ITEM 6.1 Justen 2nd Additionot �T`go
MINNSIGOTA
�~
DEPARTMENT INFORMATION
Request for
City
Council Action
IN 11111111111111
ORIGINATING DEPARTMENT:
REQUESTOR:
MEETING DATE:
Planning
City Planner Licht
24JtAly 2013
PRESENTER(s):
REVIEWED BY:
ITEM #:
City Planner Licht
d
6.1 — Justen 2r' Addition
.AGENDA ITEM DETAILS
City staff recommends approval of the requested preliminary/final plat, approval ofadevelopment
agreement and vacation of existing drainage and utility easements for the Jutsen 2,m. Addition.
ARE YOU SEEKING APPROVAL orACONTRACT?
No.
IS A PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED?
Held by Planning Commission 17 June 2013.
GTTMZLLC has submitted application for preliminary and final plat approval for atwo lot subdivision
located atthe northeast corner ofPackard Avenue and 8omStreet. |naddition tothe subdivision
approval, the applicant /s also requesting vacation of existing drainage and utility easements that will be
replaced when the proposed final plat |srecorded.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their meeting on 17 June 2013 to consider the
applications. Mr. Chad Christian was present as the developer along with Mr. Bill Christian representing
Christian Brothers Inc. who will be building the homes on the two proposed lots. Chad Christian
indicated that they had no comments regarding the reviews by City staff and agreed with the
recommended conditions ofapproval. Bill Christian stated that the homes would likely besplit entry
designs based on site conditions with estimated sale values of between $250,000 and $350,000.
The meeting was well attended by surrounding property owners who submitted apetition opposing the
project. The issues raised as part of the public hearing focused primary that the proposed subdivision
and construction of homes would have a negative effect on area drainage impacting adjacent
properties. City staff reviewed the extent of the grading plan noting that the soil tests and grading plan
have been reviewed by the City Engineer and found to be consistent with City requirements. |twaa
noted that a stormvxaterpipe broken byutility installation had caused drainage to pond in yards area
but after it was repaired there have been no further issues. Questions were also raised about the
ability to subdivide the existing outlot., concerns about additional traffic on Packard Avenue. Unofficial
minutes of the Planning Commission's Public Hearing are attached.
The Planning Commission discussion focused on the potential drainage issues. City staff was asked to
review the certification process for the grading plan when the lots are developed and as the houses are
built both under the development contract and building permit requirements. City staff also reviewed
for the Planning Commission the purposes for outlots and how they may be platted into lots and blocks
for development. Following discussion, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and voted 5-
0 to recommend approval of the applications subject to the conditions of approval as outlined in the
attached findings of fact.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS; EiATTACHED NONE
A. Planning Report dated 13 June 2013
B. Engineering Review dated June 12,,2013
C. Draft Planning Commission meeting minutes of June 17, 2013
D. Draft Development Agreement
E. Findings of Fact and Decision
F. Resolution 2013-38 approving a development contract
G. Resolution 2013-39 vacating existing drainage and utility easements
POSSIBLE MOTION
Please word motion as you would like it to appear In the minutes.
Motion, to approve the Preliminary and Final Plat of the Ju ten 2nd Addition subject to the conditions
outlined in the Findings of Fact as presented, adoption Resolution 2013-38 approving the development
agreement and adoption of Resolution 2013-39 vacating existing drainage and utility easements.
BUDGET INFORMATION
FUNDING' BUDGETED: Ei YES
NA ci NO
ACTION TAKEN
❑APPROVED AS REQUESTED u DENIED Ej TABLED ci OTHER (List changes)
-COMMENTS:
3601 Thurston Avenue N, Suite 100
Anoka, MN 66303
Phone: 76x3„2 1.6840
Facsimile: 763.427.05 20
TPC@PlanningCo.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Otsego Planning Commission
FROM: Daniel Licht, AICP
ISE: Otsego — Justen 2nd Addition; Preliminary/Final Plat
REPORT DATE: 13 June 2013
ACTION DATE: 23 July 2013
TPC FILE- 101.02 — 13.02
BACKGROUND
GTTV12 LLC has submitted plans to subdivide Outlot A, Justen Addition into two
buildable lots. Outlot A is a vacant 3.62 acre parcel located at the northeast corner of
Packard Avenue and 88th Street, which was platted in 1999 when the current property
owner subdivided it from their single family dwelling to the southeast (Lot 1, Block I
Justen Addition). Outlot A and the adjacent single family property are now under
separate ownership. The application requires consideration of a preliminary and filial
plat as well as vacation of existing drainage and utility easements. A public hearing
has been noticed for the Planning Commission meeting on 17 June 2017 to consider
the application.
Exhibits:
A. Site Location
B. James Addition Utility/Resubdivision Plan
C. Preliminary Plat
D. Final Plat
ANALYSIS
Comprehensive Plan. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for low
density residential uses within the Long Range Urban Service Area, This area allows
for large lot single family residential lots served by on-site septic and well utilities. To
mina nize the potential need for future sanitary sewer and water utilities to be extend9d
to the Long Range Urban Service Area, the Comprehensive Plan establishes that ally
additional subdivision meet one or more of the following criteria -
I . The development will result in completion of an unfinished street network.
2. The development will have the result of correcting or improving a demonstrated
area drainage problem.
3. The development provides for dedication of lands to a legitimate public purpose.
In order to satisfy these criteria, City staff recornmends that a 30 foot wide outlot be
platted parallel to the northwest lot line of Lot 1, Block I Justen 2nd Addition extending
between Packard Avenue and the exception parcel to the north. This outlot WOLIIJ ke
deeded to the City to allow the opportunity for access to the exception parcel to be
changed from CSAH 39 to Packard Avenue. Similar outlots were platted with Heril;age
Hills for accesses off of Odean Avenue and 8 5.t h Street. This would eliminate a
driveway frorn CSAH 39, which is a legitimate public purpose, given the designatioil by
the Comprehensive Plan as a Minor Arterial roadway to which direct access is to be
prohibited. The option access to Packard Avenue would also address the likelihoo(Ithat
the existing driveway from the exception parcel will be made right-in/right-out only VeNell
CSAH 39 is upgraded in the future.
Zoning, The subject site is zoned R-3, Residential Long Range Urban Service Dislrict.
The R-3 District allows for construction of single family dwellings as a permitted use.
However, the current outlot designation of the subject site prohibits placement of ani
structures until platted as lots/blocks.
Surrounding Land Uses, The subject site is surrounded by the following existing
and/or planned land uses. The proposed two single family lots will be consistentwitN
the character of the existing neighborhood.
Direction
Land Use Plan
Zoning
Existing Use
North
LD Residential
R-3 District
Single Family
East
LD Residential
R-3 District
Single Family
West
LD Residential
R-3 District
Single Family
South
LD Residential
R-3 District
Single Family
James Addition. The subject site (and adjacent single family lot) were originally
platted as part of the James Addition in 1989. The James Addition provided for_66100t
wide drainage and utility easements along the side and rear lots lines of the subdivis:iGn
to allow for future extension of sanitary sewer and water Utilities and the possibility of
extending streets to allow subdivision of the one -acre or larger lots into urban sized 110ts.
The subject site has a recorded 33 foot easement along a portion of the east lot line not
shown on the submitted plans, which must be revised to illustrate the existing
easernent. The utility and resubdivision plan for Jarnes Addition does not require arsy
additional easements through outlot A to connect to Packard Avenue.
2
Access. The two proposed lots .have frontage to and will be accessed frorn Packard
Avenue, which is a paved rural section City street. Traffic generated by the two
additional lots will not create capacity or wear issues for this existing street.
Lot Requirements. The R-3 District requires a minimum lot area of one acre and
minimurn width of 150 feet. The two lots proposed on the preliminary and final plat
comply with these requirements. Lot 1, Block I will continue to comply with these
requirements after the preliminary and final plat are redrawn to provide the outlot
recommended above for access to the exception parcel to the north. We would also not
that it would be possible to create a third lot if the north -south lot line between proposed
Lot 2, Block 1 Justen 2nd Addition and Lot 1, Block 1 Justen Addition were shifted 15
feet to the east allowing each lot 150 feet of frontage to 88t" Street with the cooperation
of the property owners.
Setbacks. Setbacks applicable to the preliminary and final plat are shcwn below.
Each of theproposed lots has adequate buildable area within the lot area in
consideration of the setback requirements.
Yard
Front
Side
Rear
Wetland
Corner Interior
Min. Setback
aft.
aft. I Oft.
Soft.
4oft.
Utilities. The proposed lots will be served by on-site septic systems and wells. The
developer has provided soil, tests for review and designs for septic Systems on each lot
will be required to provide both a primary and secondary drainfield site. All utility issues
are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
Grading Plan. The developer has submitted grading information on the preliminary
plat illustrating the proposed topography contours for construction 'of a single farnily
dwelling upon each lot. The grading plan indicates foundation elevations for each
house are above the elevation of Packard Avenue as required by 20-16-9.D of the
Zoning Ordinance. All grading, drainage and erosion control issues are subject to
review and approval by the City Engineer.
Easements. The subject site is overlaid entirely by drainage and utility eas.ernent
established when the outlot wasp latted to prohibit any structures from beim placed
upon the property and prevent any alteration of the site. With the subdivision of the
property into two lots, the existing drainage and utility easement is to be vacated and
replaced by drainage and utility easements at the perimeter of each lot in accordance
with Section 21-7-15 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The preliminary and final plat must
also include the wetland at the southwest corner of the property and the 20 foot wetland
buffer required by Section 20-16-9.E of the Zoning Ordinance within a conservation
easement. All easements are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer.
Park Dedication. The proposed subdivision of the subject site creating two additional
buildable lots triggers park dedication requirements in accordance with Section 21-7-18
of the Subdivision Ordinance. The Comprehensive Plan does not establish a park
3
search area including the subject site so park dedication requirements will be satisfied
as a cash fee in lieu of land, which is $2,635-00 per lot. -
Development CoXtra Gt. The developer is not installing pUbliC iMprovements as part of
the proposed subdivision to the provisions required in a development contract will be
litinited. The City Attorney will draft the development contract for consideration by the
City Council together with the application requiring payment of all fees and escrows,
dedication of the recommended outlot and cornpliance with all conditions of approval.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed Justin Addition 2nd meet s the intent of the Comprehensive Plan to allow
subdivisions within the Long Range Urban Service Area only when a public purpose is
accomplished and also complies with the applicable requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance. our office recommends approval of the
applications as set forth below.
POSSIBLE ACTIONS
Motion to recommend to City Council vacation of existing drainage and utility
easements and approval of the Justin 2nd Addition prelirninary/final plat, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The preliminary/final plat are revised to address the comments of the City
Engineer in their mer of June 12, 2013, subject to approval of the City
Engineer.
2. The preliminary and final plat is revised to provide an outlot 30 feet wide parallel
to the northwest lot line of Lot `1, Block 1 Justen 2nd Addition and extending frorn
Packard Avenue to P I D 118 -Soo -222202, which is to be deeded to the City
without restriction.
3. The preliminary/finai plat are revised to depict the 33 foot drainage and utility
easement recorded along a portion of the east lot line not shown on the
submitted plans.
4. The wetland and wetland buffer required by Section 20-16-9.E of the Zoning
Ordinance shall be overlaid by drainage and utility easement and conservation
easement.
5. All easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
6. All grading, drainage and erosion control issues are subject to review and
approval by the City Engineer.
2
7. All Utility iSSLies are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
8. Park and trail dedication reqUirements shall be satisfied as a cash fee in HeU Of
land in accordance with Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance and the
City's current fee scheftle.
9. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City subject to
review and approval by the City Attorney,
C. Lori Johnson, City Administrator
Tami Luff: City Clerk
Andy MacArthur, City Attorney
Ron Wagner, City Engineer
Chad Christian, applicant
5
�i��Date Created: 6113/2013Justen 2nd Addition
Location
C
c
"Lou
�} 1����ti I��j f o�-r;;i � �-a��ji �' <}�-o�}N � �caa+7i�� c�xc-�4 �
Dr
LO r%
V) 1 '01 if, bi Je3 bi 19
21
--j
04*41 0'a'UT I ONVI Ommi
VOC41 o4,c5l r PUT-Sil 007cxi
7]
bid
cl I ON
of
C) �--A,
is CO
L___°°-
cq zi
LOOK
0i - - - - - -
0
w r
I q-
I- CKTSbZ
rr-,
9L I
1 1
I I 1 14 cr-
LO A I
�V4
7 tip 01
UD F a CA t
1 4
tjLk: i _--R -
WL
vib
7 Casa
PA
z 7-
i
to 'pp
z
VNI, A I
o co
cj � kq
r
b6i_ V
_7,-
V 1 , F CK
Fj
X4.
LL:U. L
S,
h
�O
017-4 Y- 172014 -d c V 0
F. 000-40,11
2
"qim* TO I E -
LEI '371LA 2
Ir
"Dn"
rf, j t 0 T
D
cs <
ktij
Ld
LLJ
cq
0
U.
Ld
W
a:
Ow
16r
%r
c•
Ls
-c
CL
ri 6!
fi
LA
A
S ;4A 13 3'N
Vh
—1
44
ktij
Ld
LLJ
cq
0
U.
Ld
W
a:
Ow
r � .........
�T TFi LSE Cf rh'F rr, ff� GF — I —
i --' AiH*£ST CT HEIR CF .SECPON 22. T FAII, 1- 23, 5E 11rw 2�, 7 121, �. 23 I i
OWNO r IT COM TJ' CAS T-JRCW LfOe tiw."T)
I I I
118-500-2222,02
I I LA WREAhX MV r XL.K0CH
131cra IsrH sr M I
I I OTSEW we
1 r a- cif 8- 003CSO
�F RE1' P TM -%-O & CHER AFL L SSCC6SON11 271 PACKAM AVIE
OT"It 3.3330 �
I / d
J
[j I
I - t',00-1, i 1 A �` � F4
L J'-. 1 1 L. Ld I
a7o.a, x a7O,9 x a9't6'i1'-VxeUNE rUaa as9-�
a7LI 2��-
x=
i- ~ rr�aa-rc�-��3oao
1St37 BOTH ST W
' asa_s *r ,'/ _ — -- aces .a I It I i~ 0M60 WN 5"30
LOT f
1.70 Ac. 1
IL
s 1 I
Ir --l- .c8T0.4
IV
�V, Sg i ®aMl Eqa 1.3K ` aayo 9 j
SCTaJ 9 ,
_--zel--
2-
--:!U----88 4xas�T 1�"
1 570.0 8 I , X-970 9
,t T3 I
b
7 ar 2�
$ 8 J
I 1' <I `r I
xdlt-s 11a-W2--Cd31??d�
L.?' L LAA5J3'i
�I Ia47.# � __ 6.+D J ..� tags 8a1N Sr NE I
o TSE00 WN 3 I
LTA
D
6 j
4
o
it x
IA
WTMCXS V.
FaI F'
F
DRAW -ACE ANO uTurr ti EASEvVOr a zo +I �
�77 x s �. K M Mp
199TH YM EO W. k,
A r--,% r--,% f —r f r x A F t
Lam' t F i %.� f w I
I 118-0.58-0021 O
IIST07/�fyfwi�FA �Slr�hZ
orwX— ZONING R - 1L
I
LEGEND
Job 1> D
STOOM SEWET
� • ' �� a�S9 �}r�•
CA MY NASW
Sa
— ---9 � �-- -
—� sfiFrl7 MMXW (fMuuzvi4M)
r
SMT V"A7TrJ1V
•o j,
-
~
Fp2poscv spot EwArxi (,sE NoTe ignow)
fl
571.2 r,
+'`��, 8
-- �—• --�.
lFE7 AVO DEI:WEATAW PERFMWED Brr-
MsT5'
P47.3 Wth S-TfrE- r
MAN H LO'AC # MMA K A.L9 &ERG
$257 PACKARD AW
0MG0 M 55J,3" £
r it
Jif: M,a-398-2705
M S13-1
SZPPM T Sf #k?f- S F'ERTOR 3 157'
1^7S
.0073 ?55ih STR=
J[Tilau-L Jet 65JL"
PH: J20--398--2Ta.5
m B -f
GaEOrWHh CAL SCHL &OiW c
04WEAVINT TE571W ruC"4K CL�t1ESJ
337 JIst A4EhVU 54YJM
FtJEN
WAnr PARK, UM
(J20) 233-4J3d
&TV
I
ti x
I I
OEM J,1 LOAC & [IRA x �G
9?57 P �,a0 AW ere
I
Ld
a
'� I
<�
I
I
1t8-Of6-Qp�ff6
8791 OW" AW W
ors,<cv �� saa.sa
I
Ilea
I
�-oQ3ran
,+,P,'r! A WDYW 4
I621 r C0- WEN CM
EXCUSCR LIN 55131-2013X1
: 3
223
IS
•13-
d
'
I
AL
11F W
X869-4
1 t 0 W rt r r2-
PICHAR13 11 # P"MA L fJ_LTSG
l"] PA"ARD ME h
OrSECO L4Y 35,
F A X A
%.J f --k J V f t_ -
f ' Q
� '�
ZONINGR-
I
I
a
I / d
J
[j I
I - t',00-1, i 1 A �` � F4
L J'-. 1 1 L. Ld I
a7o.a, x a7O,9 x a9't6'i1'-VxeUNE rUaa as9-�
a7LI 2��-
x=
i- ~ rr�aa-rc�-��3oao
1St37 BOTH ST W
' asa_s *r ,'/ _ — -- aces .a I It I i~ 0M60 WN 5"30
LOT f
1.70 Ac. 1
IL
s 1 I
Ir --l- .c8T0.4
IV
�V, Sg i ®aMl Eqa 1.3K ` aayo 9 j
SCTaJ 9 ,
_--zel--
2-
--:!U----88 4xas�T 1�"
1 570.0 8 I , X-970 9
,t T3 I
b
7 ar 2�
$ 8 J
I 1' <I `r I
xdlt-s 11a-W2--Cd31??d�
L.?' L LAA5J3'i
�I Ia47.# � __ 6.+D J ..� tags 8a1N Sr NE I
o TSE00 WN 3 I
LTA
D
6 j
4
o
it x
IA
WTMCXS V.
FaI F'
F
DRAW -ACE ANO uTurr ti EASEvVOr a zo +I �
�77 x s �. K M Mp
199TH YM EO W. k,
A r--,% r--,% f —r f r x A F t
Lam' t F i %.� f w I
I 118-0.58-0021 O
IIST07/�fyfwi�FA �Slr�hZ
orwX— ZONING R - 1L
I
LEGEND
Job 1> D
STOOM SEWET
CA MY NASW
;OOCX �..
— ---9 � �-- -
—� sfiFrl7 MMXW (fMuuzvi4M)
x _a
SMT V"A7TrJ1V
ME OF STRUCrJOH- NO EJ'AiN4TOPX WXL BE CCAIPLE ED trl?47X EJ4"
04061DUJLL HOUSE M CONSTRUCTED HOLME C0NSTA4XT*M DUST MiFCRU
Pm;hFvsw CGIYTaw (strv e auow)
x 9152-8
Fp2poscv spot EwArxi (,sE NoTe ignow)
fl
VGN
-- �—• --�.
lFE7 AVO DEI:WEATAW PERFMWED Brr-
MsT5'
P47.3 Wth S-TfrE- r
Xyla I -L.
Jif: M,a-398-2705
M S13-1
SZPPM T Sf #k?f- S F'ERTOR 3 157'
1^7S
.0073 ?55ih STR=
J[Tilau-L Jet 65JL"
PH: J20--398--2Ta.5
m B -f
GaEOrWHh CAL SCHL &OiW c
04WEAVINT TE571W ruC"4K CL�t1ESJ
337 JIst A4EhVU 54YJM
WAnr PARK, UM
(J20) 233-4J3d
&TV
s
'N
� ,r Cacrfrr
ACAMN MAP "I) .IFIL esWO
TYPICAL HOUSE DETAIL
PrcFcr#:f OvilhcV& a-4l+Wry oav r.dnrr cry & non vwr
;OOCX �..
PROPOSEI} LOT CRADM, AND HOUSE LO ATIONS/fR"A.MM AAC SH0WI !
O FcEFEREN" ONLY. EBF OULEWC FVGTPR97. fxLJ4 G`2- I Nl AHO LOir�f
G '�G 11ki1 t 8 DETF] ilaNt D BY T7 . M1I#fG4 AT ME
� A00 Fiat h . h ler+'r ss
44 a,,d � a7� %f iFsar arld MOO
Fe skJtk f*Jr ritJ41F. r a Fa onaF
ME OF STRUCrJOH- NO EJ'AiN4TOPX WXL BE CCAIPLE ED trl?47X EJ4"
04061DUJLL HOUSE M CONSTRUCTED HOLME C0NSTA4XT*M DUST MiFCRU
edr�Jt� strata# f"1-6f-Wlr XF+e' Of *?Wv"
TO ALL RECOMMENUATMS OF aADE74DYDErT 7ESTM 7ECf COVS,
REPORT OF G'EOTEC1 L MVST)GATK 3 DATED JtY&- 5. 201,,
\- VICINITY MAP
O 9000 2000 Juvo
C i7I 5CAL E RV F=
r,
1
41
-f4'
1 (9fJ7ki Sy' ff•&)
41
PREE-IMBVARY PLAT
OF
,icer '1- SECON-0 ADDITION
pgopuuy-
&-oWt & JUSTE AVOnX #l, ccconVrq is the recorded prat thtre f. lYr 212
COLMIty, )<+ -IneJr3ta,
PiDI_ i t 2--06 1-[Iowf o
&U cwjsjum
cis nAN a omits ANO FEkiODELERS WC -
209&0 ROGERS VMVE. $LAE COO
fiA kN. 3b374
fogap gly DiSfdfJ9s
12145 TUCKER JRO
KN>5: ►2 $ iJJ+i 55374
VLY"-RO"LW tJ+ND sICES
708 1ST AM&E N& SLUE jt
Bllf'-rAM WN 3•S3 tJ
Tot�Parcar J.82 Acres
Lot 1; t.70
Lot 2 t, 92
lrf',nkrnum Lat Mea: 1 Acre
I nn'rvm Lot width: (fnierfar I30 fast
tcvrref 07S fe-vt
Wnsirrsvm Lct Oepih. 100 fast
Structs era _ LEntmiwn Se f bcw-kg:
FroaL (r*M s-rrett dr ctd-de-ea: right of wcy)c 35 Iaet
SkN; 10 feel
Rda+r. 20 feet
Ar -cord nq to MFP M -ad kupLIronce 9•31e 1Jap. Co,�ty-tPonW M_arltFer~
270747 0002 A (Rrrfas4 Sp Comber 30 1592). tl-.Ls property Fee rn Ions
X (oraos d4termLmad to W "31 -de tha 500 -2 -ear P-44 h).
Ail exdroll-~ Vv and wfi%*fy oost rsants ovae t7AW A, vkhkh Irer#
dadcnte"d fn !+''te Mle of Aw" }100MOf"f oro JUSTN A,ODr77 M ehoff ba
rioted by the OV of Otsego p4Lv to the r r&rj of JUS" SECOND
The dr-ok+gge ar�d u ��aarn�rliy wm #�-Irrea�rl w�I t.e
dedceled h the pts# of �JS7t7't $EC�}d�Q yD�7?OF�
C 50 100 1.50
GRAPW SCALF AN M7
o DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET
• DENOTES IRON MONUMENT F -OU O
I hereby cerVy tflot 04 survayr plan, or
report oras prepdred by role ar Larder my
+d�ect sup•er%iskn a-nd that i om a Ltcvlsad
t_"d 5urrrsyror udder the Falea of this State
of Mnnesahs.
clo lm
Trace C. McCoy
i kense No. 44531
RCIRFIfe-EST CC-A.iEA 0- TIHF- 11 r'1 2/4 OF
T1F
t11__SECV0N 22. T. 12J. ft. 23. irOUND ?0rcZ_%4r
CCkrwy CAST-j.qCN 1L*Cn1jt1,D1J)
KNO,'? ALL MEN F)Y 1HESC PRESENTS: That — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T._, fee Owner of the ta(lo,'-Ing
'�� I
dr-5cr;oed properly silucted in the County of Wrighl, Stat of Minnesota, �o waif:
L
Gullet A. JUSTEN ADDITI011, according to 1 �4_j
p'�p la I liereof on fife arid of record in
the office of the County Recorder in ondf -M�r;qhl County, Minnesoto.
flare coused the _-;oma to be surveyed arid ,g��el,os JUS71W SECOND AMMON and do hL5reby
��-�" -_ _ _ _ _ 4t _ _ y* _� _ :� donate orad decir.cale to the puWrc for puVic #_e' forever the drc;nage and utility easements .05
w
shon on(hr;s plot for droinoge and *% LdQ1 k7N',PLVPQSeS Only.
L L I 4 I
IV -10
U F 0 rf VA WV4PI T
L
-j55- 50 - -
.--...TR LE-, it, T or. t -
P
.,.%0 F, -1 A F. .4 fT-- A r_1% 1--%
%.,I V I L 4r__1 L -.f L_a I 1 I f I N,
CCS NV? 0-F WE Urd F/4
rf IX sEcnCW4 22 T- J22. R. 23
frow�o Awv-�, ai citp ocultiociiF
Ar ACAD -WaFACE)
K, 15,-Oo/
0 60 1:50
C-PAPHiC SCALF I&I FEET
a DENOTES IRO )JONW4EW YOU140
0 DENOTES IRON HWJUPENTS SST AND
MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 4,4531
F04R T14E PURPOSES OF THIS FLAT, 7HE MFST
LINE OF ME MV f14 0;;' SECTION 22, T. 121, R
23. IS ASSUMED TO BEAR S 00-06'34- C
VfCnC;&
LA_
Re)v 5LCP3 feel 41 h -HO. P-4-,'oss cV-&--t4e
ildr-01.4 AJ dd>hi�q 1.21 FYF&S. ald 10C-7 AF01
;-I k*-Jfh, UAI*So tthffPwr'jF0 jhdkaje4 C -'ICF 01J341hg
r;g_5 [ - 0 t- 1woy hae 2 C;r :AS Frn qV" I % V pla f.
VICINITY MAP
SECPOIJ 22. _r. )21. R4 23, ti RIC -10 COW4TY, 1.14-4
0 1000 2009 J000
GRAMC SCM.E W FEE F
ROTH STREE11 Iva
10T" 13711 ET AIEJ
A I T) f S TR Gr Ng
Ca
K
W
#i71# a rfif�r; r to cz
U
05711 z;S TFL cz-: rT 4
in witness ohereof said has hereunto set — — — hand this day of
20—. V N,
ir
(Fee Owner)
State of
Couril
.y of
eY I%\
The fonagvl instrument svos ucknowledgad before me this day of
20 . b
(florae Printed)
(Signolure)
Nof,,ry P.blic. County, Afinrpesola
14y Cornroissfun Expivcs,
I hereby certify thol I hove surveyed and ploMd or directly supervised the survqy;no and pfalfTng
of the land described on this plat os JUSTEI'l SECOND Ate T1011; Ws plat Is a correct
represeritali'an cif the boundary survey: all malhernolicaf data and labots are correctly dc-signCled;
aft monuments depicted on the plot have been or wil) be correctly set wilh;n one year; all voter
boundaries and r e# lands as of this date, as defpnea in PJS 505.01, Subd, 3, are shown and
fohel&d; and aY pWirz ways are shoksr, and lobe eel,
Trace C. McCoy. Land Surveyof
Minnesoia License No. 4453;
slafe of Uinnosoto
Counly of Wright
The foregoing surveyor's certificate was ack"o.-..1edqi!d before me this dby of
20 by grace C. McCoy, Lond 5ur-veyDr, 1.Iinae5vfa Liccnse No. 44531-
(Narne Printed)
(5igncture)
Notary PubFic. ' Covn(y, Minnesota
My CcrnmTssion Expires
CITY COWXIL
This p!aj of JUSTEtJ SECOND ADDIVON was approved rind accepter) by the City CounCif rf the
City of 01sego, Minnnsofa, of e meeting held ih;s (joy of
t.iayor
City Clerk
COUNTY 5URVEYOR
Heviaived end opproved W5 — day 01 20
fight Counly Surveyor
CGUNTY AUDirOR
Taxes gold for all yaors thr"gh year _. and Ironsfer entered this day or
4 20
Wright Counly Auditor
COUNTY TREASURE;R
f hereby certify trot luxes payable in 1he year on fonds herein dasceibed are Paid this
clay of 2Q_.
tit County Ircesurer
COUNTY RECORDER
I hereby ceir(;4, thul IhFs Fnstrament meas tiled in the office of 1he Ccunly Recorder for record on
thi's — day of 2CL_ 01 --o'clock M., and 11.0!; dv6, recorded ;n
cobr'nef . as oocumcnt h1o. -
County Recorder, Vlr;ght Count),, Alinnesola
F1
-P
IS C%
O CS
4n to
C.L
C
KNO,'? ALL MEN F)Y 1HESC PRESENTS: That — — — — — — — — — — — — — — T._, fee Owner of the ta(lo,'-Ing
'�� I
dr-5cr;oed properly silucted in the County of Wrighl, Stat of Minnesota, �o waif:
L
Gullet A. JUSTEN ADDITI011, according to 1 �4_j
p'�p la I liereof on fife arid of record in
the office of the County Recorder in ondf -M�r;qhl County, Minnesoto.
flare coused the _-;oma to be surveyed arid ,g��el,os JUS71W SECOND AMMON and do hL5reby
��-�" -_ _ _ _ _ 4t _ _ y* _� _ :� donate orad decir.cale to the puWrc for puVic #_e' forever the drc;nage and utility easements .05
w
shon on(hr;s plot for droinoge and *% LdQ1 k7N',PLVPQSeS Only.
L L I 4 I
IV -10
U F 0 rf VA WV4PI T
L
-j55- 50 - -
.--...TR LE-, it, T or. t -
P
.,.%0 F, -1 A F. .4 fT-- A r_1% 1--%
%.,I V I L 4r__1 L -.f L_a I 1 I f I N,
CCS NV? 0-F WE Urd F/4
rf IX sEcnCW4 22 T- J22. R. 23
frow�o Awv-�, ai citp ocultiociiF
Ar ACAD -WaFACE)
K, 15,-Oo/
0 60 1:50
C-PAPHiC SCALF I&I FEET
a DENOTES IRO )JONW4EW YOU140
0 DENOTES IRON HWJUPENTS SST AND
MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 4,4531
F04R T14E PURPOSES OF THIS FLAT, 7HE MFST
LINE OF ME MV f14 0;;' SECTION 22, T. 121, R
23. IS ASSUMED TO BEAR S 00-06'34- C
VfCnC;&
LA_
Re)v 5LCP3 feel 41 h -HO. P-4-,'oss cV-&--t4e
ildr-01.4 AJ dd>hi�q 1.21 FYF&S. ald 10C-7 AF01
;-I k*-Jfh, UAI*So tthffPwr'jF0 jhdkaje4 C -'ICF 01J341hg
r;g_5 [ - 0 t- 1woy hae 2 C;r :AS Frn qV" I % V pla f.
VICINITY MAP
SECPOIJ 22. _r. )21. R4 23, ti RIC -10 COW4TY, 1.14-4
0 1000 2009 J000
GRAMC SCM.E W FEE F
ROTH STREE11 Iva
10T" 13711 ET AIEJ
A I T) f S TR Gr Ng
Ca
K
W
#i71# a rfif�r; r to cz
U
05711 z;S TFL cz-: rT 4
in witness ohereof said has hereunto set — — — hand this day of
20—. V N,
ir
(Fee Owner)
State of
Couril
.y of
eY I%\
The fonagvl instrument svos ucknowledgad before me this day of
20 . b
(florae Printed)
(Signolure)
Nof,,ry P.blic. County, Afinrpesola
14y Cornroissfun Expivcs,
I hereby certify thol I hove surveyed and ploMd or directly supervised the survqy;no and pfalfTng
of the land described on this plat os JUSTEI'l SECOND Ate T1011; Ws plat Is a correct
represeritali'an cif the boundary survey: all malhernolicaf data and labots are correctly dc-signCled;
aft monuments depicted on the plot have been or wil) be correctly set wilh;n one year; all voter
boundaries and r e# lands as of this date, as defpnea in PJS 505.01, Subd, 3, are shown and
fohel&d; and aY pWirz ways are shoksr, and lobe eel,
Trace C. McCoy. Land Surveyof
Minnesoia License No. 4453;
slafe of Uinnosoto
Counly of Wright
The foregoing surveyor's certificate was ack"o.-..1edqi!d before me this dby of
20 by grace C. McCoy, Lond 5ur-veyDr, 1.Iinae5vfa Liccnse No. 44531-
(Narne Printed)
(5igncture)
Notary PubFic. ' Covn(y, Minnesota
My CcrnmTssion Expires
CITY COWXIL
This p!aj of JUSTEtJ SECOND ADDIVON was approved rind accepter) by the City CounCif rf the
City of 01sego, Minnnsofa, of e meeting held ih;s (joy of
t.iayor
City Clerk
COUNTY 5URVEYOR
Heviaived end opproved W5 — day 01 20
fight Counly Surveyor
CGUNTY AUDirOR
Taxes gold for all yaors thr"gh year _. and Ironsfer entered this day or
4 20
Wright Counly Auditor
COUNTY TREASURE;R
f hereby certify trot luxes payable in 1he year on fonds herein dasceibed are Paid this
clay of 2Q_.
tit County Ircesurer
COUNTY RECORDER
I hereby ceir(;4, thul IhFs Fnstrament meas tiled in the office of 1he Ccunly Recorder for record on
thi's — day of 2CL_ 01 --o'clock M., and 11.0!; dv6, recorded ;n
cobr'nef . as oocumcnt h1o. -
County Recorder, Vlr;ght Count),, Alinnesola
Halcanson
Anderson
11ilAssoc.,inc.
16
3601 Thurston Avenue, Anoka, NIN 55303
Phone: 763/427-5860 Fax- 763/427-0520
MEMORANDUM
TOO.9
Honoi-able Mayor and City Council
CC: Lori Johnson, City Adiiiiiiistratoi-
Taini Loff, City Clerk
Dan Licht, AICP, City Plannei-
Andy MacArthur, City Attorney
Ronald Wagnet-, P.E. City Engincei-
Bill Christian, Cht-intian Builders and Remodelers, lite.
Meyei--Rolilin Land Services
FROM* Brent Larson, P.E., Assistant City Engineer
DATE: June 12, 2013 (RXi VISED 6/20/13)
Imo* Jus ten S e c o n d Addition — P reli in in a i-y/Final Pla t Review
We have reviewed the Preliminary and Final Plat, dated 6/10/13, for the above referenced subdivision. The
submitted plat is to be considered for preliminary and filial acceptance and therefore must meet all
requirements pertaining to preliminary and final submittals.
Additional information has been obtained with regards to questions raised at the Planning Commission. A
Wetland Delineation Report and a Soil Boring & Preliminary Septic Evaluation Report for the proposed
Plat have been received. We have also contacted Independent Testing Technologies ' , Inc. regarding to
clarify the existing ground water elevations. The original Engineering review has been revised as this new
information has been received. With this in consideration and recognizing that this is essentially a lot split
only, and no public improvenientsare proposed at this time, we would offer the following comments:
Preliminary Plat
1. The James Addition and Risten Addition plats both depict a 33' wide drainage and utility easement
along the east side of the property which does not show up on the Justen 2nd Addition plat (see
attach inents). This easenient is' intended for a potential street needed to subdivide of existing lots in
the ftiftire. We recommend that this easement remain and not be abandoned. It has been proposed
that the cleanest way to vacate the easement would be to vacate all easements on Outlot A. Then
dedicate new easements in the plat of JUST EN SECOND ADI T1
2. The proposed water system locations must be shown.
3. The proposed septic system and back-up system locations must be shown either in a separate
drawing or on the preliminary plat. The Septic Evaltiation Report provides this information.
C:\Users\Tanii\AppData\Local\ilvlici-osoft\Witido%vs\Teiiiporary Internet Files\Coiiteiit.Otittook\K4X23YMO\ot2500 Justen 2nd
rl (revised).doe
4. The low floor elevations are at or above the minimum elevations reconamended in the geotecluiical
rep ort by Independent Testi ng Tecluio lo gi e s, Inc. (ITT) dated June 5, 2 0 13 � As previ o u s I y
mentioned, we have contacted ITT regarding what elevation they found the ground Nvater to b(:,,, at.
They explained that their drilling Crew started drilling In the wrona spot near the northwest corner
of the intersection of Packard Avenue and 88'11 Street. The stated that they did encounter water
approximately two feet below thesurficice in this area. But since this Nvasn't the area that they Nvere
SUPPosed to be doing the soil borings in this information was not relevant to the soils report. They
confirmed that the ground water depths of approximately 6.5 feet and 7 feet below the surface at
approximate elevation 864) shown in the report are correct. The 6 additional soil borincys done with
the Septic Evaluation also showed the ground water to be at an approximately elevation of 8611,
5. The wetland in the southwest corner of Lot 2., Block I shall have a protective, buffer of natural
vegetation at least twenty (20) feet wide from the delineated edge at the time of development shall
surround all wetlands within parcels preliminary plat. The buffer shall be overlaid by'a
conservation easement and marked by pernianent signs to prevent encroachment.
6. A principal building setback of forty (40) feet from the delineated edge of all wetlands or twenty
(20) feet from the edge of a buffer easement, whichever is greater, shall be, provided.
7. A statement certifying the enviromnental conditions of the site is required.
8. A shallow basin may be required to treat the rL1110ff equal to two 100 yr back-to-back storms (as
there is no outlet) of the new impervious area. This Nvould most likely be an infiltration basin based
on the soils described in the geotecluiical report. This basin should bellaced in the southern
portion of Lot 2, Block I and be covered by a drainage and utility easement. The basin would
overflow to the wetland in the Northeast corner of Packard Avenue and 88"' Street. This basin and
drainage easement would also allow the storniwater runoff ftom the adjacent property to the east, to
continue to flow to the west without fear of being blocked in the future.
Fin,al Plat
I . See above comments 1, 5 and 6.
2. ROW shall be rounded at intersections (10' radius) to allow for utility installation.
Stuninar and/or Recommendation
We recommend approval contingent on the above comments being addressed.
kanson
Anderson
C:\Users\Tai-ni\AppData\Local�Microsoft\Wiiido�Nrs\Teiiil)oi-ary Internet FilesTontent.0atki i7H Assoc,Ire .
rvNvl (revised).doe
OTSE GO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
OTSEGO CITY HALL
June 17, 2013
.7:00 PM
(UNOFFICIAL)
Call to Or
Chair Black ca the meeting to order at 7:00 PM,
Roll Call - : Chair Pam R
ck; Commissioners: David Thompson, ichard Nichols, Tammie
Fallon, Brian Gerten an eather Eidem. Absent: Aaron Stritesky and Jim Kolles.
City Council: CM Vern Hei Staff: Daniel Licht, City Planner; and Tauri Loff, City
Clerk.
1. Consider the following minute.
1.1 March 4, 2013 Planninq minute.
owission Meetin
Commissioner Thompson motioned to Nk rove as written. Seconded by
C
Commissioner Nichols. All in favor. Motio arried.
.Public Hearing items:
2.1 Justen 2nd Addition: Nss�b
A, Preliminary and Final Plat,
B. Vacation of Drainaw-Easernent,
City Planner Licht presented the Planning Report. Applicant Chad Christian, 7193 NE
River Road, and Bill Christian from Christian Builders were present and agreed with City
staff report.
City Clerk Leff attested all the proper noticing,, posting and publishing has been
completed.
Chair Black opened the Public Hearing at 7:09 PM.
Ken Paige, 15108 8W�' Street, said he is the adjoining property and there have been a
lot of drainage issues in the past he is concerned with drainage with this project. Mr.
Paige also stated he was told the property could not be subdivided and can't build on.
He said he spoke with a driller that hit water at 2-4 feet below the surface. Mr. Paige
submitted to the City Clerk a petition signed by residents against the project.
Dean Lowe, 8957 Packard Avenue NE, his understanding was there would be no
building on this lot.
Steve Schuck, 15170 88t" Street NE, said it is understanding the property could not be
subdivided and that outlots were prohibited from building citing language in the
Subdivision Ordinance, He said his sister tried to subdivide the lot to the south of this
Planning Commission Minutes — June 17, 2013 (UNOFFICIAL)
Page 2
site and was told no subdivision would be allowed. Mr. Schuck said he has concern
with the drainage and where it will go.
Cory Vue, 8809 Packard Avenue NE, is concerned with the drainage and spoke of a
stink hole in the street at the intersection of Packard Avenue and 88'hStreet as a' safety
concern.
Debbie Lowe, 8957 Packard Avenue NE,, is concerned with the additional traffic and
signage. Chair Black asked what type of sign the City posts for dead end streets and if a
a "No Outlet"' sign would be possible. City Planner Licht said the City has adopted the
uniform traffic sign manual but has discussed other options for a dead end signs such
as those mounted on top of the street name signs.
Joe Campbell, 8738 Packard Avenue NE, brought pictures of the drainage issue in back
yard from previous years that has now been fixed but he has concern for additional
drainage issue. The Planning Commissioner asked if there was any water issue now.
Mr. Campbell said no.
Danny Fietek, 15117 87th Street NE, said he has a water concern and stated he thought
the property could not be subdivided. Mr. Fietek asked if the residents would be
required to subdivide if sewer and grater was available. City Planner Licht said right now
the City is only considering the subdivision of this property and that the City has no
plans for sewer and water in that area in accordance with the Current Comprehensive
Plan,
Commissioner Nichols asked what had been fixed in this area regarding stormwater.
City Planner Licht said there was a breakage in a stormwater pipe at the intersection
that the Public Works Department repaired.
Commissioner Nichols asked with the grading plan is anything going to be moved
around other that the houses pad. City Planner Licht said that the only grading will
occur at the house pads,
There was discussion on easement and access.
Commissioner Thompson asked the builder if the houses will be raised. Mr. Bill Christian
said that the houses will most likely be split entry designs that doesn't require a lot of
fill.
Dean Lowe, 8957 Packard Avenue NE, said the current trees are taking up the
stormwater runoff and he is concerned about their with removal.
Ken Paige,, 15108 W Street,, asked if they are changing the elevation of the site. City
Planner Licht said just in the area of the building pad.
Planning Commission Minutes — June 17, 2013 (UNOFFICIAL)
Page 3
Cory Vue, 8809 Packard Avenue NE, stated his safety concern again regarding the sink
holes that acquired a couple years ago and how long it took to get fixed. City Planner
Licht said the City Council has directed the Public Works Department in the future to
contract if needed to get it resolved as quickly as possible,
Applicant Chad Christian said both proposed lots are over acre which means there
should be little impact to stormwater drainage and that he plans on keeping as many
trees as possible.
Chair Black closed the Public Hearing at 7:41 PMR
Commissioner Gerten asked what the Planning Commission needed to do regarding the
petition that was submitted. City Planner Licht said that the Planning Commission may
take it into consideration in making a recommendation to the City Council, it is entered
into the record but no additional action needs to be taken regarding it.
Commissioner Gerten asked about requiring an escrow to guarantee compliance with
the grading plan. City Planner Licht said the City requires an escrow for completion of
the grading plan as part of the development contract and once the grading is complete
and has been certified by the City Engineer the escrow is then released,
Commissioner Nichols asked about the outlot status on these parcels. City Planner Licht
established in 1999 when the then owner of the house at the southeast corner of the
site subdivided the property into a one acre lot and Outlot A.
Commissioner Fallon asked at the end of the project will it have to be inspected. City
Planner Licht said that a certified survey is requi'r-ed to be provided at the time each
house is completed to ensure compliance with the approved grading plan.
Commissioner Gerten motioned to recommend to the City Council vacation of
existing drainage and utility easement and approval of the Justin 2"d Addition
prelim inary/final plat, subject to the nine requirements listed in the Planners
Report, Seconded by Commissioner Fallon. All in favor. Motion carried,,
CM Heidner requested the City Engineer follow up prior to the City Council meeting
regarding the issues raised regarding the soil test and the culvert issue as part of the
public hearing.
3. Zoning Ordinance u.
e
tI
City Planner Licht presented t lanning Report.
Commissioner Thompson review e is list of items; livable structures,, easement
j
between p rope rties/pla 'plantings, tonna helters or safe rooms for townhouses and
DEVELOPMENT AGRE E1 NT
JUST EN SECOND ADDITION
AGRI UMENT entered into this day of June, 2013 behveen the City of Otsego
("City"), a municipal corporation organized tinder the laws of the State of Minnesota, and
GITM2, LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company ("Developer").
Request for Plat Approval. The Developer has requested that the City
approve ta plat entitled JUSTEN SECOND ADDITION (referred to in this
Agreement as "the Plat") and legally described as follows:
Outlot A. JUSTEN ADDITION, according to the Plat on file and of record at the Office of
the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota.
The plat contains two (2) single family residential lots and one outlot. The plat is zoned R-
3. Residential Long Range Urban Sei-vice District as approved by Ordinance adopted by the
City Council on October 11, 1999.
2. Conditions of Plat Approval, The City hereby approves the plat on
condition that the Developer enter into this Agreement, ftirnish the security required by it,
and record the Plat with the Wright County Recorder or Registrar of Titles within one
hundred (100) days after the City Council approves the final plat. The Developer shall
cooperate with the City in recording the Plat and all required additional deeds and
documents and providing assurance that the Plat and all required documents have been
properly and timely recorded. Any restrictive covenants for the Plat shall be submitted to
the City Attorney for approval and shall be recorded prior to sale of any lots within the Plat.
3. Right to Pimoceed. Within the Plat or land to be platted, the Developer may
not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct sewer lines, storm sewers,
water lines, streets, utilities, public or private improvements, or any buildings or structures
until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this Agreement has been fully
executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, and all conditions contained in the
Agreement have been met, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the
Plat and this Agreement have been recorded with the Wright County Recorder's Office, 4)
The Developer has initiated and attended a pre -construction meeting with the City Engineer,
and 5) the Zoning Administrator has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied
and that the Developer may proceed; or until such time as approval to commence earlier
construction is specifically approved by the City, and Developer has fiffly complied with all
conditions set forth by City staff.
4. Changes in Official Controls. JUSTEN SECOND ADDITION is a planned
rind staged development within the meaning of Mimi. Stat. 462.358, , Subd. 3cand no
at end; to the City's Comprehensive Plan or other Official Controls shall apply to or
affect the use, development density, lot size, lot layout, or platting requirements for ftiture
phases of JUSTEN SECOND ADDITION for a period of five (5) years. Thereafter,
notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, to the ftill extent permitted by
State law, the City may require compliance with any amendsretsto the City's
Comprehensive Plan, other Official Controls enacted after the date of this Agreement. This
provision does not apply to regulations or Official Controls related to park and trail
dedication or any fee established by the City chargeable to the Developer for municipal
costs arising from said fidure phases.
5. Development Plans. The Plat shall be developed in accordance with the
plans on file at the office of the City Clerk and the conditions stated below. If the plans val-Y
from the written term s of this Agreement, the written tern s shall control. The plans are:
Plan A Final Plat, JUSTN SECOND ADDITION, dated
2013 Prepared by Meyer- Rohlin Land Services.
Plan B Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan prepared by Meyer-
Rohlin Land Set -vices and as finally approved by the City Engineer.
Plan C Construction Plans for JUSTEN SECOND ADDITION, prepated by
Meyer-Rohlin Land Services and as finally approved by the City
Engineer.
Plan D Specifications for YUSTEN SECOND ADDITION, prepared by
Meyer- Rohlin Land Services and as finally approved by the City
Engineer.
6. Improvements. The Developer shall install and/or pay for the following:
A. Site grading and ponding
B. Underground installation of all utilities
C. Storm water management improvements
D. Setting of lot and block monuments
E. Construction surveying and staking
Improvements shall be installed in accordance with City standards, the City
Code, and the above -referenced plans that have been famished to the City and approved by
the City Engineer. The Developer shall obtain all necessary pennits before proceeding with
construction. The City shall provide adequate field inspection persoiuiel. to assure
acceptable quality control, which will allow certification of the constrUction work. The City
inay, when reasonably required to do so, and at the Developer's expense, have one (1) or
more City inspectors and a qualified engineer inspect the work. Within thirty (3 0) days
after the completion of the improvements and before all retained security is released, the
Developer shall supply the City with a complete set of reproducible "as constructed" and an
electronic file of the "as constructed" plans in. AutoCAD.DWG file or a DXF file, all
prepared in accordance with City standards. Before the security for the completion of
utilities is fully released, iron monuments shall be installed in accordance with Mimiesota
Statutes 505.02. The Developer's surveyor shall submit a written notice to the City
ceilifying that the monuments are installed following site grading, utility and street
consti-Lietion.
7. Contractors/Subcontractors. City Council members, City employees, and
City Plaimiing Con Fission n-iembers, and corporations, partnerships and other entities in
which such individuals have greater than a twenty five percent (25%) ownership interest or
in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the
public improvements identified in Paragraph 7 above.
8. Permits. The Developer shall obtain or requite its contractors and
subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, which may include, but are not limited to.
Wright County for County Road access and or in County right of
way.
B. MNDOT for State Highway Access
C. MNDOT for work in right of way
D. Mimiesota. Department of Health for watermaills
E. MPC A NPDES Permit for construction activity
F. MPC A for sanitary sewer and hazardous material removal and
disposal
G. DNR for dewatering
H. City of Otsego for building permits
1. City of Otsego for sanitary sewer coluiections
J. City of Otsego for retaining walls
9. Deivateiing. Due to the variable nature of groundwater levels and
stormwater flows, it will be the Developer's and the Developer's contractors and
subcontractors responsibility to satisfy themselves with regard to the elevation of
groundwater in the area and the level of effort needed to perform dewatering and storm
flow routing operations. All dewatering shall be in accordance with all applicable County,
State, and Federal rules and regulations. DNR regulations regarding appropriations permits
shall be strictly followed,
10. Three of Performance. The Developer shall install all listed improvements
by D ec emb er 3 1, 20 13. The Developer may re quest an extension of time from the City to be
submitted in writing to the City Clerk, for which said extension shall be conditioned upon
updating the security posted by Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended
completion date. Final wear course placement outside of the above time, fraine must lave
the written approval of the City Engineer. The City may impose additional conditions on the
extension necessary to ensure performance.
11. Right of Entryt The Developer hereby grants to the City, its agents,
employees, officers and contractors an irrevocable right of entry to enter the Plat to perform
any and all work and inspections necessary or deemed appropriate by the City during the
installation of improvements by Developer or the City, or to make any necessary corrective
actions necessary by the City. Except in emergency situations, as defined by the City, the
City shall give the developer fifteen (15) business days notice stating the deficiencies and
necessaiT corrections prior to making any corrective action. Said right of enti-Y shall
continue until the City finally accepts the improvements and any applicable warranty period
has expired.
12. Erosion Control. Prior to initiating site grading, and before any utility
construction is coniaiienced or ffirther building permits are issued, the erosion control plan,
Plan B, shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. If
the City Engineer determines that it would be unreasonable to require fell implementation
of the erosion control plan prior to utility COEStrUCtion or issuance of certain building
permits, he shall state in writing what construction can. take place and what particular
building permits, can be issued prior to fall implementation. The City may impose
additional erosion control requiren-ients if, in the opinion of the City Engineer, they would
be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be
reseeded forth Nvith after the completion of the work, in that area. If the Developer does not
comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or any stipplenlentary instructions, the
City inay, with reasonable notice, take action- as it deems appropriate.
13. Grading Plan. Plat grading shall be in accordance with the approved
grading plan, Plan B. The plan shall conform to City specifications and the City Code.
Ponds, swat es, and ditches shall be constructed on public casements or land owned by the
City. Within thirty (30) days after completion of grading and before any retained security is
Rilly released, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as built" grading plan including
Certification by a registered land surveyor or qualifted engineer that all pends, swates, and
ditches have been constructed on public easements or land owned by the City. "As built"
plans shall include field verified elevations of the following:
A. Cross sections of ponds
B. Location and elevations of swales and ditches
C. Lot corkers and house pads
Occupancy permits shall not be issued by the Building Official until the
grading and drainage plan is certified as set forth above.
14. Clean Up. The Developer shall promptly clean any and all dirt and debris
froni streets and constmetion sites in accordance with the City Code resulting from
constr-uction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns.
15. Ownership of Improvements. Upon acceptance by the City Council of the
work and construction required by this Agreement, improvements lying within public
easements and public fight -of -way shall become City propert)r without ffirther notice or
action.
16 SeNvage Treatment and Water- Service, No occupancy permit for any
building within the plat will be issued by the City until an approved septic system
and approved well has been installed on an individual lot.
1
17. Administrati've Fee. A fee for City Administration of this project shall be
paid prior to the City executing the plat and this Agreement. Said fee shall be one percent
l%of the estimated construction costs of the improvements within the plat, or
alternatively a minit-num fee, The administrative fee for this Plat is a inininium fee of
$500.00 and is contained within the escrow and fees established in Paragraph 19 of this
Agreement. Thisfee is inin-iediately available to the City upon establisluiient of the escrow.
18. Park and Trail Dedication. The City Park and Trail fee for this Plat is
$2,635.00 per lot or $ 5,270.00. The fee is included in the escrow established in Paragraph
19 of this Agreement.
19, City Engineering Administration and Construction ObseiWation, Legal
Fees Escrow and City Fees. The Developer shall pay a fee for consulting engineering
administration. City engineering administration following approval of the Plat. City
engineering administration will include consultation with Developer and its engineer on
status or problems regarding the project, monitoring during the warranty period, general
administration and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service
shall be the actual amount billed for those services estimated to be three percent (3%) of the
estimated construction cost of the finprovements to be inspected, assuming norinal
construction and project scheduling. The Developer shall pay for construction observation
performed by the City Engineer. Construction observation shall include part or ftill tinic
obsei-vatioll, as deter -mined by the City Engineer, of proposed street, sanitary sewer, water
and stoma drainage construction and will be billed on hourly rates actually required for said
inspection estimated to be five percent (5%) of the estimated constiliction cost of the
improvements to be inspected. In the event of prolonged constrUCtion or unusual problems,
the City will notify the Developer of anticipated cost overrLI11S for engineering
administration and observation services.
The escrow and fee account shall also include estimated fees for Legal
expenses actually 'incurred, City Administrative Fee (a flat fee due upon execution of this
Agreement), Park and Trail Dedication Fees (a flat fee due upon execution of this
Agreen-rent ) and shall be established as follows:
ESCROW AND FEES
1,500.00
City Engineering Review Services
(estimated, actual billings to be paid)
Legal Fees (estimated, actual billings to be paid) 15500.00
City Administrative (flat minimum fee) $ 500*00
Park & Trail Fee ($2,635.00 per lot) $ 53270.00
TOTAL S 8J70,00
This escrow amount shall be submitted to the City prior to the City executing the Plat
and this Agreement. All administrative and legal fees related to plan review, drafting of this
Agreement and any other necessary items shall be paid to the City prior to execution of the
Plat and this Agreement. Any amounts for legal and engineering not utilized from this
escrow find shall be returned to the Developer when all improvements have been
completed, all financial obligations to the City satisfied, and the required "as constructed"
plans have been received by the City.
All other amounts listed as flat fees are non-refundable and available ii -D -mediately
for City use when posted.
20. Security. To ensure compliance with the terms of this Agreement, and
construction of all public improvenients, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash
escrow or other "security" in the amount of: no Security is reqWred since no public
improvements are being installed.
21. Landscaping. The Developer shall install two (2) trees upon each lot within
the Plat of a species approved by the Zoning Adininistrator. These plantings may not be
installed in a public right-of-way. Any security posted for this agreement or prior additions
inay be used to cure any defects in the event that the Developer, it assigns or successors
fails to install landscaping according to this Agreement. Landscaping security to insure
compliance with the approved Landscape Plan shall be $1,000 per lot to posted with the
City at the time of app I ication for a bwilding permit on each lot. Any trees Which can cause a
public nuisance or public hazard, such as bug infestation or weak bark, are specifically
prohibited.
The Developer, Builders or Property Owners (applicant for building permit)
in the residential lot area shall sod all front yards within the buildable -poi lion of each lot
and shall post any security required by the City to assure landscaping or other itellis in
compliance with the City Code. The Developer, Builder or Property Owner shall provide
not less than six (6) inches of topsoil in required front yards or side yards abutting public
rights-of-way. Where slopes lie in excess of ten (1 0) percent, sodding (staked) Shall be
required. Weather permitting, the trees, grass seed and sod shall be planted before
Certificates of Occupancy are issued. All grass seed shall be maintained so that t-tirf is
established within one (1) year of planting.
If landscaping as required by the City Code and this Agreement is not timely
completed, the City may enter the lot or lots, perform the work, and apply ally posted
security toward the cost. The Developer, it assigns or successors, Builder or Property Owner
will provide will provide all trees, grass, seed and sod within the Plat and shall maintain
said plantings and warrant them to remain alive, of good quality and disease free for twelve
(12) months after planting. Any replacement shall be warranted for twelve (12) months
from the time of planting.
22, Significant Trees, There are no significant trees within the Plat. The
Developer is not rcquired to replace any significant trees.
23. Outlot A. Developer shall transfer Outlot A to the City at the time of
recording the Plat for purposes of establishing a ffiture access to Packard Avenue rather
than CSAF1 39 for the Exception Parcel to the Noilh.
24. Claims. The Developer shall pay any subcontractor within ten (10) days of
the Developer's receipt of payment by the City for undisputed services provided by the
subcontractor. In the event that the City receives claims from labor, materialmen, or others
that perforin work required by this Agreement, and the sunis clue thein have not been paid,
and the laborers, inaterialn-ien or others are seeking payment fron'i the City, the Developer
hereby authorizes the City to cotmiience an interpleader action pursuant to Rule 22,
Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure for the Distriot Courts, to draw upon the letters of
credit in an amount up to one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the claim (s) and
deposit the funds in compliance with the Rule, and upon such deposit, the Developer shall
release3 discharge, and disiniss the City from any ffirther proceedings as it pertains to the
letters of credit deposited with the District Court, except that the Cour t shall retain
jurisdiction to determine attorney fees pursuant to this Agreement. In the event that the
Developer desires to make a cash deposit instead of drawing down the letter of credit if a
claim is made as stated above., they shall inmediatelynotify the City of this intent at the
time the claim is made and shall delivery one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the
clain-1 to the City within ten (10) days of such notice in the form of cash or ceilified. clieck.
25. Restrictions. The following restrictions apply to the property and all lots thereon
shall be held, sold, and conveyed subject to the following conditions and
restrictions, which are for the purpose of protecting the value and desirability of
the plat and insuring that all conditions imposed by the City in this Agreement
are properly recorded against the property. Said conditions shall rain with the real
property and be binding on all parties having a right, title or interest in the plat or
any pact thereof, their heirs, executors, representatives, successors and assigns:
None.
26. Responsibility for Costs.
A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs
incurred by them or the City in conjunction with the development of
the Plat, including, but not limited to, legal, planning, engineering, and
inspection expenses incurred in connection with development of said
Plat, the preparation of this Agreement, and all costs and expenses
incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting development of the
plat.
B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees
hamiless from claims inade by itself and third parties for damages
sustained or costs incurred resulting froin Plat development. The
Developer shall indenuffy the City and its officers and employees for
all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in
consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees.
C. The Developer shall reirnburse the City for costs incurred in the
enforcement of this Agreement, including engineering fees, attorney's
fees, and costs and disbursements.
D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for
obligations incurred under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after
receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all plat
development work and construction, including but not limited to the
issuance of building permits for lots which the Developers may or may
not have sold, until all bills are paid in frill. Claims not paid within
thirty (3 0) days shall accrue interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%)
per year.
27. Developer's Default. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of
the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and
the City may then draw down the security established in Paragraph 17 to pay for ally work
undertaken, provided the Developer is first given notice of the or in default, not less than
seven (7) days in advance. This notice provision does not -apply if the work performed by
the City or its contractors is of ran emergency nature, as determined at the sole discretion of
the city. Should such emergency work be required the City will make all reasonable efforts
to notify the Developer as soon as possible. When the City does any such work, the City
may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part pursuant to any
applicable statutes or ordinances.
28. Miscellaneous.
A. The Developer represents to the City that the plat complies with all
City, County, State, and Federal laws and regulations, including but
not limited to, Subdivision Ordinances, Zoning Ordinances, and
envirownental regulations except where specifically excluded by this
agreement. If the City determines that the Plat does not comply, the
City may, at its option, reffise to allow construction or development
work in the plat until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's
deniand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance.
B. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this
Agreement.
C. Breach of any of the terms of this Agreement by the Developer shall
be grounds for denial or revocation of building permits.
D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or
phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement.
E. If building permits are issued by the City prior to the completion and
acceptance of public improvements, the Developer shall assume all
liability for the costs resulting in any delay in completion of public
fin provements and damage to any public improvements caused by the
City, the Developer, its contractors, subcontractors, materialmen,
employees, agents, or third. parties. No one may occupy a building for
which a building permit is issued on either a temporary or permanent
basis until the streets needed for access have been paved with a
6
bituminous surface, unless a specific exception is approved by the
city.
F. The action or inaction of the City sliall not constitute a waiver or
aniendment to the provisions of this Agreeinent. To be binding,
c
amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and
approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure
to promptly take legal action to enforce this Agreen-lent shall not be a
waiver or release.
G. This Agreement Shall run with the land, shall be recorded against the
title to the property and all properties therein established by the Plat,
and shall be binding on all parties having any fight, title or interests in
this phase of the plat or any part thereof, their heirs, successors, and
assigns. After the Developer has completed the work required of them
under this Agreement as set forth in Section 8, at the Developer's
request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developers a release
or Pallial release (s) of this Agreement.
H. The Developer shall take out and maintain until one (1) year after the
City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and
property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death,
and any claiins, for property damage which may arise out of the
Developer's or or the work of their subcontractors or by one
directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily
injury and death shall not be less than $500,000.00 for one person and
$
1,000,000.00 for each occurrence; Iiiii its for prop erty damage shall be
not less than $200,000.00 for each occurrence. The City shall be
named as an additional named insured on said policy, and the
Developer shall file a copy of the insurance coverage with the City
prior to the City issuing finiher building permits.
1. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is
cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy,
express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at Law
or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right,
power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing inay be
exercised frons time to time as often and in such order as may be
deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to
exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
J. The Developer shall pay for all local costs related to drainage
improvements required to complete the construction according to the
plans and conditions that are a part of this Agreement.
10
K. Should development of the plat proceed at a pace slower, than
anticipated, and for that reason, specific tens of this agreement
become onerous or unduly burdensome to the Developers, upon
his/her application, the City will enter into negotiations regarding
those specific terms and shall not unreasonably withhold consent to
appropriate changes in the terms of this Agreement.
L. The Developer shall demonstrate and maintain compliance with the
1991 Wetland Conservation Act.
M. The Developer shall be responsible for all on site drainage as well as
for any affects that their actions may have on adjoining properties.
Specifically, the Developer shall maintain existing drainage tiles on
site, and shall be responsible for any and all drainage problems related
to either, the site drainage tiles or problems with on-site drainage
facilities to be constructed in accordance with this agreement and plat
approval.
29. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall
be either hand delivered to the Developer, their einployees or agents, or
mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the following address:
GTTM2, LLC 5 Attention:
'. Notice to the City shall be in writing and shall be either
hand delivered to the City Clerk at the following address: City of Otsego,
City Hall13400 90t" Street NU4, Otsego, MN 55330, Attention: City
Clerk
CITY OF OTSEGO
Jessica Stockainp, Mayor
Tar Loff, City Clerk-
DEVELOPER
GTTM2, LLC
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SS.
COUNTY OF WFJGHT
Its:
The foregoing insti-ument was acknowledged before me this day of
2013, by Jessica Stockani p, Mayor and by Taini Luff, City Clerk,
of the City Otsego, a Mitmesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the City and pursuant
to the authority of the City Council.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS.
SO
Notary Public
COUNTYOF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this dq of
2013, by
of GTTM2 LLC a Miiuiesota limited liability colimanv,
authoritr and oii behalf of the company.
0
DRAFTED BYS
MACARTHUR LAW OFFICE, LLC
3 601 Thurston Avenue North
Suite 103
Anoka, MN 55303
(763) 231-5850
13
Notary Public
the
With
!P
kk
Ot e #.
"tN4. 'L'�'�% 9
FINDINGS of FACT AND DECISION
FINAL PLAT
APPLICANT: GMTTM , LLC
06-20-13
APPLICATION: Request for approval of a Final Plat for two single family lots and one outlot to be
known asJust n 2nd Addition.
CITY COUNCIL MEETING: 24 June 2013
FINDINGS: Eased upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council of the
City of Otsego now makes the following findings of fact:
A. The legal description of the property is Outlot A, Justen Addition, City of Otsego, County of
Wright, State of Minnesota.
B. The subject site is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for low density residential land uses
within the Long mange Urban Service Area.
C. The subject site is zoned R-3, Residential Long range Urban Service District.
D. The applicant is proposing to final plat two single family lots and one outlot to be deeded to
the City.
E. The Request for City Council Action dated 24 .dune 2013 prepared by the City Planner, The
Planning Company LLC,, is incorporated herein.
F. The Planning Report dated 13 June 2013 prepared by the City Planner, The Planning
Company LLC,, is incorporated herein.
G. The Engineering Reviews dated June 12, 2013 and June 20, 2013 prepared by the City
Engineer, Halanson Anderson Associates Inc., is incorporated herein.
H. The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their regular meeting on 17 June 2013 to
consider the application, preceded by published and mailed notice; upon review of the
application, and ether evidence, the public hearing was closed and the Planning Commission
voted 5-0 to recommend City Council approval of the application,
DECISION: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the application is
hereby APPROVED subject to the following conditions:
1. The preliminary and final plat are revised to address the comments of the City Engineer in
their memorandum of June 12, 2013, subject to approval of the City Engineer.
2. The preliminary and final plat is revised to provide an outlot 30 feet wide parallel to the
northwest lot line of Lot 1, Block 1 Justen 2 oa Addition and extending from Packard Avenue to
PID 118-500-222202, which is to be deeded to the City without restriction.
. The preliminary/final plat are revised to depict the 33 foot drainage and utility easement
recorded along a portion of the east lot line not shown on the submitted plans.
4. The wetland and wetland buffer required by section -1-9.E of the honing Ordinance shall
be overlaid by drainage and utility easement and conservation easement.
. All easements are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
6. All grading, drainage and erosion control issues are subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer.
7. All utility issues are subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
8. Parc and trail dedication requirements shall be satisfied as a cash fee in lieu of land in
accordance with Section 21-7-18 of the Subdivision Ordinance and the City's current fee
schedule.
. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City subject to review and
approval by the City Attorneys.
10. The submitted plans are revised to provide a stormwater basin with a design and capacity
approved by the City Engineer and overlaid by drainage and utility easements within the
southern portion of Lot 2, Bloch 1,
MOTION BY:
SECOND Y;
ALL IN F"OR:
THOSE OPPOSED:
Attest:
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 24th day of June, 2013.,
Tani Loff, City Clerk
CITY of OTSE O
Ey:
.
,vesica L. Stoclampt Mayor
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO, 2013-38
RESOLUTION APPROVING DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT- JUSTET'
SECOND ADDITION
W RE, AS, GTTM2. LLC is seeking approval of a Plat known as JUSTEN
SECOND ADDITION; and
WHERE AS, the approved Plat requires transfer to the City of an outlot and
payment of City costs and fees; and
WHEREAS, those obligations are contained in the attached Developers
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Developers Agreement also sets forth the escrow required for
payment of City costs and fees and establishes the various remedies a-%-railable to
the City in the event that Developer breaches the terms and conditions of the
Agreeinent.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Otsego, Wright County, Minnesota as follows;
1. The attached Developers Agreement between the City of Otsego and
GTTM2, LLC is hereby approved.
2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Developers
Agreen-lent on behalf of the City of Otsego.
ADOPTED this 24th day of June, 2013 by the City Council of Otsego.
MOTION TO ADOPT the Resolution by Council Member•.
and seconded by Council Member,
IN FAVOR:
OPPOSED:
CITY OF OTSEGO
Jessica Stockamp, Mayor
Tami Loff, City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO.: 2013 - 39
CITY OF OTSEGO
COUNTY OF WRIGHT, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF A EXISTING DRAINAGE AND
UTILITY EASEMENTS PLATTED WITHIN JUSTEN 2 ND ADDITION.
WHEREAS, the City of Otsego approved a final plat of Justin 2nd Addition; and,
WHEREAS, the Justin Addition final plat included dedication to the City of
drainage and utility easements shown by Exhibit A; and,
WHEREAS, GTTM2 LLC has proposed to replat the area shown on Exhibit A
with single family lots and one outlot to be deeded to the City and submitted a
preliminary plat to be known as Justin 2nd Addition; and,
WHEREAS, the preliminary plat of Justin 2nd Addition would establish those
drainage and utility easements required by Section 21-7-15 of the Subdivision
Ordinance based on the design of the preliminary plat; and,
WHEREAS, the easements shown on the Justin 2nd Addition preliminary plat
would supersede and make unnecessary those drainage and utility easements
previously dedicated with the Justin Addition final plat; and,
WHEREAS, GTTM2 LLC has applied for vacation of the drainage and utility
easements dedicated with the Justin Addition final plat; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing at their regular
meeting on 17 June 2017 to consider the vacation, preceded by required published and
mailed legal notice; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Report prepared by the City Planner, The Planning
Company LLC, is incorporated herein; and,
WHEREAS, the Engineering Review prepared by the City Engineer, Hakanson
1
is incorporated herein, and
Anderson Associates Inc., 3
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard all parties interested therein and
closed the public hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the drainage and utility easements dedicated with the Justin
Addition final plat serve no useful public purpose upon concurrent recording of a final
plat for Justin 2'0 Addition; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council having considered all information received related
to the proposed vacation and easement dedication finds that vacating a portion of the
existing right-of-way as shown on Exhibit A would be in the public interest,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Otsego
that Otsego hereby orders:
That the drainage and utility easement located in the City of Otsego, Wright
County, State of Minnesota described by Exhibit A is hereby vacated.
2. The vacation of said drainage and utility easement shall be effective upon the
recording of a final plat for Justin 2nd Addition.
3. The City Council hereby determines that the vacation of said drainage and utility
easement shall cause no damage to any abutting or nearby property owners and
therefore no damages are awarded to any such property owners.
MOTION BY:
SEGOND BY:
ALL IN FAVOR:
THOSE OPPOSED:
2013.
ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Otsego this 24"' day of June,
CITY OF OTSEGO
Jessica L. Stockamp, Mayor
2
ATTEST:
T mi L ff, City Clare