06-11-12 OHF-r-�
s
O
N
O
N
0
Citi
o
� e
o
=_
i
w
0
r
C
Citi
N
M
3
4
M
0
�l
r
'O C5
Ct
O O ~ U
U
O U �
4J U
C5 �
A
ct
[TJ �
st OU 3 N
ct
3 cz
�- �- u 05 o 0
-o •o 0� v�
clz� ct
cr N M d'
WRIGHT COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN
FIGURE 10
ISSUES -- EAST REGION
51"t
C"TM G? ION
NOW ORI
ANA AT_ _ y`��-v Iyy lN1KR'drtl
�- Mt, T
�I'IOULi�tR Dif'1,G I FNGY �-,�,
woo-9trIGI��I Y _ mm"ift. � Al
"TR
L
"au CT.
-
1@Tmm 5m.
i7c
Tom �.
tx t +em
�I
�
OtPrl�t Y _.
�!j ~—
Y 'niNJl, l�
APO I.ANt4
Off-StRoat
rap / e I RS PA
#I ilnt
peorK GtION
1994
PARK AMA"
Ago I.ANis
�'�' fRONtA�i
r
�sr f� INt�Rl;�GtION
i IIPROVi11tNt5
ET.
APO I.ANSO
fICONtAbi
dArl u
L
"au CT.
-
m.'F«
tx t +em
N 1J/6r�Agi Now
"i nit
1994
PARK AMA"
Ago I.ANis
�'�' fRONtA�i
r
�sr f� INt�Rl;�GtION
i IIPROVi11tNt5
ET.
APO I.ANSO
fICONtAbi
dArl u
Northeast Wright County
2004 Sub -Area Study
Figure 24
Monticello ���� ® Recommended Staging of
Major Improvement Projects
C6)
V `U
<' 1151h Si PIE 118 B51h 51 NF LL'Y Legend
s... WY
Shorl-Term (2004-2015)
a 14 Otsego 2 ��� Mid -Term (2015-2025)
72W 51 NE �;�� z 10 Long -Term (2025-2040)
1C3) ROW Preservation (2004-2040)
® Ai 5 's eslesl ; ; i Existing Interchange
Alberto le< Proposed Half Interchange
500. 91 NE `9) < 11i wn sl NE B Llp};� Proposed Full Interchange
119
2 ( ® E=xisting Bridge
q r ® Future Bridge
St. Michae
1211 U'Y` /1 Denotes Reference Number
\^J in Tables 19-21
+� L, > ® Notes:
ad
�- RO f�
�7) � , �ers® 1. Proposed system plan has two
options for treatment of access at
m r,`N R@4efV9 Hassall® I-94lCSAH 37 (A); one option is ® for half -diamond Interchange to and
slhs"" from the east.
" Hanover. ' ` 2. River crossing location/
alignment to be determined (J).
LL ^ ® 1 0 1 2
Miles
® (� N
51
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT AREAS
sO a� �-�u , l, Ami
6 HOUR1�3t
SNI 1 iOG Lv 71 ni ` � `,��: /1111 • ;
li mnu un .�- .• umm� � - .�.
nut uonn
p � Ott R �►�. � a ��Iiil► ej N � ��.
All
31
,. �'' C; � � ,,1 YOB. /In ■..
��i.•Au�� � lM ID. a'.
�/ vntuu■�� it
s
' iii rig' �.' �.� �.� �. •y[
fGl�liaet•`
1
VA
z
w
0
0000
a,
-i--j
un
�
C73
.�
Ct
I
• r•rC75
O
0
0
4-4n
•�
1
1'
OTSEGO ALBERTVILLE
IUr
Jun .. 2012 — 3:51-
ROW
ROW FOOTPRINT = 120' — 140'
TRAIL ONLY
(LAMBERT LANE TO MACIVER AVE.)
J. 1I
CITYr�I'
066Tgv0
11INN E.
EXHIBIT 2
OT388
11--ll�
rL•^O6, 2.Inwn.icr.c—\rn�nrm�� .nisi
ROW
120' — 110'
ROW
TRAIL ONLY
(MACIVER AVE. TO MARTIN FARMS AVE.)
0 6 6- o
NI P IPdC 801-1
EXHIBIT 3
OT388
TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN IN FEASIBILITY REPORT
APRIL 9, 2012
110' ROW (MAM
06" IV0e o
C'iINP!C:.UTf�
I--Verson
Jun 00, 2012 — 3:40pm
70TH STREET
EXHIBIT 4A
OT388
M
ct
ct
4)
E
F
kn
v�
4>
�
O
r—.
Clt
U
�
U
�
�
U
O
O
O
�
bJJ
ccs
U
t
•v
v
O
Uct
.�
.0
ct
�
ct
O
�
o
�
o
�
�
M
ct
ct
4)
E
F
kn
r
n
n
r
n
�
A
M
r
w
�
�
�
CSG
U
o
�
y
cz
�
o
~�
H
O
� CC$
�--, ct
A cr
Zct
wo
o
U
ct
U
MSI •� •Q ct
U
ct
I•�I �; ct
Z a C
MSI Z v O cnct
CA
ct
� 0 0
K
A
z
MA
Fo40
SOUTH SIDE RESIDENT - URBAN SECTION
80' ROW —
12, PAVED SURFACE
TRAIL
BED
10'
TRAIL —
u1(Irl�rl
PAVED 12' VEHICLE 12' VEHICLE PAVED
SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE I TRAVEL LANE SHOULDI
14' ADDITIONAL W r" w r � 1.
65' PERSCRIPTIVE ROW
I
CL OF EXISTING
GRAVEL ROAD
3" ASPHALT
' 6" CLASS 5
h
Jun 04, 2012 — 4:23pm
K:\caE_eny\PRUJF.CTS\MUNICIPAL\OTJI
70TH STREET
MAILBOX
oCITY 01
tse`o
NO ADDITIONAL ROW MINNESOTA V
VARIES —I
HOUSE
7 1/2" ASPHALT
12" CLASS 5
EXHIBIT
OT388
NORTH SIDE RESIDENT - URBAN SECTION
- Otk9Fo
N ADDITIONAL RWL MINNESOTA
80' ROW
5'
HOUSE BOULEVARD
12'
VARIES TRAIL
BED — PAYED SURFACE
10' MAILBOX
TRAIL
sJ4d o
PAVED 12' VEHICLE 1 12' VEHICLE
SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE 11 TRAVEL LANE
14' ADDITIONAL ROW
66' PERSCRIPTIVE ROW
CL OF EXISTING
GRAVEL ROAD
lVders°n 70TH STREET EXHIBIT
Jun 04, 2012 - 4: 24pm OT388
M:: \catl_mq\PROJECTS MUIJICIPAL\Oi}BB\dwp\077&1 FFAS.dwq
- - -_
I r f'
a �•
,
- J
s• .
•c
- FARMSTEAD
^ ,,,r -a ., ,�' �" ; ' `;yam' r:. � •.. � t '*t '' L ,. 4ar ,.., .�•i, �a ' s �'v'�° ,c.•` ,� �_ � .. � ',,'� y r
L
c
. ':'i..} ti : ;.'.'�'a �,'' .. , -. •a+ 2 ._, :�:... � '.�..:� s= ;r, s�--.� rb ,. ` . a�i�is`a,'.. , -_ n ,� ., '3
y
_
7 � .�
s.
118-500-304300
Yf,
S REVOCABLE
�i< �' POTENTIAL TREE REMOVAL= E1
f� J.O,HN K ,Ll, ABLE TRU
a
� r
•
x '
x
WLd-
�.
4 3705
18.56'
Ld
• i� i ! ' '.
154.52
1 6-52
/._ .tri"'�'�:' n _ _ _ _ 1. J s �l �l.i j. l -i t., � �•T
111
J
t ;,? � �Isr�i�•�II isi1wrftti_i,'+ � '�� + ��' F.. �d - r � - I�r � II� (` _
�I+lt�,•?,,, t4��S1�;+1'�y�+3 S�`F �i'+ ' t,.' + _. �e�t�`;�sn ,. ,�I,�ts
' � ' 1 I It �� i i •+ h � f i _
MPH CURVES
pf
G, £ttit
t ilt•} Ott ' lJ, 1. •�I-
r,: 11 8-500-311200 %;. M�+, 4 >;•, I t1 t
�i ,>.� JOHN KOLLES R
` EVD
• , , i • ' �1• _ I t nh 1, �'x r�� �;
LEGEND
HAKANSON
If `' ANDERSON
PROPOSED ROW
- 70TH STREET ALIGNMENT
- PROPOSED OFF STREET TRAIL
CENTERLINE PROPOSED STREET
CURB
ROW NEEDED
100 0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
r,
OtCITY QF
se o
[i(KK EsOT(-.
_i
f
-s -
Lli
Z —
1•I, i ~j
W
Q118-500-311100CREEK; CROSSING
CLARANCE SHUMACHER FAMILY LPLiA
i Q�,'I -�
;I
i 5;
t
tol-
c �
..f
a
55 MPH CURVES ,.
1 18=500-322ZOts
LAURA' VESA
ROW NEEDED RMA,
,�. 118-50Q 3'1::1;..1-00
fl; _ CLARANCE SHUMACHER -FAMILY `LP
- - __ - ' f � - � � �' Rte'.'_ . � � _r.,�•''�t t:, ,
14
t
. s '
LEGEND
PROPOSED ROW
70TH STREET ALIGNMENT
100 0 100 200
__ _ PROPOSED
- OFF STREET TRAIL N
HAKANSON CENTERLINE PROPOSED STREET SCALE IN FEET
ANDERSON CURB
CITY OF
se o
V)
ry
F—
I
O J_
O
M Q
M �
m
N ry
Iw
oU
O Z
f oo w
ry
—(D
r- cD
L
O
O
1
-V
W
b
NW
l.L
4J_
N
y O
�1
J
i
J �
00 �
—
or
u
N Q
cc
m
U-
O
M D
N Q
IJ
o
w
ooh
Z
O
O
Lli
IL
�
Ln [�
a
a
II
�U
1
CO
IL Q
V)
ry
F—
I
O J_
O
M Q
M �
m
N ry
Iw
oU
O Z
f oo w
ry
—(D
r- cD
Q
W
O
>
W
0
Z_
W
b
Z
4J_
w
w
�1
r U
t I
Al
O Z
N
00 �
N Z
u
N Q
cc
m
U-
O
M D
N Q
IJ
o
w
ooh
M
O
O
I �
IL
�
Ln [�
a
a
II
�U
1
CO
J��y rt i•
t rjjli • .,iJ�i�
f ,14 k 1.
F 00
4
A�••
it
k
Q
>
W
0
a.
W
b
CD
4J_
d
w
�1
O Q
t I
Al
• ,'�4 u.
00 �
co
u
M cn
cc
m
U-
O
y
00ry
y.►
O
W
C)
w
W
z
O
ry
W
_Z
Z
W
N U
O Z
N
N Z
N Q
M �
I J
O
Ln
I �
00ry
Q
Z
W
W
J
w
o w
N LL -
I•
Z
W
fr
i t
>
W
4J_
')
w
�1
O Q
t I
Al
• ,'�4 u.
N ce,
co
O
Ix
N =)
cc
m
U-
O
LL
0
a
w
N Q
w
m
o
w
t� J
O
O
IL
�
Ln [�
a
a
II
m
w V
li
CO
J��y rt i•
t rjjli • .,iJ�i�
f ,14 k 1.
Z
W
W
J
w
o w
N LL -
I•
Z
fr
4J_
F -
w
w
t I
Al
V
co
O
Ix
Z
cc
m
U-
O
LL
0
a
w
0
w
w
m
o
w
z
IL
�
m`w
=
h
II
a
a
II
m
w V
li
Z
W
W
J
w
o w
N LL -
I•
Z
00
V) Ln
z rx
1••x•4
fr
4J_
F -
w
w
LLI
co
O
Ix
Z
cc
m
U-
O
LL
0
a
w
0
w
w
m
o
w
z
IL
�
m`w
=
h
II
a
a
II
m
w V
li
00
V) Ln
z rx
1••x•4
LEGEND
HAKANSON
ANDERSON
118-500-293400
WAYNE BECKER
SAEET SHIFTED SOUTH
hI 1 04.1'
PROPOSED ROW
70TH STREET ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED OFF STREET TRAIL
CENTERLINE PROPOSED STREET
CURB
STREET SHIFTED SOUTH 138.2
POTENTIAL TREE REMOVAL
POTENTIAL SILr' 0
AND VVLl
118-500-322200 118-182-001010
CHRIS & LAURA VEVEA DALE, VALERIUS
1 18-500-294200
WAYNE BECKER
118-500-294201
~NICHOLAS KOLLES
lJ3
1 18-500-321 100"'-"
VALERIUS MEADOWS IN.
C/O ALLEN VALERIUS
100 0 1 00 200 CITY OF
e 0
I Ot�
SCALE IN FEET MIN,N SOT" 9
T• ee
;. �,.. • ,r,t , 1 1 8 5001 ,�941;00 ,:: -
118-500-294200 WAYNE'--.BECK
I WAYNE BECKER
118-500-294201
NICHOLAS. KOL ES
POTENTIAL SOIL CORRECTION
t
r.'�a �t.�,S• i r t. i
AND-- WETLAND FILL
188.5' 1lti;1'=
: _ _ — --==— . .
-- ..:� - STREET SHIFTED NORTH
t -
,----
POTENTIAL SOIL CORRECTION
t
r.'�a �t.�,S• i r t. i
AND-- WETLAND FILL
188.5' 1lti;1'=
: _ _ — --==— . .
-- ..:� - STREET SHIFTED NORTH
t -
1 1 —500 X21200
n
M RVIN & DOREEN
VALERIUS= .
1 18-500-321 100
VALERIUS MEADOWS INC
— -
C/O ALLEN-VALERIUS
. '
18-500-321100
-
' •e4-
--. -. VALERIUS MEADOWS .INC
C 0 ALLEN VALERIUS
tZ'P.
_-.
t
LEGEND
HAKANSON
i^ ANDERSON
PROPOSED ROW
70TH STREET ALIGNMENT
PROPOSED OFF STREET TRAIL
CENTERLINE PROPOSED STREET
CURB
100 0 100 200
SCALE IN FEET
148.3'
118-182-00201.0
ALLEN & JACKI VALERIUS
CI
OF
xot�
MINNESOo
I
TA
118-500-29440
MERLIN VALERIU'
118-500-294402
MERLIN VALERIUS
`
r. i
118-500-283302
s LANCE & LAURA BOLSON
S: —294401
MARLIN :F ALERIUS
POTENTIAL TREE R MOVAL-
08.1 k.�.
S
118`-500-321100--
VALERIUS MEADOWS INC
C/O ALLEN VALERIUS
f �
It
i r
LEGEND
118-500-283300
BRADLEY & DEBORAH PRAUGHT
POTENTIAL TREE REMOVAL-"
. r
j S
C~
ROW NEEDED
118-500-332200
BRADLEY & DEBORAH PRAUGHT
TURN AND BYPASS
LANES -�,
1 1 8-500—
TE RY &
POTENTIAL
83301
HERYL WESTEMEIER
118-500-283402
ROBERT & RACHEL CULLINAN
118-500-283400
PAUL MILLER
IL
REE REMOVAL
lip
118-500-283403
DESOTO ASSOCIATES `�^Y
Z1ESOTO
8
—500-2834033 ASSOCIATES
.174
PROPOSED ROW
G_
70TH STREET ALIGNMENT 200 0 200 400 ot�
TY OF
PROPOSED OFF STREET TRAIL x HAKANSON --CENTERLINE PROPOSED STREET SCALE IN FEET
ANDERSON CURB
70th Street Typical Section Differences (Martin Farms Avenue to Oakwood Avenue)
Feasibility Report
Feb. 2011
(MSA minimum)
Feasibility Report
April 9, 2012
(Wright County request)
Alternative
(City staff
recommendation)
110'/80' 2 @ 8' 40'
(2' / 6') (28' paved)
110'/ 80' 2 @ 9' 41'
(8' / 1') (40' paved)
110'/ 80' 2 @ 8' 40'
(6' / 2') (36' paved)
TYPICAL SECTION
7 2' PAVED !t' 2' PAVED —
SHOULDER =SHOULDER
w 6' GaAVEI 12' DRIVE 12' DRIVE 6' f.RAVEI,
a 2' MIN SHOULDER 1 t� c� SMOULDER 2' MIN ri
1 p LANE LANE p
4:1 TYPICAL= 1:1 INSIOPE 4:1 INSLOPE
S:I MAX TYPICAL
SLOPE 5' DITCH I 6' DITCH 3:1 MAX
BOTTOM _ BOTTOM SLOPE
T�4.5" ASPHALT
tam CL 5
PREPARED
1�Hakanson UDORADE OTTiEGO
■,nAnderson ^
See attachment for detail
TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN IN FEASIBILITY REPORT
APRIL 9, 2012Otc» er
MMM.fef�
AMML
70TH STMIT
See attachment for detail
TYPICAL SECTION
PRESENTED DECEMBER 12,201
EXHIBIT 4A
onu
'I,akns
Jaon
■■ demon
70TH STREET
See attachment for detail
EXHIBIT 41
OR1iM
TYPICAL SECTION
Z - 80' z
2' PAVED 2' PAVED =I
SHOULDER Z Z SHOULDER
6' GRAVEL -' -' 6' GRAVEL
a_ 2' MIN SHOULDER 12 DRIVE 12 DRIVE SHOULDER 2' MIN
0 o LANE LANE o 0
if U- � Of
4% I 2%-3% I a-
4:1 TYPICAL '�1-4:1 INSLOPE 4:1 INSLOPE 4:1
3:1 MAX TYPICAL
SLOPE 6' DITCH I 6' DITCH 3:1 MAX
BOTTOM BOTTOM SLOPE
Nov 30. 2010 - 4:36M
N: \<.d-mq\PROXC75\MUNICIPAL\OT715EA\d,g\OT]15-NSA-2011.dwq
Hakanson
Anderson
4.5" ASPHALT
L" CL 5REDclTr off
ADE 07SEGO
_____ ON THP GREAT RIVER ROAD
TYPICAL SECTION SHOWN IN FEASIBILITY REPORT
APRIL 9, 2012
I - 110' Row (MAX.) ..a
o�
"Se O
MINNESOii�
ll=n
Jun 06, 2012 - 3:48pm
70TH STREET
EXHIBIT 4A
OT388
TYPICAL SECTION
PRESENTED DECEMBER 12, 2011 CITY Ur,.
utsfgo
1117WW (MAX)
�Hakanson
Anderson
May 31, 2012 — 2:13pm
70TH STREET
EXHIBIT 4
OT3W
MINIMUM MSA STANDARDS
COUNTY REQUEST SECTION
STAFF RECOMMEDATIONS