed notice. Upon review of the conditional use permit application and evidence received, the Otsego Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the conditional use permit based on the aforementioned findings. DECISION Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a second curb cut access to a single family residential lot is approved in its present form subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant recognize that future sanitary sewer service to the property and implementation of the resubdivision plan could necessitate relocation or removal of the proposed detached garage (proposed in conjunction with second driveway construction). 2. A determination is made that the proposed curb cut is not located less than 40 feet from the driveway of the abutting northerly lot. 3. The proposed driveway is surfaced in asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick. 4. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to drainage issues. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council this 9th day of June 1997. CITY OF OTSEGO Larry Fournier, Mayor ATTEST: By:: Elaine Beatty, City Clerk/Zoning Administrator 3 MAY.19.1997 12:36PM TO:OTSEGO Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. May 19, 1997 Ma. Elaine Beatty, Clerk City of Otsego 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Conditional Land Use Permits Dear Elaine: NO. 465 P. 1/2 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 Fax 612/427-346}- 0520 The three Conditional Land Use Permits to be presented at the planning commission on 5/21/97 require some comment as these requests relate to engineering matters. Engineers • Gregory Paumen 14223 NE 78th Street The only issue would be that the proposer continues to use the existing single driveway and that the proposed building does not change drainage patterns. These are issues the building inspector can monitor. • Gregory & Linda Strommen 8433 Palmdren Ave NE We object to additional driveways due to the culvert, which creates another obstruction in the flow line of the ditch. We.also are concerned that In allowing this action, the City violates the subdivision overlay plans for Country Ridge. Allowing this may constitute a precedent. There may not be any other solution to this situation unless a common singular driveway can be accomplished. • Charles Klein 8045 Ochou Ave NE The item of concern In the Conditional Land Use Permit would be the wetlands and septic tank drainfleld. Wetlands should be delineated with completion of the Certificate of Exemption or Compliance or No Loss Form. As for the septic tank drainfield, the building inspector should review the system for conformance to setbacks to the wetland. The mover should be responsible for any damage to the streets in Walesch Estates resulting from the move in. The streets in this area are in poor condition. Landscape Architects Surmyons NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Otsego Mayor and City Council Otsego Planning Commission Bob Kirmis 12 May 1997 Otsego - Strommen Curb Cut CUP 176.02 - 97.05 Gregory and Linda Strommen have requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow the construction of a second curb cut access to their one acre single family residential lot located south of 85th Street and west of Palmgren Avenue. The proposed second curb cut would provide access to a future detached garage which is proposed to be sited ± 50 feet from the site's principal building. According to the Zoning Ordinance, single family uses are limited to one curb cut access per property except by approval of a conditional use permit. The subject property is zoned R-3, Residential Immediate Urban Service. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Site Location Exhibit B: Detailed Site Location Exhibit C: Site Plan 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 Recommendation Based on the following review, our office recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit to allow a second curb cut for a single family residential use subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant recognize that future sanitary sewer service to the property and implementation of the resubdivision plan could necessitate relocation or removal of the proposed detached garage (proposed in conjunction with second driveway construction). 2. A determination is made that the proposed curb cut is not located less than 40 feet from the driveway of the abutting northerly lot. 3. The proposed driveway is surfaced in asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick_ 4. The City Engineer provide comment and recommendation in regard to drainage issues. 6. Comments of other City staff. ISSUES ANALYSIS CUP Evaluation Criteria. According to Section 20-4-2.F of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission and City Council must consider possible adverse effects of the proposed conditional use. Judgement may be based upon, but not limited to, the following factors: 1. The proposed action's consistency with the specific policies and provisions of the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use's compatibility with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use's conformity with all performance standards contained herein (i.e., parking, loading, noise, etc.). 4. The proposed use's effect upon the area in which it is proposed. 5. The proposed use's impact upon property values of the area in which it is proposed. 2 6. Traffic generation by the proposed use in relation to capabilities of streets serving the property. 7. The proposed use's impact upon existing public services and facilities including parks, schools, streets, and utilities, and its potential to overburden the City's service capacity. Existing Conditions. As shown on the submitted site plan (Exhibit C), the applicants' home is located on the southern one-half of their lot (consistent with resubdivision plan). The home currently includes a two stall attached garage located alongside the property's southern boundary. Expansion of the existing garage (with access from existing driveway) is not possible due to the side yard setback limitations and the floor plan of the home which prohibits northerly expansion. Recognizing these limitations, a detached garage has been proposed to the northwest of the existing residence. Access to the detached garage via the property's existing curb cub would present significant difficulties due to the location of a well and tree within the front yard of the lot (see Exhibit C). Driveway/Access Policy. The City's Comprehensive Plan includes various policies related to street access. Specifically, the plan states the following: • Vehicular access onto all types of arterials shall be minimized and limited ensuring adequate distance between intersections and utilization of appropriate traffic control methods and devices. • Wherever possible, access to property shall be prohibited from major streets. Detached frontage roads are to provide property access for properties "fronting" such streets and roads. Palmgren Avenue, from which the subject property is provided access, is classified as a "local" street. As such, access limitations addressed by the Comprehensive Plan are not necessarily applicable. The City's Zoning Ordinance does, however, include various regulations related to curb cut placement. These standards will be addressed in following sections of this report. Curb Cut Spacing. Section 20-22-4.H.7 of the Zoning Ordinance states that driveways for single family dwellings may not be located less than 40 feet from one another. With a spacing of ± 70 feet, the proposed curb cuts upon the applicants' property conform to this requirement. As a condition of CUP approval, a determination should be made that the proposed curb cut does not lie less than 40 feet from the driveway of the adjacent northerly lot. 3 Resubdivision Plan. As noted previously, the applicants' home has been sited on the southern one-half of the lot, consistent with the Country Ridge resubdivision plan. The purpose of the resubdivision plan is to provide property owners with a means to lessen financial burdens (i.e., assessments) associated with possible future sanitary sewer service. In this regard, the applicant should recognize that future sanitary sewer service could necessitate relocation or removal of the proposed detached garage. This is of course a decision to be made by the property owner. Setbacks. According to the Zoning Ordinance, curb cut openings must be a minimum of five feet from the side property line in all districts. As shown on the submitted site plan, the second curb cut is proposed to lie 30 feet from the lot's northern property line and conforms to the Ordinance requirement. Driveway Surfacing. In accordance with Ordinance requirements, the proposed driveway should be surfaced in asphalt, concrete, cobblestone, or paving brick. Drainage. Construction of the proposed second driveway will require the installation of a second culvert. As part of the conditional use permit consideration, a finding should be made that the proposed curb cut will not adversely impact site and area drainage patterns. This issue should be subject to further comment and recommendation by the City Engineer. Curb Cut Width. According to the Ordinance, no curb cut may exceed 24 feet in width unless approved by the City Engineer. The proposed "second" curb cut measures 15 feet in width and conforms with the Ordinance requirement. CONCLUSION Based on the preceding review, our office recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit to allow a "second" curb cut upon a single family residential lot subject to the conditions listed in the Executive Summary of this report. PC: Elaine Beatty Larry Koshak Andy MacArthur Jerry Olson Gregory and Linda Strommen 112 EXHIBIT A - SITE LOCA? i SHORtwh,aA�D»omwonN 16151. I . I„.1. I~ 7!'1 7 ” coma ROAD No. 39 vZ 1514 4 2 2 �2 . ACRES y `1 1 ■ x ` '057 _ _ a r. 3 ^, N.E. °9N STREET tL �1 3 O _ • ° 1] �+ i + r'1 �"' �I 71 �I yi 4. 3,I 2 N.E. °E58thIn i 'i J n� 17 o r+. 13 .. ° ° t+ M�7 }} 13 -F-87th ; j STREET �. 4 C O 13 ti 11 11 TO 1 ... I 6 S 7 7 3— I I • �! 7 4 3 - • _ , 2- 3 SITE L — =- = s .� f �4 s i 7~ I tr 7 Y t £] 14 3 2 1 � Inrm 10~ M„y a 4 2 J \ 720. I EXHIBIT B - DETAILED SITE LOCATION 2 0 D ----- ^�---_b 1; City of Otsego Engineer's Agenda Items City Council Meeting June 9, 1997 8.1 Consider Quotes for Dust Control/Gravel Surface Conditioning Chemical A Quote for application of Magnesium Chloride was received from Dustcoating, Inc. in the amount of $0.49/gallon. The quote includes five miles of roadway 21' wide. The total cost would be $9,065. We have solicited a quote from Thermo Gas and had not received that as of this writing. We had estimated 20' wide roads at $0.50/gallon for a total costs of $8,800. We recommend awarding this work to Dustcoating, Inc. and proceeding with the application of the Magnesium Chloride. We have attached the Quote received for reference. 8.2 Approve City Engineer Selection of Sewer Plant Site in Eastern Area of City Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc. would analyze treatment plant sites based on our preliminary analysis and with input from Bonestroo. We would select three potential sites and rank them according to best fit for the treatment plant. We will prepare a brief report, with exhibits, discussing our findings. Our proposed cost to complete this work is $750. We can proceed with the work immediately upon Council approval. 8.3 Louis Szenay Pond Site Louis Szenay currently owns Lot 3, Block 1 of the Otsego Acres 2nd Addition. The property lies within subdistrict 4D of the Hall's Pond Watershed District. Mr. Szenay has requested that the City consider purchasing the property. The lot was considered unbuildable by staff as it is presently configured. Our firm had recommended purchasing the lot if a reasonable price was agreed upon and if funds were available. There are presently no funds available in the Hall's Pond Watershed District account. General funds would be required. Any potential stormwater storage area within the Hall's Pond Watershed District would be of value. The City could purchase the property at this time and agenda6.9 construct a pond at a later date. The attached Exhibit N depicts the property in question. A building, which had set vacant on the property, has been removed. If the City does purchase the property, we recommend that the landowner perform the following tasks prior to sale: 1. Remove or bury the remainder of the building and foundation. This should be coordinated with the City Building Inspector. 2. Seal and abandon the well. 3. Pump out and fill in the septic tank. agenda6.9 MAY, -29' 97 (THU) 10:10 DUSTCOATING TEL:612 894 0126 P. 001 Item 8.1 DUSTCOATING, INC. 7217 128th Street West Savage, MN 55378 Telephone: (612) 894-0012 Fax: (612) 894-0126 DATE: o29 _ 97 TO: )_Or y� Ko s l,e,k OF - FAX F:FAX FROM: Number of pages including cover sheet: Message: Y(ce �o,- 'S �, es o� Yod-d wG� al (� U U.- 49 l�5 is�ta fie ajl°� If transmission is incomplete, please call (612) 894-0012 If transmission is incomplete, please call (612) 894-0012 MAY.-29'97(THU) 10:11 DUSTCOATING OUSTCOATING, INC. ,425 D'CHENE LANE TEL:612 894 0126 P.002 QUOTATION MAPLE PLAIN, MN 55359 Phone Number 612-479-1593 OR 1-800-352-9785 7 TO; DATE I TERMS bver� ELIVERY U- qi yve ......................... P:QUANTITY A C1 I QUOTE INCULED'S [DELIVERY, APPLICATION, AND TAX Questions concerning this Quote? Call: KATHY JOHNSON, OR STAN JOHNSON THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSIN SS! AREA OF BENEFIT EXHIBIT •0 0 2 AREA 4C, 4D, 4E, 4F, AND 4G STORM SEWER AND AREA OF BENEFIT Hakanson Anderson Assoc.,Inc. cigineers, Surveyors & Landscape Architects 3601 Thurston Ave., Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612-427-5860 FAX 612-427-0520 Item 8.3 !` F.TWN- 6-97 FR I 15:50 24erm o9ras Com p an y FAX COVER SHEET Date 6 // s ?— To Company So�c/ O✓p'��dv.�J Phone # 2�2a - - 5 -PC o F ax # ?.z d - �/ -"7 O s'�2 a Froin- CY eUL QSSoc,"a-cs ,1`nc- Thermogas Company 312 South Davis Litchfield, MN 55355 Phone: 320-693-2452 Fax: 320-693-3700 Number of pages including cover letter: Memo: POST OFFICE BOX 561 L1TCHrEL0, MINNESOTA 55353 (612) 633-2452 P.01 rd &/ JUN- 6-97 FRI 15:50 etui o yrs Coin p an y Attention; Larry Hakanson-Anderson Associates, Inc. 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, MN 55303 June 6, 1997 Dear Larry, Thermogas is submitting a bid for Road Dust Control to cover an area of five miles long by 21 feet wide. This bid includes application at $.47 per galloon. Thank you for allowing us to bid. Sincerely, Steve Minnehan Thermogas Company POST OFFICE GOX 561 LITCHFIELO. MINNESOTA 55755 (612) 693-2452 1 P.02 ,;QN— 6-97 FR I 15:51 P.03 MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET Xk19d#=ftr Road DUSt Control CHEMICAL NAME: MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE A premium blend of materials for dust control offering the combined benefits of premium ingredients resulting in a hydroscopic product with maximum surface penetration capability and dust reduction performance. PLANT FACILITY LOCATION: Thermogas Company CAS 1717 S. Boulder 23.8-31.25 Tulsa, OK 74119 Calcium Chloride 918 581-1800 For Emergency Information Contact Potassium Chloride Transportation (CHEMTREC): 800 424-9300 Environmental/Health/Safety: 918 581-1961 INGREDIENTS Ingredient % CAS Magnesium Chloride 23.8-31.25 7791-18-6 (Mg) Calcium Chloride 4.2 to 6.75 10043-52-4 (Ca) Potassium Chloride 0 7627-14-5 Sodium Chloride less than 1 7447-40-7 * Other 0 to .3 -Company trade secret additives for coloring, corrosion inhibition, surface tension modifiers, blending agents and antifoamers. All are biodegradable and classified non hazardous. Boiling Point: Solubility in Water: Vapor Pressure: Specific Gravity: Vapor Density (Air = 1): % Volatile by Vol: Appearance and Odor: Density: DM 115-97 PHYSICAL. DATA 230-250F, 110-121C Completely Miscible 7-15 mmHg .@ 25C/77F 1.29-1.43 Not Applicable 60-70 (Water) Clear to Straw Liquid Solution. 10.51 to 11,28 lbs/gal. �I ♦ Therinegm f JUN- 6-97 FR I 15:51 ERSONAL P OTECT VE U PMENT P.04 Respiratory Protection: N/A Eyes and Face: Monogoggles Hands, Arms and Body: Rubber Gloves Other Clothing and Equipment: None Required EMERGENCY MEDICAL PROCEDUR Inhalation: Remove from exposure Skin Contact: Flush with water Eye Contact: Flush immediately with plenty of water for at least 15 minutes, if irritation persists, obtain medical attention. Ingestion: Drink water and induce vomiting. (Do not attempt to induce vomiting to an unconscious person.) HEALTH/SAFETY INFORMATION Health - Inhalation: Not likely. May be a respiratory irritant. Skin Contact: Slight irritation if not flushed with water. Mild irritant similar to common salt. Eye Contact: Irritant which causes immediate inflammation of eye; com- parable to common salt. Ingestion: Mild cathartic. Fire and Explosion: NOT FLAMMABLE Reactivity - Stability: Stable Hazardous Decomposition Products: If evaporated to ryness and heated to a minimum of 500 F, hydrogen chloride (HCI) vapors could be liberated. ENVIRQNMENTAL Action to Take for Spills (use appropriate safety equipment): Flush area with plenty of water. May be slick on hard surfaces. Disposal Method: Keep out of drinking water sources. Dispose in accordance with local, state and federal environmental regulations. Ventilation: If needed, use general or local ventilation to control mists and aerosols. Respiratory Protection: None normally needed. If required, use an approved acid mist respirator. Eye Protection: Safety glasses with side shields; for severe exposure, chemical workers goggles. Eye fountain near work area. Protective clothing: Clean, body -covering clothing. Hands and face covering may be required depending upon severity of possible exposure. JUN— 6-97 FRI 15:52 P.05 s THIS n NAMEANDAbORESS OF INSU A ED CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE FICATE IS ISSUCO ASA MATTER OF IN{'ORAIATION ONLY AND CONFERS HO RIGHTS ON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. RTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEMOOR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFCROED ST THE POLICIES LISTED BELOW MAPCO INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES INCLUDING THERMOGAS COMPANY 1800 SOUTH BALTIMORE TULSA OK 74119 Dole ms,is TO CCRTOn THAT TME POLICIES 09 INSURANCE USTCO BELOW HAVE RN ISSUED TO THE o+SunED NAMED •i0v� FOP TME POLICY PERIOD INDICAICO, NOTWITNSTANOING ANY REOUME. HEN. TERM OR CON0171OM OFANT CON TRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WNICM tWS CERTIFICAre NAY BE ISSUED CR MAT PERTAIN, TME INSURANC! AFFORDED BY THE POuC:95 DESCwilp HEREIN Is SU615CT TO ALL THE TCRMD, ExCLU CION& ANO CON0ITION9 OF Such POLICIES. LIMI rs SHOWN MAY nave IESN REDUCED NY PAID CLAIMS. Ro11Ins Hudig Hail of Oklahoma, Inc. Two Warren Place 6120 SONIh Yale. SNiIs 300, P.0 Bos 3406 Tutfa. Oklahoma 74101.3406 Telephone 913/496.3900 Telefax 919/496.0460 December 15, 1995 193 x TYPE OF INSLINANCE COMOAN' L POLICY NVMBER POLICY EFFECMIE DATE (MM,DOHYYJ EAP�u4 IYDN ALL LIMITS M 7NOUSANDB y _ -- DATE (MMrCO n CEJ6R•L AG A EOATE S O GENERAL UAsur COAIr,IERclAL OFNEnAI LIABR:TY Twin City Fire ►RODUCTS•COMPAP4 AOcaEWTE S 3, 000 i CL,ULIS MADE Insurance Company antes PERSONALS ADvEnTii;Z waY�_ 3 000 X CCCURRENCE KJ0000041 12/31/95 12/31/9 EAR-«a.I� s 3 000 J X CwNERS l COrITMCTORS PROTECTIVE IE�+�Mn 3 A 0 0 flnE pANAGE (MIr CME FMQ a -- — 3 000 uracAL a=eE ANr DMc rEPson i 3 000 s �sEASGcr L Mrn 3}00. OFFICt.ASARE. EzCL _ I ndem� - — AtJTOMoeaEUABe,rrY OTHER gip. X AW AUTO Insurance Company Various CIGNA 3,000 y�r Aga +� ln;�ll Companies ALLwANED.uroc of North America• WC - Statutory EXCESS WC XWCC41224782 ri>c IEL - $3,000 SCHEDULED AUTOS (CIGNA) 12/31/95 12/31/9 ` -Moms PI A i ��,` r }( IARmAUT08 ISA -6353496 --- � -- ' ;'c';�nh' x NON OWNED WTOS*1"' y _ 4 AVT T'/ •;•' �p ANM E41Ya°`r`T� EACH AGGREGA OCCUFaat�CE EXC933LIABnm VIMBRELu FDRu O7HER TMAN 1:RELLA FCRY i ClAAHS AMDE OCCURRENCE antes a� WORK9R4'COMPENSATION various CIGNA Com AND tMPLOYERS'Ly10Rl'M1 SCFC41943348-WI 1/01/96 1/01/97 ETATvcOFT +-:!; �Pr„a •fir WLRC41943312—TX_ IE�+�Mn 3 A 0 0 ThePROPRIETcw DARTrEr76,ExECIli1VE X_ Na WLRC419 4 3 3 3 6 -A / O s �sEASGcr L Mrn 3}00. OFFICt.ASARE. EzCL .. S X19EASE FAp ENPIOTEE' OTHER Various CIGNA Companies 1/01/96 1/01/97 WC - Statutory EXCESS WC XWCC41224782 IEL - $3,000 CESCRIPTIQN OF OPEAATIONerLOCATI0N5NkICL33/AE3TaICTICNysvfiGAUfT'En19 I NAME AND ADDRESS” OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER MAPCO Inc. and Subsidiaries All Locations (for information and to copy as necessary for vehicles). Risk Management Dept. Tulsa - (918) 599-3649 CANCELLATION: SMOULOANY OF THEABOVE DEaC W BEC POLICIES BE CINCELLEO 9E9CRE THE EFMIRATICN DATETHERECF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVCR TO MAR--�-�— OAYSWRITTEN 40TICETO THE CERTIFICATENOLCERNAMEO TO THE LEFT. SLIT FAILUnE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SMALL IMPC>E NC OBLIGATION On LIABILITY OF ANY IONO UPON THE COMPANY, ITS AGENTS ON REPRESENTATIVES MNNESOTA artment of Revenue Property Tax Division Mail Station 3340 Phone (612) 296-5141 June 5, 1997 St. Paul, MI' .55�1J1 9 1997 TO: ALL CITY CLERKS, ADMINISTRATORS, MANAGERS, AND FINANCE DIRECTORS RE: CHANGES IN THE CERTIFICATION OF LOCAL PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR LOCAL PERFORMANCE AID PAYABLE IN 1998 Laws 1997, Chapter 231, Article 11, Section 7 provides for changes to the local performance aid (LPA) statute (Minnesota Statutes, Section 477A.05). In order to qualify for LPA in 1998, a city must affirm that (1) the aid will result in a reduction in property taxes at least equal to the amount of aid received, and (2) the city will spend the aid on programs for which it has developed a system of performance measures and that these measures will allow for the measurement of continuous improvement and will be regularly compiled and presented to the city council at least once a year. The city must identify the program or programs that are to be funded with the aid. The city is eligible for aid if it affirms that it is in the process of developing and implementing a system of performance measures for the program or programs for which the aid is being sought. However, the aid may not be spent on the program or programs until the performance measurement system has been instituted, unless the aid is being used to establish the performance measurement system. Local performance aid will be determined as follows for calendar year 1998: Laws 1997, Chapter 231, Article 11, Section 7 provides for $440,000 in addition to $4,107,673 (the amount paid in 1997) plus an inflation adjustment based on the implicit price deflator. A per capita aid amount will be determined by dividing the total aid available by the total population of all cities that qualify for the aid. Each qualifying city then receives an aid amount based on its population times the per capita aid amount. Distribution of LPA is based on yearly certifications for each qualifying city. Cities are required to submit an annual certification in order to receive LPA payable in calendar year 1998 and subsequent years. LPA will be paid in two equal installments on July 20 and December 26 of 1998. Qualifying cities will receive a certification of their 1998 LPA by July 31, 1997. As mentioned above, your city may qualify for LPA by (1) affirming that this aid will result in a reduction in property taxes equal to the amount of aid received and that (2) your city will spend the aid on programs for which it has developed a system of performance measures and that these measures will allow for the measurement of continuous improvement and will be regularly compiled and presented to the city council at least once each year. An equal opportunity employer (continued) TDD: (612) 215-0069 Page 2 Enclosed is a new certification for 1998 LPA. This certification replaces the certification which was enclosed with the letter dated March 25, 1997. This new certification must be signed by the mayor and the chair of the city council, and it must be returned to our office by June 30, 1997. NOTE: If our office does not receive a certification from your city by June 30, 1997, your city will not be eligible to receive this aid in calendar year 1998. If you have any questions regarding the completion of this fora, please feel free to call me at (612) 296-5141. Sincerely, 4/) L V / & , L.CleLarry y Research Analysis Specialist Property Tax Division Enclosure Form LPA - CI REVISED Certification of Local Performance Measures for Local Performance Aid Payable in 1998 Complete and return to: Minnesota Department of Revenue. Property Tax Division. Mail Station 3340. St. Paul, Minnesota 55146-3340 Phone: (612)296-5141 Name and mailing address of governmental unit Name of person filling out form Telephone County of location 1. Does your city affirm that local performance aid will result in a reduction in property taxes at least equal to the amount of local performance aid received? YES NO 2. Does your city affirm that the local performance aid will be spent on the program or programs for which it has developed a system of performance measures and that these measures will allow for the measurement of continuous improvement and will be regularly compiled and presented to the city council at least once a year? YES NO 3. If the answer to questions 1 & 2 is yes, what program or programs will be funded by local performance aid, or what program or programs will the local performance aid be used to establish performance measurement system(s) for? This form must be returned to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, Property Tax Division, by June 30, 1997 in order for your city to be eligible to receive Local Performance Aid payable in 1998. Note: City certifications must be signed by the Mayor and the Chair of the City Council. We do hereby certify that, to the best of our knowledge and belief, the facts presented in this certification are true and correct. ire of Mayor Signature of f City Council Date • • Pnr the period 06/02!97 t0 06/02. Claims List for APPrOvat MUNICIPAL OF CITY OF OTSEGO CLAIM TOTAL DATE NUMBER CLAIM 7 ACCOUNT ACCOUNT TO WHOM PAID 06/02/97 25 101.10 101-43100-ZZU WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE CO PARTS & SUPPLIES 06/02/97 2579 220.16 101-41940-220 G & K TEXTILE LEASING',SYSTEMS SERVICES 4/28'- 5/26/97 .101743100-220 06/02/97 2580 891.82 101-41940-389 06/02/97 2581 222.49 101-43100-322 101-41940-322 06/02/97.2582_748� _03 101-41400-320 01-4 4 - --101-43100-320' "-101-43100-320' 101-45200-320 06/02/97 2583 06/02/97 2585 102.72 101-41940-325 06/02/97 2586 6,121.74 202-42200-390 06/02/9 1 - - al 101-41700-301 701-41700-301 701-41/00-301 06/-1 - 'coo WRIGHT-HENNEPIN CO-OP ELECTRIC ASSN SERVICE TO 5/15 A / 701-41700-301 619.16 605-48000-322 101-43200-322 101-43200-322 b G 06/02/97 2590 4,130.00 101-41400-371 DEMCON DISPOSAL, INC CLEAN UP DAY 06/02/97 2591 50.00 101-41900-355 ECONOMIC DEV. PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT MEMBERSHIP _ _ 'NICIPAL Uti TO 5/b 259Z 790.14 101-43100-322 M -R SIGN UNLIMITED ELECTRIC, INC CITY OF ROGERS SCHARBER 3 SONS THE HARDWARE STORE NAPA OF ELK NC. H G WEBER OIL COMPANY SOFTRONICS ST JOSEPHS EQUIPMENT INC RANDY'S SANITATION 5 r BEVERLY WILSON, TREASURER LIGHTS AT CITY HALL SAND BAGS PART'S- PARTS TSPARTS SUPPLIES 74R7-3_ 5/16 DELIVERY COMPUTER UPGRADE ANNUAL PARTS MAY SERVICE r MEMBERSHIP DUES PRINTING & POUBLISHING 06/02/97 2594 06/02/97 2595 06/02/97 2597 06/02/97 2598 U6/Q2/9/ 2bV9 06/02/97 2600 06/02/'3' 2601 . 06/02/97 2603 06/02/97 2604 Vb/ '/ . 06/02/97 2606 06/02/'?' 2607 101-43200-322 91.32 101-41940-220 200.00 101-41400-310 15.04 101-43100-220 21.01 101-43100-220 628.89 101-43100-202 20.00 101-41400-390 -1- 1 40.03 101-43100-220 272.50 101-41610-390 J - l..b juz - 30.00 1e1-41+00-355 333.08 101-41400-350 3.3,228.27 _.. 37._2? 17 I')T AL '(EAli TO Dram 68.42 151.74 52.19 170.30 383.30 65.32 34.41 102.72 6,121.74 80.00 1,414.50 92.00 47.09 22.63 526.45 23/.92 4,130.00 50.00 53.01 604.88 91.32 200.00 15.04 21.01 628.89 20.00 140.03 272.50 30.00 33.08 33,28.27